Language selection

Search

Patent 2952063 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2952063
(54) English Title: METHODS OF MANUFACTURING SILICON BLADES FOR SHAVING RAZORS
(54) French Title: PROCEDES DE FABRICATION DE LAMES DE SILICIUM POUR RASOIRS
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B26B 21/58 (2006.01)
  • B32B 37/00 (2006.01)
  • B32B 38/10 (2006.01)
  • B32B 38/18 (2006.01)
  • C30B 29/06 (2006.01)
  • C30B 33/08 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SIMMS, GRAHAM JOHN (United Kingdom)
  • LEUSSINK, PETER JOHANNUS
  • SONNENBERG, NEVILLE (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • THE GILLETTE COMPANY LLC
(71) Applicants :
  • THE GILLETTE COMPANY LLC (United States of America)
(74) Agent: MBM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGENCY
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2015-06-16
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2015-12-23
Examination requested: 2016-12-12
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2015/035910
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2015195591
(85) National Entry: 2016-12-12

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
14/306,702 (United States of America) 2014-06-17

Abstracts

English Abstract

Methods are provided for the manufacture of razor blades from silicon material. In some implementations, the method includes aligning a mono-crystalline silicon wafer comprising a {100} surface at an angle where {111} planes intersect the {100} surface parallel and perpendicular to the wafer; etching the mono-crystalline silicon wafer to expose an {111} plane and a second plane to provide a blade edge having between about a 20 degree included blade angle and about a 35 degree included blade angle; applying a hard coating on the blade edge; providing a radius of curvature of the blade edge between about 20 nanometers and about 100 nanometers after deposition of the hard coating; applying a soft coating on the blade edge; and removing the razor blade from the mono-crystalline silicon wafer.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne des procédés pour la fabrication de lames de rasoir à partir d'un matériau à base de silicium. Dans certains modes de réalisation, le procédé consiste à aligner une tranche de silicium monocristallin comprenant une surface {100} à un angle où des plans {111} coupent la surface {100} parallèlement et perpendiculairement à la tranche ; à graver la tranche de silicium monocristallin pour faire apparaître un plan {111} et un deuxième plan en vue d'obtenir un bord de lame présentant un angle de lame entre environ 20 degrés inclus et environ 35 degrés inclus ; à appliquer un revêtement dur sur le bord de lame ; à conférer un rayon de courbure au bord de lame entre environ 20 nanomètres et environ 100 nanomètres après le dépôt du revêtement dur ; à appliquer un revêtement souple sur le bord de lame ; et à enlever la lame de rasoir de la tranche de silicium monocristallin.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
What is claimed is:
1. A method for manufacturing at least one razor blade comprising:
aligning a mono-crystalline silicon wafer comprising a {100} surface at an
angle where
{111} planes intersect the (100} surface parallel and perpendicular to the
wafer;
etching the mono-crystalline silicon wafer to expose an (111 } plane and a
second plane to
provide at least one blade edge having between about a 19.5 degree included
blade angle and
about a 35.3 degree included blade angle;
applying at least one inner layer on the at least one blade edge;
providing a radius of curvature of the at least one blade edge between about
20
nanometers and about 100 nanometers after deposition of the at least one inner
layer;
applying at least one outer layer on the at least one blade edge; and
removing the at least one razor blade from the mono-crystalline silicon wafer.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the second plane is a {110} plane or a
(552) plane.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising applying a masking layer to the
mono-crystalline
silicon wafer prior to the aligning step.
4. The method of claim 3, further comprising patterning the masking layer to
define a profile of
the at least one razor blade.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one inner layer comprises
diamond, diamond-like
carbon, amorphous diamond, boron nitride, niobium nitride, silicon nitride,
chromium nitride,
zirconium nitride, titanium nitride, silicon carbide, alumina, zirconia, or
any combination
thereof and wherein the at least one outer layer comprises
polytetrafluoroethylene.
6. The method of claim 3 or 4, further comprising removing the masking layer
before applying
the at least one inner layer.
7. The method of claim 3 or 4, further comprising applying a second masking
layer before
applying the at least one outer layer.
12

