Language selection

Search

Patent 2797606 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2797606
(54) English Title: VORTEX SHEDDING ELECTRICAL GENERATOR
(54) French Title: GENERATEUR ELECTRIQUE A TOURBILLONS
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • F03B 17/06 (2006.01)
  • F01D 23/00 (2006.01)
  • F03B 13/22 (2006.01)
  • F03D 5/06 (2006.01)
  • H02K 7/18 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BUTLER, KRISTOPHER K. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • KRISTOPHER K. BUTLER
(71) Applicants :
  • KRISTOPHER K. BUTLER (Canada)
(74) Agent:
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2012-11-20
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2014-05-20
Examination requested: 2015-01-19
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


A device for the generation of electricity by converting the kinetic energy
from a fluid flow to
electrical energy. More specifically a device configured to create a Karman
vortex street within a
home water main, and use it to generate electricity. The device comprises, a
blunt body arranged
crosswise to the fluid flow, an attached membrane, a magnet attached to the
membrane, and at least
one electrical conducting coil. The membrane and magnet oscillate in response
to the Karman
vortex street. The resulting relative motion between the magnet and the
electrical conducting coil is
converted into electrical energy. Other arrangements of the device are
described.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


9
The Embodiments Of The Device In Which An Exclusive Property Or Privilege Is
Claimed
Are Defined As Follows:
1. A device for converting kinetic energy from a fluid flow to electrical
energy comprising: at
least one blunt body situated against at least one fluid flow; at least one
membrane attached
to the at least one blunt body, wherein the at least one membrane oscillates
when subject to
the at least one fluid flow; at least one magnet attached to the at least one
membrane,
wherein the at least one magnet is configured to move with the at least one
membrane; and at
least one electrical conducting coil configured to the relative motion of the
at least one
magnet, whereby at least one electrical current is induced in the at least one
electrical
conducting coil.
2. A device according to claim 1, wherein the device further comprises at
least one induced
venturi effect, by means of a constricted portion of the at least one fluid
flow.
3. A device according to claim 1, wherein the blunt body is at most as wide as
the fluid flow.
4. A device according to claim 1, wherein the at least one blunt body produces
a karman vortex
street when subject to the at least one fluid flow.
5. A device according to claim 1, wherein the at least one membrane
oscillations are in
response to at least one of the listed effects, comprising: karman vortex
street, vortex
shedding, fluid flow, and turbulent wake.
6. A device according to claim 1, wherein the at least one membrane is a
flexible membrane.
7. A device according to claim 1, wherein the at least one membrane is at most
as wide as the at
least one fluid flow.
8. A device according to claim 1, wherein the at least one blunt body further
comprises at least
one smooth surface for increased turbulent wake.
9. A device according to claim 1, wherein the at least one blunt body further
comprises at least
one of the listed types of dimpled surfaces for reduced turbulent wake:
circular, polygonal,
and platonic solids.
10. A device according to claim 1, wherein the at least one blunt body is at
least one streamlined
body.
11. A device according to claim 10, wherein the at least one streamlined body
is resilient.
12. A device according to claim 11, wherein the at least one resilient
streamlined body flexes

