Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
Title: Furnace Structural Integrity Monitoring Systems and Methods
FIELD
[1] The described embodiments relate to a system and method for monitoring
the
structural integrity and physical deformation of a metallurgical furnace.
BACKGROUND
[2] A typical metallurgical furnace is a container having sidewalls with a
multi-layer
construction. The outer layer is typically a steel shell provided for
structural support.
The inner layer includes a refractory lining, constructed from one or more
layers of
refractory bricks, that is provided to shield the outer steel shell from
molten materials
and aggressive chemicals inside the furnace. In some furnaces, a cooling layer
is also
provided between the outer steel shell and the refractory lining to prevent
excessive
heat transfer from the refractory lining to the outer steel shell. In some
furnace designs,
the layers of brick and/or cooling elements are set in place with a soft sand-
like material
that solidifies during the operation of the furnace.
[3] During the operation of a metallurgical furnace, the refractory lining
can be
deteriorated by mechanical and thermal stress in addition to chemical
degradation
resulting in a loss of overall refractory lining thickness. As the refractory
lining
deteriorates molten materials and aggressive chemicals penetrate into widening
spaces
in and/or between refractory bricks leading to delamination (i.e. separation)
of the layers
in the refractory lining. Such delamination can exert expansive stresses on
the outer
steel shell, and may cause local deformation of the steel shell. Deterioration
of the
refractory lining can also lead to structural failures that may cause the
outer steel shell
to be exposed to molten materials and aggressive chemicals inside the furnace.
[4] Moreover, if the molten materials and aggressive chemicals reach the
outer steel
shell there is an imminent risk of severe injury to personnel working near the
furnace,
because the outer steel shell is typically not capable of reliably holding
back the molten
materials and aggressive chemicals inside the furnace. Loss of heat
transferability and
¨ 1 ¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
conductivity are also known to occur as a result of the deterioration of the
refractory
lining, both of which may contribute to deformation and failure of the steel
shell.
[5] Another mode of refractory lining deterioration, common in furnaces
that include
water-cooled elements, is hydration of the refractory lining. Under certain
temperatures,
water that has leaked from a cooling element can react with the refractory
bricks
causing expedited deterioration of the refractory lining. In particular,
magnesia (MgO)
based refractory bricks are susceptible to this mode of failure. Expansion of
the
refractory lining caused by hydration can exert increased expansive pressures
on the
steel shell, and may contribute to local deformation of the shell.
[6] It is desirable to monitor the structural integrity of the furnace, and
particularly the
outer steel shell, in order to help predict the timing and location of shell
ruptures.
Making a reliable and accurate assessment of the condition of the steel shell
is difficult
to do without first emptying the furnace and shutting down the industrial
process in
which the furnace is involved. Shutting down a metallurgical furnace for
routine
inspection is costly and operators try to make use of inspection methods that
can be
employed while the furnace is operating. However, the hostile working
environment in
which a furnace is typically used skew the measurements made. For example,
extremely high temperatures in the furnaces, vibrations, ambient noise, dust,
and
electrical and mechanical hazards are known to distort the structural
integrity
measurements generated by the previously known inspection methods.
Conventional
deformation monitoring tools, such as strain gauges, can be useful, but can
only
measure deformation in the vicinity in which they are installed. Further,
conventional
strain gauges are generally unable to differentiate between elastic and
plastic
deformation of the outer shell.
[7] A systematic method monitoring the structural integrity of the steel
shell and
identifying the beginning cracks and other structural defects in real-time has
not been
developed. As a result, operators are forced to shut down and cool furnaces in
order to
check the shell integrity from time-to-time, and may have little or no warning
of an
impending shell rupture which can result in the leakage of molten metal from
the
) furnace into the surrounding environment (a run-out).
¨2¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
SUMMARY
[8] In a first aspect, various embodiments provide an acoustic emission
monitoring
system for monitoring structural integrity of a furnace having a furnace
shell, the system
comprising: a controller; and a plurality of acoustic emission sensors mounted
to the
furnace shell and to the controller to provide electric signals corresponding
to acoustic
emission (AE) events generated in the furnace to the controller.
[9] In some embodiments, at least some of the sensors are coupled to the
controller
through a preamplifier.
[10] In some embodiments, at least some of the sensors are removably mounted
to
the furnace shell.
[11] In some embodiments, at least some of the sensors are magnetically
mounted to
the furnace shell.
[12] In some embodiments, at least some of the sensors are permanently
mounted.
[13] In some embodiments, at least some of the sensors are mounted to the
furnace
shell in a predetermined mounting pattern.
[14] In some embodiments, at least some of the sensors are mounted to the
furnace
shell in positions corresponding to one or more furnace components.
