Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING
A LUBRICANT DISCARD INTERVAL
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE
[0001] The present disclosure relates to a system, a method, and a
computer program for
determining usability of lubricants and when to replace the lubricants in, for
example, an engine,
a power transmission device, a turbine, a generator, a motor, or the like.
BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE
[0002] Engines (or motors) are designed to convert one form of energy
(such as, for
example, fuel combustion, electricity, nuclear reactions, and the like) to
mechanical energy, such
as, for example, mechanical motion. For instance, combustion engines convert
fuel combustion
energy to motion energy. These engines typically include one or more
combustion chambers
that contain and confine the combustion of a fuel (e.g., a fossil fuel),
allowing the resultant high
temperature and high pressure gases to expand and drive mechanical components
such as, for
example, pistons, turbine blades, or the like.
[0003] Internal combustion engines are typically used in vehicles,
including, e.g.,
motorcycles, scooters, automobiles, boats, trucks, locomotives, watercraft,
aircraft, ships, gas
turbines, generators, heavy duty machinery, and the like. During operation of,
for example, an
internal combustion engine that comprises one or more pistons, a piston may be
driven by
expanding gases resulting from the combustion of the fuel in the chamber,
causing the piston to
move along a predetermined path for a predetermined distance along a length of
the chamber.
The piston may be connected to a crankshaft through a connecting rod to
translate the movement
of the piston to a rotation of the crankshaft. The engine may further include
an intake valve or
port and an exhaust valve or port. The engine may comprise any number of sets
of pistons,
connecting rods and chambers. The various moving parts of the engine cause
friction, which
results in the wear of the moving parts and diminished power output of the
engine.
1
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
[0004] Most of the moving parts in the engine are made of metal.
During operation,
metal to metal contact of the moving parts causes wear on the moving parts. To
minimize wear
of the moving= parts, and, therefore, to maximize engine durability and
longevity, a lubricant
(e.g., an engine oil) is used to lubricate the moving parts in the engine. The
lubricant may also
function to clean, inhibit corrosion, improve sealing, and cool the engine by
carrying heat away
from the moving parts. The lubricant reduces friction by, for example,
creating a separating film
= between surfaces of adjacent moving parts to minimize direct contact
between the surfaces,
decreasing heat caused by the friction and reducing wear.
[0005] Most lubricants are made from a petroleum hydrocarbon
derived from crude oil.
Alternatively (or additionally), the lubricants may be made from synthetic
materials, such as,
e.g., synthetic esters, polyalphaolefins, and the like. Additives are added to
the lubricant to
improve certain properties. The additives may include, for example,
detergents, dispersants,
corrosion inhibitors, alkaline additives, and the like. One of the most
important properties of
lubricants is to maintain a lubricating film between the moving parts of the
engine. Another
important property of lubricants is its ability to neutralize acids.
[0006] In engines, the lubricants are exposed to the byproducts of
internal combustion,
including, for example, carbonaceous particles, metallic particles, and the
like. During operation
of the engine, the lubricants undergo both thermal and mechanical degradation,
and
contamination which impairs their function. Eventually the loss of performance
may become
significant enough to necessitate removal of the used lubricant and
replacement with a fresh
lubricant. Thus, time-based (e.g., 92 days, 184 days, 276 days, every 6
months, or the like)
and/or distance-based (e.g., every three thousand miles, every five thousand
miles, or the like)
lubricant drainage intervals (LDIs) are typically used in determining when to
replace the
lubricants in an engine.
[0007] In the railroad industry, engine oil samples are typically
taken from locomotive
engines about every 2 to 3 weeks. These samples are then analyzed to identify
problems, such
as, e.g., coolant leaks, fuel dilution, metal wear, oil deterioration,
improper oil in use, and the
like. The railroads schedule oil change intervals based on, e.g., original
equipment manufacturer
(OEM) recommendations, operating history, and the like. Currently, a common
industry practice
for drain intervals is about every 184 days. However, this drain interval may
be too long for
some engines, such as, e.g., engines that are operated under severe
conditions, or engines that are
2
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
=
experiencing performance issues, or new engines that have just been placed
into service and are
susceptible to break-in wear. Further, the time between drain intervals may be
shorter than
optimal for some engines, such as, e.g., engines that are operated under
ideally optimal
=
conditions.
[0008] In the trucking industry, for example, truck fleets have often
utilized oil analysis
to establish oil drain intervals for entire fleets. The oil drain intervals,
however, are based on
fleets rather than individual engines. Again, the established oil drain
intervals may be too long
for some engines, while shorter than necessary for others.
[0009] While lubricant drainage intervals are typically set based on
the time in service or
the distance that a vehicle has traveled, actual operating conditions and
engine hours of operation
may vary drastically for a give time in service or a distance traveled by a
vehicle. Thus, fixed
time/distance lubricant discard (or drain) intervals may result in the
continued use of spent
engine lubricant where an engine is operated under severe conditions or where
the engine is not
operating properly, which may result in poor fuel efficiency, costly
maintenance, premature
engine failure, and the like. The fixed time/distance lubricant discard
intervals may also result
in the premature, and therefore, inefficient discarding of engine lubricant
that remains unspent at
the discard interval, thereby increasing the amount of waste byproduct to be
disposed of, as well
as the costs associated with the replacement of the engine lubricant
(including, e.g., the cost of
the lubricant, the cost of labor to replace the lubricant, disposal costs,
engine down time costs,
and the like).
[00010] The engine lubricant may be considered to be spent when, for
example, the
properties of the engine lubricant have been degraded to a point where the
engine lubricant
ceases to properly lubricate the engine parts, inhibit corrosion, or the like.
[00011] Although it would seem ideal to analyze the condition of used
oil from each piece
of equipment and only change it when the analysis indicates it is close to the
end of its useful
life, there are other costs to consider in determining the most cost effective
time to change oil. In
their use, engines contribute to revenue production making it costly to take
them out of service.
As a consequence many maintenance tasks for equipment are preplanned and
grouped together
enabling these tasks to be performed during a planned shutdown of the
equipment, or when many
of the tasks can be performed simultaneously to minimize downtime. Equipment
operators
3
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
usually schedule maintenance to optimize overall cost. This means that to
maximize production,
individual maintenance tasks may be performed before they are actually needed.
[00012] Some maintenance tasks need to be performed more frequently than
others.
