Language selection

Search

Patent 2763680 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2763680
(54) English Title: METHODS FOR PREVENTING PROPPANT CARRYOVER FROM FRACTURES, AND GRAVEL-PACKED FILTER
(54) French Title: METHODES DE PREVENTION D'ENTRAINEMENT D'AGENT DE SOUTEMENT DE FRACTURES, ET FILTRE A GRAVIER
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C9K 8/80 (2006.01)
  • C9K 8/56 (2006.01)
  • E21B 43/267 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PERSHIKOVA, ELENA MIKHAILOVNA (Russian Federation)
  • BARMATOV, EVGENY BORISOVICH (Russian Federation)
  • LYAPUNOV, KONSTANTIN MIKHAILOVICH (Russian Federation)
(73) Owners :
  • SCHLUMBERGER CANADA LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • SCHLUMBERGER CANADA LIMITED (Canada)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2015-08-25
(22) Filed Date: 2007-12-10
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2008-06-28
Examination requested: 2012-05-30
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
2006146962 (Russian Federation) 2006-12-28

Abstracts

English Abstract

This invention relates to the oil and gas industry, in particular, to methods affecting the formation productivity at the oil and gas production stage. A method for fracture propping in a subsurface layer, which ensures a reliable protection of wells from the proppant carryover from the fracture, has been proposed. According to the proposed method, a fracturing fluid is mixed with a propping agent and granulated binding material with a length-to-width ratio of less than or equal to 10; thereafter, a formation fracturing process is implemented. Then, the granulated binding material hardens and forms a homogenous firm mass with the propping agent, which impedes the closing of the fracture and precludes proppant carryover from the fracture. Or, a fracturing fluid composition obtained by mixing a propping agent with a binding compound in the form of a powder whose size varies from about 1 to about 500 µm. A gravel-packed filter is then constructed; the said filter is based on the application of the working fluid comprising a propping filler and granulated binding component with a length-to-width ratio of less than or equal to 10, or comprising a propping filler and a binding compound in the form of a powder with a size varying from about I to about 500 microns.


French Abstract

Cette invention se rapporte à lindustrie pétrolière et gazière, en particulier aux méthodes qui touchent la productivité des gisements, à la phase de production pétrolière et gazière. Linvention propose une méthode de soutènement de fracture dans une couche souterraine, qui assure une protection fiable des puits contre lentraînement de lagent de soutènement de la fracture. Selon la méthode proposée, un fluide de fracturation est mélangé à un agent de soutènement et du matériau de liaison granulaire, avec un rapport longueur à largeur inférieur ou égal à 10. Par la suite, un processus de fracturation de gisement est mis en uvre. Ensuite, le matériau de liaison granulaire durcit et forme une masse homogène ferme avec lagent de soutènement, laquelle entrave la fermeture de la fracture et empêche lentraînement de lagent de soutènement de la fracture. Une autre alternative consiste à utiliser une composition de fluide de fracturation obtenue en mélangeant un agent de soutènement avec un composé de liaison, sous forme de poudre dont la grosseur est comprise entre 1 et 500 µm. Un filtre à gravier est ensuite fabriqué. Le principe dudit filtre repose sur lapplication du fluide de travail qui comprend un produit dapport de soutènement et un élément de liaison granulaire, avec un rapport longueur à largeur inférieur ou égal à 10, ou qui comprend un produit dapport de soutènement et un composé de liaison sous forme de poudre, avec une grosseur comprise environ entre 1 et 500 µm.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


9
CLAIMS:
1. A method for preventing proppant carryover from fractures, in which a
fracturing fluid is mixed with a filler component comprising at least one
propping agent and at
least one powder-like binding component whose size varies from 0.5 to 500
µm.
2. The method according to claim 1, in which the content of the powder-like
binding component in the total volume of the filler component varies in the
range of 0.1 to
99.9 % by weight.
3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
at least one material selected from the group consisting of particulates
having been hardened
by a hydraulic hardening, air hardening or autoclave hardening classes, acid-
proof bonding
materials as well as mixtures thereof.
4. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
gypsum binding materials.
5. The method according to claim 4, in which the filler component comprises
crystalline hydrates CaSO4 and anhydrites.
6. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
lime binding materials.
7. The method according to claim 6, in which the filler component comprises
materials selected from calcium oxides and CaO hydration and carbonization
products.
8. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
magnesium binding materials.
9. The method according to claim 8, in which the filler component comprises
magnesium oxide or a saline sealer.

