Language selection

Search

Patent 2949072 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2949072
(54) English Title: CERAMIC PROPPANTS
(54) French Title: AGENTS DE SOUTENEMENT EN CERAMIQUE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C04B 35/46 (2006.01)
  • C09K 8/80 (2006.01)
  • E21B 43/267 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • O'BRIEN, FRANK (United States of America)
  • HELLER, CHRIS (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • SHAMROCK GROUP
(71) Applicants :
  • SHAMROCK GROUP (United States of America)
(74) Agent: MACRAE & CO.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2015-04-21
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2015-11-19
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2015/026833
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2015175172
(85) National Entry: 2016-11-14

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
14/275,226 (United States of America) 2014-05-12

Abstracts

English Abstract

A sintered, generally spherical ceramic body, having an alumina content of from about 52 to about 55 weight percent distributed substantially homogeneously throughout the body, a silica content from about 32 to about 38 weight percent distributed substantially homogeneously throughout the body, an apparent specific gravity of about 2.61 to about 2.65, and a bulk density of about 1.45 to about 1.56 grams per cubic centimeter.


French Abstract

On décrit un corps en céramique fritté, généralement sphérique, qui présente une teneur en alumine d'environ 52 à environ 55 pour cent en poids répartie de manière sensiblement homogène dans tout le corps; une teneur en silice d'environ 32 à environ 38 pour cent en poids répartie de manière sensiblement homogène dans tout le corps; une gravité spécifique apparente d'environ 2,61 à environ 2,65; et une densité apparente d'environ 1,45 à environ 1,56 grammes par centimètre cube.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Claims:
l claim:
1. A sintered, generally spherical ceramic body, comprising:
an alumina content between about 32 and about 39 weight percent
distributed substantially homogeneously throughout the body;
a silica content between about 52 and about 58 weight percent
distributed substantially homogeneously throughout the body;
a titania content of between about 1.7 and 2.5 weight percent
distributed substantially homogeneously throughout the body;
wherein the sintered, generally spherical ceramic body has an
apparent specific gravity of between about 2.61 and about 2.65; and
wherein the sintered, generally spherical ceramic body has a bulk
density of between about 1.45 and about 1.55 grams per cubic centimeter.
2. The sintered body of claim 1 wherein the sintered, generally
spherical ceramic body is characterized by a crush of less than about 10
percent at
7500 psi.
3. The sintered body of claim 1 wherein the sintered, generally
spherical ceramic body is characterized by a crush of less than about 5
percent at
7500 psi.
14

4. The sintered body of claim 1 wherein the sintered, generally
spherical ceramic body is characterized by a crush of less than about 10
percent at
8000 psi.
5. The sintered body of claim 1 wherein the sintered, generally
spherical ceramic body is characterized by an alumina content between about 35
and about 38 weight percent and by a silica content between about 54 and about
57 weight percent.
6. The sintered body of claim 5 and further comprising between about
2.2 and about 3.2 weight percent iron and other compounds selected from the
group including calcia, magnesia, potassium oxide, strontium oxide, and
combinations thereof.
7. The sintered body of claim 1 wherein the sintered body has a
Krumbein roundness value of at least 0.9.

8. A method of making a sintered, generally spherical ceramic pellet
having an alumina content of between about 32 and about 36 weight percent, a
silica content of between about 54 and about 59 weight percent, a specific
gravity of about 2.65, a bulk density of about 1.45 grams per cubic
centimeter,
and less than about 10 percent crush at 7500 psi, comprising:
pelletizing a raw material blend substantially comprising
aluminosilicate and having an iron content of between about 1.5 and about 5.0
weight percent, a silica content of between about 54 and about 59 weight
percent and an alumina content of between about 32 and about 36 weight
percent;
sintering the pellets at a temperature of between about 2345 and
about 2420 degrees Fahrenheit for up to about 30 minutes.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein the raw material blend is Missouri
fireclay.
10. The method of claim 8 wherein the raw material blend is a blend of
Missouri fireclay and high iron aluminosilicate.
16

