Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
1
INTER ACCESS POINT INTERFERENCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE MECHANISMS TO ACHIEVE
NETWORK QOS TARGET IN WIRELESS CELLULAR SYSTEMS
Claim of Priority under 35 U.S.C. 119
[0001] The present Application for Patent claims priority to Provisional
Application
No. 61/048,905, entitled "A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FULL QoS IN A
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM", filed April 29, 2008, which is assigned
to the assignee hereof and hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
BACKGROUND
1. Field
[0002] The following description relates generally to wireless communications,
and
more particularly to methods and systems to that enable quality of service
(QoS)
differentiation and/or prioritization across multiple base stations within a
wireless
communications system.
II. Background
[0003] Wireless communication systems are widely deployed to provide various
types
of communication; for instance, voice and/or data can be provided via such
wireless
communication systems. A typical wireless communication system, or network,
can
provide multiple users access to one or more shared resources (e.g.,
bandwidth, transmit
power, ...). For instance, a system can use a variety of multiple access
techniques such
as Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM), Time Division Multiplexing (TDM),
Code
Division Multiplexing (CDM), Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing
(OFDM),
and others.
[0004] Generally, wireless multiple-access communication systems can
simultaneously
support communication for multiple access terminals. Each access terminal can
communicate with one or more base stations via transmissions on forward and
reverse
links. The forward link (or downlink) refers to the communication link from
base
stations to access terminals, and the reverse link (or uplink) refers to the
communication
link from access terminals to base stations. This communication link can be
established
via a single-in-single-out, multiple-in-single-out or a multiple-in-multiple-
out (MIMO)
system.
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
2
[0005] MIMO systems commonly employ multiple (NT) transmit antennas and
multiple
(NR) receive antennas for data transmission. A MIMO channel formed by the NT
transmit and NR receive antennas can be decomposed into NS independent
channels,
which can be referred to as spatial channels, where Ns <_ {NT, NR 1. Each of
the NS
independent channels corresponds to a dimension. Moreover, MIMO systems can
provide improved performance (e.g., increased spectral efficiency, higher
throughput
and/or greater reliability) if the additional dimensionalities created by the
multiple
transmit and receive antennas are utilized.
[0006] MIMO systems can support various duplexing techniques to divide forward
and
reverse link communications over a common physical medium. For instance,
frequency
division duplex (FDD) systems can utilize disparate frequency regions for
forward and
reverse link communications. Further, in time division duplex (TDD) systems,
forward
and reverse link communications can employ a common frequency region so that
the
reciprocity principle allows estimation of the forward link channel from
reverse link
channel.
[0007] Wireless communication systems oftentimes employ one or more base
stations
that provide a coverage area. A typical base station can transmit multiple
data streams
for broadcast, multicast and/or unicast services, wherein a data stream may be
a stream
of data that can be of independent reception interest to an access terminal.
An access
terminal within the coverage area of such base station can be employed to
receive one,
more than one, or all the data streams carried by the composite stream.
Likewise, an
access terminal can transmit data to the base station or another access
terminal.
[0008] In recent years, users have started to replace fixed line
communications with
mobile communications and have increasingly demanded great voice quality,
reliable
service, and low prices.
[0009] In addition to mobile phone networks currently in place, a new class of
small
base station has emerged, which may be installed in a user's home or office
and provide
indoor wireless coverage to mobile units using existing broadband Internet
connections.
Such personal miniature base stations are generally known as access point base
stations,
or, alternatively, Home Node B (HNB) or femtocells. Typically, such miniature
base
stations are connected to the Internet and the mobile operator's network via
DSL router
or cable modem.
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
3
SUMMARY
[0010] The following presents a simplified summary of one or more embodiments
in
order to provide a basic understanding of such embodiments. This summary is
not an
extensive overview of all contemplated embodiments, and is intended to neither
identify
key or critical elements of all embodiments nor delineate the scope of any or
all
embodiments. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of one or more
embodiments
in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is
presented later.
[0011] In accordance with one or more embodiments and corresponding discussion
thereof, various aspects are described in connection with effectuating and/or
facilitating
quality of service (QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across a
plurality of base
stations situated in wireless communications network. The claimed subject
matter
consists of informational signaling mechanisms to achieve network wide quality
of
service (QoS) targets through base station (or cell) cooperation. A notion of
aggregate
cell congestion is defined, based on the quality of service (QoS) status of
each
constituent flow traversing through cells controlled or serviced by a base
station.
Associated with the aggregate congestion state is an aggregate cell priority,
based on the
quality of service (QoS) priority levels that already exist for the
constituent flows. This
congestion information can be passed between cells or base stations that
control or
service cells, and the messaging can be triggered based on a cell's quality of
service
(QoS) needs and perceived local network environment. The cell congestion
concept
based on aggregate cell flow quality of service (QoS) status can be utilized
by each base
station controlling or servicing cells in a distributed fashion to coordinate
overall
network resource usage and achieve fair quality of service (QoS) flow behavior
across
the network.
[0012] The claimed subject matter in accordance with various aspects set forth
herein
provides an apparatus operable in a wireless communication system wherein the
apparatus comprises a processor, configured to obtain a current resource
allocation for
one or more cells controlled by a first base station, ascertain whether the
current
resource allocation satisfies a quality of service target associated with data
flows
traversing through at least one of the one or more cells controlled by the
first base
station, and dispatch an inter cell interference coordination indicator to a
second base
station, and memory coupled to the processor for persisting data.
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
4
[0013] Additionally, the claimed subject matter in accordance with further
aspects
provides various methodologies utilized in wireless communications systems,
the
method comprising the acts of soliciting a current resource allocation for
cells
controlled by a first base station, ascertaining whether or not the current
resource
allocation satisfies quality of service targets associated with data flows
traversing
through at least one of the cells controlled by the first base station, and
disseminating an
inter cell interference coordination indicator to a second base station.
[0014] Moreover, the claimed subject matter in accordance with yet further
aspects set
forth herein also provides an apparatus operable in wireless communication
systems
wherein the apparatus includes memory that retains instructions related to
obtaining
resource allocations for cells controlled by a first base station,
ascertaining whether the
resource allocations satisfy quality of service targets associated with data
flows
traversing through the cells controlled by the first base station, and
subsequently or
contemporaneously dispatching inter cell interference coordination indicators
to a
second base station; and processors, coupled to the memory, configured to
execute the
instructions retained in memory.
[0015] Furthermore and in accordance with yet further aspects described
herein, the
claimed subject matter provides an apparatus operable in wireless
communication
systems that includes means for obtaining a current resource allocation for
cells
controlled by a first base station, means for ascertaining whether or not the
current
resource allocation satisfies a quality of service target associated with data
flows
traversing through at least one of the one or more cells controlled by the
first base
station, and means for dispatching inter cell interference coordination
indicators to
neighboring or proximate base stations.
[0016] In addition and in accordance with further aspects elucidated herein,
the claimed
matter also provides a computer-program product, the computer-program product
comprising code for obtaining current resource allocations for cells
controlled by a base
station, code for ascertaining whether the resource allocations satisfy
quality of service
targets associated with data flow traversing through the cells controlled by
the base
station, and code for communicating inter cell interference coordination
indicators to
neighboring base stations.
[0017] To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the one or
more
embodiments comprise the features hereinafter fully described and particularly
pointed
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
out in the claims. The following description and the annexed drawings set
forth in
detail certain illustrative aspects of the one or more embodiments. These
aspects are
indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles
of various
embodiments can be employed and the described embodiments are intended to
include
all such aspects and their equivalents.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0018] FIG. 1 is an illustration of a wireless communication system in
accordance with
various aspects set forth herein.
[0019] FIG. 2 is an illustration of an example system that effectuates quality
of service
(QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across a plurality of base
stations situated in a
wireless communication environment.
[0020] FIG. 3 is an illustration of an example system that effectuates quality
of service
(QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across a plurality of base
stations situated in a
wireless communication environment.
[0021] FIG. 4 is an illustration of an example system that effectuates quality
of service
(QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across a plurality of base
stations situated in a
wireless communication environment.
[0022] FIGs. 5-7 illustrate example methodologies that facilitate quality of
service
(QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across one or more neighboring
base stations
in accordance with aspects of the claimed subject matter.
