Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
PREDICTIVE OVERLAP CONTROL MODEL
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates to a control system for agricultural
implements, and more
particularly to a control system that takes into account delays in turning on
and off functions of
the agricultural implements due to implement latency.
2. Description of the Related Art
[0002] Agricultural implements are commonly used to perform various
agricultural functions,
such as tilling, planting, spraying, and fertilizing. As modern farming
methods have become
more competitive, it has become increasingly important that fields and
agricultural products to be
applied to the fields are used efficiently. To this end, agricultural
functions applied to the fields,
whether such agricultural function is tillage, seeding, or application of
fertilizer or other
chemicals, are carefully controlled in order to prevent gaps where the
agricultural function is not
applied, or overlaps where the agricultural function is applied more than
once.
[0003] In order to prevent this from happening, today's in-cab control systems
accomplish
overlap control using a centralized control system that commands an implement
to "turn on now"
or "turn off now" as the implement crosses a computed boundary, such as a
boundary where the
agricultural function has been performed before, or an edge boundary of the
field. Such in-cab
control systems use reactive models, so that the command is given when the
boundary is crossed.
Normally such systems are tied to GPS position information that is updated at
a rate of 5 to 10
hertz, or 0.1 to 0.2 seconds between updates. At a typical sprayer speed of 25
miles per hour, for
example, this can result in gaps or over-applications of 3 1/2 to 7 feet.
Further latency due to
delays in software comparing the implement position to the boundary position,
issuance of a
1
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
command to the implement, and reaction to the command by the implement,
particularly when
the agricultural function has an inherent lag between actuators on the
implement taking action
and initiation or cessation of the agricultural function, can increase
resultant gaps or over-
applications considerably. Multiplied by the number of times that such
boundaries are crossed in
treating a given field, for example boundaries between rows and headland
passes, these gaps or
over-applications can add up to considerable wasted space or wasted
agricultural resources.
[0004] In order to compensate for this, prior art systems have provided an
operator the ability
to program in a "start early" distance, a "stop late" distance, and a "product
delay" time. The
product delay represents the time between the system starting or stopping the
agricultural
implement and actual initiation or cessation of the agricultural function.
Effectively, setting the
product delay results in an offset of the reported location of the
agricultural implement in the
direction of travel of the agricultural implement. This new offset location is
referred to as the
product delay edge. The "start early" distance allowed for a further offset of
the reported
location of the agricultural implement in the direction of travel of the
agricultural implement
when transitioning from an overlap to a non-overlap area, i.e. ¨ offset of the
location of the
agricultural implement toward the non-overlap area. This new offset location
is referred to as the
start early edge. The start early edge is used when initiating the
agricultural function of the
agricultural implement upon leaving the overlap area. The "stop late" distance
allowed for a
further offset of the reported location of the agricultural implement in the
opposite direction to
the direction of travel of the agricultural implement when transitioning from
a non-overlap area
to an overlap area, i.e. ¨ offset of the location of the agricultural
implement away from the
overlap area. This new offset location is referred to as the stop late edge.
The stop late edge is
used when ceasing the agricultural function of the agricultural implement upon
entering the
2
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
overlap area. The "start early" and "stop late" distances allowed for fine-
tuning of the
performance of the agricultural implement after configuring the "product
delay".
[0005] As each of the "start early" distance, "stop late" distance, and
"product delay" time
resulted in an offset of the reported location of the agricultural implement,
the prior art systems
still relied upon a "turn on now" or "turn off now" command sent to the
agricultural implement
when the reported location of the agricultural implement intercepted a
boundary between a non-
overlap area and an overlap area, or vice versa. Actual initiation or
cessation of the agricultural
function is still subject to variation as a result of changes in vehicle
speed, vehicle heading,
variations in central control system latency, and GPS position update
frequency. As noted
previously, the GPS position update frequency in particular can account for as
much as 7 feet of
variation, even with the reported location of the agricultural implement
offset to compensate for
system latency. Furthermore, in a centralized control system, multiple
individual latencies of
various agricultural implements had to be accounted for by reprogramming the
"product delay"
time to compensate.
