Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02718246 2010-09-10
WO 2009/113995 PCT/US2008/012245
METHOD OF REGENERATION OF SCR CATALYST
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent
application
61/068,989, filed March 11, 2008, herein incorporated by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates to a method of regeneration of a
catalyst,
more particularly to a method of regeneration of a selective catalytic
reduction (SCR)
catalyst.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] High temperature thermal processes, for example, the generation of
steam
for the production of electricity in power plants utilizing fossil fuels,
often create
environmentally harmful by-products. These compounds, specifically nitrous
oxides (NOx),
have to be removed from the flue gases of the high temperature thermal process
before
being discharged to the environment. The standard for removing NOx from flue
gases is the
selective catalytic reduction (SCR) process, where a reducing reagent,
typically ammonia, is
injected, mixed into the flue gas, and sent through a catalytic reaction
chamber where the
catalyst facilitates the reduction of NOx with the reducing agent to form
elemental nitrogen
and water. The catalyst, often referred to as a DeNOx catalyst, aids these
reactions and is
typically constructed of titanium dioxide containing the oxides of transition
metals such as,
for example, vanadium, molybdenum, and tungsten to act as catalytically active
components. The catalyst is arranged on plates, in a honeycomb fashion or as a
corrugated
structure and placed parallel to the direction of flue gas flow. However,
during operation,
the catalyst undergoes a loss of activity and efficiency as a result of
plugging with ash and
deactivation of the active components from certain compounds contained in flue
gas which
1
CA 02718246 2010-09-10
WO 2009/113995 PCT/US2008/012245
are poisonous to the catalyst. Among these are, for example, sodium (Na),
potassium (K),
arsenic (As), phosphorous (P) and many others.
[0004] It is generally known in the regeneration of SCR catalysts, that
inorganic
acids may be used to clean and restore a catalyst such as in a soaking step
and a
neutralization step. Typically, inorganic acids such as sulfuric acid (H2SO4)
and
hydrochloric acid (HCl) are commonly used inorganic acids in such steps.
Sulfuric acid is
relatively inexpensive and readily available. Inorganic acids are typically
odorless which is
another reason why they are commonly used. H2SO4 is also used due to the fact
that SO2
and SO3 is present in the flue gas and collected by the catalyst during
operation in a power
plant facility and when a catalyst is submerged in an aqueous solution such as
water, it is
removed from the catalyst forming a diluted sulfuric acid. Thus, it is already
present in the
catalyst and new contaminants via other acids are not being introduced into
the catalyst.
However, the known methods are also disadvantageous because diluted H2SO4 also
corrodes
the steel casings of the catalyst. This provides water soluble iron substances
which can
penetrate in the inside of the'pores of a SCR-catalyst. These iron ions are
probably the main
cause of enhancing some of the undesired side reactions during regular SCR
operations in a
power plant. . During the most undesired of these side reactions, the contents
of SO2 in the
flue gas can be partially oxidized to SO3i which reacts with water (H20) in
the flue gas to
produce H2SO4. Corrosion of all steel surfaces at temperatures below the H2SO4
dew point
is a problem for all equipment downstream of the catalyst. Furthermore, the
possible
emission of visible H2SO4 aerosol particles into the atmosphere may not be
desirable.
[0005] Thus, there is a need for an alternative method of regeneration of SCR
catalyst that provides the optimum performance of the catalyst yet minimizes
or reduces the
amount of SO2 oxidized to SO3 in a power plant. Of particular importance is
the
2
CA 02718246 2010-09-10
WO 2009/113995 PCT/US2008/012245
composition of the regeneration solution during the neutralization stage of
the regeneration
process.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] The present invention provides for a method of regeneration of a SCR
catalyst for use in high temperature processes such as a power plant facility
burning fossil
fuels, bio-based fuels, or a combination thereof, wherein poisons are removed
from the
catalyst. The method is suitable for use during the regeneration process,
particularly the
neutralization step using C1 to C8 carboxylic acids.
[0007] Further areas 'of applicability of the present invention will become
apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be
understood that the
detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred
embodiment of the
invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended
to limit the
scope of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0008] For a more complete understanding of this invention reference' should
now be had to the preferred embodiments illustrated in greater detail in the
accompanying
drawings and described below. In the drawings, which are not necessarily to
scale:
[0009] Figure 1 is a graphical illustration of the data shown in Table I of
Example 1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0010] The following detailed description of the invention is merely exemplary
in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application,
or uses.
