Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
1
IMPROVED MULTIPHASE LOW MIXING PROCESSES
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates generally to chemical processes
including
one or more reactants in the gas phase, one or more reactants in the liquid
phase
and a solid catalyst, and more particularly relates to those multiphase
processes that
are characterized as low mixing - i.e., exhibiting plug flow or quasi-plug
flow of the
reactants (an optionally of the catalyst, for example, a transported bed) in a
continuous mode of operation or a semi batch mode of operation.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Multiphase processes involving the reaction of gas and liquid phase
reactants on a solid catalyst form the basis for production of a large variety
of
intermediate and end products, as examples, in the manufacture of monomers and
pharmaceuticals and in crude oil processing. From the perspective of the gases
used
in such processes, a number of commercially important gas-liquid reaction
systems
can be considered for instance that involve the reaction of hydrogen with a
liquid
substrate (hydrogenation, hydrogenolysis, hydrotreating), that involve the
reaction
of oxygen or a similar oxygen-based gaseous reactant (e.g., ozone) with a
liquid
substrate (oxidation, ozonolysis), that involve the reaction of a halogen gas
with a
liquid substrate (fluorination, chlorination) or that involve the use of a
combination
of gases (hydroformylation).
[0003] Solid catalysts are desirably used in both gas-liquid and in liquid-
liquid
reaction systems for facilitating the separation and recovery of spent
catalyst and
the processing of crude reaction products, but gas-liquid reaction systems
frequently
pose difficulties in terms of getting a gaseous reactant into a liquid and to
a
heterogeneous solid catalyst surface. As a result, in certain types of
multiphase
processes particularly (as elaborated in greater detail hereafter), sub-
stoichiometric
gas to liquid reactant ratios can occur in the presence of the catalyst, so
that
undesirable side reactions can be catalyzed of liquid phase components at the
solid
catalyst interface. As well, replenishment of the gas reactant(s) is difficult
as the
gas reactant(s) is spent in these undesirable side reactions. Further,
catalyst
lifetime can be shortened by the interaction of the liquid reactant(s) with
the
catalyst.
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
2
[0004] The
relative overabundance of a liquid reactant as compared to a gaseous
reactant (which can be an alternative way of considering a sub-stoichiometric
gas to
liquid reactant ratio condition) can particularly be an issue with those
continuous
reaction systems that are characterized by limited axial mixing from inlet to
outlet,
i.e., that are plug flow or quasi-plug flow in nature, as intrinsically a
liquid substrate
concentration is high at the inlet and lower at the outlet of the reactor, as
well as in
semi batch reaction systems, since again intrinsically a liquid substrate
concentration
is greatest at the start of a batch and lower at the end.
[0005] These and
other complexities and difficulties of carrying out multiphase
processes involving a solid catalyst and gas and liquid phase reactants are
well
documented in the literature and well-known to those in the art. In Trickle
Bed
Reactors: Reactor Engineering Et Applications, V.V. Ranade, R. V. Chaudhari
and P. R.
Gunjal, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2011), for example, the advantages and
disadvantages
of various multiphase reactor systems are discussed at pages 9-12, including
slurry
reactors (where the reaction is carried out between mobile catalyst particles,
gas,
and liquid phases ) and fixed-bed reactors (where the reaction between gas and
liquid phase reactants takes place on or at the stationary catalyst).
[0006] In
contrast, well-mixed slurry reactors (whether operated continuously
or, as is more common, in a batchwise manner) facilitate effective temperature
control within the reactor and are characterized by intensive mass transfer
between
all phases. However,
as discussed in the cited reference, such well-mixed slurry
reactors pose difficulties in terms of the separation of the product from the
catalyst
due to catalyst attrition, in terms of abrasion of equipment surfaces by
moving
catalyst particles, in terms of low specific productivity per unit volume, and
in terms
of use in a continuous mode taking into account catalyst separation and
regeneration
needs.
[0007]
Accordingly, fixed bed reactors have been viewed as favored especially
for continuous processes, however, these reactors have their own limitations,
complexities and disadvantages in the context of carrying out multiphase
processes
involving reactants in the gas and liquid phases and a solid catalyst.
[0008] The sub-
stoichiometric issues described above are among the limitations,
complexities and disadvantages recognized and discussed in a general frame of
reference in Datsevich et at., "Multiphase fixed-bed technologies: Comparative
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
3
analysis of industrial processes (experience of development and industrial
implementation)", Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 261, pp 143-161 (2004)
(hereinafter "Datsevich"), in particular on page 148 and following in relation
especially to Figure 4, wherein Datsevich observes that in the initial part of
a
multiphase fixed bed reactor wherein the gas and liquid phase reactants first
combine there is a significant stoichiometric excess of the liquid reactant
both in the
bulk liquid as well as at the catalyst surface, so that the reaction in this
initial part is
limited by mass transport resistance of the gas into the liquid (especially
for gases
such as hydrogen and oxygen having "very bad solubility in liquids"). At the
same
time, in the latter part of the reactor, Datsevich observes that these systems
are
mass-transfer-limited by the liquid compound. Datsevich also observes that
along
the axial flow of a fixed bed multiphase gas-liquid reaction system there is a
point at
which there is an "ideal" correlation of the concentrations of the gas and
liquid
reactants, wherein the concentration of a liquid phase reactant corresponds to
the
stoichiometric concentration of a gaseous reactant on the catalyst surface, so
that
for active catalysts both concentrations are zero at the catalyst surface.
[0009] The complexities of carrying out these multiphase processes in a
continuous fixed bed reactor are explored experimentally and through math
modeling in a more specific context of interest for the present invention in a
preferred application, in Kilpio et al., "Experimental and Modeling Study of
Catalytic
Hydrogenation of Glucose to Sorbitol in a Continuously Operating Packed-Bed
Reactor", Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, vol.52, pp 7690-7703, wherein temperature-
and concentration-dependent reaction kinetics, catalyst deactivation, internal
diffusion and heat conduction within the solid catalyst particles, radial heat
conduction and mass dispersion in a selected reactor section, liquid holdup,
gas-
liquid mass transfer, pressure drop and axial dispersion were evaluated in,
and used
to math-model, a lab scale (1.15 cm diameter, 7 cm long) continuous flow
packed
bed reactor containing 0.5 grams of a commercial ruthenium on carbon catalyst.