[0006] What is needed in the art is a control model for preventing or
minimizing gaps or over-
applications of agricultural functions by agricultural implements, while not
relying upon the rate
at which GPS position information is updated, not being dependent upon latency
due to delays in
software, and taking into account the individual latency in the reaction times
of various
agricultural implements.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0007] The present invention takes into account system and implement latency
by utilizing a
predictive model operating in a tractor control system that instructs an
agricultural implement
3
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
control system to "turn on/off in X feet" or to "turn on/off in X seconds." A
dedicated
agricultural implement control system may further calculate a distance or time
in advance of the
commanded distance or time based on the individual latency of that particular
agricultural
implement, represented by a product delay implement edge, at which advance
time or distance
the agricultural implement acts upon the command. Alternately, the dedicated
agricultural
implement control system may report the individual latency of that particular
agricultural
implement to the tractor control system, which calculates this latency into
its "turn on/off in X
feet" or "turn on/off in X seconds" commands. In this way, the actual
initiation or cessation of
the agricultural function takes place at the time or distance commanded, once
the latent time or
distance delay of the agricultural implement has elapsed.
[0008] Further, this allows the tractor control system to apply a standard
calculation based on
its own internal latencies, represented by the product delay edge, while
relying upon the
dedicated agricultural implement control systems to take into account
differing latencies of
various agricultural implements. This internal latency of the tractor control
system may be
significantly smaller than the latency of the agricultural implement, as it
does not include the
pure mechanical latencies of the agricultural implement. Meanwhile, the
dedicated implement
control system can keep track of the individual latency of the agricultural
implement and
calculate the advance time or distance accordingly, or provide the individual
latency information
to the tractor control system for it to use in making its calculations.
Additionally, this
arrangement improves accuracy when the ideal turn on/off point occurs between
GPS cycle
times.
100091 The predictive algorithm used in the predictive model of the present
invention may
follow an auto-guidance swath in order to know where the tractor and
agricultural implement are
4
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
going, assuming that the autoguidance system stays engaged on the swath, in
order to calculate
the "turn on/off in X feet" or to "turn on/off in X seconds" commands. The
predictive algorithm
may alternately simply predict a likely path of the agricultural implement a
number of seconds
into the future, rather than relying on the auto-guidance swath, which number
of seconds may be
a function of the individual latency of the agricultural implement, for
example two times the
individual latency of the agricultural implement, or may be a preset value.
The predictive
algorithm may further take into account turns and extend or predict the turn
based on position
history. Additionally, the predicted likely path of the agricultural implement
used to calculate
the "turn on/off in X feet" or to "turn on/off in X seconds" commands may be
chosen as a
shortest potential distance when the agricultural implement is already in an
overlapping area, and
may be chosen as a longest potential distance when the agricultural implement
is not currently in
an overlapping area.
[0010] The present invention may be utilized on an agricultural implement that
has individual
implement sections that can be turned on and off, so that "turn on/off in X
feet" or to "turn on/off
in X seconds" commands are given for each section by the tractor control
system. The dedicated
implement control system can then apply the appropriate individual latency for
each section in
calculating the advance time or distance for that section. Further, the
present invention may be
utilized on a self-propelled agricultural implement, wherein the implement
latency is
incorporated directly into the product delay value.
[0011] The determination of when and where the agricultural implement, or
individual
implement sections of the agricultural implement, or the product delay edge,
start early edge,
stop late edge, or product delay implement edge thereof, will cross a boundary
into or out of an
area where the agricultural function has already been performed is
accomplished using a
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
calculation of colliding polygons. This is computationally intensive and
requires computing
resources. Therefore, once the determination that a boundary will be crossed
and the time or
distance to such boundary has been calculated, either using an auto-guidance
swath or using a
predicted likely path, the algorithm may conserve computing resources by only
re-computing the
time or distance if ground speed or bearing has changed.