[0023] FIG. 8 is an illustration of an example system that facilitates quality
of service
(QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across a plurality of base
stations situated in a
wireless communication environment.
[0024] FIG. 9 is an illustration of an example wireless network environment
that can be
employed in conjunction with the various systems and methods described herein.
[0025] FIG. 10 is an illustration of an example system that enables utilizing
quality of
service (QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across one or more
neighboring base
stations in a wireless communication environment.
[0026] FIG. 11 is an illustration of an example system that enables utilizing
quality of
service (QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across one or more
neighboring base
stations in a wireless communication environment.
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
6
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0027] Various embodiments are now described with reference to the drawings,
wherein
like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the
following
description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set
forth in order
to provide a thorough understanding of one or more embodiments. It may be
evident,
however, that such embodiment(s) may be practiced without these specific
details. In
other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram
form in
order to facilitate describing one or more embodiments.
[0028] As used in this application, the terms "component," "module," "system,"
and the
like are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware,
firmware, a
combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For
example, a component can be, but is not limited to being, a process running on
a
processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a
program,
and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a
computing
device and the computing device can be a component. One or more components can
reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component can be
localized on
one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers. In addition,
these
components can execute from various computer readable media having various
data
structures stored thereon. The components can communicate by way of local
and/or
remote processes such as in accordance with a signal having one or more data
packets
(e.g., data from one component interacting with another component in a local
system,
distributed system, and/or across a network such as the Internet with other
systems by
way of the signal).
[0029] The techniques described herein can be used for various wireless
communication
systems such as code division multiple access (CDMA), time division multiple
access
(TDMA), frequency division multiple access (FDMA), orthogonal frequency
division
multiple access (OFDMA), single carrier-frequency division multiple access (SC-
FDMA) and other systems. The terms "system" and "network" are often used
interchangeably. A CDMA system can implement a radio technology such as
Universal
Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA), CDMA2000, etc. UTRA includes Wideband-CDMA
(W-CDMA) and other variants of CDMA. CDMA2000 covers IS-2000, IS-95 and IS-
856 standards. A TDMA system can implement a radio technology such as Global
System for Mobile Communications (GSM). An OFDMA system can implement a
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
7
radio technology such as Evolved UTRA (E-UTRA), Ultra Mobile Broadband (UMB),
IEEE 802.11 (Wi-Fi), IEEE 802.16 (WiMAX), IEEE 802.20, Flash-OFDM, etc. UTRA
and E-UTRA are part of Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS). 3GPP
Long Term Evolution (LTE) is an upcoming release of UMTS that uses E-UTRA,
which employs OFDMA on the downlink and SC-FDMA on the uplink.
[0030] Single carrier frequency division multiple access (SC-FDMA) utilizes
single
carrier modulation and frequency domain equalization. SC-FDMA has similar
performance and essentially the same overall complexity as those of an OFDMA
system. A SC-FDMA signal has lower peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) because
of
its inherent single carrier structure. SC-FDMA can be used, for instance, in
uplink
communications where lower PAPR greatly benefits access terminals in terms of
transmit power efficiency. Accordingly, SC-FDMA can be implemented as an
uplink
multiple access scheme in 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) or Evolved UTRA.
[0031] Furthermore, various embodiments are described herein in connection
with an
access terminal. An access terminal can also be called a system, subscriber
unit,
subscriber station, mobile station, mobile, remote station, remote terminal,
mobile
device, user terminal, terminal, wireless communication device, user agent,
user device,
or user equipment (UE). An access terminal can be a cellular telephone, a
cordless
telephone, a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) phone, a wireless local loop
(WLL)
station, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a handheld device having wireless
connection capability, computing device, or other processing device connected
to a
wireless modem. Moreover, various embodiments are described herein in
connection
with a base station. A base station can be utilized for communicating with
access
terminal(s) and can also be referred to as an access point, Node B, Evolved
Node B
(eNodeB) or some other terminology.
[0032] Moreover, various aspects or features described herein can be
implemented as a
method, apparatus, or article of manufacture using standard programming and/or
engineering techniques. The term "article of manufacture" as used herein is
intended to
encompass a computer program accessible from any computer-readable device,
carrier,
or media. For example, computer-readable media can include but are not limited
to
magnetic storage devices (e.g., hard disk, floppy disk, magnetic strips,
etc.), optical
disks (e.g., compact disk (CD), digital versatile disk (DVD), etc.), smart
cards, and flash
memory devices (e.g., EPROM, card, stick, key drive, etc.). Additionally,
various
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
8
storage media described herein can represent one or more devices and/or other
machine-
readable media for storing information. The term "machine-readable medium" can
include, without being limited to, wireless channels and various other media
capable of
storing, containing, and/or carrying instruction(s) and/or data.
[0033] Referring now to Fig. 1, a wireless communication system 100 is
illustrated in
accordance with various embodiments presented herein. System 100 comprises a
base
station 102 that can include multiple antenna groups. For example, one antenna
group
can include antennas 104 and 106, another group can comprise antennas 108 and
110,
and an additional group can include antennas 112 and 114. Two antennas are
illustrated
for each antenna group; however, more or fewer antennas can be utilized for
each
group. Base station 102 can additionally include a transmitter chain and a
receiver
chain, each of which can in turn comprise a plurality of components associated
with
signal transmission and reception (e.g., processors, modulators, multiplexers,
demodulators, demultiplexers, antennas, etc.), as will be appreciated by one
skilled in
the art.
[0034] Base station 102 can communicate with one or more access terminals such
as
access terminal 116 and access terminal 122; however, it is to be appreciated
that base
station 102 can communicate with substantially any number of access terminals
similar
to access terminals 116 and 122. Access terminals 116 and 122 can be, for
example,
cellular phones, smart phones, laptops, handheld communication devices,
handheld
computing devices, satellite radios, global positioning systems, PDAs, and/or
any other
suitable device for communicating over wireless communication system 100. As
depicted, access terminal 116 is in communication with antennas 112 and 114,
where
antennas 112 and 114 transmit information to access terminal 116 over a
forward link
118 and receive information from access terminal 116 over a reverse link 120.
Moreover, access terminal 122 is in communication with antennas 104 and 106,
where
antennas 104 and 106 transmit information to access terminal 122 over a
forward link
124 and receive information from access terminal 122 over a reverse link 126.
In a
frequency division duplex (FDD) system, forward link 118 can utilize a
different
frequency band than that used by reverse link 120, and forward link 124 can
employ a
different frequency band than that employed by reverse link 126, for example.
Further,
in a time division duplex (TDD) system, forward link 118 and reverse link 120
can
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
9
utilize a common frequency band and forward link 124 and reverse link 126 can
utilize
a common frequency band.
[0035] Each group of antennas and/or the area in which they are designated to
communicate can be referred to as a sector of base station 102. For example,
antenna
groups can be designed to communicate to access terminals in a sector of the
areas
covered by base station 102. In communication over forward links 118 and 124,
the
transmitting antennas of base station 102 can utilize beamforming to improve
signal-to-
noise ratio of forward links 118 and 124 for access terminals 116 and 122.
Also, while
base station 102 utilizes beamforming to transmit to access terminals 116 and
122
scattered randomly through an associated coverage, access terminals in
neighboring
cells can be subject to less interference as compared to a base station
transmitting
through a single antenna to all its access terminals.
[0036] Prior to embarking on an extensive discussion and overview of the
claimed
subject matter, it should be noted, without limitation or loss of generality,
that the while
the claimed subject matter is elucidated in terms of the downlink aspects of
quality of
service (QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across multiple base
stations, the
claimed matter with equal facility and/or functionality can have application
to the uplink
analogs of quality of service (QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization
across multiple
base stations as well.
[0037] Cell edge users can benefit significantly from a reduction in
interference power
from neighboring cells. Efficiency of cell resource utilization can thus be
enhanced if
there is cooperation across base stations or eNodeB's, coordinating power use
across
physical resource blocks (PRBs). Utilization of inter cell interference
coordination
(ICIC) signaling as employed by the claimed subject matter can create a
mechanism that
achieves this type of coordination. Groups of cells that successfully
coordinate
transmissions and/or received transmissions can, as a result, benefit each
cell in its
overall resource efficiency, making such schemes of value even when no
specific
relative quality of service (QoS) status is necessarily shared.
