Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
ULTRASONIC ELECTROLYTE SENSOR
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application
claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional
Application No. 61/645,789, filed on May 11, 2012. The entire disclosure of
the above application is incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD
[0002] The present
disclosure relates to battery testing, and more
particularly to an ultrasonic sensor for detecting an electrolyte level in a
battery cell.
BACKGROUND
[0003] This section
provides background information related to the
present disclosure which is not necessarily prior art.
[0004] Battery
cells have plates surrounded by an electrolyte.
When the level of electrolyte in the battery cell drops sufficiently, known as
dry
out, failure of the battery cell can occur. In
battery cells allowing for
electrolyte to be added, the battery cells are typically checked periodically
and
electrolyte added to replace any lost electrolyte. One such type of battery is
the lead-acid battery and water is added as needed to keep the electrolyte
level at a full level.
[0005] Sealed
batteries, as the name implies, are sealed and do not
allow electrolyte to be added to make up for lost electrolyte. A common type
of sealed battery is the valve-regulated lead-acid (VRLA) battery.
[0006] It is
desirable to monitor the electrolyte level of a battery as a
low electrolyte level is an indicator of early dry out of the battery making
it
more likely that the battery will fail. Also, in batteries where electrolyte
can be
added, monitoring the electrolyte level allows a user to be alerted when
electrolyte needs to be added.
[0007] Typical approaches for monitoring electrolyte levels in
battery cells are intrusive as they are installed within the cells of the
batteries.
The inside of a battery cell is a highlight corrosive environment, requiring
that
1
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
the components of the monitoring device installed within the cells be made of
material that can withstand this environment. Also, the mechanical design of
that part of the monitoring device that is installed within a battery cell is
specific to the configuration of the battery cell thus requiring differing
mechanical designs for battery cells with different configurations.
[0008] Ohmic measurements and capacity testing are other
technologies that are used to determine dry out of battery cells. Ohmic
measurements often cannot identify that dry out is occurring until it has
become severe. Capacity testing is often considered the best method of
determining dry out, but the equipment tends to be expensive and the process
time consuming.
SUMMARY
[0009] This section provides a general summary of the disclosure,
and is not a comprehensive disclosure of its full scope or all of its
features.
[0010] In one aspect the present disclosure relates to a system
for
monitoring an electrolyte level in a battery cell and generating an indication
of
a fault condition when the electrolyte level drops below a predetermined
acceptable level. The system may comprise a controller, an ultrasonic
transmit circuit for transmitting an ultrasonic signal into an interior area
of the
battery cell, and an ultrasonic receive circuit. The ultrasonic receive
circuit
may be used for receiving the ultrasonic signal after it has been reflected
from
the interior area of the battery cell. The controller may be configured to use
the reflected ultrasonic signal and a predetermined calibration signal
representing the predetermined acceptable level of the electrolyte to
determine when the electrolyte level has dropped below the predetermined
acceptable level.
[0011] In another aspect the present disclosure relates to a
system
for monitoring an electrolyte level in a battery cell and generating an
indication
of a fault condition when the electrolyte level drops below a predetermined
acceptable level. The system may comprise a microcontroller, an ultrasonic
transmit circuit for transmitting ultrasonic signal pulses into an interior
area of
the battery cell, and an ultrasonic receive circuit. The ultrasonic receive
circuit
may be used for receiving the ultrasonic signal pulses after the electronic
2
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
signal pulses have been reflected from the interior area of the battery cell.
The microcontroller may be configured to perform a plurality of operations
that
involve converting each one of the reflected ultrasonic signal pulses into a
calibration data sample during a calibration procedure to construct a
calibration signature waveform; converting each one of the reflected
ultrasonic
signal pulses into a test data sample during a test procedure to construct a
test signature waveform; and using the reflected ultrasonic signal to create a
predetermined calibration signature. waveform. The predetermined calibration
signature waveform may represent the predetermined acceptable level of the
electrolyte. The microcontroller may also use the received ultrasonic signal
to
construct a test signature waveform representative of a real time electrolyte
level within the battery cell. The microcontroller may use the test and
calibration signature waveforms to detect, in real time, when the electrolyte
level within the battery has dropped below the predetermined acceptable
level.
