Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
FIELD
The present invention relates to an electric machine, particularly an electric
machine with
permanent magnets, arranged for reducing magnetic interference forces.
BACKGROUND
In existing electric machines, including those with permanent magnets,
magnetic
interference forces contribute to undesirable energy loss, machine wear and/or
interruptions to smooth operation. Electric machines, also referred to as
electrical
machines, include linear and rotary motors and generators. Magnetic
interference forces
(including torques) include forces caused by magnetic interactions that
hinder, or at least
do not contribute to, efficient transduction between electrical and mechanical
energy, and
therefore reduce the efficiency and/or smooth operation of the electric
machine. The
magnetic interference forces can include forces opposing the motion (e.g.,
cogging torque
in a rotary machine) and attraction forces between moving parts (e.g., between
the rotor
and the stator) which can contribute to friction, stiction and forces on the
bearings in the
machine. For example, there can be particular positions on the path of motion
of the
machine's segments where magnetic interference forces, including an opposition
force that
acts in the opposite direction to the motion, acts to reduce the efficiency of
the machine.
To overcome the opposition force, additional power must be supplied to the
electric
machine which may be particularly problematic when starting the machine.
In existing electric machines, having permanent magnets spaced along the
periphery in the
rotor body in close proximity to the stator poles, may cause undesirable
magnetic forces
between the stator poles and the rotor. For electric machines with
electromagnets, having
the stator poles in close proximity to the rotor iron core may cause
undesirable magnetic
CA 02743366 2011-05-11 PCT/AU2009/001457
`:WRPO9b1DCC\TRNU978557 I.DOC4%)6/2O lb Received 7 June 2010
-2-
forces between the stator poles and the rotor body when the electromagnet is
energised. In
existing electric machines, embedding a magnet in a magnetic material may
decrease the
magnet efficiency.
Electric motors are controlled by electrical power sources and transduce
electrical power
into mechanical power. Existing electric motors can have inefficient control
circuits and
processes for providing power to the electrical coils that generate the
dynamic magnetic
fields, particularly at higher operating frequencies.
It is desired to address or ameliorate one or more disadvantages or
limitations associated
with existing electric machines, or to at least provide a useful alternative.
SUMMARY
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided an electric
machine including:
a first part, being a stator or rotor/runner, including a first segment with a
first number
of mutually spaced poles;
a second part, being a rotor/runner or stator, including a second segment with
a second
number of mutually spaced poles arranged to transduce between electrical and
mechanical energy by magnetic. interaction with the poles of the first
segment, the
second segment having substantially the same length as the first segment;
permanent magnets of the poles of the first part; and
electrical coils of the poles of the second part,
wherein the second number differs from the first number by one to
substantially reduce the
magnetic interference forces in the direction of motion,
wherein gap depths in gaps between the poles of each part are sufficiently
deep to
substantially attenuate magnetic interactions between a body of each part and
the poles
of the other part, thereby reducing magnetic interference forces between the
first part
and the second pat,
Amended Sheet
IPEAJAU
CA 02743366 2011-05-11 PCT/AU2009/001457
C:WRPonbI\DCC\TRN2978557 1.DOC-4162010
Received 7 June 2010
-3-
wherein each part is symmetrical in a direction transverse a direction of
motion between
the first part and the second part and transverse a depth of the parts, for
substantially
balancing magnetic forces acting perpendicular to the direction of motion, and
wherein the gap depths of the part with the permanent magnets, excluding any
permanent
magnet (PM) thickness, are at least equal to the PM thickness.
The present invention also provides a linear electric machine including:
a stator having a stator body and a plurality of linearly spaced stator poles,
each stator
pole including a permanent magnet mounted thereon; and
a runner mounted adjacent the stator for movement in a movement direction
parallel
to the stator body and having a runner body and a plurality of linearly spaced
runner poles, each runner pole including an electrical coil, the runner poles
arranged to transduce between electrical .and mechanical energy by magnetic
interaction with the stator poles,
wherein:
the stator includes a plurality of stator segments, each of a selected length
in the
movement direction, and the runner includes one or more runner segments, each
of the selected length in the movement direction;
the number of the stator poles in each stator segment differs by one from the
number
of runner poles in each runner segment, thereby substantially reducing
magnetic
interference forces in the movement direction; and
the stator includes gaps between adjacent stator poles, each having a depth,
excluding
a permanent magnet de pth of each permanent magnet, at least equal to the
permanent magnet depth, thereby substantially reducing magnetic forces
between the runner poles and the stator body acting perpendicular to the
direction of motion.
,kriended Sheet
rPEP! iU
CA 02743366 2011-05-11 PCT/AU2009/001457
C: WRPonbI\DCC\TRM297855I.DOC-7BK211111
Received 7 June 2010
-3A-
The present invention also provides a linear electric'machine including:
a stator having a stator body and a plurality of linearly spaced stator poles,
each stator
pole including an electrical coil; and
a runner mounted adjacent the stator for movement in a movement direction
parallel
to the stator body and having a runner body and a plurality of linearly spaced
runner poles, each runner pole including a permanent magnet mounted thereon,
the runner poles arranged to transduce between electrical and mechanical
energy
by magnetic interaction with the stator poles,
wherein:
the stator includes a plurality of stator segments, each of a selected length
in the
movement direction, and the runner includes one or more runner segments, each
of the selected length in the movement direction;
the number of the stator poles in each stator segment differs by one from the
number
of runner poles in each runner segment, thereby substantially reducing
magnetic
interference forces in the movement direction; and
the runner includes gaps between adjacent runner poles, each having a depth,
excluding a permanent magnet depth of each permanent magnet, at least.equal to
the permanent magnet depth, thereby substantially reducing magnetic forces
between the stator poles and the runner body acting perpendicular to the
direction of motion.
