Language selection

Search

Patent 2902860 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2902860
(54) English Title: INTEGRATION OF MOLTEN CARBONATE FUEL CELLS IN A REFINERY SETTING
(54) French Title: INTEGRATION DE PILES A COMBUSTIBLE EN CARBONATE FONDU DANS UNE INSTALLATION DE RAFFINERIE
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H01M 8/0637 (2016.01)
  • C01B 3/50 (2006.01)
  • H01M 8/0668 (2016.01)
  • H01M 8/14 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BERLOWITZ, PAUL J. (United States of America)
  • BARCKHOLTZ, TIMOTHY ANDREW (United States of America)
  • LEE, ANITA S. (United States of America)
  • HERSHKOWITZ, FRANK (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2019-08-27
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2014-03-13
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2014-09-25
Examination requested: 2018-10-10
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2014/025208
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2014151207
(85) National Entry: 2015-08-27

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
61/787,587 (United States of America) 2013-03-15
61/787,697 (United States of America) 2013-03-15
61/787,879 (United States of America) 2013-03-15
61/788,628 (United States of America) 2013-03-15
61/884,376 (United States of America) 2013-09-30
61/884,545 (United States of America) 2013-09-30
61/884,565 (United States of America) 2013-09-30
61/884,586 (United States of America) 2013-09-30
61/884,605 (United States of America) 2013-09-30
61/884,635 (United States of America) 2013-09-30
61/889,757 (United States of America) 2013-10-11

Abstracts

English Abstract

In various aspects, systems and methods are provided for operating molten carbonate fuel cells in a refinery setting. The molten carbonate fuel cells can be used to provide hydrogen to various refinery processes, including providing hydrogen in place of using a carbon-based fuel for various combustion reactions. In a further aspect, CO2 -containing streams generated by refinery processes can also be used as input streams to the molten carbonate fuel cells.


French Abstract

Dans divers aspects, des systèmes et des procédés sont prévus pour mettre en uvre des piles à combustible en carbonate fondu dans une installation de raffinerie. Les piles à combustible en carbonate fondu peuvent être utilisées pour fournir de l'hydrogène à divers processus de raffinerie, notamment pour fournir de l'hydrogène au lieu d'utiliser un combustible à base de carbone pour diverses réactions de combustion. Dans un autre aspect, des flux contenant du CO2 générés par des processus de raffinerie peuvent également être utilisés en tant que flux d'entrée dans les piles à combustible en carbonate fondu.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS:
1. A method for generating hydrogen in a refinery, the method comprising:
introducing a fuel stream comprising a reformable fuel into an anode of a
molten
carbonate fuel cell, an internal refoiming element associated with the anode,
or a combination
thereof;
introducing a cathode inlet stream comprising CO2 and C2 into a cathode of the
molten
carbonate fuel cell;
generating electricity within the molten carbonate fuel cell;
generating an anode exhaust comprising H2 and CO2;
performing a separation on the anode exhaust to form a CO2-rich gas stream
having a
CO2 content greater than a CO2 content of the anode exhaust, and a CO2-
depleted gas stream
comprising hydrogen and having a CO2 content less than the CO2 content of the
anode exhaust;
and
delivering the CO2-depleted gas stream to one or more second refinery
processes,
wherein the molten carbonate fuel cell is operated (i) such that a CO2
utilization in the
cathode is at least 60% and either (ii) so as to achieve a thermal ratio from
0.25 to 1.15, or (iii)
such that an amount of the reformable fuel introduced into the anode, the
internal reforming
element associated with the anode, or the combination thereof, provides a
reformable fuel
surplus ratio of at least 1.5, or (iv) both (ii) and (iii).
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the cathode inlet stream comprises one or
more
CO2-containing streams derived directly or indirectly from one or more first
refinery processes.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising separating H2O from at least
one of the anode
exhaust, the CO2-depleted stream, and the CO2-rich stream in one or more
separation stages.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein a ratio of net moles of syngas in the
anode exhaust to
moles of CO2 in a cathode exhaust is at least 2Ø
84

5. The method of claim 1, wherein a fuel utilization in the anode is 50% or
less and/or
wherein an amount of the reformable fuel introduced into the anode, the
internal reforming
element associated with the anode, or the combination thereof, provides a
reformable fuel
surplus ratio of at least 2.0 and/or wherein the molten carbonate fuel cell is
operated at a thermal
ratio from 0.25 to 1Ø
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the molten carbonate fuel cell is
operated to generate
electrical power at a current density of at least 150 mA/cm2 and at least 80
mW/cm2 of waste
heat, the method further comprising performing an effective amount of an
endothermic reaction
to maintain a temperature differential between an anode inlet and an anode
outlet of 100° C or
less.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein performing the endothermic reaction
consumes at least
40% of the waste heat.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein an electrical efficiency for the molten
carbonate fuel
cell is between 10% and 40% and/or a total fuel cell efficiency for the molten
carbonate fuel
cell is at least 55%.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the CO2-depleted gas stream comprises an
H2-rich gas
stream and a syngas stream, each of which having a CO2 content less than the
CO2 content of
the anode exhaust.
10. The method of claim 2, wherein at least one process in the one or more
first refinery
processes is a process in the one or more second refinery processes.
11. The method of claim 2, wherein the fuel stream is derived from one or
more third
refinery processes.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein at least a portion of the fuel stream
passes through a
pre-reforming stage prior to being introduced into the anode.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein at least a portion of the fuel stream
passes through a
desulfurization stage prior to being introduced into the anode.
14. The method of claim 9, further comprising separating H2O from one or
more of the
anode exhaust, the CO2-rich gas stream, and the a CO2-depleted gas stream.
15. The method of claim 2, wherein the anode exhaust has a molar ratio of
H2 to CO of at
least 3.0:1, and has a CO2 content of at least 10 vol %.
16. The method of claim 2, further comprising modifying an H2 content of
one or more of
the anode exhaust, the CO2-rich gas stream, and the a CO2-depleted gas stream
using a water
gas shift process.
17. The method of claim 2, wherein the separating of the anode exhaust
comprises using a
membrane.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein the CO2-depleted gas stream is further
separated into a
first Hz-rich stream having a first H2 purity and a second H2-rich stream
having a second H2
purity, wherein the second H2-rich stream is compressed to a pressure greater
than the first
H2-rich stream.
19. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the one or more second
refinery processes
involves using hydrogen as a reactant and/or as a combustant.
20. The method of claim 1, wherein the molten carbonate fuel cell is
operated at steady state
conditions with regard to the CO2 utilization in the cathode, the thermal
ratio, and/or the
reformable fuel surplus ratio.
86

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCT/US2014/025208
INTEGRATION OF MOLTEN CARBONATE FUEL CELLS IN A REFINERY
SETTING
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] In various aspects, the invention is related to chemical production
and/or
power generation processes integrated with the use of molten carbonate fuel
cells.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Molten carbonate fuel cells utilize hydrogen and/or other fuels to
generate
electricity. The hydrogen may be provided by reforming methane or other
reformable
fuels in a steam reformer that is upstream of the fuel cell or within the fuel
cell.
Reformable fuels can encompass hydrocarbonaceous materials that can be reacted
with
steam and/or oxygen at elevated temperature and/or pressure to produce a
gaseous
product that comprises hydrogen. Alternatively or additionally, fuel can be
reformed in
the anode cell in a molten carbonate fuel cell, which can be operated to
create
conditions that are suitable for reforming fuels in the anode. Alternately or
additionally,
the reforming can occur both externally and internally to the fuel cell.
[0003] Traditionally, molten carbonate fuel cells are operated to maximize
electricity
production per unit of fuel input, which may be referred to as the fuel cell's
electrical
efficiency. This maximization can be based on the fuel cell alone or in
conjunction with
another power generation system. In order to achieve increased electrical
production
and to manage the heat generation, fuel utilization within a fuel cell is
typically
maintained at 70% to 75%.
[0004] U.S. Published Patent Application 2011/0111315 describes a system and
process for operating fuel cell systems with substantial hydrogen content in
the anode
inlet stream. The technology in the '315 publication is concerned with
providing
enough fuel in the anode inlet so that sufficient fuel remains for the
oxidation reaction
as the fuel approaches the anode exit. To ensure adequate fuel, the '315
publication
provides fuel with a high concentration of H2. The H2 not utilized in the
oxidation
reaction is recycled to the anode for use in the next pass. On a single pass
basis, the H2
utilization may range from 10% to 30%. The '315 reference does not describe
significant reforming within the anode, instead relying primarily on external
reforming.
[0005] U.S. Published Patent Application 2005/0123810 describes a system and
method for co-production of hydrogen and electrical energy. The co-production
system
1

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
comprises a fuel cell and a separation unit, which is configured to receive
the anode
exhaust stream and separate hydrogen. A portion of the anode exhaust is also
recycled
to the anode inlet. The operating ranges given in the '810 publication appear
to be
based on a solid oxide fuel cell. Molten carbonate fuel cells are described as
an
alternative.
[0006] U.S. Published Patent Application 2003/0008183 describes a system and
method for co-production of hydrogen and electrical power. A fuel cell is
mentioned as
a general type of chemical converter for converting a hydrocarbon-type fuel to
hydrogen. The fuel cell system also includes an external reformer and a high
temperature fuel cell. An embodiment of the fuel cell system is described that
has an
electrical efficiency of about 45% and a chemical production rate of about 25%
resulting in a system coproduction efficiency of about 70%. The '183
publication does
not appear to describe the electrical efficiency of the fuel cell in isolation
from the
system.
[0007] U.S. Patent 5,084,362 describes a system for integrating a fuel cell
with a
gasification system so that coal gas can be used as a fuel source for the
anode of the
fuel cell. Hydrogen generated by the fuel cell is used as an input for a
gasifier that is
used to generate methane from a coal gas (or other coal) input. The methane
from the
gasifier is then used as at least part of the input fuel to the fuel cell.
Thus, at least a
portion of the hydrogen generated by the fuel cell is indirectly recycled to
the fuel cell
anode inlet in the form of the methane generated by the gasifier.
[0008] An article in the Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology (G.
Manzolini
et. al., J. Fuel Cell Sci. and Tech., Vol. 9, Feb 2012) describes a power
generation
system that combines a combustion power generator with molten carbonate fuel
cells.
Various arrangements of fuel cells and operating parameters are described. The
combustion output from the combustion generator is used in part as the input
for the
cathode of the fuel cell. One goal of the simulations in the Manzolini article
is to use
the MCFC to separate CO2 from the power generator's exhaust. The simulation
described in the Manzolini article establishes a maximum outlet temperature of
660 C
and notes that the inlet temperature must be sufficiently cooler to account
for the
temperature increase across the fuel cell. The electrical efficiency (i.e.
electricity
generated/ fuel input) for the MCFC fuel cell in a base model case is 50%. The
2

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
electrical efficiency in a test model case, which is optimized for CO2
sequestration, is
also 50%.
[0009] An article by Desideri et al. (Intl. J. of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 37,
2012)
describes a method for modeling the performance of a power generation system
using a
fuel cell for CO2 separation. Recirculation of anode exhaust to the anode
inlet and the
cathode exhaust to the cathode inlet are used to improve the performance of
the fuel
cell. The model parameters describe an MCFC electrical efficiency of 50.3%.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0010] In an aspect, a method for generating hydrogen in a refinery is
provided. The
method includes introducing a fuel stream comprising a reformable fuel into
the anode
of a molten carbonate fuel cell, an internal reforming element associated with
the
anode, or a combination thereof; receiving one or more CO2-containing streams
derived from one or more first refinery processes; introducing a cathode inlet
stream
comprising CO2 and 02 into the cathode of the fuel cell, the cathode inlet
stream
comprising at least a portion of the one or more CO2-containing streams;
generating
electricity within the molten carbonate fuel cell; withdrawing, from an anode
exhaust,
one or more gas streams comprising H2, H2 and CO, or a combination thereof;
and
delivering the one or more gas streams withdrawn from the anode exhaust to one
or
more second refinery processes.
[0011] In an additional aspect, the withdrawing, from the anode exhaust, one
or more
gas streams comprising H2, H2 and CO, or a combination thereof comprises:
generating
the anode exhaust; and separating the anode exhaust to form at least one gas
stream
having a CO2 content greater than a CO2 content of the anode exhaust, and the
one or
more gas streams comprising H2; H2 and CO, or a combination thereof, the one
or
more gas stream having a CO2 content less than the CO2 content of the anode
exhaust.
[0012] In an additional aspect, the withdrawing, from the anode exhaust, one
or more
gas streams comprising H2, H2 and CO, or a combination thereof comprises:
generating
the anode exhaust; separating CO2 and H2O from the anode exhaust to form a
first gas
stream having a first volume percent of H2; separating a second gas stream
having a
second volume percent of H2 from the first gas stream, the second volume
percent of
H2 being greater than the first volume percent of H2; compressing the first
gas stream
3

=
to a first pressure; and compressing the second gas stream to a second
pressure, the second
pressure being greater than the first pressure.
[0013] In another aspect, a method for generating hydrogen in a refinery is
provided. The
method includes introducing a fuel stream comprising a reformable fuel into
the anode of a
molten carbonate fuel cell, an internal reforming element associated with the
anode, or a
combination thereof; introducing a cathode inlet stream comprising CO2 and 02
into the cathode
of the fuel cell; generating electricity within the molten carbonate fuel
cell; generating an anode
exhaust comprising H2 and CO2; separating the anode exhaust to form at least
one gas stream
having a CO2 content greater than a CO2 content of the anode exhaust, and one
or more gas
streams having a CO2 content less than the CO2 content of the anode exhaust;
and delivering
the one or more gas streams having a CO2 content less than the CO2 content of
the anode exhaust
to one or more second refinery processes.
[0014] This application is related to 21 other co-pending PCT applications,
filed on even date
herewith, and identified by the following publication application numbers and
titles: W02014/151182 entitled "Integrated Power Generation and Carbon Capture
using Fuel
Cells"; W02014/151188 entitled "Integrated Power Generation and Carbon Capture
using Fuel
Cells"; W02014/151184 entitled "Integrated Power Generation and Carbon Capture
using Fuel
Cells"; W02014/151187 entitled "Integrated Power Generation and Carbon Capture
using Fuel
Cells"; W02014/151189 entitled "Integrated Power Generation and Chemical
Production using
Fuel Cells"; W02014/151192 entitled "Integrated Power Generation and Chemical
Production
using Fuel Cells at a Reduced Electrical Efficiency"; W02014/151194 entitled
"Integrated
Power Generation and Chemical Production using Fuel Cells"; W02014/151199
entitled
"Integrated Power Generation and Chemical Production using Fuel Cells";
W02014/151191
entitled "Integrated Carbon Capture and Chemical Production using Fuel Cells";
W02014/151193 entitled "Integrated Power Generation and Chemical Production
using Fuel
Cells"; W02014/151196 entitled "Integrated Operation of Molten Carbonate Fuel
Cells";
W02014/151203 entitled "Mitigation of NOx in Integrated Power Production";
W02014/151210 entitled "Integrated Power Generation using Molten Carbonate
Fuel Cells";
W02014/151214 entitled "Integrated of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells in Fischer-
Tropsch
Synthesis"; W02014/151216 entitled "Integrated of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells
in
4
CA 2902860 2019-05-23

A
Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis"; W02014/151219 entitled "Integrated of Molten
Carbonate Fuel
Cells in Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis"; W02014/151225 entitled "Integrated of
Molten
Carbonate Fuel Cells in Methanol Synthesis"; W02014/151212 entitled
"Integrated of Molten
Carbonate Fuel Cells for Synthesis of Nitrogen Compounds"; W02014/151215
entitled
"Integrated of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells with Fermentation Processes";
W02014/151218
entitled "Integrated of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells in Iron and Steel
Processing"; and
W02014/151224 entitled "Integrated of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells in Cement
Processing".
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0015] FIG. 1 schematically shows an example of a configuration for molten
carbonate fuel
cells and associated reforming and separation stages.
[0016] FIG. 2 schematically shows another example of a configuration for
molten carbonate
fuel cells and associated reforming and separation stages.
[0017] FIG. 3 schematically shows an example of the operation of a molten
carbonate fuel
cell.
[0018] FIG. 4 schematically shows an example of a combined cycle system for
generating
electricity based on combustion of a carbon-based fuel.
[0019] FIG. 5 schematically shows an example of a combined cycle system for
generating
electricity based on combustion of a carbon-based fuel.
[0020] FIG. 6 schematically shows an example of a system for generating
hydrogen and
electrical power in a refinery setting.
[0021] FIG. 7 shows an example of process flows in a system for generating
hydrogen and
electrical power in a refinery setting.
[0022] FIG. 8 schematically shows an example of a system for generating
hydrogen and
electrical power in a refinery setting.
[0023] FIG. 9 shows an example of process flows in a system for generating
hydrogen and
electrical power in a refinery setting.
CA 2902860 2019-05-23

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
Overview
[0024] In various aspects, the operation of molten carbonate fuel cells can be
integrated with a variety of chemical and/or materials production processes.
The
production processes can correspond to production of an output from the molten
carbonate fuel cells, or the production process can consume or provide one or
more fuel
cell streams.
Integration of MCFC with Refinery Hydrogen Use and "Carbon-Free" Hydrogen
[0025] Hydrogen can be used within the refinery for a variety of processes.
Most
refineries both generate hydrogen in some processes (for example, gasoline
reforming
to produce aromatics) and use hydrogen for other processes (for example,
sulfur
removal from gasoline and diesel blending streams). Additionally, refineries
can have
a large number of boilers, furnaces and/or other systems for heating reactors
that
require energy. These heating and/or energy generation systems generally do
not utilize
hydrogen, because hydrogen can typically be more valuable than other fuel
sources,
and because most refineries are, on an overall basis, net importers of
hydrogen.
Generally, hydrogen import can be done by building on-site, and/or by
accessing
nearby/pipeline sources of hydrogen to bring the overall refinery into
balance.
[0026] Since most refinery processes typically take place at elevated
temperature and
usually require heat provided by boilers of various sorts (as well as process
steam),
refineries generally contain large numbers of heating systems. This can result
in a large
number of point sources of CO2 that can vary widely in size. Some, like cat
cracking,
can produce large amounts of CO2, while others can produce modest amounts.
Each of
these point sources of CO2 can contribute to the overall refinery CO2
production. As
most integrated refineries are typically about 70-95% thermally efficient on
an overall
basis at converting crude oil to products, typically about 5-30% of the carbon
entering
the refinery in crude oil or other inputs can be exhausted (to the air) as
CO2. Reduction
of these emissions can improve refinery greenhouse gas emissions per unit of
product
produced.
[0027] In various aspects, integration of an MCFC system with a refinery
hydrogen
supply can reduce, minimize, or eliminate hydrogen constraints on the overall
refinery
operation. Additionally or alternately, the MCFC system can use, as inputs,
any of a
6

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
wide variety of off-gasses and/or other streams, as long as they can be
converted to
"clean" light gasses and syngas mixtures. It is noted that the light gas
and/or syngas
mixtures can be used without much restriction on the amount of inerts (e.g.,
N2, CO21
and the like, and combinations thereof) present. This "input integration" can
additionally or alternately be a feature in streamlining overall efficiency in
refinery
operation. More generally, an MCFC system can provide a single integrated
solution
for up to four (or potentially more) aspects of refinery operation: production
of heat for
process units, production of hydrogen as a reactant, collection and
sequestration of
carbon, and efficient utilization of off-gases and purge streams from various
processes.
[0028] In some aspects, H2 can be used as the fuel in burners in a refinery to
reduce,
minimize, or eliminate CO2 emission point sources. A centralized supply of H2
for
both purposes can simplify overall refinery operations by reducing the number
and type
of fuels and reactants ¨ only one material can be distributed for these
purposes. For
example, hydrogen can be used at a variety of temperatures and pressures. An
MCFC
system can produce hydrogen from the anode exhaust stream after (optional)
separation
of water and CO2, and further (optional) purification through any conventional
method,
such as pressure-swing adsorption. Once purified to typical refinery
requirements, such
as a purity (on a dry basis) of at least about 80 vol% H2, or at least about
90 vol%, or at
least 95 vol% or at least 98 vol%, a hydrogen-containing stream can be
pressurized to
an appropriate pressure for process use and piped/transported to any process.
The
hydrogen-containing stream may be split into multiple streams where lower
purity
and/or lower pressure streams can be sent to some processes or burners, while
higher
purity and/or higher pressure streams can be sent to other processes.
[0029] The integrated system can additionally or alternately, but typically
advantageously, produce electricity. The electrical production may be used to
at least
partially power MCFC-related systems, such as separation systems or
compressors, as
well as to power at least a portion (such as up to all) of the refinery
electrical demand.
This electricity can be produced at relatively high efficiency with little or
no
transmission losses. Additionally, some or all of the electricity can
optionally be direct
current (DC) electricity, for instance where DC power could be preferred for
the
operation of some systems without the normal losses in transformers/inverters.
In some
aspects, an MCFC system can be sized so that at least a portion (or all) of
the power
7

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
needed by the refinery can be provided, or even so that excess power can be
provided.
Additionally or alternately, the MCFC system can be sized to a desired H2/heat
load
and/or to the electrical load. Furthermore, the system can be operated over a
range of
conditions, allowing for variable amounts of both electrical and hydrogen
demand.
[0030] At least a portion of the refinery processes that produce CO2 can be
collected
and used as some or all of the gasses for the cathode inlet, such as a
majority of the
CO2 production processes or all of the CO2 production processes. If necessary,
these
gases can be mixed with air or other oxygen containing streams to comprise a
gas
mixture with both CO2 and oxygen appropriate for the cathode inlet. Fuel
constituents
present in these streams can typically be burned with excess oxygen/air to
provide
preheating of the cathode inlet. The CO2 concentration of the overall cathode
inlet can
vary widely, and can typically be at least about 4 vol%, such as at least
about 6 vol%, at
least about 8 vol%, or at least about 10 vol%. If the collected streams do not
contain
sufficient CO2 concentrations for MCFC operations (or even if so), then CO2
produced
in the separation of the anode exhaust and/or from one or more off-gas or
purge streams
from the separation process can be recycled to the cathode inlet. Heating for
the
cathode inlet streams may come from combustion of off-gases in these streams,
heat
exchange, and/or addition of combustible fuel components. For example, in some
aspects the MCFC system can use high carbon materials, like coke or petcoke,
and/or
other "bottoms" from petroleum processes, to provide heat for inlet streams
where the
combustion products from those materials can be used as a CO2 source for the
cathode.
[0031] Additionally or alternately, at least a portion of the CO2 for the
cathode inlet
stream can be provided by a combustion turbine, such as a turbine that can use
methane/natural gas as a fuel. In this type of configuration, CO2 generated by
processes such as catalytic cracking may not be mitigated, but CO2 generated
by
heaters, boilers, and/or other burners can be reduced or minimized by using H2
generated by the MCFC.
[0032] The anode outlet stream can contain a large concentration of carbon
dioxide as
well as other syngas components. Typically, CO2 can be removed from this
stream
efficiently to produce a CO2 product that can be used for a variety of other
processes.
As a significant fraction of the carbon dioxide produced from the refinery can
exit from
an MCFC anode, collection of CO2 can be efficient and greatly simplified. The
8

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
collection of CO2 as a single point source can then be used for other
operations (e.g.,
EOR if near oil fields, re-injection to gas wells) and/or can be
captured/sequestered.
The removal of a majority of the entire CO2 load, such as at least about 70%,
or at least
about 80%, for both H2 production and electricity use, can substantially lower
the
greenhouse gas impact of refinery operations and can improve overall refinery
efficiency (conversion of crude to products) by adding a high-efficiency
source of
electricity, hydrogen, and heat within a single process.
[0033] In aspects where an MCFC system is integrated with the hydrogen
delivery
system in a refinery, the anode input for the MCFC system can be selected from
a large
variety of materials available from various refinery processes, such as light
gasses pre-
reformed to reduce C2+; methane; gasified heavy materials like gasified coke
or
bitumen; syngas; and/or any other hydrocarbonaceous material that can be
cleaned of
sulfur and other harmful impurities; as well as combinations thereof. Thus,
the MCFC
system, with proper pre-cleanup, can act as a "disposal" for all sorts of
inputs which
might otherwise not have an efficient or effective use in the refinery.
Instead of
eventually being exhausted to the atmosphere, optionally after being burned as
a fuel, a
predominant amount of the carbon in these "waste", "purge", or other
undesirable
streams can be effectively concentrated/captured as separated CO2 by the
system. The
cathode input can be or comprise any refinery stream containing CO2 off-gasses
plus
any recycle from the anode exhaust or burned fresh methane that might be used
for heat
exchange. Most refineries have a wide variety of processes operating at
various
temperatures, so appropriate refinery processes can be selected for some heat
integration to manage, for example, clean-up cooling and heating. The cathode
exhaust
can generally be exhausted to the atmosphere. The anode exhaust can be used as
is,
optionally after separation of some components, and /or can undergo both
separation
and water-gas shift to produce a stream that is nearly all H2. The high H2
content
stream can be purified to a desired level for various reactive processes,
while
combustion H2 can contain greater levels of residual CO, CO2, and so forth, as
combustion of such a stream can still result in reduced emissions of carbon
oxides
relative to combustion of a hydrocarbonaceous fuel. CO, separated from the
anode
exhaust can optionally be recycled, for example, for use as an input to the
cathode.
Additionally or alternately, feeds to the anode can include those with large
CO2
9

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
impurities such as natural gas with a large CO2 content. For normal refinery
operations
this type of stream could increase the CO2 emissions from the refinery when
used for
either heat or hydrogen generation. When fed to the anode of an MCFC system,
however, the separation stage(s) can effectively remove this additional CO2 as
part of
removal of other CO2 in the anode exhaust.
[0034] An additional difficulty in capturing carbon from the disparate CO2
sources in
a refinery can be the low concentration of the CO2 often present in the
refinery streams.
In general, the energy required for separation of the CO2 from the gas stream
is highly
dependent on the concentration of CO2 in the stream. For processes that
generate gas
streams with low CO2 concentrations, such as CO2 concentrations of about 10
vol% or
less, substantial energy can be required to separate CO2 from a stream to form
a high
purity CO2 stream. By contrast, in some aspects, a feature of an MCFC
containing
system can be that CO2 can be transferred from a relatively low concentration
stream
(such as a cathode inlet stream) to a relatively high concentration stream
(such as an
anode exhaust). This can reduce the energy requirements for forming a high
purity CO2
gas stream. As a result, an MCFC can provide substantial energy savings when
attempting to form, for example, a CO2-containing stream for sequestration.
[0035] Output electricity generated by the MCFC directly can typically be as
DC
power, but can be configured to produce any convenient mix of DC and/or AC
power at
a variety of current and voltage settings. Typically, a power plant / input
electrical for a
refinery can be a common high voltage AC current (e.g. ¨960V). Due to the way
molten carbonate fuel cells are constructed, one can produce essentially any
DC
current/voltage and, with inversion, a variety of AC voltages. DC, produced
locally,
should not suffer transmission losses typical of long-distance power lines and
should
not require inverters, at considerable cost and some efficiency loss. This can
provide
some flexibility in designing compressors, pumps, and other components and/or
can
eliminate a number of grid and/or local electrical inefficiencies.
[0036] In addition to use within a refinery, hydrogen can be more generally
useful for
a wide variety of products and processes, as it produces only water vapor on
combustion. However, most conventional approaches to making hydrogen require
large
emissions of carbon. For example, production of hydrogen from steam reforming
of
methane can typically produce CO2 (from the carbon in the methane) and waste
heat.