[0012] In still another aspect the present disclosure relates to a
method for monitoring an electrolyte level in a battery cell and generating an
indication of a fault condition when the electrolyte level drops below a
predetermined acceptable level. The method may comprise transmitting a
first plurality of ultrasonic signals and receiving a first plurality of
reflected
ultrasonic signals. The first plurality of reflected ultrasonic signals may be
used to construct a calibration signature representative of a condition where
the electrolyte level is at least at the predetermined acceptable level. A
second plurality of ultrasonic signals may be transmitted and received to
create a second plurality of reflected ultrasonic signals. The second
plurality
of reflected ultrasonic signals may be used to construct a test signature
representative of an actual level of the electrolyte within the battery cell.
The
calibration and test signatures may be used to determine when the electrolyte
level in the battery cell drops below the predetermined acceptable level.
[0013] Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the
description provided herein. The description and specific examples in this
summary are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to
limit the scope of the present disclosure.
3
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0014] The
drawings described herein are for illustrative purposes
only of selected embodiments and not all possible implementations, and are
not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
[0015] Figure 1 is a
schematic of a circuit topology of an ultrasonic
electrolyte sensor in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure;
[0016] Figure 2
is a perspective view showing the ultrasonic
electrolyte sensor of Figure 1 mounted to a case of a battery cell;
[0017] Figures
3A and 3B are oscilloscope traces showing the
reflection of an ultrasonic signal from an interface between an inner wall of
a
battery cell and electrolyte in a battery cell when the battery cell has a
full
electrolyte level and from an interface between an inner wall of the battery
cell
and air when the battery cell has a low electrolyte level;
[0018] Figure 4
is a flowchart illustrating various operations that
may be performed by the system of Figure 1 during a calibration procedure;
and
[0019] Figure 5
is a flowchart illustrating various operations that
may be performed by the system in determining if an electrolyte level of the
battery it is being used to monitor is at least at a predetermined acceptable
level.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0020] Example embodiments will now be described more fully with
reference to the accompanying draWings.
[0021] Figure 1 is a
schematic of an illustrative circuit topology for
an ultrasonic electrolyte level sensor system 10 (hereinafter "the system 10")
in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure. The system 10 of
Figure 1 may illustratively include.a printed circuit board 12 propagated with
a
plurality of components for creating a highly sensitive, ultrasonic
electrolyte
=
sensor.
[0022] The components of the system 10 may include a data input
port 14 and a data output port 16s. The input and output ports 14 and 16,
respectively, may be RJ-11 ports or they may take any other suitable form.
The system 10 also may include a controller, for example a microcontroller
4
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
18, having an analog-to-digital converter ("ADC") 18a and a random access
memory ("RAM") 18b. The microcontroller 18 may be in communication with
the ports 14 and 16. The microcontroller 18 may have a built in temperature
sensor 20, the operation of which will be described in greater detail in the
following paragraphs.
[0023] The microcontroller 18 may be in communication with an
ultrasonic receiver circuit 22 and with an ultrasonic transmitter circuit 24.
The
ultrasonic receiver circuit 22 includes an ultrasonic transducer 26, such as a
400 kHz piezo electric ultrasonic transducer, and the ultrasonic transmitter
circuit includes an ultrasonic transducer 28, such as a 400 kHz piezo electric
ultrasonic transducer. The ultrasonic receiver circuit 22 may also include an
echo detection circuit 22a and an envelope follower circuit 22b. A calibration
pushbutton 32 may be provided to enable an individual to initiate a
calibration
procedure for the system 10. A voltage regulator 34 is included to supply a
regulated DC voltage to the components of the system 10 that require
electrical power for their operation.
[0024] Figure 2 shows the system 10 mounted to a case (i.e.,
housing) 36 of a battery cell 38. It will be appreciated that the case 36 will
typically have a "Low" and "High" electrolyte level markings on it, identified
in
Figure 2 by reference numbers 36a and 36b, respectively that allow an
individual to visually determine what level the electrolyte level is at. The
system 10 may include a suitable housing 40 in which the PCB board 12 and
its associated components are housed. The system 10 may be mounted to
the battery cell case 36 so that the ultrasonic receive transducer 26 and the
ultrasonic transmit transducer 28 face the battery cell 38 case at a desired
position on a sidewall of the case 36 to be able to detect a low electrolyte
level condition within the battery cell 38. In one specific implementation
this
may be accomplished by providing a line 40a (Figure 2) or other demarcation
on the housing 40 which may be aligned with the "Low" electrolyte level
marking when the housing 40 is physically secured to the case 36. The line
40a is at a location on the housing 40, relative to the positioning of the
transmit and receive transducers 26 and 28, which is predetermined to result
in a "Low" electrolyte level signal from the system 10 if the electrolyte
level in
the battery case 36 falls to (or below) the "Low" level marking 36a on the
5
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
battery case 36. The housing 40 may be secured to the battery case 36 by
any suitable means, but in one preferred form is secured with an adhesive.