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one inner layer is applied
after removing the at
least one razor blade from the silicon wafer.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one inner layer is applied
before removing the at
least one razor blade from the silicon wafer, wherein the at least one inner
layer is first
applied to a first side of the at least one razor blade and then applied to a
second side of the at
least one razor blade opposite the first side.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein a variation in a surface roughness of the
at least one razor
blade is between about 100 nanometer to 200 nanometers.
11. The method of claim 1, further comprising forming at least one blade box
on the silicon
wafer, each comprising a plurality of razor blades and a perimeter encasing
the plurality of
razor blades.
12. The method of claim 1, further comprising disposing the at least one razor
blade in a razor
cartridge housing.
13. The method of claim 11, further comprising disposing the at least one
blade box in a razor
cartridge.
14. A razor blade formed using the method of claim 1.
15. A razor cartridge formed using the method of claim 1.
13

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02952063 2016-12-12
WO 2015/195591 PCT/US2015/035910
METHODS OF MANUFACTURING SILICON BLADES FOR SHAVING RAZORS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to methods of manufacturing blades for shaving razors,
and more
particularly to manufacturing blades for shaving razors from silicon.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Razor blades are typically formed of a suitable metallic sheet material such
as stainless
steel, which is slit to a desired width and heat-treated to harden the metal.
The hardening
operation utilizes a high temperature furnace, where the metal may be exposed
to temperatures
greater than 1145 C for up to about 20 seconds, followed by quenching,
whereby the metal is
rapidly cooled to obtain certain desired material properties.
After hardening, a cutting edge is formed on the blade. The cutting edge
typically has a
wedge-shaped configuration with an ultimate tip having a radius less than
about 1000 angstroms,
e.g., about 200-300 angstroms. However, blade edge radii can range from 300
angstroms to
10,000 angstroms due to inherent limitations in the manufacture process using
metallic sheet
material.
The advantage of this prior method is that it is a proven, economical process
for making
blades in high volume at high speed. However, it is ever desirable to find
processes that can
further reduce edge quality variability in order to achieve improved sharpness
consistency, and
can form blade edges of increased strength that will result in a lower force
required to trim hair,
thereby improving comfort during shaving. It would be particularly desirable
if such a process
could utilize lower cost materials for blade formation.
Therefore, there is a need for a lower cost method of making blades for
shaving razors
having increased edge strength and less variability in edge sharpness to
provide an improved
shaving experience.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a simple, efficient method for producing razor
blades from
a silicon wafer. Moreover, some methods are suitable for producing blade boxes
comprising a
1

CA 02952063 2016-12-12
WO 2015/195591 PCT/US2015/035910
plurality of razor blades formed in a single silicon wafer to be disposed as a
single unit in a razor
cartridge.
In one aspect, the method includes aligning a mono-crystalline silicon wafer
comprising a
1100) surface at an angle where {1 11) planes intersect the {100 ) surface
parallel and
perpendicular to the wafer. The wafer undergoes etching to expose an ( 1 1 1 )
plane and a second
plane to provide a blade edge having between about a 20 degree included blade
angle and about a
35 degree included blade angle. A hard coating is applied on the blade edge
providing a radius
of curvature of the blade edge between about 20 nanometers and about 100
nanometers after
deposition of the hard coating. A soft coating is then applied on the blade
edge. The razor blade
is removed from the mono-crystalline silicon wafer. The second plane can be
the {110} plane, or
it can be the 1552) plane.
In some aspects, a masking layer can be applied to the mono-crystalline
silicon wafer.
The masking layer can be patterned to define the blade angle profile of the
razor blade. The
masking layer can be removed before applying the hard coating. The hard
coating can comprise
diamond, diamond-like carbon, amorphous diamond, boron nitride, niobium
nitride, silicon
nitride, chromium nitride, zirconium nitride, titanium nitride, silicon
carbide, alumina, zirconia,
or any combination thereof. A second masking layer can be applied to the wafer
before applying
the soft coating. The soft coating can comprise polytetrafluoroethylerte. The
hard coating can be
applied before removing the razor blade from the silicon wafer.
In other aspects, the razor blade is formed into a blade box comprising a
plurality of razor
blades on the silicon wafer. The blade box can have a rectangular perimeter
enclosing the
plurality of razor blades.
In still other aspects, the razor blade can be disposed in a razor cartridge
housing or, the
entire blade box can be disposed in a razor cartridge.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the
accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and
advantages of
the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the
claims.
2

