Language selection

Search

Patent 2920907 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2920907
(54) English Title: AIRFOIL MASKING TOOL AND METHOD OF POLISHING AN AIRFOIL
(54) French Title: OUTIL DE MASQUAGE DE PROFIL AERODYNAMIQUE ET PROCEDE DE POLISSAGE D'UN PROFIL AERODYNAMIQUE
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B24C 9/00 (2006.01)
  • B24B 31/06 (2006.01)
  • B24B 31/12 (2006.01)
  • B24B 41/06 (2012.01)
  • B24C 1/04 (2006.01)
  • B24C 3/18 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MARTIN, LEE (Canada)
  • BELL, JOSHUA (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • MDS COATING TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
(71) Applicants :
  • MDS COATING TECHNOLOGIES CORP. (Canada)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2023-03-28
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2014-08-18
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2015-03-05
Examination requested: 2019-06-26
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/CA2014/000628
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2015027310
(85) National Entry: 2016-02-10

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
61/870,980 (United States of America) 2013-08-28
61/907,207 (United States of America) 2013-11-21
61/913,439 (United States of America) 2013-12-09
62,001,425 (United States of America) 2014-05-21

Abstracts

English Abstract

An airfoil masking tool constructed to protect the leading edge, trailing edge and tip of an airfoil during polishing of the airfoil. A method of polishing an airfoil using the masking tool.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un outil de masquage de profil aérodynamique construit pour protéger le bord d'attaque, le bord de fuite et la pointe d'un profil aérodynamique pendant le polissage du profil aérodynamique. L'invention concerne également un procédé de polissage d'un profil aérodynamique à l'aide de l'outil de masquage.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLMMS:
1. An airfoil masking tool constructed to hold an airfoil during polishing,
the tool
comprising: a body constructed and arranged to hold an airfoil in place in a
polishing machine during polishing and to cover a leading edge, trailing edge
and tip of the airfoil to protect the leading edge, trailing edge and tip from
abrasion from a moving polishing media during polishing and the polishing
media contacts an exposed surface of the airfoil during polishing, and cover
any edges or surfaces of the airfoil that are to be protected from abrasion,
wherein each of the leading, trailing and tip are aligned with the masking
tool
when the airfoil is mounted in the masking tool, and further comprising a
mount configured to mount the masking tool in a stationary position within
the polishing machine to set an angle between the moving polishing media
and the airfoil held in place within the making tool.
2. The airfoil masking tool according to claim 1, further comprising a
plurality of
masking tools aligned in a rail.
3. The airfoil masking tool according to claim 1, further comprising a
plurality of
masking tools connected together in a row.
4. The airfoil masking tool according to claim 1, wherein the mount
comprising
a magnetic base plate.
5. An apparatus for finishing the surfaces of an airfoil, the apparatus
comprising: a tub; finishing media in the toroidal tub; a motor for moving the
polishing media in the tub in a generally revolving helical motion in the tub;
an airfoil masking tool comprising a body constructed and arranged to hold
an airfoil in place during polishing and to cover a leading edge, trailing
edge
and tip of the airfoil to protect the leading edge, trailing edge and tip from
abrasion from a polishing media during polishing and the polishing media
contacts an exposed surface of the airfoil during polishing, wherein each of
13
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-29

the leading, trailing and tip are aligned with the masking tool when the
airfoil
is mounted in the masking tool; and a mount constructed to mount the
masking tool in a stationary position within the tub at a selected flow angle
of
the moving polishing media flowing against the exposed surface during
polishing.
6. An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein said media is selected from
the
group consisting of: sand, stone, metal, porcelain, natural organic materials,
ceramics, polymeric compositions and hybrid multi-component media.
7. An apparatus according to claim 6, wherein said media further comprises
a
chemical composition.
8. An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the shape of the tub is
selected
from the group consisting of toroids, bowls, troughs, ovals and racetrack
shapes.
9. A method of polishing an airfoil, the method comprising: providing a
polishing machine containing a polishing media; mounting an airfoil in a
masking tool, the masking tool covering a leading edge, trailing edge and tip
of the airfoil, to provide a mounted airfoil having an exposed surface to be
polished, wherein each of the leading, trailing and tip are aligned with the
masking tool; mounting the mounted airfoil in the polishing machine at a
stationary position set at a flow angle of the polishing media in relation to
the
exposed surface that provides a surface roughness Ra of less than 5 micro-
inches during polishing; polishing the mounted airfoil by contacting the
exposed surface of the airfoil with the polishing medium at the flow angle to
form a polished airfoil having a surface roughness Ra of less than 5 micro-
inches, wherein the masking tool prevents alterations to the leading edge,
trailing edge and tip of the airfoil during polishing; and removing the
polished
airfoil from the masking tool.
14
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-29

