Language selection

Search

Patent 2809527 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2809527
(54) English Title: VEHICLE FLOOR
(54) French Title: PLANCHER DE VEHICULE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • F41H 7/04 (2006.01)
  • F41H 7/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MEARS, JEFF (United States of America)
  • GERST, DAVID M. (United States of America)
  • RASICO, JAMES G. (United States of America)
  • NEWMAN, CRAIG ALAN (United States of America)
  • HUGHES, CRAIG F. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • INTERNATIONAL TRUCK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC
(71) Applicants :
  • INTERNATIONAL TRUCK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC (United States of America)
(74) Agent: FINLAYSON & SINGLEHURST
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2013-03-14
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2013-09-26
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
61/615,694 (United States of America) 2012-03-26

Abstracts

English Abstract


A blast absorption structure and system for use in absorbing blast forces
exerted upon an
armored vehicle is disclosed. The blast absorption structure includes a first
absorption
component and a second absorption component, wherein the first and second
absorption
components deform to absorb and slow the forces prior to reaching an occupant
of the cabin.
Deformation of the first and second components reduces the blast force load
transmitted through
the vehicle structure to the occupants' lower extremities, thereby avoiding
catastrophic injury to
the lower extremities.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


What is claimed is:
1. A blast absorbing structure for use in absorbing blast force energy exerted
on an underside of
a personnel cabin of a vehicle, the structure comprising:
a first absorption component for initial absorption of the blast forces
exerted on the floor
of the vehicle; and
a second absorption component supported on the first absorption component for
secondary absorption of the blast forces, wherein the first and second
absorption components
cooperatively move between an initial position and a blast force position to
diminish the blast
forces reaching an occupant of the cabin.
2. The blast absorbing structure of claim 1, wherein the first absorbing
component is an energy
absorbing support.
3. The blast absorbing structure of claim 2, wherein the first absorbing
component further
includes a plurality of energy absorbing supports.
4. The blast absorbing structure of claim 1, wherein the first and second
absorbing components
form a floating floor of the vehicle.
5. The blast absorbing structure of claim 2, wherein the energy absorbing
support receives an
initial blast force exerted on the underside of the vehicle.
8

6. The blast absorbing structure of claim 2, wherein the energy absorbing
support deforms in
response to the initial blast force.
7. The blast absorbing structure of claim 1, wherein the second absorption
component is a
moveable surface.
8. The blast absorbing structure of 7, wherein the moveable surface is
horizontally supported by
the first absorbing component.
9. The blast absorbing structure of claim 8, wherein the moveable surface is a
floating surface.
10. The blast absorbing structure of claim 7, wherein the surface is moveable
in a vertical
direction in response to the deformation of the energy absorbing support when
the blast force is
exerted on the energy absorbing support.
11. The blast absorbing structure of claim 10, wherein the vertical movement
of the surface is
diminished by the deformation of the energy absorbing support.
12. The blast absorbing structure of claim 8, wherein the moveable surface is
in direct contact
with at least one lower extremity of the occupant of the cabin.
13. The blast absorbing structure of claim 1, wherein the structure further
includes a plurality of
guides for limiting movement of the surface prior to a blast event.
9

14. A blast absorbing system for use in absorbing blast energy exerted on a
personnel cabin of a
vehicle, the system comprising:
at least one energy absorbing component;
a floating surface supported by the energy absorbing component, the floating
surface
moveable between an initial position and a blast force position;
a guide for retaining the floating surface in a horizontal position, wherein
upon receipt of
a blast force upon the floor, the energy absorbing component deforms to absorb
the blast force
and diminish movement of the floating surface from the initial position to the
blast force
position.
15. The blast absorbing system of claim 14, wherein the system further
includes a second guide
for limiting movement of the floating surface.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