10
10. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
a lime-silica material comprising a mixture of CaO or Ca(OH)2 with fine-milled
silica which
hardens at subterranean formation temperatures.
11. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
lime-pozzolanic and lime-cindery materials.
12. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
lime-containing components and a reactive silicic acid in the form of
amorphous silica or
silicate glass, whose hardening is caused by the interaction of lime with
active silica or glass
with the formation of calcium hydrosilicates.
13. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
slag-alkali binders comprising a constituent that includes a caustic alkali
and slag in a vitreous
state, and whose hardening proceeds with the formation of alkaline aluminum
silicates.
14. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
cements based on high-basic calcium silicates.
15. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
at least cement based on calcium aluminate, calcium sulfoaluminates or calcium
fluoroaluminates.
16. The method according to claim 1 5, in which the calcium aluminate is
CaAl,
CaAl2 or Ca12Al7.
17. The method according to claim 15, in which the filler component
comprises a
calcium aluminate cement, a high-alumina cement, or a sulfoaluminate cement.
18. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
an iron or sulphur-iron cement.

11
19. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
calcium ferrites or calcium sulphur ferrite cements, portland cement, roman
cement,
calcareous lime or mixtures thereof.
20. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the particulate binding
component comprises phosphates.
21. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
water soluble silicates.
22. The method according to claim 1 or 2, in which the filler component
comprises
polymer-cement and polymer-silicate compositions comprising organic compounds
as
modifying components and inorganic compounds as the base.
23. The method according to claim 1, in which the filler component
comprises at
least one compound selected from the group consisting of hydroxy salts of
alumina, chrome,
zirconium, colloidal silica solutions, partially dehydrated crystalline
hydrates of aluminum
sulfates and calcium aluminates.
24. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 23, in which at least
one of the
fluid or the filler component further comprises at least one as additive
selected from the group
consisting of polymers, barite particles, red iron ore, glass beads, and
porous particles, sand
with polymeric coating, ceramic particles, sand, cured or curable proppants
and sands,
swollen expanded clay, vermiculite, agloporite, deformable particles, adhesive
materials and
fibrous materials.
25. A method for preventing proppant carryover from fractures, in which a
formation fracturing liquid is mixed with a propping agent, powder-like
binding component as
well as with components precluding proppant carryover from fractures,
including deformable
particles, adhesive and fibrous materials.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02763680 2012-01-04
53853-19D
1
Methods for preventing proppant carryover from fractures, and gravel-packed
filter
This is a divisional application of Canadian patent application
serial No. 2,614,114, filed on Dec. 10, 2007.
This invention relates to the oil and gas industry, in particular, to
methods affecting the formation productivity at the oil and gas production
stage.
The subject matter of this divisional application is directed to a method
for preventing proppant carryover from fractures, in which a fracturing fluid
is mixed
with a propping agent and binding components in the form of a powder whose
size
varies from 0.5 to 500 pm.
The subject matter of the parent application was restricted to a method
for preventing proppant carryover from a fracture, according to which a fluid
used in
the formation fracturing process is mixed with a filler component comprising
at least
one propping agent and at least one granulated binding component having a
length-
to-width ratio of less than or equal to 10, which fluid solidifies under
subsurface
formation conditions.
However, it should be understood that the expression "the invention"
and the like, as used herein, encompass the subject matter of both the parent
and
this divisional application.
A carryover of proppant from a fracture to the well at the post-fracturing
period either during the initial cleaning or sometimes even after completion
of the well
construction is a crucial issue for the oil production sector. As practice
experience
shows, up to 20% of proppant could be conveyed to the well, which, in its
turn, could
lead to a number of negative consequences; some of them are specified below.
In
marginal wells, proppant settles in a casing; thus, regular washings are
required and
the cost of well repair operations grows. A premature wear and failure of
electrical

