Language selection

Search

Patent 2779674 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2779674
(54) English Title: IMPROVED SLOPE OF AN OPEN CUT MINE
(54) French Title: PENTE PERFECTIONNEE D'UNE MINE A CIEL OUVERT
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E2D 17/18 (2006.01)
  • E2D 17/20 (2006.01)
  • E21C 41/26 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HAILE, ANDREW (Australia)
(73) Owners :
  • BHP BILLITON SSM DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD
(71) Applicants :
  • BHP BILLITON SSM DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD (Australia)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2010-11-04
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2011-05-12
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/AU2010/001459
(87) International Publication Number: AU2010001459
(85) National Entry: 2012-05-02

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
2009905382 (Australia) 2009-11-04

Abstracts

English Abstract

This invention relates to open cut mines and in particular an improved slope to of an open cut mine. The slope includes a substantially vertical batter face (5) with a plurality of reinforcing members (10) spaced from a crest (7) of the batter face (5).


French Abstract

La présente invention concerne des mines à ciel ouvert et en particulier une pente perfectionnée d'une mine à ciel ouvert. La pente comprend une face de fruit sensiblement verticale (5) avec une pluralité d'élément de renfort (10) espacés d'une crête (7) de la face de fruit (5).

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


8
THE CLAIMS DEFINING THE INVENTION ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1. An improved slope of an open cut mine including a plurality batters with
a berm extending from a toe of each batter, each batter having an
excavated batter face which is substantially vertical and extends from
the toe to a crest of the batter, reinforcing means installed prior to the
excavation of the face and spaced from the proposed crest, the
reinforcing means including a plurality of reinforcing members each
located in a substantially vertical borehole formed at said spacing from
the proposed crest, each borehole extends to a depth of at least the
distance between the crest and the toe, each reinforcing member
extends substantially the depth of the each borehole
2. An improved slope according to claim 1 wherein the depth of each
borehole exceeds the distance between the crest and the toe by up to
15%.
3. An improved slope according to claim 1 or 2 wherein each borehole is
spaced from an adjacent borehole by between 1000mm and 5000mm.
4. An improved slope according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein each
reinforcing member is a bar or cable of a diameter of between 20mm
and 100mm.
5. An improved slope according to claim 4 wherein the bar or cable is
formed from steel.
6. An improved slope according to any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein each
reinforcing member is formed from fibreglass.
7. An improved slope according to any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein the
reinforcing member is grouted in position in the borehole.
8. An improved slope according to any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the
length of the reinforcing member exceeds the depth of the borehole.

9
9. An improved slope according to claim 8 wherein the reinforcing member
extends out from the borehole to interact with a safety fence extending
between the plurality of boreholes.
10. An improved slope according to any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the
length of the reinforcing member is less than the length of the borehole
so that the reinforcing member is countersunk in the borehole.
11. An improved slope according to any one of claims 1 to 9 wherein the
substantially vertical face is within the range of 75° to 90°.
12. An improved slope according to any one of the preceding claims
wherein each borehole is spaced from the crest by no less than 800mm.
13. A method of forming a reinforced rock slope in an open cut mine
including drilling a plurality of vertical boreholes to a borehole depth,
locating a reinforcing member in each borehole which is substantially the
length of the borehole depth, grouting the reinforcing bar in the hole,
locating a crest of a batter which is spaced from the boreholes,
excavating a face to the batter which is substantially parallel with the
boreholes, the height of the batter face from the crest to a toe is no less
than the depth of the borehole adjacent the face, wherein the excavation
of the face is performed after the reinforcing member has been grouted
in place in the borehole.
14. A method according to claim 13 including drilling each borehole so that it
is no greater than 300 mm in diameter.
15. A method according to claim 13 or 14 including spacing the crest of the
batter from each borehole so that the reinforcing member is behind the
crest of the batter by no less than 800mm.
16. A method according to any one of claims 13 to 15 including spacing
each borehole from its adjacent borehole at no less than 1000mm
centres.