10. The method according to claim 9, further comprising mounting a
plurality of
mounted airfoils on a base plate and mounting the base plate in the polishing
machine so that exposed surfaces of the airfoils are aligned and conducting
the polishing so that the polishing medium contacts the exposed surfaces of
the airfoils at a selected flovv angle.
11. The method according to claim 9, wherein the flow angle is from 50 to 0
degrees to the orientation of the leading edge/trailing edge chord axis of the
airfoils.
12. The method according to claim 9, wherein the airfoil is coated with an
erosion resistant coating.
13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the polishing media comprises
an
abrasive diamond polishing paste.
14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the polishing process time to
achieve the desired surface finish is shorter than for an uncoated airfoil.
15. The method according to claim 12, wherein the surface finish of the
polished
coated article remains smoother for an extended duration compared to a
polished uncoated article in erosive conditions.
16. The method according to claim 12, wherein the material loss from the
polished surface of the polished coated article is minimized when compared
to a polished uncoated article.
17. The method according to claim 13, wherein the polishing media
comprises:
diamond powder in the range of 26 to 156 grams; gum in the range of 4 to
24 mL; water soluble oil in the range of 26 to 104 mL; and water in the
range of 1 to 3 L per 100 kg of abrasive media.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-29

18. The method according to claim 13, wherein the polishing media
comprises:
diamond powder in the range of 52 to 104 grams; gum in the range of 8 to
16 mL; water soluble oil in the range of 26 to 78 mL; and water in the range
of 1 to 2 L per 100 kg of abrasive media.
19. The method according to claim 13, wherein the polishing media
comprises:
diamond powder in the range of 65 to 78 grams; gum in the range of 10 to
13 mL; water soluble oil in the range of 45 to 65 mL; and water in the range
of 1 to 1.6 L per 100 kg of abrasive media.
20. The method according to claim 9, wherein the polishing process further
comprises making a fine adjustment to a dimension or shape of the airfoil by
a controlled removal of material in a desired location.
21. A method of making a fine adjustment to a dimension or shape of an
airfoil
using the method of claim 9, comprising controlling a flow of the polishing
media over the exposed surface of the airfoil such that an action of the
polishing media is more heavily concentrated in an area where a dimensional
adjustment is required.
22. The method according to claim 21, wherein from 1 micron up to one
millimeter in thickness of material is removed from the airfoil.
23. The method according to claim 10, wherein the base plate comprises a
magnetic base plate.
24. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the mount comprises a base
plate configured to mount the masking tool in a stationary position within the
polishing machine to set an angle between the moving polishing media and
the airfoil held in place within the making tool.
16
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-06-29