One specific adhesive that may be preferred is VHB 4910 bonding tape
available from 3M Corporation. Similarly the ultrasonic transducers 26 and 28
may themselves be secured with a suitable adhesive tape, such as VHB
4910, to an interior surface of the housing 40 of the system 10. Whatever
means is used to secure the housing 40 to the battery case 36, as well as the
transducers 26 and 28 to the interior surface of the housing 40, a highly
important consideration is that an excellent "coupling" is achieved to
minimize
reflections of the ultrasonic signal that is reflected back as a result of the
housing 40 to housing 36 connection.
[0025] The microcontroller 18 of the system 10 may be programmed
to control the overall operation of the system, as described below. It should
be understood that control devices other than microcontrollers could be used,
such as ASIC's and microprocessor systems. The system 10 may include a
"monitoring" mode where it tests the electrolyte level in the battery cell 38
to
see if it is at or below a "low" level (i.e., below "Low" level mark 36a on
the
battery case 36). The system 10 may also include a "calibration" mode where
it establishes a signal that corresponds to a "norm" condition for the battery
cell 38. The norm condition may be represented by a reflected ultrasonic
signal that is present when the electrolyte level corresponds to the "Full"
level
marking 36b on the battery case 36. Thus, the norm condition may be viewed
as a "Full" condition for the electrolyte level in the battery 38.
[0026] In the
monitoring mode the system 10 periodically tests the
battery cell 38 to determine if the electrolyte level in the battery cell has
fallen
below the Low mark 36a on the battery case 36. For example, the system 10
may test the battery cell 38 every 5-30 seconds, and in one preferred
implantation every 10 seconds. It should be understood that ten seconds is
just one example, and other time intervals could just as easily be used.
[0027] When the system 10 tests the battery cell 38 it generates a
short ultrasonic test signal that is transmitted by the ultrasonic transmit
transducer 28. The ultrasonic signal from the ultrasonic transmit transducer
28 is directed at the battery cell case 36 so that the ultrasonic signal
irradiates
a swath between the High electrolyte level mark 36b and the Low electrolyte
6
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
level mark 36a. The ultrasonic test signal may be a strong 400 kHz signal,
illustratively a burst between 2.5 and 10 microseconds. It may be, for
example, a 2.5 microsecond burst, which is one cycle. The ultrasonic test
signal may be referred to herein as a "ping." The transmitted ultrasonic
signal
is reflected back by the electrolyte within the battery cell case 36 and
received
by the ultrasonic receive transducer 26. The received ultrasonic signal may
be used by the microcontroller 18 to determine if the electrolyte level is
low.
In the embodiment of Figure 1, the transmit and receive ultrasonic
transducers 28 and 26, respectively, are preferably separate transducers to
reduce residual ringing in their respective ultrasonic transmit elements. It
should be understood, however, that the same ultrasonic transducer can be
used as both the ultrasonic transmit transducer and the ultrasonic receive
transducer. To eliminate the "echo" that may result from the transmitted
ultrasonic signal being reflected back from the sensor's plastic case 36, the
echo rejection circuit 22a and the envelope follower circuit 22b may be used
to remove, for example, the first 10ps of the reflected ultrasonic signal that
is
detected by the ultrasonic receive transducer. This early echo is high in
amplitude and could have a significant impact on the envelope obtained. The
echo rejection needs to be performed before the envelope is obtained in order
to acquire an envelope that corresponds only to the signal reflected from the
electrolyte or air interface with . the battery cell case 36. The reflected
ultrasonic signal from the electrolyte within the battery case 36 (with any
echo
component removed) is then compared to the value representing the norm,
which may be stored in a memory such as an EEPROM, so it can be used
after a power or reset cycle associated with the microcontroller 18. If the
reflected ultrasonic signal deviates sufficiently from the norm, the
microcontroller 18 determines that the electrolyte level in the battery cell
is at
or below a predetermined acceptable level (i.e., at or below the predetermined
"Low" level).
[0028] The case 36 of the battery cell 38 may be a plastic case.