17. A method according to any one of claims 13 to 16 including providing a
reinforcing member in the form of a reinforcing bar is no less than 40mm
in diameter.
18. A method according to any one of claims 13 to 17 including drilling the
borehole depth to exceed the height of the face of the batter by at least
15%.
19. A method according to any one of claims 13 to 18 including providing a
length of the reinforcing member that is less than the length of the
borehole so that the reinforcing member is countersunk in the borehole.
20. A method according to any one of claims 13 to 19 wherein the method of
excavating the face includes drilling and blasting to produce the
substantially vertical face within a range of 75° to 90°.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02779674 2012-05-02
WO 2011/054035 PCT/AU2010/001459
1
IMPROVED SLOPE OF AN OPEN CUT MINE
This invention relates to an improved slope of an open cut mine and a method
of forming a reinforced rock slope in an open cut mine. The invention has been
developed for an application in an open cut mine and it will be convenient to
hereinafter describe the invention with reference to this particular
application. It
should be appreciated that the invention may have other applications in an
open
excavation environment, such as a quarry, and the invention is not to be
limited
to use only in a mine.
Mining companies use various methods of extracting ore from the ground, and
an open cut mine is one method that requires the removal of a substantial
volume of material. The excavation of the material develops a pit with a floor
and a slope extending up from the floor. The slope is formed by a series of
batters, with berms spacing the batters and providing rockfall catchment or a
ramp for mining traffic accessing the pit floor. It is generally desirable to
maximise the angle of the slope as it has the potential to minimise the
extraction
of waste material and maximise the extraction of ore.
A batter is generally excavated to an angle that, having regard to the
characteristics of the rock, is naturally stable. This is generally no greater
than
70 and normally more in the range of 50 to 70 . Where the berm at the top of
the batter is acting as a ramp, or accommodating other critical mine
infrastructure such as vent stacks or pumping stations, it is desirable to
decrease the angle to account for the additional load and risk.
It ought to be appreciated that any angle other than 90 will typically result
in
inefficiencies. Where the batter is formed in the ore being mined, a batter of
less
than 90 will result in ore being left behind to maintain the berm above.
Where
the batter is to be formed in waste material, a batter of less than 90 may
result
in waste material being unnecessarily removed, particularly when it is outside
the area of the ore deposit. Despite these inefficiencies open cut mines still
tend
to have batter faces at angles less than 70 to ensure natural stability.

CA 02779674 2012-05-02
WO 2011/054035 PCT/AU2010/001459
2
A safety issue with open cut mines relates to rocks falling from the face of
the
batter onto traffic or personal on the berm below. This is exacerbated where
the
batter is of less than 90 as the rocks bounce off the batter face and project
out
from the toe of the batter onto the berm, or past the berm and into lower
working areas of the mine. It has been found that with a batter angle of about
600, the rocks fall generally between 2m and 9m from the toe of the batter but
may well exceed this. This is a wide spread particularly given a berm may be
generally around 10m.
The above discussed is included in the specification solely for the purpose of
providing a context for the present invention. It is not suggested or
represented
that any of these matters form part of the prior art base or the common
general
knowledge in the field relevant to the present invention as it existed in
Australia
before the priority date of this invention. Throughout this specification the
terms
"open pit" and "open cut" may be used interchangeably.
According to one aspect of this invention there is provided an improved slope
of
an open cut mine including a plurality batters with a berm extending from a
toe
of each batter, each batter having an excavated batter face which is
substantially vertical and extends from the toe to a crest of the batter,
reinforcing means installed prior to the excavation of the face and spaced
from
the proposed crest, the reinforcing means including a plurality of reinforcing
members each located in a substantially vertical borehole formed at said
spacing from the proposed crest, each borehole extends to a depth of at least
the distance between the crest and the toe, each reinforcing member extends
substantially the depth of the each borehole
It is preferred that the depth of each borehole exceeds the distance between
the
crest and the toe by up to 15%. It is further preferred that each borehole is
spaced from an adjacent borehole by between 1000mm and 5000mm. It is still
further preferred that each reinforcing member is a bar or cable of a diameter
of
between 20mm and 100mm. It is preferred that the bar or cable is formed from
steel, or alternatively each reinforcing member is formed from fibreglass. It
is