25. The
apparatus according to claim 24, wherein the base plate comprises a
magnetic base plate.
17

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02920907 2016-02-10
WO 2015/027310 PCT/CA2014/000628
AIRFOIL MASKING TOOL AND METHOD OF POLISHING AN AIRFOIL
Field of the Invention
The invention relates to an airfoil masking tool and use of the masking tool
in a method
of polishing the airfoil.
Background of the Invention
lo The demand for ever greater efficiency gains in gas turbine engines has
lead to the
demand for ultra-fine (low surface roughness) airfoils that have a surface
roughness Ra
in the region of 1 to 5 micro-inches. NASA has demonstrated that an industry-
standard
surface finished compressor rotor blade ultrapolished, also known by super
finishing,
super polishing, ultra finishing and high precision surface finishing, to a 5
micro-inch
finish can produce an increase in engine efficiency of approximately 0.5%,
William B.
Roberts et al, The Effect of Ultrapolish on a Transonic Axial Rotor, ASME
Turbo Expo
2005 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress Reno Nevada, June 6 to
9,
2005.
It is widely known that media finishing processes, such as those recipes that
are
commonly provided with media finishing equipment sold by the Rosier, Sweco,
Giant,
Royson, etc., are able to polish most metal surfaces to achieve surface
roughness Ra
measurements in the region of 7 to 25 micro-inches. The media finishing
process
typically comprises a tub style, batch bowl, or a continuous flow-through
vibratory
finisher filled with hard ceramic media stones of various shapes, abrasive
content and
sizes, that is vibrated with an electric motor that spins an eccentric weight.
Hard
ceramic media is loaded into the bowl and the act of vibrating the bowl causes
that
media to flow in a directional manner and circulate around the bowl. Water and
burnishing compounds are typically added to the bowl to assist in the
polishing, and
1
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-10-25

CA 02920907 2016-02-10
WO 2015/027310 PCT/CA2014/000628
sometimes a paste or powder may also be added to accelerate the process. The
articles that are to be polished are added to the bowl so that they flow
around with the
media. The parts can also be fixed in a stationary position in the bowl, but
this is not
typical. An example of a suitable polishing machine is shown in U.S. Patent
No.
6,261,154.
High energy finishing processes such as high energy tumbling or centrifugal
finishing
and drag-finishing are able to achieve lower surface finish conditions.
However, the high
energy nature of these processes can result in the loss of material at sharp
edges which
may harm the dimensions of the part.
When it comes to polishing close-toleranced parts such as gas turbine engine
airfoils,
the polishing process can be very aggressive on sharp radius edges and corners
such
as the leading and trailing edges of the airfoils and blade tip corners.
Changes in the
dimensions of the leading and trailing edges and blade tip corners can have a
profoundly detrimental effect on the mechanical properties and aerodynamic
efficiency
of the airfoils. Thus, a process for super-polishing close-toleranced airfoils
must be able
to preserve the dimensions of these areas and possibly others.
Summary of the Invention
An objective of the invention is to provide a super-polishing media process
that will
avoid altering close-toleranced dimensions of parts such as turbine blades.
Another objective is to provide an airfoil masking tool constructed to hold
and protect
parts of the airfoil during the polishing process.
The objectives can be obtained by a method of polishing an airfoil comprising:
mounting an airfoil in a masking tool, the masking tool covering at least
one of a leading edge, trailing edge or tip of the airfoil, to provide a
mounted
airfoil;
placing the mounted airfoil in a polishing machine;
polishing the mounted airfoil by contacting an exposed surface of the
airfoil with a polishing medium at a flow angle that provides a surface
roughness
2
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-10-25

CA 02920907 2016-02-10
WO 2015/027310 PCT/CA2014/000628
Ra of less than 5 micro-inches, to form a polished airfoil having a surface
roughness Ra of less than 5 micro-inches; and
removing the polished airfoil from the masking tool.
The objectives can also be obtained by using an airfoil masking tool
constructed to hold
an airfoil during polishing comprising:
a body constructed and arranged to hold an airfoil in place during polishing
and
to cover at least one of a leading edge, trailing edge or tip of the airfoil,
or any edges or
surfaces of the airfoil that are to be protected from abrasion.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Fig. 1 illustrates a masking tool.
Fig. 2 illustrates the airfoil masking tools ganged together in a row.
Fig. 3 illustrates a base plate.
Fig. 4 illustrates a bladed disc or rotor.
Figs. 5 and 6 illustrate a bladed disc or rotor with masking tooling.
Fig. 7 illustrates a graph of the results of an erosion test.
Fig. 8 illustrates an erosion test procedure.
Fig. 9 illustrates a polishing machine.
Fig. 10 illustrates a vane sector with masking tooling
Detailed Description of the Invention
The invention will now be explained with reference to the attached non-
limiting Figs.
Fig. 1 illustrates a masking tool 7 designed to hold parts, in this case
airfoils 1, during
polishing. The tool 7 comprises a body 5 constructed to cover at least the
leading edge
2 or trailing edge 3 or blade tip 4 of the airfoil 1, so that the polishing
media contacts the
exposed surface of the airfoil and cannot directly contact the leading edge 2
or trailing
edge 3 or blade tip 4. The airfoil 1 can be secured in the body 5 by means of
an end
cap 6 to hold the airfoil root and also prevent polishing in this area. The
body 5 and end
3