[0011] An advantage of the method of the present invention is that the de-
nitrogenation performance of a catalyst can be regained with the method of the
present
invention to a level that can approximate or achieve the activity of a new
catalyst. In the
3
CA 02718246 2010-09-10
WO 2009/113995 PCT/US2008/012245
method of SCR catalyst cleaning and regeneration of the present invention,
elimination of
catalyst poisons occurs in conjunction with a re-impregnation of active
components onto the
catalyst to regain maximum catalytic performance. The method of the present
invention is
particularly suitable for the removal of catalyst poisons from a SCR catalyst
in order the
regain the lost activity of the catalyst. Furthermore, the method of the
present invention
achieves maximum regeneration performance by identifying the optimum choice of
treatment solution and treatment parameters particularly suitable for
neutralization in the
catalyst regeneration process. For example, the method of the present
invention provides
for the necessary removal of excess alkali material from the catalyst while
reducing the
amount of corrosion products entering the solution from the catalyst's steel
casings.
[0012] The method of the present invention comprises removing a catalyst from
a power plant facility. The power plant facility may bum fuel that includes,
but is not
limited to, fossil-fuel, bio-based fuel, or a combination thereof. The
catalyst is analyzed, for
example, by composition and for contaminant type and level. The catalyst may
be of any
shape or size including, but not limited to, honeycomb shaped, plate-type, and
corrugated-
type. Power plant facilities utilize varying sources of fuel with differing
qualities and
origins, all of which alters the extent and speed of catalyst deactivation.
[0013] In the method of the present invention, the catalyst is dry cleaned. A
dry
cleaning is typically conducted without water by physical means to remove
physical
contaminants such as dust and fly ash before the catalyst is chemically
cleaned or washed
and reactivated. Physical means include, but are not limited to, vacuum,
brush, shaking,
scraping, and disassembling the catalyst casings, i.e. to separate trapped fly
ash.
Disassembling the catalyst casings relates to a particular type of catalyst
comprised of
multiple boxes. For this type of catalyst, the boxes are typically removed
from the casing's
frame in order to be dry pre-cleaned. A catalyst that is laden with dust and
fly ash creates a
4
CA 02718246 2010-09-10
WO 2009/113995 PCT/US2008/012245
physical hindrance to the reactions that are to take place to clean the flue
gas. The fly ash is
typically, cleared by compressed air, industrial vacuum cleaners, or simply
gravity.
[0014] After dry pre-cleaning, the catalyst is optionally wet pre-washed. Wet
pre-washing refers to washing of the catalyst by a hose or pressure washer,
for.example. The
water used for wet pre-washing includes, but is not limited to, recycled
water, city water,
process water, well water, and deionized water. Salt layers can also form a
barrier in
addition to fly ash, and salts are typically removed by wet pre-washing.
[0015] After dry pre-cleaning and/or wet pre-washing, the catalyst is
chemically
cleaned. The chemical cleaning of the catalyst typically occurs by immersing
the catalyst in
a soaking bath and optionally an ultrasonic treatment.
[0016] The catalyst is placed in a soaking bath for soaking and washing of the
catalyst or a combination thereof. The soaking bath is typically housed in a
tank with
optionally being blown through the catalyst during the soaking. The soaking
bath comprises
an aqueous solution of inorganic bases, inorganic acids, or a combination
thereof.
Elimination of catalyst poisoning contaminants is preferably achieved by a
moderately
strong base or moderately strong acid. Inorganic bases are used in a pH range
of above
about 10, preferably from about 11 to about 14 and acid in the pH range of up
to about 6,
preferably from about 1 to about 6. The aqueous solution comprises water of
the type which
includes, but is not limited to, recycled water, city water, process water,
well water, and
deionized water. The soaking bath may optionally comprise other chemical
additives
including, but not limited to, surface active substances. The time period for
the soaking bath
is at least thirty minutes. Preferably, the time period for the soaking bath
is from about 3 to
6 hours although there is no limit on the maximum time period for the soaking
bath in
accordance with the present invention. During the soaking bath, chemicals and
water may
CA 02718246 2010-09-10
WO 2009/113995 PCT/US2008/012245
be added to replace any water that is removed and sent, for example, to a
wastewater
system.
[0017] After the soaking bath, the catalyst is optionally placed or submerged
into
a tank where it is subjected to an ultrasonic treatment. The ultrasonic
treatment tank
comprises' water and a base, acid, or combination thereof. One or more
catalysts can be
treated at the same time. Ultrasonic transducers are placed around the
catalyst, for example,
on top of the catalyst and another on the bottom of the catalyst. Each of the
catalysts is
ultrasonically treated simultaneously, for example, from the top and the
bottom for a certain
period of time such as, for example, 30 to 45 minutes although longer or
shorter periods of
time are in accordance with the method of the present invention. The treatment
solution may
be circulated and/or replaced during the course of treatment.
