Language selection

Search

Patent 2838649 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2838649
(54) English Title: BIOCIDE COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING HERBICIDES, FATTY ACID AMIDES AND FATTY ACIDS
(54) French Title: COMPOSITIONS BIOCIDES RENFERMANT DES HERBICIDES, DES AMIDES D'ACIDE GRASET DES ACIDES GRAS
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A01N 37/18 (2006.01)
  • A01N 43/56 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BARKER, PHYLLIS (United States of America)
  • HAILU, ALEFESH (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • COGNIS IP MANAGEMENT GMBH
(71) Applicants :
  • COGNIS IP MANAGEMENT GMBH (Germany)
(74) Agent: ROBIC AGENCE PI S.E.C./ROBIC IP AGENCY LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2020-05-26
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2012-07-04
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2013-01-10
Examination requested: 2017-06-29
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP2012/062949
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2013004707
(85) National Entry: 2013-12-06

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
61/504,504 (United States of America) 2011-07-05

Abstracts

English Abstract


The specification discloses biocide compositions, comprising: (a) Herbicides;
(b) Fatty
acid amides; (c) Fatty acids; and optionally (d) Emulsifiers and/or (e)
Polyols. The
compositions exhibit an improved stability especially at lower temperatures
and are both
environmental friendly and non-toxic. The specification also discloses a use
of the biocide
composition as a weed control agent and a method for controlling and fighting
weed
growth in a crop field using the biocide composition.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne des compositions biocides comprenant: (a) des herbicides; (b) des amides d'acides gras; (c) des acides gras; et éventuellement (d) des agents émulsifiants et/ou (e) des polyols. Les compositions présentent une stabilité améliorée spécialement à des températures plus basses et elles sont à la fois écologiques et non toxiques.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Claims
1. Biocide composition, comprising
(a) Herbicides;
(b) Fatty acid amides characterized in that said fatty acid amines are
derived from fatty acids having 6 to 10 carbon atoms or lactic acid;
(c) Fatty acids, and optionally
(d) Emulsifiers and/or
(e) Polyols;
characterized in that said herbicides exhibit solubility in water of less than
5
g/I at a temperature of 20°C and a water hardness of at most 1000 ppm.
2. Compositions according to claim 1, characterized in that said herbicides
(component a) are solid.
3. Compositions according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that said
herbicide is
pyraflufen-ethyl.
4. Compositions according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in
that said
fatty acid amides are fatty acid dialkyl amides
5. Compositions according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in
that said
fatty acid amides are fatty acid dimethyl amides.
6. Compositions according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in
that said
fatty acid amides are C6-C10 fatty acid dimethyl amides.
7. Compositions according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in
that said
fatty acids (component c) follow general formula (II)
R2CO-OH (II)
in which R2CO stands for a linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated,
optionally hydroxyl-substituted acyl radical having 6 to 22 carbon atoms and 0
or 1 to 3 double bonds.
12

8. Compositions according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in
that said
fatty acids are C16-C18 fatty acids having 0 or 1 to 3 double bonds.
9. Compositions according to any one of claims 1 to 8, characterized in
that said
fatty acid is tall oil fatty acid.
10. Compositions according to any one of claims 1 to 9, characterized in
that said
emulsifiers (component d) represent non-ionic emulsifiers.
11. Compositions according to any one of claims 1 to 10, characterized in
that
said emulsifiers represent polymeric non-ionic emulsifiers.
12. Compositions according to any one of claims 1 to 11, characterized in
that
said emulsifiers represent alkoxylation products of alkyl phenols.
13. Compositions according to any one of claims 1 to 12, characterized in
that
said emulsifiers represent nonyl phenol EO/PO block copolymers.
14. Compositions according to any one of claims 1 to 13, characterized in
that
said polyols (component e) are selected from the group consisting of glycerol;
alkylene glycols; technical oligoglycerol mixtures with a degree of self-
condensation of 1 .5 to 10; methylol components; lower alkyl glucosides;
sugar alcohols containing 5 to 12 carbon atoms, sugars containing 5 to 12
carbon atoms; and amino sugars.
15. Compositions according to any one of claims 1 to 14, characterized in
that
they comprise
(a) 0.1 to 5 % by wt. herbicides;
(b) 50 to 90 % by wt.fatty acid amides;
(c) 5 to 15 % by wt. fatty acids; and optionally
(d) 0.5 to 5 % by wt. emulsifiers and/or
(e) 0.1 to 1 % by wt. polyols
on condition that the amounts add to 100 % .
13

