Language selection

Search

Patent 2718576 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2718576
(54) English Title: METHOD OF MAKING A HIGH STRENGTH, HIGH TOUGHNESS, FATIGUE RESISTANT, PRECIPITATION HARDENABLE STAINLESS STEEL AND PRODUCTS MADE THEREFROM
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE REALISATION D'UN ACIER INOXYDABLE DURCISSABLE PAR PRECIPITATION, RESISTANT A LA FATIGUE, A RIGIDITE ET A RESISTANCE ELEVEES
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C21C 07/064 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/44 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/50 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KRIEBLE, ROBERT WAYNE (United States of America)
  • MARTIN, WILLIAM JOSEPH (United States of America)
  • ZOGAS, THOMAS CONSTANTINE (United States of America)
  • WERT, DAVID ELMER (United States of America)
  • NOVOTNY, PAUL MICHAEL (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • CRS HOLDINGS INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • CRS HOLDINGS INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2013-02-12
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2009-02-27
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2009-09-03
Examination requested: 2010-09-15
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2009/035548
(87) International Publication Number: US2009035548
(85) National Entry: 2010-09-15

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
61/032,598 (United States of America) 2008-02-29

Abstracts

English Abstract


A process for making a precipitation hardenable stainless steel alloy is
described. The process includes the step of
melting a martensitic steel alloy having the following composition in weight
percent, about Carbon 0.03 max. Manganese 1.0
max. Silicon 0.75 max. Phosphorus 0.040 max. Sulfur 0.020 max. Chromium 10-13
Nickel 10.5-11.6 Titanium 1.5-1.8
Molybde-num 0.25-1.5 Copper 0.95 max. Aluminum 0.25 max. Niobium 0.3 max.
Boron 0.010 max. Nitrogen 0.030 max. and the balance
being iron and usual impurities. The process also includes the step of adding
calcium to the alloy while molten. The calcium
com-bines with available sulfur and oxygen to form calcium base inclusions
selected from the group consisting of calcium sulfides,
cal-cium oxides, calcium oxysulfides, and combinations thereof. In a further
step, the alloy is processed to remove at least a portion of
the calcium base inclusions. The alloy is then solidified. As a result of the
process, the alloy has a matrix containing a sparse
dis-persion of said calcium-based inclusions and substantially no rare-earth
base inclusions.


French Abstract

Linvention concerne un procédé de réalisation dun alliage en acier inoxydable durcissable par précipitation. Le procédé comprend létape consistant à faire fondre un alliage en acier martensitique ayant la composition suivante en pourcentage en poids : environ 0,03 max. de carbone, 1,0 max de manganèse, 0,75 max. de silicium, 0,040 max de phosphore, 0,020 max de soufre, 10-13 de chrome, 10,5-11,6 de nickel, 1,5-1,8 de titane, 0,25-1,5 de molybdène, 0,95 max de cuivre, 0,25 max de cuivre, 0,25 max daluminium, 0,3 max de niobium, 0,010 max de bore, 0,030 max dazote, le reste étant constitué de fer et dimpuretés habituelles. Le procédé comprend également létape consistant à ajouter du calcium à lalliage pendant quil est fondu. Le calcium se combine au soufre et à loxygène disponibles pour former des inclusions à base de calcium choisies dans le groupe constitué de sulfures de calcium, doxydes de calcium, doxysulfures de calcium, et de combinaisons de ceux-ci. Dans une autre étape, lalliage est traité pour éliminer au moins une partie des inclusions de la base de calcium. Lalliage est ensuite solidifié. Du fait de ce procédé, lalliage a une matrice contenant une dispersion éparse desdites inclusions à base de calcium et sensiblement aucune inclusion à base de terre rare.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
1. A method of making a precipitation hardenable, high strength, high
toughness,
stainless steel alloy comprising the steps of:
melting a martensitic steel alloy having the following composition in weight
percent,
about
Carbon 0.03 max.
Manganese 1.0 max.
Silicon 0.75 max.
Phosphorus 0.040 max.
Sulfur 0.020 max.
Chroinium 10-13
Nickel 10.5-11.6
Titanium 1.5-1.8
Molybdenum 0.25-1.5
Copper 0.95 max.
Aluminum 0.25 max.
Niobium 0.3 max.
Boron 0.010 max.
Nitrogen 0.030 max.
and the balance being iron and usual impurities;
adding calcium to the alloy while molten whereby the calcium combines with
available sulfur and oxygen to form calcium-based inclusions selected from the
group
consisting of calcium sulfides, calcium oxides, calcium oxysulfides, and
combinations
thereof;
processing said alloy to remove at least a portion of said calcium-based
inclusions;
and then
solidifying said alloy;
whereby rare earth metal additions are not used in the alloy, and after said
processing and
solidifying steps said alloy contains substantially no rare-earth based
inclusions and any
residual calciuin-based inclusions are sparsely dispersed in the alloy.
2. The method as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the melting step comprises vacuum
melting the martensitic steel alloy and the adding step is performed during
said vacuum
melting.