[0038] Nevertheless, in addition to the aforementioned efficiency gain, it can
also be
possible to balance quality of service (QoS) requirements across cells through
the
sharing of quality of service (QoS) status information. This quality of
service (QoS)
information should be based at least in part on overall cell congestion (e.g.,
upload (UL)
congestion and download (DL) congestion), and should take into account the
priority of
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
the congested Radio Bearers or flows of data, thereby enabling resource
allocation
tradeoffs based on relative quality of service (QoS) priority across cells.
[0039] The claimed subject matter in accordance with the various aspects set
forth
herein, adds a bit field to an inter cell interference coordinator (ICIC)
indicator, the bit
field defines the highest-priority Radio Bearer or flow that is currently
congested in a
cell, wherein a state of congestion can typically occur when one of the
quality of service
(QoS) targets (e.g., delay, guaranteed bit rate, ...) for the given Radio
Bearer or data
flow is consistently not being met. The number of bits added to the inter cell
interference coordination (ICIC) indicator can be similar to that needed for
exactly one
priority level. For instance, the number of bits added to the inter cell
interference
coordination (ICIC) indicator can be the number of bits that are necessary to
code at
least one 3GPP Rel. 8 quality of service priority (QoS) number. Further there
can be
one reserved bit that can indicate that no Radio Bearer of flow is currently
in
congestion. Typically, the inter cell interference coordinator (ICIC)
indicator can be
triggered anytime there is a change in the highest priority level of a
congested Radio
Bearer or flow, or when the per-physical resource block (PRB) bit pattern is
adjusted, in
addition to other triggers that can be defined that are not based directly on
quality of
service (QoS) considerations.
[0040] Fig. 2 provides illustration of a system 200 that facilitates and/or
effectuates
Quality of Service (QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across a
plurality of base
stations (2021, ..., 2022, where Z denotes an integer greater than zero),
wherein each of
the plurality of base stations (2021, ..., 2022) are in a proximate
relationship with one
another such that cells controlled or serviced by each base station can cause
interference
to cells controlled or serviced by its neighbors during the transmit and/or
receive phase
of operations. Further as illustrated, base stations (2021, ..., 2022) can
control or service
one or more cells, such as cells 2041 (e.g., cells A1, B1, C1, ...) and cells
2042 (e.g., Az,
Bz, Cz, ...). It should be noted without limitation or loss of generality,
that while only
three cells have been depicted as being controlled by each of base station
2021 and/or
base station 2022, a greater or fewer number of cells can be controlled or
serviced by its
corresponding base station. Additionally, it should further be noted that each
of the one
or more cells 2041 and/or one or more cells 204z can be divided into one or
more sectors
comprising further cells. Base station 2021, ..., base station 2022 can
transmit and/or
receive information, signals, data, instructions, commands, bits, symbols, and
the like.
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
11
It is also to be appreciated that the term base station as utilized herein can
also refer to
an access point, Node B, Evolved Node B (e.g., eNodeB, eNB) or referred to by
some
other terminology. Also, although not depicted, it is to be appreciated that
base station
2021, ..., base station 2022 can be in continuous and/or intermittent
correspondence or
communication with one or more access terminals or user equipment. Moreover,
although not illustrated, it is to be further appreciated, without limitation
or loss of
generality, that base station 2021, ..., base station 2022 can be
substantially similar.
According to an illustration, system 200 can be a Long Term Evolution (LTE)
based
system; however, the claimed subject matter is not necessarily so limited.
[0041] Base stations 2021, ..., 202z, as illustrated through cooperation with
one another
can obtain efficiency gains and mitigate inter-cellular interference by
coordinating
power usage across physical resource blocks. Such coordination can be
accomplished
by utilization of inter cell interference coordination (ICIC) signaling
wherein each base
station 2021, ..., 202z controlling its respective cells (e.g., 2041, ...,
2042) can
correspond or communicate with one another so that they can coordinate their
operations (e.g., transmissions and/or received transmission) in such a manner
that
enhances overall resource efficiency as well as balancing quality of service
(QoS)
requirements across cells 2021, ..., 2022 by sharing quality of service (QoS)
status
information.
[0042] Currently, Long Term Evolution (LTE) based systems have a concept of an
X2
channel wherein base stations 2021, ..., 2022 can be connected via associated
X2
interfaces to one another. However, since the mobility mechanism as
conceptualized by
the Long Term Evolution (LTE) standard does not include an anchor point in the
Long
Term Evolution (LTE) Radio Access Network (RAN), the X2 channel/interface can
typically only be used between base stations (e.g., 2021, ..., 2022) that have
proximate
or neighboring cells. Nonetheless, the X2 channel/interface can provide a
direct
connection between a first base station (e.g., 2021) and a second base station
(e.g.,
2022), wherein the first base station (e.g., 2021) controls or services one or
more cells
2041 (e.g.,A1, B1, C1, ...) that are in a proximate relationship with one or
more cells
2042 (e.g., Az, Bz, Cz, ...) controlled or serviced by base station 2022 such
that the
proximate relationship between one or more of the cells 2041 or cells 204z
causes inter
cell interference. For instance, cell C1 controlled by base station 2021 can
be adjacent or
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
12
contiguous to and interfering with transmissions and/or received transmissions
to/from
cell Az controlled by base station 202z.
[0043] To date, there have been successful efforts to utilize quality of
service (QoS)
metrics on an intra-cellular basis (e.g., within cells controlled by the same
base station)
since access terminals or user equipment when they come within the ambit of
cells (e.g.,
2041, ..., 2042) controlled or serviced by a base station (e.g., base stations
2021, ...,
2022) are typically assigned or allocated to a single cell based at least in
part on signal
quality. Central to the success of such efforts has been the role of the
scheduler that
typically controls resources allocated to Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP),
video, best
effort, Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), and the like. Additionally, the
scheduler
has generally also been responsible for setting up and handling flows subject
to quality
of service (QoS) constraints (e.g., controlling the quality of the quality of
service (QoS)
received by particular flows allocated particular resources), etc.
Nevertheless, there are
and always have been intrinsic couplings between or across cells (e.g., 2041,
..., 2042)
in that cells (e.g., 2041, ..., 2042) controlled by disparate or different
base stations (e.g.,
base stations 2021, ..., 2022) can affect each other by creating/generating
interference to
each other.
[0044] Interference between cells serviced or controlled by different or
disparate base
stations and the consequent diminution of quality of service (QoS) to flows
associated
with both interfering cells (e.g., cell C1 and Az) has nevertheless at the
very least been
overlooked, discounted, or deprecated given the current overarching
operational
archetype with respect to intra-cellular centrism. This intra-cellular
centrism can be
illustrated as follows, wherein base station 2021 on perceiving the reduced
quality of
service (QoS) experienced by flows associated with cell C1 effectuates
resource
allocations and scheduling schemes to ensure that the flows within cell C1 and
subject to
the diminution attain their quality of service (QoS) targets, whereas base
station 2022
can actuate other probably dissonant resource allocations and scheduling
paradigms to
assure that flows associated with cell Az can realize their quality of service
(QoS) goals.
Nevertheless, and as will be appreciated by those moderately adroit in this
field of
endeavor, the resource allocations and/or scheduling schemes implemented by
each of
base station 2021 and base station 202z in their respective, individual, and
independent
endeavors to ensure that local quality of service (QoS) targets associated
with data flows
(and/or impinged data flows) passing through each of the cells under their
respective
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
13
control, can cause interference to one another; or more succinctly put, each
of base
station 202, and base station 2022 in its independent endeavors to control and
maximize
local quality of service (QoS) targets associated with data flows under their
respective
control causes mutual interference to the other. Accordingly, there currently
are no
mechanisms to control when and/or how quality of service (QoS) metrics should
be
applied throughout a wireless cellular system, and especially, when and/or how
quality
of service (QoS) metrics can be applied with respect to neighboring cells
(e.g., C, and
Az) controlled or serviced by disparate or different base stations (e.g., base
station 202,
and base station 2022 respectively).