CA 02763680 2012-01-04
53853-19D
la
submersible pumps is another consequence of the carryover of unbound proppant
or
other solid particles of rocks. Also, oil or gas production decrease is
observed due to
a significant loss of the near wellbore conductivity caused as a result of a
reduced
fracture thickness or overlapping of a production zone.
At present, several methods allowing a significant decrease in the
carryover of proppant or other propping agents from the facture are known.
The most wide-spread approach is based on the application of proppant
with a hardening resin coating (US 5218038), which is injected into the
fracture at the
end of the treatment process. However, the application of this proppant has a
number of notable restrictions which are caused by casual chemical reactions
of the
resin coating with a layer fracturing fluid. On one hand, this interaction
causes partial
degradation and disintegration of the coating, thus reducing the contact
strength
among proppant particles and, therefore, decreasing the proppant pack
strength. On
the other hand, the interaction between the resin coating components and
fracturing
fluid components causes uncontrolled change in of rheological properties of
the fluid,
which also diminishes the fracturing process efficiency. The above-listed
factors
alongside with periodic cyclic loads emerged due to the well closure and
construction
as well as an extended well closure period could significantly reduce the
proppant
filler strength.

CA 02763680 2012-01-04
53853-19
2
In another method, a fibrous material mixed with a propping agent material is
added with the aim to limit the conveyance of a proppant placed in a formation
(US5330005); in this process, fibers interweave among proppant particles and
thus
increase the proppant strength and restricts the back-flow carryover of the
proppant.
Besides, the addition of fibers enables a more effective redistribution of
loads through
addition of bulkheads along a vast area of the proppant filler. A fibrous
structure is more
flexible as compared to cured resin proppant; it allows movements of proppant-
fibrous
filler without the strength property deterioration.
In another method (US 5908073); fiber bundles comprising about 5 to 200
separate fibers with a length of 0.8 to 2.5 mm and diameter of 10 to 1,000 um
are used
for preventing proppant carryover from the well. In this process, the fiber
bundle structure
is fixed from one side.
A method of mixing proppant with the deformable material in the bead-shaped
particles (US 6059034) is known. The said deformable particles are made of a
polymeric
material. Deformable polymeric particles could be differently shaped (oval,
wedge-like,
cubic, bar-like, cylindrical, conic, etc.); however, a maximum length-to-base
ratio of
equal to or less than 5 is preferable. In case of deformable materials with a
cone-shaped
diameter as well as for aluminum particles, the maximum length-to-base ratio
should be
equal to or less than 25. Deformable particles could be made as spherical
plastic balls or
composite particles containing a non-deformable core and a deformable coating.
Generally, the volurrie of the non-deformable core is about 50 to 95% (vol.)
of the total
volume of the particle and can be made of silica, cristobalite, graphite,
gypsum or talc. In
another embodiment (US 6330916), the core consists of deformable materials and
could
include milled or crushed materials, e.g., nutshell, seed shell, fruits
kernels and processed
wood.
For fixing a propping agent and restricting its carryover, a mixture of the
proppant
with adhesive polymeric materials could be applied (US 5582249). Adhesive
compositions enter into a mechanical contact with the propping agent
particles, ensphere
and cover the particles with a thin sticky layer. As a result, particles glue
to each other as
well as with sand or crushed fragments of the propping agent, thus completely
preventing
=
=

CA 02763680 2012-01-04
3
the carryover of solid particles from the fracture. The ability to maintain
adhesiveness
over a long period of time and at increased wellbore temperatures without
stitching or
hardening is intrinsic feature of sticky compounds.
Sticky materials could combine with other chemical agents, which are used in
the
formation fracturing process, e.g., retarding agents, antimicrobial agents,
polymer gel
destructors, as well as antioxidant and wax-formation and corrosion retarding
agents (US
6209643).
There is another known method for fracture propping with the application of
sticky agents and resin proppants (US 7032667). The US patent No. 6742590
discloses a
method for protecting fractures from the carryover of the propping filler,
using a mixture
of sticky materials with deformable particles, which are on their own are
effective
additives to prevent the proppant carryover.
Another variety of materials used for proppant carryover fighting is
thermoplastic
materials (US 5501274, EP 0735235). Thermoplastic materials when mixed with a
propping agent are capable of softening being exposed to high temperatures of
rocks, and
thereafter they stick with the propping agent to form agglutinated aggregates
which
include a plural number of the proppant.
A method for using thermoplastic materials mixed with a resin proppant is
known
(US 5697440). In a number of methods, a thermoplastic material is mixed with
the
proppant in a liquid state or in the form of a solution in a suitable solvent
(US 6830105).
In this case, an elastomer-forming compound could solidify either itself, or
under the
influence of special additional chemical reagents, to form thermoplastic
materials.
Another known method describes the application of a fracturing fluid, which is
a
self-degrading cement (US patent application No. US 2006/0169448) comprising
acid
and main components, whose interaction causes formation of a cement material,
as well
as a degrading component, which could disintegrate under the fracture
conditions and
ensures the formation of cavities in the cement.
Another known method describes the formation fracturing process using a new
type of propping particles as well as the composition of a new material for
creating
gravel-packed filters with the application of hydrated cement particles with
an average

