Language selection

Search

Patent 2782342 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2782342
(54) English Title: A PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF A PAPER OR PAPERBOARD PRODUCT
(54) French Title: PROCEDE POUR LA PRODUCTION D'UN PRODUIT EN PAPIER OU EN CARTON
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • D21H 17/25 (2006.01)
  • D21H 11/18 (2006.01)
  • D21H 11/20 (2006.01)
  • D21H 17/28 (2006.01)
  • D21H 21/18 (2006.01)
  • D21H 21/50 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • AXRUP, LARS (Sweden)
  • HEISKANEN, ISTO (Finland)
  • RIIKONEN, MIKA (Finland)
(73) Owners :
  • STORA ENSO OYJ
(71) Applicants :
  • STORA ENSO OYJ (Finland)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2010-11-30
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2011-06-09
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/SE2010/051322
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2011068457
(85) National Entry: 2012-05-30

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
0950930-8 (Sweden) 2009-12-03

Abstracts

English Abstract

The present invention relates to a process for producing a paper or paperboard product which process comprises the steps of, providing a furnish comprising fibers, adding starch to the furnish, adding microfibrillated cellulose to the furnish, conducting the furnish to a wire in order to form a web, wherein the starch and microfibrillated cellulose is added separately to the furnish.


French Abstract

La présente invention porte sur un procédé pour produire un produit en papier ou en carton, lequel procédé comprend les étapes consistant à fournir une composition comprenant des fibres, ajouter de l'amidon à la composition, ajouter de la cellulose à microfibrilles à la composition, amener la composition vers un fil afin de former un film, l'amidon et la cellulose à microfibrilles étant ajoutés séparément à la composition.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


10
Claims
1. A process for producing a paper or paperboard product which
process comprises the steps of:
-providing a furnish comprising fibers,
-adding starch to the furnish,
-adding microfibrillated cellulose to the furnish,
-conducting the furnish to a wire in order to form a web,
wherein the starch and microfibrillated cellulose is added separately to
the furnish.
2. The process to claim 1 characterized in that 2-15% by weight of
starch and 1-15% by weight of microfibrillated cellulose is added.
3. The process according to any of the preceding claims characterized
in that the web being formed by said furnish comprising starch and
microfibrillated cellulose forms a layer of the paper or paperboard product.
4. The process according to claim 3 characterized in that the web
forms a middle layer of the paper or paperboard product.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02782342 2012-05-30
WO 2011/068457 PCT/SE2010/051322
A PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF A PAPER OR PAPERBOARD
PRODUCT.
Field of the invention
The present invention relates to a process for production of a paper or
paperboard product comprising a furnish which comprises starch and
microfibrillated cellulose.
Background
In papermaking processes there is an ongoing concern to find ways to
produce paper or paperboard at reduced costs without impairing the
properties of the product, e.g. without decreasing the strength of the
product.
One way to reduce the cost is to increase the filler content of a paper or
paperboard product and thus be able to reduce the amount of fibers in the
paper or paperboard. Besides being economically beneficial, fillers also
improve the opacity and printability properties of the product. However, large
amount of fillers in the product decreases the strength. Thus, there is a
balance between the possible amount of fillers added and the required
strength of the paper or paperboard produced.
Furthermore, during production of paperboard there is a desire to
produce a strong but yet low density product. When increasing the strength of
a paperboard the density normally increases. There is thus a balance
between the desired strength and the density of the paperboard product.
It is possible to compensate for the decrease in strength, caused for
example by addition of large amount of filler or by increased bulk, by
improving the fiber bonding properties between the fibers in the paper or
paperboard, thereby maintaining the strength. The predominant treatment for
improving paper or paperboard strength, particularly dry strength, has so far
been to add a strength agent, preferably cationic starch, to the furnish prior
to
the sheet forming operation. Cationic starch molecules added to the furnish
can adhere to the naturally anionic pulp fibers by electrostatic attraction
and