CA 02952063 2016-12-12
WO 2015/195591 PCT/US2015/035910
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG la is a perspective view of a silicon razor blade according to one
embodiment of the
present invention.
FIG. lb is a side view of the silicon razor blade of FIG. la.
FIG 2a is a perspective view of a silicon razor blade according to another
embodiment of
the present invention.
FIG. 2b is a side view of the silicon razor blade of FIG 2a.
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a monocrystalline silicon wafer according to
one
embodiment of the present invention.
FIG 4 is a flow diagram of a method of manufacturing razor blades from
silicon,
according to one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a silicon wafer having a plurality of razor
blades formed
therein according to one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a razor cartridge having silicon razor blades,
according to
one embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The methods of the present disclosure provide for the manufacture of blades
for shaving
devices or razors. Specifically, disclosed are methods for manufacturing razor
blades for shaving
devices from silicon material. Accordingly, the razor blades are fabricated on
a standard mono-
crystalline silicon wafer with top and bottom surfaces using semiconductor
industry etching
techniques.
In FIGS. I a and lb, there are shown two views of a razor blade 10,
manufactured in
accordance with the methods of manufacturing described herein. As shown in
FIG. la, the razor
blade 10 includes a silicon body portion or substrate 12 with a wedge-shaped
sharp edge having a
tip 14. The tip 14 has a blade edge 13 having about a 35.3 degree included
blade angle 15, as
shown in FIG. lb. Facets 16 and 18 diverge from the tip 14. The blade angle of
tip 14 is
determined by the intersection of the {110) and {1111 planes. The facet 16
comprises the
surface of the {111} plane, while the facet 18 comprises the 110) plane
surface.
Turning now to FIGS. 2a and 2b, there are shown two views of a razor blade 20,
manufactured in accordance with the methods of manufacturing described herein.
As shown in
3

CA 02952063 2016-12-12
WO 2015/195591 PCT/US2015/035910
FIG 2a, the razor blade 20 includes a silicon body portion or substrate 22
with a wedge-shaped
sharp edge having a tip 24. The tip 24 has a blade edge 23 of about a 19.5
degree included blade
angle 25, as shown in FIG. 2b. Facets 26 and 28 diverge from the tip 24. The
blade angle of tip
24 is determined by the intersection of the {552} and { 1 1 1 ) planes. The
facet 26 comprises the
surface of the {111) plane, while the facet 28 comprises the surface of the
{552} plane.
Manufacturing the razor blades of FIGS. la-2b includes aligning a mono-
crystalline
silicon wafer comprising a 1100) surface at an angle where {111} planes
intersect the 1100)
surface parallel and perpendicular to the wafer. The silicon wafer is etched
between two planes
to provide a blade edge having the appropriate blade angle. A hard coating is
applied to the blade
edge, wherein a radius of curvature of the blade edge is between about 20
nanometers and about
100 nanometers after deposition of the hard coating. A soft coating is also
applied to the blade
edge. The silicon razor blade is then removed from the mono-crystalline
silicon wafer.
The silicon razor blades described herein can be made using physical etching
techniques
for forming ultra-fine three-dimensional silicon structures that are well
known in the
semiconductor industry, such as wet etching (e.g., chemical solution), dry
etching (e.g., ion-
beam), or a combination thereof
In general, mono-crystalline silicon wafers are known to have a long-range
order in
atomic arrangement, and also a long-range order in direction dependency of
bonding between
atoms (e.g., covalent bonding between silicon atoms). Therefore, an
intersection between crystal
planes is maintained over the long range. By using this intersection as a
cutting edge, the present
invention makes it possible to form a razor blade with an ultra-fine cutting
edge using the above-
described silicon micromachining techniques. The base silicon material for
formation of the
razor blades is a single crystal silicon with the preferred crystal
orientation defined herein.
However, other orientations of mono-crystalline silicon are suitable, as is
poly-crystalline silicon.
To aid in understanding, FIG 3 illustrates an embodiment of a standard
monocrystalline
silicon wafer 300 having a top surface 302 and a bottom surface 304, both a
{1001 surface, and
showing a partial portion of the cubic lattice 306. When wafer 300 is oriented
parallel to a <110>
orientation, a masking layer can be applied such that the top surface 302 can
be subjected to
chemical etching, whereby an inclined plane 308, in this embodiment a 11111
plane, is formed
4