The present invention also provides a rotary electric machine including:
a stator having a stator body and a plurality of circumferentially spaced
stator poles,
each stator pole including a permanent magnet mounted thereon; and
a rotor mounted within the stator for rotation about an axis and having a
central rotor
body and a plurality of circumferentially spaced rotor poles, each rotor pole
including an electrical coil, the rotor poles arranged to transduce between
electrical and mechanical energy by magnetic interaction with the stator
poles,
Amended Sheet
IPEA/AU
CA 02743366 2011-05-11 PCT/AU2009/001457
NRPoab" `C\TR'"2978557-I. `a"16120 10 Received 7 June 2010
-3B-
wherein:
the stator includes a plurality of stator segments, each subtending a selected
angle
relative to the axis, and the rotor, includes a corresponding plurality of
rotor
segments, each subtending the selected angle relative to the axis;
the number of the stator poles in each stator segment differs by one from the
number
of rotor poles in each corresponding rotor segment, thereby substantially
reducing magnetic interference forces tangential to the axis; and
the stator includes gaps between adjacent stator poles, each having a radial
depth,
excluding a radial permanent magnet depth of each permanent magnet, at least
equal to the radial permanent magnet depth, thereby substantially reducing
radial
magnetic forces between the rotor poles and the stator body.
The present invention also provides a rotary electric machine including:
a stator having a stator body and a plurality of circumferentially spaced
stator poles,
each stator pole including an electrical coil; and
a rotor mounted within the stator for rotation about an axis and having a
central rotor
body and a plurality of circumferentially spaced rotor poles, each rotor pole
including a permanent magnet mounted thereon, the rotor poles arranged to
transduce between electrical and mechanical energy by magnetic interaction
with
the stator poles,
wherein:
the stator includes a plurality of stator segments, each subtending a selected
angle
relative to the axis, and the rotor includes a corresponding plurality of
rotor
segments, each subtending the selected angle relative to the axis;
the number of the stator poles in each stator segment differs by one from the
number
of rotor poles in each corresponding rotor segment, thereby substantially
reducing magnetic interference forces tangential to the axis; and
the rotor includes gaps between adjacent rotor poles, each having a radial
depth,
excluding a radial permanent magnet depth of each permanent magnet, at least
Amended Sheet
IPEA/AU
CA 02743366 2011-05-11 PCT/AU2009/001457
CaNRPOnbrDCC\TRNQ978557 I.DOC- /O6QO M
Received 7 June 2010
-3C-
equal to the radial permanent magnet depth, thereby substantially reducing
radial
magnetic forces between the stator poles and the'rotor body.
In embodiments, the second part moves relative to the first part during
operation of the
machine, and the magnetic interference forces include forces and torques such
as the
cogging torque. Each part has a body of soft magnetic material which can be
magnetically
attracted to the magnetic poles (either permanent magnets, or electro-
magnetised poles) on
the other part. Keeping a large distance between the poles of one part and the
body of the
other part will reduce - forces of attraction between them (and thus .
undesirable forces
perpendicular to the. direction of motion). The minimum depth of the gaps of
the first part
is substantially equal to one thickness of the permanent magnet used on one
part, i.e., the
overall gap depth, from the magnet pole face to ' the body, is equal twice the
magnet
thickness.
The gap depths of the part with the permanent magnets, excluding any permanent
magnet
(PM) thickness, can be approximately equal to at least the PM thickness, and
preferably
within 20%, 10%, or 5%, or substantially equal to the pole widths of the part.
The poles of each part can be substantially equally spaced on each part, with
the gaps
between the poles being within about 20%, 10%, or 5%, or substantially equal
to the pole
widths of the poles on each part.
The poles on each part can be arranged symmetrically on an axis perpendicular
to the
direction of motion, thereby providing directly opposing equal magnetic
interference
forces perpendicular to the direction of motion, and thus substantial
cancellation of forces
normal to the direction of motion.
Amended Sheet
IPEA/AU
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-4-
The poles of the first part can include electrical coils, and the poles of the
second part can
include the permanent magnets. Alternatively, the poles of the first part can
include the
permanent magnets, and the poles of the second part can include electrical
coils.
The polar faces of the permanent magnets can alternate on adjacent poles. For
example, the
polar faces of the permanent magnets on one part alternate North-South-North-
South-
North-South along the entire part.
The electric machine can be a rotary machine wherein the length of each
segment is an
angle. The first part can be the rotor and the second part can be the stator
(or vice versa).
The first segment can form a first half of the first part of the rotary
machine, and the
second segment can form a first half of the second part of the rotary machine.
This can
allow a reduction of radial magnetic interference forces. Alternatively, the
electric machine
can be a linear machine wherein the length of each segment is a distance. The
first part can
be the runner or mover, and the second part can be the stator (or vice versa).
The electric machine can be a motor driven by a controller having an
electrical period. In
some embodiments, each coil receives electrical power from the controller
during a first
half of the electrical period, via a single switch. In other embodiments, each
coil receives
positive electrical power from the controller during a first half of the
electrical period, and
negative electrical power during a second half of the electrical period. Each
coil can
receive the electrical power via four switches in an H-bridge configuration,
or via two
switches in a half-bridge configuration.
Each coil can receive the electrical power for approximately a quarter of the
electrical
period.
The machine can be a generator that receives a mechanical power input via a
rotor or
runner, and terminals of each coil can provide an electrical power output. A
first set of
coils can receive electrical power while a second set of coils can provide an
electrical
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-5-
power output. This allows the machine to function as a motor and a generator
simultaneously. The first part can be the rotor in a rotary generator, or the
runner in a linear
generator.
An electric machine can include: a first electric machine; and a second
electric machine,
wherein the first electric machine and the second electric machine have the
same numbers
of poles on their respective parts, and share a common drive shaft, and
wherein the poles
of the first electric machine are offset from the poles of the second electric
machine to
reduce magnetic interference forces. Having rotors in the same shaft with
offset poles can
further reduce magnetic interference forces, such as cogging torque, by
cancelling out the
magnetic interference forces at positions where the force on one of the
individual machines
is non-zero.