3. The method as claimed in Claim 2 wherein the processing step comprises
vacuum
remelting the alloy.
4. The method as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the processing step comprises
vacuum
remelting the alloy.
5. A method of making a precipitation hardenable, high strength, high
toughness,
stainless steel alloy comprising the steps of.
melting a martensitic steel alloy having the following composition in weight
percent,
about
Carbon 0.02 max.
Manganese 0.25 max.
Silicon 0.25 max.
Phosphorus 0.015 max.
Sulfur 0.010 max.
Chromium 10.5-12.5
Nickel 10.75-11.25
Titanium 1.5-1.7
Molybdenum 0.75-1.25
Copper 0.50 max.
Aluminum 0.050 max.
Niobium 0.050 max.
Boron 0.001-0.005
Nitrogen 0.015 max.
and the balance being iron and usual impurities;
adding calcium to the alloy while molten whereby the calcium combines with
available sulfur and oxygen to form calcium-based inclusions selected from the
group
consisting of calcium sulfides, calcium oxides, calcium oxysulfides, and
combinations
thereof;
processing said alloy to remove at least a portion of said calcium-based
inclusions;
and then
solidifying said alloy;
whereby rare earth metal additions are not used in the alloy, and after said
processing and
solidifying steps said alloy contains substantially no rare-earth based
inclusions and any
residual calcium-based inclusions are sparsely dispersed in the alloy.
11

6. The method as claimed in Claim 5 wherein the melting step comprises vacuum
melting the martensitic steel alloy and the adding step is performed during
said vacuum
melting.
7. The method as claimed in Claim 6 wherein the processing step comprises
vacuum
remelting the alloy.
8. The method as claimed in Claim 5 wherein the processing step comprises
vacuum
remelting the alloy.
9. A method of making a precipitation hardenable, high strength, high
toughness,
stainless steel alloy comprising the steps of:
melting a martensitic steel alloy having the following composition in weight
percent,
about
Carbon 0.015 max.
Manganese 0.10 max.
Silicon 0.10 max.
Phosphorus 0.0 10 max.
Sulfur 0.005 max.
Chromium 11.0-12.0
Nickel 10.85-11.25
Titanium 1.5-1.7
Molybdenum 0.9-1.1
Copper 0.25 max.
Aluminum 0.025 max.
Niobium 0.025 max.
Boron 0.0015-0.0035
Nitrogen 0.010 max.
and the balance being iron and usual impurities;
adding calcium to the alloy while molten whereby the calcium combines with
available sulfur and oxygen to form calcium-based inclusions selected from the
group
consisting of calcium sulfides, calcium oxides, calcium oxysulfides, and
combinations
thereof;
processing said alloy to remove at least a portion of said calcium-based
inclusions;
and then
solidifying said alloy;
12

whereby rare earth metal additions are not used in the alloy, and after said
processing and
solidifying steps said alloy contains substantially no rare-earth based
inclusions and any
residual calcium-based inclusions are sparsely dispersed in the alloy.
10. The method as claimed in Claim 9 wherein the melting step comprises vacuum
melting the martensitic steel alloy and the adding step is performed during
said vacuum
melting.
11. The method as claimed in Claim 10 wherein the processing step comprises
vacuum
remelting the alloy.
12. The method as claimed in Claim 9 wherein the processing step comprises
vacuum
remelting the alloy.
13