[0010] In recognition of the above-mentioned complexities and mass transfer
related limitations of continuous fixed bed multiphase reaction systems,
continual
efforts have been made to improve the performance of such systems.
[0011] Datsevich proposes one refinement to address and reduce mass
transfer
limitations from gas to liquid, using instead a "saturator" before the reactor
to
accomplish the mass transfer, so that only a liquid phase saturated with gas
is fed
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
4
into the reactor. In effect, the reactor volume in the initial part of a fixed
bed
reactor holding the gas phase is avoided altogether. Datsevich observes that
since
the solubilities of gases such as hydrogen and oxygen are low and the
concentration
of the liquid reactant in the feed is comparatively higher than the
equilibrium gas
concentration in the liquid phase, recycling of the final product through the
saturator
is necessary to deliver the needed quantity of gas to the reaction zone.
Datsevich
thus effectively takes the approach of diluting the inlet or starting
concentration of a
substrate in the liquid phase (using the product or a portion thereof as the
diluent),
so limiting the liquid substrate's availability to the heterogeneous catalyst
in a
corresponding way as a gaseous reactant's availability to the catalyst is
limited by
gas solubility and resistance to mass transfer considerations.
[0012] A series of published applications and issued patents to Michael D.
Ackerson and others, see, e.g., US 2012/0184789 to Ackerson et al.; US
7,569,136; US
7,291,257; US 6,881,326; US 6,428,686; and US 6,123,835, are of a very similar
nature, wherein various methods of hydroprocessing both petroleum and non-
petroleum feedstocks (US 2012/0184789) are described in which a diluent is fed
with
hydrogen and a feedstock in need of hydroprocessing so that substantially all
of the
feed and hydrogen are in a single, continuous liquid phase as a hydrogen -gas-
free
liquid feed stream to the reactor. As in Datsevich, the diluent can be at
least a
portion of a cooled and/or separated reaction product that is recycled.
[0013] In effect, both Datsevich's presaturated one-liquid-flow (or POLF)
technology and Ackerson's process technology operate in the liquid mass
transfer-
limited region of Figure 4 in Datsevich, and use dilution and significant
product
recycling to cope with throughput decay while avoiding the sub-stoichiometric
issues
in the initial part of the reactor in a conventional fixed bed multiphase
reaction
system that have been mentioned above. However, these types of approaches do
intrinsically involve some loss of productivity in the use of dilution, as
well as
significant costs for the substantial recycle that is required especially for
low-
solubility gases such as hydrogen and oxygen.
[0014] Because of this recycle aspect of Datsevich's and Ackerson's
approaches,
these approaches have however been recognized as ill-suited for chemical
processes
involving high rates of gas consumption in that enormous product recycle rates
(or
equivalent dilution, diluent recovery and recycle for non-product diluents)
would be
required. Modifications of the POLF concept have accordingly been proposed
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
5
wherein some gas would enter the reactor in the gas phase so that as gas in
the
liquid phase in consumed by reaction, a constant gas concentration in the
liquid
phase would be maintained through the whole of the fixed bed, see, e.g., DE
102006044579, RU 2083540 and WO 03091363.
[0015] Another
approach to the particular sub-stoichiometric issues described
above would be to improve the solubility and/or availability of gas phase
reactants in
the liquid phase. Though not in regard to a process involving a solid
catalyst, US
2013/0240781 Al to Subramaniam et at., for example, reports a method for
increasing the ozone concentration in a liquid, and then using the increased
ozone
concentration liquid for performing (in the absence of a catalyst) ozonolysis
of a
substrate. As related
by Subramaniam et al., ozonolysis has typically been
performed by bubbling ozone through an aqueous phase or through an organic
liquid
phase containing a substrate. However, these traditional methods are described
as
having certain drawbacks. Since ozone is highly reactive, the reaction
temperature
must be subambient (close to 0 degrees Celsius), but ozone is of limited
solubility in
a liquid phase at these temperatures. Further, ozone tends to react with many
traditional organic solvents that might be used, resulting in waste products
and
further limiting ozone availability for conducting the reaction. The solution
offered
by Subramaniam et al. is to introduce ozone into an inert liquid under
circumstances
wherein the ozone/liquid combination has a temperature between about 0.8 and
1.5
times the critical temperature of ozone, and increasing isothermally the
pressure of
the ozone-containing gas above the liquid to about 0.3 to about 5 times the
critical
pressure of ozone so as to increase the solubility of the ozone in the liquid.
The
pressure is controlled to tune the solubility of the ozone in the liquid.
[0016] US
7,365,234 by Subramaniam et al. adopts a similar approach in the
context of the catalytic hydroformylation of olefinic feedstocks, wherein an
olefin is
reacted with CO and H2 in the presence of a hydroformylation catalyst in a
liquid that
has been volumetrically expanded with a compressed gas, typically
supercritical or
subcritical (near critical) carbon dioxide added generally to the limits of
the
solubility of a homogeneous Rh-based catalyst, to tunably increase the amount
of CO
and H2 available for reaction in the liquid phase. Surprisingly, altering the
amount of
the compressed gas in the liquid phase alters the chemoselectivity of the
products,
and varying the content of the compressed gas in the liquid allows higher
ratios of
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
6
the more desired linear aldehyde to less desired branched aldehyde products to
be
realized.