[0012] The present invention may, in addition to boundaries representing field
boundaries or
automatically set boundaries resulting from previous application of the
agricultural function, and
in addition to product delay edges set by the tractor control system to
compensate for latencies
introduced by the central system, and in addition to product delay implement
adjustments by the
implement control system to compensate for the individual latencies of the
agricultural
implement, further allow an operator to set "start early" or "stop late"
distances as before, in
order to further fine tune the system. These are then integrated into the
calculation providing the
"turn on/off in X feet" or to "turn on/off in X seconds" commands given by the
tractor control
system. Additionally, the present invention may allow an operator to fine tune
the system by
inputting an adjustment to be applied directly to the "turn on/off in X feet"
or to "turn on/off in X
seconds" commands.
[0013] The present invention may continue to give a redundant "turn on now" or
"turn off
now" command when the product delay edge set by the tractor control system, as
modified by a
"start early" or "stop late" distance if applicable, the "turn on/off in X
feet" or to "turn on/off in
X seconds" commands notwithstanding.
[0014] The invention in one form is directed to an overlap control system. The
overlap control
system includes an agricultural vehicle control system operable to utilize a
product delay (PD)
value in seconds, a start early (SE) distance, and/or a stop late (SL)
distance to determine at least
6
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
one offset edge from a location of an agricultural implement. The agricultural
vehicle control
system is operable to look ahead along a guidance swath or at least one
predicted path of the
agricultural implement, and to determine that an intercept will occur between
the at least one
offset edge and a boundary along the guidance swath or predicted path. The
agricultural vehicle
control system is further operable to calculate a distance or time to the
intercept, and to send a
command to change an on/off state of the agricultural implement in the
calculated distance or
time.
[0015] The invention in another form is directed to an implement control
system associated
with an agricultural implement. The implement control system is operable to
receive a command
to change an on/off state of the agricultural implement from an agricultural
vehicle control
system in a calculated time or distance. The implement control system is
further operable to
cause the calculated distance or time to be adjusted in order to compensate
for latency delay of
the agricultural implement in changing the on/off state.
[0016] The invention in another form is directed to a method of controlling an
agricultural
implement, including a series of steps. The first step is looking ahead along
a guidance swath or
at least one predicted path. The second step is determining that an intercept
will occur along the
guidance swath or at least one predicted path between an offset edge and a
boundary. The offset
edge is offset from a location of an agricultural implement on the basis of a
product delay (PD)
value in seconds, a start early (SE) distance, a stop late (SL) distance,
and/or a product delay
implement (PDI) value in seconds. The third step is calculating a distance or
a time to the
intercept, and the fourth step is sending a command to change an on/off state
of the agricultural
implement in the calculated distance or time.
7
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
[0017] An advantage of the present invention is that it saves on input costs
associated with
agricultural materials applied by agricultural implements, while increasing
yields due to avoiding
over or under application of these materials. Another advantage is that the
invention does not
rely on "start now" or "stop now" commands, which depend on the GPS update
rate for
accuracy. Instead, the invention allows the agricultural function being
applied by the agricultural
implement to initiate or cease exactly when the commanded time has elapsed or
the commanded
distance has been covered, which may potentially occur in between GPS updates.