16. Compositions according to any one of claims 1 to 14, characterized in
that
they comprise
(a) 0.1 to 5 % by wt. pyraflufen-ethyl;
(b) 50 to 90 % by wt.C6-C10 fatty acid dimethyl amides;
(c) 5 to 15 % by wt. tall oil fatty acid; and optionally
(d) 0.5 to 5 % by wt. nonyl phenol EO/PO block copolymer and/or
(e) 0.1 to 1 % by wt. propylene glycol
on condition that the amounts add to 100 %.
17. Use of a composition as defined in any one of claims 1 to 16 as a weed
control agent.
18. Use of a composition as defined in any one of claims 1 to 16 as a crop
protection agent.
19. A process for controlling and fighting weed growth in a crop field,
characterized in that a composition as defined in any one of claims 1 to 16 is
diluted with water to provide a sprayable emulsion or dispersion and said
emulsion or dispersion is applied to the crop.
20. Process according to claim 19, characterized in that said emulsion or
dispersion is applied in the form of a tank mix having a water content of 50
to
95 % by wt.
14

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Biocide compositions comprising herbicides, fatty acid amides and fatty acids
Field of invention
The present invention belongs to the area of agrochemicals and refers to
emulsifiable
concentrates for herbicides comprising an environmental friendly and non-toxic
blend of
solvents.
State of the art
It is a well-known that many solid herbicides show a poor solubility in water
and other
solvents, such a poor solubility making always difficult to produce
concentrates with
sufficient amounts of active matter. Typically, aromatic hydrocarbons are used
as
solvents, but although they show high solvent power they are considered to be
carcinogenic, unfriendly to the environment and exhibit an unpleasant odour.
In the past
they were replaced at least in part by oleochemicals showing a higher degree
of
biodegradability. Especially methyl esters of fatty acids were used, although
their
solvent power is lower than for example NIVIP or other aromat- ics. As a
matter of fact,
methyl esters do not prevent the separation of crystals out of the solution
once the
temperatures go down to 5 C or lower.
It has therefore been the object of the present invention to provide
emulsifiable
concentrates comprising at least up to 5 % b.w. herbicides, in particular
solids as for
example pyraflufen, showing a better solubility in particular at lower
temperatures in
order to prevent separation and crystallisation. In addition, the concentrates
should
exhibit a more pleasant odour and should be based on solvents which are non-
toxic,
highly biodegradable and environmental friendly.
Description of the invention
Object of the present invention are biocide composition, comprising:
(a) Herbicides;
(b) Fatty acid amides;
(c) Fatty acids; and optionally
1
CA 2838649 2019-07-19

(d) Emulsifiers and/or
(e) PolyoIs.
Another embodiment of the invention relates to a biocide composition
comprising
(a) Herbicides;
(b) Fatty acid amides characterized in that said fatty acid amines are
derived
from fatty acids having 6 to 10 carbon atoms or lactic acid;
(c) Fatty acids; and optionally
(d) Emulsifiers and/or
(e) Polyols;
characterized in that said herbicides exhibit solubility in water of less than
5 g/I at a
temperature of 20 C and a water hardness of at most 1000 ppm.
Surprisingly, it has been observed that using a blend of fatty acid amides and
fatty acids
also solid herbicides like pyraflufen, which typically show a very poor
solubility in water
and other solvents can be easily formulated. The concentrates remain stable
even
when cooled down to temperatures between +5 and -5 C independently from water
hardness, what typically has a disadvantageous impact on solubility. In
addition, the
solvent blends comply with the regulations as set out in the 40 CFR 180
listing. Also the
formulations are free of naphthalene and show higher flash points.
Finally, the solvent blends are full biodegradable, non-toxic and
environmental friendly.
Stability can be further improved by adding emulsifiers, in particular non-
ionic polymers,
and small amounts of polyols, in particular glycols.
Herbicides
An herbicide (Compound a) is a pesticide used to kill unwanted plants.
Selective
herbicides kill specific targets while leaving the desired crop relatively
unharmed. Some
of these acts by interfering with the growth of the weed and are often based
on plant
hormones. Herbicides used to clear waste ground are non-selective and kill all
plant
material with which they come into contact. Herbicides are widely used in
agriculture
2
CA 2838649 2019-07-19