CA 02952063 2016-12-12
WO 2015/195591 PCT/US2015/035910
(i.e., revealed). In the embodiment of FIG. 3, the wafer 300 is orientated to
a <0 -1 1>
orientation, but it is understood that the orientation can be in any {110}
plane direction.
Likewise, the inclined plane 308 revealed by the etching is the (1 -1 -1)
plane, but it is also
understood that any {111) plane can be revealed in a <110> direction.
Referring now to FIG. 4, a flow diagram of a method of manufacturing razor
blades from
silicon according to one embodiment is illustrated. A mono-crystalline silicon
wafer is
preferably selected as the substrate in which to form the razor blades, as
shown in step 400.
There is no limitation with respect to thickness of the silicon wafer used to
form the razor blades.
Therefore, when the rigidity of the razor blade is needed, a relatively thick
wafer can be used.
On the other hand, a relatively thin silicon wafer (e.g., about 350
micrometers) may be used to
form razor blades suitable for close shaving. The silicon wafer can be secured
to a mounting
assembly, if desired.
In step 410, a masking layer is applied to the top and bottom surfaces of the
silicon wafer
(e.g., surfaces 302 and 304 of Fig. 3). The masking layer can be applied to
each of the top and
bottom surfaces independently, or to both surfaces simultaneously. The masking
layer can be
applied using any number of thin film deposition processes, such as chemical
vapor deposition
(CVD), electrodeposition, physical vapor deposition (PVD), spin coating,
spraying, painting, and
the like. In one embodiment, the masking layer step 410 is performed by low
pressure CVD of
silicon nitride. However, other possible masking layers are envisioned that
possess a high
selectivity relative to the silicon wafer substrate material, such as silicon
oxide, chromium gold,
and the like. The masking layer can have a thickness of about 200 nanometers
to about 500
nanometers.
The crystal alignment of the silicon wafer is determined in step 420, so that
the desired
planes of the silicon wafer are identified. For the razor blades embodied in
FIGS. la-2b, the
orientation of the intersecting line of the {111} plane surface and the
silicon wafer surface (top or
bottom) is determined. To find the orientation of the intersecting line,
several known methods
can be used. One alignment method is the Vangbo alignment, and it is based on
the technique
disclosed in the article "Precise mask alignment to the cyystallographic
orientation of silicon
wafers using wet anisotropic etching," M. Vangbo and Y Backlund, J. Micromech,
Microeng, 6
(1996), pp. 279-284 (describing a technique using fork structures to align the
masking layer).
5

CA 02952063 2016-12-12
WO 2015/195591 PCT/US2015/035910
The Vangbo alignment method is based on the symmetry of the silicon wafer
surface to that of
the {111) planes. This technique can be useful, because the orientation of the
intersection line
between, for example, the { 1 1 1 ) plane and the {552} plane cannot be seen
directly (i.e.,
optically) from the wafer surface. Additionally, the orientation will vary
from wafer batch to
wafer batch and even within a single wafer batch from wafer to wafer, because
of the differences
during dicing and polishing of the wafers. Further, although wafers used in
common
microelectromechanical systems fabrication tend to have symmetrical planes,
the silicon wafers
used as described herein to form blade edges suitable for shaving (e.g., 19.5-
degree included
angle), generally have asymmetrical planes. Other methods for aligning both
sides of the wafer
to form the blade edge in the masking layer can also be used, such as X-ray
diffraction
techniques, which utilize Bragg diffraction, or the utilization of terraces
formed with {111)
planes.
A double-sided alignment is then used in step 430 to define the blade edges in
the
masking layer, as the silicon wafer will generally be etched from both the top
and bottom
surfaces to form the final blade edge. In order to properly form the blade
edges, it is important to
precisely align the masking layer to the crystal planes of the silicon wafer.
To create sharp and
straight blade edges in the shortest time possible, the mask edge must be as
close to parallel as
possible to the intersection line of the {Ill) plane and the wafer surface.
Once the wafer is aligned to define the blade edge(s), the masking layer can
be patterned
for the desired razor blade shape. The mask is patterned in step 440 through
known etching
techniques, such as reactive ion etching, whereby the mask is removed from the
substrate surface
in the desired areas, thereby revealing the silicon wafer substrate in those
areas.
To begin forming the razor blade shape, such as the above-described facets and
the like, a
conventional masked anisotropic etching process using the specifically
patterned masking layer
is used in step 150. The mono-crystalline silicon wafer is immersed in etching
fluid, which is
controlled for concentration and temperature. After a predetermined length of
time has elapsed,
the wafer is removed from immersion. During the anisotropic etching step 450,
etching is
performed from the portions of the silicon that are not covered by the masking
layer on the wafer,
thereby revealing the {111} plane along the mask pattern. In the peripheral
portions of the
masking layer, an inclined surface is thereby formed that slopes in relation
to the top and bottom
6