10
when exposed to a fluid flow.
13. A device according to claim 1, wherein the device further comprises a
method of reducing
resonance disaster by means of at least one of the listed methods: shock
mounts, dampening
materials, and tuned mass damper.
14. A device according to claim 1, wherein the blunt body is in at least one
fixed position.
15. A device according to claim 1, wherein the device further comprises at
least one resilient
material situated between the at least one magnet and the at least one
electrical conducting
coil.
16. A device according to claim 15, wherein the at least one resilient
material further comprises
at least one diaphragm.
17. A device for converting kinetic energy from a fluid flow to electrical
energy comprising: a
bluff body crosswise to a fluid flow, producing a karman vortex street; a
flexible membrane
attached to the bluff body, wherein the flexible membrane oscillates when
subject to the
karman vortex street; a magnet attached to the flexible membrane, wherein the
magnet is
configured to move with the flexible membrane; and a electrical conducting
coil configured
to the relative motion of the magnet, whereby a electrical current is induced
in the electrical
conducting coil.
18. A device according to claim 17, wherein the device further comprises at
least one resilient
material situated between the at least one magnet and the at least one
electrical conducting
coil.
19. A device according to claim 17, wherein the at least one bluff body is at
least one
streamlined body.
20. A device according to claim 17, wherein the bluff body is in at least one
fixed position.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02797606 2012-11-20
1
Vortex Shedding Electrical Generator
Background Of The Invention
Field Of The Invention
The device pertains to converting kinetic energy from a fluid flow into
electrical energy.
Description Of Prior Art
In light of the national focus on reducing energy costs, many home owners are
seeking ways of
implementing renewable energy technologies. In response, businesses such as
home builders are
changing the way they build homes, such as building them to generate as much
energy as they use.
Unfortunately, this approach comes at a higher cost to traditional home
construction.
In addition, many of the mechanisms used to produce renewable energy, such as
windmills, solar
panels, and hydroelectric generators, continue to remain at a high cost for
the average consumer, in
spite of subsidies and other programs. In response, consumers are constructing
mechanisms that are
not CSA approved, making the consumer liable for potential property damages if
the homemade
mechanisms fail.
Homes have a readily available supply of kinetic energy stored in the fluid
flow of the water main,
during usage. This overlooked source of potential energy can be converted to
electricity to reduce
home owners electricity costs, providing a low cost alternative to existing
renewable energy
technologies.
The following patents illustrate some methods for what has been tried to
harness the kinetic energy
of a fluid flow to electrical energy. CA Patent application 2640868 to Bowles,
Adrian Robert, GB,
on December 21, 2005. The disadvantages of this invention include, but are not
limited to: The
invention primarily utilizes the movement of a blunt body, which is not an
efficient use of the fluid
flows potential generation of vortices. The invention also requires the moving
blunt body to have a

CA 02797606 2012-11-20
2
fixed support arm, which fixed end opposite of the blunt body would act as an
unnecessary blunt
object within a fluid flow, whereby this would produce undue flow restriction.
Figure 8 calls for a
cruciform arrangement of blunt bodies, which would produce vortices in
opposing directions to each
35 other, whereby reducing the oscillation of the bodies. Figure 9 calls
for a blunt body containing
magnet stacks, and magnetic permeable cores wound with coils, which creates a
significant mass to
oscillate. This large mass would require a high fluid flow rate, which could
lead to resonance
failure. The invention also calls for figures such as 6, 7, 8, and 9 to have
electrical leads attached to
a primary moving part of the invention ¨ the arm, whereby the constant motion
of the arm would
40 fatigue the leads to failure. Lastly quoted as a disadvantage on page 7
of the application,
"...electrical output of a piezoelectric material is generally proportional to
the level of induced stress
but such materials exhibit relatively small strain rates even under high
forces..." which means the
invention's electrical generation would be limited by the piezoelectric
material.
45 Patent application CA 2753413 issued to Pabon, Jahir on 5 June 2009. The
disadvantages of the
invention include, but are not limited to: All the embodiments comprise a
series of mechanical parts
such as: springs, masses, and vortex shedding portions. All of which have the
potential to rub
improperly against the invention's other parts. In addition possessing so many
moving parts
increases maintenance and manufacturing costs of the invention.
US Patent 7986051 issued to Shawn Michael Frayne on 26 July 2011. The
disadvantages of this
invention include, but are not limited to: The configuration of the invention
does not suit it for
usage in pipes or other similar contained fluid flow. Claim 3 describes a
tension device, which
keeps tension on the membrane so that it will flutter in a fluid flow, whereby
the movement of the
membrane is converted to electricity. This suggests that the invention
requires regular adjustments
or tuning in order to achieve the optimal flutter.
CA Patent application 2707177 to Frayne Shawn M. The disadvantages mentioned
for the
previously listed patent also apply to this invention. Other disadvantages
include, but are not
limited to: The coils are illustrated as being attached to the membrane, which
will fatigue the coil as
it moves with the membrane, leading to breaks in the coil's leads.