and in landscape turf management. They are applied in total vegetation control
(TVC)
programs for maintenance of highways and railroads. Smaller quantities are
used in
forestry, pasture systems, and management of areas set aside as wildlife
habitat. In
general, active ingredients representing including various chemical clas- ses
and
corresponding examples can be used
o Anilides such as propanil
o Aryloxycarboxylic acids e.g. MCPA-thioethyl
o Aryloxyphenoxypropionates e.g. clodinafop-propargyl, cyhalofop-butyl,
diclofops,
fluazi- fops, haloxyfops, quizalofops,
o Chloroacetamides e.g. acetolochlor, alachlor, butachlor, dimethenamid,
metolachlor,
propachlor
o Cyclohexanedione oximes e.g. clethodim, sethoxydim, tralkoxydim,
o Benzamides such as isoxaben
2a
CA 2838649 2019-07-19

CA 02838649 2013-12-06
WO 2013/004707 PCT/EP2012/062949
o Benzimidazoles such as dicamba, ethofumesate
o Dinitroanilines e.g. trifluralin, pendimethalin,
o Diphenyl ethers e.g. aclonifen, oxyfluorfen,
o The glycine derivative glyphosate, a systemic nonselective (it kills any
type of plant)
herbicide used in no-till burndown and for weed control in crops that are
genetically
modified to resist its effects,
o Hydroxybenzonitriles e.g. bromoxynil,
o lmidazolinones e.g. fenamidone, imazapic, imazamox, imazapic, imazapyr,
imazaquin,
o lsoxazolidinones e.g. clomazone
o Paraquat as bypyridylium,
o Phenyl carbamates e.g. desmedipham, phenmedipham,
o Phenylpyrazoles e.g. pyraflufen-ethyl
o Phenylpyrazolines e.g. pinoxaden,
o Pyridinecarboxylic acids or synthetic auxins e.g. picloram, clopyralid,
and triclopyr,
o Pyrimidinyloxybenzoics e.g. bispyrtbac-sodium
o Sulfonyureas e.g. amidosulfuron, azimsulfuron, bensulfuron-methyl,
chlorsulfuron, fla-
zasulfuron, foramsulfuron, flupyrsulfuron-methyl-sodium, nicosulfuron,
rimsulfuron, sul-
fosulfuron, tribenuron-methyl, trifloxysurlfuron-sodiurn, triflusulfuron,
tritosulfuron,
o Triazolopyrimidines e.g. penoxsulam, metosulam, florasulam,
o Triketones e.g. mesotriones, sulcotrione,
o Ureas e.g. diuron, linuron,
o Phenoxycarboxylic acids such as 2,4-D, MCPA, MCPB, mecoprops,
o Triazines such as atrazine, simazine, terbuthylazine,
and their mixtures. In accordance with the present technical teaching the
preferred herbicides
are those which are solid at 20 C and exhibit solubility in water of less
than 5 g/I at a tempera-
ture of 20 C and a water hardness of at most 1000 ppm, like for example
pyraflufens, and in
particular pyraflufen-ethyl.
Fatty acid amides
Fatty acid amides (Compound b) typically follow general formula (I)
3