[0045] The claimed subject matter, as illustrated in Fig. 2, provides a
network wide
quality of service (QoS) mechanism rather than a cell centric quality of
service (QoS)
mechanism. It should be noted without limitation or loss of generality that
the claimed
subject does not supplant the current cell centric quality of service (QoS)
mechanism,
but rather augments or provides an adjunct to the current quality of service
(QoS)
mechanism, whereby base stations (e.g., base stations 2021, ..., 2022) can
coordinate
their resource allocations and/or scheduling schemes in a manner that reduces
or
mitigates inter-cell/cross cell interference where the interfering cells are
controlled by
different but proximate base stations.
[0046] Implementation of the claimed subject matter can thus lead to
efficiency
improvement through interference avoidance. For instance, resource allocations
and/or
scheduling policies, implemented by base station 202, with respect to cell C1
in
furtherance of quality of service (QoS) targets associated with various tasks
or flows
disseminated via C1, can be selected so as not to interfere with the quality
of service
(QoS) targets associated with the various tasks or flows being dispatched by
cell Az,
where cell Az is controlled by a disparate base station (e.g., base station
2022). To
achieve such efficiency advantages through interference avoidance, base
station 202, in
reducing inter-cell/cross-cell interference to cell Az, can identify resource
allocations
and/or scheduling policies for use by cell C1 that are not inimical with the
throughput of
flows to meet quality of service (QoS) targets within cell Az. Similarly, base
station
2022 in reducing cross-cell interference to cell C1 controlled or serviced by
base station
202, can adopt scheduling policies and resource allocations for use in cell Az
that are
complimentary or concordant with the resource allocations and/or scheduling
policies
adopted by base station 202, in its servicing or control over cell C,. Thus,
for example,
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
14
base station 202, can decide that in order to meet or exceed the quality of
service (QoS)
targets for a particular high priority flow in cell C, that the flow should be
broadcast at a
first frequency. Base station 2022 in recognition of the high priority flow
being
dispatched in cell C, and base station 2021's attempts to satisfy quality of
service (QoS)
targets associated with this high priority flow, can decide that since the
flows associated
with cell Az do not rise to the same level of priority as those being carried
out in cell C1
to broadcast at a second non-interfering frequency. Thus, by base station 202,
and base
station 2022 collaborating with one another via an inter cell interference
indicator,
mutually agreeable non-interfering broadcast frequency patterns (e.g., C,
broadcasting
at a first frequency, and Az broadcasting at a second non-interfering
frequency)
interference avoidance can be effectuated.
[0047] Moreover, such interference avoidance mechanisms as utilized by the
claimed
subject matter can additionally provide indication of access terminal or user
equipment
location with respect to or relative to neighboring base stations. For
example, if user
equipment is currently associated with cells controlled or serviced by base
station 2021,
the interference avoidance mechanisms adopted and/or effectuated by each of
base
station 202, and/or base station 2022 can provide relative location
information regarding
the whereabouts of user equipment relative to each of base station 202, and/or
base
station 202z. Nevertheless it should be appreciated that implementation of
avoidance
mechanisms on a general basis is typically not desirable for all user
equipment, but can
be expedient for user equipment that is subject to interference (even marginal
interference) from neighboring base stations and cells under their control.
[0048] Turning now to Fig. 3 that illustrates a system 300 that facilitates
and/or
effectuates quality of service (QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization
across a
plurality of base stations wherein each of the plurality of base stations are
in a proximate
relationship with one another such that each base station or one or more of
the cells
serviced or controlled by the base station can cause interference to one or
more cells
associated with its neighbors during the transmit and/or receive phase of
operations. As
depicted system 300 can include first base station 302 and second base station
306 that
can be in continuous or intermittent communication via X2 channel 304. As
stated
above, the X2 channel 304 can provide a direct connection between first base
station
302 and second base station 306, wherein first base station 302 controls or
services one
or more cells that are in a proximate relationship with one or more cells
controlled or
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
serviced by second base station 306 such that the proximate relationship
between one or
more of the cells controlled or serviced by first base station 302 causes
inter cell
interference to one or more of the cells controlled or service by second base
station 306,
or the proximate relationship between the one or more cells controlled or
serviced by
second base station 306 causes interference to the one or more cells
controlled or
serviced by first base station 302. As will be appreciated by those of
moderate skill in
this field of endeavor, X2 channel 304 can be connected to respective X2
interfaces (not
depicted) associated with each of first base station 302 and second base
station 306.
[0049] X2 channel 304, in accordance with aspects of the claimed subject
matter, can be
employed to provide a signaling mechanism between first base station 302 and
second
base station 306 to allow each of first base station 302 and second base
station 306 to
interchange state information about the one or more cells that they
respectively control
or service, wherein the state information can relate to one or more cells that
are subject
to a state of congestion and which is communicated in the form of an inter
cell
interference coordination indicator. Additionally, X2 channel 304 can also be
employed
to convey priority data (e.g., the current level of priority associated with a
flow as well
as prospective levels of priority associated with future flows) that can also
be included
in the inter cell coordination indicator communicated between first base
station 302 and
second base station 306.
[0050] In order to provide the facilities and/or functionalities of the
signaling
mechanism between first base station 302 and second base station 306 different
implementation strategies can be employed. In accordance with one strategy, a
centralized mechanism can be adopted wherein a single monolithic system wide
entity
coordinates resource allocation and scheduling policies that are to be
utilized by each
first base station 302 and second base station 306 in order to mitigate or
obviate cross
cell interference between cells controlled or serviced by each of first base
station 302
and second base station 306. An alternative and/or additional strategy, and
one that
better comports with the underlying principles set forth by the Long Term
Evolution
(LTE) standard, is to employ a distributed or decentralized mechanism wherein
each
participating base station (e.g., neighboring first base station 302 and/or
second base
station 306) utilizes state and/or priority information included in inter cell
interference
coordination indicators supplied/received via X2 channel 304 in order to
ameliorate the
effects of interference between cells serviced or controlled by each of first
base station
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
16
302 and/or second base station 306. As will be appreciated by those cognizant
in this
field of endeavor, such a distributed or decentralized mechanism imbues each
proximate
or neighboring base station and its associated cells in a peer-to-peer
relationship with
one another wherein no single base station or cell necessarily has overall
control over
the distributed or decentralized mechanism.
[0051] Accordingly and in light of the foregoing, first base station 302 can
include
scheduler component 308 that can utilize one or more scheduling paradigms
(e.g., first-
come first served, channel-dependent scheduling, round-robin, max-min fair
scheduling,
proportionally fair scheduling, weighted fair queuing, maximum throughput,
...) to
ascertain how to share available radio resources to achieve as efficient a
resource
utilization as possible in light of quality of service (QoS) targets
associated with one or
more data flows that are being dispatched from one or more cells controlled or
serviced
by first base station 302. Scheduler component 308 can further provide
indication as to
the highest priority flow or Radio Bearer that is currently in congestion
within a cell
controlled or serviced by first base station 302. A state of congestion
typically can
occur within a cell when and if any one of the quality of service (QoS)
targets (e.g.,
delay, guaranteed bit rate, ...) for a congested flow is consistently not
being met. Thus,
in addition to scheduling data flows to satisfy quality of service (QoS)
targets, scheduler
component 308 can also provide congestion metrics associated with those data
flows
that do not comport with their respective quality of service (QoS) targets,
and can, from
these non complicit data flows, further identify the highest priority data
flows that, at
any instant in time, are subject to the worst congestion (e.g., the highest
priority data
flow that consistently does not satisfy its own respective quality of service
(QoS)
target).
[0052] As is typical, scheduler component 308 can effectuate resource
allocations that
mitigate or obviate cell interference between cells controlled or serviced by
the same
base station. For instance, referring back to Fig. 2, scheduler component 308
included
in base station 202, can ensure that resource allocations within cells 204,
(e.g., Ai, B,,
C,, ...) controlled or serviced by base station 202, are complementary so that
interference between cell A, and cells B, and C, is mitigated, interference
between cell
B, and cells A, and C, is mitigated, and/or interference between cell C, and
cells A, and
B, is similarly mitigated. Such mitigation or obviation of cell interference
between cells
controlled or serviced by the same base station can be brought into effect by
scheduler
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
17
component 308 taking into account the respective data flows and/or quality of
service
(QoS) targets associated with such data flows and allocating resources in such
a manner
that avoids conflicts between the cells controlled or serviced by the same
base station.