Preplanned maintenance is often based around a set of schedules. For example a
fleet of trucks
may have an A schedule every 30 days, a B schedule every 60 days, and a C
Schedule every 120
days. A truck coming in for its first maintenance after 30 days would have all
the services
performed that are required in Schedule A. 30 days later it would have
services A and B
performed. 30 days after that (90 days cumulative) it would require the
services in schedule A
only. At 120 days of service it would require all the procedures in schedules
A, B and C. The
cycle would then be repeated.
[00013] If the fleet oil drain interval was scheduled for 30 days, and it
was determined that
a 45 day oil change interval would be safe, it is highly unlikely that taking
these trucks out of
service at 45 days only to change oil would be a cost effective undertaking.
Moving the fleet to a
60 day oil change would be a practical endeavor, if that was determined to be
a safe drain
interval, because it would convert the oil change from a schedule A to a
schedule B function, cut
the oil change costs in half, and not result in any new out of service costs.
If the oil change
happened to be the only item in maintenance schedule A, this would result in a
productivity
improvement because the equipment would be taken out of service less
frequently.
[00014] Because it is often difficult to predict how much useful life
remains in a used oil,
oil change intervals are frequently standardized across like pieces of
equipment in a business
unit. The oil change interval selection can be based on many different factors
including the
business unit's maintenance history with the specific equipment, the severity
of service, the
equipment manufacturer's recommendation, used oil analysis, etc. The oil
change interval is
usually chosen by what the business unit believes is the lowest overall cost
in the trade-off
between maintenance costs, repair costs, and downtime. Because no two units
are identical, or
used in identical service, the oil change interval is usually chosen to
accommodate the most
severe situation. This means that in a set of like engines, some engines that
are milder or in
milder service, and may be able to operate quite effectively on longer oil
drain intervals.
[00015] A good example, is railroad locomotives. These engines require
safety
inspections every 92 days. Oil changes used to be performed every 92 days to
coincide with this
out of service point. Many locomotive fleets have found that conditions are
such that they can
4
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
now change oil every 184 days. The next logical oil change interval increase
would be to 276
days to coincide with a safety inspection. Some locomotives, particularly some
GE FDL units
under some operating conditions, cannot safely go for 276 days without an oil
change. Thus, an
unfulfilled need exists for a system and method to test used oil and predict
at, for example, 150
days of service, based on the used oil analysis, which units should be changed
at, e.g., 184 days
and which units can safely continue to, e.g., 276 days without an oil change.
[00016] The present disclosure provides a system, a method, and a computer
program for
testing used oil and, using the methodology described herein, predicting (or
enabling a user to
predict) at, for example, 150 days of service, based on the used oil analysis,
which units in, e.g.,
a railroad locomotive fleet should be changed at, for example, 184 days and
which can safely
continue to, for example, 276 days without an oil change.
SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE
[00017] The disclosure provides a system, a method, and a computer program
to
determine the usability of a lubricant such as, e.g., engine oil, and when to
replace the lubricant
in a particular engine. The system, method, and computer program are further
configured to
generate a lubricant discard interval for each engine in, e.g., a company's
fleet of vehicles. The
lubricant discard interval is generated based on one or more modeled parameter
values for each
engine in, e.g., the company's fleet of vehicles. The system, method, and
computer program are
configured to generate a lubricant discard interval schedule for each of the
vehicles in the
company's fleet based on the future predicted analysis of the lubricant in use
for each engine.
[00018] According to an aspect of the disclosure, a system is provided for
predicting a
lubricant drain interval in an engine based on an analysis parameter value or
set parameter values
measured in a sample of engine lubricant taken from the engine. The system
comprises: a first
input that receives the analysis parameter value; a second input that receives
an analysis
parameter threshold value; and a determiner that predicts a future analysis
parameter value based
on the analysis parameter value and the analysis parameter threshold value.
The system may
further comprise: a computer that receives the lubricant drain interval. The
engine lubricant may
comprise an engine oil. The computer may comprise the determiner. The first
input may receive
a historical analysis parameter value for the engine.
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
[00019] The determiner may be configured to generate the lubricant drain
interval for the
engine. The determiner may perform modeling on the historical analysis
parameter value and
said analysis parameter value to determine the future analysis parameter
value. The modeling
may comprise: a linear regression; a non-linear regression; a logistic
regression; a neural
network; discriminate analysis; if-then logic; partial least squares
regression; and the like. The
determiner may compare the future analysis parameter value to the analysis
parameter threshold
value. The determiner may generate the lubricant drain interval for the engine
based on the
comparison of the future analysis parameter value to the analysis parameter
threshold value.
[00020] The first input may receive an additional analysis parameter
value, and the
determiner may perform a linear regression on said analysis parameter value or
a nonlinear
regression on the additional analysis parameter value. The analysis parameter
value may
include, for example, a concentration of iron in the engine lubricant sample
and the additional
analysis parameter value may include, for example, a concentration of lead in
the engine
lubricant sample. The analysis parameter value and the additional analysis
parameter value may
be selected, for example, from iron, lead, tin, copper aluminum, boron,
oxidation, nitration,
potassium, silicon, sodium, soot, TBN, water, fuel, sludge, and insolubles in
the engine lubricant
sample.
[00021] The analysis parameter m is selected, for example, from a group of
analysis
parameters consisting of iron, lead, tin, copper aluminum, boron, oxidation,
nitration, potassium,
silicon, sodium, soot, water, fuel, sludge, insolubles, etc.
[00022] According to a further aspect of the disclosure, a method is
provided for selecting
a plurality of engines for an extended lubricant drain interval, the method
comprising: retrieving
lubricant discard interval data for a plurality of engines; categorizing the
lubricant discard data
into at least two categories, including an extended lubricant discard interval
category and a
normal lubricant di¨scard interval category; and generating a lubricant
discard interval schedule
for the plurality of engines. The extended lubricant discard interval category
may, for example,
comprise 276 days and a normal lubricant discard interval category comprises
184 days.
[00023] According to a still further aspect of the disclosure, a method is
provided for
predicting a lubricant drain interval in an engine based on an analysis
parameter value that is
measured in a sample of engine lubricant taken from the engine, the method
comprising:
receiving at a first input the analysis parameter value; receiving at a second
input an analysis
6
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
parameter threshold value; and predicting a future analysis parameter value
based on the analysis
parameter value and the analysis parameter threshold value.
The method =may further comprise predicting a probability when the future
analysis parameter
value will exceed the analysis parameter threshold value.
[00024] According to a still further aspect of the disclosure, a computer
readable medium
may be provided that comprises a computer program, as described hereinbelow,
for carrying out
the process described herein.
[00025] Additional features, advantages, and embodiments of the disclosure
may be set
forth or apparent from consideration of the detailed description and drawings.