When the electrolyte level in the battery cell 38 is at or above the norm
level
(i.e., the Full level 36b), there will be a plastic/electrolyte interface at
an inner
wall of the battery cell case that is impinged by the transmitted ultrasonic
test
signal directed at the battery cell 38. When the battery cell 38 has a low
7
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
electrolyte level, there will be a plastic/air interface at the inner wall of
the
battery cell case 36 that is impinged by the ultrasonic test signal
transmitted at
the battery cell. The plastic/electrolyte interface has a lower reflection
coefficient compared to the plastic/air interface, resulting in more
ultrasonic
energy being transmitted forward into the battery and less ultrasonic energy
being reflected back to the ultrasonic receive transducer 26. Conversely, the
comparatively higher reflection coefficient of the plastic/air interface
results in
more ultrasonic energy being reflected back to the ultrasonic receive
transducer 26 and less energy being transmitted forward into the battery cell
38. Thus, the ultrasonic signal reflected by the interface at the inner wall
of
the battery cell case 36 has more energy when the battery cell 38 has a low
electrolyte level and will have a higher magnitude than the ultrasonic signal
reflected by the interface at the inner wall of the battery cell case 36 when
the
battery cell has a full electrolyte level.
[0029] Figure 3A shows,
an ultrasonic signal 50 reflected by the
interface at the inner wall/electrolyte interface of the battery cell case 36
when
the battery cell 38 has a full electrolyte level. Figure 3B shows an
ultrasonic
signal 52 generated by the interface of the inner wall of the battery cell
case
36 and air when the battery cell 38 has a low electrolyte level. The
microcontroller 18 thus determines that the electrolyte in the battery cell 38
is
low when the magnitude of the reflected ultrasonic signal is a certain
predetermined percentage above. the magnitude that corresponds to the
previously determined signal value for the norm (i.e., "Full) condition, as
described above. Illustratively, the microcontroller 18 determines that the
electrolyte level in the battery cell, 38 is low when the reflected ultrasonic
signal is at least fifty percent above the signal level that has been
predetermined for the norm electrolyte level. In an
example, the
microcontroller 18 determines that the electrolyte level in the battery cell
38 is
low when the reflected signal is at least 300 millivolts above the signal
level
that has been predetermined to correspond to the norm condition. In this
example, then, the 300mv value would correspond to the predetermined
acceptable level of the electrolyte (i.e., the "Low" level 36a). It should be
understood that the predetermined voltage level may be determined
heuristically and may be higher or lower than fifty percent or 300 millivolts.
8
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
[0030] The
reflected ultrasonic signal received by the receive
ultrasonic transducer 26 may be amplified, demodulated, and presented to the
ADC 18a, which may be part of the microcontroller 18 or it may be an
independent component. For convenience, the ADC 18a is shown in Figure 1
as being part of the microcontroller 18. A plurality of samples are taken with
the ADC 18a to obtain a plurality of digital test data points and the
resulting
digital test data points stored in a memory, such as the RAM 18b of the
microcontroller 18. The digital test data points represent a signature of the
actual reflected ultrasonic signal. This test signature (that is, the digital
test
data points) is then compared to the signature that corresponds to the norm
condition. Again, the norm condition is represented by a signature of a
reflected ultrasonic signal of the battery cell 38 in a known good (i.e.,
electrolyte "Full" condition). If the test signature deviates sufficiently
from the
signature corresponding to the norm condition, the microcontroller 18
determines that the electrolyte level in the battery cell 38 is low. The test
signature for the norm condition may be programmed into the microcontroller
18 (i.e., stored in the RAM 18b) or it may be obtained by a calibration
routine,
discussed below. As discussed in more detail below, the norm condition may
be represented by a set of digital data points that collectively represent a
signature of a reflected ultrasonic wave of the battery cell 38 obtained by
testing the battery cell when it is in a known, full electrolyte condition.
[0031] The reflected ultrasonic signal (after amplification and
demodulation and echo removal) may be sampled with the ADC 18a every
11.5 microseconds to obtain a suitable number of test samples, and in this
example seven such test samples. Sampling
may illustratively start
10microseconds after the ping. it should be understood that sampling can
occur at periods of other than 11.5 microseconds and that other than seven
samples can be taken. Also, a test may include a plurality of pings and
subsequent test samples. By way of example and not of limitation, a test may
include sixteen pings with seven samples taken after each ping. The
corresponding samples taken after each ping may then be averaged to
generate a set of seven test data points, also referred to as a test
signature,
with each test data point being the average of the corresponding samples
taken after each of the sixteen pings. That is, the first sample obtained
after
9
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
each of the sixteen pings are averaged, the second sample obtained after
each of the sixteen pings are averaged, and so on.