[0018] A further advantage of the present invention is that it can be used
with multiple
agricultural implements with various individual known delay values between
action being taken
by the implement controls and initiation or cessation of the agricultural
function. Finally, the
present invention transfers the computational burden of the math associated
with the implement
latency to the implement control system.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0019] The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this
invention, and the
manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention will be
better understood
by reference to the following description of an embodiment of the invention
taken in conjunction
with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
[0020] Fig. 1 is a graphical representation of a prior art overlap control
model;
[0021] Fig. 2 is another graphical representation of the prior art overlap
control model shown
in Fig. 1;
[0022] Fig. 3A is a graphical representation of an embodiment of the
invention, being a
predictive overlap control model;
8
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
[0023] Fig. 3B is a flow chart showing the series of steps taken in the
functioning of an
embodiment of the invention;
[0024] Fig. 4A is a graphical representation of another embodiment of the
invention, also
being a predictive overlap control model;
[0025] Fig. 4B is a flow chart showing the series of steps taken in the
functioning of an
embodiment of the invention; and
[0026] Fig. 5 is a graphical representation of another embodiment of the
invention, also being
a predictive overlap control model.
[0027] Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts
throughout the several
views. The exemplifications set out herein illustrate embodiments of the
invention, and such
exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the
invention in any manner.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0028] Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to Figs. 1 and 2,
there is shown a
graphical representation of a prior art overlap control model. A tractor 10
pulling an agricultural
implement 12 is in the process of moving from a non-overlap area 50 to an
overlap area 48 in
Fig. 1, and in the process of moving from an overlap area 48 to a non-overlap
area 50 in Fig. 2.
The non-overlap area 50 is separated from the overlap area 48 by a boundary
22, which may be a
boundary of the field, or may be a boundary between an area where the
agricultural function
being performed by the agricultural implement 12 has not yet been performed,
i.e. ¨ the non-
overlap area, and an area where the agricultural function being performed by
the agricultural
implement 12 has already been performed, i.e. ¨ the overlap area.
[0029] Besides being a physical boundary, the boundary 22 is represented
within a tractor
9
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
control system 14 as geometric math data related to map information also
residing within the
tractor control system 14, in other words a virtual boundary. As the tractor
10 moves, a GPS
receiver 52 provides the tractor control system 14 with position information
that allows the
tractor control system to determine the location of the tractor 10 and the
agricultural implement
12, or in the case of a self-propelled agricultural implement, just the
location of the implement
itself.
[0030] In order to provide some compensation for overall system latency, the
tractor control
system 14 allows an operator to input a Product Delay value in seconds, which
results in an
offset of the reported location of the agricultural implement 12 in the
direction of travel of the
tractor 10, which offset location is called the Product Delay (PD) edge 24.
The distance of this
offset location may be a function of the actual tractor velocity (VT), or may
simply be a
multiplication of the Product Delay value times an expected tractor velocity.
The tractor control
system 14 further allows the operator to input a Stop Late (SL) value in feet,
which results in an
offset of the reported location of the agricultural implement 12 opposite to
the direction of travel
of the tractor 10, which offset location is called the Stop Late edge 26. The
Stop Late edge 26 is
applicable when the tractor 10 is transitioning from a non-overlap area 50 to
an overlap area 48
to delay the cessation of the agricultural function being performed by the
agricultural implement
12 by that number of feet. Similarly, the tractor control system 14 further
allows the operator to
input a Start Early (SE) value in feet, which results in an offset of the
reported location of the
agricultural implement 12 in the direction of travel of the tractor 10, which
offset location is
called the Start Early edge 28. The Start Early edge 28 is applicable when the
tractor 10 is
transitioning from an overlap area 48 to a non-overlap area 50 to advance the
initiation of the
agricultural function being performed by the agricultural implement 12 by that
number of feet.
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
[0031] The offsets represented by the Product Delay edge 24, the Stop Late
edge 26, and the
Start Early edge 28 are a way to allow the operator to attempt to further fine-
tune the start or
shutoff of the agricultural function being performed by the agricultural
implement 12. Each of
these offsets then resides within the tractor control system 14.