Moreover, it is
noted that the foregoing summary of the disclosure and the following detailed
description and
drawings provide non-limiting examples of the disclosure, which are intended
to provide
explanation without limiting the scope of the disclosure as claimed.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[00026] The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further
understanding of the disclosure, are incorporated in and constitute a part of
this specification,
illustrate embodiments of the disclosure and together with the detailed
description serve to
explain the principles of the disclosure. No attempt is made to show
structural details of the
disclosure in more detail than may be necessary for a fundamental
understanding of the
disclosure and the various ways in which it may be practiced. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 A shows an example of a system that determines the usability of a
lubricant and
when to replace the lubricant;
FIG. 1B shows a representation of a determiner module that may be included in
the
system of FIG. 1A;
FIG. 2 shows an example of a lubricant analysis process for analyzing a sample
of an
engine lubricant;
FIG. 3 shows an example of an engine lubricant discard interval determination
process
for determining the usability of an engine lubricant and establishing an
engine lubricant discard
interval for a particular engine;
FIG. 4 shows an example of historical data that may be retrieved from a
storage for a
7
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
particular engine;
FIG. 5 shows a scatter plot chart for another example of historical data for
another
engine, with the dates provided on the abscissa axis and the= analysis
parameter (Fe, iron)
provided on the ordinate axis;
FIG. 6 shows an example of General Electric (GE) OEM recommendations for a GE
locomotive engine;
FIG. 7 shows an example of Electro-Motive Diesel (EMD) OEM recommendations for
an EMD locomotive engine;
FIG. 8 shows an example of an implementation of the system of FIG. 1;
FIG. 9 shows an example of eight scatter plot charts of iron (Fe) versus oil-
age for a
locomotive unit;
FIG. 10 shows an example of eight scatter plot charts of soot versus oil-age
for a
locomotive unit;
FIG. 11 shows an example of eight scatter plot charts of TBN versus oil-age
for a
locomotive unit;
FIG. 12 shows an example of a scatter plot chart of soot versus oil-age for a
locomotive
unit;
FIG. 13 shows an example of eight scatter plot charts of iron (Fe) versus oil-
age for a
locomotive unit;
FIG. 14 shows an example of eight scatter plot charts of soot versus oil-age
for a
locomotive unit;
FIG. 15 shows an example of a matrix scatter plot chart for another locomotive
unit; and
FIG. 16 shows an example of a process for setting a maintenance schedule for
one or
more engines.
[00027] The present disclosure is further described in the detailed
description that follows.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE
[00028] The disclosure and the various features and advantageous details
thereof are
explained more fully with reference to the non-limiting embodiments and
examples that are
described and/or illustrated in the accompanying drawings and detailed in the
following
8
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
description. It is noted that the features illustrated in the drawings and
attachment are not
necessarily drawn to scale, and features of one embodiment may be employed
with other
embodiments as the skilled artisan would recognize, even if not explicitly
stated= herein.
Descriptions of well-known components and processing techniques may be omitted
so as to not
unnecessarily obscure the embodiments of the disclosure. The examples used
herein are
intended merely to facilitate an understanding of ways in which the disclosure
may be practiced
and to further enable those of skill in the art to practice the embodiments of
the disclosure.
Accordingly, the examples and embodiments herein should not be construed as
limiting the
scope of the disclosure. Moreover, it is noted that like reference numerals
represent similar parts
throughout the several views of the drawings.
[00029] A "computer," as used in this disclosure, means any machine,
device, circuit,
component, or module, or any system of machines, devices, circuits,
components, modules, or
the like, which are capable of manipulating data according to one or more
instructions, such as,
for example, without limitation, a processor, a microprocessor, a central
processing unit, a
general purpose computer, a super computer, a personal computer, a laptop
computer, a palmtop
computer, a notebook computer, a cloud computer, a desktop computer, a
workstation computer,
a server, or the like, or an array of processors, microprocessors, central
processing units, general
purpose computers, super computers, personal computers, laptop computers,
palmtop computers,
notebook computers, desktop computers, workstation computers, servers, or the
like.
[00030] A "server," as used in this disclosure, means any combination of
software and/or
hardware, including at least one application and/or at least one computer to
perform services for
connected clients as part of a client-server architecture. The at least one
server application may
include, but is not limited to, for example, an application program that can
accept connections to
service requests from clients by sending back responses to the clients. The
server may be
configured to run the at least one application, often under heavy workloads,
unattended, for
extended periods of time with minimal human direction. The server may include
a plurality of
computers configured, with the at least one application being divided among
the computers
depending upon the workload. For example, under light loading, the at least
one application can
run on a single computer. However, under heavy loading, multiple computers may
be required
to run the at least one application. The server, or any if its computers, may
also be used as a
workstation.
9
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
[00031]
"Linear regression," as used in this disclosure, means any known linear
regression methodology known by those skilled in the art, including general
linear models
(GLM) such as, for example, polynomial expressions that may be restricted to a
class of
problems that satisfy a set of requirements. These requirements pertain to the
model error. The
model error is the difference between the observed value and the predicted
value. The
investigation of the model error is a key factor for evaluating model
adequacy. The required
assumptions for general linear models include: the errors have a mean of zero;
the errors are
uncorrelated; the errors are normally distributed; and the errors have a
constant variance. If any
of the foregoing assumptions are violated, then it is generally required to
apply some sort of
transformation, add more variables to accommodate systemic sources of
variance, or apply
another type of modeling method such as a non-linear type of modeling
approach.
[00032]
"Linear regression," as used in this disclosure, may include a "generalized
linear
model" (GLZ). A GLZ has two key features that distinguish it from the GLM
method. It
includes a link and a distribution function. The link is a transformation
function such as an
identity, a power, or log. The distribution function pertains to the error
component. In GLM, the
errors are normally distributed. With GLZ, the errors can be specified as
normal or from one of
the exponential family of distributions. Some examples include the Poisson,
binomial, gamma,
and inverse Gaussian. Due to the link and distribution function, this type of
modeling approach
may be referred to as a "nonlinear" type of modeling.
[00033]
"Logistic regression" is a unique modeling approach for binary or dichotomous
type response data. Logistic regression may be applied to problems that have
pass/fail {0, 1}
data. The two unique features for the logistic regression model include: the
conditional mean of
the regression equation must be formulated to be bounded between 0 and 1; and
the binomial
distribution describes the distribution of the errors. The predicted value for
the logistic model
can be expressed as the logged odds or probability of a pass/fail for a unique
set of conditions of
the independent (x) variables.