CA 02838649 2013-12-06
WO 2013/004707 PCT/EP2012/062949
R1CONR2R3 (I)
in which RICO stands for a linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated,
optionally hydroxyl-
substituted acyl radical having 2 to 22 carbon atoms and 0 or 1 to 3 double
bonds, and R2 and
R3 independently represent either hydrogen or alkyl radicals having Ito 12
carbon atoms.
Typical examples are amides derived from capronic acid, caprylic acid, capric
acid, lauric acid,
myrystic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, isostearic acid, 12-hydroxy
stearic acid, ricinoleic acid,
oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, gadoleic acid, arachidonic acid,
erucic acid, behenic acid
and their mixtures. Also suitable are amides derived from hydroxy acids, like
citric acid or in
particular lactic acid. Indeed, the preferred amides are derived from either
fatty acids having 6
to 10 carbon atoms or lactic acid.
In another preferred embodiment the fatty acid amides represent fatty acid
dialkyl amides, in
particular fatty acid dimethyl amides. Overall preferred are C6-C10 fatty acid
dimethyl amides,
as for example Agnique KE 3658 (Cognis GmbH)
The fatty acid amides represent the major part of the solvent blend and can be
present in the
composition in amounts of from about 50 to about 90, and in particular from
about 75 to about
85 % b.w.
Fatty acids
Suitable fatty acids (Compound c) follow general formula (II)
R2CO-OH (II)
in which R2C0 stands for a linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated,
optionally hydroxyl-
substituted acyl radical having 6 to 22 carbon atoms and 0 or 1 to 3 double
bonds. Typical
examples are capronic acid, caprylic acid, capric acid, lauric acid, myrystic
acid, palmitic acid,
stearic acid, isostearic acid, 12-hydroxy stearic acid, ricinoleic acid, oleic
acid, linoleic acid,
linolenic acid, gadoleic acid, arachidonic acid, erucic acid, behenic acid and
their mixtures.
Instead of the free acids also salts are applicable, for example sodium,
potassium, lithium,
ammonium and alkanolammonium salts, especially in those cases where also the
herbicide is
a salt. The preferred species represent C16-C18 fatty acids having 0 and/or 1
to 3 double bonds,
in particular tall oil fatty acid. The fatty acids can be present in the
formulation in amounts of
from about 5 to about 15, and preferably from about 7 to about 12 % b.w.
Emulsifiers
It has been found advantageous to improve especially stability at temperatures
below 0 C by
4

adding emulsifiers (Compound D), in particular non-ionic emulsifiers including
for
example:
o products of the addition of 2 to 50 mol ethylene oxide and/or 0 to 50 mol
propylene oxide onto linear C8-22 fatty alcohols, onto C12-22 fatty acids and
onto
alkyl phenols containing 8 to 15 carbon atoms in the alkyl group;
o C12/18 fatty acid monoesters and diesters of addition products of 1 to 30
mol
ethylene oxide onto glycerol;
o glycerol mono- and diesters and sorbitan mono- and diesters of saturated
and
unsaturated fatty acids containing 6 to 22 carbon atoms and ethylene oxide
addition products thereof;
o addition products of 15 to 60 mol ethylene oxide onto castor oil and/or
hydrogenated castor oil;
o polyol esters and, in particular, polyglycerol esters such as, for
example,
polyglycerol polyricinoleate, polyglycerol poly-12-hydroxystearate or
polyglycerol
dimerate isostearate. Mixtures of compounds from several of these classes are
also suitable;
o addition products of 2 to 15 mol ethylene oxide onto castor oil and/or
hydrogenated castor oil;
o partial esters based on linear, branched, unsaturated or saturated C6/22
fatty
acids, ricinoleic acid and 1 2-hydroxystearic acid and glycerol, polyglycerol,
pentaerythritol, - dipentaerythritol, sugar alcohols (for example sorbitol),
alkyl
glucosides (for example methyl glucoside, butyl glucoside, lauryl glucoside)
and
polyglucosides (for example cellulose);
o mono-, di and trialkyl phosphates and mono-, di- and/or tri-PEG-alkyl
phosphates
and salts thereof;
CA 2838649 2018-12-07