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
Production of hydrogen from electrolysis can require electricity that can
typically be
derived from a mixture of fossil fuel production to the electrical grid. These
production
systems can all result in effluent exhausts comprising CO2. The effluents, if
carbon
capture is required, would typically entail separate carbon capture systems at
those
various sources, without any convenient integration into wider refinery
operations.
Typically, these sources can actually be outside of the refinery gates,
allowing for little
or no synergistic production consumption of the various chemical, electrical,
and heat
inputs and outputs.
[0037] Additionally or alternately, MCFC containing systems according to the
invention can provide the means to separate CO2 efficiently from the process
as an
integral part of the separation and hydrogen purification steps. The CO2 can
then be
captured, and/or used for other useful processes. This can occur at high
overall system
efficiency ¨ far higher than conventional means of producing net hydrogen
export,
especially at small scale and under variable load.
[0038] The use of a MCFC system for hydrogen production for use in subsequent
processes that may generate electrical power or heat can allow for relatively
low-
emission production at relatively high efficiency and with low (minimum)
carbon
emissions. The MCFC system can dynamically respond to varying needs for
hydrogen
by adjusting the ratio of chemical energy production to electrical energy
production and
can be ideal for uses where loads and demands may not be approximately
constant ¨
varying from pure electrical production with no excess hydrogen to high
hydrogen
production. Furthermore, the integrated MCFC system can be scaled over a wider
range
of applications with relatively high efficiency than larger scale systems such
as
methane steam reformers.
[0039] The MCFC ¨ hydrogen production system can have an advantage that
repurposing the hydrogen for fuel value can produce lower net CO2 emissions
than
conventional systems without carbon capture and can produce far lower
emissions with
use of the inherent system CO2 separation. This can be valuable in a variety
of
applications. Hydrogen can be produced for fuel cell vehicles that can use low
temperature/low pressure hydrogen. The amount of hydrogen and electricity can
be
varied depending on overall demand maintaining overall high system efficiency.
Hydrogen for export into boilers and/or other combined heat and power systems
can
11

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
allow for the constant production of electricity, e.g., in stand-alone
generation, along
with a variable amount of carbon-free heat via the production of hydrogen with
subsequent combustion in heater / boiler and similar systems. For example, an
installation could produce primarily electricity in the summer for air
conditioning
systems while switching to a mix of primarily chemical energy in the winter
for heating
operations. Other applications can include systems designed to provide on-site
hydrogen such as in laboratories and other technical and manufacturing
facilities where
some hydrogen can be beneficial along with a need for electrical energy.
[0040] In aspects involving hydrogen production and/or electrical power
generation,
the anode inlet can be fed by fresh methane, another suitable hydrocarbon
fuel, and/or
the combination of fresh fuel and recycled CO and/or H2 from the various
processes.
The anode outlet stream comprising H2 and/or CO can provide the components to
produce hydrogen. This can typically be done through some combination of
reaction,
separation, and purification steps. An example would be a first stage
employing water-
gas shift to shift as much CO as possible to H2 by the reaction H20 + CO = H2
+ CO2,
followed by a second (and subsequent) stage(s) that remove H20 and CO2 from
the H2,
and provide a suitable purity product. Such stages can include PSA, cryogenic
separation, membranes, and other known separation methods, either individually
or in
combination. The off-gasses from these steps can be recycled and/or used to
provide
heat for inlet streams. The separated CO2 can be used as a recycle stream
and/or can be
captured and/or used for other processes. The cathode inlet can be composed of
recycled CO2 from the overall process and/or CO, produced by the combustion of
fresh (or recycled) fuel used to provide heat to the inlet streams. The
cathode effluent
can typically be exhausted to the atmosphere, optionally but preferably after
heat
recovery to, for example, provide heat for other process streams and/or in
combined
cycled electrical production, though the cathode effluent could optionally but
less
preferably be sent for further treatment, if desired.
[0041] MCFC systems integrated into carbon-free heat and power applications
can be
used over a range of operating conditions ranging from fuel utilizations with
lower
hydrogen make (e.g., 60-70%) to lower fuel utilizations (e.g., 20-30%) for
high
hydrogen production. The exact operational range of an individual application
may
vary widely both by application and over time. The ability to adapt to this
operational
12

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
range can be a desirable advantage. The number of separation stages and/or the
purity
achieved can depend on the ultimate application. Simple production of hydrogen
for
low-emissions heat can be tolerant to modest impurities in the hydrogen, as
even a few
percent CO2 and/or CO could still result in very low overall emissions. High
purification applications such as fuel cell vehicles and/or hydrogen for
laboratories may
require multiple steps (e.g. cryogenic separation followed by PSA) to achieve
purity
specifications.
[0042] As an example of providing hydrogen to multiple refinery processes, an
MCFC can be operated to generate electricity and an anode exhaust that
contains H2,
CO2, and H20. One or more separations can be used to separate CO2 and/or H20
from
the anode exhaust (or alternatively from a gas stream derived from the anode
exhaust).
This can result in a first gas stream having an increased volume percent of H2
relative
to the anode exhaust. A separation can then be performed on the first gas
stream to
form a second gas stream with an even higher volume percentage of H2 than the
first
gas stream. The remaining portion of the first gas stream can then be
compressed to a
first pressure for use in a process with less stringent requirements for
hydrogen, while
the second gas stream can be compressed to a second (higher) pressure for use
in a
process requiring a higher pressure and/or higher purity hydrogen input.
Additional Fuel Cell Operation Strategies
[0043] As an addition, complement, and/or alternative to the fuel cell
operating
strategies described herein, a molten carbonate fuel cell can be operated so
that the
amount of reforming can be selected relative to the amount of oxidation in
order to
achieve a desired thermal ratio for the fuel cell. As used herein, the
"thermal ratio" is
defined as the heat produced by exothermic reactions in a fuel cell assembly
divided by
the endothermic heat demand of reforming reactions occurring within the fuel
cell
assembly. Expressed mathematically, the thermal ratio (TH) = QEx/QEN, where
QEx is
the sum of heat produced by exothermic reactions and QFN is the sum of heat
consumed
by the endothermic reactions occurring within the fuel cell. Note that the
heat produced
by the exothermic reactions corresponds to any heat due to reforming
reactions, water
gas shift reactions, and the electrochemical reactions in the cell. The heat
generated by
the electrochemical reactions can be calculated based on the ideal
electrochemical
potential of the fuel cell reaction across the electrolyte minus the actual
output voltage
13

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
of the fuel cell. For example, the ideal electrochemical potential of the
reaction in a
MCFC is believed to be about 1.04V based on the net reaction that occurs in
the cell.
During operation of the MCFC, the cell will typically have an output voltage
less than
1.04 V due to various losses. For example, a common output/operating voltage
can be
about 0.7 V. The heat generated is equal to the electrochemical potential of
the cell
(i.e. ¨1.04V) minus the operating voltage. For example, the heat produced by
the
electrochemical reactions in the cell is ¨0.34 V when the output voltage of
¨0.7V.
Thus, in this scenario, the electrochemical reactions would produce ¨0.7 V of
electricity and ¨0.34 V of heat energy. In such an example, the ¨0.7 V of
electrical
energy is not included as part of ()Ex. In other words, heat energy is not
electrical
energy.
[0044] In various aspects, a thermal ratio can be determined for any
convenient fuel
cell structure, such as a fuel cell stack, an individual fuel cell within a
fuel cell stack, a
fuel cell stack with an integrated reforming stage, a fuel cell stack with an
integrated
endothermic reaction stage, or a combination thereof. The thermal ratio may
also be
calculated for different units within a fuel cell stack, such as an assembly
of fuel cells
or fuel cell stacks. For example, the thermal ratio may be calculated for a
single anode
within a single fuel cell, an anode section within a fuel cell stack, or an
anode section
within a fuel cell stack along with integrated reforming stages and/or
integrated
endothermic reaction stage elements in sufficiently close proximity to the
anode section
to be integrated from a heat integration standpoint. As used herein, "an anode
section"
comprises anodes within a fuel cell stack that share a common inlet or outlet
manifold.
[0045] In various aspects of the invention, the operation of the fuel cells
can be
characterized based on a thermal ratio. Where fuel cells are operated to have
a desired
thermal ratio, a molten carbonate fuel cell can be operated to have a thermal
ratio of
about 1.5 or less, for example about 1.3 or less, or about 1.15 or less, or
about 1.0 or
less, or about 0.95 or less, or about 0.90 or less, or about 0.85 or less, or
about 0.80 or
less, or about 0.75 or less. Additionally or alternately, the thermal ratio
can be at least
about 0.25, or at least about 0.35, or at least about 0.45, or at least about
0.50.
Additionally or alternately, in some aspects the fuel cell can be operated to
have a
temperature rise between anode input and anode output of about 40 C or less,
such as
about 20 C or less, or about 10 C or less. Further additionally or
alternately, the fuel
14

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
cell can be operated to have an anode outlet temperature that is from about 10
C lower
to about 10 C higher than the temperature of the anode inlet. Still further
additionally
or alternately, the fuel cell can be operated to have an anode inlet
temperature that is
greater than the anode outlet temperature, such as at least about 5 C greater,
or at least
about 10 C greater, or at least about 20 C greater, or at least about 25 C
greater. Yet
still further additionally or alternately, the fuel cell can be operated to
have an anode
inlet temperature that is greater than the anode outlet temperature by about
100 C or
less, such as by about 80 C or less, or about 60 C or less, or about 50 C or
less, or
about 40 C or less, or about 30 C or less, or about 20 C or less.
[0046] As an addition, complement, and/or alternative to the fuel cell
operating
strategies described herein, a molten carbonate fuel cell (such as a fuel cell
assembly)
can be operated with increased production of syngas (or hydrogen) while also
reducing
or minimizing the amount of CO, exiting the fuel cell in the cathode exhaust
stream.
Syngas can be a valuable input for a variety of processes. In addition to
having fuel
value, syngas can be used as a raw material for forming other higher value
products,
such as by using syngas as an input for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and/or
methanol
synthesis processes. One option for making syngas can be to reform a
hydrocarbon or
hydrocarbon-like fuel, such as methane or natural gas. For many types of
industrial
processes, a syngas having a ratio of H2 to CO of close to 2:1 (or even lower)
can often
be desirable. A water gas shift reaction can be used to reduce the H, to CO
ratio in a
syngas if additional CO, is available, such as is produced in the anodes.
[0047] One way of characterizing the overall benefit provided by integrating
syngas
generation with use of molten carbonate fuel cells can be based on a ratio of
the net
amount of syngas that exits the fuel cells in the anode exhaust relative to
the amount of
CO2 that exits the fuel cells in the cathode exhaust. This characterization
measures the
effectiveness of producing power with low emissions and high efficiency (both
electrical and chemical). In this description, the net amount of syngas in an
anode
exhaust is defined as the combined number of moles of H2 and number of moles
of CO
present in the anode exhaust, offset by the amount of H2 and CO present in the
anode
inlet. Because the ratio is based on the net amount of syngas in the anode
exhaust,
simply passing excess H2 into the anode does not change the value of the
ratio.
However, H2 and/or CO generated due to reforming in the anode and/or in an
internal

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
reforming stage associated with the anode can lead to higher values of the
ratio.
Hydrogen oxidized in the anode can lower the ratio. It is noted that the water
gas shift
reaction can exchange H2 for CO, so the combined moles of H2 and CO represents
the
total potential syngas in the anode exhaust, regardless of the eventual
desired ratio of
H2 to CO in a syngas. The syngas content of the anode exhaust (H2 + CO) can
then be
compared with the CO, content of the cathode exhaust. This can provide a type
of
efficiency value that can also account for the amount of carbon capture. This
can
equivalently be expressed as an equation as
Ratio of net syngas in anode exhaust to cathode CO2 = net moles of (H2 +
CO)ANoDE /
moles of (CO2)cAIHODE
[0048] In various aspects, the ratio of net moles of syngas in the anode
exhaust to the
moles of CO2 in the cathode exhaust can be at least about 2.0, such as at
least about
3.0, or at least about 4.0, or at least about 5Ø In some aspects, the ratio
of net syngas
in the anode exhaust to the amount of CO2 in the cathode exhaust can be still
higher,
such as at least about 10.0, or at least about 15.0, or at least about 20Ø
Ratio values of
about 40.0 or less, such as about 30.0 or less, or about 20.0 or less, can
additionally or
alternately be achieved. In aspects where the amount of CO2 at the cathode
inlet is
about 6.0 volume % or less, such as about 5.0 volume % or less, ratio values
of at least
about 1.5 may be sufficient/realistic. Such molar ratio values of net syngas
in the
anode exhaust to the amount of CO2 in the cathode exhaust can be greater than
the
values for conventionally operated fuel cells.
[0049] As an addition, complement, and/or alternative to the fuel cell
operating
strategies described herein, a molten carbonate fuel cell (such as a fuel cell
assembly)
can be operated at a reduced fuel utilization value, such as a fuel
utilization of about
50% or less, while also having a high CO, utilization value, such as at least
about 60%.
In this type of configuration, the molten carbonate fuel cell can be effective
for carbon
capture, as the CO2 utilization can advantageously be sufficiently high.
Rather than
attempting to maximize electrical efficiency, in this type of configuration
the total
efficiency of the fuel cell can be improved or increased based on the combined
electrical and chemical efficiency. The chemical efficiency can be based on
withdrawal of a hydrogen and/or syngas stream from the anode exhaust as an
output for
use in other processes. Even though the electrical efficiency may be reduced
relative to
16

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
some conventional configurations, making use of the chemical energy output in
the
anode exhaust can allow for a desirable total efficiency for the fuel cell.
[0050] In various aspects, the fuel utilization in the fuel cell anode can be
about 50%
or less, such as about 40% or less, or about 30% or less, or about 25% or
less, or about
20% or less. In various aspects, in order to generate at least some electric
power, the
fuel utilization in the fuel cell can be at least about 5%, such as at least
about 10%, or at
least about 15%, or at least about 20%, or at least about 25%, or at least
about 30%.
Additionally or alternatively, the CO, utilization can be at least about 60%,
such as at
least about 65%, or at least about 70%, or at least about 75%.
[0051] As an addition, complement, and/or alternative to the fuel cell
operating
strategies described herein, a molten carbonate fuel cell can be operated at
conditions
that increase or maximize syngas production, possibly at the detriment of
electricity
production and electrical efficiency. Instead of selecting the operating
conditions of a
fuel cell to improve or maximize the electrical efficiency of the fuel cell,
operating
conditions, possibly including an amount of reformable fuel passed into the
anode, can
be established to increase the chemical energy output of the fuel cell. These
operating
conditions can result in a lower electrical efficiency of the fuel cell.
Despite the
reduced electrical efficiency, optionally, but preferably, the operating
conditions can
lead to an increase in the total efficiency of the fuel cell, which is based
on the
combined electrical efficiency and chemical efficiency of the fuel cell. By
increasing
the ratio of reformable fuel introduced into the anode to the fuel that is
actually
electrochemically oxidized at the anode, the chemical energy content in the
anode
output can be increased.
[0052] In some aspects, the reformable hydrogen content of reformable fuel in
the
input stream delivered to the anode and/or to a reforming stage associated
with the
anode can be at least about 50% greater than the net amount of hydrogen
reacted at the
anode, such as at least about 75% greater or at least about 100% greater.
Additionally
or alternately, the reformable hydrogen content of fuel in the input stream
delivered to
the anode and/or to a reforming stage associated with the anode can be at
least about
50% greater than the net amount of hydrogen reacted at the anode, such as at
least
about 75% greater or at least about 100% greater. In various aspects, a ratio
of the
reformable hydrogen content of the reformable fuel in the fuel stream relative
to an
17

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCT/1JS2014/025208
amount of hydrogen reacted in the anode can be at least about 1.5 : 1, or at
least about
2.0 : 1, or at least about 2.5 : 1, or at least about 3.0 : 1. Additionally or
alternately, the
ratio of reformable hydrogen content of the reformable fuel in the fuel stream
relative
to the amount of hydrogen reacted in the anode can be about 20 : 1 or less,
such as
about 15 : 1 or less or about 10 : 1 or less. In one aspect, it is
contemplated that less
than 100% of the reformable hydrogen content in the anode inlet stream can be
converted to hydrogen. For example, at least about 80% of the reformable
hydrogen
content in an anode inlet stream can be converted to hydrogen in the anode
and/or in an
associated reforming stage(s), such as at least about 85%, or at least about
90%.
Additionally or alternately, the amount of reformable fuel delivered to the
anode can be
characterized based on the Lower Heating Value (LHV) of the reformable fuel
relative
to the LHV of the hydrogen oxidized in the anode. This can be referred to as a
reformable fuel surplus ratio. In various aspects, the reformable fuel surplus
ratio can
be at least about 2.0, such as at least about 2.5, or at least about 3.0, or
at least about
4Ø Additionally or alternately, the reforniable fuel surplus ratio can be
about 25.0 or
less, such as about 20.0 or less, or about 15.0 or less, or about 10.0 or
less.
[0053] As an addition, complement, and/or alternative to the fuel cell
operating
strategies described herein, a molten carbonate fuel cell (such as a fuel cell
assembly)
can also be operated at conditions that can improve or optimize the combined
electrical
efficiency and chemical efficiency of the fuel cell. Instead of selecting
conventional
conditions for maximizing the electrical efficiency of a fuel cell, the
operating
conditions can allow for output of excess synthesis gas and/or hydrogen in the
anode
exhaust of the fuel cell. The synthesis gas and/or hydrogen can then be used
in a
variety of applications, including chemical synthesis processes and collection
of
hydrogen for use as a "clean" fuel. In aspects of the invention, electrical
efficiency can
be reduced to achieve a high overall efficiency, which includes a chemical
efficiency
based on the chemical energy value of syngas and/or hydrogen produced relative
to the
energy value of the fuel input for the fuel cell.
[0054] In some aspects, the operation of the fuel cells can be characterized
based on
electrical efficiency. Where fuel cells are operated to have a low electrical
efficiency
(EE), a molten carbonate fuel cell can be operated to have an electrical
efficiency of
about 40% or less, for example, about 35% EE or less, about 30% EE or less,
about
18

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
25% EE or less, or about 20% EE or less, about 15% EE or less, or about 10% EE
or
less. Additionally or alternately, the EE can be at least about 5%, or at
least about 10%,
or at least about 15%, or at least about 20%. Further additionally or
alternately, the
operation of the fuel cells can be characterized based on total fuel cell
efficiency
(TFCE), such as a combined electrical efficiency and chemical efficiency of
the fuel
cell(s). Where fuel cells are operated to have a high total fuel cell
efficiency, a molten
carbonate fuel cell can be operated to have a TFCE (and/or combined electrical
efficiency and chemical efficiency) of about 55% or more, for example, about
60% or
more, or about 65% or more, or about 70% or more, or about 75% or more, or
about
80% or more, or about 85% or more. It is noted that for a total fuel cell
efficiency
and/or combined electrical efficiency and chemical efficiency, any additional
electricity
generated from use of excess heat generated by the fuel cell can be excluded
from the
efficiency calculation.
[0055] In various aspects of the invention, the operation of the fuel cells
can be
characterized based on a desired electrical efficiency of about 40% or less
and a desired
total fuel cell efficiency of about 55% or more. Where fuel cells are operated
to have a
desired electrical efficiency and a desired total fuel cell efficiency, a
molten carbonate
fuel cell can be operated to have an electrical efficiency of about 40% or
less with a
TFCE of about 55% or more, for example, about 35% EE or less with about a TFCE
of
60% or more, about 30% EE or less with about a TFCE of about 65% or more,
about
25% EE or less with about a 70% TFCE or more, or about 20% EE or less with
about a
TFCE of 75% or more, about 15% EE or less with about a TFCE of 80% or more, or
about 10% EE or less with about a TFCE of about 85% or more.
[0056] As an addition, complement, and/or alternative to the fuel cell
operating
strategies described herein, a molten carbonate fuel cell (such as a fuel cell
assembly)
can be operated at conditions that can provide increased power density. The
power
density of a fuel cell corresponds to the actual operating voltage VA
multiplied by the
current density I. For a molten carbonate fuel cell operating at a voltage VA,
the fuel
cell also can tend to generate waste heat, the waste heat defined as (Vo ¨
VA)*I based
on the differential between VA and the ideal voltage Vo for a fuel cell
providing current
density I. A portion of this waste heat can be consumed by reforming of a
reformable
fuel within the anode of the fuel cell. The remaining portion of this waste
heat can be
19