[00034] In
the case of the used lubricant (or oil) analysis, Logistic regression models
may
be used to predict the probability that a critical threshold for a used
lubricant parameter will be
exceeded. If the predicted probability is high that a critical lubricant life
parameter will be
exceeded, then the conclusion will be that the lubricant drain interval should
not be extended.
io
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
[00035]
Other modeling techniques such as Partial Least Squares and Principal
Components Regression can also be applied to predict/forecast the value for a
set of used
lubricant critical parameter(s). Alternatively, a discriminate analysis can
also be applied to
identify the variables/attributes that separate the used lubricant data into
two different groups.
The first and second groups in the discriminate analysis correspond to the
conditions that can and
cannot lead to the extension of the lubricant drain interval.
[00036] A
"neural network" may be an effective nonlinear and assumption free type of
modeling approach. Two common architectures of Neural Networks include, for
example,
Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF). The output of
the RBF
network is a function of the network weights, radial distances, and sigma
width parameter. The
output of the MLP is based on the weighted sum of the inputs and an activation
function. The
sigmoid is the general type of activation function form.
- =
-
.4(
Xj - 4;1,
0.4p.,i Layer Tv,
-= . OutpuL La) es
X f =- 1/)
Lyr-
ibdilen Layer
Inp .z.> er
Ax)==
Where: / ,4( j
I .1x-111 y ,4! viP = gi
0, ="7- eXilfI , _________________________ k,
j
1
Radial Basis Function NN Multi-Layer Perceptron NN
The variables xi Xd are predictor variables, wi wd
(or dm) and wl wmi are weighting
values, and y is the output.
[00037] The
response parameter (y) data may be linear or nonlinear related to the
predictor (x) variables. As shown in the TBN plot in FIG. 11 for unit
Locomotive Unit 2248, the
relationship between the predictor (x), oil age, and the response parameter
(y) TBN corresponds
with a non-linear decreasing trend. In this example, it may be advantageous to
utilize a higher
order polynomial expression, neural network (NN), natural log transform of oil
age days to better
characterize the underlying relationship between TBN and oil age.
11
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
[00038] In FIG. 9, the relationship between the response parameter (y) and
oil age may be
linear. As shown in the Fe (iron) plot for unit Locomotive Unit 2248, the
relationship between
the predictor (x), oil age, and the response parameter (y) Fe (iron) tends to
exhibit a linear
increasing trend. As such, this data may be expressed with a linear polynomial
function.
[00039] A "database," as used in this disclosure, means any combination of
software
and/or hardware, including at least one application and/or at least one
computer. The database
may include a structured collection of records or data organized according to
a database model,
such as, for example, but not limited to at least one of a relational model, a
hierarchical model, a
network model or the like. The database may include a database management
system application
(DBMS) as is known in the art. The at least one application may include, but
is not limited to,
for example, an application program that can accept connections to service
requests from clients
by sending back responses to the clients. The database may be configured to
run the at least one
application, often under heavy workloads, unattended, for extended periods of
time with minimal
human direction.
[00040] A "communication link," as used in this disclosure, means a wired
and/or wireless
medium that conveys data or information between at least two points. The wired
or wireless
medium may include, for example, a metallic conductor link, a radio frequency
(RF)
communication link, an Infrared (IR) communication link, an optical
communication link, or the
like, without limitation. The RF communication link may include, for example,
WiFi, WiMAX,
IEEE 802.11, DECT, OG, 1G, 2G, 3G or 4G cellular standards, Bluetooth, and the
like.
[00041] A "network," as used in this disclosure means, but is not limited
to, for example,
at least one of a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a
metropolitan area
network (MAN), a personal area network (PAN), a campus area network, a
corporate area
network, a global area network (GAN), a broadband area network (BAN), a
cellular network, the
Internet, or the like, or any combination of the foregoing, any of which may
be configured to
communicate data via a wireless and/or a wired communication medium. These
networks may
run a variety of protocols not limited to TCP/IP, IRC or HTTP.
[00042] The terms "including," "comprising," and variations thereof, as
used in this
disclosure, mean "including, but not limited to", unless expressly specified
otherwise.
[00043] The terms "a," "an," and "the," as used in this disclosure, means
"one or more",
unless expressly specified otherwise.
12
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
[00044] Devices that are in communication with each other need not be in
continuous
communication with each other, unless expressly specified otherwise. In
addition, devices that
are in communication with each other may communicate directly or indirectly
through one or
more intermediaries.
[00045] Although process steps, method steps, algorithms, or the like, may
be described in
a sequential order, such processes, methods, and algorithms may be configured
to work in
alternate orders. In other words, any sequence or order of steps that may be
described does not
necessarily indicate a requirement that the steps be performed in that order.
The steps of the
processes, methods, or algorithms described herein may be performed in any
order practical.
Further, some steps may be performed simultaneously.
[00046] When a single device or article is described herein, it will be
readily apparent that
more than one device or article may be used in place of a single device or
article. Similarly,
where more than one device or article is described herein, it will be readily
apparent that a single
device or article may be used in place of the more than one device or article.
The functionality
or the features of a device may be alternatively embodied by one or more other
devices which
are not explicitly described as having such functionality or features.
[00047] A "computer-readable medium," as used in this disclosure, means any
medium
that participates in providing data (for example, instructions) which may be
read by a computer.
Such a medium may take many forms, including non-volatile media, volatile
media, and
transmission media. Non-volatile media may include, for example, optical or
magnetic disks and
other persistent memory. Volatile media may include dynamic random access
memory
(DRAM). Transmission media may include coaxial cables, copper wire, and fiber
optics,
including the wires that comprise a system bus coupled to the processor.
Transmission media
may include or convey acoustic waves, light waves and electromagnetic
emissions, such as those
generated during radio frequency (RF) and infrared (IR) data communications.
Common forms
of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible
disk, hard disk,
magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, DVD, any other optical
medium, punch
cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a
PROM, an
EPROM, a FLASH-EEPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, a carrier wave as
described
hereinafter, or any other medium from which a computer can read. The computer-
readable
13
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
=
medium may include a "Cloud," which includes a distribution of files across
multiple (e.g.,
thousands of) memory caches on multiple (e.g., thousands of) computers.
[00048] Various forms of computer readable media may be involved in=
carrying
sequences of instructions to a computer. For example, sequences of instruction
(i) may be
delivered from a RAM to a processor, (ii) may be carried over a wireless
transmission medium,
and/or (iii) may be formatted according to numerous formats, standards or
protocols, including,
for example, WiFi, WiMAX, IEEE 802.11, DECT, OG, 1G, 2G, 3G or 4G cellular
standards,
Bluetooth, or the like.