[0017] In hydroprocessing, too, processes are known wherein a hydrogen
donor
solvent or another material is used to improve hydrogen transfer and
availability into
the reacting liquid phase, however, at the cost of requiring additional
separation and
recovery/recycle steps, or in relation to the Subramaniam references with the
requirement of operating under certain near critical ranges of conditions with
the
added costs associated with achieving and maintaining these conditions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0018] The present invention in one aspect relates to a process for
improving
multiphase, low mixing reaction systems including a solid catalyst, one or
more
reactants in the gas phase and one or more reactants in the liquid phase, by
closely
approaching and preferably achieving, but not substantially exceeding, both
initially
and downstream in a continuous process (or later, in a semi batch process), a
targeted concentration of a liquid phase reactant. The targeted concentration
will in
preferred embodiments correspond to that concentration that provides maximum
economic value in the context of a particular continuous, multiphase low
mixing
reaction system over a reference timeframe, considering catalyst deactivation
rates,
byproduct formation and related purification requirements, productivity in
terms of
desired products and selectivity to those products and so forth.
[0019] In effect, the present invention according to this aspect seeks to
not only
achieve but perpetuate along at least some portion of the length (meaning, in
the
axial flow direction to the product outlet) of a multiphase low mixing gas-
liquid
reaction system, or for a longer period of time in a semi batch, multiphase
low
mixing process, an initial concentration of a liquid reactant at the start of
a
continuous plug flow or quasi-plug flow process or at the start of a semi
batch
process that provides a desired performance of the overall reaction system
under
selected and preferably optimized operating conditions.
[0020] From another perspective, the present invention seeks to avoid or at
least
reduce the occurrence of significantly sub-stoichiometric ratios of a gaseous
reactant
to a liquid substrate with which the gaseous reactant is to react over the
length of a
continuous reactor (from the initial combining of the gaseous reactant and the
liquid
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
7
substrate to the product outlet) or over the duration of a semi batch reaction
through controlling the liquid substrate concentration, without requiring a
dilution of
the liquid substrate entering the reactor or at the beginning of a batch.
[0021] In one
embodiment of a continuous process, this is accomplished by
introducing a liquid phase reactant into the reactor at the targeted
concentration of
the liquid phase reactant at a plurality of locations in the direction of
fluid flow
through the reactor toward the product outlet. In a variation, a gaseous feed
is
introduced at one or more locations downstream of the inlet to maintain a
desired
gas/liquid ratio in the reactor. It is expected that the multiphase continuous
process
will most commonly be carried out in a fixed bed reactor of the trickle bed or
packed
bubble column variety or in a series of such reactors including quench boxes
wherein
downstream additions of the liquid phase reactant will be accomplished, though
continuous multiphase, low mixing slurry reactors (transported bed reactors)
are
contemplated as well.
[0022] In another
embodiment of a continuous process, a liquid phase reactant is
introduced at the inlet in the targeted concentration, and at one or more
downstream locations in a concentration or concentrations greater than the
targeted
concentration, as needed to closely approach and preferably achieve, but not
substantially exceed, the targeted concentration in the reactor from the
addition
point. In a variation, a gaseous feed is introduced at one or more locations
downstream of the inlet to maintain a desired gas/liquid ratio in the reactor.
Again,
it is expected that most commonly such continuous multiphase processes will be
carried out in in a fixed bed reactor of the trickle bed or packed bubble
column
variety or in a series of such reactors, but other continuous low mixing
embodiments
are contemplated.
[0023] In a
further variation of either of these embodiments, namely, wherein
the downstream addition or additions are at a targeted concentration of a
reactant
in the liquid phase or at a concentration or concentrations greater than the
targeted
concentration, the number of downstream additions and their placement relative
to
where the gas and liquid reactants are first combined in the presence of the
catalyst
and reacted are selected so as to minimize the total catalyst requirements for
a
certain production rate of a desired product, or at least to enable a
substantial
reduction in total catalyst requirements compared to a scenario wherein no
downstream additions are made. In certain
embodiments, the requisite
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
8
configuration (in terms of number of additions and placement thereof) for
minimizing
or at least accomplishing a significant reduction in the total catalyst
requirements is
accomplished iteratively by experimentation. In other embodiments, the
requisite
configuration is determined by a process including modeling the performance of
the
system as a function of the number and placement of downstream additions of a
liquid phase reactant at the targeted concentration or at a greater
concentration or
concentrations.
[0024] In one embodiment of a semi batch process, a liquid phase reactant
is
introduced at the targeted concentration at the initiation of a batch, and one
or
more additions of the liquid phase reactant are later made each at the
targeted or a
greater concentration than the first concentration, as needed to closely
approach
and preferably achieve, but not substantially exceed, the targeted
concentration in
the reactor from the time of an addition. In a variation, one or more
additions of a
gaseous feed are made after the initiation of a batch to maintain a desired
gas/liquid
ratio in the batch.
[0025] In a further variation of either of these semi batch embodiments,
namely,
wherein the later addition or additions are at a targeted concentration of a
reactant
in the liquid phase or at a concentration or concentrations greater than the
targeted
concentration, the number of additions and their timing relative to the
initiation of a
batch are selected so as to minimize the total catalyst requirements for a
certain
production rate of a desired product or at least to enable a substantial
reduction in
total catalyst requirements compared to a scenario wherein no later additions
are
made. In certain embodiments, the requisite configuration (in terms of number
of
additions and timing thereof) for minimizing or at least accomplishing a
significant
reduction in the total catalyst requirements is accomplished iteratively by
experimentation. In other embodiments, the requisite configuration is
determined
by a process including modeling the performance of the system as a function of
the
number and timing of later additions of a liquid phase reactant at the
targeted
concentration or at a greater concentration or concentrations.
[0026] In a further embodiment, the concentration profile of dextrose as a
function of the number of side injections/downstream additions, according to a
process of the present invention, in a modeled continuous fixed bed process
for
producing sorbitol by the hydrogenation of an aqueous dextrose liquid phase
reactant
in the presence of a Raney nickel sponge metal catalyst is obtained.