r CA 02809527 2013-03-14
VEHICLE FLOOR
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] The present disclosure relates to a blast absorbing structure and
system for use in
decreasing the extent of catastrophic injury to the occupants of a vehicle,
including a military
vehicle subjected to a blast. More specifically, the structure and system
absorbs the energy from
a blast before it reaches the lower extremities of the occupants in the
vehicle cabin.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Armored vehicles are frequently threatened by improvised explosive
devices (IEDs)
designed to cause harm to the vehicle and its occupants. IEDs are typically
one or more grouped
artillery shells redeployed and detonated in an effort to inflict casualties.
These explosive
devices when detonated beneath a floor of a vehicle often create localized
deformation of the
floor of the vehicle thereby transmitting large vertical loads onto the lower
extremities of
occupants of the vehicle. For example, detonations below the underbelly of an
armored vehicle
may cause the vehicle floor to accelerate at 100G or more and reach velocities
of 7 to 12 m/s
over a time period of 3 to 5 msec. These high rates of acceleration and
velocity transmit large
mechanical forces on the lower extremities of the occupants within the vehicle
cabin, often
resulting in catastrophic injury or worse.
1

'r CA 02809527 2013-03-14
[0004] Armor countermeasures typically consist of heavy metal plates placed
between the
threat and the vehicle in such a way as to resist hull breach and aggressive
floor accelerations.
These heavy metal plates also work in concert with layers of additional metal,
ceramic,
composite or plastic materials designed to prevent lethal high velocity
fragments from entering
the vehicle. The heavy metal plates are typically mounted to the underside of
the vehicle in
shapes to take advantage of venting efficiency, inherent geometric stiffness,
and deflection
characteristics when presented with incoming pressure and fragmentation.
Carrying a heavy
blast and fragment resistant hulls results in significant performance
disadvantage to the vehicle
in terms of reduced fuel economy, lost cargo capacity and increased
transportation shipping
costs.
[0005] In addition to the outer metal plates, the interior of the personnel
cabin may include a
blast mat. During a blast event on an armored vehicle, the lower extremities
of the occupants of
the vehicle are frequently subjected to injuries from the blast energy being
transmitted through
the vehicle structure. One current solution to dissipate the energy is to use
blast mats on the
floor where the occupants of the vehicle rest their feet. However, current
blast mats are
expensive and heavy, often contributing unwanted additional weight to an
already heavy vehicle.
[0006] Therefore, there is a need for an efficient, cost-effective energy
absorbing system for
use during a high acceleration event, such as a blast event underneath the
vehicle. The present
structure and system is usable, for example, in a personnel cabin of a
vehicle, specifically as a
floor, and includes an energy absorbing device for absorbing and dissipating
the blast forces
from an explosive device, thereby lessening the impact of the forces on the
lower extremities of
the occupants of the vehicle. The device includes energy absorbing supports, a
flat panel or
surface positioned on top of the supports, and at least one retainer or guide
to maintain the
2

CA 02809527 2013-03-14
movement direction of the surface. The energy absorbing supports suspended the
top surface,
creating a "floating floor" to improve the absorption and dissipation of
forces exerted on the
underbelly of the vehicle during a blast event, while avoiding the negative
tradeoffs of
alternative designs.
SUMMARY
100071 There is disclosed herein a structure and system, each of which
avoids the
disadvantages of prior structures and devices while affording additional
structural and operating
advantages.
100081 Generally speaking, a blast absorbing structure for use in absorbing
blast forces
exerted on a floor of a personnel cabin of a vehicle is disclosed.
[0009] In an embodiment, the blast structure comprises a first absorption
component for
initial absorption of the blast forces exerted on the floor of the vehicle and
a second absorption
component for secondary absorption of the blast forces, wherein the first and
second absorption
components cooperatively move between an initial position and a blast force
position to diminish
the blast forces prior to the blast forces to reaching an occupant of the
cabin.
[0010] In another embodiment, a blast absorbing system for use on a floor
of a personnel
cabin of a vehicle, is disclosed. The system comprises at least one energy
absorbing component,
a floating surface supported by the energy absorbing component, the floating
surface moveable
between an initial position and a blast force position, and a guide for
retaining the floating
surface in a horizontal position, wherein upon receipt of a blast force upon
the floor, the energy
absorbing components deform to absorb the blast force and diminish movement of
the floating
surface from the initial position to the blast force position.
3