11. A method of using sintered, generally spherical ceramic bodies to
prop open a fracture in a subterranean geological formation, comprising in
combination:
injecting a pressurized fluid into a geological formation at a
sufficient rate to fracture the same;
injecting into the fracture a fluid containing sintered, generally
spherical ceramic bodies into the fracture; and
lodging a volume of sintered generally spherical ceramic bodies in the
fracture;
wherein the respective bodies are characterized by an alumina
content of between about 32 and about 35 weight percent, a silica content of
between about 57 and about 59 weight percent, a specific gravity of about
2.63,
a bulk density of about 1.49 grams per cubic centimeter, and a crush of less
than
about 10 percent at 7500 psi.
12. A high strength propping agent for use in hydraulic fracturing of
subterranean formations comprising a plurality of solid, substantially
spherical
particles, wherein the particles are characterized by an alumina content of
between 32 and 37 weight percent, a titania content of between 1.7 and 2.5
weight percent, a specific gravity of between 2.61 and 2.65 grams per cubic
centimeter and ambient temperature permeability of at least about 100,000
millidarcies at 8,000 psi.
17

13. The propping agent of claim 12 wherein the particles have a silica
content of between 54 and 57 weight percent.
14. The propping agent of claim 13 wherein the composition of the
particles comprises: about 36 weight percent alumina, about 56 weight percent
silica, about 3 weight percent iron oxide, and about 2 weight percent titania,
with
the remainder being alkali and alkali earth metal oxides
15. The propping agent of claim 12 wherein said particles are
substantially sintered Missouri fireclay.
16. The propping agent of claim 12 wherein the particles have a
Krumbein sphericity of at least 0.9.
18

17. The propping agent of claim 12 wherein the particles also include a
crush strength enhancer selected from the group of rutile, bentonite, ball
clay,
fireclay, nepheline syenite, fused bauxite dust, wollastonite, feldspar and
talc.
18. The propping agent of claim 17 wherein the loose fill density is in
the range between 1.54 and 1.63 gm/cc, the particles are sintered naturally
occurring ore, and the particles are sintered for about 30 minutes at a
temperature in the range of about 2345 degrees Fahrenheit to about 2420
degrees Fahrenheit.
19. The propping agent of claim 12 wherein the bulk density is about
1.50 g/cc.
19

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02949072 2016-11-14
WO 2015/175172
PCT/US2015/026833
CERAMIC PROPPANTS
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This patent application is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to
then co-pending U.S. Patent Application serial no. 12/986,479, filed on
January 7, 2011, and to co-pending U.S. Patent Application serial no.
14/275,226, filed on May 12, 2014.
TECHNICAL FIELD
The claimed technology relates generally to small, generally spherical
ceramic bodies and, more particularly, to alumina-silicate proppant bodies for
use
in fracturing subterranean geological formations.
BACKGROUND
Hydraulic fracturing is a technique for increasing the output and
productivity of oil and gas wells by cracking the geological formation
surrounding
and defining an oil and/or gas reserve to create pathways through which the
entrapped oil and/or gas may more easily flow for extraction. First, a highly
pressurized fluid is injected into an existing well bore at a sufficiently
high rate of

CA 02949072 2016-11-14
WO 2015/175172
PCT/US2015/026833
flow to put sufficient stress on the geological formation to induce fracturing
thereof, thus creating a network of cracks in the rock defining the oil and
gas
reservoir. Next, a fluid containing a vast amount of small particulate
propping
agents, or proppants, is introduced into the crack network such that the
proppants will become positioned in the newly-opened fissures to prevent their
closure due to geological forces. In other words, the proppants literally
"prop"
the cracks open.
To do their jobs, the proppants are typically formed to have sufficient
mechanical strength to hold the cracks open against the dynamic geological
forces
that would otherwise operate to close or distort them. Typically, these
geological
forces increase with the depth of the well. Also, proppants are typically made
to
be somewhat fluid permeable and/or conductive, such that even when present in
aggregate, they do not substantially obstruct the flow of oil and/or gas
desired to
be extracted from the well. Typically, propping agents have been made stronger
through densification or by increasing the alumina content thereof. However,
denser, heavier proppants are harder to pump, more expensive to transport, and
are less permeable than lighter, more porous agents.
Another desired characteristic of proppants is that they be inexpensive to
produce, since it takes a great volume of proppants to hold open cracks in
even a
relatively small well. Sand is cheap and plentiful and is often selected as an
advantageous propping agent for maintaining the cracks formed in wells and
geological formations experiencing relatively low closure forces (i.e., 4,000
psi or
less). Moreover, the strength of the sand may be extended to withstand closure
forces of 8000 psi or more through such sorting processes as screening, sizing
and
2

