Language selection

Search

Patent 2920054 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2920054
(54) English Title: A METHOD OF PROCESSING HEAVY OILS AND RESIDUA
(54) French Title: UNE METHODE DE TRAITEMENT DES HUILES LOURDES ET DES RESIDUS
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10G 47/36 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • ZHAO, SUOQI (China)
  • WEI, QIANG (China)
  • XU, CHUNMING (China)
  • XU, ZHIMING (China)
  • SUN, XUEWEN (China)
  • CHUNG, KENG H. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • WELL RESOURCES INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • WELL RESOURCES INC. (Canada)
(74) Agent: CPST INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INC.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2018-08-14
(22) Filed Date: 2016-02-05
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2016-11-29
Examination requested: 2018-02-07
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
201510290167.0 (China) 2015-05-29

Abstracts

English Abstract

There is provided a process of treating a heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material, comprising: contacting a feed material with at least a catalyst material within a contacting zone to effect generation of a total product such that a contacting zone material is disposed within the contacting zone and consists of the catalyst material and a feed/product- comprising mixture comprising the feed material and the total product, wherein the feed/product- comprising mixture includes a Conradson carbon residue content of at least 12 weight percent, based on the total weight of the feed/product-comprising mixture, and also includes an asphaltene content of less than two (2) weight percent, based on the total weight of the feed/product- comprising mixture, and wherein the feed material includes deasphalted heavy hydrocarbon- comprising material. A heavy hydrocarbon-containing feed for a catalytic hydroprocessing or catalytic hydrocracking process is also provided, wherein the feed comprises a deasphalted heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material having a Conradson carbon residue, CCR, content greater than about 12 wt% and an asphaltene content less than about 2 wt%. The feed results in reduced catalyst deactivation or catalyst coking during the catalytic hydroprocessing or catalytic hydrocracking process


French Abstract

Un procédé est présenté servant au traitement de matériau comportant des hydrocarbures lourds et comprend la mise en contact de la matière première avec au moins une matière catalytique dans une zone de contact pour réaliser la génération dun produit entier de sorte quun matériau de zone de contact est disposé dans la zone de contact et renferme la matière catalytique et un mélange comportant la matière première et le produit comprenant la matière première et le produit total, où le mélange comprenant la matière première et le produit a une teneur de résidu Conradson denviron 12 pour cent par poids, selon le poids total du mélange comportant la matière première et le produit et également une teneur en asphaltène de moins de deux (2) pour cent, selon le poids total du mélange comprenant la matière première et le produit, et où la matière première comprend de la matière comportant des hydrocarbures lourds désasphaltés. Une matière première comportant des hydrocarbures lourds destinée à lhydrotraitement catalytique ou au procédé dhydrocraquage catalytique est également présentée, où la matière première comprend une matière comportant des hydrocarbures lourds désasphaltés ayant une teneur en résidu Conradson, CCR, supérieure à environ 12 % par poids et une teneur en asphaltène inférieure à environ 2 % par poids. La matière première produit une réduction de la désactivation catalytique ou du cokage catalytique pendant lhydrotraitement catalytique ou le procédé dhydrocraquage catalytique.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
1. A process of treating a heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material,
comprising:
contacting a feed material with at least a catalyst material within a
contacting zone to
effect generation of a total product such that a contacting zone material is
disposed within the
contacting zone and consists of the catalyst material and a feed/product-
comprising mixture
comprising the feed material and the total product, wherein the feed/product-
comprising mixture
includes a Conradson carbon residue content of at least 12 weight percent,
based on the total
weight of the feed/product-comprising mixture, and also includes an asphaltene
content of less
than two weight percent, based on the total weight of the feed/product-
comprising mixture,
wherein the feed material includes deasphalted heavy hydrocarbon-comprising
material, and
wherein the catalyst material in the contacting zone is in the form of a
packed bed.
2. The process as claimed in claim 1, comprising at least one of the
following (a) to (c)
characteristics:
(a) the Conradson carbon residue content is less than 18 weight percent, based
on the
total weight of the feed/product-comprising mixture;
(b) the reaction retention time of feed/product-comprising mixture to the
catalyst material
within the contacting zone is at least 10 minutes;
(c) the feed/product-comprising mixture includes a total metals content of at
least 100
unit weight parts per million unit weight parts of feed/product-comprising
mixture.
3. A process of treating a heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material,
comprising:
contacting a feed material with at least a catalyst material within a
contacting zone to
effect generation of a total product such that a contacting zone material is
disposed within the
contacting zone and consists of the catalyst material and a feed comprising
deasphalted heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising material from deasphalting a heavy hydrocarbon-
comprising material,
wherein the feed includes a Conradson carbon residue content of at least 12
weight percent,
based on the total weight of the feed, and also includes an asphaltene content
of less than two
weight percent, based on the total weight of the feed, and wherein the
catalyst material in the
contacting zone is in the form of a packed bed.
23

4. The process as claimed in claim 3, comprising at least one of the
following (a) to (c)
characteristics:
(a) the Conradson carbon residue content is less than 18 weight percent, based
on the
total weight of the feed;
(b) the reaction retention time of feed to the catalyst material within the
contacting zone
is at least 10 minutes;
(c) the feed includes a total metals content of at least 100 unit weight parts
per million
unit weight parts of feed.
5. The process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the catalyst
material
includes particulate material.
6. The process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the catalyst
material has a
pore size of 10 to 30 nanometers, a total pore volume of 0.8 to 2 milliliters
per gram, and
specific surface area of 150 to 400 square meters per gram.
7. The process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the feed
material further
includes a hydrogen donor.
8. The process as claimed in claim 7, wherein the hydrogen donor includes
molecular
hydrogen.
9. The process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the
contacting effects
hydroprocessing of at least a fraction of hydrocarbon material of the feed
material.
10. The process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the
contacting is effected
while the feed/product-comprising mixture is being flowed through the
contacting zone in
response to a driving force.
11. The process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the
deasphalted heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising material includes a Conradson carbon residue content of
at least 12
weight percent, based on the total weight of the deasphalted heavy hydrocarbon-
comprising
24

material, and also includes an asphaltene content of less than two (2) weight
percent, based on
the total weight of the deasphalted heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material.
12. The process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the heavy
hydrocarbon-
comprising material includes a Conradson carbon residue content of at least 12
weight percent,
based on the total weight of the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising mixture, and
also includes an
asphaltene content of less than 40 weight percent, based on the total weight
of the heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising mixture.
13. The process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12, further comprising
deasphalting a
heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material to generate the deasphalted heavy
hydrocarbon-
comprising material.
14. The process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the
contacting effects
hydroprocessing of at least a fraction of hydrocarbon material of the feed
material.
15. The process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein the
contacting is effected
while the feed is being flowed through the contacting zone in response to a
driving force.
16. The process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, further comprising
deasphalting a
heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material to generate the deasphalted heavy
hydrocarbon-
comprising material.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 2,920,054
Blass Ref: 12492/00004
1 A METHOD OF PROCESSING HEAVY OILS AND RESIDUA
2 FIELD
3 [0001] The present disclosure relates to the processing of heavy
hydrocarbons.