o wool wax alcohols;
o polysiloxane/polyalkyl polyether copolymers and corresponding
derivatives; and
o mixed esters of pentaerythritol, fatty acids, citric acid and fatty
alcohol and/or
mixed esters of C6-22 fatty acids, methyl glucose and polyols, preferably
glycerol
or polyglycerol.
The addition products of ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide onto fatty
alcohols, fatty
acids, alkylphenols, glycerol mono- and diesters and sorbitan mono- and
diesters of
fatty acids or onto castor oil are known commercially available products. They
are
homologue mixtures of which the average degree of alkoxylation corresponds to
the
ratio between the quantities of ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide and
substrate with
which the addition reaction is carried out. C12/18 fatty acid monoesters and
diesters of
addition products of ethylene oxide onto glyc
5a
CA 2838649 2018-12-07

CA 02838649 2013-12-06
WO 2013/004707 PCT/EP2012/062949
erol are known as lipid layer enhancers for cosmetic formulations. The
preferred emulsifiers
are described in more detail as follows:
a) Partial glycerides
Typical examples of suitable partial glycerides are hydroxystearic acid
monoglyceride, hydrox-
ystearic acid diglyceride, isostearic acid monoglyceride, isostearic acid
diglyceride, oleic acid
monoglyceride, oleic acid diglyceride, ricinoleic acid monoglyceride,
ricinoleic acid diglyceride,
linoleic acid monoglyceride, linoleic acid diglyceride, linolenic acid
monoglyceride, linolenic acid
diglyceride, erucic acid monoglyceride, erucic acid diglyceride, tartaric acid
monoglyceride,
tartaric acid diglyceride, citric acid monoglyceride, citric acid diglyceride,
malic acid monoglyc-
eride, malic acid diglyceride and technical mixtures thereof which may still
contain small quanti-
ties of triglyceride from the production process. Addition products of 1 to
30, and preferably 5
to 10, mol ethylene oxide onto the partial glycerides mentioned are also
suitable.
b) Sorbitan esters
Suitable sorbitan esters are sorbitan monoisostearate, sorbitan
sesquiisostearate, sorbitan
diisostearate, sorbitan triisostearate, sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan
sesquioleate, sorbitan di-
oleate, sorbitan trioleate, sorbitan monoerucate, sorbitan sesquierucate,
sorbitan dierucate,
sorbitan trierucate, sorbitan monoricinoleate, sorbitan sesquiricinoleate,
sorbitan diricinoleate,
sorbitan triricinoleate, sorbitan monohydroxystearate, sorbitan
sesquihydroxystearate, sorbitan
dihydroxystearate, sorbitan trihydroxystearate, sorbitan monotartrate,
sorbitan sesquitartrate,
sorbitan ditartrate, sorbitan tritartrate, sorbitan monocitrate, sorbitan
sesquicitrate, sorbitan
dicitrate, sorbitan tricitrate, sorbitan monomaleate, sorbitan sesquimaleate,
sorbitan dimaleate,
sorbitan trimaleate and technical mixtures thereof. Addition products of 1 to
30, and preferably
5 to 10, mol ethylene oxide onto the sorbitan esters mentioned are also
suitable.
C) Alk(en)yl oligoglycosides
The alkyl or alkenyl oligoglycosides representing also preferred emulsifiers
may be derived
from aldoses or ketoses containing 5 or 6 carbon atoms, preferably glucose.
Accordingly, the
preferred alkyl and/or alkenyl oligoglycosides are alkyl or alkenyl
oligoglucosides. These mate-
rials are also known generically as " alkyl polyglycosides" (APG). The
alk(en)yl oligoglyco-
sides according to the invention correspond to formula (III) :
R10[G]p (Ill)
6

