Language selection

Search

Patent 2731438 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2731438
(54) English Title: ANTI-PANCREATIC CANCER ANTIBODIES
(54) French Title: ANTICORPS ANTI-CANCER PANCREATIQUE
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C07K 16/28 (2006.01)
  • A61K 39/395 (2006.01)
  • A61K 49/00 (2006.01)
  • A61K 51/10 (2006.01)
  • A61P 35/00 (2006.01)
  • C07K 16/18 (2006.01)
  • C07K 16/46 (2006.01)
  • C07K 19/00 (2006.01)
  • G01N 33/574 (2006.01)
  • A61K 47/48 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • GOLDENBERG, DAVID M. (United States of America)
  • HANSEN, HANS J. (United States of America)
  • CHANG, CHIEN-HSING (United States of America)
  • GOLD, DAVID V. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • IMMUNOMEDICS, INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • IMMUNOMEDICS, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2017-07-11
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2009-08-07
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2010-02-11
Examination requested: 2014-07-08
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2009/053192
(87) International Publication Number: WO2010/017500
(85) National Entry: 2011-01-19

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
61/087,463 United States of America 2008-08-08
12/343,655 United States of America 2008-12-24
61/144,227 United States of America 2009-01-13
12/418,877 United States of America 2009-04-06

Abstracts

English Abstract





Described herein are compositions and methods of use of anti-pancreatic cancer
antibodies or fragments thereof,
such as murine, chimeric, humanized or human PAM4 antibodies. The subject
antibodies show a number of novel and useful therapeutic
characteristics, such as binding with high specificity to pancreatic and other
cancers, but not to normal or benign pancreatic
tissues and binding to a high percentage of early stage pancreatic cancers. In
preferred embodiments, the antibodies bind to pancreatic
cancer mucins. The antibodies and fragments are of use for the detection,
diagnosis and/or treatment of cancer, such as
pancreatic cancer. The antibodies, such as PAM4 antibodies, bind to a PAM4
antigen that shows unique cell and tissue distributions
compared with other known antibodies such as CA 19.9, DUPAN2, SPAN1, Nd2,
B72.3, and Lea a and Le(y) antibodies that
bind to the Lewis antigens.


French Abstract

La présente invention concerne des compositions et des procédés dutilisation danticorps anti-cancer pancréatique ou des fragments de ceux-ci, tels que des anticorps PAM4 murins, chimères, humanisés ou humains. Les présents anticorps présentent plusieurs caractéristiques thérapeutiques nouvelles et utiles telles que la liaison avec une spécificité élevée au cancer pancréatique et à dautres cancers, mais pas aux tissus pancréatiques normaux ou bénins et la liaison à un pourcentage élevé de cancers pancréatiques à un stade précoce. Dans des modes de réalisation préférés, les anticorps se lient à des mucines de cancer pancréatique. Les anticorps et fragments sont utiles pour la détection, le diagnostic et/ou le traitement du cancer, tel que le cancer pancréatique. Les anticorps tels que les anticorps PAM4, se lient à un antigène PAM4 qui présente des distributions cellulaire et tissulaire uniques par rapport à dautres anticorps connus tels que les anticorps CA19.9, DUPAN2, SPAN1, Nd2, B72.3 et Leaª et Le(y) qui se lient à des antigènes Lewis.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CLAIMS:

1. An antibody construct comprising at least one anti-pancreatic cancer
antibody
or antigen-binding fragment thereof that binds to pancreatic cancer cells and
does not bind to
normal pancreatic tissue or pancreatitis or benign pancreatic tissue, wherein
the anti-
pancreatic cancer antibody or fragment thereof binds to a linear peptide
consisting of the
amino acid sequence WTWNITKAYPLP (SEQ ID NO:29) or to a cyclic peptide
consisting of
the amino acid sequence ACPEWWGTTC (SEQ ID NO:30).
2. The antibody construct of claim 1, wherein the anti-pancreatic cancer
antibody
or fragment thereof binds to PanIN-1A, PanIN-1B, PanIN-2, invasive pancreatic
adenocarcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma, mucinous cyst neoplasms (MCN),
intrapancreatic
mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia.
3. An antibody construct comprising at least one anti-pancreatic cancer
antibody
or antigen-binding fragment thereof that binds to pancreatic cancer cells and
does not bind to
normal pancreatic tissue or pancreatitis or benign pancreatic tissue, wherein
the anti-
pancreatic cancer antibody or fragment thereof binds to a linear peptide
consisting of the
amino acid sequence WTWNITKAYPLP (SEQ ID NO:29) or to a cyclic peptide
consisting of
the amino acid sequence ACPEWWGTTC (SEQ ID NO:30), wherein the construct is a
trimeric DNL (dock and lock) construct comprising two copies of a PAM4
antibody fragment
moiety attached to one copy of a second antibody fragment moiety.
4. The antibody construct of claim 3, wherein each PAM4 antibody fragment
moiety comprises a PAM4 Fab fragment attached to a DDD2 peptide represented by
SEQ ID
NO:34 and the second antibody fragment moiety comprises a Fab fragment
attached to an
AD2 peptide represented by SEQ ID NO:36 and a dimer of the DDD2 peptide binds
to the
AD2 peptide to form the trimeric construct.
5. The antibody construct of claim 4, wherein the PAM4 antibody fragment is
an
hPAM4 Fab fragment and the second antibody fragment binds to a tumor
associated antigen
(TAA) or a hapten.

130


6. The antibody construct of claim 1, wherein the anti-pancreatic cancer
antibody
or fragment thereof binds to a PAM4 antigen.
7. The antibody construct of claim 5, wherein the hapten is histamine
succinyl
glycyl.
8. The antibody construct of claim 5, wherein the second antibody binds to
a
TAA selected from the group consisting of a Lewis antigen, Le(y),
carcinoembryonic antigen
(CEACAM5), CEACAM6, colon-specific antigen-p (CSAp), MUC-1, MUC-2, MUC-3,
MUC-4, MUC-5ac, MUC-16, MUC-17, HLA-DR, CD40, CD74, CD-80, CD138, HER2/neu,
EGFR, EGP-1, EGP-2, an angiogenesis factor, VEGF, P1GF, insulin-like growth
factor,
carbonic anhydrase IX, tenascin, platelet-derived growth factor, IL-6, an
oncogene product,
bcl-2, Kras, p53, cMET and a tumor necrosis factor.
9. The antibody construct of claim 5, wherein the second antibody is
selected
from the group consisting of hA20, hA19, hIMMU31, hLL1, hLL2, hMu-9, hL243,
hMN-14,
hRS7, hMN-3, hRl, CA19.9, DUPAN2, SPAN1, Nd2, B72.3 and CC49.
10. The antibody construct of any one of claims 1, 2 and 6, wherein the
anti-
pancreatic cancer antibody or fragment thereof is murine, chimeric, humanized
or human.
11. The antibody construct of claim 3 or 4, wherein the PAM4 antibody
fragment
moiety comprises a murine, chimeric, humanized or human PAM4 antibody
fragment.
12. The antibody construct of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the anti-
pancreatic cancer antibody or antigen- binding fragment thereof is conjugated
to at least one
therapeutic agent.
13. The antibody construct of claim 12, wherein the therapeutic agent is
selected
from the group consisting of a radionuclide, an immunomodulator, a hormone, a
hormone
antagonist, an enzyme, an anti-sense oligonucleotide, an siRNA, an enzyme
inhibitor, a
photoactive therapeutic agent, a cytotoxic agent, a drug, a toxin, an
angiogenesis inhibitor and
a pro-apoptotic agent.
131

14. The antibody construct of claim 13, wherein the drug is selected from
the
group consisting of nitrogen mustards, ethylenimine derivatives, alkyl
sulfonates,
nitrosoureas, gemcitabine, triazenes, folic acid analogs, anthracyclines,
taxanes, COX-2
inhibitors, pyrimidine analogs, purine analogs, antibiotics, enzyme
inhibitors,
epipodophyllotoxins, platinum coordination complexes, vinca alkaloids,
substituted ureas,
methyl hydrazine derivatives, adrenocortical suppressants, hormone
antagonists, endostatin,
taxols, camptothecins, SN-38, doxorubicins and their analogs, antimetabolites,
alkylating
agents, antimitotics, anti-angiogenic agents, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mTOR
inhibitors, heat
shock protein (HSP90) inhibitors, proteosome inhibitors, HDAC inhibitors, pro-
apoptotic
agents, methotrexate and CPT-11.
15. The antibody construct of claim 13, wherein the toxin is selected from
the
group consisting of ricin, abrin, alpha toxin, saporin, ribonuclease (RNase),
DNase I,
Staphylococcal enterotoxin-A, pokeweed antiviral protein, gelonin, diphtheria
toxin,
Pseudomonas exotoxin, and Pseudomonas endotoxin.
16. The antibody construct of claim 13, wherein the immunomodulator is
selected
from the group consisting of a cytokine, a stem cell growth factor, a
lymphotoxin, a
hematopoietic factor, a colony stimulating factor (CSF), an interleukin (IL),
an interferon
(IFN), a stem cell growth factor, erythropoietin, thrombopoietin, tumor
necrosis factor (TNF),
granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte macrophage-colony
stimulating
factor (GM-CSF), interferon-.alpha., interferon-.beta., interferon-.gamma. and
the stem cell growth factor
designated "S1 factor".
17. The antibody construct of claim 16 wherein the cytokine is selected
from the
group consisting of human growth hormone, N-methionyl human growth hormone,
bovine
growth hormone, parathyroid hormone, thyroxine, insulin, proinsulin, relaxin,
prorelaxin,
glycoprotein follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), thyroid stimulating hormone
(TSH),
luteinizing hormone (LH), placenta growth factor (P1GF), hepatic growth
factor,
prostaglandin, fibroblast growth factor, prolactin, placental lactogen, OB
protein, tumor
necrosis factor-.alpha., tumor necrosis factor-.beta., mullerian-inhibiting
substance, mouse
132


gonadotropin-associated peptide, inhibin, activin, vascular endothelial growth
factor, integrin,
thrombopoietin (TPO), NGF-.beta., platelet-growth factor, TGF-.alpha., TGF-
.beta., insulin-like growth
factor-I, insulin-like growth factor-II, erythropoietin (EPO), osteoinductive
factors, interferon-
.alpha., interferon-.beta., interferon-.gamma., macrophage-CSF (M-CSF), IL-1,
IL-1.alpha., IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5,
IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-11, IL-12, IL-13, IL-14, IL-15, IL-16, IL-
17, IL-18, IL-21,
IL-25, LIF, FLT-3, angiostatin, thrombospondin, endostatin, TNF-.alpha. and
LT.
1 8. The antibody construct of claim 13, wherein the radionuclide is
selected from
the group consisting of 111In, 177Lu, 212Bi, 213Bi, 211At, 62Cu, 67Cu, 90Y,
125I, 131I, 32P, 33P, 47Sc,
111Ag, 67Ga, 142Pr, 153Sm, 161Tb, 152Dy, 166Dy, 161Ho, 166Ho, 186Re, 188Re,
189Re, 212Pb, 223Ra,
225Ac, 59Fe, 75Se, 77As, 89Sr, 99Mo, 105Rh, 109Pd, 143Pr, 149Pm, 169Er, 194Ir,
198Au, 199Au, 211Pb,
58Co, 80m Br, 99m Tc, 103m Rh, 109Pt, 119Sb, 189m Os, 192Ir, 219Rn, 215Po,
221Fr, 217At, 255Fm, 11C, 13N,
15O, 75Br, 224Ac, 126I, 133I, 77Br, 113m In, 95Ru, 97Ru, 103Ru, 195Ru, 197Hg,
203Hg, 121m Te, 122m Te,
125m Te, 165Tm, 167Tm, 168Tm, 197Pt, 143Pr, 57Co, 51Cr, 75Se, 201Tl, 76Br and
169Yb.

133

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
ANTI-PANCREATIC CANCER ANTIBODIES
RELATED APPLICATIONS
[001] This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Application 12/343,655,
filed
=
December 24, 2008; and 12/418,877, filed April 6, 2009; and Provisional U.S.
Patent
Application Serial Nos. 61/087,463, filed August 8, 2008, and 61/144,227,
filed January
13, 2009.
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR
DEVELOPMENT
[002] This work was supported in part by NIH grant ROI-CA54425. The U.S.
Government may have certain rights in this invention.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
[003] This invention relates to murine, chimeric, humanized and human
antibodies and
fragments thereof that bind with high selectivity and frequency to pancreatic
cancer cells
and to a lesser extent to other cancer cells and not appreciably to normal
pancreatic cells
or pancreatitis. In preferred embodiments, the antibodies or fragments are
PAM4
antibodies or fragments. The subject antibodies are of use in cancer
detection, diagnosis
and therapy, particularly for pancreatic cancers. In particular embodiments,
the subject
antibodies are of use for detection and/or diagnosis of the earliest stages of
pancreatic
cancer.
Related Art
[004] Pancreatic cancer is a malignant growth of the pancreas that mainly
occurs in the
cells of the pancreatic ducts. This disease is the ninth most common form of
cancer, yet it
is the fourth and fifth leading cause of cancer deaths in men and women,
respectively.
Cancer of the pancreas is almost always fatal, with a five-year survival rate
that is less
than 3%.
[005] The most conunon symptoms of pancreatic cancer include jaundice,
abdominal
pain, and weight loss, which, together with other presenting factors, are
nonspecific in
1

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
nature. Thus, diagnosing pancreatic cancer at an early stage of tumor growth
is often
difficult and requires extensive diagnostic work-up, often times including
exploratory
surgery. Endoscopic ultrasonography and computed tomography are the best
noninvasive
means available today for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. However, reliable
detection of
small tumors, as well as differentiation of pancreatic cancer from focal
pancreatitis, is
difficult. The vast majority of patients with pancreatic cancer are presently
diagnosed at a
late stage when the tumor has already extended outside of the capsule to
invade
surrounding organs and/or has metastasized extensively. Gold et al., Crit.
Rev.
Oncology/Hematology, 39:147-54 (2001). Late detection of the disease is
common, and
early pancreatic cancer diagnosis is rare in the clinical setting.
[006] Current treatment procedures available for pancreatic cancer have not
led to a cure,
nor to a substantially improved survival time. Surgical resection has been the
only
modality that offers a chance at survival. However, due to a large tumor
burden, only 10%
to 25% of patients are candidates for "curative resection." For those patients
undergoing a
surgical treatment, the five-year survival rate is still poor, averaging only
about 10%.
[007] Early detection and diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, as well as
appropriate staging
of the disease, would provide an increased survival advantage. A number of
laboratories
are proceeding on the development of a diagnostic procedure based upon the
release of a
tumor-associated marker into the bloodstream as well as detection of the
marker substance
within biopsy specimens. The best tumor associated marker for pancreatic
cancer has
been the immunoassay for CA19.9. Elevated levels of this sialylated Lea
epitope structure
were found in 70% of pancreatic cancer patients but were not found in any of
the focal
pancreatitis specimens examined. However, CA19.9 levels were found to be
elevated in a
number of other malignant and benign conditions, so that currently the assay
cannot be
used for diagnosis. However, the assay is useful for monitoring, the continued
increase in
CA19.9 serum levels after surgery being indicative of a poor prognosis. Many
other
monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have been reported with immunoassays for
diagnosis in
varying stages of development. These include but are not limited to DUPAN2,
SPAN1,
B72.3, 1a3, and various anti-CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen, or CEACAM5)
antibodies.
[008] Antibodies, in particular MAbs and engineered antibodies or antibody
fragments,
have been tested widely and shown to be of value in detection and treatment of
various
human disorders, including cancers, autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases,
inflammatory diseases, and cardiovascular diseases [Filpula and McGuire, Exp.
Opin.
2

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
Ther. Patents (1999) 9: 231-245]. The clinical utility of an antibody or an
antibody-
derived agent is primarily dependent on its ability to bind to a specific
targeted antigen
associated with a particular disorder. Selectivity is valuable for delivering
a diagnostic or
therapeutic agent, such as drugs, toxins, cytokines, hormones, hormone
antagonists,
enzymes, enzyme inhibitors, oligonucleotides, growth factors, radionuclides,
angiogenesis
inhibitors or metals, to a target location during the detection and treatment
phases of a
human disorder, particularly if the diagnostic or therapeutic agent is toxic
to normal tissue
in the body. Radiolabeled antibodies have been used with some success in
numerous
malignancies, including ovarian cancer, colon cancer, medullary thyroid
cancer, and
lymphomas. This technology may also prove useful for pancreatic cancer.
However,
previously reported antibodies against pancreatic cancer antigens have not
been
successfully employed to date for the effective therapy or early detection
and/or diagnosis
of pancreatic cancer.
[009] One suggested approach for delivering agents to a target site, referred
to as direct
targeting, is a technique designed to target specific antigens with antibodies
carrying
diagnostic or therapeutic agents. In the context of tumors, the direct
targeting approach
utilizes a labeled anti-tumor monospecific antibody that recognizes the target
tumor
through its antigens. The technique involves injecting the labeled
monospecific antibody
into the patient and allowing the antibody to localize at the target tumor to
obtain
diagnostic or therapeutic benefits. The unbound antibody clears the body.
[010] Another suggested solution, referred to as the "Affinity Enhancement
System"
(AES), is a technique designed to overcome deficiencies of direct tumor
targeting by
antibodies carrying diagnostic or therapeutic agents [U.S. Pat. No. 5,256,395
(1993),
Barbet et al., Cancer Biotherapy & Radiopharmaceuticals 14: 153-166 (1999)].
The AES
utilizes a labeled divalent hapten and an anti-tumor/anti-hapten bispecific
antibody that
recognizes both the target tumor and the labeled hapten. Haptens with higher
valency and
antibodies with higher specificity may also be utilized for this procedure.
The technique
involves injecting the antibody into the patient and allowing it to localize
at the target
tumor. After a sufficient amount of time for the unbound antibody to clear
from the blood
stream, the labeled hapten is administered. The hapten binds to the antibody-
antigen
complex located at the site of the target cell to obtain diagnostic or
therapeutic benefits,
while the unbound hapten rapidly clears from the body. Barbet mentions the
possibility
that a bivalent hapten may crosslink with bispecific antibodies, when the
latter are bound
3

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
to the tumor surface. As a result, the labeled complex is more stable and
stays at the
tumor for a longer period of time.
[011] There remains a need in the art for antibodies that exhibit high
selectivity for
pancreatic cancer and other types of cancers, compared to nounal pancreatic
tissues and
other normal tissues. Specifically, there remains a need for antibodies that
perform as a
useful diagnostic and/or therapeutic tool for pancreatic cancer, preferably at
the earliest
stages of the disease, and that exhibits enhanced uptake at tArgeted antigens,
decreased
binding to constituents in the blood of healthy individuals and thereby also
optimal
protection of normal tissues and cells from toxic therapeutic agents when
these are
conjugated to such antibodies. Use of such antibodies to detect pancreatic
cancer-
associated antigens in body fluids, particularly blood, can enable improved
earlier
diagnosis of this disease, so long as it differentiates well from benign
diseases, and can
also be used for monitoring response to therapy and potentially also to
enhance prognosis
by indicating disease burden.
SUMMARY
[012] In various embodiments, the present invention concerns antibodies,
antigen-
binding antibody fragments and fusion proteins that bind to pancreatic cancer
cells, with
little or no binding to normal or non-neoplastic pancreatic cells. Preferably,
the antibodies
bind to the earliest stages of pancreatic cancer, such as PanIN-1A and 1B and
PanIN-2.
More preferably, the antibodies bind to 80 to 90% or more of human invasive
pancreatic
adenocarcinoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, Pan1N-1A, PanIN-1B
and
PanIN-2 lesions. Most preferably, the antibodies can distinguish between early
stage
pancreatic cancer and non-malignant conditions such as pancreatitis. Such
antibodies are
of particular use for early detection of cancer and differential diagnosis
between early
stage pancreatic cancer and benign pancreatic conditions. In preferred
embodiments, such
antibodies are of use for in vivo or ex vivo analysis of samples from
individuals suspected
of having early stage pancreatic or certain other cancers.
[013] The antibodies, antibody fragments or fusion proteins may be derived by
immunization and/or selection with mucin, and are preferably reactive against
mucin of
pancreatic cancer. Accordingly, the antibodies, antibody fragments and fusion
proteins
preferably bind to an antigen associated with pancreatic cancer cells. More
preferably, the
antibodies, antibody fragments or fusion proteins may bind to a mucin
expressed in
4

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
pancreatic cancer, such as MUC-1 or MUC-5. In certain embodiments, the
antibodies,
antibody fragments or fusion proteins may bind to cells transfected with and
expressing a
MUC-1 antigen.
[014] In alternative embodiments, the antibodies, antibody fragments or fusion
proteins
may bind to synthetic peptide sequences, for example to phage display
peptides.
Exemplary peptides that may bind to the anti-pancreatic cancer antibodies
include, but are
not limited to, WTWNITKAYPLP (SEQ ID NO:29) and ACPEWWGTTC (SEQ ID
NO:30). Such synthetic peptides may be linear or cyclic and may or may not
compete
with antibody binding to the endogenous pancreatic cancer antigen. Amino acids
in
certain positions of the synthetic peptide sequences may be less critical for
antibody
binding than others. For example, in SEQ ID NO:29 the residues K, A and L at
positions
7, 8 and 11 of the peptide sequence may be varied while still retaining
antibody binding.
Similarly, in SEQ ID NO:30 the threonine residues at positions 8 and 9 of the
sequence
may be varied, although substitution of the threonine at position 9 may
significantly affect
antibody binding to the peptide.
[015] In other preferred embodiments, binding of the antibodies to a target
pancreatic
cancer antigen is inhibited by treatment of the target antigen with reagents
such as
dithiothreitol (DTT) and/or periodate. Thus, binding of the antibodies to a
pancreatic
cancer antigen may be dependent upon the presence of disulfide bonds and/or
the
glycosylation state of the target antigen. In more preferred embodiments, the
epitope
recognized by the subject antibodies is not cross-reactive with other reported
mucin-
specific antibodies, such as the MA5 antibody, the CLH2-2 antibody and/or the
45M1
antibody (see, e.g., Major et al., J Histochem Cytochem. 35:139-48, 1987; Dion
et al.,
Hybridoma 10:595-610, 1991).
[016] The subject antibodies or fragments may be naked antibodies or fragments
or
preferably are conjugated to at least one therapeutic and/or diagnostic agent
for delivery of
the agent to target tissues. In alternative embodiments, the PAM4 antibodies
or fragments
may be part of a bispecific fusion protein or antibody with a first binding
site for a target
cell antigen and a second binding site for a hapten conjugated to a targetable
construct.
The targetable construct may in turn be attached to at least one therapeutic
and/or
diagnostic agent, of use in pretargeting techniques.
[017] In preferred embodiments, the subject antibody, antibody fragment or
fusion
protein comprises a murine, chimeric, humanized or human PAM4 antibody or
fragment.

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
Such PAM4 antibodies or fragments preferably comprise the CDR sequences of a
murine
PAM4 antibody, such as the light chain variable region CDR sequences CDR1
(SASSSVSSSYLY, SEQ ID NO:1); CDR2 (STSNLAS, SEQ ID NO:2); and CDR3
(HQWNRYPYT, SEQ ID NO:3); and the heavy chain variable region CDR sequences
CDR1 (SYVLH, SEQ ID NO:4); CDR2 (YINPYNDGTQYNEKFKG, SEQ ID NO:5)and
CDR3 (GFGGSYGFAY, SEQ ID NO:6).
[018] Particular embodiments may concern compositions and methods of use of
murine
PAM4 antibodies, preferably comprising murine PAM4 variable region sequences
as
disclosed in FIG. 1A and 1B (SEQ ID NO:9 and SEQ ID NO:11). Such murine PAM4
antibodies or fragments may be of use in in vitro or ex vivo diagnostic
techniques, such as
immunohistochemical analysis of tissue samples or immunoassay of body fluid
samples
from subjects suspected of having pancreatic cancer or other types of cancer.
[019] Other particular embodiments may concern compositions and methods of use
of
chimeric PAM4 antibodies, comprising murine variable region sequences attached
to
human antibody constant region sequences. Preferably the chimeric PAM4
antibodies or
fragments comprise the cPAM4 variable region sequences shown in FIG. 2A and 2B
(SEQ
ID NO:12 and SEQ ID NO:13). Such chimeric antibodies are less immunogenic in
humans than murine antibodies, while retaining the antigen-binding
specificities of the
parent murine antibody. Chimeric antibodies are well known in the art for use
in
diagnostic and/or therapeutic treatment of cancer.
[020] Still other particular embodiments may concern compositions and methods
of use
of humanized PAM4 antibodies or fragments thereof, comprising the
complementarity-
determining regions (CDRs) of a murine PAM4 MAb as discussed above and human
antibody framework region (FR) and constant region sequences. In a preferred
embodiment, the FRs of the light and heavy chain variable regions of the
humanized
PAM4 antibody or fragment thereof comprise at least one amino acid substituted
from the
corresponding FRs of a murine PAM4 MAb. Still more preferred, the humanized
PAM4
antibody or fragment thereof may comprise at least amino acid residue selected
from
amino acid residues 5, 27, 30, 38, 48, 66, 67 and 69 of the murine PAM4 heavy
chain
variable region (FIG. 1B) and/or at least one amino acid selected from amino
acid residues
21, 47, 59, 60, 85, 87 and 100 of the murine PAM4 light chain variable region
(FIG. 1A).
Most preferably, the humanized PAM4 antibody or fragment thereof comprises the
6

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
hPAM4 VH amino acid sequence of FIG. 4B (SEQ ID NO:19) and the hPAM4 Vic amino

acid sequence of FIG. 4A (SEQ ID NO:16).
[021] In alternative embodiments, the anti-pancreatic cancer antibodies may be
murine,
chimeric, humanized or human antibodies that bind to the same antigenic
determinant
(epitope) as a chimeric PAM4 (cPAM4) antibody. As discussed below, the cPAM4
antibody is one that comprises the light chain variable region CDR sequences
CDR1
(SASSSVSSSYLY, SEQ ID NO:1); CDR2 (STSNLAS, SEQ ID NO:2); and CDR3
(HQWNRYPYT, SEQ ID NO:3); and the heavy chain variable region CDR sequences
CDR1 (SYVLH, SEQ ID NO:4); CDR2 (YINPYNDGTQYNEKFKG, SEQ ID NO:5)and
CDR3 (GFGGSYGFAY, SEQ ID NO:6). Antibodies that bind to the same antigenic
determinant may be identified by a variety of techniques known in the art,
such as by
competitive binding studies using the cPAM4 antibody as the competing antibody
and
human pancreatic mucin as the target antigen. (See, e.g., Example 1, paragraph
[0214]
below.) Antibodies that block (compete for) binding to human pancreatic mucin
of a
cPAM4 antibody are referred to as cross-blocking antibodies. Preferably, such
cross-
blocking antibodies are prepared by immunization with extracts comprising
human
pancreatic cancer mucins.
[022] Another embodiment is a cancer cell targeting diagnostic immunoconjugate

comprising an anti-pancreatic cancer antibody, antibody fragment or fusion
protein that is
bound to at least one diagnostic (or detection) agent.
[023] Preferably, the diagnostic agent is selected from the group consisting
of a
radionuclide, a contrast agent, a fluorescent agent, a chemiluminescent agent,
a
bioluminescent agent, a paramagnetic ion, an enzyme and a photoactive
diagnostic agent.
Still more preferred, the diagnostic agent is a radionuclide with an energy
between 20 and
4,000 keV or is a radionuclide selected from the group consisting of " In,
lllIn, 177/rx, 18F5
52Fe, 62Cu, 64Cu, 67Cu, 67Ga, "Ga, "Y, "Y, "Zr, 94mTc, 94Tc, 99mTc, 12015
123/5 124/5 125/5 131/5
154-158Gd, 32p, 11C, 13N, 150, 186Re, 188Re, 51mn, 52m¨n,
M "Co,
72As, 75Br, 76Br, 82MRb, 83Sr,
or other gamma-, beta-, or positron-emitters. In a particularly preferred
embodiment, the
diagnostic radionuclide 18F is used for labeling and PET imaging, as described
in the
Examples below. The 18F may be attached to an antibody, antibody fragment or
peptide
by complexation to a metal, such as aluminum, and binding of the 18F-metal
complex to a
chelating moiety that is conjugated to a targeting protein, peptide or other
molecule.
7

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
10241 Also preferred, the diagnostic agent is a paramagnetic ion, such as
chromium (III),
manganese (II), iron (III), iron (II), cobalt (II), nickel (II), copper (II),
neodymium (III),
samarium (III), ytterbium (III), gadolinium (III), vanadium (II), terbium
(III), dysprosium
(III), holmium (III) and erbium (III), or a radiopaque material, such as
barium, diatrizoate,
ethiodized oil, gallium citrate, iocarmic acid, iocetamic acid, iodamide,
iodipamide,
iodoxamic acid, iogulamide, iohexol, iopamidol, iopanoic acid, ioprocemic
acid, iosefamic
acid, ioseric acid, iosulamide meglumine, iosemetic acid, iotasul, iotetric
acid, iothalamic =
acid, iotroxic acid, ioxaglic acid, ioxotrizoic acid, ipodate, meglumine,
metrizamide,
metrizoate, propyliodone, and thallous chloride.
[0251 In still other embodiments, the diagnostic agent is a fluorescent
labeling compound
selected from the group consisting of fluorescein isothiocyanate, rhodamine,
phycoerytherin, phycocyanin, allophycocyanin, o-phthaldehyde and
fluorescamine, a
chemiluminescent labeling compound selected from the group consisting of
luminol,
isoluminol, an aromatic acridinium ester, an imidazole, an acridinium salt and
an oxalate
ester, or a bioluminescent compound selected from the group consisting of
luciferin,
luciferase and aequorin. In another embodiment, the diagnostic
immunoconjugates are
used in intraoperative, endoscopic, or intravascular tumor diagnosis.
[026] Another embodiment is a cancer cell-targeting therapeutic
immunoconjugate
comprising an antibody or fragment thereof or fusion protein bound to at least
one
therapeutic agent. Preferably, the therapeutic agent is selected from the
group consisting
of a radionuclide, an itnmunomodulator, a hormone, a hormone antagonist, an
enzyme, an
oligonucleotide such as an anti-sense oligonucleotide or a siRNA, an enzyme
inhibitor, a
photoactive therapeutic agent, a cytotoxic agent such as a drug or toxin, an
angiogenesis
inhibitor and a pro-apoptotic agent. In embodiments where more than one
therapeutic
agent is used, the therapeutic agents may comprise multiple copies of the same
therapeutic
agent or else combinations of different therapeutic agents.
[027] In one embodiment, an oligonucleotide, such as an antisense molecule or
siRNA
inhibiting bc1-2 expression as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,734,033,
may be conjugated to, or form the
therapeutic agent portion of an immunoconjugate or antibody fusion protein.
Alternatively, the oligonucleotide may be administered concurrently or
sequentially with a
naked or conjugated anti-pancreatic cancer antibody or antibody fragment, such
as a
PAM4 antibody. In a preferred embodiment, the oligonucleotide is an antisense
8

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
oligonucleotide that is directed against an oncogene or oncogene product, such
as bc1-2,
p53, ras or other well-known oncogenes.
[028] In a preferred embodiment, the therapeutic agent is a cytotoxic agent,
such as a
drug or a toxin. Also preferred, the drug is selected from the group
consisting of nitrogen
mustards, ethylenimine derivatives, alkyl sulfonates, nitrosoureas,
gemcitabine, triazenes,
folic acid analogs, anthracyclines, taxanes, COX-2 inhibitors, pyrimidine
analogs, purine
analogs, antibiotics, enzyme inhibitors, epipodophyllotoxins, platinum
coordination
complexes, vinca alkaloids, substituted ureas, methyl hydrazine derivatives,
adrenocortical
suppressants, hormone antagonists, endostatin, taxols, camptothecins, SN-38,
doxorubicins and their analogs, antimetabolites, alkylating agents,
antimitotics, anti-
angiogenic agents, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, heat shock
protein
(HSP90) inhibitors, proteosome inhibitors, HDAC inhibitors, pro-apoptotic
agents,
methotrexate, CPT-11, and a combination thereof.
[029] In another preferred embodiment, the therapeutic agent is a toxin
selected from the
group consisting of ricin, abrin, alpha toxin, saporin, ribonuclease (RNase),
DNase I,
Staphylococcal enterotoxin-A, pokeweed antiviral protein, gelonin, diphtheria
toxin,
Pseudomonas exotoxin, and Pseudomonas endotoxin and combinations thereof. Or
an
immunomodulator selected from the group consisting of a cytokine, a stem cell
growth
factor, a lymphotoxin, a hematopoietic factor, a colony stimulating factor
(CSF), an
interferon (IFN), a stem cell growth factor, erythropoietin, thrombopoietin
and a
combinations thereof.
[030] In other preferred embodiments, the therapeutic agent is a radionuclide
selected
from the group consisting of '''In, 177Lu, 212Bi, 213- =,
BI 211At, 62C11, 67CU, 90Y, 1251,
131/, 32p, 33p, 47sc, IllAg, 67Ga, I42pr, 153sm, 161Tb, 166Dy, 166H0, I86Re,
188-K e,
189Re,
212pb, 223Ra, 225Ae, 59Fe, 75Se, 77As, 895r, 99M0, 105Rh, 109pd, 143pr, 149pm,
169Er,
1941r, 198AU, I99AU, and 21IPb, and combinations thereof Also preferred are
radionuclides that substantially decay with Auger-emitting particles. For
example, Co-58,
Ga-67, Br-80m, Tc-99m, Rh-103m, Pt-109, In-111, Sb-119, 1-125, Ho-161, Os-189m
and
Ir-192. Decay energies of useful beta-particle-emitting nuclides are
preferably <1,000
keV, more preferably <100 keV, and most preferably <70 keV. Also preferred are

radionuclides that substantially decay with generation of alpha-particles.
Such
radionuclides include, but are not limited to: Dy-152, At-211, Bi-212, Ra-223,
Rn-219,
Po-215, Bi-211, Ac-225, Fr-221, At-217, Bi-213 and Fm-255. Decay energies of
useful
9

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
alpha-particle-emitting radionuclides are preferably 2,000-10,000 keV, more
preferably
3,000-8,000 keV, and most preferably 4,000-7,000 keV. Additional potential
-
radioisotopes of use include 11C, 13N, 150, 75Br, 198Au, 224Ac, 1261, 1331,
77Br, 113mIn,
95Ru, 97Ru, 1 3Ru, 105Ru, 107Hg, 203Hg, 121m-re, ininTe, i25mTe, 165Tm,
167Tin, 168Tm,
197pt, 109pd, 105R1i, 142pr, 143pr, 161Tb, 166H0, 199A11, 57CO, 58CO, 51Cr,
59Fe, 75Se,
201T1, 225Ac, 76Br, 1697-1
k01
Y and the like. In other embodiments the therapeutic agent
is a
photoactive therapeutic agent selected from the group consisting of chromogens
and dyes.
[031] Alternatively, the therapeutic agent is an enzyme selected from the
group
consisting of malate dehydrogenase, staphylococcal nuclease, delta-V-steroid
isomerase,
yeast alcohol dehydrogenase, alpha-glycerophosphate dehydrogenase, triose
phosphate
isomerase, horseradish peroxidase, alkaline phosphatase, asparaginase, glucose
oxidase,
beta-galactosidase, ribonuclease, urease, catalase, glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase,
glucoamylase and acetylcholinesterase. Such enzymes may be used, for example,
in
combination with prodrugs that are administered in relatively non-toxic form
and
converted at the target site by the enzyme into a cytotoxic agent. In other
alternatives, a
drug may be converted into less toxic form by endogenous enzymes in the
subject but may
be reconverted into a cytotoxic form by the therapeutic enzyme.
[032] Also contemplated are multivalent, multispecific antibodies or fragments
thereof
comprising at least one binding site having an affinity toward a PAM4 target
antigen and
one or more hapten binding sites having affinity towards hapten molecules.
Preferably,
the antibody or fragment thereof is a chimeric, humanized or fully human
antibody or
fragment thereof. The hapten molecule may be conjugated to a targetable
construct for
delivery of one or more therapeutic and/or diagnostic agents. In certain
preferred
embodiments, the multivalent antibodies or fragments thereof may be prepared
by the
dock-and-lock (DNL) technique, as described in the Examples below. An
exemplary
DNL construct incorporating hPAM4 antibody fragments is designated TF10, as
described
below.
[033] Also contemplated is a bispecific antibody or fragment thereof
comprising at least
one binding site with an affinity toward a PAM4 target antigen and at least
one binding
site with an affinity toward a targetable construct/conjugates selected from
the group
consisting of:
DOTA-D-Asp-D-Lys(HSG)-D-Asp-D-Lys(HSG)-NH2 (IMP 271);
DOTA-D-Glu-D-Lys(HSG)-D-Glu-D-Lys(HSG)-NH2 (IMP 277);

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
DOTA-D-Tyr-D-Lys(HSG)-D-Glu-D-Lys(HSG)-NH2 (IMP 288);
DOTA-D-Ala-D-Lys(HSG)-D-Glu-D-Lys(HSG)-NH2 (IMP 0281);
NOTA-ITC benzyl-D-Ala-D-Lys(HSG)-D-Tyr-D-Lys(HSG)-NH2 (IMP 449);
NODA-Ga-D-Ala-D-Lys(HSG)-D-Tyr-D-Lys(HSG)-NH2 (IMP 460);
NOTA-D-Ala-D-Lys(HSG)-D-Tyr-D-Lys(HSG)-NH2 (IMP 461);
NOTA-D-Asp-D-Lys(HSG)-D-Tyr-D-Lys(HSG)-NH2 (IMP 462);
NOTA-D-Ala-D-Lys(HSG)-D-Tyr-D-Lys(HSG)-NH2 (IMP 465);
C-NETA-succinyl-D-Lys(HSG)-D-Tyr-D-Lys(HSG)-NH2 (IMP 467);
S-NETA-D-Lys(HSG)-D-Tyr-D-Lys(HSG)-NH2 (IMP 469); and
L-NETA-succinyl-D-Lys(HSG)-D-Tyr-D-Lys(HSG)-NH2 (IMP 470)
that is capable of carrying at least one diagnostic and/or therapeutic agent.
Other
targetable constructs suitable for use are disclosed, for example, in U.S.
Patent Nos.
6,576,746; 6,962,702; 7,052,872; 7,138,103; 7,172,751 and 7,405,320 and U.S.
Patent
Application Serial No. 12/112,289.
10341 Other embodiments concern fiision proteins or fragments thereof
comprising at
least two anti-pancreatic cancer antibodies and fragments thereof as described
herein.
Alternatively, the fusion protein or fragment thereof may comprise at least
one first anti-
pancreatic cancer antibody or fragment thereof and at least one second MAb or
fragment
thereof. Preferably, the second MAb binds to a tumor-associated antigen, for
example
selected from the group consisting of CA19.9, DUPAN2, SPAN1, Nd2, B72.3, CC49,

CEA (CEACAM5), CEACAM6, Lea, the Lewis antigen Le(y), CSAp, insulin-like
growth
factor (ILGF), epithelial glycoprotein-1 (EGP-1), epithelial glycoprotein-2
(EGP-2), CD-
80, placental growth factor (P1GF), carbonic anhydrase IX, tenascin, IL-6, HLA-
DR,
CD40, CD74 (e.g., milatuzumab), CD138 (syndecan-1), MUC-1, MUC-2, MUC-3, MUC-
4, MUC-Sac, MUC-16, MUC-17, TAG-72, EGFR, platelet-derived growth factor
(PDGF),
angiogenesis factors (e.g., VEGF and P1GF), products of oncogenes (e.g., bc1-
2, Kras,
p53), cMET, HER2/neu, and antigens associated with gastric cancer and
colorectal cancer.
The antibody fusion protein or fragments thereof may further comprise at least
one
diagnostic and/or therapeutic agent.
[035] Also described herein are DNA sequences comprising a nucleic acid
encoding an
anti-pancreatic cancer antibody, fusion protein, multispecific antibody,
bispecific antibody
or fragment thereof as described herein. Other embodiments concern expression
vectors
11

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
and/or host cells comprising the antibody encoding DNA sequences. In certain
preferred
embodiments, the host cell may be an Sp2/0 cell line transformed with a mutant
Bc1-2
gene, for example with a triple mutant Bc1-2 gene (T69E, S70E, S87E), that has
been
adapted to cell transformation and growth in serum free medium. (See, e.g.,
U.S. Patent
Application Nos. 11/187,863 (now issued U.S. Patent No. 7,531,327), filed July
25, 2005;
11/487,215 (now issued U.S. Patent No. 7,537,930), filed July 14, 2006; and
11/877,728,
filed October 24, 2007.
[036] Another embodiment concerns methods of delivering a diagnostic or
therapeutic
agent, or a combination thereof, to a target comprising (i) providing a
composition that
comprises an anti-pancreatic cancer antibody or fragment, such as a PAM4
antibody or
fragment, conjugated to at least one diagnostic and/or therapeutic agent and
(ii)
administering to a subject in need thereof the diagnostic or therapeutic
conjugate of any
one of the antibodies, antibody fragments or fusion proteins claimed herein.
[037] Also contemplated is a method of delivering a diagnostic agent, a
therapeutic
agent, or a combination thereof to a target, comprising: (a) administering to
a subject any
one of the multivalent, multispecific or bispecific antibodies or fragments
thereof that have
an affinity toward a PAM4 antigen and comprise one or more hapten binding
sites; (b)
waiting a sufficient amount of time for antibody that does not bind to the
PAM4 antigen to
clear the subject's blood stream; and (c) administering to said subject a
carrier molecule
comprising a diagnostic agent, a therapeutic agent, or a combination thereof,
that binds to
a binding site of the antibody. Preferably, the carrier molecule binds to more
than one
binding site of the antibody.
[038] Described herein is a method for diagnosing or treating cancer,
comprising: (a)
administering to a subject any one of the multivalent, multispecific
antibodies or
fragments thereof claimed herein that have an affinity toward a PAM4 antigen
and
comprise one or more hapten binding sites; (b) waiting a sufficient amount of
time for an
amount of the non-bound antibody to clear the subject's blood stream; and (c)
administering to said subject a carrier molecule comprising a diagnostic
agent, a
therapeutic agent, or a combination thereof, that binds to a binding site of
the antibody. In
a preferred embodiment the cancer is pancreatic cancer. Also preferred, the
method can
be used for intraoperative identification of diseased tissues, endoscopic
identification of
diseased tissues, or intravascular identification of diseased tissues.
12

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[039] Another embodiment is a method of treating a malignancy in a subject
comprising
administering to said subject a therapeutically effective amount of an
antibody or fragment
thereof that binds to a PAM4 antigen, optionally conjugated to at least one
therapeutic
agent. The antibody or fragment thereof may alternatively be a naked antibody
or
fragment thereof In more preferred embodiments, the antibody or fragment is
administered either before, simultaneously with, or after administration of
another
therapeutic agent as described above.
[040] Contemplated herein is a method of diagnosing a malignancy in a subject,

particularly a pancreatic cancer, comprising (a) administering to said subject
a diagnostic
conjugate comprising an antibody or fragment thereof that binds to a PAM4
antigen,
wherein said MAb or fragment thereof is conjugated to at least one diagnostic
agent, and
(b) detecting the presence of labeled antibody bound to pancreatic cancer
cells or other
malignant cells, wherein binding of the antibody is diagnostic for the
presence of
pancreatic cancer or another malignancy. In preferred embodiments, the
antibody or
fragment binds to pancreatic cancer and not to normal pancreatic tissue,
pancreatitis or
other non-malignant conditions. In less preferred embodiments, the antibody or
fragment
binds at a significantly higher level to cancer cells than to non-malignant
cells, allowing
differential diagnosis of cancer from non-malignant conditions. In a most
preferred
embodiment, the diagnostic agent may be an F-18 labeled molecule that is
detected by
PET imaging.
[041] In more preferred embodiments, the use of anti-pancreatic cancer
antibodies, such
as the hPAM4 antibody, allows the detection and/or diagnosis of pancreatic
cancer with
high specificity and sensitivity at the earliest stages of malignant disease.
Preferably, the
diagnostic antibody or fragment is capable of labeling at least 70%, more
preferably at
least 80%, more preferably at least 90%, more preferably at least 95%, most
preferably
about 100% of well differentiated, moderately differentiated and poorly
differentiated
pancreatic cancer and 90% or more of invasive pancreatic adenocarcinomas. The
anti-
pancreatic cancer antibody of use is preferably capable of detecting 85% or
more of
PanIN-1A, PanIN-1B, PanIN-2, IPMN and MCN precursor lesions. Most preferably,
immunoassays using the anti-pancreatic cancer antibody are capable of
detecting 89% or
more of total PanIN, 86% or more of IPMN, and 92% or more of MCN.
[042] An alternative embodiment is a method of detecting PAM4 antigen and/or
diagnosing pancreatic cancer in an individual by in vitro analysis of blood,
plasma or
13