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
absorbed by the surrounding fuel cell structures and gas flows, resulting in a
temperature differential across the fuel cell. Under conventional operating
conditions,
the power density of a fuel cell can be limited based on the amount of waste
heat that
the fuel cell can tolerate without compromising the integrity of the fuel
cell.
[0057] In various aspects, the amount of waste heat that a fuel cell can
tolerate can be
increased by performing an effective amount of an endothermic reaction within
the fuel
cell. One example of an endothermic reaction includes steam reforming of a
reformable fuel within a fuel cell anode and/or in an associated reforming
stage, such as
an integrated reforming stage in a fuel cell stack. By providing additional
reformable
fuel to the anode of the fuel cell (or to an integrated / associated reforming
stage),
additional reforming can be performed so that additional waste heat can be
consumed.
This can reduce the amount of temperature differential across the fuel cell,
thus
allowing the fuel cell to operate under an operating condition with an
increased amount
of waste heat. The loss of electrical efficiency can be offset by the creation
of an
additional product stream, such as syngas and/or H2, that can be used for
various
purposes including additional electricity generation further expanding the
power range
of the system.
[0058] In various aspects, the amount of waste heat generated by a fuel cell,
(Vo ¨
VA)*I as defined above, can be at least about 30 mW/cm2, such as at least
about 40
mW/cm2, or at least about 50 mW/cm2, or at least about 60 mW/cm2, or at least
about
70 mW/cm2, or at least about 80 mW/cm2, or at least about 100 mW/cm2, or at
least
about 120 mW/cm2, or at least about 140 mW/cm2, or at least about 160 mW/cm2,
or at
least about 180 mW/cm2. Additionally or alternately, the amount of waste heat
generated by a fuel cell can be less than about 250 mW/cm2, such as less than
about
200 mW/cm2, or less than about 180 mW/cm2, or less than about 165 mW/cm2, or
less
than about 150 mW/cm2.
[0059] Although the amount of waste heat being generated can be relatively
high,
such waste heat may not necessarily represent operating a fuel cell with poor
efficiency.
Instead, the waste heat can be generated due to operating a fuel cell at an
increased
power density. Part of improving the power density of a fuel cell can include
operating
the fuel cell at a sufficiently high current density. In various aspects, the
current
density generated by the fuel cell can be at least about 150 mA/cm2, such as
at least

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
about 160 mA/cm2, or at least about 170 mA/cm2, or at least about 180 mA/cm2,
or at
least about 190 mA/cm2, or at least about 200 mA/cm2, or at least about 225
mA/cm2,
or at least about 250 mA/cm2. Additionally or alternately, the current density
generated
by the fuel cell can be about 500 mA/cm2 or less, such as 450 mA/cm2, or less,
or 400
mA/cm2, or less or 350 mA/cm2, or less or 300 mA/cm2 or less.
[0060] In various aspects, to allow a fuel cell to be operated with increased
power
generation and increased generation of waste heat, an effective amount of an
endothermic reaction (such as a reforming reaction) can be performed.
Alternatively,
other endothermic reactions unrelated to anode operations can be used to
utilize the
waste heat by interspersing "plates" or stages into the fuel cell array that
arc in thermal
communication but not fluid communication. The effective amount of the
endothermic
reaction can be performed in an associated reforming stage, an integrated
reforming
stage, an integrated stack element for performing an endothermic reaction, or
a
combination thereof. The effective amount of the endothermic reaction can
correspond
to an amount sufficient to reduce the temperature rise from the fuel cell
inlet to the fuel
cell outlet to about 100 C or less, such as about 90 C or less, or about 80 C
or less, or
about 70 C or less, or about 60 C or less, or about 50 C or less, or about 40
C or less,
or about 30 C or less. Additionally or alternately, the effective amount of
the
endothermic reaction can correspond to an amount sufficient to cause a
temperature
decrease from the fuel cell inlet to the fuel cell outlet of about 100 C or
less, such as
about 90 C or less, or about 80 C or less, or about 70 C or less, or about 60
C or less,
or about 50 C or less, or about 40 C or less, or about 30 C or less, or about
20 C or
less, or about 10 C or less. A temperature decrease from the fuel cell inlet
to the fuel
cell outlet can occur when the effective amount of the endothermic reaction
exceeds the
waste heat generated. Additionally or alternately, this can correspond to
having the
endothermic reaction(s) (such as a combination of reforming and another
endothermic
reaction) consume at least about 40% of the waste heat generated by the fuel
cell, such
as consuming at least about 50% of the waste heat, or at least about 60% of
the waste
heat, or at least about 75% of the waste heat. Further additionally or
alternately, the
endothermic reaction(s) can consume about 95% of the waste heat or less, such
as
about 90% of the waste heat or less, or about 85% of the waste heat or less.
21

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
[0061] As an addition, complement, and/or alternative to the fuel cell
operating
strategies described herein, a molten carbonate fuel cell (such as a fuel cell
assembly)
can be operated at conditions corresponding to a decreased operating voltage
and a low
fuel utilization. In various aspects, the fuel cell can be operated at a
voltage VA of less
than about 0.7 Volts, for example less than about 0.68 V, less than about 0.67
V, less
than about 0.66 V, or about 0.65 V or less. Additionally or alternatively, the
fuel cell
can be operated at a voltage VA of at least about 0.60, for example at least
about 0.61,
at least about 0.62, or at least about 0.63. In so doing, energy that would
otherwise
leave the fuel cell as electrical energy at high voltage can remain within the
cell as heat
as the voltage is lowered. This additional heat can allow for increased
endothermic
reactions to occur, for example increasing the CH4 conversion to syngas.
Definitions
[0062] Syngas: In this description, syngas is defined as mixture of H2 and CO
in any
ratio. Optionally, H2O and/or CO2 may be present in the syngas. Optionally,
inert
compounds (such as nitrogen) and residual reformable fuel compounds may be
present
in the syngas. If components other than H2 and CO are present in the syngas,
the
combined volume percentage of H2 and CO in the syngas can be at least 25 vol%
relative to the total volume of the syngas, such as at least 40 vol%, or at
least 50 vol%,
or at least 60 vol%. Additionally or alternately, the combined volume
percentage of H2
and CO in the syngas can be 100 vol% or less, such as 95 vol% or less or 90
vol% or
less.
[0063] Reformable fuel: A reformable fuel is defined as a fuel that contains
carbon-
hydrogen bonds that can be reformed to generate H2. Hydrocarbons are examples
of
reformable fuels, as are other hydrocarbonaceous compounds such as alcohols.
Although CO and H20 can participate in a water gas shift reaction to form
hydrogen,
CO is not considered a reformable fuel under this definition.
[0064] Reformable hydrogen content: The reformable hydrogen content of a fuel
is
defined as the number of H2 molecules that can be derived from a fuel by
reforming the
fuel and then driving the water gas shift reaction to completion to maximize
Hi
production. It is noted that H2 by definition has a reformable hydrogen
content of 1,
although Hi itself is not defined as a reformable fuel herein. Similarly, CO
has a
reformable hydrogen content of 1. Although CO is not strictly reformable,
driving the
22

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
water gas shift reaction to completion will result in exchange of a CO for an
H2. As
examples of reformable hydrogen content for reformable fuels, the reformable
hydrogen content of methane is 4 H2 molecules while the reformable hydrogen
content
of ethane is 7 H2 molecules. More generally, if a fuel has the composition
CxHyOz,
then the reformable hydrogen content of the fuel at 100% reforming and water-
gas shift
is n(H2 max reforming) = 2x + y/2 ¨ z. Based on this definition, fuel
utilization within
a cell can then be expressed as n(H2 ox)/n(H2 max reforming). Of course, the
reformable hydrogen content of a mixture of components can be determined based
on
the reformable hydrogen content of the individual components. The reformable
hydrogen content of compounds that contain other heteroatoms, such as oxygen,
sulfur
or nitrogen, can also be calculated in a similar manner.
[0065] Oxidation Reaction: In this discussion, the oxidation reaction within
the
anode of a fuel cell is defined as the reaction corresponding to oxidation of
H2 by
reaction with C032- to form f120 and CO2. It is noted that the reforming
reaction
within the anode, where a compound containing a carbon-hydrogen bond is
converted
into H2 and CO or CO2, is excluded from this definition of the oxidation
reaction in the
anode. The water-gas shift reaction is similarly outside of this definition of
the
oxidation reaction. It is further noted that references to a combustion
reaction are
defined as references to reactions where H2 or a compound containing carbon-
hydrogen bond(s) are reacted with 02 to form H20 and carbon oxides in a non-
electrochemical burner, such as the combustion zone of a combustion-powered
generator.
[0066] Aspects of the invention can adjust anode fuel parameters to achieve a
desired
operating range for the fuel cell. Anode fuel parameters can be characterized
directly,
and/or in relation to other fuel cell processes in the form of one or more
ratios. For
example, the anode fuel parameters can be controlled to achieve one or more
ratios
including a fuel utilization, a fuel cell heating value utilization, a fuel
surplus ratio, a
reformable fuel surplus ratio, a reformable hydrogen content fuel ratio, and
combinations thereof.
[0067] Fuel utilization: Fuel utilization is an option for characterizing
operation of
the anode based on the amount of oxidized fuel relative to the reformable
hydrogen
content of an input stream can be used to define a fuel utilization for a fuel
cell. In this
23

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
discussion, "fuel utilization" is defined as the ratio of the amount of
hydrogen oxidized
in the anode for production of electricity (as described above) versus the
reformable
hydrogen content of the anode input (including any associated reforming
stages).
Reformable hydrogen content has been defined above as the number of H2
molecules
that can be derived from a fuel by reforming the fuel and then driving the
water gas
shift reaction to completion to maximize H2 production. For example, each
methane
introduced into an anode and exposed to steam reforming conditions results in
generation of the equivalent of 4 H2 molecules at max production. (Depending
on the
reforming and/or anode conditions, the reforming product can correspond to a
non-
water gas shifted product, where one or more of the H2 molecules is present
instead in
the form of a CO molecule.) Thus, methane is defined as having a reformable
hydrogen content of 4 H2 molecules. As another example, under this definition
ethane
has a reformable hydrogen content of 7 H2 molecules.
[0068] The utilization of fuel in the anode can also be characterized by
defining a
heating value utilization based on a ratio of the Lower Heating Value of
hydrogen
oxidized in the anode due to the fuel cell anode reaction relative to the
Lower Heating
Value of all fuel delivered to the anode and/or a reforming stage associated
with the
anode. The "fuel cell heating value utilization" as used herein can be
computed using
the flow rates and Lower Heating Value (LHV) of the fuel components entering
and
leaving the fuel cell anode. As such, fuel cell heating value utilization can
be computed
as (LHV(anode in) ¨ LHV(anode_out))/LHV(anode_in), where LHV(anode_in) and
LHV(anode_out) refer to the LHV of the fuel components (such as H2, CH4,
and/or
CO) in the anode inlet and outlet streams or flows, respectively. In this
definition, the
LHV of a stream or flow may be computed as a sum of values for each fuel
component
in the input and/or output stream. The contribution of each fuel component to
the sum
can correspond to the fuel component's flow rate (e.g., mol/hr) multiplied by
the fuel
component's LHV (e.g., joules/mol).
[0069] Lower Heating Value: The lower heating value is defined as the enthalpy
of
combustion of a fuel component to vapor phase, fully oxidized products (i.e.,
vapor
phase CO2 and H20 product). For example, any CO2 present in an anode input
stream
does not contribute to the fuel content of the anode input, since CO2 is
already fully
oxidized. For this definition, the amount of oxidation occurring in the anode
due to the
24

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
anode fuel cell reaction is defined as oxidation of H2 in the anode as part of
the
electrochemical reaction in the anode, as defined above.
[0070] It is noted that, for the special case where the only fuel in the anode
input flow
is H2, the only reaction involving a fuel component that can take place in the
anode
represents the conversion of H, into H20. In this special case, the fuel
utilization
simplifies to (H2-rate-in minus H2-rate-out)/H2-rate-in. In such a case, H2
would be
the only fuel component, and so the H2 LHV would cancel out of the equation.
In the
more general case, the anode feed may contain, for example, CH4, H2, and CO in
various amounts. Because these species can typically be present in different
amounts in
the anode outlet, the summation as described above can be needed to determine
the fuel
utilization.
[0071] Alternatively or in addition to fuel utilization, the utilization for
other reactants
in the fuel cell can be characterized. For example, the operation of a fuel
cell can
additionally or alternately be characterized with regard to "CO2 utilization"
and/or
"oxidant" utilization. The values for CO2 utilization and/or oxidant
utilization can be
specified in a similar manner.
[0072] Fuel surplus ratio: Still another way to characterize the reactions in
a molten
carbonate fuel cell is by defining a utilization based on a ratio of the Lower
Heating
Value of all fuel delivered to the anode and/or a reforming stage associated
with the
anode relative to the Lower Heating Value of hydrogen oxidized in the anode
due to the
fuel cell anode reaction. This quantity will be referred to as a fuel surplus
ratio. As
such the fuel surplus ratio can be computed as (LHV (anode in)/ (LHV(anode_in)-
LHV(anode out)) where LHV(anode in) and LHV(anode out) refer to the LHV of the
fuel components (such as H2, CH4, and/or CO) in the anode inlet and outlet
streams or
flows, respectively. In various aspects of the invention, a molten carbonate
fuel cell can
be operated to have a fuel surplus ratio of at least about 1.0, such as at
least about 1.5,
or at least about 2.0, or at least about 2.5, or at least about 3.0, or at
least about 4Ø
Additionally or alternately, the fuel surplus ratio can be about 25.0 or less.
[0073] It is noted that not all of the reformable fuel in the input stream for
the anode
may be reformed. Preferably, at least about 90% of the reformable fuel in the
input
stream to the anode (and/or into an associated reforming stage) can be
reformed prior to
exiting the anode, such as at least about 95% or at least about 98%. In some
alternative

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
aspects, the amount of reformable fuel that is reformed can be from about 75%
to about
90%, such as at least about 80%.
[0074] The above definition for fuel surplus ratio provides a method for
characterizing the amount of reforming occurring within the anode and/or
reforming
stage(s) associated with a fuel cell relative to the amount of fuel consumed
in the fuel
cell anode for generation of electric power.
[0075] Optionally, the fuel surplus ratio can be modified to account for
situations
where fuel is recycled from the anode output to the anode input. When fuel
(such as
H2, CO, and/or unreformed or partially reformed hydrocarbons) is recycled from
anode
output to anode input, such recycled fuel components do not represent a
surplus amount
of reformable or reformed fuel that can be used for other purposes. Instead,
such
recycled fuel components merely indicate a desire to reduce fuel utilization
in a fuel
cell.
[0076] Reformable fuel surplus ratio: Calculating a reformable fuel surplus
ratio is
one option to account for such recycled fuel components is to narrow the
definition of
surplus fuel, so that only the LHV of reformable fuels is included in the
input stream to
the anode. As used herein the "reformable fuel surplus ratio" is defined as
the Lower
Heating Value of reformable fuel delivered to the anode and/or a reforming
stage
associated with the anode relative to the Lower Heating Value of hydrogen
oxidized in
the anode due to the fuel cell anode reaction. Under the definition for
reformable fuel
surplus ratio, the LHV of any H2 or CO in the anode input is excluded. Such an
LHV
of reformable fuel can still be measured by characterizing the actual
composition
entering a fuel cell anode, so no distinction between recycled components and
fresh
components needs to be made. Although some non-reformed or partially reformed
fuel
may also be recycled, in most aspects the majority of the fuel recycled to the
anode can
correspond to reformed products such as H2 or CO. Expressed mathematically,
the
reformable fuel surplus ratio (RRFs) = LHV RF/ LHV OH, where LHV RF is the
Lower
Heating Value (LHV) of the reformable fuel and LHV OH is the Lower Heating
Value
(LHV) of the hydrogen oxidized in the anode. The LHV of the hydrogen oxidized
in
the anode may be calculated by subtracting the LHV of the anode outlet stream
from
the LHV of the anode inlet stream (e.g., LHV(anode jn)-LHV(anode_out)). In
various
aspects of the invention, a molten carbonate fuel cell can be operated to have
a
26

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
reformable fuel surplus ratio of at least about 0.25, such as at least about
0.5, or at least
about 1.0, or at least about 1.5, or at least about 2.0, or at least about
2.5, or at least
about 3.0, or at least about 4Ø Additionally or alternately, the reformable
fuel surplus
ratio can be about 25.0 or less. It is noted that this narrower definition
based on the
amount of reformable fuel delivered to the anode relative to the amount of
oxidation in
the anode can distinguish between two types of fuel cell operation methods
that have
low fuel utilization. Some fuel cells achieve low fuel utilization by
recycling a
substantial portion of the anode output back to the anode input. This recycle
can allow
any hydrogen in the anode input to be used again as an input to the anode.
This can
reduce the amount of reforming, as even though the fuel utilization is low for
a single
pass through the fuel cell, at least a portion of the unused fuel is recycled
for use in a
later pass. Thus, fuel cells with a wide variety of fuel utilization values
may have the
same ratio of reformable fuel delivered to the anode reforming stage(s) versus
hydrogen
oxidized in the anode reaction. In order to change the ratio of reformable
fuel delivered
to the anode reforming stages relative to the amount of oxidation in the
anode, either an
anode feed with a native content of non-reformable fuel needs to be
identified, or
unused fuel in the anode output needs to be withdrawn for other uses, or both.
[0077] Reformable hydrogen surplus ratio: Still another option for
characterizing
the operation of a fuel cell is based on a "reformable hydrogen surplus
ratio." The
reformable fuel surplus ratio defined above is defined based on the lower
heating value
of reformable fuel components. The reformable hydrogen surplus ratio is
defined as
the reformable hydrogen content of reformable fuel delivered to the anode
and/or a
reforming stage associated with the anode relative to the hydrogen reacted in
the anode
due to the fuel cell anode reaction. As such, the "reformable hydrogen surplus
ratio"
can be computed as (RFC(reformable_anode_in)/ (RFC(reformable_anode_in) -
RFC(anode_out)), where RFC(reformable_anode_in) refers to the reformable
hydrogen
content of reformable fuels in the anode inlet streams or flows, while RFC
(anode_out)
refers to the reformable hydrogen content of the fuel components (such as H2,
CH4,
and/or CO) in the anode inlet and outlet streams or flows. The RFC can be
expressed in
moles/s, moles/hr, or similar. An example of a method for operating a fuel
cell with a
large ratio of reformable fuel delivered to the anode reforming stage(s)
versus amount
of oxidation in the anode can be a method where excess reforming is performed
in
27

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
order to balance the generation and consumption of heat in the fuel cell.
Reforming a
reformable fuel to form H2 and CO is an endothermic process. This endothermic
reaction can be countered by the generation of electrical current in the fuel
cell, which
can also produce excess heat corresponding (roughly) to the difference between
the
amount of heat generated by the anode oxidation reaction and the carbonate
formation
reaction and the energy that exits the fuel cell in the form of electric
current. The
excess heat per mole of hydrogen involved in the anode oxidation reaction /
carbonate
formation reaction can be greater than the heat absorbed to generate a mole of
hydrogen
by reforming. As a result, a fuel cell operated under conventional conditions
can
exhibit a temperature increase from inlet to outlet. Instead of this type of
conventional
operation, the amount of fuel reformed in the reforming stages associated with
the
anode can be increased. For example, additional fuel can be reformed so that
the heat
generated by the exothermic fuel cell reactions can be (roughly) balanced by
the heat
consumed in reforming, or even the heat consumed by reforming can be beyond
the
excess heat generated by the fuel oxidation, resulting in a temperature drop
across the
fuel cell This can result in a substantial excess of hydrogen relative to the
amount
needed for electrical power generation. As one example, a feed to the anode
inlet of a
fuel cell or an associated reforming stage can be substantially composed of
reformable
fuel, such as a substantially pure methane feed. During conventional operation
for
electric power generation using such a fuel, a molten carbonate fuel cell can
be
operated with a fuel utilization of about 75%. This means that about 75% (or
3/4) of the
fuel content delivered to the anode is used to form hydrogen that is then
reacted in the
anode with carbonate ions to form H2 0 and CO2. In conventional operation, the
remaining about 25% of the fuel content can be reformed to H2 within the fuel
cell (or
can pass through the fuel cell unreacted for any CO or H, in the fuel), and
then
combusted outside of the fuel cell to form H20 and CO2 to provide heat for the
cathode
inlet to the fuel cell. The reformable hydrogen surplus ratio in this
situation can be
4/(4-1) = 4/3.
[0078] Electrical efficiency: As used herein, the term "electrical efficiency"
("EE")
is defined as the electrochemical power produced by the fuel cell divided by
the rate of
Lower Heating Value ("LHV") of fuel input to the fuel cell. The fuel inputs to
the fuel
cell includes both fuel delivered to the anode as well as any fuel used to
maintain the
28

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
temperature of the fuel cell, such as fuel delivered to a burner associated
with a fuel
cell. In this description, the power produced by the fuel may be described in
terms of
LHV(el) fuel rate.
[0079] Electrochemical power: As used herein, the term "electrochemical power"
or
LHV(el) is the power generated by the circuit connecting the cathode to the
anode in
the fuel cell and the transfer of carbonate ions across the fuel cell's
electrolyte.
Electrochemical power excludes power produced or consumed by equipment
upstream
or downstream from the fuel cell. For example, electricity produced from heat
in a fuel
cell exhaust stream is not considered part of the electrochemical power.
Similarly,
power generated by a gas turbine or other equipment upstream of the fuel cell
is not
part of the electrochemical power generated. The "electrochemical power" does
not
take electrical power consumed during operation of the fuel cell into account,
or any
loss incurred by conversion of the direct current to alternating current. In
other words,
electrical power used to supply the fuel cell operation or otherwise operate
the fuel cell
is not subtracted from the direct current power produced by the fuel cell. As
used
herein, the power density is the current density multiplied by voltage. As
used herein,
the total fuel cell power is the power density multiplied by the fuel cell
area.
[0080] Fuel inputs: As used herein, the term "anode fuel input," designated as
LHV(anode_in), is the amount of fuel within the anode inlet stream. The term
"fuel
input", designated as LHV(in), is the total amount of fuel delivered to the
fuel cell,
including both the amount of fuel within the anode inlet stream and the amount
of fuel
used to maintain the temperature of the fuel cell. The fuel may include both
reformable
and nonreformable fuels, based on the definition of a reformable fuel provided
herein.
Fuel input is not the same as fuel utilization.
[0081] Total fuel cell efficiency: As used herein, the term "total fuel cell
efficiency"
("TFCE") is defined as: the electrochemical power generated by the fuel cell,
plus the
rate of LHV of syngas produced by the fuel cell, divided by the rate of LHV of
fuel
input to the anode. In other words, TFCE = (LHV(el) + LHV(sg
net))/LHV(anode_in),
where LHV(anode_in) refers to rate at which the LHV of the fuel components
(such as
H2, CH4, and/or CO) delivered to the anode and LHV(sg net) refers to a rate at
which
syngas (H2, CO) is produced in the anode, which is the difference between
syngas input
to the anode and syngas output from the anode. LHV(el) describes the
electrochemical
29

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
power generation of the fuel cell. The total fuel cell efficiency excludes
heat generated
by the fuel cell that is put to beneficial use outside of the fuel cell. In
operation, heat
generated by the fuel cell may be put to beneficial use by downstream
equipment. For
example, the heat may be used to generate additional electricity or to heat
water. These
uses, when they occur apart from the fuel cell, are not part of the total fuel
cell
efficiency, as the term is used in this application. The total fuel cell
efficiency is for the
fuel cell operation only, and does not include power production, or
consumption,
upstream, or downstream, of the fuel cell.
[0082] Chemical efficiency: As used herein, the term "chemical efficiency", is
defined as the lower heating value of H2 and CO in the anode exhaust of the
fuel cell,
or LHV(sg out), divided by the fuel input, or LHV(in).
[0083] Neither the electrical efficiency nor the total system efficiency takes
the
efficiency of upstream or downstream processes into consideration. For
example, it
may be advantageous to use turbine exhaust as a source of CO2 for the fuel
cell
cathode. In this arrangement, the efficiency of the turbine is not considered
as part of
the electrical efficiency or the total fuel cell efficiency calculation.
Similarly, outputs
from the fuel cell may be recycled as inputs to the fuel cell. A recycle loop
is not
considered when calculating electrical efficiency or the total fuel cell
efficiency in
single pass mode.
[0084] Syngas produced: As used herein, the term "syngas produced" is the
difference between syngas input to the anode and syngas output from the anode.
Syngas may be used as an input, or fuel, for the anode, at least in part. For
example, a
system may include an anode recycle loop that returns syngas from the anode
exhaust
to the anode inlet where it is supplemented with natural gas or other suitable
fuel.
Syngas produced LHV (sg net) = (LHV(sg out) - LHV(sg in)), where LHV(sg in)
and
LHV(sg out) refer to the LHV of the syngas in the anode inlet and syngas in
the anode
outlet streams or flows, respectively. It is noted that at least a portion of
the syngas
produced by the reforming reactions within an anode can typically be utilized
in the
anode to produce electricity. The hydrogen utilized to produce electricity is
not
included in the definition of "syngas produced" because it does not exit the
anode. As
used herein, the term "syngas ratio" is the LHV of the net syngas produced
divided by
the LHV of the fuel input to the anode or LHV (sg net)/LHV(anode in). Molar
flow

