Language selection

Search

Patent 2751874 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2751874
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR SEQUESTRATION OF FLUIDS IN GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS
(54) French Title: PROCEDE POUR LA SEQUESTRATION DE FLUIDES DANS DES FORMATIONS GEOLOGIQUES
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B65G 05/00 (2006.01)
  • E21F 17/16 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BILAK, ROMAN (Canada)
  • DUSSEAULT, MAURICE B. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • ROMAN BILAK
  • MAURICE B. DUSSEAULT
(71) Applicants :
  • ROMAN BILAK (Canada)
  • MAURICE B. DUSSEAULT (Canada)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2016-05-17
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2010-03-11
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2010-09-16
Examination requested: 2013-11-08
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: 2751874/
(87) International Publication Number: CA2010000316
(85) National Entry: 2011-08-09

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
61/159,335 (United States of America) 2009-03-11
61/173,301 (United States of America) 2009-04-28

Abstracts

English Abstract


A process for geo-sequestration of a water-soluble fluid includes selection of
a target water-laden geological formation
bounded by an upper formation of low permeability, providing an injection well
into the formation and injecting the fluid
into the injection well under conditions of temperature, pressure and density
contrast selected to cause the fluid to enter the
formation and rise within the formation. This generates a density-driven
convection current of formation water which promotes
enhanced mixing of the water-soluble fluid with formation water.


French Abstract

L'invention porte sur un procédé pour la géo-séquestration d'un fluide hydrosoluble comprenant la sélection d'une formation géologique chargée d'eau cible limitée par une formation supérieure de faible perméabilité, la formation d'un puits d'injection dans la formation et l'injection du fluide dans le puits d'injection dans des conditions de température, de pression et de différence de densité choisies pour faire entrer le fluide dans la formation et monter à l'intérieur de la formation. Ceci produit un courant de convection d'eau de formation entraîné par la densité qui favorise un mélange accru du fluide hydrosoluble avec l'eau de formation.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
1. A process for sequestration of a water-soluble gaseous fluid within a
subsurface water-laden formation, comprising:
selecting a target water-laden geological formation;
providing a fluid injection well into said formation comprising at
least one opening to discharge fluid into said formation;
providing a source of said fluid in communication with said injection
well; and
injecting said fluid into said formation from said injection well at a
pressure which is somewhat below the natural fracture pressure of said
formation whereby said fluid enters said formation and rises in a plume that
contains undissolved gas within said formation with sufficient volume, flow
rate
and density contrast between said fluid and water within said formation to
induce a density contrast-driven convection cell within said formation.
2. The process of claim 1, wherein said injecting increases the rate of
diffusive mass transfer or dissolution of said fluid into water within said
formation and flushes additional water substantially laterally into the region
of
said well bore, thereby increasing storage capacity and storage rate of said
fluid
in said formation.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein said fluid comprises at least one
water-soluble gas and at least one water-insoluble gas, said process further
comprising:
providing a withdrawal well in said formation; and
withdrawing said water-insoluble gas from said formation through said
withdrawal well, thereby providing additional volume in said formation for
further sequestration of said water-soluble gas.
4. The process of claim 3 comprising the further step of passing said
water-insoluble gas through a gas turbine after withdrawal thereof from said
formation to generate electricity.
22

5. The process of claim 1 further comprising:
providing a water injection well into said formation; and
injecting water into said formation to produce a cross current of
water within said formation from a region remote from said injection well and
to
further promote said convective mixing of said fluid with said formation
water.
6. The process of claim 1 further comprising providing a plurality of
injection wells located within said formation for generating a plurality of
convection currents within said formation.
7. The process of any one of claims 1to 6 further comprising the step
of injecting additional water into said formation to induce flux of fluid-
unsaturated water into said formation in the region of said injection well.
8. The process of any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein said injection well
is a substantially vertical injection well, a horizontal injection well or a
deviated
well.
9. The process of claim 7 or claim 8 wherein said injection well defines
a path for promoting said convective mixing in said formation.
10. The process of any one of claims 1 to 9 further comprising
determining optimal placement of at least one opening in said injection well
with
respect to the configuration of said formation for improving said convection
current, thereby further promoting enhanced mixing of said water-soluble fluid
with said formation water.
11. The process of any one of claims 1 to 10 wherein said formation
has an intrinsic permeability of at least 300 mD in the vertical direction.
12. The process of any one of claim 1 to 11 wherein said formation has
a porosity exceeding 15% with the formation water being saline water.
23

13. The process of any one of claim 1 to 12 wherein one or more of the
following parameters are assessed and/or manipulated individually or
collectively
to enhance said convective mixing of said fluid:
a) composition of said fluid to be injected into said formation;
b) placement of said fluid injection well in said formation;
c) temperature of said fluid to be injected into said formation
d) rate of injection of said fluid into said formation;
e) injection pressure of said fluid into said formation;
f) numbers of said injection wells placed in said formation;
g) locations and profiles of said injection wells in said formation;
h) pH of water in said formation;
i) salinity of water in said formation;
density of water in said formation;
k) volume of said injected fluid;
l) partial pressure of said injected fluid in water in said formation; and
m) density of said fluid
14. The process of any one of claims 1 to 13 wherein said fluid
comprises flue gas.
15. The process of claim 14 further comprising the step of enriching the
concentration of carbon dioxide within said flue gas prior to injection into
said
formation.
16. The process of any one of claims 1 to 13 wherein said fluid
comprises one or of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, methane, NOx or hydrogen
sulfide.
17. The process of Claim1 wherein said induced convection cell
comprises displacement of water in the formation by the said lower density
plume, higher density formation water flowing downwards in said formation, and
lower density formation water flowing laterally or vertically to replace the
higher
density water that flows downward in said formation, said convection cell
24