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
serum samples. Preferably, the sample is subjected to an organic phase
extraction, using
an organic solvent such as butanol, before it is processed for immunodetection
using an
anti-pancreatic cancer antibody, such as a PAM4 antibody. Following organic
phase
extraction, aqueous phase is analyzed for the presence of PAM4 antigen in the
sample,
using any of a variety of immunoassay techniques known in the art, such as
ELISA,
sandwich immunoassay, solid phase RIA, and similar techniques.
10431 Another embodiment is a method of treating a cancer cell in a subject
comprising
administering to said subject a composition comprising a naked antibody or
fragment
thereof or a naked antibody fusion protein or fragment thereof that binds to a
PAM4
antigen. Preferably, the method further comprises administering a second naked
antibody
or fragment thereof selected from the group consisting of CA19.9, DUPAN2,
SPAN1,
Nd2, B72.3, CC49, anti-CEA, anti-CEACAM6, anti-EGP-1, anti-EGP-2, anti-Lea,
antibodies defined by the Lewis antigen Le(y), and antibodies against CSAp,
MUC-1,
MUC-2, MUC-3, MUC-4, MUC-5ac, MUC-16, MUC-17, TAG-72, EGFR, CD40, HLA-
DR, CD74, CD138, angiogenesis factors (e.g., VEGF and placenta-like growth
factor
(PIGF), insulin-like growth factor (ILGF), tenascin, platelet-derived growth
factor, IL-6,
products of oncogenes, cMET, and HER2/neu.
[0441 Still other embodiments concern a method of diagnosing a malignancy in a
subject
comprising (i) performing an in vitro diagnosis assay on a specimen from said
subject with
a composition comprising an antibody or fragment thereof that binds to a PAM4
antigen;
and (ii) detecting the presence of antibody or fragment bound to malignant
cells in the
specimen. Preferably, the malignancy is a cancer. Still preferred, the cancer
is pancreatic
cancer.
14

CA 02731438 2016-09-22
,
52392-81
[0044a] The present invention as claimed relates to:
- an antibody construct comprising at least one anti-pancreatic cancer
antibody
or antigen-binding fragment thereof that binds to pancreatic cancer cells and
does not bind to
normal pancreatic tissue or pancreatitis or benign pancreatic tissue, wherein
the anti-
pancreatic cancer antibody or fragment thereof binds to a linear peptide
consisting of the
amino acid sequence WTWNITKAYPLP (SEQ ID NO:29) or to a cyclic peptide
consisting of
the amino acid sequence ACPEWWGTTC (SEQ ID NO:30); and
- an antibody construct comprising at least one anti-pancreatic cancer
antibody
or antigen-binding fragment thereof that binds to pancreatic cancer cells and
does not bind to
normal pancreatic tissue or pancreatitis or benign pancreatic tissue, wherein
the anti-
pancreatic cancer antibody or fragment thereof binds to a linear peptide
consisting of the
amino acid sequence WTWNITKAYPLP (SEQ ID NO:29) or to a cyclic peptide
consisting of
the amino acid sequence ACPEWWGTTC (SEQ ID NO:30), wherein the construct is a
trimeric DNL (dock and lock) construct comprising two copies of a PAM4
antibody fragment
moiety attached to one copy of a second antibody fragment moiety.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[045] FIG. I. Variable region cDNA sequences and the deduced amino
acid
sequences of the murine PAM4 antibody. FIG. 1A shows the DNA (SEQ ID NO:8) and
amino
acid (SEQ ID NO:9) sequences of the murine PAM4 Vk. FIG. 1B shows the DNA (SEQ
ID
NO: 10) and amino acid (SEQ ID NO:11) sequences of the murine PAM4 VH. Amino
acid
sequences encoded by the corresponding DNA sequences are given as one-letter
codes below
the nucleotide sequence. Numbering of the nucleotide sequence is on the right
side. The
amino acid residues in the CDR regions are shown in bold and underlined.
Kabat's Ig
molecule numbering is used for amino acid residues as shown by the numbering
14a

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
above the amino acid residues. The amino acid residues numbered by a letter
are the
insertion residues defined by Kabat numbering scheme. The insertion residues
have the
same preceding digits as that of the previous residue. For example, residues
82, 82A, 82B,
and 82C in FIG. 1B are indicated as 82, A, B, and C, respectively.
[046] FIG. 2. Amino acid sequences of the chimeric PAM4 (cPAM4) heavy and
light
chain variable regions expressed in Sp2/0 cells. FIG. 2A shows the amino acid
sequence
(SEQ ID NO:12) of the cPAM4 Vk. FIG. 2B shows the amino acid sequence (SEQ ID
NO:13) of the cPAM4 VH. The sequences are given as one letter codes. The amino
acid
residues in the CDR regions are shown in bold and underlined. The numbering of
amino
acids is the same as in FIG. 1.
[047] FIG. 3. Alignment of the amino acid sequences of heavy and light chain
variable
regions of a human antibody, PAM4 and hPAM4. FIG. 3A shows the Vic amino acid
sequence alignment of the human antibody Walker (SEQ ID NO:14) with PAM4 (SEQ
ID
NO:9) and hPAM4 (SEQ ID NO:16), and FIG. 3B shows the VH amino acid sequence
alignment of the human antibody Wi12 (FR1-3) (SEQ ID NO:17) and NEWM (FR4)
(SEQ ID NO:28) with PAM4 (SEQ ID NO:11) and hPAM4 (SEQ ID NO:19). Dots
indicate the residues of PAM4 that are identical to the corresponding residues
of the
human or humanized antibodies. Boxed regions represent the CDR regions. Both N-
and
C-terminal residues (underlined) of hPAM4 are fixed by the staging vectors
used. Kabat's
Ig molecule number scheme is used to number the residues as in FIG. 1.
[048] FIG. 4. DNA and amino acid sequences of the humanized PAM4 (hPAM4)
heavy and light chain variable regions expressed in 5p2/0 cells. FIG. 4A shows
the DNA
(SEQ ID NO:15) and amino acid (SEQ ID NO:16) sequences of the hPAM4 Vic and
FIG.
4B shows the DNA (SEQ ID NO:18) and amino acid (SEQ ID NO:19) sequences of the

hPAM4VH. Numbering of the nucleotide sequence is on the right side. Amino acid

sequences encoded by the corresponding DNA sequences are given as one-letter
codes.
The amino acid residues in the CDR regions are shown in bold and underlined.
Kabat's Ig
molecule numbering scheme is used for amino acid residues as in FIG. 1A and
FIG. 1B.
[049] FIG. 5. Binding activity of humanized PAM4 antibody, hPAM4, as compared
to
the chimeric PAM4, cPAM4. hPAM4 is shown by diamonds and cPAM4 is shown by
closed circles. Results indicate comparable binding activity of the hPAM4
antibody and
cPAM4 when competing with 125I-cPAM4 binding to CaPanl antigens.

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[050] FIG. 6. PET/CT fusion images for a patient with inoperable metastatic
pancreatic
cancer treated with fractionated 90Y-hPAM4 plus gemcitabine, before therapy
(left side)
and post-therapy (right side). The circle indicates the location of the
primary lesion,
which shows a significant decrease in PET/CT intensity following therapy.
[051] FIG. 7. 3D PET images for a patient with inoperable metastatic
pancreatic cancer
treated with fractionated 90Y-hPAM4 plus gemcitabine, before therapy (left
side) and post-
therapy (right side). Arrows point to the locations of the primary lesion (on
right) and
metastases (on left), each of which shows a significant decrease in PET image
intensity
after therapy with radiolabeled hPAM4 plus gemcitabine.
[052] FIG. 8. In vivo imaging of tumors using an 1111n-labeled diHSG peptide
(IMP
288) with or without pretargeting TF10 bispecific anti-pancreatic cancer mucin
antibody.
FIG. 8A - mice showing location of tumors (arrow). FIG. 8B shows the detected
tumors
with "In-labeled IMP 288 in the presence (above) or absence (below) of TF10
bispecific
antibody.
[053] FIG. 9. Exemplary binding curves for TF10, PAM4-IgG, PAM4-F(abt)2and a
monovalent bsPAM4 chemical conjugate (PAM4-Fab' x anti-DTPA-Fab'). Binding to
target mucin antigen was measured by ELISA assay.
[054] FIG. 10. Immunoscintigraphy of CaPanl human pancreatic cancer xenografts
(-
0.25 g). (A) An image of mice that were injected with bispecific TF10 (80 g,
5.07 X 10-10
mol) followed 16 h later by administration of "11n-IMP-288 (30 Ci, 5.07 X 10-
11 mol).
The image was taken 3 h later. The intensity of the image background was
increased to
match the intensity of the image obtained when 111In-IMP-288 was administered
alone (30
Ci, 5.07 X 10-11 m01). (B) No targeting was observed in mice given "11n-IMP-
288 alone.
(C) An image of mice that were given '111n-DOTA-PAM4-IgG (20 Ci, 50 g) with
imaging done 24 h later. Although tumors are visible, considerable background
activity is
still present at this time point.
1055] FIG. 11. Extended biodistribution of "In-DOTA-PAM4-IgG (20 Ci, 50 g)
and
TF10-pretargeted "In-IMP-288 (80 g, 5.07 x 101 mol TF10 followed 16 h later
with 30
Ci, 5.07 x 1011 mol

"In-IMP-288) in nude mice bearing CaPanl human pancreatic
cancer xenografts (mean tumor weight +/- SD, 0.28 +/- 0.21 and 0.10 +/- 0.06 g
for the
pretargeting and IgG groups of animals, respectively)
16

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[056] FIG. 12. Therapeutic activity of a single treatment of established (-0.4
cm3)
CaPanl tumors with 0.15 mCi of90Y-hPAM4 IgG, or 0.25 or 0.50 mCi of TF10-
pretargeted 90Y-IMP-288.
[057] FIG. 13. Effect of gemcitabine potentiation of PT-RAIT therapy.
[058] FIG. 14. Effect of combination of cetuximab with gemcitabine and PT-
RAIT.
[059] FIG. 15. Differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using PAM4-based
immunoassay. The red line shows the cutoff level selected for a positive
result, based on
ROC analysis.
[060] FIG. 16. Frequency distribution of PAM4 antigen in patient sera from
healthy
volunteers and individuals with varying stages of pancreatic cancer.
[061] FIG. 17. ROC curve for PAM4 serum immunoassay.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Definitions
[062] Unless otherwise specified, "a" or "an" means one or more.
[063] As used herein, "about" means plus or minus 10%. For example, "about
100"
would include any number between 90 and 110.
[064] The term "substantially less" means at least 90%, more preferably 95%,
more
preferably 98%, more preferably 99%, more preferably 99.9% less.
[065] As described herein, the term "PAM4 antibody" includes murine, chimeric,

humanized and human PAM4 antibodies. In preferred embodiments, the PAM4
antibody
or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises the CDR sequences of SEQ ID NO:1
to
SEQ ID NO:6.
[066] As used herein, a "PAM4 antigen" is an antigen bound by a PAM4 antibody.
In
preferred embodiments, treatment of PAM4 antigen with DTT or periodate
inhibits or
prevents binding of the PAM4 antibody. In more preferred embodiments, the PAM4

antigen is an epitope of a mucin expressed by a pancreatic cancer cell, such
as MUC-1 or
MUC-5.
[067] As used herein, an "anti-pancreatic cancer antibody" is an antibody that
exhibits
the same diagnostic, therapeutic and binding characteristics as the PAM4
antibody. In
preferred embodiments, the "anti-pancreatic cancer antibody" binds to the same
epitope as
the PAM4 antibody.
17

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[068] A "non-endocrine pancreatic cancer" generally refers to cancers arising
from the
exocrine pancreatic glands. The term excludes pancreatic insulinomas and
includes
pancreatic carcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma,
squamous
cell carcinoma and giant cell carcinoma and precursor lesions such as
pancreatic intra-
epithelial neoplasia (PanIN), mucinous cyst neoplasms (MCN) and
intrapancreatic
mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), which are neoplastic but not yet malignant. The
terms
"pancreatic cancer" and "non-endocrine pancreatic cancer" are used
interchangeably
herein.
[069] An antibody, as described herein, refers to a full-length (i.e.,
naturally occurring or
formed by normal immunoglobulin gene fragment recombinatorial processes)
immunoglobulin molecule (e.g., an IgG antibody) or an immunologically active
(i.e.,
specifically binding) portion of an immunoglobulin molecule, like an antibody
fragment.
[070] An antibody fragment is a portion of an antibody such as F(abt)2, Fab',
Fab, Fv,
sFy and the like. Regardless of structure, an antibody fragment binds with the
same
antigen that is recognized by the full-length antibody. The term "antibody
fragment" also
includes isolated fragments consisting of the variable regions of antibodies,
such as the
"Fv" fragments consisting of the variable regions of the heavy and light
chains and
recombinant single chain polypeptide molecules in which light and heavy
variable regions
are connected by a peptide linker ("scFv proteins").
[071] A naked antibody is an antibody or fragment thereof that is not
conjugated to a
therapeutic or diagnostic agent. Generally, the Fc portion of the antibody
molecule
provides effector functions, such as complement-mediated cytotoxicity (CDC)
and ADCC
(antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity), which set mechanisms into action
that may
result in cell lysis. However, the Fc portion may not be required for
therapeutic function,
with other mechanisms, such as signaling-induced apoptosis, coming into play.
Naked
antibodies include both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies, as well as
fusion proteins
and certain recombinant antibodies, such as chimeric, humanized or human
antibodies.
[072] A chimeric antibody is a recombinant protein that contains the variable
domains
including the complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of an antibody
derived from
one species, preferably a rodent antibody, while the constant domains of the
antibody
molecule are derived from those of a human antibody. For veterinary
applications, the
constant domains of the chimeric antibody may be derived from that of other
species, such
as a cat or dog.
18

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
1073] A humanized antibody is a recombinant protein in which the CDRs from an
antibody from one species; e.g., a rodent antibody, are transferred from the
heavy and light
variable chains of the rodent antibody into human heavy and light variable
domains (e.g.,
framework region sequences). The constant domains of the antibody molecule are
derived
from those of a human antibody. In certain embodiments, a limited number of
framework
region amino acid residues from the parent (rodent) antibody may be
substituted into the
human antibody framework region sequences.
[074] A human antibody is, e.g., an antibody obtained from transgenic mice
that have
been "engineered" to produce specific human antibodies in response to
antigenic
challenge. In this technique, elements of the human heavy and light chain loci
are
introduced into strains of mice derived from embryonic stem cell lines that
contain
targeted disruptions of the endogenous murine heavy chain and light chain
loci. The
transgenic mice can synthesize human antibodies specific for particular
antigens, and the
mice can be used to produce human antibody-secreting hybridomas. Methods for
obtaining human antibodies from transgenic mice are described by Green et al.,
Nature
Genet. 7:13 (1994), Lonberg et al., Nature 368:856 (1994), and Taylor et al.,
Int. Immun.
6:579 (1994). A fully human antibody also can be constructed by genetic or
chromosomal
transfection methods, as well as phage display technology, all of which are
known in the
art. See for example, McCafferty et al., Nature 348:552-553 (1990) for the
production of
human antibodies and fragments thereof in vitro, from irrununoglobulin
variable domain
gene repertoires from unimmunized donors. In this technique, antibody variable
domain
genes are cloned in-frame into either a major or minor coat protein gene of a
filamentous
bacteriophage, and displayed as functional antibody fragments on the surface
of the phage
particle. Because the filamentous particle contains a single-stranded DNA copy
of the
phage genome, selections based on the functional properties of the antibody
also result in
selection of the gene encoding the antibody exhibiting those properties. In
this way, the
phage mimics some of the properties of the B cell. Phage display can be
performed in a
variety of formats, for review, see e.g. Johnson and Chiswell, Current
Opiniion in
Structural Biology 3:5564-571 (1993). Human antibodies may also be generated
by in
vitro activated B cells. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,567,610 and 5,229,275.
[075) A therapeutic agent is a compound, molecule or atom which is
administered
separately, concurrently or sequentially with an antibody moiety or conjugated
to an
19

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
=
52392-81
antibody moiety, i.e., antibody or antibody fragment, or a subfragment, and is
useful in the
treatment of a disease. Examples of therapeutic agents include antibodies,
antibody
fragments, drugs, toxins, nucleases, hormones, immunomodulators, pro-apoptotic
agents,
anti-angiogenic agents, boron compounds, photoactive agents or dyes and
radioisotopes.
Therapeutic agents of use are described in more detail below.
[076] A diagnostic agent is a molecule, atom or other detectable moiety which
may be
administered conjugated to an antibody moiety or targetable 'construct and is
useful in
detecting or diagnosing a disease by locating cells containing the target
antigen. Useful
diagnostic agents include, but are not limited to, radioisotopes, dyes (such
as with the
biotin-streptavidin complex), contrast agents, fluorescent compounds or
molecules and
enhancing agents (e.g., paramagnetic ions) for magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) or
positron emission tomography (PET) scanning. Preferably, the diagnostic agents
are
selected from the group consisting of radioisotopes, enhancing agents for use
in magnetic
resonance imaging, and fluorescent compounds. In order to load an antibody
component
with radioactive metals or paramagnetic ions, it may be necessary to react it
with a reagent
having a long tail to which are attached a multiplicity of chelating groups
for binding the
ions. Such a tail can be a polymer such as a polylysine, polysaccharide, or
other
derivatized or derivatizable chain having pendant groups to which can be bound
chelating
groups such as, e.g., ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA),
diethylenetriarninepentaacetic acid (DTPA), DOTA, NOTA, NETA, porphyrins,
polyamines, crown ethers, bis-thiosemicarbazones, polyoximes, and like groups
known to
be useful for this purpose. Chelates are coupled to the antibodies using
standard
chemistries. The chelate is normally linked to the antibody by a group which
enables
formation of a bond to the molecule with minimal loss of immunoreactivity and
minimal
aggregation and/or internal cross-linking. Other, more unusual, methods and
reagents for
conjugating chelates to antibodies are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,824,659.
Particularly useful metal-chelate
combinations include 2-benzyl-DTPA and its monomethyl and cyclohexyl analogs,
used
with diagnostic isotopes in the general energy range of 60 to 4,000 keV, such
as 1251, 1311,
1231, 1241, 62cti, 64c11, , 18-F'11 "Ga, "Ga, "mTc, 94mTc, "C, 13N, 150,
76Br, for
radioimaging. The same chelates, when complexed with non-radioactive metals,
such as
manganese, iron and gadolinium are useful for MRI, when used along with the
antibodies
of the invention. Macrocyclic chelates such as NOTA (1,4,7-triazacyclononane-
N,N',N"-

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81 =
triacetic acid), DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid), and
TETA (p-
bromoacetamido-benzyl-tetraethylaminetetraacetic acid) are of use with a
variety of
metals and radiometals, most particularly with radionuclides of gallium,
yttrium and
copper, respectively. Such metal-chelate complexes can be made very stable by
tailoring
the ring size to the metal of interest. Other ring-type chelates such as
rnacrocyclic
polyethers, which are of interest for stably binding nuclides, such as 223Ra
for
radioimmunotherapy (RAIT) are encompassed by the invention. More recently,
techniques of general utility for labeling virtually any molecule with an 18F
atom of use in
PET imaging have been described in U.S. Patent Application Serial No.
12/112,289 (now
issued U.S. Patent No. 7,563,433).
[077] An immunoconjugate is an antibody, antibody fragment or fusion protein
conjugated to at least one therapeutic and/or diagnostic agent. The diagnostic
agent can
comprise a radionuclide or non-radionuclide, a contrast agent (such as for
magnetic
resonance imaging, computed tomography or ultrasound), and the radionuclide
can be a
gamma-, beta-, alpha-, Auger electron-, or positron-emitting isotope. The
therapeutic
agent may be any agent of use to treat a disease state such as cancer,
described in more
detail below.
[078] An expression vector is a DNA molecule comprising a gene that is
expressed in a
host cell. Typically, gene expression is placed under the control of certain
regulatory
elements, including constitutive or inducible promoters, tissue-specific
regulatory
elements and enhancers. Such a gene is said to be "operably linked to" the
regulatory
elements.
10791 A recombinant host may be any prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell that
contains either
a cloning vector or expression vector. This term also includes those
prokaryotic or
eukaryotic cells, as well as transgenic animals, that have been genetically
engineered to
contain the cloned gene(s) in the chromosome or genome of the host cell.
Suitable
mammalian host cells include myeloma cells, such as SP2/0 cells, and NSO
cells, as well
as Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells, hybridoma cell lines and other mammalian
host
cell useful for expressing antibodies. Also particularly useful to express
mAbs and other
fusion proteins are Sp2/0 cells transfected with an apoptosis inhibitor, such
as a Bcl-EEE
gene, and adapted to grow and be further transfected in serum free conditions,
as described
in U11/187,863 (now issued U.S. Patent No. 7,531,327), filed July 25, 2005;
11/487,215
21

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
(now issued U.S. Patent No. 7,537,930), filed July 14, 2006; and 11/877,728,
filed
October 24, 2007.
[080] As used herein, the term antibody fusion protein is a recombinantly
produced
antigen-binding molecule in which two or more of the same or different natural
antibody,
single-chain antibody or antibody fragments with the same or different
specificities are
linked. Valency of the fusion protein indicates the total number of binding
arms or sites
the fusion protein has to an antigen or epitope; i.e., monovalent, bivalent,
trivalent or
multivalent. The multivalency of the antibody fusion protein means that it can
take
advantage of multiple interactions in binding to an antigen, thus increasing
the avidity of
binding to the antigen. Specificity indicates how many antigens or epitopes an
antibody
fusion protein is able to bind; i.e., monospecific, bispecific, trispecific,
multispecific.
Using these definitions, a natural antibody, e.g., an IgG, is bivalent because
it has two
binding arms but is monospecific because it binds to one antigen.
Monospecific,
multivalent fusion proteins have more than one binding site for an epitope but
only bind
with the same or different epitopes on the same antigen, for example a diabody
with two
binding sites reactive with the same antigen. The fusion protein may comprise
a
multivalent or multispecific combination of different antibody components or
multiple
copies of the same antibody component. The fusion protein may additionally
comprise a
therapeutic agent. Examples of therapeutic agents suitable for such fusion
proteins include
immunomodulators ("antibody-immunomodulator fusion protein") and toxins
("antibody-
toxin fusion protein"). One preferred toxin comprises a ribonuclease (RNase),
preferably
a recombinant RNase.
[081] A multispecific antibody is an antibody that can bind simultaneously to
at least
two targets that are of different structure, e.g., two different antigens, two
different
epitopes on the same antigen, or a hapten and/or an antigen or epitope.
Multispecific,
multivalent antibodies are constructs that have more than one binding site,
and the binding
sites are of different specificity.
[082] A bispecific antibody is an antibody that can bind simultaneously to two
different
targets. Bispecific antibodies (bsAb) and bispecific antibody fragments
(bsFab) may have
at least one arm that specifically binds to, for example, a tumor-associated
antigen and at
least one other arm that specifically binds to a targetable conjugate that
bears a therapeutic
22

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
or diagnostic agent. A variety of bispecific fusion proteins can be produced
using
molecular engineering.
PAM4 Antibodies
[083] Various embodiments of the invention concern antibodies that react with
very
high selectivity with pancreatic cancer as opposed to normal or benign
pancreatic tissues.
The anti-pancreatic cancer antibodies and fragments thereof are preferably
raised against a
crude mucin preparation from a tumor of the human pancreas, although partially
purified
or even purified mucins may be utilized. A non-limiting example of such
antibodies is the
PAM4 antibody.
[084] The murine PAM4 (mPAM4) antibody was developed by employing pancreatic
cancer mucin derived from the xenografted RIP-1 human pancreatic carcinoma as
immunogen. (Gold et al., Int. J. Cancer, 57:204-210, 1994.) As discussed
below,
antibody cross-reactivity and immunohistochemical staining studies indicate
that the
PAM4 antibody recognizes a unique and novel epitope on a target pancreatic
cancer
antigen. Immunohistochemical staining studies, such as those described in
Example 2,
have shown that the PAM4 MAb binds to an antigen expressed by breast, pancreas
and
other cancer cells, with limited binding to normal human tissue; however, the
highest
expression is usually by pancreatic cancer cells. Thus, the PAM4 antibodies
are relatively
specific to pancreatic cancer and preferentially bind pancreatic cancer cells.
The PAM4
antibody is reactive with a target epitope which can be internalized. This
epitope is
expressed primarily by antigens associated with pancreatic cancer and not with
focal
pancreatitis or normal pancreatic tissue. Binding of PAM4 antibody to the PAM4
epitope
is inhibited by treatment of the antigen with DTT or periodate. Localization
and therapy
studies using a radiolabeled PAM4 MAb in animal models have demonstrated tumor

targeting and therapeutic efficacy.
[085] The PAM4 antibodies bind to PAM4 antigen, which is expressed by many
organs
and tumor types, but is preferentially expressed in pancreatic cancer cells.
Studies with a
PAM4 MAb, such as in Example 3, indicate that the antibody exhibits several
important
properties, which make it a good candidate for clinical diagnostic and
therapeutic
applications. The PAM4 antigen provides a useful target for diagnosis and
therapy of
pancreatic and other cancers. The PAM4 antibody apparently recognizes an
epitope of a
pancreatic cancer antigen that is distinct from the epitopes recognized by non-
PAM4 anti-
23

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
pancreatic cancer antibodies (CA19.9, DUPAN2, SPAN1, Nd2, CEACAM5, B72.3, anti-

Lea, and other anti-Lewis antigens).
[086] Antibodies suitable for use in combination or conjunction with PAM4
antibodies
include, for example, the antibodies CA19.9, DUPAN2, SPAN1, Nd2, B72.3, CC49,
anti-
CEA, anti-CEACAM6, anti-Lea, anti-HLA-DR, anti-CD40, anti-CD74, anti-CD138,
and
antibodies defined by the Lewis antigen Le(y), or antibodies against colon-
specific
antigen-p (CSAp), MUC-1, MUC-2, MUC-3, MUC-4, MUC-5ac, MUC-16, MUC-17,
EGP-1, EGP-2, HER2/neu, EGFR, angiogenesis factors (e.g., VEGF and P1GF),
insulin-
like growth factor (ILGF), tenascin, platelet-derived growth factor, and IL-6,
as well as
products of oncogenes (bc1-2, Kras, p53), cMET, and antibodies against tumor
necrosis
substances, such as described in patents by Epstein et al. (U.S. Pat. Nos.
6,071,491,
6.017,514, 5,019,368 and 5,882,626). Such antibodies would be useful for
complementing
PAM4 antibody immunodetection and immunotherapy methods. These and other
therapeutic agents could act synergistically with anti-pancreatic cancer
antibodies, such as
PAM4 antibody, when administered before, together with or after administration
of PAM4
antibody.
[087] In therapeutic applications, antibodies that are agonistic or
antagonistic to
immunomodulators involved in effector cell function against tumor cells could
also be
useful in combination with PAM4 antibodies alone or in combination with other
tumor-
associated antibodies, one example being antibodies against CD40. Todryk et
al., J.
Immunol Methods, 248:139-147 (2001); Turner et al., J. Immunol, 166:89-94
(2001).
Also of use are antibodies against markers or products of oncogenes (e.g., bc1-
2, Kras,
p53, cMET), or antibodies against angiogenesis factors, such as VEGFR and
placenta-like
growth factor (P1GF).
[088] The availability of another PAM4-like antibody that binds to a different
epitope of
the PAM4 antigen is important for the development of a double-deteiminant
enzyme-
linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), of use for detecting a PAM4 antigen in
clinical
samples. ELISA experiments are described in Example 1 and 5.
[089] The murine, chimeric, humanized and fully human PAM4 antibodies and
fragments thereof described herein are exemplary of anti-pancreatic cancer
antibodies of
use for diagnostic and/or therapeutic methods. The Examples below disclose a
preferred
embodiment of the construction and use of a humanized PMA4 antibody. Because
non-
human monoclonal antibodies can be recognized by the human host as a foreign
protein,
24

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
and repeated injections can lead to harmful hypersensitivity reactions,
humanization of a
murine antibody sequences can reduce the adverse immune response that patients
may
experience. For murine-based monoclonal antibodies, this is often referred to
as a Human
Anti-Mouse Antibody (HAMA) response. Preferably some human residues in the
framework regions of the humanized anti-pancreatic cancer antibody or
fragments thereof
are replaced by their murine counterparts. It is also preferred that a
combination of
framework sequences from two different human antibodies is used for VH. The
constant
domains of the antibody molecule are derived from those of a human antibody.
[090] Another preferred embodiment is a human anti-pancreatic cancer antibody,
such
as a human PAM4 antibody. A human antibody is an antibody obtained, for
example,
from transgenic mice that have been "engineered" to produce specific human
antibodies in
response to antigenic challenge. In this technique, elements of the human
heavy and light
chain locus are introduced into strains of mice derived from embryonic stem
cell lines that
contain targeted disruptions of the endogenous heavy chain and light chain
loci. The
transgenic mice can synthesize human antibodies specific for human antigens,
and the
mice can be used to produce human antibody-secreting hybridomas. Methods for
obtaining human antibodies from transgenic mice are described by Green et al.,
Nature
Genet. 7:13 (1994), Lonberg et al., Nature 368:856 (1994), and Taylor et al.,
Int. Immun.
6:579 (1994).
[091] A fully human antibody also can be constructed by genetic or chromosomal

transfection methods, as well as phage display technology, all of which are
known in the
art. See for example, McCafferty et al., Nature 348:552-553 (1990) for the
production of
human antibodies and fragments thereof in vitro, from immunoglobulin variable
domain
gene repertoires from unimmunized donors. In this technique, antibody variable
domain
genes are cloned in-frame into either a major or minor coat protein gene of a
filamentous
bacteriophage, and displayed as functional antibody fragments on the surface
of the phage
particle. Because the filamentous particle contains a single-stranded DNA copy
of the
phage genome, selections based on the functional properties of the antibody
also result in
selection of the gene encoding the antibody exhibiting those properties. In
this way, the
phage mimics some of the properties of the B cell. Phage display can be
performed in a
variety of formats, for their review, see e.g. Johnson and Chiswell, Current
Opinion in
Structural Biology 3:5564-571 (1993).
Antibody Preparation

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
[092] Monoclonal antibodies for specific antigens may be obtained by methods
known
to those skilled in the art. See, for example, Kohler and Milstein, Nature
256: 495 (1975),
and Coligan et al. (eds.), CURRENT PROTOCOLS IN IMMUNOLOGY, VOL. 1, pages
2.5.1-2.6.7 (John Wiley & Sons 1991) (hereinafter "Coligan"). Briefly, anti-
pancreatic
cancer MAbs can be obtained by injecting mice with a composition comprising
mucins
from pancreatic cancer, such as the PAM4 antigen, verifying the presence of
antibody
production by removing a serum sample, removing the spleen to obtain B-
lymphocytes,
fusing the B-lyrnphocytes with myeloma cells to produce hybridomas, cloning
the
hybridomas, selecting positive clones which produce antibodies to PAM4
antigen,
culturing the clones that produce antibodies to PAM4 antigen, and isolating
anti-
pancreatic cancer antibodies from the hybridoma cultures.
1093] After the initial raising of antibodies to the immunogen, the antibodies
can be
sequenced and subsequently prepared by recombinant techniques to produce
chimeric or
humanized antibodies. Chimerization of murine antibodies and antibody
fragments are
well known to those skilled in the art. The use of antibody components derived
from
chimerized monoclonal antibodies reduces potential problems associated with
the
inununogenicity of murine constant regions.
[094] General techniques for cloning murine immunoglobulin variable domains
are
described, for example, by the publication of Orlandi et al., Proc Nat'l Acad.
Sci. USA 86:
3833 (1989). In general, the VK (variable light chain)
and VH (variable heavy chain) sequences for murine antibodies can be obtained
by a
variety of molecular cloning procedures, such as RT-PCR, 5'-RACE, and cDNA
library
screening. Specifically, the VH and VK sequences of the murine PAM4 MAb were
cloned
by PCR amplification from the hybridoma cells by RT-PCR, and their sequences
determined by DNA sequencing. To confirm their authenticity, the cloned VK and
VH
genes can be expressed in cell culture as a chimeric Ab as described by
Orlandi et al.,
(Proe Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 86: 3833, 1989).
[095] In a preferred embodiment, a chimerized PAM4 antibody or antibody
fragment
comprises the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) and framework regions
(FR)
of a murine PAM4 MAb and the light and heavy chain constant regions of a human

antibody, wherein the CDRs of the light chain variable region of the
chimerized PAM4
comprises CDR1 comprising an amino acid sequence of SASSSVSSSYLY (SEQ ID
NO:1); CDR2 comprising an amino acid sequence of STSNLAS (SEQ ID NO:2); and
26

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
CDR3 comprising an amino acia sequence of HQWNRYPYT (SEQ ID NO:3); and the
CDRs of the heavy chain variable region of the chimerized PAM4 MAb comprises
CDR1
comprising an amino acid sequence of SYVLH (SEQ ID NO:4); CDR2 comprising an
amino acid sequence of YINPYNDGTQYNEKFKG (SEQ ID NO:5) and CDR3
comprising an amino acid sequence of GFGGSYGFAY (SEQ ID NO:6). The use of
antibody components derived from chimerized monoclonal antibodies reduces
potential
problems associated with the immunogenicity of murine constant regions.
[096] Humanization of murine antibodies and antibody fragments is also well
known to
those skilled in the art. Techniques for producing humanized MAbs are
disclosed, for
example, by Carter et al., Proc Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 89: 4285 (1992), Singer
et al., J.
Immun. 150: 2844 (1992), Mountain et al. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 10:1
(1992), and
Coligan at pages 10.19.1-10.19.11. For
example, humanized monoclonal antibodies may be produced by transferring
murine
complementary determining regions from heavy and light variable chains of the
mouse
immunoglobulin into a human variable domain, and then, substituting human
residues in
the framework regions of the murine counterparts. The use of human framework
region
sequences, in addition to human constant region sequences, further reduces the
chance of
inducing HAMA reactions.
[097] Based on the PAM4 variable region sequences, obtained as described
above, a
humanized PAM4 antibody can be designed and constructed as described by Leung
et al.
(Mol Immunol. 32: 1413 (1995)). Example 1 describes
the humanization process utilized for construction of the hPAM4 MAb.
[098] The nucleotide sequences of the primers used to prepare the hPAM4
antibodies are
discussed in Example 1, below. In a preferred embodiment, a humanized PAM4
antibody
or antibody fragment comprises the light and heavy chain CDR sequences (SEQ ID
NO:1
to SEQ ID NO:6) disclosed above. Also preferred, the FRs of the light and
heavy chain
variable regions of the humanized antibody comprise at least one amino acid
substituted
from said corresponding FRs of the murine PAM4 MAb.
[099] A fully human antibody, e.g., human PAM4 can be obtained from a
transgenic
non-human animal. See, e.g., Mendez et al., Nature Genetics, 15: 146-156
(1997); U.S.
Pat. No. 5,633,425. For example, a human antibody can be recovered from a
transgenic
mouse possessing human immunoglobulin loci. The mouse humoral immune system is

humanized by inactivating the endogenous immunoglobulin genes and introducing
human
27

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
immunoglobulin loci. The human immunoglobulin loci are exceedingly complex and

comprise a large number of discrete segments which together occupy almost 0.2%
of the
human genome. To ensure that transgenic mice are capable of producing adequate

repertoires of antibodies, large portions of human heavy- and light-chain loci
must be
introduced into the mouse genome. This is accomplished in a stepwise process
beginning
with the formation of yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) containing either
human
heavy- or light-chain immunoglobulin loci in genaline configuration. Since
each insert is
approximately 1 Mb in size, YAC construction requires homologous recombination
of
overlapping fragments of the immunoglobulin loci. The two YACs, one containing
the
heavy-chain loci and one containing the light-chain loci, are introduced
separately into
mice via fusion of YAC-containing yeast spheroblasts with mouse embryonic stem
cells.
Embryonic stem cell clones are then microinjected into mouse blastocysts.
Resulting
chimeric males are screened for their ability to transmit the YAC through
their germline
and are bred with mice deficient in murine antibody production. Breeding the
two
transgenic strains, one containing the human heavy-chain loci and the other
containing the
human light-chain loci, creates progeny which produce human antibodies in
response to
immunization.
[0100] Antibodies can be produced by cell culture techniques using methods
known in the
art. In one example transfectoma cultures are adapted to serum-free medium.
For
production of humanized antibody, cells may be grown as a 500 ml culture in
roller bottles
using HSFM. Cultures are centrifuged and the supernatant filtered through a
0.2 pm
membrane. The filtered medium is passed through a protein-A column (1 x 3 cm)
at a
flow rate of 1 ml/min. The resin is then washed with about 10 column volumes
of PBS and
protein A-bound antibody is eluted from the column with 0.1 M glycine buffer
(pH 3.5)
containing 10 mM EDTA. Fractions of 1.0 ml are collected in tubes containing
10 1 of 3
M Tris (pH 8.6), and protein concentrations determined from the absorbance at
280/260
nm. Peak fractions are pooled, dialyzed against PBS, and the antibody
concentrated, for
example, with a Centricon 30 filter (Amicon, Beverly, MA). The antibody
concentration
is determined by ELISA and its concentration adjusted to about 1 mg/ml using
PBS.
Sodium azide, 0.01% (w/v), is conveniently added to the sample as
preservative.
[0101] Antibodies can be isolated and purified from hybridoma cultures by a
variety of
well-established techniques. Such isolation techniques include affinity
chromatography
with Protein-A Sepharose, size-exclusion chromatography, and ion-exchange
28

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
chromatography. See, for example, Coligan at pages 2.7.1-2.7.12 and pages
2.9.1-2.9.3.
Also, see Baines et al., "Purification of Immunoglobulin G (IgG)," in METHODS
IN
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, VOL. 10, pages 79-104 (The Humana Press, Inc. 1992).
[0102] Anti-pancreatic cancer MAbs can be characterized by a variety of
techniques that
are well-known to those of skill in the art. For example, the ability of an
antibody to bind
to the PAM4 antigen can be verified using an indirect enzyme immunoassay, flow

cytometry analysis, ELISA or Western blot analysis.
Antibody Fragments
[0103] Antibody fragments are antigen binding portions of an antibody, such as
F(abl)2,
Fab', F(ab)2, Fab, Fv, sFv, scFv and the like. Antibody fragments which
recognize
specific epitopes can be generated by known techniques. F(ab1)2 fragments, for
example,
can be produced by pepsin digestion of the antibody molecule. These and other
methods
are described, for example, by Goldenberg, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,036,945 and
4,331,647 and
references contained therein. Also, see Nisonoff et al., Arch Biochem.
Biophys. 89: 230
(1960); Porter, Biochem. J. 73: 119 (1959), Edelman et al., in METHODS IN
ENZYMOLOGY VOL. 1, page 422 (Academic Press 1967), and Coligan at pages 2.8.1-
2.8.10 and 2.10.-2.10.4. Alternatively, Fab' expression libraries can be
constructed (Huse
et al., 1989, Science, 246:1274-1281) to allow rapid and easy identification
of monoclonal
Fab' fragments with the desired specificity.
[0104] A single chain Fv molecule (scFv) comprises a VL domain and a VH
domain. The
VL and VH domains associate to form a target binding site. These two domains
are
further covalently linked by a peptide linker (L). A scFv molecule is denoted
as either
VL-L-VH if the VL domain is the N-terminal part of the scFv molecule, or as VH-
L-VL if
the VH domain is the N-terminal part of the scFv molecule. Methods for making
scFv
molecules and designing suitable peptide linkers are described in U.S. Pat.
No. 4,704,692,
U.S. Pat. No. 4,946,778, R. Raag and M. Whitlow, "Single Chain Fvs." FASEB Vol
9:73-
80 (1995) and R. E. Bird and B. W. Walker, Single Chain Antibody Variable
Regions,
TIBTECH, Vol 9: 132-137 (1991).
[0105] Other antibody fragments, for example single domain antibody fragments,
are
known in the art and may be used in the claimed constructs. Single domain
antibodies
(VHH) may be obtained, for example, from camels, alpacas or llamas by standard

immunization techniques. (See, e.g., Muyldermans et al., TIBS 26:230-235,
2001; Yau et
al., J Immunol Methods 281:161-75, 2003; Maass et al., J Immunol Methods
324:13-25,
29

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
2007). The VHH may have potent antigen-binding capacity and can interact with
novel
epitopes that are inacessible to conventional VH-VL pairs. (Muyldermans et
al., 2001).
Alpaca serum IgG contains about 50% camelid heavy chain only IgG antibodies
(HCAbs)
(Maass et al., 2007). Alpacas may be immunized with known antigens, such as
TNF-a,
and VHHs can be isolated that bind to and neutralize the target antigen (Maass
et al.,
2007). PCR primers that amplify virtually all alpaca VHH coding sequences have
been
identified and may be used to construct alpaca VHH phage display libraries,
which can be
used for antibody fragment isolation by standard biopanning techniques well
known in the
art (Maass et al., 2007).
[0106] An antibody fragment can also be prepared by proteolytic hydrolysis of
a full-
length antibody or by expression in E. coli or another host of the DNA coding
for the
fragment. An antibody fragment can be obtained by pepsin or papain digestion
of full-
length antibodies by conventional methods. For example, an antibody fragment
can be
produced by enzymatic cleavage of antibodies with pepsin to provide an
approximate 100
Kd fragment denoted F(ab')2. This fragment can be further cleaved using a
thiol reducing
agent, and optionally a blocking group for the sulfhydryl groups resulting
from cleavage
of disulfide linkages, to produce an approximate 50 Kd Fab' monovalent
fragment.
Alternatively, an enzymatic cleavage using papain produces two monovalent Fab
fragments and an Fc fragment directly.
[0107] Another form of antibody fragment is a peptide coding for a single
complementarity-determining region (CDR). A CDR is a segment of the variable
region
of an antibody that is complementary in structure to the epitope to which the
antibody
binds and is more variable than the rest of the variable region. Accordingly,
a CDR is
sometimes referred to as a hypervariable region. A variable region comprises
three CDRs.
CDR peptides can be obtained by constructing genes encoding the CDR of an
antibody of
interest. Such genes are prepared, for example, by using the polymerase chain
reaction
(PCR) to synthesize the variable region from RNA of antibody-producing cells.
See, for
example, Larrick et al., Methods: A Companion to Methods in Enzymology 2: 106
(1991);
Courtenay-Luck, "Genetic Manipulation of Monoclonal Antibodies," in MONOCLONAL

ANTIBODIES: PRODUCTION, ENGINEERING AND CLINICAL APPLICATION,
Ritter et al. (eds.), pages 166-179 (Cambridge University Press 1995); and
Ward et al.,
"Genetic Manipulation and Expression of Antibodies," in MONOCLONAL

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
ANTIBODIES: PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS, Birch et al., (eds.), pages 137-185
(Wiley-Liss, Inc. 1995).
[0108] Other methods of cleaving antibodies, such as separation of heavy
chains to form
monovalent light-heavy chain fragments, further cleavage of fragments, or
other
enzymatic, chemical or genetic techniques may also be used, so long as the
fragments bind
to the antigen that is recognized by the intact antibody.
Antibody Fusion Proteins
[0109] Fusion proteins comprising the anti-pancreatic cancer antibodies of
interest can be
prepared by a variety of conventional procedures, ranging from glutaraldehyde
linkage to
more specific linkages between functional groups. The antibodies and/or
antibody
fragments that comprise the fusion proteins described herein are preferably
covalently
bound to one another, directly or through a linker moiety, through one or more
functional
groups on the antibody or fragment, e.g., amine, carboxyl, phenyl, thiol, or
hydroxyl
groups. Various conventional linkers in addition to glutaraldehyde can be
used, e.g.,
diisocyanates, diiosothiocyanates, bis(hydroxysuccinimide)esters,
carbodiimides,
maleimidehydroxy succinimide esters, and the like.
[0110] A simple method for producing fusion proteins is to mix the antibodies
or
fragments in the presence of glutaraldehyde. The initial Schiff base linkages
can be
stabilized, e.g., by borohydride reduction to secondary amines. A
diiosothiocyanate or
carbodiimide can be used in place of glutaraldehyde as a non-site-specific
linker. In one
embodiment, an antibody fusion protein comprises an anti-pancreatic cancer
MAb, or
fragment thereof, wherein the MAb binds to the PAM4 antigen. This fusion
protein and
fragments thereof preferentially bind pancreatic cancer cells. This
monovalent,
monospecific MAb is useful for direct targeting of an antigen, where the MAb
is attached
to a therapeutic agent, a diagnostic agent, or a combination thereof, and the
protein is
administered directly to a patient.
[0111] The fusion proteins may instead comprise at least two anti-pancreatic
cancer MAbs
that bind to distinct epitopes of the PAM4 antigen. For example, the MAbs can
produce
antigen specific diabodies, triabodies and tetrabodies, which are multivalent
but
monospecific to the PAM4 antigen. The non-covalent association of two or more
scFv
molecules can form functional diabodies, triabodies and tetrabodies.
Monospecific
diabodies are homodimers of the same scFv, where each scFv comprises the VH
domain
from the selected antibody connected by a short linker to the VL domain of the
same
31

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
antibody. A diabody is a bivalent dimer formed by the non-covalent association
of two
scFvs, yielding two Fv binding sites. A triabody results from the formation of
a trivalent
timer of three scFvs, yielding three binding sites, and a tetrabody is a
tetravalent tetramer
of four scFvs, resulting in four binding sites. Several monospecific diabodies
have been
made using an expression vector that contains a recombinant gene construct
comprising
VH1-linker-VL1. See Holliger et al., Proc Natl. Acad. Sci USA 90: 6444-6448
(1993);
Atwell et al., Molecular Immunology 33: 1301-1302 (1996); Holliger et al.,
Nature
Biotechnology 15: 632-631(1997); Helfrich et al., Int J Cancer 76: 232-239
(1998);
Kipriyanov et al., Int J Cancer 77: 763-772 (1998); Holiger et al., Cancer
Research 59:
2909-2916(1999)). Methods of constructing scFvs are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.

