Language selection

Search

Patent 2885119 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2885119
(54) English Title: ARRANGEMENT FOR MOUNTING A RUNNER ON A VEHICLE SLIDING ON RUNNERS
(54) French Title: DISPOSITIF D'INSTALLATION D'UN PASSAGE SUR UN VEHICULE GLISSANT SUR LES PASSAGES
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B62B 17/04 (2006.01)
  • B62B 19/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • RINTAMAKI, VEIKKO (Finland)
(73) Owners :
  • TRAILANDER OY
(71) Applicants :
  • TRAILANDER OY (Finland)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2023-03-28
(22) Filed Date: 2015-03-16
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2015-11-27
Examination requested: 2020-02-11
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
2014 5480 (Finland) 2014-05-27

Abstracts

English Abstract


Arrangement for mounting a runner (2) of vehicles and devices
sliding on runners (2), such as sledges (1) functioning as a trailer
on snow, in which arrangement a runner (2) is connected to a
sledge (1) from both the tip of the runner (2) and from at least one
other point of the runner (2). The invention is implemented in such
a way that arranged between the tip of the runner (2) and the sledge
(1) is a rigid tip support (3), which is hinged in a fixed manner
turnably at both its ends, and in that between the sledge (1) and the
runner (2) is also installed at least one center support (4), which is
hinged in a fixed manner turnably at both its ends.


French Abstract

Linvention concerne la disposition de coulisseaux (2) de véhicules et de dispositifs glissant sur les coulisseaux (2), comme des traîneaux (1) servant de remorque sur la neige, dans lesquels la disposition dun coulisseau (2) est raccordée à un traîneau (1) par lextrémité du coulisseau (2) et au moins un autre point dancrage du coulisseau (2). Linvention est installée de sorte quentre lextrémité du coulisseau (2) et le traîneau (1) se trouve un support dextrémité solide (3) doté de charnières rotatives fixées aux deux extrémités, et quentre le traîneau (1) et le coulisseau (2) se trouve également au moins un support central (4) doté de charnières rotatives fixées aux deux extrémités.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


7
CLAIMS
The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege
is
claimed are defined as follows:
1. System for mounting a runner on a vehicle sliding on runners so that a
tip of the
runner is connected to the vehicle and at least one other point of the runner
is connected to
the vehicle, the system comprising:
a rigid tip support; and
at least one center support,
wherein the rigid tip support has a first end for pivotable attachment to the
tip of the
runner and a second end for pivotable attachment to the vehicle, and
wherein the at least one center support has a first end for pivotable
attachment to the
at least one other point of the runner and a second end for pivotable
attachment to the
vehicle.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein an element that functions as a spring and
as a shock
absorber forms the at least one center support.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the at least one center support is formed
from two
rods hinged to each other and wherein the element is installed between the two
rods.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one center support comprises
two center
supports and wherein each of the two center supports is formed from an element
that
functions as a spring and as a shock absorber.
5. The system of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the vehicle is a sledge.
6. The system of claim 5, wherein the sledge is able to function as a
trailer on snow.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-07-11

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


1
ARRANGEMENT FOR MOUNTING A RUNNER ON A VEHICLE
SLIDING ON RUNNERS
The object of the present invention is an arrangement for mounting a
runner of vehicles and devices sliding on runners, such as sledges
functioning as a trailer on snow, in which arrangement a runner is
connected to a sledge from both the tip of the runner and from at
least one other point of the runner.
The invention thus relates to an arrangement for mounting/fixing the
runners of vehicles and devices sliding on runners, such as sledges
functioning as a trailer on snow. Reference is made hereinafter to a
sledge, but this must be interpreted more widely to mean vehicles of
the type referred to in the preceding.
Fig. 1 presents a sledge 1' according to prior art, wherein the runner is
mounted with two supports, which are connected at their bottom ends
to a transverse shaft A. One of the two supports can be sprung. In this
embodiment the tip of the runner 2' is free, i.e. it is not supported on
the sledge.
Fig. 2 presents a second known mounting solution for a runner of a
sledge. A difference to the solution of Fig. 1 is that now also the tip of
the runner 2' is supported on the sledge 1'. The joint between the support
and the sledge is made to be slidable; as indicated with the arrow.
Fig. 3 presents yet another known solution, wherein the runner is
supported with two vertical rigid supports and the tip of the runner is
fixed to the sledge.
There have been advances in the technical development of sledges
along with the development of motor sleighs. A conventional sledge,
which typically has rigidly installed runners, no longer meets the
requirements for moving and transporting that takes place on snow
or frozen ground. To achieve smooth motion and comfort, spring
suspensions have been built into sledges for decades now and
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-07-11

