Language selection

Search

Patent 2892295 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2892295
(54) English Title: ICE SKATE BLADE
(54) French Title: LAME POUR PATIN A GLACE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A63C 01/32 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • FINLEY, DENNIS J. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • DENNIS J. FINLEY
(71) Applicants :
  • DENNIS J. FINLEY (Canada)
(74) Agent: NEXUS LAW GROUP LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2015-05-20
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2016-01-04
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
62021044 (United States of America) 2014-07-04

Abstracts

English Abstract


A skate blade for an ice hockey skate comprising a blade having an upper
portion having a
thickness corresponding to a standard skate blade and a lower portion having a
pair of
substantially parallel side walls defining a lower portion thickness of
between 4.06 to 6.35 mm,
the lower portion thickness extending from the bottom of the blade a height of
3.175 to 4.45
mm.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
What is claimed is:
1. An ice skate blade comprising: a top surface for fitting into an ice skate
frame and a
bottom edge, a pair of substantially parallel upper side surfaces defining an
upper
portion having a thickness of approximately 3 mm, and a pair of substantially
parallel
lower side surfaces defining a lower portion having a thickness of between
4.06 to 6.35
mm.
2. The ice skate blade of claim 1 wherein said lower portion having a height
measured
from said bottom edge of between 3.175 mm to 4.45 mm.
3. The ice skate blade of claim 2 wherein said lower portion having a
thickness between
4.39 mm to 4.83 mm.
4. An ice skate blade for use with hockey skates comprising an elongated
arcuate steel
blade having a top surface with a connection system for connecting to a hockey
skate
and a bottom surface for engaging an ice surface, said blade having a first
thickness at
said top and a second thick!' ess at said bottom, said second thickness being
selected
from a range of thicknesses between 4.06 to 6.35 mm.
5. The ice skate blade of claim 4 wherein said second thickness extending from
said
bottom surface a height of between 3.175 to 4.45 mm forming a lower portion of
said
skate blade.
6. The ice skate blade of claim 5 wherein said second thickness being between
4.39 and
4.83 mm.
7. An ice hockey skate equipped with the skate blade of any one of claims 1 to
6.
6

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02892295 2015-05-20
TITLE OF THE INVENTION
ICE SKATE BLADE
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an improved ice skate blade for an ice hockey
skate.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Hockey is a very competitive sport. As training programs and coaching has
improved, so too
has the speed and skill of the players. In addition, with advances in
technology, hockey
equipment has improved over the years ¨ becoming lighter and stronger. Skates
have been
designed with blades that balance the competing requirements of strength and
weight ¨ the
blade needs to be thick enough to resist transverse impacts on the blade and
yet be as thin as
possible to limit their weight. For example, blades have been made of high
grade stainless steel
and lightweight aluminum fused together by epoxy and rivets.
Besides, the focus on strength/weight, a number of new skate blade designs
have been
developed in order provide the user with an advantage over a standard skate
blade.
For example, U.S. Patent No. 4,314,708 teaches an ice skate blade having an
elongated flat
blade body defining opposed side walls and a support bottom edge having a slot
in at least a
forward half portion thereof intermediate the opposed side walls and a solid
rear portion. The
bottom portion of the blade is wider (up to 150 thousandths of an inch) than
the top, which is
the typical blade thickness (about 120 thousandths of an inch). According to
the patent, this
additional thickness is required in order that opposed side walls (shoulder
portions 24) on each
side of the slot are sufficiently thick to resist transverse impact during a
game of hockey.
According to the patent, the two thin opposed side walls provide better
penetration of the ice as
each side wall is thinner than a regular skate blade. In addition, the patent
teaches that the thin
blades in combination with the subctantially flat bottom edge provides for
better acceleration
and stability in sweeping curve motions or in backward skating.
1

CA 02892295 2015-05-20
U.S. Patent No. 4,907,813 issued to Hall teaches a skate blade having a
skating edge having
two widths. The front toe portion of the blade has a width equivalent to a
standard hockey ice
skate, while a gliding portion behind the toe portion has a narrower width
corresponding to ice
skate racing blades. According to the teachings of Hall, "the provision of the
narrower blade
portion in this area of the edge allows for an increase in gliding speeds
similar to that obtained
with racing skates" (see column 2, lines 44-46).
In addition to designs reducing the width of the blade in order to increase
performance, other
designs have focussed on the angle of the blade. For example, U.S. Patent No.
6,830,251 to
Titzmann teaches an ice skate blade having an upper portion with parallel
sides (like a normal
hockey skate blade), and a lower portion having two faces flared outwardly
from the upper
portion thereby providing angled cutting edges, the angle being between 4 to
12 degrees from
the vertical, preferably 8 degrees. Titzmann teaches that the effectiveness of
the blade is
dependent on the special relationship between the bottom width, preferably
between 4-5 mm,
and the preferred angles of the lower faces. As sharpening the blade will
affect this, the blade
will lose its preferred advantage, becoming less effective with each
sharpening. The solution
presented by Titzmann is to use material for the blade that is hard enough not
to require
frequent sharpening.
U.S. Patent No. 7,234,709 issued to Lambert also teaches angling the skate
blade cutting edge
in order to improve performance. Lambert teaches a skate blade having an upper
portion
having a standard skate blade width, a middle portion wider than the upper
portion and a lower
portion having angled side walls such that it is wider at the bottom than at
the top where it joins
with the middle portion. According to Lambert, the preferred angle is between
2 and 8 degrees,
and most preferably between 4 and 5 degrees. The middle portion is 4 mm wide
and provides
added rigidity, with the angled lower portion "providing edges with much
improved ice
penetration with the result that trajectory changes are greatly facilitated,
and better release are
retained when skating" (column 5, lines 11-14).
While the above designs have addressed various shortcomings of prior art skate
blades, there
remains a need for an improved skate blade.
Objects of the invention will be apparent from the description that follows.
2