CA 02797606 2012-11-20
3
CA Patent 2266632 issued to Arnold, Lee on 9 March 2004. The disadvantages of
this invention
include, but are not limited to: The use of mechanical linkage, gears, and
flywheels to harness the
65 fluid flow induced flutter of the hydrofoils to electrical energy. This
increases maintenance and
manufacturing costs of the invention. Not only that, but it is an inefficient
method of converting the
kinetic energy from the fluid flow, resulting in lost energy when converting
the kinetic energy to
mechanical, to mechanical again, to generate electricity.
70 The present device seeks to use the well-known effect of Karman vortex
street, for converting a
fluid flows kinetic energy to electrical energy. Karman vortex street thus
described as, when a blunt
body, streamlined body, bluff body or other such body is placed against a
fluid flow of a certain
Reynolds number. Flow past such bodies experiences boundary layer separation
and a turbulent
wake, comprising of vortices downstream.
In addition, it is known that a high Reynolds number range will produce a
periodic flow pattern of
vortices shed regularly, alternating from opposite sides of the body. As the
vortices are shed, the
corresponding uneven pressure distributions upon the opposite sides of the
body generate an
alternating oscillation.
From the previously listed prior art one can conclude that they fail to teach
or suggest an invention
that would convert fluid flow kinetic energy to electrical, in the manner of
the device. It is proposed
that at least one device be configured with at least one section of water
main, to provide a cost-
effective alternative to costly renewable energy technologies. Furthermore the
nature of the device
would not significantly reduce the existing pressure of the water main. It
should also be noted that
the present device usage is not limited to water mains. It should also be
noted that the embodiment
of fig.2 has been tested in a fluid flow with favorable results.
Summary Of The Invention
The device comprises, at least one blunt body situated crosswise to a fluid
flow, with at least one
flexible membrane attached to the blunt body, with at least one magnet
attached to the flexible
membrane, and there is at least one electrical conducting coil. As the fluid
flow interacts with the

CA 02797606 2012-11-20
4
blunt body, a Karman vortex street is generated. As the vortices are shed on
alternating sides of the
95 blunt body, the flexible membrane is driven in an oscillating manner,
thus propelling the magnet
towards and away from each electrical conducting coil. Through the relative
motion of the magnet,
electricity is induced in the coils.
Some of the advantages of the device over the prior art include, but are not
limited to:
100
= A blunt body whose width is in a fixed position, and whose width is at
least as wide as the
fluid flow, enabling it to utilize more potential vortices within a fluid
flow.
= A blunt body configured, so as not to create competing vortices.
= A device anchored within the fluid flow by means of the blunt body,
bypassing the need for
105 additional fixed points.
= The magnet is of a lesser mass, compared to a heavier mass combination
such as magnet
stacks, and magnetic permeable cores wound with coils, wherein the lesser mass
requires a
slower fluid flow in order to move.
= The devices electrical conducting coils are situated in such a way that
they do not fatigue the
110 coil leads.
= The device does not employ springs, gears, mechanical linkages, turbines,
flywheels, or
other such parts. And for this reason maintenance and manufacturing costs are
cost
effective.
= The electrical conducting coils can be of a different gauge and number of
turns, without
115 affecting the oscillations of the flexible membrane, because the
electrical conducting coils
are not attached to the flexible membrane.
= The device can be employed with a pipeline, without significantly
reducing transport
pressure.
= Materials to construct the device are readily available.
120 = The device, in some embodiments can be virtually silent.
= The device employs a resilient material, situated between the magnet and
coil, which allows
the magnets movement to: Get closer to the electrical conducting coil core,
thus inducing a
greater current, to increase the rate of relative movement between coil and
magnet, thus
increasing current, to reduce operating noise levels, to reduce potential
damage to the coil,