CA 02782342 2012-05-30
WO 2011/068457 2 PCT/SE2010/051322
thus be retained in the wet fiber mat and remain in the final paper or
paperboard.
When adding large amounts of cationic starch to a papermaking furnish,
in order to achieve high resulting paper strength, two major problems arise.
The first is that the cationic starch molecules tend to saturate the anionic
charge on the cellulose fibers, thus setting a limit to the amount of cationic
starch which can be added to the slurry. If an excess of cationic starch is
added, only a portion of the starch added will be retained in the sheet, and
the
rest will circulate in the paper or board machine white water system. A second
problem is that fibers which are made cationic by excessive cationic starch
addition will not be able to adsorb other cationic additives which are
commonly added to the pulp slurry, such as sizing agents and retention aids.
Furthermore, high amounts of starch often cause problems with runnability,
microbiology and foaming during the production process.
It has recently been found that addition of microfibrillated cellulose to a
paper or board will increase the strength of the product, probably due to the
improved fiber bonding.
However, there is still a need for a cost efficient product with good
strength properties.
Summary of the invention
It is an object of the present invention to provide a process which in an
easy and cost efficient way will be able to produce a paper or paperboard with
improved strength and density.
These objects and other advantages are achieved by the paper or
paperboard product according to claim 1. The present invention relates to a
process for producing a paper or paperboard product which process
comprises the steps of; providing a furnish comprising fibers, adding starch
to
the furnish, adding microfibrillated cellulose to the furnish and conducting
the
furnish to a wire in order to form a web, wherein the starch and
microfibrillated
cellulose is added separately to the furnish. It has been shown that a product
comprising both starch and microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) increases the
strength of the product since the amount of starch can be increased without
increasing the density of the paper or paperboard product.

CA 02782342 2012-05-30
WO 2011/068457 3 PCT/SE2010/051322
It is preferred that the furnish comprises 2-15% by weight of starch and
1-15% by weight of microfibrillated cellulose. The amount of starch
respectively MFC of the product depends on the end use and the
corresponded desired properties of the product. High amounts of starch will
increase the strength of the product and it has been shown that the
combination of MFC and starch makes it possible for the product to retain
larger amounts of starch.
The web being formed by said furnish comprising starch and
microfibrillated cellulose preferably forms a layer of the paper or paperboard
product. The paper or paperboard product is preferably a multilayer product
which comprises at least two layers. It may be preferred that the product
comprises at least three layers and that the layer located in the middle of
the
product comprises furnish comprising starch and microfibrillated cellulose,
i.e.
the web being formed by the furnish that comprises starch and MFC, forms a
middle layer of the paper or paperboard.
Detailed description
The invention relates to a process for production of a paper or
paperboard product comprising a furnish which comprises starch and
microfibrillated cellulose. The furnish comprises starch in an amount of 2-15%
by weight, preferably between 3-5% by weight. Consequently, the product
thus comprises starch of an amount of 2-15% by weight, preferably between
3-5% by weight.
The furnish preferably comprises cellulosic fibers. The cellulosic fibers
may be hardwood and/or softwood fibers. The cellulosic fibers may be
mechanically, chemimechanically and/or chemically treated. The fibers may
also be bleached or unbleached.
It has been found that the addition of starch and microfibrillated
cellulose (MFC) to a furnish has a very good effect on the strength of the
paper or paperboard. Products comprising both starch in large amounts and
MFC, makes it possible for the product to retain larger amount of starch. .
Surprisingly, it has also been found that the addition of both starch, in
large
amounts, and MFC do not increase the densification of the product. The

CA 02782342 2012-05-30
WO 2011/068457 4 PCT/SE2010/051322
combination of MFC and starch thus has a synergistic effect when it comes to
boosting the strength of a paper or paperboard product without increasing the
density of the product to the same extend. It is thus possible to decrease the
density of the paper or paperboard product but still be able to produce a
strong product. In this way a much cheaper product can be produced since
the fiber content of the product can be decreased and the strength can be
remained (compared to products produced according to prior art).
Furthermore, the weight of the product will be decreased which will reduce
costs during transportation and handling.
Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) (also known as nanocellulose) is a
material made from wood cellulose fibers, where the individual microfibrils
have been partly or totally detached from each other. MFC is normally very
thin (-20 nm) and the length is often between 100 nm to 10 pm. However, the
microfibrils may also be longer, for example between 10-100 pm but lengths
up to 200pm can also be used. Fibers that has been fibrillated and which
have microfibrills on the surface and microfibrils that are separated and
located in a water phase of a slurry are included in the definition MFC.
MFC can be produced in a number of different ways. It is possible to
mechanically treat cellulosic fibers so that microfibrils are formed. The
production of nanocellulose or microfibrillated cellulose with bacteria is
another option. It is also possible to produce microfibrils from cellulose by
the
aid of different chemicals and/or enzymes which will break or dissolve the
fibers.
One example of production of MFC is shown in W02007091942 which
describes production of MFC by the aid of refining in combination with
addition of an enzyme.
It is also possible to modify the microfibrillated cellulose before addition
to the furnish. In this way it is possible to change its interaction and
affinity to
other substances. For example, by introducing more anionic charges to MFC
the stability of the fibril and fibril aggregates of the MFC are increased.
How
the modification of the microfibrillated fibers is done depends, for example
on
the other components present in the furnish.