[00049] FIG. 1A shows an example of a system 100 that determines the
usability of a
lubricant and when to replace the lubricant in, for example, an engine. The
system 100
comprises an analyzer 110, a computer 120, a server 130, and a database 140,
all of which may
be linked through a network 150 via communication links 160 or directly via
the communication
links 160. The analyzer 110 may be located on (or in) an engine, in an engine
compartment of a
vehicle, in a building, or the like. The computer 120 may be located at, e.g.,
a customer site,
such as, e.g., a customer shop, a customer building, or the like. The server
130 and/or database
140 may be located at a product provider site, such as, e.g., an engine
lubricant distributor or
supplier, an engine lubricant retailer, or the like.
[00050] The analyzer 110 may include, e.g., a spectral analyzer, a
viscosity analyzer, an
acid analyzer, a solids analyzer, a flashpoint analyzer, an oxidation
analyzer, a nitration analyzer,
and the like. The analyzer 110 is configured to receive a sample of an engine
lubricant that has
been taken from a particular engine and analyze the sample to identify and
measure one or more
analysis parameters. For instance, the spectral analyzer 110 may perform
spectral analysis of the
lubricant sample to determine the levels (e.g., in parts per million (ppm)) of
analysis parameters.
The analysis parameters (AP) may include, e.g., wear metals, contaminants,
additives, and the
like, that may be present in the lubricant. The analysis parameters may also
include an indication
and concentration of engine coolant in the lubricant. The spectral analyzer
may include, e.g., a
Rotrode Emission Spectrometer, an Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrometer, or
the like. The
wear metals that may be identified and measured include, e.g., aluminum,
antimony, chromium,
copper, iron, lead, nickel, silver, tin, titanium, zinc, and the like. The
additives that may be
identified and measured include, e.g., antimony, boron, calcium, copper,
magnesium,
molybdenum, phosphorus, potassium, silicon, sodium, zinc, and the like. The
contaminants that
14
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
may be identified and measured include, e.g., zinc, boron, potassium, silicon,
sodium, soot,
water, fuel, sludge, insolubles, and the like. The oxidation and nitration
analyzers may provide
information concerning degradation of the lubricant by measuring oxidation =
and nitration,
respectively.
[00051] The viscosity analyzer may include, e.g., a viscometer that
performs viscosity
analysis to determine the effective grade of the lubricant. The viscosity
analyzer may measure
the lubricant at a temperature of, e.g. -35 C, -20 C, 0 C, 40 C, 100 C, or any
other temperature,
as is known in the art. The viscosity analyzer may measure the effective
viscosity of the
lubricant by, e.g., measuring the time that it takes the lubricant to flow
between two sensors that
are provide on a conduit (e.g., a glass tube, or the like) that is maintained
at a constant
temperature. Alternatively (or additionally) the viscosity analyzer may
measure, e.g., high
temperature, high shear, dynamic, kinematic, and the like.
[00052] An acid analyzer may measure the lubricant's Total Base Number
(TBN) by, e.g.,
mixing the lubricant with a diluent and titrating the mixture with, e.g.,
alcohol-Hydrochloric acid
(HC1) solution until all of the alkaline constituents that are present in the
lubricant are
neutralized. The acid analyzer may additionally (or alternatively) measure the
lubricant's Total
Acid Number (TAN). In this regard, the acid analyzer may, e.g., mix the engine
lubricant with a
diluent and, then, titrate the mixture with, e.g., alcohol-potassium hydroxide
(KOH) until all of
the acids present in the engine lubricant have been neutralized. The TAN or
TBN results may be
reported in milligrams of, e.g., KOH or HC1 per gram of engine lubricant.
[00053] The solids analyzer may perform an analysis of the solids in the
lubricant to
identify the particular solids and the concentration of the solids in the
lubricant. The solids
analyzer may include, e.g., a laser-based particle counter, infrared analyzer,
or the like, that
detects and measures the concentration of particles in a sample of lubricant.
[00054] The flashpoint analyzer may analyze the lubricant to determine the
temperature at
which the vapors from the lubricant ignite. For instance, the flashpoint
analyzer may slowly heat
a sample of lubricant, keeping accurate measurements of the temperature of the
sample. When
the evaporated gases ignite or become ignitable, the temperature of the sample
may be recorded
as the flash point temperature of the particular lubricant sample.
[00055] The analyzer 110 may include a transceiver (not shown) that is
configured to send
and receive data and instructions over the communication link 160. For
instance, the analyzer
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
110 may be configured to send data from the engine or the engine compartment
of the vehicle to
the customer computer 120 and/or the server 130 or database 140. The analyzer
110 may be
configured to directly sample an engine lubricant in an engine and provide
analysis data in
substantial real-time, which may be sent to the customer computer 120 and/or
the server 130 (or
database 140).
[00056]
Alternatively, the analyzer 110 may be located at a remote laboratory, where
samples (e.g., 4oz, 8oz, or the like) of engine lubricant may be received at
the laboratory for
testing via messenger, mail, or the like. The results of the analysis may be
sent by the analyzer
110 to the customer computer 120 and/or the server 130 via the communication
links 160. For
instance, after a sample of the engine lubricant has been analyzed by the
analyzer 110, the engine
lubricant analysis results may be sent to the database 140, where the results
may be associated
with and stored in, e.g., a database record (or file) that is associated with
a particular engine, a
particular engine type, a particular vehicle, a particular engine
manufacturer, a particular vehicle
manufacturer, a particular entity (e.g., a person, a company, an institution,
or the like), or the
like. The database record may include historical information, including past
lubricant analysis
results for the associated engine and/or vehicle. It is noted that the
database 140 may be located
internally in the server 130.
[00057]
FIG. 1B shows a representation of a determiner module 170 that may be included
in the server 130 to carry out an aspect of the disclosure. The determiner 170
may include
software and/or hardware. The determiner 170 may include a central processing
unit (CPU) and
a memory. The determiner 170 is configured to receive and compare a measured
analysis
parameter value AP to an analysis parameter threshold value APTH. The
determiner 170
determines a lubricant discard (or drain) interval (LDI) based on the
comparison of the measured
analysis parameter value AP to the analysis parameter threshold value APrit.
The determiner
170 may provide an output that indicates whether the LDI interval may be
extended, or not, or
whether it needs to be shortened.