2
runners are mounted on a joint in such a way that that they give to
accommodate unevenness of the ground.
Mounting the runners of devices moving on runners differs from
mounting the wheels of devices running on wheels mainly in that a
runner meets the running surface, such as the ground, for a longer
distance and rocking of the runner by means of a transverse axis, i.e.
a mounting joint, is desirable for the sake of smooth motion and
runner durability.
The mounting of a runner in such a way that its tip is free and the
mounting is only in the middle of the runner is known in the art. In
this case a strong torsion is exerted on the mounting joint when the
sledge turns. There is also the danger that in the sideslip movement
of the runner forming in conjunction with the turning the runner will
hit a solid object or the tip of the runner will "bite" into an object, such
as the rear of a tree trunk. Likewise, when crossing a deep depression,
such as a ditch, or when coming down a river bank reaching ice, the tip
of the runner might be pressed into soft ground.
For the sake of safety and mechanical durability, it is desirable to fix the
tips of the runners to the frame of the device with an articulated support.
Fixing the tip of a runner to the frame of a sledge is problematic because the
rocking of the runner in the joint causes a change in the distance of the tip
of
the runner in relation to the frame. Many types of solutions to the problem
have
been presented. The fixing of the tip support of the runner to the frame can
be
sliding or the tip support can be variable in length. A sliding mounting joint
of
a runner can, for its part, be used with a tip support that is hinged in a
fixed
manner.
The mounting of the runner becomes even more problematic when spring
suspension is added to it. The springing movement, i.e. the changing of the
distance of the hinge point of the runner with respect to the frame of the
sledge
also changes the position of the tip of the runner with respect to the frame
of
the sledge. In practice this is addressed by increasing the designed sliding
trajectory of the tip support.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-07-11

3
The problems caused by detrimental substances, such as sand, dust, rust
and frozen water in the sliding points is problematic in all the
aforementioned arrangements. Additionally, a sliding joint often causes a
disturbing noise and it is also a wearing part.
The purpose of the present invention is to achieve an arrangement for
mounting a runner on a vehicle sliding on runners, which arrangement
does not have the aforementioned drawbacks.
According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system
for
mounting a runner on a vehicle sliding on runners so that a tip of the runner
is
connected to the vehicle and at least one other point of the runner is
connected
to the vehicle, the system comprising a rigid tip support and at least one
center
support. The rigid tip support has a first end for pivotable attachment to the
tip
of the runner and a second end for pivotable attachment to the vehicle. The at
least one center support has a first end for pivotable attachment to the at
least
one other point of the runner and a second end for pivotable attachment to the
vehicle. Notably, the ends of the rigid tip support and the ends of the at
least
one center support are for pivotable attachment in a way that does not allow
sliding.
In some embodiments, an element that functions as a spring and as a shock
absorber forms the at least one center support.
In some embodiments, the at least one center support is formed from two rods
hinged to each other and wherein the element is installed between the two
rods.
In some embodiments, the at least one center support comprises two center
supports and wherein each of the two center supports is formed from an
element that functions as a spring and as a shock absorber.
In some embodiments, the vehicle is a sledge.
In some embodiments, the sledge is able to function as a trailer on snow.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-07-11