CA 02920907 2016-02-10
WO 2015/027310 PCT/CA2014/000628
cap 6 can be made of metal such as but not limited to steel, titanium,
aluminum or
nickel alloys or non-metallic materials such as, but not limited to rubber of
varying
hardness or plastic such as ABS, Nylon, reinforced Nylon, polycarbonate,
polypropylene, DeIran or a combination of the above. The masking tools 7 can
be
designed so that there is minimal wear and material loss on the masking tools
7 so that
they can be used multiple times. The airfoil 1 can have a coating present on
the
exposed surface. This coating can be applied by physical vapor deposition
methods.
As shown in Fig. 2, a plurality of airfoil masking tools 8 may be ganged
together in a row
9 and then placed over a plurality of airfoils 10 to be polished. The
plurality of airfoils 10
can be located in one of the slots of a rail 11. The masking tool assembly
fits so that
each airfoil leading edge, trailing edge and tip can be automatically aligned
with the
associated masking tool 8. Preferably, the exposed surface of the airfoils to
be polished
should be aligned so that the flow of polishing medium contacts the surfaces
at the
same angle between the medium flow direction and the orientation of the
leading
edge/trailing edge chord axis of the airfoils; termed the flow angle.
The rail of blades 12 or individual masking tools 7 can then be fitted onto a
base plate
13 as shown in Fig. 3. Multiple rails of blades 12 that can be of the same
size and
shape, but may also be of different part designs that can be loaded into
adjacent slots
on a base plate 13. The fully loaded base plate 13 can then be secured in the
polishing
machine, for example a tumbling machine. Equally, the blades may be organized
in
other patterns, such as a curve or staggered arrangement, as an alternative to
the linear
arrangement shown in Fig. 3. Additionally, the masking tooling may be secured
on a
ferromagnetic base plate by means of a magnetic component to hold the tooling
and
blade in the correct position without the need for a rail. Additionally,
blades may be
mounted into other tooling structures more suited to the type of polishing
machine to be
used as exemplified but not limited to tumbling or drag finishing machines.
Bladed discs or rotors 14, as shown in Fig. 4, are well known engine
components that
comprises of airfoils 15 that are integral to the rotor hub. The leading 16
and trailing
edges 17 and blade tips 18 can be protected using masking tooling 19, 20, as
shown in
Fig. 5 and as a complete assembly 21 in Fig. 6 in order to prevent excessive
material
4

CA 02920907 2016-02-10
WO 2015/027310 PCT/CA2014/000628
removal during the tumbling process. The masking tooling can be made from
metal
such as but not limited to steel, titanium, aluminum or nickel alloys or non-
metallic
materials, such as, but not limited to rubber of varying hardness' or plastic
such as ABS,
Nylon, reinforced Nylon, polycarbonate, polypropylene, DeIran or a combination
of the
above.
Vane sectors 27, as shown in Fig 10, are well known engine components that
comprise
airfoils 22, an outer shroud 23, and an inner shroud 24 into which the
airfoils are
attached. The leading 25 and trailing 26 edges of the airfoils can be
protected by using
a masking tool 30 comprising of two parts; and upper 29 and a lower 28 part;
and as a
complete assembly 31 in Fig. 10 in order to prevent excessive material removal
during
the polishing process. The masking tooling can be made from metal such as but
not
limited to steel, titanium, aluminum or nickel alloys or non-metallic
materials, such as,
but not limited to rubber of varying hardness' or plastic such as ABS, Nylon,
reinforced
Nylon, polycarbonate, polypropylene, DeIran or a combination of the above.
The present invention can utilize any suitable polishing machine for mass
finishing the
surface of workpieces, in particular the airfoil masking tool holding the
airfoil. Fig. 9
illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a suitable polishing machine. The
polishing
machine comprises a container or tub 100 which Fig. 9 illustrates as being
circular or
toroidal in its shape, and which¨in this and related shapes¨is referred to as
a "bowl."
zo In its dictionary definition, the term "toroid" refers to "a surface
generated by a plane
closed curved rotated about a line that lies in the same plane as the curve
but does not
intersect it" (Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 10th Edition, 1993).
The shape is
more colloquially referred to as resembling a doughnut. It will be understood
that
although a toroid is the best method of describing the shape of this
embodiment of the
bowl 100, that the invention is not limited to this particular shape nor
should the term
"toroid" as used herein, be limited to structures that meet the rigorous
mathematical
definition. Those familiar with solid geometry and the like will of course
recognize that
the functional equivalent of a toroid could be made using slightly different
shapes, but
that these would fall within the claims of the invention. Other container
shapes that can
5