For example, scheduler 308 can direct cell Ai to utilize a first frequency to
broadcast its
data flow, can direct cell Bi to employ a second frequency to broadcast its
data flow,
and direct cell Ci to use a third frequency to broadcast its data flows so
that each of the
respective data flows in cells Ai, B1, and Ci can satisfy their quality of
service (QoS)
targets.
[0053] Moreover, scheduler component 308 can also effectuate resource
allocations that
can mitigate or obviate cell interference between cells controlled or serviced
by
different but proximate or neighboring base stations (e.g., first base station
302 and
second base station 306). In this instance, scheduler component 308 in concert
with
inter cell interference coordination component 310 can take measures to
facilitate
interference avoidance based at least in part on information supplied/received
from one
or more proximate base stations via X2 channel 304. For example, scheduler
component 308, based at least in part on the respective data flows and/or
quality of
service (QoS) criteria associated with the cells controlled or serviced by the
base station
(e.g., first base station 302) in which scheduler component 308 is included
and/or
information supplied/received from the one or more proximate base stations via
the X2
channel 304, can adopt resource allocation strategies that facilitates
interference
avoidance with cells controlled or serviced by neighboring base stations
(e.g., second
base station 306). For instance, scheduler component 308 can ascertain that
data flows
associated with cell Ci controlled by first base station 302 are of a lower
priority than
data flows associated with cell Az controlled by second base station 306. In
recognition
of the fact that the data flows associated with cell Ci are of a relatively
lower priority
than those being broadcast in cell Az, scheduler component 308 can modify the
resource
allocations in cell Ci to allow cell Az to broadcast its higher priority
traffic. One
illustrative resource allocation scheme that can be utilized by scheduler
component 308
to facilitate the foregoing can be to ensure that broadcast of the lower
priority flows in
cell Ci is carried out at a non interfering frequency with regard to the
frequency at
which cell Az is broadcasting its higher priority traffic. A further
illustrative resource
allocation scheme that can be implemented by scheduler component 308 to ensure
that
broadcast of the lower priority flows in cell Ci controlled or serviced by
first base
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
18
station 302 does not interfere with the higher priority flows in cell Az
serviced or
controlled by second base station 306, is for scheduler component 308 to
direct cell Ci
to broadcast its lower priority data flows at a first power level while the
higher priority
flows in cell Az controlled or serviced by second base station 306 are being
broadcast at
a second power level, wherein the first power level and the second power level
are non
interfering with one another.
[0054] As will be appreciated by those moderately conversant in this field of
endeavor,
second base station 306 can also include a scheduler component that can be
configured
and operable in a manner as that expounded upon in connection with scheduler
component 308, and as such can provide reciprocal functionalities and/or
facilities to
those elucidated above. Thus, the scheduler component included in second base
station
306 can in conjunction with an inter cell interference coordination component
also
included with second base station 306 can implement resource allocation
schemes that
are consonant with the resource allocation schemes implemented by scheduler
component 308 included in first base station 302. For example, when scheduler
component 308 included in first base station 302 implements a resource
allocation for
low priority data flows being broadcast by cell C1, in recognition that data
flows being
broadcast by cell Az have a relatively higher priority, the scheduler
component included
in second base station 306 can direct cell Az to broadcast its higher priority
data flows
using a different resource allocation so as to avoid interference with the
broadcast of the
lower priority data flows being broadcast by cell Ci. For instance, the
scheduler
component associated with second base station 306 can direct cell Az to
broadcast its
higher data flows at a first power level on the understanding (e.g.,
communicated by
first base station 302 to second base station 306 via X2 channel 304) that
scheduler 308
included with first base station 302 will direct cell Ci to broadcast its
lower priority data
flows at a second power level. As will be apparent to those reasonably
cognizant in this
field of endeavor, the first power level utilized by cell Az to broadcast its
higher priority
data flows can be selected by the scheduler component associated with second
base
station 306 so that the selected first power level does not interfere with
broadcast of the
lower priority data flow by cell Ci at the second power level selected by
scheduler
component 308 associated with first base station 302.
[0055] As will be appreciated by those of reasonable cognition in this field,
scheduler
component 308 in concert with, or based at least in part on, feedback or feed
forward
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
19
from inter cell interference coordination component 310 can selectively
utilize resource
blocks or power levels in preference to other resource blocks or power levels
in order to
obviate or mitigate cross-cell interference wherein the cross-cell
interference is
attributable to two or more cells controlled or serviced by different
proximately situated
base stations such as first base station 302 and second base station 306.
Moreover, as
will be further appreciated scheduler component 308 can effectuate pattern
coordination
whereon each scheduler component included in participating base stations can
dynamically and over time gravitate to a mutually beneficial agreement as how
best to
broadcast their highest priority congested data flows in cells controlled by a
first base
station and subject to interference from cells controlled or serviced by a
second
neighboring base station. By ensuring that there is mutual collaboration
between
neighboring base stations regarding the broadcast of congested data flows in
cells
subject to interference from other cells controlled or serviced by other
neighboring base
stations, efficiency and throughput gains can be accrued.
[0056] Further, included in first base station 302 can be inter cell
interference
coordination component 310 that can continuously and/or periodically monitor
the
activities partaken by scheduling component 308 regarding the resource
allocation mix
utilized by scheduling component 308 in servicing data flows in the various
cells
controlled by first base station 302 in order for data flows to satisfy their
respective
quality of service (QoS) targets. Inter cell interference coordination
component 310 can
also monitor whether or not quality of service (QoS) targets for data flows
within cells
controlled or serviced by first base station 302 are being met, and from this
information
can determine or ascertain which of the cells are failing to satisfy their
quality of service
(QoS) targets and therefore can be considered congested. Moreover, inter cell
interference coordination component 310 can also ascertain from these
congested cells
which data flow has the highest priority.
[0057] Additionally, inter cell interference coordination component 310 can
also
provide a conciliation aspect wherein input received or solicited from
scheduler
component 308 and information acquired or obtained (e.g., via X2 channel 304)
from a
plurality of neighboring base stations can be employed to provide indication
to
scheduler component 308 of the respective priorities and/or congestion
experienced by
data flows in cells controlled or serviced by the neighboring base stations.
Scheduler
component 308 can utilize such information or input to modify the resource
allocations
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
in cells controlled by the base station in which scheduler component 308 is
included,
where there are conflicts with cells controlled or serviced by one or more
neighboring
base station. For example, if it is ascertained from information received via
X2 channel
304 that cell Az controlled or serviced by second base station 306 is
attempting to
broadcast a high priority data flow but is currently subject to congestion
(e.g., the
quality of service (QoS) targets for the data flow in cell Az are consistently
not being
met), and it is further determined that the current resource allocations
provided by
scheduler component 308 to cell Ci controlled or serviced by first base
station 302 in
broadcasting its lower priority data flow are inimical to the broadcast of the
high
priority data flow in cell Az, then inter cell interference coordination
component 310
can direct scheduler component 308 to adjust its resource allocation mix for
cell Ci so
that the higher priority data flow in cell Az controlled or serviced by second
base station
306 is able to more closely adhere to it associated quality of service (QoS)
targets. It
should be noted that when the foregoing is implemented both the high priority
data flow
being broadcast from cell Az and the relatively lower priority data flow being
broadcast
from cell Ci can see benefit in that resource allocations implemented by each
of the
scheduler components included in first base station 302 and second base
station 306
respectively can be complementary to one another. For instance, the scheduler
component associated with second base station 306 can selectively choose to
broadcast
the higher priority data flow in cell Az at a first power level, whereas
scheduler
component 308 included with first base station 302 can selectively choose to
broadcast
the lower priority data flow in cell Ci at a first frequency. In this manner,
through
mutual collaboration between first base station 302 and second base station
306 and use
of corresponding inter cell interference coordination components, interference
that was
previously experienced by data flows in cell Az and cell Ci can be avoided or
at the
very least mitigated.