CA 02763680 2013-04-29
=
53853-19D
4
size ranging from 5 Jim to 2.5 cm (US patent application No. 2006/0162926,
US 2006/0166834).
This invention relates to the oils and gas industry, in particular, to the
development of a method for preventing carryover of proppant from fractures.
The suggested
method for fracture propping in an underground layer ensures as reliable
protection of the
well from the proppant conveyance from the fracture. In this method, a
formation fracturing
fluid is mixed with a propping filler and a granulated binding material with a
length-to-width
ratio of equal to or less than 10, and thereafter, a formation fracturing
process is implemented.
Then, the granulated binding material is solidified to form a homogeneous firm
mass with the
propping agent, which obstructs the closure of the fracture and precludes the
proppant
carryover.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a
method for preventing proppant carryover from fractures, in which a fracturing
fluid is mixed
with a filler component comprising at least one propping agent and at least
one powder-like
binding component whose size varies from 0.5 to 500 pm.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided
a
method for preventing proppant carryover from fractures, in which a formation
fracturing
liquid is mixed with a propping agent, powder-like binding component as well
as with
components precluding proppant carryover from fractures, including deformable
particles,
adhesive and fibrous materials.
Technical result of this invention is as follows.
1. Fracturing fluid composition obtained by mixing a propping filler and a
granulated binding component with a length-to-width ratio of equal to or less
than 10, which
could solidify under underground formation conditions.
2. Fracturing fluid composition obtained by mixing a propping filler and a
granulated binding composition in the form of a powder, whose size varies from
about 1 pm
to about 500 pm. In this case, powder-like particles of the binding component
get into contact

CA 02763680 2013-04-29
53853-19D
4a
with the propping filler and are then solidified thus increasing the propping
filler pack
strength.
3. Fracturing fluid composition obtained by mixing a propping filler and a
granulated or powder binding material as well as other components obstructing
the proppant
conveyance from the fracture, including deformable particles and adhesive and
fiber-like
materials.
4. Development of gravel-packed filter which is based on the application of a
working fluid comprising a propping filler and a granulated binding component
with a length-
to-width ratio of equal to or less than 10, or comprising a propping filler
and a granulated
binding composition in the form of a powder, whose size varies from about 1 gm
to about
500 gm.

CA 02763680 2012-01-04
At least one of the below-listed materials can be used as a propping filler:
ceramic
particles and sand of a different shape, plated solidified and curable
proppants and sands;
swollen expanded clay, vermiculite, and agloporite.
Proppant or polymer-coated sand can be used as a propping filler.
Granulated and powder-like binding components could be added in a fracturing
fluid either in a dry state, or in the form of suspension in water, working
fluid, gel or
other suitable solvent, including those modified with various surfactants.
At least one of binding components of the below-listed hardening classes could
be
used as a granulated binding component: hydraulic, air and autoclave hardening
as well as
acid-proof binding materials as well as their mixture, including:
1. Binding materials on the basis of crystalline hydrates CaSO4 and anhydrite
(gypsum binding materials);
2. Binding materials on the basis of CaO, CaO hydration and carbonization
products
(lime binding materials);
3. Binding materials on the basis of MgO and saline sealers (magnesian binding
materials);
4. Lime-silica binding materials comprising a mixture of CaO or Ca(OH)2 with
fine-
milled silica, which solidify at increased temperatures;
5. Lime-pozzolanic and lime-cindery binding materials comprising a lime-
containing
component and a reactive silicic acid in the form of amorphous silica or
silicate
glass, whose hardening occurs due to the interaction of a lime with an active
silicon oxide or glass with the formation of calcium hydrosilicates;
6. Slag-alkali binding materials, which include a component comprising caustic
alkali and slag, preferably, in a vitreous state, whose hardening is connected
with
the formation of alcaline aluminum silicate;
7. Cements (binding) on the basis of high-basic calcium silicates (portland
cement
clinker, natural cement, calcareous cement, hydraulic lime), whose binding
properties are essentially predefined by hydration of tricalcium (Ca3Si05) and
dicalcium (Ca2SiO4) silicates, including slag-portland cement;