4
The mounting of the runner is therefore done in such a way that the tip
support
of the runner is rigid ( does not stretch or contract) and is hinged in a
fixed
manner to the tip of the runner and correspondingly to the frame (mounting
rod) of the sledge, and the vertical supporting of the runner is done with an
arrangement that allows horizontal movement of the runner in relation to the
frame of the sledge using a rigid or sprung center support that is hinged in a
fixed manner. A runner can be supported also with a plurality of vertical
supports.
One of the advantages of the invention that can be mentioned is that no
sliding
joints at all are needed for the mounting of the runner, but instead all the
joints
can be implemented as noise-free, durable and simple solutions having small
clearances.
In the following, the invention will be described in more detail by the aid of
some preferred embodiments with reference to the attached drawings,
wherein
Fig. 1 presents a mounting of the runners of a sledge
according to the state of the art.
Fig. 2 presents a second mounting of the runners of a
sledge according to the state of the art.
Fig. 3 presents a third mounting of the runners of a sledge
according to the state of the art.
Fig. 4 presents the mounting of the runners of a sledge
according to one embodiment of the invention.
Fig. 5 presents the mounting of the runners of a sledge
according to a second embodiment of the invention.
Fig. 6 presents the mounting of the runners of a sledge
according to a third embodiment of the invention.
Fig. 7 presents the mounting of the runners of a sledge
according to a fourth embodiment of the invention.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-07-11

5
Fig. 8 presents the mounting of the runners of a sledge
according to a fifth embodiment of the invention.
Fig. 9 presents a series of diagrams of the functioning
of the sprung mounting according to Fig. 6.
Fig. 4 presents the mounting of a runner according to one
embodiment of the invention. The sledge is marked with the
reference number 1 and the runner with the reference number 2.
Here only one runner is addressed, but typically on a sledge there are
two side by side. The supporting of the runner is implemented with
two supports hinged at their ends in such a way that the tip support 3
handles the supporting of the runner 2 in the horizontal direction and
the center support 4 handles the supporting of the runner 2 in the
vertical direction. As the runner moves to accommodate
unevennesses in the base on which it moves, compensation of the
horizontal movement of the mounting point B of the runner 2 caused
by the circular trajectories of the tip support and the runner occurs
with a rocking motion of the center support. The length of the center
support 4 must be sufficient compared to the combined horizontal
distance of movement of the tip support 3 and the tip of the runner
2, to avoid an unreasonably large change in the distance of the
runner and the frame of the sledge as well as to avoid excessive
"tilting" with respect to the frame of the sledge.
In the embodiment presented by Fig. 5 the center support 4 is sprung
and provided with shock absorption. This element must be sufficiently
robust to receive also the lateral forces of the runner 2. Otherwise
the structure is the same as in the embodiment of Fig. 4.
Fig. 6 presents a different structure of the sprung center support 4.
In it the center support 4 is composed of two rods that are hinged to
each other, between which a spring is installed. This structure is
described in more detail in Fig. 9, which presents the position of the
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-07-11

6
runner and its mounting means in four different operating situations
a-d.
Fig. 7 shows a solution according to the invention, wherein the
springing of the center support is implemented in a different manner
than in the preceding embodiment. A lever mechanism, which is
supported on a combined spring element/shock absorber element 4,
forms the center support.
Fig. 8 presents an embodiment of the invention wherein the tip
support 3 is installed in the same manner as in the other various
alternatives of the invention. Instead of one center support 4, in this
embodiment there are two center supports 4, both of which are
formed from the combined spring element/shock absorber element.
In this case one of the center supports is disposed closer to the front
part of the runner and the other closer to the rear part of the runner.
What is therefore essential in the invention is a tip support 3 that is
hinged in a fixed manner, which tip support is installed between the
mounting rod of the sledge 1 and the tip of the runner 2. The phrase
hinged in a fixed manner means that the tip support is hinged so as
to turn around a transverse axis, but not in a way that allows sliding.
It is also essential that at least one center support 4, in addition to
the tip support 3, is between the sledge 1 and the runner 2. Each
center support is hinged in a fixed manner at both its ends. If there
is more than one center support, they are separate, i.e. they are not
connected to each other at any point.
It is obvious to the person skilled in the art that the invention is not
limited to the embodiments described above, but that it can be varied
within the scope of the claims presented below.
The characteristic features possibly presented in the description in
conjunction with other characteristic features can also, if necessary,
be used separately to each other.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-07-11