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
9
[0027] The principles involved in the process of the present invention and
the
manner in which the present invention can be utilized to provide improved
process
economics in these multiphase gas-liquid reaction systems will be more readily
understood on considering the following drawings and detailed description of
certain
embodiments of the invention, which will be understood as not limiting of the
scope
of the present invention and as provided for purposes of illustration only.
DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
[0028] A number of processes have been mentioned above, in which the
present
invention may be beneficially employed. Those skilled in the art will
understand that
these processes and especially the specific example embodiments described in
greater detail hereafter are not however to be considered limiting of the
present
invention, and that the present invention can be of value generally for
multiphase,
low mixing processes involving a solid catalyst and reactants in both the gas
and
liquid phases, wherein gas solubility and gas-liquid mass transfer limitations
may
result in sub-stoichiometric gas-liquid reactant ratios and to such
difficulties as
throughput limitations, byproduct formation and side reactions, and catalyst
deactivation. The present invention is also expected to be of significant
value
generally in the context of such multiphase phases which are further
characterized
by higher consumption rates of a gaseous reactant, for example, in
applications
wherein the saturated, single liquid approach of Datsevich or Ackerson et at.
would
require an impracticably large recycle.
[0029] This having been said, it is considered that one desirable
application of
the present invention will be for improving processes in which hydrogen gas
reacts
with a substrate in a liquid, e.g., in hydrogenation, hydrogenolysis and
hydrotreatment, and especially but without limitation for improving those
solid-
catalyzed processes in which hydrogen gas reacts with a substrate in a liquid.
[0030] An example of a commercially significant hydrogenation is the
hydrogenation of sugars to sugar alcohols, for example, dextrose to sorbitol.
Conventionally an aqueous sugars solution is hydrogenated, and there are
numerous
published examples of different catalysts and associated process conditions
for
carrying out this transformation.
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
10
[0031] GB 806,236 (1957) describes the known use of platinum, palladium and
nickel catalysts, but indicates that none of these exhibited highly efficient
conversions at reaction temperatures below 160 degrees Celsius and
hydrogenation
pressures below 1500 psig, whereas the claimed supported ruthenium or
ruthenium-
based catalyst was prescribed for use at hydrogenation pressures ranging from
100 to
1500 psig and temperatures of preferably 80 to 200 degrees Celsius. Examples
are
given of the hydrogenation of dextrose, sucrose, maltose and lactose.
[0032] GB 1,025,813 (1966) concerns a process for producing mannitol,
sorbitol
and mixtures of these by the catalytic hydrogenation of an aqueous solution
(20 to 80
percent by weight) of dextrose and/or invert sugar in the presence of lime
(CaO) and
a supported nickel catalyst, at hydrogenation pressures of from 500 to 3000
psig and
a temperature of from 60 to 100 degrees Celsius.
[0033] US 4,292,451 to deBerardinis et at. (1981) describes the catalytic
hydrogenation of an aqueous solution of dextrose and mannose in the presence
of
preferably a supported nickel catalyst, wherein the sugars mixture contains a
mannitol yield-enhancing amount of an alkali metal salt of a weak acid, for
example,
sodium carbonate. Preferably the hydrogenation is done in two stages, with the
first
conducted at from 80-95 degrees Celsius, and the second at 120-150 degrees
Celsius.
[0034] EP 0 006 313 (1982) describes a number of known hydrogenation
methods
for reducing sugars to sugar alcohols, but suggests the majority are not
stereoselective. The claimed advance in EP'313 is a method for reducing a
sugar to a
particular stereoisomer in significant excess and preferably exclusively,
using a
supported catalyst of finely divided metallic copper and a particulate support
material. The sugar is brought into contact with the catalyst in the presence
of a
solvent medium. Organic solvents are mentioned as possibilities, but
hydrophilic
solvents are preferred, and water is most preferred.
[0035] A literature survey produces a number of catalysts of a similar
character
for hydrogenating dextrose solutions to produce sorbitol: ruthenium on carbon;
a
supported Ni catalyst including Co, Mn, Cu, Cr, Mo, Ca, Zn, Fe or W; an
amorphous
NiMoAl catalyst; a Raney nickel sponge metal catalyst modified by molybdenum;
nickel and/or cobalt plated sponge catalysts; Mo-, Cr- and Fe-promoted Raney
nickel sponge metal catalyst catalysts and so forth.
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
11
[0036] While
certain of the references mention limiting the concentration of
sugars in the feed to avoid handling difficulties from the feed being too
viscous (US
4,292,451) or sugars crystallizing out of solution (GB 1,025,813) or suggest
performing the hydrogenation in stages at different operating conditions (US
4,292,451), and while all obviously seek improvements in the yield of the
desired
sugar alcohol product(s) from adopting a new catalyst or modification of an
existing
catalyst, none of these processes suggests feeding a portion of the sugars
solution
into contact with the prescribed catalyst at a targeted substrate
concentration at a
plurality of locations in the direction of fluid flow through the reactor in a
continuous
process (or at the targeted concentration at the reactor inlet and at a
greater
concentration downstream of the inlet to approach, but not substantially
exceed the
targeted concentration downstream of the inlet), or at different times in a
semi
batch process. Nevertheless, based on the results we have obtained as
described in
the examples below, it is considered that all of the various known catalysts,
additives and methods for hydrogenating sugars to sugar alcohols, for
instance, can
be beneficially adapted according to the present invention.
[0037] In an
embodiment, the present invention relates to a continuous
multiphase process. In the context of a process for the hydrogenation of one
or more
sugars in an aqueous solution, a combined hydrogen and aqueous sugar(s)
solution
feed at a selected sugar (substrate) concentration is fed to a reactor
containing a
suitable hydrogenation catalyst. The
aqueous sugar(s) solution feed is also
introduced at one or more additional locations downstream of where the
solution is
first fed into the reactor, at appropriate flow rates so as to closely
approach and
preferably achieve, but not substantially exceed, a concentration of sugar in
the
liquid phase in the reactor equal to that of the feed. In a variation that may
be
particularly relevant for high gas consumption systems, additional hydrogen
(or a gas
reactant in a generalized embodiment) may be input to the reactor at one or
more
additional locations beyond the inlet. As a result of the one or more
downstream
additions of solution, preferably a sugar concentration that is within thirty
percent of
the selected concentration in solution is realized for at least about ten
percent of
the reactor's length, and more preferably for at least about thirty percent of
the
reactor's length.