CA 02763680 2012-01-04
6
8. Cements on the basis of low-basic calcium aluminates (CaA, CA2, C12A7) as
well
as on the basis of their derivatives, e.g. calcium sulfoaluminates, calcium
fluoroaluminates (aluminate cement, high-alumina cement, sulfoaluminate
cement); high iron oxide cements and sulfur high iron oxide cements;
9. Cements on the basis of calcium ferrites and their derivatives ¨ calcium
sulfoferrites;
10. Phosphatic binding materials (cement and binding materials), which harden
due to
phosphate formation;
11. Watersoluble silicate ¨ based binding materials including alkali metal
silicates
(soluble glasses) and organic base silicates;
12. Polymer-cement and polymer-silicate binding compositions which include
organic
compositions as modifying components and inorganic binding materials (cement,
soluble glass) as the base;
13. Hydroxy salts of aluminum, chrome, zirconium, colloidal solution of silica
and
aluminum oxide, partially dehydrated crystalline hydrates of aluminum sulfates
and calcium aluminates.
A granulated binding component could comprise either one component, or have a
multi-component composition. In addition to binding components, the A
granulated
binding component could include components which ensure required strength
properties
(e.g., polymers) and density (e.g., particles of barite, red iron ore, glass
beads, porous
particles).
A granulated binding component could be differently shaped: spherical,
cylindrical,
sparry, cubic, oval, flaked, scaly, irregular shape, or a mixture of the above-
mentioned
shapes, but with a length-to-width ratio to be equal to or less than 10.
The content of granulated binding filler in the total volume of propping and
granulated fillers varies in the range from 0.1 to 99.9% by weight.
Actual density of granulated binding agent could vary in the range from 0.3 to
5
g/cm3.

CA 02763680 2012-01-04
7
At least one of binding components of the below-listed hardening classes could
be
used as a powder binding component: hydraulic, air and autoclave hardening as
well as
acid-proof binding materials as well as their mixture, including:
1. Binding materials on the basis of crystalline hydrates CaSO4 and anhydrite
(gypsum binding materials);
2. Binding materials on the basis of CaO, CaO hydration and carbonization
products
(lime binding materials);
3. Binding materials on the basis of MgO and saline sealers (magnesian binding
materials);
4. Lime-silica binding materials comprising a mixture of CaO or Ca(OH)2 with
fine-
milled silica, which solidify at increased temperatures;
5. Lime-pozzolanic and lime-cindery binding materials comprising a lime-
containing
component and a reactive silicic acid in the form of amorphous silica or
silicate
glass, whose hardening occurs due to the interaction of a lime with an active
silicon oxide or glass with the formation of calcium hydrosilicates;
6. Slag-alkali binding materials, which include a component comprising caustic
alkali and slag, preferably, in a vitreous state, whose hardening is connected
with
the formation of alcaline aluminum silicate;
7. Cements (binding) on the basis of high-basic calcium silicates (portland
cement
clinker, natural cement, calcareous cement, hydraulic lime), whose binding
properties are essentially predefined by hydration of tricalcium (Ca3Si05) and
dicalcium (Ca2SiO4) silicates, including slag-portland cement;
8. Cements on the basis of low-basic calcium aluminates (CaA, CA2, C12A7) as
well
as on the basis of their derivatives, e.g. calcium sulfoaluminates, calcium
fluoroaluminates (aluminate cement, high-alumina cement, sulfoaluminate
cement); high iron oxide cements and sulfur high iron oxide cements;
9. Cements on the basis of calcium ferrites and their derivatives ¨ calcium
sulfoferrites;
10. Phosphatic binding materials (cement and binding materials), which harden
due to
phosphate formation;