CA 02949072 2016-11-14
WO 2015/175172
PCT/US2015/026833
shaping the sand. However, the sand proppant performance drops off
dramatically as the closure forces increase, such that even highly processed
and
selected sand is inadequate under closure forces much exceeding 10,000 psi.
Further, sand tends to be nonporous, and as such is less than ideal from a
permeability standpoint. Moreover, the sorting and processing steps add
expense, thus detracting from one of the main characteristics, low expense,
making sand attractive in the first place.
Some high-alumina aluminosilicate compositions, such as bauxite with an
alumina content in the 75-90% range, offer sufficient strength to function as
proppants under relatively high closure forces and at relatively great well
depths.
However, these high-alumina proppants likewise have high densities/ apparent
specific gravities approaching or exceeding 3.5 g/cc, and thus add the
requirement
of high viscosity pumping fluids and/or high pumping rates to prevent them
from
settling out during the injection process. Increased fluid viscosity and the
requisite
high pumping rates cost precision and control of the injection operation, thus
making fracture control and high conductivity fractures more difficult to
achieve
and maintain. Moreover, the high-alumina proppants tend to be more abrasive,
and thus speed the wear of the pumping and fluid transport equipment.
Additionally, sintered high-alumina compositions are relatively expensive,
often
priced ten to fifteen times that of sand.
Intermediate density proppants, defined as those having an apparent
specific gravity in the 3.1 to 3.4 g/cc range, have been developed to provide
sufficient strength to keep cracks open at well depths of from about 8,000 to
about 12,000 feet. In these materials, lower density is achieved primarily by
3

CA 02949072 2016-11-14
WO 2015/175172
PCT/US2015/026833
reduction of the alumina content to about 75%. Proppants having even lower
densities, such as around 3.0 g/cc, have been formed from kaolin clay
precursors
and are characterized by an alumina content of about 50%. These low density
proppants are typically intended for use at well depths up to about 8,000
feet.
An even lower density proppant has been developed having an alumina
content of from 25% to 40% and an apparent specific gravity of from 2.20 to
2.60 g/cc. While the reduced density allows for the use of less viscous
pumping
fluid and lower pumping rates (which are both desirable for prolonging
equipment life and thus reducing repair and replacement costs), the tradeoff
is in
proppant strength. Lowering the alumina content of the material generally
results
in a lower density proppant with corresponding lower strength, since the
higher
silica content results in significant loss of strength.
Accordingly, there has been a definite need for a proppant composition
enjoying both lower density and less expensive precursor materials that also
has
yield proppants having sufficient mechanical strength to withstand closure
pressures of 8000-10,000 psi or greater. The claimed novel technology
addresses
these needs.
4

CA 02949072 2016-11-14
WO 2015/175172
PCT/US2015/026833
SUMMARY
The claimed novel technology relates to an improved formulation for
ceramic proppant bodies characterized by a relatively low alumina content. One
object is to provide an improved ceramic proppant formulation. Related objects
and advantages of the claimed technology will be apparent from the following
description.