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02718576 2010-09-15
WO 2009/108892 PCT/US2009/035548
TITLE OF THE INVENTION
METHOD OF MAKING A HIGH STRENGTH, HIGH TOUGHNESS,
FATIGUE RESISTANT, PRECIPITATION HARDENABLE STAINLESS STEEL
AND PRODUCT MADE THEREFROM
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to precipitation-hardenable stainless steel alloys and
in
particular to a method of making such alloys to reduce the size and
distribution of inclusions
that adversely affect the fatigue resistance and fracture toughness provided
by such alloys.
Description of the Related Art
US Patent No. 5,681,528 and US Patent No. 5,855,844 describe high-strength,
notch-
ductile, precipitation-hardening stainless steels. Those alloys are used for
structural
applications in the aerospace industry and in many additional non-aerospace
uses. Testing of
the known alloys by the aerospace industry has indicated that the fatigue life
provided by the
alloys, while considered to be acceptable, leaves something to be desired.
Fatigue life is a
very important parameter for the design of aerospace structural members.
Improved fatigue
life would allow for either product weight savings or longer design service
life for structural
components. It is desired to provide improved fatigue-strength relative to the
known alloys,
while still maintaining the excellent combination of strength, toughness, and
corrosion
resistance that the known alloys provide.
The abovementioned fatigue testing has demonstrated that the majority of
fatigue
failures initiate at large second phase inclusions, which are present in the
material as a result
of the alloy composition and processing. The alloy according to the present
invention is
designed to provide strength and toughness that are equivalent to the known
alloy, but
without the resultant large second phase inclusions that adversely affect the
fatigue resistance
of the known alloy.
1

CA 02718576 2012-02-13
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The improvement in fatigue life desired for the known precipitation
hardenable, stainless steel alloys is achieved to a large degree by the alloy
in
accordance with the present invention. The alloy according to this invention
is a
precipitation hardening Cr-Ni-Ti-- Mo martensitic stainless steel alloy that
provides a
unique combination of corrosion resistance, fatigue resistance, strength, and
toughness.
The present invention provides a method of making a precipitation hardenable,
high strength, high toughness stainless steel, having broad, intermediate, and
preferred
compositional ranges, in weight percent:
Broad Intermediate Preferred
C 0.03 max 0.02 max 0.015 max
Mn 1.0 max 0.25 max 0.10 max
Si 0.75 max 0.25 max 0.10 max
P 0.040 max 0.015 max 0.010 max
S 0.020 max 0.010 max 0.005 max
Cr 10-13 10.5-12.5 11.0-12.0
Ni 10.5-11.6 10.75-11.25 10.85-11.25
Ti 1.5-1.8 1.5-1.7 1.5-1.7
Mo 0.25-1.5 0.75-1.25 0.9-1.1
Cu 0.95 max 0.50 max 0.25 max
Al 0.25 max 0.050 max 0.025 max
Nb 0.3 max 0.050 max 0.025 max
B 0.010 max 0.001-0.005 0.0015-0.0035
N 0.030 max 0.015 max 0.010 max
The balance of the alloy is essentially iron except for the usual impurities
found in
commercial grades of such steels and minor amounts of additional elements
which
may vary from a few thousandths of a percent up to larger amounts that do not
objectionably detract from the desired combination of properties provided by
this
alloy. The alloy according to this invention is further characterized by a
plurality of
non-strengthening, calcium-based inclusions that are sparsely dispersed in the
matrix
steel.
2