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Letter Sent 2023-03-28
Inactive: Grant downloaded 2023-03-28
Inactive: Grant downloaded 2023-03-28
Grant by Issuance 2023-03-28
Inactive: Cover page published 2023-03-27
Pre-grant 2023-01-24
Inactive: Final fee received 2023-01-24
Letter Sent 2022-10-27
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2022-10-27
Inactive: Q2 passed 2022-08-16
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2022-08-16
Inactive: Ack. of Reinst. (Due Care Not Required): Corr. Sent 2022-08-02
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2022-07-11
Amendment Received - Response to Examiner's Requisition 2022-07-11
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2022-07-11
Reinstatement Request Received 2022-07-11
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to an Examiner's Requisition 2021-07-12
Examiner's Report 2021-03-12
Inactive: Report - No QC 2021-03-08
Common Representative Appointed 2020-11-07
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2020-08-17
Letter Sent 2020-02-25
Request for Examination Received 2020-02-11
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2020-02-11
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2020-02-11
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2019-07-24
Inactive: Cover page published 2015-12-14
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2015-11-27
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2015-09-18
Inactive: IPC assigned 2015-04-09
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2015-04-09
Inactive: IPC assigned 2015-04-09
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (bilingual) 2015-03-26
Application Received - Regular National 2015-03-23
Inactive: QC images - Scanning 2015-03-16
Inactive: Pre-classification 2015-03-16

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2022-07-11
2021-07-12

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2023-03-06

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - standard 2015-03-16
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2017-03-16 2017-02-21
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2018-03-16 2018-02-22
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2019-03-18 2019-02-27
Request for examination - standard 2020-03-16 2020-02-11
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2020-03-16 2020-03-02
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2021-03-16 2021-03-05
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2022-03-16 2022-03-15
Reinstatement 2022-07-12 2022-07-11
Final fee - standard 2023-01-24
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 2023-03-16 2023-03-06
MF (patent, 9th anniv.) - standard 2024-03-18 2024-03-04
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
TRAILANDER OY
Past Owners on Record
VEIKKO RINTAMAKI
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2015-03-15 6 234
Abstract 2015-03-15 1 16
Claims 2015-03-15 1 28
Drawings 2015-03-15 4 52
Representative drawing 2015-10-29 1 5
Abstract 2022-07-10 1 20
Description 2022-07-10 6 327
Claims 2022-07-10 1 40
Drawings 2022-07-10 4 79
Representative drawing 2023-03-06 1 8
Maintenance fee payment 2024-03-03 36 1,459
Filing Certificate 2015-03-25 1 178
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2016-11-16 1 112
Courtesy - Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2020-02-24 1 434
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R86(2)) 2021-09-06 1 550
Courtesy - Acknowledgment of Reinstatement (Request for Examination (Due Care not Required)) 2022-08-01 1 408
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2022-10-26 1 580
Electronic Grant Certificate 2023-03-27 1 2,527
Amendment / response to report 2015-09-17 1 21
Request for examination 2020-02-10 4 100
Amendment / response to report 2020-08-16 4 108
Examiner requisition 2021-03-11 6 376
Maintenance fee payment 2022-03-14 1 26
Reinstatement / Amendment / response to report 2022-07-10 27 1,157
Final fee 2023-01-23 4 132