4 BACKGROUND
[0002] In conventional refineries, fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) is the
key process used
6 to convert heavy distillates (vacuum gas oil) into transportation fuels
such as gasoline, jet fuel,
7 and diesel. Packed bed hydrotreating and hydroprocessing units are used
for removing
8 contaminants and enhancing the feedstock processability prior to further
processing. For the
9 past 30 years, tremendous advances have been achieved in FCC and packed
bed
hydrotreating/hydroprocessing technologies. Some of the improvements to these
catalytic
11 refinery processes have been made to their ability to process heavier
feedstock, which typically
12 comprises a blend of distillates and certain amount of residua.
Currently, many modern
13 refineries are equipped with resid fluid catalytic cracking (RFCC) units
and packed bed resid
14 hydroprocessing units to process and convert low-value heavy feedstock
into transportation
fuels. However, these catalytic processes require stringent feedstock quality
specifications to
16 prevent rapid catalyst deactivation and plugging of the catalyst-
comprising packed bed. In
17 particular, it has been generally believed that feedstocks with
excessive Conradson Carbon
18 Residue (CCR), and/or excessive total metals, would be unsuitable for
processing through
19 catalyst material-comprising packed beds. Zuo [Zuo, L., Technology-
Economics in
Petrochemical, Sinopec Technology and Economic Information Center, 2000,
16(1), 16-21] and
21 Motaghi et al. [Motaghi, M., Subramanian, A. and Ulrich, B., Hydrocarbon
Processing, February
22 1, 2011, p. 37-43] suggest that, for RFCC, CCR content should not exceed
eight (8) weight
23 percent, based on the total weight of the feedstock, and 20 units of
weight of total metals per
24 million units of weight of feedstock. Dai et al. [Dai, L., Hu, Y. and
Li, J., Petroleum Processing
and Petrochemicals, 2000, 31(12), 13-16] and Threlkel et al. [Threlkel, R.,
Dillon, C., Singh,
26 U.G. and Ziebarth, M.S., Proceedings of Japan Petroleum Institute
International Symposium,
27 November 5-7, 2008] suggest that, for packed bed resid hydroprocessing,
CCR content should
28 not exceed 12 weight percent, based on the total weight of feedstock,
and 100 units of weight of
29 total metals per million units of weight of feedstock.
1
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 [0003] In this respect, it is generally believed that feedstocks
with excessive CCR
2 content, or excessive total metals content, are unsuitable for processing
through catalytic
3 material-comprising packed beds [Motaghi, M., Subramanian, A. and Ulrich,
B., Hydrocarbon
4 Processing, February 1, 2011, p. 37-43]. Even after subjecting such
feedstock to deasphalting,
the resultant deasphalted heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material may still be
unsuitable for
6 processing through catalytic material-comprising packed beds, and often
requires blending with
7 light crude or a lighter hydrocarbon fraction so as to sufficiently
dilute the undesirable
8 contaminants to satisfactory concentrations for such processing [de Haan,
D. Street, M. and
9 Orzeszko, G., Hydrocarbon Processing, February 1,2013, p.41-44].
SUMMARY
11 [0004] In one aspect, there is provided a process of treating a
heavy hydrocarbon-
12 comprising material, comprising: contacting a feed material with at
least one catalyst material
13 within a contacting zone to effect generation of a total product such
that a contacting zone
14 material is disposed within the contacting zone and consists of the
catalyst material and a
feed/product-comprising mixture comprising the feed material and the total
product, wherein the
16 feed/product-comprising mixture includes a CCR content of at least 12
weight percent, based on
17 the total weight of the feed/product-comprising mixture, and also
includes an asphaltene content
18 of less than two (2) weight percent, based on the total weight of the
feed/product-comprising
19 mixture, and wherein the feed material includes deasphalted heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising
material.
21 [0005] In another aspect, there is provided a process of
treating a heavy hydrocarbon-
22 comprising material, comprising: contacting a feed material with at
least a catalyst material
23 within a contacting zone to effect generation of a total product such
that a contacting zone
24 material is disposed within the contacting zone and consists of the
catalyst material and a feed
comprising deasphalting a heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material to generate
the deasphalted
26 heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material, wherein the feed includes a
Conradson carbon residue
27 (CCR) content of at least 12 weight percent, based on the total weight
of the feed, and also
28 includes an asphaltene content of less than two (2) weight percent,
based on the total weight of
29 the feed.
2
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 [0006] One or more of the following advantages may be realized
when practicing the
2 disclosed processes.
3 [0007] Heavy crudes and residua can be treated by using
conventional refinery
4 processes (such as packed bed resid hydroprocessing or resid fluid
catalytic cracking, RFCC)
without the use of expensive and energy intensive upgrading processes,
resulting in significant
6 reduction in capital and operating costs of processing heavy crudes and
residual. There are two
7 conventional heavy crude and resid upgrading process flow sheet options
that are generally
8 available to the refiners. The first one is to use either coking or
ebullated bed hydroprocessing
9 to upgrade the high CCR and/or metals content feedstocks. The alternative
is to subject the
high CCR and/or metals content feedstock to solvent deasphalting to produce a
lower CCR
11 and/or metals content deasphalted oil (DAO) which is diluted with a
refinery intermediate stream
12 such vacuum gas oil. The DA0 and vacuum gas oil mixture is further
processed in the refinery
13 processes [de Haan, D. Street, M. and Orzeszko, G., Hydrocarbon
Processing, February 1,
14 2013, p. 41-44]. However, either coking or ebullated bed hydroprocessing
is still required to
process the bottoms stream from the solvent deasphalting unit. In any case,
the current
16 commercial resid upgrading requires capital costs of at least US$10,000-
50,000 per barrel of
17 feedstock and operating costs of at least US$10-15 per barrel of
feedstock. In contrast, the
18 presently disclosed processes require capital costs of about US$1,500-
2,000 per barrel of
19 feedstock and operating costs of about US$1.00-1.50 per barrel of
feedstock.
[0008] The heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material feed, of the presently
disclosed
21 processes, that is derived from deasphalting operations, require less
intensive hydrogen
22 addition, versus coking-derived (thermally cracked) liquid products,
and, therefore, provides a
23 benefit of a significant reduction in hydrogen uptake per barrel and
lower catalyst deactivation
24 rate. It is generally known that the coking derived (thermally cracked)
liquid products are highly
hydrogen deficient and require at least 1,200-1,600 standard cubic feet of
hydrogen to
26 hydrotreat a barrel of coker product. On the other hand, the heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising
27 material feed, of the presently disclosed processes, may only require
about 800 standard cubic
28 feet of hydrogen to hydrotreat a barrel of such heavy hydrocarbon-
comprising material. In
29 ebullated bed hydroprocessing, the hydroprocessing catalysts are
deactivated quickly by high
CCR and/or metals content feedstocks. On the other hand, the heavy hydrocarbon-
comprising
3
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 material feed resulting from the presently disclosed processes, would not
deactivate
2 hydroprocessing catalysts to the same extent.
3 [0009] Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per barrel may be reduced
by as much as 40
4 percent compared to conventional heavy crude upgrading operations, when
using the heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising material feed of the presently disclosed processes. In
most heavy
6 crude upgraders, steam-methane reforming is used to produce the required
hydrogen and by-
7 product CO2. Since the disclosed processes require at least 40 percent
less hydrogen (to effect
8 hydrotreating of the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material feed, of the
presently disclosed
9 processes) versus the coker-based upgrading operation, the CO2 emissions
will be 40 percent
less.