CA 02920907 2016-02-10
WO 2015/027310 PCT/CA2014/000628
be used with the present invention include, but are not limited to, troughs,
ovals, and
racetrack shapes.
The tub 100 holds a finishing media which is generally designated by the
dotted
portions 112. The finishing media is a collection of small objects, usually
selected to be
uniform in shape, size, and composition, which strike a workpiece to be
finished and
carry out a polishing or abrading action upon it. The nature and type of
finishing media
selected for use with the invention is not critical to the invention, but
exemplary media
include natural stone, sand, porcelain, ceramic particles of various shapes
and sizes,
metal balls, certain natural organic media (e.g. walnut shells), or polymer-
based
materials or hybrid multi-component media (e.g. plastic or porcelain with
embedded
abrasive particles such as diamond). The individual pieces of the media are
also
referred to as "working bodies" to differentiate them from the workpieces
being finished.
In Fig. 9, the workpiece 113 to be polished is illustrated as the open wheel
113. It will be
understood that although a simple open wheel is illustrated, the invention
offers
significant advantages for workpieces of much more complex shape, as shown by
the
airfoil in the attached Figs., and that the simple illustration of Fig. 9 is
included for
schematic and illustrative purposes rather than as any limitation of the
claimed
invention.
The invention further comprises means for moving the media 112 in the tub 100
in a
generally revolving motion that is indicated by the arrow 114 in Fig. 9. The
control of the
media 112 in the tub 100 is generally well understood in this art and will not
be
discussed in detail herein. Exemplary discussions of the manner in which the
motion of
the tub 100 can be used to move the media 112 are set forth, for example, in
U.S. Pat.
No. 3,464,674 at Column 3, line 26 though Column 4, line 38, and U.S. Pat. No.
4,428,161.
For example, a motor can be flexibly mounted to the tub and an eccentrically-
mounted
weight on a motor shaft can be used for vibrating the motor and the tub when
vibrations
are desired.
6
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-10-25