CA 02892295 2015-05-20
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention consists of a skate blade for use on an ice skate, the skate
blade having an upper
portion having substantially parallel sides defining a standard hockey blade
width
(approximately 3 mm) and a lower portion having substantially parallel sides
defining a
uniform width, preferably between 4.06 mm to 6.35 mm.
The lower portion is of a uniform thickness (width) having a height measured
from the bottom
edge of the blade of between 3.175 mm to 4.45 mm.
The foregoing was intended as a broad summary only and of only some of the
aspects of the
invention. It was not intended to define the limits or requirements of the
invention. Other
aspects of the invention will be appreciated by reference to the detailed
description of the
preferred embodiment and to the claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These and other features of the invention will become more apparent from the
following
description in which reference is made to the appended drawings and wherein:
Fig. 1 is a side view of a skate blade according to the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a cross sectional view of the skate blade shown in Fig. 1, taken
along line A-A.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The preferred embodiment of a skate blade 2 according to the present invention
for use in
playing hockey is shown in Fig 1. The skate blade 2 has a top edge 4, a bottom
edge 6 and an
upper portion having a pair of side walls 5, 7, and a lower portion having a
pair of side walls 9,
11, as shown in Fig. 2. The side walls 5, 7 are substantially parallel and
define a blade width 20
corresponding to the standard width of a hockey skate blade (approximately 3
mm). The lower
portion 10 side walls 9, 11 are also substantially parallel and define a blade
width (or thickness)
16 that is wider than that of the upper portion.
3

CA 02892295 2015-05-20
Preferably, lower portion 10 has a uniform blade width of between 4.06 mm
(.160 inch) to 6.35
mm (.250 inch) and a height 18 that is between 3.175 mm to 4.45 mm (.125 to
.175 inches).
The height of the lower portion allows the blade to be ground and reshaped
without losing the
width at the bottom to maintain the same performance grind after grind when
being sharpened.
In addition, some skaters like to alter the bottom of the blade, grinding more
at the front and
back of the skate blade in order to increase the arc of the blade. Having a
sufficient height of
lower portion 10 allows a blade to be sharpened in this fashion while still
maintaining the same
bottom edge width throughout the length of the blade. This is not possible
with the prior art
angled side edge designs. At the same time, limiting the height of the lower
portion helps keep
the overall weight of the blade down so as not to impact long term performance
by a user.
The most preferred width of the lower portion is between 4.39 mm to 4.83 mm
(.173 to .190
inches), with the larger size being more desirable for use with a larger user
(100 kg or 220 lbs
and above). Once into the larger weight users, the additional width appears
helpful in
preventing the skate blade from digging too deep into the ice surface.
The skate blade 2 is equipped with a mounting system for mounting the blade
into a blade-
holding system for a skate as known in the art. As shown in Fig. 1, the
mounting system could
be in the form of a pair of connecting elements 12 and 14 elevated above the
top edge 4 of
blade 2. Of course, the connecting elements of the mounting system can be
modified to
correspond to a variety of different blade-holding systems in order to
accommodate different
skate brands.
As shown in Fig. 2, the bottom surface 22 is concave between opposite bottom
edges 6 of sides
5, 7. The concavity can be varied as known in the art and depending on the
skater's own
preferences.
When using the blades of the present invention as compared to a standard
hockey skate blade,
the glide speed is notably faster and requires less effort. The blades may be
sharpened (ground)
many times without any performance loss as the width of the lower portion will
remain constant
for many skate sharpenings (essentially until the blade has been reduced to an
overall height
that a user would consider too small for use and get a new blade). In
addition, as discussed
4

CA 02892295 2015-05-20
above, a given user can re-profile the arc of the blade and maintain the same
performance
characteristics along the full length of the blade edge.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the preferred and
alternative embodiments
have been described in some detail but that certain modifications may be
practiced without
departing from the principles of the invention.
5

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2018-05-23
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2018-05-23
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2017-05-23
Inactive: Cover page published 2016-02-02
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2016-01-04
Inactive: IPC assigned 2015-08-02
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2015-08-02
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (bilingual) 2015-05-28
Inactive: Applicant deleted 2015-05-28
Application Received - Regular National 2015-05-28
Inactive: QC images - Scanning 2015-05-20
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2015-05-20
Inactive: Pre-classification 2015-05-20

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2017-05-23

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 2015-05-20
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
DENNIS J. FINLEY
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

({010=All Documents, 020=As Filed, 030=As Open to Public Inspection, 040=At Issuance, 050=Examination, 060=Incoming Correspondence, 070=Miscellaneous, 080=Outgoing Correspondence, 090=Payment})


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2015-05-19 5 191
Claims 2015-05-19 1 30
Abstract 2015-05-19 1 9
Drawings 2015-05-19 2 11
Representative drawing 2015-12-07 1 4
Filing Certificate 2015-05-27 1 178
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2017-01-22 1 113
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2017-07-03 1 172