CA 02952063 2016-12-12
WO 2015/195591 PCT/US2015/035910
surfaces of the single-crystal silicon wafer, and etching progresses.
Ultimately, inclined surfaces
(e.g., facets 16 and 18 in Fig. la) forming from the top surface and bottom
surface of the silicon
wafer are formed through etching the substrate and ultimately meet to form the
blade edge.
Chemical etching is a well-known process for removing silicon from a mono-
crystalline
silicon wafer in a uniform manner. For example, the profile on the top surface
of the wafer can
be uniformly brought down to intersect with the profile on the opposing bottom
surface and form
the razor blade shape. Chemical etching is used in order to achieve the
desired blade sharpness
while preserving the included blade angle. The bottom surface etch can be done
simultaneously
with the top surface etch or it can be done separately. Chemical etchant
composition,
temperature, agitation and duration should be controlled to achieve desired
results. Anisotropic
or "orientation-dependent" etchants may etch much faster in one direction than
in another. In
potassium hydroxide (KOH), for example, etch rate of OW planes is relatively
slow compared
to all other crystal planes of silicon. In general, the slowest etching planes
are exposed as the
etch progresses. It is known that etching inside corners in {100} silicon
surfaces stops at
intersecting {111) planes. For example, if an opening in an etch mask forms a
rectangle, an
anisotropic etching agent will etch down exposing {111} planes to form a V-
type groove with
respect to two opposing sides. When conducted on both sides of the wafer and
with various
etchants, temperatures, and time constraints, razor blade edges can be formed
in the wafer. In
one embodiment, the silicon wafer undergoes anisotropic etching at step 450
with the KOH
etching agent. For example, the wafer can be submersed in a 25 percent by
weight KOH solution
in water at a temperature of about 70 degrees Celsius. Other combinations and
concentrations
can be used to achieve the same purpose. For example, other possible
anisotropic etching agents
are tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH), hydrazine, an aqueous solution of
ethylene
diamine and pyrocatechol (EDP), and the like.
In one embodiment, an ulstrasonic bath is used for the anisotropic chemical
etching step
450. The ultrasonic bath helps to reduce the adherence of hydrogen, formed
during etching, to
the silicon surface.
After completion of the etching, the mask is removed in step 460 from the
silicon wafer
surfaces. For a silicon nitride masking layer, hydrogen fluoride solution can
be used to remove
the masking layer. Other masking materials can be removed with different
etching agents. For
7

CA 02952063 2016-12-12
WO 2015/195591 PCT/US2015/035910
example, chromium gold masking layers can be removed with potassium iodide
(KI), perchloric
acid, and cerium ammonium nitrate.
An inner layer, such as a hard coating, can then be applied to the surfaces of
the razor
blade. The inner layer step 470 can be conducted while the razor blade remains
attached to the
silicon wafer, or the inner layering step 470 can be done upon separation of
the razor blade from
the wafer. When the inner layer is a hard coating layer disposed on at least
the blade edge of the
razor blade, it can provide improved strength, improved corrosion resistance
and improved
shaving ability. The hard coating layer can be made from fine-, micro-, or
nano-crystalline
carbon-containing materials (e.g., diamond, amorphous diamond or diamond like
carbon (DLC)),
nitrides (e.g., boron nitride, niobium nitride, silicon nitride, chromium
nitride, zirconium nitride,
or titanium nitride), carbides (e.g., silicon carbide), oxides (e.g., alumina,
zirconia) or other
ceramic materials (including nanolayers or nanocomposites). The carbon
containing materials
can be doped with other elements, such as tungsten, titanium, silver, or
chromium by including
these additives, for example in the target during application by sputtering.
The materials can also
incorporate hydrogen, e.g., hydrogenated DLC. In one embodiment, the hard
coating layer
disposed on the silicon razor blade is made of silicon nitride. In another
embodiment, the hard
coating layer disposed on the silicon razor blade is made of DLC. The hard
coating layer can
have a thickness of less than about 3,000 angstroms; specifically from about
500 angstroms to
about 1,500 angstroms. The hard coating layer is applied to the blade edge
wherein a radius of
curvature of the blade edge is between about 20 nanometers and about 1000
nanometers after
application. Radius of curvature, also known as edge radius or cutting radius,
is the radius of the
sharpened edge that cuts the facial hair. A smaller radius of curvature
generally correlates to a
sharper blade. In one embodiment, the silicon razor blade has a radius of
curvature between
about 50 nanometers and about 150 nanometers.
Methods of depositing the inner hard coating layer can include, well known
methods such
as, plasma chemical vapor deposition (PCVD), plasma-enhanced chemical vapor
deposition
(PECVD), and the like. Depending upon the hard coating material and method of
deposition
chosen, each side of the razor blade can be coated simultaneously, or each
side can be coated
separately (e.g., the ( 1 1 1 ) blade facet coated first and the (552) blade
facet coated second). This
layer provides added strength.
8