CA 02838649 2013-12-06
WO 2013/004707 PCT/EP2012/062949
wherein R1 is an alkyl or alkenyl radical having from 6 to 22 carbon atoms, G
is a sugar unit
having 5 or 6 carbon atoms and p is a number from 1 to 10. The index p in
general formula (II)
indicates the degree of oligomerisation (DP degree), i.e. the distribution of
mono- and oligogly-
cosides, and is a number of 1 to 10. Whereas p in a given compound must always
be an inte-
ger and, above all, may assume a value of 1 to 6, the value p for a certain
alkyl oligoglycoside
is an analytically determined calculated quantity which is mostly a broken
number. Alk(en)yl
oligoglycosides having an average degree of oligomerisation p of 1.1 to 3.0
are preferably
used. Alk(en)yl oligoglycosides having a degree of oligomerisation below 1.7
and, more par-
ticularly, between 1.2 and 1.4 are preferred from the applicational point of
view. The alkyl or
alkenyl radical R1 may be derived from primary alcohols containing 4 to 22 and
preferably 8 to
16 carbon atoms. Typical examples are butanol, caproic alcohol, caprylic
alcohol, capric alco-
hol, undecyl alcohol, lauryl alcohol, myristyl alcohol, cetyl alcohol,
palmitoleyl alcohol, stearyl
alcohol, isostearyl alcohol, oleyl alcohol, elaidyl alcohol, petroselinyl
alcohol, arachyl alcohol,
gadoleyl alcohol, behenyl alcohol, erucyl alcohol and technical mixtures
thereof such as are
formed, for example, in the hydrogenation of technical fatty acid methyl
esters or in the hydro-
genation of aldehydes from Roelen's oxo synthesis. Alkyl oligoglucosides based
on hydrogen-
ated Ca-Cis coconut oil alcohol having a DP of 1 to 3 are preferred. Also
suitable are alkoxyla-
tion products of alkyl oligoglucosides, for example adducts of 1 to 10 moles
ethylene oxide
and/or 1 to 5 moles propylene oxide to C8-Cio or C12-C18 alkyl oligoglucoside
having a DP be-
tween 1.2 and 1.4.
d) Alkoxylated vegetable oils and copolymers
Suitable emulsifiers are castor oil, rape seed oil, soy bean oil ethoxylated
with 3 to 80 moles
ethylene oxide (Agnique CSO 35, Agnique SBO 10, Agnique SBO 60). Typical
copolymers
are ethoxylated and propoxylated block and/or random polymers of C2-C22 linear
or branched
alcohols or alkyl phenols.
The most preferred non-ionic emulsifiers represent polymeric alkoxylation
products of alkyl
phenols, preferably of nonyl phenols. Particular useful are nonyl phenol EO/PO
block copoly-
mers comprising up to 50 ethylene oxide and up to 50 propylene oxide unit, as
for example
Agnique BP NP-4030 (Cognis GmbH). Preferably, the emulsifiers and the fatty
acids are used
in ratios by weight of about 10:90 to about 40:60, and in particular about
25:75.
Po lyo Is
7

CA 02838649 2013-12-06
WO 2013/004707 PCT/EP2012/062949
It has also found advantageous adding small amounts of polyols (Compound e) in
order to
further improve solubility and avoid haze formation in the concentrates.
Suitable polyols can be
selected from the following groups:
= glycerol;
= alkylene glycols such as, for example, ethylene glycol, diethylene
glycol, propylene glycol,
butylene glycol, hexylene glycol and polyethylene glycols with an average
molecular
weight of 100 to 1000 Dalton;
= technical oligoglycerol mixtures with a degree of self-condensation of
1.5 to 10, such as
for example technical diglycerol mixtures with a diglycerol content of 40 to
50% by weight;
= methylol compounds such as, in particular, trimethylol ethane,
trimethylol propane, trime-
thylol butane, pentaerythritol and dipentaerythritol;
= lower alkyl glucosides, particularly those containing 1 to 8 carbon atoms
in the alkyl group,
for example methyl and butyl glucoside;
= sugar alcohols containing 5 to 12 carbon atoms, for example sorbitol or
mannitol,
= sugars containing 5 to 12 carbon atoms, for example glucose or sucrose;
= amino sugars, for example glucamine;
= dialcohol amines, such as diethanol amine or 2-aminopropane-1,3-diol.
Particular useful are alkylene glycols, in particular ethylene glycol and
preferably propylene
glycol which can be added in amounts of from about 0.1 to about 5, and in
particular from
about 0.5 to about 2 % b.w.
Compositions
Further preferred embodiments of the invention are directed to specific
concentrates, more
particularly referring to compositions comprising:
(a) Solid herbicides;
(b) Fatty acid amides derived from Cs-C1 fatty acids or lactic acid;
(c) C16-C18 fatty acids; and optionally
(d) Non-ionic emulsifiers and/or
(e) Polyols;
and more preferably compositions, comprising
(a) about 0.1 to about 5 % b.w. herbicides;
8