[00058]
According to an embodiment of the disclosure, the determiner 170 is configured
to receive and compare each of a plurality of measured analysis parameter
values, AN, APn,
to the analysis parameter threshold value AP-rn for a particular analysis
parameter in a particular
engine, where the analysis parameter values API, ..., AP n include the
measured levels or
concentrations of the particular analysis parameter AP in n samples of engine
lubricant that were
16
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
taken over n separate dates, where n is a positive integer that is greater
than, or equal to 1. The
determiner 170 may include artificial intelligence, such as, e.g., a neural
network, fuzzy logic, or
the like, that performs linear regression, non-linear regression, logistic
regression, or the like, on
the plurality of analysis parameter values AP t, APn
for each analysis parameter. The
determiner 170 may implement, e.g., "if-then" methodologies to predict future
AP values. For
example, the determiner 170 may determine an LDI for a given engine by
determining if
AP(soot) > 45 at day 150, then the determiner 170 may predict that the soot
critical value will be
exceeded at day 276; or, if AP(VIS100C) > 16.5 and AP(TAN) > 3.8 at day 150,
then the critical
values for TAN or VIS100C will be exceeded, thereby making it necessary to set
the LDI at a
point sooner than 276 days, such as, e.g., at 184 days. The determiner 170 is
configured to
monitor and predict when an AP value (e.g., level, concentration, or the like)
of the analysis
parameter will likely exceed the associated threshold value APTH by using,
e.g., linear regression,
non-linear regression, logistic regression, or the like.
[00059] The
determiner 170 is configured to repeat the process for m different analysis
parameters, where m is equal to or greater than 1, and where m corresponds to
the number of
different analysis parameters that are identified and measured in n samples of
engine lubricant
that are taken from and analyzed for a particular engine. That is, the
determiner 170 performs,
e.g., a linear regression for each of the values AP(1)1,
AP(1)n, AP(m)i, AP(m)n, while
comparing each of the values AP(1)1, AP(1)n,
AP(m)i, AP(m)n to respective threshold
values AP(1)-ru
AP(m)rut. As noted earlier, the analysis parameter value AP may include, for
example, a level, an amount, a concentration, or the like, of a wear metal, an
additive, a
contaminant, or the like, in a sample of engine lubricant. The determiner 170
predicts an
occurrence (e.g., a time, a day, a date, or the like) when a future analysis
parameter value APn+]
is expected to exceed (or fall under) the associated threshold value APTH for
the associated
analysis parameter. The determiner 170 may then set the LDI based on the
predicted occurrence.
For instance, the determiner 170 may set an LDI on a date that is well before,
or just prior to
when the future value APn+i is expected to exceed (or fall under) the
associated threshold value
APTH.
[00060] The
determiner 170 may be configured to perform different prediction
methodologies for different analysis parameters. For instance, the determiner
170 may
17
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
implement linear extrapolation to predict future values for iron or soot, but
implement
logarithmic prediction (non-linear prediction) to predict future values for
lead.
[00061] FIG. 2 shows an example of a lubricant analysis process 200 for
analyzing a
sample of an engine lubricant. Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the process 200
begins when a
sample of engine lubricant is received at the analyzer 110 from a source (Step
210). The source
may include, e.g., an engine, an individual, a company (e.g., railroad
company, trucking
company, shipping company, rental car company, or the like), an institution
(e.g., a school, a
hospital, or the like), an agency (e.g., a government agency, or the like), or
the like. In the
instance where the analyzer 110 (shown in FIG. 1A) is located on (or in) the
engine, or in the
engine compartment near the engine, the source may be the engine itself, and
the analyzer 110
may be placed, e.g., in the lubricant flow path, between the engine and an
external lubricant filter
(e.g., an engine oil filter) or an external lubricant cooler (e.g., an engine
oil cooler).
[00062] After the sample of the engine lubricant is received (Step 210)
from a particular
engine, the lubricant sample may be analyzed by the analyzer 110 to identify
and measure the
types and concentrations of the wear metals, the additives, the contaminants,
and the like, that
are present in the lubricant. The analyzer 110 may further measure TBN, TAN,
viscosity,
flashpoint, and the like, of the lubricant.
[00063] The results of the analysis may be compiled and reproduced in an
analysis report
for the analyzed sample of engine lubricant (Step 230). The analysis report
may then be sent to
the customer computer 120 and/or the server 130 (Step 240). The report may be
sent to the
database 140, where the report may be associated with and stored in a record
for the particular
engine. Alternatively, the analysis report may be displayed directly on, e.g.,
an on-board-display
(not shown) of a vehicle (Step 240). The lubricant analysis report may be
include, e.g., raw data,
tabulated data, or the like, for the identified and measured analysis
parameters, including, e.g.,
wear metals, additives, contaminants, TBN, TAN, viscosity, flashpoint, and the
like. The
lubricant analysis report may be generated and produced in human readable form
(e.g., a
printout, a display, an audio file, a video file, a multimedia file, or the
like), so as to be readable
by a human, or the report may be provided in a machine-readable format, so
that the report may
be received and processed by the customer computer 120, the server 130, and/or
the database
140 without any human intervention.
18
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
[00064] According to an aspect of the disclosure, a computer readable
medium is provided
that contains a computer program, which when executed in, for example, the
analyzer 110, which
=may include a computer (not shown), causes the process =200 in FIG. 2 to be
carried out. The
computer program may be tangibly embodied in the computer readable medium,
which may
comprise a code segment or a code section for each of the steps 210 through
240.
[00065] FIG. 3 shows an example of an engine lubricant discard interval
determination
process 300 for determining the usability of an engine lubricant and
establishing an engine
lubricant discard interval for a particular engine.
[00066] According to an embodiment of the disclosure, the process 300 may
be carried out
by the customer computer 120 or the server 130. The results of the process 300
may be stored in
the database 140. Alternatively, according to another embodiment of the
disclosure, the process
300 may be carried out in its entirety by the analyzer 110.
[00067] Referring to FIG. 3, initially, engine data and a lubricant
analysis report are
received by, e.g., the server 130 (or customer computer 120) for a particular
engine or a
particular vehicle (Step 310). The engine data may include, e.g., the year in
which the engine
was manufactured, the engine type, the engine manufacturer, the engine
displacement, the place
of manufacture of the engine, the engine serial number, the vehicle serial
number in which the
engine is installed, and the like. The lubricant analysis report may be
received from, e.g., the
analyzer 110 (Step 240 in FIG. 2) and the report may include analysis
parameter values AP(1)n,
AP(m)n.