CA 02952063 2016-12-12
WO 2015/195591 PCT/US2015/035910
An outer layer is applied on the inner hard coating layer of the silicon razor
blade in an
outer layer application step 480. The outer layer, also sometimes referred to
a soft coating layer,
is used to provide reduced friction during shaving. The outer layer may be a
polymer
composition or a modified polymer composition. The polymer composition may be
polyfluorocarbon. A suitable polyflourocarbon is polytetrafluoroethylene
(PTFE), sometimes
referred to as a telomer. This material is a nonflammable and stable dry
lubricant that consists of
small particles that yield stable dispersions. It may generally be furnished
as an aqueous
dispersion of about 20% solids by weight and can be applied by dipping,
spraying, or brushing,
and can thereafter be air dried or melt coated. The silicon razor blades may
be heated prior to
application of the outer layer. In one embodiment, the silicon razor blades
are heated to about
120 degrees Celsius before an aqueous dispersion of PTFE is spray coated
thereon. The outer
layer is preferably less than about 5,000 angstroms and could typically be
about 1,500 angstroms
to about 4,000 angstroms, and can be as thin as about 100 angstroms, provided
that a continuous
coating is maintained. Masks can be used during the outer layer application
step 480 to help
prevent non-cutting sides of the razor blades from being coated with the outer
layer. This can
improve the ability of the non-cutting sides of blades to then be attached to
a blade support, or
the like, in a razor cartridge. For example, some methods for attaching blades
use glue. Glue,
however, generally does not adhere well to some outer layer materials, such as
PTFE.
The silicon razor blade can be removed from the wafer, in step 490, by any
means
suitable for separating the blade from the wafer without damage to the blade,
particularly the fine
edges. The razor blade can be mechanically cut, such as with a saw, laser-cut,
water-cut,
snapped, and the like. Once five from the wafer substrate, the razor blade can
be assembled into
a razor cartridge, as is well-known in the razor art. For example, one or more
silicon razor blades
are adhered to blade supports and assembled into razor cartridge housings.
Once removed from
the wafer, the blades can then be assembled into a razor cartridge at step
492. For example, the
blades can be attached to blade supports, which can then be installed in a
razor cartridge housing.
An example of a razor cartridge housing 600 is illustrated in Fig. 6. The
razor cartridge 600
includes a plurality of silicon razor blades 602.
While the methods of manufacturing described herein have been referred to with
primary
reference to a single razor blade, the methods are easily applicable to the
manufacture of multiple
razor blades simultaneously. In FIG 5, a silicon wafer 200 having a plurality
of silicon razor
9