4,946,778 (1990) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,132,405 (1992).
Methods of producing multivalent,
monospecific antibodies based on scFv are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,837,242
(1998),
U.S. Pat. No. 5,844,094 (1998) and WO-98/44001 (1998),
The multivalent, monospecific antibody fusion
protein binds to two or more of the same type of epitopes that can be situated
on the same
antigen or on separate antigens. The increased valency allows for additional
interaction,
increased affinity, and longer residence times. These antibody fusion proteins
can be
utilized in direct targeting systems, where the antibody fusion protein is
conjugated to a
therapeutic agent, a diagnostic agent, or a combination thereof, and
administered directly
to a patient in need thereof.
[0112] A preferred embodiment is a multivalent, multispecific antibody or
fragment
thereof comprising one or more antigen binding sites having an affinity toward
a PAM4
target epitope and one or more additional binding sites for other epitopes
associated with
pancreatic cancer. This fusion protein is multispecific because it binds at
least two
different epitopes, which can reside on the same or different antigens. For
example, the
fusion protein may comprise more than one antigen binding site, the first with
an affinity
toward a PAM4 antigen epitope and the second with an affinity toward another
target
antigen such as TAG-72 or CEA. Another example is a bispecific antibody fusion
protein
which may comprise a CA19.9 MAb (or fragment thereof) and a PAM4 MAb (or
fragment
thereof). Such a fusion protein will have an affinity toward CA19.9 as well as
the PAM4
antigen. The antibody fusion proteins and fragments thereof can be utilized in
direct
targeting systems, where the antibody fusion protein is conjugated to a
therapeutic agent, a
32

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
diagnostic agent, or a combination thereof, and administered directly to a
patient in need
thereof.
[0113] Another preferred embodiment is a multivalent, multispecific antibody
comprising
at least one binding site having affinity toward a PAM4 target epitope and at
least one
hapten binding site having affinity towards hapten molecules. For example, a
bispecific
fusion protein may comprise the 679 MAb (or fragment thereof) and the PAM4 MAb
(or
fragment thereof). The monoclonal 679 antibody binds with high affinity to
molecules
containing the tri-peptide moiety histamine succinyl glycyl (HSG). Such a
bispecific
PAM4 antibody fusion protein can be prepared, for example, by obtaining a
F(ab')2
fragment from 679, as described above. The interchain disulfide bridges of the
679 F(ab')2
fragment are gently reduced with DTT, taking care to avoid light-heavy chain
linkage, to
form Fab'-SH fragments. The SH group(s) is (are) activated with an excess of
bis-
maleimide linker (1,1'-(methylenedi-4,1-phenylene)b-is-malemide). The PAM4 MAb
is
converted to Fab'-SH and then reacted with the activated 679 Fab'-SH fragment
to obtain a
bispecific antibody fusion protein. Bispecific antibody fusion proteins such
as this one
can be utilized in affinity enhancing systems, where the target antigen is
pretargeted with
the fusion protein and is subsequently targeted with a diagnostic or
therapeutic agent
attached to a carrier moiety (targetable construct) containing one or more HSG
haptens. In
alternative preferred embodiments, a DNL-based hPAM4-679 construct, such as
TF10,
may be prepared and used as described in the Examples below.
[0114] Bispecific antibodies can be made by a variety of conventional methods,
e.g.,
disulfide cleavage and reformation of mixtures of whole IgG or, preferably
F(ab')2
fragments, fusions of more than one hybridoma to form polyomas that produce
antibodies
having more than one specificity, and by genetic engineering. Bispecific
antibody fusion
proteins have been prepared by oxidative cleavage of Fab' fragments resulting
from
reductive cleavage of different antibodies. This is advantageously carried out
by mixing
two different F(ab')2 fragments produced by pepsin digestion of two different
antibodies,
reductive cleavage to form a mixture of Fab' fragments, followed by oxidative
reformation
of the disulfide linkages to produce a mixture of F(ab')2 fragments including
bispecific
antibody fusion proteins containing a Fab' portion specific to each of the
original epitopes.
General techniques for the preparation of antibody fusion proteins may be
found, for
example, in Nisonoff et al., Arch Biochem Biophys. 93: 470 (1961), Hmmerling
et al., J
Exp Med. 128: 1461 (1968), and U.S. Pat. No. 4,331,647.
33

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
[0115] More selective linkage can be achieved by using a heterobifunctional
linker such
as maleimidehydroxysuccinimide ester. Reaction of the ester with an antibody
or
fragment will derivatize amine groups on the antibody or fragment, and the
derivative can
then be reacted with, e.g., an antibody Fab fragment having free sulfhydryl
groups (or, a
larger fragment or intact antibody with sulfhydryl groups appended thereto by,
e.g., Traut's
Reagent). Such a linker is less likely to crosslink groups in the same
antibody and
improves the selectivity of the linkage.
[0116] It is advantageous to link the antibodies or fragments at sites remote
from the
antigen- binding sites. This can be accomplished by, e.g., linkage to cleaved
interchain
sulfydryl groups, as noted above. Another method involves reacting an antibody
having
an oxidized carbohydrate portion with another antibody that has at lease one
free amine
function. This results in an initial Schiff base linkage, which is preferably
stabilized by
reduction to a secondary amine, e.g., by borohydride reduction, to form the
final
composite. Such site-specific linkages are disclosed, for small molecules, in
U.S. Pat. No.
4,671,958, and for larger addends in U.S. Pat. No. 4,699,784.
[0117] ScFvs with linkers greater than 12 amino acid residues in length (for
example, 15-
or 18-residue linkers) allow interactions between the VH and VL domains on the
same
chain and generally form a mixture of monomers, dirners (termed diabodies) and
small
amounts of higher mass multimers, (Kortt et al., Eur J Biochem. (1994) 221:
151-157).
ScFvs with linkers of 5 or less amino acid residues, however, prohibit
intramolecular
pairing of the VH and VL domains on the same chain, forcing pairing with VH
and VL
domains on a different chain. Linkers between 3- and 12-residues form
predominantly
dimers (Atwell et al., Protein Engineering (1999) 12: 597-604). With linkers
between 0
and 2 residues, trimeric (termed triabodies), tetrameric (termed tetrabodies)
or higher
oligomeric structures of scFvs are formed; however, the exact patterns of
oligomerization
appear to depend on the composition as well as the orientation of the V-
domains, in
addition to the linker length.
[0118] More recently, a novel technique for construction of mixtures of
antibodies,
antibody fragments and/or other effector moieties in virtually any combination
desired has
been described in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/389,358 (now issued
U.S. Patent
7,550,143), filed 3/24/06; 11/391,584 (now issued U.S. Patent 7,521,056),
filed 3/28/06;
11/478,021 (now issued U.S. Patent 7,534,866), filed 6/29/06; 11/633,729 (now
issued
34

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
=
U.S. Patent 7,527,787), filed 12/5/06; and 11/925,408, filed 10/26/07.
The technique, known
generally as dock-and-lock (DNL) involves the production of fusion proteins
that
comprise at their N- or C-terminal ends one of two complementary peptide
sequences,
called dimerization and docking domain (DDD) and anchoring domain (AD)
sequences.
In preferred embodiments, the DDD sequences are derived from the regulatory
subunits of
cAMP-dependent protein kinase and the AD .sequence is derived from the
sequence of A-
kinase anchoring protein (AICAP). The DDD sequences form dimers that bind to
the AD
sequence, which allows formation of trimers, tetramers, hexamers or any of a
variety of
other complexes. By attaching effector moieties, such as antibodies or
antibody
fragments, to the DDD and AD sequences, complexes may be formed of any
selected
combination of antibodies or antibody fragments. The DNL complexes may be
covalently
stabilized by formation of disulfide bonds or other linkages.
[0119] Bispecific antibodies comprising the =antigen-binding variable region
sequences of
any known anti-TAA antibody may be utilized, including but not limited to
hPAM4 (U.S.
Patent No. 7,282,567), hA20 (U.S. Patent No. 7,251,164), hAl9 (U.S. Patent No.

7,109,304), hIMMU31 (U.S. Patent No. 7,300,655), hLL1 (U.S. Patent No.
7,312,318,
), hLL2 (U.S. Patent No. 7,074,403), hMu-9 (U.S. Patent No. 7,387,773), hL243
(U.S.
Patent Application No. 11/368,296), hMN-14 (U.S. Patent No. 6,676,924), hRS7
(U.S.
Patent No. 7,238,785), hMN-3 (U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 10/672,278)
and hRl.
[0120] Other antibodies of use may be commercially obtained from a wide
variety of
known sources. For example, a variety of antibody secreting hybridoma lines
are
available from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). A
large
number of antibodies against various disease targets, including but not
limited to tumor-
associated antigens, have been deposited at the ATCC and/or have published
variable
region sequences and are available for use in the claimed methods and
compositions. See,
e.g., U.S. Patent Nos. 7,312,318; 7,282,567; 7,151,164; 7,074,403; 7,060,802;
7,056,509;
7,049,060; 7,045,132; 7,041,803; 7,041,802; 7,041,293; 7,038,018; 7,037,498;
7,012,133;
7,001,598; 6,998,468; 6,994,976; 6,994,852; 6,989,241; 6,974,863; 6,965,018;
6,964,854;
6,962,981; 6,962,813; 6,956,107; 6,951,924; 6,949,244; 6,946,129; 6,943,020;
6,939,547;
6,921,645; 6,921,645; 6,921,533; 6,919,433; 6,919,078; 6,916,475; 6,905,681;
6,899,879;
= ,
.35

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
6,893,625; 6,887,468; 6,887,466; 6,884,594; 6,881,405; 6,878,812; 6,875,580;
6,872,568;
6,867,006; 6,864,062; 6,861,511; 6,861,227; 6,861,226; 6,838,282; 6,835,549;
6,835,370;
6,824,780; 6,824,778; 6,812,206; 6,793,924; 6,783,758; 6,770,450; 6,767,711;
6,764,688;
6,764,681; 6,764,679; 6,743,898; 6,733,981; 6,730,307; 6,720,15; 6,716,966;
6,709,653;
6,693,176; 6,692,908; 6,689,607; 6,689,362; 6,689,355; 6,682,737; 6,682,736;
6,682,734;
6,673,344; 6,653,104; 6,652,852; 6,635,482; 6,630,144; 6,610,833; 6,610,294;
6,605,441;
6,605,279; 6,596,852; 6,592,868; 6,576,745; 6,572;856; 6,566,076; 6,562,618;
6,545,130;
6,544,749; 6,534,058; 6,528,625; 6,528,269; 6,521,227; 6,518,404; 6,511,665;
6,491,915;
6,488,930; 6,482,598; 6,482,408; 6,479,247; 6,468,531; 6,468,529; 6,465,173;
6,461,823;
6,458,356; 6,455,044; 6,455,040, 6,451,310; 6,444,206' 6,441,143; 6,432,404;
6,432,402;
6,419,928; 6,413,726; 6,406,694; 6,403,770; 6,403,091; 6,395,276; 6,395,274;
6,387,350;
6,383,759; 6,383,484; 6,376,654; 6,372,215; 6,359,126; 6,355,481; 6,355,444;
6,355,245;
6,355,244; 6,346,246; 6,344,198; 6,340,571; 6,340,459; 6,331,175; 6,306,393;
6,254,868;
6,187,287; 6,183,744; 6,129,914; 6,120,767; 6,096,289; 6,077,499; 5,922,302;
5,874,540;
5,814,440; 5,798,229; 5,789,554; 5,776,456; 5,736,119; 5,716,595; 5,677,136;
5,587,459;
5,443,953, 5,525,338.
These are exemplary only and a wide variety of other antibodies and their
hybridomas are known in the art. The skilled artisan will realize that
antibody sequences
or antibody-secreting hybridomas against almost any disease-associated antigen
may be
obtained by a simple search of the ATCC, NCBI and/or USPTO databases for
antibodies
against a selected disease-associated target of interest. The antigen binding
domains of the
cloned antibodies may be amplified, excised, ligated into an expression
vector, transfected
into an adapted host cell and used for protein production, using standard
techniques well
known in the art.
Pretargeting
[0121] Bispecific or multispecific antibodies may be utilized in pre-targeting
techniques.
Pre-targeting is a multistep process originally developed to resolve the slow
blood
clearance of directly targeting antibodies, which contributes to undesirable
toxicity to
normal tissues such as bone marrow. With pre-targeting, a radionuclide or
other
therapeutic agent is attached to a small delivery molecule (targetable
construct or
targetable conjugate) that is cleared within minutes from the blood. A pre-
targeting
bispecific or multispecific antibody, which has binding sites for the
targetable construct as
36

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
well as a target antigen, is administered first, free antibody is allowed to
clear from
circulation and then the targetable construct is administered.
[0122] Pre-targeting methods are well known in the art, for example, as
disclosed in
Goodwin et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,863,713; Goodwin et al., J. Nucl. Med. 29:226,
1988;
Hnatowich et al., J. Nucl. Med. 28:1294, 1987; Oehr et al., J. Nucl. Med.
29:728, 1988;
Klibanov et al., J. Nucl. Med. 29:1951, 1988; Sinitsyn et al., J. Nucl. Med.
30:66, 1989;
Kalofonos et al., J. Nucl. Med. 31:1791, 1990; Schechter et al., Int. J.
Cancer 48:167,
1991; Paganelli et al., Cancer Res. 51:5960, 1991; Paganelli et al., Nucl.
Med. Commun.
12:211, 1991; U.S. Pat. No. 5,256,395; Stickney et al., Cancer Res. 51:6650,
1991; Yuan
et al., Cancer Res. 51:3119, 1991; U.S. Pat. No. 6,077,499; U.S. Ser. No.
09/597,580; U.S.
Ser. No. 10/361,026; U.S. Ser. No. 09/337,756; U.S. Ser. No. 09/823,746; U.S.
Ser. No.
10/116,116; U.S. Ser. No. 09/382,186; U.S. Ser. No. 10/150,654; U.S. Pat. No.
6,090,381;
U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,511; U.S. Ser. No. 10/114,315; U.S. Provisional
Application No.
60/386,411; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/345,641; U.S. Provisional
Application
No. 60/328,835; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/426,379; U.S. Ser. No.
09/823,746;
U.S. Ser. No. 09/337,756; U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/342,103; and
U.S. Patent
No. 6,962,702.
[0123] A pre-targeting method of treating or diagnosing a disease or disorder
in a subject
may be provided by: (1) administering to the subject a bispecific antibody or
antigen
binding antibody fragment; (2) optionally administering to the subject a
clearing
composition, and allowing the composition to clear the antibody from
circulation; and (3)
administering to the subject the targetable construct, containing one or more
chelated or
chemically bound therapeutic or diagnostic agents. The technique may also be
utilized for
antibody dependent enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT) by administering an enzyme
conjugated to a targetable construct, followed by a prodrug that is converted
into active
form by the enzyme.
Expression Vectors and Host Cells
[0124] An expression vector is a DNA molecule comprising a gene that is
expressed in a
host cell. Typically, gene expression is placed under the control of certain
regulatory
elements, including constitutive or inducible promoters, tissue-specific
regulatory
elements, and enhancers. Such a gene is said to be "operably linked to" the
regulatory
elements. A promoter is a DNA sequence that directs the transcription of a
structural
gene. A structural gene is a DNA sequence that is transcribed into messenger
RNA
37

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
(mRNA) which is then translated into a peptide or protein. If a promoter is an
inducible
promoter, then the rate of transcription increases in response to an inducing
agent. In
contrast, the rate of transcription is not regulated by an inducing agent if
the promoter is a
constitutive promoter. An enhancer is a DNA regulatory element that can
increase the
efficiency of transcription, regardless of the distance or orientation of the
enhancer relative
to the start site of transcription.
[0125] An isolated DNA molecule is a fragment of DNA that is not integrated in
the
chromosomal DNA of a cell or organism. In preferred embodiments, a DNA
sequence to
be expressed will be packaged into an expression vector and transfected into a
host cell,
where it is preferably integrated into the host cell chromosomal DNA. Methods
for
construction of nucleic acids of any selected sequence, for example by
chemical synthesis
of shorter oligonucleotides and assembly into a protein encoding sequence, are
well
known in the art. Alternatively, DNA sequences of interest may be cut using
restriction
endonucleases and spliced together to make a selected protein encoding
sequence. Other
techniques for producing specific changes in encoded protein sequences, such
as site-
directed mutagenesis, are also well known.
[0126] A cloning vector is a DNA molecule, such as a plasmid, cosmid, or
bacteriophage,
that has the capability of replicating autonomously in a host cell. Cloning
vectors
typically contain one or a small number of restriction endonuclease
recognition sites at
which foreign DNA sequences can be inserted in a determinable fashion without
loss of an
essential biological function of the vector, as well as a marker gene that is
suitable for use
in the identification and selection of cells transformed with the cloning
vector. Marker
genes typically include genes that provide resistance to tetracycline,
ampicillin, kanamycin
or other antibiotics. A recombinant host may be any prokaryotic or eukaryotic
cell that
contains either a cloning vector or expression vector. This term also includes
those
prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells that have been genetically engineered to
contain the cloned
gene(s) in the chromosome or genome of the host cell.
[0127] Suitable host cells include microbial or mammalian host cells. A
preferred host is
the human cell line, PER.C6, which was developed for production of MAbs, and
other
fusion proteins. Accordingly, a preferred embodiment is a host cell comprising
a DNA
sequence encoding the anti-pancreatic cancer MAb, conjugate, fusion protein or
fragments
thereof. PER.C6 cells (WO 97/00326) were generated by transfection of primary
human
embryonic retina cells, using a plasmid that contained the Adserotype 5 (Ad5)
E1A- and
38

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
El B-coding sequences (Ad5 nucleotides 459-3510) under the control of the
human
phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) promoter.
[0128] Other mammalian host cells may be used, including myeloma cells, such
as SP2/0
cells, and NSO cells, as well as Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells, hybridoma
cell lines
and other mammalian host cell useful for expressing antibodies. Also
particularly useful
to express mAbs and other fusion proteins are Sp2/0 cells transfected with an
apoptosis
inhibitor, such as a Bcl-EEE gene, and adapted to grow and be further
transfected in serum
free conditions, as described in U.S. Patent Application Serial Nos.
11/187,863 (now
issued U.S. Patent No. 7,531,327), filed July 25, 2005; 11/487,215 (now issued
U.S.
Patent No. 7,537,930), filed July 14, 2006; and 11/877,728, filed October 24,
2007).
In certain cases,
the apoptosis inhibitor and/or structural gene to be expressed may be
amplified by
exposing the host cell to an appropriate concentration of methotrexate. Sp2/0
cells
transfected with Bcl-EEE and conditioned to grow in serum-free medium have
been
reported to exhibited prolonged longevity in culture, higher cell density, and
significantly
higher rates of protein production (U.S. Patent No. 7,531,327; U.S. Patent No.
7,537,930);
USSN 11/877,728, filed October 24, 2007).
Antibody Use for Treatment and Diagnosis
[0129] Certain embodiments concern methods of diagnosing or treating a
malignancy in a
subject, comprising administering to the subject an anti-pancreatic cancer
MAb, fusion
protein or fragment thereof, wherein the MAb, fusion protein or fragment is
bound to at
least one diagnostic and/or therapeutic agent. Also preferred is a method for
diagnosing or
treating cancer, comprising administering to a subject a multivalent,
multispecific
antibody or fragment thereof comprising one or more antigen binding sites
toward a
PAM4 antigen and one or more hapten binding sites, waiting a sufficient amount
of time
for non-bound antibody to clear the subject's blood stream; and then
administering to the
subject a carrier molecule comprising a diagnostic agent, a therapeutic agent,
or a
combination thereof, that binds to the hapten-binding site of the localized
antibody. In a
more preferred embodiment, the cancer is a non-endocrine pancreatic cancer.
[0130] The use of MAbs for in vitro diagnosis is well-known. See, for example,
Carlsson
et al., Bio/Technology 7 (6): 567 (1989). For example, MAbs can be used to
detect the
presence of a tumor-associated antigen in tissue from biopsy samples. MAbs
also can be
used to measure the amount of tumor-associated antigen in clinical fluid
samples using
39

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
techniques such as radioimmunoassay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and
fluorescence immunoassay.
[0131] Conjugates of tumor-targeted MAbs and toxins can be used to selectively
kill
cancer cells in vivo (Spalding, Bio/Technology 9(8): 701 (1991); Goldenberg,
Scientific
American Science & Medicine 1(1): 64 (1994)). For example, therapeutic studies
in
experimental animal models have demonstrated the anti-tumor activity of
antibodies
carrying cytotoxic radionuclides. (Goldenberg et al., Cancer Res. 41: 4354
(1981),
Cheung et al., J. Nat'l Cancer Inst. 77: 739 (1986), and Senekowitsch et al.,
J. Nucl. Med.
30: 531 (1989)). In a preferred embodiment, the conjugate comprises a "Y-
labeled
hPAM4 antibody. The conjugate may optionally be administered in conjunction
with one
or more other therapeutic agents. In a preferred embodiment, "Y-labeled hPAM4
is
administered together with gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil to a patient with
pancreatic
cancer. In a further preferred embodiment, "Y is conjugated to a DOTA chelate
for
attachment to hPAM4. In a still further preferred embodiment, the 90Y-DOTA-
hPAM4 is
combined with gemcitabine in fractionated doses comprising a treatment cycle,
such as
with repeated, lower, less-toxic doses of gemcitabine combined with lower,
fractionated
doses of 90Y-DOTA-hPAM4.
[0132] As tolerated, repeated cycles of this fractionated dose schedule are
indicated. By
way of example, 4 weekly doses of 200 mg/m2 of gemcitabine are combined with
three
weekly doses of 8 mg/m2 of 90Y-DOTA-hPAM4, with the latter commencing in the
second week of gemcitabine administration; this constitutes a single therapy
cycle. Still
other doses, higher and lower of each component, may constitute a fractionated
dose,
which is determined by conventional means of assessing hematopoietic toxicity,
since
myelosuppressive effects of both agents can be cumulative. A skilled physician
in such
therapy interventions can adjust these doses based on the patient's bone
marrow status and
general health status based on many factors, including prior exposure to
myelosuppressive
therapeutic agents. These principles can also apply to combinations of
radiolabeled
hPAM4 with other therapeutic agents, including radiosensitizing drugs such as
5-
fluorouracil and cisplatin.
[0133] Chimeric, humanized and human antibodies and fragments thereof have
been used
for in vivo therapeutic and diagnostic methods. Accordingly contemplated is a
method of
delivering a diagnostic or therapeutic agent, or a combination thereof, to a
target
comprising (i) providing a composition that comprises an anti-pancreatic
cancer antibody

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
or fragment thereof, such as a chimeric, humanized or human PAM4 antibody,
conjugated
to at least one diagnostic and/or therapeutic agent and (ii) administering to
a subject the
diagnostic or therapeutic antibody conjugate. In a preferred embodiment, the
anti-
pancreatic cancer antibodies and fragments thereof are humanized or fully
human.
[0134] Also described herein is a cancer cell targeting diagnostic or
therapeutic conjugate
comprising, for example, a chimeric, humanized or human PAM4 MAb or fragment
thereof bound to at least one diagnostic or at least one therapeutic agent.
Preferably, the
diagnostic conjugate is a photoactive diagnostic agent, an ultrasound
detectable agent, an
MRI contrast agent or a PET radionuclide, such as 18F or 68Ga. Still
preferred, the
diagnostic agent is a radionuclide with an energy between 20 and 4,000 keV.
[0135] Another embodiment concerns a method for treating a malignancy
comprising
administering a naked anti-pancreatic cancer antibody, antibody fragment or
fusion
protein, such as a PAM4 antibody, either alone or in conjunction with one or
more other
therapeutic agents. The other therapeutic agent may be added before,
simultaneously with
or after the antibody. In a preferred embodiment, the therapeutic agent is
gemcitabine, and
in a more preferred embodiment, gemcitabine is given with the hPAM4
radioconjugate in
a fractionated dose schedule at lower doses than the conventional 800-1,000
mg/m2 doses
of gemcitabine given weekly for 6 weeks. For example, when combined with
fractionated
therapeutic doses of 9 Y-PAM4, repeated fractionated doses intended to
function as a
radiosensitizing agent of 200-380 mg/m2 gemcitabine are infused. The skilled
artisan will
realize that the antibodies, fusion proteins and/or fragments thereof
described and claimed
herein may be administered with any known or described therapeutic agent,
including but
not limited to heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90)
[0136] The compositions for treatment contain at least one humanized or fully
human
anti-pancreatic cancer antibody or fragment thereof either alone and
unconjugated, or
conjugated or unconjugated and in combination with other antibodies or
fragments
thereof, such as other humanized or chimeric antibodies, human antibodies,
therapeutic
agents or immunomodulators. Naked or conjugated antibodies to the same or
different
epitope or antigen may also be combined with one or more of the anti-
pancreatic cancer
antibodies or fragments thereof
[0137] Accordingly, the present invention contemplates the administration of
anti-
pancreatic cancer antibodies and fragments thereof, including fusion proteins
and
fragments thereof, alone, as a naked antibody or antibody fragment, or
administered as a
41

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
multimodal therapy. Preferably, the antibody is a humanized or fully human
PAM4
antibody or fragment thereof. Multimodal therapies further include
immunotherapy with a
naked anti-pancreatic cancer antibody supplemented with administration of
other
antibodies in the form of naked antibodies, fusion proteins, or as
immunoconjugates. For
example, a humanized or fully human PAM4 antibody may be combined with another

naked antibody, or a humanized PAM4 or other antibody conjugated to an
isotope, one or
more chemotherapeutic agents, cytokines, toxins or a combination thereof. For
example,
the present invention contemplates treatment of a naked or conjugated PAM4
antibody or
fragments thereof before, in combination with, or after other pancreatic tumor
associated
antibodies such as CA19.9, DUPAN2, SPAN1, Nd2, B72.3, CC49, anti-Lea
antibodies,
and antibodies to other Lewis antigens (e.g., Le(y)), as well as antibodies
against
carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA or CEACAM5), CEACAM6, colon-specific antigen-p
(CSAp), MUC-1, MUC-2, MUC-3, MUC-4, MUC-5ac, MUC-16, MUC-17, HLA-DR,
CD40, CD74, CD138, HER2/neu, EGFR, EGP-1, EGP-2, angiogenesis factors (e.g.,
VEGF, P1GF), insulin-like growth factor (ILGF), tenascin, platelet-derived
growth factor,
and IL-6, as well as products of oncogenes (e.g., bc1-2, Kras, p53), cMET, and
antibodies
against tumor necrosis substances. These solid tumor antibodies may be naked
or
conjugated to, inter alia, drugs, toxins, isotopes, radionuclides or
immunomodulators.
Many different antibody combinations may be constructed and used in either
naked or
conjugated form. Alternatively, different naked antibody combinations may be
employed
for administration in combination with other therapeutic agents, such as a
cytotoxic drug
or with radiation, given consecutively, simultaneously, or sequentially.
[0138] The antibodies described herein directly target PAM4 positive tumors.
The
antibodies bind selectively to pancreatic cancer or other cancer antigens and
as the number
of binding sites on the molecule increases, the affinity for the target cell
increases and a
longer residence time is observed at the desired location. Moreover, non-
antigen bound
molecules are cleared from the body quickly and exposure of normal tissues is
minimized.
A use of multispecific antibodies is in AES systems, where anti-PAM4
antibodies pre-
target positive tumors for subsequent specific delivery of diagnostic or
therapeutic agents.
The agents may be carried by histamine succinyl glycyl (HSG) containing
peptides. The
murine monoclonal antibody designated 679 binds with high affinity to
molecules
containing the tri-peptide HSG hapten (Morel et al, Molecular Immunology, 27,
995-1000,
1990) and may be used to form a bispecific antibody with hPAM4; but even more
42

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
preferred is the use of a humanized version of 679. Alternative haptens may
also be
utilized, such as In-DTPA or NOTA. The bispecific antibodies bind selectively
to targeted
antigens allowing for increased affinity and a longer residence time at the
desired location.
Moreover, non-antigen bound antibodies are cleared from the body quickly and
exposure
of normal tissues is minimized. PAM4 and other antibodies against pancreatic
cancer can
be used to diagnose and/or treat mammalian cancer. Diagnosis requires the
further step of
detecting the bound, labeled antibodies or fragments using known techniques.
[0139] In the context of this application, the terms "diagnosis" or
"detection" can be used
interchangeably. Whereas diagnosis usually refers to defining a tissue's
specific
histological status, detection recognizes and locates a tissue, lesion or
organism containing
a particular antigen.
[0140] Administration of the antibodies and their fragments can be effected by

intravenous, intraarterial, intraperitoneal, intramuscular, subcutaneous,
intrapleural,
intrathecal, perfusion through a regional catheter, or direct intralesional
injection. When
administering the antibody by injection, the administration may be by
continuous infusion
or by single or multiple boluses.
Naked Antibody Therapy
[0141] The efficacy of the naked anti-pancreatic cancer antibodies and their
fragments can
be enhanced by supplementing these naked antibodies with one or more other
naked
antibodies, or with one or more immunoconjugates conjugated with one or more
therapeutic agents, including drugs, toxins, immunomodulators, hormones,
oligonucleotides, hormone antagonists, enzymes, enzyme inhibitors, therapeutic

radionuclides, angiogenesis inhibitors, etc., administered concurrently or
sequentially or
according to a prescribed dosing regimen. Alternatively, naked antibodies may
be
administered in conjunction with therapeutic agents that are not attached to
other
antibodies. Antibodies that may be used to supplement the naked anti-
pancreatic cancer
antibodies may be directed against either the same cancer cells or against
immunomodulator cells (e.g., CD40+ cells) that can be recruited to enhance the
antitumor
effects of the naked antibodies of choice.
Immunoconjugates, Therapeutic and Diagnostic Agents
[0142] Anti-pancreatic cancer antibodies and fragments thereof may be
conjugated to at
least one therapeutic and/or diagnostic agent for therapy or diagnosis. For
immunotherapy, the objective is to deliver cytotoxic doses of radioactivity,
toxin, antibody
43

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
and/or drug to target cells, while minimizing exposure to non-target tissues.
Preferably,
anti-pancreatic cancer antibodies are be used to diagnose and/or treat
pancreatic tumors.
[0143] Any of the antibodies, antibody fragments and fusion proteins can be
conjugated
with one or more therapeutic or diagnostic agents, using a variety of
techniques known in
the art. One or more therapeutic or diagnostic agents= may be attached to each
antibody,
antibody fragment or fusion protein. If the Fc region =is absent (for example
with certain
antibody fragments), it is possible to introduce a carbohydrate moiety into
the light chain
variable region of either an antibody or antibody fragment to which a
therapeutic or
diagnostic agent may be attached. See, for example, Leung et al., J Immunol.
154: 5919
(1995); Hansen et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,443,953 (1995), Leung et al., U.S. Pat.
No.
6,254,868. =
[0144] Methods for conjugating peptides to antibody components via an antibody

carbohydrate moiety are well-known to those of skillin the art. See, for
example, Shih et
al., Int J Cancer 41: 832 (1988); Shih et al., Int J Cancer 46: 1101 (1990);
and Shih et al.,
U.S. Pat. No. 5,057,313.
The general method involves reacting an =antibody component having an
oxidized carbohydrate portion with a carrier polymer that has at least one
free amine
function and that is loaded with a plurality of therapeutic agents, such as
peptides or drugs.
This reaction results in an initial Schiff base (imine) linkage, which can be
stabilized by
reduction to a secondary amine to form the final conjugate.
[0145] Antibody fusion proteins or multispecific antibodies comprise two or
more
antibodies or fragments thereof, each of which may be attached to at least one
therapeutic
agent and/or diagnostic agent. Accordingly, one or more of the antibodies or
fragments
thereof of the antibody fusion protein can have more than one therapeutic
and/or
diagnostic agent attached. Further, the therapeutic agents do not need to be
the same but
can be different therapeutic agents, for example, one can attach a drug and a
radioisotope
to the same fusion protein. Particularly, an IgG can be radiolabeled with "II
and attached
to a drug. The 1311 can be incorporated into the tyrosine of the IgG and the
drug attached
to the epsilon amino group of the IgG lysines. Both therapeutic and diagnostic
agents also
can be attached to reduced SH groups and to the carbohydrate side chains of
antibodies.
Alternatively, a bispecific antibody may comprise one antibody or fragment
thereof
against a disease antigen and another against a hapten attached to a
targetable construct,
for use in pretargeting techniques as discussed above.
44

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
[0146] A wide variety of diagnostic and therapeutic reagents can be
administered
concurrently or sequentially, or advantageously conjugated to the antibodies
of the
invention, for example, drugs, toxins, oligonucleotides, immunomodulators,
hormones,
hormone antagonists, enzymes, enzyme inhibitors, radionuclides, angiogenesis
inhibitors,
etc. The therapeutic agents recited here are those agents that also are useful
for
administration separately with a naked antibody as described above.
Therapeutic agents
include, for example, chemotherapeutic drugs such as vinca alkaloids,
anthracyclines,
gemcitabine, epidophyllotoxins, taxanes, antimetabolites, alkylating agents,
antibiotics,
SN-38, COX-2 inhibitors, antimitotics, antiangiogenic and apoptotoic agents,
particularly
doxonibicin, methotrexate, taxol, CPT-11, camptothecans, proteosome
inhibitors, mTOR
inhibitors, HDAC inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and others from these
and other
classes of anticancer agents, and the like. Other useful cancer
chemotherapeutic drugs for
administering concurrently or sequentially, or for the preparation of
immunoconjugates
and antibody fusion proteins include nitrogen mustards, alkyl sulfonates,
nitrosoureas,
triazenes, folic acid analogs, COX-2 inhibitors, antimetabolites, pyrimidine
analogs,
purine analogs, platinum coordination complexes, mTOR inhibitors, tyrosine
kinase
inhibitors, proteosome inhibitors, HDAC inhibitors, camptothecins, hormones,
and the
like. Suitable chemotherapeutic agents are described in REMINGTON'S
PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 19th Ed. (Mack Publishing Co. 1995), and in
GOODMAN AND GILMAN'S THE PHARMACOLOGICAL BASIS OF
THERAPEUTICS, 7th Ed. (MacMillan Publishing Co. 1985), as well as revised
editions
of these publications. Other suitable chemotherapeutic agents, such as
experimental
drugs, are known to those of skill in the art.
[0147] In a preferred embodiment, conjugates of camptothecins and related
compounds,
such as SN-38, may be conjugated to hPAM4 or other anti-pancreatic cancer
antibodies,
for example as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/026,811,
filed February
6, 2008; and 11/388,032, filed March 23, 2006.
[0148] In another preferred embodiment, an hPAM4 antibody is conjugated to
gemcitabine. In another embodiment, gemcitabine is given before, after, or
concurrently
with a naked or conjugated chimeric, humanized or human PAM4 antibody.
Preferably,
the conjugated hPAM4 antibody or antibody fragment is conjugated to a
radionuclide.

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
[0149] A toxin can be of animal, plant or microbial origin. A toxin, such as
Pseudomonas
exotoxin, may also be complexed to or form the therapeutic agent portion of an

immunoconjugate of the anti-pancreatic cancer and hPAM4 antibodies. Other
toxins
suitably employed in the preparation of such conjugates or other fusion
proteins, include
ricin, abrin, ribonuclease (RNase), DNase I, Staphylococcal enterotoxin-A,
pokeweed
antiviral protein, gelonin, diphtheria toxin, Pseudomonas exotoxin, and
Pseudomonas
= endotoxin. See, for example, Pastan et al., Cell 47:641 (1986),
Goldenberg, CA--A
Cancer Journal for Clinicians 44:43 (1994), Sharkey and Goldenberg, CA--A
Cancer
Journal for Clinicians 56:226 (2006). Additional toxins suitable for use are
known to those
of skill in the art and are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,077,499.
[01501 An immunomodulator, such as a cytokine, may also be conjugated to, or
form the
therapeutic agent portion of the immunoconjugate, or may be administered with,
but
unconjugated to, an antibody, antibody fragment or fusion protein. The fusion
protein
may comprise one or more antibodies or fragments thereof binding to different
antigens.
For example, the fusion protein may bind the PAM4 antigen as well as
immunomodulating cells or factors. Alternatively, subjects can receive a naked
antibody,
antibody fragment or fusion protein and a separately administered cytokine,
which can be
administered before, concurrently or after administration of the naked
antibodies. As used
herein, the term "immunomodulator" includes a cytokine, a lymphokine, a
monokine, a
stem cell growth factor, a lymphotoxin, a hematopoietic factor, a colony
stimulating factor
(CSF), an interferon (IFN), parathyroid hormone, thyroxine, insulin,
proinsulin, relaxin,
prorelaxin, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), thyroid stimulating hormone
(TSH),
luteinizing hormone (LH), hepatic growth factor, prostaglandin, fibroblast
growth factor,
prolactin, placental lactogen, OB protein, a transforming growth factor (TGF),
TGF-a,
TGF-[3, insulin-like growth factor (ILGF), erythropoietin, thrombopoietin,
tumor necrosis
factor (TNF), TNF- a, TNF-13, a mullerian-inhibiting substance, mouse
gonadotropin-
associated peptide, inhibin, activin, vascular endothelial growth factor,
integrin,
interleukin (IL), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte
macrophage-
colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon- a, interferon- (3, interferon-
y, S1 factor,
IL-1, IL-lcc, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, 1L-10, IL-11, IL-
12, IL-13, IL-
14, IL-15, IL-16, IL-17, IL-18 IL-21 and IL-25, LIF, kit-ligand, FLT-3,
angiostatin,
thrombospondin, endostatin and LT, and the like.
46

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[0151] Alternatively, the antibodies and fragments can be detectably labeled
by linking
the antibody to an enzyme. When the antibody-enzyme conjugate is incubated in
the
presence of the appropriate substrate, the enzyme moiety reacts with the
substrate to
produce a chemical moiety which can be detected, for example, by
spectrophotometric,
fluorometric or visual means. Examples of enzymes that can be used to
detectably label
antibody include malate dehydrogenase, staphylococcal nuclease, delta-V-
steroid
isomerase, yeast alcohol dehydrogenase, alpha-glycerophosphate dehydrogenase,
triose
phosphate isomerase, horseradish peroxidase, alkaline phosphatase,
asparaginase, glucose
oxidase, alpha-galactosidase, ribonuclease, urease, catalase, glucose-6-
phosphate
dehydrogenase, glucoamylase and acetylcholinesterase.
[0152] A therapeutic or diagnostic agent can be attached at the hinge region
of a reduced
antibody component via disulfide bond formation. As an alternative, such
agents can be
attached to the antibody component using a heterobifunctional cross-linker,
such as N-
succinyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)proprionate (SPDP). Yu et al., Int. J. Cancer 56:
244 (1994).
General techniques for such conjugation are well-known in the art. See, for
example,
Wong, CHEMISTRY OF PROTEIN CONJUGATION AND CROSS-LINKING (CRC
Press 1991); Upeslacis et al., "Modification of Antibodies by Chemical
Methods," in
MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES: PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS, Birch et al.
(eds.), pages 187-230 (Wiley-Liss, Inc. 1995); Price, "Production and
Characterization of
Synthetic Peptide-Derived Antibodies," in MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES:
PRODUCTION, ENGINEERING AND CLINICAL APPLICATION, Ritter et al. (eds.),
pages 60-84 (Cambridge University Press 1995). Alternatively, the therapeutic
or
diagnostic agent can be conjugated via a carbohydrate moiety in the Fc region
of the
antibody. The carbohydrate group can be used to increase the loading of the
same agent
that is bound to a thiol group, or the carbohydrate moiety can be used to bind
a different
peptide.
[0153] The immunoconjugate may comprise one or more radioactive isotopes
useful for
detecting diseased tissue. Particularly useful diagnostic radionuclides
include, but are not
whi, , , , , IlIn 177Lu 18F $2Fe 62-u,
limited to, C Cu,64 67CU, 67Ga, 68Ga, 86y, 90Y,
89Zr, 94mTc,
94Tc, 99mTc, 1201, 1231, 1241, 125/, 1311, 154-158Gd, 32p, 11C, 13N, 150,
186Re, 188Re, 51mu, 52mmu,
55 72 75 76 82M 83
Co, As, Br, Br, Rb, Sr, or other gamma-, beta-, or positron-
emitters, preferably
with a decay energy in the range of 20 to 4,000 keV, more preferably in the
range of 25 to
4,000 keV, and even more preferably in the range of 25 to 1,000 keV, and still
more
47

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
preferably in the range of 70 to 700 keV. Total decay energies of useful
positron-emitting
radionuclides are preferably <2,000 keV, more preferably under 1,000 keV, and
most
preferably <700 keV. Radionuclides useful as diagnostic agents utilizing gamma-
ray
detection include, but are not limited to: 51Cr, "Co, "Co, 59Fe, 67Cu, 67Ga,
"Se, 97Ru,
99mTc, min, 114min, 123/, 125/, 1311, 169-s.Y , 197 Hg, and 201T1. Decay
energies of useful
gamma-ray emitting radionuclides are preferably 20-2000 keV, more preferably
60-600
keV, and most preferably 100-300 keV.
[0154] The immunoconjugate may comprise one or more radioactive isotopes
useful for
treating diseased tissue. Particularly useful therapeutic radionuclides
include, but are not
limited to '''In, 171u, 212Bi, 213Bi, 211At562cu, 64cu, 67Cu, 90y, 1251, 1311,
32p, 33p, 47sc,
111Ag, 67Ga, 142pr, 153sm, 161Tb, 166Dy, 166H0, 186Re, 188Re, 189Re, 212pb,
223Ra, 225 = c,
A 59Fe,
75Se, 77As, 89Sr, 99Mo, lo5Rh, 109pd, 143pr, 149pm, 169Er, 194vr, 1 - 9g
1 Au,
199Au, and 211Pb. The
therapeutic radionuclide preferably has a decay energy in the range of 20 to
6,000 keV,
preferably in the ranges 60 to 200 keV for an Auger emitter, 100-2,500 keV for
a beta
emitter, and 4,000-6,000 keV for an alpha emitter. Maximum decay energies of
useful
beta-particle-emitting nuclides are preferably 20-5,000 keV, more preferably
100-4,000
keV, and most preferably 500-2,500 keV. Also preferred are radionuclides that
substantially decay with Auger-emitting particles. For example, Co-58, Ga-67,
Br-80m,
Tc-99m, Rh-103m, Pt-109, In-111, Sb-119, 1-125, Ho-161, Os-189m and Ir-192.
Decay
energies of useful beta-particle-emitting nuclides are preferably <1,000 keV,
more
preferably <100 keV, and most preferably <70 keV. Also preferred are
radionuclides that
substantially decay with generation of alpha-particles. Such radionuclides
include, but are
not limited to: Dy-152, At-211, Bi-212, Ra-223, Rn-219, Po-215, Bi-211, Ac-
225, Fr-221,
At-217, Bi-213 and Fm-255. Decay energies of useful alpha-particle-emitting
radionuclides are preferably 2,000-10,000 keV, more preferably 3,000-8,000
keV, and
most preferably 4,000-7,000 keV.
[0155] For example, 67Cu, considered one of the more promising radioisotopes
for
radioimmunotherapy due to its 61.5-hour half-life and abundant supply of beta
particles
and gamma rays, can be conjugated to an antibody using the chelating agent, p-
bromoacetamido-benzyl-tetraethylaminetetraacetic acid (TETA). Chase, supra.
Alternatively, 90Y, which emits an energetic beta particle, can be coupled to
an antibody,
antibody fragment or fusion protein, using diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid
(DTPA), or
more preferably using DOTA. Methods of conjugating Y to antibodies or
targetable
48