sufficient to enhance convective mixing of said fluid and said water, relative
to
fluid injected under conditions which do not induce a convection cell, and
said
convection cell can bring water from remote regions of the formation to the
region of the injection well to further enhance convective mixing of said
fluid and
said water.
18. A process for sequestration of a water-soluble gaseous fluid within
a
water-laden formation comprising:
providing a computer programmed with a computer program stored on a
computer readable medium, said program comprising a representation of a
known geological formation, and at least one fluid injection well, said
computer
program provided with means to vary one or more parameters selected from the
group consisting of:
a) composition of said fluid to be injected into said formation;
b) placement of said fluid injection well in said formation;
c) temperature of said fluid to be injected into said formation
d) rate of injection of said fluid into said formation;
e) injection pressure of said fluid into said formation;
f) numbers of said injection wells placed in said formation;
g) locations and profiles of said injection wells in said formation;
h) pH of water in said formation;
i) salinity of water in said formation;
j) density of water in said formation;
k) volume of said injected fluid;
l) partial pressure of said injected fluid in water in said formation; and
m) density of said fluid;
wherein said computer program is configured to calculate properties
of a convection cell generated in said formation based on dispersion of fluids
in
said formation, said dispersion of fluids influenced by said one or more
parameters;
inputting into said computer some or all of said parameters a
through m;

manipulating said one or more parameters to model an effective
convection cell;
replicating said one or more parameters with components of an
injection well system at the site of said formation and thereby generating at
least one density-driven convection current within said formation wherein said
convection cell is generated by injecting said fluid into said formation from
said
injection well at a pressure which is somewhat below the natural fracture
pressure of said formation to cause said fluid to enter said formation and
rise in
a plume that contains undissolved gas within said formation with sufficient
volume, flow rate and density contrast between said fluid and water within
said
formation to induce a density contrast-driven convection cell comprising water
of
lower density rising vertically and higher density flowing laterally to
replace the
lower density water that flows vertically, said convection cell bringing water
from
remote regions of the formation to the region of the injection well, said
convection cell sufficient to enhance convective mixing of said fluid and said
water, relative to fluid injected under conditions which do not induce a
convection cell; and
sequestering said water-soluble fluid using said injection well
system.
19. The process of claim 18 wherein said computer program is further
provided with means to simulate varying of placement of a plurality of fluid
injection wells in said formation.
20. The process of claim 18 or claim 19 wherein said computer program
is further provided with means to simulate varying of placement of one or more
fluid withdrawal wells in said formation.
21. The process of claim 18 or claim 19 wherein said computer program
is further provided with means to simulate varying of placement of one or more
water injection wells in said formation.
26

22. The process of any one of claims 1 to 21 wherein said water-soluble
fluid comprises a gas that is not in a supercritical form.
23. The process of any one of claims 1 to 21 wherein said water-soluble
fluid comprises a gas that is in a supercritical form.
24. The process of any one of claims 1-23 wherein said fluid is injected
into the formation at a temperature which is higher than the ambient
temperature of the formation water.
25. The process of any one of claims 1-24 wherein the formation has a
natural dip of up to 20°.
26. The process of any one of claims 1-25 wherein the fluid is injected
into the formation into a location close to the base of the formation.
27

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02751874 2015-07-14
PROCESS FOR SEQUESTRATION OF FLUIDS IN GEOLOGICAL
FORMATIONS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to subsurface sequestration of fluids,
and in particular to the sequestration of water-soluble gases such as CO2 and
other greenhouse gases in water-laden geological formations.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] This invention claims priority to United States Patent Application
Nos. 61/159,335 filed on March 11, 2009 and 61/173,301 filed on April 28,
2009.
[0003] Human activities have an impact upon the levels of greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere, which in turn is believed to affect the world's
climate.
Changes in atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases have the effect of
altering the energy balance of the climate system and increases in
anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations are likely to have caused most of
the increases in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century.
Earth's
most abundant greenhouse gases include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous
oxide, ozone and chlorofluorocarbons. The most abundantly-produced of these
by human industrial activity is CO2.
[0004] Various strategies have been conceived for permanent storage of
CO2. These forms include sequestration of gases in various deep geological
formations (including saline aquifers and exhausted gas fields), liquid
storage in
the ocean, and solid storage by reaction of CO2 with metal oxides to produce
stable carbonates.
[0005] In a process known as geo-sequestration, CO2, generally in
supercritical (SC) form, is injected directly into underground geological
1

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
formations. Oil fields, gas fields, saline aquifers, un-minable coal seams,
and
saline-filled basalt formations have been suggested as storage sites. Various
physical (e.g., highly impermeable cap-rock), solubility and geochemical
trapping mechanisms are generally expected to prevent the CO2 from escaping
to the surface. Geo-sequestration can also be performed for other suitable
gases.
[0006] Saline aquifers contain highly mineralized brines, and have so far
been considered of little benefit to humans. Saline aquifers have been used
for
storage of chemical waste in a few cases, and attempts have been made to use
such aquifers to sequester CO2. The main advantage of saline aquifers is their
large potential storage volume and their common occurrence. One disadvantage
of any practical use of saline aquifers for this purpose is that relatively
little is
known about them. Leakage of CO2 back into the atmosphere may be a problem
in saline aquifer storage. However, current research shows that several
trapping
mechanisms immobilize the CO2 underground, reducing the risk of leakage.
[0007] The densest concentration of CO2 that can be placed in a porous
formation such as a saline aquifer is when CO2 is in a supercritical state -
referred to herein as SC-0O2. Most sequestration schemes are based on
injection of SC-0O2 in this supercritical state when the material behaves as a
relatively dense compressible liquid with an extremely low viscosity, far
lower
than any formation liquid. The object is to displace most or all of the water
in
the saline aquifer, replacing 100% or some fraction of the porosity with SC-
COB.
[0008] In a prominent example of such a geo-sequestration strategy, the
Sleipner project, operated by the Norwegian oil and gas company StatoilHydro,
separates CO2 (4 to 9.5 % in content) from the natural gas recovered from a
nearby gas well. The separated CO2 is converted to the supercritical (SC- CO2)
form and injected into a salt water-containing sand layer, called the Utsira
Formation, which lies 1000 m below the sea bottom. Several seismic surveys
have been undertaken to investigate whether the storage of CO2 remains secure.
2