[0032] In an
aspect, the system 10 has a calibration mode in which
it is calibrated to obtain the norm, illustratively a calibration signature,
against
which the comparison of the test data is made. The temperature sensor 20
associated with the microcontroller 18 may be used to sense the temperature
of the microcontroller 18 and/or the ambient environment in which the system
is being used, and to provide a sensed temperature value to the
microcontroller 18 that it may use to compensate for temperature conditions
10 that may
affect the magnitude of the reflected ultrasonic signal. There is a
high correlation between the surrounding temperature and the amplitude of
the reflected signal. By using the temperature sensor 20 embedded in the
microcontroller 18 to acquire the temperature, the signal amplitude is
compensated for every sample in real-time. This compensation is performed
for the test signal as well as for the calibration (or normal) signal. The
microcontroller 18 may also include firmware that includes a suitable
algorithm for making an automatic noise level determination, which in turn
allows an automatic fault level sensitivity adjustment to be made by the
microcontroller 18. The fault level sensitivity adjustment may be used to
compensate for excessive humidity or dryness that the sensor 10 is
experiencing that would otherwise affect the magnitude of the reflected
ultrasonic signal that is received by the receive ultrasonic transducer 28. In
this regard it will be appreciated that the magnitude of the reflected signal
may
be affected by extremes of humidity or dryness, which effectively influences
the quality of the "coupling" that is achieved between the sensor housing 40
and the battery case 36.
[0033] if the
Referring to Figure 4 a flowchart 100 illustrates one
example of various operations that may be performed during the calibration
mode. The calibration mode is only initiated after visually verifying that the
battery cell 38 is in a known good condition, that is, having its electrolyte
level
at least at the predetermined acceptable level, as indicated at operation 102.
At operation 104 the calibration mode may then be entered by pressing the
calibration pushbutton 32 shown .in Figure 1. The calibration mode may
involve initially executing a coupling test pursuant to a coupling test mode.
1Q.
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
The coupling test mode makes a preliminary check of the quality of the
acoustic coupling between the sensor's 10 housing 40 and the housing 36 of
the battery cell 38. During the coupling test mode a check is made of the
magnitude of the reflected signal emitted from the ultrasonic transmit
transducer 28. If the magnitude of the reflected signal received by the
receive
transducer 26 is too far above a predetermined upper limit (e.g., 520mv) then
a full calibration operation is not performed. In this instance a red "Fault"
LED
56 may be turned on, which indicates that the physical coupling between the
housing 40 and the battery case 36 is unsatisfactory to enable a proper
calibration to be performed. If the magnitude of the reflected signal is below
the predetermined upper limit, then the calibration mode will continue.
[0034] During
calibration the ultrasonic ping described above is
generated and transmitted into the battery cell 38 as indicated at operation
106. A first data sample is then obtained at operation 108. During operation
108 the reflected ultrasonic signal representing the first data sample is
amplified, demodulated, and presented to the ADC 18a. The data sample
thus is converted to a corresponding digital value. The just-obtained data
sample may then be stored in memory (e.g., RAM 18b), as indicated at
operation 110. A check may then be made if the desired number of data
samples has been obtained, as indicated at operation 112. If not, then a
counter is incremented at operation 114 and operations 108-112 are
repeated. If the check at operation 112 indicates that the desired number of
data samples has been obtained (in this example 7 such data samples), then
a check is made at operation 116 to determine if the predetermined number of
ultrasonic pings has been performed. If not, then the data sample counter is
reset to "1" as indicated at operation 118 and operations 106-112 are re-
performed for the next generated ping.
[0035] If the check at operation 116 indicates that the
predetermined number of ultrasonic pings has been performed, then the
collected data samples are averaged together at operation 120. This may
involve averaging all of the 1st data samples collected after each ultrasonic
ping to obtain an average of the 1st group of data samples, and then
averaging all of the 2nd data samples collected after each ultrasonic ping to
obtain an average of all the 2nd data samples collected, and so forth. When
11
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
the averaging is completed an average data sample value will exist for each
of the data samples collected. So if seven data samples were collected after
each ultrasonic ping, operation 120 would create seven average data sample
values, with each average value representing the average of those data
samples collected at specific points in the data collection sequence.