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
constructs are known in the art and any such known methods may be used. (See,
e.g., U.S.
Patent No. 7,259,249.
See also Linden et al., Clin Cancer Res. 11:5215-22, 2005; Sharkey et al., J
Nucl Med.
46:620-33, 2005; Sharkey et al., J Nucl Med. 44:2000-18, 2003.)
[0156] Additional potential therapeutic radioisotopes include "C, 13N, 150,
75Br, 198Au,
224Ac, 126/, 133-,
1 77Br, "3"ln, 95Ru, 97Ru, 1 3Ru, 195Ru, wing, 20314g, 121mTe, 122mTe, 125mTe,
165Tm, 167Tm, 168Tm, 197pt, 109pd, 105Rh, 142pr, 143pr, 161Tb, 166-0,
H 199Au, 57Co, "Co, 51Cr,
59Fe, 75se, 201T1, 225m, 76Br, 169v
Y and the like.
[0157] In another embodiment, a radiosensitizer can be used in combination
with a naked
or conjugated antibody or antibody fragment. For example, the radiosensitizer
can be used
in combination with a radiolabeled antibody or antibody fragment. The addition
of the
radiosensitizer can result in enhanced efficacy when compared to treatment
with the
radiolabeled antibody or antibody fragment alone. Radiosensitizers are
described in D. M.
Goldenberg (ed.), CANCER THERAPY WITH RADIOLABELED ANTIBODIES, CRC
Press (1995). Other typical radionsensitizers of interest for use with this
technology
include gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin, and have been used in
combination with
external irradiation in the therapy of diverse cancers, including pancreatic
cancer.
Therefore, we have studied the combination of gemcitabine at what is believed
to be
radiosensitizing doses (once weekly 200 mg/m2 over 4 weeks) of gemcitabine
combined
with fractionated doses of 99Y-hPAM4, and have observed objective evidence of
pancreatic cancer reduction after a single cycle of this combination that
proved to be well-
tolerated (no grade 3-4 toxicities by NCI-CTC v. 3 standard).
[0158] Antibodies or fragments thereof that have a boron addend-loaded carrier
for
thermal neutron activation therapy will normally be effected in similar ways.
However, it
will be advantageous to wait until non-targeted immunoconjugate clears before
neutron
irradiation is performed. Clearance can be accelerated using an anti-idiotypic
antibody
that binds to the anti-pancreatic cancer antibody. See U.S. Pat. No. 4,624,846
for a
description of this general principle. For example, boron addends such as
carboranes, can
be attached to antibodies. Carboranes can be prepared with carboxyl functions
on pendant
side chains, as is well-known in the art. Attachment of carboranes to a
carrier, such as
aminodextran, can be achieved by activation of the carboxyl groups of the
carboranes and
condensation with amines on the carrier. The intermediate conjugate is then
conjugated to
the antibody. After administration of the antibody conjugate, a boron addend
is activated
49

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
=
52392-81 =
by thermal neutron irradiation and converted to radioactive atoms which decay
by alpha-
emission to produce highly toxic, short-range effects.
[01591 Methods= of diagnosing cancer in a subject may be accomplished by
administering
a diagnostic immunoconjugate and detecting the diagnostic label attached to an

immunoconjugate that is localized to a cancer or tumor. The antibodies,
antibody
fragments and rusion proteins may be conjugated to =the diagnostic agent or
may be
= administered in a pretargeting technique using targetable constructs
attached to a
diagnostic agent. Radioactive agents that can be used as diagnostic agents are
discussed
above. A suitable non-radioactive diagnostic agent is a contrast agent
suitable for
magnetic resonance imaging, X-rays, computed tomography or ultrasound.
Magnetic
= imaging agents include, for example, non-radioactive metals, such as
manganese, iron and
gadolinium, complexed with metal-chelate combinations that include 2-benzyl-
DTPA and
its monomethyl and cyclohexyl analogs. See U.S. Ser. No. 09/921,290 filed on
Oct. 10, 2001.
Other imaging
agents such as PET scanning nucleotides, preferably 18F, may also be used.
[0160] Contrast agents, such as MRI contrast agents, including, for example,
gadolinium
ions, lanthanum ions, dysprosium ions, iron ions, manganese ions or other
comparable
labels, CT contrast agents, and ultrasound contrast agents may be used as
diagnostic
agents. Paramagnetic ions suitable for use include include chromium (III),
manganese
(II), iron (III), iron (II), cobalt (II), nickel (II), copper (II), neodymium
(III), samarium
(III), ytterbium (II.I), gadolinium (III), vanadium (II), terbium (III),
dysprosium (III),
holmium (III) and erbium (III), with gadolinium being particularly preferred.
[0161] Ions useful in other contexts, such as X-ray imaging, include but are
not limited to
lanthanum (III), gold (III), lead (II) and lifsmuth (III). Fluorescent labels
include
rhodamine, fluorescein and renographin. Rhodamine and fluorescein are often
linked via
an isothiocyanate intermediate.
[0162] Metals are also useful in diagnostic agents, including those for
magnetic resonance
imaging techniques. These metals include, but are not limited to: gadolinium,
manganese,
iron, chromium, copper, cobalt, nickel, dysprosium, rhenium, europium,
terbium, holmium
and neodymium. In order to load an antibody with radioactive metals or
paramagnetic
ions, it may be necessary to react it with a reagent having a long tail to
which are attached
a multiplicity of chelating groups for binding the ions. Such a tail can be a
polymer such
as a polylysine, polysaccharide, or other derivatized or derivatizable chain
having pendant
= 50
=

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
groups to which can be bound chelating groups such= as, e.g.,
ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid (EDTA), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), porphyrins,
polyamines, crown
ethers, bis-thiosemicarbazones, polyoximes, and like groups known to be useful
for this
purpose.
[0163] Chelates are coupled to an antibody, fusion protein, or fragments
thereof using
standard chemistries. The chelate is normally linked to the antibody by a
group which
enables formation of a bond to the molecule with minimal loss of
immunoreactivity and
minimal aggregation and/or internal cross-linking. Other, more unusual,
methods and
reagents for conjugating chelates to antibodies are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
4,824,659 to
Hawthorne, entitled "Antibody Conjugates", issued Apr. 25, 1989.
Particularly useful metal-chelate
combinations include 2-benzyl-DTPA and its monomethyl and cyclohexyl analogs,
used
with diagnostic isotopes in the general energy range of 20 to 2,000 keV. The
same
chelates, when complexed with non-radioactive metals, such as manganese, iron
and
gadolinium are useful for MRI. Macrocyclic chelates such as NOTA, DOTA, and
TETA
are of use with a variety of metals and radiometals, most particularly with
radionuclides of
gallium, yttrium and copper, respectively. Such metal-chelate complexes can be
made
very stable by tailoring the ring size to the metal of interest. Other ring-
type chelates such
as macrocyclic polyethers, which are of interest for stably binding nuclides,
such as 223Ra
for RAIT are encompassed by the invention.
[0164] Radiopaque and contrast materials are used for enhancing X-rays and
computed
tomography, and include iodine compounds, barium compounds, gallium compounds,

thallium compounds, etc. Specific compounds include barium, diatrizoate,
ethiodized oil,
gallium citrate, iocarmic acid, iocetamic acid, iodamide, iodipamide,
iodoxamic acid,
iogulamide, iohexol, iopamidol, iopanoic acid, ioprocemic acid, iosefamic
acid, ioseric
acid, iosulamide meglumine, iosemetic acid, iotasul, iotetric acid, iothalamic
acid, iotroxic
acid, ioxaglic acid, ioxotrizoic acid, ipodate, meglumine, metrizamide,
metrizoate,
propyliodone, and thallous chloride.
[0165] The antibodies, antibody fragments and fusion proteins also can be
labeled with a
fluorescent compound. The presence of a fluorescent-labeled MAb is determined
by
exposing the antibody to light of the proper wavelength and detecting the
resultant
fluorescence. Fluorescent labeling compounds include Alexa 350, Alexa 430,
AMCA,
aminoacridine, BODIPY 630/650, BODIPY 650/665; BODIPY-FL, BODIPY-R60,
51

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
BODIPY-TMR, BODIPY-TRX, 5-carboxy-4',5'-dichloro-2',7'-dimethoxy fluorescein,
5-
carboxy-2',4',5',7'-tetrachlorofluorescein, 5-carboxyfluorescein, 5-
carboxyrhodamine, 6-
carboxyrhodamine, 6-carboxytetramethyl amino, Cascade Blue, Cy2, Cy3, Cy5,6-
FAM,
dansyl chloride, Fluorescein, fluorescein isothiocyanate, fluorescamine, HEX,
6-JOE,
NBD (7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole), Oregon Green 488, Oregon Green 500,
Oregon
Green 514, Pacific Blue, phthalic acid, terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid,
cresyl fast
violet, cresyl blue violet, brilliant cresyl blue, para-aminobenzoic acid,
erythrosine,
phthalocyanines, phthaldehyde, azomethines, cyanines, xanthines,
succinylfluoresceins,
rare earth metal cryptates, europium trisbipyridine diamine, a europium
cryptate or
chelate, diamine, dicyanins, La Jolla blue dye, allopycocyanin, allococyanin
B,
phycocyanin C, phycocyanin R, thiamine, phycoerythrocyanin, phycoerythrin R,
REG,
Rhodamine Green, rhodamine isothiocyanate, Rhodamine Red, ROX, TAMRA, TET,
TRIT (tetramethyl rhodamine isothiol), Tetramethylrhodamine, and Texas Red.
Fluorescently-labeled antibodies are particularly useful for flow cytometry
analysis, but
can also be used in endoscopic and intravascular detection methods..
[0166] Alternatively, the antibodies, antibody fragments and fusion proteins
can be
detectably labeled by coupling the antibody to a chemiluminescent compound.
The
presence of the chemiluminescent-tagged MAb is determined by detecting the
presence of
luminescence that arises during the course of a chemical reaction. Examples of

chemiluminescent labeling compounds include luminol, isoluminol, an aromatic
acridinium ester, an imidazole, an acridinium salt and an oxalate ester.
[0167] Similarly, a bioluminescent compound can be used to label the
antibodies and
fragments there. Bioluminescence is a type of chemiluminescence found in
biological
systems in which a catalytic protein increases the efficiency of the
chemiluminescent
reaction. The presence of a bioluminescent protein is determined by detecting
the presence
of luminescence. Bioluminescent compounds that are useful for labeling include
luciferin,
luciferase and aequorin.
[0168] Accordingly, a method of diagnosing a malignancy in a subject is
described,
comprising performing an in vitro diagnosis assay on a specimen (fluid, tissue
or cells)
from the subject with a composition comprising an anti-pancreatic cancer MAb,
fusion
protein or fragment thereof. Immunohistochemistry can be used to detect the
presence of
PAM4 antigen in a cell or tissue by the presence of bound antibody.
Preferably, the
52

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
malignancy that is being diagnosed is a cancer. Most preferably, the cancer is
pancreatic
cancer.
[0169] Additionally, a chelator such as DTPA, DOTA, TETA, or NOTA or a
suitable
peptide, to which a detectable label, such as a fluorescent molecule, or
cytotoxic agent,
such as a heavy metal or radionuclide, can be conjugated to a subject
antibody. For
example, a therapeutically useful immunoconjugate can be obtained by
conjugating a
photoactive agent or dye to an antibody fusion protein. Fluorescent
compositions, such as
fluorochrome, and other chromogens, or dyes, such as porphyrins sensitive to
visible light,
have been used to detect and to treat lesions by directing the suitable light
to the lesion. In
therapy, this has been termed photoradiation, phototherapy, or photodynamic
therapy (Jori
et al. (eds.), PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY OF TUMORS AND OTHER DISEASES
(Libreria Progetto 1985); van den Bergh, Chem. Britain 22:430 (1986)).
Moreover,
monoclonal antibodies have been coupled with photoactivated dyes for achieving

phototherapy. Mew et al., J. Immunol. 130:1473 (1983); idem., Cancer Res.
45:4380
(1985); Oseroff et al., Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:8744 (1986); idem.,
Photochem.
Photobiol. 46:83 (1987); Hasan et al., Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 288:471 (1989);
Tatsuta et al.,
Lasers Surg. Med. 9:422 (1989); Pelegrin et al., Cancer 67:2529 (1991).
[01701 For purposes of therapy, the anti-pancreatic cancer antibodies and
fragments
thereof are administered to a patient in a therapeutically effective amount.
An antibody is
said to be administered in a "therapeutically effective amount" if the amount
administered
is physiologically significant. An agent is physiologically significant if its
presence results
in a detectable change in the physiology of a recipient patient.
[0171] A diagnostic agent is a molecule or atom, which may be administered
conjugated
to an antibody, antibody fragment or fusion protein or a targetable construct,
and is useful
in diagnosing/detecting a disease by locating the cells containing the disease-
associated
antigen. Useful diagnostic agents include, but are not limited to,
radioisotopes, dyes (such
as with the biotin-streptavidin complex), radiopaque materials (e.g., iodine,
barium,
gallium, and thallium compounds and the like), contrast agents, fluorescent
compounds or
molecules and enhancing agents (e.g., paramagnetic ions) for magnetic
resonance imaging
(MRI). U.S. Pat. No. 6,331,175 describes MRI technique and the preparation of
antibodies conjugated to a MRI enhancing agent. Preferably, the diagnostic
agents are
selected from the group consisting of radioisotopes for nuclear imaging,
endoscopic and
intravascular detection, enhancing agents for use in magnetic resonance
imaging or in
53

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
ultrasonography, radiopaque and contrast agents for X-rays and computed
tomography,
and fluorescent compounds for fluoroscopy, including endoscopic fluoroscopy.
Fluorescent and radioactive agents conjugated to antibodies or used in
bispecific,
pretargeting methods, are particularly useful for endoscopic, intraoperative
or
intravascular detection of the targeted antigens associated with diseased
tissues or clusters
of cells, such as malignant tumors, as disclosed in Goldenberg U.S. Pat. Nos.
5,716,595;
6,096,289 and U.S. application Ser. No. 09/348,818,
particularly with gamma-, beta- and positron-emitters.
Endoscopic applications may be used when there is spread to a structure that
allows an
endoscope, such as the colon. Radionuclides useful for positron emission
tomography
include, but are not limited to: F-18, Mn-51, Mn-52m, Fe-52, Co-55, Cu-62, Cu-
64, Ga-
68, As-72, Br-75, Br-76, Rb-82m, Sr-83, Y-86, Zr-89, Tc-94m, In-110, 1-120,
and 1-124.
Total decay energies of useful positron-emitting radionuclides are preferably
<2,000 keV,
more preferably under 1,000 keV, and most preferably <700 keV. Radionuclides
useful as
diagnostic agents utilizing gamma-ray detection include, but are not limited
to: Cr-51, Co-
57, Co-58, Fe-59, Cu-67, Ga-67, Se-75, Ru-97, Tc-99m, In-111, 1n-114m, 1-123,
1-125, I-
131, Yb-169, Hg-197, and TI-201. Decay energies of useful gamma-ray emitting
radionuclides are preferably 20-2000 keV, more preferably 60-600 keV, and most

preferably 100-300 keV.
In Vitro Diagnosis
[0172] The present invention contemplates the use of anti-pancreatic cancer
antibodies to
screen biological samples in vitro for the presence of the PAM4 antigen. In
such
immunoassays, the antibody, antibody fragment or fusion protein may be
utilized in liquid
phase or bound to a solid-phase carrier, as described below. For purposes of
in vitro
diagnosis, any type of antibody such as murine, chimeric, humanized or human
may be
utilized, since there is no host immune response to consider.
[0173] One example of a screening method for deterrnining whether a biological
sample
contains the PAM4 antigen is the radioimmunoassay (RIA). For example, in one
form of
RIA, the substance under test is mixed with PAM4 MAb in the presence of
radiolabeled
PAM4 antigen. In this method, the concentration of the test substance will be
inversely
proportional to the amount of labeled PAM4 antigen bound to the MAb and
directly
related to the amount of free, labeled PAM4 antigen. Other suitable screening
methods
will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art.
54

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[0174] Alternatively, in vitro assays can be performed in which an anti-
pancreatic cancer
antibody, antibody fragment or fusion protein is bound to a solid-phase
carrier. For
example, MAbs can be attached to a polymer, such as aminodextran, in order to
link the
MAb to an insoluble support such as a polymer-coated bead, a plate or a tube.
[0175] Other suitable in vitro assays will be readily apparent to those of
skill in the art.
The specific concentrations of detectably labeled antibody and PAM4 antigen,
the
temperature and time of incubation, as well as other assay conditions may be
varied,
depending on various factors including the concentration of the PAM4 antigen
in the
sample, the nature of the sample, and the like. The binding activity of a
sample of anti-
pancreatic cancer antibody may be determined according to well-known methods.
Those
skilled in the art will be able to determine operative and optimal assay
conditions for each
determination by employing routine experimentation.
[0176] The presence of the PAM4 antigen in a biological sample can be
determined using
an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (e.g., Gold et al. J Clin Oncol.
24:252-
58, 2006). In the direct competitive ELISA, a pure or semipure antigen
preparation is
bound to a solid support that is insoluble in the fluid or cellular extract
being tested and a
quantity of detectably labeled soluble antibody is added to permit detection
and/or
quantitation of the binary complex formed between solid-phase antigen and
labeled
antibody.
[0177] In contrast, a "double-determinant" ELISA, also known as a "two-site
ELISA" or
"sandwich assay," requires small amounts of antigen and the assay does not
require
extensive purification of the antigen. Thus, the double-determinant ELISA is
preferred to
the direct competitive ELISA for the detection of an antigen in a clinical
sample. See, for
example, the use of the double-determinant ELISA for quantitation of the c-myc

oncoprotein in biopsy specimens. Field et al., Oncogene 4: 1463 (1989);
Spandidos et al.,
AntiCancer Res. 9: 821 (1989).
[0178] In a double-determinant ELISA, a quantity of unlabeled MAb or antibody
fragment (the "capture antibody") is bound to a solid support, the test sample
is brought
into contact with the capture antibody, and a quantity of detectably labeled
soluble
antibody (or antibody fragment) is added to permit detection and/or
quantitation of the
ternary complex formed between the capture antibody, antigen, and labeled
antibody. In
the present context, an antibody fragment is a portion of an anti-pancreatic
cancer MAb
that binds to an epitope of the PAM4 antigen. Methods of performing a double-

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
determinant ELISA are well-known. See, for example, Field et al., supra,
Spandidos et al.,
supra, and Moore et al., "Twin-Site ELISAs for fos and myc Oncoproteins Using
the
AMPAK System," in METHODS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, VOL. 10, pages 273-
281 (The Humana Press, Inc. 1992).
[0179] In the double-determinant ELISA, the soluble antibody or antibody
fragment must
bind to a PAM4 epitope that is distinct from the epitope recognized by the
capture
antibody. The double-determinant ELISA can be performed to ascertain whether
the
PAM4 antigen is present in a biopsy sample. Alternatively, the assay can be
performed to
quantitate the amount of PAM4 antigen that is present in a clinical sample of
body fluid.
The quantitative assay can be perfoimed by including dilutions of purified
PAM4 antigen.
[0180] The anti-pancreatic cancer Mabs, fusion proteins, and fragments thereof
also are
suited for the preparation of an assay kit. Such a kit may comprise a carrier
means that is
compartmentalized to receive in close confinement one or more container means
such as
vials, tubes and the like, each of said container means comprising the
separate elements of
the immunoassay.
[0181] The subject antibodies, antibody fragments and fusion proteins also can
be used to
detect the presence of the PAM4 antigen in tissue sections prepared from a
histological
specimen. Such in situ detection can be used to determine the presence of the
PAM4
antigen and to determine the distribution of the PAM4 antigen in the examined
tissue. In
situ detection can be accomplished by applying a detectably-labeled antibody
to frozen
tissue sections. Studies indicate that the PAM4 antigen is preserved in
paraffin-embedded
sections. General techniques of in situ detection are well-known to those of
ordinary skill.
See, for example, Ponder, "Cell Marking Techniques and Their Application," in
MAMMALIAN DEVELOPMENT: A PRACTICAL APPROACH 113-38 Monk (ed.)
(IRL Press 1987), and Coligan at pages 5.8.1-5.8.8.
[0182] Antibodies, antibody fragments and fusion proteins can be detectably
labeled with
any appropriate marker moiety, for example, a radioisotope, an enzyme, a
fluorescent
label, a dye, a chromagen, a chemiluminescent label, a bioluminescent labels
or a
paramagnetic label.
[0183] The marker moiety can be a radioisotope that is detected by such means
as the use
of a gamma counter or a scintillation counter or by autoradiography. In a
preferred
embodiment, the diagnostic conjugate is a gamma-, beta- or a positron-emitting
isotope.
A marker moiety in the present description refers to a molecule that will
generate a signal
56

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
under predetermined conditions. Examples of marker moieties include
radioisotopes,
enzymes, fluorescent labels, chemiluminescent labels, bioluminescent labels
and
paramagnetic labels.
[0184] The binding of marker moieties to anti-pancreatic cancer antibodies can
be
accomplished using standard techniques known to the art. Typical methodology
in this
regard is described by Kennedy et al., Clin Chim Acta 70: 1 (1976), Schurs et
al., Clin.
Chim. Acta 81: 1 (1977), Shih et al., Int J Cancer 46: 1101 (1990).
[0185] The above-described in vitro and in situ detection methods may be used
to assist
in the diagnosis or staging of a pathological condition. For example, such
methods can be
used to detect tumors that express the PAM4 antigen such as pancreatic cancer.
In Vivo Diagnosis/Detection
[0186] Various methods of in vivo diagnostic imaging with radiolabeled MAbs
are well-
known. In the technique of immunoscintigraphy, for example, antibodies are
labeled with
a gamma-emitting radioisotope and introduced into a patient. A gamma camera is
used to
detect the location and distribution of gamma-emitting radioisotopes. See, for
example,
Srivastava (ed.), RADIOLABELED MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES FOR IMAGING
AND THERAPY (Plenum Press 1988), Chase, "Medical Applications of
Radioisotopes,"
in REMINGTON'S PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 18th Edition, Gennaro et al.
(eds.), pp. 624-652 (Mack Publishing Co., 1990), and Brown, "Clinical Use of
Monoclonal Antibodies," in BIOTECHNOLOGY AND PHARMACY 227-49, Pezzuto et
al. (eds.) (Chapman & Hall 1993).
[0187] For diagnostic imaging, radioisotopes may be bound to antibody either
directly or
indirectly by using an intermediary functional group. Useful intermediary
functional
groups include chelators such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and
diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. For example, see Shih et al., supra, and
U.S. Pat. No.
5,057,313.
[0188] The radiation dose delivered to the patient is maintained at as low a
level as
possible through the choice of isotope for the best combination of minimum
half-life,
minimum retention in the body, and minimum quantity of isotope which will
permit
detection and accurate measurement. Examples of radioisotopes that can be
bound to an anti-
1
pereatic cancer antibody and are appropriate for diagnostic imaging include
99m Tc 11
, In
and 18F.
57

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[0189] The subject antibodies, antibody fragments and fusion proteins also can
be labeled
with paramagnetic ions and a variety of radiological contrast agents for
purposes of in vivo
diagnosis. Contrast agents that are particularly useful for magnetic resonance
imaging
comprise gadolinium, manganese, dysprosium, lanthanum, or iron ions.
Additional agents
include chromium, copper, cobalt, nickel, rhenium, europium, terbium, holmium,
or
neodymium. Antibodies and fragments thereof can also be conjugated to
ultrasound
contrast/enhancing agents. For example, one ultrasound contrast agent is a
liposome.
Also preferred, the ultrasound contrast agent is a liposome that is gas
filled.
[0190] In a preferred embodiment, a bispecific antibody can be conjugated to a
contrast
agent. For example, the bispecific antibody may comprise more than one image-
enhancing agent for use in ultrasound imaging. In another preferred
embodiment, the
contrast agent is a liposome. Preferably, the liposome comprises a bivalent
DTPA-peptide
covalently attached to the outside surface of the liposome.
Pharmaceutically Suitable Excipients
[0191] Additional pharmaceutical methods may be employed to control the
duration of
action of an anti-pancreatic cancer antibody in a therapeutic application.
Control release
preparations can be prepared through the use of polymers to complex or adsorb
the
antibody, antibody fragment or fusion protein. For example, biocompatible
polymers
include matrices of poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) and matrices of a
polyanhydride
copolymer of a stearic acid dimer and sebacic acid. Sherwood et al.,
Bio/Technology 10:
1446 (1992). The rate of release of an antibody, antibody fragment or fusion
protein from
such a matrix depends upon the molecular weight of the antibody, antibody
fragment or
fusion protein, the amount of antibody within the matrix, and the size of
dispersed
particles. Saltzman et al., Biophys. J. 55: 163 (1989); Sherwood et al.,
supra. Other solid
dosage forms are described in Ansel et al., PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORMS
AND DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS, 5th Edition (Lea & Febiger 1990), and Gennaro
(ed.), REMINGTON'S PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 18th Edition (Mack Publishing
Company 1990), and revised editions thereof.
[0192] The antibodies, fragments thereof or fusion proteins to be delivered to
a subject
can comprise one or more pharmaceutically suitable excipients, one or more
additional
ingredients, or some combination of these. The antibody can be formulated
according to
known methods to prepare pharmaceutically useful compositions, whereby the
immunoconjugate or naked antibody is combined in a mixture with a
pharmaceutically
58

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
suitable excipient. Sterile phosphate-buffered saline is one example of a
pharmaceutically
suitable excipient. Other suitable excipients are well-known to those in the
art. See, for
example, Ansel et al., PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORMS AND DRUG
DELIVERY SYSTEMS, 5th Edition (Lea & Febiger 1990), and Gennaro (ed.),
REMINGTON'S PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 18th Edition (Mack Publishing
Company 1990), and revised editions thereof.
[0193] The immunoconjugate or naked antibody can be formulated for intravenous

administration via, for example, bolus injection or continuous infusion.
Formulations for
injection can be presented in unit dosage form, e.g., in ampules or in multi-
dose
containers, with an added preservative. The compositions can take such forms
as
suspensions, solutions or emulsions in oily or aqueous vehicles, and can
contain
formulatory agents such as suspending, stabilizing and/or dispersing agents.
Alternatively,
the active ingredient can be in powder form for constitution with a suitable
vehicle, e.g.,
sterile pyrogen-free water, before use.
[0194] The immunoconjugate, naked antibody, fragment thereof or fusion protein
may
also be administered to a mammal subcutaneously or by other parenteral routes.
In a
preferred embodiment, the antibody or fragment thereof is administered in a
dosage of 20
to 2000 milligrams protein per dose. Moreover, the administration may be by
continuous
infusion or by single or multiple boluses. In general, the dosage of an
administered
immunoconjugate, fusion protein or naked antibody for humans will vary
depending upon
such factors as the patient's age, weight, height, sex, general medical
condition and
previous medical history. Typically, it is desirable to provide the recipient
with a dosage
of immunoconjugate, antibody fusion protein or naked antibody that is in the
range of
from about 1 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg as a single intravenous or infusion, although a
lower or
higher dosage also may be administered as circumstances dictate. This dosage
may be
repeated as needed, for example, once per week for four to ten weeks,
preferably once per
week for eight weeks, and more preferably, once per week for four weeks. It
may also be
given less frequently, such as every other week for several months, or more
frequently,
such as two- or three-time weekly. The dosage may be given through various
parenteral
routes, with appropriate adjustment of the dose and schedule.
59

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
Kits
[0195] Various embodiments may concern kits containing components suitable for

treating or diagnosing diseased tissue in a patient. Exemplary kits may
contain at least one
antibody, antigen binding fragment or fusion protein as described herein. If
the
composition containing components for administration is not formulated for
delivery via
the alimentary canal, such as by oral delivery, a device capable of delivering
the kit
components through some other route may be included. One type of device, for
applications such as parenteral delivery, is a syringe that is used to inject
the composition
into the body of a subject. Inhalation devices may also be used. In certain
embodiments,
an anti-pancreatic cancer antibody or antigen binding fragment thereof may be
provided in
the form of a prefilled syringe or autoinjection pen containing a sterile,
liquid formulation
or lyophilized preparation of antibody (e.g., Kivitz et al., Clin. Ther. 2006,
28:1619-29).
[0196] The kit components may be packaged together or separated into two or
more
containers. In some embodiments, the containers may be vials that contain
sterile,
lyophilized formulations of a composition that are suitable for
reconstitution. A kit may
also contain one or more buffers suitable for reconstitution and/or dilution
of other
reagents. Other containers that may be used include, but are not limited to, a
pouch, tray,
box, tube, or the like. Kit components may be packaged and maintained
sterilely within
the containers. Another component that can be included is instructions for use
of the kit.
EXAMPLES
[0197] The examples below are illustrative of embodiments of the current
invention and
are not limiting to the scope of the claims. The examples discuss studies
employing an
exemplary anti-pancreatic cancer monoclonal antibody (PAM4). Clinical studies
with the
PAM4 MAb have shown that a majority of pancreatic cancer lesions were targeted
in
patients and there was no indication of uptake in normal tissues. Dosimetry
indicated that
it was possible to deliver 10 to 20 cGy/mCi to tumors, with a tumor to red
marrow dose
ratio of 3:1 to 10:1. The data show that PAM4 is useful for the treatment of
pancreatic
cancer.
Example 1. Humanized PAM4 Mab
[0198] In preferred embodiments, the claimed methods and compositions utilize
the
antibody hPAM4 which is a humanized IgG of the murine PAM4 MAb raised against

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
pancreatic cancer mucin. Humanization of the murine PAM4 sequences was
utilized to
reduce the human antimouse antibody (HAMA) response. To produce the humanized
PAM4, murine complementarity determining regions (CDR) were transferred from
heavy
and light variable chains of the mouse immunoglobulin into human framework
region
(FR) antibody sequences, followed by the replacement of some human FR residues
with
their murine counterparts. Humanized monoclonal antibodies are suitable for
use in in
vitro and in vivo diagnostic and therapeutic methods.
[0199] Comparison of the variable region framework sequences of the murine
PAM4
MAb (FIGS. 1A and 1B) to known human antibodies in the Kabat database showed
that
the FRs of PAM4 Vic and VH exhibited the highest degree of sequence homology
to that
of the human antibodies Walker Vic and Wi12 VH, respectively. Therefore, the
Walker VI(
and Wi12 VH FRs were selected as the human frameworks into which the murine
CDRs
for PAM4 Vic and VH were grafted, respectively (FIG. 3). The FR4 sequence of
the
human antibody, NEWM, however, was used to replace the Wi12 FR4 sequence for
the
humanization of the PAM4 heavy chain (FIG. 3B). A few amino acid residues in
PAM4
FRs that flank the putative CDRs were maintained in hPAM4 based on the
consideration
that these residues have more impact on Ag binding than other FR residues.
These
residues were 21M, 47W, 59P, 60A, 85S, 87F, and 100G of Vic and 27Y, 30P, 38K,
481,
66K, 67A, and 69L of VH. The DNA and amino acid sequences of hPAM4 Vic (SEQ ID

NO:16) and VH (SEQ ID NO:19) are shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, respectively.
[0200] A modified strategy as described by Leung et al. (Leung et al., 1994))
was used to
construct the designed VI( and VH genes (FIG. 4) for hPAM4 using a combination
of long
oligonucleotide syntheses and PCR. For the construction of the hPAM4 VH
domain, two
long oligonucleotides, hPAM4VHA (173-mer) and hPAM4VHB (173-mer) were
synthesized on an automated DNA synthesizer (Applied Biosystem).
[0201] hPAM4VHA represents nt 17 to 189 of the hPAM4 VH domain.
5'- AGTCTGGGGC TGAGGTGAAG AAGCCTGGGG CCTCAGTGAA
GGTCTCCTGC GAGGCTTCTG GATACACATT CCCTAGCTAT GTTTTGCACT
GGGTGAAGCA GGCCCCTGGA CAAGGGCTTG AGTGGATTGG ATATATTAAT
CCTTACAATG ATGGTACTCA GTACAATGAG AAG-3' (SEQ ID NO:20)
61

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[0202] hPAM4VHB represents the minus strand of the hPAM4 VH domain
complementary to nt 169 to 341.
5'- AGGGTTCCCT GGCCCCAGTA AGCAAATCCG TAGCTACCAC CGAAGCCTCT
TGCACAGTAA TACACGGCCG TGTCGTCAGA TCTCAGCCTG CTCAGCTCCA
TGTAGGCTGT GTTGATGGAC GTGTCCCTGG TCAGTGTGGC CTTGCCTTTG
AACTTCTCAT TGTACTGAGT ACC-3' (SEQ ID NO:21)
[0203] The 3'-terminal sequences (21 nt residues) of hPAM4VHA and VHB are
complementary to each other. Under defined PCR condition, the 3'-ends of
hPAM4VHA
and VHB anneal to form a short double stranded DNA flanked by the rest of the
long
oligonucleotides. Each annealed end serves as a primer for the transcription
of the single
stranded DNA, resulting in a double strand DNA composed of the nt 17 to 341 of
hPAM4
VH. This DNA was further amplified in the presence of two short
oligonucleotides,
hPAM4VHBACK and hPAM4VHFOR to form the full-length hPAM4 VH. The
underlined portions are restriction sites for subcloning as shown in FIG. 4B.
hPAM4VHBACK 5'-CAG GTG CAG CTG CAG CAG TCT GGG GCT GAG GTG A-3'
(SEQ ID NO:22)
hPAM4VHFOR 5'-TGA GGA GAC GGT GAC CAG GGT TCC CTG GCC CCA-3'
(SEQ ID NO:23)
[0204] A minimal amount of hPAM4VHA and VHB (determined empirically) was
amplified in the presence of 10 1_, of 10X PCR Buffer (500 mM KC1, 100 mM
Tris HC1
buffer, pH 8.3, 15 mM MgC12), 2 prnol of hPAM4VHBACK and hPAM4VKFOR, and 2.5
units of Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer Cetus, Norwalk, Conn.). This
reaction
mixture was subjected to three cycles of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
consisting of
denaturation at 94 C for 1 minute, annealing at 45 C for 1 minute, and
polymerization at
72 C for 1.5 minutes. This procedure was followed by 27 cycles of PCR reaction

consisting of denaturation at 94 C for 1 minute, annealing at 55 C for 1
minute, and
polymerization at 72 C for 1 minute. Double-stranded PCR-amplified product for
hPAM4
VH was gel-purified, restriction-digested with PstI and BstEII restriction
sites and cloned
into the complementary PstI/BstEII restriction sites of the heavy chain
staging vector,
VHpBS2, in which the VH sequence was fully assembled with the DNA sequence
62

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
encoding the translation initiation codon and a secretion signal peptide in-
frame ligated at
the 5'-end and an intron sequence at the 3'-end. VHpBS2 is a modified staging
vector of
VHpBS (Leung et al., Hybridoma, 13:469, 1994), into which a XhoI restriction
site was
introduced at sixteen bases upstream of the translation initiation codon to
facilitate the
next subcloning step. The assembled VH gene was subcloned as a XhoI-BamHI
restriction fragment into the expression vector, pdHL2, which contains the
expression
cassettes for both human IgG heavy and light chains under the control of IgH
enhancer
and MT1 promoter, as well as a mouse d/fr gene as a marker for selection and
amplification. Since the heavy chain region of pdHL2 lacks a BamHI restriction
site, this
ligation requires use of a linker to provide a bridge between the BamHI site
of the variable
chain and the HindIII site present in the pdHL2 vector. The resulting
expression vectors
were designated as hPAM4VHpdHL2.
[0205] For constructing the full length DNA of the humanized Vic sequence,
hPAM4VKA (157-mer) and hPAM4VKB (156-mer) were synthesized as described above.

hPAM4VKA and VKB were amplified by two short oligonucleotides hPAM4VKBACK
and hPAM4VKFOR as described above.
[0206] hPAM4VKA represents nt 16 to 172 of the hPAM4 Vic domain.
5'-CAGTCTCCAT CCTCCCTGTC TGCATCTGTA GGAGACAGAG TCACCATGAC
CTGCAGTGCC AGCTCAAGTG TAAGTTCCAG CTACTTGTAC TGGTACCAAC
AGAAACCAGG GAAAGCCCCC AAACTCTGGA TTTATAGCAC ATCCAACCTG
GCTTCTG-3' (SEQ ID NO:24)
[0207] hPAM4VKB represents the minus strand of the hPAM4 VI( domain
complementary to nt 153 to 308.
5'-GTCCCCCCTC CGAACGTGTA CGGGTACCTA TTCCACTGAT GGCAGAAATA
AGAGGCAGAA TCTTCAGGTT GCAGACTGCT GATGGTGAGA GTGAAGTCTG
TCCCAGATCC ACTGCCACTG AAGCGAGCAG GGACTCCAGA AGCCAGGTTG
GATGTG-3' (SEQ ID NO:25)
[0208] The 3'-terminal sequences (20 nt residues) of hPAM4VKA and VKB are
complementary to each other. Under defined PCR condition, the 3'-ends of
hPAM4VKA
and VKB anneal to form a short double-stranded DNA flanked by the rest of the
long
63

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
oligonucleotides. Each annealed end served as a primer for the transcription
of the single
stranded DNA, resulting in a double strand DNA composed of nt 16 to 308 of
hPAM4 Vic
This DNA was further amplified in the presence of two short oligonucleotides,
hPAM4VKBACK and hPAM4VKFOR to form the full-length hPAM4 Vic. The
underlined portions are restriction sites for subcloning as described below.
hPAM4VKBACK 5'-GAC ATC CAG CTG ACC CAG TCT CCA TCC TCC CTG-3'
(SEQ ID NO:26)
hPAM4VKFOR 5'- TTA GAT CTC CAG TCG TGT CCC CCC TCC GAA CGT-3' (SEQ
ID NO:27)
[0209] Gel-purified PCR products for hPAM4 Vic were restriction-digested with
PvuII
and BglII and cloned into the complementary PvuII/Bc1I sites of the light
chain staging
vector, VKpBR2. VKpBR2 is a modified staging vector of VKpBR (Leung et al.,
Hybridoma, 13:469, 1994), into which a XbaI restriction site was introduced at
sixteen
bases upstream of the translation initiation codon. The assembled Vic genes
were
subcloned as XbaI-BamHI restriction fragments into the expression vector
containing the
VH sequence, hPAM4VHpdHL2. The resulting expression vectors were designated as

hPAM4pdHL2.
[0210] Approximately 301..tg of hPAM4pdHL2 was linearized by digestion with
San and
transfected into Sp2/0-Ag14 cells by electroporation at 450 V and 25 F. The
transfected
cells were plated into 96-well plates and incubated in a CO2 cell culture
incubator for two
days and then selected for MTX resistance. Colonies surviving selection
emerged in two
to three weeks and were screened for human antibody secretion by ELISA assay.
Briefly,
supernatants (-100 ul) from the surviving colonies were added into the wells
of an ELISA
microplate precoated with goat anti-human IgG F(ab')2 fragment-specific Ab.
The plate
was incubated for one hour at room temperature. Unbound proteins were removed
by
washing three times with wash buffer (PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20).
Horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG Fc fragment-specific Ab was added to
the
wells. Following incubation for one hour, a substrate solution (100 4/well)
containing 4
mM o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (OPD) and 0.04% H202 in PBS was added to

the wells after washing. Color was allowed to develop in the dark for 30
minutes and the
reaction was stopped by the addition of 504 of 4 N H2SO4 solution. The bound
human
64

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
IgG was measured by reading the absorbance at 490 nm on an ELISA reader.
Positive cell
clones were expanded and hPAM4 was purified from cell culture supernatant by
affinity
chromatography on a Protein A column.
[0211] The Ag-binding activity of hPAM4 was confirmed by ELISA assay in a
microtiter
plate coated with pancreas cancer cell extracts. An ELISA competitive binding
assay
using PAM4-antigen coated plates was developed to assess the Ag-binding
affinity of
hPAM4 in comparison with that of a chimeric PAM4 composed of murine V and
human C
domains. Constant amounts of the HRP-conjugated cPAM4 mixed with varying
concentrations of cPAM4 or hPAM4 were added to the coated wells and incubated
at
room temperature for 1-2 h. The amount of HRP-conjugated cPAM4 bound to the
CaPanl
Ag was revealed by reading the absorbance at 490 nm after the addition of a
substrate
solution containing 4 mM o-
phenylenediamine dihydrochloride and 0.04% H202.
As shown by the competition assays in FIG. 4, hPAM4 and cPAM4 antibodies
exhibited
similar binding activities.
Example 2. Immunohistochemistry Staining Studies
[0212] Immunohistochemistry on normal adult tissues showed that the PAM4
reactive
epitope was restricted to the gastrointestinal tract where staining was weak,
yet positive
(Table 1). Normal pancreatic tissue, including ducts, ductules, acini, and
islet cells, were
negative for staining. A PAM4 based enzyme immunoassay with tissue homogenates
as
antigens generally supported the immunohistology data (Table 2). The PAM4
epitope
was absent from normal pancreas and other non-gastrointestinal tissues. In
neoplastic
tissues, PAM4 was reactive with twenty one out of twenty five (85%) pancreatic
cancers
(Table 3 and Table 4) and ten out of twenty six colon cancers, but only
limited reactivity
with tumors of the stomach, lung, breast, ovary, prostate, liver or kidney
(Table 4).
PAM4 reactivity appeared to correlate with the stage of tumor differentiation,
with a
greater percentage of staining observed in well differentiated pancreatic
cancers than in
moderately differentiated or poorly differentiated tumors. Generally, poorly
differentiated
tumors represent less than 10% of all pancreatic cancers.
[0213] These studies have shown the PAM4 reactivity and tissue distribution
(both
normal and cancer) to be unlike that reported for the CA19.9, DUPAN2, SPAN1,
Nd2 and
B72.3 antibodies and antibodies against the Lewis antigens. Together with
crossblocking
studies performed with certain of these MAbs, the data suggests that the PAM4
MAb

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
recognizes a unique and novel epitope. When compared to the antigens
recognized by the
CA19.9, DUPAN2, and anti-Lea antibodies, the PAM4 antigen appears to be more
restricted in its tissue distribution and is reactive with a higher percentage
of pancreatic
tumors. Moreover, it gives a greater overall intensity of reaction at
equivalent
concentrations and is reactive with a higher percentage of cells within the
pancreatic
tumors. Finally, PAM4 was found to be only weakly reactive with three out of
twelve
chronic pancreatitis specimens, whereas CA19.9 and DUPAN2 were strongly
reactive
with all twelve specimens. Although it is recognized that specificity is
dependent in part
upon the type of assay employed and the range and number of tissues examined,
the
ability of PAM4 to discriminate between normal and neoplastic pancreatic
tissue, its
ability to react with a large percentage of the cancer specimens, the high
intensity of the
reactions, and the ability to distinguish between early stage pancreatic
cancer and benign
conditions such as pancreatitis are important characteristics of this
exemplary anti-
pancreatic cancer antibody.
TABLE 1 Immunoperoxidase Staining of Normal Adult Tissues with MAb PAM4
Tissue Staining
Reaction
Pancreas (22)a
Ducts
Acini
Islets
Submaxillary gland (2)
Esophagus (2)
Stomach (3) + mucus secreting cells
Duodenum (3) + goblet cells
Jejunum (3) + goblet cells
Ileum (3) + goblet cells
Colon (5) + goblet cells
Liver (3)
Gallbladder (2)
Bronchus (3)
66