The electric machine can be part of an electrical power system.
In embodiments, the electric machine's geometry provides, for many positions
of
translation (for a linear machine) or rotation (for a rotary machine), a
cancellation or
reduction or balancing of magnetic interference forces compared to existing
electric
machines. The magnetic interference forces are caused by magnetic interaction
between
the two parts of the machine: between the stator and the rotor (in a rotary
machine), or
between the stator and the runner (in a linear machine). The magnetic
interference forces
may be in the direction of motion of the machine (tangential forces and
torques in a rotary
machine, e.g., cogging torque) or directly between the two parts (radial
forces in a rotary
machine). The reduction of magnetic interference forces reduces the power
required to
provide motion in an electric machine (a motor and/or a generator), and thus
increases its
efficiency and/or smoothness of operation.
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-6-
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Preferred embodiments are hereinafter further described, by way of example
only, with
reference to the accompanying drawings, which are not to scale, wherein:
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a first segment of a first part of an
electric
machine and a second segment of a second part of the electric machine;
Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of the first segment including permanent
magnet
poles and the second segment including electromagnet poles;
Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the first segment including electromagnet
poles
and a second segment including permanent magnet poles;
Figure 4a is a schematic diagram of a pole of the first part and a pole of the
second
part arranged in alignment with each other transverse the direction of motion;
Figure 4b is a schematic diagram of a pole of the second part arranged halfway
between two poles of the first part in the direction of motion;
Figure 4c is a schematic diagram of two poles of the second part arranged
symmetrically in a direction of motion with two poles of the first part;
Figure 4d is a schematic diagram of a pole of the first part arranged halfway
between two poles of the second part in the direction of motion;
Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of a linear electric machine having a stator
including a plurality of segments and permanent magnets;
Figure 5A is a schematic diagram of a linear electric machine having a stator
including a plurality of segments and electromagnets;
Figure 6 is a schematic diagram of a rotary electric machine having a rotor
and a
stator each including a plurality of segments;
Figure 7a is a schematic diagram of the rotary electric machine in a zero-
degree
position;
Figure 7b is a schematic diagram of the rotary machine in an 18-degree
position;
Figure 7c is a schematic diagram of the rotary machine in a 36-degree
position;
Figure 7d is a schematic diagram of the rotary machine in a 54-degree
position;
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-7-
Figure 8 is a schematic block diagram of a switch controller for an electric
motor;
Figure 9 is a timing diagram of the electric motor driven by the switch
controller
operating at a low frequency;
Figure 10 is a timing diagram for the electric motor driven by the switch
controller
operating at a high frequency;
Figure 11 is a schematic block diagram of an H-bridge controller for the
electric
motor;
Figure 12 is a block diagram of an H-bridge circuit of the H-bridge
controller;
Figure 13 is a timing diagram for the electric motor driven by the H-bridge
controller operating at a low frequency;
Figure 14 is a timing diagram for the electric motor driven by the H-bridge
controller operating at a high frequency;
Figure 15 is a block diagram of a half-bridge controller;
Figure 16 is a block diagram of a half-bridge circuit of the half-bridge
controller.
Figure 17 is a timing diagram for the electric motor driven by the half-bridge
controller operating at a low frequency; and
Figure 18 is a timing diagram for the electric motor driven by the half-bridge
controller operating at a high frequency.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Herein described is an electric machine (such as a rotary motor, rotary
generator, linear
motor or linear generator) with two parts that are arranged to transduce
between electrical
and mechanical energy by magnetic interaction. The two parts are for example a
stator and
a rotor (in a rotary machine) or a stator and a runner (in a linear machine).
Each part
includes an integer number of segments of equal length (angular length for a
rotary
machine or linear length for a linear machine).
CA 02743366 2011-05-11 PCT/AU2009/001457
C:\NRPonbl\DCC\7RN\2978557 LDOC4d16/2010
Received 7 June 2010
-8-
Machine Configuration
As shown in Figure 1, the segments, for example a first segment 102 and a
second segment
104, each include a body 106, 108 and one or more poles 110, 1.12. The two
segments 102,
. 104, during operation, move relative to one another in a motion direction
114 aligned with
the rows of poles 110, 112. The two segments 102, 104 interact magnetically
due to
magnetic fields generated by magnets included in the poles 110, 112. The
magnets cause
magnetic fields to link primarily the'pole faces 116 of the first segment 102
to adjacent
pole faces 118 of the second segment 104. Magnetic forces caused by these
magnetic fields
provide a movement of the segment 102, 104 in the motion direction 114 in an
electric
motor, and in an electric generator currents generated in a coil wrapped
around a pole, for
example pole 112 of second segment 104, by movement of these magnetic fields
generate
electricity when the segments 102, 104 are moved relative to one another in
the motion
direction 114.
The body 106, 108 of each segment 102, 104 is primarily formed of a soft
magnetic
material, such as Silicon Iron, Cobalt Iron, Nickel Alloys, Low Carbon Steel,
Magnetic
Stainless Steel, etc.
The poles 110 of the first segment 102 are formed of the soft magnetic
material and
include magnets, which can be permanent magnets 202, as shown in Figure 2, or
electro
magnets 302, as seen in Figure 3. Each pole 110 of the first segment 102 is
formed with a
substantially equal first pole width 120. Between adjacent poles 110 of the
first segment
102 a gap 122 in the magnetic material of the first segment 102 is formed to
create a region
of high magnetic permeability where it is.-more difficult to link magnetic
fields than in the
body 106 and the poles 110. Each gap 122 has a gap depth 124 between the pole
face 116
and the body 106 (the gap depth 124 is also known as the "pole height"),
excluding any
permanent magnet on the face of the pole face 116. Each gap 122 also has a gap
width 126
which is substantially equal to the pole width 120. The gap width 126 is an
angular width
in a rotary machine.
Amended Sheet
IPEA/AU .