11 [0010] The heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material feed, of the
presently disclosed
12 processes, has high density and superior feedstock characteristics,
resulting in high yield of
13 good quality refined finishing products. High density feedstocks
generally contain large
14 hydrocarbon molecules. Compared to a small hydrocarbon molecule, a large
hydrocarbon
molecule produces a relatively high liquid yield and low gas yield when it is
subjected to catalytic
16 cracking with and without the presence of hydrogen. Also compared to a
highly hydrogen
17 deficient and aromatic coker products, the products derived from the
disclosed processes are
18 virgin feedstock which have good characteristics for catalytic cracking
and produces high quality
19 refined finishing products.
[0011] Use of the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material feed, of the
presently
21 disclosed processes, effects a significant reduction in refinery by-
products and overall
22 hydrocarbon losses. For example, in the coking process, the oilsands
bitumen which contains
23 14 weight percent CCR and 16 weight percent asphaltenes, produces 20
weight percent by-
24 product coke and 10 weight percent of by-product gases. In contrast, the
disclosed processes
produce 16 weight percent by-product asphaltenes. This is believed to be
related to the fact that
26 the disclosed processes are physical separation processes, capable of
selective removal of
27 asphaltenes from oilsands bitumen, whereas coking is a high severity
thermal cracking reaction
28 process.
29 [0012] In another aspect, there is provided a heavy hydrocarbon-
containing feed for a
catalytic hydroprocessing or catalytic hydrocracking process, the feed
comprising a deasphalted
4
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material having a Conradson carbon residue,
CCR, content
2 greater than about 12 wt% and an asphaltene content less than about 2
wt%.
3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
4 [0013] The processes of the description will now be discussed
with reference to the
following accompanying drawings:
6 [0014] Figure 1 illustrates a schematic drawing of an aspect of
the described process.
7 [0015] Figure 2 illustrates a schematic drawing of another
aspect of the described
8 process.
9 [0016] Figure 3 illustrates a schematic drawing of another
aspect of the described
process.
11 [0017] Figure 4 is a process flow diagram of the process of
Example 1.
12 [0018] Figure 5 is a process flow diagram of the process of
Example 2.
13 [0019] Figure 6 illustrates the Fourier transform ion cyclotron
resonance mass
14 spectrometry analysis of deasphalted oil (DAO) showing relative
abundance (y-axis) and
number of double bond equivalents (DBEs), which correlates to the number of
aromatic rings.
16 DETAILED DESCRIPTION
17 [0020] The present invention is based on the results of an
experimental program to
18 determine the chemistry of asphaltenes in deasphalted oil (DAO) samples
obtained from the
19 selective asphaltene separation process described in U.S. Patent No.
7,597,794 under various
operating conditions, specifically the distribution of basic nitrogen
compounds of asphaltenes.
21 The findings from this program are discussed below.
22 [0021] When the DAD asphaltenes derived from various vacuum
residua (see Table 1)
23 were subjected to Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass
Spectrometry (FT-ICR MS)
24 analysis (see Figure 6), it was found that for DAC, with a low
asphaltenes content (i.e. up to 2
wt%), the distributions of basic nitrogen compounds of asphaltenes were Type
1. In contrast,
26 for DAO with a high asphaltenes content (i.e. greater than 2 wt%), the
distributions of basic
5
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 nitrogen compounds of asphaltenes were Type 2, indicating relatively more
highly condensed
2 nitrogen compounds. In summary, the chemistry of DAD asphaltenes is
dependent on the DAD
3 asphaltenes content, which is likely due to selective extraction of
asphaltenes sub-fractions.
4 [0022] As known in the art, highly condensed nitrogen compounds
are detrimental to
catalytic refining processes, causing rapid catalyst deactivation and catalyst
coking. For this
6 reason, the DAD samples with various asphaltenes contents, as listed in
Table 1, were
7 subjected to catalytic hydroprocessing screening tests. Specifically, the
DAD samples were
8 mixed with hydrogen gas at 9 MPa and the mixture was introduced to a 125
mL continuous
9 catalyst testing unit at 390 C and 0.5 h-1 liquid hourly space velocity
(LHSV). The testing unit
was packed with five types of catalysts, namely hydrodemetallization,
hydrodesulfurization,
11 hydrodenitrogenation, CCR removal, and hydrocracking catalysts, in a
grading bed
12 configuration. The pressure drop across the packed catalyst bed reactor
was monitored. The
13 results in Table 1 showed that the DAD with less than 2 wt% asphaltenes
had a constant
14 differential pressure across the catalyst bed after 18 h of continuous
run, indicating no catalyst
coking or plugging. For DAD with higher than 2 wt% asphaltenes, a 50 kPa
differential pressure
16 increase across the catalyst bed after 7 h of continuous run, indicating
catalyst coking or
17 plugging. In an extreme case of DAD with 8.5 wt% asphaltenes, the
catalyst reactor was
18 plugged after 2 h of operation. This showed that DAD with higher that 2
wt% asphaltenes was
19 not a suitable feed for packed hydroprocessing processes.
[0023] Table 1
Type of DAO DA0 CCR Type of Remarks
vacuum resid asphaltenes content, wt% nitrogen
content, wt% compounds
Athabasca Traces amount 13.0 1 No pressure drop after 18
h
Athabasca 1.5 13.7 1 No pressure drop after 18
h
Athabasca 32 14.8 2 50 kPa pressure drop
after 8
Athabasca 8.5 16.5 2 Catalyst bed plugging
after 2
Venezuela Traces amount 13.5 1 No pressure drop after 18
h
Venezuela 1.8 13.9 1 No pressure drop after 18
h
Venezuela 4.1 14.6 2 50 kPa pressure drop
after 7
Refinery bottoms Traces amount 13.1 1 No pressure drop after 18
h
Refinery bottoms 1.3 13.5 1 No pressure drop after 18
h
6
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
Refinery bottoms 1.7 13.9 1 No
pressure drop after 18 h
1
2 [0024] Referring to Figures 1 to 3, there is provided a process
of treating a deasphalted
3 heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 12.
4 [0025] Figure 1 illustrates one aspect of the described process,
wherein a feed material
10, comprising deasphalted heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material, is routed to
a contacting
6 zone, or reaction zone, 14 that comprises a catalyst material 15. The
selection of catalyst
7 material 15 would be dependent on the characteristics of feed. In
general, the catalyst is one
8 that is suitable for promoting a catalytic reaction for upgrading at
least a fraction of the
9 hydrocarbon material contained in the feed material 10, wherein such
catalytic reaction occurs
within the reaction zone 14. This catalytic upgrading results in the
production of a total product
11 material, or upgraded product, 16. Thus, as will be understood, during
operation of the process,
12 a reaction zone material is generated within the reaction zone, such
reaction zone material
13 consisting of the catalyst material 15 and a feed/product-comprising
mixture, wherein the
14 feed/product-comprising mixture comprises the unreacted feed material 10
and the total product
material 16. The total product material 16, in turn, comprises the material
generated by the
16 upgrading of at least a fraction of hydrocarbon material of the feed
material 10.
17 [0026] Figures 2 and 3 illustrate another aspect, wherein the
process further includes
18 deasphalting a heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 to generate the
deasphalted heavy
19 hydrocarbon-comprising material 12.
[0027] The heavy-hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 may be liquid, semi-
solid, or solid,
21 or any combination thereof.