[00068] The server 130 may query its internal data storage 135 (shown in
FIG. 8) or the
database 140 to determine if a record exists for the particular engine
identified by the received
engine data (Step 320). If it is determined that a record does exist for the
particular engine (YES
at Step 320), then the identified record is retrieved from storage 135 (or
140) (Step 340). The
retrieved record may include a plurality of historical values for each of the
measured analysis
parameters, e.g., values AP(1)1,..., AP(1)n-ì,..., AP(m)i,..., AP(m)n-i.
[00069] If it is determined that record does not exist for the particular
engine (NO at Step
320), then a record is created in the local data storage 135 (FIG. 8) and/or
the database 140 (FIG.
1A) (Step 330). The created record may include a plurality of fields for the
particular engine,
including, e.g., a customer name (e.g., a railroad company, a trucking
company, a shipping
company, or the like), a customer address (e.g., an email address, a
geographic address, a
19
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
telephone number, a point of contact name, or the like), the year in which the
engine was
manufactured, the engine type, the engine manufacturer, the engine
displacement, the place of
manufacture of the engine, the engine serial number, the last service date for
the engine, the
details of the last service, the date that the engine was put into operation,
the number of hours on
the engine, the number of miles on the engine, the vehicle serial number in
which the engine is
installed, and the like. The fields of the record may be populated with the
data received in the
engine data (Step 310). The created record may further include OEM
recommendations (e.g.,
recommendations 600, 700, shown in FIGS. 6, 7, respectively), industry
recommendations, trade
group recommendations, standards body recommendations, individual
recommendations, or the
like, which may include threshold values for one or more analysis parameters,
APtn(1),...,
APrx(m).
[00070] The
received lubricant sample data may be processed by the server 130 (e.g., the
determiner 170, shown in FIG. 1B) and the analysis parameter values for the
particular engine,
AP(1)n,
AP(m)n, along with the historical values, AP(1)i,..., AP(1)n-/,...,
AP(m)i,..., AP(m)n-
t, may be compared against the associated analysis parameter threshold values
APTH(1),...,
APTH(m) (Step 350). Further, a lubricant discard interval LDI may be
determined by performing
a regression analysis on the values AP(1)1,..., AP(1)n,..., AP(m)i,...,
AP(m)n, to predict when a
value of the future analysis parameter values AP(1)n+/,..., AP(m)n+i will
exceed (or fall under)
an associated threshold value APrn(1)...APTH(m) (Step 360). The LDI may
include, e.g., a time,
a day, a number of days, a date, a number of engine hours, or the like. The
record for the
particular engine may be updated to include the LDI information and the
received analysis
parameter values AP(1)n,
AP(m)n, as well as the predicted values AP(1)n+1,..., AP(m)n+i
(Step 370). The generated LDI data may be sent to the customer computer 120
(or the server
130) and/or the database 140 (Step 380).
[000711
According to an aspect of the disclosure, a computer readable medium is
provided
that contains a computer program, which when executed in, for example, the
server 130 (or the
computer 120), causes the process 300 in FIG. 3 to be carried out. The
computer program may
be tangibly embodied in the computer readable medium, which may comprise a
code segment or
a code section for each of the steps 310 through 380.
[000721
FIG. 4 shows an example of historical data 400 that may be retrieved from the
database 140 for a particular engine (e.g., locomotive unit 2248), where n =
25 and m = 1. In this
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
example, the historical data may include four columns of data, including: a
TAKEN column that
includes the dates on which a lubricant sample was taken from the unit 2248; a
TESTED column
that includes the= respective dates on which the taken lubricant samples were
tested; a UNIT
column that identifies the engine (e.g., unit 2248); and an analysis parameter
column that
identifies a particular analysis parameter (Fe), the wear metal iron, and
includes n analysis
parameter values, from the earliest recorded value, AP(1)/ = 2(ppm), to the
last recorded value,
AP(1)25 = 4(ppm). As seen, the values AP(1)/
AP(1)25 range from a low of 2(ppm) to a high
of 18(ppm).
[00073]
FIG. 5 shows a scatter plot chart for another example of historical data that
may
be retrieved from the database 140 for another engine, with the dates provided
on the abscissa
axis and the analysis parameter (Fe, iron) provided on the ordinate axis.
[00074]
FIG. 6 shows an example of General Electric (GE) OEM recommendations 600
for a GE locomotive engine that may be retrieved from the database 140. As
seen, the
recommendations 600 include a list of analysis parameters AP, ranging from
copper (Cu) to
TBN. In this instance, m = 24. Each of the analysis parameters AP has an
associated "Critical"
threshold value AP-m-c, an associated "Abnormal" threshold value APTH-A, and
an associated
"Marginal" threshold value APTH-M. The recommendations 600 also include a
"Problems"
column that provides a suggested cause if a particular analysis parameter
exceeds anyone of the
three identified threshold values.
[00075]
FIG. 7 shows an example of Electro-Motive Diesel (EMD) OEM
recommendations 700 for an EMD locomotive engine that may be retrieved from
the database
140. As seen, the recommendations 700 include a list of analysis parameters AP
similar to those
in FIG. 6, ranging from silver (Ag) to TBN. In this instance, m = 25. As
discussed earlier with
regard to the recommendations 600, each of the analysis parameters in the
recommendations 700
has an associated "Critical" threshold value APTH-c, an associated "Abnormal"
threshold value
APTH-A, and an associated "Marginal" threshold value APTH-M. Like the
recommendations 600,
the recommendations 700 also include a "Problem" column that suggests causes
when a
particular analysis parameter is beyond anyone of the three identified
threshold values.
[00076] In
the recommendations 600 (or 700), should a particular analysis parameter go
beyond (exceed or be less than) the recommended "Marginal" threshold value,
but have a value
less extreme than the "Abnormal" threshold value, then the recommendations
recommend that
21
CA 02798672 2015-05-01
the unit (or engine) be "shopped" during the next inspection and the indicated
problem (in the
"Problem" column) be investigated. If the particular analysis parameter is
beyond (exceed or be
less than) the recommended "Abnormal" threshold value, but does not go beyond
(exceed or be
less than) the "Critical" threshold value, then the recommendations recommend
that the particular
unit (or engine) be sent to the shop immediately for service, and that the
associated problem in
the "Problem" column be investigated. If the particular analysis parameter
goes beyond (exceed
or be less than) the recommended "Critical" threshold value, then the
recommendations
recommend that the particular unit (or engine) be shut down immediately and
the unit be
serviced, beginning with an investigation of the associated problem identified
in the "Problem"
column.