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
[0009] Injection of gaseous CO2 (i.e. not in supercritical form) into a
subsurface formation in solution with water at the maximum solubility limit is
a
desirable approach to sequestration of this gas that has been proposed with
mixed success in the past. Prior to the present invention, a problem of
sequestering of CO2 by dissolution in an aqueous solution within geological
formations has been that the porous volume of the formation is occupied far
less
efficiently than the occupation which occurs upon injection of SC-0O2. Once
the
active injection phase is completed, there is no more active mixing within the
porous medium. Thereafter, the dissolution of the CO2 within the formation
water is controlled by the concentration differences, the contact area, and
the
diffusion path length. Mass transfer rates associated with such concentration
gradient-driven diffusion processes in porous media are slow and it is
expected
that thousands of years may be required to approach full dissolution of the
CO2
in the aqueous phase within the geological formation.
[0010] The "reduced-mixing, long-term concentration gradient diffusion"
problem persists even with injection of SC-0O2. At the high injection rates
proposed for SC-0O2 sequestration, the SC-0O2 will first displace water and
occupy the pore space directly, with only a small amount of convective and
dispersive-occurring mixing at the displacement fronts. As SC-0O2 is injected
over time, a growing area of contact is generated between the two fluids and a
dissolution zone is generated. The SC-0O2 then becomes dissolved into the
saline water along this contact area, largely as the result of diffusion and
dispersion associated with forced advection caused by pressure driven flow
(from
injection of the SC-0O2 under pressure).
[0011] Because of the density difference between saline water and SC-0O2,
there are also gravitational forces that will tend to segregate the liquids in
the
saline aquifer: the SC-0O2 will rise above the denser water, forming a
"pancake"
under zones that are finer-grained with poorer permeability (shale streaks,
siltstones, etc.). This not only suppresses part of the mixing component that
would arise in a more uniform displacement, it also leads to a significant
inefficiency in the access to the pore volumes in the formation: portions of
the
3

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
formation remote from the injection point are largely inaccessible to any
storage
mechanism (displacement by or dissolving of CO2 into solution).
[0012] Once the injection ceases, only a small fraction of the SC-0O2 has
gone into solution because of the mixing and diffusive effects at the displace-
ment fronts, and because the advective driving force (injection pressure)
ceases.
The CO2 can no longer be advectively mixed with the water, and this leaves
only
diffusion effects that are driven solely by concentration gradients of CO2 in
the
water.
[0013] In a saline aquifer formation, after injection, the SC-0O2 remains
high in the zone above the injection site due to its lesser density. This
density-
graded system provides a stabilizing force that further reduces the rate of
any
diffusion process. Initially, the diffusion front is relatively narrow and
distinct
with large surface area between the CO2 and water and the solution process
happens relatively efficiently. But over time this front grows and widens
vertically. As a result, the front becomes less distinct. This produces a
thicker
diffusion or transition zone with less surface area between the CO2 and water
that has a low CO2 concentration (i.e. the transition-dissolution-contact area
between the SC-0O2 and the formation water becomes enriched with CO2. The
vertical distance between water from remote regions of the formation and SC-
CO2 grows as CO2-unsaturated water is further away from the SC-0O2. Hence
the diffusion/solution process slows considerably. As a result it can take
many
thousands of years for CO2 to enter into solution, since in situ movement of
water at remote regions of the formation (to facilitate the CO2 in solution
with
water process) is very slow. At this stage, there is no convective mixing
between
the SC-0O2 and the formation water due to the density graded system,
[0014] Density graded systems in porous media are extremely stable over
long times. Once active mixing ceases, it will take thousands of years for SC-
0O2
to become dissolved in the water phase under typical sequestration conditions.
There is simply no mechanism to bring "new water" into contact with the SC-
CO2, and the process becomes totally dominated by slow diffusion.
4

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0015] Although the safe and permanent disposal of CO2 represents an
important challenge, as referred to in detail above, long-term disposal of
other
water-soluble gases and fluids also presents similar challenges, to address
the
greenhouse effect as well as other needs. The present invention thus relates
to
the (essentially) permanent disposal of a wide variety of water-soluble
fluids, by
providing processes and systems for mixing and dispersing of such fluids
within
a water-laden geological formation such as a saline aquifer to improve
sequestration conditions.
[0016] Objects of the present invention include:
a) To provide a method for geo-sequestration of water-soluble
fluids, in particular but not limited to gases, by injection of the fluid into
a water-
laden formation in a manner which improves the mixing of the fluid with
formation water to improve the dissolution of the fluid, through the
generation of
in situ convection currents or convection cells.
b) To increase the volumetric extent of the dissolution process
in the geological formation, thereby improving the storage capacity for water-
soluble fluids (such as CO2) within the formation.
c) To provide a process to enhance both the separation of
water-soluble gases from a mixture of soluble and insoluble gases and the
sequestration of the soluble gases in a geological formation, and to withdraw
the
insoluble gas from the geological formation to preserve the volume of the
geological formation available to accommodate dissolved soluble gas.
d) To provide a method for determining conditions for
sequestration of a water-soluble fluid in a geological formation using a
computer
model of the formation and computer simulations of injection of fluids.
e) To provide an alternative method for enhanced sequestration
of water-soluble gases in geological formations which does not require pre-
injection separation of gases nor conversion of the injected gases to a
supercritical form.