[0036] The digital data points corresponding to the stored data
samples are used to construct a signature that is used to represent the norm
condition, that is, a signature that represents the battery cell 38 in a known
good condition. It should be understood that preferably the same number of
pings are made and samples taken in the calibration procedure as in actual
testing. Thus in the above described example in which four pings are used
followed by seven data samples (and where the corresponding samples after
each of the four pings are averaged) after each ping, this preferably occurs
both in the calibration mode and then when an actual test is conducted. The
calibration mode allows a "calibration signature" (i.e., waveform) to be
created
that represents the norm condition and which takes into account the electrical
characteristics of the particular battery cell, and thus "calibrates" the
system
10 for use with the particular battery cell that it is being used to monitor.
When this same sequence of operations is performed during actual testing, a
"test signature" is created (i.e., a waveform represented by the collected
data
samples obtained). It will also be appreciated that when a calibration is
initiated, the microcontroller 18 may also clear any fault conditions and any
previous calibration signature may be replaced with a new calibration
signature.
[0037] One example of a test sequence for the battery cell 38 is
shown in the flowchart 200 of Figure 5. When testing the battery cell 38, the
microcontroller 18 may initially obtain a first one of the averaged data
samples
used to construct the calibration waveform, as well as a first one of the
averaged data samples used to construct the just-obtained test signature, as
indicated at operation 202. At operation 204 the microcontroller 18 may
perform a comparison of the magnitudes of the first averaged test samples of
each of the calibration and test signatures to determine if the data sample of
the test signature exceeds that bf the calibration signature by at least a
minimum predetermined amount (e.g., 300mv or more). If so, a software test
12
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
counter may be incremented by the microcontroller 18 at operation 206. If
not, then a check may be made by the microcontroller 18 if all of the data
samples (seven in this example) have been checked, as indicated at
operation 208. If the check at operation 208 produces a "No" answer, then n
is incremented and operations 202-204 are repeated by the microcontroller 18
with the next averaged data sample for each of the test and calibration
signatures.
[0038] If the
test at operation 208 indicates that all of the averaged
data samples have been considered (i.e., in this example all seven averaged
data samples), then a check is made by the microcontroller 18 to determine if
the test counter is at or exceeds a predetermined value, which in this example
is "3" or higher. The microcontroller 18 determines that the electrolyte level
is
below the norm condition when, for example, three of the seven comparisons
described above show that the averaged data sample of the test signature is
higher by the predetermined amount (e.g., 300mv) than the corresponding
averaged data sample of the calibration signature. When this condition is
present the microcontroller 18 may generate a signal that illuminates the
fault
LED 56 to indicate a "Low Electrolyte" level. However, if the check at
operation 212 indicates that the test counter is not at a value of three or
higher, then the microcontroller 18 may clear the test counter and set the
data
sample n value back to "1", as indicated at operation 216. The microcontroller
18 may then wait a predetermined time period (e.g., 10 minutes), as indicated
at operation 218, before repeating the entire test sequence shown in the
flowchart 200.
[0039] As long as the system 10 is receiving power, the green LED
58 may be powered on. During normal monitoring the green LED 58 may be
controlled by the microcontroller 16 to blink at a first rate or frequency. As
a
measurement is being obtained by the system 10, the green LED 58 may be
controlled to remain illuminated. This provides an immediate visual clue to
the user that the system 10 is functioning as intended.
[0040] It should also be understood that different comparison
sequences could be implemented other than the "three of seven" comparison
sequence described above, when making the determination if the electrolyte
level is at the norm condition. The fault LED 56 has been described as being
13
CA 02815535 2013-05-10
Attorney Docket No. 6499-000166/US
red in color, although any other color could be used. The fault LED 56 alerts
a user to the fault condition. If the electrolyte level is determined to be at
least
at the norm condition, then the fault LED 56 remains off. The microcontroller
18 may also transmit data, such as the test signatures and fault status, to a
host via the data output transmission port 16.
[0041] The foregoing description of the embodiments has been
provided for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to
be
exhaustive or to limit the disclosure. Individual elements or features of a
particular embodiment are generally not limited to that particular embodiment,
but, where applicable, are interchangeable and can be used in a selected
embodiment, even if not specifically shown or described. The same may also
be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a
departure from the disclosure, and all such modifications are intended to be
included within the scope of the disclosure.
.;
14