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500 PCT/US2009/053192
Lung (3)
Heart (3)
Spleen (3)
Kidney (3)
Bladder (3)
Prostate (2)
Testes (2)
Uterus (2)
Ovary (2)
a ¨ number of individual specimens examined in parentheses
TABLE 2 Monoclonal Antibody PAM4 Reactivity with Normal Adult Tissue
Homogenates by EIA
Tissue gig tissue'
Pancreas 6.4
Esophagus 8.1
Stomach 61.3
Duodenum 44.7
Jejunum 60.6
Colon 74.5
Liver 0.0
Gallbladder 5.6
Heart 3.7
Spleen 3.4
Kidney 6.6
Bladder 4.9
Thyroid 3.5
Adrenal 1.3
Ureter 2.6
Testes 3.9
CaPanl Pancreatic Tumor 569
a ¨ values are mean from two autopsy specimens
67

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
TABLE 3 Immunohistochemical Reactivity of Several Monoclonal Antibodies with
Pancreatic Tumors
Differentiation PAM4 CA19.9 Lea DUPAN2
=
1 W -H-+ - - +++
,
2 M ++ +++ -H-+ +
3 M + - + +
-
4 M -H-+ +++ +-H- +
M -H- + - _
6 M + ND ND ND
7 M* -H-+ I I I +++ -1--1--f-
8 M + - - +++
9 M ++ + ++ _
-
M* -H- ++ ++ +++
11 M ++ +++ -H-+ +
12 M ++ + +
13 M + +-H- +++ +
14 M ++ ' + + -H-
M ill + + ++
16 M + + ++ -
17 M - + + -
18 M ++ ++ ++ ++
19 M +++ + -H-+ ++
,
M + - - -
21 M +++ 111 + ++
22 P + + + -H-+
,
23 P - - - -
24 P - - - -
P - - + -
TOTAL 21/25 17/24 18/24 16/24
- : Negative; +: 5-20% of tissue is stained; ++ : 21-50% of tissue is stained;
+++ : >50% of tissue is stained; W,M,P : Well, moderate, or poor
differentiation;
* : Metastatic tissue; ND : Not Done
68

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
TABLE 4 Immunoperoxidase Staining of Neoplastic Tissues with MAb PAM4
Cancer Tissue Positive/Total
Pancreas 21/25
Colon 10/26
Stomach 1/5
Lung 1/15
Breast 0/30
Ovarian 0/10
Prostate 0/4
Liver 0/10
Kidney 0/4
Example 3. In Vivo Biodistribution and Tumor Targeting of Radiolabeled PAM4
[0214] Initial biodistribution studies of PAM4 were carried out in a series of
four different
xenografted human pancreatic tumors covering the range of expected
differentiation.
Each of the four tumor lines employed, AsPcl, BxPc3, Hs766T and CaPanl,
exhibited
concentrations of131I-PAM4 within the tumors (range: 21%-48% ID/g on day
three) that
were significantly (P<0.01-0.001) higher than concomitantly administered
nonspecific,
isotype-matched Ag8 antibody (range: 3.6%-9.3% ID/g on day three). The
biodistribution
data were used to estimate potential radiation doses to the tumor of 12,230;
10,684; 6,835;
and 15,843 cGy/mCi of injected dose to AsPcl, BxPc3, Hs766T and CaPanl,
respectively.
With an actual maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 0.7 mCi, PAM4 could provide
substantial rad dose to each of the xenografted tumor models. In each tumor
line the blood
levels of radiolabeled PAM4 were significantly (P<0.01-0.001) lower than the
nonspecific
Ag8. Potential radiation doses to the blood from PAM4 were 1.4-4.4 fold lower
than from
Ag8. When radiation doses to the tumor from PAM4 were normalized to the blood
doses
from PAM4, the tumors received doses that were 2.2; 3.3; 3.4; and 13.1-fold
higher than
blood, respectively. Importantly, potential radiation doses to non-tumor
tissues were
minimal.
[0215] The biodistribution of PAM4 was compared with an anti-CEA antibody, MN-
14,
using the CaPanl tumor model. The concentration of PAM4 within the tumor was
much
69

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
greater than MN-14 at early timepoints, yielding tumor:blood ratios at day
three of 12.7
2.3 for PAM4 compared to 2.7 1.9 for MN-14. Although PAM4 uptake within the
tumor was significantly higher than for MN-14 at early timepoints (day one--
P<0.001; day
three--P<0.01), dosimetry analyses indicated only a 3.2-fold higher dose to
the tumor
from PAM4 as compared to MN-14 over the fourteen day study period. This was
due to a
rapid clearance of PAM4 from the tumor, such that at later timepoints similar
concentrations of the two antibodies were present within the tumors. A rapid
clearance of
PAM4 from the tumor was also noted in the BxPc3 and Hs766T but not AsPc1 tumor

models. These observations were unlike those reported for other anti-mucin
antibodies, as
for example G9 and B72.3 in colorectal cancer, where each exhibited longer
retention
times as compared to the MN-14 antibody. Results from studies on the
metabolism of
PAM4, indicate that after initial binding to the tumor cell, antibody is
rapidly released,
possibly being catabolized or being shed as an antigen:antibody complex. The
blood
clearance is also very rapid. These data suggest that 1311 may not be the
appropriate choice
of isotope for therapeutic applications. A short-lived isotope, such as 90Y or
188Re, that
can be administered frequently may be a more effective reagent.
[0216] PAM4 showed no evidence of targeting to normal tissues, except in the
CaPanl
tumor model, where a small but statistically significant splenic uptake was
observed
(range 3.1-7.5% ID/g on day-3). This type of splenic targeting has been
observed in the
clinical application of the anti-mucin antibodies B72.3 and CC49. Importantly,
these
studies also reported that splenic targeting did not affect tumor uptake of
antibody nor did
it interfere with interpretation of the nuclear scans. These studies suggested
that splenic
targeting was not due to crossreactive antigens in the spleen, nor to binding
by Fc
receptors, but rather to one or more of the following possibilities: direct
targeting of
antigen trapped in the spleen, or indirect uptake of antigen:antibody
complexes formed
either in the blood or released from the tumor site. The latter would require
the presence
of immune complexes in the blood. However, these were not observed when
specimens as
early as five minutes and as late as seven days were examined by gel
filtration (HPLC,
GF-250 column); radiolabeled antibody eluted as native material. The former
explanation
seems more likely in view of the fact that the CaPanl tumor produced large
quantities of
PAM4-reactive antigen, 100- to 1000-fold higher than for the other tumor cell
lines
examined. The lack of splenic targeting by PAM4 in these other tumor lines
suggests that
this phenomenon was related to excessive antigen production. Splenic targeting
can be

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
overcome by increasing the protein dose to 10 [tg from the original 2 i.tg
dose. A greater
amount of the splenic entrapped antigen presumably was complexed with
unlabeled
PAM4 rather than radiolabeled antibody. Increasing the protein dose had no
adverse effect
upon targeting of PAM4 to the tumor or nontumor tissues. In fact, an increase
of the
protein dose to 100 pg more than doubled the concentration of radiolabeled
PAM4 within
the CaPanl tumor.
Example 4. Development of Orthotopic Pancreatic Tumor Model in Athymic Nude
Mice.
[0217] In order to resemble the clinical presentation of pancreatic cancer in
an animal
model more closely, we developed an orthotopic model by injecting tumor cells
directly
into the head of the pancreas. Orthotopic CaPanl tumors grew progressively
without
overt symptoms until the development of ascites and death at ten to fourteen
weeks. By
three to four weeks post-implantation, animals developed a palpable tumor of
approximately 0.2 g. Within eight weeks of growth, primary tumors of
approximately 1.2
g along with metastases to the liver and spleen were observed (1-3 metastatic
tumors/animal; each tumor <0.1 g). At ten to fourteen weeks seeding of the
diaphragm
with development of ascites were evident. Ascites formation and occasional
jaundice
were usually the first overt indications of tumor growth. At this time tumors
were quite
large, 1 to 2 g, and animals had at most only three to four weeks until death
occurred.
[0218] Radiolabeled 131I-PAM4, administered to animals bearing four week old
orthotopic tumors (approximately 0.2 g) showed specific targeting to the
primary tumor
with localization indices of 7.9 3.0 at day one increasing to 22.8 15.3 at
day fourteen.
No evidence of specific targeting to other tissues was noted. In one case
where tumor
metastases to the liver and spleen were observed, both metastases were
targeted, and had
high concentrations of radiolabeled antibody. In addition, approximately half
of the
animals developed a subcutaneous tumor at the incision site. No significant
differences
were noted in the targeting of orthotopic and subcutaneous tumors within the
same animal,
and no significant differences were observed in the targeting of orthotopic
tumor whether
or not the animal had an additional subcutaneous tumor. The estimated
radiation doses
from PAM4 were 6,704 and 1,655 cGy/mCi to the primary tumor and blood,
respectively.
71

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
Example 5. Experimental Radioimmunotherapy of Pancreatic Cancer
[0219] The initial studies on the use of 131I-PAM4 for therapy were carried
out with the
CaPanl tumor, which was grown as a subcutaneous xenograft in athymic mice.
Animals
bearing a 0.25 g tumor were administered 350 Ci, 131I-PAM4 in an experiment
that also
compared the therapeutic effects of a similar dose of nonspecific Ag8. The MTD
for
administration of 131I-PAM4 to animals bearing 1 cm3 tumors is 700 ii,Ci. By
weeks five
and six, the PAM4 treated animals showed a dramatic regression of tumor, and
even at
week twenty seven, five out of eight remained tumor free. The untreated, as
well as Ag8-
treated animals, showed rapid progression of tumor growth although a
significant
difference was noted between these two control groups. At seven weeks, tumors
from the
untreated group had grown 20.0 14.6-fold from the initial timepoint whereas
the 1311-
Ag8-treated tumors had grown only 4.9 1.8-fold. At this time point, the PAM4
tumors
had regressed to 0.1 0.1-fold of their original size, a significant
difference from both
untreated (P < 0.001) and nonspecific Ag8-treated (P < 0.01) animals.
[0220] These data show that CaPanl tumors were sensitive to treatment with
131I-PAM4.
The outcome, that is, regression or progression of the tumor, was dependent
upon several
factors including initial tumor size. Thus, groups of animals bearing CaPanl
tumor
burdens of 0.25 g, 0.5 g, 1.0 g, or 2.0 g were treated with a single dose of
the 350 1.1Ci 1311-
PAM4. The majority of animals having tumors of initial size 0.25 g and 0.5 g
(nine of ten
animals in each group) showed tumor regression or growth inhibition for at
least sixteen
weeks post treatment. In the 1.0 g tumor group five out of seven showed no
tumor growth
for the sixteen week period and in the 2.0 g tumor group six out of nine
showed no tumor
growth for a period of six weeks before progression occurred. Although a
single 350 !Xi
dose was not as effective against larger tumors, a single dose may not be the
appropriate
regimen for large tumors.
[0221] Toxicity studies indicate the ability to give multiple cycles of
radioimunotherapy,
which may be more effective with a larger tumor burden. Animals bearing CaPanl
tumors
averaging 1.0 g, were given either a single dose of 350 tiCi 131I-PAM4, two
doses given at
times zero and four weeks or were left untreated. The untreated group had a
mean
survival time of 3.7 1.0 weeks (survival defined as time for tumor to reach
5 cm3).
Animals died as early as three weeks, with no animal surviving past six weeks.
A single
dose of 350 IACi 131I-PAM4 produced a significant increase in the survival
time to 18.8
4.2 weeks (P<0.0001). The range of animal deaths extended from weeks thirteen
to
72

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
twenty five. None of the animals were alive at the end of the study period of
twenty six
weeks.
[0222] A significant increase in survival time was observed for the two dose
group as
compared to the single dose group. Half of the animals were alive at the
twenty six week
timepoint with tumor sizes from 1.0-2.8 cm3, and a mean tumor growth rate of
1.6 0.7
fold from initial tumor size. For those animals that were non-survivors at
twenty six
weeks, the mean survival time (17.7 5.3 weeks) was similar to the single
dose group.
[0223] Therapy studies with PAM4 were also conducted using the orthotopic
tumor
model. Groups of animals bearing four week old orthotopic tumors (estimated
tumor
weight of 0.25 g) were either left untreated or treated with a single dose of
either 350 !Xi
131I-PAM4 or 350 i_iCi of 131I-nonspecific Ag8. The untreated animals had a
50% death
rate by week ten with no survivors at week fifteen. Animals administered
nonspecific 1311-
Ag8 at four weeks of tumor growth, showed a 50% death rate at week seven with
no
survivors at week fourteen. Although statistically (logrank analysis) there
were no
differences between these two groups, it is possible that radiation toxicity
had occurred in
the Ag8 treated animals. Radiolabeled PAM4 provided a significant survival
advantage
(P<0.001) as compared to the untreated or Ag8 treated animals, with 70%
survival at
sixteen weeks, the end of the experiment. At this time the surviving animals
were
sacrificed to determine tumor size. All animals had tumor with an average
weight of 1.2
g, as well as one or two small ((0.1 g) metastases evident in four of the
seven animals. At
sixteen weeks of growth, these tumors were more representative of an eight-
week-old
tumor.
Example 6. Combined Modality GEMZAR Chemotherapy and 1311-PAM4
Experimental Radioimmunotherapy
[0224] Initial studies into the combined use of gemcitabine (GEMZARC) with
131,_
PAM4 radioimmunotherapy were performed as a checkerboard array; a single dose
of
gemcitabine (0, 100, 200, 500 mg/kg) versus a single dose of '311-PAM4
([MTD=700 piCi]
100%, 75%, 50%, 0% of the MTD). The combined MTD was found to be 500 mg/kg
gemcitabine with 350110 131I-PAM4 (50% MTD). Toxicity, as measured by loss of
body
weight, went to the maximum considered as nontoxic; that is 20% loss in body
weight.
Although the combined treatment protocol was significantly more effective than

gemcitabine alone, the treatment was no more effective than radioimmunotherapy
alone.
73

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
The next studies were performed at a low dose of gemcitabine and
radioimmunotherapy to
examine if a true synergistic therapeutic effect would be observed. Athymic
nude mice
bearing tumors of approximately 1 cm3 (approximately 5% of body weight) were
administered gemcitabine, 100 mg/kg on days zero, three, six, nine, and
twelve, with 100
[iCi of131I-PAM4 given on day zero. A therapeutic effect was observed with
statistically
significant (P<0.0001) regression (two of five tumors less than 0.1 cm3)
and/or growth
inhibition of the tumors compared to gemcitabine alone. Thus, at lower dosages
of
therapeutic agent, there surprisingly appears to be a synergistic effect of
the combination
of gemcitabine and radioimmunotherapy. Of additional note, in terms of body
weight,
toxicity was not observed. The combination treatment protocol can, if
necessary, be
delivered in multiple cycles, with the second treatment cycle beginning in
week-four, as
was done with the radioimmunotherapy-alone studies described above.
Example 7. Pretargeting with Bispecific cPAM4 x 734 and 99mTc- or 1111n-
Labeled
Peptide Haptens
[0225] For imaging of pancreatic cancer using a pretargeted approach we
prepared a
bispecific F(ab1)2 antibody (bsMAb) consisting of a chimeric PAM4 (cPAM4) Fab'
and a
murine 734 (m734) Fab'. The murine 734 antibody recognizes an In-DTPA complex.

This bsMAb was labeled with 1251 (7 ptCi) and injected into athymic nude mice
bearing a
human pancreatic cancer xenograft (CaPan1). A non-targeting F(ab')2 bsMAb made
from
chimeric rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) and m734, was labeled with
1311 and
co-injected as a control. At various time-points (4, 24, 36, 48, and 72-hours
post-
injection) mice were necropsied, the tissues removed and counted to determine
percent-
injected dose per gram (% ID/g). There was significantly greater tumor uptake
of
bsPAM4 at each time-point in comparison to the control bs-rituximab (P<0.032
or better).
Our past experience with this type of pre-targeting system suggested that a
blood level of
less than 1% ID/g was necessary to obtain good tumor:non-tumor ratios. At 36-
hours
post-administration of the bsPAM4 there was 1.10 0.40% ID/g in the blood
which fell to
0.56 0.08% ID/g at 48 hours post-injection. Tumor uptake at these two time-
points was
6.43 1.50% ID/g and 5.37 2.38% ID/g, respectively. These values were
significantly
higher than the control bs-rituximab which had 0.65 0.33% ID/g and 0.47
0.19% ID/g
in the tumor at 36 and 48 hours, respectively (P<0.018 and P<0.0098). Blood
clearance
rates, however, were very similar and were not significantly different.
74

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[0226] Based on these data, a pre-targeting experiment was carried out in
CaPanl tumor-
bearing mice in which radiolabeled peptide-haptens were injected 40-hours post-
bsMAb
administration. Two peptides, IMP-192 and IMP-156, were used, each containing
divalent
DTPA for recognition by the 734 MAb, but one had an additional group specific
for
binding 99mTc stably (IMP-192). Tumor-bearing mice (tumor volume about 0.30
cm3)
were administered 125I-bsPAM4 (6 Ci) followed 40 hours later by a
radiolabeled peptide-
hapten (34.5 Ci; 1.5 x 1041 moles; bsMAb:peptide=10:1). One group of mice
received
99mTc-labeled IMP192 while a second group of mice received "In-labeled IMP156.

Controls for non-specific targeting included two groups that received 125I-bs-
rituximab
prior to administration of radiolabeled peptide and two other groups that
received "In- or
99mTc-labeled peptide alone.
[0227] Mice were sacrificed at 3 and 24 hours after the administration of
peptides and
the% ID/g determined for the tumor and various tissues. Consistent with our
previous
findings, there was significantly greater bsPAM4 in the tumors in comparison
to the non-
targeting control bsRituximab, 8.2 3.4% and 0.3 0.08% ID/g, respectively
(P<0.0001).
This translated into a significantly greatly tumor uptake of 1111n-IMP156
(20.2 5.5%
ID/g vs. 0.9 0.1% ID/g, P<0.0001). There was also significantly greater
tumor uptake
of 99mTc-IMP192 in the mice pre-targeted with bsPAM4 than in those pre-
targeted with
bs-rituximab (16.8 4.8% ID/g vs. 1.1 0.2% ID/g, P<0.0005). Tumor uptake of
each
peptide, when administered alone, was significantly less than in those mice
that received
the bsPAM4 (0.2 .05% ID/g and 0.1 0.03% ID/g for 99mTc-IMP 192 and 111In-
IMP156,
P<0.0004 and P<0.0001, respectively).
[0228] As with the 3-hour time-point, there was significantly more bsPAM4 in
the tumors
at 24 hours post-injection of peptide (64 hours post bsMAb administration)
than bs-
rituximab (6.4 2.2% ID/g vs. 0.2 0.09% ID/g, respectively; P<0.0001). At
this time-
point there was 11.1 In-IMP156 and 12.9 4.2% ID/g 99mTc-IMP192 in
the tumors of mice pre-targeted with bsPAM4 versus 0.5 0.2% ID/g and 0.4
0.03%
ID/g in bs-rituximab pre-targeted tumors (P<0.0008 and P<0.0002,
respectively). In the
mice that received peptide alone, there was significantly less 99mTc-IMP192 in
the tumors
(0.06 0.02% ID/g, P<0.0007) and 111In-IMP156 (0.09 0.02% ID/g, P<0.0002)
in
comparison to the bsPAM4 pre-targeted peptides.
Table 5. Tumor:Non-Tumor Tissue Ratios at Early Time-Points

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
Pre-targeted Pre-targeted 125I-bsPAM4
1111n-Peptide 99mTc-Peptide F(ab')2
(3-Hours)
(3-Hours)
(4-Hours)
Tissue Mean ( STD) Mean ( STD) Mean ( STD)
Tumor 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Liver 36.07 11.74 16.66 7.19 2.34 0.61
Spleen 33.40 20.62 14.62 9.12 2.15 .074
Kidney 7.79 2.81 8.13 3.33 1.10 .020
Lung 44.55 12.99 15.75 5.85 1.58 .037
Blood 36.47 8.28 9.93 5.21 0.47 0.11
Bone 123.24 40.00
W. Bone 378.00 124.57
Pancreas 155.55 30.07 73.29 32.85 4.65 1.23
Tumor
Wt (g) 0.189 (0.0 70) 0.1 74 (0.040) 0.1 79 (0.139)
( STD)
102291 Table 5 presents the tumor:non-tumor ratios (T:NT) of various tissues
for these
groups, each at an early time-point post-administration of radiolabeled
product. It is
important to note that at 4-hours post-administration of bsPAM4 x m734
F(abt)2, the
tumor:blood ratio was less than 2:1. However, at 3-hours post-administration,
the pre-
targeted I I lIn-IMP156 and 99mTc-IMP192 had significantly greater
tumor:nontumor ratios
for all tissues examined and in particular tumor:blood ratios were equal to
36:1 and 9:1,
(P<0.001 and P<0.011, respectively). When we examined tumor:blood ratios at
the 24-
hour time-point, the pre-targeted "In-IMP156 and 99mTc-IMP192 had
significantly higher
values, 274:1 and 80:1, respectively, versus 4:1 for 125I-bsPAM4 alone
(P<0.0002). These
data strongly support the ability to utilize this pretargeted bsPAM4 approach
with short
half-life, high energy radioisotopes that would then deliver high radiation
dose to tumor
with minimal radiation dose to non-tumor tissues.
76

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
Example 8. Binding of PAM4 Antibodies to Transfected Cell Lines
Transfected Pancreatic Cells
[0230] PanC1 human pancreatic adenocarinoma cells that do not express the MUC-
1
mucin were transfected with MUC-1 encoding cDNA as disclosed in Hudson et al.
(Amer.
J. Pathol. 148, 3:951-60, 1996) and obtained from Dr. M.A. Hollingsworth
(Univ. of
Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE). The MUC-1 cDNAs encoded either 30 tandem
repeat (30TR) or 42 tandem repeat (42TR) versions of MUC-1 (Hudson et al.,
1996; Lidell
et al, FEBS J. 275:481-89, 2008). The MUC-1 sequences were identical other
than in the
number of tandem repeat sequences encoded.
[0231] PanC1 cells transfected with either 30TR or 42TR MUC-1 or control
vectors (no
insert or reversed insert) or untransfected PanC1 cells were examined for
reactivity with
PAM4 antibody by enzyme immunoassay of the supernatants from cell culture.
Neither
the untransfected PanC1 cells nor the control transfected PanC1 cells produced
detectable
levels of PAM4-reactive mucins by immunoassay (not shown). However, both the
30TR
and 42TR MUC-1 transfected cells were highly reactive with PAM4 antibody (not
shown).
[0232] The transfected PanC1 cells were reexamined using a more sensitive
immunoassay. Briefly, cells were grown in T75 flasks until they reached
approximately
80%-90% confluency (-4-5 days from initial seeding). At this time, the spent-
media were
collected, centrifuged at high speed, and used for quantitation of PAM4-
reactive mucin by
enzyme immunoassay. The cells were also collected and counted. Both the Panel
parent
cell line originating from Dr. Hollingsworth and a separate Panel cell line
obtained from
the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA), as well as the vector
control,
produced low, but detectable quantities of PAM4-reactive mucin (0.87 0.17,
0.54 0.17
and 0.02 0.02 [ig,/mL/106 cells, respectively), whereas the 30TR-MUC-1 gene
transfected cells produced 14.17 2.221.ig/mL/106 cells (P <0.0003 or better
for
comparison of 30TR-MUC-1 gene transfected media compared to all other
samples).
[0233] It has been reported that transfection of PanC1 cells with MUC-1 cDNA,
in
addition to increasing expression of MUC-1 by the transfected PanC1 cells,
also has
secondary effects on cell protein expression, such as increasing levels of
cytokeratins 8
and 18 in the transfected cells (Hudson et al., 1996, Abstract), but only in
cells transfected
with the larger (42TR) MUC-1 cDNA (Hudson et al. 1996, pg. 956, col. 1, 3td
paragraph).
Transfected Kidney Cells
77

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[0234] MUC-1 gene-transfected HEK-293 (human embryonic kidney cells) produced
MUC-1 that was reactive with the MA5 monoclonal antibody, but that was not
reactive
with PAM4 (not shown). However, as discussed above, MUC-1-transfected PanC1
cells
that express very low levels of endogenous MUC-1 synthesized MUC-1 that was
strongly
reactive with PAM4 and non-reactive with MAb-MA5. Heterologous sandwich
immunoassays (PAM4¨*MA5 and MA5¨*PAM4 capture/probe) did not function to
produce a signal with supernatants from several cell lines. Use of a
polyclonal anti-mucin
antiserum as probe with the PAM4 or MA5 MAbs as capture reagents did provide
effective immunoassays. Cross-blocking of these two MAbs within their
respective
immunoassays using the polyclonal as the probe suggested these MAbs were
reactive with
independent epitopes.
[0235] The data suggest that the PAM4 and MA5 epitopes are not co-expressed
within the
same antigenic molecule, and that while the PanC1 cell line may possess
biosynthetic
processes that create the PAM4-epitope, the HEK-293 cells do not. Differences
in post-
translational modification of the MUC-1 protein core (expression/activity of
specific
glycosyltransferases) may be responsible for these findings.
Example 9. Effects of Reagent Treatment on Immunoreactivity of PAM4 Antigen
[0236] Treatment of pancreatic mucin PAM4 antigen with DTT (15 min at room
temp),
completely abolished reactivity with PAM4 (DTT-EC50, 0.60 + 0.00 [iM). The
only
cysteines (cystine bridges) within MUC-1 are present within the transmembrane
domain
and should not be accessible to DTT. The secreted form of MUC-1 does not
contain the
transmembrane domain and therefore has no intramolecular cystine bridges. Data
from
periodate oxidation treatment of PAM4 antigen with 0.05 M sodium periodate for
2 hrs at
room temperature yielded 40% loss of immunoreactivity with PAM4 antibody (not
shown). Further periodate studies have shown as high as a 60% loss of
immunoreactivity
with PAM4 antibody (not shown). The results of periodate and DTT studies
suggest that
the PAM4 epitope is conformationally dependent upon some minimal form of
glycosylation, and may be affected by intermolecular disulfide bond formation.
Example 10. Distribution and Cross-Reactivity of the PAM4 Antigen
[0237] The expression of the PAM4-epitope within PaniNs is atypical for MUC-1.
It is
similar to the expression reported for MUC-Sac as detected by the commercially
available
78

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
MAb-CLH2-2. However, an attempted sandwich immunoassay with PAM4 capture and
MAb-CLH2-2 as probe gave negative results. Although this possibly suggests the
PAM4
and CLH2-2 epitopes may overlap and thus block each other, the CLH2-2 was
reported to
be reactive with 42/66 (64%) gastric carcinomas whereas the PAM4 MAb showed
reactivity with only 6/40 (15%) of gastric carcinomas and, of these, only in
focal
reactivity.
[0238] Use of the commercially available 45M1, an anti-MUC-Sac MAb, as a probe

reagent in EIA (with PAM4 as capture) provided positive results, indicating
that the two
epitopes may be present on the same antigenic molecule. Blocking studies
(either
direction) indicated that the epitopes bound by 45M1 and PAM4 are in fact two
distinct
epitopes, as no blocking was observed. Labeling of tissue microarrays
consisting of cores
from invasive pancreatic carcinoma has demonstrated significant differences
for
expression of the 45M1 and PAM4 epitopes in individual patient specimens. 0f28

specimens, concordance was observed in only 17 cases (61%). PAM4 was reactive
with
24/28 cases (86%) while 45M1 was reactive with 13/28 (46%) cases (not shown).
[0239] It is possible that in the studies above (Example 8) regarding MUC-1
gene
transfection, expression of MUC-1 may have upregulated expression of another
mucin, or
affected exposure of the PAM4-epitope in some other manner. The results of
periodate
studies are consistent with glycosylation as a factor in PAM4 antigen
immunoreactivity
with the PAM4 antibody. Thus, results of studies with apomucins may not be
definitive
for antigen determination.
102401 Although based on EIA capture, the PAM4 antibody appears to bind to the
same
antigenic protein as the 45M1 anti-MUC-5ac MAb, it is noted that MUC-Sac is
not
specific to pancreas cancer and it is found in a number of normal tissues
(other than the
gastric mucosa with which PAM4 is reactive). For example, MUC-Sac is found in
normal
lung, colon and other tissues. PAM4 antibody does not bind to normal lung
tissues, except
as indicated above in few samples and to a limited or minimal amount.
[0241] With respect to the effects of DTT and periodate, it is probable that
the peptide
core disulfide bridges are identical no matter what tissue produces the
protein. A specific
amino acid sequence should fold in a specific manner, independent of the
tissue source.
However, glycosylation patterns may differ dependent upon tissue source.
Example 11. Phage Display Peptide Binding of PAM4 Antibody
79

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[0242] PAM4 antibody binding was examined with two different phage display
peptide
libraries. The first was a linear peptide library consisting of 12 amino acid
sequences and
the second was a cyclic peptide consisting of 7 amino acid sequences cyclized
by a
disulfide bridge. We panned the individual libraries alternately against hPAM4
and hLL2
(negative selection with anti-CD22 antibody) for a combined total of 4 rounds,
and then
screened the phage displayed peptide for reactivity with both hPAM4 and mPAM4
with
little to no reactivity against hLL2. Phage binding in a non-specific manner
(i.e., binding
to epratuzumab [hLL2]) were discarded.
[0243] For the linear phage-displayed peptide, the sequence WTWNITKAYPLP (SEQ
ID
NO:29) was identified 30 times (in 35 sequenced phage), each of which were
shown to
have reactivity with PAM4 antibodies. A mutational analysis was conducted in
which a
library based on this sequence and having 7.5% degeneracy at each position,
was
constructed, panned and screened as before. Variability was noted in the 19
obtained
peptide sequences that were positive for PAM4 binding with 7 being identical
to the
parental sequence, 5 having the sequence WTWNITKEYPQP (SEQ ID NO:31) and the
rest being uniquely present. Table 6 shows the results of this mutational
analysis. The
upper row lists the sequences identified and the lower row lists the frequency
with which
each of the amino acids was identified in that position. The parent sequence
is most
frequent (bold) with the next highest variation a substitution of E for A at
position 8 and a
substitution of Q for L at position 11. It does not appear that these
substitutions had any
great effect upon immunoreactivity.
Table 6. Phage Display Amino Acid Sequence Variation with Linear Peptide
Binding
to PAM4 Antibody (SEQ ID NO: 60)
W T WN I T K A
number of 19 19 19 18 19 17 14 10 18 17 11
19
occurrences 1 2 1 5 1 2 5

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500 PCT/US2009/053192
(out of 19 2 1 1
sequences 1 1 1
analyzed) 1 1 1
1
102441 Results with the phage displayed cyclic library were significantly
different from
the linear library (Table 7). The sequence ACPEWWGTTC (SEQ ID NO:30) was
present
in 33 of 35 peptide sequences examined. Analysis of the cyclic library
presented the
following results (positions with an asterick were invariant and not subject
to selective
pressure in the library).
Table 7. Phage Display Amino Acid Sequence Variation with Linear Peptide
Binding to PAM4 Antibody (SEQ ID NO: 61)
A
number of * 33 35 35 35 34 29 28
occurrences 2 1 5 4
(out of 19 1 1
sequences 1
analyzed) 1
[0245] The two cysteines (at positions 2 and 10) formed a disulfide bridge.
Substitution
of T at position 9 with any amino acid greatly affected immunoreactivity. The
sequence
GTTGTTC (SEQ ID NO:32) is present within the MUC-5ac protein towards the amino

terminus as compared to the cyclic peptide sequence shown above, which shows
homology at the C-terminal end of the consensus peptide sequence. However, the
cyclic
peptide only showed approximately 10% of the immunoreactivity of the linear
sequence
with the PAM4 antibody. Both linear and cyclic consensus sequences are
associated with
81

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
a cysteine, which may or may not relate to the effect of DTT on PAM4 antigen
immunoreactivity.
[0246] The results reported herein indicate that the PAM4 epitope is dependent
upon a
specific conformation which may be produced by disulfide bridges, as well as a
specific
glycosylation pattern.
Example 12. Immunohistology of Pancreatic Cancer in a Pancreatitis Specimen
[0231] Several pathologic conditions predispose patients to the development of
pancreatic
carcinoma, such as pancreatitis, diabetes, smoking and others. Within this pre-
selected
group of patients, screening measures are particularly important for the early
detection of
pancreatic neoplasia. We examined 9 specimens of chronic pancreatitis tissue
from
patients having primary diagnosis of this disease. We employed an anti-CD74
MAb, LL1,
as an indicator of inflammatory infiltrate, and MAb-MA5 as a positive control
for
pancreatic ductal and acinar cells. Whereas the two control MAbs provided
immunohistologic evidence consistent with pancreatitis, in no instance did
PAM4 react
with inflamed pancreatic tissue. However, in one case, a moderately
differentiated
pancreatic adenocarcinoma was also present within the tissue specimen. PAM4
gave an
intense stain of the neoplastic cells within this tumor. In a second case,
while the inflamed
tissue was negative with PAM4, a small Pan1N precursor lesion was identified
that was
labeled with PAM4. Labeling of the PanIN within this latter specimen is
consistent with
early detection of pancreatic neoplasia in a patient diagnosed with a non-
malignant
disease. These results show that detection and/or diagnosis using the PAM4
antibody may
be performed with high sensitivity and selectivity for pancreatic neoplasia
against a
background of benign pancreatic tissues.
Example 13. Therapy of a Patient With Inoperable and Metastatic Pancreatic
Carcinoma
[0232] Patient 118-001, CWG, is a 63-year-old man with Stage-IV pancreatic
adenocarcinoma with multiple liver metastases, diagnosed in November of 2007.
He
agreed to undertake combined radioimmunotherapy and gemcitabine chemotherapy
as a
first treatment strategy, and was then given a first therapy cycle of 6.5
mCi/m2 of 90Y-
hPAM4, combined with 200 mg/m2 gemcitabine, whereby the gemcitabine was given
once
weekly on weeks 1-4 and 90Y-hPAM4 was given once-weeky on weeks 2-4 (3 doses).
82

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
Two months later, the same therapy cycle was repeated, because no major
toxicities were
noted after the first cycle. Already 4 weeks after the first therapy cycle, CT
evidence of a
reduction in the diameters of the primary tumor and 2 of the 3 liver
metastases surprisingly
was noted, and this was consistent with significant decreases in the SUV
values of FDG-
PET scans, with 3 of the 4 tumors returning to normal background SUV levels at
this time
(FIG. 6 and FIG. 7). The patient's pre-therapy CA-19.9 level of 1,297 dropped
to a low
level of 77, further supportive of the therapy being effective. Table 8 shows
the effects of
combined radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-hPAM4 and gemcitabine chemotherapy in
this
patient. It was surprising and unexpected that such low doses of the
radionuclide
conjugated to the antibody combined with such low, nontoxic, doses of
gemcitabine
showed such antitumor activity even after only a single course of this
therapy.
Table 8. Effects of Combined Radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-hPAM4 and
Gemcitabine Chemotherapy in Metastatic Pancreatic Carcinoma
Tumor Baseline 4 wk post-Tx Baseline
PET 4 wk post-Tx
Location Longest Longest (SUV) PET (SUV)
Diameter (cm) Diameter (cm)
Pancreatic tail 4.5 4.3 9.2 4.2
(primary)
L hepatic met 1.9 1.9 4.1
background
R post hepatic 1.7 1.6 3.7
background
met
R central 1.9 1.2 3.2
background
hepatic met
Example 14. Therapy of a Patient with Inoperable Metastatic Pancreatic
Carcinoma
[0233] A 56-year-old male with extensive, inoperable adenocarcinoma of the
pancreas,
with several liver metastases ranging from 1 to 4 cm in diameter, substantial
weight loss
(30 lbs of weight or more), mild jaundice, lethargy and weakness, as well as
abdominal
pains requiring medication, is given 4 weekly infusions of gemcitabine at
doses of 200
mg/m2 each. On the last three gemcitabine infusions, 90Y-DOTA-hPAM4
radiolabeled
humanized antibody is administered at a dose of 10 mCi/m2 of 90Y and 20 mg
antibody
protein, in a two-hour i.v. infusion. Two weeks later, the patient is given a
course of
83

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
gemcitabine chemotherapy consisting of 3 weekly doses of 600 mg/m2 by i.v.
infusion.
The patient is then evaluated 4 weeks later, and has a mild leukopenia (grade-
2), no other
major blood or enzyme changes over baseline, but shows an improvement in the
blood
CA19.9 titer from 5,700 to 1,200 and a decrease in jaundice, with an overall
subjective
improvement. This follows 3 weeks later with a repeat of the cycle of lower-
dose
gemcitabine (weekly x 4), with 3 doses of 90Y-DOTA-hPAM4. Four weeks later,
the
patient is reevaluated, and the CT and PET scans confirm an approximately 40%
reduction
of total tumor mass (primary cancer and metastases), with a further reduction
of the
CA19.9 titer to 870. The patient regains appetite and activity, and is able to
return to more
usual daily activities without the need for pain medication. He gains 12 lbs
after
beginning this experimental therapy. A repeat of the scans and blood values
indicates that
this response is maintained 6 weeks later.
Example 15. Preparation of Dock-and-Lock (DNL) Constructs for Pretargeting
DDD and AD Fusion Proteins
[0247] The DNL technique can be used to make dimers, trimers, tetramers,
hexamers, etc.
comprising virtually any antibodies or fragments thereof or other effector
moieties. For
certain preferred embodiments, IgG antibodies or Fab antibody fragments may be

produced as fusion proteins containing either a dimerization and docking
domain (DDD)
or anchoring domain (AD) sequence. Although in preferred embodiments the DDD
and
AD moieties are produced as fusion proteins, the skilled artisan will realize
that other
methods of conjugation, such as chemical cross-linking, may be utilized within
the scope
of the claimed methods and compositions.
[0248] Bispecific antibodies may be formed by combining a Fab-DDD fusion
protein of a
first antibody with a Fab-AD fusion protein of a second antibody.
Alternatively,
constructs may be made that combine IgG-AD fusion proteins with Fab-DDD fusion

proteins. The technique is not limiting and any protein or peptide of use may
be produced
as an AD or DDD fusion protein for incorporation into a DNL construct. Where
chemical
cross-linking is utilized, the AD and DDD conjugates are not limited to
proteins or
peptides and may comprise any molecule that may be cross-linked to an AD or
DDD
sequence using any cross-linking technique known in the art. In certain
exemplary
embodiments, a polyethylene glycol (PEG) or other polymeric moiety may be
incorporated into a DNL construct, as described in further detail below.
84

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[0249] For pretargeting applications, an antibody or fragment containing a
binding site for
an antigen associated with a diseased tissue, such as a tumor-associated
antigen (TAA),
may be combined with a second antibody or fragment that binds a hapten on a
targetable
construct, to which a therapeutic and/or diagnostic agent is attached. The DNL-
based
bispecific antibody is administered to a subject, circulating antibody is
allowed to clear
from the blood and localize to target tissue, and the conjugated targetable
construct is
added and binds to the localized antibody for diagnosis or therapy.
[0250] Independent transgenic cell lines may be developed for each Fab or IgG
fusion
protein. Once produced, the modules can be purified if desired or maintained
in the cell
culture supernatant fluid. Following production, any DDD-fusion protein module
can be
combined with any AD-fusion protein module to generate a bispecific DNL
construct. For
different types of constructs, different AD or DDD sequences may be utilized.
Exemplary
DDD and AD sequences are provided below.
DDD1: SHIQIPPGLTELLQGYTVEVLRQQPPDLVEFAVEYFTRLREARA (SEQ ID
NO:33)
DDD2: CGHIQIPPGLTELLQGYTVEVLRQQPPDLVEFAVEYFTRLREARA (SEQ ID
NO:34)
AD1: QIEYLAKQIVDNAIQQA (SEQ ID NO:35)
AD2: CGQIEYLAKQIVDNAIQQAGC (SEQ ID NO:36)
Expression Vectors
[0251] The plasmid vector pdHL2 has been used to produce a number of
antibodies and
antibody-based constructs. See Gillies et al., J Immunol Methods (1989),
125:191-202;
Losman et al., Cancer (Phila) (1997), 80:2660-6. The di-cistronic mammalian
expression
vector directs the synthesis of the heavy and light chains of IgG. The vector
sequences are
mostly identical for many different IgG-pdHL2 constructs, with the only
differences
existing in the variable domain (VH and VL) sequences. Using molecular biology
tools
known to those skilled in the art, these IgG expression vectors can be
converted into Fab-
DDD or Fab-AD expression vectors. To generate Fab-DDD expression vectors, the
coding sequences for the hinge, CH2 and CH3 domains of the heavy chain are
replaced
with a sequence encoding the first 4 residues of the hinge, a 14 residue Gly-
Ser linker and

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
the first 44 residues of human RIIa (referred to as DDD1). To generate Fab-AD
expression vectors, the sequences for the hinge, CH2 and CH3 domains of IgG
are
replaced with a sequence encoding the first 4 residues of the hinge, a 15
residue Gly-Ser
linker and a 17 residue synthetic AD called AKAP-IS (referred to as AD1),
which was
generated using bioinformatics and peptide array technology and shown to bind
RIIa
dimers with a very high affinity (0.4 nM). See Alto, et al. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci., U.S.A
(2003), 100:4445-50.
[0252] Two shuttle vectors were designed to facilitate the conversion of IgG-
pdHL2
vectors to either Fab-DDD1 or Fab-AD1 expression vectors, as described below.
Preparation of CHI
[0253] The CH1 domain was amplified by PCR using the pdHL2 plasmid vector as a

template. The left PCR primer consisted of the upstream (5') end of the CH1
domain and
a SacII restriction endonuclease site, which is 5' of the CHI coding sequence.
The right
primer consisted of the sequence coding for the first 4 residues of the hinge
(PKSC)
followed by four glycines and a serine, with the final two codons (GS)
comprising a Bam
HI restriction site. The 410 bp PCR amplimer was cloned into the PGEMT PCR
cloning
vector (PROMEGAC, Inc.) and clones were screened for inserts in the T7 (5')
orientation.
Construction of (G4S)2DDDI ((a15)2 disclosed as SEQ ID NO:37)
[0254] A duplex oligonucleotide, designated (G4S)2DDD1 ((G4S)2 disclosed as
SEQ ID
NO:37), was synthesized by Sigma GENOSYS (Haverhill, UK) to code for the
amino
acid sequence of DDD1 preceded by 11 residues of the linker peptide, with the
first two
codons comprising a BamHI restriction site. A stop codon and an EagI
restriction site are
appended to the 3'end. The encoded polypeptide sequence is shown below.
GSGGGGSGGGGSHIQIPPGLTELLQGYTVEVLRQQPPDLVEFAVEYFTRLREARA
(SEQ ID NO:38)
[0255] Two oligonucleotides, designated RIIA1-44 top and RIIA1-44 bottom, that
overlap
by 30 base pairs on their 3' ends, were synthesized (Sigma GENOSYS ) and
combined to
comprise the central 154 base pairs of the 174 bp DDD1 sequence. The
oligonucleotides
were annealed and subjected to a primer extension reaction with Taq
polymerase.
Following primer extension, the duplex was amplified by PCR. The amplimer was
cloned
into PGEMTIO and screened for inserts in the T7 (5') orientation.
86

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
Construction of (G4S)2-AD1 ((G4S)2 disclosed as SEQ ID NO:37)
[0256] A duplex oligonucleotide, designated (G4S)2-AD1 ((G4S)2 disclosed as
SEQ ID
NO:37), was synthesized (Sigma GENOSYSO) to code for the amino acid sequence
of
AD1 preceded by 11 residues of the linker peptide with the first two codons
comprising a
BamHI restriction site. A stop codon and an EagI restriction site are appended
to the
3'end. The encoded polypeptide sequence is shown below.
GSGGGGSGGGGSQIEYLAKQIVDNAIQQA (SEQ ID NO:39)
[0257] Two complimentary overlapping oligonucleotides encoding the above
peptide
sequence, designated AKAP-IS Top and AKAP-IS Bottom, were synthesized and
annealed. The duplex was amplified by PCR. The amplimer was cloned into the
PGEMT vector and screened for inserts in the T7 (5') orientation.
Ligating DDD1 with CH1
[0258] A 190 bp fragment encoding the DDD1 sequence was excised from PGEMT
with BamHI and NotI restriction enzymes and then ligated into the same sites
in CH1-
PGEMT to generate the shuttle vector CH1-DDD1-PGEMT .
Ligating AD1 with CH1
[0259] A 110 bp fragment containing the AD1 sequence was excised from PGEMT
with
BamHI and NotI and then ligated into the same sites in CH1-PGEMT to generate
the
shuttle vector CH1-AD1-PGEMT .
Cloning CH1-DDD1 or CH1-AD1 into pdHL2-based vectors
[0260] With this modular design either CH1-DDD1 or CH1-AD1 can be incorporated
into
any IgG construct in the pdHL2 vector. The entire heavy chain constant domain
is
replaced with one of the above constructs by removing the SacII/EagI
restriction fragment
(CHI -CH3) from pdHL2 and replacing it with the SacII/EagI fragment of CH1-
DDD1 or
CH1-AD1, which is excised from the respective pGemT shuttle vector.
Construction of h679-Fd-AD1-pdHL2
[0261] h679-Fd-AD1-pdHL2 is an expression vector for production of h679 Fab
with
AD1 coupled to the carboxyl terminal end of the CH1 domain of the Fd via a
flexible
Gly/Ser peptide spacer composed of 14 amino acid residues. A pdHL2-based
vector
containing the variable domains of h679 was converted to h679-Fd-AD1-pdHL2 by
87