[15] In some embodiments, the spacing of at least some of the sensors mounted
on
the furnace shell is determined by one or more factors selected from the
following list of
factors: properties of some or all of the sensors; the resolution of some of
all of the
sensors; the number of sensors used; the location of furnace components; and
the size
of the furnace.
[16] In some embodiments, at least some of the sensors are sensitive to
acoustic
emissions having a frequency higher than a selected threshold.
[17] In some embodiments, the controller includes a filtration module to
filter the
electric signals.
[18] In some embodiments, the filtration module filters out signals below a
selected
threshold.
[19] In some embodiments, the threshold is selected from the group consisting
of: an
operating threshold AE value; a warning AE threshold value, an alarm AE
threshold
value and a shutdown AE threshold value.
¨3¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
[20] In some embodiments, the system includes sensors of different types.
[21] In some embodiments, the controller includes an output module for
providing
one or more output signal corresponding to the electric signals.
[22] In some embodiments, an output signal is provided when the intensity of
AE
events detected by at least one of the sensors exceeds a threshold.
[23] In some embodiments, the threshold is selected from the group consisting
of: an
operating threshold AE value; a warning AE threshold value, an alarm AE
threshold
value and a shutdown AE threshold value.
[24] In some embodiments, at least one of the output signals is selected from
the
group consisting of: warning signals, alarm signals, control signals, sensor
control
signals and feedback signals.
[25] In some embodiments, the controller includes a display apparatus for
providing
information relating to the electric signals.
[26] In some embodiments, the controller includes a location module for
estimating
the location of the origin of an acoustic emission event.
[27] In another aspect, some embodiments, provide a method of monitoring the
structure of a furnace, the method including: mounting a plurality of acoustic
emission
sensors to the furnace shell; receiving, from at least one of the acoustic
emissions
sensors, electric signals corresponding to an acoustic emission event
generated in the
furnace; and analyzing the electric signals.
[28] In some embodiments, the method includes positioning at least some of the
sensors in a predetermined mounting pattern.
[29] In some embodiments, the method includes positioning at least some of the
sensors in positions corresponding to one or more furnace components.
[30] In some embodiments, the method includes spacing the sensors mounted on
the
furnace shell based on one or more factors selected from the following list of
factors:
properties of some or all of the sensors; the resolution of some of all of the
sensors; the
number of sensors used; the location of furnace components; and the size of
the
furnace.
) [31] In some embodiments, the method includes filtering out acoustic
emissions that
are identified by fewer than a selected number of the sensors.
¨4¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
[32] In some embodiments, the method includes filtering out acoustic emissions
corresponding to normal operating noises of the furnace.
[33] In some embodiments, the controller includes a display apparatus for
providing
information relating to the electric signals.
[34] In some embodiments, the method includes estimating the location of the
origin
of an acoustic emission event.
[35] In some embodiments, the method includes identifying one or more pre-
cursor
AE events.
[36] In some embodiments, the method includes applying a speed wave correction
based on the operating temperature of a furnace to refine the estimated
location of the
origin of an acoustic emission event.
[37] In some embodiments, the method includes providing an output identifying
the
estimated location of the origin of an acoustic emission event.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[38] For a better understanding of the applicant's teachings described herein,
reference will now be made, by way of example only, to the accompanying
drawings
which show at least one exemplary embodiment, and in which:
[39] Figure 1 is a schematic representation of an Acoustic Emission (AE)
monitoring
system installed on a metallurgical furnace;
[40] Figure 2 is a partial cross-sectional view of the furnace of Figure 1,
taken along
line 2-2;
[41] Figure 3 is an enlarged view of region 3 of the furnace of Figure 1;
[42] Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of an example of a controller for an AE
monitoring system;
[43] Figure 5 is a line graph illustrating AE activity in a furnace over time;
[44] Figure 5a is an enlarged view of region 5a on Figure 5;
[45] Figure 6 is a flow chart illustrating a method of operating an AE
monitoring
system; and
[46] Figure 7 is line graph illustrating an exemplary AE signal.
¨5¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
[47] For simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the figures
have not
necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the
elements
may be exaggerated relative to other elements for clarity. Further, where
considered
appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among the figures to indicate
corresponding or analogous elements.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[48] Various apparatuses or processes are described below to provide an
example of
an embodiment of each claimed invention. No embodiment described below limits
any
claimed invention and any claimed invention may cover processes or apparatuses
that
are not described below. The claimed inventions are not limited to apparatuses
or
processes having all of the features of any one apparatus or process described
below
or to features common to multiple or all of the apparatuses described below.