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
rates of syngas and fuel can be used instead of LHV to express a molar-based
syngas
ratio and a molar-based syngas produced.
[0085] Steam to carbon ratio (S/C): As used herein, the steam to carbon ratio
(S/C)
is the molar ratio of steam in a flow to reformable carbon in the flow. Carbon
in the
form of CO and CO2 are not included as reformable carbon in this definition.
The
steam to carbon ratio can be measured and/or controlled at different points in
the
system. For example, the composition of an anode inlet stream can be
manipulated to
achieve a S/C that is suitable for reforming in the anode. The S/C can be
given as the
molar flow rate of H2 0 divided by the product of the molar flow rate of fuel
multiplied
by the number of carbon atoms in the fuel, e.g. one for methane. Thus, S/C
=ffvo/(fc)/4
X #C), where frpo is the molar flow rate of water, where f(21/4 is the molar
flow rate of
methane (or other fuel) and #C is the number of carbons in the fuel.
[0086] EGR ratio: Aspects of the invention can use a turbine in partnership
with a
fuel cell. The combined fuel cell and turbine system may include exhaust gas
recycle
("EGR"). In an EGR system, at least a portion of the exhaust gas generated by
the
turbine can be sent to a heat recovery generator. Another portion of the
exhaust gas can
be sent to the fuel cell. The EGR ratio describes the amount of exhaust gas
routed to
the fuel cell versus the total exhaust gas routed to either the fuel cell or
heat recovery
generator. As used herein, the "EGR ratio" is the flow rate for the fuel cell
bound
portion of the exhaust gas divided by the combined flow rate for the fuel cell
bound
portion and the recovery bound portion, which is sent to the heat recovery
generator.
[0087] In various aspects of the invention, a molten carbonate fuel cell
(MCFC) can
be used to facilitate separation of CO2 from a CO2-containing stream while
also
generating additional electrical power. The CO2 separation can be further
enhanced by
taking advantage of synergies with the combustion-based power generator that
can
provide at least a portion of the input feed to the cathode portion of the
fuel cell.
[0088] Fuel Cell and Fuel Cell Components: In this discussion, a fuel cell can
correspond to a single cell, with an anode and a cathode separated by an
electrolyte.
The anode and cathode can receive input gas flows to facilitate the respective
anode
and cathode reactions for transporting charge across the electrolyte and
generating
electricity. A fuel cell stack can represent a plurality of cells in an
integrated unit.
Although a fuel cell stack can include multiple fuel cells, the fuel cells can
typically be
31

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
connected in parallel and can function (approximately) as if they collectively
represented a single fuel cell of a larger size. When an input flow is
delivered to the
anode or cathode of a fuel cell stack, the fuel stack can include flow
channels for
dividing the input flow between each of the cells in the stack and flow
channels for
combining the output flows from the individual cells. In this discussion, a
fuel cell
array can be used to refer to a plurality of fuel cells (such as a plurality
of fuel cell
stacks) that are arranged in series, in parallel, or in any other convenient
manner (e.g.,
in a combination of series and parallel). A fuel cell array can include one or
more
stages of fuel cells and/or fuel cell stacks, where the anode/cathode output
from a first
stage may serve as the anode/cathode input for a second stage. It is noted
that the
anodes in a fuel cell array do not have to be connected in the same way as the
cathodes
in the array. For convenience, the input to the first anode stage of a fuel
cell array may
be referred to as the anode input for the array, and the input to the first
cathode stage of
the fuel cell array may be referred to as the cathode input to the array.
Similarly, the
output from the final anode/cathode stage may be referred to as the
anode/cathode
output from the array.
[0089] It should be understood that reference to use of a fuel cell herein
typically
denotes a "fuel cell stack" composed of individual fuel cells, and more
generally refers
to use of one or more fuel cell stacks in fluid communication. Individual fuel
cell
elements (plates) can typically be "stacked" together in a rectangular array
called a
"fuel cell stack". This fuel cell stack can typically take a feed stream and
distribute
reactants among all of the individual fuel cell elements and can then collect
the
products from each of these elements. When viewed as a unit, the fuel cell
stack in
operation can be taken as a whole even though composed of many (often tens or
hundreds) of individual fuel cell elements. These individual fuel cell
elements can
typically have similar voltages (as the reactant and product concentrations
are similar),
and the total power output can result from the summation of all of the
electrical
currents in all of the cell elements, when the elements are electrically
connected in
series. Stacks can also be arranged in a series arrangement to produce high
voltages. A
parallel arrangement can boost the current. If a sufficiently large volume
fuel cell stack
is available to process a given exhaust flow, the systems and methods
described herein
can be used with a single molten carbonate fuel cell stack. In other aspects
of the
32

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
invention, a plurality of fuel cell stacks may be desirable or needed for a
variety of
reasons.
[0090] For the purposes of this invention, unless otherwise specified, the
term "fuel
cell" should be understood to also refer to and/or is defined as including a
reference to a
fuel cell stack composed of set of one or more individual fuel cell elements
for which
there is a single input and output, as that is the manner in which fuel cells
are typically
employed in practice. Similarly, the term fuel cells (plural), unless
otherwise specified,
should be understood to also refer to and/or is defined as including a
plurality of
separate fuel cell stacks. In other words, all references within this
document, unless
specifically noted, can refer interchangeably to the operation of a fuel cell
stack as a
"fuel cell". For example, the volume of exhaust generated by a commercial
scale
combustion generator may be too large for processing by a fuel cell (i.e., a
single stack)
of conventional size. In order to process the full exhaust, a plurality of
fuel cells (i.e.,
two or more separate fuel cells or fuel cell stacks) can be arranged in
parallel, so that
each fuel cell can process (roughly) an equal portion of the combustion
exhaust.
Although multiple fuel cells can be used, each fuel cell can typically be
operated in a
generally similar manner, given its (roughly) equal portion of the combustion
exhaust.
[0091] "Internal reforming" and "external reforming": A fuel cell or fuel cell
stack may include one or more internal reforming sections. As used herein, the
term
"internal reforming" refers to fuel reforming occurring within the body of a
fuel cell, a
fuel cell stack, or otherwise within a fuel cell assembly. External reforming,
which is
often used in conjunction with a fuel cell, occurs in a separate piece of
equipment that
is located outside of the fuel cell stack. In other words, the body of the
external
reformer is not in direct physical contact with the body of a fuel cell or
fuel cell stack.
In a typical set up, the output from the external reformer can be fed to the
anode inlet of
a fuel cell. Unless otherwise noted specifically, the reforming described
within this
application is internal reforming.
[0092] Internal reforming may occur within a fuel cell anode. Internal
reforming can
additionally or alternately occur within an internal reforming element
integrated within
a fuel cell assembly. The integrated reforming element may be located between
fuel
cell elements within a fuel cell stack. In other words, one of the trays in
the stack can be
a reforming section instead of a fuel cell element. In one aspect, the flow
arrangement
33

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
within a fuel cell stack directs fuel to the internal reforming elements and
then into the
anode portion of the fuel cells. Thus, from a flow perspective, the internal
reforming
elements and fuel cell elements can be arranged in series within the fuel cell
stack. As
used herein, the term "anode reforming" is fuel reforming that occurs within
an anode.
As used herein, the term "internal reforming" is reforming that occurs within
an
integrated reforming element and not in an anode section.
[0093] In some aspects, a reforming stage that is internal to a fuel cell
assembly can
be considered to be associated with the anode(s) in the fuel cell assembly. In
some
alternative aspects, for a reforming stage in a fuel cell stack that can be
associated with
an anode (such as associated with multiple anodes), a flow path can be
available so that
the output flow from the reforming stage is passed into at least one anode.
This can
correspond to having an initial section of a fuel cell plate not in contact
with the
electrolyte and instead can serve just as a reforming catalyst. Another option
for an
associated reforming stage can be to have a separate integrated reforming
stage as one
of the elements in a fuel cell stack, where the output from the integrated
reforming
stage can be returned to the input side of one or more of the fuel cells in
the fuel cell
stack.
[0094] From a heat integration standpoint, a characteristic height in a fuel
cell stack
can be the height of an individual fuel cell stack element. It is noted that
the separate
reforming stage and/or a separate endothermic reaction stage could have a
different
height in the stack than a fuel cell. In such a scenario, the height of a fuel
cell element
can be used as the characteristic height. In some aspects, an integrated
endothermic
reaction stage can be defined as a stage that is heat integrated with one or
more fuel
cells, so that the integrated endothermic reaction stage can use the heat from
the fuel
cells as a heat source for the endothermic reaction. Such an integrated
endothermic
reaction stage can be defined as being positioned less than 5 times the height
of a stack
element from any fuel cells providing heat to the integrated stage. For
example, an
integrated endothermic reaction stage (such as a reforming stage) can be
positioned less
than 5 times the height of a stack element from any fuel cells that are heat
integrated,
such as less than 3 times the height of a stack element. In this discussion,
an integrated
reforming stage and/or integrated endothermic reaction stage that represent an
adjacent
34

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
stack element to a fuel cell element can be defined as being about one stack
element
height or less away from the adjacent fuel cell element.
[0095] In some aspects, a separate reforming stage that is heat integrated
with a fuel
cell element can correspond to a reforming stage associated with the fuel cell
element.
In such aspects, an integrated fuel cell element can provide at least a
portion of the heat
to the associated reforming stage, and the associated reforming stage can
provide at
least a portion of the reforming stage output to the integrated fuel cell as a
fuel stream.
In other aspects, a separate reforming stage can be integrated with a fuel
cell for heat
transfer without being associated with the fuel cell. In this type of
situation, the
separate reforming stage can receive heat from the fuel cell, but the decision
can be
made not to use the output of the reforming stage as an input to the fuel
cell. Instead,
the decision can be made to use the output of such a reforming stage for
another
purpose, such as directly adding the output to the anode exhaust stream,
and/or for
forming a separate output stream from the fuel cell assembly.
[0096] More generally, a separate stack element in a fuel cell stack can be
used to
perform any convenient type of endothermic reaction that can take advantage of
the
waste heat provided by integrated fuel cell stack elements. Instead of plates
suitable for
performing a reforming reaction on a hydrocarbon fuel stream, a separate stack
element
can have plates suitable for catalyzing another type of endothermic reaction.
A
manifold or other arrangement of inlet conduits in the fuel cell stack can be
used to
provide an appropriate input flow to each stack element. A similar manifold or
other
arrangement of outlet conduits can additionally or alternately be used to
withdraw the
output flows from each stack element. Optionally, the output flows from a
endothermic
reaction stage in a stack can be withdrawn from the fuel cell stack without
having the
output flow pass through a fuel cell anode. In such an optional aspect, the
products of
the exothermic reaction can therefore exit from the fuel cell stack without
passing
through a fuel cell anode. Examples of other types of endothermic reactions
that can be
performed in stack elements in a fuel cell stack can include, without
limitation, ethanol
dehydration to form ethylene and ethane cracking.
[0097] Recycle: As defined herein, recycle of a portion of a fuel cell output
(such as
an anode exhaust or a stream separated or withdrawn from an anode exhaust) to
a fuel
cell inlet can correspond to a direct or indirect recycle stream. A direct
recycle of a

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
stream to a fuel cell inlet is defined as recycle of the stream without
passing through an
intermediate process, while an indirect recycle involves recycle after passing
a stream
through one or more intermediate processes. For example, if the anode exhaust
is
passed through a CO2 separation stage prior to recycle, this is considered an
indirect
recycle of the anode exhaust. If a portion of the anode exhaust, such as an H2
stream
withdrawn from the anode exhaust, is passed into a gasifier for converting
coal into a
fuel suitable for introduction into the fuel cell, then that is also
considered an indirect
recycle.
Anode Inputs and Outputs
[0098] In various aspects of the invention, the MCFC array can be fed by a
fuel
received at the anode inlet that comprises, for example, both hydrogen and a
hydrocarbon such as methane (or alternatively a hydrocarbonaceous or
hydrocarbon-
like compound that may contain heteroatoms different from C and H). Most of
the
methane (or other hydrocarbonaceous or hydrocarbon-like compound) fed to the
anode
can typically be fresh methane. In this description, a fresh fuel such as
fresh methane
refers to a fuel that is not recycled from another fuel cell process. For
example,
methane recycled from the anode outlet stream back to the anode inlet may not
be
considered "fresh" methane, and can instead be described as reclaimed methane.
The
fuel source used can be shared with other components, such as a turbine that
uses a
portion of the fuel source to provide a CO2-containing stream for the cathode
input.
The fuel source input can include water in a proportion to the fuel
appropriate for
reforming the hydrocarbon (or hydrocarbon-like) compound in the reforming
section
that generates hydrogen. For example, if methane is the fuel input for
reforming to
generate H2, the molar ratio of water to fuel can be from about one to one to
about ten
to one, such as at least about two to one. A ratio of four to one or greater
is typical for
external reforming, but lower values can be typical for internal reforming. To
the
degree that H2 is a portion of the fuel source, in some optional aspects no
additional
water may be needed in the fuel, as the oxidation of H2 at the anode can tend
to
produce H20 that can be used for reforming the fuel. The fuel source can also
optionally contain components incidental to the fuel source (e.g., a natural
gas feed can
contain some content of CO2 as an additional component). For example, a
natural gas
feed can contain CO2, N2, and/or other inert (noble) gases as additional
components.
36

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
Optionally, in some aspects the fuel source may also contain CO, such as CO
from a
recycled portion of the anode exhaust. An additional or alternate potential
source for
CO in the fuel into a fuel cell assembly can be CO generated by steam
reforming of a
hydrocarbon fuel performed on the fuel prior to entering the fuel cell
assembly.
[0099] More generally, a variety of types of fuel streams may be suitable for
use as an
input stream for the anode of a molten carbonate fuel cell. Some fuel streams
can
correspond to streams containing hydrocarbons and/or hydrocarbon-like
compounds
that may also include heteroatoms different from C and H. In this discussion,
unless
otherwise specified, a reference to a fuel stream containing hydrocarbons for
an MCFC
anode is defined to include fuel streams containing such hydrocarbon-like
compounds.
Examples of hydrocarbon (including hydrocarbon-like) fuel streams include
natural
gas, streams containing Cl ¨ C4 carbon compounds (such as methane or ethane),
and
streams containing heavier C5+ hydrocarbons (including hydrocarbon-like
compounds), as well as combinations thereof. Still other additional or
alternate
examples of potential fuel streams for use in an anode input can include
biogas-type
streams, such as methane produced from natural (biological) decomposition of
organic
material.
[00100] In some aspects, a molten carbonate fuel cell can be used to process
an input
fuel stream, such as a natural gas and/or hydrocarbon stream, with a low
energy content
due to the presence of diluent compounds. For example, some sources of methane
and/or natural gas are sources that can include substantial amounts of either
CO2 or
other inert molecules, such as nitrogen, argon, or helium. Due to the presence
of
elevated amounts of CO2 and/or inerts, the energy content of a fuel stream
based on the
source can be reduced. Using a low energy content fuel for a combustion
reaction
(such as for powering a combustion-powered turbine) can pose difficulties.
However, a
molten carbonate fuel cell can generate power based on a low energy content
fuel
source with a reduced or minimal impact on the efficiency of the fuel cell.
The
presence of additional gas volume can require additional heat for raising the
temperature of the fuel to the temperature for reforming and/or the anode
reaction.
Additionally, due to the equilibrium nature of the water gas shift reaction
within a fuel
cell anode, the presence of additional CO2 can have an impact on the relative
amounts
of H2 and CO present in the anode output. However, the inert compounds
otherwise
37

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
can have only a minimal direct impact on the reforming and anode reactions.
The
amount of CO2 and/or inert compounds in a fuel stream for a molten carbonate
fuel
cell, when present, can be at least about 1 vol%, such as at least about 2
vol%, or at
least about 5 vol%, or at least about 10 vol%, or at least about 15 vol%, or
at least
about 20 vol%, or at least about 25 vol%, or at least about 30 vol%, or at
least about 35
vol%, or at least about 40 vol%, or at least about 45 vol%, or at least about
50 vol %, or
at least about 75 vol%. Additionally or alternately, the amount of CO2 and/or
inert
compounds in a fuel stream for a molten carbonate fuel cell can be about 90
vol% or
less, such as about 75 vol% or less, or about 60 vol% or less, or about 50
vol% or less,
or about 40 vol% or less, or about 35 vol% or less.
[00101] Yet other examples of potential sources for an anode input stream can
correspond to refinery and/or other industrial process output streams. For
example,
coking is a common process in many refineries for converting heavier compounds
to
lower boiling ranges. Coking typically produces an off-gas containing a
variety of
compounds that are gases at room temperature, including CO and various Cl ¨ C4
hydrocarbons. This off-gas can be used as at least a portion of an anode input
stream.
Other refinery off-gas streams can additionally or alternately be suitable for
inclusion in
an anode input stream, such as light ends (Cl ¨ C4) generated during cracking
or other
refinery processes. Still other suitable refinery streams can additionally or
alternately
include refinery streams containing CO or CO2 that also contain H2 and/or
reformable
fuel compounds.
[00102] Still other potential sources for an anode input can additionally or
alternately
include streams with increased water content. For example, an ethanol output
stream
from an ethanol plant (or another type of fermentation process) can include a
substantial portion of H2O prior to final distillation. Such H2O can typically
cause
only minimal impact on the operation of a fuel cell. Thus, a fermentation
mixture of
alcohol (or other fermentation product) and water can be used as at least a
portion of an
anode input stream.
[00103] Biogas, or digester gas, is another additional or alternate potential
source for
an anode input. Biogas may primarily comprise methane and CO, and is typically
produced by the breakdown or digestion of organic matter. Anaerobic bacteria
may be
38

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
used to digest the organic matter and produce the biogas. Impurities, such as
sulfur-
containing compounds, may be removed from the biogas prior to use as an anode
input.
[00104] The output stream from an MCFC anode can include H20, CO2, CO, and H2.
Optionally, the anode output stream could also have unreacted fuel (such as H2
or CH4)
or inert compounds in the feed as additional output components. Instead of
using this
output stream as a fuel source to provide heat for a reforming reaction or as
a
combustion fuel for heating the cell, one or more separations can be performed
on the
anode output stream to separate the CO2 from the components with potential
value as
inputs to another process, such as H2 or CO. The H2 and/or CO can be used as a
syngas for chemical synthesis, as a source of hydrogen for chemical reaction,
and/or as
a fuel with reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
[00105] In various aspects, the composition of the output stream from the
anode can be
impacted by several factors. Factors that can influence the anode output
composition
can include the composition of the input stream to the anode, the amount of
current
generated by the fuel cell, and/or the temperature at the exit of the anode.
The
temperature of at the anode exit can be relevant due to the equilibrium nature
of the
water gas shift reaction. In a typical anode, at least one of the plates
forming the wall
of the anode can be suitable for catalyzing the water gas shift reaction. As a
result, if
a) the composition of the anode input stream is known, b) the extent of
reforming of
reformable fuel in the anode input stream is known, and c) the amount of
carbonate
transported from the cathode to anode (corresponding to the amount of
electrical
current generated) is known, the composition of the anode output can be
determined
based on the equilibrium constant for the water gas shift reaction.
Keq = [CO2] [H2] / [CO] [H2 01
[00106] In the above equation, Keg is the equilibrium constant for the
reaction at a
given temperature and pressure, and [X] is the partial pressure of component
X. Based
on the water gas shift reaction, it can be noted that an increased CO2
concentration in
the anode input can tend to result in additional CO formation (at the expense
of H2)
while an increased H20 concentration can tend to result in additional H2
formation (at
the expense of CO).
[00107] To determine the composition at the anode output, the composition of
the
anode input can be used as a starting point. This composition can then be
modified to
39

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207 PCMJS2014/025208
reflect the extent of reforming of any reformable fuels that can occur within
the anode.
Such reforming can reduce the hydrocarbon content of the anode input in
exchange for
increased hydrogen and CO2. Next, based on the amount of electrical current
generated, the amount of H2 in the anode input can be reduced in exchange for
additional H20 and CO2. This composition can then be adjusted based on the
equilibrium constant for the water gas shift reaction to determine the exit
concentrations for H2, CO, CO2, and H20.
[00108] Table 1 shows the anode exhaust composition at different fuel
utilizations for
a typical type of fuel. The anode exhaust composition can reflect the combined
result
of the anode reforming reaction, water gas shift reaction, and the anode
oxidation
reaction. The output composition values in Table 1 were calculated by assuming
an
anode input composition with an about 2 to 1 ratio of steam (H20) to carbon
(reformable fuel). The reformable fuel was assumed to be methane, which was
assumed to be 100% reformed to hydrogen. The initial CO2 and H2 concentrations
in
the anode input were assumed to be negligible, while the input N2
concentration was
about 0.5%. The fuel utilization Uf (as defined herein) was allowed to vary
from about
35% to about 70% as shown in the table. The exit temperature for the fuel cell
anode
was assumed to be about 650 C for purposes of determining the correct value
for the
equilibrium constant.
TABLE 1 - Anode Exhaust Composition
Uf 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70%
Anode Exhaust Composition
1120 %, wet 32.5%
34.1% 35.5% 36.7% 37.8% 38.9% 39.8% 40.5%
CO2 %, wet 26.7% 29.4% 32.0% 34.5% 36.9% 39.3% 41.5% 43.8%
112 %, wet 29.4%
26.0% 22.9% 20.0% 17.3% 14.8% 12.5% 10.4%
CO %, wet 10.8% 10.0% 9.2% 8.4% 7.5% 6.7% 5.8% 4.9%
N2 %, wet 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4%
0.4%
CO2 %, dry 39.6%
44.6% 49.6% 54.5% 59.4% 64.2% 69.0% 73.7%
112 %, dry 43.6%
39.4% 35.4% 31.5% 27.8% 24.2% 20.7% 17.5%
CO %, dry 16.1% 15.2% 14.3% 13.2% 12.1% 10.9% 9.7% 8.2%
N2 (X), dry 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7%
0.7%
112/C0 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1
(H2-0O2)/ 0.07 -0.09 -0.22 -0.34 -0.44 -0.53 -0.61
-0.69
(CO+CO2)