CA 02797606 2012-11-20
125 membrane and the magnet from mechanical interactions, and to keep
the fluid flow
contained in a housing or pipe.
Additional features and advantages of the device will become apparent in the
description of the
preferred embodiment, figures, and claims.
130
Brief Description Of The Drawings
Fig.1 is a side view of the device in one embodiment.
Fig.2 is a side view of another embodiment of the device.
Fig.3 is a side view of the preferred embodiment of the device.
135 Fig.4a is a top down side view of a variation in surface of the blunt
body of the device.
Fig.4b is a top down side view of a variation in surface of the blunt body of
the device.
Fig.4c is a top down side view of a variation in surface of the blunt body of
the device.
Description Of The Preferred Embodiment
140
It should be noted that the Venturi effect will be utilized in the preferred
embodiment. The Venturi
effect being described as: A fluid flow pressure being reduced in a portion of
the fluid flow, due to a
constricted portion of the fluid flow, by means of a constricted pipe or other
means. Fluid flow in
the constricted portion has a higher rate of flow.
145
Fig.3 depicts the preferred embodiment of the device, wherein a blunt body
(12) is placed crosswise
to at least one fluid flow (F), whereby the interaction generates a Karman
vortex street (v). At least
one flexible membrane (14), preferably made of plastic is attached to the
blunt body (12), and
oscillates in response to the Karman vortex street (v).
150
At least one magnet (16), preferably made of NdFeB is attached to the flexible
membrane (14),
which moves (x) with the flexible membrane (14) oscillations, with a section
of flexible membrane
(14) extending past the magnet (16).
155 At least one electrical conducting coil (18), preferably made of
enameled copper wire, is configured

CA 02797606 2012-11-20
6
to the magnet (16). At least one diaphragm (20), preferably made of a
resilient material, is situated
between the magnet (16) and the electrical conducting coils (18), whereby
reducing mechanical
damage to the magnet (16), electrical conducting coils (18), and the flexible
membrane (14).
160 And at least one method of inducing at least one Venturi effect (22) is
employed in the device. From
the movement (x) of the magnet (16), in relation to the electrical conducting
coils (18), an electrical
current is induced.
In another embodiment, illustrated by Fig.1, at least one blunt body (12) is
placed against the
165 direction of fluid flow (F) within a pipe (10). As the flow (F)
interacts with the blunt body (12), a
Karman vortex street (v) is formed downstream. The votices within the Karman
vortex street (v)
interact with at least one flexible membrane (14). The membrane (14) is
attached to the blunt body
(12), so as the vortices interact with it, the membrane (14) oscillates. There
is at least one electrical
conducting coil (18) inside the pipe (10).
170
There is at least one magnet (16) attached to the membrane (14), which moves
toward and away
from each electrical conducting coil (18). The relative motion (x) of the
magnet (16) to the coils
(18) induces an electrical current within each coil (18).
175 In another embodiment, illustrated by Fig.2, at least one blunt body
(12) is placed crosswise a fluid
flow (F) within a pipe (10). The fluid flow (F) interacts with the blunt body
(12), producing a
Karman vortex street (v) downstream. At least one attached flexible membrane
(14) oscillates in
response to the vortices within the Karman vortex street (v). And attached to
the membrane (14) is
at least one magnet (16), which moves (x) in a similar oscillating manner as
the membrane (14).
180
Situated in relation to the movement (x) of the magnet (16) are at least one
juxtaposed diaphragm
(20), preferably made of a resilient material. And situated to the diaphragm
(20) is at least one
electrical conducting coil (18), preferably made of enameled copper wire. As
the magnet (16)
moves with the membrane (14), it flexes each diaphragm (20) alternately into
the core of each coil
185 (18). Simultaneously, its magnetic field interacts with the electrical
conducting coils (18), inducing
an electrical current in each coil (18). The diaphragm (20) also serves the
purpose of keeping the