It is
possible that an apparatus or process described below is not an embodiment of
any
claimed invention. Any invention disclosed in an apparatus or process
described below
that is not claimed in this document may be the subject matter of another
protective
instrument, for example, a continuing patent application, and the applicants,
inventors
or owners do not intend to abandon, disclaim or dedicate to the public any
such
invention by its disclosure in this document.
[49] Run-outs are undesirable but common occurences with operating
metallurgical
furnaces. A run-out occurs when the molten contents of the furnace leaks into
the
surrounding environment. Run-outs can result in costly down-time for the
furnace, and
can pose a safety hazard to operators working in the vicinity of the furnace.
[50] Some run-outs can be caused by flaws in or between the refractory lining
of a
furnace, which allow molten metal to seep through the refractory layers and
contact the
steel outer shell of the furnace. Refractory flaws can be caused by extensive
wear of
internal refractory lining, or hydration and physical/chemical deformation and
weakening
of the refractory lining or through a discontinuity in the lining. The
Applicant has
discovered that these mechanisms causing a run-out, can produce acoustic
emissions
and can result in furnace shell deformations.
) [51] Combinations of systems and methods for measuring elastic and plastic
deformation of the furnace shell, detecting micro cracking and cracking of the
furnace
¨6¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
shell, detecting refractory displacements and formation of discontinuities
resulting in
run-outs and detecting the refractory wear can be used to help facilitate the
structural
integrity monitoring of metallurgical furnaces. Such systems may allow timely
application of preventive measures or safety procedures, if required, before
the damage
of the furnace becomes severe and/or results in a run-out.
[52] A structural integrity monitoring system can be used to monitor the
structural
integrity of furnace. Optionally, the structural integrity monitoring system
can be used to
monitor the condition of the furnace in real-time. The structural integrity
monitoring
system can be configured to use a plurality of different types of sensors,
either
individually or in combination. Suitable types of sensors can include, for
example,
acoustic sensors, vibration sensors, strain gauges, optical sensors and
temperature
sensors. In some instances it may be useful to include multiple different
types of
sensors within an integrity monitoring system to help facilitate the
collection of multiple
types of data. Optionally, this combination of data can be processed using a
common
system controller. For simplicity, an example of a structural integrity
monitoring system
described below is described as having a single type of acoustic emission
sensor,
however other embodiments of the integrity monitoring system may include a
plurality of
different sensor types.
[53] Acoustic emission testing is a method for monitoring the condition of
materials
deforming under an externally and/or internally applied stress. Acoustic
emissions (AE)
may be defined as a transient elastic waves generated by the rapid release of
energy
within a material when the material is yielding or plastically deforming.
Acoustic
emission sensing or monitoring equipment can "listen" to the sounds of cracks
growing,
fibres breaking and many other modes of active damage in the stressed
material. By
monitoring AE signals from a given structure, small-scale damage to the
structure may
be detectable before a larger structural failure occurs. Multi-sensor AE
systems can
also be used to locate the origin of a crack (or other such mechanical
failure) and
predict the direction of crack propagation. When used in this manner, AE can
be used
as a non-destructive testing or monitoring technique to find defects, for
example, during
structural proof tests and plant operation.
¨7¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
[54] The Applicant has discovered that an AE monitoring system can be
configured to
monitor the structural integrity of a smelting furnace.
[55] Conventional strain gauge measurement techniques are capable of detecting
physical expansion in the outer shell of a smelting furnace. However, known
strain
gauge base systems, relying primarily on dimensional changes in the material,
cannot
distinguish between reversible elastic deformation and potentially problematic
plastic
deformation in a material. Unlike strain gauge based systems, the Applicant's
AE
monitoring systems can be used to detect the stress waves generated by a rapid
release of energy in a material, which usually accompanies plastic
deformation. When
undergoing reversible, elastic deformation, the internal structure of a
material remains
generally intact, and releases very little, if any acoustic emissions.
[56] By monitoring acoustic emissions generated within a material, an AE
monitoring
system can be capable of identifying the transition from reversible to
irreversible
deformation in a material, and detecting active flaws in materials such as
crack growth
(including microcrack formation and growth).
[57] The use of a plurality of sensors, for example arranged in sensors'
arrays to
define sensing regions, may help facilitate AE origin location. Identifying
the source of
the origin of AE signals can help identify areas of stress concentration in
the material,
which may lead to the formation of larger cracks and other defects. Locating
the
portions of the material that have undergone significant plastic deformation
may help
identify portions of the material that may be more likely to fail, and that
may be
inspected and/or repaired before failure.
[58] Referring to Figures 1 and 2 an AE monitoring system 100 is installed on
a
metallurgical furnace 102 and is configured to monitor the structural
integrity of the
furnace.