CA 02920907 2016-02-10
WO 2015/027310 PCT/CA2014/000628
One embodiment of the invention is shown in Fig. 9, which utilizes a
positioning and
rotating device, examples shown as the rotating shaft or spindle 121, for
positioning and
rotating the workpiece 113 that is to be polished in the media 112. The shaft
121
may rotate or hold the workpiece 113 stationary about an axis 124 that is
oblique to the
axis 122 about which the media revolves, and does so without moving the
position of
the workpiece 113 with respect to the tub 100 as the workpiece 113 is held or
rotated.
The workpiece 113 can be made to hold stationary or rotate the workpiece at
any angle
to the axis 124 to produce the best desired orientation for polishing the
workpiece 113.
Instead of using the positioning and rotating device, the workpiece can be
mounted in a
fixed position inside the tub 100.
In addition to the two non-limiting examples of polishing machines disclosed
herein,
other polishing machines can be used. The invention is applicable to any
polishing
machine capable of adjusting the angle of the flow of the polishing media in
relation to
the workpiece being polished. By specifically aligning the airfoils and
protecting the
leading edge, trailing edge and tip, the exposed surfaces of the airfoils can
be polished
to higher degree. Preferred polishing machines are a tumbling machine, a high
energy
centrifugal barrel finishing machine or a drag finishing machine. A preferred
medium is
ceramic. The polishing machine should be constructed to flow the medium with
or
without an abrasive paste at desired flow angles against the exposed surfaces
of the
airfoils. Preferably, the flow angle is selected to provide a surface
roughness Ra of less
than 5 micro-inches. Examples of suitable flow angles are 50 to 0 degrees,
more
preferably 40 to 10 degrees, and most preferably 20 to 10 degrees, to the
orientation of
the leading edge/trailing edge chord axis of the airfoils.
In tumbling machines having two side vibration motors, one can be set at 0 to
50
degrees, and more preferably +10 to 40 degrees, and more preferably +10 to 20
degrees and the other side motor at 0 to -50 degrees, and more preferably -10
to -40
degrees, and more preferably -10 to -20 degrees. However the motor orientation
can
be altered to change the flow angle of media as necessary such that the flow
angle is
within 50 to 0 degrees and more preferably 40 to 10 degrees, more preferably
30 to 10
7

CA 02920907 2016-02-10
WO 2015/027310 PCT/CA2014/000628
and most preferably 20 to 10 degrees at the desired angle to the orientation
of the
leading edge/trailing edge chord axis of the airfoils.
Bladed discs or rotors 14, as shown in Fig. 4, are well known engine
components that
comprises of airfoils 15 that are integral to the rotor hub. The leading 16
and trailing
edges 17 and blade tips 18 can be protected using masking tooling 19, 20, as
shown in
Fig. 5 and as a complete assembly 21 in Fig. 6 in order to prevent excessive
material
removal during the tumbling process. The masking tooling can be made from
metal
such as but not limited to steel, titanium, aluminum or nickel alloys or non-
metallic
materials, such as, but not limited to rubber of varying hardness' or plastic
such as ABS,
Nylon, reinforced Nylon, polycarbonate, polypropylene, DeIran or a combination
of the
above.
A preferred medium for polishing metallic airfoils comprises ceramic media,
such as the
RCP porcelain non-abrasive polishing stones that can be acquired from ROsler
along
with a Rosier RPP6279 abrasive paste. However, these media are usually not
suitable
for polishing airfoils that are coated with an erosion resistant coating such
as
BalckGolde. Surprisingly, a method that was found to produce a surface finish
to levels
below 4 pin was a medium comprising diamond paste. The paste used to polish
the
BlackGolde coating was comprised of a one-micron diamond powder with a gum
that
serves to keep the diamond powder on the surface of the ceramic media and a
water
soluble oil, commonly used in metallographic polishing, that assists in the
acceleration
of the polishing process.
Preferably the polishing paste comprises a polishing media and a carrier. The
polishing
media can be any media suitable for polishing an airfoil. Examples of suitable
media
include, but are not limited to, ceramic and diamond. Any suitable carrier for
the media
can be used. Preferred carriers comprise gum, water and oil.
A preferred polishing paste comprises the following components:
at least one gum in the range of 4 to 24 mL, preferably 8 to 16 mL, more
preferably 10 to 13 mL;
8