[0058] Furthermore, inter cell interference coordination component 310 can
also
include a dispatch aspect that can construct an inter cell interference
coordination
indicator that can subsequently be dispatched or disseminated over X2 channel
304 to
one or more neighboring base stations. The inter cell interference
coordination indicator
can range from a single bit to a plurality of bits. Nevertheless, typically
the number of
bits included in the inter cell interference coordination indicator
constructed by inter cell
interference coordination component 310 is sufficient to convey one priority
level (e.g.,
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
21
the number of bits necessary to convey at least one 3GPP priority level), but
as will be
appreciated the claimed subject matter is not necessarily so limited.
Moreover, the inter
cell interference coordination indicator can be constructed by inter cell
interference
coordination component 310 at any time when there is a change in the highest
priority
level of a congested data flow or when the per-physical resource block bit
pattern is
adjusted. Additionally, inter cell interference coordination indicator
construction can be
triggered based at least in part on other considerations not necessarily tied
to quality of
service (QoS) considerations.
[0059] As will be appreciated by those moderately cognizant in this field of
endeavor,
second base station 306 can also be provisioned with a similar scheduler
component 308
and inter cell interference coordination component 310 which can operate in
manners
similar to those elucidated above in connection with first base station 302.
Moreover, it
should further be noted, without limitation or loss of generality, that the
neighbor
relationship between first base station 302 and second base station 306 is
typically
defined by the vendor specific implementation of the X2 channel hookups
between the
base stations. Thus, for example, first base station 302 and second base
station 306 can
be a few meters from one another so much so that the cells (and the data flows
passing
through such cells) controlled or serviced by each of first base station 302
and second
base station 306 can be in common opposition to one another (e.g., there is
constant
and/or persistent interference between cells controlled by first base station
302 and
second base station 306), or first base station 302 and second base station
306 can be
many kilometers apart such that data flows passing through cells controlled or
serviced
by first base station 302 and second base station 306 can infrequently, if
ever, come into
direct conflict with one another. Nevertheless, as will be appreciated by
those of
moderate proficiency in this field of endeavor, interference coordination
and/or
interference avoidance is typically focused on more proximate neighbors rather
than far
neighbors, and one or more network measurements can be employed to
differentiate
between far neighbors and more proximate and/or interfering neighbors.
[0060] Fig. 4 provides a more detailed depiction 400 of first base station
302, and more
particularly a more detailed depiction of inter cell interference coordination
component
310. As illustrated, inter cell interference component 310 can include monitor
component 402 that can continuously and/or periodically monitor the scheduling
activities of scheduler component 308 to determine or ascertain the resource
allocations
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
22
made by scheduler component 308 with respect to cells controlled or serviced
by first
base station 302 and whether or not quality of service (QoS) targets are being
met in
relation to data flows passing through those cells associated with first base
station 302.
From this information, monitor component 402 can ascertain whether or not data
flows
passing through cells controlled or serviced by first base station 302 are
satisfying their
respective quality of service (QoS) targets. Where monitor component 402
establishes
that one or more data flows traversing through one or more cells are failing
to satisfy
their quality of service (QoS) targets, monitor component 402 can consider
such a
finding as indication that the data flows in these cells are currently subject
to
congestion. Moreover, monitor component 402 can also ascertain from each of
these
congested cells the highest priority data flow within the congested cell that
is subject to
such congestion.
[0061] Inter cell interference coordination component 310 can also include
conciliation
component 404 that can utilize information provided by or solicited from
monitor
component 402, scheduler component 308, and/or information acquired or
obtained via
X2 channel 304 from one or more neighboring base stations (e.g., second base
station
306) to provide feedback or feed forward to scheduler component 308 of the
respective
priorities and/or congestion being experience by data flows in cells
associated with the
one or more neighboring base stations. The information supplied by
conciliation
component 404 to scheduler component 308 can be utilized by scheduler
component
308 to modify resource allocations in cells controlled or serviced by the base
station
(e.g., first base station 302) in which scheduler component 308 is situated so
that
interference between conflicting cells (e.g., cells controlled or serviced by
first base
station 302 and second base station 306) are more complementary with one
another.
For instance, based at least in part on information received from conciliation
component
404, scheduler component 308 can effect resource allocations that do not
conflict with
resource allocations that can have been effected by a scheduler component
associated
with a disparate neighboring base station controlling cells that are in
conflict with cells
controlled or serviced by first base station 302.
[0062] Additionally, inter cell interference coordination component 310 can
also
include dispatch component 406 that can assemble an inter cell interference
coordination indicator that can be sent via X2 channel 304 to neighboring base
stations.
Dispatch component 406 can assemble or construct the inter cell interference
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
23
coordination indicator as a series of bits sufficient to indicate at least one
priority level
(e.g., the priority level of the highest priority data flow subject to
congestion in a
particular cell controlled or serviced by first base station 302). Dispatch
component 406
can undertake assembly and dispatch of the inter cell interference
coordination indicator
when there is a change in the highest priority level of a congested data flow,
or when the
per-physical block bit pattern is adjusted, for example. Further, dispatch
component
406 can also undertake construction and dissemination of inter cell
interference
coordination indicators based on considerations other than considerations
related to
quality of service (QoS) criteria. Once dispatch component 406 has constructed
the
inter cell interference coordination indicator, it can send the inter cell
interference
coordination indicator via the X2 channel to neighboring base stations,
wherein the inter
cell interference coordination indicator can be utilized by similarly
configured scheduler
components and/or inter cell interference coordination components associated
or
included with the neighboring base stations.
[0063] Referring to Figs. 5-7, methodologies relating to effectuating quality
of service
(QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across a plurality of base
stations in a wireless
communication environment are illustrated. While, for purposes of simplicity
of
explanation, the methodologies are shown and described as a series of acts, it
is to be
understood and appreciated that the methodologies are not limited by the order
of acts,
as some acts can, in accordance with one or more embodiments, occur in
different
orders and/or concurrently with other acts from that shown and described
herein. For
example, those skilled in the art will understand and appreciate that a
methodology
could alternatively be represented as a series of interrelated states or
events, such as in a
state diagram. Moreover, not all illustrated acts can be required to implement
a
methodology in accordance with one or more embodiments.
[0064] With reference to Fig. 5, illustrated therein is a methodology 500 that
effectuates
quality of service (QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across a
plurality of base
stations in accordance with an aspect of the claimed subject matter.
Methodology 500
can commence at 502 where current resource allocations to one or more cells
controlled
by a base station can be obtained wherein the resource allocations have been
made
based at least in part on quality of service (QoS) metrics associated with
data flows
traversing through the one or more cells controlled by the base station. At
504
methodology 500 can ascertain whether current and/or prospective quality of
service
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
24
(QoS) requirements/targets are being, or can be, met by the current resource
allocations.
Where at 504 if it is observed that quality of service (QoS)
requirements/targets for data
flows passing through the one or more cells is not being met a state of
congestion can be
noted for those data flows and further an ordering can be carried out so that
the highest
priority data flow can be identified. At 506 the current and prospective
quality of
service (QoS) targets/requirements, resource allocations, and/or highest
identified
priority data flow under congestion can be dispatched to neighboring base
stations (e.g.,
via an X2 channel) as a bit or series of bits in an inter cell interference
coordination
indicator.
[0065] Fig. 6 illustrates a further methodology 600 that facilitates and/or
effectuates
quality of service (QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across a
plurality of base
stations in accordance with an aspect of the claimed subject matter.
Methodology 600
can commence at 602 where quality of service (QoS) metrics, resource
allocations, and
other pertinent information related to the highest identified priority data
flow that is in a
state of congestion in a particular cell controlled by a neighboring base
station can be
received. At 604 the information received at 602 can be utilized (e.g.,
directed to a
scheduling aspect/component) to adjust the resource allocation mix to one or
more cells
controlled or serviced by the receiving base station, and in particular, the
resource
allocation mix can be adjusted so as to ensure that the highest priority data
flow under
congestion in a cell associated with or controlled by a neighboring base is
able to satisfy
its quality of service (QoS) target. At 606 the current resource allocation
mix, the
quality of service (QoS) metrics, and/or highest identified priority data flow
under
congestion in one or more cells controlled or serviced by the receiving base
station can
be disseminated to neighboring base stations as a bit, or series of bits, in
an inter cell
interference coordination indicator.