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-9-
To reduce air friction ("windage") in the machine, non-magnetic materials,
such as
Aluminium, Copper, Plastic, etc. can be inserted into the gaps 122 and/or 128.
Each pole 112 of the second segment 104 is separated from the adjacent pole
118 in the
second segment 104 by a gap 128, which also has a height 130 and a width 132,
correspondingly similar to the gap 122, gap height 124 and gap width 126 of
the first;
segment 102.
The poles 112 of the second segment 104 have a pole width 134 similar to the
pole width
120 of the first segment 102 and substantially equal to the gap width 132.
Each pole 122 of
the second segment is formed of the soft magnetic material and includes a
magnet which
can be an electromagnet 204, as shown in Figure 2, or a permanent magnet 304,
as shown
in Figure 3. Each electromagnet 204 includes a coil of magnetic wire such as
copper wire.
Each segment 102, 104 is of equal length L (which can be angular length in a
rotary
machine), but has an unequal number of poles 110, 114, as in an example shown
in Figures
1, 2, and 3. One segment has a first number of poles (e.g., the first segment
102 has three
poles 110) and the other segment has a second number of poles (e.g., the
second segment
has two poles 112), and the second number of poles differs from the first
number of poles,
by one (i.e., the second number can be greater or less than the first number
by one pole). In
other words, one segment has a number of poles n, and the other segment has a
number of
poles n+1. This ratio of the number of poles between the two segments, n:
(n+1), allows
for a reduction in the magnetic interference forces, in particular magnetic
interference
forces acting in the motion direction 114, such as cogging torque, which
opposes motion in
a rotary machine.
By having the pole ratio n: (n+1), magnetic forces caused by the magnetism of
the poles
110, 112, in the motion direction 114 substantially cancelled out for a
plurality of positions
of the two segments 102, 104 relative to each other in the motion direction
114. For
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-10-
example, for a direct alignment of a pole 110 of a first part 104 and a
directly adjacent pole
112 of a second part 404 of the electric machine, as shown in Figure 4a, the
magnetic
forces between the two poles 110, 112 do not include any component in the
motion
direction 114. Similarly, for a pole 112 of the second part 404 arranged to be
half way
between two poles 110 of the first part 402 in the motion direction 114, as
shown in Figure
4b, the magnetic forces between the poles 110, 112 balance out in the motion
direction
114, so there is zero net force acting in the motion direction 114 between the
poles 110,
112 in this arrangement. Similarly, for a pair of poles 112 of the second part
404 arranged
symmetrically with a pair of poles 110 of the first part 402, as shown in
Figure 4c, there is
no force in the motion direction 114 as the forces between the poles 110, 112
substantially
balance out in this position. Similarly, for a pole 110 of the first part 402
arranged half way
between two poles 112 of the second part 404 in the motion direction 114, the
forces, as
shown in Figure 4d, the forces in the motion direction 114 balance out. Having
the poles
110, 112 arranged in segments 102, 104 of equal length and integer number in
each part
402, 404 of the electric machine provides for the poles 110, 112 to be
arranged in the
positions of zero force in the motion direction 114 (as shown in Figures 4a,
4b, 4c and 4d)
at a plurality of points in position/time as the two parts 402, 404 move
relative to each
other in the motion direction 114. The arrangement can substantially reduce
magnetic
interaction forces in the motion direction 114.
A higher value of n will provide higher number of positions where the
cancellation of
magnetic interference force occurs. At positions between points where
cancellation exists,
the resultant force in the motion direction 114 will be non-zero, but is not
substantial for
large values of n, e.g., for n greater than 3, or as large as practicable. In
general, a
cooperating pair of segments, with n and (n+1) will possess 2*n*(n+1)
positions per
segment length L where the resultant force in the motion direction 114 is
substantially
zero. A higher value of 2n(n+l) provides a higher reduction in magnetic
interference
forces in the direction of motion.
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-11-
For example, a linear electric machine 500, as shown in Figure 5, includes a
first part in
the form of a linear stator 502, and a second part in the form of runner 504.
The linear
stator 502 includes a plurality of linear stator segments 506 each of which
has a plurality of
stator poles 508 and a body 510. Each stator pole 508 includes a permanent
magnet 511 at
each pole face. The stator poles 508 are equally spaced with gaps between the
poles 508 of
equal width with the poles 508 themselves (i.e., the gap width is equal to the
pole width).
The runner 504 includes runner poles 512, which include electromagnets, and a
body 514.
The runner 504 includes two runner segments 516, each of which has two poles
512 and
shares the same body 514.
In the linear electric machine 500, the runner 504 has a length of one runner
segment 516,
which includes two runner poles 512. The linear stator 502 includes a
plurality of linear
stator segments 506, each of which is the same length as the runner segment
516, and each
of which includes three stator poles 508. Thus the runner segment 516 has n
number of
poles, and the linear stator segment 506 has a number n+1 number of poles.
The linear stator 502 in the linear electric machine 500 is arranged on
opposite sides of the
runner 504 to provide balancing of magnetic forces perpendicular to the motion
direction
114 and transverse the depth of the parts (e.g., from between the top and the
bottom, or
between two opposite sides). The depth of each part is depth along the
dimension shown
into the page in Figure 5. The two parts of the machine, being the linear
stator 502 and the
runner 504, are symmetrical in a direction perpendicular to the motion
direction 114, and
this allows a substantial reduction in the magnetic interference forces acting
perpendicular
to the motion direction 114. For example, if only one side, e.g., linear
stator segments 506
forming one side 502A of the linear stator 502, and the runner segment 516
forming the
same corresponding side 504A of the runner 504, were operating together,
magnetic forces
acting perpendicular to the motion direction 114 between the parts 502A, 504A,
would
experience substantial forces perpendicular to the motion direction 114, which
would need
to be counteracted using mechanical means, e.g., guiding rails. By providing a
symmetrical
mirror image of each pair of interacting sets of poles, the magnetic
interference forces
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-12-
perpendicular to the motion direction 114 are substantially reduced. Reducing
these forces
allows for smoother and more efficient operation of the electric machine.