[59] In the illustrated example, the furnace 102 is an electric circular
furnace that
includes a bottom plate 104, a roof 106 and an outer shell 108. The outer
shell 108 can
be formed from any suitable material, including steel. The interior of the
furnace 102 is
lined with refractory material 110. Refractory material may help insulate the
bottom
) plate 104 and outer shell 108 from the molten metal that can be contained in
the
¨8¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
furnace. In the illustrated example, the furnace 102 includes multiple hearth
refractory
layers 112 and wall refractory material 114.
[60] Acoustic emissions may be generated by a plurality of sources within the
furnace
102, including, for example, deformation and cracking of the outer shell 108,
erosion of
refractory material 110, movement of refractory material relative 110 to the
outer shell
108, leaks in cooling water systems and electrode arcing.
[61] The AE monitoring system 100 includes a plurality of AE sensors 116
mounted
to the furnace 102. In the illustrated example, the AE monitoring system
includes
sixteen AE sensors 116 mounted on the outer shell 108 of the furnace 102.
Optionally,
the plurality of AE sensors 116 can be detachably mounted to the furnace outer
shell
108 using a suitable detachable connecter, including, for example, a magnet.
Alternatively, some or all of the AE sensors 116 can be permanently mounted
furnace
outer shell 108. The AE sensors 116 are operable to convert acoustic emissions
generated within the furnace into corresponding electrical signals.
[62] Each AE sensor 116 is linked to a corresponding AE preamplifier 118. For
simplicity, only a single RE preamplifier 118 is illustrated in Figure 1,
however, a
corresponding AE preamplifier 118 can be connected to each RE sensor 116. The
AE
preamplifiers 118 are configured to receive the corresponding electrical
signals from the
AE sensors 116 and to transmit an amplified electrical signal to a controller
120. The
plurality of AE preamplifiers 118 are communicably linked to the controller
120, using a
plurality of suitable data cables. In the illustrated example, the controller
120 is a
computer. Alternatively, the controller 120 can be any suitable apparatus,
including, for
example a PLC.
[63] Optionally, instead of being provided as separate components, the AE
preamplifiers 118 may be integrated into the AE sensors 116, or the controller
120, as
opposed to be provided as a separate component.
[64] Optionally, the AE sensors 116, AE preamplifiers 118, controller 120,
cables and
any other system components can be thermally shielded to help protect the
system
components from the heat of the furnace.
) [65] Referring also to Figure 3, the plurality of AE sensors 116 can be
mounted to the
outer shell 108 in a predetermined mounting pattern. In the illustrated
example, the
¨9¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
sixteen AE sensors 116 are mounted to the furnace outer shell 108 in two
generally
linear rows 122a, 122b. A first row 122a of AE sensors 116 is located at a
first height
124 above the bottom plate 104 of the furnace 102. The height of the first row
122b
can be selected based on a plurality of factors, including, for example, the
configuration
furnace and the location of furnace components (such as tapholes, stiffening
layers,
refractory layers, etc.). In the illustrated example, the first row of sensors
122a is
positioned approximately one hundred fifty millimeters above the bottom plate
104 of
the furnace 102.
[66] The plurality of AE sensors 116 in the first row 122a are laterally
offset from each
other by a first lateral spacing distance 126. The first lateral spacing
distance 126 can
be selected based on a plurality of factors, including, for example, the AE
sensor 116
properties (such as sensor resolution), the number of AE sensors 116 used, the
location of furnace structural features (such as tapholes, stiffening
elements, etc.) and
the size of the furnace outer shell 108. In the illustrated example, the first
lateral
spacing distance 126 is approximately nine thousand millimeters. Using this
lateral
spacing distance 126 enables the plurality of AE sensors 116 in the first row
122a to be
generally equally spaced around the perimeter of the furnace outer shell 108.
Alternatively, the lateral spacing distance 126 between AE sensors 116 in the
first row
122a need not be constant around the perimeter of the furnace 102.
[67] A second row 122b of AE sensors 116 is positioned above the first row
122a and
is offset from the first row 122a by a vertical offset distance 128. In the
illustrated
example, the vertical offset distance 128 is less than the first lateral
spacing distance
126, and is approximately twelve hundred millimeters. Optionally, the vertical
offset
distance 128 can be between about five and about three thousand millimeters.
[68] The AE sensors 116 in the second row 122b are offset from each other by a
second lateral spacing distance 130. Optionally, as illustrated, the second
lateral
spacing distance 130 can be generally equal to the first lateral spacing
distance 126.
[69] Optionally, the AE sensors 116 in the second row 122b can be laterally
offset
from the AE sensors 116 in the first row 122a by a row lateral offset distance
132. In
D the illustrated example, the row lateral offset distance 132 is
approximately half of the
first lateral spacing distance 126.