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
12
[0038] A product stream is then recovered from the reactor, and sent on for
further processing and purification (not shown) as needed and as is
conventionally
known.
[0039] The substrate concentration in the feed (and targeted in the reactor
downstream of the inlet, through the further addition points) will be designed
in
certain preferred embodiments to maximize (or certainly at least improve) the
economic value derived at a given point in time from the production of the
desired
product(s) from a given gas/liquid reaction system.
[0040] Typically in this regard there will be an optimal gas/liquid
reactant feed
ratio (and correspondingly an optimal substrate concentration in the liquid
feed) for
a given gas/liquid process that will balance expected side reactions in the
liquid
phase as well as catalyst deactivation/degradation due to sub-stoichiometric
gas/liquid reactant conditions prevailing in the reactor (in light of the
abovementioned solubility and gas/liquid mass transfer constraints) against
added
liquid reactant throughput, and the process of the present invention in
preferred
embodiments seeks by means of subsequent additions of a liquid reactant or
substrate (and of gaseous reactant as needed) to closely approach or
preferably
realize these optimal conditions over at least a greater portion of the length
of a
continuous reactor, or for a longer period of time in the course of a semi
batch
process, than occurs in the absence of the subsequent additions. By utilizing
accumulated product as a co-solvent, the additional solvent separation and
recovery
costs and the throughput losses from the substrate dilution that would be
required of
a single feed to avoid significantly sub-stoichiometric conditions and
attendant
byproduct formation and catalyst degradation/deactivation difficulties can
additionally be avoided. In a continuous process, these substrate additions
occur at
one or more different, side injection points along the axial flow from reactor
inlet to
outlet, while in a semi batch process these substrate additions will occur in
one or
more instances over the duration of a batch from start to completion.
[0041] As will be demonstrated by the examples below and as will be
discussed
more fully below, by operating in this manner a number of benefits can be
obtained.
One significant benefit is that the manufacturer can substantially reduce the
volume
of catalyst required in its process to produce a given amount of a desired
product. In
the dextrose to sorbitol process that is specifically addressed in the
examples, the
Raney nickel sponge metal catalyst that was used as of the time of filing
cost about
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
13
$30/lb., so a reduction in the total catalyst volume required of at least 10
percent,
at least 20 percent and at least 30 percent will represent a substantial
savings.
[0042] Parenthetically, by "side injection" or any similar terminology used
herein it is not intended that a particular manner of addition is required,
and such
terms should be understood as encompassing any manner by which an additional
supply of a reactant (liquid or gas) may be introduced into a continuous
multiphase
process downstream of the point at which the gas and liquid reactants are
combined
in the presence of a solid catalyst and the reaction is initiated, or at a
later time
from the initiation of a batch in a semi batch mode of operation.
[0043] It will be immediately appreciated given the variety of gas/liquid
reaction
systems generally and given the numerous catalyst systems, ranges of operating
conditions and other process refinements suggested for carrying out a given
gas/liquid reaction, as illustrated above, for example, in the hydrogenation
of sugars
to sugar alcohols - not to mention changes in market conditions affecting the
value of
products and the various costs that affect the value proposition for operating
a
process in a certain way at a point in time - that it is not realistically
possible to
specify what selected substrate concentration would be "best" for every solid-
catalyzed gas/liquid reaction system to which the present invention can be
beneficially applied - but those skilled in the art will be well able with an
understanding of the principles behind the present invention and in light of
the
illustrative examples that follow (as well as previous work with a particular
gas/liquid reaction system at various substrate concentrations) to determine
and
select a substrate concentration to achieve in the initial feed to a reactor
and to
target for approaching in the reactor through subsequent substrate additions.
[0044] In certain embodiments according to either a continuous or a semi
batch
mode of operation, as previously mentioned and as demonstrated by the examples
that follow, the number of additions of a reactant (gas and/or liquid) and the
placement or timing of each of those additions for achieving a targeted
concentration of a liquid phase reactant (whatever that may be) can be
selected to
maximize a reduction in the total catalyst requirements to produce a certain
amount
of a desired product within a given time in a continuous process or per batch
in a
semi batch process. For the same reasons given above, it is not realistically
possible
either to specify in advance how many additions should be made or where or
when
each addition should be made, however, those skilled in the art should be well
able
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
14
to determine the number and placement or timing of additions of a reactant
that
should be used to reduce total catalyst requirements by a desired amount or to
minimize the total catalyst requirements for a given reaction system. In some
instances, this determination may most conveniently be made iteratively by
experimentation, as for example where a single downstream or later addition is
contemplated in a given process, while in other instances the most reasonable
way to
proceed will be to construct or employ a computer model of the reaction
system's
performance as a function of the number and placement or timing of additions.
The
number and placement or timing of additions can then be validated in many
instances, as needed, in a pilot scale unit before modifying an existing
commercial
scale reactor or series of reactors or before constructing apparatus to
accomplish the
indicated number of additions where and/or when indicated.
[0045] Because
the targeted concentration of a liquid phase reactant for
greatest value realization can be expected to vary somewhat over time, it is
considered that an embodiment such as described hereinbelow will be generally
preferred for practicing the present invention. In the particular illustrative
context
of hydrogenating an aqueous sugar solution, such as hydrogenating an aqueous
dextrose solution to provide sorbitol, the following illustrative embodiment
comprises using a concentrated aqueous dextrose solution that is divided into
a
downstream injection portion and a feed portion. The concentrated aqueous
dextrose solution has a higher concentration than the targeted concentration
in the
reactor. The feed portion is diluted with additional water to achieve an
aqueous
inlet feed at the targeted dextrose concentration, while downstream injection
portion is used to introduce one or more downstream portions of the more
concentrated aqueous dextrose solution into the reactor. By using a
more
concentrated solution and diluting with additional solvent to reach a targeted
inlet
concentration of a reactant in the liquid phase, refinements in the targeted
inlet
concentration responsive to the use of a different catalyst, for example, may
be
quickly and easily made.