CA 02718576 2012-02-13
The method includes the step of melting a precipitation-hardenable stainless
steel alloy having the weight percent composition set forth above. The method
further
includes the step of adding calcium to the molten alloy in an amount
sufficient to
combine with available sulfur and oxygen in the molten alloy to form calcium-
based
inclusions selected from the group consisting of calcium sulphides, calcium
oxides,
calcium oxysulfides, and combinations thereof. The method also includes the
steps of
processing the alloy to remove at least a portion of the inclusions from the
alloy and
then solidifying the refined alloy, whereby rare earth metal additions are not
used in
the alloy, and after said processing and solidifying steps said alloy contains
substantially no rare-earth based inclusions and any residual calcium-based
inclusions
are sparsely dispersed in the alloy.
The foregoing tabulation is provided as a convenient summary and is not
intended thereby to restrict the lower and upper values of the ranges of the
individual
elements of the alloy of this invention for use in combination with each
other, or to
restrict the ranges of the elements for use solely in combination with each
other. Thus,
one or more of the element ranges of the broad composition can be used with
one or
more of the other ranges for the remaining elements in the preferred
composition. In
addition, a minimum or maximum for an element of one preferred embodiment can
be
used with the maximum or minimum for that element from another preferred
embodiment. Throughout this application percent (%) means percent by weight
unless
otherwise indicated. The term "inclusion" encompasses secondary particles and
phases such as sulfides, oxides, oxysulfides, carbides, nitrides, and
carbonitrides.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In the alloy according to the present invention, the unique combination of
strength, notch toughness, and stress-corrosion cracking resistance is
achieved by
balancing the elements chromium, nickel, titanium, and molybdenum. At least
about
10%, better yet at least about 10.5%, and preferably at least about 11.0%
chromium is
present in the alloy to provide corrosion resistance commensurate with that of
a
conventional stainless steel under oxidizing conditions. At least about 10.5%,
better
yet at least about 10.75%, and preferably at least about 10.85% nickel is
present in the
alloy because it benefits the notch toughness of
3

CA 02718576 2010-09-15
WO 2009/108892 PCT/US2009/035548
the alloy. At least about 1.5% titanium is present in the alloy to benefit the
strength of the
alloy through the precipitation of a nickel-titanium-rich phase during aging.
At least about
0.25%, better yet at least about 0.75%, and preferably at least about 0.9%
molybdenum is
also present in the alloy because it contributes to the alloy's notch
toughness. Molybdenum
also benefits the alloy's corrosion resistance in reducing media and in
environments which
promote pitting attack and stress-corrosion cracking.
When chromium, nickel, titanium, and/or molybdenum are not properly balanced,
the
alloy's ability to transform fully to a martensitic structure using
conventional processing
techniques is inhibited. Furthermore, improper balancing of chromium, nickel,
titanium, and
molybdenum in this alloy impairs the alloy's ability to remain substantially
fully martensitic
when solution treated and age-hardened. Under such conditions the strength
provided by the
alloy is significantly reduced. Therefore, chromium, nickel, titanium, and
molybdenum
present in this alloy are restricted. More particularly, chromium is limited
to not more than
about 13%, better yet to not more than about 12.5%, and preferably to not more
than about
12.0% and nickel is limited to not more than about 11.6% and preferably to not
more than
about 11.25%. Titanium is restricted to not more than about 1.8% and
preferably to not more
than about 1.7% and molybdenum is restricted to not more than about 1.5%,
better yet to not
more than about 1.25%, and preferably to not more than about 1.1%.
Sulfur in this alloy tends to combine with manganese and/or titanium to form
manganese sulfides (MnS) and/or titanium sulfides (TiS) which adversely affect
the fracture
toughness, notch toughness, and notch tensile strength of the alloy. A product
form of this
alloy having a large cross-section, i.e., >0.7 in2 (>4 cm), does not undergo
sufficient
thermomechanical processing to homogenize the alloy and neutralize the adverse
effect of
the sulfide inclusions. A small addition of calcium is preferably made to the
alloy to benefit
the fatigue strength of the alloy by combining with sulfur to facilitate the
removal of sulfur
from the alloy. In the known alloy, small additions of cerium, lanthanum,
and/or other rare
earth metals are used to benefit the toughness and fracture toughness
properties, especially in
large section sizes. However, although the use of such rare earth treatment
benefits the
4