22 [0028] In some aspects of the described process, the heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising
23 material 4 is a material that includes at least 10 weight percent (wt%)
of hydrocarbon-
24 comprising material that boils above 500 C. In some aspects the heavy
hydrocarbon-
comprising material 4 is a material includes at least 20 weight percent of
hydrocarbon-
26 comprising material that boils above 500 C. In some aspects the heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising
27 material 4 is a material includes at least 30 weight percent of
hydrocarbon-comprising material
28 that boils above 500 C. In some aspects the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising
material 4 is a
7
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 material includes at least 40 weight percent of hydrocarbon-comprising
material that boils above
2 500 C. In some aspects the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 is a
material includes at
3 least 50 weight percent of hydrocarbon-comprising material that boils
above 500 C. In some
4 aspects the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 is a material
includes at least 60 weight
percent of hydrocarbon-comprising material that boils above 500 C. In some
aspects the heavy
6 hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 is a material includes at least 70
weight percent of
7 hydrocarbon-comprising material that boils above 500 C. In some aspects
the heavy
8 hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 is a material includes at least 75
weight percent of
9 hydrocarbon-comprising material that boils above 500 C. In some aspects
the heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 is a material includes at least 80 weight
percent of
11 hydrocarbon-comprising material that boils above 500 C. In some aspects
the heavy
12 hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 is a material includes at least 90
weight percent of
13 hydrocarbon-comprising material that boils above 500 C. In some aspects
the heavy
14 hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 is a material that boils above 500 C.
[0029] In some aspects the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 includes
a CCR
16 content of at least 12 weight percent (wt%), based on the total weight
of the heavy hydrocarbon-
17 comprising material. In particular, the CCR content of the material 4 is
between 12 to 30 wt%.
18 In some aspects the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 includes a
CCR content of at
19 least 13 weight percent (wt%), based on the total weight of the heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising
material. In some aspects the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 includes
a CCR
21 content of at least 14 weight percent (wt%), based on the total weight
of the heavy hydrocarbon-
22 comprising material. In some aspects the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising
material 4 includes a
23 CCR content that is less than 30 weight percent (wt%), based on the
total weight of the heavy
24 hydrocarbon-comprising material.
[0030] In some aspects of the described process, the heavy hydrocarbon-
comprising
26 material 4 includes an asphaltene content of less than 40 weight
percent, based on the total
27 weight of the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material. In some of these
aspects, the heavy
28 hydrocarbon-comprising material includes an asphaltene content of less
than 20 weight percent,
29 based on the total weight of the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising mixture.
In some of these
aspects, the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material includes an asphaltene
content of less
8
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 than 15 weight percent, based on the total weight of the heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising
2 material.
3 [0031] In some aspects of the described process, the heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising
4 material 4 includes an inorganic solids content of less than one (1)
weight percent, based on the
total weight of the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material. In some of these
aspects, the heavy
6 hydrocarbon-comprising material includes an inorganic solids content of
less than 0.5 weight
7 percent, based on the total weight of the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising
material.
8 [0032] In some aspects of the described process, the inorganic
solids of the heavy
9 hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 may be micrometer (10-6 m) sized
particles, which can be
determined by high temperature filtration technique. In some aspects, the
inorganic solids in the
11 heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 may be sub-micron (smaller than
10-6 m) sized
12 particles, which can be determined by ultra-high speed centrifugation of
the diluted heavy
13 hydrocarbon-comprising material 4.
14 [0033] In some aspects of the described process, the heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising
material 4 has an API (American Petroleum Institute) gravity of less than 20 .
In some aspects,
16 the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 has an API gravity of less
than 150. In some
17 aspects, the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 has an API gravity
of less than 12 . In
18 some aspects, the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 has an API
gravity of less than
19 10 . In some aspects, the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 has an
API gravity of less
than 5 . In some aspects, the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 has an
API gravity of
21 less than 0 . In some aspects, the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material
4 has an API gravity
22 of less than -2 . In some aspects, the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising
material 4 has an API
23 gravity of less than -4 . In some aspects, the heavy hydrocarbon-
comprising material 4 has an
24 API gravity of less than -8 . In some aspects, the heavy hydrocarbon-
comprising material 4 has
an API gravity of less than -10 .
26 [0034] In some aspects of the described process, the heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising
27 material 4 includes, or in some aspects, consists of, residuum or resid.
Exemplary residua
28 include various heavy crude and refinery fractions as would be known to
persons skilled in the
29 art. In this respect, in some aspects, the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising
material includes, or in
some aspects, consists of, fresh resid hydrocarbon feeds, a bottoms stream
from a refinery
9
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 process, such as petroleum atmospheric tower bottoms, vacuum tower
bottoms, or a bottoms
2 stream from a coker or a visbreaker or a thermal cracking unit, or a
bottoms stream from a fluid
3 catalytically cracked (FCC) or a RFCC unit, hydrocracked atmospheric
tower or vacuum tower
4 bottoms, straight run vacuum gas oil, hydrocracked vacuum gas oil, FCC
slurry oils or cycle oils,
as well as other similar hydrocarbon-comprising materials, or any combination
thereof, each of
6 which may be straight run, process derived, hydrocracked, or otherwise
partially treated
7 (desulfurized). The heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 described
herein may also include
8 various impurities, such as sulphur, nitrogen, oxygen, halides, and
metals.
9 [0035] In some aspects of the described process, the heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising
material 4 includes, or in some aspects, consists of, a crude, such as a heavy
and/or an ultra-
11 heavy crude. Crude refers to hydrocarbon material which has been
produced and/or retorted
12 from hydrocarbon-containing formations and which has not yet been
distilled and/or fractionally
13 distilled in a treatment facility to produce multiple components with
specific boiling range
14 distributions, such as atmospheric distillation methods and/or vacuum
distillation methods.
Exemplary crudes include coal derived liquids, bitumen, tar sands, or crude
oil.
16 [0036] As discussed further herein, and as illustrated in
Figures 2 and 3, the heavy
17 hydrocarbon material used in the presently described process is
preferably first subjected to a
18 deasphalting step. Alternatively, the presently described process
includes a deasphalting step.
19 Such deasphalting results in the production of the deasphalted heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising
material 12. As will be understood by persons skilled in the art, the
asphaltene content of the
21 deasphalted heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 12 would generally be
less than the
22 asphaltene content of the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4. As
discussed further
23 below, the deasphalting step may involve any known method, such as a
solvent extraction
24 process or a reactive process etc. In a preferred aspect, the
deasphalting step results in a
hydrocarbon material containing up to 2% asphaltenes.
26 [0037] In some aspects of the described process, the step of
deasphalting is effected by
27 solvent extraction, as is well known in the art. Examples of such
solvent extraction methods are
28 described in, for example, the article by BilIon and others published in
1994 in Volume 49, No. 5
29 of the journal of the French Petroleum Institute, pages 495 to 507, in
the book "Raffinage et
conversion des produits lourds du petrole [Refining and Conversion of Heavy
Petroleum
31 Products]" by J. F. Le Page, S. G. Chatila, and M. Davidson, Edition
Technip, pages 17-32.