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
[0017] In one aspect of the invention, there is provided a process for
sequestration of a water-soluble fluid by injection of the fluid from an
injection
well into a water-laden geological formation under conditions of temperature
and/or pressure selected to cause the fluid to enter and disperse within the
formation with sufficient volume, pressure, and density-contrast with the
formation water to generate a convection current or convection cell within the
formation. A target geological formation comprising an aquifer .is selected
which
is bounded above and optionally also below by layers of low permeability for
containing the water bearing formation in a stable state. The said low
permeability layer can be located either directly above or below the aquifer
or
separated from the aquifer by one or more layers. The injection well extends
into the target formation. The fluid is pressurized and/or heated, and
introduced
into the formation from the injection well so as to generate one or more
convection cells and thereby to enhance dispersal, dissolution and
sequestration
of the fluid, or a water-soluble fraction thereof, within a large region in
the
formation.
[0018] According to this aspect, initial movement of the fluid in the
formation is expected to occur as a low-density displacement front moving
outwardly in the formation as the fluid percolates through the formation. In
the
case of a gas, the gas may disperse initially as bubbles or pockets of
undissolved
gas. This displacement front will displace water within the pore spaces of the
formation which is then driven to flow outwards and away from the percolation
area. This associated water flow contributes to the development of in situ
convention cells or convection currents. The injected fluid will subsequently
develop into a low density plume that spreads laterally as well as moving
vertically upwardly through the formation. This plume is a region of lower
density than the water within adjacent parts of the formation where the
injected
fluid is not present. A lateral contrast in the average fluid density is thus
generated. This process induces a density contrast-driven convective flow
cell.
Hence, a density-driven flow cell is generated wherein the region of lower
density fluid (such as water which is heated and/or contains undissolved gas)
rises vertically because it is less dense than the adjacent formation water.
This
6

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
more dense water then flows laterally to replace the lower density fluid that
flows vertically, sustaining a large-scale convection cell.
[0019] The density contrast driven convection process described herein
enhances mixing of the water-soluble fluid with formation water as the
convection current develops in the formation and enhances the mixing between
the injected fluid and the formation water. The undissolved soluble fluid
enters
into solution, and fresh, fluid-unsaturated water from remote regions of the
formation is brought into contact with additional undissolved soluble fluid.
[0020] In one embodiment, CO2 (usually combined with other gas) is
injected under suitable conditions as described above into a formation that
contains water which is unsaturated with CO2. Unsaturated water from remote
regions in the formation then moves into the region of the injection well as
the
result of the action of the large convection cell, and replaces local (in the
vicinity
of the injection well) CO2-rich water with CO2-free water, which can strip the
CO2
out of the injected gas more efficiently. Furthermore, the large-scale
convection
cell not only increases the diffusive mass transfer of CO2 into solution, it
also
acts to bring remote CO2-free water into the injection well bore region,
thereby
increasing the effective volume in the formation that can be accessed through
one injection well as a result of this flushing action. Thus the density-
driven
convection process provides rapid mass transfer of CO2 into solution and
enhanced storage capacity for geo-sequestration.
[0021] The consequences of implementing this density-driven convection
process are that the short-term storage capacity of the formation increases
and
the long-term capacity also increases through access to lateral water flux
with
maximized mixing.
[0022] The process may comprise injecting a fluid consisting of a mixture
of water-soluble and insoluble gases. In this aspect, a withdrawal well is
provided, which is in fluid communication with the aquifer or in communication
with an insoluble gas pocket in the formation, for withdrawal of the
insoluble,
non-sequestered gas. The water-insoluble gas is withdrawn from the formation
7

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
with the withdrawal well, thereby providing additional volume in the formation
for further sequestration of the water-soluble liquid or gas.
[0023] The process may further include providing one or more water
injection wells into the formation and injecting water into the formation,
thereby
producing a cross current of water within the formation originating from a
region
remote from the injection well. This water injection process further enhances
the
convective current/cell process and water flux in the formation.
[0024] According to another aspect, a plurality of fluid injection wells
may
be provided to generate a plurality of convection currents in the formation,
thereby providing enhanced mixing of the water-soluble liquid or gas in the
formation. The configuration of the wells can be designed to promote the
development of sustained convention currents in the formation. The injection
wells may be horizontal injection wells, vertical injection wells or deviated
wells.
In some embodiments, the injection well defines a path that substantially
intersects the formation vertically, horizontally or at a deviated angle from
the
vertical.
[0026] In some embodiments, the process further includes determining
appropriate placement of one or more openings in the injection well for
discharge of fluid, such that the openings are spaced sufficiently below the
upper
face of the formation to generate a convection current so as to promote
enhanced mixing of the water-soluble fluid with formation water.
[0026] In some embodiments, the injected fluid is flue gas. As used
herein,
the term "flue gas" refers to gas produced by an industrial combustion such as
a
fireplace, oven, furnace, boiler or steam generator, or a recovery process
(such
as recovery of natural gas from a well). Such gases typically exit to the
atmosphere via a flue. The term "flue gas" encompasses combustion exhaust
gas produced at fossil fuel or biomass-burning burning power plants. The
composition of flue gas depends on what is being burned, but it will usually
consist of mostly nitrogen derived from the combustion air, CO2 and water
vapor
as well as excess 02 (also derived from the combustion air). Flue gas may
8