A linear electric machine 500A, as shown in Figure 5A, includes a first part
in the form of
a linear stator 552 and a second part in the form of a runner 554 with a
permanent magnet
511 at each pole face. The arrangement of the linear electric machine 500A
corresponds to
the arrangement of the linear electric machine 500 described above, except the
linear stator
552 includes poles with permanent magnets and the runner 554 includes poles
with
electromagnets 511. The operation of the linear electric machine 500A is
correspondingly
similar to that of the linear electric machine 500.
To optimise the performance of the electric machine during operation (i.e.,
the dynamic
phase), the height of each pole with a permanent magnet (PM), excluding the PM
thickness, is at least the PM thickness, and preferably within 20%, 10%, or 5%
or
substantially equal to the pole widths of the part. This substantially reduces
any forces of
attraction between the pole magnets and the soft magnetic material of the
body. This also
allows for almost all of the magnetic field lines to be directed between
adjacent poles on
the different parts, and not directed towards the body of either part. Thus
these field lines
will mainly be contributing to the generation of useful force/torque.
The values / sizes of the gap widths 126, 132 depend on the magnet height and
the type of
magnet used (e.g., Neodymium Iron Boron, Samarium Cobalt, Ceramic, or Alnico)
to
substantially reduce magnetic fringe fields at the ends of the magnet that
interact with
neighbouring or next-to-adjacent, poles of the other part. The values of the
gap width 126,
132 are selected in conjunction with the pole height (or gap depth) to provide
sufficient
space for electromagnet coil windings around respective poles. For example,
the poles of
each part can be substantially equally spaced on each part, with the gaps
between the poles
being within about 20%, 10%, or 5%, or substantially equal to the pole widths
of the poles
on each part.
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
- 13-
The electric machine can be a rotary electric machine 600, which includes a
rotary stator
602 and a rotor 604, as shown in Figure 6. The rotary stator 602 includes a
body 606 of
soft magnetic material and a plurality of stator poles 608 spaced equally
about the rotary
stator 602 with equal gaps 609 between adjacent stator poles 608. The stator
gaps 609 are
substantially equal in angular width to the stator poles 608. Each stator pole
608 includes a
magnet in the form of an electromagnet formed by windings around the pole 608.
The
rotor 604 includes a body 610 and a plurality of rotor poles 612 spaced
equally about the
rotor 604 by rotor gaps 614 of substantially equal angular width to the rotor
poles 612.
Each rotor pole 612 includes a magnet in the form of a permanent magnet on the
pole face,
facing the stator poles 608 for magnetic interaction between the poles 608,
612, which
provides for transduction between the mechanical energy and electrical energy
in the
rotary electric machine 600. The rotor 604 rotates in the direction of motion
114 about an
axis 616 in the centre of the rotor 604. The rotary stator 602 includes a
plurality of stator
segments, each with n stator poles 608, the stator segment being of equal
angular length
with a corresponding rotor segment, which includes (n+1) rotor poles 612. The
rotary
electric machine 600 is arranged with at least two segments in each of the
rotary stator 602
and the rotor 604 and is generally symmetrical along a line perpendicular to
the motion
direction 114 and transverse the depth of the rotor 604 and stator 602, to
allow for
substantial cancellation (or balancing) of magnetic interference forces in the
radial
direction (i.e., radial to the motion axis 616) in an equivalent cancellation
(or balancing) of
transverse magnetic interference forces described above with reference to the
linear
electric machine 500. The depth of the rotor 604 and the stator 602 is the
depth of the
machine along its axis of rotation.
In the rotary electric machine 600, n=4 and the rotor 604 consists of one
segment with a
permanent magnet attached to each of its five poles 612, and a diametrically
opposed
segment also with five poles 612. The rotary stator 602 consists of one
segment with an
electromagnet (formed by a coil) on each of its four poles 608, and a
diametrically opposed
segment also with four poles 608. The angle subtended by the rotor segment is
180 deg.
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-14-
The angle subtended by the stator segment is also 180 deg. The diametrically
opposed
segments of each part are shown on opposite sides of the dotted line 618 in
Figure 6.
The electric machine 600 can be configured with magnets of all of the rotary
poles 612
have pole faces with alternating polarity, i.e., North/South/North/South/etc.
as shown in
Figure 7a.
The electric machine 600 can be used as a rotary motor to transduce electrical
energy into
mechanical energy (that is, rotation of the rotor 604) by magnetic
interactions between the
permanent magnets on the rotor poles 612 and the electromagnets on the stator
poles 608.
An electric current from an electrical power supply is directed through the
coils (windings)
of the electromagnets, thereby generating. magnetic fields that exert forces
on the
permanent magnets of the rotor 604. The magnetic field of each stator pole 608
is
controlled, both in strength and direction, by the electric current in the
electromagnet.
Electrical Controller
For an electric machine configured as a motor, the electric machine can
include an
electrical controller for supplying the electrical current to the motor,
having a switching
arrangement (or "switching scheme") for controlling the motor, referred to as
a driven
motor. The driven motor can be a rotary electric motor with electromagnets on
its stator
poles, a rotary electric motor with electromagnets on its rotor poles, or a
linear electric
motor with electromagnets on its stator poles or runner poles. The driven
motor can have n
rotor/runner poles, or n stator poles. For example, the driven motor can be in
the form of
the rotary machine 600.
The electrical controller is configured to control the supply of electrical
current to the coils
of the electric machine such that magnetic fields that oppose the preferred
motion of the
driven motor are substantially avoided, or at least minimised. For example,
even for high-
frequency operation of the driven motor, described hereinafter with reference
to Figures
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-15-
10, 14 and 18, the electrical controller provides electrical power to the
coils of the
electromagnets of the driven motor substantially only when the resulting
generated
magnetic field is generally favourable to (i.e., supports) motion of the
driven motor in the
preferred motor direction. In this way, each coil is not driven to generate
any substantial
magnetic field that generates a magnetic interference force (in conjunction
with the poles
of the other part) generally opposing the preferred motion of the driven
motor.