¨ 10 ¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
[70] Referring to Figures 1 and 3, in the illustrated configuration, each
group of three,
laterally adjacent AE sensors 116 (including sensors from both rows 122a,
122b)
defines a generally triangular sensor region 134, illustrated using cross-
hatching in
Figure 1. Optionally, the plurality of AE sensors 116 can be positioned in
another
pattern to form differently shaped sensor regions.
[71] The AE sensors 116 can be any suitable type of AE sensor that can
withstand
the operating environment of the furnace 102. The operating frequency range of
the
AE sensors 116 can be selected so that it includes the expected acoustic
emission
frequencies of the furnace components, which can be, for example, between
about
20kHz and about 120kHz. In some instances, relevant acoustic emission
frequencies
can be between about 60kHz and about 80kHz, or greater than 120kHz. In the
illustrated example, the sensors are model R6a ¨ 60kHz piezoelectric resonant
AE
sensors, having an operating frequency range of about 35-100kHz and an
operating
temperature range of about -65 to 175 degrees Celsius.
[72] If the AE monitoring system 100 is intended to monitor only a portion of
the
acoustic emissions generated within the furnace 102 (for example acoustic
emissions
generated by changes in refractory 110 condition and/ or plastic deformation
in the
outer shell 108), acoustic emissions generated by other sources can be
separated out
when the emissions are processed by the controller 120.
[73] For example, relatively low frequency emissions generated by electrode
arcing,
which may be about 50kHz, can be filtered out using a filtration module in the
controller
120 (Figure 4), which may include, for example, a high pass filter. Other
types of
normal operating noises may be identified and removed using pattern
recognition
software, which may also be provided in the filtration module or other portion
of the
controller 120.
[74] Examples of such irrelevant acoustic signals may include mechanical
noise,
cooling water flow, furnace start-up sounds and tapping or lancing sounds.
Irrelevant
acoustic emissions, and other unwanted system noise, can be eliminated using
one or
more filters in the filtration module and/or by the use of supplemental "guard
sensors" to
) help filter out or block the irrelevant signals.
¨11¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
[75] Optionally, the AE sensors 116 can be selected so that the lower end of
their
operating frequency range (for example about 35kHz) is higher than the
expected range
of frequencies that are produced using traditional reflection-based acoustic
monitoring
or ultrasonic testing systems (for example sound waves generated by hammers,
strikers
or other mechanical impacts that are expected to be between about 2kHz and
about
25kHz). Selecting the AE sensor frequency range in this manner may help reduce
the
detection of relatively low frequency, unwanted and/or interfering sound waves
via the
AE sensors.
[76] Optionally, all of the AE sensors 116 can be identical. Alternatively,
the plurality
of AE sensors 116 can include more than one type of AE sensor.
[77] Referring to Figure 4, one example of the controller 120 includes an
input
module 136, a filtration module 138, a processor 140, a memory module 142, an
operator I/O module 144 and an output module 146.
[78] The input module 136 can be any suitable module that can be configured to
receive electric signals from the plurality of AE preamplifiers 118, and
transfer the
signals to another controller 120 component. The input module 136 can be a
multi-
channel input module and can include an analogue to digital converter and
other
suitable components.
[79] The filtration module 138 can include a combination of hardware and
software
components that can be configured to help filter signal noise and standard
operating
sounds from the AE signals detected by the AE sensors 116. The filtration
module can
include, for example, high pass, low pass and/or band pass filters and pattern
recognition software components.
[80] The processor 140 is linked to a plurality of other controller
components, and can
be any suitable processor.
[81] The memory module 142 is configured to store system reference values,
such as
AE threshold values (as explained below), and can be queried by the processor
140.
The memory module 142 can also store a variety of other software modules,
including
operating systems and sensor interface software.
[82] The operator I/O module 144 is configured to enable a system operator to
engage the AE monitoring system 100, for example to modify the operating
parameters
¨12¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
of the AE monitoring system 100. The I/O module 144 can include physical and
graphical interface components, including, for example a keyboard, a mouse, a
touchscreen and a display monitor.
[83] The output module 146 is linked to the processor 140 and is operable to
generate and output a variety of output signals 148. The output signals 148
can include
a variety of signals, including, for example, warning signals, alarm signals,
control
signals (for example to control one or more functions of the furnace 102),
sensor control
signals and feedback signals.
[84] The AE monitoring system 100 can also include a display apparatus 150.
The
display apparatus can be operable to provide information to a system operator.
The
display apparatus can include visual transducers (including for example
display
screens, lights and gauges), audible transducers (including, for example,
horns, bells
and sirens) and any combination thereof.