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
replacement of the SacII/EagI fragment with the CH1-AD1 fragment, which was
excised
from the CH1-AD1-SV3 shuttle vector with SacII and EagI.
Construction of C-DDD1-Fd-hMN-14-pdHL2
[0262] C-DDD1-Fd-hMN-14-pdHL2 is an expression vector for production of a
stable
dimer that comprises two copies of a fusion protein C-DDD1-Fab-hMN-14, in
which
DDD1 is linked to hMN-14 Fab at the carboxyl terminus of CH1 via a flexible
peptide
spacer. The plasmid vector hMN-14(I)-pdHL2, which has been used to produce hMN-
14
IgG, was converted to C-DDD1-Fd-hMN-14-pdHL2 by digestion with SacII and EagI
restriction endonucleases to remove the CH1-CH3 domains and insertion of the
CH1-
DDD1 fragment, which was excised from the CH1-DDD1-5V3 shuttle vector with
SacII
and EagI.
[0263] The same technique has been utilized to produce plasmids for Fab
expression of a
wide variety of known antibodies, such as hLL1, hLL2, hPAM4, hRl, hRS7, hMN-
14,
hMN-15, hA19, hA20 and many others. Generally, the antibody variable region
coding
sequences were present in a pdHL2 expression vector and the expression vector
was
converted for production of an AD- or DDD-fusion protein as described above.
The AD-
and DDD-fusion proteins comprising a Fab fragment of any of such antibodies
may be
combined, in an approximate ratio of two DDD-fusion proteins per one AD-fusion
protein,
to generate a trimeric DNL construct comprising two Fab fragments of a first
antibody and
one Fab fragment of a second antibody.
C-DDD2-Fd-hMN-14-pdHL2
[0264] C-DDD2-Fd-hMN-14-pdHL2 is an expression vector for production of C-DDD2-

Fab-hMN-14, which possesses a dimerization and docking domain sequence of DDD2

appended to the carboxyl terminus of the Fd of hMN-14 via a 14 amino acid
residue
Gly/Ser peptide linker. The fusion protein secreted is composed of two
identical copies of
hMN-14 Fab held together by non-covalent interaction of the DDD2 domains.
[0265] The expression vector was engineered as follows. Two overlapping,
complimentary oligonucleotides, which comprise the coding sequence for part of
the
linker peptide (GGGGSGGGCG, SEQ ID NO:40) and residues 1-13 of DDD2, were made

synthetically. The oligonucleotides were annealed and phosphorylated with T4
PNK,
88

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
resulting in overhangs on the 5' and 3' ends that are compatible for ligation
with DNA
digested with the restriction endonucleases BamHI and PstI, respectively.
[0266] The duplex DNA was ligated with the shuttle vector CH1-DDD1-PGEMTO,
which was prepared by digestion with BamHI and PstI, to generate the shuttle
vector CH1-
DDD2-PGEMTO. A 507 bp fragment was excised from CH1-DDD2-PGEMTO with
SacII and EagI and ligated with the IgG expression vector hMN-14(I)-pdHL2,
which was
prepared by digestion with SacII and EagI. The final expression construct was
designated
C-DDD2-Fd-hMN-14-pdHL2. Similar techniques have been utilized to generated
DDD2-
fusion proteins of the Fab fragments of a number of different humanized
antibodies.
h679-Fd-AD2-pdHL2
[0267] h679-Fab-AD2, was designed to pair as B to C-DDD2-Fab-hMN-14 as A. h679-

Fd-AD2-pdHL2 is an expression vector for the production of h679-Fab-AD2, which

possesses an anchoring domain sequence of AD2 appended to the carboxyl
terminal end of
the CH1 domain via a 14 amino acid residue Gly/Ser peptide linker. AD2 has one

cysteine residue preceding and another one following the anchor domain
sequence of
AD1.
[0268] The expression vector was engineered as follows. Two overlapping,
complimentary oligonucleotides (AD2 Top and AD2 Bottom), which comprise the
coding
sequence for AD2 and part of the linker sequence, were made synthetically. The

oligonucleotides were annealed and phosphorylated with T4 PNK, resulting in
overhangs
on the 5' and 3' ends that are compatible for ligation with DNA digested with
the
restriction endonucleases BamHI and SpeI, respectively.
[0269] The duplex DNA was ligated into the shuttle vector CH1-AD1-PGEMTO,
which
was prepared by digestion with BamHI and SpeI, to generate the shuttle vector
CH1-AD2-
PGEMT . A 429 base pair fragment containing CH1 and AD2 coding sequences was
excised from the shuttle vector with SacII and EagI restriction enzymes and
ligated into
h679-pdHL2 vector that prepared by digestion with those same enzymes. The
final
expression vector is h679-Fd-AD2-pdHL2.
Generation of TF2 DNL Pretargeting Construct
[0270] A trimeric DNL construct designated TF2 was obtained by reacting C-DDD2-
Fab-
hMN-14 with h679-Fab-AD2. A pilot batch of TF2 was generated with >90% yield
as
follows. Protein L-purified C-DDD2-Fab-hMN-14 (200 mg) was mixed with h679-Fab-

89

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
AD2 (60 mg) at a 1.4:1 molar ratio. The total protein concentration was 1.5
mg/ml in PBS
containing 1 mM EDTA. Subsequent steps involved TCEP reduction, HIC
chromatography, DMSO oxidation, and IMP 291 affinity chromatography. Before
the
addition of TCEP, SE-HPLC did not show any evidence of a2b formation. Addition
of 5
mM TCEP rapidly resulted in the formation of a2b complex consistent with a 157
kDa
protein expected for the binary structure. TF2 was purified to near
homogeneity by IMP
291 affinity chromatography (not shown). IMP 291 is a synthetic peptide
containing the
HSG hapten to which the 679 Fab binds (Rossi et al., 2005, Clin Cancer Res
11:7122s-
29s). SE-HPLC analysis of the IMP 291 unbound fraction demonstrated the
removal of
a4, a2 and free kappa chains from the product (not shown).
[0271] Non-reducing SDS-PAGE analysis demonstrated that the majority of TF2
exists as
a large, covalent structure with a relative mobility near that of IgG (not
shown). The
additional bands suggest that disulfide formation is incomplete under the
experimental
conditions (not shown). Reducing SDS-PAGE shows that any additional bands
apparent
in the non-reducing gel are product-related (not shown), as only bands
representing the
constituent polypeptides of TF2 were evident (not shown). However, the
relative
mobilities of each of the four polypeptides were too close to be resolved.
MALDI-TOF
mass spectrometry (not shown) revealed a single peak of 156,434 Da, which is
within
99.5% of the calculated mass (157,319 Da) of TF2.
[0272] The functionality of TF2 was determined by BIACORE assay. TF2, C-DDD1-
hMN-14+h679-AD1 (used as a control sample of noncovalent a2b complex), or C-
DDD2-
hMN-14+h679-AD2 (used as a control sample of unreduced a2 and b components)
were
diluted to 1 pg/m1 (total protein) and passed over a sensorchip immobilized
with HSG.
The response for TF2 was approximately two-fold that of the two control
samples,
indicating that only the h679-Fab-AD component in the control samples would
bind to and
remain on the sensorchip. Subsequent injections of WI2 IgG, an anti-idiotype
antibody for
hMN-14, demonstrated that only TF2 had a DDD-Fab-hMN-14 component that was
tightly associated with h679-Fab-AD as indicated by an additional signal
response. The
additional increase of response units resulting from the binding of WI2 to TF2

immobilized on the sensorchip corresponded to two fully functional binding
sites, each
contributed by one subunit of C-DDD2-Fab-hMN-14. This was confirmed by the
ability
of TF2 to bind two Fab fragments of WI2 (not shown).
Production of TF10 Bispecific Antibody for Pretargeting

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
102731 A similar protocol was used to generate a trimeric TF10 DNL construct,
comprising two copies of a C-DDD2-Fab-hPAM4 and one copy of C-AD2-Fab-679. The

cancer-targeting antibody component in TF10 was derived from hPAM4, a
humanized
anti-pancreatic cancer mucin MAb that has been studied in detail as a
radiolabeled MAb
(e.g., Gold et al., Clin. Cancer Res. 13: 7380-7387, 2007). The hapten-binding
component
was derived from h679, a humanized anti-histaminyl-succinyl-glycine (HSG) MAb.
The
TFIO bispecific ([hPAM4]2 x h679) antibody was produced using the method
disclosed
for production of the (anti CEA)2 x anti HSG bsAb TF2, as described above. The
TF10
construct bears two humanized PAM4 Fabs and one humanized 679 Fab.
[0274] The two fusion proteins (hPAM4-DDD and h679-AD2) were expressed
independently in stably transfected myeloma cells. The tissue culture
supernatant fluids
were combined, resulting in a two-fold molar excess of hPAM4-DDD. The reaction

mixture was incubated at room temperature for 24 hours under mild reducing
conditions
using 1 mM reduced glutathione. Following reduction, the DNL reaction was
completed
by mild oxidation using 2 mM oxidized glutathione. TF10 was isolated by
affinity
chromatography using IMP 291-affigel resin, which binds with high specificity
to the
h679 Fab.
[0275] A full tissue histology and blood cell binding panel has been examined
for hPAM4
IgG and for an anti-CEA x anti-HSG bsMAb that is entering clinical trials.
hPAM4
binding was restricted to very weak binding to the urinary bladder and stomach
in 1/3
specimens (no binding was seen in vivo), and no binding to normal tissues was
attributed
to the anti-CEA x anti-HSG bsMAb. Furthermore, in vitro studies against cell
lines
bearing the H1 and H2 histamine receptors showed no antagonistic or agonistic
activity
with the IMP 288 di-HSG peptide, and animal studies in 2 different species
showed no
pharmacologic activity of the peptide related to the histamine component at
doses 20,000
times higher than that used for imaging. Thus, the HSG-histamine derivative
does not
have pharmacologic activity.
Example 16. Imaging Studies Using Pretargeting With TF10 Bispecific Antibody
and 1111n-Labeled Peptides
1102761 The following study demonstrates the feasibility of in vivo imaging
using the
pretargeting technique with bispecific antibodies incorporating hPAM4 and
labeled
peptides. The TF10 bispecific antibody, comprising two copies of a C-DDD2-Fab-
91

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
hPAM4 and one copy of C-AD2-Fab-679, was prepared as described in the
preceding
Example. Nude mice bearing 0.2 to 0.3 g human pancreatic cancer xenografts
were
imaged, using pretargeting with TF10 and "In-IMP-288 peptide. The results,
shown in
FIG. 8, demonstrate how clearly delineated tumors can be detected in animal
models
using a bsMAb pretargeting method, with 111In-1abe1ed di-HSG peptide, IMP-288.
The
six animals in the top of FIG. 8 received 2 different doses of TF10 (10:1 and
20:1 mole
ratio to the moles of peptide given), and the next day they were given an "In-
labeled
diHSG peptide (IMP 288). The 3 other animals on the bottom of FIG. 8 received
only the
1111n-IMP-288 (no pretargeting). The images were taken 3 h after the injection
of the
labeled peptide and show clear localization of 0.2 ¨ 0.3 g tumors in the
pretargeted
animals, with no localization in the animals given the 1"In-peptide alone.
Tumor uptake
averaged 20-25% ID/g with tumor/blood ratios exceeding 2000:1, tumor/liver
ratios of
170:1, and tumor/kidney ratios of 18/1.
Example 17. Production of Targeting Peptides for Use in Pretargeting and 18F
Labeling
[0277] In a variety of embodiments, 18F-labeled proteins or peptides are
prepared by a
novel technique and used for diagnostic and/or imaging studies, such as PET
imaging.
The novel technique for 18F labeling involves preparation of an 18F-metal
complex,
preferably an 18F-aluminum complex, which is chelated to a chelating moiety,
such as
DOTA, NOTA or NETA or derivatives thereof. Chelating moieties may be attached
to
proteins, peptides or any other molecule using conjugation techniques well
known in the
art. In certain preferred embodiments, the 18F-A1 complex is formed in
solution first and
then attached to a chelating moiety that is already conjugated to a protein or
peptide.
However, in alternative embodiments the aluminum may be first attached to the
chelating
moiety and the 18F added later.
Peptide Synthesis
[0278] Peptides were synthesized by solid phase peptide synthesis using the
Fmoc
strategy. Groups were added to the side chains of diamino amino acids by using

Fmoc/Aloc protecting groups to allow differential deprotection. The Aloe
groups were
removed by the method of Dangles et. al. (J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52:4984-4993)
except that
piperidine was added in a 1:1 ratio to the acetic acid used. The unsymmetrical
tetra-t-butyl
92

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
,
52392-81
DTPA was made as described in McBride et al. (US Patent Application Pub. No.US

2005/0002945.
[0279] The tri-t-butyl DOTA, symmetrical tetra-t-butyl DTPA, ITC-benzyl DTPA,
p-
SCN-Bn-NOTA and TACN were obtained from MACROCYCLICS (Dallas, TX). The
DiBocTACN, NODA-GA(tBu)3 and the NO2AtBu were purchased from CheMatech
(Dijon, France). The Alod/Fmoc Lysine and Dap (diaminopropionic acid
derivatives (also
Dpr)) were obtained from CREOSALUS (Louisville, KY) or BACHEM (Torrance,
CA). The Sieber Amide resin was obtained from NOVABIOCHEM (San Diego, CA).
The remaining Fmoc amino acids were obtained from CREOSALUS , BACHEM ,
PEPTECH (Burlington, MA), EMD BIOSCIENCES (San Diego, CA), CHEM
IMPEX (Wood Dale, IL) or NOVABIOCHEM . The aluminum chloride hexahydrate
was purchased from SIGMA-ALDRICH (Milwaukee, WI). The remaining solvents and
reagents were purchased from FISHER SCIENTIFIC (Pittsburgh, PA) or SIGMA-
ALDRICH (Milwaukee, WI). 18F was supplied by IBA MOLECULAR (Somerset,
NJ)
18F-Labeling of IMP 272
[0280] The first peptide that was prepared and 18F-labeled was IMP 272:
DTPA-Gln-Ala-Lys(HSG)-D-Tyr-Lys(HSG)-NH2 MH+ 1512
[0281] IMP 272 was synthesized as described (McBride et al., US Patent
Application
Publ. No. 20040241158.
[0282] Acetate buffer solution - Acetic acid, 1.509 g was diluted in ¨ 160 mL
water and
the pH was adjusted by the addition of 1 M NaOH then diluted to 250 mL to make
a 0.1 M
solution at pH 4.03.
[0283] Aluminum acetate buffer solution - A solution of aluminum was prepared
by
dissolving 0.1028 g of AlC13 hexahydrate in 42.6 mL DI water. A 4 mL aliquot
of the
aluminum solution was mixed with 16 mL of a 0.1 M Na0Ac solution at pH 4 to
provide a
2 mM Al stock solution.
[0284] IMP 272 acetate buffer solution - Peptide, 0.0011 g, 7.28 x 10 mol IMP
272 was
dissolved in 364 l_tL of the 0.1 M pH 4 acetate buffer solution to obtain a 2
mM stock
solution of the peptide.
93

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[0285] F-18 Labeling of IMP 272 - A 3 uL aliquot of the aluminum stock
solution was
placed in a REACTI-VIALTm and mixed with 50 pl 18F (as received) and 3 L of
the IMP
272 solution. The solution was heated in a heating block at 110 C for 15 min
and analyzed
by reverse phase HPLC. HPLC analysis (not shown) showed 93% free 18F and 7%
bound
to the peptide. An additional 10 pt of the IMP 272 solution was added to the
reaction and
it was heated again and analyzed by reverse phase HPLC (not shown). The HPLC
trace
showed 8%18F at the void volume and 92% of the activity attached to the
peptide. The
remainder of the peptide solution was incubated at room temperature with 150
uL PBS for
¨ lhr and then examined by reverse phase HPLC. The HPLC (not shown) showed 58%

18F unbound and 42% still attached to the peptide. The data indicate that 18F-
A1-DTPA
complex may be unstable when mixed with phosphate.
[0286] The labeled peptide was purified by applying the labeled peptide
solution onto a 1
cc (30 mg) WATERS HLB column (Part # 186001879) and washing with 300 uL water

to remove unbound F-18. The peptide was eluted by washing the column with 2 x
100 p.L
1:1 Et0H/H20. The purified peptide was incubated in water at 25 C and
analyzed by
reverse phase HPLC (not shown). The HPLC analysis showed that the 18F-labeled
IMP
272 was not stable in water. After 40 min incubation in water about 17% of the
18F was
released from the peptide, while 83% was retained (not shown).
[0287] The peptide (16 uL 2 mM IMP 272, 48 pig) was labeled with 18F and
analyzed for
antibody binding by size exclusion HPLC. The size exclusion HPLC showed that
the
peptide bound hMN-14 x 679 but did not bind to the irrelevant bispecific
antibody hMN-
14 x 734 (not shown).
IMP 272 18F Labeling with Other Metals
[0288] A ¨3 uL aliquot of the metal stock solution (6 x 10-9 mol) was placed
in a
polypropylene cone vial and mixed with 754 18F (as received), incubated at
room
temperature for ¨ 2 min and then mixed with 20 p,L of a 2 mM (4 x 10-8 mol)
IMP 272
solution in 0.1 M Na0Ac pH 4 buffer. The solution was heated in a heating
block at 100 C
for 15 min and analyzed by reverse phase HPLC. IMP 272 was labeled with indium

(24%), gallium (36%), zirconium (15%), lutetium (37%) and yttrium (2%) (not
shown).
These results demonstrate that the 18F metal labeling technique is not limited
to an
aluminum ligand, but can also utilize other metals as well. With different
metal ligands,
94

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
different chelating moieties may be utilized to optimize binding of an F-18-
metal
conjugate.
Production and Use of a Serum-Stable 18F-Labeled Peptide IMP 449
[0289] The peptide, IMP 448 D-Ala-D-Lys(HSG)-D-Tyr-D-Lys(HSG)-NH2 MH+ 1009
was made on Sieber Amide resin by adding the following amino acids to the
resin in the
order shown: Aloc-D-Lys(Fmoc)-0H, Trt-HSG-OH, the Aloc was cleaved, Fmoc-D-
Tyr(But)-0H, Aloc-D-Lys(Fmoc)-0H, Trt-HSG-OH, the Aloc was cleaved, Fmoc-D-Ala-

OH with final Fmoc cleavage to make the desired peptide. The peptide was then
cleaved
from the resin and purified by HPLC to produce IMP 448, which was then coupled
to ITC-
benzyl NOTA. The peptide, IMP 448, 0.0757g (7.5 x 10-5 mol) was mixed with
0.0509 g
(9.09 x 10-5 mol) ITC benzyl NOTA and dissolved in 1 mL water. Potassium
carbonate
anhydrous (0.2171 g) was then slowly added to the stirred peptide/NOTA
solution. The
reaction solution was pH 10.6 after the addition of all the carbonate. The
reaction was
allowed to stir at room temperature overnight. The reaction was carefully
quenched with 1
M HC1 after 14 hr and purified by HPLC to obtain 48 mg of IMP 449.
18F Labeling of IMP 449
[0290] The peptide IMP 449 (0.002 g, 1.37 x 10-6 mol) was dissolved in 686 ttL
(2 mM
peptide solution) 0.1 M Na0Ac pH 4.02. Three microliters of a 2 mM solution of
Al in a
pH 4 acetate buffer was mixed with 15 L, 1.3 mCi of "F. The solution was then
mixed
with 20 L of the 2 mM IMP 449 solution and heated at 105 C for 15 min.
Reverse Phase
HPLC analysis showed 35% (tR ¨ 10 min) of the activity was attached to the
peptide and
65% of the activity was eluted at the void volume of the column (3.1 min, not
shown)
indicating that the majority of activity was not associated with the peptide.
The crude
labeled mixture (5 !IL) was mixed with pooled human serum and incubated at 37
C. An
aliquot was removed after 15 min and analyzed by HPLC. The HPLC showed 9.8% of
the
activity was still attached to the peptide (down from 35%). Another aliquot
was removed
after 1 hr and analyzed by HPLC. The HPLC showed 7.6% of the activity was
still
attached to the peptide (down from 35%), which was essentially the same as the
15 min
trace (data not shown).
High Dose 18F Labeling

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[02911 Further studies with purified IMP 449 demonstrated that the 18F-labeled
peptide
was highly stable (91%, not shown) in human serum at 37 C for at least one
hour and was
partially stable (76%, not shown) in human serum at 37 C for at least four
hours.
Additional studies were performed in which the IMP 449 was prepared in the
presence of
ascorbic acid as a stabilizing agent. In those studies (not shown), the metal-
18F-peptide
complex showed no detectable decomposition in serum after 4 hr at 37 C. The
mouse
urine 30 min after injection of '8F-labeled peptide was found to contain 18F
bound to the
peptide (not shown). These results demonstrate that the 18F-labeled peptides
disclosed
herein exhibit sufficient stability under approximated in vivo conditions to
be used for 18F
imaging studies.
[02921 For studies in the absence of ascorbic acid, 18F - 21 mCi in ¨ 4004 of
water was
mixed with 9 pi, of 2 mM A1C13 in 0.1 M pH 4 Na0Ac. The peptide, IMP 449, 60
1_,
(0.01 M, 6 x 10-7 mol in 0.5 NaOH pH 4.13) was added and the solution was
heated to 110
C for 15 min. The crude labeled peptide was then purified by placing the
reaction solution
in the barrel of a 1 cc WATERS HLB column and eluting with water to remove
unbound
18F followed by 1:1 Et0H/H20 to elute the 18F-labeled peptide. The crude
reaction solution
was pulled through the column into a waste vial and the column was washed with
3 x 1
mL fractions of water (18.97 mCi). The HLB column was then placed on a new
vial and
eluted with 2 x 200 ilL 1:1 Et0H/H20 to collect the labeled peptide (1.83
mCi). The
column retained 0.1 mCi of activity after all of the elutions were complete.
An aliquot of
the purified 18F-labeled peptide (20 L) was mixed with 2004 of pooled human
serum
and heated at 37 C. Aliquots were analyzed by reverse phase HPLC. The results
showed
the relative stability of 18F-labeled purified IMP 449 at 37 C at time zero,
one hour (91%
labeled peptide), two hours (77% labeled peptide) and four hours (76% labeled
peptide) of
incubation in human serum (not shown). It was also observed that 18F-labeled
IMP 449
was stable in TFA solution, which is occasionally used during reverse phase
HPLC
chromatography. There appears to be a general correlation between stability in
TFA and
stability in human serum observed for the exemplary 18F-labeled molecules
described
herein. These results demonstrate that 18F-labeled peptide, produced according
to the
methods disclosed herein, shows sufficient stability in human serum to be
successfully
used for in vivo labeling and imaging studies, for example using PET scanning
to detect
labeled cells or tissues. Finally, since IMP 449 peptide contains a thiourea
linkage, which
is sensitive to radiolysis, several products are observed by RP-HPLC. However,
when
96

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
ascorbic acid is added to the reaction mixture, the side products generated
were markedly
reduced.
Example 18. In Vivo Studies With Pretargeting TF10 DNL Construct and 18F-
Labeled Peptide
[0293] 18F-labeled IMP 449 was prepared as follows. The 18F, 54.7 mCi in ¨ 0.5
mL was
mixed with 3 pl 2 mM Al in 0.1 M Na0Ac pH 4 buffer. After 3 min 10 !IL of 0.05
M
IMP 449 in 0.5 M pH 4 Na0Ac buffer was added and the reaction was heated in a
96 C
heating block for 15 min. The contents of the reaction were removed with a
syringe. The
crude labeled peptide was then purified by HPLC on a C18 column. The flow rate
was 3
mL/min. Buffer A was 0.1% TFA in water and Buffer B was 90% acetonitrile in
water
with 0.1% TFA. The gradient went from 100% A to 75/25 A:B over 15 min. There
was
about 1 min difference in retention time (tR) between the labeled peptide,
which eluted
first and the unlabeled peptide. The HPLC eluent was collected in 0.5 min (mL)
fractions.
The labeled peptide had a tR between 6 to 9 min depending on the column used.
The
HPLC purified peptide sample was further processed by diluting the fractions
of interest
two fold in water and placing the solution in the barrel of a 1 cc WATERS HLB
column.
The cartridge was eluted with 3 x 1 mL water to remove acetonitrile and TFA
followed by
400 [IL 1:1 Et0H/H20 to elute the 18F-labeled peptide. The purified [A118F]
IMP 449
eluted as a single peak on an analytical HPLC C18 column (not shown).
[0294] TACONIC nude mice bearing the four slow-growing sc CaPanl xenografts
were
used for in vivo studies. Three of the mice were injected with TF10 (162 fig)
followed
with [A1' 8F]IMP 449 18 h later. TF10 is a humanized bispecific antibody of
use for
tumor imaging studies, with divalent binding to the PAM-4 defined tumor
antigen and
monovalent binding to HSG (see, e.g., Gold et al., 2007, J. Clin. Oncol.
25(18S):4564).
One mouse was injected with peptide alone. All of the mice were necropsied at
1 h post
peptide injection. Tissues were counted immediately. Animal #2 showed high
counts in
the femur. The femur was transferred into a new vial and was recounted along
with the
old empty vial. Recounting indicated that the counts were on the tissue. This
femur was
broken and had a large piece of muscle attached to it. Comparison of mean
distributions
showed substantially higher levels of '8F-labeled peptide localized in the
tumor than in any
normal tissues in the presence of tumor-targeting bispecific antibody.
97

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[0295] Tissue uptake was similar in animals given the [A118F] IMP 449 alone or
in a
pretargeting setting (Table 9). Uptake in the human pancreatic cancer
xenograft, CaPanl,
at 1 h was increased 5-fold in the pretargeted animals as compared to the
peptide alone
(4.6 0.9% ID/g vs. 0.89% ID/g). Exceptional tumor/nontumor ratios were
achieved at
this time (e.g., tumor/blood and liver ratios were 23.4 2.0 and 23.5 2.8,
respectively).
Table 9. Tissue uptake at 1 h post peptide injection, mean and the individual
animals:
TF10 (162ng) -418 h - [A118F] IMP 449 [A118F] IMP 449
(10 :1) alone
Animal Animal Animal
Tissue n Mean SD 1 2 3 Animal 1
4.330
Tumor 3 4.591 0.854 (0.675 5.546 3.898 0.893
(mass) g) (0.306g) (0.353g) (0.721g)
Liver 3 0.197 0.041 0.163 0.242 0.186 0.253
Spleen 3 0.202 0.022 0.180 0.224 0.200 0.226
Kidney 3 5.624 0.531 5.513 6.202 5.158 5.744
Lung 3 0.421 0.197 0.352 0.643 0.268 0.474
Blood 3 0.196 0.028 0.204 0.219 0.165 0.360
Stomach 3 0.123 0.046 0.080 0.172 0.118 0.329
Small
Int. 3 0.248 0.042 0.218 0.295 0.230 0.392
Large
Int. 3 0.141 0.094 0.065 0.247 0.112 0.113
Pancreas 3 0.185 0.078 0.259 0.194 0.103 0.174
Spine 3 0.394 0.427 0.140 0.888 0.155 0.239
Femur 3 3.899 4.098 2.577 8.494 0.625 0.237
Brain 3 0.064 0.041 0.020 0.072 0.100 0.075
Muscle 3 0.696 0.761 0.077 1.545 0.465 0.162
[0296] The results demonstrate that 18F labeled peptide used in conjunction
with a PAM4
containing antibody construct, such as the TF10 DNL construct, provide
suitable targeting
of the 18F label to perform in vivo imaging, such as PET imaging analysis.
98

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
Example 19. Further Imaging Studies with TF10
Summary
[02971 Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the application of
radiolabeled
mAb-PAM4 for nuclear imaging and radioimmunotherapy of pancreatic carcinoma.
We
have examined herein the ability of the novel PAM4-based, bispecific
monoclonal
antibody (mAb) construct, TF10, to pretarget a radiolabeled peptide for
improved imaging
and therapy. TF10 is a humanized, bispecific mAb, divalent for mAb-PAM4 and
monovalent for mAb-679, reactive against the histamine-succinyl-glycine
hapten.
Biodistribution studies and nuclear imaging of the radiolabeled TF10 and/or
TF10-
pretargeted hapten-peptide (IMP-288) were conducted in nude mice bearing
CaPanl
human pancreatic cancer xenografts.1251-TF10 cleared rapidly from the blood,
with levels
decreasing to <1% injected dose per gram (ID/g) by 16 hours. Tumor uptake was
3.47
0.66% ID/g at this time point with no accumulation in any normal tissue. To
show the
utility of the pretargeting approach, "In-IMP-288 was administered 16 hours
after TF10.
At 3 hours postadministration of radiolabeled peptide, imaging showed intense
uptake
within the tumors and no evidence of accretion in any normal tissue (Example
16). No
targeting was observed in animals given only the "In-peptide (Example 16).
Tumor
uptake of the TF10-pretargeted "In-IMP-288 was 24.3 1.7% ID/g, whereas for
"In-
IMP-288 alone it was only 0.12 0.002% ID/g at 16 hours. Tumor/blood ratios
were
significantly greater for the pretargeting group (r.1,000:1 at 3 hours)
compared with "In-
PAM4-IgG (-5:1 at 24 hours; P < 0.0003). Radiation dose estimates suggested
that
TF10/9 Y-peptide pretargeting would provide a greater antitumor effect than
90Y-PAM4-
IgG. Thus, the results support that TF10 pretargeting may provide improved
imaging for
early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic cancer as compared
with directly
radiolabeled PAM4-IgG. (Gold et al., Cancer Res 2008, 68(12):4819-26)
[02981 We have identified a unique biomarker present on mucin expressed by
>85% of
invasive pancreatic adenocarcinomas, including early stage I disease and the
precursor
lesions, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary
mucinous neoplasia
(Gold et al., Clin Cancer Res 2007, 13:7380-87). The specific epitope, as
detected by
mAb-PAM4 (Gold et al., Int J Cancer 1994, 57:204-10), is absent from normal
and
inflamed pancreatic tissues, as well as most other malignant tissues. Thus,
detection of the
epitope provides a high diagnostic likelihood for the presence of pancreatic
neoplasia.
99

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
Early clinical studies using 1311- and 99mTc-1abe1ed, murine PAM4 IgG or Fab',

respectively, showed specific targeting in 8 of 10 patients with invasive
pancreatic
adenocarcinoma (Mariani et al., Cancer Res 1995, 55:5911s-15s; Gold et al.,
Crit Rev
Oncol Hematol 2001, 39:147-54). Of the two negative patients, one had a poorly

differentiated pancreatic carcinoma that did not express the PAM4-epitope,
whereas the
other patient was later found to have pancreatitis rather than a malignant
lesion.
[0299] Accordingly, the high specificity of PAM4 for pancreatic cancer is of
use for the
detection and diagnosis of early disease. In addition to improved detection,
90Y-PAM4 IgG
was found to be effective in treating large human pancreatic cancer xenografts
in nude
mice (Cardillo et al., Clin Cancer Res 2001, 7:3186-92), and when combined
with
gemcitabine, further improvements in therapeutic response were observed (Gold
et al.,
Clin Cancer Res 2004, 10:3552-61; Gold et al., Int J Cancer 2004, 109:618-26).
A Phase I
therapy trial in patients who failed gemcitabine treatment was recently
completed, finding
the maximum tolerated dose of 9 Y-humanized PAM4 IgG to be 20 mCi/m2 (Gulec et
al.,
Proc Amer Soc Clin Onc, 43rd Annual Meeting, J Clin Oncol 2007, 25(18S):636s).

Although all patients showed disease progression at or after week 8, initial
shrinkage of
tumor was observed in several cases. Clinical studies are now underway to
evaluate a
fractionated dosing regimen of 90Y-hPAM4 IgG in combination with a
radiosensitizing
dose of gemcitabine.
[0300] We report herein the development of a novel recombinant, humanized
bispecific
monoclonal antibody (mAb), TF10, based on the targeting specificity of PAM4 to

pancreatic cancer. This construct also binds to the unique synthetic hapten,
histamine-
succinyl-glycine (HSG), which has been incorporated in a number of small
peptides that
can be radiolabeled with a wide range of radionuclides suitable for single-
photon emission
computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, as

well as for therapeutic purposes (Karacay et al., Clin Cancer Res 2005,
11:7879-85;
Sharkey et al., Leukemia 2005, 19:1064-9; Rossi et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S
A 2006,
103:6841-6; McBride et al., J Nucl Med 2006, 47:1678-88). These studies
illustrate the
potential of this new construct to target pancreatic adenocarcinoma for
imaging or
therapeutic applications.
Methods and Materials
[0301] The TF2 and TF10 bispecific DNL constructs and the IMP 288 targeting
peptide
were prepared as described above. Sodium iodide (1251) and indium chloride
(111In) were
100

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
obtained from PERKIN-ELMER . TF10 was routinely labeled with 1251 by the
iodogen
method, with purification by use of size-exclusion spin columns. Radiolabeling
of DOTA-
peptide and DOTA-PAM4-IgG with 1111nC1 was done as previously described (Rossi
et al.,
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:6841-6; McBride et al., J Nucl Med 2006,
47:1678-
88). Purity of the radiolabeled products was examined by size-exclusion high-
performance
liquid chromatography with the amount of free, unbound isotope determined by
instant
TLC.
[0302] For TF10 distribution studies, female athymic nude mice ¨20 g (TACONIC

Farms), bearing s.c. CaPanl human pancreatic cancer xenografts, were injected
with 125I-
TF10 (10 Ci; 40 jig, 2.50 x 10-1 mol). At various time points, groups of
mice (n = 5)
were necropsied, with tumor and nontumor tissues removed and counted in a
gamma
counter to determine the percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue
(%ID/g), with these
values used to calculate blood clearance rates and tumor/nontumor ratios.
[0303] For pretargeting biodistribution studies, a bispecific mAb/radiolabeled
peptide
molar ratio of 10:1 was used. For example, a group of athymic nude mice
bearing s.c.
CaPanl human pancreatic cancer xenografts was administered TF10 (80 pig, 5.07
x 10-10
mol), whereas a second group was left untreated. At 16 h postinjection of
TF10, ii'In-
IMP-288 hapten-peptide (30 piCi, 5.07 x 10-11 mol) was administered. Mice were

necropsied at several time points, with tumor and nontumor tissues removed and
counted
in a gamma counter to determine the %ID/g. Tumor/nontumor ratios were
calculated from
these data. In a separate study, groups of mice were given 1111n-DOTA-PAM4-IgG
(20 [IC,
50 [tg, 3.13 x 10-1 mol) for the purpose of comparing biodistribution,
nuclear imaging,
and potential therapeutic activity. Radiation dose estimates were calculated
from the time-
activity curves with the assumption of no activity at zero time. Student's t
test was used to
assess significant differences.
[0304] To perform nuclear immuoscintigraphy, at 3 h postinjection of
radiolabeled peptide
or 24 h postinjection of radiolabeled hPAM4-IgG, tumor-bearing mice were
imaged with a
dual-head Solus gamma camera fitted with medium energy collimator for 111In
(ADAC
Laboratories). Mice were imaged for a total of 100,000 cpm or 10 min,
whichever came
first.
Results
[0305] In vitro characterization of the bispecific mAb TF10. The binding of
TF10 to the
target mucin antigen was analyzed by ELISA (FIG. 9). The results showed nearly
identical
101

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
binding curves for the divalent TF10, PAM4-IgG, and PAM4-F(aW)2 (half-maximal
binding was calculated as 1.42 0.10, 1.31 0.12, and 1.83 0.16 nmol/L,
respectively; P
> 0.05 for all), whereas the monovalent bsPAM4 chemical conjugate (PAM4-Fab' x
anti-
DTPA-Fab') had a significantly lower avidity (half-maximal binding, 30.61
2.05 nmol/L;
P = 0.0379, compared with TF10), suggesting that TF10 binds in a divalent
manner. The
immunoreactive fraction of 1251-TF10 bound to the mucin was 87%, with 9% found
as
unbound TF10 and 3% as free iodide (not shown). Ninety percent of the 111In-
IMP-288
bound to TF10 (not shown). Of the total '111n-IMP-288 bound to TF10, 92%
eluted at
higher molecular weight when excess mucin (200 i_tg) was added, with only 3%
eluting
with the non¨mucin-reactive TF10 fraction. An additional 5% of the
radiolabeled peptide
eluted in the free peptide volume. None of the radiolabeled peptide bound to
the mucin
antigen in the absence of TF10 (not shown).
[0306] Biodistribution of 125I-TF10 in CaPanl tumor¨bearing nude mice. TF10
showed a
rapid clearance from the blood, starting with 21.03 1.93 %ID/g at 1 hour and
decreasing
to just 0.13 0.02 %ID/g at 16 hours. The biological half-life was calculated
to be 2.19
hours [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.11-2.27 hours]. Tissue uptake
revealed
enhanced activity in the liver, spleen, and kidneys at 1 hour, which cleared
just as quickly
by 16 hours [T1/2 = 2.09 hours (95% CI, 2.08-2.10), 2.84 hours (95% CI, 2.49-
3.29), and
2.44 hours (95% CI, 2.28-2.63) for liver, spleen, and kidney, respectively].
Activity in the
stomach most likely reflects the accretion and excretion of radioiodine,
suggesting that the
radioiodinated TF10 was actively catabolized, presumably in the liver and
spleen, thereby
explaining its rapid clearance from the blood. Nevertheless, by 16 hours, the
concentration
of radioiodine within the stomach was below 1% ID/g. A group of five non¨tumor-
bearing
nude mice given 1251-TF10 and necropsied at 16 hours showed similar tissue
distribution,
suggesting that the tumor had not affected the bispecific mAb distribution and
clearance
from nolinal tissues (data not shown). Of course, it is possible that
differences occurred
before the initial time point examined. Tumor uptake of TF10 peaked at 6 hours

postinjection (7.16 1.10 %ID/g) and had decreased to half maximum binding
(3.47
0.66 %ID/g) at 16 hours. Tumor uptake again decreased nearly 2-fold over the
next 32
hours, but then was stable over the following 24 hours.
[0307] Biodistribution of TF10-pretargeted, "11n-labeled peptide. Although
maximum
tumor uptake of TF10 occurred at 6 hours, previous experience indicated that
the
radiolabeled peptide would need to be given at a time point when blood levels
of TF10 had
1 02

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
cleared to <1% ID/g (i.e., 16 hours). Higher levels of TF10 in the blood would
lead to
unacceptably high binding of the radiolabeled peptide within the blood (i.e.,
low
tumor/blood ratios), whereas administering the peptide at a later time would
mean the
concentration of TF10 in the tumor would be decreased with consequently
reduced
concentration of radiolabeled peptide within the tumor. Thus, an initial
pretargeting study
was done using a 16-hour interval. With the amount of the 111In-IMP-288 held
constant (30
5.07 x 10-11 mol), increasing amounts of TF10 were given so that the
administered
dose of TF10 and IMP-288 expressed as mole ratio varied from 5:1 to 20:1
(Table 10).
Table 10. Biodistribution of 1111n-IMP-288 alone (no TF10) or pretargeted with
varying
amounts of TF10
%ID/g at 3 h (mean SD)
5:1 10:1 20:1 No TF10
Tumor 19.0 3.49 24.3
1.71 28.6 0.73 0.12 0.00
Liver 0.09 0.01 0.21
0.12 0.17 0.01 0.07 0.00
Spleen 0.12 0.04 0.16
0.07 0.26 0.10 0.04 0.01
Kidneys 1.59 0.11 1.72 0.24 1.53 0.14 1.71 0.22
Lungs 0.19 0.06 0.26
0.00 0.29 0.04 0.03 0.00
Blood 0.01 0.00 0.01
0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Stomach 0.03 0.02 0.02
0.02 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.01
Small intestine 0.12 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.04
0.01 0.06 0.02
Large intestine 0.23 0.10 0.39
0.08 0.25 0.08 0.33 0.02
Pancreas 0.02 0.00 0.02
0.01 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00
Tumor weight (g) 0.12 0.03 0.32
0.09 0.27 0.01 0.35 0.03
103081 At 3 hours the amount of "1In-IMP-288 in the blood was barely
detectable
(0.01%). Tumor uptake increased from 19.0 3.49% ID/g to 28.55 0.73% ID/g
as the
amount of bispecific mAb administered was increased 4-fold (statistically
significant
1 03

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
differences were observed for comparison of each TF10/peptide ratio, one group
to
another; P < 0.03 or better), but without any appreciable increase in normal
tissue uptake.
Tumor uptake in the animals given TF10 was >100-fold higher than when "In-IMP-
288
was given alone. Comparison ofillIn activity in the normal tissues of the
animals that
either received or did not receive prior administration of TF10 indicated
similar absolute
values, which in most instances were not significantly different. This
suggests that the
bispecific mAb had cleared sufficiently from all normal tissues by 16 hours to
avoid
appreciable peptide uptake in these tissues. Tumor/blood ratios were >2,000:1,
with other
tissue ratios exceeding 100:1. Even tumor/kidney ratios exceeded 10:1. The
highest tumor
uptake of radioisotope with minimal targeting to nontumor tissues resulted
from the 20:1
ratio; however, either of the TF10/peptide ratios could be used to achieve
exceptional
targeting to tumor, both in terms of signal intensity and contrast ratios. The
10:1 ratio was
chosen for further study because the absolute difference in tumor uptake of
radiolabeled
peptide was not substantially different between the 10:1 (24.3 1.71% ID/g)
and 20:1
(28.6 0.73% ID/g) ratios.
[0309] Images of the animals given TF10-pretargeted 111In-IMP-288 at a
bispecific
mAb/peptide ratio of 10:1, or the "In-IMP-288 peptide alone, are shown in FIG.
10. The
majority of these tumors were <0.5 cm in diameter, weighing ¨0.25 g. The
images show
highly intense uptake in the tumor of the TF10-pretargeted animals (FIG. 10A).
The
intensity of the image background for the TF10-pretargeted animals was
increased to
match the intensity of the image taken of the animals given the 1111n-IMP-288
alone (FIG.
10B). However, when the images were optimized for the TF10-pretargeted mice,
the
signal intensity and contrast were so high that no additional activity was
observed in the
body. No tumor localization was seen in the animals given the 1"In-IMP-288
alone, even
when image intensity was enhanced (FIG. 10C).
[0310] An additional experiment was done to assess the kinetics of targeting
"In-hPAM4
whole-IgG compared with that of the TF10-pretargeted1"In-IMP-288 peptide.
Tumor
uptake of the "In-peptide was highest at the initial time point examined, 3
hours (15.99
4.11% ID/g), whereas the blood concentration of radiolabeled peptide was only
0.02
0.01% ID/g, providing a mean tumor/blood ratio of 946.3 383Ø Over time,
radiolabeled
peptide cleared from the tumor with a biological half-life of 76.04 hours.
Among
nontumor tissues, uptake was highest in the kidneys, averaging 1.89 0.42%
ID/g at 3
hours with a steady decrease over time (biological half-life, 33.6 hours).
Liver uptake
104

