Language selection

Search

Patent 2822200 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2822200
(54) English Title: IMPRESSED CURRENT CATHODIC PROTECTION
(54) French Title: PROTECTION CATHODIQUE PAR COURANT IMPOSE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C23F 13/04 (2006.01)
  • C23F 13/22 (2006.01)
  • G01N 17/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • ROGACHEVA, ALEXANDRA VASIL'EVNA (United Kingdom)
  • HUDSON, STEVEN (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • EXPRO NORTH SEA LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • EXPRO NORTH SEA LIMITED (United Kingdom)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2011-12-06
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2012-06-28
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/GB2011/001689
(87) International Publication Number: GB2011001689
(85) National Entry: 2013-06-18

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
GB1021754.5 (United Kingdom) 2010-12-20

Abstracts

English Abstract

An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement comprising an elongate metallic structure 2 to be protected and cathodic protection apparatus 3 which comprises a DC power supply 31 and an anode 32. One terminal of the power supply 31 is connected to the structure at a connection point 33 and another terminal of the power supply 31 is connected to the anode. The arrangement includes monitoring apparatus 4 for monitoring effectiveness of cathodic protection provided by the cathodic protection apparatus 3 by determining the electrical potential of the structure relative to surroundings at at least one location which is spaced from the connection point 33.


French Abstract

La présente invention concerne un agencement de protection cathodique par courant imposé comprenant une structure métallique allongée (2) à protéger et un appareil de protection cathodique (3) comprenant une alimentation en courant continu (31) et une anode (32). Une borne de l'alimentation (31) est connectée à la structure en un point de connexion point (33) et une autre borne de l'alimentation (31) est connectée à l'anode. L'agencement comprend un appareil de surveillance (4) destiné à surveiller l'efficacité de la protection cathodique fournie par l'appareil de protection cathodique (3) par détermination du potentiel électrique de la structure par rapport aux zones environnantes au niveau d'au moins un emplacement espacé du point de connexion (33).

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


14
Claims
1. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement comprising an elongate
metallic structure to be protected, cathodic protection apparatus which
comprises
a DC power supply and an anode, one terminal of the power supply being
connected to the structure at a connection point and another terminal of the
power
supply being connected to the anode, and monitoring apparatus for monitoring
effectiveness of cathodic protection provided by the cathodic protection
apparatus
by determining the electrical potential of the structure relative to
surroundings at at
least one location which is spaced from the connection point.
2. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to claim 1
in
which, the monitoring apparatus comprises means for determining the electrical
potential of the structure relative to surroundings at a reference point on
the
structure to be protected which reference point is spaced from said one
location.
3. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to claim 2
in
which the reference point is the connection point.
4. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to claim 2
or
claim 3 in which the means for determining the electrical potential of the
structure
relative to surroundings at the reference point comprises a second structure
which
is spaced from the structure to be protected and the anode, and means for
measuring the potential difference between the second structure and the
structure
to be protected to allow determination of the electrical potential of the
structure
relative to surroundings at the reference point.
5. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to any one
of
claims 2 to 4 in which the means for determining the electrical potential of
the
structure relative to surroundings at the reference point comprises a memory
in
which is stored a parameter which is representative of the impedance of the
elongate structure as seen from the reference point, means for measuring the
current supplied to the structure at the reference point and means for
calculating

15
the electrical potential of the structure relative to surroundings at the
reference
point using said parameter and the measured current.
6. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to any
preceding claim in which the monitoring apparatus comprises a central station.
7. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to claim 6
in
which the central station comprises part or all of the means for determining
the
electrical potential of the structure relative to surroundings at the
reference point.
8. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to claim 6
or
claim 7 in which the central station may be arranged to determine the
electrical
potential of the structure relative to surroundings at at least one location
which is
spaced from the connection point in dependence on one or more inputs.
9. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to any
preceding claim where the elongate structure to be protected comprises tubing
and the monitoring apparatus comprises a tool which is arranged to be located
within the tubing.
10. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to claim 9
in
which the tool comprises a spaced pair of contacts for contacting with an
internal
surface of the tubing at axially spaced locations, and a control unit
comprising a
sensor for measuring the potential difference between the contacts.
11. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to claim 10
in
which the control unit comprises a transmitter for transmitting, to the
central
station, data indicating a measured potential difference between the contacts.
12. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to claim 11
in which the tool is arranged to transmit said data along the elongate
metallic
structure.