[0018] Following the soaking bath and/or ultrasonic treatment in a basic
solution, the method of the present invention comprises treating the catalyst
in an acidic
solution referred to as neutralization. Among the purposes of the acid
treatment is to
remove excess base or alkali solution and activate the reaction centers of the
catalyst. The
acids to be used may be organic or inorganic. Preferably, the acid is an
organic acid. More
preferably, the organic acid is a C1 to C8 carboxylic acid. More preferably,
the organic acid
is selected from the group consisting of formic acid, acetic acid, and a
combination thereof.
The acid is present in a concentration range of from about 0.1% to about 3%.
Preferably,
the pH of the aqueous solution is in the range of up to about 5.5, preferably
from about 1 to
about 5.5, more preferably about 2 to about 3.5. The neutralization treatment
is at a
temperature in the range of up to about 176 F (80 C), preferably from about
60 F to about
140 F. The time period for neutralization is up to about four (4) hours,
preferably in the
range of from about thirty (30) minutes to about four (4) hours.
Neutralization can take
6
CA 02718246 2010-09-10
WO 2009/113995 PCT/US2008/012245
place in one or two steps, where the second step offers an increased
concentration gradient.
After neutralization, the catalyst is subsequently rinsed and dried.
[0019] After the catalyst is rinsed and dried, the catalyst is analyzed to
determine
the concentration of active components such as any transitional metallic
oxides that are
comprised in the active sites on the catalyst. A significant loss of active
components
necessitates the re-impregnation of the catalyst by treating the catalyst in
an aqueous
solution comprising water and organic substances with various concentrations
of metal
compounds. The catalyst is subsequently dried to prepare the catalyst for
service.
[0020] The method of the present invention is advantageous because the use of
a
C1 to C8 carboxylic acid, such as formic acid or acetic acid, provides for an
effective
neutralization treatment time that is at least about two (2) times faster than
with an inorganic
acid. Another advantage is the fact that C1 to C8 carboxylic acids decompose
or burn in a
drying process and, therefore, it is not necessary to have a rinsing step
after neutralization.
Another advantage of the method of the present invention is that the
mobilization of iron
ions out of metal casings such as steel is expected to be reduced by about 30
to 50% for a
comparable pH range. This is expected to avoid an unwanted increase of the
S02/SO3
conversion rate of the catalyst and improve the performance of the catalyst.
[0021] The present invention may be better understood by reference to the
following non-limiting examples, set forth below.
[0022] EXAMPLE 1
[0023] An experiment was conducted to determine the neutralization rate for
various acids. Each acid was tested at a concentration of 1.2%. A log of a
honeycomb SCR
catalyst was cut into sample sizes of 2 inches x 2 inches, which had weights
between 50.2g
to 52.1g. Each sample was treated by soaking and ultrasonic treatment for
thirty (30)
minutes in an ultrasonic bath at a temperature of 40 C in a solution having a
concentration
7
CA 02718246 2010-09-10
WO 2009/113995 PCT/US2008/012245
of 1.2% sodium hydroxide (200 mL). The sample was then removed from the
ultrasonic
bath and subjected to neutralization in 200 mL of each acid with continuous
mixing
(magnetic stir) at a temperature of 24 C. Acid was added as needed to keep
the respective
acid solution in a pH range of between 2.5 and 3.5 so as to keep the pH near
the starting
concentration level of the acid. For example, as shown in Table 1, after
twenty (20)
minutes, formic acid reached a pH of 3.5 and additional formic acid was added
to reduce the
pH to 2.5 in run 1. The neutralization was considered finished when there was
a constant
pH value for at least two or three measurements. The results of the experiment
are set forth
in Table 1 and the results are shown graphically in Figure 1.
[0024] Table 1
Time pH of pH of pH of pH of pH of pH of pH of pH of
(min) sulfuric sulfuric hydro- hydro- formic formic acetic acetic
acid acid chloric chloric acid acid acid acid
run 1 run 2 acid acid run I run 2 run I run 2
run 1 run 2
0 1.1 1.1 0.6 0.6 2.4 2.4 1.9 2.0
4 1.6 1.7 1.1 1.5 3.1 3.0 2.4 2.4
8 1.7 1.6 1.2 1.4 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.4
9 1.7 1.6 1.2 1.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
12 1.9 2.0 1.3 1.4 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.7
16 2.1 2.2 1.6 1.6 3.2 3.3 3.0 3.0
20 2.2 2.3 1.8 1.8 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.3
21 2.2 2.3 1.8 1.8 2.5 2.5 2.2 2.4
24 2.5 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.4
28 2.8 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.9 2.5 2.6
32 3.1 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.7
36 3.4 3.3 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.7
37 1.5 1.5 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9
40 1.7 1.7 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.0
44 1.8 1.8 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.1
48 1.9 1.9 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.3 3.1
52 2.1 2.2 3.5 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.1
56 2.1 2.2 3.4 3.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.2
60 2.1 2.2 3.5 3.4 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.2
8
CA 02718246 2010-09-10
WO 2009/113995 PCT/US2008/012245
[0025] It was observed from the data in Table 1 that the neutralization with
formic acid was finished in 32 minutes, the neutralization with hydrochloric
acid was
finished in 37 minutes, the neutralization with acetic acid was finished in 44
minutes, and
the neutralization with sulfuric acid was finished in 56 minutes. It was
observed from the
data in Table 1 that the neutralization rate with formic acid was nearly twice
as fast as
compared to the neutralization rate with the sulfuric acid. It was also
observed from -the
data in Table 1 that the neutralization rate with acetic acid was faster as
compared to the
neutralization rate with the inorganic acids.
