Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
VIRTUAL LIMIT SWITCH
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This invention relates to a valve used in a process, and more
particularly, to a
method for determining whether the valve is closed or open without the use of
a limit switch
or a position sensor.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Process valves are used in the chemical, pharmaceutical, food and
other
industries to control or regulate fluid flow. It is desirable to monitor the
operational state of a
valve, such as whether the valve is opened, partially opened or closed, to
ensure that a
particular process or activity is actually being performed. One method for
monitoring the
operational state of a valve is through the use of a valve position sensor
such as a limit
switch.
[0003] Many industries utilize valve islands or manifolds that include a
group of
valves, such as pneumatic valves, that are mounted on a common base. Such
islands typically
include an electrical connection and a pneumatic connection for providing
electricity and
supply air in order to operate the valves in the valve island. An advantage of
a valve island is
that the island may be expanded by incrementally adding valve stations as
needed for a
particular process or facility. However, a limit switch is not used in many
single valve and
valve island configurations for various reasons. A reason is the relatively
high cost associated
with installation and maintenance of the limit switches. For example, it may
be difficult to
install electrical wiring for a limit switch that is remotely located in a
facility. As a result, it is
difficult to remotely monitor the operational state of the valves in the valve
island.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0004] A method associated with a valve package having a process valve, an
actuator
and a controller. The method includes obtaining a baseline signature
corresponding to
opening or closing the valve as the valve moves from a first position to a
second position.
1
CA 2883942 2017-07-13
The method also includes obtaining an operating signature corresponding to
values associated
with the baseline signature each time the valve moves from the first position
to the second
position. In addition. the operating signature is compared to the baseline
signature. The
method further includes determining if one or more of the values associated
with the
operating signature is within an acceptable range from the corresponding one
or more values
in the baseline signature.
[0004A] In another broad aspect of the invention, a method is provided
associated with
a valve package having a process valve, an actuator and a controller. The
method comprises
obtaining a baseline signature corresponding to opening or closing the valve
as the valve
moves from a first position to a second position. A first acceptable range for
a first section of
the baseline signature is determined, wherein the first section of the
baseline signature
corresponds to a time when the valve begins to move from an open or closed
position. A
second acceptable range for a second section of the baseline signature is
determined, wherein
the second section of the baseline signature corresponds to a time when the
valve moves to
the open or closed position. An operating signature is obtained corresponding
to values
associated with the baseline signature each time the valve moves from the
first position to the
second position. The operating signature is compared to the baseline signature
to determine if
values associated with the operating signature are within the first and second
acceptable
ranges for the first and second sections of the baseline signature.
[0004B] In a further broad aspect of the invention, a method is provided
associated with
a valve package having a process valve, an actuator and a controller. The
method comprises
obtaining a baseline signature corresponding to opening or closing the valve
as the valve
moves from a first position to a second position. A first acceptable range for
a first section of
the baseline signature is determined, wherein the first section of the
baseline signature
corresponds to a time when the valve begins to move from an open or closed
position. A
second acceptable range for a second section of the baseline signature is
determined, wherein
the second section of the baseline signature corresponds to a time when the
valve moves to
the open or closed position. An operating signature is obtained corresponding
to values
associated with the baseline signature each time the valve moves from the
first position to the
2
CA 2883942 2017-07-13
second position. A plurality of operating signatures are then stored memory in
accordance
with a first-in, first-out method. The operating signature is compared to the
baseline signature
to determine if values associated with the operating signature are within the
first and second
acceptable ranges for the first and second sections of the baseline signature.
An operating
signature is then locked having one or more values that exceed the acceptable
range.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0005] Fig. 1 depicts a valve package.
[0006] Fig. 2 illustrates an exemplary baseline signature of differential
pressure vs.
time for the valve package.
[0007] Fig. 3 depicts exemplary acceptable ranges for differential pressure
and time
for portions of the baseline signature.
[0008] Fig. 4 depicts an exemplary first deviation from the baseline
signature which
exceeds a first acceptable range.