[85] In use, the AE monitoring system 100 is used to monitor the acoustic
emissions
generated by the furnace 102 and to detect the occurrence of one or more AE
events.
An AE event is an acoustic emission that is related to, or may affect, the
structural
integrity of the furnace (e.g. emissions caused by plastic deformation of the
outer shell
and/or changes in the condition of the refractory), as opposed to the normal
operating
sounds and noises of the furnace.
[86] AE activity in the furnace 102 can be measured by the number of AE events
detected. AE intensity can be measured by magnitude of the AE event signal
parameters (e.g. energy, amplitude, duration, rise time, etc.). Monitoring of
both AE
activity and AE intensity may be used to help identify changes in structural
integrity.
[87] The AE monitoring system 100 can be configured to continuously monitor
the
acoustic emissions from the furnace 102, in real time, and can generate
warning or
alert outputs if changes in structural integrity are detected.
[88] In some instances, the plurality of AE sensors 116 may detect other
acoustic
signals that are generally irrelevant to the structural integrity of the
furnace outer shell,
and are not considered to be AE events.
) [89] Referring again to Figure 3, in the illustrated example, the
controller 120 is
configured such that it will only recognize an acoustic emission as an AE
event if the
¨ 13 ¨
acoustic signal is detected by at least three AE sensors 116 on the outer
shell 108.
Detecting an AE event with at least three AE sensors may help facilitate
triangulation of
the origin of the AE event (represented graphically by point 170) based on,
for example,
the differences in times of arrival measured for each AE sensor 116. This
configuration
may also help filter out a portion of the noise-related or weak signals, if
such signals are
not detected by at least three AE sensors 116. The location of the origin 170
of the AE
event relative to the AE sensors 116 can be converted into a physical location
on the
furnace 102 using the known locations of the AE sensors. Optionally, the
controller 120
can include a location module 172 to calculate the location of the origin 170
of an AE
event relative to the at least three AE sensors 116.
[90] Identifying the origin 170 of the AE events generated on or within the
outer
shell 108 and/or refractory material 110 may help a user locate regions on the
furnace
102 that are experiencing relatively high amounts of local plastic
deformation, refractory
wear or other structural changes. Identifying the location of such regions may
help
facilitate increased inspection and/or maintenance of such regions.
[91] The operating temperature of the furnace 102 can affect the AE (i.e.
stress
wave) velocity in the refractory materials 110 and the outer shell 108. Once
the furnace
102 is in operation, the wave speed correction due to temperature factor will
be taken
into consideration, for example using a thermal correction factor, to help
facilitate
accurate origin 170 location using triangulation.
[92] The AE monitoring system 100, using the plurality of AE sensors 116,
can
also be configured to monitor the refractory wear. Positioning the AE sensors
116 in
the predetermined array pattern (or alternatively another pattern such as a
grid including
multiple rows and columns) may help facilitate both the triangulation and
zonal location
of the origins 170 of the AE events generated by, or indicative of, refractory
wear.
[93] Ultrasonic wave velocity measurements may also be used in conjunction
with active AE measurements. Ultrasonic wave measurements may help calibrate
the
AE sensors 116. For example, an ultrasonic wave can be generated by an
artificial
source such as impact at a known location or distance away from the AE sensors
116.
¨ 14 -
CA 2833786 2018-12-18
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
Preferably, a set of ultrasonic wave velocity measurements shall be taken
prior to the
commissioning of a new furnace 102. During this stage, an operator can
generate
impacts at the refractory wall 114 at known locations, from the inside of the
furnace
102. The signals can be detected by the AE sensors 116 mounted on the outer
surface
of the outer shell 108. The velocity model, which will be used for passive AE
monitoring,
can then, be calculated based on these initial readings, and using a thermal
correction
factor. The synthetic ultrasonic signals may also be analyzed for their
amplitude and
frequency range.
[94] Referring to Figure 5, a line graph illustrates a schematic
representation of the
AE activity generated by the furnace 102 during operation.
[95] During the start-up phase 152, for example when the furnace is started
for the
first time, a variety of acoustic emissions may be generated throughout the
furnace 102.
Some of these emissions may have a relatively high magnitude, as illustrated.
[96] During start-up, increases in operating temperature and ferrostatic
pressure
exerted by the molten contents of the furnace 102 may cause the outer shell
108 to
elastically expand, and may cause some degree of permanent, plastic
deformation or
stretching of the outer shell 108. During this initial expansion process, a
plurality of AE
events may be detected by the AE monitoring system 100 as the steel outer
shell
plastically deforms.
[97] When the furnace reaches a generally steady-state operating phase 154,
the
outer shell may not experience further plastic deformation, and the number of
AE
events generated within the outer shell will decrease and/or be substantially
eliminated.