[0026] EXAMPLE 2
[0027] An experiment was conducted to determine the iron mobilization rate for
various acids. In particular, three organic acids and two inorganic acids were
tested. A 100
g iron plate (not corroded) was placed in 500 mL of deionized water. Acid was
added to
obtain solutions with the acid concentrations and pH shown in Table 2. The pH
of the
solution was measured with a pH meter and the concentration of iron in the
acid solution
was measured in mg/L at different periods in time. The Fe(2+) concentration of
each
solution was measured using the MERCKOQUANTTM Eisen-Test 500 mg/L Fe(II) mg/l
(nr.
1.10004.0001) from VWR International of Germany. Additional deionized water
was added
to a test solution when needed to maintain the concentration of the test
solution at 500 mg/L
in order to.be within the test parameters of the above mentioned test. Due to
iron corrosion,
ascorbic acid was added to solutions as needed to reduce Fe(+3) to Fe(+2) for
acids that
oxidize the iron to maintain test parameters. The temperature of each solution
was 20 C.
The resulting data is shown in Table 2.
[0028] Table 2
Acid Acid pH Fe (2+) Fe (2+) Fe (2+) Fe (2+) Fe (2+)
Conc. in mg/L in mg/L in mg/L in mg/L in mg/L
after 30 after 60 after 90 after 120 after 240
9
CA 02718246 2010-09-10
WO 2009/113995 PCT/US2008/012245
minutes minutes minutes minutes minutes
formic 0.5% 3.1 5 10 10 10 20
formic 1.0% 2.9 10 20 20 20 20
formic 1.5% 2.8 20 50 50 50 50
formic 2.0% 2.7 20 50 50 80 100
formic 5.0% 2.5 50 50 100 120 160
acetic 0.5% - 10 10 10 20 20
acetic 1.0% - 10 10 10 20 20
acetic 1.5% - 20 20 20 20 30
acetic 2.0% - 20 20 20 20 40
acetic 5.0% - 20 20 20 20 40
oxalic 0.5% - - - - - -
oxalic 1.0% - 150 200 300 500 500
oxalic 1.5% - - - - - -
oxalic 2.0% - - - - - -
oxalic 5.0% - 250 500 1000 1000 1000
sulfuric 0.5% 2.8 - - - - -
sulfuric 1.0% 2.0 150 200 300 500 500
sulfuric 1.5% 1.6 - - - - -
sulfuric 2.0% - - - - -
sulfuric 5.0% - 250 500 1000 - -
nitric 0.5% - - - - - -
nitric 1.0% - 150 200 300 500 500
nitric 1.5% - - - - - -
nitric 2.0% - - - - - -
nitric 5.0% - 250 500 1000 - -
[0029] Note that the dashes in the table indicate no tests were performed as
the
amount of iron mobilized already exceeded the maximum iron ion concentration
achieved in
1% carboxylic acid.
[0030] It was observed from the data in Table 2 that the performance of the
organic acids was best, namely the acetic acid and formic acid. It was
observed that a
concentration range from 0.5% to 1.5% of both acetic acid and formic acid
reacted nearly
identically. It was also observed from the data in Table 2 that the
mobilization of iron in the
case of inorganic acids was between 5 and 8 times higher than the organic
acids.
[0031] It will therefore be readily understood by those persons skilled in the
art
that the present invention is suitable for broad utility and application and
not limited to the
CA 02718246 2010-09-10
WO 2009/113995 PCT/US2008/012245
utility industry. Many embodiments and adaptations of the present invention
other than
those herein described, as well as many variations, modifications and
equivalent
arrangements, will be apparent from or reasonably suggested by the present
invention and
the foregoing description thereof, without departing from the substance or
scope of the
present invention. Accordingly, while the present invention has been described
herein in
detail in relation to its preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that
this disclosure is
only illustrative and exemplary of the present invention and is made merely
for purposes of
providing a full and enabling disclosure of the invention. The foregoing
disclosure is not
intended or to be construed to limit the present invention or otherwise to
exclude any such
other embodiments, adaptations, variations, modifications and equivalent
arrangements.
11