16
13. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to any one
of claims 10 to 12 in which the monitoring apparatus is arranged to determine
the
electrical potential of the structure relative to surroundings at at least one
location
which is spaced from said connection point in dependence on the potential
difference measured between the spaced contacts of the tool as measured by the
sensor of the tool.
14. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to any one
of claims 9 to 13 in which the tool is arranged for movement within the
tubing.
15. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to claim 14
in which the monitoring apparatus is arranged to use the tool to take
potential
difference measurements continuously or at intervals as it is moved along the
tubing.
16. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to any
preceding claim in which the monitoring apparatus comprises a memory in which
is stored a model based on parameters specific to the elongate structure and
its
surroundings which model predicts how the absolute value of a potential
applied to
the structure at the reference point will decay along the length of the
structure
away from the reference point.
17. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to claim 16
in which the monitoring apparatus is arranged to use the model based on
parameters specific to the elongate structure and its surroundings in
determining
the electrical potential of the structure relative to surroundings at at least
one
location which is spaced from said connection point.
18. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to any one
of claims 2 to 17 in which the means for determining the electrical potential
of the
structure relative to surroundings at the reference point comprises a memory
in
which is stored a model based on parameters specific to the elongate structure
and its surroundings which model predicts how the absolute value of a
potential

17
applied to the structure at the reference point will decay along the length of
the
structure away from the reference point.
19. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to claim 10
or any one of claims 11 to 18 when dependent on claim 10 in which the
monitoring
apparatus is arranged to determine the electrical potential of the structure
relative
to surroundings at at least one location which is spaced from said connection
point
in dependence on:
i) the electrical potential of the structure relative to surroundings at said
reference
point as determined by the means for determining the electrical potential of
the
structure relative to surroundings at the reference point;
and in dependence on at least one of:
ii) the potential difference measured between the spaced contacts of the tool
as
measured by the sensor of the tool; and
iii) the model based on parameters specific to the elongate structure and its
surroundings.
20. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to any
preceding claim in which the monitoring apparatus is arranged to indicate when
the magnitude of the potential of the structure relative to the surroundings
falls
below a threshold level at at least one point along the length of the
structure.
21. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to any
preceding claim in which the monitoring apparatus is arranged to indicate at
what
distance from the reference point the potential of the structure relative to
the
surroundings falls below a threshold level.
22. An impressed current cathodic protection arrangement according to any
preceding claim in which the monitoring apparatus is arranged to indicate the
potential of the structure relative to the surroundings as a function of
distance
away from the reference point.

18
23. A well installation comprising an impressed current cathodic protection
arrangement according to any preceding claim.
24. A method of monitoring an impressed current cathodic protection
arrangement, the arrangement comprising an elongate metallic structure to be
protected, and cathodic protection apparatus which comprises a DC power supply
and an anode, one terminal of the power supply being connected to the
structure
at a connection point and another terminal of the power supply being connected
to
the anode, the method comprising the step of:
monitoring effectiveness of the cathodic protection provided by the cathodic
protection apparatus by determining the electrical potential of the structure
relative
to surroundings at at least one location which is spaced from the connection
point.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02822200 2013-06-18
WO 2012/085493 PCT/GB2011/001689
Impressed Current Cathodic Protection
This invention relates to impressed current cathodic protection arrangements.
Impressed current cathodic protection arrangements are commonly used to
protect metallic structures against corrosion. The systems work by applying a
negative potential to the metallic structure which is to be protected such
that
corrosion processes are suppressed. This is achieved by the use of a DC power
supply which has one terminal connected to the structure to be protected and
another terminal connected to an anode. The system will only be effective in
preventing corrosion provided that the structure is held at a large enough
negative
potential relative to the surroundings. For practical reasons the impressed
current
will be applied to the protected structure at a finite number of locations. In
some
circumstances this may be a single location.
It will be clear that as one progresses along the metallic structure away from
the
connection point, the magnitude of the potential of the protected structure
relative
to the surroundings will decrease. If a point is reached where the effective
potential of this structure relative to the surroundings is less than a
required
threshold level, the cathodic protection will cease to be effective from that
point
onwards.
Impressed current cathodic protection systems are used to protect a range of
different metallic structures. One particular situation where they are used is
in the
protection of flow-lines, for example pipeline systems and well insulations in
the oil
and gas inriustry. in RnrnP such nirnurnstannPs nirPnt inRpPntinn dirAnt
measurement of the conditions at various points along a protected structure
can
be impractical or impossible.
This situation is likely to be particularly acute with impressed current
cathodic
protection systems which are to protect elongate metallic structures such as
pipelines where the impressed current needs to be effective over a significant
distance of metallic structure leading away from the connection point.