[0032] When the tractor control system 14 determines that the Stop Late edge
26, as adjusted
from the actual location of the agricultural implement 12, has reached the
boundary 22 when
transitioning from the non-overlap area 50 to the overlap area 48, it sends a
"stop now"
command to the agricultural implement 12. Conversely, when the tractor control
system 14
determines that the Start Early edge 28, as adjusted from the actual location
of the agricultural
implement 12, has reached the boundary 22 when transitioning from the overlap
area 48 to the
non-overlap area 50, it sends a "start now" command to the agricultural
implement 12.
[0033] While the Product Delay edge 24, the Stop Late edge 26, and the Start
Early edge 28
provide some compensation for overall system latency, cessation or initiation
of application of
the agricultural function being performed by the agricultural implement 12 at
the correct time is
still subject to changes in vehicle speed, vehicle heading, and variations in
the system latency.
Further, cessation or initiation of application of the agricultural function
being performed by the
agricultural implement 12 at the correct time is particularly susceptible to
GPS position update
frequency, as explained previously, and to the differences in individual
latencies of various
agricultural implements 12.
[0034] Turning now to Figs. 3A and 4A, a graphical representation of an
embodiment of a
Predictive Overlap Control Model according to the present invention is
provided. A tractor 10
pulling an agricultural implement 12 is again in the process of moving from a
non-overlap area
50 to an overlap area 48 in Fig. 3A, and in the process of moving from an
overlap area 48 to a
11
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
non-overlap area 50 in Fig. 4A. The non-overlap area 50 is again separated
from the overlap
area 48 by a boundary 22, which is again represented within a tractor control
system 14 as
geometric math data related to map information also residing within the
tractor control system
14. As the tractor 10 moves, a GPS receiver 52 again provides the tractor
control system 14 with
position information that allows the tractor control system to determine the
location of the tractor
and the agricultural implement 12.
[0035] The tractor control system 14 in the present invention may still allow
an operator to
input, or may automatically determine, a Product Delay value that results in
an offset of the
reported location of the agricultural implement 12 in the direction of travel
of the tractor 10
resulting in the Product Delay edge 24. The tractor control system 14 may also
still allow the
operator to input a Stop Late value that results in an offset of the reported
location of the
agricultural implement 12 opposite to the direction of travel of the tractor
10 resulting in the Stop
Late edge 26. Similarly, the tractor control system 14 may still allow the
operator to input a Start
Early value that results in an offset of the reported location of the
agricultural implement 12 in
the direction of travel of the tractor 10 resulting in the Start Early edge
28. Each of these offsets
still resides within the tractor control system 14. While the Stop Late edge
26 and Start Early
edge 28 both still represent offsets in feet entered by the operator in order
to fine tune the system
if necessary, the Product Delay edge 24 of the present invention differs from
the Product Delay
edge of the prior art in that the time entered or automatically determined
represents only the
internal latencies of the tractor control system 14.
[0036] The implement control system 16 then calculates a further Product Delay
Implement
(PDO value in seconds that results in a further offset of the reported
location of the agricultural
implement 12 in the direction of travel of the tractor 10, resulting in the
Product Delay
12
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
Implement edge 30. The Product Delay Implement edge 30 is used in order to
compensate for
the individual latency of the agricultural implement 12. Note that the Product
Delay Implement
value is represented as a stop edge in Figs. 3 and 4. However, it may or may
not be a stop edge
in the same sense as the Product Delay stop edge, the Stop Late edge, and the
Start Early edge.
That is to say, the adjustment to the commanded start and stop times and/or
distances may only
exist as the time and/or distance adjustment performed by the implement
control system, instead
of residing within the tractor control system 14 as another offset in the
location of the
agricultural implement 12 as determined by the GPS receiver 52.
[0037] Alternately, the Product Delay Implement value may be applied in both
ways, so that
the implement control system 16 applies an adjustment to commanded start and
stop times and/or
distances sent by the tractor control system 14, and represents the Product
Delay Implement as a
further stop edge offset from one of the regular Product Delay edge 24, the
Stop Late edge 26,
and the Start Early edge 28, as applicable. The implement control system 16 in
this scenario
further provides information regarding the latency of the agricultural
implement 12 to the tractor
control system 14, which then calculates a further offset Product Delay
Implement edge as
illustrated.