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
further contain methane (CH4), carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide, nitrous
oxides and sulfur oxides, as well as particulates.
[0027] In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a process for
determining conditions for sequestration of a water-soluble fluid. The process
employs computer modeling of structure and conditions of a known water-laden
formation. Computer modeling programs for simulating formations are known in
the art. The skilled person will have the knowledge to modify an existing
program or to develop a new program using routine methodology for simulating
water-laden formations as well as the components and conditions employed in
performing the processes described herein. In accordance with this aspect of
the
invention, a computer program stored on a computer readable medium is
provided which includes a representation of a known formation and a fluid
injection well. The computer program is provided with means to vary one or
more of the following parameters: placement of the fluid injection well(s) in
the
formation, partial pressure of gas in the formation, rate of injection of
fluid into
the formation, numbers of injection wells placed in the formation, pH of water
in
the formation, salinity of water in the formation, and density of water in the
formation. The computer program is configured to calculate properties of a
convection cell generated in the formation based on dispersion of fluids in
the
formation which is influenced by one or more of the parameters. A report is
then
produced which provides recommended well patterns and injection conditions
and, optionally, sequestration conditions within the formation. The
sequestration
conditions include the parameters used in determining the properties of the
convection cell which is generated when the recommended conditions are
adhered to.
[0028] In some embodiments, the computer program is further provided
with means to simulate the varying of placement of a plurality of fluid
injection
wells, gas withdrawal wells, and/or water injection wells in the formation.
[0029] The process for determining conditions for sequestration of a water-
soluble fluid described above may then be put into practice by configuring one
or
more injection wells and, optionally, one or more withdrawal wells and/or
water
9

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
injection wells for appropriate placement within the formation according to
the
parameters used to produce the convection cell in the computer simulation.
[0030] The term "gas" as used herein, unless a different meaning is
expressed or implied, means either a gas or combination of gases. Similarly,
"liquid" means either a liquid or combination of liquids, unless a different
meaning is expressed or implied.
[0031] The term "fluid" as used herein, unless a different meaning is
expressed or implied, means: a) a water-soluble liquid; b) a water-soluble
gas;
c) a combination of water-soluble liquids; d) a combination of water-soluble
and
insoluble liquids; d) a combination of water-soluble gases; or e) a
combination of
water-soluble gas and water-insoluble gas. Said liquid or gas may comprise
multiple types of liquids or gases. The fluid has a lower density than the
water
present in the formation to facilitate the generation of a convection current
or
convection cell.
[0032] As used herein, the term "insoluble" is not meant as an absolute
term, but as a relative term which means "poorly soluble" or substantially
less
soluble than a substance recognized by one with skill in the art as "soluble."
[0033] As used herein, the terms "formation" or "water-laden formation"
refer to a subsurface layer of water-bearing permeable rock or unconsolidated
materials such as gravel, sand, silt, or clay, that contains sufficient water
within
its pores to permit generation of a convection current therein. A saline
aquifer
is a non-limiting example of a geological formation suitable for the processes
disclosed herein. The related term "target formation" refers to the formation
selected for injection of liquids or gases for sequestration.
[0034] As used herein, the term "formation water" or "water" refers to
water present within the formation. The formation water may be present in the
formation as a bulk water phase or may be segregated in pockets or droplets
within a geological matrix of gravel sand, silt, or clay. The water may be
saline
or laden with other dissolved substances.

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
[0035] As used herein, the terms "low permeability" means less than about
100 millidarcy (mD) and the term "high permeability" means greater than about
300 rnD.
[0036] As used herein, references to CO2 and other liquids or gases refer
to
such fluids in purified, supercritical (in the case of gases) or impure forms.
[0037] These and other advantages of the invention will become apparent
upon reading the following detailed description and upon referring to the
drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0038] FIGURE 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a geological
formation with a single horizontal injection well and two horizontal
withdrawal
wells showing the directions of the convection currents produced by gas
injection, and also showing a source of flue gas and components for processing
the gas prior to injection. Cross currents are also shown.
[0039] FIGURE 2 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a geological
formation with three horizontal injection wells and four vertical withdrawal
wells
showing the directions of the convection currents produced by gas injection.
Cross currents are also shown.
(0040] FIGURE 3 is a schematic cross sectional view of an inclined
formation with a single horizontal injection well and a single withdrawal well
showing the direction of a convection current produced by gas injection. Cross
currents are also shown.
[0041] FIGURE 4 is a schematic representation of a gas sequestration
array showing a single injection well, two withdrawal wells and two water
injection wells. Gas pockets within the formation are also shown.
11

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0042] In the following description of embodiments, similar features are
referred to with similar reference numerals.
[0043] Figure 1 shows one embodiment of the process for injection of flue
gas to sequester the greenhouse gas components thereof. It will be understood
that similar processes may be used to sequester other fluids. Figure 1
illustrates
a schematic cross-sectional view of a subsurface formation 10 located deep
beneath ground surface 5. The formation 10 consists of a deeply buried high
permeability saline aquifer. The formation is bounded at its upper margin and,
preferably, lower margin, by upper and lower layers 60 and 80 having low
permeability. Formation 10 may be disposed in various orientations and
configurations, such as a flattened generally horizontal orientation, or a
sloping
or other configuration (for example, see Figure 3). Formation 10 should have a
region with sufficient top to bottom spacing to permit the generation of
convection currents within the formation water, as will be described in more
detail herein. It is believed that formation 10 should have a region with a
minimum vertical spacing of about 25 to 30 meters. The term "spacing" refers
to the distance "y" shown in Figure 1, that is, the vertical distance between
upper and lower margins of the formation. This region with a vertical spacing
of
at least y should also extend horizontally for a distance of at least about
1000
meters. Injection well 12 has at least one discharge opening 13 within this
region. The range of vertical spacing y may depend upon other factors such as
the pressure and the temperature of the gases emanating from the discharge
opening 13 of injection well 12. However, the inventors do not wish to be
bound
by theory and it is contemplated that under suitable conditions an aquifer
with a
lesser vertical spacing, or wherein the region with this minimum vertical
spacing
extends horizontally to a lesser extent than the above, may be used for the
present invention.
[0044] A source 25 of gas is provided, in which the gas normally consists
of a mixture of gases. In the case of flue gas (raw or CO2 enriched), the gas
12