CA 02920907 2016-02-10
WO 2015/027310 PCT/CA2014/000628
at least one water soluble oil in the range of 26 to 104 mL, preferably 26 to
78
mL, and more preferably 45 to 65 mL;
water in the amount of 1 to 3 L; preferably 1 to 2 L and more preferably 1 to
1.6
L;
at least one ceramic media, with the amounts being per 100kg of ceramic media.
The amounts of the components can be adjusted up and down within these ranges
for
any desired amount of ceramic media. When polishing a coated airfoil, the
polishing
paste preferably further comprises at least one diamond powder in the range of
26 to
156 grams, preferably 52 to 104 grams, and more preferably 65 to 78 grams.
Examples of suitable polishing paste compositions comprise:
Diamond powder in the range of 100 to 600 grams, preferably 200 to 400 grams
and more preferably 250 to 300 grams;
Gum in the range of 15 to 90 mL, preferably 30 to 60 mL and more preferably 40
to 50 mL;
Water soluble oil in the range of 100 to 400 mL, preferably 100 to 300 mL, and
more preferably 150 to 200 mL;
Water in the range of 3 to 10 L, preferably 4 to 7 Land more preferably 4 to 5
L;
and
ROsler RCP media in the range of 200 to 600 kg, preferably 300 to 500 kg and
more preferably 360 to 410 kg.
The invention is also suitable for fine adjustments to a structure of the
airfoil or other
desired workpiece. For example, the polishing can be conducted to remove a
desired
portion of the airfoil to change or alter a dimension or shape of the airfoil.
For example,
the airfoil can be machined or cast into a desired shape and then fine
adjustments to
the shape can be performed at the same time as polishing, by controlling the
flow of
media over the surface of the part such that the action of the media is more
heavily
concentrated in the area where a dimensional adjustment is required. The
surface of
any desired portion of the airfoil can be removed at the same time as
polishing. This
9

CA 02920907 2016-02-10
WO 2015/027310 PCT/CA2014/000628
method is suitable for controlled removal of material ranging from 1 micron up
to one
millimeter in thickness of material from the airfoil.
The polishing method will be further described with reference to the following
non-
limiting examples.
Examples
The process for the super-finishing of parts such as turbine blades comprises
of the
following components:
Example 1
1. Tumbling machine
The example of the tumbling machine used in this embodiment of the process
was a Walter Trowal MV-25
2. Ceramic media
The ceramic media used in this process can be almost any media that is
suitable
for contacting all areas of the part to be polished. One embodiment of this
process used Rosier RCP porcelain non-abrasive polishing stones to process the
parts.
3. An abrasive paste
The abrasive used in this process comprises:
2.5Kg Rosier paste (RPP6279), or Rosier RPP579, or Walther Trowel SDB
Trowapast PKP

CA 02920907 2016-02-10
WO 2015/027310 PCT/CA2014/000628
5L water
And was a suitable quantity to use with 800-900 lbs Rosier RCP media.
4. Stationary fixed parts
Airfoils protected with masking tooling similar to that described here were
mounted on a base plate and loaded into the tumbling machine and were held
stationary on a plate in the tumbler as shown in Fig. 3.
The Walter Trowal MV-25 tumbling machine is equipped with three vibrator
motors; two
on the side and one on the base. The two side motors can be oriented
individually
about 360 degrees. In the present example, the two side motors were set to 10
degrees from the horizontal; one at +10 degrees and the other at -10 degrees.
During operation the three motors were set to 100% power. The media flows in
one
direction, for example generally from the leading edge to trailing edge of the
airfoils, and
every 14 minutes the medium flow was reversed automatically by the machine so
that
the medium flow direction was generally from trailing edge to leading edge and
then
from leading edge to trailing edge. This cycle was repeated for 5 to 51/2
hours. Longer
or shorter time periods can be used as required to achieve the required
surface finish.
Once the polishing run was completed the media parts were rinsed with water
and a 2-
5% by volume of a burnishing compound (brand name Rosier FC120) for 45 minutes
to
an hour. At this point the process was complete and the polished parts were
removed
from the media. The surface roughness Ra was less than 5 micro-inches.
Example 2
The same process as Example 1 was used to super polish airfoils that were
first coated
with an erosion resistant coating, MDS Coating Technologies' BlackGold
coating. The
erosion resistant coating was applied to the airfoils and once polished
according to the
present invention to a surface finish (Ra) of less than 4 pin. The surface
finish retention
11