CA 02838649 2013-12-06
WO 2013/004707 PCT/EP2012/062949
(b) about 50 to about 90 % fatty acid amides;
(c) about 5 to about 15 % b.w. fatty acids; and optionally
(d) about 0.5 to about 5 c/o b.w. emulsifiers and/or
(e) about 0.1 to about 1 c/o b.w. polyols
on condition that the amounts add to 100 %. The most preferred compositions
comprise
(a) about 0.1 to about 5 c1/0 b.w. pyraflufen-ethyl;
(b) about 50 to about 90 % C6-C10 fatty acid dimethyl amides;
(c) about 5 to about 15 % b.w. tall oil fatty acid; and optionally
(d) about 0.5 to about 5 % b.w. nonyl phenol EO/PO block copolymer and/or
(e) about 0.1 to about 1 % b.w. propylene glycol
on condition that the amounts add to 100 %.
Industrial application
Further embodiments of the present invention refer to the use of a composition
as explained
above as a weed control and/or crop protection agent.
The invention also deals with a process for controlling and fighting weed
growth in a field, ac-
cording to which a composition according as explained above is diluted with
water to provide a
sprayable emulsion or dispersion and said emulsion or dispersion is applied to
the crop. Typi-
cally, one applies emulsions or dispersions in form of a tank mix having a
water content of 50
to 95 % b.w.
9

CA 02838649 2013-12-06
WO 2013/004707
PCT/EP2012/062949
Examples
Example 1 and 2, Comparative Example C1
Solubility of pyraflufen-ethyl in two solvents was evaluated by preparing
compositions of 1 to
% b.w. of the herbicide in various solvents at 20 C. The solutions were
cooled down to 0 C
and allowed to thaw three times. The evaluation was done after the last
defrosting step. The
results are shown in Table 1. (+) means that the herbicide is fully dissolved
and the solution is
clear, (-) means that the solution is incomplete and/or the solution is hazy.
Examples 1 and 2
10 are according to the invention, Example Cl serves for comparison.
Table 1
Solubility of pyraflufen-ethyl
Ex. Solvents Solubility herbicide 1% b.w.]
1.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 8.5 10.0
1 C6-Cio Fatty acid dimethyl am- .. +
ide
2 Lactic acid dimethyl amide
Cl C6-C10 Fatty acid methyl ester
Examples 3 to 5, Comparative Examples C2 to C4
Emulsion stability was tested by dissolving 50 ml of some emulsifiable
concentrates at 20 C in
950 ml of water showing different hardness. The samples were stored at 20 C
and stability
evaluated over a period from 0.5 to 24 hours. The results are compiled in
Table 2. Examples 3
to 5 are according to the invention, Examples C2 to C4 serve for comparison.
(+) means that
the emulsion is homogenous and clear (#) stands for homogenous, but hazy and (-
) for inho-
mogeneous.