CA 02782342 2012-05-30
WO 2011/068457 5 PCT/SE2010/051322
The furnish comprises 2-15% by weight of starch, preferably between
3-5% by weight, and it is preferred that the furnish further comprises MFC in
an amount of 1-15% by weight. The chosen amount of starch respectively
MFC added to the furnish depends on the final product produced and the
desired properties of the product. Higher amounts of starch will increase the
strength of the product. However, it is not possible to increase the amount of
starch too much since other problems then may occur. Also, the amount of
MFC must be regulated based on the amount of starch and of course also on
the end use of the product. Too high amounts of MFC may cause dewatering
problems since MFC is a very fine material which easily absorbs water and
increased content will make it more difficult to dewater the product.
The paper or paperboard product is preferably a multilayer product
comprising at least two layers. It may be preferred that the product comprises
at least three layers and that the layer located in the middle of the product
comprises furnish comprising starch and microfibrillated cellulose. However,
it
is also possible that at least one outer layer of the product or even all
layers
of the product comprises furnish comprising starch and MFC. For some
products it might be advantageous that at least one of the outer layers
comprises furnish comprising starch and MFC. In this way it is possible to
increase the strength and/or the bulk of this layer. Consequently, depending
on the end use of the product, it is decided which and how many of the layers
that will comprise furnish comprising starch and MFC.
It is not necessary that the entire furnish in a layer of the paper or
paperboard product comprises starch and MFC, but it is preferred that the
starch and MFC is added to the majority of the furnish of the layer. However,
the layer may also comprise other components, such as broke pulp which
does not comprise starch and MFC.
The furnish may also contain various amounts of fillers to increase for
example runnability and cost-efficiency of the process and the produced
substrate. Other commonly used additives used in the production of paper or
paperboard can also be added.
The paperboard product is preferably a high quality paperboard
product, such a liquid packaging board, graphical board or food service

CA 02782342 2012-05-30
WO 2011/068457 6 PCT/SE2010/051322
board. The paper product is preferably a high quality paper, such as copy
paper of grades A or B, graphical papers, LWC, SC or news paper for high
speed printing machines.
The process for producing a paper or paperboard product which
process comprises the steps of providing a furnish comprising fibers, adding
starch to the furnish, adding microfibrillated cellulose to the furnish and
conducting the furnish to a wire in order to form a web. The addition of
starch
and MFC is preferably done in the machine chest or before the fan pump. It
may also be possible to do the addition to the circulation water which later
on
is added to the furnish. However, all practical points of addition for the
starch
and MFC can be used as long as there is enough time and mixing of the
starch and MFC with the furnish before it is conducted to the wire.
The starch and MFC is added separately. It is preferred to first add
starch followed by addition of MFC. It could be possible to mix the starch and
MFC before addition to the furnish, however the result is then not as good as
when starch and MFC is added separately. It is then possible to mix starch
and MFC before addition to the furnish by cooking them, preferably by the
use of a jet-cooker. It has been shown that by cooking the mixture of starch
and MFC, the MFC shows less tendency to flocculate. Furthermore, by
altering the charge and charge density of e.g. starch, different degrees of
flocculation can be obtained and it would thus be possible to neutralize the
charge of MFC. This might affect dewatering and retention of the fibers and
eventual fillers in the product. It may also be possible to add a layer of
starch
on the MFC and then add this mixture to the furnish, i.e. a multilayering
effect
can be created.