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
normally consists of a mixture of water-soluble and insoluble gases (such as
nitrogen). In the described example, source 25 comprises a source of flue gas,
such as a fossil-fuel burning power plant or other facility. It will be
apparent
that essentially any stationary source of gas may serve as the source. The gas
mixture includes a water-soluble gas 16 and a water-insoluble gas 18.
Preferably, the water-soluble gas is either a greenhouse gas or other
pollutant.
More preferably, the water-soluble gas is one or more of the following: CO2,
NON,
or hydrogen sulfide. Most preferably, the greenhouse gas is CO2. Preferably,
the water-insoluble gas is nitrogen or methane. Source 25 may be located close
to or above formation 10 or at some remove therefrom, such that the gas is
piped to an injection site 40. The raw gas may derive from multiple sources,
for
example several fuel-burning facilities, wherein raw gases are piped to a
common disposal facility,
[0045] According to another aspect, the soluble gas component may be
enriched by known means, so as to enhance the efficiency of the sequestration
process. Such enrichment may be done at source 25 of the gas or immediately
prior to sequestration.
[0046] One or more gas injection wells 12 extend into formation 10. In
Figure 1, only a single such well is shown. Well 12 is a generally
conventional
high pressure gas injection well, having at least one and preferably multiple
gas
discharge openings 13 within formation 10. Well 12 may comprise any suitable
orientation, but is preferably horizontal within formation 10, with multiple
openings 13 spaced along the horizontal portion.
[0047] In order to provide sufficient pressure, heating and other
conditions of the flue gas, the gas is piped from source 25 to a gas treatment
unit 40 prior to being fed into injection well 12. The gas treatment unit
pressurizes and heats the raw gas and may optionally enrich certain components
of the gas. The conditions of pressure and temperature depend in part on the
conditions within the aquifer including its permeability, formation pressure,
the
salinity of water within the aquifer, as well as the composition of the gas
being
injected.
13

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
[0048] The pressurized and optionally heated gas is fed into injection
well
12 and introduced into the aquifer via openings 13. The gas is injected into
formation 10 with sufficient volume and driving pressure and optionally added
heat to generate one or more convection current cells within the formation
water. It is believed that a convection cell is generated according to the
following mechanism. Injection of the heated gas initially generates a current
within the immediately adjacent formation water. This current develops as a
result of the upward movement of bubbles of undissolved gas formed within the
formation water, and optionally the elevated temperature of the injected gas,
displacing natural formation water from the pore space of the formation. The
gas disperses initially as bubbles or pockets of undissolved gas. The
resulting
movement of the formation water initiates one or more convection currents or
cells 14 within the formation water. Over time, a relatively low density plume
of
formation water develops as the gas becomes dispersed in the formation water
because of horizontal dispersion during vertical flow and the heterogeneity of
the
formation. The gas plume therefore tends to spread laterally as well as moving
vertically. The corresponding movements of the formation water and gas plume
generate one or more convection currents or cells 14 within the formation. As
additional gas is fed into the formation, the resulting plume will continue to
generate convection currents or cells 14 within the formation water in the
region
of the injection well due to density differences between the ambient formation
water and the plume. This current includes a component that flows laterally
and
rises upwardly, as a result of the dispersive movement of the plume of
injected
gas. The dimensions of this current depend at least in part on the dimensions
of
the aquifer including its vertical spacing and the density, driving pressure,
volume or flow rate and temperature of the injected gas. The soluble gas 16
dissolves into the formation water, facilitated by the enhanced mixing action
caused by the said convection cells/currents. The water-insoluble gas 18
separates out due to its insolubility, and rises to accumulate in a gas cap or
pocket 20 which is usually located immediately beneath the upper low
permeability formation 60.
14

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
[0049] At least one and preferably a plurality of withdrawal wells 22 are
provided. The withdrawal well(s) 22 are employed to vent the water-insoluble
gas 18 out of the formation 10, thereby providing additional volume in the
formation 10 for further sequestration of the water-soluble gas 16. The
withdrawal wells 22 extend into the formation 10, at least into an upper
portion
thereof. These wells include inlet openings 23 located within the formation
10,
at locations where the gas caps or pockets are expected to accumulate. The
withdrawal well(s) 22 may provide a conduit to a surface installation SO where
the insoluble gas may be either vented to the atmosphere, if for example the
insoluble gas is nitrogen or into a gas treatment or capture facility, if for
example the insoluble gas represents a useful product such as methane.
[0050] The venting process may rely on the internal pressure within the
gas pocket to vent the gas, or alternatively the accumulated gas may be
pumped in order to more rapidly and thoroughly withdraw the insoluble gases
from the formation 10. Preferably, a portion of withdrawal well 22 is
horizontal
to permit it to extend through an extended region of a gas pocket 20.
[0051] The venting process may be designed to extract some of the energy
present in the compressed insoluble gases by passing high-pressure vented
gases through a gas turbine to generate electricity, after such gasses have
vented from the gas pocket.
[0052] Shown in Figure 2, in another embodiment of the process is a
schematic cross-sectional view of a geological formation 10 with multiple
horizontal injection well openings and multiple withdrawal wells 22 showing
the
directions of convection currents 14 produced by gas injection. Also shown are
cross currents 24 which are influenced by the development of the convection
currents 14. As described in the embodiment of Figure 1, water-soluble gas 16
becomes dispersed within formation 10 as a plume of lower density fluid and
generates a convection current 14 while water-insoluble gas 18 rises toward a
gas pocket 20. Cross currents 24 provide additional mixing between water-
soluble gas 16 and the formation water. Also as described above, four
withdrawal wells 22 are employed to draw the water-insoluble gases out of the