[0046] As
mentioned, what concentration should be targeted for any given
multiphase system will depend on a number of factors, including but not being
limited to what catalyst is used and how that catalyst tends to lose activity
at various
inlet concentrations in that gas/liquid system. In the particular context of a
process
for producing sorbitol by the continuous hydrogenation of an aqueous solution
of
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
15
dextrose with a Raney nickel sponge metal catalyst, however, we found as
demonstrated by the examples below that material improvements in the
productivity
and longevity of the catalyst were able to be realized by selecting a dextrose
concentration in the aqueous feed of not more than about 30 percent,
preferably not
more than about 25 percent, and more preferably about 20 percent or less, and
carrying out at least one and preferably more than one side injection of a
concentrated dextrose solution to realize the targeted feed concentration in
the
reactor downstream of the inlet.
[0047] Another commercially important example of a process wherein hydrogen
is reacted with a substrate in the liquid phase is the hydrogenolysis of C-0
and C-C
bonds, especially of sugars, sugar alcohols, lactic acid and glycerol in
solutions of the
same to produce various desired chemical products, such as propylene glycol.
[0048] US 6,841,085 to Werpy et at. in this regard describes a number of
known
processes of this character, wherein an aqueous solution of saccharose was
converted
by hydrogenolysis over a nickel-on-kieselguhr catalyst to a product containing
glycerol and propylene glycol (or 1,2-propanediol)(see US 3,030,429 to
Conradin et
al.), sorbitol was converted by hydrogenolysis to glycerol over the same
catalyst with
an alkali promoter being added to the feed stream to control pH and nickel
leaching
(US 4,338,472 to Sirkar), hydrogenolysis of sorbitol and xylitol over a nickel
on
silica/alumina catalyst produced ethylene glycol, propylene glycol and
glycerol (US
4,404,411 to Tanikella), and sorbitol was converted again to propylene glycol
over a
ruthenium-on-carbon catalyst (US 5,600,028 to Gubitosa). In the Werpy '085
patent,
sorbitol, glycerol, xylitol, and lactic acid examples are given over a Re-
containing
multimetallic catalyst wherein ethylene glycol, glycerol or propylene glycol
or any
combination thereof are produced, with particular emphasis on the production
of
propylene glycol.
[0049] Still another example of a gas-liquid reaction system in which the
process
of the present invention may be applied is in the heterogeneously catalyzed
hydrotreatment of hydrocarbons in a petroleum refining context. Hydrotreating
or
hydroprocessing refers to a variety of catalytic hydrogenation processes which
saturate unsaturated hydrocarbons and remove S, N, 0, and metals from
different
petroleum streams in a refinery. These contaminants, if not removed from the
petroleum fractions as they travel through the refinery processing units, can
have
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
16
detrimental effects on the equipment, the catalysts, and the quality of the
finished
product.
[0050] Typically, hydrotreating is done prior to processes such as
catalytic
reforming so that the reforming catalyst is not contaminated by untreated
feedstock.
Hydrotreating is also used prior to catalytic cracking to reduce sulfur and
improve
product yields, and to upgrade middle-distillate petroleum fractions into
finished
kerosene, diesel fuel, and heating fuel oils. In addition, hydrotreating
converts
olefins and aromatics to saturated compounds. Hydrotreating processes
represent
some of the most important catalytic processes and the annual sales of
hydrotreating
catalysts represent close to 10% of the total world market for catalysts.
[0051] Hydrotreating for sulfur removal is called hydrodesulfurization. In
a
typical catalytic hydrodesulfurization unit, the feedstock is deaerated and
mixed
with hydrogen, preheated in a fired heater (600 -800 F) and then charged
under
pressure (up to 1,000 psi) through a fixed-bed catalytic reactor. In the
reactor, the
sulfur and nitrogen compounds in the feedstock are converted into hydrogen
sulfide
(H2S) and ammonia (NH3). The reaction products leave the reactor and after
cooling
to a low temperature enter a liquid/gas separator. The hydrogen-rich gas from
the
high-pressure separation is recycled to combine with the feedstock, and the
low-
pressure gas stream, rich in H2S, is sent to a gas treating unit where H2S is
removed.
The clean gas is then suitable as fuel for the refinery furnaces. The liquid
stream is
the product from hydrotreating and is normally sent to a stripping column for
removal of H2S and other undesirable components. In cases where steam is used
for
stripping, the product is sent to a vacuum drier for removal of water.
Hydrodesulfurized products are blended or used as catalytic reforming
feedstock.
[0052] Other hydrotreating applications in which the process of the present
invention may be used include using hydrotreating to improve the burning
characteristics of distillates such as kerosene, by converting aromatics into
naphthenes, which are cleaner-burning compounds. Lube-oil hydrotreating uses
catalytic treatment of the oil with hydrogen to improve product quality. The
objectives in mild tube hydrotreating include saturation of olefins and
improvements
in color, odor, and acid nature of the oil. Mild tube hydrotreating also may
be used
following solvent processing. Operating temperatures are usually below 600 F
and
operating pressures below 800 psi. Severe tube hydrotreating, at temperatures
in
the 600 -750 F range and hydrogen pressures up to 3,000 psi, is capable of
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
17
saturating aromatic rings, along with sulfur and nitrogen removal, to impart
specific
properties not achieved at mild conditions.
[0053] The process of the present invention may also be used in the
hydrotreating of pyrolysis gasoline (pygas), a by-product from the manufacture
of
ethylene. Traditionally, the outlet for pygas has been motor gasoline
blending, a
suitable route in view of its high octane number. However, only small portions
can
be blended untreated owing to the unacceptable odor, color, and gum-forming
tendencies of this material. The quality of pygas, which is high in diolefin
content,
can be satisfactorily improved by hydrotreating, whereby conversion of
diolefins into
mono-olefins provides an acceptable product for motor gas blending.