During such periods of steady state operation, the AE monitoring system 100
may
detect little to no AE activity from the outer shell 108. A steady state
baseline for
acoustic emissions from a given furnace can be determined during this steady-
state
phase 154 of operation, and an operating threshold AE value 156 can be
determined.
The threshold AE value may be unique for any given furnace or vessel that is
monitored
using an AE monitoring system 100. The AE threshold value can be stored in the
memory module 142.
¨ 15 ¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
[98] Optionally, a plurality of different AE value thresholds can be stored
for a given
furnace 102. For example, a warning AE threshold value 156a and a higher,
alarm AE
threshold value 156b can be both be stored for a given furnace 102.
[99] While the furnace 102 is in operation, changes in the operating
conditions of the
furnace over time may exert additional forces on the outer shell 108, which in
some
instances may lead to unwanted plastic deformation of the outer shell 108. For
example, uncontrolled hearth refractory 112 expansion may cause bulging
deformation
in the steel outer shell 108 and may cause local separation of the outer shell
108 from
the inner refractory materials 110. Separation between the outer shell 108 and
the
refractory 110 may decrease cooling efficiency and may lead to further damage
to the
outer shell 108. In other examples, outer shell 108 deformation may be caused
by
hydration of the refractory bricks 110 (i.e. swelling) beyond the intended
design limits.
Regions of local outer shell deformation may be prone to failure, which may
result in a
run-out.
[100] The aggressive thermal and chemical conditions inside the furnace 102,
as well
as the movement of the molten bath, may also contribute to wearing of the
refractory
110. Typically the refractory wear occurs in the hearth 112, near the
tapholes, within the
walls below the maximum bath level. The wearing of the refractory 110 can
affect the
structural stability of the furnace by thinning the refractory walls 114. The
heat transfer
is also affected which may lead to even further deterioration. Also the
potential for metal
leaks increase due to the thinning of the walls 114, hearth 112 or tapholes.
[101] Any of the above conditions can disrupt the operating conditions of the
furnace
102, illustrated as an interruption phase 158, resulting in increased AE
activity and/or
AE intensity.
[102] If, as illustrated, the AE intensity detected using the AE sensors 116
is compared
to and exceeds one or more of the AE threshold values 156, the controller 120
may
generate a corresponding output. In the illustrated example, the first AE peak
in the
interruption phase 158 exceeds the alarm AE threshold value 156b, and may
trigger an
alarm output from the controller 120 (for example a flashing red light and
audible siren).
The following four AE peaks in interruption phase 158 (to the right as viewed
in Figure
5) exceed the warning AE threshold 156a, but do not exceed the alarm AE
threshold
¨ 16 ¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
156b. Detection of these four peaks may result in a warning output from the
controller
120 (such as a warning display on a computer screen and a flashing yellow
light).
When the AE intensity drops below the warning AE threshold, the warning
outputs may
cease.
[103] Preferably, the AE threshold values 156 are set such that normal
operations of
the furnace which raise the baseline AE level of the furnace 102, for example
a general
increase in operating power (illustrated as power increase phase 160), will
not trigger a
warning or alert output.
[104] Optionally, an emergency or shut-down AE threshold value 156c can be
stored
in the memory 142. During a severe interruption phase 162 (such as may occur
preceding and during a run-out), the AE intensity generated by the furnace 102
may
increase significantly. Such an increase may exceed both the warning and alarm
AE
thresholds 156a, 156b. If the AE intensity reaches the shut-down AE threshold
156c,
the controller 120 may be operable to automatically intervene in the operation
of the
furnace 102. For example, the controller 120 may be configured to
automatically
reduce the power supplied to the furnace 102 if the AE signals from the
furnace exceed
the shut-down AE threshold 156c.
[105] Preferably, the AE threshold values 156 are selected so that the AE
monitoring
system 100 can detect, and optionally locate the source of, AE events within
the
furnace 102 before the outer shell 108 reaches its failure point. In this
configuration,
the AE monitoring system 100 can be used to help predict potential points of
failure on
the outer shell 108 before such failures occur.
[106] For example, referring to Figure 5a, run-out related AE events in the
sever
interruption phase 162 (which are typically high intensity) may be generated
and
detected in advance of an actual outer shell 108 rupture. Detection of these
lower level
pre-cursor AE events, illustrated as a warning phase 162a, may allow a system
operator to predict that a run-out (or other such event) is about to occur,
and to adjust
or shut down the furnace 102 prior to an actual rupture occurring.