CA 02949072 2016-11-14
WO 2015/175172
PCT/US2015/026833
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the
claimed technology and presenting its currently understood best mode of
operation, reference will now be made to the embodiments and specific language
will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no
limitation of the scope of the claimed technology is thereby intended, with
such
alterations and further modifications in the illustrated device and such
further
applications of the principles of the claimed technology as illustrated
therein being
contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the
claimed technology relates.
The claimed technology relates to a light weight sintered ceramic material
of intermediate strength, such as a propping agent or proppant useful in the
hydraulic fracturing of subterranean geological formations surrounding and
defining oil wells, gas wells and similar boreholes. The sintered ceramic
material
is typically formed as solid, substantially spherical particles or pellets and
is
typically characterized as having a silica content between about 52 and about
58
weight percent, an alumina content of between about 32 and about 39 weight
percent, an apparent specific gravity of between about 2.61 and 2.69 (more
typically between about 2.63 and 2.65), a bulk density of between about 1.41
and about 1.65 grams per cubic centimeter (more typically a loose fill density
of
between about 1.45 and 1.55, or between about 1.54 and about 1.61 g/cc),
Krumbein sphericity of at least about 0.7 (more typically at least about 0.8
and
still more typically at least about 0.9), a mechanical crush strength such
that no
6

CA 02949072 2016-11-14
WO 2015/175172
PCT/US2015/026833
more than 10% of a test population are crushed at 7500 PSI (more typically no
more than 5% at 7500 PSI and/or no more than 10% at 8000 PSI), and an
ambient temperature permeability of at least about 100,000 millidarcies at
8,000
psi.
More particularly, the aluminosilicate proppant particles typically have a
silica (5i02) content of between about 54 and about 55 weight percent, an
alumina (A1203) content of between 30 and about 36 weight percent. Typical
proppant particle composition ranges (in weight percents) are as follows:
Typical More Typical
5i02 52-60 54-55
A1203 30-38 32-36
TiO2 1.7-3.0 1.7-2.5
Fe203 1.5-5.0 2.2-3.3
CaO 0.2-0.4 0.2-0.4
MgO 0.2-1.0 0.3-0.6
K20 0.4-2.5 1.5-2.0
5r02 0.01-0.1 0.01-0.1
Total 100.00 100.00
These proppants typically have a specific gravity of between about 2.61 and
about 2.69 and more typically between about 2.63 and about 2.65. The
proppants typically have a bulk density of between about 1.41 and about 1.65,
and more typically between about 1.45 and about 1.55 gm/cc.
Typically, the propping agent particles are made from high-iron
aluminosilicate materials or fireclay typically found deposited in and around
St.
Louis, High Hill and Mexico Missouri (i.e., Missouri fireclay). Similar
mineral
formations may also be found in such places as Ohio, Kentucky, Pennsylvania,
certain parts of Europe and the like. In general, Missouri fireclay is a
relatively
high iron-content bauxite or bauxitic material. Typically, the Missouri
fireclay will
7

CA 02949072 2016-11-14
WO 2015/175172
PCT/US2015/026833
be blended with at least some (typically, about 5 weight percent or more) high
iron aluminosilicate, a high iron aluminosilicate source, or similar mineral
compositions.
A small amount (typically around 5 weight percent) crush strength
enhancer material may be added to the Missouri fireclay to increase the
strength
of the proppants produced therefrom. The crush strength enhancer is typically
a
material such as nepheline syenite, fused bauxite dust, wollastonite, talc,
feldspar,
rutile, bentonite, ball clay, fireclay or the like, which act to increase the
strength
of the aluminosilicate proppants particles without substantially altering
their
density, specific gravity, conductivity and the like. Typically, small
additions of
crush strength enhancers such as these operate to impede cristobalite
formation
during the sintering of the proppant particles, thus increasing their crush
strength.
The propping agent particles are typically prepared from a dry mixed
precursor including the Missouri fireclay material, any additional clays, any
strength enhancing additives, and a suitable binder to yield a composition
within
the ranges outlined above. In other embodiments, the precursors may be mixed
as an aqueous suspension or the like. The dry mixed precursor is typically a
substantially homogeneous mixture, and yields green and, later, fired
proppants
having substantially homogeneous compositions with the component oxides
homogeneously distributed therein. The mixture is then granulated through
mixture-intensive shaping into generally spherical particles. The generally
spherical particles are typically larger than the desired size of the final
proppant
particles, to allow for shrinkage to occur during the firing process (i.e.,
the final
proppant size is typically targeted to a convenient size range, such as 16/30
mesh,
8