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
[00109] Table 1 shows anode output compositions for a particular set of
conditions and
anode input composition. More generally, in various aspects the anode output
can
include about 10 vol% to about 50 vol% H20. The amount of H20 can vary
greatly, as
H20 in the anode can be produced by the anode oxidation reaction. If an excess
of
H20 beyond what is needed for reforming is introduced into the anode, the
excess H20
can typically pass through largely unreacted, with the exception of H20
consumed (or
generated) due to fuel reforming and the water gas shift reaction. The CO2
concentration in the anode output can also vary widely, such as from about 20
vol% to
about 50 vol% CO2. The amount of CO2 can be influenced by both the amount of
electrical current generated as well as the amount of CO2 in the anode input
flow. The
amount of H2 in the anode output can additionally or alternately be from about
10 vol%
H2 to about 50 vol% L12, depending on the fuel utilization in the anode. At
the anode
output, the amount of CO can be from about 5 vol% to about 20 vol%. It is
noted that
the amount of CO relative to the amount of H2 in the anode output for a given
fuel cell
can be determined in part by the equilibrium constant for the water gas shift
reaction at
the temperature and pressure present in the fuel cell. The anode output can
further
additionally or alternately include 5 vol% or less of various other
components, such as
N2, CH4 (or other unreacted carbon-containing fuels), and/or other components.
[00110] Optionally, one or more water gas shift reaction stages can be
included after
the anode output to convert CO and H20 in the anode output into CO2 and H2, if
desired. The amount of H2 present in the anode output can be increased, for
example,
by using a water gas shift reactor at lower temperature to convert H20 and CO
present
in the anode output into H2 and CO2. Alternatively, the temperature can be
raised and
the water-gas shift reaction can be reversed, producing more CO and H20 from
H2 and
CO2. Water is an expected output of the reaction occurring at the anode, so
the anode
output can typically have an excess of H20 relative to the amount of CO
present in the
anode output. Alternatively, H20 can be added to the stream after the anode
exit but
before the water gas shift reaction. CO can be present in the anode output due
to
incomplete carbon conversion during reforming and/or due to the equilibrium
balancing
reactions between H2O, CO, H2, and CO2 (i.e., the water-gas shift equilibrium)
under
either reforming conditions or the conditions present during the anode
reaction. A
water gas shift reactor can be operated under conditions to drive the
equilibrium further
41

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
in the direction of forming CO2 and H2 at the expense of CO and H20. Higher
temperatures can tend to favor the formation of CO and H20. Thus, one option
for
operating the water gas shift reactor can be to expose the anode output stream
to a
suitable catalyst, such as a catalyst including iron oxide, zinc oxide, copper
on zinc
oxide, or the like, at a suitable temperature, e.g., between about 190 C to
about 210 C.
Optionally, the water-gas shift reactor can include two stages for reducing
the CO
concentration in an anode output stream, with a first higher temperature stage
operated
at a temperature from at least about 300 C to about 375 C and a second lower
temperature stage operated at a temperature of about 225 C or less, such as
from about
180 C to about 210 C. In addition to increasing the amount of H2 present in
the anode
output, the water-gas shift reaction can additionally or alternately increase
the amount
of CO2 at the expense of CO. This can exchange difficult-to-remove carbon
monoxide
(CO) for carbon dioxide, which can be more readily removed by condensation
(e.g.,
cryogenic removal), chemical reaction (such as amine removal), and/or other
CO2
removal methods. Additionally or alternately, it may be desirable to increase
the CO
content present in the anode exhaust in order to achieve a desired ratio of H2
to CO.
[00111] After passing through the optional water gas shift reaction stage, the
anode
output can be passed through one or more separation stages for removal of
water and/or
CO2 from the anode output stream. For example, one or more CO, output streams
can
be formed by performing CO2 separation on the anode output using one or more
methods individually or in combination. Such methods can be used to generate
CO2
output stream(s) having a CO2 content of 90 vol% or greater, such as at least
95% vol%
CO2, or at least 98 vol% CO2. Such methods can recover about at least about
70% of
the CO2 content of the anode output, such as at least about 80% of the CO2
content of
the anode output, or at least about 90%. Alternatively, in some aspects it may
be
desirable to recover only a portion of the CO2 within an anode output stream,
with the
recovered portion of CO2 being about 33% to about 90% of the CO2 in the anode
output, such as at least about 40%, or at least about 50%. For example, it may
be
desirable to retain some CO, in the anode output flow so that a desired
composition can
be achieved in a subsequent water gas shift stage. Suitable separation methods
may
comprise use of a physical solvent (e.g., SelexolTM or RectisolTm); amines or
other
bases (e.g., MEA or MDEA); refrigeration (e.g., cryogenic separation);
pressure swing
42

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
adsorption; vacuum swing adsorption; and combinations thereof. A cryogenic CO2
separator can be an example of a suitable separator. As the anode output is
cooled, the
majority of the water in the anode output can be separated out as a condensed
(liquid)
phase. Further cooling and/or pressurizing of the water-depleted anode output
flow
can then separate high purity CO,, as the other remaining components in the
anode
output flow (such as H2, N2, CH4) do not tend to readily form condensed
phases. A
cryogenic CO2 separator can recover between about 33% and about 90% of the CO
present in a flow, depending on the operating conditions.
[00112] Removal of water from the anode exhaust to form one or more water
output
streams can also be beneficial, whether prior to, during, or after performing
CO2
separation. The amount of water in the anode output can vary depending on
operating
conditions selected. For example, the steam-to-carbon ratio established at the
anode
inlet can affect the water content in the anode exhaust, with high steam-to-
carbon ratios
typically resulting in a large amount of water that can pass through the anode
unreacted
and/or reacted only due to the water gas shift equilibrium in the anode.
Depending on
the aspect, the water content in the anode exhaust can correspond to up to
about 30% or
more of the volume in the anode exhaust. Additionally or alternately, the
water content
can be about 80% or less of the volume of the anode exhaust. While such water
can be
removed by compression and/or cooling with resulting condensation, the removal
of
this water can require extra compressor power and/or heat exchange surface
area and
excessive cooling water. One beneficial way to remove a portion of this excess
water
can be based on use of an adsorbent bed that can capture the humidity from the
moist
anode effluent and can then be 'regenerated' using dry anode feed gas, in
order to
provide additional water for the anode feed. HVAC-style (heating, ventilation,
and air
conditioning) adsorption wheels design can be applicable, because anode
exhaust and
inlet can be similar in pressure, and minor leakage from one stream to the
other can
have minimal impact on the overall process. In embodiments where CO2 removal
is
performed using a cryogenic process, removal of water prior to or during CO2
removal
may be desirable, including removal by triethyleneglycol (TEG) system and/or
desiccants. By contrast, if an amine wash is used for CO2 removal, water can
be
removed from the anode exhaust downstream from the CO2 removal stage.
43

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
[00113] Alternately or in addition to a CO2 output stream and/or a water
output stream,
the anode output can be used to form one or more product streams containing a
desired
chemical or fuel product. Such a product stream or streams can correspond to a
syngas
stream, a hydrogen stream, or both syngas product and hydrogen product
streams. For
example, a hydrogen product stream containing at least about 70 vol% H2, such
as at
least about 90 vol% H, or at least about 95 vol% H2, can be formed.
Additionally or
alternately, a syngas stream containing at least about 70 vol% of H, and CO
combined,
such as at least about 90 vol% of H2 and CO can be formed. The one or more
product
streams can have a gas volume corresponding to at least about 75% of the
combined H2
and CO gas volumes in the anode output, such as at least about 85% or at least
about
90% of the combined H2 and CO gas volumes. It is noted that the relative
amounts of
H2 and CO in the products streams may differ from the H2 to CO ratio in the
anode
output based on use of water gas shift reaction stages to convert between the
products.
[00114] In some aspects, it can be desirable to remove or separate a portion
of the H2
present in the anode output. For example, in some aspects the H2 to CO ratio
in the
anode exhaust can be at least about 3.0 : 1. By contrast, processes that make
use of
syngas, such as Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, may consume H2 and CO in a
different
ratio, such as a ratio that is closer to 2 : 1. One alternative can be to use
a water gas
shift reaction to modify the content of the anode output to have an H2 to CO
ratio
closer to a desired syngas composition. Another alternative can be to use a
membrane
separation to remove a portion of the H2 present in the anode output to
achieve a
desired ratio of H2 and CO, or still alternately to use a combination of
membrane
separation and water gas shift reactions. One advantage of using a membrane
separation to remove only a portion of the H2 in the anode output can be that
the
desired separation can be performed under relatively mild conditions. Since
one goal
can be to produce a retentate that still has a substantial H2 content, a
permeate of high
purity hydrogen can be generated by membrane separation without requiring
severe
conditions. For example, rather than having a pressure on the permeate side of
the
membrane of about 100 kPaa or less (such as ambient pressure), the permeate
side can
be at an elevated pressure relative to ambient while still having sufficient
driving force
to perform the membrane separation. Additionally or alternately, a sweep gas
such as
methane can be used to provide a driving force for the membrane separation.
This can
44

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
reduce the purity of the H2 permeate stream, but may be advantageous,
depending on
the desired use for the permeate stream.
[00115] In various aspects of the invention, at least a portion of the anode
exhaust
stream (preferably after separation of CO2 and/or H20) can be used as a feed
for a
process external to the fuel cell and associated reforming stages. In various
aspects, the
anode exhaust can have a ratio of H2 to CO of about 1.5 : 1 to about 10 : 1,
such as at
least about 3.0 : 1, or at least about 4.0 : 1, or at least about 5.0 : 1. A
syngas stream
can be generated or withdrawn from the anode exhaust. The anode exhaust gas,
optionally after separation of CO2 and/or H2 0, and optionally after
performing a water
gas shift reaction and/or a membrane separation to remove excess hydrogen, can
correspond to a stream containing substantial portions of H2 and/or CO. For a
stream
with a relatively low content of CO, such as a stream where the ratio of H2 to
CO is at
least about 3 : I, the anode exhaust can be suitable for use as an H2 feed.
Examples of
processes that could benefit from an H2 feed can include, but are not limited
to,
refinery processes, an ammonia synthesis plant, or a turbine in a (different)
power
generation system, or combinations thereof Depending on the application, still
lower
CO2 contents can be desirable. For a stream with an H2-to-CO ratio of less
than about
2.2 to 1 and greater than about 1.9 to 1, the stream can be suitable for use
as a syngas
feed. Examples of processes that could benefit from a syngas feed can include,
but are
not limited to, a gas-to-liquids plant (such as a plant using a Fischer-
Tropsch process
with a non-shifting catalyst) and/or a methanol synthesis plant. The amount of
the
anode exhaust used as a feed for an external process can be any convenient
amount.
Optionally, when a portion of the anode exhaust is used as a feed for an
external
process, a second portion of the anode exhaust can be recycled to the anode
input
and/or recycled to the combustion zone for a combustion-powered generator.
[00116] The input streams useful for different types of Fischer-Tropsch
synthesis
processes can provide an example of the different types of product streams
that may be
desirable to generate from the anode output. For a Fischer-Tropsch synthesis
reaction
system that uses a shifting catalyst, such as an iron-based catalyst, the
desired input
stream to the reaction system can include CO2 in addition to H2 and CO. If a
sufficient
amount of CO2 is not present in the input stream, a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst
with water
gas shift activity can consume CO in order to generate additional CO2,
resulting in a

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
syngas that can be deficient in CO. For integration of such a Fischer-Tropsch
process
with an MCFC fuel cell, the separation stages for the anode output can be
operated to
retain a desired amount of CO2 (and optionally H20) in the syngas product. By
contrast, for a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst based on a non-shifting catalyst, any
CO2
present in a product stream could serve as an inert component in the Fischer-
Tropsch
reaction system.
[00117] In an aspect where the membrane is swept with a sweep gas such as a
methane
sweep gas, the methane sweep gas can correspond to a methane stream used as
the
anode fuel or in a different low pressure process, such as a boiler, furnace,
gas turbine,
or other fuel-consuming device. In such an aspect, low levels of CO2
permeation
across the membrane can have minimal consequence. Such CO2 that may permeate
across the membrane can have a minimal impact on the reactions within the
anode, and
such CO2 can remain contained in the anode product. Therefore, the CO2 (if
any) lost
across the membrane due to permeation does not need to be transferred again
across the
MCFC electrolyte. This can significantly reduce the separation selectivity
requirement
for the hydrogen peimeation membrane. This can allow, for example, use of a
higher-
permeability membrane having a lower selectivity, which can enable use of a
lower
pressure and/or reduced membrane surface area. In such an aspect of the
invention, the
volume of the sweep gas can be a large multiple of the volume of hydrogen in
the
anode exhaust, which can allow the effective hydrogen concentration on the
permeate
side to be maintained close to zero. The hydrogen thus separated can be
incorporated
into the turbine-fed methane where it can enhance the turbine combustion
characteristics, as described above.
[00118] It is noted that excess H, produced in the anode can represent a fuel
where the
greenhouse gases have already been separated. Any CO2 in the anode output can
be
readily separated from the anode output, such as by using an amine wash, a
cryogenic
CO2 separator, and/or a pressure or vacuum swing absorption process. Several
of the
components of the anode output (H2, CO, CH4) are not easily removed, while CO2
and
H20 can usually be readily removed. Depending on the embodiment, at least
about 90
vol% of the CO, in the anode output can be separated out to form a relatively
high
purity CO2 output stream. Thus, any CO2 generated in the anode can be
efficiently
separated out to form a high purity CO, output stream. After separation, the
remaining
46

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
portion of the anode output can correspond primarily to components with
chemical
and/or fuel value, as well as reduced amounts of CO2 and/or H20. Since a
substantial
portion of the CO2 generated by the original fuel (prior to reforming) can
have been
separated out, the amount of CO2 generated by subsequent burning of the
remaining
portion of the anode output can be reduced. In particular, to the degree that
the fuel in
the remaining portion of the anode output is H2, no additional greenhouse
gases can
typically be formed by burning of this fuel.
[00119] The anode exhaust can be subjected to a variety of gas processing
options,
including water-gas shift and separation of the components from each other.
Two
general anode processing schemes are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.
[00120] FIG. 1 schematically shows an example of a reaction system for
operating a
fuel cell array of molten carbonate fuel cells in conjunction with a chemical
synthesis
process. In FIG. 1, a fuel stream 105 is provided to a reforming stage (or
stages) 110
associated with the anode 127 of a fuel cell 120, such as a fuel cell that is
part of a fuel
cell stack in a fuel cell array. The reforming stage 110 associated with fuel
cell 120 can
be internal to a fuel cell assembly. In some optional aspects, an external
reforming
stage (not shown) can also be used to reform a portion of the reformable fuel
in an
input stream prior to passing the input stream into a fuel cell assembly. Fuel
stream 105
can preferably include a reformable fuel, such as methane, other hydrocarbons,
and/or
other hydrocarbon-like compounds such as organic compounds containing carbon-
hydrogen bonds. Fuel stream 105 can also optionally contain H2 and/or CO, such
as H2
and/or CO provided by optional anode recycle stream 185. It is noted that
anode
recycle stream 185 is optional, and that in many aspects no recycle stream is
provided
from the anode exhaust 125 back to anode 127, either directly or indirectly
via
combination with fuel stream 105 or reformed fuel stream 115. After reforming,
the
reformed fuel stream 115 can be passed into anode 127 of fuel cell 120. A CO2
and
02-containing stream 119 can also be passed into cathode 129. A flow of
carbonate
ions 122, C032-, from the cathode portion 129 of the fuel cell can provide the
remaining reactant needed for the anode fuel cell reactions. Based on the
reactions in
the anode 127, the resulting anode exhaust 125 can include H20, CO2, one or
more
components corresponding to incompletely reacted fuel (H2, CO, CH4, or other
components corresponding to a reformable fuel), and optionally one or more
additional
47

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
nonreactive components, such as N2 and/or other contaminants that are part of
fuel
stream 105. The anode exhaust 125 can then be passed into one or more
separation
stages. For example, a CO2 removal stage 140 can correspond to a cryogenic CO2
removal system, an amine wash stage for removal of acid gases such as CO2, or
another suitable type of CO2 separation stage for separating a CO2 output
stream 143
from the anode exhaust. Optionally, the anode exhaust can first be passed
through a
water gas shift reactor 130 to convert any CO present in the anode exhaust
(along with
some H20) into CO2 and H2 in an optionally water gas shifted anode exhaust
135.
Depending on the nature of the CO2 removal stage, a water condensation or
removal
stage 150 may be desirable to remove a water output stream 153 from the anode
exhaust. Though shown in FIG. 1 after the CO2 separation stage 140, it may
optionally
be located before the CO2 separation stage 140 instead. Additionally, an
optional
membrane separation stage 160 for separation of H/ can be used to generate a
high
purity permeate stream 163 of H2. The resulting retentate stream 166 can then
be used
as an input to a chemical synthesis process. Stream 166 could additionally or
alternately be shifted in a second water-gas shift reactor 131 to adjust the
H2, CO, and
CO2 content to a different ratio, producing an output stream 168 for further
use in a
chemical synthesis process. In FIG. 1, anode recycle stream 185 is shown as
being
withdrawn from the retentate stream 166, but the anode recycle stream 185
could
additionally or alternately be withdrawn from other convenient locations in or
between
the various separation stages. The separation stages and shift reactor(s)
could
additionally or alternately be configured in different orders, and/or in a
parallel
configuration. Finally, a stream with a reduced content of CO2 139 can be
generated as
an output from cathode 129. For the sake of simplicity, various stages of
compression
and heat addition/removal that might be useful in the process, as well as
steam addition
or removal, are not shown.
[00121] As noted above, the various types of separations performed on the
anode
exhaust can be performed in any convenient order. FIG. 2 shows an example of
an
alternative order for performing separations on an anode exhaust. In FIG. 2,
anode
exhaust 125 can be initially passed into separation stage 260 for removing a
portion
263 of the hydrogen content from the anode exhaust 125. This can allow, for
example,
reduction of the H/ content of the anode exhaust to provide a retentate 266
with a ratio
48

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
of H2 to CO closer to 2 : 1. The ratio of H2 to CO can then be further
adjusted to
achieve a desired value in a water gas shift stage 230. The water gas shifted
output 235
can then pass through CO2 separation stage 240 and water removal stage 250 to
produce an output stream 275 suitable for use as an input to a desired
chemical
synthesis process. Optionally, output stream 275 could be exposed to an
additional
water gas shift stage (not shown). A portion of output stream 275 can
optionally be
recycled (not shown) to the anode input. Of course, still other combinations
and
sequencing of separation stages can be used to generate a stream based on the
anode
output that has a desired composition. For the sake of simplicity, various
stages of
compression and heat addition/removal that might be useful in the process, as
well as
steam addition or removal, are not shown.
Cathode Inputs and Outputs
[00122] Conventionally, a molten carbonate fuel cell can be operated based on
drawing
a desired load while consuming some portion of the fuel in the fuel stream
delivered to
the anode. The voltage of the fuel cell can then be determined by the load,
fuel input to
the anode, air and CO2 provided to the cathode, and the internal resistances
of the fuel
cell. The CO2 to the cathode can be conventionally provided in part by using
the anode
exhaust as at least a part of the cathode input stream. By contrast, the
present invention
can use separate/different sources for the anode input and cathode input. By
removing
any direct link between the composition of the anode input flow and the
cathode input
flow, additional options become available for operating the fuel cell, such as
to
generate excess synthesis gas, to improve capture of carbon dioxide, and/or to
improve
the total efficiency (electrical plus chemical power) of the fuel cell, among
others.
[00123] In a molten carbonate fuel cell, the transport of carbonate ions
across the
electrolyte in the fuel cell can provide a method for transporting CO2 from a
first flow
path to a second flow path, where the transport method can allow transport
from a
lower concentration (the cathode) to a higher concentration (the anode), which
can thus
facilitate capture of CO2. Part of the selectivity of the fuel cell for CO2
separation can
be based on the electrochemical reactions allowing the cell to generate
electrical power.
For nonreactive species (such as N2) that effectively do not participate in
the
electrochemical reactions within the fuel cell, there can be an insignificant
amount of
reaction and transport from cathode to anode. By contrast, the potential
(voltage)
49

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
difference between the cathode and anode can provide a strong driving force
for
transport of carbonate ions across the fuel cell. As a result, the transport
of carbonate
ions in the molten carbonate fuel cell can allow CO2 to be transported from
the cathode
(lower CO2 concentration) to the anode (higher CO2 concentration) with
relatively high
selectivity. However, a challenge in using molten carbonate fuel cells for
carbon
dioxide removal can be that the fuel cells have limited ability to remove
carbon dioxide
from relatively dilute cathode feeds. The voltage and/or power generated by a
carbonate fuel cell can start to drop rapidly as the CO2 concentration falls
below about
2.0 vol%. As the CO2 concentration drops further, e.g., to below about 1.0
vol%, at
some point the voltage across the fuel cell can become low enough that little
or no
further transport of carbonate may occur and the fuel cell ceases to function.
Thus, at
least some CO2 is likely to be present in the exhaust gas from the cathode
stage of a
fuel cell under commercially viable operating conditions.
[00124] The amount of carbon dioxide delivered to the fuel cell cathode(s) can
be
determined based on the CO2 content of a source for the cathode inlet. One
example of
a suitable CO2-containing stream for use as a cathode input flow can be an
output or
exhaust flow from a combustion source. Examples of combustion sources include,
but
are not limited to, sources based on combustion of natural gas, combustion of
coal,
and/or combustion of other hydrocarbon-type fuels (including biologically
derived
fuels). Additional or alternate sources can include other types of boilers,
fired heaters,
furnaces, and/or other types of devices that bum carbon-containing fuels in
order to
heat another substance (such as water or air). To a first approximation, the
CO2
content of the output flow from a combustion source can be a minor portion of
the
flow. Even for a higher CO2 content exhaust flow, such as the output from a
coal-fired
combustion source, the CO2 content from most commercial coal-fired power
plants can
be about 15 vol% or less. More generally, the CO2 content of an output or
exhaust
flow from a combustion source can be at least about 1.5 vol%, or at least
about 1.6
vol%, or at least about 1.7 vol%, or at least about 1.8 vol% , or at least
about 1.9 vol%,
or at least greater 2 vol%, or at least about 4 vol%, or at least about 5
vol%, or at least
about 6 vol%, or at least about 8 vol%. Additionally or alternately, the CO2
content of
an output or exhaust flow from a combustion source can be about 20 vol% or
less, such
as about 15 vol% or less, or about 12 vol% or less, or about 10 vol % or less,
or about 9

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
vol % or less, or about 8 vol % or less, or about 7 vol% or less, or about 6.5
vol% or
less, or about 6 vol% or less, or about 5.5 vol% or less, or about 5 vol% or
less, or
about 4.5 vol% or less. The concentrations given above are on a dry basis. It
is noted
that the lower CO2 content values can be present in the exhaust from some
natural gas
or methane combustion sources, such as generators that are part of a power
generation
system that may or may not include an exhaust gas recycle loop.
[00125] Other potential sources for a cathode input stream can additionally or
alternately include sources of bio-produced CO2. This can include, for
example, CO2
generated during processing of bio-derived compounds, such as CO2 generated
during
ethanol production. An additional or alternate example can include CO2
generated by
combustion of a bio-produced fuel, such as combustion of lignocellulose. Still
other
additional or alternate potential CO2 sources can correspond to output or
exhaust
streams from various industrial processes, such as CO2-containing streams
generated
by plants for manufacture of steel, cement, and/or paper.
[00126] Yet another additional or alternate potential source of CO2 can be CO2-
containing streams from a fuel cell. The 002-containing stream from a fuel
cell can
correspond to a cathode output stream from a different fuel cell, an anode
output stream
from a different fuel cell, a recycle stream from the cathode output to the
cathode input
of a fuel cell, and/or a recycle stream from an anode output to a cathode
input of a fuel
cell. For example, an MCFC operated in standalone mode under conventional
conditions can generate a cathode exhaust with a CO2 concentration of at least
about 5
vol%. Such a CO2-containing cathode exhaust could be used as a cathode input
for an
MCFC operated according to an aspect of the invention. More generally, other
types of
fuel cells that generate a CO2 output from the cathode exhaust can
additionally or
alternately be used, as well as other types of CO2-containing streams not
generated by a
"combustion" reaction and/or by a combustion-powered generator. Optionally but
preferably, a CO2-containing stream from another fuel cell can be from another
molten
carbonate fuel cell. For example, for molten carbonate fuel cells connected in
series
with respect to the cathodes, the output from the cathode for a first molten
carbonate
fuel cell can be used as the input to the cathode for a second molten
carbonate fuel cell.
[00127] For various types of CO2-containing streams from sources other than
combustion sources, the CO2 content of the stream can vary widely. The CO2
content
51