[0009] Fig. 5 depicts second, third and fourth exemplary deviations from
the baseline
signature 28 which exceed the first acceptable range.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0010] Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it
is to be
understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details
of construction and
the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or
illustrated in the
following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being
practiced or
of being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the
phraseology and
terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be
regarded as
limiting. The use of "including," "comprising," or "having" and variations
thereof herein is
meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well
as additional
items. Unless specified or limited otherwise, the terms "mounted,"
"connected," "supported,'
and "coupled" and variations thereof are used broadly and encompass direct and
indirect
mountings, connections, supports, and couplings. Further, "connected" and
"coupled" are not
restricted to physical or mechanical connections or couplings. In the
description below, like
3
CA 2883942 2017-07-13
,
reference numerals and labels are used to describe the same, similar or
corresponding parts in
the several views of Figs. 1-6.
[0011] Referring to FIG. 1, a valve package 10 typically includes
controller 12,
memory 14, solenoid 16, actuator 18, pressure sensor 20 and process valve 22.
Valve 22 is
installed in a process pipeline to allow, restrict or prevent process media
flowing through the
valve 22. The actuator 18 is mounted on valve 22 and is typically
pneumatically actuated, but
may also be electric or hydraulic. A number of different types of actuators
may be used to
open/close particular types of valves. For example, a linear actuator may be
used to
open/close a diaphragm valve; a rotary actuator may be used to open close a
butterfly or ball
valve. The actuator 18 may include an output shaft that is connected to a
valve stem having a
disc or other moveable valve member. The output shaft either rotates or lifts
upward
(depending on the valve type) to provide the necessary torque to turn or lift
the valve stem in
order to either move the valve member toward the valve seat until contact is
made with the
valve seat to close the valve or move the valve member away from the valve
seat to open the
valve 22. The controller 12 is configured to control the actuator 18 based on
various input
signals. The controller 12 further includes the capability to monitor valve
operation and
signal an error message if a failure condition occurs. The time it takes the
valve 22 to open
and close depends on the type and size of the valve 22, the torque rating of
the actuator 18,
the configuration of the valve seat and other parameters. The valve package 10
may be part of
a valve island 24 having plurality of valve packages 10. Alternatively, a
valve package 10
may be configured as a standalone item. A programmable computer 26 may be used
to
provide instructions to the controller 12 for operating the valve package 10.
4
CA 2883942 2017-07-13
CA 02883942 2015-03-03
WO 2014/039852
PCT/US2013/058553
[00i21 Fig..
2 illustrates an exemplary baseline signature 28 of differential pressure vs.
time for a valve package 10 having a spring return actuator. In particular,
Fig. 2 depicts a
baseline signature 28 for closing the valve 22. It is understood that the
following description
also applies to a baseline signature for opening the valve 22. The
differential pressure is the
pressure between a supply pressure and a port of the spring return actuator.
The pressure at time
t ¨ 0 corresponds to the pressure when the valve 22 is open and prior to
closing the valve 22
wherein a maximum differential pressure of approximately 80 psi is available
to close the valve
22. When the controller 12 transmits a command to the actuator 18 to close the
valve 22, the
differential pressure steadily decreases from approximately 80 psi to 5 psi at
after approximately
0.5 seconds in a first section 28a of the baseline signature 28, thus
exhausting a substantial
amount of pressure in order for the valve member to overcome inertia and
friction to break away
from the open position. From approximately 0.9 seconds to 1.7 seconds, the
differential pressure
is relatively flat at approximately 13 psi in a second section 28b of the
baseline signature 28, thus
indicating a slew time wherein the valve member is movint.,t to the closed
position. From
approximately 1.7 seconds to 2.4 seconds the differential pressure is
gradually reduced to zero in
a third section 28c of the baseline signature 28, thus indicating that the
valve member is moving
into the valve seat and the valve 22 is subsequently closed.
(001.3]
Valves frequently exhibit varying levels of hysteresis when opening and
closing,
for example. For certain applications, it has been determined that deviations
front the baseline
signature 28, due to hysteresis, which are within a predetermined range for
differential press=
and time are acceptable. The deviation may he based on a percentage of the
baseline signature
28 and may be user defined. Referring to Fig. 3, exemplary acceptable ranges
for differential
pressure and time for portions of the baseline signature 28 are shown. In
particular, Fig. 3
depicts a first acceptable range 30 for differential pressure and time for the
first section 28a of
the baseline signature 28 (i.e. when the valve member begins to move from the
open position).