[0066] Fig. 7 illustrates another methodology 700 that effectuates quality of
service
(QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across a plurality of base
stations in
accordance with an aspect of the claimed subject matter. Methodology 700 can
commence at 702 where quality of service (QoS) metrics, resource allocations,
and
information pertaining to the highest identified priority flow that is in a
state of
congestion in a particular cell controlled or serviced by a neighboring base
station can
be received. It should be noted without limitation or loss of generality, that
in the
information received at 702 can be received by way of an inter cell
interference
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
coordination indicator (e.g., as a bit or series of bits sufficient to convey
at least the
highest priority data flow that is in a state of congestion). At 704 quality
of service
(QoS) metrics and resource allocations that have been made in furtherance
meeting
quality of service (QoS) targets for particular data flows in one or more
cells controlled
or serviced by the receiving base station can be obtained from the scheduler.
At 706 the
quality of service (QoS) metrics, resource allocations, and information
relating to the
highest identified priority flow that is in a state of congestion in a
particular cell
controlled or serviced by neighboring base stations, as well as resource
allocations,
quality of service (QoS) metrics, and information relating to the highest
identified
priority flow that is in a state of congestion in cells controlled or serviced
by the
receiving base station can be utilized to direct a scheduler associated with
the receiving
base station to adjust the current resource allocation mix so that at least
one of the
highest identified priority data flow that is in a state of congestion in
cells controlled or
serviced by the receiving base station or the highest identified priority data
flow that is
in a state of congestion in cells controlled or serviced by one or more of the
neighboring
base stations is able to satisfy its quality of service targets. At 708 the re-
adjusted
resource allocation mix effectuated by the scheduler associated with the
receiving base
station, the highest identified priority data flow that is currently in a
state of congestion
in cells controlled by the receiving base station, and/or the quality of
service (QoS)
metrics associated with the various data flows traversing through cells
controlled or
serviced by the receiving base station can be disseminated, via a X2
channel/interface
couplet, to neighboring base stations as a inter cell interference
coordination indicator
(e.g., as a bit or series of bits that at least conveys to the neighboring
base station the
highest priority data flow that is in a state of congestion in the receiving
base station -
the base station on which methodology 700 is running).
[0067] It will be appreciated that, in accordance with one or more aspects
described
herein, inferences can be made regarding selecting or choosing appropriate
resource
allocation mixes in light of congested data flows traversing through cells
controlled by a
local base station and/or a proximate or neighboring remote base station. As
used
herein, the term to "infer" or "inference" refers generally to the process of
reasoning
about or inferring states of the system, environment, and/or user from a set
of
observations as captured via events and/or data. Inference can be employed to
identify a
specific context or action, or can generate a probability distribution over
states, for
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
26
example. The inference can be probabilistic-that is, the computation of a
probability
distribution over states of interest based on a consideration of data and
events.
Inference can also refer to techniques employed for composing higher-level
events from
a set of events and/or data. Such inference results in the construction of new
events or
actions from a set of observed events and/or stored event data, whether or not
the events
are correlated in close temporal proximity, and whether the events and data
come from
one or several event and data sources.
[0068] Fig. 8 is an illustration of a system 800 that facilitates transmitting
circuit
switched voice over packet switched networks. System 800 comprises a base
station
302 (e.g., access point, ...) with a receiver 808 that receives signal(s) from
one or more
access terminals 802 through a plurality of receive antennas 804, and a
transmitter 820
that transmits to the one or more access terminals 802 through a transmit
antenna 806.
Receiver 808 can receive information from receive antennas 804 and is
operatively
associated with a demodulator 810 that demodulates received information.
Demodulated symbols are analyzed by a processor 812 dedicated to analyzing
information received by receiver 808 and/or generating information for
transmission by
a transmitter 820, a processor that controls one or more components of base
station 302,
and/or which is coupled to a memory 814 that stores data to be transmitted to
or
received from access terminal(s) 802 (or a disparate base station (not shown))
and/or
any other suitable information related to performing the various actions and
functions
set forth herein. Processor 812 is further coupled to a inter cell
interference
coordination component 816 that facilitate transmission of inter cell
interference
coordination indicators over packet switched networks. Further, inter cell
interference
coordination component 816 can provide information to be transmitted to a
modulator
818. Modulator 818 can multiplex a frame for transmission by a transmitter 820
through antennas 806 to access terminal(s) 802. Although depicted as being
separate
from the processor 812, it is to be appreciated that inter cell interference
coordination
component 816 and/or modulator 818 can be part of processor 812 or a number of
processors (not shown).
[0069] Fig. 9 shows an example wireless communication system 900. The wireless
communication system 900 depicts one base station 910 and one access terminal
950 for
sake of brevity. However, it is to be appreciated that system 900 can include
more than
one base station and/or more than one access terminal, wherein additional base
stations
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
27
and/or access terminals can be substantially similar or different from example
base
station 910 and access terminal 950 described below. In addition, it is to be
appreciated
that base station 910 and/or access terminal 950 can employ the systems (Figs.
1-4)
and/or methods (Figs. 5-7) described herein to facilitate wireless
communication there
between.
[0070] At base station 910, traffic data for a number of data streams is
provided from a
data source 912 to a transmit (TX) data processor 914. According to an
example, each
data stream can be transmitted over a respective antenna. TX data processor
914
formats, codes, and interleaves the traffic data stream based on a particular
coding
scheme selected for that data stream to provide coded data.
[0071] The coded data for each data stream can be multiplexed with pilot data
using
orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) techniques. Additionally or
alternatively, the pilot symbols can be frequency division multiplexed (FDM),
time
division multiplexed (TDM), or code division multiplexed (CDM). The pilot data
is
typically a known data pattern that is processed in a known manner and can be
used at
access terminal 950 to estimate channel response. The multiplexed pilot and
coded data
for each data stream can be modulated (e.g., symbol mapped) based on a
particular
modulation scheme (e.g., binary phase-shift keying (BPSK), quadrature phase-
shift
keying (QPSK), M-phase-shift keying (M-PSK), M-quadrature amplitude modulation
(M-QAM), etc.) selected for that data stream to provide modulation symbols.
The data
rate, coding, and modulation for each data stream can be determined by
instructions
performed or provided by processor 930.
[0072] The modulation symbols for the data streams can be provided to a TX
MIMO
processor 920, which can further process the modulation symbols (e.g., for
OFDM).
TX MIMO processor 920 then provides NT modulation symbol streams to NT
transmitters (TMTR) 922a through 922t. In various embodiments, TX MIMO
processor
920 applies beamforming weights to the symbols of the data streams and to the
antenna
from which the symbol is being transmitted.
[0073] Each transmitter 922 receives and processes a respective symbol stream
to
provide one or more analog signals, and further conditions (e.g., amplifies,
filters, and
upconverts) the analog signals to provide a modulated signal suitable for
transmission
over the MIMO channel. Further, NT modulated signals from transmitters 922a
through
922t are transmitted from NT antennas 924a through 924t, respectively.
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
28
[0074] At access terminal 950, the transmitted modulated signals are received
by NR
antennas 952a through 952r and the received signal from each antenna 952 is
provided
to a respective receiver (RCVR) 954a through 954r. Each receiver 954
conditions (e.g.,
filters, amplifies, and downconverts) a respective signal, digitizes the
conditioned signal
to provide samples, and further processes the samples to provide a
corresponding
"received" symbol stream.
[0075] An RX data processor 960 can receive and process the NR received symbol
streams from NR receivers 954 based on a particular receiver processing
technique to
provide NT "detected" symbol streams. RX data processor 960 can demodulate,
deinterleave, and decode each detected symbol stream to recover the traffic
data for the
data stream. The processing by RX data processor 960 is complementary to that
performed by TX MIMO processor 920 and TX data processor 914 at base station
910.
[0076] A processor 970 can periodically determine which available technology
to
utilize as discussed above. Further, processor 970 can formulate a reverse
link message
comprising a matrix index portion and a rank value portion.
[0077] The reverse link message can comprise various types of information
regarding
the communication link and/or the received data stream. The reverse link
message can
be processed by a TX data processor 938, which also receives traffic data for
a number
of data streams from a data source 936, modulated by a modulator 980,
conditioned by
transmitters 954a through 954r, and transmitted back to base station 910.