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
formation 10, thereby providing additional volume in the formation 10 for
further sequestration of the water-soluble gas 16.
[0053] The large-scale convection cell acts to bring remote water to the
injection well bore region via a "cross-current" 24 increasing the effective
volume in formation 10 that can be accessed through one injection well by
"flushing" the lateral water into the well bore region.
[0054] Shown in Figure 3, in another embodiment of the process, is a
schematic cross sectional view of an inclined formation 10 indicating a
horizontal
injection well 12 and a withdrawal well 22 showing the direction of a
convection
current 14 produced by gas injection. As described above, water-soluble gas 16
becomes dispersed within the formation as a plume of lower density fluid and
generates a convection current 14 while water-insoluble gas 18 rises toward
gas
pocket 20. Cross currents 24 are shown moving through the formation 10
towards the gas pocket 20.
[0055] Shown in Figure 4, in another embodiment of the process, is a
schematic representation of a gas sequestration array disposed in a formation
showing a gas injection well 12 for injection of a gas mixture 35, withdrawal
wells 22 and water injection wells 26 for injection of water. The gas outlet
region of gas injection well 12 is placed near the lower boundary of the
formation 10. Each withdrawal well 22 extends into gas pockets 20 within the
formation 10 for withdrawal of insoluble gas 18 contained therein, which has
separated from the injected gas mixture 35 by differential solubility of the
respective components of the mixture 35. Additional water 28 can be injected
into the formation via one or more water injection wells 26. This added water
can then flow into the matrix of formation 10 as indicated by arrows 32 to
bring
additional water into the formation 10 and promote mixing of gas mixture 35 in
formation 10.
16

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
Example 1: Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide in a Saline Aquifer by
Density Driven Convection
[0056] In this example, the gas mixture being injected includes CO2,
which
is highly soluble in water, along with other gases which are less soluble in
water
under the conditions of temperature, pressure, pH, and salinity within the
formation. The gas mixture is injected at a high rate into a location close to
the
base of the formation. The formation has considerable vertical extent, or a
dip
which provides a vertical extent of about 20 m. For example, not excluding
other possible cases that may be acceptable, a desirable saline formation
would
be located over 1000 m deep within the strata and of great lateral extent. It
would have an intrinsic permeability of at least 1 Darcy in the vertical
direction.
The formation would have a porosity exceeding 15% with the pore fluid being
saline water. It is considered more desirable if the formation has a natural
dip
(inclination) of up to 20 . It is advantageous if the formation is bounded by
an
upper formation of rocks of low permeability to the mobile phases involved in
the sequestration process, including gases and water.
[0057] Preferably, the injection pressure is higher than the formation
pressure within the saline aquifer formation by an amount that is determined
by
the porosity and permeability of the host rock, along with other secondary
factors. For example, an injection well with a 1000 m long horizontal section
is
drilled into a 1500 m deep saline aquifer which has a natural formation
pressure
of 15 MPa. A mixture containing CO2 and other gases is injected uniformly
along
the length of the horizontal section at a pressure greater than 15 MPa. The
injection pressure is normally somewhat below the fracture pressure of the
formation. However, in some circumstances where it is deemed necessary to
encourage and promote vertical flow within the formation (for example where it
is desired to increase the fluid flow rate and enhance distribution of fluid
in the
formation), the injection pressure may be slightly higher than the natural
fracturing pressure of the formation, such that limited length vertical
fractures
are generated in order to increase the mixing length of the gas-water contact
zone. Those skilled in the art will be able to readily determine a suitable
17

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
injection pressure or range of pressures to induce the formation of density-
driven convection currents within the target formation water. One of the
relevant considerations is the extent to which it is desired to increase the
sweep
efficiency, or the extent of distribution of gas in the formation laterally or
vertically, of the injected gas.
[0058] The gas may be optionally injected at an elevated temperature
above the ambient temperature of the formation water, in order to further
enhance the density contrast between the injected gas - and consequently the
formation water which is charged with the injected gas, and the surrounding
formation water.
[0059] Initially, under the high pressure gradients near the well bore,
the
injection may lead to a local displacement mechanism, with the liquid in the
pores being mostly physically displaced by the gas that is entering. In a
suitable
formation, as the size of the injected zone increases, the driving pressure
decreases (because of the greater radius, pressure drops off because of radial
spreading), and the height of the gas column increases, leading to a
gravitational segregation effect which arises from differences in phase
densities.
Once the effect is large enough, the gas will tend to rise towards the top of
the
formation, most likely through a tortuous path due to the presence of small
flow
impedance barriers such as shale streaks or small bodies of fine-grained sand.
[0060] Due to dispersion in vertical flow and the heterogeneity of the
formation, the gas will spread out in an upward-moving plume that spreads
laterally as well as moving vertically. This plume represents a region of
lower
pore fluid density than the adjacent parts of the saline formation that have
no
free gas, therefore a lateral contrast in the average fluid density is
generated
which creates a large density-difference-driven convective flow cell.
[0061] This density contrast will greatly increase the in situ forced
mixing
between the injected gas and the formation water. Water is brought from
remote locations in the formation to the injection site as the result of the
creation of the large convection cell, and this replenishes in part the local
water
18