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
of an input stream to a cathode can contain at least about 2 vol% of CO2, such
as at
least about 4 vol%, or at least about 5 vol%, or at least about 6 vol%, or at
least about 8
vol%. Additionally or alternately, the CO2 content of an input stream to a
cathode can
be about 30 vol% or less, such as about 25 vol% or less, or about 20 vol% or
less, or
about 15 vol% or less, or about 10 vol% or less, or about 8 vol% or less, or
about 6
vol% or less, or about 4 vol% or less. For some still higher CO2 content
streams, the
CO2 content can be greater than about 30 vol%, such as a stream substantially
composed of CO2 with only incidental amounts of other compounds. As an
example, a
gas-fired turbine without exhaust gas recycle can produce an exhaust stream
with a
CO2 content of approximately 4.2 vol%. With EGR, a gas-fired turbine can
produce an
exhaust stream with a CO2 content of about 6-8 vol%. Stoichiometric combustion
of
methane can produce an exhaust stream with a CO2 content of about 11 vol%.
Combustion of coal can produce an exhaust stream with a CO2 content of about
15-20
vol%. Fired heaters using refinery off-gas can produce an exhaust stream with
a CO2
content of about 12-15 vol%. A gas turbine operated on a low BTU gas without
any
EGR can produce an exhaust stream with a CO2 content of ¨12 vol%.
[00128] In addition to CO2, a cathode input stream must include 02 to provide
the
components necessary for the cathode reaction. Some cathode input streams can
be
based on having air as a component. For example, a combustion exhaust stream
can be
formed by combusting a hydrocarbon fuel in the presence of air. Such a
combustion
exhaust stream, or another type of cathode input stream having an oxygen
content
based on inclusion of air, can have an oxygen content of about 20 vol% or
less, such as
about 15 vol% or less, or about 10 vol% or less. Additionally or alternately,
the oxygen
content of the cathode input stream can be at least about 4 vol%, such as at
least about
6 vol%, or at least about 8 vol%. More generally, a cathode input stream can
have a
suitable content of oxygen for performing the cathode reaction. In some
aspects, this
can correspond to an oxygen content of about 5 vol% to about 15 vol%, such as
from
about 7 vol% to about 9 vol%. For many types of cathode input streams, the
combined
amount of CO2 and 02 can correspond to less than about 21 vol% of the input
stream,
such as less than about 15 vol% of the stream or less than about 10 vol% of
the stream.
An air stream containing oxygen can be combined with a CO2 source that has low
52

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
oxygen content. For example, the exhaust stream generated by burning coal may
include a low oxygen content that can be mixed with air to form a cathode
inlet stream.
[00129] In addition to CO2 and 02, a cathode input stream can also be composed
of
inert/non-reactive species such as N2, H20, and other typical oxidant (air)
components.
For example, for a cathode input derived from an exhaust from a combustion
reaction,
if air is used as part of the oxidant source for the combustion reaction, the
exhaust gas
can include typical components of air such as Ni, Hi 0, and other compounds in
minor
amounts that are present in air. Depending on the nature of the fuel source
for the
combustion reaction, additional species present after combustion based on the
fuel
source may include one or more of H20, oxides of nitrogen (N0x) and/or sulfur
(S0x),
and other compounds either present in the fuel and/or that are partial or
complete
combustion products of compounds present in the fuel, such as CO. These
species may
be present in amounts that do not poison the cathode catalyst surfaces though
they may
reduce the overall cathode activity. Such reductions in performance may be
acceptable,
or species that interact with the cathode catalyst may be reduced to
acceptable levels by
known pollutant removal technologies.
[00130] The amount of 02 present in a cathode input stream (such as an input
cathode
stream based on a combustion exhaust) can advantageously be sufficient to
provide the
oxygen needed for the cathode reaction in the fuel cell. Thus, the volume
percentage of
02 can advantageously be at least 0.5 times the amount of CO2 in the exhaust.
Optionally, as necessary, additional air can be added to the cathode input to
provide
sufficient oxidant for the cathode reaction. When some form of air is used as
the
oxidant, the amount of N2 in the cathode exhaust can be at least about 78
vol%, e.g., at
least about 88 vol%, and/or about 95 vol% or less. In some aspects, the
cathode input
stream can additionally or alternately contain compounds that are generally
viewed as
contaminants, such as H2S or NH3. In other aspects, the cathode input stream
can be
cleaned to reduce or minimize the content of such contaminants.
[00131] In addition to the reaction to form carbonate ions for transport
across the
electrolyte, the conditions in the cathode can also be suitable for conversion
of nitrogen
oxides into nitrate and/or nitrate ions. Hereinafter, only nitrate ions will
be referred to
for convenience. The resulting nitrate ions can also be transported across the
electrolyte for reaction in the anode. NOx concentrations in a cathode input
stream can
53

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
typically be on the order of ppm, so this nitrate transport reaction can have
a minimal
impact on the amount of carbonate transported across the electrolyte. However,
this
method of NOx removal can be beneficial for cathode input streams based on
combustion exhausts from gas turbines, as this can provide a mechanism for
reducing
NOx emissions. The conditions in the cathode can additionally or alternately
be
suitable for conversion of unburned hydrocarbons (in combination with 02 in
the
cathode input stream) to typical combustion products, such as CO2 and H20.
[00132] A suitable temperature for operation of an MCFC can be between about
450 C
and about 750 C, such as at least about 500 C, e.g., with an inlet temperature
of about
550 C and an outlet temperature of about 625 C. Prior to entering the cathode,
heat
can be added to or removed from the combustion exhaust, if desired, e.g., to
provide
heat for other processes, such as reforming the fuel input for the anode. For
example, if
the source for the cathode input stream is a combustion exhaust stream, the
combustion
exhaust stream may have a temperature greater than a desired temperature for
the
cathode inlet. In such an aspect, heat can be removed from the combustion
exhaust
prior to use as the cathode input stream. Alternatively, the combustion
exhaust could
be at very low temperature, for example after a wet gas scrubber on a coal-
fired boiler,
in which case the combustion exhaust can be below about 100 C. Alternatively,
the
combustion exhaust could be from the exhaust of a gas turbine operated in
combined
cycle mode, in which the gas can be cooled by raising steam to run a steam
turbine for
additional power generation. In this case, the gas can be below about 50 C.
Heat can
be added to a combustion exhaust that is cooler than desired.
Fuel Cell Arrangement
[00133] In various aspects, a configuration option for a fuel cell (such as a
fuel cell
array containing multiple fuel cell stacks) can be to divide the CO2-
containing stream
between a plurality of fuel cells. Some types of sources for CO2-containing
streams
can generate large volumetric flow rates relative to the capacity of an
individual fuel
cell. For example, the CO2-containing output stream from an industrial
combustion
source can typically correspond to a large flow volume relative to desirable
operating
conditions for a single MCFC of reasonable size. Instead of processing the
entire flow
in a single MCFC, the flow can be divided amongst a plurality of MCFC units,
usually
54

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
at least some of which can be in parallel, so that the flow rate in each unit
can be within
a desired flow range.
[00134] A second configuration option can be to utilize fuel cells in series
to
successively remove CO2 from a flow stream. Regardless of the number of
initial fuel
cells to which a CO2-containing stream can be distributed to in parallel, each
initial fuel
cell can be followed by one or more additional cells in series to further
remove
additional CO2. If the desired amount of CO2 in the cathode output is
sufficiently low,
attempting to remove CO2 from a cathode input stream down to the desired level
in a
single fuel cell or fuel cell stage could lead to a low and/or unpredictable
voltage output
for the fuel cell. Rather than attempting to remove CO2 to the desired level
in a single
fuel cell or fuel cell stage, CO, can be removed in successive cells until a
desired level
can be achieved. For example, each cell in a series of fuel cells can be used
to remove
some percentage (e.g., about 50%) of the CO, present in a fuel stream. In such
an
example, if three fuel cells are used in series, the CO2 concentration can be
reduced
(e.g., to about 15% or less of the original amount present, which can
correspond to
reducing the CO2 concentration from about 6% to about 1% or less over the
course of
three fuel cells in series).
[00135] In another configuration, the operating conditions can be selected in
early fuel
stages in series to provide a desired output voltage while the array of stages
can be
selected to achieve a desired level of carbon separation. As an example, an
array of
fuel cells can be used with three fuel cells in series. The first two fuel
cells in series
can be used to remove CO2 while maintaining a desired output voltage. The
final fuel
cell can then be operated to remove CO2 to a desired concentration but at a
lower
voltage.
[00136] In still another configuration, there can be separate connectivity for
the anodes
and cathodes in a fuel cell array. For example, if the fuel cell array
includes fuel
cathodes connected in series, the corresponding anodes can be connected in any
convenient manner, not necessarily matching up with the same arrangement as
their
corresponding cathodes, for example. This can include, for instance,
connecting the
anodes in parallel, so that each anode receives the same type of fuel feed,
and/or
connecting the anodes in a reverse series, so that the highest fuel
concentration in the
anodes can correspond to those cathodes having the lowest CO2 concentration.

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
[00137] In yet another configuration, the amount of fuel delivered to one or
more
anode stages and/or the amount of CO2 delivered to one or more cathode stages
can be
controlled in order to improve the performance of the fuel cell array. For
example, a
fuel cell array can have a plurality of cathode stages connected in series. In
an array
that includes three cathode stages in series, this can mean that the output
from a first
cathode stage can correspond to the input for a second cathode stage, and the
output
from the second cathode stage can correspond to the input for a third cathode
stage. In
this type of configuration, the CO2 concentration can decrease with each
successive
cathode stage. To compensate for this reduced CO2 concentration, additional
hydrogen
and/or methane can be delivered to the anode stages corresponding to the later
cathode
stages. The additional hydrogen and/or methane in the anodes corresponding to
the
later cathode stages can at least partially offset the loss of voltage and/or
current caused
by the reduced CO, concentration, which can increase the voltage and thus net
power
produced by the fuel cell. In another example, the cathodes in a fuel cell
array can be
connected partially in series and partially in parallel. In this type of
example, instead of
passing the entire combustion output into the cathodes in the first cathode
stage, at least
a portion of the combustion exhaust can be passed into a later cathode stage.
This can
provide an increased CO2 content in a later cathode stage. Still other options
for using
variable feeds to either anode stages or cathode stages can be used if
desired.
[00138] The cathode of a fuel cell can correspond to a plurality of cathodes
from an
array of fuel cells, as previously described. In some aspects, a fuel cell
array can be
operated to improve or maximize the amount of carbon transferred from the
cathode to
the anode. In such aspects, for the cathode output from the final cathode(s)
in an array
sequence (typically at least including a series arrangement, or else the final
cathode(s)
and the initial cathode(s) would be the same), the output composition can
include about
2.0 vol% or less of CO2 (e.g., about 1.5 vol% or less or about 1.2 vol% or
less) and/or
at least about 0.5 vol% of CO2, or at least about 1.0 vol%, or at least about
1.2 vol% or
at least about 1.5 vol%. Due to this limitation, the net efficiency of CO2
removal when
using molten carbonate fuel cells can be dependent on the amount of CO2 in the
cathode input. For cathode input streams with CO2 contents of greater than
about 6
vol%, such as at least about 8%, the limitation on the amount of CO, that can
be
removed is not severe. However, for a combustion reaction using natural gas as
a fuel
56

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
and with excess air, as is typically found in a gas turbine, the amount of CO2
in the
combustion exhaust may only correspond to a CO2 concentration at the cathode
input
of less than about 5 vol%. Use of exhaust gas recycle can allow the amount of
CO, at
the cathode input to be increased to at least about 5 vol%, e.g., at least
about 6 vol%. If
EGR is increased when using natural gas as a fuel to produce a CO2
concentration
beyond about 6 vol%, then the flammability in the combustor can be decreased
and the
gas turbine may become unstable. However, when H2 is added to the fuel, the
flammability window can be significantly increased, allowing the amount of
exhaust
gas recycle to be increased further, so that concentrations of CO2 at the
cathode input
of at least about 7.5 vol% or at least about 8 vol% can be achieved. As an
example,
based on a removal limit of about 1.5 vol% at the cathode exhaust, increasing
the CO2
content at the cathode input from about 5.5 vol% to about 7.5 vol% can
correspond to a
¨10% increase in the amount of CO2 that can be captured using a fuel cell and
transported to the anode loop for eventual CO, separation. The amount of 02 in
the
cathode output can additionally or alternately be reduced, typically in an
amount
proportional to the amount of CO2 removed, which can result in small
corresponding
increases in the amount(s) of the other (non-cathode-reactive) species at the
cathode
exit.
[00139] In other aspects, a fuel cell array can be operated to improve or
maximize the
energy output of the fuel cell, such as the total energy output, the electric
energy output,
the syngas chemical energy output, or a combination thereof. For example,
molten
carbonate fuel cells can be operated with an excess of reformable fuel in a
variety of
situations, such as for generation of a syngas stream for use in chemical
synthesis plant
and/or for generation of a high purity hydrogen stream. The syngas stream
and/or
hydrogen stream can be used as a syngas source, a hydrogen source, as a clean
fuel
source, and/or for any other convenient application. In such aspects, the
amount of
CO2 in the cathode exhaust can be related to the amount of CO, in the cathode
input
stream and the CO2 utilization at the desired operating conditions for
improving or
maximizing the fuel cell energy output.
[00140] Additionally or alternately, depending on the operating conditions, an
MCFC
can lower the CO2 content of a cathode exhaust stream to about 5.0 vol% or
less, e.g.,
about 4.0 vol% or less, or about 2.0 vol% or less, or about 1.5 vol% or less,
or about
57

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
1.2 vol% or less. Additionally or alternately, the CO2 content of the cathode
exhaust
stream can be at least about 0.9 vol%, such as at least about 1.0 vol%, or at
least about
1.2 vol%, or at least about 1.5 vol%.
Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Operation
[00141] In some aspects, a fuel cell may be operated in a single pass or once-
through
mode. In single pass mode, reformed products in the anode exhaust are not
returned to
the anode inlet. Thus, recycling syngas, hydrogen, or some other product from
the
anode output directly to the anode inlet is not done in single pass operation.
More
generally, in single pass operation, reformed products in the anode exhaust
are also not
returned indirectly to the anode inlet, such as by using reformed products to
process a
fuel stream subsequently introduced into the anode inlet. Optionally, CO2 from
the
anode outlet can be recycled to the cathode inlet during operation of an MCFC
in single
pass mode. More generally, in some alternative aspects, recycling from the
anode
outlet to the cathode inlet may occur for an MCFC operating in single pass
mode. Heat
from the anode exhaust or output may additionally or alternately be recycled
in a single
pass mode. For example, the anode output flow may pass through a heat
exchanger
that cools the anode output and warms another stream, such as an input stream
for the
anode and/or the cathode. Recycling heat from anode to the fuel cell is
consistent with
use in single pass or once-through operation. Optionally
but not preferably,
constituents of the anode output may be burned to provide heat to the fuel
cell during
single pass mode.
[00142] FIG. 3 shows a schematic example of the operation of an MCFC for
generation of electrical power. In FIG. 3, the anode portion of the fuel cell
can receive
fuel and steam (H20) as inputs, with outputs of water, CO2, and optionally
excess H2,
CH4 (or other hydrocarbons), and/or CO. The cathode portion of the fuel cell
can
receive CO2 and some oxidant (e.g., air/02) as inputs, with an output
corresponding to
a reduced amount of CO2 in 02-depleted oxidant (air). Within the fuel cell,
CO2 ions
formed in the cathode side can be transported across the electrolyte to
provide the
carbonate ions needed for the reactions occurring at the anode.
[00143] Several reactions can occur within a molten carbonate fuel cell such
as the
example fuel cell shown in FIG. 3. The reforming reactions can be optional,
and can be
reduced or eliminated if sufficient H2 is provided directly to the anode. The
following
58

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
reactions are based on CH4, but similar reactions can occur when other fuels
are used in
the fuel cell.
(1) <anode reforming> CH4 + H20 => 3H2 + CO
(2) <water gas shift> CO + H20 => H2 = CO2
(3) < reforming and water gas shift combined> CH4 + 2H20 => 4H2 +
CO2
(4) <anode H2 oxidation> H2 + CO2 => H20 + CO2 + 2el
(5) <cathode> 1/202 + CO2 + 2e => CO2
[00144] Reaction (1) represents the basic hydrocarbon reforming reaction to
generate
H2 for use in the anode of the fuel cell. The CO formed in reaction (1) can be
converted to H2 by the water-gas shift reaction (2). The combination of
reactions (1)
and (2) is shown as reaction (3). Reactions (1) and (2) can occur external to
the fuel
cell, and/or the reforming can be performed internal to the anode.
[00145] Reactions (4) and (5), at the anode and cathode respectively,
represent the
reactions that can result in electrical power generation within the fuel cell.
Reaction (4)
combines H2, either present in the feed or optionally generated by reactions
(1) and/or
(2), with carbonate ions to form H20, CO2, and electrons to the circuit.
Reaction (5)
combines 02, CO2, and electrons from the circuit to form carbonate ions. The
carbonate ions generated by reaction (5) can be transported across the
electrolyte of the
fuel cell to provide the carbonate ions needed for reaction (4). In
combination with the
transport of carbonate ions across the electrolyte, a closed current loop can
then be
formed by providing an electrical connection between the anode and cathode.
[00146] In various embodiments, a goal of operating the fuel cell can be to
improve the
total efficiency of the fuel cell and/or the total efficiency of the fuel cell
plus an
integrated chemical synthesis process. This is typically in contrast to
conventional
operation of a fuel cell, where the goal can be to operate the fuel cell with
high
electrical efficiency for using the fuel provided to the cell for generation
of electrical
power. As defined above, total fuel cell efficiency may be determined by
dividing the
electric output of the fuel cell plus the lower heating value of the fuel cell
outputs by
the lower heating value of the input components for the fuel cell. In other
words,
TFCE = (LHV(el) + LHV(sg out))/LHV(in), where LHV(in) and LHV(sg out) refer to
the LHV of the fuel components (such as Hz, CH4, and/or CO) delivered to the
fuel cell
59

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
and syngas (H2, CO and/or CO2) in the anode outlet streams or flows,
respectively.
This can provide a measure of the electric energy plus chemical energy
generated by
the fuel cell and/or the integrated chemical process. It is noted that under
this definition
of total efficiency, heat energy used within the fuel cell and/or used within
the
integrated fuel cell / chemical synthesis system can contribute to total
efficiency.
However, any excess heat exchanged or otherwise withdrawn from the fuel cell
or
integrated fuel cell / chemical synthesis system is excluded from the
definition. Thus,
if excess heat from the fuel cell is used, for example, to generate steam for
electricity
generation by a steam turbine, such excess heat is excluded from the
definition of total
efficiency.
[00147] Several operational parameters may be manipulated to operate a fuel
cell with
excess reformable fuel. Some parameters can be similar to those currently
recommended for fuel cell operation. In some aspects, the cathode conditions
and
temperature inputs to the fuel cell can be similar to those recommended in the
literature. For example, the desired electrical efficiency and the desired
total fuel cell
efficiency may be achieved at a range of fuel cell operating temperatures
typical for
molten carbonate fuel cells. In typical operation, the temperature can
increase across
the fuel cell.
[00148] In other aspects, the operational parameters of the fuel cell can
deviate from
typical conditions so that the fuel cell is operated to allow a temperature
decrease from
the anode inlet to the anode outlet and/or from the cathode inlet to the
cathode outlet.
For example, the reforming reaction to convert a hydrocarbon into H2 and CO is
an
endothermic reaction. If a sufficient amount of reforming is performed in a
fuel cell
anode relative to the amount of oxidation of hydrogen to generate electrical
current, the
net heat balance in the fuel cell can be endothermic. This can cause a
temperature drop
between the inlets and outlets of a fuel cell. During endothermic operation,
the
temperature drop in the fuel cell can be controlled so that the electrolyte in
the fuel cell
remains in a molten state.
[00149] Parameters that can be manipulated in a way so as to differ from those
currently recommended can include the amount of fuel provided to the anode,
the
composition of the fuel provided to the anode, and/or the separation and
capture of
syngas in the anode output without significant recycling of syngas from the
anode

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
exhaust to either the anode input or the cathode input. In some aspects, no
recycle of
syngas or hydrogen from the anode exhaust to either the anode input or the
cathode
input can be allowed to occur, either directly or indirectly. In additional or
alternative
aspects, a limited amount of recycle can occur. In such aspects, the amount of
recycle
from the anode exhaust to the anode input and/or the cathode input can be less
than
about 10 vol% of the anode exhaust, such as less than about 5 vol%, or less
than about
1 vol%.
[00150] Additionally or alternately, a goal of operating a fuel cell can be to
separate
CO2 from the output stream of a combustion reaction or another process that
produces
a CO2 output stream, in addition to allowing generation of electric power. In
such
aspects, the combustion reaction(s) can be used to power one or more
generators or
turbines, which can provide a majority of the power generated by the combined
generator/fuel cell system. Rather than operating the fuel cell to optimize
power
generation by the fuel cell, the system can instead be operated to improve the
capture of
carbon dioxide from the combustion-powered generator while reducing or
minimizing
the number of fuels cells required for capturing the carbon dioxide. Selecting
an
appropriate configuration for the input and output flows of the fuel cell, as
well as
selecting appropriate operating conditions for the fuel cell, can allow for a
desirable
combination of total efficiency and carbon capture.
[00151] In some embodiments, the fuel cells in a fuel cell array can be
arranged so that
only a single stage of fuel cells (such as fuel cell stacks) can be present.
In this type of
embodiment, the anode fuel utilization for the single stage can represent the
anode fuel
utilization for the array. Another option can be that a fuel cell array can
contain
multiple stages of anodes and multiple stages of cathodes, with each anode
stage having
a fuel utilization within the same range, such as each anode stage having a
fuel
utilization within 10% of a specified value, for example within 5% of a
specified value.
Still another option can be that each anode stage can have a fuel utilization
equal to a
specified value or lower than the specified value by less than an amount, such
as having
each anode stage be not greater than a specified value by 10% or less, for
example, by
5% or less. As an illustrative example, a fuel cell array with a plurality of
anode stages
can have each anode stage be within about 10% of 50% fuel utilization, which
would
correspond to each anode stage having a fuel utilization between about 40% and
about
61

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
60%. As another example, a fuel cell array with a plurality of stages can have
each
anode stage be not greater than 60% anode fuel utilization with the maximum
deviation
being about 5% less, which would correspond to each anode stage having a fuel
utilization between about 55% to about 60%. In still another example, one or
more
stages of fuel cells in a fuel cell array can be operated at a fuel
utilization from about
30% to about 50%, such as operating a plurality of fuel cell stages in the
array at a fuel
utilization from about 30% to about 50%. More generally, any of the above
types of
ranges can be paired with any of the anode fuel utilization values specified
herein.
[00152] Still another additional or alternate option can include specifying a
fuel
utilization for less than all of the anode stages. For example, in some
aspects of the
invention fuel cells/stacks can be arranged at least partially in one or more
series
arrangements such that anode fuel utilization can be specified for the first
anode stage
in a series, the second anode stage in a series, the final anode stage in a
series, or any
other convenient anode stage in a series. As used herein, the "first" stage in
a series
corresponds to the stage (or set of stages, if the arrangement contains
parallel stages as
well) to which input is directly fed from the fuel source(s), with later
("second,"
"third," "final," etc.) stages representing the stages to which the output
from one or
more previous stages is fed, instead of directly from the respective fuel
source(s). In
situations where both output from previous stages and input directly from the
fuel
source(s) are co-fed into a stage, there can be a "first" (set of) stage(s)
and a "last" (set
of) stage(s), but other stages ("second," "third," etc.) can be more tricky
among which
to establish an order (e.g., in such cases, ordinal order can be determined by
concentration levels of one or more components in the composite input feed
composition, such as CO2 for instance, from highest concentration "first" to
lowest
concentration "last" with approximately similar compositional distinctions
representing
the same ordinal level.)
[00153] Yet another additional or alternate option can be to specify the anode
fuel
utilization corresponding to a particular cathode stage (again, where fuel
cells/stacks
can be arranged at least partially in one or more series arrangements). As
noted above,
based on the direction of the flows within the anodes and cathodes, the first
cathode
stage may not correspond to (be across the same fuel cell membrane from) the
first
anode stage. Thus, in some aspects of the invention, the anode fuel
utilization can be
62