[0078] At base station 910, the modulated signals from access terminal 950 are
received
by antennas 924, conditioned by receivers 922, demodulated by a demodulator
940, and
processed by a RX data processor 942 to extract the reverse link message
transmitted by
access terminal 950. Further, processor 930 can process the extracted message
to
determine which precoding matrix to use for determining the beamforming
weights.
[0079] Processors 930 and 970 can direct (e.g., control, coordinate, manage,
etc.)
operation at base station 910 and access terminal 950, respectively.
Respective
processors 930 and 970 can be associated with memory 932 and 972 that store
program
codes and data. Processors 930 and 970 can also perform computations to derive
frequency and impulse response estimates for the uplink and downlink,
respectively.
[0080] In an aspect, logical channels are classified into Control Channels and
Traffic
Channels. Logical Control Channels can include a Broadcast Control Channel
(BCCH),
which is a DL channel for broadcasting system control information. Further,
Logical
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
29
Control Channels can include a Paging Control Channel (PCCH), which is a DL
channel
that transfers paging information. Moreover, the Logical Control Channels can
comprise a Multicast Control Channel (MCCH), which is a Point-to-multipoint DL
channel used for transmitting Multimedia Broadcast and Multicast Service
(MBMS)
scheduling and control information for one or several MTCHs. Generally, after
establishing a Radio Resource Control (RRC) connection, this channel is only
used by
UEs that receive MBMS (e.g., old MCCH+MSCH). Additionally, the Logical Control
Channels can include a Dedicated Control Channel (DCCH), which is a Point-to-
point
bi-directional channel that transmits dedicated control information and can be
used by
UEs having a RRC connection. In an aspect, the Logical Traffic Channels can
comprise
a Dedicated Traffic Channel (DTCH), which is a Point-to-point bi-directional
channel
dedicated to one UE for the transfer of user information. Also, the Logical
Traffic
Channels can include a Multicast Traffic Channel (MTCH) for Point-to-
multipoint DL
channel for transmitting traffic data.
[0081] In an aspect, Transport Channels are classified into DL and UL. DL
Transport
Channels comprise a Broadcast Channel (BCH), a Downlink Shared Data Channel
(DL-
SDCH) and a Paging Channel (PCH). The PCH can support UE power saving (e.g.,
Discontinuous Reception (DRX) cycle can be indicated by the network to the UE,
...)
by being broadcasted over an entire cell and being mapped to Physical layer
(PHY)
resources that can be used for other control/traffic channels. The UL
Transport
Channels can comprise a Random Access Channel (RACH), a Request Channel
(REQCH), a Uplink Shared Data Channel (UL-SDCH) and a plurality of PHY
channels.
[0082] The PHY channels can include a set of DL channels and UL channels. For
example, the DL PHY channels can include: Common Pilot Channel (CPICH);
Synchronization Channel (SCH); Common Control Channel (CCCH); Shared DL
Control Channel (SDCCH); Multicast Control Channel (MCCH); Shared UL
Assignment Channel (SUACH); Acknowledgement Channel (ACKCH); DL Physical
Shared Data Channel (DL-PSDCH); UL Power Control Channel (UPCCH); Paging
Indicator Channel (PICH); and/or Load Indicator Channel (LICH). By way of
further
illustration, the UL PHY Channels can include: Physical Random Access Channel
(PRACH); Channel Quality Indicator Channel (CQICH); Acknowledgement Channel
(ACKCH); Antenna Subset Indicator Channel (ASICH); Shared Request Channel
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
(SREQCH); UL Physical Shared Data Channel (UL-PSDCH); and/or Broadband Pilot
Channel (BPICH).
[0083] It is to be understood that the embodiments described herein can be
implemented
in hardware, software, firmware, middleware, microcode, or any combination
thereof.
For a hardware implementation, the processing units can be implemented within
one or
more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), digital signal
processors (DSPs),
digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLD5),
field
programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, controllers, micro-controllers,
microprocessors, other electronic units designed to perform the functions
described
herein, or a combination thereof.
[0084] When the embodiments are implemented in software, firmware, middleware
or
microcode, program code or code segments, they can be stored in a machine-
readable
medium, such as a storage component. A code segment can represent a procedure,
a
function, a subprogram, a program, a routine, a subroutine, a module, a
software
package, a class, or any combination of instructions, data structures, or
program
statements. A code segment can be coupled to another code segment or a
hardware
circuit by passing and/or receiving information, data, arguments, parameters,
or memory
contents. Information, arguments, parameters, data, etc. can be passed,
forwarded, or
transmitted using any suitable means including memory sharing, message
passing, token
passing, network transmission, etc.
[0085] For a software implementation, the techniques described herein can be
implemented with modules (e.g., procedures, functions, and so on) that perform
the
functions described herein. The software codes can be stored in memory units
and
executed by processors. The memory unit can be implemented within the
processor or
external to the processor, in which case it can be communicatively coupled to
the
processor via various means as is known in the art.
[0086] With reference to Fig. 10, illustrated is a system 1000 that
effectuates quality of
service (QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across a plurality of base
stations in a
wireless communication environment. For example, system 1000 can reside at
least
partially within a base station. It is to be appreciated that system 1000 is
represented as
including functional blocks, which can be functional blocks that represent
functions
implemented by a processor, software, or combination thereof (e.g., firmware).
System
1000 includes a logical grouping 1002 of electrical components that can act in
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
31
conjunction. For instance, logical grouping 1002 can include an electrical
component
for obtaining or soliciting current scheduling resource allocations that have
been made
based at least in part on quality of service (QoS) metrics associated with
data flows
traversing through associated cells 1004. Further, logical grouping 1002 can
include an
electrical component for ascertaining whether current and/or prospective
quality of
service (QoS) targets within the associated cells are being satisfied or met
1006.
Moreover, logical grouping 1002 can comprise an electrical component for
dispatching
current and prospective quality of service (QoS) requirements, resource
allocations, and
the highest identified congested priority data flow to neighboring base
stations via an
inter cell interference coordination indicator 1008. For example, the
indication can be
transferred over a control channel (e.g., Physical Downlink Control Channel
(PDCCH),
X2 channel, ...). Additionally, system 1000 can include a memory 1010 that
retains
instructions for executing functions associated with electrical components
1004, 1006,
and 1008. While shown as being external to memory 1010, it is to be understood
that
one or more of electrical components 1004, 1006, and 1008 can exist within
memory
1010.
[0087] With reference to Fig. 11, illustrated is a system 1100 that
effectuates quality of
service (QoS) differentiation and/or prioritization across a plurality of base
stations in a
wireless communication environment. For example, system 1100 can reside at
least
partially within a base station. It is to be appreciated that system 1100 is
represented as
including functional blocks, which can be functional blocks that represent
functions
implemented by a processor, software, or combination thereof (e.g., firmware).
System
1100 includes a logical grouping 1102 of electrical components that can act in
conjunction. For instance, logical grouping 1102 can include an electrical
component
for receiving QoS metrics, resource allocations, and/or information related to
the highest
identified priority data flows that are in a state of congestion in a cell
controlled by a
neighboring base station 1104. Further, logical grouping 1102 can include an
electrical
component for adjusting resource allocations to one or more cells controlled
by the local
or receiving base station 1106. Moreover, logical grouping 1102 can comprise
an
electrical component for disseminating current resource allocation mix, the
quality of
service (QoS) metrics, and/or the highest identified congested data flow
within the
receiving or local base station to neighboring base stations via an inter cell
interference
coordination indicator 1108. For example, the indication can be transferred
over a
CA 02721445 2010-10-14
WO 2009/134921 PCT/US2009/042159
32
control channel (e.g., Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH), X2 channel,
...).
Additionally, system 1100 can include a memory 1110 that retains instructions
for
executing functions associated with electrical components 1104, 1106, and
1108. While
shown as being external to memory 1110, it is to be understood that one or
more of
electrical components 1104, 1106, and 1108 can exist within memory 1110.
[0088] What has been described above includes examples of one or more
embodiments.
It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of
components
or methodologies for purposes of describing the aforementioned embodiments,
but one
of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and
permutations of various embodiments are possible. Accordingly, the described
embodiments are intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and
variations
that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to
the extent
that the term "includes" is used in either the detailed description or the
claims, such
term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term "comprising"
as
"comprising" is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