[00077] FIG. 8 shows an example of an implementation of the system 100
(shown in FIG.
1). In this example, the locomotive unit 2248 may be in the shop for its
scheduled 184 day
service. The service technician, using the computer 120, may request an LDI
for the unit 2248 to
determine whether it is necessary to replace the engine lubricant at the 184
day point, or if the
unit 2248 may continue to run for another 92 days without replacing the engine
lubricant. In this
regard, the server 130 may query its internal data storage 135 (or database
140, where it is
provided internal to the server 130) for historical data for the unit 2248. If
the historical data is
stored in the remote database 140, then the database 140 may be periodically
queried to obtain
the most up to date information associated with the unit 2248. The determiner
170 may then
process the retrieved historical data for the unit 2248 to generate predicted
analysis parameter
values AP(1), AP(2), AP(3), AP(4), and AP(5) for all five of the set analysis
parameters at 276
days, including (1) soot, (2) lead (Pb), (3) viscosity 100C , (4) TAN, and (5)
TBN. It is noted
that other (additional or alternative) analysis parameters may be set, as one
of ordinary skill in the
art will recognize. As seen in FIG. 8, the predicted analysis parameter value
AP(3)+i for
viscosity 100C may be at an acceptable level at 276 days, but the predicted
value for AP(3)n /
TAN is at an unacceptable level, thereby making it necessary to replace the
lubricant before the
276 days, preferably at, e.g., 184 days while the unit 2248 is in the shop.
[00078] FIG. 9 shows an example of eight scatter plot charts that may be
generated by the
server 130 for the iron (Fe) versus oil-age for the locomotive unit 2248.
Specifically, the scatter
plot charts include seven charts (1 to 7) that show iron concentrations in the
engine oil measured
22
CA 02798672 2012-12-12
at various times for seven past lubricant discard intervals (LDI), and one
chart (8) that includes
AP(Fe) values for iron for the current LDI interval. As seen in the charts,
the iron levels Fe
versus oil-age tend to be linear. Thus, when oil changes have been identified,
then the oil age
can be calculated.
[00079] FIG. 10 shows an example of eight scatter plot charts of soot
versus oil-age for
the locomotive unit 2248. Specifically, the scatter plot charts include seven
charts (1 to 7) that
show soot concentrations in the engine oil measured at various times for seven
past lubricant
discard intervals (LDI), and one chart (8) that includes soot values for the
current LDI interval.
As seen in the charts, soot levels appear to also be an indicator of oil-age.
The data indicates a
linear relationship between oil age and soot.
[00080] FIG. 11 shows an example of eight scatter plot charts of TBN versus
oil-age for
the locomotive unit 2248. Specifically, the scatter plot charts include six
charts (2 to 7) that
show TBN levels in the engine oil measured at various times for six past
lubricant discard
intervals (LDI), one chart (1) for which no historical data is available, and
one chart (8) that
includes TBN levels for the current period. As seen in the charts, the
relationship between oil
age and TBN levels may be linear and/or non-linear.
[00081] FIG. 12 shows an example of a scatter plot chart of soot versus oil-
age for a
locomotive unit, with the data for seven (1 to 7) oil change intervals
superimposed along with the
soot level data during the current oil change interval (8). As seen in the
chart, a data point 1110
appears to be an outlier or unusual result data. According to principles of
the disclosure, the
system 100 (shown in FIG. 1) is configured to detect and filter out outlier
data, such as, e.g., the
data point 1110.
[00082] FIG. 13 shows an example of eight scatter plot charts of iron (Fe)
versus oil-age
for the locomotive unit 2248. FIG. 13 is similar to FIG. 9, except that FIG.
13 further includes a
predictor line 1210 that predicts the Fe levels in the engine oil during the
period from about 140
days to about 276 days, where the predictor line 1210 may be generated by the
determiner 170.
[00083] FIG. 14 shows an example of eight scatter plot charts of soot
versus oil-age for
the locomotive unit 2248. FIG. 14 is similar to FIG. 10, except that FIG. 14
further includes a
predictor line 1310 that predicts the soot levels in the engine oil during the
period from about
140 days to about 276 days, where the predictor line 1310 may be generated by
the determiner
170.
23
CA 02798672 2015-05-01
=
[00084] FIG. 15 shows an example of a matrix scatter plot chart for
another locomotive
unit 8866. As seen in the chart, ten analysis parameters, including Fe, Pb,
Cu, V100C, OXI, NIT,
SOOT, TAN, TBN, PI, are measured and plotted for six separate oil changes, n =
6.
[00085] FIG. 16 shows an example of a process 500 for setting a
maintenance schedule for
one or more engines. Referring to FIG. 1A, the database 140 may be queried to
retrieve the LDI
data for all (or less than all) of the engines that belong to a particular
customer (Step 510). The
engines identified in the retrieved data may then be categorized based on the
LDI data into one or
more LDI categories ¨ e.g., engines that require maintenance every 92 days,
engines that require
maintenance every 184 days, engines that require maintenance every 276 days,
and the like (Step
520). A maintenance schedule may be generated (or updated) for each of the
identified engines
(Step 530). The maintenance schedule may include a listing of engines that are
selected for
extended lubricant discard intervals (e.g., LDI = 276 days). The maintenance
schedule may
include a listing of engines that are selected for shortened lubricant discard
intervals (e.g., LDI =
92 days). The maintenance schedule may include a calendar that identifies the
scheduled LDI
date for each of the identified engines. The generated maintenance schedule
may then be sent to,
e.g., the customer computer 120 (Step 540).
[00086] According to an aspect of the disclosure, a computer readable
medium is provided
that contains a computer program, which when executed in, for example, the
server 130 (or the
computer 120), causes the process 500 in FIG. 16 to be carried out. The
computer program may
be tangibly embodied in the computer readable medium, which may comprise a
code segment or
a code section for each of the steps 510 through 540.
[00087] According to a further aspect of the disclosure, a marker may be
added to the
lubricant. The marker may produce a measurable change once the lubricant
becomes spent. The
marker may be measurable by, e.g., visible spectrum analysis, infrared
analysis, color change, or
the like.
[00088] While the disclosure has been described in terms of exemplary
embodiments,
those skilled in the art will recognize that the disclosure can be practiced
with modifications. The
scope of the claims should not be limited by the preferred embodiments set
forth in the examples,
but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the
description as a whole. These
examples are merely illustrative and are not meant to be an exhaustive list of
all possible designs,
embodiments, applications or modifications of the disclosure.
24