The electrical controller includes circuits that provide electrical current to
each coil on a
periodic basis, with the period Te. In example timing arrangements (i.e., time-
domain
arrangements) described hereinafter, the electrical drive currents are
repeated in each
period Te. The timing arrangements (e.g., in Figures 9, 10, 13, 14 17 and 18)
can be
described with reference to quarter-periods, that is Te/4: the start of each
period is referred
to as "Point A", the end of the first quarter period is referred to as "Point
B", the end of the
half period is referred to as "Point C", the end of three quarters of the
period is referred to
as "Point D", and the end of the period (which corresponds to the start of the
next period)
is referred to as "Point E". For a rotary driven motor, these points
correspond to angular
displacements of the rotor (for a fixed stator, or vice versa). For different
machines, these
angular displacement points, corresponding to quarter-electrical-period
movements of the
motor, have different values for difference values of n.
For an example driven motor in the form of the rotary machine 600, the
electric current in
each coil of the electromagnets is controlled, for each electromagnet, by an
example
electrical controller which has a timing arrangement based on the angular
position of the
rotor 604. The quarter-period points of the example rotary machine 600 are:
(A) a first
angular position of zero degrees, at the beginning of the electrical period Te
(referred to as
'Point A'), where a first rotor pole 612A is aligned directly with a first
stator pole 608A, as
shown in Figure 7a; (B) an 18-degree position at 1/4 of Te (referred to as
'Point B'), where
the first rotor pole 612A is rotated away from the first stator pole 608A by
an angle of 18
degrees in the direction of motion, as shown in Figure 7b; (C) a 36-degree
position at 1/2
of Te (referred to as 'Point C'), where the first rotor pole 612A is rotated
through an angle
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-16-
of 36 degrees from the first stator pole 608A, as shown in Figure 7c; and (D)
a 54-degree
position at 3/4 of Te (referred to as 'Point D'), where the first rotor pole
612A is rotated
through an angle of 54 degrees from the first stator pole 608A, as shown in
Figure 7d. By
rotation through a further 18-degree angle from Point D, the rotor 604 moves
again into the
zero degree position (i.e., Point A, also referred to as 'Point E', shown in
Figure 7a), with a
third rotor pole 612C moving into direct alignment with the first stator pole
608A, and
thereby repeating the cycle (the third rotor pole 612C has the same magnetic
polarity as the
first rotor pole 612A). The particular angles given in this example relate to
quarter-
segment movements of the two parts relative to each other for the rotary
machine 600.
The driven motor has a mechanical period Tm, which refers to the time taken
for the rotor
to rotate through a full rotation. The relationship between the mechanical
period Tm and
the electrical period Te differs for different example driven motors, and in
particular for the
different values of n and (n+1). For example, for the driven motor in the form
of the rotary
machine 600, (n+l) = 5 and the electrical period (Te) is 1/5 of the mechanical
period (Tm).
For an example electrical switch controller 800, as shown in Figure 8, each
electromagnet
is driven by a switch. A direct current (DC) power source 802, such as an
Alternating-
Current-to-Direct-Current (AC/DC) converter or bank of batteries, supplies DC
current to
motor coils 812, 812* (also referred to as "M-coils" or "MC") of the
electromagnets in a
driven motor (e.g., the example machine 600) using the power electronic
switches 810,
810*. A Direct-Current-to-Direct-Current (DC/DC) converter 804 converts DC
power
from the DC power source 802 to a suitable DC voltage for operating a position
sensor 806
and a controller circuit 808. The position sensor 806 determines the position
of the runner
504 or rotor 604 with respect to the stator 502, 602 and generates position
signals for the
controller circuit 808. The controller circuit 808 simultaneously switches
(turns ON/OFF)
the switches 810, 810* at precise selected times based on, and synchronised
with, the
position signals. Each switch is in an ON state when it is substantially
conducting, and in
an OFF state when it is substantially non-conducting. The controller circuit
808 also
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-17-
regulates the speed of the runner 504 or rotor 604 (i.e., the speed of the
motor) based on an
input controller, or a preset or preselected speed value.
Pairs of matching coils 812 and 812* and their respective switches 810, 810*,
which are
diametrically opposite in the machine, are controlled to have synchronised
currents to
balance and substantially cancel out (or at least reduce) opposing magnetic
forces,
including potential magnetic interference forces perpendicular to (or
"transverse") the
motion direction. By reducing or substantially cancelling magnetic
interference forces
generally transverse, or perpendicular to, the motion direction, undesirable
friction from
the motor bearings etc. can be reduced, thus increasing motor efficiency and
longevity.
Electrical input waveforms and mechanical output waveforms for each coil of an
example
driven motor, driven by the switch controller 800 operating at a low
frequency, are related
as shown in Figure 9. Figure 9(a) shows when having a coil current is
favourable between
Points A and C for efficient motion. For the example machine 606, as shown in
Figures 7a
and 7b, the direction of the coil current is controlled such that the
magnetization of the first
stator pole 608A has the same magnetic polarity as the first rotor pole 612A
when they are
in alignment at Point A and until they are rotated by about Te/4 to Point B.