CA 02763680 2012-01-04
8
11. Watersoluble silicate ¨ based binding materials including alkali metal
silicates
(soluble glasses) and organic base silicates;
12. Polymer-cement and polymer-silicate binding compositions which include
organic
compositions as modifying components and inorganic binding materials (cement,
soluble glass) as the base;
13. Hydroxy salts of aluminum, chrome, zirconium, colloidal solution of silica
and
aluminum oxide, partially dehydrated crystalline hydrates of aluminum sulfates
and calcium aluminates.
The size of the powder-like binding materials varies from about 0.5 to 500 um.
The content of powder-like binding materials in the propping filler varies
from 0.1
to 99.9% by weight.
The density of the powder-like binding materials could vary from about 0.5 to
about 5
g/cm3.
Granulated or powder-like binding materials will be used in the mixture with a
propping agent whose concentration in the mixture could vary in the range of
0.1 to
99.9%.
Granulated or powder-like binding materials could be added to the propping
fluid
either in a dry state or in the form of suspension in water, working fluid,
gel or other
suitable solution including those modified by various surfactants.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2763680 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2019-12-10
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Letter Sent 2018-12-10
Grant by Issuance 2015-08-25
Inactive: Cover page published 2015-08-24
Inactive: Final fee received 2015-06-09
Pre-grant 2015-06-09
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2015-01-15
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2014-12-23
Letter Sent 2014-12-23
4 2014-12-23
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2014-12-23
Inactive: Q2 passed 2014-12-19
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2014-12-19
Letter Sent 2014-12-15
Reinstatement Request Received 2014-12-02
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2014-12-02
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2014-12-02
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2013-12-03
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2013-06-03
Letter Sent 2013-05-06
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2013-04-29
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2013-04-29
Reinstatement Request Received 2013-04-29
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2013-01-03
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2012-07-03
Letter Sent 2012-06-07
Request for Examination Received 2012-05-30
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2012-05-30
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2012-05-30
Inactive: Cover page published 2012-02-06
Inactive: IPC assigned 2012-01-30
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2012-01-30
Inactive: IPC assigned 2012-01-30
Inactive: IPC assigned 2012-01-30
Divisional Requirements Determined Compliant 2012-01-23
Letter sent 2012-01-23
Application Received - Regular National 2012-01-23
Application Received - Divisional 2012-01-04
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2008-06-28

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2014-12-02
2013-04-29

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2014-10-30

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2009-12-10 2012-01-04
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2010-12-10 2012-01-04
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2011-12-12 2012-01-04
Application fee - standard 2012-01-04
Request for examination - standard 2012-05-30
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2012-12-10 2012-11-13
Reinstatement 2013-04-29
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2013-12-10 2013-11-14
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2014-12-10 2014-10-30
Reinstatement 2014-12-02
Final fee - standard 2015-06-09
MF (patent, 8th anniv.) - standard 2015-12-10 2015-11-18
MF (patent, 9th anniv.) - standard 2016-12-12 2016-11-17
MF (patent, 10th anniv.) - standard 2017-12-11 2017-12-04
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SCHLUMBERGER CANADA LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
ELENA MIKHAILOVNA PERSHIKOVA
EVGENY BORISOVICH BARMATOV
KONSTANTIN MIKHAILOVICH LYAPUNOV
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2012-01-03 9 396
Claims 2012-01-03 4 134
Abstract 2012-01-03 1 28
Cover Page 2012-02-05 1 44
Description 2013-04-28 10 413
Claims 2013-04-28 3 111
Claims 2014-12-01 3 112
Cover Page 2015-07-23 1 43
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2012-06-06 1 174
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2013-02-27 1 164
Notice of Reinstatement 2013-05-05 1 172
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2014-01-27 1 164
Notice of Reinstatement 2014-12-14 1 170
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2014-12-22 1 162
Maintenance Fee Notice 2019-01-20 1 182
Maintenance Fee Notice 2019-01-20 1 181
Correspondence 2012-01-22 1 38
Correspondence 2015-01-14 2 63
Final fee 2015-06-08 2 76