[0054] Against the backdrop of these several hydrotreating examples those
familiar with the petroleum refining and upgrading arts will readily
appreciate from a
still broader perspective, given the numerous ways in which hydrogen is used
or has
been known to be useful in petroleum refining and upgrading, that a number of
heterogeneously catalyzed gas-liquid reaction systems and operations involving
hydrogen as a reactant are known in the context of petroleum refining and
upgrading and could also make use of the process of the present invention.
[0055] The present invention is further demonstrated by the non-limiting
examples that follow:
[0056] Example 1
[0057] Monohydrate dextrose solution (50 percent dissolved solids) was
diluted
with water to provide a 20% concentration aqueous dextrose feed (used for
Example
2 below) and a 30% concentration aqueous dextrose feed (used for this Example
1).
Soda ash was added to each feed to adjust to a pH of 7.2.
[0058] A 30 cubic centimeter fixed-bed stainless steel reactor having an
internal
diameter (ID) of 0.24 cm (0.61 inches) was loaded with a commercial Raney
nickel
sponge metal catalyst hydrogenation catalyst, with stainless steel wool plugs
at the
top and bottom of the reactor. The reactor was jacketed and heated with a
circulating oil. The reactor temperature was monitored by measuring the oil
temperature, by means of an internal 0.05 cm (1/8") thermowell with an
external
0.025 cm (1/16") slidable thermocouple to monitor peak temperature. The
reactor
temperature was controlled by adjustments in the oil temperature. An ISCO high
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
18
pressure liquid metering pump was used to supply a mixed hydrogen/liquid feed
to
the reactor, with a mass flow controller being used to supply the hydrogen.
The
reactor outlet was attached to a condenser kept at 5 degrees Celsius by a
chiller
unit. The pressure within the reactor was controlled using a dome-loaded back
pressure regulator. The catalyst was regenerated after reducing sugars in the
product measured higher than 3%, using a water wash. Nickel loss by leaching
was
additionally monitored as a function of time.
[0059] For Example 1, hydrogen was supplied at 12.4 MPa (1800 psi), the
liquid
hourly space velocity was 1.0 hr-1, and a reactor temperature of 115 degrees
Celsius
was used. The hydrogen to dextrose mass ratio was set at 20:1.
Table 1. Hydrogenation of 30% Dextrose Solution with time.
On stream LHSV Reducing Reducing Ni, ppm Dextrose
hours Sugars, ppm sugars, % conversion
16 1 300 0.030 8.25 99.90%
40 1 775 0.078 16.10 99.74%
616 1 25,535 2.554 38.1 91.49%
640 1 28,116 2.812 40.0 90.63%
Regeneration 1
686 1 961 0.096 26.27 99.68%
710 1 2,365 0.237 21.11 99.21%
1838 1 12,888 1.289 7.94 95.70%
1862 1 13,323 1.332 6.16 95.56%
Regeneration 2
1886 1 1,273 0.127 5.27 99.58%
2390 1 35,554 3.555 27.9 88.15%
2414 1 36,573 3.657 23.3 87.81%
Regeneration 3
2462 1 4,046 0.405 10.3 98.65%
3230 1 25,088 2.509 12.5 91.64%
Regeneration 4
3254 1 6,159 0.616 15.6 97.95%
3854 1 23,756 2.376 3.71 92.08%
3878 1 23,375 2.338 5.07 92.21%
Regeneration 5
3902 1 3,389 0.339 8.49 98.87%
4238 1 20,361 2.036 7.97 93.21%
[0060] Table 1 shows the results from the first hydrogenation run. The 30%
feed
was processed for over 600 hours, then underwent regeneration. An initial loss
of
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
19
activity was recovered by a water washing process. The catalyst had 5
regenerations
the catalyst bed was unloaded, after more than 4000 hrs. run time.
Productivity for
the 30% solution hydrogenation over this time was 8.5 grams sorbitol per hour.
[0061] Example 2
[0062] Table 2 shows the results from hydrogenating the 20% dextrose feed
in
the same apparatus, by the same procedure and under the same conditions as in
Example 1. The 20% feed was processed for over 6000 hours cumulative run time
without deactivation or observed nickel leaching.
[0063] The average sorbitol production rate over the cumulative run time
was
lower with the dilution, however, at 5.9 g/hr. for the 20% feed.
Table 2. Hydrogenation of 20% Dextrose Solution with time.
On stream Reducing Sugars, Reducing Ni, ppm Dextrose
hours ppm sugars, % conversion
202 8 0.0008 0 99.99%
6200 10 0.001 0 99.99%
[0064] Example 3
[0065] Table 3 shows results from hydrogenating a mixed aqueous solution of
20%
dextrose with 20% sorbitol, in the same apparatus, by the same procedure and
under
the same conditions as used for Examples 1 and 2. The mixed feed was processed
for
over 1800 hours, again without deactivation or nickel leaching.
Table 3. Hydrogenation of 20% Mixed Solution with time
On stream Reducing Reducing Ni, ppm Dextrose
hours Sugars, ppm sugars, % conversion
202 8 0.0008 0 99.99%
1800 200 0.02 0 99.99%
[0066] Example 4.
[0067] Table 4 shows the results from hydrogenating a 20% dextrose feed at
an
LHSV of 1 hr.-1 , with a single addition of a concentrated 55% dextrose
solution with
0.25 ml/minute of additional hydrogen to obtain a net 19% dextrose
concentration at
the addition of the further dextrose solution and hydrogen in the reactor. The
hydrogenation was continued over 2200 hours, without observed deactivation or
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
20
nickel leaching. The average sorbitol production rate over this amount of
runtime
was 9.0 g/hr., substantially better than for the 20% single feed example and
better
even than the 30% single feed example, but with the reduced deactivation and
nickel
leaching performance of the 20% example.