CA 02782342 2012-05-30
WO 2011/068457 7 PCT/SE2010/051322
Examples
Material used:
Bleached chemothermomechanical pulp (BCTMP) at 570 CSF.
Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) was prepared by refining bleached
hardwood sulphite pulp of 4% consistency with edge load of 2 Ws/m to 28
SR. The pulp were thereafter enzymatically treated with Endoglucanase
(Novozym 476) with the activity of 0,85 ECU/g. The enzymes were dosed to
the pulp and which thereafter was treated at 50 C for 2 hours, at pH 7. After
the enzymatic treatment, the pulp was washed and enzymes were
deactivated at 80 C for 30 min. The pulp was thereafter refined once more to
90-95 SR and the refined pulp was then fluidized (Microfluidizer, Microfuidics
corp.) by letting pulp of 3% consistency pass through a 400pm chamber
followed by a 100pm chamber wherein the MFC used were formed.
Starch used was cationized starch, Raisamyl 70021, Ciba (now BASF).
C-PAM used was Percol 292 NS, Ciba (now BASF).
BMA used was Eka NP495, Eka Chemicals.
Example 1:
The dried BCTMP were soaked in water over night and then dispersed
in hot water. The BCTMP suspension was thereafter diluted to a
concentration of 0.3%.
The produced MFC was also diluted to a concentration of 0.3% and
dispersed using a kitchen mixer.
A formette sheet former was used to prepare the sheets for testing.
The sheets were prepared according to the following procedure; Pulp
suspension measured to produce a 150gsm sheet was added to the stock
tank. During agitation, starch if used, and MFC if used, was added. After 30
seconds, 500g/t C-PAM was added and after another 30 seconds was 300g/t
BMA added to the stock and the sheet forming was thereafter started.

CA 02782342 2012-05-30
WO 2011/068457 8 PCT/SE2010/051322
The formed sheet was wet pressed and dried while the shrinkage was
constrained. The dried sheet was tested for structural density according to
SCAN P 88:01, z-strength according to SCAN P 80:88 and tensile strength
index according to ISO 1924-3.
Table 1: Results of strength and density tests.
Sample Structural z-strength Tensile strength
density (kPa) Index
(kg/m3) geometrical mean
(Nm/ )
Reference 570CSF 388 103 27
Addition of 5% MFC 459 218 40
Addition of 5% Starch 396 142 32
Addition of 5% MFC and 436 240 44
2,5% Starch
Addition of 5% MFC and 426 256 47
5% Starch
As can be seen from table 1 above it is clear that the addition of the
combination of MFC and starch strongly increases the strength, both the z-
strength and the tensile index. Furthermore, the densification of the sheets
has decreased compared to if only MFC was added.
Example 2:
Tests were also performed where MFC and cationic starch either was
pre-mixed or added separately to the stock.
When pre-mixed, the MFC and cationic starch was well mixed before
addition to the stock. When added separately, cationic starch was first added
and well mixed with the stock for 5 minutes followed by addition of MFC.
MFC in an amount of 25 kg/t and cationic starch in an amount of 20
kg/t were added in both samples, both the pre-mixed and the separately
added.
After addition of the MFC and cationic starch to the stock, a formette
sheet former was used in the same manner as described in Example 1.
As a reference the stock without any MFC and cationic starch was
used.

CA 02782342 2012-05-30
WO 2011/068457 9 PCT/SE2010/051322
Scott Bond was measured according to TAPPI UM-403.
Table 2: Results of strength and density tests.
Sample Structural z-strength Scott Bond (J/m2)
density (kPa)
(k /m3)
Reference 310 170 100
Pre-mixed sample 320 210 125
Separate) added sample 320 225 145
As can be seen from Table 2, both z-strength and Scott Bond is
increased when cationic starch and MFC is separately added to the stock.
In view of the above detailed description of the present invention, other
modifications and variations will become apparent to those skilled in the art.
However, it should be apparent that such other modifications and variations
may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2782342 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2014-12-02
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2014-12-02
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2013-12-02
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2013-03-27
Maintenance Request Received 2012-10-23
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2012-08-15
Inactive: Cover page published 2012-08-07
Inactive: IPC assigned 2012-07-20
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2012-07-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 2012-07-20
Application Received - PCT 2012-07-20
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2012-07-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 2012-07-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 2012-07-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 2012-07-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 2012-07-20
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2012-05-30
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2011-06-09

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2013-12-02

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2012-10-23

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2012-05-30
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2012-11-30 2012-10-23
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
STORA ENSO OYJ
Past Owners on Record
ISTO HEISKANEN
LARS AXRUP
MIKA RIIKONEN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2012-05-30 9 433
Abstract 2012-05-30 1 53
Claims 2012-05-30 1 23
Cover Page 2012-08-07 1 30
Notice of National Entry 2012-07-20 1 206
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2012-07-31 1 111
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2014-01-27 1 172
PCT 2012-05-30 7 240
Fees 2012-10-23 1 66