The first stator
pole 608A thus repels the first rotor pole 612A and attracts the second rotor
pole 612B
which has an opposite magnetic polarity to the first rotor pole 612A. Figure
9(b) shows the
switch 810 (and thus also synchronised switch 810*) is the ON state between
Point A and
Point B. Turning OFF the switch 810 (and thus also synchronised switch 810*)
allows the
coil current to decay, due to the fall time tf, and reach zero by Point C,
when having coil
current becomes unfavourable, as shown in Figure 9(a). Figure 9(c) shows the
coil current
waveform, including a current rise time (tr) and fall time (/). The tr and tf
are dependent
on the time constant of the coil which is the ratio of the coil inductance to
its DC
resistance. For low frequency operation, the rise time and fall time are not a
substantial
part of the period Te. Figure 9(d) shows the instantaneous power of the
electrical input
(Pe) which is the product of supply voltage (Vdc), the switch state (Ss) and
the coil current
(1), or Pe=Vdc*Ss*I. Figure 9(e) shows the waveform of the torque developed
due to the
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-18-
coil current. The maximum torque is at Point B. Figure 9(f) shows the
instantaneous power
of the mechanical output (Pm) which is the product of the Torque (Tq) and the
angular
velocity of the rotor (w), or Pm=Tq*co.
Electrical input waveforms and mechanical output waveforms for each coil of an
example
driven motor, when each coil is driven by the switch controller 800 operating
at a high
frequency, are related as shown in Figure 10. The favourable times for coil
current and the
controlled switch states, as shown in Figures 10(a) and 10(b), are
substantially the same as
for low frequency operation; however, at a high frequency, the Te is much
shorter, and
thus the current rise time (tr) and fall time (t/) occupying up to a V2 of Te,
as shown in
Figure 10(c). As the switch controller 800 is operating at a higher frequency
than for the
waveforms in Figure 9, the waveforms in Figure 10 show the coil current maxima
and
minima being limited by the rise (tr) and fall (U) times. Figure 10(d) shows
the
instantaneous power of the electrical input (Pe) which has a triangle waveform
and
occupies about 1/4 of Te. Figure 10(e) shows the waveform of the torque
developed due to
the coil current. The torque is maximum at Point B. Figure 10(f) shows the
instantaneous
power of the mechanical output (Pm) which occupies about %2 of Te.
As shown in Figure 10(c), at the high operating frequency, the coil current-
rising at a rate
limited by the installed characteristics of the driven motor, including
inductance and
resistance-only increases from its minimum to its maximum after at least a
quarter of the
period Te, and similarly only decreases from its maximum to its minimum after
at least a
second quarter of the period Te, after which time the period for "favourable"
existence of
coil current, as shown in Figure 10(a) is passed: the duration of the switch
being in the ON
state is therefore selected to be substantially a quarter of a period to allow
for the coil
current to reduce to its minimum (i.e., zero in Figure 10(c)) before the time
for
"unfavourable" current, in the second half of the period Te is begun while
still keeping the
coil current on for as long as possible. In this way, the pole corresponding
to the coil will
not generate any substantial magnetic field that generates a force opposing
the preferred
motion of the driven motor, i.e., a form of "magnetic interference force".
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-19-
For an example electrical H-bridge controller 1100, each coil, MC1, MC1*,...,
MCn,
MCn*, is driven by an H-bridge circuit 1200, 1200*, shown in Figure 11. The H-
bridge
circuit 1200, including four switches 1202 (Si, S2, S3 and S4) allows current
from the
mono-polar DC source 802 (supplying +Vdc) to pass through to the coil in
either direction,
as shown in Figure 12.
The electrical input waveforms and the mechanical output waveforms for each
coil of an
example driven motor, driven by the H-bridge controller 1100 and operating at
a low
frequency, are related as shown in Figure 13. Figure 13(a) shows the waveform
of an ideal
coil current where it is positive during the first half of Te and is negative
(or reverse)
during the second half of Te. Figure 13(b) shows the four switch states
waveforms where:
Si and S4 form a pair of switches allowing positive current to pass through
the coil (Si
and S4 are turned ON at Point A, then Si is turned OFF at Point B and S4 is
turned OFF at
Point C); and S3 and S2 form a pair of switches allowing negative current to
pass through
the coil (S3 and S2 are turned ON at Point C, then S3 is turned OFF at Point D
and S2 is
turned OFF at Point E). Figure 13(c) shows the coil current waveform where the
current is
generally positive between Points A and C and is negative between Points C to
E. Figure
13(d) shows the instantaneous power of the electrical input (Pe) where power
is drawn
from the source from Point A to Point B, and from Point C to Point D. Figure
13(e) shows
the waveform of the torque developed due to the coil current. The maximum
torque is at
Points B and D. Figure 13(f) shows the instantaneous power of the mechanical
output
(Pm).
The electrical input waveforms and the mechanical output waveforms for each
coil of an
example driven motor, with the H-bridge controller 1100 and operating at a
high
frequency, are related as shown in Figure 14. The ideal coil current timings,
as shown in
Figure 14(a), and switch timings, as shown in Figure 14(b), relative to Te are
the same as
for the low frequency operation; however, the coil current is only just
positive between
Points A and C and is only just negative between Points C to E, as shown in
Figure 14(c).
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-20-
As the H-bridge controller 1100 is operating at a higher frequency than for
the waveforms
in Figure 13, the waveforms in Figure 14 show the coil current maxima and
minima being
limited by the rise (tr) and fall (tf) times. The preferred time to have each
H-bridge circuit
1200 turned ON (i.e., conducting current) is thus about '/4 Te at the maximum
operating
frequency. Figure 14(d) shows the instantaneous power of the electrical input
(Pe) where
power is drawn from the source from Point A to Point B and from Point C to
Point D.
Figure 14(e) shows the waveform of the torque developed due to the coil
current. The
maximum torque is at Points B and D. Figure 14(f) shows the instantaneous
power of the
mechanical output (Pm).
For an example electrical half-bridge controller 1500, each coil, MC1,
MC1*,..., MCn,
MCn*, is driven by a half-bridge circuit 1600, 1600*, as shown in Figure 15.
The half-
bridge circuit 1600, including two switches 1602 (S I and S2), allows current
from a bi-
polar DC source 802 (supplying both +Vdc and -Vdc) to pass through the
respective coil
in either direction, as shown in Figure 16. Each coil, MCI, MCI*,..., MCn,
MCn*, is
connected between its respective half-bridge 1600, 1600* and electrical
ground.
