Language selection

Search

Patent 2972440 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2972440
(54) English Title: AGGREGATES OF DIAMOND WITH VITRIFIED BOND
(54) French Title: AGREGATS DE DIAMANT A LIAISON VITRIFIEE
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C09K 3/14 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • WANG, JIANNA (United States of America)
  • SCOVILLE, TIMOTHY E. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • SAINT-GOBAIN ABRASIVES, INC.
  • SAINT-GOBAIN ABRASIFS
(71) Applicants :
  • SAINT-GOBAIN ABRASIVES, INC. (United States of America)
  • SAINT-GOBAIN ABRASIFS (France)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2020-04-28
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2015-12-31
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2016-07-07
Examination requested: 2017-06-27
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2015/068258
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2016109786
(85) National Entry: 2017-06-27

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
62/099,006 (United States of America) 2014-12-31

Abstracts

English Abstract

The present disclosure relates to abrasive aggregates comprised of abrasive particles in a vitreous binder composition, and methods of making and using such abrasive aggregates, including in abrasive articles. The abrasive aggregates can include modifier particles. The abrasive aggregates can include a layer of outer particles on at least a portion of the outer surface of the abrasive aggregate.


French Abstract

La présente divulgation concerne des agrégats abrasifs constitués de particules abrasives dans une composition de liant vitreux, et des procédés de fabrication et d'utilisation desdits agrégats abrasifs, notamment dans des articles abrasifs. Les agrégats abrasifs peuvent comprendre des particules d'agent modificateur et peuvent également comprendre une couche de particules extérieures sur au moins une partie de la surface extérieure de l'agrégat abrasif.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
1. An abrasive aggregate comprising:
a vitreous binder composition; and
abrasive particles dispersed in the vitreous binder composition;
wherein the abrasive particles are diamonds, wherein the vitreous binder
composition has
a glass transition temperature (Tg) in a range of 490°C to 700
°C,
wherein the vitreous binder composition comprises not less than 1 wt% and not
greater
than 40 wt% of the weight of the abrasive aggregate,
wherein the abrasive particles comprise not less than 60 wt% and not greater
than 99 wt%
of the weight of the abrasive aggregate, and
wherein the abrasive aggregate has a loose packed density in a range of not
less than 0.5
g/cm3 to not greater than 3.5 g/cm3.
2. The abrasive aggregate of claim 1, further comprising one or more modifier
particles dispersed
in the vitreous binder composition.
3. The abrasive aggregate of claim 1 or 2, further comprising a layer of outer
particles disposed
on at least a portion of the outer surface of the abrasive aggregate.
4. The abrasive aggregate of any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the vitreous
binder composition
comprises not less than 1 wt% and not greater than 15 wt% of the weight of the
abrasive
aggregate.
5. The abrasive aggregate of claim 4, wherein the abrasive particles comprise
not less than 85
wt% and not greater than 99 wt% of the weight of the abrasive aggregate.
6. The aggregate of claim 2, wherein the one or more modifier particles
comprise not less than
0.5 wt% and not greater than 15 wt% of the weight of the abrasive aggregate.
- 27 -

7. The abrasive aggregate of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the abrasive
aggregate has a loose
packed density in a range of not less than 0.9 g/cm3 to not greater than 1.5
g/cm3.
8. The abrasive aggregate of any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the abrasive
aggregate has a
porosity in a range of 5% to 85% as measured by mercury porosimetry.
9. The abrasive aggregate of any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the diamonds
are in a size range
of not less than 1 micron and not greater than 2000 microns.
10. The abrasive aggregate of any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the abrasive
aggregate has a size
in a range of not less than 2 microns and not greater than 4000 microns.
11. The abrasive aggregate of any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the modifier
particles are
silicon carbide particles, cerium particles, alumina particles, or a
combination thereof.
12. The abrasive aggregate of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the vitreous
binder composition
has a sintering temperature (Ts) in a range of 550°C to 800 °C.
13. The abrasive aggregate of any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the vitreous
binder composition
comprises about 40 wt % to 65 wt% of acid oxides, about 15 wt% to 30 wt% of
amphoteric
oxides, and about 15 wt% to 25 wt% combined base oxides and neutral oxides.
14. A method of forming an abrasive aggregate comprising:
mixing together a plurality of abrasive particles and a vitreous binder
composition to
form a mixture;
shaping the mixture to form a plurality of abrasive aggregate precursor
granules; and
sintering the abrasive aggregate precursor granules to form a plurality of
abrasive
aggregates,
wherein the abrasive particles are diamonds, wherein the vitreous binder
composition has
a glass transition temperature (Tg) in a range of 490°C to 700
°C, wherein the vitreous binder
composition comprises not less than 1 wt% and not greater than 40 wt% of the
weight of the
- 28 -