Table 4. Hydrogenation of 20% Solution with Side Injection.
On stream Reactor 1 feed, Reactor 2 feed, Sorbitol at
hours Dextrose % Dextrose % Outlet, wt %
310 20 48 30.221
814 20 48 30.645
1174 20 48 30.453
1198 20 48 30.395
1700 20 48 30.505
2216 20 48 30.097
2240 20 48 30.493
[0068] Examples 5-10
[0069] A) Completion of Computer Model:
[0070] For modeling a continuous fixed-bed dextrose hydrogenation to
sorbitol
employing downstream additions according to the present invention, a 2.5 cm (1
inch) inner diameter, 180 cubic centimeter reactor was first procured and
loaded
with 288 grams of Raney nickel sponge metal catalyst, then fed a 20 weight
percent
dextrose solution in water with hydrogen being supplied at a hydrogen/dextrose
solution of 34:1 (LHSV of 1). The reactor was operated isothermally at 115
degrees
Celsius and a pressure of 12.4 MPa (1800 psi). The sorbitol conversion at the
outlet
was 99.5 percent. No downstream addition of dextrose (or hydrogen with
dextrose)
was done.
[0071] The data gathered over a period of time from this experimental run
was
then used with the activation energy of 64.8 kJ/mol reported by Verma et al.,
"Kinetics of hydrogenation of D-glucose to sorbitol", J. Chem. Technol.
Biotechnol.
1989, vol. 46, pp. 295-301, to determine the kinetic rate constant kr for use
in a
reaction rate equation,
mot in [moll) * cHz L
_
rol)
_ L
rate [sec __ * kg catalyst' = kr sec * kg catalyst * mol L
______________________________________ * Glucose
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
21
[0072] A model was subsequently constructed in ASPEN PLUS process modeling
and optimization software from Aspen Technology, Inc., Burlington, MA 01803,
using
the same conditions and a fixed exit conversion of 99.5%, to model the effects
of
different numbers of side injections and different injection positions. In
regard to the
latter variable, progressively greater amounts of the Raney nickel sponge
metal
catalyst were observed to be required per each further unit of sorbitol
produced, as
the concentration of dextrose in solution decreased; it was postulated, then,
that by
staging downstream additions according to the concentration of dextrose in
solution
remaining unconverted at particular locations in the reactor, significant
productivity
improvements could be realized from the catalyst bed overall, by not
permitting the
unconverted dextrose concentration to fall to levels where the rate of
production or
sorbitol per unit of catalyst would begin to fall at higher rates.
[0073] Accordingly, as substantiated by the modeling that was done, the
total
catalyst requirements for production of a certain amount of sorbitol within a
given
timeframe from the modeled process could be minimized or at least significant
reduced, or equivalent, for a given amount of catalyst, production of sorbitol
could
be significantly increased or even maximized for the modeled process by
staging the
selected number of downstream additions at certain positions along the axial
flow of
the reactor.
[0074] B) Results of Modeling Different Numbers of Side Stream Injections:
[0075] A series of dextrose to sorbitol hydrogenations were modeled in
which no
side stream injections were used (conventional case), a single side stream
injection
was used, then two and then three side stream injections were used. Fixed
variables
included the overall sorbitol production rate, the final temperature of each
reactor
bed section preceding a side stream injection and at the outlet (120 degrees
Celsius),
the inlet pressure of 12.4 MPa (1800 psi), the dextrose conversion of each
reactor
bed section (99.5%), the diameter of all reactor bed sections (same in all
cases), the
inlet hydrogen/dextrose molar ratio of 34:1, a targeted dextrose concentration
of 20
percent and the use of more concentrated 50% dextrose solutions for each
modeled
addition.
[0076] Table 5 demonstrates the results of using one, two or three side
stream
injections of 50% dextrose solution, where the total catalyst volume and
average
mass flow rate of the reactor bed sections are compared to a normalized value
of 1.0
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
22
for the circumstance where no side stream injections are used in the model. In
the
"no side stream injection" case, sorbitol outlet concentration was 20.10
percent by
weight. The increased sorbitol concentration realized through the use of side
stream
injections, it be appreciated, will be beneficial in terms of energy
requirements for
removing water from the sorbitol product. Data derived from the conditions and
model results for the 0, 1, 2, and 3 injection cases demonstrate how
downstream
additions provide dextrose concentrations in the reactor that are within
thirty
percent of the inlet concentration, for a greater portion of the reactor's
length than
in the no injection case, as well as that less catalyst volume is required
where such
downstream additions are made:
Table 5
No. of Injections 1 2 3
Tot. Catalyst Volume 0.903 0.826 0.794
Avg. Mass Flow Rate of Beds 0.489 0.329 0.250
Sorbitol Concentration Out (%wt.) 32.62 39.73 43.86
[0077] C) Results of Modeling Three Staged Side Stream Injections According
to
Unconverted Dextrose Concentration Remaining in Solution:
[0078] Based on the results seen in Table 5 and to determine whether total
catalyst requirements could be reduced by staging the side stream injections
according to how much dextrose had been hydrogenated to sorbitol in a
preceding
reactor bed section, a series of simulations were done with the same reactor
system
and same fixed variables as modeled for Table 5. A first simulation made three
additions of a 50% dextrose solution when 99.5% of the previously added
dextrose had
been converted, while a second simulation made its additions when 95% of the
previously added dextrose had been converted and the third simulation made its
additions when 70% had been converted. These results are shown in Table 6,
with
the results at the 99.5% conversion benchmark again being normalized to 1 for
ease
of comparison among the three cases:
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
23
Table 6
Dextrose Conversion 99.5% 95% 70%
Tot. Catalyst Volume 1.0 0.805 0.701
Avg. Mass Flow Rate of Beds 1.0 1.039 1.351
Sorbitol Concentration Out (%wt.) 43.86 43.36 39.58
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-11-30