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
specified for the first cathode stage in a series, the second cathode stage in
a series, the
final cathode stage in a series, or any other convenient cathode stage in a
series.
[00154] Yet still another additional or alternate option can be to specify an
overall
average of fuel utilization over all fuel cells in a fuel cell array. In
various aspects, the
overall average of fuel utilization for a fuel cell array can be about 65% or
less, for
example, about 60% or less, about 55% or less, about 50% or less, or about 45%
or less
(additionally or alternately, the overall average fuel utilization for a fuel
cell array can
be at least about 25%, for example at least about 30%, at least about 35%, or
at least
about 40%). Such an average fuel utilization need not necessarily constrain
the fuel
utilization in any single stage, so long as the array of fuel cells meets the
desired fuel
utilization.
Applications for CO2 Output after Capture
[00155] In various aspects of the invention, the systems and methods described
above
can allow for production of carbon dioxide as a pressurized fluid. For
example, the
CO2 generated from a cryogenic separation stage can initially correspond to a
pressurized CO2 liquid with a purity of at least about 90%, e.g., at least
about 95%, at
least about 97%, at least about 98%, or at least about 99%. This pressurized
CO2
stream can be used, e.g., for injection into wells in order to further enhance
oil or gas
recovery such as in secondary oil recovery. When done in proximity to a
facility that
encompasses a gas turbine, the overall system may benefit from additional
synergies in
use of electrical/mechanical power and/or through heat integration with the
overall
system.
[00156] Alternatively, for systems dedicated to an enhanced oil recovery (EOR)
application (i.e., not comingled in a pipeline system with tight compositional
standards), the CO2 separation requirements may be substantially relaxed. The
EOR
application can be sensitive to the presence of 02, so 02 can be absent, in
some
embodiments, from a CO2 stream intended for use in EOR. However, the EOR
application can tend to have a low sensitivity to dissolved CO, H2, and/or
CH4. Also,
pipelines that transport the CO2 can be sensitive to these impurities. Those
dissolved
gases can typically have only subtle impacts on the solubilizing ability of
CO2 used for
EOR. Injecting gases such as CO, H2, and/or CH4 as EOR gases can result in
some
63

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
loss of fuel value recovery, but such gases can be otherwise compatible with
EOR
applications.
[00157] Additionally or alternately, a potential use for CO2 as a pressurized
liquid can
be as a nutrient in biological processes such as algae growth/harvesting. The
use of
MCFCs for CO2 separation can ensure that most biologically significant
pollutants
could be reduced to acceptably low levels, resulting in a CO2-containing
stream having
only minor amounts of other "contaminant" gases (such as CO, H2, N2, and the
like,
and combinations thereof) that are unlikely to substantially negatively affect
the growth
of photosynthetic organisms. This can be in stark contrast to the output
streams
generated by most industrial sources, which can often contain potentially
highly toxic
material such as heavy metals.
[00158] In this type of aspect of the invention, the CO2 stream generated by
separation
of CO2 in the anode loop can be used to produce biofuels and/or chemicals, as
well as
precursors thereof. Further additionally or alternately, CO2 may be produced
as a
dense fluid, allowing for much easier pumping and transport across distances,
e.g., to
large fields of photosynthetic organisms. Conventional emission sources can
emit hot
gas containing modest amounts of CO2 (e.g., about 4-15%) mixed with other
gases and
pollutants. These materials would normally need to be pumped as a dilute gas
to an
algae pond or biofuel "farm". By contrast, the MCFC system according to the
invention can produce a concentrated CO2 stream (-60-70% by volume on a dry
basis)
that can be concentrated further to 95%+ (for example 96%+, 97%+, 98%+, or
99%+)
and easily liquefied. This stream can then be transported easily and
efficiently over
long distances at relatively low cost and effectively distributed over a wide
area. In
these embodiments, residual heat from the combustion source/MCFC may be
integrated
into the overall system as well.
[00159] An alternative embodiment may apply where the CO2 source/MCFC and
biological/ chemical production sites are co-located. In that case, only
minimal
compression may be necessary (i.e., to provide enough CO, pressure to use in
the
biological production, e.g., from about 15 psig to about 150 psig). Several
novel
arrangements can be possible in such a case. Secondary reforming may
optionally be
applied to the anode exhaust to reduce CH4 content, and water-gas shift may
optionally
additionally or alternately be present to drive any remaining CO into CO2 and
H2.
64

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
[00160] The components from an anode output stream and/or cathode output
stream
can be used for a variety of purposes. One option can be to use the anode
output as a
source of hydrogen, as described above. For an MCFC integrated with or co-
located
with a refinery, the hydrogen can be used as a hydrogen source for various
refinery
processes, such as hydroprocessing. Another option can be to additionally or
alternately use hydrogen as a fuel source where the CO2 from combustion has
already
been "captured." Such hydrogen can be used in a refinery or other industrial
setting as
a fuel for a boiler, furnace, and/or fired heater, and/or the hydrogen can be
used as a
feed for an electric power generator, such as a turbine. Hydrogen from an MCFC
fuel
cell can further additionally or alternately be used as an input stream for
other types of
fuel cells that require hydrogen as an input, possibly including vehicles
powered by
fuel cells. Still another option can be to additionally or alternately use
syngas
generated as an output from an MCFC fuel cell as a fermentation input.
[00161] Another option can be to additionally or alternately use syngas
generated from
the anode output. Of course, syngas can be used as a fuel, although a syngas
based fuel
can still lead to some CO2 production when burned as fuel. In other aspects, a
syngas
output stream can be used as an input for a chemical synthesis process. One
option can
be to additionally or alternately use syngas for a Fischer-Tropsch type
process, and/or
another process where larger hydrocarbon molecules are formed from the syngas
input.
Another option can be to additionally or alternately use syngas to form an
intermediate
product such as methanol. Methanol could be used as the final product, but in
other
aspects methanol generated from syngas can be used to generate larger
compounds,
such as gasoline, olefins, aromatics, and/or other products. It is noted that
a small
amount of CO2 can be acceptable in the syngas feed to a methanol synthesis
process,
and/or to a Fischer-Tropsch process utilizing a shifting catalyst.
Hydroformylation is
an additional or alternate example of still another synthesis process that can
make use
of a syngas input.
[00162] It is noted that one variation on use of an MCFC to generate syngas
can be to
use MCFC fuel cells as part of a system for processing methane and/or natural
gas
withdrawn by an offshore oil platform or other production system that is a
considerable
distance from its ultimate market. Instead of attempting to transport the gas
phase
output fiom a well, or attempting to store the gas phase product for an
extended period,

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
the gas phase output from a well can be used as the input to an MCFC fuel cell
array.
This can lead to a variety of benefits. First, the electric power generated by
the fuel cell
array can be used as a power source for the platform. Additionally, the syngas
output
from the fuel cell array can be used as an input for a Fischer-Tropsch process
at the
production site. This can allow for formation of liquid hydrocarbon products
more
easily transported by pipeline, ship, or railcar from the production site to,
for example,
an on-shore facility or a larger terminal.
[00163] Still other integration options can additionally or alternately
include using the
cathode output as a source of higher purity, heated nitrogen. The cathode
input can
often include a large portion of air, which means a substantial portion of
nitrogen can
be included in the cathode input. The fuel cell can transport CO2 and 02 from
the
cathode across the electrolyte to the anode, and the cathode outlet can have
lower
concentrations of CO2 and 02, and thus a higher concentration of N2 than found
in air.
With subsequent removal of the residual 02 and CO2, this nitrogen output can
be used
as an input for production of ammonia or other nitrogen-containing chemicals,
such as
urea, ammonium nitrate, and/or nitric acid. It is noted that urea synthesis
could
additionally or alternately use CO2 separate from the anode output as an input
feed.
Integration Example: Applications for Integration with Combustion Turbines
[00164] In some aspects of the invention, a combustion source for generating
power
and exhausting a CO2-containing exhaust can be integrated with the operation
of
molten carbonate fuel cells. An example of a suitable combustion source is a
gas
turbine. Preferably, the gas turbine can combust natural gas, methane gas, or
another
hydrocarbon gas in a combined cycle mode integrated with steam generation and
heat
recovery for additional efficiency. Modern natural gas combined cycle
efficiencies are
about 60% for the largest and newest designs. The resulting CO2-containing
exhaust
gas stream can be produced at an elevated temperature compatible with the MCFC
operation, such as 300 C ¨ 700 C and preferably 500 C ¨ 650 C. The gas source
can
optionally but preferably be cleaned of contaminants such as sulfur that can
poison the
MCFC before entering the turbine. Alternatively, the gas source can be a coal-
fired
generator, wherein the exhaust gas would typically be cleaned post-combustion
due to
the greater level of contaminants in the exhaust gas. In such an alternative,
some heat
66

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
exchange to/from the gas may be necessary to enable clean-up at lower
temperatures.
In additional or alternate embodiments, the source of the CO2-containing
exhaust gas
can be the output from a boiler, combustor, or other heat source that burns
carbon-rich
fuels. In other additional or alternate embodiments, the source of the CO2-
containing
exhaust gas can be bio-produced CO2 in combination with other sources.
[00165] For integration with a combustion source, some alternative
configurations for
processing of a fuel cell anode can be desirable. For example, an alternative
configuration can be to recycle at least a portion of the exhaust from a fuel
cell anode to
the input of a fuel cell anode. The output stream from an MCFC anode can
include
H20, CO2, optionally CO, and optionally but typically unreacted fuel (such as
H2 or
CH4) as the primary output components. Instead of using this output stream as
an
external fuel stream and/or an input stream for integration with another
process, one or
more separations can be performed on the anode output stream in order to
separate the
CO2 from the components with potential fuel value, such as H2 or CO. The
components with fuel value can then be recycled to the input of an anode.
[00166] This type of configuration can provide one or more benefits. First,
CO2 can
be separated from the anode output, such as by using a cryogenic CO2
separator.
Several of the components of the anode output (H2, CO, CH4) are not easily
condensable components, while CO2 and H20 can be separated individually as
condensed phases. Depending on the embodiment, at least about 90 vol% of the
CO2
in the anode output can be separated to form a relatively high purity CO2
output stream.
Alternatively, in some aspects less CO2 can be removed from the anode output,
so that
about 50 vol% to about 90 vol% of the CO, in the anode output can be separated
out,
such as about 80 vol% or less or about 70 vol% or less. After separation, the
remaining
portion of the anode output can correspond primarily to components with fuel
value, as
well as reduced amounts of CO2 and/or H20. This portion of the anode output
after
separation can be recycled for use as part of the anode input, along with
additional fuel.
In this type of configuration, even though the fuel utilization in a single
pass through
the MCFC(s) may be low, the unused fuel can be advantageously recycled for
another
pass through the anode. As a result, the single-pass fuel utilization can be
at a reduced
level, while avoiding loss (exhaust) of unburned fuel to the environment.
67

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
[00167] Additionally or alternatively to recycling a portion of the anode
exhaust to the
anode input, another configuration option can be to use a portion of the anode
exhaust
as an input for a combustion reaction for a turbine or other combustion
device, such as
a boiler, furnace, and/or fired heater. The relative amounts of anode exhaust
recycled
to the anode input and/or as an input to the combustion device can be any
convenient or
desirable amount. If the anode exhaust is recycled to only one of the anode
input and
the combustion device, the amount of recycle can be any convenient amount,
such as
up to 100% of the portion of the anode exhaust remaining after any separation
to
remove CO", and/or H20. When a portion of the anode exhaust is recycled to
both the
anode input and the combustion device, the total recycled amount by definition
can be
100% or less of the remaining portion of anode exhaust. Otherwise, any
convenient
split of the anode exhaust can be used. In various embodiments of the
invention, the
amount of recycle to the anode input can be at least about 10% of the anode
exhaust
remaining after separations, for example at least about 25%, at least about
40%, at least
about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 75%, or at least about 90%.
Additionally
or alternately in those embodiments, the amount of recycle to the anode input
can be
about 90% or less of the anode exhaust remaining after separations, for
example about
75% or less, about 60% or less, about 50% or less, about 40% or less, about
25% or
less, or about 10% or less. Further additionally or alternately, in various
embodiments
of the invention, the amount of recycle to the combustion device can be at
least about
10% of the anode exhaust remaining after separations, for example at least
about 25%,
at least about 40%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about
75%, or at
least about 90%. Additionally or alternately in those embodiments, the amount
of
recycle to the combustion device can be about 90% or less of the anode exhaust
remaining after separations, for example about 75% or less, about 60% or less,
about
50% or less, about 40% or less, about 25% or less, or about 10% or less.
[00168] In still other alternative aspects of the invention, the fuel for a
combustion
device can additionally or alternately be a fuel with an elevated quantity of
components
that are inert and/or otherwise act as a diluent in the fuel. CO2 and N2 are
examples of
components in a natural gas feed that can be relatively inert during a
combustion
reaction. When the amount of inert components in a fuel feed reaches a
sufficient
level, the performance of a turbine or other combustion source can be
impacted. The
68

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
impact can be due in part to the ability of the inert components to absorb
heat, which
can tend to quench the combustion reaction. Examples of fuel feeds with a
sufficient
level of inert components can include fuel feeds containing at least about 20
vol% CO2,
or fuel feeds containing at least about 40 vol% N2, or fuel feeds containing
combinations of CO2 and N2 that have sufficient inert heat capacity to provide
similar
quenching ability. (It is noted that CO2 has a greater heat capacity than N2,
and
therefore lower concentrations of CO2 can have a similar impact as higher
concentrations of N2. CO2 can also participate in the combustion reactions
more
readily than N2, and in doing so remove H2 from the combustion. This
consumption of
H2 can have a large impact on the combustion of the fuel, by reducing the
flame speed
and narrowing the flammability range of the air and fuel mixture.) More
generally, for
a fuel feed containing inert components that impact the flammability of the
fuel feed,
the inert components in the fuel feed can be at least about 20 vol%, such as
at least
about 40 vol%, or at least about 50 vol%, or at least about 60 vol%.
Preferably, the
amount of inert components in the fuel feed can be about 80 vol% or less.
[00169] When a sufficient amount of inert components are present in a fuel
feed, the
resulting fuel feed can be outside of the flammability window for the fuel
components
of the feed. In this type of situation, addition of H2 from a recycled portion
of the
anode exhaust to the combustion zone for the generator can expand the
flammability
window for the combination of fuel feed and H2, which can allow, for example,
a fuel
feed containing at least about 20 vol% CO2 or at least about 40% N, (or other
combinations of CO2 and N2) to be successfully combusted.
[00170] Relative to a total volume of fuel feed and H2 delivered to a
combustion zone,
the amount of H2 for expanding the flammability window can be at least about 5
vol%
of the total volume of fuel feed plus H2, such as at least about 10 vol%,
and/or about 25
vol% or less. Another option for characterizing the amount of H, to add to
expand the
flammability window can be based on the amount of fuel components present in
the
fuel feed before H2 addition. Fuel components can correspond to methane,
natural gas,
other hydrocarbons, and/or other components conventionally viewed as fuel for
a
combustion-powered turbine or other generator. The amount of H2 added to the
fuel
feed can correspond to at least about one third of the volume of fuel
components (1 : 3
ratio of H2 : fuel component) in the fuel feed, such as at least about half of
the volume
69

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
of the fuel components (1 : 2 ratio). Additionally or alternately, the amount
of H2
added to the fuel feed can be roughly equal to the volume of fuel components
in the
fuel feed (1: 1 ratio) or less. For example, for a feed containing about 30
vol% CH4,
about 10% N2, and about 60% CO2, a sufficient amount of anode exhaust can be
added
to the fuel feed to achieve about a 1 : 2 ratio of H2 to CH4. For an idealized
anode
exhaust that contained only H2, addition of H2 to achieve a 1 : 2 ratio would
result in a
feed containing about 26 vol% CH4, 13 vol% H2, 9 vol% N2, and 52 vol% CO2.
Exhaust Gas Recycle
[00171] Aside from providing exhaust gas to a fuel cell array for capture and
eventual
separation of the CO2, an additional or alternate potential use for exhaust
gas can
include recycle back to the combustion reaction to increase the CO2 content.
When
hydrogen is available for addition to the combustion reaction, such as
hydrogen from
the anode exhaust of the fuel cell array, further benefits can be gained from
using
recycled exhaust gas to increase the CO2 content within the combustion
reaction.
[00172] In various aspects of the invention, the exhaust gas recycle loop of a
power
generation system can receive a first portion of the exhaust gas from
combustion, while
the fuel cell array can receive a second portion. The amount of exhaust gas
from
combustion recycled to the combustion zone of the power generation system can
be any
convenient amount, such as at least about 15% (by volume), for example at
least about
25%, at least about 35%, at least about 45%, or at least about 50%.
Additionally or
alternately, the amount of combustion exhaust gas recirculated to the
combustion zone
can be about 65% (by volume) or less, e.g., about 60% or less, about 55% or
less, about
50% or less, or about 45% or less.
[00173] In one or more aspects of the invention, a mixture of an oxidant (such
as air
and/or oxygen-enriched air) and fuel can be combusted and (simultaneously)
mixed
with a stream of recycled exhaust gas. The stream of recycled exhaust gas,
which can
generally include products of combustion such as CO2, can be used as a diluent
to
control, adjust, or otherwise moderate the temperature of combustion and of
the exhaust
that can enter the succeeding expander. As a result of using oxygen-enriched
air, the
recycled exhaust gas can have an increased CO2 content, thereby allowing the
expander
to operate at even higher expansion ratios for the same inlet and discharge
temperatures, thereby enabling significantly increased power production.

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
[00174] A gas turbine system can represent one example of a power generation
system
where recycled exhaust gas can be used to enhance the performance of the
system. The
gas turbine system can have a first/main compressor coupled to an expander via
a shaft.
The shaft can be any mechanical, electrical, or other power coupling, thereby
allowing
a portion of the mechanical energy generated by the expander to drive the main
compressor. The gas turbine system can also include a combustion chamber
configured
to combust a mixture of a fuel and an oxidant. In various aspects of the
invention, the
fuel can include any suitable hydrocarbon gas/liquid, such as syngas, natural
gas,
methane, ethane, propane, butane, naphtha diesel, kerosene, aviation fuel,
coal derived
fuel, bio-fuel, oxygenated hydrocarbon feedstock, or any combinations thereof
The
oxidant can, in some embodiments, be derived from a second or inlet compressor
fluidly coupled to the combustion chamber and adapted to compress a feed
oxidant. In
one or more embodiments of the invention, the feed oxidant can include
atmospheric
air and/or enriched air. When the oxidant includes enriched air alone or a
mixture of
atmospheric air and enriched air, the enriched air can be compressed by the
inlet
compressor (in the mixture, either before or after being mixed with the
atmospheric
air). The enriched air and/or the air-enriched air mixture can have an overall
oxygen
concentration of at least about 25 volume %, e.g., at least about 30 volume %,
at least
about 35 volume %, at least about 40 volume %, at least about 45 volume %, or
at least
about 50 volume %. Additionally or alternately, the enriched air and/or the
air-
enriched air mixture can have an overall oxygen concentration of about 80
volume % or
less, such as about 70 volume % or less.
[00175] The enriched air can be derived from any one or more of several
sources. For
example, the enriched air can be derived from such separation technologies as
membrane separation, pressure swing adsorption, temperature swing adsorption,
nitrogen plant-byproduct streams, and/or combinations thereof. The enriched
air can
additionally or alternately be derived from an air separation unit (ASU), such
as a
cryogenic ASU, for producing nitrogen for pressure maintenance or other
purposes. In
certain embodiments of the invention, the reject stream from such an ASU can
be rich
in oxygen, having an overall oxygen content from about 50 volume % to about 70
volume %, can be used as at least a portion of the enriched air and
subsequently diluted,
if needed, with unprocessed atmospheric air to obtain the desired oxygen
concentration.
71

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
[00176] In addition to the fuel and oxidant, the combustion chamber can
optionally
also receive a compressed recycle exhaust gas, such as an exhaust gas
recirculation
primarily having CO2 and nitrogen components. The compressed recycle exhaust
gas
can be derived from the main compressor, for instance, and adapted to help
facilitate
combustion of the oxidant and fuel, e.g., by moderating the temperature of the
combustion products. As can be appreciated, recirculating the exhaust gas can
serve to
increase CO2 concentration.
[00177] An exhaust gas directed to the inlet of the expander can be generated
as a
product of combustion reaction. The exhaust gas can have a heightened CO2
content
based, at least in part, on the introduction of recycled exhaust gas into the
combustion
reaction. As the exhaust gas expands through the expander, it can generate
mechanical
power to drive the main compressor, to drive an electrical generator, and/or
to power
other facilities.
[00178] The power generation system can, in many embodiments, also include an
exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system. In one or more aspects of the
invention, the
EGR system can include a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) and/or another
similar device fluidly coupled to a steam gas turbine. In at least one
embodiment, the
combination of the HRSG and the steam gas turbine can be characterized as a
power-
producing closed Rankine cycle. In combination with the gas turbine system,
the
HRSG and the steam gas turbine can form part of a combined-cycle power
generating
plant, such as a natural gas combined-cycle (NGCC) plant. The gaseous exhaust
can be
introduced to the HRSG in order to generate steam and a cooled exhaust gas.
The
HRSG can include various units for separating and/or condensing water out of
the
exhaust stream, transferring heat to form steam, and/or modifying the pressure
of
streams to a desired level. In certain embodiments, the steam can be sent to
the steam
gas turbine to generate additional electrical power.
[00179] After passing through the HRSG and optional removal of at least some
H20,
the CO2-containing exhaust stream can, in some embodiments, be recycled for
use as
an input to the combustion reaction. As noted above, the exhaust stream can be
compressed (or decompressed) to match the desired reaction pressure within the
vessel
for the combustion reaction.
Example of Integrated System
72

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
[00180] FIG. 4 schematically shows an example of an integrated system
including
introduction of both CO2-containing recycled exhaust gas and H2 or CO from the
fuel
cell anode exhaust into the combustion reaction for powering a turbine. In
FIG. 4, the
turbine can include a compressor 402, a shaft 404, an expander 406, and a
combustion
zone 415. An oxygen source 411 (such as air and/or oxygen-enriched air) can be
combined with recycled exhaust gas 498 and compressed in compressor 402 prior
to
entering combustion zone 415. A fuel 412, such as CH4, and optionally a stream
containing H, or CO 187 can be delivered to the combustion zone. The fuel and
oxidant can be reacted in zone 415 and optionally but preferably passed
through
expander 406 to generate electric power. The exhaust gas from expander 106 can
be
used to form two streams, e.g., a CO2-containing stream 422 (that can be used
as an
input feed for fuel cell array 425) and another CO2-containing stream 492
(that can be
used as the input for a heat recovery and steam generator system 490, which
can, for
example, enable additional electricity to be generated using steam turbines
494). After
passing through heat recovery system 490, including optional removal of a
portion of
H20 from the CO2-containing stream, the output stream 498 can be recycled for
compression in compressor 402 or a second compressor that is not shown. The
proportion of the exhaust from expander 406 used for CO2-containing stream 492
can
be determined based on the desired amount of CO2 for addition to combustion
zone
415.
[00181] As used herein, the EGR ratio is the flow rate for the fuel cell bound
portion of
the exhaust gas divided by the combined flow rate for the fuel cell bound
portion and
the recovery bound portion, which is sent to the heat recovery generator. For
example,
the EGR ratio for flows shown in FIG. 4 is the flow rate of stream 422 divided
by the
combined flow rate of streams 422 and 492.
[00182] The CO2-containing stream 422 can be passed into a cathode portion
(not
shown) of a molten carbonate fuel cell array 425. Based on the reactions
within fuel
cell array 425, CO2 can be separated from stream 422 and transported to the
anode
portion (not shown) of the fuel cell array 425. This can result in a cathode
output
stream 424 depleted in CO2. The cathode output stream 424 can then be passed
into a
heat recovery (and optional steam generator) system 450 for generation of heat
exchange and/or additional generation of electricity using steam turbines 454
(which
73