[0038] The present invention looks ahead along predicted paths 20 of the
tractor 10 and
agricultural implement 12 using a predictive algorithm 18 to determine a time
and/or distance at
which the Product Delay edge 24, Stop Late edge 26, Start Early edge 28,
and/or Product Delay
Implement Stop/Start edge 30, as applicable, as offset from the actual
location of the agricultural
implement 12, will intercept the boundary 22. The predicted paths 20 of the
tractor 10 and
agricultural implement 12 may be a portion of an auto-guidance swath provided
by the tractor
control system 14 along which the tractor 10 and agricultural implement 12
will move as guided
13
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
by the GPS receiver 52. Alternately, the predicted paths 20 may be multiple
predicted likely
paths as determined by the predictive algorithm 18 based on current position,
velocity, position
history, previous turns, and driver inputs, as shown. The length to which the
predicted paths 20
are calculated may be a function of the individual latency of the agricultural
implement 12 as
communicated to the tractor control system 14 by the implement control system
16, for example
two times the individual latency of the agricultural implement 12, or may be a
preset value.
100391 The determination of the time and/or distance at which the Product
Delay edge 24, Stop
Late edge 26, Start Early edge 28, and/or Product Delay Implement Stop/Start
edge 30, as
applicable, as offset from the actual location of the agricultural implement
12, will intercept the
boundary 22 is accomplished using a calculation of colliding polygons. Again,
this operation is
computationally intensive and requires computing resources. Therefore, once
the determination
that an edge will cross a boundary has been made and the time or distance to
such boundary has
been calculated, either using the auto-guidance swath or using a predicted
likely path, the
algorithm may conserve computing resources by only re-computing the time or
distance if the
ground speed or bearing of the tractor 10 and agricultural implement 12 has
changed.
[0040] In the case of a tractor 10 and agricultural implement 12 transitioning
from a non-
overlap area 50 to an overlap area 48, the predicted path 20 used to actually
calculate the time
and/or distance at which the Product Delay edge 24, Stop Late edge 26, Start
Early edge 28,
and/or Product Delay Implement Stop/Start edge 30, as applicable, will
intercept the boundary
22 may be a longest predicted path (atongest) chosen from among a set of
likely predicted paths 20.
In the case of a tractor 10 and agricultural implement 12 transitioning from
an overlap area 48 to
a non-overlap area 50, the predicted path 20 used to actually calculate the
time and/or distance at
which the Product Delay edge 24, Stop Late edge 26, Start Early edge 28,
and/or Product Delay
14
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
Implement Stop/Start edge 30, as applicable, will intercept the boundary 22
may be a shortest
predicted path (bshortest) chosen from among a set of likely predicted paths
20.
[0041] In the case of a tractor 10 and agricultural implement 12 transitioning
from a non-
overlap area 50 to an overlap area 48 as shown in Fig. 3A and 3B, once the
predictive algorithm
18 has determined that the Product Delay edge 24, Stop Late edge 26, and/or
Product Delay
Implement edge 30, as applicable, will intercept the boundary 22, has chosen a
longest predicted
path (aiongest), and has calculated the time and/or distance at which the
intercept will occur, the
predictive algorithm 18 residing in the tractor control system 14 sends a
commanded shutoff
distance and/or a commanded shutoff time to the implement control system 16.
The commanded
shutoff distance 32 then equals (aiongest + PD(VT) ¨ SL + PDI(VT)). The
commanded shutoff time
34 equals ((aiongestNT) + PD ¨ (SL/VT) + PD1). Alternately, in the embodiment
wherein the
implement control system 16 makes the final adjustment to account for its own
latency, the
tractor control system commanded shutoff distance equals (aiongest + PD(VT) ¨
SL) and the
commanded shutoff time equals ((alongestNT) + PD ¨ (SL/VT)). The implement
control system 16
then adjusts the distance by adding PDI(VT) or the time by adding Pp'.