abrasive aggregate, wherein the abrasive particles comprise not less than 60
wt% and not greater
than 99 wt% of the weight of the abrasive aggregate, and wherein the abrasive
aggregate has a
loose packed density in a range of not less than 0.5 g/cm3 to not greater than
3.5 g/cm3.
15. A nonwoven abrasive article comprising:
a nonwoven web; and
a binder disposed on the nonwoven web, and a plurality of abrasive aggregates
according
to any one of claims 1 to 13 that are disposed on or in the binder.
- 29 -

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


AGGREGATES OF DIAMOND WITH VITRIFIED BOND
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present disclosure relates to abrasive aggregates of diamond with a
vitrified bond,
and methods of making and using such abrasive aggregates, including in
abrasive articles.
Abrasive tools can use an abrasive to shape or finish a workpiece by wearing
away,
such as through rubbing or grinding, a portion of the material forming the
workpiece. The
abrasive can include abrasive grains contained within a bond material. The
abrasive grains
can include superabrasive grains (e.g., diamond) to provide superior grinding
performance on
a variety of materials. There exists a need for an improved abrasive or
abrasive tool
including superabrasive grains.
Abrasive products, such as coated abrasives, bonded abrasives, nonwoven
abrasives
and loose abrasives are used in various industries to abrade work pieces, such
as by lapping,
grinding, or polishing. Surface processing using abrasive products spans a
wide industrial
scope from initial coarse material removal to high precision finishing and
polishing of
surfaces at a submicron level. Effective and efficient surface processing of
extremely hard
surfaces, such as metal surfaces, ceramic surfaces, and cermet hybrid surfaces
poses
numerous challenges, including how to achieve high material removal rates.
Therefore, the
industry continues to demand further improved abrasive products.
SUMMARY
In accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure there is provided an
abrasive
aggregate comprising: a vitreous binder composition and abrasive particles
dispersed in the
vitreous binder composition, wherein the abrasive particles are diamonds
wherein the
vitreous binder composition has a glass transition temperature (Tg) in a range
of 490 C to
700 C, wherein the vitreous binder composition comprises not less than I wt%
and not
greater than 40 wt% of the weight of the abrasive aggregate, wherein the
abrasive particles
comprise not less than 60 wt% and not greater than 99 wt% of the weight of the
abrasive
aggregate, and wherein the abrasive aggregate has a loose packed density in a
range of not
less than 0.5 g/cm3to not greater than 3.5 &in'.
In accordance with another aspect of the present disclosure there is provided
a method
of forming an abrasive aggregate comprising: mixing together a plurality of
abrasive particles
and a vitreous binder composition to form a mixture; shaping the mixture to
form a plurality
of abrasive aggregate precursor granules; and sintering the abrasive aggregate
precursor
granules to form a plurality of abrasive aggregates, wherein the abrasive
particles are
- I -
CA 2972440 2018-12-19

diamonds, wherein the vitreous binder composition has a glass transition
temperature (Tg) in
a range of 490 C to 700 C, wherein the vitreous binder composition comprises
not less than
1 wt% and not greater than 40 wt% of the weight of the abrasive aggregate,
wherein the
abrasive particles comprise not less than 60 wt% and not greater than 99 wt%
of the weight
of the abrasive aggregate, and wherein the abrasive aggregate has a loose
packed density in a
range of not less than 0.5 g/cm3 to not greater than 3.5 g/cm3.
In accordance with still yet another aspect of the present disclosure there is
provided a
nonwoven abrasive article comprising: a nonwoven web; a binder disposed on the
nonwoven
web, and a plurality of abrasive aggregates that are disposed on or in the
binder.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Embodiments are illustrated by way of example and are not limited in the
accompanying figures.
FIG. 1 is an illustration of an embodiment of an abrasive aggregate comprising
diamond abrasive particles and a vitreous binder composition.
FIG. 2 is an illustration of an embodiment of an abrasive aggregate comprising
diamond abrasive particles, modifier particles, pores, and a vitreous binder
composition.
FIG. 3 is an illustration of an embodiment of an abrasive aggregate comprising
diamond abrasive particles, a vitreous bond, and a layer of silicon carbide
particles disposed
on the outer surface of the abrasive aggregate.
FIG. 4 is a process flow diagram of an embodiment of a method of making an
abrasive aggregate.
FIG. 5 is a photograph of bars of abrasive aggregate material formed according
to an
embodiment.
FIG. 6A is an image of abrasive aggregates according to an embodiment.
- la -
CA 2972440 2018-12-19