CA 02920907 2016-02-10
WO 2015/027310
PCT/CA2014/000628
of the coated and polished surface was compared to an uncoated surface having
a
surface finish (Ra) of less than 4 pin by subjecting the polished coated and
uncoated
surfaces to erosion using Arizona road dust as the abrasive media. Fig. 7
illustrates the
results of the erosion test. The results shown in Fig. 7 demonstrate that the
polished
coating prolonged and maintained the surface finish in erosive conditions to
an Ra of
less than 10 pin. In contrast, the uncoated polished surface at the same
conditions
resulted in a surface finish Ra of 34 pin. The erosion test procedure is shown
schematically in Fig 8.
The abrasive paste for polishing coated gas turbine blades (Example 1, Item 3)
is:
275g of 1 micron diamond powder
45mL xanthan gum
200mL water soluble oil ¨ Anamet Rust Inhibitor
4 - 5 L water
And was a suitable quantity to use with 360 ¨410 kg Rosier RCP media.
While the claimed invention has been described in detail and with reference to
specific
embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art
that various
changes and modifications can be made to the claimed invention without
departing from
the spirit and scope thereof.
12

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Grant downloaded 2023-03-30
Letter Sent 2023-03-28
Grant by Issuance 2023-03-28
Inactive: Cover page published 2023-03-27
Inactive: Final fee received 2023-01-30
Pre-grant 2023-01-30
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2022-10-05
Letter Sent 2022-10-05
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2022-07-28
Interview Request Received 2022-07-21
Inactive: Correspondence - Prosecution 2022-07-20
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2022-06-29
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2022-06-29
Interview Request Received 2022-06-17
Inactive: Q2 failed 2022-06-09
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2022-04-06
Amendment Received - Response to Examiner's Requisition 2022-04-06
Examiner's Report 2021-12-17
Inactive: QS failed 2021-12-15
Inactive: Ack. of Reinst. (Due Care Not Required): Corr. Sent 2021-10-29
Reinstatement Request Received 2021-10-25
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2021-10-25
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2021-10-25
Amendment Received - Response to Examiner's Requisition 2021-10-25
Common Representative Appointed 2020-11-07
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to an Examiner's Requisition 2020-11-06
Examiner's Report 2020-07-06
Inactive: Report - No QC 2020-06-29
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Letter Sent 2019-07-08
Request for Examination Received 2019-06-26
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2019-06-26
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2019-06-26
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2018-01-12
Inactive: Cover page published 2016-03-09
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2016-03-01
Letter Sent 2016-02-18
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-02-18
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-02-18
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-02-18
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-02-18
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-02-18
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-02-18
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2016-02-18
Application Received - PCT 2016-02-18
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2016-02-10
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2015-03-05

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2021-10-25
2020-11-06

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2022-07-27

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MDS COATING TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Past Owners on Record
JOSHUA BELL
LEE MARTIN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2016-02-10 12 568
Representative drawing 2016-02-10 1 4
Drawings 2016-02-10 5 116
Abstract 2016-02-10 2 59
Claims 2016-02-10 5 142
Cover Page 2016-03-09 1 35
Description 2021-10-25 12 573
Claims 2021-10-25 4 162
Claims 2022-04-06 5 164
Claims 2022-06-29 5 155
Representative drawing 2023-03-07 1 5
Cover Page 2023-03-07 1 35
Maintenance fee payment 2024-06-25 35 1,429
Notice of National Entry 2016-03-01 1 192
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2016-02-18 1 103
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2016-04-19 1 113
Reminder - Request for Examination 2019-04-23 1 127
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2019-07-08 1 186
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R86(2)) 2021-01-04 1 549
Courtesy - Acknowledgment of Reinstatement (Request for Examination (Due Care not Required)) 2021-10-29 1 403
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2022-10-05 1 579
Electronic Grant Certificate 2023-03-28 1 2,527
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) 2016-02-10 5 195
International search report 2016-02-10 4 158
National entry request 2016-02-10 11 264
Amendment - Claims 2016-02-10 5 157
Request for examination 2019-06-26 1 34
Examiner requisition 2020-07-06 4 228
Reinstatement / Amendment / response to report 2021-10-25 31 1,611
Examiner requisition 2021-12-17 3 150
Amendment / response to report 2022-04-06 16 487
Interview Record with Cover Letter Registered 2022-06-17 1 15
Interview Record with Cover Letter Registered 2022-07-21 2 14
Amendment / response to report 2022-06-29 16 415
Prosecution correspondence 2022-07-20 22 658
Final fee 2023-01-30 5 150