[107] If the furnace 102 is subsequently cooled (for example during a
shutdown), the
D outer shell 108 may elastically contract, but may retain a certain degree
of plastic
deformation. When the furnace 102 is re-heated to substantially the same
operating
¨ 17 ¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
conditions, such as during a subsequent start-up phase 152a, the outer shell
108 may
undergo elastic expansion (which does not include the rapid release of energy
from
within the material and does not generate AE events), but may not undergo any
further
plastic deformation. During this re-heating phase 152a, the outer shell 108
may not
generate AE events that exceed the operating threshold AE values 156 unless,
for
example, the new thermal expansion exceeds the original amount of thermal
expansion.
[108] Referring to Figure 6, one method of operating the AE monitoring system
100
includes a step 600 of detecting acoustic emissions from within the furnace
102. At
step 602 the acoustic emissions are converted into corresponding electrical
signals,
and at step 604 the signals are filtered to separate RE events from background
noise
and normal operating sounds. At step 606 the AE events are compared to one or
more
predetermined AE threshold values, and at step 608 a query is made to
determine if the
detected AE event exceeds one or more threshold values 156.
[109] If the AE event does not exceed an AE threshold 156, the method may
return to
step 600 and continue monitoring the furnace 102. Alternatively, if the AE
event does
exceed the AE threshold 156, the method may proceed to optional locating step
610 (in
which the location of the origin 170 of the AE event is determine) or may
proceed
directly to step 612, in which an appropriate output signal is generated by
the controller
120.
[110] Optionally, the AE monitoring system can be configured to identify the
type and
severity of the damage (for example cracks) occurring in the outer shell. In
such a
configuration, the AE events can be assumed to behave like point sources and
can be
analyzed using a SiGMA procedure (simplified Green's function for moment
tensor
analysis). Sources of AE events can be classified as tensile or shear cracks
by
applying the eigenvalue analysis to the moment tensor. The direction of crack
propagation can be derived from the eigenvectors.
[111] An example of a mathematical solution of wave motion u(x, t) due to
cracking,
simplified by using moment tensor Mpg, is given by Equation 1, where the
symbol *
3 represents the convolution integral in time, b(y) represents the crack
motion vector, Cpoi
is the elastic constant, Go,q(x, y, t) are the spatial derivatives of Green's
functions, n is
¨ 18 ¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
the normal vector to the crack surface, and / is the unit direction vector of
the crack
motion. S(t) is the source-time function of crack and AV is the crack volume.
Uk (x, t)=Gkpq y,t).41 pc, *
F C pgidb(Y)1 kn dF = C kni[i F b(y)c1F1 = C pqkll kn AV = M pq (1)
[112] From a sample RE waveform as shown in Figure 7, the arrival time P1 and
the
first motion amplitude P2 are determined and subjected to further processing.
The
classification of crack is performed by the eigenvalue analysis of the moment
tensor,
where X, Y and Z denote the shear ratio, the deviatroic tensile ratio, and the
isotropic
tensile ratio, respectively. According to the SiGMA procedure, the AE sources
are
classified based on the following criteria:
X < 40% classified as tensile cracks;
40% <X < 60% classified as mixed mode cracks;
X> 60% classified as shear cracks.
[113] Information regarding the location of the crack, the cracking mode, and
the time
and rate of occurrence may help facilitate a better understanding of the
phenomenon
inside the furnace 102 leading the outer shell 108 deformation and failure.
[114] Optionally, the controller 120 may be adapted to communicate with a
plurality of
other sensors and monitoring devices, including, for example, mechanical
strain
gauges, optical strain gauges, resistance strain gauges, thermal sensors and
topological survey equipment (such as laser scanners). Information from
multiple
sensors and monitoring devices can be processed to help monitor the structural
integrity and other operating characteristics of the furnace 102.
[115] In addition to the embodiments described herein, AE equipment may be
adaptable to many forms of production quality control testing, including weld
monitoring
and leak detection.
[116] The present invention has been described here by way of example only.
Various
modification and variations may be made to these exemplary embodiments without
departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which is limited only by
the
) appended claims.
¨ 19 ¨
CA 02833786 2013-10-21
WO 2012/159208 PCT/CA2012/000526
[117] The integrity monitoring system can be configured to use a plurality of
different
types of sensors, either individually or in combination. Suitable types of
sensors can
include, for example, acoustic sensors, vibration sensors, strain gauges,
optical sensors
and temperature sensors. In some instances it may be useful to include
multiple
different types of sensors within an integrity monitoring system to help
facilitate the
collection of multiple types of data. Optionally, this combination of data can
be
processed using a common system controller. For simplicity, an example of a
structural
integrity monitoring system described below is described as having a single
type of
sensor, however other embodiments of the system may include a plurality of
different
sensor types.
¨20 ¨