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 Exemplary solvent extraction processes, for effecting the deasphalting,
are also described in
2 U.S. Patent No. 7,597,794.
3 [0038] In some aspects of the described process, the deasphalting is
effected by
4 contacting the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 4 with solvent
material 6, within a solvent
material contacting zone 8 (or 8A), to effect production of a mixture
including an asphaltene-
,
6 depleted heavy hydrocarbon comprising material intermediate 12 and an
asphaltene-enriched
7 solvent material intermediate 11.
8 [0039] In some aspects of the described process, the solvent material
that is used for
9 the deasphalting is a hydrocarbon material which is a liquid at the
operating conditions of the
solvent material contacting zone. In some aspects, the solvent material is a
relatively light
11 hydrocarbon or a mixture including two or more light hydrocarbons.
Exemplary light
12 hydrocarbons include propane, butane, isobutane, pentane, isopentane,
hexane, heptane, and
13 corresponding mono-olefinic hydrocarbons, and corresponding cyclic
hydrocarbons. In some
14 aspects, the solvent material includes one or more paraffinic
hydrocarbons having from 3 to 7
carbon atoms in total per molecule.
16 [0040] In some aspects of the described process, the solvent material
used for the
17 deasphalting step is a supercritical fluid at the operating conditions
of the solvent material
18 contacting zone 8 or 8A.
19 [0041] In some aspects of the described process, the solvent material
is pentane.
[0042] The mixture, resulting from the contacting zone, is preferably
separated, within a
21 separation zone, as shown at 8 or 8B, into at least the asphaltene-
depleted heavy hydrocarbon-
22 comprising material fraction 12 and the asphaltene-enriched solvent
material fraction 11. The
23 asphaltene content of the asphaltene-depleted heavy hydrocarbon-
comprising fraction 12 is less
24 than the asphaltene content of the heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material
4. As will be
understood, other fractions may also be separated during the separation step.
26 [0043] In some aspects of the described process, the above mentioned
separation step
27 is effected by gravity separation. In other aspects, the separation is
effected by phase
28 separation. In other aspects, the separation is effected by an
extraction process. Generally, the
29 asphaltene-enriched solvent material fraction 11, which would have a
higher density than the
11
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 asphaltene-depleted heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material fraction 12, is
recovered as a
2 bottoms product, and the asphaltene-depleted heavy hydrocarbon-comprising
material fraction
3 12 is recovered as an overhead product.
4 [0044] Referring to Figure 2, in one aspect, both the contacting
and separation steps are
conducted within a combined contactor/separator 9, such as a mixer-decanter or
an extraction
6 column. In this respect, the solvent material contacting zone and the
separation zone are at
7 least partially co-located within zone 8.
8 [0045] Referring to Figure 3, in another aspect, the contacting
and separation steps are
9 conducted in separate units. For example, as illustrated in Figure 3, the
contacting step is
effected within unit 9A, which is preferably a mixer, having a mixing zone 8A.
The resulting
11 mixture is then supplied to a separator 9B having a separation zone 8B
to effect the separation
12 step. As indicated above, the separation step may comprise a gravity
separation.
13 [0046] In some aspects of the described process, the
contactor/separator 9 may
14 contain bubble trays, packing elements such as rings or saddles,
structured trays, or
combinations thereof, to facilitate contacting between the heavy hydrocarbon-
comprising
16 material and the solvent material. In other aspects, the
contactor/separator may be an empty
17 column without any internals.
18 [0047] In some aspects of the described process, the
contactor/separator 9 is operated
19 such that the temperature within the contacting/separation zone 8 is
near or above the
pseudocritical temperature Tpc of the solvent material, and the pressure
within the
21 contacting/separation zone 8 is above the pseudocritical pressure Ppc of
the solvent material.
22 [0048] In some aspects of the described process, the asphaltene-
depleted heavy
23 hydrocarbon-comprising material fraction 12 is further separated into at
least a solvent-rich
24 fraction, a concentrated asphaltene-depleted lighter oil material
fraction and a concentrated
asphaltene-depleted heavier hydrocarbon-comprising material fraction. In such
case, the
26 concentrated asphaltene-depleted heavier hydrocarbon-comprising material
fraction is
27 recovered as the deasphalted heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 12.
As will be
28 understood, other fractions may also be separated. In some of these
aspects, the separation is
29 effected by steam stripping, evaporation, distillation, or by a
supercritical separation process
(i.e., under supercritical conditions). In some of these aspects, solvent
material, from the
12
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 solvent-rich fraction, is recovered for recycle and re-use in the solvent
extraction unit operation
2 of the deasphalting step.
3 [0049] As shown in Figures 2 and 3, a feed material 10,
including the deasphalted
4 heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 12, is provided in reaction zone
14, in the presence of
catalyst material 15, under conditions which effect upgrading of at least a
fraction of the
6 hydrocarbon material of the feed material. The catalyst material 15
serves to catalyze the
7 upgrading of the feed material 10.
8 [0050] The catalyst material 15 may be any catalyst that is
suitable for increasing the
9 rate of chemical reaction(s) which effect the upgrading of at least a
portion of the hydrocarbon
material in the feed material 10. Upgrading, in this context, will be
understood to mean a
11 process wherein hydrocarbon material of the feed material 10 undergoes
at least one of the
12 following changes: reduction in the molecular weight; reduction in the
boiling point range;
13 reduction in the concentration of asphaltenes; reduction in the
concentration of hydrocarbon free
14 radicals; or a reduction of impurities, such as sulphur, nitrogen,
oxygen, halides, and metals.
[0051] In some aspects of the described process, the catalyst 15 comprises
particulate
16 material in the shape of cylindrical extrudate, trilobes extrudate, or
tetralobes extrudate. In
17 some aspects, the extrudate has a diameter of one (1) millimetre to five
(5) millimetres and a
18 length of three (3) millimetres to 30 millimetres. In some aspects, the
catalyst material 15 for
19 hydrodemetalization is a cylindrical extrudate having a diameter of
three (3) millimetres to five
(5) millimetres and a length of three (3) millimetres to 10 millimetres. In
some aspects, the
21 catalyst material 15 for hydrodesulfurization is a trilobes extrudate
having a diameter of 1.5
22 millimetres to three (3) millimetres and a length of 10 millimetres to
30 millimetres. In some
23 aspects, the catalyst material 15 for hydrodenitrogenation or hydro-CCR
removal is a trilobes
24 extrudate having a diameter of one (1) millimetre to two (2) millimetres
and a length of 10
millimetres to 30 millimetres.
26 [0052] In some aspects of the described process, the catalyst
material 15 has a pore
27 size of 10 to 30 nanometres, such as 15 to 25 nanometres. Also, in some
aspects, the catalyst
28 material 15 has a total pore volume of 0.8 to 2 millilitres per gram of
catalyst material, such as 1
29 to 1.5 millilitres per gram of catalyst material. Also, in some aspects,
the catalyst material 15
13
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 has a specific surface area of 150 to 400 square metres per gram of
catalyst material,
2 preferable 200-250 square metres per gram of catalyst material.
3 [0053] In some aspects of the described process, the ratio of
volume of catalyst material
4 15 to volume of feed material 10 within the reaction zone 14 is from 0.5
to 5Ø In some
aspects, this ratio is from 1.0 to 2Ø
6 [0054] In some aspects of the described process, the reaction
residence time of feed or
7 feed/product-comprising mixture to the catalyst material 15 within the
reaction zone 14 is at
8 least 10 minutes. In some of these aspects, the reaction residence time
is less than 30 minutes.