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
with CO2-free water, which can therefore strip the CO2 out of the injected gas
more efficiently. Therefore, the large-scale convection cell not only
increases the
diffusive mass transfer of CO2 into solution, it also acts to bring remote
water to
the injection well bore region, increasing the effective volume in the
formation
that can be accessed through one injection well by "flushing" the lateral
water
into the well bore region. The gases of lower solubility remain as non-
dissolved
gaseous phases and spread laterally and essentially upwardly, where they can
be removed by withdrawal wells such as passive drain wells. The density-driven
convection process provides more rapid mass transfer into solution.
[0062] Implementation of this process increases the short-term storage
capacity of soluble gases in the formation as well as increasing the long-term
capacity by maximizing mixing and promoting lateral water flux. The overall
sequestration process may involve preliminary passage of a flue gas mixture
(for
example, containing about 13% CO2 and 87% N2) through a membrane or other
type of purification or gas enrichment system so that the injected gas is 25%-
80% CO2, with the remainder being essentially N2; such a gas/CO2 enrichment
process will also help with improved storage capacity in situ and particularly
with
the rate at which the soluble gases (CO2 in this realization) can be injected
and
subjected to contact with the formation waters. The specific content of the
injected gas can be varied in response to driving economic and environmental
factors, as the process does not depend upon having a specific composition of
the injected gas.
[0063] It is envisioned that the process may include one or more long
horizontally drilled well bores for injection completed with a slotted liner
with no
cement. Such wells may be placed in a parallel offset configuration, with the
distance between the wells dependent on analysis, such as computer modeling
that provides some insight as to the effective convection cell size. The
length of
the wells may be designed based on the rate at which gas can enter the
formation at an appropriate rate to maximize mass transfer and convection
mixing.
19

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
[0064] Each well may be equipped with an interior tubing system that can
distribute the gas injection evenly along the length of the well so that equal
volumes of gas can enter the well bore at various locations over time, in a
manner known per se in the art.
[0065] The well may be operated to maximize the contact of CO2 with
saline formation water by controlling at the surface the volume, rate and
pressure of the gas stream being injected. It is considered to be advantageous
if the injection wells are placed near the bottom of the formation, whether
the
injection wells consist of horizontal or vertical wells.
[0066] In another embodiment, conditions for sequestration of a water-
soluble fluid within a water-laden formation are determined by a computer-
implemented simulation. The process consists of providing a computer which is
programmed by a computer program stored on a computer readable medium.
The program comprises a representation of a known geological formation in a
manner known to the art. The computer is programmed to represent at least
one injection well for injecting a mixture of soluble and insoluble fluid into
said
formation, and includes means know to the art to vary one or more parameters.
These parameters are selected from the group consisting of:
a) composition of said fluid to be injected into said formation;
b) placement of said fluid injection well in said formation;
c) temperature of said fluid to be injected into said formation
d) rate of injection of said fluid into said formation;
e) injection pressure of said fluid into said formation;
f) numbers of said injection wells placed in said formation;
g) locations and profiles of said injection wells in said formation;
h) pH of said water in said formation;
i) salinity of said water in said formation;
j) density of said water in said formation;
k) volume of said injected fluid;
I) partial pressure of said injected fluid in said formation water;
and
m) density of said fluid.

CA 02751874 2011-08-09
WO 2010/102385
PCT/CA2010/000316
[0067] The computer program is configured to calculate properties of a
convection cell generated in said formation arising from density-driven move-
ment of said fluid and formation water within said formation influenced by one
or
more of said parameters. The computer produces a report providing sequestra-
tion conditions and preferred injection conditions comprising said one or more
parameters.
[0068] The computer program is further provided with means to vary
placement of one or more fluid withdrawal or water injection wells in said
formation.
[0069] Preferably, the fluid comprises a greenhouse gas, as described
above.
[0070] According to another embodiment, the invention relates to a
process for sequestration of a water-soluble fluid within a water-laden
formation.
According to this embodiment, a computer modeling step as described above is
performed. The parameters determined in said model are then replicated on
site under real-world conditions with components of an injection well system
at
the site of said known formation, in order to generate at least one density-
driven
convection current within said formation to achieve sequestering of said water-
soluble fluid using said injection well system.
[0071] It will be seen that the present invention has been described by
way of preferred embodiments of various aspects of the invention. However, it
will be understood that one skilled in the art may depart from or vary the
embodiments described in detail herein, while still remaining within the scope
of
the invention as defined in this patent specification as a whole, including
the
claims.
21

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2018-01-12
Grant by Issuance 2016-05-17
Inactive: Cover page published 2016-05-16
Inactive: Final fee received 2016-01-06
Pre-grant 2016-01-06
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2015-09-30
Letter Sent 2015-09-30
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2015-09-30
Inactive: Q2 passed 2015-09-08
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2015-09-08
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2015-07-14
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2015-03-31
Inactive: Report - No QC 2015-03-24
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2014-05-02
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2014-01-09
Letter Sent 2013-12-05
Inactive: Correspondence - Prosecution 2013-12-02
Inactive: Office letter 2013-11-20
Letter Sent 2013-11-20
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2013-11-08
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2013-11-08
Request for Examination Received 2013-11-08
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2013-03-08
Inactive: Correspondence - PCT 2011-12-19
Inactive: Cover page published 2011-10-03
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2011-09-22
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2011-09-22
Inactive: Inventor deleted 2011-09-22
Inactive: IPC assigned 2011-09-22
Inactive: IPC assigned 2011-09-22
Application Received - PCT 2011-09-22
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2011-08-09
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2010-09-16

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2016-03-10

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ROMAN BILAK
MAURICE B. DUSSEAULT
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2011-08-08 21 997
Claims 2011-08-08 6 219
Drawings 2011-08-08 4 69
Abstract 2011-08-08 1 66
Representative drawing 2011-09-22 1 12
Description 2015-07-13 21 992
Claims 2015-07-13 6 189
Representative drawing 2016-03-31 1 10
Maintenance fee payment 2024-03-06 4 123
Notice of National Entry 2011-09-21 1 194
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2011-11-14 1 112
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2013-11-19 1 176
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2015-09-29 1 160
PCT 2011-08-08 2 68
Correspondence 2011-12-18 2 77
Correspondence 2013-11-19 1 17
Correspondence 2013-12-04 1 11
Amendment / response to report 2015-07-13 18 624
Final fee 2016-01-05 1 50