Thus, in accordance with the first acceptable range 30, if the differential
pressure decreases from
approximately. 80 psi to 5 psi within approximately 0.5 seconds when the valve
member begins
to move from the open position, then no valve malfunction has occurred. Fig. 3
also depicts a
second acceptable. range 32 for the third section 28a of the baseline
signature 28 (i.e. when the
valve member is moving into the valve seat and subsequently the valve 22 is
closed). In
CA 02883942 2015-03-03
WO 2014/039852 PCT/US2013/058553
accordance with the invention, the baseline signature 28 and the first 30 and
second 32
acceptable ranges establish the parameters for determining whether the valve
22 is closed.
Further, the determination of whether the valve 22 is closed is accomplished -
without the use of a
limit switch. Thus, if the second acceptable range 32 is exceeded for example,
this indicates that
the valve 22 is not closed.
100141 During use, operational signatures are generated each time a valve
is commanded
to close. Any operational signatures having a differential pressure or time
value that falls outside
of the first 30 and second 28 acceptable ranges indicates a possible valve
malfunction. Referring
to Fig. 4, an exemplary first deviation 34 from the baseline signature 28
which occurred during
use and is outside of the first acceptable range 30, is shown. In Fig. 4, it
can be seen that the
differential pressure decreased from approximately 80 psi to 13 psi in
approximately 1.3-1.4
seconds during first deviation 34, in contrast to approximately 80 psi to 5
psi after approximately
0.5 seconds in accordance with the first section 28a of the baseline signature
28, thus reducing
the amount of slew, time in second section 28b. The remaining portions of Fig.
4 complied with
the baseline signature 28 thus indicating that the valve 22 gill closed even
though a deviation
from the baseline signature 28 occurred elsewhere.
[00151 It is desirable to compare each operational signature wdth the
baseline signature
28 in order to ascertain whether the valve 22 is operating within acceptable
ranges or -whether
there is a possible valve malfunction. A plurality of operational signatures
may be stored in
memory 14 and are then each compared with. the baseline signature 28. The
operational
signatures may be stored in memory 14 based 011 a first-in first-out (i.e.
"FIFO") method
depending on the type of application and memory size. In particular, the
memory 14 stores a
predetermined number of operational signatures wherein the first stored
operational signature is
replaced by a newly generated operational signature on a continual basis as
new operating
signatures are generated. If one or more of the operational signatures is not
within the first 30
and second 28 acceptable ranges, an alann is generated and the non-compliant
signature is
locked in memory 14 with a date and time stamp. As such, the current invention
provides =
information regarding the condition of the valve 22 during operation of valve
22 which may then
be used as part of a condition based or predictive maintenance program. The
number of
6
CA 02883942 2015-03-03
WO 2014/039852
PCT/US2013/058553
operational signatures stored in memory 14 May -vary by application. In one
embodiment, four
operational signatures are stored.
[00161 Referring to Fig. 5, second 36, third 38 and fourth 40 exemplary
deviations from
the baseline signature 28 which are outside of the first acceptable range 30
is shown. In Fig. 5, it
can be seen that second 36, third 3$ and fourth 40 deviations occurred during
the first section
28a. The second 36, third 38 and fourth 40 exemplary deviations may be
designated as FIFO
deviations stored in memory 14. The remaining portions of Fig. 5 complied with
the baseline
signature 28 thus indicating that the valve 22 still closed even though
deviations from the
baseline signature 28 occurred elsewhere.
. [0017] Referring to Fig. 6, a flowchart in accordance with the current
invention is shown.
At step 50, a baseline signature 28 of pressure vs. time is generated for a
valve 22 which does not
include a limit switch. At step 52, the first 30 and second 32 acceptable
ranges for the first 28a
and third 28e sections of the baseline signature 28 are deterinined. At step
54, an operational
signature for the valve 22 is generated. At step 56, the operational signature
is compared with
the baseline signature 28 and the first 30 and second 32 acceptable ranges. At
-step 58, a
determination is made as to whether there is a deviation with respect to the
first 30 and second 32
acceptable ranges. If a deviation has occurred, an alarm is generated and the
non-compliant
signature is locked in memory with a date and time stamp at step 60. If no
deviation has
occurred, then the valve 22 is determined to be closed at step 62. Therefore,
the current
invention enables determination of whether the valve 22 is closed based on
whether the valve
signature 28 exceeds the first 30 and second 28 acceptable ranges and is
accomplished without
the use of a limit switch.
[0018] 'While the invention has been described in conjunction with
specific
embodiments, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, permutations
and variations
will become apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing
description.
Accordingly, it is intended that the present invention embrace an such
alternatives, modifications
and variations.
=
7