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
started at 0.15 0.06% ID/g and remained essentially unchanged over time. In
contrast to
the TF10-pretargeted "11n-IMP-288, the "In-hPAM4-IgG had a slower clearance
from
the blood, albeit there was a substantial clearance within the first 24 hours,
decreasing
from 30.1% ID/g at 3 hours to just 11.5 1.7% ID/g at 24 hours. Variable
elevated uptake
in the spleen suggested that the antibody was likely being removed from the
blood by
targeting of secreted mucin that had become entrapped within the spleen. Tumor
uptake
peaked at 48 hours with 80.4 6.1% ID/g, and remained at an elevated level
over the
duration of the monitoring period. The high tumor uptake, paired with a more
rapid than
expected blood clearance for an IgG, produced tumor/blood ratios of 5.2 1.0
within 24
hours. FIG. 10C shows the images of the animals at 24 hours postadministration
of 111In-
PAM4-IgG, illustrating that tumors could be visualized at this early time, but
there was
still considerable activity within the abdomen. Tumor/nontumor ratios were
mostly higher
for TF10-pretargeted '111n-labeled hapten-peptide as compared with "11n-hPAM4-
IgG,
except for the kidneys, where tumor/kidney ratios with the '111n-IMP-288 and
111In-
hPAM4-IgG were similar at later times. However, tumor/kidney ratios for the
TF10-
pretargeted "In-IMP-288 were high enough (e.g., ¨7:1) at 3 hours to easily
discern tumor
from normal tissue.
[0311] FIG. 11 illustrates the potential therapeutic capability of the direct
and pretargeted
methods to deliver radionuclide (90Y). Although the concentration (%ID/g) of
radioisotope
within the tumor seems to be much greater when delivered by PAM4-IgG than by
pretargeted TF10 at their respective maximum tolerated dose (0.15 mCi for 90Y-
hPAM4
and 0.9 mCi for TF10-pretargeted90Y-IMP-288), the radiation dose to tumor
would be
similar (10,080 and 9,229 cGy for 90Y-PAM4-IgG and TF10-pretargeted 90Y-IMP-
288,
respectively). The advantage for the pretargeting method would be the
exceptionally low
activity in blood (9 cGy), almost 200-fold less than with the 90Y-hPAM4 IgG
(1,623 cGy).
It is also important to note that the radiation dose to liver, as well as
other nontumor
organs, would be much lower with the TF10-pretargeted 90Y-IMP-288. The
exception
would be the kidneys, where the radiation dose would be similar for both
protocols at their
respective maximum dose (612 and 784 cGy for 90Y-PAlv14-IgG and TF10-90Y-IMP-
288,
respectively). The data suggest that for 90Y-PAM4-IgG, as with most other
radiolabeled
whole-IgG mAbs, the dose-limiting toxicity would be hematologic; however, for
the TF10
pretargeting protocol, the dose-limiting toxicity would be the kidneys.
Discussion
105

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[0312] Current diagnostic modalities such as ultrasound, computerized
tomography (CT),
and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technologies, which provide anatomic
images,
along with PET imaging of the metabolic environment, have routinely been found
to
provide high sensitivity in the detection of pancreatic masses. However, these
data are, for
the most part, based on detection of lesions >2 cm in a population that is
already
presenting clinical symptoms. At this time in the progression of the
pancreatic carcinoma,
the prognosis is rather dismal. To improve patient outcomes, detection of
small, early
pancreatic neoplasms in the asymptomatic patient is necessary.
[0313] Imaging with a mAb-targeted approach, such as is described herein with
mAb-
PAM4, may provide for the diagnosis of these small, early cancers. Of prime
importance is
the specificity of the mAb. We have presented considerable data, including
immunohistochemical studies of tissue specimens (Gold et al., Clin Cancer Res
2007;13:7380-7; Gold et al., Int J Cancer 1994;57:204-10) and immunoassay of
patient
sera (Gold et al., J Clin Oncol 2006;24:252-8), to show that mAb-PAM4 is
highly reactive
with a biomarker, the presence of which provides high diagnostic likelihood of
pancreatic
neoplasia. Furthermore, we determined that PAM4, although not reactive with
normal
adult pancreatic tissues nor active pancreatitis, is reactive with the
earliest stages of
neoplastic progression within the pancreas (pancreatic intraepithelial
neoplasia 1 and
intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia) and that the biomarker remains at
high levels of
expression throughout the progression to invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma
(Gold et al.,
Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:7380-7). Preclinical studies with athymic nude mice
bearing
human pancreatic tumor xenografts have shown specific targeting of
radiolabeled murine,
chimeric, and humanized versions of PAM4.
[0314] In the current studies, we have examined a next-generation,
recombinant, bispecific
PAM4-based construct, TF10, which is divalent for the PAM4 arm and monovalent
for the
anti-HSG hapten arm. There are several important characteristics of this
pretargeting
system's constructs, named dock-and-lock, including its general applicability
and ease of
synthesis. However, for the present consideration, the major differences from
the
previously reported chemical construct are the valency, which provides
improved binding
to tumor antigen, and, importantly, its pharmacokinetics. TF10 clearance from
nontumor
tissues is much more rapid than was observed for the chemical conjugate. Time
for blood
levels of the bispecific constructs to reach less than 1% ID/g was 40 hours
postinjection for
the chemical construct versus 16 hours for TF10. A more rapid clearance of the
106

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
pretargeting agent has provided a vast improvement of the tumor/blood ratio,
while
maintaining high signal strength at the tumor site (%ID/g).
[03151 In addition to providing a means for early detection and diagnosis, the
results
support the use of the TF10 pretargeting system for cancer therapy.
Consideration of the
effective radiation dose to tumor and nontumor tissues favors the pretargeting
method over
directly radiolabeled PAM4-IgG. The dose estimates suggest that the two
delivery systems
have different dose-limiting toxicities: myelotoxicity for the directly
radiolabeled PAM4
versus the kidney for the TF10 pretargeting system. This is of significance
for the future
clinical development of radiolabeled PAM4 as a therapeutic agent. Gemcitabine,
the
frontline drug of choice for pancreatic cancer, can provide significant
radiosensitization of
tumor cells. In previous studies, we showed that combinations of gemcitabine
and directly
radiolabeled PAM4-IgG provided synergistic antitumor effects compared with
either arm
alone (Gold et al., Clin Cancer Res 2004,10:3552-61; Gold et al., Int J Cancer
2004,
109:618-26). The dose-limiting factor with this combination was overlapping
hematologic
toxicity. However, because the dose-limiting organ for TF10 pretargeting seems
to be the
kidney rather than hematologic tissues, combinations with gemcitabine should
be less
toxic, thus allowing increased administration of radioisotope with
consequently greater
antitumor efficacy.
[0316] The superior imaging achieved with TF10 pretargeting in preclinical
models, as
compared with directly radiolabeled DOTA-PAM4-IgG, provides a compelling
rationale
to proceed to clinical trials with this imaging system. The specificity of the
tumor-targeting
mAb for pancreatic neoplasms, coupled with the bispecific antibody platform
technology
providing the ability to conjugate various imaging compounds to the HSG-hapten-
peptide
for SPECT (1 "In) f PET (68Ga), ultrasound (Au), or other contrast agents, or
for that matter
90Y or other radionuclides for therapy, provides high potential to improve
overall patient
outcomes (Goldenberg et al., J Nucl Med 2008,49:158-63). In particular, we
believe that
a TF10-based ImmunoPET procedure will have major clinical value to screen
individuals
at high-risk for development of pancreatic cancer (e.g., genetic
predisposition, chronic
pancreatitis, smokers, etc.), as well as a means for follow-up of patients
with suspicious
abdominal images from conventional technologies and/or with indications due to
the
presence of specific biomarker(s) or abnoimal biochemical findings. When used
as part of
an ongoing medical plan for following these patients, early detection of
pancreatic cancer
may be achieved. Finally, in combination with gemcitabine, TF10 pretargeting
may
107

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
provide a better opportunity for control of tumor growth than directly
radiolabeled PAM4-
IgG.
Example 20. Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer Xenografts with Gemcitabine and 90Y-
Labeled Peptide Pretargeted Using TF10
Summary
[0317] 90Y-hPAM4 IgG is currently being examined in Phase I/II trials in
combination
with gemcitabine in patients with Stage III/IV pancreatic cancer. We disclose
a new
approach for pretargeting radionuclides that is able to deliver a similar
amount of
radioactivity to pancreatic cancer xenografts, but with less hematological
toxicity, which
would be more amenable for combination with gemcitabine. Nude mice bearing
¨0.4 cm3
sc CaPanl human pancreatic cancer were administered a recombinant bsMAb, TF10,

followed 1 day later with a "Y-labeled hapten-peptide (IMP-288). Various doses
and
schedules of gemcitabine were added to this treatment, and tumor progression
monitored
up to 28 weeks. 0.7 mCi PT-RAIT alone produce only a transient 60% loss in
blood
counts, and animals given 0.9 mCi of PT-RAIT alone and 0.7 mCi PT-RAIT + 6 mg
gemcitabine (human equivalent ¨1000 mg/m2) had no histological evidence of
renal
toxicity after 9 months. A single dose of 0.25 or 0.5 mCi PT-RAIT alone can
completely
ablate 20% and 80% of the tumors, respectively. Monthly fractionated PT-RAIT
(0.25
mCi/dose given at the start of each gemcitabine cycle) added to a standard
gemcitabine
regimen (6 mg wkly x 3; 1 wk off; repeat 3 times) significantly increased the
median time
for tumors to reach 3.0 cm3 over PT-RAIT alone. Other treatment plans
examining non-
cytotoxic radiosensitizing dose regimens of gemcitabine added to PT-RAIT also
showed
significant improvements in treatment response over PT-RAIT alone. The results
show
that PT-RAIT is a promising new approach for treating pancreatic cancer.
Current data
indicate combining PT-RAIT with gemcitabine will enhance therapeutic
responses.
Methods
[0318] TF10 bispecific antibody was prepared as described above. For
pretargeting, TF10
was given to nude mice bearing the human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line,
CaPan 1 .
After allowing sufficient time for TF10 to clear from the blood (16h), the
radiolabeled
divalent HSG-peptide was administered. The small molecular weight HSG-peptide
(-1.4
kD) clears within minutes from the blood, entering the extravascular space
where it can
bind to anti-HSG arm of the pretargeted TF10 bsMAb. Within a few hours, >80%
of the
108

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
radiolabeled HSG-peptide is excreted in the urine, leaving the tumor localized
peptide and
a trace amount in the normal tissues.
Results
[0319] FIG. 12 illustrates the therapeutic activity derived from a single
treatment of
established (-0.4 cm3) CaPanl tumors with 0.15 mCi of 9 Y-hPAM4 IgG, or 0.25
or 0.50
mCi of TF10-pretargeted 90Y-IMP-288. Similar anti-tumor activity was observed
for the
0.5-mCi pretargeted dose vs. 0.15-mCi dose of the directly radiolabeled IgG,
but
hematological toxicity was severe at this level of the direct conjugate (not
shown), while
the pretargeted dose was only moderately toxic (not shown). Indeed, the MTD
for
pretargeting using 90Y-IMP-288 is at least 0.9 mCi in nude mice.
[0320] FIG. 13 shows that the combination of gemcitabine and PT-RAIT has a
synergistic
effect on anti-tumor therapy. Human equivalent doses of 1000 mg/m2 (6 mg) of
gemcitabine (GEM) were given intraperitoneally to mice weekly for 3 weeks,
then after
resting for 1 week, this regimen was repeated 2 twice. PT-RAIT (0.25 mCi of
TF10-
pretargeted 90Y-IMP-288) was given 1 day after the first GEM dose in each of
the 3 cycles
of treatment. Gem alone had no significant impact on tumor progression
(survival based
on time to progress to 3.0 cm3). PT-RAIT alone improved survival compared to
untreated
animals, but the combined GEM with PT-RAIT regimen increased the median
survival by
nearly 10 weeks. Because hematological toxicity is NOT dose-limiting for PT-
RAIT, but
it is one of the limitations for gemcitabine therapy, these studies suggest
that PT-RAIT
could be added to a standard GEM therapy with the potential for enhanced
responses. The
significant synergistic effect of gemcitabine plus PT-RAIT was surprising and
unexpected.
[0321] A further study examined the effect of the timing of administration on
the
potentiation of anti-tumor effect of gemcitabine plus PT-RAIT. A single 6-mg
dose of
GEM was given one day before or 1 day after 0.25 mCi of TF10-pretargeted 90Y-
IMP-288
(not shown). This study confirmed what is already well known with GEM, i.e.,
radiosensitization is best given in advance of the radiation. Percent survival
of treated
mice showed little difference in survival time between PT-RAIT alone and PT-
RAIT with
gemcitabine given 22 hours after the radiolabeled peptide. However,
administration of
gemcitabine 19 hours prior to PT-RAIT resulted in a substantial increase in
survival (not
shown).
[0322] Single PT-RAIT (0.25 mCi) combined with cetuximab (1 mg weekly ip; 7
weeks)
or with cetuximab + GEM (6 mg weekly x 3) in animals bearing CaPanl showed the
109

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
GEM + cetuximab combination with PT-RAIT providing a better initial response
(FIG.
14), but the response associated with just cetuximab alone added to PT-RAIT
was
encouraging (FIG. 14), since it was as good or better than PT-RAIT + GEM.
Because the
overall survival in this study was excellent, with only 2 tumors in each group
progressing
to >2.0 cm3 after 24 weeks when the study was terminated, these results
indicate a
potential role for cetuximab when added to PT-RAIT.
Example 21. Effect of Fractionated Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy (PT-RAIT)
for Pancreatic Cancer Therapy
[0323] We evaluated fractionated therapy with 90Y-DOTA-di-HSG peptide (IMP-
288) and
TF10. Studies using TF10 and radiolabeled IMP-288 were performed in nude mice
bearing s.c. CaPanl human pancreatic cancer xenografts, 0.32-0.54cm3. For
therapy,
TF10-pretargeted 90Y-IMP-288 was given [A] once (0.6mCi on wk 0) or [B]
fractionated
(0.3 mCi on wks 0 and 1), [C] (0.2 mCi on wks 0, 1 and 2) or [D] (0.2 mCi on
wks 0, 1
and 4).
[0324] Tumor regression (>90%) was observed in the majority of mice, 9/10,
10/10, 9/10
and 8/10 in groups [A], [B], [C] and [D], respectively. In group [A], maximum
tumor
regression in 50 % of the mice was reached at 3.7 wks, compared to 6.1, 8.1
and 7.1 wks
in [B], [C] and [D], respectively. Some tumors showed regrowth. At week 14,
the best
therapeutic response was observed in the fractionated group (2x0.3 mCi), with
6/10 mice
having no tumors (NT) compared to 3/10 in the 3x0.2 mCi groups and 1/10 in the
lx
0.6mCi group. No major body weight loss was observed. Fractionated PT-RAIT
provides
another alternative for treating pancreatic cancer with minimum toxicity.
110

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
Example 22. 901{-hPAM4 Radioimmunotherapy (RAIT) Plus Radiosensitizing
Gemcitabine (GEM) Treatment in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (PC)
[0325] 90Y-hPAM4, a humanized antibody highly specific for PC, showed
transient
activity in patients with advanced disease, and GEM enhanced RAIT in
preclinical
studies. This study evaluated repeated treatment cycles of 90Y-hPAM4 plus GEM
in
patients with untreated, unresectable PC. The 90Y-dose was escalated by
cohort, with
patients repeating 4-wk cycles (once weekly 200 mg/m2 GEM, 90Y-hPAM4 once-
weekly
wks 2-4) until progression or =acceptable toxicity. Response assessments used
CT, FDG-
PET, and CA19.9 serum levels.
[0326] 0f8 patients (3F/5M, 56-72 y.o.) at the 1st 2 dose levels (6.5 and 9.0
mCi/m290Y-
hPAM4 x 3), hematologic toxicity has been transient Grade 1-2. Two patients
responded
to initial treatment with FDG SUV and CA19.9 decreases, and lesion regression
by CT.
Both patients continue in good performance status now after 9 and 11 mo. and
after a total
of 3 and 4 cycles, respectively, without additional toxicity. A 3'd patient
with a stable
response by PET and CT and decreases in CA19.9 levels after initial treatment
is now
undergoing a 2nd cycle. Four other patients had early disease progression and
the
remaining patient is still being evaluated. Dose escalation is continuing
after fractionated
RAIT with 90Y-hPAM4 plus low-dose gemcitabine demonstrated therapeutic
activity at
the initial 90Y-dose levels, with minimal hematologic toxicity, even after 4
therapy cycles.
Example 23. Early Detection of Pancreatic Carcinoma Using Mab-PAM4 and In
Vitro Immunoassay
[0327] Immunohistochemistry studies were performed with PAM4 antibody. Results

obtained with stained tissue sections showed no reaction of PAM4 with normal
pancreatic
ducts, ductules and acinar tissues (not shown). In contrast, use of the MA5
antibody
applied to the same tissue samples showed diffuse positive staining of normal
pancreatic
ducts and acinar tissue (not shown). In tissue sections with well
differentiated or
moderately differentiated pancreatic adenocarcinoma, PAM4 staining was
positive, with
mostly cytoplasmic staining but intensification of at the cell surface. Normal
pancreatic
tissue in the same tissue sections was unstained.
[0328] Table II shows the results of immunohistochemical analysis with PAM4
MAb in
pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples of various stages of differentiation.
Overall, there
111

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
was an 87% detection rate for all pancreatic cancer samples, with 100%
detection of well
differentiated and almost 90% detection of moderately differentiated
pancreatic cancers.
Table 11 PAM4 Labeling Pattern
Cancer n Focal Diffuse Total
Well Diff. 13 2 11 13(100%)
Moderately 24 6 = 15 21 (88%)
Diff.
Poorly Diff. 18 5 9 14 (78%)
Total 55 13 35 48 (87%)
[0329] Table 12 shows that PAM4 immunohistochemical staining also detected a
very
high percentage of precursor lesions of pancreatic cancer, including PanIn-1A
to PanIN-3,
IPMN (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms) and MCN (mucinous cystic
neoplasms). Overall, PAM4 staining detected 89% of all pancreatic precursor
lesions.
These results demonstrate that PAM4 antibody-based immunodetection is capable
of
detecting almost 90% of pancreatic cancers and precursor lesions by in vitro
analysis.
PAM4 expression was observed in the earliest phases of PanIN development.
Intense
staining was observed in IPMN and MCN samples (not shown). The PAM4 epitope
was
present at high concentrations (intense diffuse stain) in the great majority
of pancreatic
adenocarcinomas. PAM4 showed diffuse, intense ractivity with the earliest
stages of
pancreatic carcinoma precursor lesions, including PanIN-1, IPMN and MCN, yet
was non-
reactive with normal pancreatic tissue. Taken together, these results show
that diagnosis
and/or detection with the PAM4 antibody is capable of detecting, with very
high
specificity, the earliest stages of pancreatic cancer development.
Table 12 PAM4 Labeling Pattern
Focal Diffuse Total
PanIn-1A 27 9 15 24 (89%)
PanIn-1B 20 4 16 20 (100%)
PanIn-2 11 6 4 10 (91%)
Panln-3 5 2 0 2 (40%)
Total PanIn 63 21 35 56 (89%)
112

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500 PCT/US2009/053192
IPMN 36 6 25 31 (86%)
MCN 27 3 22 25 (92%)
[0330] An enzyme based immunoassay for PAM4 antigen in serum samples was
developed. FIG. 15 shows the results of differential diagnosis using PAM4
immunoassay
for pancreatic cancer versus normal tissues and other types of cancer. The
results showed
a sensitivity of detection of pancreatic cancer of 77.4%, with a specificity
of detection of
94.3%, comparing pancreatic carcinoma (n=53) with all other specimens (n=233),
including pancreatitis and breast, ovarian and colorectal cancer and lymphoma.
The data
of FIG. 15 are presented in tabular form in Table 13.
Table 13. PAM4-Reactive Mucin in Patient Sera
Mean SD Median Range
# Positive
(%)
Normal 43 0.1 0.3 0.0 0-2.0 0
(0)
Pancreatitis 87 3.0 11.5 0.0 0-63.6 4
(5)
Pancreatic CA 53 171 317 31.7 0-1000 41
(77)
Colorectal CA 36 3.3 7.7 0.0 0-37.8 5
(14)
Breast CA 30 3.7 10.1 0.0 0-53.5 2
(7)
Ovarian CA 15 1.8 4.3 0.0 0-16.5 1
(7)
Lymphoma 19 12.3 44.2 0.0 0-194 1
(5)
[0331] An ROC curve (not shown) was constructed with the data from Table 13.
Examining a total of 283 patients, including 53 with pancreatic carcinoma, and
comparing
the presence of circulating PAM4 antigen in patients with pancreatic cancer to
all other
samples, the ROC curve provided an AUC of 0.88 0.03 (95% ci, 0.84-0.92) with
a P
value <0.0001, a highly significant difference for discrimination of
pancreatic carcinoma
from non-pancreatic carcinoma samples. Comparing pancreatic CA with other
tumors and
normal tissue, the PAM4 based serum assay showed a sensitivity of 77% and a
specificity
of 95%.
[0332] A comparison was made of PAM4 antigen concentration in serum samples
from
normal patients, "early" (stage 1) pancreatic carcinoma and all pancreatic
carcinoma
samples. The specimens included 13 sera from healthy volunteers, 12 sera from
stage-1,
113

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
13 sera from stage-2 and 25 sera from stage-3/4 (advanced) pancreatic
carcinoma. A
cutoff value of 8.8 units/ml (red line) was used, as determined by ROC curve
statistical
analysis. The frequency distribution of PAM4 antigen concentration is shown in
FIG. 16,
which shows that 92% of "early" stage-1 pancreatic carcinomas were above the
cutoff line
for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. An ROC curve for the PAM4 based assay is
shown in
FIG. 17, which demonstrates a sensitivity of 81.6% and specificity of 84.6%
for the
PAM4 assay in detection of pancreatic cancer.
[0333] These results confirm that an enzyme immunoassay based on PAM4 antibody

binding can detect and quantitate PAM4-reactive antigen in the serum of
pancreatic
carcinoma patients. The immunoassay demonstrates high specificity and
sensitivity for
pancreatic carcinoma. The majority of patients with stage 1 disease were
detectable using
the PAM4 immunoassay.
[0334] In conclusion, an immunohistology procedure employing PAM4 antibody
identified approximately 90% of invasive pancreatic carcinoma and its
precursor lesions,
PanIN, IPMN and MCN. A PAM4 based enzyme immunoassy to quantitate PAM4
antigen in human patient sera showed high sensitivity and specificity for
detection of early
pancreatic carcinoma. Due to the high specificity of PAM4 for pancreatic
carcinoma, the
mucin biomarker can also serve as a target for in vivo targeting of imaging
and therapeutic
agents. ImmunoPET imaging for detection of "early" pancreatic carcinoma is of
use for
the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, when it can be more effectively
treated. Use of
radioimmunotherapy with a humanized PAM4 antibody construct, preferably in
combination with a radiosensitizing agent, is of use for the treatment of
pancreatic cancer.
Example 24. PEGylated DNL Constructs
[0335] In certain embodiments, it may be preferred to prepare constructs
comprising
PEGylated forms of antibody or immunoconjugate. Such PEGylated constructs may
be
prepared by the DNL technique.
[0336] In a preferred method, the effector moiety to be PEGylated, such as
hPAM4 Fab, is
linked to a DDD sequence to generate the DDD module. A PEG reagent of a
desirable
molecular size is derivatized with a complementary AD sequence and the
resulting PEG-
AD module is combined with the DDD module to produce the PEGylated conjugate
that
consists of a single PEG tethered site-specifically to two copies of the Fab
or other effector
moiety via the disulfide bonds formed between DDD and AD. The PEG reagents may
be
114

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
capped at one end with a methoxy group (m-PEG), can be linear or branched, and
may
contain one of the following functional groups: propionic aldehyde, butyric
aldehyde,
ortho-pyridylthioester (OPTE), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), thiazolidine-2-
thione,
succinimidyl carbonate (SC), maleimide, or ortho-pyridyldisulfide (OPPS).
Among the
effector moieties that may be of interest for PEGylation are enzymes,
cytokines,
chemokines, growth factors, peptides, aptamers, hemoglobins, antibodies and
antibody
fragments. The method is not limiting and a wide variety of agents may be
PEGylated
using the disclosed methods and compositions. PEG of various sizes and
derivatized with
a variety of reactive moieties may be obtained from commercial sources as
discussed in
more detail below.
Generation of PEG-AD2 modules
IMP350: CGQIEYLAKQIVDNAIQQAGC(SS-tbu)-NH2 (SEQ ID NO:41)
103371 IMP350, incorporating the sequence of AD2, was made on a 0.1 mmol scale
with
Sieber Amide resin using Fmoc methodology on a peptide synthesizer. Starting
from the
C-terminus the protected amino acids used were Fmoc-Cys(t-Buthio)-0H, Fmoc-Gly-
OH,
Fmoc-Ala-OH, Fmoc-Gln(Trt)-0H, Fmoc-Gln(Trt)-0H, Fmoc-Ile-OH, Fmoc-Ala-OH,
Fmoc-Asn(Trt)-0H, Fmoc-Asp(OBut)-0H, Fmoc-Val-OH, Fmoc-Ile-OH, Fmoc-Gln(Trt)-
OH, Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-0H, Fmoc-Ala-OH, Fmoc-Leu-OH, Fmoc-Tyr(But)-0H, Fmoc-
Glu(0But)-0H, Fmoc-Ile-OH, Fmoc-Gln(Trt)-0H, Fmoc-Gly-OH and Fmoc-Cys(Trt)-
OH. The peptide was cleaved from the resin and purified by reverse phase (RP)-
HPLC.
Synthesis of PEG2o-IMP350
[0338] IMP350 (0.0104 g) was mixed with 0.1022 g of mPEG-OPTE (20kDa,
NEKTAR Therapeutics) in 7 mL of 1 M Tris buffer at pH 7.81. Acetonitrile, 1
mL, was
then added to dissolve some suspended material. The reaction was stirred at
room
temperature for 3 h and then 0.0527 g of TCEP was added along with 0.0549 g of

cysteine. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1.5 h and then purified on a PD-
10 desalting
column, which was equilibrated with 20% methanol in water. The sample was
eluted,
frozen and lyophilized to obtain 0.0924 g of crude PEG20-IMP350 (MH+ 23508 by
MALDI).
Synthesis of IMP362 (PEG20-IMP360)
115

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
IMP360: CGQIEYLAKQIVDNAIQQAGC(SS-tbu)G-EDANS (SEQ ID NO:42)
MI-1266O
[0339] IMP 360, incorporating the AD2 sequence, was synthesized on a 0.1 mrnol
scale
with Fmoc-Gly-EDANS resin using Fmoc methodology on a peptide synthesizer. The

Fmoc-Gly-OH was added to the resin manually using 0.23 g of Fmoc-Gly-OH, 0.29
g of
HATU, 26 uL of DIEA, 7.5 mL of DMF and 0.57 g of EDANS resin
(NOVABIOCHEMO). The reagents were mixed and added to the resin. The reaction
was
mixed at room temperature for 2.5 hr and the resin was washed with DMF and IPA
to
remove the excess reagents. Starting from the C-terminus the protected amino
acids used
were Fmoc-Cys(t-Buthio)-0H, Fmoc-Gly-OH, Fmoc-Ala-OH, Fmoc-Gln(Trt)-0H, Fmoc-
Gln(Trt)-0H, Fmoc-Ile-OH, Fmoc-Ala-OH, Fmoc-Asn(Trt)-0H, Fmoc-Asp(OBut)-0H,
Fmoc-Val-OH, Fmoc-Ile-OH, Fmoc-Gln(TrO-OH, Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-0H, Fmoc-Ala-OH,
Fmoc-Leu-OH, Fmoc-Tyr(But)-0H, Fmoc-Glu(0But)-0H, Fmoc-Ile-OH, Fmoc-Gln(Trt)-
OH, Fmoc-Gly-OH and Fmoc-Cys(Trt)-0H. The peptide was cleaved from the resin
and
purified by RP-HPLC.
[0340] For synthesis of IMP362, IMP360 (0.0115 g) was mixed with 0.1272 g of
mPEG-
OPTE (20kDa, NEKTAR Therapeutics) in 7 mL of 1 M tris buffer, pH 7.81.
Acetonitrile
(1 mL) was then added to dissolve some suspended material. The reaction was
stirred at
room temperature for 4 h and then 0.0410 g of TCEP was added along with 0.0431
g of
cysteine. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h and purified on a PD-10
desalting
column, which was equilibrated with 20% methanol in water. The sample was
eluted,
frozen and lyophilized to obtain 0.1471 g of crude IMP362 (MH+ 23713).
Synthesis of IMP413 (PEG30-IMP360)
[0341] For synthesis of IMP 413, IMP 360 (0.0103 g) was mixed with 0.1601 g of
mPEG-
OPTE (301(Da, NEKTAR Therapeutics) in 7 mL of 1 M tris buffer at pH 7.81.
Acetonitrile (1 mL) was then added to dissolve some suspended material. The
reaction
was stirred at room temperature for 4.5 h and then 0.0423 g of TCEP was added
along
with 0.0473 g of cysteine. The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h followed
by dialysis for
two days. The dialyzed material was frozen and lyophilized to obtain 0.1552 g
of crude
IMP413 (MH+ 34499).
116

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
Synthesis of IMP421
IMP 421 Ac-C-PEG3-C(S-tBu)GQIEYLAKQIVDNAIQQAGC(S-tBu)G-NH2
(SEQ ID NO:43)
10342] The peptide IMP421, MH+ 2891 was made on NOVASYNO TGR resin (487.6
mg, 0.112 mmol) by adding the following amino acids to the resin in the order
shown:
Fmoc-Gly-OH, Fmoc-Cys(t-Buthio)-0H, Fmoc-Gly-OH, Fmoc-Ala-OH, Fmoc-Gln(Trt)-
OH, Fmoc-Gln(Trt)-0H, Fmoc-Ile-OH, Fmoc-Ala-OH, Fmoc-Asn(Trt)-0H, Fmoc-
Asp(OBut)-0H, Fmoc-Val-OH, Fmoc-Ile-OH, Fmoc-Gln(Trt)-0H, Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-0H,
Fmoc-Ala-OH, Fmoc-Leu-OH, Fmoc-Tyr(But)-0H, Fmoc-Glu(0But)-0H, Fmoc-Ile-OH,
Fmoc-Gln(Trt)-0H, Fmoc-Gly-OH, Fmoc-Cys(t-Buthio)-0H, Fmoc-NH-PEG3-COOH,
Fmoc-Cys(Trt)-0H. The N-terminal amino acid was protected as an acetyl
derivative.
The peptide was then cleaved from the resin and purified by RP-HPLC to yield
32.7 mg of
a white solid.
Synthesis of IMP457
[03431 IMP 421 (SEQ ID NO:43, incorporating the sequence of AD2, was
synthesized by
standard chemical means. To a solution of 15.2 mg (5.26 mop IMP 421 (F.W.
2890.50)
and 274.5 mg (6.86 mol) mPEG2-MAL-40K in 1 mL of acetonitrile was added 7 mL
1
M Tris pH 7.8 and allowed to react at room temperature for 3 h. The excess
mPEG2-
MAL-40K was quenched with 49.4 mg L-cysteine, followed by S-S-tBu deprotection
over
one hour with 59.1 mg TCEP. The reaction mixture was dialyzed overnight at 2-8
C
using two 3-12 mL capacity 10K SLIDE-A-LYZER dialysis cassettes (4 ml into
each
cassette) into 5 L of 5 mM ammonium acetate, pH 5Ø Three more 5 L buffer
changes of 5
mM ammonium acetate, pH 5.0 were made the next day with each dialysis lasting
at least
21/2 h. The purified product (19.4 mL) was transferred into two 20 mL
scintillation vials,
frozen and lyophilized to yield 246.7 mg of a white solid. MALDI-TOF gave
results of
mPEG2-MAL-40K 42,982 and IMP-457 45,500.
Example 25. Generation of PEGylated hPAM4 by DNL
[0344] A DNL structure is prepared having two copies of hPAM4 Fab coupled to a
20
kDa PEG. A DNL reaction is performed by the addition of reduced and
lyophilized
IMP362 in 10-fold molar excess to hPAM4 Fab-DDD2 in 250 mM imidazole, 0.02%
Tween 20, 150 mM NaC1, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.5. After 6 h at room
117

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
temperature in the dark, the reaction mixture is dialyzed against CM Loading
Buffer (150
mM NaC1, 20 mM NaAc, pH 4.5) at 4 C in the dark. The solution is loaded onto a
1-mL
Hi-Trap CM-FF column (AMERSHAMO), which is pre-equilibrated with CM Loading
buffer. After sample loading, the column is washed with CM loading buffer to
baseline,
followed by washing with 15 mL of 0.25 M NaC1, 20 mM NaAc, pH 4.5. The
PEGylated
hPAM4 is eluted with 12.5 mL of 0.5 M NaC1, 20 mM NaAc, pH 4.5.
[03451 The conjugation process is analyzed by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie blue
staining.
Under non-reducing conditions, the Coomassie blue-stained gel reveals the
presence of a
major band in the reaction mixture, which is absent in the unbound or 0.25 M
NaC1 wash
fraction, but evident in the 0.5 M NaC1 fraction. Fluorescence imaging, which
is used to
detect the EDANS tag on IMP362, demonstrates that the band contains IMP362 and
the
presence of excess IMP362 in the reaction mixture and the unbound fraction.
The DNL
reaction results in the site-specific and covalent conjugation of IMP362 with
a dimer of
hPAM4 Fab. Under reducing conditions, which breaks the disulfide linkage, the
components of the DNL structures are resolved. The calculated MW of the (hPAM4

Fab)2-PEG construct matches that determined by MALDI TOF. Overall, the DNL
reaction results in a near quantitative yield of a homogeneous product that is
> 90% pure
after purification by cation-exchange chromatography.
103461 Another DNL reaction is performed by the addition of reduced and
lyophilized
IMP457 in 10-fold molar excess to hPAM4 Fab-DDD2 in 250 mM imidazole, 0.02%
Tween 20, 150 mM NaC1, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.5. After 60 h at room
temperature, 1mM oxidized glutathione is added to the reaction mixture, which
is then
held for an additional 2 h. The mixture is diluted 1:20 with CM Loading Buffer
(150 mM
NaC1, 20 mM NaAc, pH 4.5) and titrated to pH 4.5 with acetic acid. The
solution is loaded
onto a 1-mL Hi-Trap CM-FF column (AMERSHAMg), which is pre-equilibrated with
CM Loading Buffer. After sample loading, the column is washed with CM Loading
Buffer
to baseline, followed by washing with 15 mL of 0.25 M NaC1, 20 mM NaAc, pH
4.5. The
PEGylated product is eluted with 20 mL of 0.5 M NaC1, 20 mM NaAc, pH 4.5. The
DNL
construct is concentrated to 2 mL and diafiltered into 0.4 M PBS, pH 7.4. The
final
PEGylated hPAM4 Fab2 construct is approximately 90% purity as determined by
SDS-
PAGE.
[0347] A DNL construct having two copies of hPAM4 Fab coupled to a 30 kDa PEG
is
prepared as described immediately above using IMP413 instead of IMP362. The
118

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
PEGylated hPAM4 Fab2 DNL construct is purified as described above and obtained
in
approximately 90% purity. The PEGylated DNL constructs may be used for
therapeutic
methods as described above for non-PEGylated forms of hPAM4.
Example 26. Generation of DDD module based on Interferon (IFN)-cab
[0348] The cDNA sequence for IFN-a2b was amplified by PCR, resulting in a
sequence
comprising the following features, in which XbaI and BamHI are restriction
sites, the
signal peptide is native to IFN-a2b, and 6 His is a hexahistidine tag (SEQ ID
NO: 59):
XbaI---Signal peptide--- IFNa2b ---6 His---BamHI (6 His disclosed as SEQ ID
NO: 59).
The resulting secreted protein consists of IFN-a2b fused at its C-terminus to
a polypeptide
consisting of SEQ ID NO:44.
KSHHHHHHGSGGGGSGGGCGHIQIPPGLTELLQGYTVEVLRQQPPDLVEFAVEYF
TRLREARA (SEQ ID NO:44)
[0349] PCR amplification was accomplished using a full length human IFNcc2b
cDNA
clone (TNVITROGEN Ultimate ORF human clone cat# HORFO1Clone ID I0H35221)
as a template and the following oligonucleotides as primers:
IFNA2 Xba I Left
5'-TCTAGACACAGGACCTCATCATGGCCTTGACCTTTGCTTTACTGG-3'
(SEQ ID NO:45)
IFNA2 BamHI right
5'GGATCCATGATGGTGATGATGGTGTGACTTTTCCTTACTTCTTAAACT
TTCTTGC-3' (SEQ ID NO:46)
[0350] The PCR amplimer was cloned into the PGEMT vector (PROMEGA0). A
DDD2-pdHL2 mammalian expression vector was prepared for ligation with IFN-a2b
by
digestion with XbaI and Bam HI restriction endonucleases. The IFN-a2b amplimer
was
excised from PGEMT with XbaI and Bam HI and ligated into the DDD2-pdHL2
vector
to generate the expression vector IFN-a2b-DDD2-pdHL2.
[0351] IFN-a2b-DDD2-pdHL2 was linearized by digestion with Sall enzyme and
stably
transfected into Sp/EEE myeloma cells by electroporation (see, e.g., U.S.
Patent
7,537,930). Two clones were found to have detectable levels of IFN-a2b by
ELISA. One
119

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
of the two clones, designated 95, was adapted to growth in serum-free media
without
substantial decrease in productivity. The clone was subsequently amplified
with increasing
methotrexate (MTX) concentrations from 0.1 to 0.8 i.cM over five weeks. At
this stage, it
was sub-cloned by limiting dilution and the highest producing sub-clone (95-5)
was
expanded. The productivity of 95-5 grown in shake-flasks was estimated to be
2.5 mg/L
using commercial rIFN-a2b (CHEMICONC IF007, Lot 06008039084) as a standard.
[03521 Clone 95-5 was expanded to 34 roller bottles containing a total of 20 L
of serum-
free Hybridoma SFM with 0.8 li.M MTX and allowed to reach terminal culture.
The
supernatant fluid was clarified by centrifugation and filtered (0.2 11M). The
filtrate was
diafiltered into 1X Binding buffer (10 mM imidazole, 0.5 M NaC1, 50 mM
NaH2PO4, pH
7.5) and concentrated to 310 mL in preparation for purification by immobilized
metal
affinity chromatography (IMAC). The concentrate was loaded onto a 30-mL Ni-NTA

column, which was washed with 500 mL of 0.02% Tween 20 in 1X binding buffer
and
then 290 mL of 30 mM imidazole, 0.02% Tween 20, 0.5 M NaC1, 50 mM NaH2PO4, pH
7.5. The product was eluted with 110 mL of 250 mM imidazole, 0.02% Tween 20,
150
mM NaC1, 50 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.5. Approximately 6 mg of IFNa2b-DDD2 was
purified.
[0353] The purity of IFN-cc2b-DDD2 was assessed by SDS-PAGE under reducing
conditions (not shown). IFN-a2b-DDD2 was the most heavily stained band and
accounted
for approximately 50% of the total protein (not shown). The product resolved
as a doublet
with an Mr of ¨26 kDa, which is consistent with the calculated MW of IFN-a2b-
DDD2-
SP (26 kDa). There was one major contaminant with a Mr of 34 kDa and many
faint
contaminating bands (not shown).
Example 27. Generation of hPAINT4 Fab-(IFN-cc2b)2 by DNL
Creation of C-H-AD2-IgG-pdHL2 expression vectors.
[03541 The pdHL2 mammalian expression vector has been used to mediate the
expression
of many recombinant IgGs. A plasmid shuttle vector was produced to facilitate
the
conversion of any IgG-pdHL2 vector into a C-H-AD2-IgG-pdHL2 vector. The gene
for
the Fc (CH2 and CH3 domains) was amplified using the pdHL2 vector as a
template and
the oligonucleotides Fc BglII Left and Fc Bam-EcoRI Right as primers.
Fc BglII Left
120

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
5'-AGATCTGGCGCACCTGAACTCCTG-3' (SEQ ID NO:47)
Fc Bam-EcoRI Right
5' -GAATTCGGATCCTTTACCCGGAGACAGGGAGAG-3' (SEQ ID NO:48)
[0355] The amplimer was cloned in the PGEMTO PCR cloning vector. The Fc insert

fragment was excised from PGEMT and ligated with AD2-pdHL2 vector to generate
the
shuttle vector Fc-AD2-pdHL2.
Generation of hPAM4 IgG-AD2
[0356] To convert any IgG-pdHL2 expression vector to a C-H-AD2-IgG-pdHL2
expression vector, an 861 bp BsrGI / NdeI restriction fragment is excised from
the former
and replaced with a 952 bp BsrGI / NdeI restriction fragment excised from the
Fc-AD2-
pdHL2 vector. BsrGI cuts in the CH3 domain and NdeI cuts downstream (3') of
the
expression cassette. This method is used to generate a hPAM4 IgG-AD2 protein.
Generation of hPAM4 IgG-(IFN-a2b)2 Construct
[0357] A DNL reaction is performed by the addition of reduced and lyophilized
hPAM4
IgG-AD2 to IFN-a2b-DDD2 in 250 mM imidazole, 0.02% Tween 20, 150 mM NaC1, 1
mM EDTA, 50 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.5. After 6 h at room temperature in the dark, the

reaction mixture is dialyzed against CM Loading Buffer (150 mM NaC1, 20 mM
NaAc,
pH 4.5) at 4 C in the dark. The solution is loaded onto a 1-mL Hi-Trap CM-FF
column
(AMERSHAMe), which is pre-equilibrated with CM Loading buffer. After sample
loading, the column is washed with CM loading buffer to baseline, followed by
washing
with 15 mL of 0.25 M NaC1, 20 mM NaAc, pH 4.5. The product is eluted with 12.5
mL of
0.5 M NaC1, 20 mM NaAc, pH 4.5. The DNL reaction results in the site-specific
and
covalent conjugation of hPAM4 IgG with a dimer of IFN-a2b. Both the IgG and
IFN-a2b
moieties retain their respective physiological activities in the DNL
construct. This
technique may be used to attach any cytokine or other physiologically active
protein or
peptide to hPAM4 for targeted delivery to pancreatic cancer or other cancers
that express
the PAM4 antigen.
Example 28. AD and DDD Sequence Variants
[0358] In certain preferred embodiments, the AD and DDD sequences incorporated
into
the DNL complexes comprise the amino acid sequences of AD2 (SEQ ID NO:36) and
DDD2 (SEQ ID NO:34), as described above. However, in alternative embodiments
sequence variants of the AD and/or DDD moieties may be utilized in
construction of the
121

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
cytokine-MAb DNL complexes. The structure-function relationships of the AD and
DDD
domains have been the subject of investigation. (See, e.g., Burns-Hamuro et
al., 2005,
Protein Sci 14:2982-92; Carr et al., 2001, J Biol Chem 276:17332-38; Alto et
al., 2003,
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:4445-50; Hundsrucker et al., 2006, Biochem J
396:297-306;
Stokka et al., 2006, Biochem J 400:493-99; Gold et al., 2006, Mol Cell 24:383-
95;
Kinderman et al., 2006, Mol Cell 24:397-408.)
[0359] For example, Kinderman et al. (2006) examined the crystal structure of
the AD-
DDD binding interaction and concluded that the human DDD sequence contained a
number of conserved amino acid residues that were important in either dimer
formation or
AKAP binding, underlined in SEQ ID NO:33 below. (See Figure 1 of Kinderman et
al.,
2006.) The skilled artisan will realize that in designing sequence variants of
the DDD
sequence, one would desirably avoid changing any of the underlined residues,
while
conservative amino acid substitutions might be made for residues that are less
critical for
dimerization and AKAP binding.
Human DDD sequence from protein kinase A
SHIQIPPGLTELLQGYTVEVLRQQPPDLVEFAVEYFTRLREARA (SEQ ID NO:33)
[0360] Alto et al. (2003) performed a bioinformatic analysis of the AD
sequence of
various AKAP proteins to design an RII selective AD sequence called AKAP-IS
(SEQ ID
NO:35), with a binding constant for DDD of 0.4 nM. The AKAP-IS sequence was
designed as a peptide antagonist of AKAP binding to PKA. Residues in the AKAP-
IS
sequence where substitutions tended to decrease binding to DDD are underlined
in SEQ
ID NO:35 below.
AKAP-IS sequence
QIEYLAKQIVDNAIQQA (SEQ ID NO:35)
[0361] Similarly, Gold (2006) utilized crystallography and peptide screening
to develop a
SuperAKAP-IS sequence (SEQ ID NO:49), exhibiting a five order of magnitude
higher
selectivity for the RII isoform of PKA compared with the RI isoform.
Underlined residues
indicate the positions of amino acid substitutions, relative to the AKAP-IS
sequence, that
increased binding to the DDD moiety of RIIa. In this sequence, the N-terminal
Q residue
is numbered as residue number 4 and the C-terminal A residue is residue number
20.
Residues where substitutions could be made to affect the affinity for RIIa
were residues 8,
122