9 In some of these aspects, the reaction residence time is less than 60
minutes. In some of these
aspects, the reaction residence time is less than 90 minutes. In some of these
aspects, the
11 reaction residence time is less than 120 minutes.
12 [0055] In some aspects of the described process, the contacting
of the feed with the
13 catalyst is effected while the feed/product-comprising mixture is being
flowed through the
14 contacting zone in response to a driving force.
[0056] In some aspects of the described process, the catalyst material 15
is suitable for
16 facilitating hydrogen addition that effects the redistribution of
hydrogen amongst the various
17 hydrocarbon components of the hydrocarbon material of the feed material,
resulting in
18 increased hydrogen/carbon (H/C) atomic ratio of the product material.
19 [0057] In some aspects of the described process, the feed
material 10 also includes a
hydrogen donor. In this regard, hydrogen donor means hydrogen or a compound
which is
21 reactive with other materials of the feed material, within the reaction
zone, to produce hydrogen.
22 In some of these aspects, the hydrogen donor includes molecular
hydrogen, such as diatomic
23 hydrogen (H2). In some of these aspects, the molecular hydrogen is
gaseous.
24 [0058] Where the feed material 10 includes a hydrogen donor,
such as molecular
hydrogen, contacting of the feed with the catalyst 15 effects an upgrading of
the hydrocarbon
26 material of the feed material, and such upgrading is generally known as
"hydroprocessing". As
27 known in the art, the term "Hydroprocessing" is used to define as the
upgrading, in the presence
28 of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon material of the feed material.
Hydroprocessing includes
29 hydroconversion, hydrocracking, hydrogenation, hydrotreating,
hydrodesuplhurization,
14
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 hydrodenitrogenation, hydrodemetallation, hydrodearomatization,
hydroisomerization, and
2 hydrodewaxing. As will be understood, the catalyst material 15 used in
the presently described
3 process may comprise a combination of different catalysts for
facilitating one or more of the
4 above mentioned reactions. For example, the catalyst material 15 may
comprise a combination
of five catalysts to catalyze, for example, one or more of
hydrodemetalization,
6 hydrodesulphurization, hydrodenitrogenation, CCR removal, and/or
hydrocracking of the feed
7 material.
8 [0059] In some aspects of the described process, the catalyst
material includes a
9 functional catalyst material and a catalyst support material, wherein the
functional catalyst
material is supported on the catalyst support material. In some aspects, the
functional catalyst
11 material comprises 0.1 to 5 weight percent cobalt and 1.2 to 30 weight
percent molybdenum. In
12 some aspects, the functional catalyst material comprises 0.1 to 5 weight
percent nickel and 1.2
13 to 30 weight percent molybdenum. In some aspects, the functional
catalyst material comprises
14 0.1 to 5 weight percent nickel and 2 to 40 weight percent tungsten. In
some aspects, the
catalyst support material comprises 0 to 15 weight percent zeolite, and 0.1 to
5 weight percent
16 phosphorous, and 20 to 90 weight percent gamma-alumina. In some aspects,
the catalyst
17 support material comprises 0 to 15 weight percent zeolite, and 0.1 to 5
weight percent
18 phosphorous, and 20 to 90 weight percent alumina-silica. All values of
weight percent are based
19 on the total weight of catalyst material.
[0060] In some aspects of the described process, in addition to the
deasphalted heavy
21 hydrocarbon-comprising material 12, the feed material 10 may
additionally include a dilution
22 agent for effecting dilution of the deasphalted heavy hydrocarbon-
comprising material 12 prior to
23 the step of contacting the material with the catalyst material 15. As
would be known to persons
24 skilled in the art, the step of dilution is preferably effected for
mitigating fouling, deactivation, or
other degradation of the catalyst material.
26 [0061] In some aspects of the described process, the feed
material 10 is deasphalted
27 heavy hydrocarbon-comprising material 12, and the deasphalted heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising
28 material 12 is supplied to the reaction zone in undiluted form.
29 [0062] In some aspects, the reaction zone 14 is disposed within
a reaction vessel 18 as
shown in Figures 2 and 3.
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 [0063] The upgrading described above results in the production
of a total product
2 material (upgraded product) 16. As illustrated in Figures 2 and 3, a
reaction zone material is
3 disposed within the reaction zone and consists of the catalyst material
15, a feed/product-
4 comprising mixture comprising the feed material 10 and the total product
material 16. The total
product material 16 includes the material generated by the upgrading of at
least a portion of the
6 hydrocarbon material of the feed material 10.
7 [0064] The feed/product-comprising mixture has a CCR content of
at least 12 weight
8 percent, based on the total weight of the feed/product-comprising
mixture, and an asphaltene
9 content of less than two (2) weight percent, based on the total weight of
the feed/product-
comprising mixture. In some aspects, the feed has a CCR content of at least 12
weight percent,
11 based on the total weight of the feed, and an asphaltene content of less
than two (2) weight
12 percent, based on the total weight of the feed.
13 [0065] In some aspects of the described process, the CCR content
is at least 13 weight
14 percent, based on the total weight of the feed or feed/product-
comprising mixture. In some
aspects, the CCR content is less than 18 weight percent, based on the total
weight of the feed
16 or feed/product-comprising mixture. In some aspects, the CCR content is
less than 17 weight
17 percent, based on the total weight of the feed or feed/product-
comprising mixture. In some
18 aspects, the CCR content is less than 16 weight percent, based on the
total weight of the feed
19 or feed/product-comprising mixture. In some aspects, the CCR content is
less than 15 weight
percent, based on the total weight of the feed or feed/product-comprising
mixture. In some
21 aspects, the CCR content is less than 14 weight percent, based on the
total weight of the feed
22 or feed/product-comprising mixture.
23 [0066] In some aspects of the described process, the asphaltene
content is negligible.
24 In other words, in such aspects, the feed or feed/product-comprising
mixture contains
substantially no asphaltenes. In this regard, it will be understood that
'substantially no
26 asphaltenes" is intended to mean that the asphaltene content is 0 or
substantially close to 0,
27 which will be understood to include some trace amounts of asphaltenes.
28 [0067] CCR content is defined herein as equal to the value as
determined by test
29 method ASTM D4530, Standard Test Method for Determination of Carbon
Residue (Micro
Method).
16
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 [0068] The asphaltene content of the feed or feed/product-
comprising mixture is defined
2 herein by the modified China Petroleum and Petrochemical Industry
Standard Test Method
3 SH/T0509-92. In some aspects, the asphaltene content of the feed or
feed/product-comprising
4 mixture is defined by ASTM 6560-12, Standard Test Method for
Determination of Asphaltenes in
Crude Petroleum and Petroleum Products.
6 [0069] Total metals content is defined herein as the sum of
nickel content and vanadium
7 content as determined by test method ASTM D5708, Standard Test Methods
for Determination
8 of Nickel, Vanadium, and Iron in Crude Oils and Residual Fuels by
Inductively Coupled Plasma
9 (ICP) Atomic Emission Spectrometry.
[0070] In some aspects of the described process, the feed/product-
comprising mixture
11 includes a total metals content of at least 100 unit weight parts per
million unit weight parts of
12 feed/product-comprising mixture. In some of these aspects, the
feed/product-comprising
13 mixture includes a total metals content of less than 400 unit weight
parts per million unit weight
14 parts of feed/product-comprising mixture. In some aspects, the feed
includes a total metals
content of at least 100 unit weight parts per million unit weight parts of
feed. In some of these
16 aspects, the feed includes a total metals content of less than 400 unit
weight parts per million
17 unit weight parts of feed.