CA 02822200 2013-06-18
WO 2012/085493 PCT/GB2011/001689
2
This invention is directed at addressing these types of issues.
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided an
impressed
current cathodic protection arrangement comprising an elongate metallic
structure
to be protected, cathodic protection apparatus which comprises a DC power
supply and an anode, one terminal of the power supply being connected to the
structure at a connection point and another terminal of the power supply being
connected to the anode, and monitoring apparatus for monitoring effectiveness
of
cathodic protection provided by the cathodic protection apparatus by
determining
the electrical potential of the structure relative to surroundings at at least
one
location which is spaced from the connection point.
The monitoring apparatus may comprise means for determining the electrical
potential of the structure relative to surroundings at a reference point on
the
structure to be protected which reference point is spaced from said one
location.
The reference point may be the connection point.
The means for determining the electrical potential of the structure relative
to
surroundings at the reference point may comprise a second structure which is
spaced from the structure to be protected and the anode, and means for
measuring the potential difference between the second structure and the
structure
to be protected to allow determination of the electrical potential of the
structure
relative to surroundings at the reference point.
The means for determining the electrical potential of the structure relative
to
surroundings at the reference point may comprise a memory in which is stored a
parameter which is representative of the impedance of the elongate structure
as
seen from the reference point, means for measuring the current supplied to the
structure at the reference point and means for calculating the electrical
potential of
the structure relative to surroundings at the reference point using said
parameter
and the measured current.

CA 02822200 2013-06-18
WO 2012/085493 PCT/GB2011/001689
3
The elongate structure to be protected may comprise tubing. Typically the
tubing
may be tubing provided in an oil and/or gas installation such as a well and/or
pipeline system. In such a case the reference structure may comprise another
well
or pipeline installation.
Note that here the expression tubing is used to refer to casings, liners and
any
other such tubular metallic structure found in a well installation as well as
production tubing, for which the term "tubing" is sometimes reserved in the
oil and
gas industries. The elongate structure may comprise two or more tubing
structures running at least partly within one another.
The monitoring apparatus may comprise a central station.
The central station may comprise part or all of the means for determining the
electrical potential of the structure relative to surroundings at the
reference point.
The central station may be arranged to determine the electrical potential of
the
structure relative to surroundings at at least one location which is spaced
from the
connection point in dependence on one or more inputs.
The monitoring apparatus may comprise a tool which is arranged to run within
the
tubing. The tool and central station may be arranged for communication
therebetween.
The tool may comprise a spaced pair of contacts for contacting with an
internal
surface of the tubing at axially spaced locations; and a control unit
comprising a
sensor for measuring the potential difference between the contacts. The
control
unit may comprise a transmitter for transmitting, to the central station, data
indicating a measured potential difference between the contacts.
Preferably the tool is arranged to transmit said data along the elongate
metallic
structure. Other transmission mechanisms may be used, for example a cable may
be provided along which said data may be transmitted, or non-electrical
techniques may be used.