CA 02718576 2010-09-15
WO 2009/108892 PCT/US2009/035548
toughness of the alloy, it has now been found that remnants of such rare earth
inclusions may
also serve as crack initiation sites that adversely affect the fatigue
strength of the alloy.
Therefore, rare earth additions are not used in the present alloy so as to
avoid the presence of
the rare earth inclusions. Rare earth metals including cerium, lanthanum,
yttrium, etc. are
restricted such that the combined amounts of such elements are not more than
about 0.001%.
Preferably, the alloy contains not more than about 0.0008%, and better yet not
more than
0.0007% of such elements.
The elimination of the rare earth treatment would have been expected to
adversely
affect the fracture toughness of the alloy, especially in larger section
sizes. However, it has
been found that the use of the calcium treatment instead of the rare earth
treatment not only
benefits the fatigue strength of the alloy, but does not adversely affect the
combination of
toughness and fracture toughness provided by this alloy. Therefore, it is
believed that the
alloy according to the present invention provides strength and toughness
equivalent to the
known alloys.
Additional elements such as boron, aluminum, niobium, manganese, and silicon
may
be present in controlled amounts to benefit other desirable properties
provided by this alloy.
More specifically, up to about 0.0 10% boron, better yet up to about 0.005%
boron, and
preferably up to about 0.0035% boron can be present in the alloy to benefit
the hot
workability of the alloy. In order to provide the desired effect, at least
about 0.001% and
preferably at least about 0.0015% boron is present in the alloy.
Aluminum and/or niobium can be present in the alloy to benefit the yield and
ultimate
tensile strengths. More particularly, up to about 0.25%, better yet up to
about 0.10%, still
better up to about 0.050%, and preferably up to about 0.025% aluminum can be
present in
the alloy. Also, up to about 0.3%, better yet up to about 0.10%, still better
up to about
0.050%, and preferably up to about 0.025% niobium can be present in the alloy.
Although
higher yield and ultimate tensile strengths are obtainable when aluminum
and/or niobium are
present in this alloy, the increased strength is developed at the expense of
notch toughness.
5

CA 02718576 2010-09-15
WO 2009/108892 PCT/US2009/035548
Therefore, when optimum notch toughness is desired, aluminum and niobium are
restricted
to the usual residual levels.
Up to about 1.0%, better yet up to about 0.5%, still better up to about 0.25%,
and
preferably up to about 0.10% manganese and/or up to about 0.75%, better yet up
to about
0.5%, still better up to about 0.25%, and preferably up to about 0.10% silicon
can be present
in the alloy as residuals from scrap sources or deoxidizing additions. Such
additions are
beneficial when the alloy is not vacuum melted. Manganese and/or silicon are
preferably kept
at low levels because of their deleterious effects on toughness, corrosion
resistance, and the
austenite-martensite phase balance in the matrix material.
The balance of the alloy is essentially iron apart from the usual impurities
found in
commercial grades of alloys intended for similar service or use. The levels of
such elements
are controlled so as not to adversely affect the desired properties.
In particular, too much carbon and/or nitrogen impair the corrosion resistance
and
deleteriously affect the toughness and fatigue strength provided by this
alloy. Accordingly,
not more than about 0.03%, better yet not more than about 0.02%, and
preferably not more
than about 0.015% carbon is present in the alloy. Also, not more than about
0.030%, better
yet not more than about 0.015%, and preferably not more than about 0.0 10%
nitrogen is
present in the alloy. When carbon and/or nitrogen are present in larger
amounts, the carbon
and/or nitrogen combines with titanium to form titanium-rich non-metallic
inclusions, such
as titanium carbonitrides. That reaction inhibits the formation of the nickel-
titanium-rich
phase which is a primary factor in the high strength provided by this alloy.
Moreover, such
carbonitrides serve as crack-initiation sites and adversely affect the
fracture toughness and
fatigue resistance provided by the alloy.
Phosphorus is maintained at a low level because of its deleterious effect on
toughness
and corrosion resistance. Accordingly, not more than about 0.040%, better yet
not more than
about 0.015%, and preferably not more than about 0.0 10% phosphorus is present
in the alloy.
6