CA 02949072 2016-11-14
WO 2015/175172
PCT/US2015/026833
20/40 mesh, 40/80 mesh, or the like). Those fractions of undesired sizes, such
as
undersized and oversized fractions, are typically recycled into the layer of
fluidized particles. The non-recycled fractions are then typically dried,
calcined
and sintered. Sintering is typically accomplished at a temperature of between
about 2345 and about 2450 degrees Fahrenheit (or between about 1285 and
about 1327 degrees Celsius) to yield sintered proppants.
The as-sintered proppants typically have a specific gravity of between
about 2.61 and about 2.69, more typically about 2.63 to about 2.65; this
relatively low specific gravity allows for easier and less destructive pumping
of a
fluid containing the proppants for injection into crack formations. More
typically, the proppants are characterized by a Krumbein sphericity of about
0.7
or greater. Still more typically, the proppants have a Krumbein sphericity of
at
least about 0.8; yet more typically, the proppants have a Krumbein sphericity
of
at least about 0.9.
Typically, the propping agents have sufficient mechanical strength such that
80% of a sample may withstand crushing forces of 7500 psi; more typically, at
least about 90% survive. Still more typically, the propping agents have
sufficient
mechanical strength such that 90% of a sample may withstand crushing forces of
8000 psi and/or 95% of the sample may withstand a crushing load of 7500 psi.
In other words, the proppants are typically characterized by a 20% crush at
7500
psi; more typically a 10% crush at 7500 psi; and still more typically by a 10
percent crush at 8000 psi and/or a 5% crush at 7500 psi..
Aluminosilicate ore blend from St. Louis, Missouri having the following
analysis by weight after ignition at 800 degrees Celsius: 5i02 - 57%; A1203 -
35%;
9

CA 02949072 2016-11-14
WO 2015/175172
PCT/US2015/026833
TiO2 - 1.8%; Fe203 - 3.5%; with the remainder being alkali and alkali-earth
metal
oxides. Green strength may be increased through the addition of starches,
swelling clay, KCI, NaOH, NH4CI, PVA, or other binders.
This material is generally formed through mixer granulation techniques to
yield a small, generally spherical pellet. The pellets are typically screened
and
extracted and sized in target, oversized and undersized fractions or ranges.
The
oversized fractions may be ground down to size, such as in a grinding unit,
while
the undersized fractions may be recycled or extracted for other uses. The
remaining material at target size may be calcined to remove excess moisture
and
volatilize unwanted organics. The remaining material may then be formed into
any desired shapes and sizes, and/or merely sintered in a rotary kiln at a
temperature of between about 1285 and 1325 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes or
less. The sintered substantially spherical particles are characterized by a
substantially homogeneouos distribution of silica and alumina therethrough.
The
sintered particles are then subjected to a further sieving operation to
further
control the desired particle size.
In operation, sintered proppant particles of the above compositional range
are fluidically injected into precracked geological formations surrounding and
defining oil and/or gas wells. The proppants become positioned in the cracks
in
sufficiently high numbers and concentrations to wedge or prop the cracks open,
resisting geological forces arising that would otherwise urge the cracks shut.
The
proppants provide a propping layer that is sufficiently fluid
permeable/conductive
that fluids such as oil and/or gas may readily escape through the cracks and
be
extracted from the well.

CA 02949072 2016-11-14
WO 2015/175172
PCT/US2015/026833
Likewise, the proppants may be prepared and formed via any convenient
alternate aqueous process or any convenient dry or powder process.
Examples
Example 1:
A 20/40 mesh proppant sample was prepared and crush tested. The
composition of the proppant sample was analyzed via inductively coupled
plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy and was found to have the following
composition, expressed in oxide form:
A1203 35.61 wt.%
Si02 57.81 wt.%
Fe203 2.39 wt.%
1<20 1.71 wt.%
TiO2 2.00 wt.%
MgO 0.46 wt.%
CaO 0.30 wt.%
Sr02 0.06 wt.%
The specific gravity of the sample was measured to be 2.63 and the bulk
density
was measured to be 1.49. Portions of the sample were extracted for crush
testing
at various pressures. The crush test results are as follows:
Crush PSI Percentage Crushed
7500 3.8 0.3
10000 11.6 0.3
12500 26.6 0.4
15000 32.5 0.6
The sample had a crush at 7500 PSI of less than 5% and a crush at 10000 PSI of
about 10%.
11