1 CA 02809527 2013-03-14
1
[0011] These and other features and advantages of the present
structure and system can be
more readily understood from the following detailed discussion with reference
to the appended
drawing figures.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0012] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the blast absorbing structure
in use;
[0013] FIG. 2 is a side view of the blast absorbing structure of the
present disclosure;
[0014] FIG. 3 is a side view of blast absorbing structure during the
initial phase of a blast
event;
[0015] FIG. 4 is a side view of the blast absorbing structure after
the initial blast phase;
[0016] FIG. 5 is a top view of the blast absorbing structure;
[0017] FIG. 6 is a bottom view of the blast absorbing structure; and,
[0018] FIG. 7 is a side view of the blast absorbing structure showing
the guides.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0019] Referring to FIGS. 1-7, there is illustrated an exemplary
embodiment of an blast
energy absorbing structure and system, generally designated by the numeral 10,
as well as the
components thereof. The structure 10 is designed for use as a blast energy
absorbing system on
the cabin hull or lower floor structure 12 of a personnel cabin 14 of a
vehicle (not shown). The
blast energy absorbing structure is particularly useful on a military vehicle,
which is used in war-
zones for transporting personnel or cargo. This structure 10 will absorb
energy from a blast, thus
lessening the impact on the vehicle occupants' lower extremities, which rest
on the structure,
thereby reducing injury to the occupants.
4

CA 02809527 2013-03-14
7
[0020] As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the structure includes at least one
energy absorbing
support 20, which may also be referred to as a first absorption component.
Although the present
disclosure includes four supports, one at each corner of the structure 10, it
should be understood
that any number of supports may be used. Additionally, the energy absorbing
support 20 may
have any suitable shape, including but not limited to that of a pillar, square
or rectangle (FIGS. 2
-7) or a triangle or tapered side shape (FIG. 1). The energy absorbing support
20 are positioned
directly on the lower floor structure 12 of the cabin 14, and can be secured
through any suitable
fastener device including, but not limited to screws, bolts or studs.
Optionally, the supports 20
may be integrated into the lower floor structure 12 of the cabin.
[0021] The energy absorbing support 20 can be constructed from any
suitable material such
as a foamed material, including, but not limited to foamed aluminum, aluminum
honeycomb,
synthetic foams, such as polystyrene and/or polyethylene, other plastics, etc.
Regardless of the
material used for the supports, the material must be able to both support the
normal walking
loads (for example, a 300 pound load spread over a foot pressure
representative area results in a
deflection characteristic of existing production vehicle floors) and within a
common specified
working temperature range (-50 F to 160 F). Finally, the material must
progressively crush
during a blast load.
[0022] As shown in FIGS. 2-7, the structure 10 includes a top panel or
surface 30 supported
on the plurality of energy absorbing supports 20. The surface 30 is designed
to "float" above the
cabin hull or lower floor structure 12 of the vehicle. As illustrates, there
is a deliberate air space
22 between the surface 30 and the lower floor structure 12 of the cabin. As
will be explained
below, the panel or surface 30 is not in a fixed position, which allows the
surface to move in
response to a blast event. In addition to being a second energy absorbing
component, the surface