CA 02718576 2010-09-15
WO 2009/108892 PCT/US2009/035548
Not more than about 0.020%, better yet not more than about 0.010%, and
preferably
not more than about 0.005% sulfur is present in the alloy. Larger amounts of
sulfur promote
the formation of titanium-rich non-metallic inclusions which, like carbon and
nitrogen,
inhibit the desired strengthening effect of the titanium and serve as crack-
initiation sites that
adversely affect the fracture toughness and fatigue resistance provided by the
alloy. Also,
greater amounts of sulfur deleteriously affect the hot workability and
corrosion resistance of
this alloy and impair its toughness, particularly in a transverse direction.
Oxygen is limited
to not more than about 25 parts per million (ppm). Tramp elements such as
lead, bismuth,
antimony, arsenic, tellurium, selenium, tin, germanium, and gallium are
limited to about
0.003% max. each, better yet to not more than about 0.002% each, and
preferably to not
more than about 0.001% each.
Too much copper deleteriously affects the notch toughness, ductility, and
strength of
this alloy. Therefore, the alloy contains not more than about 0.95%, better
yet not more than
about 0.75%, still better, not more than about 0.50%, and preferably not more
than about
0.25% copper.
The method according to the present invention is preferably carried out by
vacuum
induction melting (VIM) the constituent elements as described above.
Preferably, VIM is
followed by vacuum arc remelting (VAR), but other practices can be used. The
preferred
method of providing calcium in this alloy is through the addition of a nickel-
calcium
compound during VIM. The nickel-calcium compound, such as the Ni-Cal alloy
sold by
Chemalloy Co. Inc., is added in an amount effective to combine with available
phosphorus,
sulfur, and oxygen. Other techniques for adding calcium may also be used. For
example,
capsules of elemental calcium or calcium master alloys can be added to the
melt. It is
believed that a slag containing calcium or a calcium compound may also be
used. The
chemical reactions result in the formation of secondary phase inclusions such
as calcium
sulfides, calcium oxides, and calcium oxysulfides that can be readily removed
during primary
or secondary melting. It is believed that any residual calcium-based
inclusions are sparsely
dispersed in the alloy matrix material upon solidification. It is expected
that after VAR the
7

CA 02718576 2010-09-15
WO 2009/108892 PCT/US2009/035548
alloy contains less than about 0.001% calcium and not more than about 0.001%
sulfur. The
inclusions are generally smaller in major cross-sectional size than the rare-
earth-based
inclusions and Ti-rich non-metallic inclusions that are present in the known
alloys. It is also
believed that the size distribution of the calcium-based inclusions is about
0.5 m to about
3.00 gm in major cross-sectional dimension, when such inclusions are present.
The very
small size and sparse dispersion of Ca-based inclusions benefits the strength,
toughness, and
fatigue resistance provided by the alloy.
This alloy can be made using powder metallurgy techniques, if desired.
Although the
alloy of the present invention can be hot or cold worked, cold working
enhances the
mechanical strength of the alloy.
The precipitation hardening alloy of the present invention is solution
annealed and
then age hardened to develop the desired high strength and hardness. The
solution annealing
temperature should be high enough to dissolve essentially all of the undesired
precipitates
into the alloy matrix material. However, if the solution annealing temperature
is too high, it
will impair the fracture toughness of the alloy by promoting excessive grain
growth.
Typically, the alloy of the present invention is solution annealed at about
1700 F-1900 F
(927 C-1038 C) for about 1 hour and then quenched.
When desired, this alloy can also be subjected to a deep chill treatment after
it is
quenched, to further develop the high strength of the alloy. The deep chill
treatment cools the
alloy to a temperature sufficiently below the martensite finish temperature to
ensure the
completion of the martensite transformation. Typically, a deep chill treatment
consists of
cooling the alloy to below about -100 F (-73 C) for about 1 to 8 hours. The
need for a deep
chill treatment will be affected, at least in part, by the martensite finish
NO temperature of
the alloy. If the MF temperature is sufficiently high, the transformation to a
martensitic
structure will proceed without the need for a deep chill treatment. In
addition, the need for a
deep chill treatment may also depend on the cross-sectional size of the piece
being
manufactured. As the size of the piece increases, segregation in the alloy
becomes more
8