CA 02949072 2016-11-14
WO 2015/175172
PCT/US2015/026833
Example 2:
The sample of Example 1 was subjected to roundness and sphericity
analysis. Roundness is essentially a measure of the degree of abrasion of
particles
and may be expressed as the ratio of the average radius of curvature of the
edges
or corners of a particle to the radius of curvature of the maximum inscribed
sphere. Sphericity, while similar in concept to roundness, is a measure of how
close in overall shape a particle is to a sphere, and may be taken as the
ratio of
the surface area of an idealized sphere to the surface area of a particle of
the same
volume. Sphericity is often visually measured, such as on the Krumbein scale.
Thus, since both roundness and sphericity are ratios against ideal cases, the
closer
the value to 1.0, the more round and/or spherical the particle. Twenty random
sample particles were measured both for roundness and sphericity. A measured
mean value of 0.8 0.1 was found for both sphericity and for roundness, while
the mode was 0.9 for both.
Example 3:
A 20/40 mesh proppant sample was prepared and crush tested. The
composition of the proppant sample was analyzed via inductively coupled
plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy and was found to have the following
composition, expressed in oxide form:
A1203 35.92 wt.%
Si02 57.04 wt.%
Fe203 2.72 wt.%
1<20 1.80 wt.%
TiO2 1.96 wt.%
MgO 0.47 wt.%
CaO 0.17 wt.%
Sr02 0.05 wt.%
12

CA 02949072 2016-11-14
WO 2015/175172
PCT/US2015/026833
The sample had a specific gravity of 2.63 and a bulk density of 1.49. The acid
solubility of the sample was measured to be 4.0% 0.0 in accordance with ISO
13503-2, section 8 procedures using 60% HF as a source.
While the claimed technology has been illustrated and described in detail
in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as
illustrative and not restrictive in character. It is understood that the
embodiments
have been shown and described in the foregoing specification in satisfaction
of
the best mode and enablement requirements. It is understood that one of
ordinary skill in the art could readily make a nigh-infinite number of
insubstantial
changes and modifications to the above-described embodiments and that it
would be impractical to attempt to describe all such embodiment variations in
the
present specification. Accordingly, it is understood that all changes and
modifications that come within the spirit of the claimed technology are
desired to
be protected.
13

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2949072 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2020-08-31
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2020-08-31
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-08-19
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-08-19
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-08-19
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-08-06
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-08-06
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-08-06
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-07-16
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-07-16
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-07-16
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-07-02
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-07-02
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-07-02
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-06-10
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-06-10
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-06-10
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-05-28
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-05-28
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-05-28
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-05-14
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-05-14
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-05-14
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-04-28
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-04-28
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-04-28
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-03-29
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-03-29
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-03-29
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2019-04-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2017-02-24
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2017-02-24
Inactive: IPC assigned 2017-02-24
Inactive: IPC removed 2017-02-24
Inactive: Cover page published 2016-12-15
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2016-11-25
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2016-11-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-11-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-11-23
Application Received - PCT 2016-11-23
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2016-11-14
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2015-11-19

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2019-04-23

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2018-04-19

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2016-11-14
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2017-04-21 2017-04-13
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2018-04-23 2018-04-19
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SHAMROCK GROUP
Past Owners on Record
CHRIS HELLER
FRANK O'BRIEN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2016-11-14 13 383
Claims 2016-11-14 6 115
Abstract 2016-11-14 1 50
Cover Page 2016-12-15 1 28
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2016-12-22 1 111
Notice of National Entry 2016-11-25 1 192
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2019-06-04 1 175
National entry request 2016-11-14 4 110
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) 2016-11-14 1 20
International search report 2016-11-14 6 275