18 [0071] In some aspects of the described process, the total
product 16 is recovered from
19 the reaction zone and discharged from the reaction vessel 18.
[0072] Further aspects will now be described in further detail with
reference to the
21 following non-limiting examples.
22 [0073] Example 1
23 [0074] Athabasca bitumen-derived vacuum residuum was obtained
from a commercial
24 mined oilsands plant in Fort McMurray, Alberta. Figure 4 shows the
process scheme of treating
the vacuum residuum. The properties of vacuum residuum S301 are shown in Table
2. The high
26 concentrations of metal and CCR data in Table 2 show that the bitumen
derived vacuum
27 residuum is a relatively low quality feedstock. Hence, it was selected
as a representative
28 feedstock to illustrate an extreme worst case scenario of applying the
method of the present
17
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Slakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 description. The common upgrading process used for this type of vacuum
residuum is by either
2 coking or ebullated bed hydrocracking.
3 [0075] The vacuum residuum S301 was introduced to a one (1)
barrel per day
4 continuous pilot scale selective asphaltene separator P301, which is
similar to that described in
U.S. Patent No. 7,597,794. The selective asphaltene separator P301 used n-
pentane as solvent
6 and was operated at 160 C, 5 MPa and solvent-to-oil ratio of 4 (on the
weight basis). In the
7 selective asphaltene separator P301, the vacuum residuum S301 was
separated into two
8 products: feed S303 and asphaltene granules S304. Table 2 shows that the
quality of feed S303
9 was improved, compared to the bitumen vacuum residuum S301. However, the
feed S303 still
contained 250 ppm metals and 13 weight percent CCR, which exceeds the
specified operating
11 guidelines for packed bed resid hydroprocessing (which are 100 ppm
metals and 12 weight
12 percent CCR). The unique characteristics of feed 5303 was that it was a
deep-cut residuum
13 with negligible amount of asphaltenes.
14 [0076] The feed S303 was mixed with hydrogen gas S304 at 9 MPa
and the mixture
was introduced to a 125 mL continuous catalyst testing reactor unit P302 which
was operated at
16 390 C and 0.5 h-1 liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV). The catalysts
testing reactor unit P302
17 was a commercial apparatus packed with five types of catalysts (a
hydrodemetallization
18 catalyst, comprising 0.5 percent nickel and 2.5 percent molybdenum
supported on alumina; a
19 hydrodesulfurization catalyst comprising 2.5 percent cobalt and 20
percent molybdenum
supported on alumina; a hydrodenitrogenation catalyst comprising 4.0 percent
nickel and 25
21 percent molybdenum supported on the alumina; a CCR removal catalyst
comprising 5.0 percent
22 nickel and 30 percent molybdenum was supported on the alumina with; and
a hydrocracking
23 catalyst comprising 2.5 percent nickel and 25 percent tungsten supported
on 10 percent Y
24 zeolite mixed silica-alumina) in grading bed configuration. Prior to the
resid hydroprocessing
run of the feed S303, the reactor unit P302 had been fed continuously with a
feed, similar to
26 feed S303, and derived from an extra heavy crude, for 1500 hours. As a
result, the catalysts, in
27 the reactor unit P302, were disposed at an equilibrium state when it was
fed with the feed S303
28 and hydrogen gas mixture. The continuous packed bed resid
hydroprocessing run with the feed
29 S303 was on-stream for 1500 hours. No pressure drop build-up across the
catalyst bed was
observed for 1500 hours of continuous operation. This is an indication that no
catalyst bed
31 plugging was experienced even though the feedstock contained relatively
high concentrations of
18
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 metals (250 ppm) and a relatively high CCR concentration (13 weight
percent) without
2 experiencing catalyst bed plugging, leading to pressure drop build-up
across the catalyst bed.
3 [0077] The reaction product S307 from the reactor unit P302 was
routed to a gas/liquid
4 separator P303 in which the reaction product S307 was separated into gas
product S308 and
hydrotreated liquid product S309, which were sampled daily for analysis. The
data in Table 2
6 show that properties of the hydrotreated liquid product S309 were
dramatically improved after
7 resid hydroprocessing, including the yield of 10 weight percent diesel
and 40 weight percent
8 hydrotreated heavy gas oil, determined by simulated distillation. More
importantly, the
9 hydrotreated liquid product S309 contained 3 ppm metals, 4 weight percent
CCR and 45 weight
percent saturated hydrocarbons, which are superior characteristics for
catalytic cracking
11 feedstock.
12 [0078] The results of this example illustrate that,
surprisingly, poor-quality heavy crude
13 derived residuum can be processed using a conventional packed bed resid
hydroprocessing
14 unit for preparing a feedstock that is suitable for other refinery
processes.
[0079] Table 2. Properties of S301. S303 and S309
S301 S303 S309
Yield, wt% l8P-350 C 0 0 10
350-524 C 0 0 40
Density @20 C, g/cm3 1.0648 0.9990 0.9486
Molecular weight 545
Carbon, wt% 82.97 82.82 86.22
Hydrogen, wt% 9.65 10.43 11.53
H/C (atomic) ratio 1.39 1.50 1.60
Sulfur, wt% 6 4.8 0.59
Nitrogen, wt% 0.68 0.51 0.36
Nickel, ppm 144 77 2
Vanadium, ppm 357 176 1
Concarbon residue (CCR), wt% 23.3 13 4.2
Saturates, wt% 9.31 18.99 44.80
Aromatics, wt% 43.44 56.24 43.97
Resins, wt% 21.67 24.77 11.23
Asphaltenes, wt% 25.58 ND* ND*
19
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
*ND - Not detectable
1
2 [0080] Example 2
3 [0081] One of the purposes of a packed bed resid hydroprocessing
step is as a
4 feedstock pretreatment for RFCC unit. This example will illustrate that
certain heavy
hydrocarbon-comprising material can be good feedstock for RFCC unit with low
severity resid
6 hydroprocessing. The process of Example 2 is illustrated in Figure 5.
7 [0082] Feed S403 was obtained from a commercial selective
asphaltene separator
8 P401 located at a refinery [Zhao et al., OGJ, April 5, 2010, 52-59]. The
selective asphaltene
9 separator P401 was similar to that described in U.S. Patent No.
7,597,794. The feed to the
selective asphaltene separator P401 was a blend of heavy crude and refinery
residua. Table 3
11 shows the properties of the feed S403, including the fact that it
contained high concentrations of
12 metals (280 ppm), CCR (13.5 wt%) and 1.3 wt% asphaltenes. The feed S403
contained a high
13 amount saturated hydrocarbons (40 wt%), which is a good feedstock
characteristic for RFCC.
14 Also, our analysis indicated that the chemistry of the feed S403
asphaltenes (1.3 wt%) was not
the same as those of typical asphaltenes obtained from conventional
deasphalting processes.
16 Exemplary chemical characteristics include the distribution of nitrogen
containing compounds in
17 the feed S403 asphaltenes is different from that in typical asphaltenes
obtained from
18 conventional deasphalting processes. The feed S403 asphaltenes do not
cause
19 hydroprocessing catalyst coking and plugging of packed catalyst bed,
whereas typical
asphaltenes obtained from conventional deasphalting processes cause
hydroprocessing
21 catalyst coking and plugging of packed catalyst bed.