CA 02809527 2013-03-14
30 serves as a walking surface, essentially a floor, within the interior of
the cabin. As shown in
FIGS. 2-4, the surface 30 is in direct contact with the lower extremities of
the occupants of the
vehicle, as the occupant's feet 16 rest directly on this surface.
[0023] The surface 30 or second absorption component can be constructed
from a variety of
material, including, but not limited to steel, aluminum, aluminum honeycomb,
and any variety of
plastics and composites of the same. Construction of the surface can be
accomplished by any
suitable method including cutting, metal molding, plastic injection molding,
forming, bonding
welding, etc.
[0024] As illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4, the energy absorbing supports 20
and floating surface
30, work together to lessen in impact of a blast on the lower extremities of
the occupants of the
vehicle. In particular, immediately after an explosive blast, all of the
components naturally move
in an upward direction. It is this accelerated, upward movement of the floor
structure during a
blast that can cause catastrophic injuries to the lower extremities. However,
in the present
disclosure, the energy absorbing supports 30 crush in advance of the blast
energy reaching the
floating support, and thus, the floating support moves upward less quickly,
lessening the impact
of the blast on the lower extremities of the occupants. In addition, the air
space 22 between the
lower floor structure 12 of the cabin and the floating surface 30 provides an
area to slow the blast
forces.
[0025] In addition to the energy absorbing supports 20 and the moving floor
30, the structure
also includes a guide or retainer. Specifically, and as shown in FIGS. 5-7,
there are several
guides in the present system. The guides include retention plate 40, lateral
guide 42 and fore/aft
guides 44. The guides limit movement of the floating surface 30 generally
during both blast and
non-blast events. For example, because the floating surface 30 also acts as a
walking floor, it
6

CA 02809527 2013-03-14
should maintain some stability for walking, rather than constantly moving from
the pressure of
being walked upon. Therefore, the lateral guide 42 keeps the surface 30 from
moving laterally,
while the side guides 44 prevent the surface from moving fore and aft. The
retention plate 40 not
only compliments the lateral and side guides to secure the surface, but also
prevents the surface
from being propelled into the interior of the cabin during a blast event.
However, the guides do
not keep in the floating surface 30 in such a secured position that it cannot
move in response to
the crush of the energy supports 20 during a blast event.
[0026] In operation, and as described, the various components of the blast
absorbing
structure and system 10 work separately and in conjunction to dissipate at
least some of the
energy exerted on the underbelly of a vehicle cause by, for example, the
explosion of an IED
below the vehicle. In various exemplary embodiments, when an IED, or similar
explosive
device, is detonated below the vehicle, the force of the explosion causes the
lower floor structure
12 of the vehicle to deform. This deformation in turn forces the floor against
the lower
extremities of any occupants of the vehicle. The blast absorbing system
deforms and slows the
upward motion of the force to help dissipate the force being exerted on the
lower extremities of
the occupants, thereby reducing the likelihood of injury to the occupants.
[0027] It should be appreciated that the above-referenced forces may
include general
deformation forces, localized deformation forces, general displacement forces,
localized
displacement forces, or any other force that may be exerted upon the
underbelly of a vehicle.
[0028] It should also be appreciated that, while the above discussion is
related to deformation
forces caused by, for example, IED explosions, embodiments described herein
may be usable to
dissipate other forces, such as, for example, blunt forces impacts, grenade
detonations, small
arms fire, and any other force that may be exerted upon the underbelly of a
vehicle.
7

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2017-03-14
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2017-03-14
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2016-03-14
Inactive: Cover page published 2013-09-30
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2013-09-26
Letter Sent 2013-09-06
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2013-06-28
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-06-28
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-06-28
Application Received - Regular National 2013-03-27
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 2013-03-27
Letter Sent 2013-03-27
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2013-03-27

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2016-03-14

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2014-12-19

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Registration of a document 2013-03-14
Application fee - standard 2013-03-14
Registration of a document 2013-08-20
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2015-03-16 2014-12-19
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
INTERNATIONAL TRUCK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC
Past Owners on Record
CRAIG ALAN NEWMAN
CRAIG F. HUGHES
DAVID M. GERST
JAMES G. RASICO
JEFF MEARS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2013-09-30 2 42
Description 2013-03-14 7 303
Claims 2013-03-14 3 72
Abstract 2013-03-14 1 15
Drawings 2013-03-14 5 49
Representative drawing 2013-08-29 1 10
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2013-03-27 1 103
Filing Certificate (English) 2013-03-27 1 157
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2014-11-17 1 111
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2016-04-25 1 174