[0042] In the case of a tractor 10 and agricultural implement 12 transitioning
from an overlap
area 48 to a non-overlap area 50 as shown in Fig. 4A and 4B, once the
predictive algorithm 18
has determined that the Product Delay edge 24, Start Early edge 28, and/or
Product Delay
Implement edge 30, as applicable, will intercept the boundary 22, has chosen a
shortest predicted
path, and has calculated the time and/or distance at which the intercept will
occur, the predictive
algorithm 18 residing in the tractor control system 14 sends a commanded start
distance and/or a
commanded start time to the implement control system 16. The commanded start
distance 40
then equals (bshortest + PD(Vi) + SE + PDI(VT)). The commanded start time 42
equals ((bshortest
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
NT) + PD + (SENT) + PIN. Alternately, in the embodiment wherein the implement
control
system 16 makes the final adjustment to account for its own latency, the
tractor control system
commanded start distance equals (bshortest PD(VT) SE) and the commanded
start time equals
((bshortest NT) + PD + (SENT)). The implement control system 16 then adjusts
the distance by
adding PDI(VT) or the time by adding PD1.
[0043] The entire process of determining that the Product Delay edge 24, Stop
Late edge 26
Start Early edge 28, and/or Product Delay Implement edge 30, as applicable,
will intercept a
boundary 22, choosing a longest or shortest predicted path as appropriate,
calculating the time
and/or distance at which the intercept will occur by the tractor control
system 14, and adjustment
of the commanded start or stop time and/or distance by the implement control
system 16, if
applicable, is repeated on regular and frequent intervals, so that changes in
vehicle speed and/or
heading are accounted for.
[0044] A redundant "turn on now" or "turn off now" command may then be
provided to the
implement control system 16 by the tractor control system 14 based on the
Product Delay edge
24, Stop Late edge 26 Start Early edge 28, and/or Product Delay Implement edge
30, as
applicable, actually crossing the boundary 22 itself.
[0045] Finally, the implement control system 16 keeps track of the time
elapsed and/or
distance covered since the last commanded start distance 40 and/or commanded
start time 42, or
commanded shutoff distance 32 and/or commanded shutoff time 34 was received
from the
tractor control system 14, as adjusted according to its own individual latency
if applicable, and
takes the appropriate action when the adjusted time and/or distance has
elapsed.
[0046] An additional embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
Fig. 5, again
showing a tractor 10 pulling an agricultural implement 12 in the process of
moving from a non-
16
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
overlap area to an overlap area, or vice versa. The non-overlap area is again
separated from the
overlap area by a boundary 22. As the tractor 10 moves, a GPS receiver 52
again provides the
tractor control system 14 with position information that allows the tractor
control system to
determine the location of the tractor 10 and the agricultural implement 12. In
the arrangement
shown in Fig. 5, the agricultural implement 12 is provided with three sections
12A, 12B, and
12C.
[0047] The process of determining that the Product Delay edge 24, Stop Late
edge 26, Start
Early edge 28, and/or Product Delay Implement edge, as applicable, will
intercept a boundary
22, choosing a longest or shortest predicted path as appropriate, calculating
the time and/or
distance at which the intercept will occur by the tractor control system 14,
and adjustment of the
commanded start or stop time and/or distance by the implement control system
16 if applicable,
is then duplicated for each of the sections 12A, 12B, and 12C of the
agricultural implement 12.
The redundant process of the tractor control system 14 providing a "turn on
now" or "turn off
now" command to the implement control system 16 based the Product Delay edge
24, the Stop
Late edge 26, the Start Early edge 28, and/or the Product Delay Implement edge
30 actually
crossing the boundary 22 itself, may also be performed for each of the
sections 12A, 12B, and
12C of the agricultural implement 12.