CA 02797606 2012-11-20
7
fluid flow (F) contained in the pipe (10), and allowing the magnet (16) to get
closer to the coils (18),
so as to induce more current.
190 In another embodiment, illustrated by Fig.4, at least one blunt body
(12) is placed against the
direction of fluid flow (F) within a pipe (10). As the flow (F) interacts with
the blunt body (12), a
Karman vortex street (v) is formed downstream. The votices within the Karman
vortex street (v)
interact with at least one flexible membrane (14). The membrane (14) is
attached to the blunt body
(12), so as the vortices interact with it, the membrane (14) oscillates. There
is at least one electrical
195 conducting coil (18) outside the pipe (10).
There is at least one magnet (16) attached to the membrane (14), which moves
toward and away
from each electrical conducting coil (18). The relative motion (x) of the
magnet (16) to the coils
(18) induces an electrical current within each coil (18).
200
Figures Fig.5 to Fig.7, illustrate variations of the blunt body surface.
Illustrated in Fig.5 comprises a
surface of polygonal or platonic shape dimples, for reduced turbulent wake.
Fig.6 comprises a
circular shape dimpled surface, for reduced turbulent wake. Fig.7 comprises a
smooth surface for
increased turbulent wake. Increasing turbulent wake may result in greater
electrical generation and
205 vibrations, whereas a reduction of turbulent wake may result in reduced
vibrations and less electrical
generation.
As a warning, at least one method of preventing resonance disaster may also
need to be employed
for the device. Resonance disaster being described as, the destruction of a
system or mechanism due
210 to stored up induced vibrations, at the resonance frequency of the
system or mechanism, that
overload a system or mechanisms capacity to failure.
In the case of the device, whatever is being employed to house the device or
the device itself,
through generated vibrations of the devices resonance frequency, cause
whatever is being employed
215 to house the device or the device itself to oscillate. As this result
repeats, the vibrations are stored
within the device or housing. Because of this repeated storage and additional
energy input, the
method of housing the device oscillates more and more, until its load limit is
exceeded, and the

CA 02797606 2012-11-20
8
housing or device destroys itself. Shock mounts, dampening materials, tuned
mass damper or other
methods could be employed to prevent this.
220
Although the preferred embodiment of the device has been described, it should
be noted that
modifications, additions and alterations can be made to the device by one
skilled in the art without
departing from the spirit and scope of the device as defined in the following
claims.
225

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2016-09-28
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2016-09-28
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2015-11-20
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2015-09-28
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2015-03-27
Inactive: Report - No QC 2015-03-26
Letter Sent 2015-01-27
Request for Examination Received 2015-01-19
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2015-01-19
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2015-01-19
Maintenance Request Received 2014-10-17
Inactive: Cover page published 2014-05-28
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2014-05-20
Change of Address Requirements Determined Compliant 2013-05-30
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2013-05-22
Inactive: Office letter 2013-05-15
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2013-05-09
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-01-14
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-01-02
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-01-02
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-01-02
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2013-01-02
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-01-02
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 2012-12-17
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2012-12-17
Application Received - Regular National 2012-12-14
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2012-11-20

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2015-11-20

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2014-10-17

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 2012-11-20
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2014-11-20 2014-10-17
Request for examination - small 2015-01-19
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KRISTOPHER K. BUTLER
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2014-05-28 1 46
Description 2012-11-20 8 366
Claims 2012-11-20 2 89
Drawings 2012-11-20 5 118
Abstract 2012-11-20 1 17
Representative drawing 2014-04-22 1 17
Filing Certificate (English) 2012-12-17 1 167
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2014-08-21 1 128
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2015-01-27 1 187
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2015-08-24 1 120
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2015-11-23 1 164
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2016-01-04 1 172
Second Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2016-05-24 1 119
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2016-08-23 1 122
Correspondence 2013-05-09 1 23
Correspondence 2013-05-15 1 12
Correspondence 2013-05-22 1 24
Fees 2014-10-17 2 146