CA 02822200 2013-06-18
WO 2012/085493 PCT/GB2011/001689
4
The monitoring apparatus, for example the central station, may be arranged to
determine the electrical potential of the structure relative to surroundings
at at
least one location which is spaced from said connection point in dependence on
the potential difference measured between the spaced contacts of the tool as
measured by the sensor of the tool.
Preferably the tool is arranged for movement within the tubing. This can allow
potential difference measurements to be taken at a plurality of positions
along the
structure. The monitoring apparatus may be arranged to use the tool to take
potential difference measurements continuously or at intervals as it is moved
along
the tubing. This can allow a curve of potential along the tubing to be
plotted.
The monitoring apparatus may comprise a memory in which is stored a model
based on parameters specific to the elongate structure and its surroundings
which
model predicts how the absolute value of a potential applied to the structure
at the
reference point will decay along the length of the structure away from the
reference point.
The parameters on which the model is based may comprise one of, or a
combination of: the resistivity of the material of the elongate structure, the
relative
permeability of the material of the elongate structure, the cross-sectional
dimensions of the elongate structure, the resistivity of material surrounding
the
elongate structure, the relative permeability of material surrounding the
elongate
structure. These parameters may he recorded as a function of position along
the
elongate structure. That is to say the value of these parameters need not be
constant along the whole length of the elongate structure. The model may take
into account the presence of multiple lengths of tubing arranged within one
another, some of which extend further than others. Thus, for example, the
model
may be based on parameters concerning lengths of casing as well as production
tubing in a well installation.

CA 02822200 2013-06-18
WO 2012/085493 PCT/GB2011/001689
The monitoring apparatus may be arranged to use the model based on
parameters specific to the elongate structure and its surroundings in
determining
the electrical potential of the structure relative to surroundings at at least
one
location which is spaced from said connection point.
5
The means for determining the electrical potential of the structure relative
to =
surroundings at the reference point may comprise a memory in which is stored a
model based on parameters specific to the elongate structure and its
surroundings
which model predicts how the absolute value of a potential applied to the
structure
at the reference point will decay along the length of the structure away from
the
reference point.
The monitoring apparatus may be arranged to determine the electrical potential
of
the structure relative to surroundings at at least one location which is
spaced from
said connection point in dependence on:
i) the electrical potential of the structure relative to surroundings at said
reference
point as determined by the means for determining the electrical potential of
the
structure relative to surroundings at the reference point;
and in dependence on at least one of:
ii) the potential difference measured between the spaced contacts of the tool
as
measured by the sensor of the tool; and
iii) the model based on parameters specific to the elongate structure and its
surroundings.
Potential difference measurements from the tool and/or made at the reference
point can be used to help verify and/or improve the accuracy of the potential
difference determined using the model at any point.
The monitoring apparatus may be arranged to indicate when the magnitude of the
potential of the structure relative to the surroundings falls below a
threshold level
at at least one point along the length of the structure. The threshold level
may be
a minimum acceptable level for cathodic protection purposes.

CA 02822200 2013-06-18
WO 2012/085493 PCT/GB2011/001689
6
The monitoring apparatus may be arranged to indicate at what distance from the
reference point the potential of the structure relative to the surroundings
falls
below a threshold level.
The monitoring apparatus may be arranged to indicate the potential of the
structure relative to the surroundings as a function of distance away from the
reference point.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a well
installation comprising an impressed current cathodic protection arrangement
as
defined above.
In such a case the central station may be provided at the surface of the well
and
the tool may be provided to run within the tubing of the well. The central
station
may be arranged to determine the potential of the tubing of the well relative
to the
surrounding at the reference point and to determine the potential of the
tubing of
the well at locations away from the connection point in dependence on:
i) the potential difference measured between the spaced contacts of the tool
as
measured by the sensor of the tool; and
iii) the model based on parameters specific to the elongate structure and its
surroundings.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a
method of
monitoring an impressed current cathodic protection arrangement, the
arrangement comprising an elongate metallic structure to be protected, and
cathodic protection apparatus which comprises a DC power supply and an anode,
one terminal of the power supply being connected to the structure at a
connection
point and another terminal of the power supply being connected to the anode,
the
method comprising the step of:
monitoring effectiveness of the cathodic protection provided by the cathodic
protection apparatus by determining the electrical potential of the structure
relative
to surroundings at at least one location which is spaced from the connection
point.

CA 02822200 2013-06-18
WO 2012/085493 PCT/GB2011/001689
7
The method may include further specific steps corresponding to the features
defined above, with appropriate changes in wording where necessary. These
features are not restated here in method form in the interest of brevity.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way
of
example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 schematically shows a well installation including an impressed
current
cathodic protection arrangement;
Figure 2 shows an example plot of the absolute electrical potential of an
elongate
conductor protected by an impressed current cathodic protection system against
position along that conductor; and
Figure 3 is a flowchart showing steps in a method of monitoring an impressed
current cathodic protection arrangement.
Figure 1 shows a well installation including an impressed current cathodic
protection arrangement. The well installation comprises a wellhead 1 and
tubing 2
running away from the wellhead and down into the well. The tubing 2 is a
metallic
structure and it is this structure which is to be protected by impressed
current
cathodic protection in the present case.
Note that Figure 1 shows a simplified schematic view of the well installation,
in
=
particular of the metallic tubing running downhole. Only one run of tubing is
shown. In reality there will normally be additional casings (i.e. lengths of
metallic
tubing) running into the well as well as the central string of production
tubing. In
general terms these lengths of tubing contact against one another at multiple
locations and hence in practical terms will have the same potential as each
other.
Thus their presence does not interfere with the operation of the present
techniques
and the tubing 2 shown in Figure 1 can be considered to be representative of
the
castings as well as the production tubing of the well.
The impressed current cathodic protection arrangement shown in Figure 1
comprises cathodic protection apparatus 3 which is used to provide an
impressed
current onto the metallic tubing 2 of the well so as to protect the tubing
against

CA 02822200 2013-06-18
WO 2012/085493 PCT/GB2011/001689
8
corrosion. The cathodic protection apparatus 3 comprises a DC power supply 31
and an anode 32. A first terminal of the DC power supply 31 is connected to a
connection point 33 on the tubing 2 of the well. A second terminal of the DC
power supply 31 is connected to the anode 32. Thus the DC power supply is
arranged for applying cathodic protection currents. In this regard the
cathodic
protection apparatus 3 of the present arrangement is conventional and the
tubing
2 is protected against corrosion by virtue of the negative potential applied
to it
using the cathodic protection apparatus 3.
However the present impressed current cathodic protection arrangement further
comprises monitoring apparatus 4 for monitoring the effectiveness of the
cathodic
protection provided by the cathodic protection apparatus 3. In the present
embodiment the monitoring apparatus is distributed. That is to say, it has
various
components provided in different locations. In the present embodiment the
monitoring apparatus 4 includes a central station 5 provided at the surface of
the
well and in the same region as the power supply 31 of the cathodic protection
apparatus 3 and a downhole tool 6 which is provided within the tubing 2 of the
well. Also provided as part of the monitoring apparatus 4 is a remote
reference
earthing structure 1' which, in this embodiment, is in the form of a wellhead
of
another well. This other well is remote from the well having tubing 2 which is
to be
protected by the cathodic protection apparatus 3.
The central unit 5 comprises a monitoring unit 51 including a memory 52 and a
processor 53. The central unit 5 also comprises a meter 54 for detecting the
current applied by the power supply 31 of the cathodic protection apparatus 3
to
the connection point 33. Furthermore the central unit 5 comprises a meter 55
for
detecting the potential difference between the connection point 33 and the
reference wellhead 1'. The outputs of both of these meters 54,55 are fed into
the
monitoring unit 51.
The memory 52 of the monitoring unit 51 has stored in it a parameter which is
representative of the impedance of the elongate conductor to be protected
(i.e. the
tubing 2) as seen from a reference point, in this case the connection point
33.

CA 02822200 2013-06-18
WO 2012/085493 PCT/GB2011/001689
9
Using the supplied current value detected by the meter 54 and this stored
parameter relating to the impedance of the tubing 2 it is possible for the
monitoring
unit 51 to determine the potential at the connection point 33. Thus this is
one way
in which the present monitoring apparatus 4 is able to determine the
electrical
potential of the connection point 33 (reference point) relative to the
surroundings.
However the potential of the reference point/connection point 33 in the
present
embodiment may also be directly determined from the meter reading of the meter
55 arranged for measuring the potential difference between the connection
point
33 and the remote wellhead 1'. This is because it is reasonable to assume that
the potential of the remote wellhead 1' is the same as the potential of the
surroundings in the region of the connection point 33. This common potential
is
akin to "earth".
Thus the monitoring unit 51 may determine the potential of the connection
point 33
relative to the surroundings using either of these methods or both of these
methods.
However for the present purposes what is of primary interest is the potential
of the
metallic structure 2 at locations away from this connection point 33.
The memory 52 of the monitoring unit 51 also contains a model which is
representative of the way in which an absolute potential applied to the
metallic
structure at a reference point (i.e. in this case, the connection point 33)
will decay
as one progresses along the metallic structure (in this case, down into the
well).
This model is based on parameters relating to the resistivity of the material
of the
elongate structure (i.e. of the tubing 2¨ both casings and production tubing),
the
relative permeability of the material of the elongate structure, the cross-
sectional
dimensions of the elongate structure, the resistivity of the material
surrounding the
elongate structure and the relative permeability of the material surrounding
the
elongate structure. Furthermore these parameters may be recorded as a function
of position along the elongate structure. Using these parameters the model

CA 02822200 2013-06-18
WO 2012/085493 PCT/GB2011/001689
predicts how potential will decay along the metallic structure and a typical
plot of
how the potential will decay along the metallic structure is shown in Figure
2.
Using this model and the results of the determination of the potential at the
5 connection point 33, the monitoring unit 51 is able to predict the
potential of the
metallic structure 2 relative to its surroundings at different positions along
the
length of the metallic structure 2.
In particular it is possible to therefore determine if the magnitude of the
potential of
10 the metallic structure 2 falls below an acceptable threshold level for
providing
cathodic protection at any point along the metallic structure 2.
The monitoring apparatus 4 can be arranged to indicate if this occurs and/or
to
output a plot which is indicative of the potential of the tubing 2 along its
length.
Further it is then also possible to alter the current delivered by the DC
power
supply of the cathodic protection apparatus 3 so as to raise the magnitude of
the
cathodic protection current being supplied at the connection point 33 and
hence
hopefully raise the magnitude of the potential of the tubing 2 to acceptable
levels
along the entirety of its length (or the entirety of the length of the tubing
2 which is
to be protected). The monitoring apparatus 4 can be arranged to perform such a
function.
As mentioned above, in the present embodiment the monitoring apparatus 4 also
comprises a down hole tool 6. In the present embodiment the downhole tool 6 is
arranged for movement within the tubing 2. The tool 6 comprises axially spaced
contacts 61. A first of the contacts 61 is provided at one end of the tool 6
and a
second of the contact 61 is provided at the other end of the tool 6. These
contacts
are arranged for contacting with the internal surface of the tubing 2. The
tool 6
comprises control unit including a meter 62 for sensing the potential
difference
between this pair of contacts 61 and hence the potential difference between
two
axially spaced points on the tubing 2. Furthermore the control unit of the
tool 6

CA 02822200 2013-06-18
WO 2012/085493 PCT/GB2011/001689
11
comprises transmission means 63 for transmitting potential difference readings
back to the central unit 5.
Different forms of transmission between the tool 6 and central unit 5 may be
used.
In some instances a direct cable connection may be provided, in other
instances
acoustic or other wireless transmission techniques may be used. A particularly
preferred wireless transmission technique is one which makes use of the
metallic
structure itself (in this case tubing 2) as a signal channel. The applicants
supply
commercially a tool under the name CATS, which can provide such a transmission
mechanism in an embodiment of the present kind. This tool works on the basis
of
supplying a very high current low frequency electrical dipole signal to the
metallic
structure 2 via the contacts 61 such that the signal propagates away from the
tool
6 and can be picked up from or in the region of the wellhead 1.
Because the spacing between the space contacts 61 is known, the potential
difference measurement which can be taken by the tool 6 can be used to
determine the slope of the potential curve of the tubing 2 in the region of
the tool.
Therefore provided that the position of the tool 6 within the tubing is known,
knowledge of this slope of the potential curve can be used to help calibrate
the
model and the plot of potential versus depth in the well (as shown in Figure
2) to
improve the accuracy of potential determination at points away from the
connection point 33.
As an alternative, where the tool 6 is arranged for movement within the tubing
2 it
75 is possible to take potential difference readings at multiple points
within the well,
for example, beginning from the region of the connection point 33. In such a
case
it is possible to plot a curve representing the potential of the tubing 2
relative to the
surroundings using the determined value for the absolute potential at the
connection point 33 as a start point and the potential difference readings
from the
tool 6 to plot the curve from there onwards. In such a case there is no
absolute
requirement to use the model contained in the memory 52, which describes the
decay of potential along the tubing.

CA 02822200 2013-06-18
WO 2012/085493 PCT/GB2011/001689
12
Figure 3 is a flowchart illustrating methods of monitoring an impressed
current
cathodic protection arrangement of the type shown in Figure 1. The steps of
these
methods broadly correspond to the techniques described above.
Step 1 of the method is to determine the potential of the tubing at a
reference point
(in the embodiment described above, the connection point 33) relative to the
surroundings.
Step 2 is to determine a potential decay curve along the tubing 2 as one moves
away from the reference point.
Step 3 is to determine whether the magnitude of potential falls below an
adequate
level for effective cathodic protection at some point along the length of the
protecting metallic structure (the tubing 2 in the above embodiment).
Step 4 is an optional step of determining the point at which the magnitude of
the
potential of the tubing falls below the acceptable level.
Step 5, which again is an optional step, is to adjust the current applied by
the
power supply of the cathodic protection apparatus in order to ensure that the
potential of the tubing does not fall below an acceptable level for cathodic
protection purposes.
In carrying out step 1, when operating the embodiment of Figure 1, it is
possible to
/5 use the meter 54 for measuring the current delivered by the power supply
31 of
the cathodic protection apparatus and the stored characteristic impedance of
the
tubing from the memory 52 to determine the potential at the reference point.
Similarly it is possible to use the potential difference measured by the meter
55
between the connection point 33 and the reference wellhead 1'. Furthermore it
is
possible to use a combination of both of these results to decide a value for
the
potential at the reference point 33. Thus, for example, an average of the two
values could be used.

CA 02822200 2013-06-18
WO 2012/085493 PCT/GB2011/001689
13
Note that it is not possible to directly measure the potential difference at
the
connection point 33, relative to the wellhead 1 or any other structure in the
region
of the anode 32, since when the cathodic protection apparatus is in operation
(which is when it is desired to measure the potential at the connection point
33)
the potential in the region surrounding the anode 32 will be heavily
influenced by
the cathodic protection system itself.
When conducting step 2 using the apparatus of the embodiment shown in Figure
1, it is possible to use the model of the decay of the potential along the
metallic
structure (tubing 2) stored in the memory 52 and similarly it is possible to
use the
results of the potential difference measurements made by the tool 6. Again,
furthermore it is possible to use a combination of these two techniques to
determine the potential decay curve.
As mentioned above, whilst the above description has been written in terms of
a
cathodic protection system provided in a well installation, the present
apparatus
and method is similarly applicable to any system with an elongate conductor
and
particularly so for an installation including a tubular elongate metallic
structure
within which a tool can pass. Thus another particular example are pipeline
systems, particularly those used in the oil and gas industry. Note, of course,
however that the present systems, where appropriate, can be used without the
inclusion of a tool 6 which is located within, or runs within the structure to
be
protected.
30

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2017-12-06
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2017-12-06
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 2016-12-06
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2016-12-06
Letter Sent 2013-10-30
Inactive: Single transfer 2013-10-15
Inactive: Cover page published 2013-09-23
Inactive: Reply to s.37 Rules - PCT 2013-08-14
Inactive: Request under s.37 Rules - PCT 2013-08-05
Application Received - PCT 2013-08-05
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2013-08-05
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-08-05
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-08-05
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-08-05
Inactive: Inventor deleted 2013-08-05
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2013-08-05
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2013-06-18
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2012-06-28

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2016-12-06

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2015-11-18

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2013-12-06 2013-06-18
Basic national fee - standard 2013-06-18
Registration of a document 2013-10-15
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2014-12-08 2014-11-19
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2015-12-07 2015-11-18
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
EXPRO NORTH SEA LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
ALEXANDRA VASIL'EVNA ROGACHEVA
STEVEN HUDSON
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2013-06-17 13 615
Claims 2013-06-17 5 208
Abstract 2013-06-17 2 69
Drawings 2013-06-17 3 42
Representative drawing 2013-08-05 1 6
Notice of National Entry 2013-08-04 1 193
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2013-10-29 1 127
Reminder - Request for Examination 2016-08-08 1 117
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Request for Examination) 2017-01-16 1 164
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2017-01-16 1 172
PCT 2013-06-17 12 391
Correspondence 2013-08-04 1 22
Correspondence 2013-08-13 2 53