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
may optionally be the same as the aforementioned steam turbines 494). After
passing
through heat recovery and steam generator system 450, the resulting flue gas
stream
456 can be exhausted to the environment and/or passed through another type of
carbon
capture technology, such as an amine scrubber.
[00183] After transport of CO2 from the cathode side to the anode side of fuel
cell
array 425, the anode output 435 can optionally be passed into a water gas
shift reactor
470. Water gas shift reactor 470 can be used to generate additional H2 and CO2
at the
expense of CO (and H20) present in the anode output 435. The output from the
optional water gas shift reactor 470 can then be passed into one or more
separation
stages 440, such as a cold box or a cryogenic separator. This can allow for
separation
of an H20 stream 447 and CO2 stream 449 from the remaining portion of the
anode
output. The remaining portion of the anode output 485 can include unreacted H2
generated by reforming but not consumed in fuel cell array 425. A first
portion 445 of
the H2-containing stream 485 can be recycled to the input for the anode(s) in
fuel cell
array 425. A second portion 487 of stream 485 can be used as an input for
combustion
zone 415. A third portion 465 can be used as is for another purpose and/or
treated for
subsequent further use. Although FIG. 4 and the description herein
schematically
details up to three portions, it is contemplated that only one of these three
portions can
be exploited, only two can be exploited, or all three can be exploited
according to the
invention.
[00184] In FIG. 4, the exhaust for the exhaust gas recycle loop is provided by
a first
heat recovery and steam generator system 490, while a second heat recovery and
steam
generator system 450 can be used to capture excess heat from the cathode
output of the
fuel cell array 425. FIG. 5 shows an alternative embodiment where the exhaust
gas
recycle loop is provided by the same heat recovery steam generator used for
processing
the fuel cell array output. In FIG. 5, recycled exhaust gas 598 is provided by
heat
recovery and steam generator system 550 as a portion of the flue gas stream
556. This
can eliminate the separate heat recovery and steam generator system associated
with the
turbine.
[00185] In various embodiments of the invention, the process can be approached
as
starting with a combustion reaction for powering a turbine, an internal
combustion
engine, or another system where heat and/or pressure generated by a combustion
74

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
reaction can be converted into another form of power. The fuel for the
combustion
reaction can comprise or be hydrogen, a hydrocarbon, and/or any other compound
containing carbon that can be oxidized (combusted) to release energy. Except
for when
the fuel contains only hydrogen, the composition of the exhaust gas from the
combustion reaction can have a range of CO2 contents, depending on the nature
of the
reaction (e.g., from at least about 2 vol% to about 25 vol% or less). Thus, in
certain
embodiments where the fuel is carbonaceous, the CO2 content of the exhaust gas
can
be at least about 2 vol%, for example at least about 4 vol%, at least about 5
vol%, at
least about 6 vol%, at least about 8 vol%, or at least about 10 vol%.
Additionally or
alternately in such carbonaceous fuel embodiments, the CO2 content can be
about 25
vol% or less, for example about 20 vol% or less, about 15 vol% or less, about
10 vol%
or less, about 7 vol% or less, or about 5 vol% or less. Exhaust gases with
lower relative
CO2 contents (for carbonaceous fuels) can correspond to exhaust gases from
combustion reactions on fuels such as natural gas with lean (excess air)
combustion.
Higher relative CO2 content exhaust gases (for carbonaceous fuels) can
correspond to
optimized natural gas combustion reactions, such as those with exhaust gas
recycle,
and/or combustion of fuels such as coal.
[00186] In some aspects of the invention, the fuel for the combustion reaction
can
contain at least about 90 volume % of compounds containing five carbons or
less, e.g.,
at least about 95 volume %. In such aspects, the CO2 content of the exhaust
gas can be
at least about 4 vol%, for example at least about 5 vol%, at least about 6
vol%, at least
about 7 vol%, or at least about 7.5 vol%. Additionally or alternately, the CO2
content
of the exhaust gas can be about 13 vol% or less, e.g., about 12 vol% or less,
about 10
vol% or less, about 9 vol% or less, about 8 vol% or less, about 7 vol% or
less, or about
6 vol% or less. The CO2 content of the exhaust gas can represent a range of
values
depending on the configuration of the combustion-powered generator. Recycle of
an
exhaust gas can be beneficial for achieving a CO2 content of at least about 6
vol%,
while addition of hydrogen to the combustion reaction can allow for further
increases in
CO2 content to achieve a CO2 content of at least about 7.5 vol%.
Alternative Configuration ¨ High Severity NOx Turbine
[00187] Gas turbines can be limited in their operation by several factors. One
typical
limitation can be that the maximum temperature in the combustion zone can be

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
controlled below certain limits to achieve sufficiently low concentrations of
nitrogen
oxides (NOx) in order to satisfy regulatory emission limits. Regulatory
emission limits
can require a combustion exhaust to have a NOx content of about 20 vppm or
less, and
possible 10 vppm or less, when the combustion exhaust is allowed to exit to
the
environment.
[00188] NOx formation in natural gas-fired combustion turbines can be a
function of
temperature and residence time. Reactions that result in formation of NOx can
be of
reduced and/or minimal importance below a flame temperature of about 1500 F,
but
NOx production can increase rapidly as the temperature increases beyond this
point. In
a gas turbine, initial combustion products can be mixed with extra air to cool
the
mixture to a temperature around 1200 F, and temperature can be limited by the
metallurgy of the expander blades. Early gas turbines typically executed the
combustion in diffusion flames that had stoichiometric zones with temperatures
well
above 1500 F, resulting in higher NOx concentrations. More recently, the
current
generation of 'Dry Low Nox' (DLN) burners can use special pre-mixed burners to
burn
natural gas at cooler lean (less fuel than stoichiometric) conditions. For
example, more
of the dilution air can be mixed in to the initial flame, and less can be
mixed in later to
bring the temperature down to the ¨1200 F turbine-expander inlet temperature.
The
disadvantages for DLN burners can include poor performance at turndown, higher
maintenance, narrow ranges of operation, and poor fuel flexibility. The latter
can be a
concern, as DLN burners can be more difficult to apply to fuels of varying
quality (or
difficult to apply at all to liquid fuels). For low BTU fuels, such as fuels
containing a
high content of CO2, DLN burners are typically not used and instead diffusion
burners
can be used. In addition, gas turbine efficiency can be increased by using a
higher
turbine-expander inlet temperature. However, because there can be a limited
amount of
dilution air, and this amount can decrease with increased turbine-expander
inlet
temperature, the DLN burner can become less effective at maintaining low NOx
as the
efficiency of the gas turbine improves.
[00189] In various aspects of the invention, a system integrating a gas
turbine with a
fuel cell for carbon capture can allow use of higher combustion zone
temperatures
while reducing and/or minimizing additional NOx emissions, as well as enabling
DLN-
like NOx savings via use of turbine fuels that arc not presently compatible
with DLN
76

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
burners. In such aspects, the turbine can be run at higher power (i.e., higher
temperature) resulting in higher NOx emissions, but also higher power output
and
potentially higher efficiency. In some aspects of the invention, the amount of
NOx in
the combustion exhaust can be at least about 20 vppm, such as at least about
30 vppm,
or at least about 40 vppm. Additionally or alternately, the amount of NOx in
the
combustion exhaust can be about 1000 vppm or less, such as about 500 vppm or
less,
or about 250 vppm or less, or about 150 vppm or less, or about 100 vppm or
less. In
order to reduce the NOx levels to levels required by regulation, the resulting
NOx can
be equilibrated via thermal NOx destruction (reduction of NOx levels to
equilibrium
levels in the exhaust stream) through one of several mechanisms, such as
simple
thermal destruction in the gas phase; catalyzed destruction from the nickel
cathode
catalyst in the fuel cell array; and/or assisted thermal destruction prior to
the fuel cell
by injection of small amounts of ammonia, urea, or other reductant. This can
be
assisted by introduction of hydrogen derived from the anode exhaust. Further
reduction
of NOx in the cathode of the fuel cell can be achieved via electrochemical
destruction
wherein the NOx can react at the cathode surface and can be destroyed. This
can result
in some nitrogen transport across the membrane electrolyte to the anode, where
it may
form ammonia or other reduced nitrogen compounds. With respect to NOx
reduction
methods involving an MCFC, the expected NOx reduction from a fuel cell / fuel
cell
array can be about 80% or less of the NOx in the input to the fuel cell
cathode, such as
about 70% or less, and/or at least about 5%. It is noted that sulfidic
corrosion can also
limit temperatures and affect turbine blade metallurgy in conventional
systems.
However, the sulfur restrictions of the MCFC system can typically require
reduced fuel
sulfur levels that reduce or minimize concerns related to sulfidic corrosion.
Operating
the MCFC array at low fuel utilization can further mitigate such concerns,
such as in
aspects where a portion of the fuel for the combustion reaction corresponds to
hydrogen
from the anode exhaust.
Additional Embodiments
[00190] Embodiment 1. A method for generating hydrogen in a refinery, the
method
comprising: introducing a fuel stream comprising a reformable fuel into an
anode of a
molten carbonate fuel cell, an internal reforming element associated with the
anode, or
a combination thereof; introducing a cathode inlet stream comprising CO2 and
02 into
77

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
a cathode of the molten carbonate fuel cell; generating electricity within the
molten
carbonate fuel cell; generating an anode exhaust comprising H2 and CO2;
performing a
separation (e.g., using a membrane) on the anode exhaust to form a CO2-rich
gas
stream having a CO2 content greater than a CO2 content of the anode exhaust,
and a
CO2-depleted gas stream having a CO2 content less than the CO2 content of the
anode
exhaust, which CO2-depleted gas stream optionally comprises an H2-rich gas
stream
and a syngas stream; and delivering the CO2-depleted gas stream to one or more
second
refinery processes.
[00191] Embodiment 2. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the cathode inlet
stream comprises one or more CO2-containing streams derived directly or
indirectly
from one or more first refinery processes.
[00192] Embodiment 3. The method of embodiment 1 or 2, wherein the molten
carbonate fuel cell is operated at a thermal ratio from about 0.25 to about
1.5 (e.g., from
about 0.25 to about 1.3, from about 0.25 to about 1.15, from about 0.25 to
about 1.0,
from about 0.25 to about 0.85, or from about 0.25 to about 0.75).
[00193] Embodiment 4. The method of any of the above embodiments, further
comprising separating H2O from at least one of the anode exhaust, the CO2-
depleted
stream, and the CO2-rich stream in one or more separation stages.
[00194] Embodiment 5. The method of any of the above embodiments, wherein an
amount of the reformable fuel introduced into the anode, the internal
reforming element
associated with the anode, or the combination thereof, provides a reformable
fuel
surplus ratio of at least about 1.5 (e.g., at least about 2.0, at least about
2.5 or at least
about 3.0).
[00195] Embodiment 6. The method of any of the above embodiments, wherein a
ratio
of net moles of syngas in the anode exhaust to moles of CO2 in a cathode
exhaust is at
least about 2.0 (e.g., at least about 3.0, at least about 4.0, at least about
5.0, at least
about 10.0, or at least about 20.0), and optionally is about 40.0 or less
(e.g., about 30.0
or less or about 20.0 or less).
[00196] Embodiment 7. The method of any of the above embodiments, wherein a
fuel
utilization in the anode is about 50% or less (e.g., about 45% or less, about
40% or less,
about 35% or less, about 30% or less, about 25% or less, or about 20% or less)
and a
78

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
CO2 utilization in the cathode is at least about 60% (e.g., at least about
65%, at least
about 70%, or at least about 75%).
[00197] Embodiment 8. The method of any of the above embodiments, wherein the
molten carbonate fuel cell is operated at a first operating condition to
generate electrical
power and at least about 50 mW/cm2 (e.g., at least about 80 mW/cm2 or at least
100
mW/cm2) of waste heat, the first operating condition providing a current
density of at
least about 150 mA/cm2, and wherein an effective amount of an endothermic
reaction is
performed to maintain a temperature differential between an anode inlet and an
anode
outlet of about 100 C or less (e.g., about 80 C or less or about 60 C or
less).
[00198] Embodiment 9. The method of embodiment 8, wherein performing the
endothermic reaction consumes at least about 40% (e.g., at least about 50%, at
least
about 60%, or at least about 75%) of the waste heat.
[00199] Embodiment 10. The method of any of the above embodiments, wherein an
electrical efficiency for the molten carbonate fuel cell is between about 10%
and about
40% (e.g., between about 10% and about 35%, between about 10% and about 30%,
between about 10% and about 25%, or between about 10% and about 20%) and a
total
fuel cell efficiency for the molten carbonate fuel cell is at least about 55%
(e.g., at least
about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, or at
least about
80%).
[00200] Embodiment 11. The method of any of the above embodiments, wherein one
or more of the following are satisfied: at least one process in the one or
more first
refinery processes is a process in the one or more second refinery processes;
the fuel
stream is derived from one or more third refinery processes; and the anode
exhaust has
a molar ratio of H2 to CO of at least about 3.0:1, and has a CO, content of at
least
about 10 vol%.
[00201] Embodiment 12. The method of any of the above embodiments, wherein at
least a portion of the fuel stream passes through a pre-reforming stage prior
to being
introduced into the anode.
[00202] Embodiment 13. The method of any of the above embodiments, wherein at
least a portion of the fuel stream passes through a desulfurization stage
prior to being
introduced into the anode.
79

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
[00203] Embodiment 14. The method of any of the above embodiments, further
comprising modifying an H2 content of one or more of the anode exhaust, the
CO2-rich
gas stream, and the a CO2-depleted gas stream using a water gas shift process.
[00204] Embodiment 15. The method of any of the above embodiments, wherein the
CO2-depleted gas stream is further separated into a first H2-rich stream
having a first
H2 purity and a second H2-rich stream having a second H2 purity, wherein the
second
H2-rich stream is compressed to a pressure greater than the first H2-rich
stream.
Example ¨ Integration of MCFC with Refinery Hydrogen Supply
[00205] In the following example, calculations were performed for a
configuration
where an MCFC system was used as a source of hydrogen for supplying various
burners, boilers, and/or other units that use combustion of a fuel as a source
of energy.
While the following examples focus on supplying hydrogen to combustion
reactions,
the hydrogen generated by the MCFC could additionally or alternately be used
to
supply one or more processes (such as a plurality of processes) where hydrogen
can be
used for a purpose other than combustion. For example, the hydrogen generated
by the
MCFC could be used in one or more hydroprocessing reactors within a refinery.
[00206] In the following example, the CO2 for the cathode was calculated based
on
using an external source of CO2. This choice was made for convenience in
demonstrating the energy benefits of using an MCFC for reducing CO2 emissions
in
comparison with attempting to capture CO2 via another method, such as using
conventional amine washes for each potential point source of carbon. For
comparison
purposes, a typical expected energy cost for using an amine wash based on
using
monoethanolamine (MEA) to capture CO2 from relatively dilute CO2 streams (such
as
streams with approximately 10 vol% or less CO2) was approximated to be about 3
GJ/ton CO2. A substantial portion of this energy cost can be avoided by using
an
MCFC to concentrate CO2 in an anode exhaust stream. It is noted that, in
embodiments where CO2 is collected from various point sources within a
refinery for
use as part of the cathode input, some additional energy cost may be required
to deliver
the CO2 streams to the MCFC. However, those costs can be at least
approximately or
roughly offset (if not exceeded) by the additional energy inefficiencies
required for a
conventional configuration where a separate amine wash would need to incur
similar

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
costs for delivery of CO2 to a central amine wash, and/or by the additional
energy
inefficiencies that would be incurred by having a separate amine wash for each
point
source of CO2.
[00207] The following configuration examples provide two alternatives for
operating
an MCFC to provide hydrogen for consumption in a refinery. In the calculations
for
the first configuration, a gas turbine was used to generate electricity and to
provide a
source of CO2 for the cathode input. In the calculations for the second
configuration,
additional methane was burned to provide the heat and CO2 for operating the
fuel cell.
In both configurations, the anode exhaust was processed in one or more
separation
stages to separate CO2 (such as for sequestration) from H2 (used for fuel in
the
refinery).
[00208] In these examples, calculations were performed for supplying the heat
requirements of a typical refinery that can process about 500 kbd of crude
oil. A
refinery with a refining capacity of about 500 kbd can use about 118 Mscf/d
(or
roughly 3.34 x 106 m3 per day) of natural gas to the heating system, which can
produce
roughly 118 Msced of CO2 emissions from combustion, if no
capture/sequestration
mechanism is used. The following examples integrate a MCFC process with a
refinery
gas fired heater system in a roughly 500 kbd system to provide distributed
heating with
low CO2 emissions.
[00209] FIG. 6 schematically shows an example of a system for integrated
processing
with a combustion gas turbine, MCFC system, and refinery wide fired heaters
that burn
H2. The system in FIG. 6 is configured such that the turbine can generate the
CO2 feed
required in the cathode to produce enough H2 in the MCFC system to run the
refinery
heating system. Air 601 and methane 602 were fed to a combustion gas turbine
650
and burned to produce a hot cathode feed 603. The excess heat in hot cathode
feed 603
was used to pre-heat the anode methane feed 604, which can then be fed 605 to
the
cathode of MCFC 640. Anode methane feed 604 and steam 606 were fed to the
anode
of MCFC 640. The MCFC can produce a low CO2 content cathode exhaust 607 at
high
temperature. Depending on the aspect, the MCFC can be operated at a low fuel
utilization (e.g., of about 25% to about 60%, such as a fuel utilization of at
least about
30%, or at least about 40%, or about 50% or less, or about 40% or less).
Additionally
or alternately, the MCFC can be operated at a more conventional fuel
utilization (e.g.,
81

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
of about 70% or greater, though conventional fuel utilization can typically be
between
70% and 75%), but this can be less preferable, as the amount of potential H2
that
capable of being recovered from the anode exhaust can be reduced. Heat can be
recovered from cathode exhaust 607 in a HRSG (Heat Recovery Steam Generation
system) before the cathode exhaust is emitted to the atmosphere (or further
processed).
The anode exhaust 608 can be cooled in a HRSG and/or can be shifted in a water
gas
shift reaction stage 660. The shifted gas 609, mostly H2 and CO2, can go
through a
separation unit 670 to produce a CO2 stream 610 and a Hi stream 611. The CO2
stream 610 can be compressed and sold for use and/or sequestered. H2 stream
611 can
be distributed to the refinery heaters as the heating fuel. Each sub-stream of
H2 stream
611 can be burned with oxidant (air) 612 in burners 680 that can be located at
one or
more locations in the refinery to provide heat with substantially no CO2
emissions. For
a configuration similar to FIG. 6, FIG. 7 shows representative values for the
flow
volumes within the configuration.
[00210] Figure 8 schematically shows another example of a system for
integrated
processing with an MCFC system and a refinery fired heaters with methane and
hydrogen burners. This system was configured such that the methane burners can
generate the CO2 feed required in the cathode to produce enough H2 in the MCFC
system to run the remaining hydrogen burners. Methane 801 and oxidant (air)
802 can
be distributed to the methane burners 890. The off-gas 803 can be collected
from the
methane burners and sent to a feed pre-heater 845. Methane 804, oxidant (air)
805, and
off-gas 803 can be burned in pre-heater 845 to produce a hot cathode feed 806.
The
excess heat in 806 can be used to pre-heat the anode (methane) feed 807 and
fed to the
cathode at 808. The pre-heated methane 809 and steam 810 were fed to the
anode. The
MCFC 850 can produce a low CO2 content cathode exhaust 811 at relatively high
temperature. Heat can be recovered from cathode exhaust 811 in a HRSG, e.g.,
before
it is emitted to the atmosphere or sent for further treatment (not shown). The
anode
exhaust 812 can be cooled in a HRSG and shifted in 860. The shifted gas 813,
mostly
H2 and CO2, can go through a separation unit 870 to produce a CO2 stream 814
and a
H2 stream 815. H2 stream 815 can be distributed to the hydrogen burners 880.
Each
sub-stream can be burned with oxidant (air) 816 in burners 880 that can be
located at
one or more locations in the refinery to provide heat with substantially no
CO2
82

CA 02902860 2015-08-27
WO 2014/151207
PCMJS2014/025208
emissions. For a configuration similar to FIG. 8, FIG. 9 shows representative
values
for the flow volumes within the configuration.
[00211] Based on configurations similar to FIGS 6 and 8, and based on process
flow
similar to FIGS 7 and 9, the relative net power production was calculated for
sequestering carbon for a refinery integrated with an MCFC. This was compared
with
a calculation for the net power production for a conventional refinery system
where
amine wash systems were used for carbon capture for each point source. As
noted
above, it has been determined that using a representative amine wash (e.g.,
with MEA)
to capture CO, from a typical dilute refinery stream (such as streams
containing about
2 vol% to about 8 vol% CO2) can require about 3 GJ/ton CO2. Table 2 shows the
comparison for the inventive configurations similar to FIGS 6 and 8 (which can
result
in CO2 streams such as stream 610 or stream 814) relative to a conventional
amine
wash method. For the comparison in Table 2, the % CO2 emission reduction
represents
the percentage of carbon that passes through the anode of the MCFC. Based on
the
calculated values shown in Table 2, use of an MCFC to provide H2 for refinery
burners
and to centrally separate CO2 can result in additional available power being
generated.
This can notably be in contrast to the substantial power requirements for
separating
CO2 using a conventional configuration.
Table 2 ¨ Carbon Capture and Net Power Generation
Configuration 1 Configuration 2
% CO2 emissions reduction 55.98% 86%
Net power with MCFC power [MW] 110 36
Net power with MEA capture [MW] -115 -180
[00212] Although the present invention has been described in terms of specific
embodiments, it is not so limited. Suitable alterations/modifications for
operation
under specific conditions should be apparent to those skilled in the art. It
is therefore
intended that the following claims be interpreted as covering all such
alterations/modifications that fall within the true spirit/scope of the
invention.
83

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Grant by Issuance 2019-08-27
Inactive: Cover page published 2019-08-26
Inactive: Final fee received 2019-07-11
Pre-grant 2019-07-11
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2019-06-25
Letter Sent 2019-06-25
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2019-06-25
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2019-06-20
Inactive: Q2 passed 2019-06-20
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2019-05-23
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2018-11-23
Inactive: Report - No QC 2018-11-22
Advanced Examination Determined Compliant - PPH 2018-11-05
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2018-11-05
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2018-11-05
Advanced Examination Requested - PPH 2018-11-05
Letter Sent 2018-10-18
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2018-10-10
Request for Examination Received 2018-10-10
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2018-10-10
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-06-16
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2016-06-16
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-06-16
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-06-16
Inactive: IPC expired 2016-01-01
Inactive: IPC removed 2015-12-31
Inactive: Office letter 2015-10-23
Correct Applicant Request Received 2015-10-13
Inactive: Reply to s.37 Rules - PCT 2015-10-13
Inactive: Cover page published 2015-09-29
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2015-09-09
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2015-09-09
Inactive: IPC assigned 2015-09-09
Inactive: IPC assigned 2015-09-09
Application Received - PCT 2015-09-09
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2015-08-27
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2014-09-25

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2019-02-19

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
ANITA S. LEE
FRANK HERSHKOWITZ
PAUL J. BERLOWITZ
TIMOTHY ANDREW BARCKHOLTZ
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2015-08-27 83 4,815
Abstract 2015-08-27 1 68
Drawings 2015-08-27 9 185
Claims 2015-08-27 3 118
Representative drawing 2015-08-27 1 8
Cover Page 2015-09-29 1 41
Description 2018-11-05 83 4,893
Claims 2018-11-05 4 106
Description 2019-05-23 83 4,881
Claims 2019-05-23 3 115
Cover Page 2019-07-31 2 46
Representative drawing 2019-07-31 1 5
Notice of National Entry 2015-09-09 1 194
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2015-11-16 1 112
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2018-10-18 1 176
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2019-06-25 1 163
Request for examination 2018-10-10 1 30
Change to the Method of Correspondence 2018-11-05 2 42
PPH supporting documents 2018-11-05 6 416
PPH request 2018-11-05 12 375
Examiner Requisition 2018-11-23 3 177
International search report 2015-08-27 3 81
National entry request 2015-08-27 5 106
Response to section 37 2015-10-13 2 71
Correspondence 2015-10-23 1 21
Amendment 2019-05-23 7 281
Final fee 2019-07-11 1 32