CA 02779674 2012-05-02
WO 2011/054035 PCT/AU2010/001459
3
preferred that the reinforcing member is grouted in position in the borehole.
It is
preferred that the length of the reinforcing member exceeds the depth of the
borehole, and in particular the reinforcing member extends out from the
borehole to interact with a safety fence extending between the plurality of
boreholes. Alternatively the length of the reinforcing member is less than the
length of the borehole so that the reinforcing member is countersunk in the
borehole. It is preferred that the substantially vertical face is within the
range of
75 to 90 . It is further preferred that each borehole is spaced from the
crest by
no less than 800mm.
According to another aspect of this invention there is provided a method of
forming a reinforced rock slope in an open cut mine including drilling a
plurality
of vertical boreholes to a borehole depth, locating a reinforcing member in
each
borehole which is substantially the length of the borehole depth, grouting the
reinforcing bar in the hole, locating a crest of a batter which is spaced from
the
boreholes, excavating a face to the batter which is substantially parallel
with the
boreholes, the height of the batter face from the crest to a toe is no less
than
the depth of the borehole adjacent the face, wherein the excavation of the
face
is performed after the reinforcing member has been grouted in place in the
borehole.
It is preferred to drill each borehole so that it is no greater than 300 mm in
diameter. It is further preferred to space the crest of the batter from each
borehole so that the reinforcing member is behind the crest of the batter by
no
less than 800mm.lt is still further preferred to space each borehole from its
adjacent borehole at no less than 1000mm centres. It is still further
preferred to
provide a reinforcing member in the form of a reinforcing bar is no less than
40mm in diameter. It is still further preferred to drill the borehole depth to
exceed the height of the face of the batter by at least 15%. It is still
further
preferred to provide a length of the reinforcing member that is less than the
length of the borehole so that the reinforcing member is countersunk in the
borehole. It is still further preferred that the method of excavating the face
includes drilling and blasting to produce the substantially vertical face
within a
range of 75 to 90 .

CA 02779674 2012-05-02
WO 2011/054035 PCT/AU2010/001459
4
It will be convenient to hereinafter describe the invention in greater detail
by
reference to the accompanying drawings showing an example embodiment of
the invention. The particularity of the drawings and the related detailed
description is not to be understood as superseding the generality of the broad
definition of the invention as provided by the claims.
Figure 1 is a side cross-sectional view of a schematic illustration of an
improved
slope according to the invention.
Figure 2 illustrates a schematic view of an unimproved slope prior to
excavation
of the batters.
Figure 3 illustrates an improved slope with the batter excavated.
Referring firstly to Figure 1 that illustrates a natural surface level 1
having been
excavated to produce an improved slope 2 of an open cut pit. The improved
slope 2 includes a plurality of horizontal berms 3, each spaced by a vertical
batter 4. Each batter has a face 5 which extends from a toe 6 of the batter to
a
crest 7. The slope extends from the natural surface level 1 to the floor 8 of
the
pit.
Referring now to Figure 2 which illustrates a portion of the open cut mine
prior
to excavation. A crest 7 of the proposed batter 4 is selected, and a series of
boreholes 9 spaced from that crest 7 are drilled to a borehole depth. This
spacing is preferably no less than 800 mm, however this spacing x is merely
preferred. Spacings x of other distances are clearly possible, however it is
generally desirable that the spacing x be selected to be sufficient so as to
reduce the likelihood that the borehole 9 will be exposed when the batter is
excavated. The face 5 of the batter is exposed by a technique of drill and
blasting which can cause the crest 7 to crumble. Accordingly it is preferable
that
the borehole 9 be spaced from the crest by 1500mm to avoid the hole being
exposed when blasting.

CA 02779674 2012-05-02
WO 2011/054035 PCT/AU2010/001459
It is preferred that each borehole 9 have a diameter of no greater than 300
mm,
however this dimension is merely preferred. The function of the borehole 9 is
to
accommodate a reinforcing member 10 and therefore the diameter of the
borehole 9 is dictated to some extent by the characteristics of the
reinforcing
5 member 10. Furthermore, it is preferred that the reinforcing member 10 be
grouted in position in the borehole 9, and therefore the diameter of the
borehole
will need to be selected to satisfy minimum cover requirements, particularly
where the reinforcing member 10 is a steel bar. Accordingly, it is to be
appreciated that the diameter of the borehole 9 may vary, however it is
generally preferred that the diameter be less than 300 mm.
Each borehole 9 is preferably drilled behind the crest at a spacing y to space
it
from an adjacent borehole preferably by no less than 2000 mm, where the berm
is not supporting critical mine infrastructure. Where the berm is acting as a
ramp, or supporting critical mine infrastructure such as pumping stations or
ventilation shafts, the spacing of the boreholes may need to be less than
2000mm. It is more likely that each borehole be spaced y from an adjacent
borehole by between 2,000 and 5,000 mm. This spacing y will specifically be
dependent on the characteristics of the rock structure being reinforced by the
reinforcing member 10 and the desired level of reliability in the slope
stability. If
for example the rock structure comprises many closely spaced planes of
weakness such as a fault, joints or fracture, it may be appropriate to have
the
spacings y of each adjacent borehole relatively close. In contrast, if the
rock
structure comprises very few planes of weakness it may be appropriate to have
the spacings y relatively further apart. In either case, the spacings y can be
set
having regard to information revealed in a geological survey and variable
between adjacent boreholes 9.
The reinforcing member 10 located in each borehole 9 may take any
appropriate form. The preferred form of reinforcing member is a bar or cable
formed from steel, however as an alternative it may be formed as a fibreglass
rod. Where the reinforcing member 10 is a bar of steel, it is preferred that
the
diameter of the bar be between 20 mm and 100 mm. The diameter of the bar
will be selected according to the characteristics of the rock, depth of
borehole