CA 02952063 2016-12-12
WO 2015/195591 PCT/US2015/035910
blades 202 produced in accordance with the methods described herein is
illustrated. Manufacture
of the silicon wafer 200 to produce the plurality of razor blades 202 includes
sequential surface
masking, patterning of the mask (e.g., photolithographically) and selective
material removal in
wet and/or dry etch chemistries. After batch manufacture of the plurality of
razor blades 202 on
the silicon wafer 200, the blades are separated by sawing, dicing, and the
like, and are ready for
further assembly into razor cartridges. Looking more closely at FIG. 5, the
plurality of razor
blades are clustered together in groups of five blades. The clusters have a
generally rectangular
shape and for ease in discussion are referred to herein as blade boxes 204.
The plurality of razor
blades 202 can be manufactured in this clustered organization to reduce
downstream process
steps in the shaving razor system assembly. The blade boxes 204 have 5
individual razor blades
202, as illustrated, enclosed by a perimeter 206. The blade boxes 204 can be
manufactured
identically, or they can be different, such as each box having differences in
blade spacing,
included blade angles, number of blades, orientation of the blades, and the
like. The differences
can be made via changes to the various method steps described above, such as
masking patterns,
and the like. A blade box 204 can be removed from the wafer 200 by sawing
around the
perimeter 206, such that the self-contained blade box 204 is a singular
unitary part. The blade
box could then be inserted into the housing of a razor cartridge. Assembling
the razor cartridge
in such a manner eliminates the difficult steps of affixing each individual
razor blade to a blade
support, inserting each blade support-razor blade pair in the razor cartridge
housing, and aligning
each separate razor blade to the desired blade height, angle, and spacing. By
utilizing the method
described herein, the plurality of razor blades are aligned and secured in the
blade box, thereby
eliminating the need to affix individual blade supports and the difficult
process of aligning 5
separate razor blades into the razor cartridge housing. While Fig. 5
illustrates blade boxes 204
having 5 razor blades, it is to be understood that any number of razor blades
can be clustered
together, such as 2, 3, 4, 5, or more.
It should further be noted that while the blades illustrated in the figures
have generally
linear blade edges, other blade shapes and edge patterns can be produced by
the methods
described herein.
One of the many advantages to producing razor blades for shaving from silicon
in the
manner described herein, is that blade edges formed have very little surface
roughness. The
peak-valley dimensional surface roughness for the razor blades are between
about 100

CA 02952063 2016-12-12
WO 2015/195591 PCT/US2015/035910
nanometers to about 200 nanometers. A very low surface roughness provides for
a more
comfortable shave and less skin irritation experienced by the user.
Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being
strictly
limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise
specified, each such
dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally
equivalent range
surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as "40 mm" is
intended to mean
"about 40 mm."
Every document cited herein, including any cross referenced or related patent
or
application, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety unless
expressly excluded
or otherwise limited. The citation of any document is not an admission that it
is prior art with
respect to any invention disclosed or claimed herein or that it alone, or in
any combination with
any other reference or references, teaches, suggests or discloses any such
invention. Further, to
the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this document conflicts
with any meaning
or definition of the same term in a document incorporated by reference, the
meaning or definition
assigned to that term in this document shall govern.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated
and
described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other
changes and
modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the
invention. It is
therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and
modifications that are
within the scope of this invention.
11

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2019-05-30
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2019-05-30
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2018-06-18
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2018-05-30
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2017-11-30
Inactive: Report - No QC 2017-11-27
Inactive: Cover page published 2017-01-30
Inactive: Office letter 2017-01-30
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2017-01-26
Inactive: IPC assigned 2017-01-25
Inactive: IPC assigned 2017-01-25
Inactive: IPC assigned 2017-01-25
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 2017-01-25
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry - RFE 2016-12-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-12-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-12-20
Application Received - PCT 2016-12-20
Letter Sent 2016-12-20
Letter Sent 2016-12-20
Letter Sent 2016-12-20
Letter Sent 2016-12-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 2016-12-20
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2016-12-12
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2016-12-12
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2016-12-12
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2015-12-23

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2018-06-18

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2016-12-12

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Request for examination - standard 2016-12-12
Registration of a document 2016-12-12
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2017-06-16 2016-12-12
Basic national fee - standard 2016-12-12
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
THE GILLETTE COMPANY LLC
Past Owners on Record
GRAHAM JOHN SIMMS
NEVILLE SONNENBERG
PETER JOHANNUS LEUSSINK
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2016-12-12 11 872
Drawings 2016-12-12 5 161
Representative drawing 2016-12-12 1 32
Claims 2016-12-12 2 96
Abstract 2016-12-12 2 80
Cover Page 2017-01-30 1 53
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2018-07-30 1 173
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2016-12-20 1 174
Notice of National Entry 2016-12-23 1 201
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2016-12-20 1 103
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2016-12-20 1 103
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2016-12-20 1 102
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2018-07-11 1 164
National entry request 2016-12-12 14 453
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) 2016-12-12 1 64
International search report 2016-12-12 3 98
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) 2016-12-12 1 41
Courtesy - Office Letter 2017-01-30 1 24
Examiner Requisition 2017-11-30 3 207