CA 02838649 2013-12-06
WO 2013/004707
PCT/EP2012/062949
Table 2
Emulsion stability (all amounts in % b.w.)
Compound 3 4 5 C2 C3 C4
Pyraflufen-ethyl 2.5 2.5 2,5 2.5 2.5 2.5
C6-C10 Fatty acid dimethyl amide 82.0 82.0 82.0 - - -
C6-C10 Fatty acid methyl ester 82.0 82.0 82.0
Tall oil fatty acid 15.5 12.0 11.5 15.5 12.0
11.5
Nonyl phenol + 40E0+30P0 - 3.5 3.5 - 3.5 3.5
Propylene glycol - - 0.5 - - 0.5
Examples 3 4 5 C2 C3 C4
Stability at water hardness of 34 ppm
- after 0.5 h + + + + + +
- after 1 h + + + + + +
- after 4 h # + + # # #
- after 24 h # # + - - -
Stability at water hardness of 342 ppm
- after 0.5 h + + + + + +
- after 1 h + + + # # +
- after 4 h # # + # # #
- after 24 h # # +
Stability at water hardness of 1000 ppm
- after 0.5 h + + + + + +
- after 1 h # # + # # #
- after 4 h # # +
- after 24 h # # + - - -
11

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2838649 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Common Representative Appointed 2020-11-07
Grant by Issuance 2020-05-26
Inactive: Cover page published 2020-05-25
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-03-29
Inactive: Final fee received 2020-03-24
Pre-grant 2020-03-24
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2019-10-04
Letter Sent 2019-10-04
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2019-10-04
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2019-09-16
Inactive: QS passed 2019-09-16
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2019-07-19
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2019-01-22
Inactive: Report - No QC 2019-01-17
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2018-12-07
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2018-12-04
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2018-06-08
Inactive: Report - No QC 2018-06-06
Letter Sent 2017-07-11
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2017-06-29
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2017-06-29
Request for Examination Received 2017-06-29
Inactive: Office letter 2014-05-15
Inactive: Single transfer 2014-04-22
Inactive: Reply to s.37 Rules - PCT 2014-04-22
Inactive: Cover page published 2014-01-24
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2014-01-16
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2014-01-16
Inactive: IPC assigned 2014-01-16
Inactive: IPC assigned 2014-01-16
Application Received - PCT 2014-01-16
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2013-12-06
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2013-01-10

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2019-06-07

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2013-12-06
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2014-07-04 2014-06-26
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2015-07-06 2015-06-22
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2016-07-04 2016-06-21
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2017-07-04 2017-06-19
Request for examination - standard 2017-06-29
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2018-07-04 2018-06-11
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2019-07-04 2019-06-07
Final fee - standard 2020-04-06 2020-03-24
MF (patent, 8th anniv.) - standard 2020-07-06 2020-06-10
MF (patent, 9th anniv.) - standard 2021-07-05 2021-06-07
MF (patent, 10th anniv.) - standard 2022-07-04 2022-06-06
MF (patent, 11th anniv.) - standard 2023-07-04 2023-06-06
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - standard 2024-07-04 2024-06-11
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
COGNIS IP MANAGEMENT GMBH
Past Owners on Record
ALEFESH HAILU
PHYLLIS BARKER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2013-12-06 11 652
Abstract 2013-12-06 1 53
Claims 2013-12-06 3 108
Cover Page 2014-01-24 1 26
Abstract 2018-12-07 1 12
Claims 2018-12-07 3 96
Description 2018-12-07 13 640
Description 2019-07-19 13 649
Claims 2019-07-19 3 88
Cover Page 2020-04-24 1 26
Maintenance fee payment 2024-06-11 34 1,373
Notice of National Entry 2014-01-16 1 193
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2014-03-05 1 112
Reminder - Request for Examination 2017-03-07 1 125
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2017-07-11 1 173
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2019-10-04 1 162
Amendment / response to report 2018-12-07 27 833
PCT 2013-12-06 3 109
Correspondence 2014-04-22 2 54
Correspondence 2014-05-15 1 19
Request for examination 2017-06-29 2 59
Examiner Requisition 2018-06-08 5 267
Examiner Requisition 2019-01-22 4 200
Amendment / response to report 2019-07-19 16 544
Final fee 2020-03-24 4 94