CA 02779674 2012-05-02
WO 2011/054035 PCT/AU2010/001459
6
and/or the desired level of reliability in slope stability. The bar is placed
in situ
and grouted in position.
In one preferred embodiment it is preferred that the length of each
reinforcing
member 10 does not exceed the depth of the borehole 9. It is generally
desirable that the reinforcing member 10 and grout are countersunk so as to
reduce the likelihood that the top of the reinforcing member 10 is exposed.
The
top of the reinforcing member 10 might be exposed if the crest 7 crumbles, say
as a result of blasting the batter face 5. Accordingly countersinking to a
depth of
1000mm or greater is desirable. It may however be appropriate in certain
applications that the reinforcing member 10 does exceed the depth of the
borehole 9 as this enables the reinforcing member 10 to project from the
borehole 9. The projecting reinforcing member 10 may be used for any suitable
purpose, however it is preferred that it interacts with a safety fence 11
extending
between the plurality of adjacent boreholes 9. This alternate embodiment is
illustrated in figures 2 and 3.
The material 12 beyond the crest 7 that is to be excavated can be excavated by
any suitable means. The preferred means illustrated in Figure 2 involves
drilling
a plurality of additional boreholes 13 at the crest 7 of the batter 4, and
beyond
the crest 7. Charges can then be placed in the boreholes 13 and the material
be moved using drill and blast techniques understood and known by those
people operating in this industry.
Referring now to Figure 3 which illustrates the improved slope with the
exposed
batter face 5 extending at 90 to the berm 3 below. The batter face 5
according
to this invention is substantially vertical, and it is generally preferred
that the
substantially vertical face 5 be within the range of 750- 90 .
The boreholes 9 including the reinforcing member 10 according to the invention
extends to a depth at least equal to a distance between the crest 7 and toe 6
of
the batter face 5. It can be seen from Figure 3 that it is preferred that the
borehole depth extend beyond the toe, and it is particularly preferred that it
extend beyond the toe by up to 15%. It has been found that by extending the

CA 02779674 2012-05-02
WO 2011/054035 PCT/AU2010/001459
7
reinforced borehole 9 by this distance reduces the likelihood of shear failure
of
the batter at the toe of the batter.
It ought to be appreciated from the foregoing that an improved slope 2 as
hereinbefore described reduces the inefficiencies associated with a slope
having a batter angle of less than 700. Furthermore, it will reduce the
distance
from the toe within which rock fall occurs, providing a safer working
environment. Still furthermore, reinforcing the batter 4 before excavating the
batter face 5 is considered to be a relatively safe operation.
Various alterations, modifications and/or additions may be introduced into the
invention without departing from the spirit or ambit as defined in the
preceding
specification.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2014-11-04
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2014-11-04
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2013-11-04
Inactive: Cover page published 2012-07-25
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2012-07-04
Inactive: IPC assigned 2012-06-27
Application Received - PCT 2012-06-27
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2012-06-27
Inactive: IPC assigned 2012-06-27
Inactive: IPC assigned 2012-06-27
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2012-05-02
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2011-05-12

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2013-11-04

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2012-05-02

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2012-11-05 2012-05-02
Basic national fee - standard 2012-05-02
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
BHP BILLITON SSM DEVELOPMENT PTY LTD
Past Owners on Record
ANDREW HAILE
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2012-05-01 7 313
Drawings 2012-05-01 3 122
Abstract 2012-05-01 1 69
Representative drawing 2012-05-01 1 59
Claims 2012-05-01 3 96
Cover Page 2012-07-24 1 65
Notice of National Entry 2012-07-03 1 205
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2013-12-29 1 171
PCT 2012-05-01 8 317