[0048] Therefore, in the case of a tractor 10 and agricultural implement 12
transitioning from a
non-overlap area to an overlap area, once the predictive algorithm 18 has
determined that the
Product Delay edge 24, Stop Late edge 26, and/or Product Delay Implement edge
30, as
applicable, will intercept the boundary 22, has chosen a longest predicted
path, and has
calculated the time and/or distance at which the intercept will occur, the
predictive algorithm 18
residing in the tractor control system 14 again sends a commanded shutoff
distance 32 and/or a
17
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
commanded shutoff time 34 to the implement control system 16. The commanded
shutoff
distance 32 for section 12A then equals (atongesti + PD(VT) ¨ SL + PDI(VT)).
The commanded
shutoff time 34 for section 12A then equals ((aiongest1NT) PD ¨ (SL/VT) + PIN.
The
commanded shutoff distance 32 for section 12B then equals (atongest2 + PD(VT)
¨ SL + PDI(VT)).
The commanded shutoff time 34 for section 12B then equals ((aloogest2NT) PD ¨
(SL/VT) +
PIN. The commanded shutoff distance 32 for section 12C then equals (atongest3
+ PD(VT) ¨ SL +
PDI(VT)). The commanded shutoff time 34 for section 12C then equals
((atongest3NT) + PD ¨
(SL/VT) + PD1). As before, in the embodiment wherein the implement control
system handles
the adjustment for its own latency, the PDI(VT) and PD1 terms are instead
added by the
implement control system, rather than by the tractor control system.
[0049] In the case of a tractor 10 and agricultural implement 12 transitioning
from an overlap
area to a non-overlap area, once the predictive algorithm 18 has determined
that the Product
Delay edge 24, Start Early edge 28, and/or Product Delay Implement edge 30, as
applicable, will
intercept the boundary 22, has chosen a shortest predicted path, and has
calculated the time
and/or distance at which the intercept will occur, the predictive algorithm 18
residing in the
tractor control system 14 sends a commanded start distance 40 and/or a
commanded start time 42
to the implement control system 16. The commanded start distance 40 for
section 12A then
equals (bshortest 1 "4- PD(VT) + SE + PDI(VT)). The commanded start time 42
for section 12A then
equals ((bshortest 1 NT) PD + (SENT) + PD1). The commanded start distance 40
for section 12B
then equals (bshortest2 PD(VT) SE + PDI(VT)). The commanded start time 42
for section 12B
then equals ((bshortest2 NT) PD + (SE/VT) + PIN. The commanded start distance
40 for section
12C then equals (bshortest3 PD(VT) + SE + PDI(VT)). The commanded start time
42 for section
12C then equals ((bshoi1est3 NT) PD + (SE/VT) + PD1). As before, in the
embodiment wherein
18
52416
CA 02944081 2016-10-04
the implement control system handles the adjustment for its own latency, the
PINVT) and PD1
terms are instead added by the implement control system, rather than by the
tractor control
system.
[0050] In this way, as the intercept between the chosen predicted path and the
applicable
boundary is recalculated any time there is a change in vehicle speed or
heading, accuracy is
improved. Accuracy is further improved by the fact that the Predictive Overlap
Control Model
depends on a "turn on/off in X feet" or "turn on/off in X seconds" type of
command, eliminating
dependency on GPS position update frequency and the resultant inaccurate "turn
on now" or
"turn off now" commands. Finally, adjustment for tractor control system
latency is separated
from the adjustment for implement latency, which is now compensated for by the
individual
implement control system, which has better performance and can take into
account the individual
mechanical latency of that particular agricultural implement.
[0051] While this invention has been described with respect to at least one
embodiment, the
present invention can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this
disclosure. This
application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or
adaptations of the invention
using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover
such departures from
the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art
to which this
invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.
19
52416