CA 02718576 2010-09-15
WO 2009/108892 PCT/US2009/035548
significant and the use of a deep chill treatment becomes more beneficial.
Further, the length
of time that the piece is chilled may need to be increased for large pieces in
order to ensure
that the transformation to martensite is completed. For example, it has been
found that in a
piece having a large cross-sectional area as described above, a deep chill
treatment lasting
about 8 hours is preferred for developing the high strength that is
characteristic of this alloy.
The alloy of the present invention is age hardened in accordance with
techniques used
for the known precipitation hardening, stainless steel alloys, as are known to
those skilled in
the art. For example, the alloys are aged at a temperature between about 900 F
(482 C) and
about 1150 F (621 C) for about 4 to 8 hours. The specific aging conditions
used are selected
by considering that: (1) the ultimate tensile strength of the alloy decreases
as the aging
temperature increases; and (2) the time required to age harden the alloy to a
desired strength
level increases as the aging temperature decreases.
The terms and expressions that have been employed herein are used as terms of
description and not of limitation. There is no intention in the use of such
terms and
expressions to exclude any equivalents of the features described or any
portions thereof. It is
recognized, however, that various modifications are possible within the scope
of the
invention claimed.
9

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2718576 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2021-08-31
Inactive: COVID 19 Update DDT19/20 Reinstatement Period End Date 2021-03-13
Letter Sent 2021-03-01
Letter Sent 2020-08-31
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-08-19
Letter Sent 2020-02-27
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Grant by Issuance 2013-02-12
Inactive: Cover page published 2013-02-11
Inactive: Final fee received 2012-11-29
Pre-grant 2012-11-29
Maintenance Request Received 2012-11-29
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2012-06-01
Letter Sent 2012-06-01
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2012-06-01
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2012-05-29
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2012-02-13
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2011-08-12
Inactive: Cover page published 2010-12-17
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry - RFE 2010-11-15
Inactive: Applicant deleted 2010-11-15
Inactive: IPC assigned 2010-11-15
Inactive: IPC assigned 2010-11-15
Inactive: IPC assigned 2010-11-15
Application Received - PCT 2010-11-15
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2010-11-15
Letter Sent 2010-11-15
Letter Sent 2010-11-15
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2010-09-15
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2010-09-15
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2010-09-15
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2009-09-03

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2012-11-29

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CRS HOLDINGS INC.
Past Owners on Record
DAVID ELMER WERT
PAUL MICHAEL NOVOTNY
ROBERT WAYNE KRIEBLE
THOMAS CONSTANTINE ZOGAS
WILLIAM JOSEPH MARTIN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2010-09-14 9 451
Claims 2010-09-14 4 108
Abstract 2010-09-14 1 68
Description 2012-02-12 9 438
Claims 2012-02-12 4 99
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2010-11-14 1 189
Notice of National Entry 2010-11-14 1 233
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2010-11-14 1 127
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2012-05-31 1 161
Commissioner's Notice - Maintenance Fee for a Patent Not Paid 2020-04-08 1 545
Courtesy - Patent Term Deemed Expired 2020-09-20 1 552
Commissioner's Notice - Maintenance Fee for a Patent Not Paid 2021-04-18 1 535
PCT 2010-09-14 9 359
Fees 2012-11-28 1 46
Correspondence 2012-11-28 1 47
Maintenance fee payment 2017-02-22 1 26
Maintenance fee payment 2018-02-26 1 26
Maintenance fee payment 2019-01-27 1 25