CA 02731438 2016-02-29
52392-81
11, 15, 16, 18, 19 and 20 (Gold et al., 2006). It is contemplated that in
certain alternative
embodiments, the SuperAKAP-IS sequence may be substituted for the AKAP-IS AD
moiety sequence to prepare cytokine-MAb DNL constructs. Other alternative
sequences
that might be substituted for the AKAP-IS AD sequence are shown in SEQ ID
NO:50-52.
Substitutions relative to the AKAP-IS sequence are underlined. It.is
anticipated that, as
with the AKAP-IS sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:49, the AD moiety may also
include
the additional N-terminal residues cysteine and glycine and C-terminal
residues glycine
and cysteine.
SuperAKAP-IS
QIEYVAKQIVDYAIHQA (SEQ ID NO:49)
Alternative AKAP sequences
QIEYKAKQIVDHAIHQA (SEQ ID NO:50)
QIEYHAKQIVDHAIHQA (SEQ ID NO:51)
QIEYVAKQIVDHAIHQA (SEQ ID N0:52)
[03621 Stokka et al. (2006) also developed peptide competitors of AKAP binding
to PKA,
shown in SEQ ID NO:53-55. The peptide antagonists were designated as Ht31 (SEQ
ID
NO:53), RIAD (SEQ ID NO:54) and PV-38 (SEQ ID NO:55). The Ht-31 peptide
exhibited a greater affinity for the RII isoform of PKA, while the RIAD and PV-
38
showed higher affinity for RI.
Ht31
DLIEEAASRIVDAVIEQVKAAGAY (SEQ ID NO:53)
RIAD
LEQYANQLADQIIKEATE (SEQ ID NO:54)
PV-38
FEELAWKIAKMIWSDVFQQC (SEQ ID NO:55)
103631 Hundsrucker et al. (2006) developed still other peptide competitors for
AKAP
binding to PKA, with a binding constant as low as 0.4 nM to the DDD of the R1I
form of
PKA. The sequences of various AKAP antagonistic peptides is provided in Table
1 of
Hundsrucker et al. Residues that were highly
123

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
conserved among the AD domains of different AKAP proteins are indicated below
by
underlining with reference to the AKAP IS sequence (SEQ ID NO:35). The
residues are
the same as observed by Alto et al. (2003), with the addition of the C-
terminal alanine
residue. (See FIG. 4 of Hundsrucker et al. (2006), incorporated herein by
reference.) The
sequences of peptide antagonists with particularly high affinities for the RII
DDD
sequence are shown in SEQ ID NO:56-58.
AKAP-IS
QIEYLAKQIVDNAIQQA (SEQ ID NO:35)
AKAP 7å-wt-pep
PEDAELVRLSKRLVENAVLKAVQQY (SEQ ID NO:56)
AKAP76-L304T-pep
PEDAELVRTSKRLVENAVLKAVQQY (SEQ ID NO:57)
AKAP7S-L308D-pep
PEDAELVRLSKRDVENAVLKAVQQY (SEQ ID NO:58)
[0364] Carr et al. (2001) examined the degree of seqeunce homology between
different
AKAP-binding DDD sequences from human and non-human proteins and identified
residues in the DDD sequences that appeared to be the most highly conserved
among
different DDD moieties. These are indicated below by underlining with
reference to the
human PKA RIIa DDD sequence of SEQ ID NO:33. Residues that were particularly
conserved are further indicated by italics. The residues overlap with, but are
not identical
to those suggested by Kinderman et al. (2006) to be important for binding to
AKAP
proteins.
SHIQ/PPGLTELLOGYTVEVLRQQPPDLVEFAVEYFTRLREARA (SEQ ID NO:33)
[0365] The skilled artisan will realize that in general, those amino acid
residues that are
highly conserved in the DDD and AD sequences from different proteins are ones
that it
may be preferred to remain constant in making amino acid substitutions, while
residues
that are less highly conserved may be more easily varied to produce sequence
variants of
the AD and/or DDD sequences described herein.
[0366] The skilled artisan will realize that these and other amino acid
substitutions in the
antibody moiety or linker portions of the DNL constructs may be utilized to
enhance the
therapeutic and/or pharmacokinetic properties of the resulting DNL constructs.
124

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
Example 29. In Vitro Detection of PAM4 Antigen in Human Serum
[0367] In certain embodiments, it is preferred to detect the presence of PAM4
antigen
and/or to diagnose the presence of pancreatic cancer in a subject by in vitro
analysis of
samples that can be obtained by non-invasive techniques, such as blood, plasma
or serum
samples. Such ex vivo analysis may be preferred, for example, in screening
procedures
where there is no a priori reason to believe that an individual has a
pancreatic tumor in a
specific location.
[0368] Studies were initially performed using patient serum samples that had
been stored
frozen for a number of years prior to analysis (Gold et al., J. Clin Oncol
2006, 24:252-58).
An in vitro enzyme immunoassay was established with monoclonal antibody PAM4
as the
capture reagent, and a polyclonal anti-mucin antibody as the probe. Patient
sera were
obtained from healthy, adult patients with acute and chronic pancreatitis, and
those with
pancreatic and other forms of cancer, and were measured for PAM4 antigen.
Methods
[0369] Reagents - A human pancreatic mucin preparation was isolated from
CaPanl, a
human pancreatic cancer grown as xenografts in athymic nude mice. Briefly, 1 g
of tissue
was homogenized in 10 mL of 0.1 M ammonium bicarbonate containing 0.5 M sodium

chloride. The sample was then centrifuged to obtain a supernatant that was
fractionated on
a SEPHAROSE -4B-CL column with the void volume material ch_romatographed on
hydroxyapatite. The unadsorbed fraction was dialyzed extensively against
deionized water
and then lyophilized. A 1 mg/mL solution was prepared in 0.01 M sodium
phosphate
buffer (pH, 7.2) containing 0.15 M sodium chloride (phosphate-buffered saline
[PBS]), and
used as the stock solution for the immunoassay standards. A polyclonal, anti-
mucin
antiserum was prepared by immunization of rabbits, as described previously
(Gold et al.,
Cancer Res 43:235-38, 1983). An IgG fraction was purified and assessed for
purity by
sodium dodecyl sulfate¨polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and
molecular-
sieve high-performance liquid chromatography. Kits for quantitation of CA19-9
were
purchased from PANOMICS Inc (Redwood City, CA).
[0370] Enzyme Immunoassay - Sera were obtained from patients enrolled in
institutional
review board¨approved clinical trials conducted by the Garden State Cancer
Center
(Belleville, NJ), as well as from the Eastern Division of the Cooperative
Human Tissue
Network (National Cancer Institute [NCI], National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD).
To perform the immunoassay, a 96-well polyvinyl plate was coated with 100 viL
of PAM4
125

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
antibody at 20 p,g/mL in PBS with incubation at 4 C overnight. On the next
morning, the
capture antibody was removed from the plate. The wells were then blocked by
addition of
200 4, of a 1% (weight/volume [w/v]) solution of casein-sodium salt in PBS and

incubated overnight at 4 C. The casein was removed from the wells and the
plate washed
x with 250 ,I, of PBS containing 0.05% (volume/volume [v/v]) Tween-20. The
standard, or unknown specimen, was diluted 1:2 in 1% (w/v) casein in PBS, 100
L was
added to the appropriate wells, and the plate incubated at 37 C for 1.5 hours.
At this time,
the plate was washed five times with PBS¨Tween-20 as mentioned already. The
polyclonal rabbit anti-mucin antibody, diluted to 5 ,g/mL in 0.1% (w/v)
casein in PBS,
was added to each well, and the plate incubated for 1 hour at 37 C. The
polyclonal
antibody was then washed from the wells as described herein, and peroxidase-
labeled
donkey antirabbit IgG, at a 1:1000 dilution in 0.1% (w/v) casein in PBS, was
added to the
wells and incubated at 37 C for 1 hour. After washing the plate as already
described, 100
[IL of a solution consisting of ortho-phenylenediamine (0.8 mg/mL) and
hydrogen
peroxide (0.3% v/v in 0.1 M Tris-HC1 [pH 8.0]), were added to the wells, and
the plate
was incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes in the dark. The reaction was
stopped
by the addition of 25 [IL of 4.0 N sulfuric acid, and the optical density read
at a
wavelength of 490 nm using a SPECTRA-MAX 250 spectrophotometer. CA19-9
determinations were performed according to the manufacturer's procedure.
Standard
curves were generated with regression analyses performed to determine
concentrations of
the unknown samples. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were
generated by
use of MED-CALC statistical software package (version 7.5; MED-CALC ,
Mariakerke Belgium).
Results
[0371] Development and Characterization of the PAM4-Based Immunoassay - We
chose
to report our results in arbitrary units/mL based on an initial reference
standard of mucin
purified from xenografted CaPanl human pancreatic tumor. The lower limit of
detection
for the immunoassay was 1.0 unit/mL, with saturation occurring at mucin
concentrations
above 100 units/mL. A linear range was determined to be 1.5 units/mL to 25
units/mL of
antigen (not shown). Interassay (n = 5) coefficients of variation (CV) were
calculated for
reference standards of 20 units/mL (CV = 8.0%) and 8 units/mL (CV = 3.8%).
Mean
recoveries were 17.5 2.8 and 7.1 1.9 for the 20 and 8 units/mL standards,
respectively.
126

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
[0372] Levels of PAM4-reactive Mucin in Patient Specimens - Sera from a total
of 283
patients, including 53 with pancreatic cancer, were examined for the presence
of PAM4
antigen. The frequency distribution of serum mucin concentrations for the
varying disease
groups was determined (FIG. 16). The receiver operator characteristic (ROC)
curve was
calculated (not shown), and the area under the curve (AUC) determined to be
0.88 0.03
(95% CI, 0.84 to 0.92) with P < .0001 (see Example 23), a highly significant
difference for
discrimination of pancreatic cancer from nonpancreatic cancer specimens. At a
cutoff
value of 10.2 units/mL, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated to be
77% and 95%
(Example 23), respectively, with a positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (+DLR)
of 13.7, as
compared with healthy, benign, and nonpancreatic cancer groups.
[0373] The data presented in Table 13 showed that the median and mean values
for the
pancreatic cancer group were more than 10-fold greater than for all of the
other groups,
even though the overwhelming majority of the nonpancreatic cancer cases were
late-stage
disease. Of 53 pancreatic cancer patients, 41 (77%) were positive at a cutoff
value of 10.2
units/mL. At this same cutoff value, none of the healthy specimens were
positive, and only
four (5%) of 87 pancreatitis patients were positive. ROC curve analyses
demonstrated high
specificity with significant differences for the discrimination of pancreatic
cancer from
normal and pancreatitis patient groups (not shown).
[0374] Comparison of PAM4 and CA19.9 Immunonassays - Of the 53 pancreatic
cancer
specimens, only 41 were assessable for both PAM4-reactive mucin and CA19-9
because
of insufficient volume of certain samples. Of these, 24 (59%) were considered
positive for
CA19-9 (at a cutoff of 35 units/mL). As with the PAM4 immunoassay, none of the

healthy specimens were positive for CA19-9. However, of the 87 pancreatitis
samples,
CA19-9 was positive in 37% (not shown). ROC analyses for discrimination of
pancreatic
cancer from pancreatitis serum specimens provided an AUC of 0.67 0.05 (95%
CI, 0.58
to 0.75), with a specificity of 63% and a +DLR of 1.6 for the CA19-9 test (not
shown).
Statistical analyses for PAM4-reactive mucin in this same subset of pancreatic
cancer and
pancreatitis sera differed little from the group analyses discussed earlier;
sensitivity for this
subset was slightly reduced (71%), but specificity remained high (96%), as did
the +DLR
(15.4) (not shown). There was no correlation between PAM4 and CA19-9 values.
Two of
the four PAM4-positive pancreatitis specimens were also positive for CA19-9. A
direct
pair-wise comparison of the ROC curves resulted in a statistically significant
difference (P
< .003), with the PAM4 immunoassay demonstrating a superior sensitivity and
specificity
127

CA 02731438 2011-01-19
WO 2010/017500
PCT/US2009/053192
for discrimination of patients with pancreatic cancer from those with
pancreatitis (not
shown).
[0375] The results obtained with serum samples frozen at -80 C and frozen for
a period of
years before analysis were not initially reproducible with fresher serum
samples.
Immunoassay with PAM4 antibody performed on fresh serum samples obtained from
individuals with known pancreatic cancer, or fresh serum samples spiked with
pancreatic
cancer mucin, routinely resulted in false negative results. It was observed
that the frozen
and stored samples, after thawing, usually separated into lipid and aqueous
components.
The lipid component was removed by centrifugation before the PAM4 immunoassay
was
performed on the remaining aqueous component. In the initial studies with
fresher serum
samples, the serum did not separate and the immunoassay was run on whole
serum.
[0376] To reproduce the effects of freezing and long-term storage, the fresher
serum
samples were subject to an organic phase extraction to remove serum lipids and
other
hydrophobic components. Although the phase extraction was performed with
butanol, the
skilled artisan will realize that the technique is not so limited and may be
performed with
alternative organic solvents known in the art. Exemplary organic solvents
known in the
art include other alcohols that are not miscible with water, chloroform,
hexane, benzene,
DMF (dimethyl formamide), DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and ether.
[0377] To perform the organic phase extraction of serum samples, 300 !IL of
serum was
placed in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube, then 300 uL of n-Butanol was added,
the tube
closed tightly and vigorously vortexed several times during a 5 min extraction
period. At
the end of the extraction, the tubes were opened and 300 ilL of choroform was
added. The
tubes were closed tightly, the tube was vigorously vorteed and then spun in a
tabletop
centrifuge at high speed for 5 min. The tubes were opened and 200 uL of the
upper
aqueous phase was removed to a clean tube. An equal volume of immunoassay
diluent
(2% casein) was added (1:2 dilution of the unknown serum) and used as antigen
in the
immunoassay protocol described above. Using the organic phase extraction,
results for
PAM4 antigen detection and pancreatic cancer diagnosis were obtained that were

equivalent to those seen with samples subjected to long term freezing and
storage
described above (not shown).
[0378] The interference of an organic component with PAM4-based immunoassay
seen
with fresh serum samples was not observed with PAM4 immunohistology on
formalin-
fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections, which are typically processed with
an organic
128

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
solvent extraction prior to immunoassay. The interfering component appears to
be limited
in distribution to serum and is not observed to interfere with PAM4 antibody
binding to
solid pancreatic cancer tumors in situ.
Example 30. Preparation and Assay of Cross-Blocking Antibodies to PAM4
[0379] Tumors of xenografted RIP1 human pancreatic carcinoma are grown in nude
mice
and harvested. The human pancreatic cancer mucins are extracted according to
Gold et al.
(Int J Cancer 1994, 15:204-10) and used to immunize mice according to standard

protocols (Harlow and Lane, Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Ch. 5, Cold
Spring
Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.) Antibody producing hybridoma cells
are
prepared from the immunized mice and screened for binding to human pancreatic
cancer
mucin extracts. Positive clones are expanded and the monoclonal antibodies are
tested for
cross-blocking activity against cPAM4 using competitive binding assays as
described in
Example 1. Cross-blocking antibodies against cPAM4 are identified by
competition for
binding to human pancreatic cancer mucin.
[0380] It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various
modifications and
variations can be made to the products, compositions, methods and processes of
this
invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover such
modifications and
variations, provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and
their
equivalents.
SEQUENCE LISTING IN ELECTRONIC FORM
In accordance with Section 111(1) of the Patent Rules, this description
contains a sequence listing in electronic form in ASCII text format
(file: 52392-81 Seq 01-FEB-11 vl.txt).
A copy of the sequence listing in electronic form is available from the
Canadian Intellectual Property Office.
The sequences in the sequence listing in electronic form are reproduced
in the following table.
SEQUENCE TABLE
<110> GOLDENBERG, DAVID M.
HANSEN, HANS J.
CHANG, CHIEN-HSING
GOLD, DAVID V.
129

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
,
<120> ANTI-PANCREATIC CANCER ANTIBODIES
<130> IMM313W01
<140>
<141>
<150> 12/418,877
<151> 2009-04-06
<150> 61/144,227
<151> 2009-01-13
<150> 12/343,655
<151> 2008-12-24
<150> 61/087,463
<151> 2008-08-08
<160> 61
<170> PatentIn version 3.5
<210> 1
<211> 12
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 1
Ser Ala Ser Ser Ser Val Ser Ser Ser Tyr Leu Tyr
1 5 10
<210> 2
<211> 7
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic humanized PAM4
antibody fragment
<400> 2
Ser Thr Ser Asn Leu Ala Ser
1 5
<210> 3
<211> 9
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic humanized PAM4
antibody fragment
<400> 3
His Gln Trp Asn Arg Tyr Pro Tyr Thr
1 5
129a

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<210> 4
<211> 5
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 4
Ser Tyr Val Leu His
1 5
<210> 5
<211> 17
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic humanized PAM4
antibody fragment
<400> 5
Tyr Ile Asn Pro Tyr Asn Asp Gly Thr Gln Tyr Asn Glu Lys Phe Lys
1 5 10 15
Gly
<210> 6
<211> 10
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic humanized PAM4
antibody fragment
<400> 6
Gly Phe Gly Gly Ser Tyr Gly Phe Ala Tyr
1 5 10
<210> 7
<211> 4
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 7
Phe Lys Tyr Lys
1
<210> 8
<211> 324
<212> DNA
<213> Mus sp.
<220>
<221> CDS
<222> (1)..(324)
129b

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<400> 8
gat att gtg atg acc cag tct cca gca atc atg tct gca tct cct ggg 48
Asp Ile Val Met Thr Gln Ser Pro Ala Ile Met Ser Ala Ser Pro Gly
1 5 10 15
gag aag gtc acc atg acc tgc agt gcc agc tca agt gta agt tcc agc 96
Glu Lys Val Thr Met Thr Cys Ser Ala Ser Ser Ser Val Ser Ser Ser
20 25 30
tac ttg tac tgg tac cag cag aag cca gga tcc tcc ccc aaa ctc tgg 144
Tyr Leu Tyr Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys Pro Gly Ser Ser Pro Lys Leu Trp
35 40 45
att tat agc aca tcc aac ctg gct tct gga gtc cct gct cgc ttc agt 192
Ile Tyr Ser Thr Ser Asn Leu Ala Ser Gly Val Pro Ala Arg Phe Ser
50 55 60
ggc agt ggg tct ggg acc tct tac tct ctc aca atc agc agc atg gag 240
Gly Ser Gly Ser Gly Thr Ser Tyr Ser Leu Thr Ile Ser Ser Met Glu
65 70 75 80
gct gaa gat gct gcc tct tat ttc tgc cat cag tgg aat agg tac ccg 288
Ala Glu Asp Ala Ala Ser Tyr Phe Cys His Gln Trp Asn Arg Tyr Pro
85 90 95
tac acg ttc gga ggg ggg acc aag ctg gaa ata aaa 324
Tyr Thr Phe Gly Gly Gly Thr Lys Leu Glu Ile Lys
100 105
<210> 9
<211> 108
<212> PRT
<213> Mus sp.
<400> 9
Asp Ile Val Met Thr Gln Ser Pro Ala Ile Met Ser Ala Ser Pro Gly
1 5 10 15
Glu Lys Val Thr Met Thr Cys Ser Ala Ser Ser Ser Val Ser Ser Ser
20 25 30
Tyr Leu Tyr Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys Pro Gly Ser Ser Pro Lys Leu Trp
35 40 45
Ile Tyr Ser Thr Ser Asn Leu Ala Ser Gly Val Pro Ala Arg Phe Ser
50 55 60
Gly Ser Gly Ser Gly Thr Ser Tyr Ser Leu Thr Ile Ser Ser Met Glu
65 70 75 80
Ala Glu Asp Ala Ala Ser Tyr Phe Cys His Gln Trp Asn Arg Tyr Pro
85 90 95
Tyr Thr Phe Gly Gly Gly Thr Lys Leu Glu Ile Lys
100 105
<210> 10
<211> 357
<212> DNA
<213> Mus sp.
<220>
<221> CDS
<222> (1)..(357)
129c

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<400> 10
gag gtt cag ctg cag gag tct gga cct gag ctg gta aag cct ggg gct 48
Glu Val Gln Leu Gln Glu Ser Gly Pro Glu Leu Val Lys Pro Gly Ala
1 5 10 15
tca gtg aag atg tcc tgc aag gct tct gga tac aca ttc cct agc tat 96
Ser Val Lys Met Ser Cys Lys Ala Ser Gly Tyr Thr Phe Pro Ser Tyr
20 25 30
gtt ttg cac tgg gtg aag cag aag cct ggg cag ggc ctt gag tgg att 144
Val Leu His Trp Val Lys Gln Lys Pro Gly Gln Gly Leu Glu Trp Ile
35 40 45
gga tat att aat cct tac aat gat ggt act cag tac aat gag aag ttc 192
Gly Tyr Ile Asn Pro Tyr Asn Asp Gly Thr Gln Tyr Asn Glu Lys Phe
50 55 60
aaa ggc aag gcc aca ctg act tca gac aaa tcg tcc agc aca gcc tac 240
Lys Gly Lys Ala Thr Leu Thr Ser Asp Lys Ser Ser Ser Thr Ala Tyr
65 70 75 80
atg gag ctc agc cgc ctg acc tct gag gac tct gcg gtc tat tac tgt 288
Met Glu Leu Ser Arg Leu Thr Ser Glu Asp Ser Ala Val Tyr Tyr Cys
85 90 95
gca aga ggc ttc ggt ggt agc tac gga ttt gct tac tgg ggc caa ggg 336
Ala Arg Gly Phe Gly Gly Ser Tyr Gly Phe Ala Tyr Trp Gly Gln Gly
100 105 110
act ctg atc act gtc tct gca 357
Thr Leu Ile Thr Val Ser Ala
115
<210> 11
<211> 119
<212> PRT
<213> Mus sp.
<400> 11
Glu Val Gln Leu Gln Glu Ser Gly Pro Glu Leu Val Lys Pro Gly Ala
1 5 10 15
Ser Val Lys Met Ser Cys Lys Ala Ser Gly Tyr Thr Phe Pro Ser Tyr
20 25 30
Val Leu His Trp Val Lys Gln Lys Pro Gly Gln Gly Leu Glu Trp Ile
35 40 45
Gly Tyr Ile Asn Pro Tyr Asn Asp Gly Thr Gln Tyr Asn Glu Lys Phe
50 55 60
Lys Gly Lys Ala Thr Leu Thr Ser Asp Lys Ser Ser Ser Thr Ala Tyr
65 70 75 80
Met Glu Leu Ser Arg Leu Thr Ser Glu Asp Ser Ala Val Tyr Tyr Cys
85 90 95
Ala Arg Gly Phe Gly Gly Ser Tyr Gly Phe Ala Tyr Trp Gly Gln Gly
100 105 110
Thr Leu Ile Thr Val Ser Ala
115
<210> 12
<211> 109
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
129d

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polypeptide
<400> 12
Asp Ile Gln Leu Thr Gln Ser Pro Ala Ile Met Ser Ala Ser Pro Gly
1 5 10 15
Glu Lys Val Thr Met Thr Cys Ser Ala Ser Ser Ser Val Ser Ser Ser
20 25 30
Tyr Leu Tyr Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys Pro Gly Ser Ser Pro Lys Leu Trp
35 40 45
Ile Tyr Ser Thr Ser Asn Leu Ala Ser Gly Val Pro Ala Arg Phe Ser
50 55 60
Gly Ser Gly Ser Gly Thr Ser Tyr Ser Leu Thr Ile Ser Ser Met Glu
65 70 75 80
Ala Glu Asp Ala Ala Ser Tyr Phe Cys His Gln Trp Asn Arg Tyr Pro
85 90 95
Tyr Thr Phe Gly Gly Gly Thr Lys Leu Glu Ile Lys Arg
100 105
<210> 13
<211> 119
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polypeptide
<400> 13
Gln Val Gln Leu Gln Glu Ser Gly Pro Glu Leu Val Lys Pro Gly Ala
1 5 10 15
Ser Val Lys Met Ser Cys Lys Ala Ser Gly Tyr Thr Phe Pro Ser Tyr
20 25 30
Val Leu His Trp Val Lys Gln Lys Pro Gly Gln Gly Leu Glu Trp Ile
35 40 45
Gly Tyr Ile Asn Pro Tyr Asn Asp Gly Thr Gln Tyr Asn Glu Lys Phe
50 55 60
Lys Gly Lys Ala Thr Leu Thr Ser Asp Lys Ser Ser Ser Thr Ala Tyr
65 70 75 80
Met Glu Leu Ser Arg Leu Thr Ser Glu Asp Ser Ala Val Tyr Tyr Cys
85 90 95
Ala Arg Gly Phe Gly Gly Ser Tyr Gly Phe Ala Tyr Trp Gly Gln Gly
100 105 110
Thr Leu Ile Thr Val Ser Ser
115
<210> 14
<211> 107
<212> PRT
<213> Homo sapiens
<400> 14
Asp Ile Gln Met Thr Gln Ser Pro Ser Ser Leu Ser Ala Ser Val Gly
1 5 10 15
Asp Arg Val Thr Ile Thr Cys Arg Ala Ser Gln Ser Ile Ser Asn Tyr
20 25 30
Leu Ser Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys Pro Gly Lys Ala Pro Lys Leu Leu Ile
35 40 45
Tyr Ala Ala Ser Ser Leu Gln Ser Gly Val Thr Ser Arg Phe Ser Gly
50 55 60
Ser Gly Ser Gly Thr Asp Phe Thr Leu Thr Ile Ser Ser Leu Gln Pro
65 70 75 80
129e

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
Glu Asp Ser Ala Thr Tyr Tyr Cys Gln Gln Ser Tyr Ser Thr Leu Ile
85 90 95
Thr Phe Gly Gln Gly Thr Arg Leu Glu Ile Lys
100 105
<210> 15
<211> 327
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polynucleotide
<220>
<221> CDS
<222> (1)..(327)
<400> 15
gac atc cag ctg acc cag tct cca tcc tcc ctg tct gca tct gta gga 48
Asp Ile Gln Leu Thr Gln Ser Pro Ser Ser Leu Ser Ala Ser Val Gly
1 5 10 15
gac aga gtc acc atg acc tgc agt gcc agc tca agt gta agt tcc agc 96
Asp Arg Val Thr Met Thr Cys Ser Ala Ser Ser Ser Val Ser Ser Ser
20 25 30
tac ttg tac tgg tac caa cag aaa cca ggg aaa gcc ccc aaa ctc tgg 144
Tyr Leu Tyr Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys Pro Gly Lys Ala Pro Lys Leu Trp
35 40 45
att tat agc aca tcc aac ctg gct tct gga gtc cct gct cgc ttc agt 192
Ile Tyr Ser Thr Ser Asn Leu Ala Ser Gly Val Pro Ala Arg Phe Ser
50 55 60
ggc agt gga tct ggg aca gac ttc act ctc acc atc agc agt ctg caa 240
Gly Ser Gly Ser Gly Thr Asp Phe Thr Leu Thr Ile Ser Ser Leu Gln
65 70 75 80
cct gaa gat tct gcc tct tat ttc tgc cat cag tgg aat agg tac ccg 288
Pro Glu Asp Ser Ala Ser Tyr Phe Cys His Gln Trp Asn Arg Tyr Pro
85 90 95
tac acg ttc gga ggg ggg aca cga ctg gag atc aaa ego 327
Tyr Thr Phe Gly Gly Gly Thr Arg Leu Glu Ile Lys Arg
100 105
<210> 16
<211> 109
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polypeptide
<400> 16
Asp Ile Gln Leu Thr Gln Ser Pro Ser Ser Leu Ser Ala Ser Val Gly
1 5 10 15
Asp Arg Val Thr Met Thr Cys Ser Ala Ser Ser Ser Val Ser Ser Ser
20 25 30
Tyr Leu Tyr Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys Pro Gly Lys Ala Pro Lys Leu Trp
35 40 45
129f

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
Ile Tyr Ser Thr Ser Asn Leu Ala Ser Gly Val Pro Ala Arg Phe Ser
50 55 60
Gly Ser Gly Ser Gly Thr Asp Phe Thr Leu Thr Ile Ser Ser Leu Gln
65 70 75 80
Pro Glu Asp Ser Ala Ser Tyr Phe Cys His Gln Trp Asn Arg Tyr Pro
85 90 95
Tyr Thr Phe Gly Gly Gly Thr Arg Leu Glu Ile Lys Arg
100 105
<210> 17
<211> 108
<212> PRT
<213> Homo sapiens
<400> 17
Gln Val Gln Leu Val Gln Ser Gly Ala Glu Val Lys Lys Pro Gly Ser
1 5 10 15
Ser Val Lys Val Ser Cys Lys Ala Ser Gly Gly Thr Phe Ser Ser Tyr
20 25 30
Ala Ile Ser Trp Val Arg Gln Ala Pro Gly Gln Gly Leu Glu Trp Met
35 40 45
Gly Gly Ile Ile Pro Ile Phe Gly Thr Ala Asn Tyr Ala Gln Lys Phe
50 55 60
Gln Gly Arg Val Thr Ile Thr Ala Asp Glu Ser Thr Ser Thr Ala Tyr
65 70 75 80
Met Glu Leu Ser Ser Leu Arg Ser Glu Asp Thr Ala Val Tyr Tyr Cys
85 90 95
Ala Arg Gly Pro Arg Leu Leu Ala Asp Val Leu Leu
100 105
<210> 18
<211> 357
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polynucleotide
<220>
<221> CDS
<222> (1)..(357)
<400> 18
cag gtg cag ctg cag cag tct ggg gct gag gtg aag aag cct ggg gcc 48
Gln Val Gln Leu Gln Gln Ser Gly Ala Glu Val Lys Lys Pro Gly Ala
1 5 10 15
tca gtg aag gtc tcc tgc gag gct tct gga tac aca ttc cct agc tat 96
Ser Val Lys Val Ser Cys Glu Ala Ser Gly Tyr Thr Phe Pro Ser Tyr
20 25 30
gtt ttg cac tgg gtg aag cag gcc cct gga caa ggg ctt gag tgg att 144
Val Leu His Trp Val Lys Gln Ala Pro Gly Gln Gly Leu Glu Trp Ile
35 40 45
gga tat att aat cct tac aat gat ggt act cag tac aat gag aag ttc 192
Gly Tyr Ile Asn Pro Tyr Asn Asp Gly Thr Gln Tyr Asn Glu Lys Phe
50 55 60
aaa ggc aag gcc aca ctg acc agg gac acg tcc atc aac aca gcc tac 240
Lys Gly Lys Ala Thr Leu Thr Arg Asp Thr Ser Ile Asn Thr Ala Tyr
65 70 75 80
129g

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
atg gag ctg agc agg ctg aga tct gac gac acg gcc gtg tat tac tgt 288
Met Glu Leu Ser Arg Leu Arg Ser Asp Asp Thr Ala Val Tyr Tyr Cys
85 90 95
gca aga ggc ttc ggt ggt agc tac gga ttt gct tac tgg ggc cag gga 336
Ala Arg Gly Phe Gly Gly Ser Tyr Gly Phe Ala Tyr Trp Gly Gln Gly
100 105 110
acc ctg gtc acc gtc tcc tca 357
Thr Leu Val Thr Val Ser Ser
115
<210> 19
<211> 119
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polypeptide
<400> 19
Gln Val Gln Leu Gln Gln Ser Gly Ala Glu Val Lys Lys Pro Gly Ala
1 5 10 15
Ser Val Lys Val Ser Cys Glu Ala Ser Gly Tyr Thr Phe Pro Ser Tyr
20 25 30
Val Leu His Trp Val Lys Gln Ala Pro Gly Gln Gly Leu Glu Trp Ile
35 40 45
Gly Tyr Ile Asn Pro Tyr Asn Asp Gly Thr Gln Tyr Asn Glu Lys Phe
50 55 60
Lys Gly Lys Ala Thr Leu Thr Arg Asp Thr Ser Ile Asn Thr Ala Tyr
65 70 75 80
Met Glu Leu Ser Arg Leu Arg Ser Asp Asp Thr Ala Val Tyr Tyr Cys
85 90 95
Ala Arg Gly Phe Gly Gly Ser Tyr Gly Phe Ala Tyr Trp Gly Gln Gly
100 105 110
Thr Leu Val Thr Val Ser Ser
115
<210> 20
<211> 173
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polynucleotide
<400> 20
agtctggggc tgaggtgaag aagcctgggg cctcagtgaa ggtctcctgc gaggcttctg 60
gatacacatt ccctagctat gttttgcact gggtgaagca ggcccctgga caagggcttg 120
agtggattgg atatattaat ccttacaatg atggtactca gtacaatgag aag 173
<210> 21
<211> 173
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polynucleotide
<400> 21
agggttccct ggccccagta agcaaatccg tagctaccac cgaagcctct tgcacagtaa 60
129h

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
tacacggccg tgtcgtcaga tctcagcctg ctcagctcca tgtaggctgt gttgatggac 120
gtgtccctgg tcagtgtggc cttgcctttg aacttctcat tgtactgagt acc 173
<210> 22
<211> 34
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic oligonucleotide
<400> 22
caggtgcagc tgcagcagtc tggggctgag gtga 34
<210> 23
<211> 33
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic oligonucleotide
<400> 23
tgaggagacg gtgaccaggg ttccctggcc cca 33
<210> 24
<211> 157
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polynucleotide
<400> 24
cagtctccat cctccctgtc tgcatctgta ggagacagag tcaccatgac ctgcagtgcc 60
agctcaagtg taagttccag ctacttgtac tggtaccaac agaaaccagg gaaagccccc 120
aaactctgga tttatagcac atccaacctg gcttctg 157
<210> 25
<211> 156
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polynucleotide
<400> 25
gtcccccctc cgaacgtgta cgggtaccta ttccactgat ggcaga4ata agaggcagaa 60
tcttcaggtt gcagactgct gatggtgaga gtgaagtctg tcccagatcc actgccactg 120
aagcgagcag ggactccaga agccaggttg gatgtg 156
<210> 26
<211> 33
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic oligonucleotide
129i

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<400> 26
gacatccagc tgacccagtc tccatcctcc ctg 33
<210> 27
<211> 33
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic oligonucleotide
<400> 27
ttagatctcc agtcgtgtcc cccctccgaa cgt 33
<210> 28
<211> 11
<212> PRT
<213> Homo sapiens
<400> 28
Trp Gly Gln Gly Thr Leu Val Thr Val Ser Ser
1 5 10
<210> 29
<211> 12
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 29
Trp Thr Trp Asn Ile Thr Lys Ala Tyr Pro Leu Pro
1 5 10
<210> 30
<211> 10
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 30
Ala Cys Pro Glu Trp Trp Gly Thr Thr Cys
1 5 10
<210> 31
<211> 12
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 31
Trp Thr Trp Asn Ile Thr Lys Glu Tyr Pro Gln Pro
1 5 10
129j

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<210> 32
<211> 7
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 32
Gly Thr Thr Gly Thr Thr Cys
1 5
<210> 33
<211> 44
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polypeptide
<400> 33
Ser His Ile Gln Ile Pro Pro Gly Leu Thr Glu Leu Leu Gln Gly Tyr
1 5 10 15
Thr Val Glu Val Leu Arg Gln Gln Pro Pro Asp Leu Val Glu Phe Ala
20 25 30
Val Glu Tyr Phe Thr Arg Leu Arg Glu Ala Arg Ala
35 40
<210> 34
<211> 45
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polypeptide
<400> 34
Cys Gly His Ile Gln Ile Pro Pro Gly Leu Thr Glu Leu Leu Gln Gly
10 15
Tyr Thr Val Glu Val Leu Arg Gln Gln Pro Pro Asp Leu Val Glu Phe
20 25 30
Ala Val Glu Tyr Phe Thr Arg Leu Arg Glu Ala Arg Ala
35 40 45
<210> 35
<211> 17
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 35
Gln Ile Glu Tyr Leu Ala Lys Gln Ile Val Asp Asn Ala Ile Gln Gln
1 5 10 15
Ala
<210> 36
<211> 21
129k

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 36
Cys Gly Gln Ile Glu Tyr Leu Ala Lys Gln Ile Val Asp Asn Ala Ile
1 5 10 15
Gln Gln Ala Gly Cys
<210> 37
<211> 10
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 37
Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser
1 5 10
<210> 38
<211> 55
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polypeptide
<400> 38
Gly Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser His Ile Gln Ile
1 5 10 15
Pro Pro Gly Leu Thr Glu Leu Leu Gln Gly Tyr Thr Val Glu Val Leu
20 25 30
Arg Gln Gln Pro Pro Asp Leu Val Glu Phe Ala Val Glu Tyr Phe Thr
35 40 45
Arg Leu Arg Glu Ala Arg Ala
50 55
<210> 39
<211> 29
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 39
Gly Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Gln Ile Glu Tyr
1 5 10 15
Leu Ala Lys Gln Ile Val Asp Asn Ala Ile Gln Gln Ala
20 25
<210> 40
<211> 10
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
1291

,
CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 40
Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Gly Gly Gly Cys Gly
1 5 10
<210> 41
<211> 21
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (21)..(21)
<223> Cys(SS-tButhio)
<220>
<223> C-term amidated
<400> 41
Cys Gly Gln Ile Glu Tyr Leu Ala Lys Gln Ile Val Asp Asn Ala Ile
1 5 10 15
Gln Gln Ala Gly Cys
<210> 42
<211> 22
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (21)..(21)
<223> Cys(SS-tButhio)
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (22)..(22)
<223> Gly-EDANS
<400> 42
Cys Gly Gln Ile Glu Tyr Leu Ala Lys Gln Ile Val Asp Asn Ala Ile
1 5 10 15
Gln Gln Ala Gly Cys Gly
<210> 43
<211> 23
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
129m

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<220>
<223> N-term acetylated
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (1)..(1)
<223> Cys-(polyethylene glycol)3
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (2)..(2)
<223> Cys(S-tButhio)
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (22)..(22)
<223> Cys(S-tButhio)
<220>
<223> C-term amidated
<400> 43
Cys Cys Gly Gln Ile Glu Tyr Leu Ala Lys Gln Ile Val Asp Asn Ala
1 5 10 15
Ile Gln Gln Ala Gly Cys Gly
<210> 44
<211> 63
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic polypeptide
<400> 44
Lys Ser His His His His His His Gly Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Gly
1 5 10 15
Gly Gly Cys Gly His Ile Gln Ile Pro Pro Gly Leu Thr Glu Leu Leu
20 25 30
Gln Gly Tyr Thr Val Glu Val Leu Arg Gln Gln Pro Pro Asp Leu Val
35 40 45
Glu Phe Ala Val Glu Tyr Phe Thr Arg Leu Arg Glu Ala Arg Ala
50 55 60
<210> 45
<211> 45
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic primer
<400> 45
tctagacaca ggacctcatc atggccttga cctttgcttt actgg 45
<210> 46
<211> 55
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
129n
,

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic primer
<400> 46
ggatccatga tggtgatgat ggtgtgactt ttccttactt cttaaacttt cttgc 55
<210> 47
<211> 24
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic primer
<400> 47
agatctggcg cacctgaact cctg 24
<210> 48
<211> 33
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic primer
<400> 48
gaattcggat cctttacccg gagacaggga gag 33
<210> 49
<211> 17
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 49
Gln Ile Glu Tyr Val Ala Lys Gln Ile Val Asp Tyr Ala Ile His Gln
1 5 10 15
Ala
<210> 50
<211> 17
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 50
Gln Ile Glu Tyr Lys Ala Lys Gln Ile Val Asp His Ala Ile His Gln
1 5 10 15
Ala
<210> 51
<211> 17
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
1290

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 51
Gln Ile Glu Tyr His Ala Lys Gln Ile Val Asp His Ala Ile His Gln
1 5 10 15
Ala
<210> 52
<211> 17
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 52
Gln Ile Glu Tyr Val Ala Lys Gln Ile Val Asp His Ala Ile His Gln
1 5 10 15
Ala
<210> 53
<211> 24
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 53
Asp Leu Ile Glu Glu Ala Ala Ser Arg Ile Val Asp Ala Val Ile Glu
1 5 10 15
Gln Val Lys Ala Ala Gly Ala Tyr
<210> 54
<211> 18
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 54
Leu Glu Gln Tyr Ala Asn Gln Leu Ala Asp Gln Ile Ile Lys Glu Ala
1 5 10 15
Thr Glu
<210> 55
<211> 20
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
129p

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<400> 55
Phe Glu Glu Leu Ala Trp Lys Ile Ala Lys Met Ile Trp Ser Asp Val
1 5 10 15
Phe Gln Gln Cys
<210> 56
<211> 25
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 56
Pro Glu Asp Ala Glu Leu Val Arg Leu Ser Lys Arg Leu Val Glu Asn
1 5 10 15
Ala Val Leu Lys Ala Val Gln Gln Tyr
20 25
<210> 57
<211> 25
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 57
Pro Glu Asp Ala Glu Leu Val Arg Thr Ser Lys Arg Leu Val Glu Asn
1 5 10 15
Ala Val Leu Lys Ala Val Gln Gln Tyr
20 25
<210> 58
<211> 25
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<400> 58
Pro Glu Asp Ala Glu Leu Val Arg Leu Ser Lys Arg Asp Val Glu Asn
1 5 10 15
Ala Val Leu Lys Ala Val Gln Gln Tyr
20 25
<210> 59
<211> 6
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic
6xHis tag
<400> 59
His His His His His His
1 5
129q

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<210> 60
<211> 12
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (4)..(4)
<223> Asn or'Asp
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (6)..(6)
<223> Thr or Arg
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (7)..(7)
<223> Lys, Arg, Thr, Asn or Gly
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (8)..(8)
<223> Ala, Glu, Thr, Arg, Phe or Cys
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (9)..(9)
<223> Tyr or Thr
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (10)..(10)
<223> Pro or Arg
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (11)..(11)
<223> Leu, Gln, Ile, Met or Cys
<400> 60
Trp Thr Trp Xaa Ile Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Xaa Pro
1 5 10
<210> 61
<211> 10
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
<220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: Synthetic peptide
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (3)..(3)
<223> Pro or Tyr
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
129'

CA 02731438 2011-02-16
<222> (7)..(7)
<223> Gly or Ser
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (8) .. (8)
<223> Thr, Gly or Ser
<220>
<221> MOD_RES
<222> (9)..(9)
<223> Thr, Met, Ser, Gln or Pro
<400> 61
Ala Cys Xaa Glu Trp Trp Xaa Xaa Xaa Cys
1 5 10
129s

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2731438 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2017-07-11
(86) PCT Filing Date 2009-08-07
(87) PCT Publication Date 2010-02-11
(85) National Entry 2011-01-19
Examination Requested 2014-07-08
(45) Issued 2017-07-11
Deemed Expired 2020-08-31

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $400.00 2011-01-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2011-08-08 $100.00 2011-01-19
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2011-02-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2012-08-07 $100.00 2012-07-23
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2013-08-07 $100.00 2013-07-23
Request for Examination $800.00 2014-07-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2014-08-07 $200.00 2014-07-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2015-08-07 $200.00 2015-07-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2016-08-08 $200.00 2016-07-21
Expired 2019 - Filing an Amendment after allowance $400.00 2016-12-08
Final Fee $858.00 2017-05-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2017-08-07 $200.00 2017-07-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2018-08-07 $200.00 2018-07-30
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
IMMUNOMEDICS, INC.
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2011-01-19 1 67
Drawings 2011-01-19 20 747
Description 2011-01-19 129 7,886
Claims 2011-01-19 8 392
Cover Page 2011-03-17 1 42
Description 2011-02-16 148 8,344
Claims 2014-07-08 9 378
Description 2016-02-29 149 8,147
Claims 2016-02-29 2 82
Claims 2016-12-08 4 170
Description 2016-09-22 149 8,146
Claims 2016-09-22 2 79
PCT 2011-01-19 4 172
Assignment 2011-01-19 2 77
Prosecution-Amendment 2011-02-16 23 586
Prosecution-Amendment 2011-01-19 1 19
Assignment 2011-02-16 14 411
Final Fee 2017-05-23 2 62
Cover Page 2017-06-12 1 42
Amendment 2016-09-22 5 216
Prosecution-Amendment 2014-07-08 11 473
Prosecution-Amendment 2014-10-20 2 77
Correspondence 2015-01-15 2 64
Examiner Requisition 2015-11-17 5 322
Amendment 2016-02-29 33 1,750
Examiner Requisition 2016-04-04 3 228
Amendment after Allowance 2016-12-08 6 246
Correspondence 2016-12-16 1 23

Biological Sequence Listings

Choose a BSL submission then click the "Download BSL" button to download the file.

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

Please note that files with extensions .pep and .seq that were created by CIPO as working files might be incomplete and are not to be considered official communication.

BSL Files

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :