Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
1
TITLE: REACTIVE EXTRACTION PROCESS FOR REGENERATION OF
AMINE-BASED SOLVENTS USED FOR CARBON DIOXIDE
CAPTURE
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to processes for removing impurities and/or
degradation products and/or heat stable salts (HSS) from amine-based solvent
streams
used for removing CO2 from gas streams. In particular, the present invention
relates to
reactive extraction processes for removing impurities and/or degradation
products
and/or heat stable salts (HSS) from amine-based liquid absorbents. The present
invention also relates to regeneration and recycling of the reactive
extractant.
BACKGROUND
Amine-based solvent solutions are commonly used for absorption of carbon
dioxide (CO2) from low-pressure flue gas streams produced as a consequence of
industrial combustion processes. Examples of effective amines commonly used
include monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), and
methyldiethanolamine (MDEA). However, while amines are effective for CO2
capture
and removal from gas streams, they are degraded and lose their efficacy by
irreversible reactions with flue gas impurities (e.g. 02, SO2, and CO).
Consequently,
the degraded amines need to be continually replaced to maintain efficient CO2
capture
and removal, resulting in increased costs to operate and manage industrial
combustion
processes. The flue gas impurities may also react with various amines to form
heat-
stable salts (HSS). The HSS species are corrosive and are typically generated
by
reactions of amines with oxidizing agents to form short-chain carboxylic
acids. These
acids subsequently quickly bond with amines to form stable salts. Not only do
HSS
have no capacity to absorb CO2, their presence in solvent solutions make it
difficult to
regenerate the solvents, at least under typical processing conditions used to
regenerate
and recycle amine solvent solutions used in CO2-capture systems.
Some conventional amine-based solvent solutions regenerating systems use
distillation to separate the amines from the HSS contaminants. Since
distillation is
achieved based on boiling point differences, a large energy input is required
to
separate the amines and water from the HSS. This makes distillation a very
energy-
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
2
demanding process, which gives rise to high operating costs. In addition, co-
evaporation commonly occurs since various HSS and degradation products may
have
boiling points close to those of the amines. As a result, the amine solvent
solutions
may still be contaminated by HSS after distillation.
SUMMARY
The present disclosure pertains to separation and recovery of impurities
and/or
degradation products and/or heat-stable salts from spent amine-based solvent
systems
used for capturing and removing CO2 from gas streams, after the CO2 has been
recovered from the amine-based solvent systems.
Some exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure pertain to reaction
compositions formulated to recover impurities, degradation products and heat-
stable
salts from spent lean amine solvent solutions. The exemplary reaction
composition
comprise mixtures of a phase- change catalyst and a diluent. Suitable phase-
change
catalysts are exemplified by tri-n-octylamine and by Aliquat 336 chemically
modified to replace a portion of its chloride ions with hydroxyl ions.
Suitable diluents
are exemplified by 1-octylamine.
Some exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure pertain to a one-stage
method for separating and recovering impurities and/or degradation products
and/or
heat-stable salts from spent amine-based solvent systems used for capturing
and
removing CO2 from gas streams, after the CO2 has been recovered from the amine-
based solvent systems.
Some exemplary embodiments pertain to a two-stage method for separating
and recovering impurities and/or degradation products and/or heat-stable salts
from
spent amine-based solvent systems used for capturing and removing CO2 from gas
streams, after the CO2 has been recovered from the amine-based solvent
systems.
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
3
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will be described in conjunction with reference to the
following drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a chart showing the effects of TOA in 1-octanol on the efficiency
of HSS extraction from water;
Figure 2 is a chart showing the effects of Aliquot 336 in 1-octanol on the
efficiency of HSS extraction from water;
Figure 3 is a chart showing the effects of TOA in 1-octanol on the efficiency
of HSS extraction from 5 kmol/m3 MEA;
Figure 4 is a chart showing the effects of Aliquot 336 in 1-octanol on the
efficiency of HSS extraction from 5 kmol/m3 MEA;
Figure 5 is a chart showing the effects of MEA on the efficiency of IISS
extraction using 0.6 kmol/m3 of TOA in 1-octanol;
Figure 6 is a chart showing the effects of MEA on the efficiency of HSS
extraction using 1.0 kmol/m3 of Aliquot 336 in 1-octanol;
Figure 7 is a chart comparing the extraction efficiency of 0.6 kmol/m3 TOA
and 1 kmol/m3 Aliquot 336 for recovery of HSS from water;
Figure 8 is a chart comparing the extraction efficiency of 0.6 kmol/m3 TOA
and 1 kmol/m3 Aliquot 336 for recovery of HSS from 5 kmol/m3 MEA;
Figure 9 is a chart showing the effects of 69 % OH ¨ Aliquot combinations
on the efficiency of HSS extraction from 5 kmol/m3 MEA;
Figure 10 is a chart showing the effects of 88 % OH ¨ Aliquot combinations
on the efficiency of HSS extraction from 5 kmol/m3 MEA;
Figure 11 is a chart showing the effects of OH ¨ modified Aliquot
combinations on the efficiency of IISS extraction from 5 kmol/m3 MEA;
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
4
Figure 12 is a chart comparing the effects of TOA, a 69 % OH ¨ Aliquot
combination, a 2-step extraction, and an extractant mixture on the efficiency
of HSS
extraction from 5 kmol/m3 MEA;
Figure 13 is a chart showing the effects of phase ratios on the efficiency of
HSS extraction from 5 kmol/m3 MEA using a 69 % OH ¨ Aliquot combination;
Figure 14 is a chart showing the effects of temperature on the efficiency of
HSS extraction from 5 kmol/m3 MEA using a 69 % OH ¨ Aliquot combination;
Figure 15 is a chart showing the effects of CO2 loading on the efficiency of
HSS extraction from 5 kmol/m3 MEA using a 88 % OH ¨ Aliquot combination;
Figure 16 is a chart showing the effects of NaOH concentration on
regeneration efficiency of a 79 % OH ¨ Aliquot combination pre-loaded with
HSS;
Figure 17 is a chart showing the effects of mixing time on regeneration
efficiency of a 69 % OH ¨ Aliquot combination pre-loaded with HSS;
Figure 18 is a chart showing the effects of temperature on regeneration
efficiency of a 69 % OH ¨ Aliquat combination pre-loaded with HSS;
Figure 19 is a chart showing the effects of phase ratio on regeneration
efficiency a 69 % OH ¨ Aliquot combination pre-loaded with HSS; and
Figure 20 is chart comparing of regeneration efficiency of a 88 % OH ¨
Aliquot combination pre-loaded with HSS and a 69 % OH ¨ Aliquot combination
pre-loaded with HSS, using a 1:1 phase ratio and a 1:2 phase ratio.
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The present invention relates to reaction compositions, methods and systems
for removing impurities and/or degradation products and/or heat-stable salts
(HSS)
from amine-based solvent systems commonly used for capturing and removing CO2
5 from gas streams. Suitable exemplary amines for the amine-based solvent
systems
include monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), and
methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), 2-amino-2-methyl-l-propanol (AMP), piperazine
(PZ), and the like. Exemplary impurities, degradation products and HSS that
can be
recovered according to the embodiments of the present invention are
exemplified by
02, CO, 502, SO3, SO4, S204, imidazole, 2-oxazolidone, N-(2-hydroxyethyl)
succinimide, N-(2-hydroxyethyl) acetamide, 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-
imidazolidinone,
formate, acetate, propionate, butyrate, oxalate, succinate, glycolate, and the
like.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a suitable
reaction composition for reacting with and recovery of impurities and/or
degradation
products and/or HSS commonly found in amine-based solvent systems comprises a
phase transfer catalyst and a suitable diluent comprising a straight-chain
fatty alcohol.
Suitable phase transfer catalysts are exemplified by tri-n-octylamine (TOA)
and
chemically modified Aliquot 336 (Aliquat is a registered trademark of Cognis
IP
Management GMBH, Duesseldorf, Fed. Rep. Germany) wherein the chemical
modification is substitution of the Cl- ions with OH- ions. Those skilled in
these arts
will understand that the IUPAC name for Aliquat 336 is N-Methyl-N,N-
dioctyloctan-
1-ammonium chloride. Aliquat 336 is also commonly referred to as
tricaprylmethylammonium chloride and methyltrioctylammonium chloride. A
suitable
straight-chain fatty acid alcohol diluent is exemplified by 1-octanol.
According to one aspect, an exemplary reaction composition comprises TOA
diluted in 1-octanol to a final TOA concentration from the range of about 0.01
kmol/m3 to about 1.5 kmol/m3, from the range of about 0.2 kmol/m3 to about 1.0
kmol/m3, from the range of about 0.4 kmol/m3 to about 0.8 kmol/m3. An
exemplary
preferred reaction composition comprises TOA diluted in 1-octanol to a final
TOA
concentration of about 0.6 kmol/m3.
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
6
According to another aspect, an exemplary reaction composition comprises a
chemically modified Aliquot 336 diluted in 1-octanol to a final concentration
from
the range of about 0.01 kmol/m3 to about 1.5 kmol/m3, from the range of about
0.2
kmol/m3 to about 1.3 kmol/m3, from the range of about 0.4 kmol/m3 to about 1.1
kmol/m3. A preferred reaction composition comprises a chemically modified
Aliquot
336 diluted in 1-octanol to a final concentration of about 1.0 kmol/m3. The
Aliquot
336 is chemically modified by replacing from about 49% to about 95% of the CF
ions
with 01-F ions, from about 59% to about 89% of the Cl- ions with OH- ions,
from
about 69% to about 79% of the Cl- ions with OH- ions. An exemplary preferred
reaction composition comprises Aliquot 336 having about 69% of the a- ions
replaced with OH- ions, and diluted in 1-octanol to a final concentration of
about 1.0
kmol/m3.
An exemplary one-stage method of the present invention for removing
impurities and/or degradation products and/or heat-stable salts (HSS) from
amine-
based solvent systems used for capturing and removing CO2 from gas streams,
generally comprises the steps of:
= recovering CO2 from a CO2-enriched amine-based solvent thereby
producing a lean amine-based solvent;
= contacting and mixing together the lean amine-based solvent with the
reaction composition of the present invention to produce an organic phase
and an aqueous phase;
= allowing the organic phase to separate from the aqueous phase whereby
the impurities and/or degradation products and/or HSS are separated into
organic phase and the lean amine-based solvent is separated into the
aqueous phase;
= separately recovering the organic phase and the aqueous phase;
= optionally regenerating the purified lean amine-based solvent recovered
in
the the aqueous phase; and
= optionally regenerating the reaction composition recovered in the organic
phase.
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
7
In this one-stage method, it is optional for the ratio of the organic phase
(i.e., reaction
composition) to the aqueous phase (i.e., the lean amine-based solvent) to be
one of 1-
to-1, or alternatively 1:2 or more, or alternatively 2:1 or more. An exemplary
preferred ratio of organic phase to aqueous phase is about 1-to-1.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a two-stage
method of the present invention for removing impurities and/or degradation
products
and/or heat-stable salts (HSS) from amine-based solvent systems used for
capturing
and removing CO2 from gas streams, generally comprises:
= recovering CO2 from a CO2-enriched amine-based solvent thereby
producing a lean amine-based solvent;
= in a first step, contacting and mixing together the lean amine-based
solvent
with a first reaction composition comprising Aliquat 336 chemically
modified by replacement of a portion of the Cl ions with OH- ions and
diluted in 1-octanol, to produce a first organic phase comprising the
impurities and/or degradation products and/or HSS and a first aqueous
phase comprising the lean amine-based solvent;
= allowing the first organic phase to separate from the first aqueous
phase;
= separately recovering the first organic phase and the first aqueous
phase;
= in a second step, contacting and mixing together the lean amine-based
solvent recovered in the first aqueous phase with a second reaction
composition comprising TOA diluted in 1-octanol to produce a second
organic phase comprising the impurities and/or degradation products
and/or HSS and a second aqueous phase comprising the lean amine-based
solvent;
= allowing the second organic phase to separate from the second aqueous
phase;
= separately recovering the second organic phase and the second aqueous
phase;
= optionally regenerating the purified lean amine-based solvent recovered
in
the the second aqueous phase;
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
8
= optionally regenerating the reaction composition recovered in the first
organic phase; and
= optionally regenerating the reaction composition recovered in the second
organic phase.
In this two-stage method, it is optional for the ratio of the first organic
phase (i.e.,
reaction composition) to the first aqueous phase (i.e., the lean amine-based
solvent),
and for the ratio of the second organic phase to the second aqueous phase, to
be one of
1-to-1, or alternatively 1:2 or more, or alternatively 2:1 or more. An
exemplary
preferred ratio of: (i) the first organic phase to the first aqueous phase is
about 1-to-1,
and (ii) the second organic phase to the second aqueous phase is about 1-to-1.
The present invention also pertains to methods and systems for regenerating
used and/or spent reaction compositions, i.e., reaction compositions that have
recovered and contain therein impurities and/or degradation products and/or
HSS.
According to one exemplary embodiment, a selected volume of an aqueous
solution
of NaOH is vigorously mixed together with a selected volume of the spent
reaction
composition at a temperature selected from the range of about 277 K to about
360 K
to produce an organic phase comprising a regenerated reaction composition and
an
aqueous phase comprising the NaOH solution into which the impurities and/or
degradation products and/or HSS have been recovered. The organic phase is
separated
and recovered from the aqueous phase, after which, the organic phase can be
recycled
for recovery of more impurities and/or degradation products and/or HSS from a
lean
amine-based solvent stream. Alternatively, the recovered organic phase can be
further
purified and regenerated by vigorously mixing with a fresh batch of aqueous
NaOH
solution. A suitable concentration of NaOH for regenerating the spent reaction
compositions of the present invention is from the range of about 0.5 kmol/m3
to about
10.0 kmol/m3, from the range of about 1.0 kmol/m3 to about 8.0 kmol/m3, from
the
range of about 2.0 kmol/m3 to about 6.0 kmol/m3, about 4.0 kmol/m3. It is
optional for
the ratio of the aqueous NaOH solution to the spent reaction composition to be
one of
1-to-1, or alternatively 1-to-2 or more, or alternatively 2-to-1 or more. An
exemplary
preferred ratio of: (i) the first organic phase to the first aqueous phase is
about 1-to-I,
and (ii) the second organic phase to the second aqueous phase is about 1-to-1.
An
exemplary preferred method for regenerating spent reaction composition
comprises
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
9
intermixing the composition with a 4.0 kmol/m3 NaOH solution at about 320 K
to
about 330 K at a NaOH to spent reaction composition ratio of about 1-to-1.
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE 1:
The following chemicals were prepared for the organic phases. Tri-n-
octylamine (TOA; 98% purity) and Aliquat 336 were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich
Canada Ltd. (Oakville, ON, CA). Reagent-grade 99% pure 1-Octanol (Sigma
Aldrich
Canada Ltd.) was used as a diluent to prepare the desired TOA and Aliquat
The following chemicals were prepared for the aqueous phases: Concentrated
MEA (> 99 % purity) was used to prepare a 5 kmol/m3 aqueous MEA solution by
diluting a predetermined weight of MEA with deionized water. Some MEA
solutions
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
simulated degraded MEA solutions containing HSS. Assessments were made of
extraction efficiencies from MEA solutions, simulated degraded MEA solutions
containing HSS, and HSS solutions. Additionally, 1000 ppm N-(2-hydroxyethyl)
acetamide, 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-imidazolidinone (75 % in water), imidazole, N-
(2-
5 hydroxyethyl) succinimide (95 %), and 2-oxazolidone (98 %) were spiked
into some
MEA solutions and used for extraction tests of neutral degraded compounds.
Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) apparatus equipped with diode array detector
(DAD) (CE, model HP 3D CE, Hewlett-Packard Canada Ltd., Montreal, Quebec,
Canada) was used for aqueous phase analysis of HSS and chloride
concentrations.
10 The first CE method used in this study was adopted from the disclosure
of Bord et al.,
(2005, Simultaneous Determination of Inorganic Anions and Organic Acids in
Amine
Solutions for Sour Gas Treatment by Capillary Electrophoresis with Indirect UV
Detection, J. Chromatography 1100: 223-229). For all CE analysis, a bare-fused
silica
capillary column of extended light path (150 fim) with dimensions of 50 um id
x 645
mm length (560 mm effective length, Agilent Technologies Canada, Mississauga,
Ontario, Canada) was used. For the first CE method, background electrolyte
(BGE)
was trimellitate-based solution prepared by mixing 0.8406 g of trimellitic (1,
2, 4-
benzenetricarboxylic) acid (> 99 % purity), 0.4000 g of polyvinyl alcohol
(average
molecular weight 30,000-70,000) and 9.6880 g of trizma base
(tris(hydroxymethyl)
aminomethane (ultrapure grade) with 400 g of nanopure water. All chemicals
were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Canada. The electrolyte was degassed in an
ultrasonic
bath (model 75D, VWR International, PA, USA) and filtered through 0.2 um nylon
filter before use. 10% (w/w). Reagent grade hexadimethrine bromide (> 95%
purity)
was also used for capillary coating. The second CE method used organic acid
buffer
for CE (pH 5.6, Agilent Technologies Canada, Mississauga, ON, CA) to
additionally
determine acetate and glycolate when Aliquat 336 was used in the extraction.
CE
water (ultra pure), 0.1, and 1 M NaOH solution purchased from Agilent
Technology,
Canada were also used for capillary flushing. Sodium molybdate (NaMo04, > 98 %
purity) was selected as an internal standard for HSS quantitative analysis.
The pH
meter used was pH/CON 510 standard model (Oakton, New York, United States)
with
a precision of 0.01 pH unit. All CE samples were prepared using in-house
nanopure
water.
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
11
Gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC-MS, model 6890-5073, Hewlett-
Packard Canada, Ltd., Montreal, Quebec, Canada) was used to analyze neutral
degradation products, i.e. N-(2-hydroxyethyl) acetamide, 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-
imidazolidinone, imidazole, N-(2-hydroxyethyl) succinimide, and 2-oxazolidone.
Chromatographic capillary column was HP-Innowax having cross-linked
polyethylene glycol as a stationary phase. The column had the dimension of
0.25 p.m
thickness x 0.25 mm i.d. x 30 m length and was obtained from Agilent
Technologies,
Canada. The introduction of sample was done by an autosampler/autoinjector
(model
7683, Hewlett-Packard Canada, Ltd., Montreal, Quebec, Canada).
1.2: Extraction Procedures:
A typical run was carried out in a 40 mL extracting bottle. Ten milliliters of
1000 ppm HSS spiked in 5 kmol/m3 aqueous MEA, or alternatively, into water
were
loaded into the bottle. In CO2 loaded experiments, 5 kmol/m3 MEA solution was
preloaded with the desired CO2 concentration by passing 100% CO2 from its gas
cylinder into the solution at a predetermined time before adding HSS. Two
milliliters
samples were taken and checked for the exact CO2 loading using the CO2
displacement technique as previously disclosed by Supap et al. (2006, Analysis
of
Monoethanolamine and Its Oxidative Degradation Products During CO2 Absorption
from Flue Gases: a Comparative Study of GC-MS, HPLC-RID, and CE-DAD
Analytical Techniques and Possible Optimum Combinations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
45(8), 2437 - 2451). For 1 to 1 phase volume ratio (volume ratio of organic
extractant
phase to aqueous phase), equal volumes of 10 mL of desired extractant phases
and
aqueous phases were loaded in the extracting bottle. For phase volume 1 to 2
experiments, the volume of extractant phase used was 10 mL while 20 mL of the
aqueous phase were added. For phase volume 2 to 1 experiments, the volume of
extractant phase used was 20 mL while 10 mL of the aqueous phase were added.
Details of extraction conditions used in this study are given in Table 1.
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
12
Table 1: Extraction conditions
Extraction Parameter Range
TOA concentration 0¨ 1 kmol/m3
Aliquatt 336 concentration 0 ¨ 1 kmol/m3
OH AliquatO concentration 1 kmol/m3
Volume Phase Ratio Ito 1, Ito 2, and 2 to 1
Temperature 298 K¨ 338 K
Mixing time 10 min
A magnetic stirrer regulated at 1200 rpm was used to mix the 2 phases
thoroughly at a predetermined time of 10 minutes or as noted. The mixing
conditions
were sufficient to allow HSS transfer from the aqueous phase to the extractant
phase
to occur at its maximum. In the case of extraction at room temperature, 2
phases were
mixed as they were prepared. For higher temperatures, extractant and aqueous
phases
were separately brought to the desired temperature in a temperature controlled
water
bath prior to mixing. The two phases were then mixed and stirred at that
temperature
in the bath throughout. The mixture was then set to ensure phase
equilibration. To
completely separate the 2 phases as well as speed up the separation process,
the
mixture was centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 8 minutes. The extractant phase on
the
upper layer was carefully removed and kept at 277 K for regeneration studies.
The
pH of aqueous phase was measured and then the aqueous phase was analyzed by CE
techniques to determine HSS concentrations remaining after extractions were
completed. Extractability of extractant was expressed in terms of extraction
efficiency
of HSS calculated using Eq (1);
[HSS 1, efõ õ IF
% Extraction efficiency ¨ _______________________ x 100 (1)
[HSS]before
Where [HSS]before and [HSSIafter denote ppm concentration of HSS before and
after extraction in aqueous MEA or water.
Similar procedures were applied for the extraction of neutral degradation
products (i.e. N-(2-hydroxyethyl) acetamide, 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-
imidazolidinone,
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
13
imidazole, N-(2-hydroxyethyl) succinimide, and 2-oxazolidone) in 5 kmol/m3 MEA
solution. The only difference was that the GC-MS technique was used to analyze
concentrations of these products before and after extraction in aqueous MEA
phase.
1.3: Chemical Modification of Aliquot 336
Modification of Aliquot 336 to the OH- form was initially carried out
following the procedure disclosed by Reisinger et al. (1995, Extraction and
Sorption
of Acetic Acid at pH above pKa To Form Calcium Magnesium Acetate. Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res., 34, 845 - 852.) for replacing the chloride ion (CF) of Aliquot
336 with
the Off ion. Exactly 2 kmol/m3 KOH was mixed into a 250 mL flask using 105 mL
equivalent in volume to Aliquot 336 (1 to 1 phase volume ratio of Aliquot
336 and
KOH). The bottle was shaken vigorously for 5 minutes at room temperature to
allow
maximum ion exchange between Cl- and OH- to occur. The mixture was set for
phase
separation. The upper layer phase of Aliquot was removed and contacted again
with
freshly prepared KOH using the same steps just described. The procedures were
then
repeated for a total of 10 contact times. Residual water was then removed from
the
final Aliquat by filtration through a hydrophobic filter. The degree of
conversion (%
OH in Aliquat ) was measured by analyzing the CF concentration that remained
in
the converted Aliquot using Mohr's method. The difference of Cl-
concentration in
the original Aliquot and that of after conversion equivalent to OH-
concentration in
the modified Aliquot structure was determined as 69%.
Attempts were made to increase the % OH in Aliquot as it might increase the
extraction efficiency. NaOH was used instead of KOH. Approximately 4 kmol/m3
NaOH was used for conversion. The mixing temperature was raised from room
temperature to 313 K by preheating NaOH and Aliquot 336 prior to mixing.
Mixing
time was also increased from 5 to 10 minutes. The Aliquot was repeatedly
contacted
with fresh NaOH for 15 contact times. The only parameter kept similar to the
first
conversion was the Aliquot to NaOH volume ratio of 1 to 1. The rest of the
procedure kept the same. Using Mohr's analysis, it was determined that the
second
conversion successfully increased the degree of conversion to 79 %. Stronger
conditions were further used to convert more of Cl- to OH-. With 5 kmol/m3
NaOH,
333 K temperature, 10 min mixing time, 15 contact times, and 1 to 2 volume
ratio of
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449 PCT/CA2012/000063
14
Aliquot and NaOH, the degree of conversion obtained was 87% for the third
conversion. The final conversion of 88% was also obtained and carried out
using
similar NaOH concentration, temperature, and mixing time as used in the third
conversion. The only difference was contact time and volume ratio selected at
21 and
1 to 1, respectively. A vacuum-rotary evaporator set at 150 mmHg and 353 K
was
used to remove water residue from the third and the fourth converted Aliquot .
The
conversion conditions are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2: Conditions used to chemically modify Aliquot 360
Contact time Volume Temperature Mixing time Degree of OH
Chemical Phase ratio ( K) (min)
Conversion (%, 2)
2 kmol/m3 KOH 10 1 to 1 298 5 69
2 kmol/m3 NaOH 15 1 to 1 313 10 79
3 kmol/m3 NaOH 15 Ito 2 333 10 87
4 kmol/m3 NaOH 21 1 to 1 333 10 88
1.4: Regeneration Procedures
Aliquot in 1-octanol samples preloaded with HSS were loaded into 40-mL
bottles. A NaOH solution having a selected concentration (i.e. 1 and 4
kmol/m3) was
then added to each bottle. The volume of organic phase and NaOH solution used
was
determined by the selected phase ratio of Aliquot to NaOH, i.e., 1 to 2, 1 to
1, and 2
to 1. The 2 phases were mixed using magnetic stirrer with conditions
previously
described in Example 1. The mixing times however were varied from 5 to 10
minutes.
Mixing was carried out outside the temperature controlled bath for room
temperature
runs. Similar procedures were used for extraction was used for higher
temperature
experiments (i.e. 313 K and 323 K). The mixtures were then left to
equilibrate after
which, the 2 phases were separated by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 8 min.
The
organic layer comprising Aliquot was removed from the bottle. The amount of
HSS
removed from Aliquot was directly analyzed from the bottom phase of aqueous
NaOH by CE technique. The regeneration efficiency determined using Eq (2) is
given
as follows;
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
kiss] NaOH after regeneration x
100
% Regeneration efficiency = (2)
[HSS j Aliquat before regeneration )
1.5: Analysis of HSS Using Capillary Electrophoresis Technique (CE)
Two CE methods were used to analyze HSS concentration in all aqueous
phase in this study (i.e. HSS in MEA and water with TOA and OH Aliquat
5 extraction, KOH, and NaOH). The first CE method adopted from the
disclosure of
Bord et al., (2005) ws used to directly determine formate, propionate,
butyrate,
oxalate, succinate, sulfite, sulfate, and thiosulfate. This method was also
used to
directly analyze partially overlapped acetate and glycolate in TOA and OH
Aliquat
extractions. Original Aliquat 336; however, caused almost 100% overlap of
acetate
10 and glycolate peaks after extraction making their quantitative analysis
with this CE
method impossible. The second CE method described previously was required for
analysis of both HSS. Prior to sample analysis, the capillary was
preconditioned by
initially flushing with 1 kmol/m3 NaOH for 20 minutes followed by 10%
hexadimethrine bromide solution for 20 minutes. 0.1 kmol/m3 NaOH was
15 subsequently flushed for 10 minutes to remove excess bromide left by the
previous
step. CE water was used to flush for additional 10 minutes. The capillary was
then
flushed with trimellitate-based BGE for 20 minutes. Voltage of -30 kV was
finally
applied for 10 minutes to complete the preconditioning process. For an actual
analysis, a sample was injected using hydrodynamic mode in which 50 mbar was
applied in the sample vial for 8 seconds. Negative voltage of 30 kV was
applied
throughout the run for 10 minutes. HSS was detected using indirect UV
detection
mode set at 350 nm with a bandwidth of 80 nm with a reference of 240 nm with a
10
nm bandwidth. The capillary was kept at 298 K, also throughout the analysis.
In
between runs, the capillary was flushed with BGE for 5 minutes. Since the
aqueous
phase was only analyzed for HSS concentration, a material balance was used to
determine HSS concentration in the extractant phase.
For the second CE method, the same capillary was initially prepared by
flushing for 15 minutes with a ready-made organic acid buffer of pH 5.6 BGE.
Hydrodynamic mode of sample introduction was still used by applying pressure
of 50
mbar for 2 and 4 seconds to sample and BGE vials, respectively. Negative
voltage of
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
16
25 kV was applied while the capillary column was kept at 293 K throughout the
analysis. DAD signal set at 350 nm with a bandwidth of 20 nm with reference of
200
nm with a bandwidth of 10 nm was used for HSS detection. The capillary was
flushed
for 4 minutes with BGE in between analysis. The analysis time was also 10
minutes.
1.6: Quantitative Analysis of HSS
Quantitative analysis of HSS was obtained using internal standard calibration
curves. Prior to sample analysis, stock solution of standard 100 ppm formate,
acetate,
propionate, butyrate, glycolate, succinate, oxalate, sulfite, sulfate, and
thiosulfate was
prepared in 0.5 kmol/m3 MEA solution. The stock solution was carefully diluted
to
10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 75 ppm using predetermined volume of 0.5 kmol/m3 MEA.
Each standard including 100 ppm stock was then spiked with 200 ppm molybdate
internal standard and run using the first CE condition described earlier. All
standards
were analyzed 3 times to check for repeatability. Standard curves were all
generated
by plotting averaged corrected peak area ratios of standard HSS and molybdate
against corresponding HSS concentrations. For sample extracted by TOA and OH
Aliquat , all HSS in aqueous phase were analyzed by these area-concentration
curves,
except acetate and glycolate whose analysis was done using additional curves
made
by height ratio. Standard area-concentration curves of acetate and glycolate
were only
used for samples from Aliquat 336 extraction. Extraction samples were
prepared by
diluting with nanopure water using a dilution ratio of 1 in 10 and later
spiked with 200
ppm molybdate. This ratio was selected so that the MEA concentration in the
diluted
sample remained the same as that of the standards. Injections were done twice
and the
area ratios (height ratio for acetate and glycolate) of HSS and molybdate were
averaged. The exact concentrations of HSS in the samples were obtained by
comparison of their ratios with the corresponding standard curves. The
statistical error
was in the range of 5% ¨ 10%.
Since acetate and glycolate extracted by Aliquat 336 could not be completely
separated by the first CE method, the second CE method was used to determine
the
acetate concentration. The near 100% overlapped peak from the first CE method
was
probably due to changes of aqueous phase matrix after contacting with Aliquat
336.
Such changes could have affected both HSS differently on how they would be
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
17
separated by the first CE technique. The effect could have potentially shifted
both
peaks causing such overlap to occur. The sample was initially run with the
second CE
method and the acetate concentration was identified by calibrating its area
with the
additional standard curve of acetate also generated by the second CE
procedure. This
acetate concentration was subsequently used to determine the corresponding
area ratio
of the acetate peak from its standard curve made earlier by the first CE
method. This
area was a representative of the exact area of acetate peak if the sample was
only
analyzed for acetate by the first CE approach. Later on, the same sample
analyzed by
the first CE technique was used to determine the overlapped area of acetate
and
glycolate. The combined area was then subtracted by the predetermined acetate
area
to give the peak area of glycolate as it would have responded if only
glycolate was
present in the sample. Glycolate peak area was finally calibrated for the
exact
concentration with its calibration curve previously made by the first CE
method.
1.7: Analysis of Neutral Degradation Products Using Gas Chromatography-Mass
Spectrometry Technique (GC-MS)
For a typical GC-MS analysis, 1-uL sample was injected at the GC inlet set at
523 K using a split injection mode with a split ratio of 30 to 1. The GC oven
was
initially set at 373 K and ramped to 513 K at the rate of 280 K/min. The
temperature was kept at 513 K for additional 10 minutes to ensure complete
elution
of all degradation products. A constant flow rate mode was used with helium
carrier
gas regulated at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The GC-MS interface, MS quad, MS
source,
and EM voltage were kept at 523 K, 423 K, 503 K, and 1858 K, respectively.
The
MS scan mode used had a mass range from 10 to 300 daltons. Prior to analysis,
standard curves of the degradation products were made. Standard mixture
containing
100 to 1000 ppm of N-(2-hydroxyethyl) acetamide, 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-
imidazolidinone, imidazole, N-(2-hydroxyethyl) succinimide, and 2-oxazolidone
were carefully prepared and analyzed 3 times using the GC-MS conditions
described
earlier. The external standard curves were generated by plotting averaged
areas and
the corresponding concentrations of the degradation products. Similar
procedures
were applied to the samples. The exact concentration of the degradation
products
were identified by calibrating the averaged peak areas with the corresponding
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
18
standard curves. The accuracy of GC-MS technique reported in terms of standard
error was less than 5%.
EXAMPLE 2: Extractions using TOA and Aliquot 336
2.1: Extraction of HSS in Water
An aqueous HSS solution without MEA was initially used both to study the
effect of concentrations of TOA and Aliquot 336, and also to determine the
optimum
concentration of each extractant. The results were used to establish the
effect of MEA.
TOA and Aliquot 336 were investigated using concentrations in the range of
0.2 to 1
kmol/m3 in 1-octanol diluent. Higher concentrations were not used since they
were
found unsuitable, especially for Aliquot 336. Concentrations higher than 1
kmol/m3
Aliquot 336 generated emulsion during extraction. The formation of emulsion
made
separation between extractant and aqueous phase extremely difficult. The HSS
solution used for extraction contained 1000 ppm of formate, acetate,
propionate,
butyrate, oxalate, succinate, and glycolate. Sulfate, sulfite, and thiosulfate
of
equivalent concentration were also added to represent S02-derived HSS. The
extraction temperature, extractant to aqueous phase volume ratio, and mixing
time
were kept at room temperature, 1 to 1, and 10 minutes, respectively unless
otherwise
noted,
Figure 1 shows the concentration effect of TOA on extraction efficiency of
HSS used in this study. The extraction efficiency for HSS was found to
increase as the
concentration of TOA increased from 0.2 to 0.6 kmol/m3. The maximum efficiency
was reached when extraction was carried out using 0.6 kmol/m3 TOA. The
efficiency
obtained at this optimum concentration was in the range of 58 to 96 % for
different
HSS. The extraction efficiency slightly decreased as higher concentrations
(0.7 to 1.0
kmol/m3) were used. At the lower concentration range of TOA (i.e. 0.2 to 0.6
kmol/m3), an increase of concentration increased the extracting capacity.
Thus, more
HSS could be transferred from the aqueous phase to the extractant phase. When
the
concentration was higher than 0.6 kmol/m3, TOA became more viscous. A higher
viscosity limits mass transfer of HSS from the aqueous phase to the extractant
phase
thereby minimizing the positive effect of higher TOA concentration, and thus
reducing the anticipated higher extraction efficiency.
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
19
The effects of Aliquat 336 concentration are shown in Figure 2. The
extraction efficiencies of all HSS concentrations were found to increase
steadily from
0.2 kmol/m3 until a maximum was reached at 1 kmol/m3. The efficiency obtained
at
this concentration was in the range of 36 to 91 % for various HSS.
2.2: Extraction of HSS in Aqueous MEA Solution
The extraction technique was also carried out for the removal of HSS in 5
kmol/m3 aqueous MEA solution. Similar concentrations of HSS as used in section
2.1
were also used in the MEA solution. The concentrations of TOA and Aliquot 336
in
1-octanol were separately varied from 0 to 1 kmol/m3. The extraction
efficiencies
obtained from various concentrations of TOA and Aliquot 336 are shown in
Figures
3 and 4, respectively. In Figure 3, all HSS show similar trend in which the
efficiency
increased as the concentration of TOA increased from 0 kmol/m3 until the
maximum
extraction was reached with 0.6 kmol/m3. At the optimum concentration, the
maximum extraction range of 44 to 86 % was obtained for various HSS. Unlike
non-
MEA systems, the extraction efficiency dropped dramatically when extractions
were
performed using higher concentrations of TOA (e.g. 1 kmol/m3). Similar
explanation
given for the non-MEA system in which high viscosity limited the mass transfer
could
be used to explain the current decrease in extraction efficiency with increase
of
concentration of TOA beyond 0.6 kmol/m3. In addition to viscosity, the
presence of
MEA also has an effect.
The effects of Aliquot 336 concentrations are shown in Figure 4. The
extraction efficiency of all HSS increased dramatically when 0 to 0.4 kmol/m3
Aliquot 336 was used. However, the effects became less significant when the
extraction was performed with 0.5 to 1 kmol/m3 Aliquot 336. At the optimum
concentration of 1 kmol/m3 Aliquat 336, the extraction efficiency obtained
was in
the range of 40 to 88 %.
2.3: Effects of MEA
MEA played a significant role in the extraction of HSS using TOA and
Aliquat 336. Even with the same extractant, the extraction efficiency of HSS
was
different in the presence and absence of MEA. In order to study the effect of
MEA,
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
the extraction data of HSS obtained in section 2.1 and 2.2 at optimum
concentrations
of TOA (i.e. 0.6 kmol/m3) and Aliquat 336 (i.e. 1 kmol/m3) were used for
comparison. Figure 5 shows the extractability of HSS in water and aqueous MEA
solution using TOA. It is clear that the efficiency of all HSS decreased when
MEA
5 was present in the system. The extraction efficiency was reduced to as
much as 31 %
for sulfate, thiosulfate and oxalate while butyrate was affected the least
with a 9 %
decrease. The remaining HSS showed the decrease between 11 to 25 %. To
understand the decrease of TOA extraction performance when MEA was present, an
extraction mechanism of HSS by TOA needs to be established.
10 TOA is an aliphatic amine which extracts acids from an aqueous phase by
forming an acid-base complex with the un-dissociated acids. The extraction
mechanism corresponding to the acid¨base complex formation by hydrogen bonding
for HSS extraction can be given as in Eq (3).
TOA+ HA <---> TOA ¨ HA (3)
15 The extraction by ion-pair formation of TOA and acid was suggested
Kyuchoukov, et al. (2001, "Extraction of Lactic Acid by Means of a Mixed
Extractant". Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40 (23), 5635 - 5639). The reaction
corresponding
to HSS extraction in the current study is given in Eq (4).
TOA + H+ + A- TOA ¨ (4)
20 where species with over bar, HA and A- represent species in organic
extractant phase,
un-dissociated HSS, and dissociated HSS, respectively.
Dissociation of HSS and pH of the aqueous phase play a significant role in
determining the extraction mechanism and, more importantly, the extraction
efficiency. HSS can exist in un-dissociated or dissociated forms (i.e. HA or A-
)
following the reaction given in Eq (5);
HA -> H+ + A- (5)
Equation (6) can be used to relate the pH of the aqueous phase to the
concentration ratio of A- and HA:
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
21
pH = pK, + log [Al
(6)
[HA]
where Ka , [A], and [HA] are acid dissociation constant of HSS, and
concentrations of
dissociated FISS and un-dissociated HSS, respectively.
For the extraction without MEA, the pH of the aqueous phase was measured at
2.7. Based on Eq (6) alone, the organic HSS used in this study except oxalate,
existed
at 10 to 100 times more in the un-dissociated form than the dissociated form
while
the opposite was observed for the stronger acidic oxalate and inorganic HSS
(i.e.
sulfate and thiosulfate). This could suggest a difference in the dominant
extraction
mechanism.
When HSS was added in 5 koml/m3 MEA solution, the aqueous phase pH
changed to 11.5. At this pH, the organic HSS was present mostly in the
dissociated
form. Hong et al. (2005, "Removal of Acetic Acid from Aqueous Solutions
Containing
Succinic Acid and Acetic Acid by Tri-n-octylamine". Separation and
Purification
Technology., 42, 151 ¨ 157) reported that TOA will preferentially extract un-
dissociated acids. This could account for the reduction of the extraction
efficiency of
the organic HSS as shown in Figure 5. Oxalate and inorganic HSS were also
affected
at this pH. The dramatic increase of [A] as compared to [HA] could also be
blamed
for the decrease in the extraction efficiency. The negative effect of MEA
could be
two-fold. In addition to the decrease of extraction efficiency induced by pH
change,
the strong bonding of MEA and HSS could also contribute to the reduced TOA
extraction performance. This effect is more prominent for stronger acidic
species (i.e.
oxalate and inorganic sulfate and thiosulfate) since they chemically bond more
strongly to MEA. The organic HSS (i.e. formate, acetate, propionate, butyrate,
glycolate, and succinate) experienced less bonding force due to much less
acidity.
This could explain the larger reduction in extraction efficiency observed
(over 30 %
for oxalate, sulfate, and thiosulfate) when MEA was present whereas, most of
the
organic HSS experienced less than 20 % decrease in efficiency.
Figure 6 represents the MEA effect on the extractability of HSS at room
temperature by 1 kmol/m3 Aliquat 336 in 1-octanol. As a quaternary ammonium
salt,
Aliquat 336 can extract HSS based on the ion exchange reaction as follows;
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
22
KIN+ Cr + K4--> KIN+ A- +Cr (7)
where R4V C/- represents Aliquot 336.
In non-MEA system, oxalate, sulfate, and thiosulfate still yielded high
percentage of extraction efficiency respectively measured at 89%, 84%, and
82%,
which were higher than those of the remaining HSS except butyrate. Based on
previous discussion, inorganic HSS and oxalate, even though at low pH, existed
mostly in the dissociated form, thus favouring the ion-exchange reaction of
Aliquot
336 as given in Eq (7). While the rest shows efficiency only between 36% to
75%
except butyrate of which 91% was extracted. The low extractability of formate,
acetate, propionate, succinate, and glycolate were observed because their
existence in
the un-dissociated form was unfavorable to Aliquot extraction. Butyrate was
the
exception possibly due to its long-chained molecule and higher hydrophobicity,
which
allowed a better solvation by Aliquot 336 and 1-octanol, thereby giving a
better
extraction.
It is clear from Figure 6 that MEA also affected the performance of Aliquot
336. A strong interaction of MEA and oxalate, thiosulfate, and sulfate could
have
played a major role in the decrease of extraction efficiency respectively for
19%,
28%, and 30%. On the other hand, the extractability of organic HSS especially
formate and glycolate was boosted up with MEA up to as high as a 12% increase
in
extraction efficiency. The increase of pH to 11.5 in MEA solution could be
responsible because it totally shifted Eq (5) to the right resulting in the
organic HSS
existing mostly in the dissociated form which is prefered for Aliquot 336
extraction.
Although MEA interacted with these organic HSS, its effect was less pronounced
than
that of the previous HSS group (i.e. oxalate, thiosulfate, and sulfate) due to
a much
weaker interaction with MEA. The effect of pH, therefore, could have overcome
the
effect of MEA interaction and thus became dominant. MEA did not have a
significant
effect on propionate and butyrate though it helped to increase the solution
pH, and
thus to promote the formation of dissociated form of the two. In our view, the
extraction capacity limit of both HSS must have been reached and no further
increase
in extraction efficiency could be obtained.
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
23
EXAMPLE 3: Selection of Extractant for CO, Absorption Process
TOA worked much more effectively than Aliquot 336 at a low pH
(essentially the system without MEA) as shown in Figure 7. In order to select
the
extractant for removal of HSS in CO2 absorption process, their extraction
efficiencies
for HSS in aqueous MEA solution must be compared. Figure 8 shows a side by
side
comparison of HSS extraction efficiency in MEA solution using TOA and Aliquot
336. When MEA was present, a superior extraction efficiency of Aliquot 336 to
TOA was observed for sulfate and oxalate. Formate, acetate, propionate,
butyrate,
glycolate, and succinate showed somewhat similar affinity to both
extractrants.
Thiosulfate was the only HSS extracted for which TOA was 12% better than
Aliquot 336 in the MEA system.
Although the extraction efficiencies of TOA and Aliquot 336 were generally
close in aqueous MEA solution, Aliquot 336 was selected for further
investigation
for two reasons. First, the extraction efficiency of Aliquot 336 could be
improved if
the Aliquot 336 was chemically modified. In contrast to TOA, Aliquot 336 is
a
quaternary ammonium based anion exchange compound in which its chloride (Cl)
exchanges with HSS in aqueous amine phase during extraction. In order to
increase its
extraction efficiency, the cr can be replaced with a less-attracting exchange
ion.
Based on the degree of affinity, hydroxide (OH) is found suitable having less
affinity
to the anion exchanger than Cr. The ease of ion exchange ability of OH- could
therefore, increase the HSS extractability from aqueous amine phase. During
the
extraction, the use of Aliquot 336 was also found to introduce Ci into the
amine
solvent via anion-exchange reaction. The introduction of Cl is undesirable
because it
can induce corrosion problem to the CO2 absorption plant. Thus, chemical
modification of Aliquot 336 described earlier also serves to prevent chloride
contamination in the amine solution. Further extraction with TOA was also
carried
out. However, it was only done by the use of TOA and modified Aliquot in 2-
step or
mixed extraction to determine for a possible synergistic effect and reduction
of Ci
contamination.
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
24
EXAMPLE 4: Improvement of HSS Extraction Efficiency
4.1: OH-Converted Aliquat
Attempts were made to increase the extraction efficiency of HSS in MEA
solution using chemical modification done by replacing CF with 01-1- in the
structure
of Aliquot 336. The degrees of conversion obtained were 69%, 79%, 87%, and
88%.
To ensure the working concentration for the converted Aliquat still remained
1
kmol/m3, 69% 01I- contained Aliquot was initially used to determine the
optimum
concentration. Figure 9 shows the extraction efficiency of HSS with various
concentrations of 69% converted Aliquot in 1-octanol. Similar trend as
obtained for
the original Aliquat was observed. The efficiency dramatically increased from
0 to
0.3 kmol/m3. Higher than 0.4 kmol/m3, the increase of the efficiency began to
slow
down and finally reached the maximum extractability at 1 kmol/m3. About 88%
converted Aliquot also gave the same trend in which 1 kmol/m3 was found to be
the
optimum as shown in Figure 10. Therefore, this concentration is used for the
remaining converted Aliquot to determine the extraction efficiency.
Figure 11 represents the effect of % OH- on the extractability of HSS in MEA
solution at room temperature. The efficiency of the original Aliquat 336 is
also
included for comparison. At the optimum concentration of 1 kmol/m3, 69%
conversion of Aliquot clearly improved the extractability of the original
Aliquot .
The extraction efficiency was increased by 45%, 44%, 42%, 39%, 38%, 36%, 29%,
22%, 20%, and 9%, respectively for sulfite, acetate, succinate, sulfate,
thiosulfate,
formate, oxalate, propionate, glycolate, and butyrate. The majority of HSS
reached
90% extraction efficiency with 69% OH- aliquat. It shows that using 01-1-
Aliquat is
more effective in the ion exchange process with HSS than the original with CI-
. It is
also clear that the difficult to remove ions (such as inorganic sulfate and
thiosulfate)
benefited the most, though they bind strongly with MEA in the aqueous solution
as
mentioned previously in Figure 6. Highly hydrophilic HSS such as formate and
acetate were also extracted into the organic phase much better with the 01-I-
modified
Aliquot .
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
Off Aliquat of 79%, 87%, and 88% were additionally tested using 1 kmol/m3
in 1-octanol. Also shown in Figure 11, an increase of % OH- in the Aliquat
structure
from 69% to 79%, 87% and 88% did not yield any significant increase in the
extractability of HSS in which the extraction efficiency of most HSS still
remained
5 above 90%. The exception was only for glycolate in which a clear
improvement was
observed increasing from 69% to above 80%. The apparent insignificant effect
of %
OH- increase could be as a result of the anion-exchange equilibrium between OH-
and
HSS reaching its maximum capacity at about 60% to 70% conversion. Further
increase of extraction with higher % OH- was therefore not possible under the
10 prevalent extraction condition.
4.2: Two-stage Extraction and Mixed OH Aliquat and TOA
Two-stage extraction was carried out by applying 69% OH Aliquot of 1
kmol/m3 to extract HSS from aqueous MEA solution. 0.6 kmol/m3 TOA was
respectively used in the second step to extract additional HSS from the
aqueous
15 solution. The efficiency of the 2-step extraction is shown in Figure 12.
The data for
TOA and 69% converted Aliquat alone are also separately given in the same
figure
for comparison. The 2-step extraction clearly extracted HSS much better than
TOA
alone giving the removal efficiency in the range of 81% to 98%. However, it
showed
similar extractability to 69% OH- Aliquat for all HSS except glycolate in
which its
20 efficiency was increased from 69% to 81%. A mixture of the 2 extractants
using their
optimum concentrations also performed well and equal to 69% converted Aliquat
.
Above 90% extraction efficiency was obtained for most HSS with glycolate and
acetate being only above 80% efficiency range. A mixture of 69% OFT Aliquat
and
TOA clearly showed synergistic effect. It boosted TOA extractability
dramatically. In
25 summary, the extraction using 2 step and mixed extractants was superior
to the
extraction using TOA alone. On the other hand, the mixture performance was
equal to
69% OH" converted Aliquat . This indicates that converted Aliquat alone is
capable
of cleaning up HSS in MEA solution.
4.3: Management of CF Contamination in Amine Solution
As mentioned previously, the chemical modification of Aliquat 336 was also
served to reduce cr contamination in MEA solution during extraction. Table 3
shows
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
26
the concentration of Cr released into MEA solution after the extraction using
OH-
converted Aliquat of various conversions.
Table 3: Concentration in MEA solution after extraction with various OH
modified
Aliquot
OH Modified Aliquot Chloride Concentration After
(%) Extraction
(ppm, 10)
69 218
79 188
87 130
88 120
Less concentration of Cl- was found if a higher % conversion to OH- of
Aliquat was used. The CF contamination was a result of competitive ion
exchange
reaction of the remaining Cl- and OH- in the converted Aliquot structure for
HSS in
the amine solution. This shows that modification of Aliquot is absolutely
necessary
not only for increasing its extraction power but also for reducing Cr
contamination in
MEA solution.
The mixed extractant and two-stage extraction techniques were also tested for
cr removal. To clearly see the Cl- removal efficiency, competitive reaction of
HSS-
Aliquat was eliminated. Therefore, tests were carried out with only Cl- in
MEA
solution. 5 lanol/m3 MEA solution initially containing 60 ppm a- was used for
extraction. 87 % converted Aliquat and TOA at 1 and 0.6 kmol/m3, respectively
was
used in both extraction techniques. Table 4 shows concentration of cr in MEA
solution before and after mixed extractant and 2-step extractions. The results
showed
that the use of the mixed extractants reduced a- concentration from 60 to 36
ppm,
which accounted for 40% removal. The two-stage extraction was found to be
superior
to the mixed extractants because it reduced the concentration of Cl- to 16 ppm
equivalent to 73% removal efficiency. This shows that Cl- contamination is
manageable with both the 2-step extraction and mixed extractants, but more so
by the
2-step extraction.
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
27
Table 4: Removal of cr from 5 kmol/m3 MEA solution using 2 step extraction and
mixed extractant of 0.6 kmol/m3 of TOA and 1 kmol/m3 of 87% OH
Aliquot at room temperature, 10 min mixing time and 1 to 1 phase ratio
Chloride Concentration (ppm)
Before Extraction After Extraction
Mixed Extractant 2 Step Extraction
61 36 16
EXAMPLE 5: Optimization of Extraction Parameters
5.1: Effect of Phase Ratio of Aliquot and Aqueous MEA Solution
69% conversion of Aliquot at 1 kmol/m3 was used to determine the most
effective Aliquot /aqueous amine phase ratio. Figure 13 shows the effect of
phase
ratio defined as volume ratio of Aliquot in 1-octanol to aqueous MEA
solution. Two
phase ratios of 1 to 2 and 2 to 1 were tested and compared with previous data
for 1 to
1. The phase ratio of 1 to 2 was found to result in a decrease in the
extraction
efficiency of HSS when compared with the base run using 1 to 1 phase ratio. It
was
also the least effective among the ratios tested yielding the least efficiency
for all
HSS. Most fISS showed extraction efficiencies well below 90% (example, 41% for
acetate and 48% for glycolate were extracted from aqueous MEA solution).
Oxalate
and succinate were the only HSS for which more than 90% was extracted into
Aliquot . On the other hand, the extraction efficiency of all the HSS improved
after
switching from phase ratio 1 to 2 to 2 to I. Doubling the volume of Aliquot
was able
to extract most of the HSS higher than 94% from the amine phase and more than
the
phase ratio of 1 to 2. However, 2 to 1 phase ratio only showed either a little
increase
or unimportant change in the extraction efficiency over 1 to 1 ratio with the
exception
of glycolate. A marked improvement was seen from glycolate in which its
extraction
efficiency increased from 69% to 91% when the phase ratio changed from 1 to 1
to 2
to 1. The extraction ability increased with increase of the phase ratio was
observed
because a higher phase ratio (i.e. 2 to 1) contained more Aliquot , thus
increased the
extraction capacity of the system. In our view, although the phase ratio of 2
to 1 was
able to reach maximum extractability, 1 to 1 ratio performed fairly
equivalent. This
has made the extraction with the phase ratio 1 to 1 a preferred choice because
it could
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
28
save extractant cost. In addition, the use of less extractant also minimizes
the
generation and disposal of waste from the extraction process.
5.2: Extraction Temperatures
Extraction at temperatures of 313 K, 323 K, and 338 K were carried out and
compared with previous run of room temperature. 69% OH Aliquat with 1 to 1
phase
ratio was still used throughout this section. The effect of temperature on
extraction of
HSS from MEA solution is illustrated in Figure 14. Extraction efficiency of
HSS
remained unchanged throughout the tested temperature range. The exception only
applied to glycolate, which was extracted better at a higher temperature.
However,
temperature did not significantly affect the overall extractability of the
Aliquat .
Although a reaction of acid-amine complex in organic extractant phase is
exothermic,
the stability of the complex was less affected by temperature due to the
stronger
basicity of the amine. Since temperature in the study range has no effect,
more
choices are available as one can select to apply the extraction technique to
the lean
MEA stream after the rich/lean heat exchange either with or without cooling.
EXAMPLE 6: Effect of CO2 Loading
The effects of CO2 loading on efficiency of HSS extraction were determined
using modified Aliquat . Assessments of the effects of CO2 loading were
carried out
with 88% conversion of modified Aliquat at the optimum concentration of 1
kmol/m3. Room temperature and 1 to 1 phase ratio were selected for this study.
Figure
15 shows that the increase of CO2 loading from 0 to 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mol/mol
MEA
respectively decreased the extractability of the extractant, and thus
decreased the %
extraction of HSS. When MEA solution was loaded with CO2 at 0, 0.1, 0.2, and
0.3
mol/mol, its pH was reduced respectively. The decrease of pH with CO2 loading
could be used to account for the reduced HSS extraction efficiency because it
made
the ion-exchange mechanism less favorable. In addition to reduced pH, CO2 in
MEA
solution could also introduce competitive reactions with HSS. The absorption
reactions are known to generate anions such as carbonate (C032-), bicarbonate
(HCO3-
), and carbamate (OHCH2CH2NHC00). These CO2 induced anions potentially
compete in ion-exchange mechanism for OIT with HSS, thus reducing the quantity
of
HSS extracted into the Aliquat phase. The effect of CO2 indicates that the
MEA
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449 PCT/CA2012/000063
29
stream to be extracted should be as lean as possible to minimize the
undesirable
competitive reactions.
EXAMPLE 7: Regeneration of Used Aliquat
In order to recycle the Aliquat in the extraction process, regeneration of
used
extractant is desired. This section aims at determining the best regeneration
conditions
for replenishment of the used aliquat. Based on initial screening, NaOH was
selected
as a regenerant due to its strong basicity. HSS preloaded Aliquat previously
obtained
from the extraction experiments were used throughout this section. Pre-loaded
HSS
concentrations in OH Aliquat used in the regeneration study are given in
Table 5.
Mixing time, temperature, and volume phase ratio of used Aliquat and NaOH are
also optimized.
Table 5: Summary of HSS preloaded 1 kmol/m3 OH Aliquat
HSS Concentration (ppm)
69% OH Aliquai 79% Aliquat 87% Aliquat 88% Aliqua
Formate 877 910 930 852
Acetate 845 771 920 825
Propionate 880 921 874 846
Butyrate 938 960 893 818
Glycolate 808 859 813 789
Oxalate 995 990 999 999
Succinate 1032 1019 955 999
Sulfate 924 961 911 864
Thiosulfate 915 895 889 830
7.1: Effect of NaOH Concentration
The effect of NaOH concentration was evaluated using 1 and 4 kmol/m3
NaOH. Mixing time was set at 10 minutes, temperature was set at 316 K, and
and
phase ratio set at 1 to 2. 79% OH Aliquat preloaded with known concentration
of
HSS shown in Table 5 was used for regeneration. Regeneration efficiency was
calculated based on HSS concentration released into NaOH phase after
contacting
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
with used Aliquat . Figure 16 shows clearly that 4 kmol/m3 NaOH was over 50%
more effective than its 1 kmol/m3 counterpart. Regeneration efficiency ranging
between 59% to 89% was obtained except for sulfite, propionate, and butyrate
which
respectively resulted in 48%, 15%, and 5% regeneration efficiencies. NaOH of 1
5 kmol/m3 shows only less than 39% efficiency for most HSS. A higher NaOH
concentration resulted in higher OH- available for Aliquat regeneration.
7.2 Effect of Mixing Time
Mixing time also affected regeneration efficiency as shown in Figure 17. The
test was carried out using 2 mixing times of 5 and 10 minutes. NaOH
concentration,
10 temperature, and phase ratio were set at 4 kmol/m3, 298 K, and 1 to 1,
respectively.
Preloaded HSS 69% 011 Aliquat was used for regeneration. An increase of
mixing
time from 5 to 10 minutes increased the ability of the NaOH to better
regenerate
Aliquat . The effect was more pronounced for thiosulate and sulfite. A longer
mixing
time basically provided more contact time of the ion-exchange process of HSS
and
15 OH-.
7.3 Effect of Temperature
Figure 18 shows the effect of regeneration temperature with 4 kmol/m3 NaOH,
10 min mixing time, and 1 to 2 phase ratio. Preloaded HSS Aliquat prepared as
described in previous sections was used to study the effects of temperature.
20 Temperatures tested were 298 K, 313 K, and 323 K. Regeneration of
used Aliquat
was found to be temperature dependent. Results showed that a higher
temperature was
required to better regenerate the used aliquat. Regeneration was most
effective using
the highest temperature of 323 K showing over 50% efficiency for most HSS.
Propionate and butyrate were the exceptions with only 12% and 6% efficiency.
When
25 regeneration at 313 K was used, the efficiency clearly dropped. A huge
decrease was
further observed when regeneration was carried out at 298 K. This indicates
the
endothermic nature of the regeneration process of Aliquat using NaOH.
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
31
7.4: Effect of Phase Ratio
The optimum aliquat/NaOH phase ratio was determined using 69% OH
Aliquot , 4 kmol/m3 NaOH, 10 mm mixing time, and 298 K temperature. In Figure
19, regeneration using phase ratio of 2 to 1 shows a small range of efficiency
in which
most HSS was extracted back into NaOH phase by only 30%. The highest
percentage
that this phase ratio produced was 38% for sulfite. A further test was carried
out with
1 to 1 Aliquot to Na01-1, which was found to be optimum. The reduction of
Aliquot
volume showed significant improvement on regeneration efficiency of many HSS.
Thiosulfate, sulfate, oxalate, formate, and succinate showed over 100%
increase in
terms of regeneration efficiency compared to those obtained from 2 to 1 phase
ratio.
Acetate was the only HSS for which the efficiency decreased with 1 to 1 phase
ratio
while sulfite was not affected by the phase ratio change. A test was further
attempted
by changing the phase ratio to 1 to 2. Figure 19 shows that an increase of
NaOH phase
volume had a negative effect by reducing the regeneration efficiency of most
HSS to
as low as those obtained by the previous 2 to 1 volume ratio. The efficiency
of sulfite
and acetate were also reduced and were the lowest among volume ratio tested in
this
study. The only benefit of using 1 to 2 phase ratio was for glycolate in which
it
yielded the highest regeneration efficiency.
Figure 20 also confirms the effectiveness of 1 to 1 ratio. The regeneration
efficiency was obtained also by using the optimum conditions found for the
other
parameters (i.e. 4 kmol/m3 NaOH, 10 min mixing time, and 323 K temperature).
The
88% OH Aliquot preloaded with HSS was used to test the optimum conditions.
The
result is compared with run of 1 to 2 phase ratio of 69% OH Aliquot to NaOH.
It is
clear that 1 to 1 phase ratio works more effectively than the rest of the
conditions.
EXAMPLE 8: Extraction of Neutral Degradation Products
In addition to HSS, the extraction technique developed in this study was also
applied to the extraction of neutral degradation products. 5 kmol/m3 MEA
solution
spiked with 1000 ppm of major degradation products of imidazole, N-(2-
hydroxyethyl) acetamide, 2-oxazolidone, N-(2-hydroxyethyl) succinimide, and 1-
(2-
hydroxyethyl)-2-imidazolidinone was used. The extraction was carried out with
1
CA 02823081 2013-06-26
WO 2012/097449
PCT/CA2012/000063
32
kmol/m3 88% OH aliquat, 1 to 1 phase ratio of Aliquat and aqueous amine, and
room temperature. Table 6 shows concentrations of neutral degradation products
in
MEA solution after extraction and the corresponding % extraction efficiency.
The
Aliquat also successfully extracted imidazole, 2-oxazolidone, and N-(2-
hydroxyethyl) succinimide from aqueous MEA solution. Extraction efficiencies
of
96%, 98%, 99% were observed for imidazole, 2-oxazolidone, and N-(2-
hydroxyethyl)
succinimide, respectively. N-(2-hydroxyethyl) acetamide and 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-
2-
imidazolidinone were also extracted by Aliquat with the respective
efficiencies of
43% and 49%.
Table 6: Extraction of neutral degradation products in 5 kmol/m3 MEA solution
using 1 kmol/m3 88% OH Aliquaeat room temperature, 10 min mixing
time, and 1 to 1 phase ratio
Degradation Products Extraction Efficiency
(%, 5)
Imidazole 96
2-Oxazolidone 98
N-(2-hydroxyethyl)succinimide 99
N-(2-hydroxyethyl)acetamide 43
1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-imidazolidinone 49
The high percentage of extraction efficiency of imidazole could possibly be
because of its resonance structure. The lone pair electron delocalization of
acidic
nitrogen atom into the ring induces various negatively charged sites on the
ring. This
could be favorable to ion-exchange process with 01-I- from aliquat. 2-
oxazolidone and
N-(2-hydroxyethyl) succinimide could also acquire resonance structure but
giving
only one negative site on the carbonyl oxygen. If this was the only site for
ion-
exchange process with Aliquat . There must be other factors contributing to a
very
high extraction efficiency similar to that of imidazole. The ring structure
could have
also contributed because it was what 2-oxazolidone, and N-(2-hydroxyethyl)
succinimide had in common with imidazole.