22 [0083] The feed S403 was mixed with hydrogen gas S405 at 9 MPa
and the mixture
23 was introduced to a 125 mL continuous catalyst testing reactor unit P402
which was operated at
24 390 C and 1.0 ft' liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV). The catalysts
testing reactor unit P402
was a commercial apparatus packed with five types of catalysts (a
hydrodemetallization
26 catalyst, comprising 0.2 percent nickel and 5 percent molybdenum
supported on alumina; a
27 hydrodesulfurization catalyst comprising 2.5 percent cobalt and 25
percent molybdenum
28 supported on alumina; a hydrodenitrogenation catalyst comprising 3.0
percent nickel and 20
29 percent molybdenum supported on the alumina; a CCR removal catalyst
comprising 4.0 percent
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 nickel and 25 percent molybdenum was supported on the alumina with; and a
hydrocracking
2 catalyst comprising 2.0 percent nickel and 25 percent tungsten supported
on 20 percent Y
3 zeolite mixed silica-alumina) in grading bed configuration. Prior to the
resid hydroprocessing
4 run of the feed S403, the reactor unit P402 was subjected to pre-
sulfiding with 2% carbon
disulfide in cyclohexane for 72 hours, followed by pre-coking with Chinese
Daqing derived
6 vacuum gas oil for 48 hours. The continuous packed bed resid
hydroprocessing run with the
7 feed S403 was on-stream for 400 hours. No pressure drop build-up across
the catalyst bed was
8 observed for 400 hours of continuous operation. Surprisingly, even though
the feedstock
9 contained such high concentrations of metals (280 ppm), CCR (13.5 wt%)
and 1.3 wt%
asphaltenes, no catalyst bed plugging, leading to pressure drop build-up
across the catalyst
11 bed, was observed.
12 [0084] The reaction product S407 from the reactor unit P402 was
routed to a gas/liquid
13 separator P403 in which the reaction product S407 was separated into gas
product S408 and
14 hydrotreated liquid product S409, which were sampled daily for analysis.
The data in Table 3
show that properties of hydrotreated liquid product S409 were improved after
resid
16 hydroprocessing: 8.5 weight percent CCR and 53 weight percent saturate
hydrocarbons.
17 However, the hydrotreated liquid product S409 had a relatively high
density (0.934 g/cm3) and
18 relatively high metals concentration (53 ppm), and these values were
higher than those
19 prescribed by typical threshold RFCC feedstock specifications. It is
generally believed that high
density feedstock may cause fluidization instability in a FCC riser reactor,
due to interaction of
21 catalyst particles and hydrocarbons, which result in catalyst particle
agglomeration. Typically,
22 RFCC feedstock consists of a blend of vacuum residuum and vacuum gas
oil.
23 [0085] The hydrotreated liquid product S409 was subjected to
RFCC test in a 1.5 kg/h
24 continuous modified ARCO type FCC pilot testing unit P404. The
continuous RFCC pilot run
was on-stream for 24 hours and exhibited a stable and smooth operation.
Inspection of spent
26 catalysts indicated that, surprisingly, no catalyst particle
agglomeration occurred. As shown in
27 Table 2, the RFCC product yields were in-line with those obtained from
the oilsands derived a
28 low yield deasphalted oil [Yui et al., OGJ., January 19, 1988]. In the
commercial FCC operation,
29 the coke by-product is combusted in the FCC catalyst regenerator and
provided the heat for the
FCC process.
21
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

CA 2,920,054
Blakes Ref: 12492/00004
1 [0086] This illustrates that surprisingly, poor-quality heavy
crude derived residuum, with
2 relatively high asphaltenes content, can be processed using a
conventional packed bed resid
3 hydroprocessing unit and RFCC units.
4 [0087] Table 3. Properties of S403, S409 and S411-415
S403 S409
Yield, wt% Gas 2.66 S411
LPG (C3-C4) 17.02 S411
Gasoilne 41.85 S412
Diesel 18.79 S413
Slurry oil 9.94 S414
Coke 9.48 S415
Density @20 C, g/cm3 0.9976 0.9342
Nickel, ppm 56.00 14.90
Vanadium, ppm 222.00 38.50
Concarbon residue (CCR), wt% 13.48 8.45
Saturates, wt% 40.20 52.96
Aromatics, wt% 41.70 36.00
Resins, wt% 16.80 10.10
Asphaltenes, wt% 1.30 0.90
6
7 [0088] While the subject process has been described with
reference to illustrative
8 aspects and examples, the description is not intended to be construed in
a limiting sense. Thus,
9 various modifications of the illustrative aspects, as well as other
aspects of the invention, will be
apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to this description. It
is therefore
11 contemplated that the appended claims will cover any such modifications
or aspects.
12
22
23310177.1
CA 2920054 2018-02-07

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2920054 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2020-10-23
Inactive: Associate patent agent removed 2020-07-16
Inactive: Office letter 2020-07-16
Inactive: Office letter 2020-07-16
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2020-07-16
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2020-07-16
Revocation of Agent Request 2020-05-21
Appointment of Agent Request 2020-05-21
Inactive: Associate patent agent added 2020-04-29
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2020-03-17
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2020-03-17
Revocation of Agent Request 2020-03-17
Appointment of Agent Request 2020-03-17
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Grant by Issuance 2018-08-14
Inactive: Cover page published 2018-08-13
Pre-grant 2018-06-26
Inactive: Final fee received 2018-06-26
4 2018-06-15
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2018-06-15
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2018-06-15
Letter Sent 2018-06-15
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2018-06-11
Inactive: Q2 passed 2018-06-11
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2018-04-10
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2018-04-04
Inactive: Report - No QC 2018-04-04
Letter Sent 2018-02-13
Request for Examination Received 2018-02-07
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2018-02-07
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2018-02-07
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2018-02-07
Advanced Examination Determined Compliant - PPH 2018-02-07
Advanced Examination Requested - PPH 2018-02-07
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2016-11-29
Inactive: Cover page published 2016-11-28
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (bilingual) 2016-02-15
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2016-02-11
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-02-11
Letter Sent 2016-02-08
Application Received - Regular National 2016-02-08

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2017-11-08

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
WELL RESOURCES INC.
Past Owners on Record
CHUNMING XU
KENG H. CHUNG
QIANG WEI
SUOQI ZHAO
XUEWEN SUN
ZHIMING XU
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2016-02-04 22 1,160
Abstract 2016-02-04 1 30
Drawings 2016-02-04 5 54
Claims 2016-02-04 3 112
Cover Page 2016-11-06 1 41
Description 2018-02-06 22 1,179
Claims 2018-02-06 3 114
Cover Page 2018-07-18 1 41
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2016-02-07 1 102
Filing Certificate 2016-02-14 1 179
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2017-10-09 1 111
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2018-02-12 1 187
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2018-06-14 1 162
New application 2016-02-04 19 459
Maintenance fee payment 2017-11-07 1 25
Request for examination / PPH request / Amendment 2018-02-06 33 1,497
Examiner Requisition 2018-04-03 3 160
Amendment 2018-04-09 3 79
Final fee 2018-06-25 3 77