The electrical input waveforms and mechanical output waveforms for each coil
of an
example driven motor, driven by the half-bridge controller 1600 and operating
at a low
frequency, are related as shown in Figure 17. Figure 17(a) shows the waveform
of an ideal
coil current where it is positive during the first half of Te and is negative
(or reverse)
during the second half of Te. Figure 17(b) shows the two switch state
waveforms where:
switch Si allows positive current to pass through the coil (Si is turned ON at
Point A, then
it is turned OFF at Point B); and switch S2 allows negative current to pass
through the coil
(S2 is turned ON at Point C, then it is turned OFF at Point D). Each switch is
ON for '/4 of
each period. Figure 17(c) shows the coil current waveform where the current is
positive
between points A and C and is negative between points C to F. Figure 17(d)
shows the
instantaneous power of the electrical input (Pe) where power is drawn from the
source
from Point A to Point B and from Point C to Point D. Figure 17(e) shows the
waveform of
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-21-
the torque developed due to the coil current. The maximum torque is at points
B and D.
Figure 17(f) shows the instantaneous power of the mechanical output (Pm).
The electrical input waveforms and mechanical output waveforms for each coil
of an
example driven motor, driven by the half-bridge controller 1600 and operating
at a high
frequency, are related as shown in Figure 18. The ideal current and switch
timings are the
same relative to the Te as for the low-frequency operation, as shown in
Figures 18(a) and
18(b). Figure 18(c) shows the coil current waveform where the current is
positive between
Point A and Point C and is negative between Point C and Point E. As the half-
bridge
controller 1600 is operating at a higher frequency than for the waveforms in
Figure 17, the
waveforms in Figure 18 show the coil current maxima and minima being limited
by the
rise (tr) and fall (tf) times. For operation at the maximum frequency of the
motor, the
preferred time to have each switch Si, S2 turned ON is thus about '/4 Te, as
shown in
Figure 18. Figure 18(d) shows the instantaneous power of the electrical input
(Pe) where
power is drawn from the source from Point A to Point B and from Point C to
Point D.
Figure 18(e) shows the waveform of the torque developed due to the coil
current. The
maximum torque is at points B and D. Figure 18(f) shows the instantaneous
power of the
mechanical output (Pm).
Preferably, the controller (such as the switch controller 800, the H-bridge
controller 1100,
or the half-bridge controller 1500), including its controller circuit, is
configured to provide
(or "inject") electrical current into each coil individually by including a
switch (such as the
single switch, the H-bridge switch or the half-bridge switch) for each coil,
and by
providing the electrical current from a power source (such as a direct current
DC source) to
the coils in parallel. Powering the coils in parallel rather than in series
allows for a greater
flow of electrical current in each coil because the electrical resistance of
only one coil is
experienced by the voltage of the DC source (rather than the electrical
resistance of a
plurality of coils for coils in series). Higher current in the coils (within
performance limits
of the coil conductors) produces higher electromagnetic forces in the electric
machine.
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-22-
An electric machine can be a multi-part machine, which includes a plurality of
moving
magnetic parts, equivalent to a plurality of individual electric machines with
shared
mechanical parts. For example, a multi-part machine can include: a first
electric machine
and a second electric machine with the same numbers of poles on their
respective parts,
sharing a common drive shaft. The poles of the first electric machine are
preferably offset
from the poles of the second electric machine so as to further reduce magnetic
interference
forces. For example, having rotors on the same shaft with offset poles, can
reduce
magnetic interference forces, such as cogging torque, by cancelling out the
magnetic
interference forces at positions where the force on one of the individual
machines is non-
zero.
The electric machine can be used in various applications and systems. The
electric
machine is scalable, i.e., it can be made into various sizes and power
ratings. As a rotary
motor, the machine can be incorporated into various appliances, power tools,
electric cars,
etc. As a rotary electric generator it can be used in wind powered electric
generators,
hydro-electric generators, hybrid cars, etc. As a linear electric motor it can
be used, for
example, in electromagnetic railways and magnetic trains.
Example
In a computer simulated prototype, the electric machine is in the form of a
linear machine
where n=4 (similar to a machine as shown in Figure 5A where n=2). The example
machine
includes a stator with 5 poles per segment (there are multiple stator-
segments). The stator
pole width is 35 mm, the stator pole gap width is 35 mm, and the stator gap
depth is 35
mm. The stator body comprises soft magnetic material of silicon steel. The
linear machine
includes a runner with 4 poles per segment (there are two runner-segments in
symmetry).
The runner pole width is 44 mm, the runner gap width is 44 mm, and the runner
gap depth
is 44 mm. The magnetic material of the runner is a low carbon steel. The
runner includes
permanent magnets (PMs) with widths of 35 mm and thicknesses of 10 mm made of
neodymium iron boron. The stator poles include coils of copper wire with 100
turns per
coil. An air gap of 5 mm separates the stator and runner pole faces. The depth
of the
CA 02743366 2011-05-11
WO 2010/054425 PCT/AU2009/001457
-23-
machine, i.e., the depth of the parts transverse the direction of motion and
into the page in
Figure 5A-which is thus the depth of the stator, the runner and the PMs-is 100
mm.
In simulations of the simulated prototype machine, the peak value of non-zero
magnetic
interference forces in the direction of motion was about 26 N. The electrical
input peak
current was about 50 A per coil. The peak value of force produced in the
direction of
motion was about 510 N per energised coil.
Interpretation
Many modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art without
departing from the
scope of the present invention.
The reference in this specification to any prior publication (or information
derived from it),
or to any matter which is known, is not, and should not be taken as an
acknowledgment or
admission or any form of suggestion that that prior publication (or
information derived
from it) or known matter forms part of the common general knowledge in the
field of
endeavour to which this specification relates.