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786
PCMJS2015/068258
FIG. 6B is a cross section image of the abrasive aggregates shown in FIG. 6A.
FIG. 7A is an image of abrasive aggregates according to an embodiment.
FIG. 7B is a cross section image of the abrasive aggregates shown in FIG. 7A.
FIG. 8A is an image of abrasive aggregates according to an embodiment.
FIG. 8B is a cross section image of the abrasive aggregates shown in FIG. 8A.
FIG. 9 is an image of abrasive aggregates according to an embodiment.
FIG. 10 is an image of abrasive aggregates according to an embodiment.
FIG. 11 is an image of abrasive aggregates according to an embodiment.
FIG. 12 is a graph comparing abrasive performance of a nonwoven wheel that
includes inventive abrasive aggregates according to an embodiment to abrasive
performance
of nonwoven wheels that include conventional diamonds.
FIG. 13A is an image of abrasive aggregates according to an embodiment.
FIG. 13B is a cross section image of the abrasive aggregates shown in FIG.
13A.
FIG. 14A is an image of abrasive aggregates according to an embodiment.
FIG. 14B is a cross section image of the abrasive aggregates shown in FIG.
14A.
FIG. 15 is an image of a mixture according to an embodiment of abrasive
particles,
vitreous binder composition, and aqueous organic binder.
FIG. 16 is an image of abrasive aggregate precursor granules according to an
embodiment formed from the mixture shown in FIG. 15.
FIG. 17 is an image of abrasive aggregates according to an embodiment formed
from
the abrasive aggregate precursor granules shown in FIG. 16.
FIG. 18 is a cross section image of the abrasive aggregates shown in FIG. 17.
FIG. 19 is a graph comparing abrasive performance of conventional nonwoven
grinding wheels that include loose diamond to inventive nonwoven grinding
wheels that
.. include abrasive aggregates embodiments shown in FIG. 17.
FIG. 20 is a photograph showing an inventive nonwoven abrasive wheel set up to
conduct 90 Degree Angle testing that includes the inventive abrasive
aggregates shown in
FIG. 17.
Skilled artisans appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for
simplicity
and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the
dimensions of
some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other
elements to help to
improve understanding of embodiments of the invention.
- 2 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786 PCMJS2015/068258
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The following description in combination with the figures is provided to
assist in
understanding the teachings disclosed herein. The following discussion will
focus on specific
implementations and embodiments of the teachings. This focus is provided to
assist in
.. describing the teachings and should not be interpreted as a limitation on
the scope or
applicability of the teachings. However, other embodiments can be used based
on the
teachings as disclosed in this application.
The terms "comprises," "comprising," "includes," "including," "has," "having"
or any
other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For
example, a
method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of features is not
necessarily limited only to
those features but may include other features not expressly listed or inherent
to such method,
article, or apparatus. Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, "or"
refers to an
inclusive-or and not to an exclusive-or. For example, a condition A or B is
satisfied by any
one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present),
A is false (or not
present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).
Also, the use of "a" or -an" is employed to describe elements and components
described herein. This is done merely for convenience and to give a general
sense of the
scope of the invention. This description should be read to include one, at
least one, or the
singular as also including the plural, or vice versa, unless it is clear that
it is meant otherwise.
For example, when a single item is described herein, more than one item may be
used in
place of a single item. Similarly, where more than one item is described
herein, a single item
may be substituted for that more than one item.
As used herein, the term "aggregate" may be used to refer to a particle made
of a
plurality of smaller particles that have been combined in such a manner that
it is relatively
.. difficult to separate or disintegrate the aggregate particle into smaller
particles by the
application of pressure or agitation. This is in contrast to the term
"agglomerate," which is
used herein to refer to a particle made up of a plurality of smaller particles
that have been
combined in such a manner that it is relatively easy to separate the
agglomerate particle or
disintegrate the agglomerate particle back into smaller particles, such as by
the application of
.. pressure or hand agitation.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have
the same
meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which
this invention
belongs. The materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not
intended to be
limiting. To the extent not described herein, many details regarding specific
materials and
- 3 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786
PCMJS2015/068258
processing acts are conventional and may be found in textbooks and other
sources within the
abrasive arts.
FIG. 1 shows an illustration of a cross section of an abrasive aggregate 100
comprising a vitreous binder composition 101 and abrasive particles 103
dispersed in the
vitreous binder composition, wherein the abrasive particles are diamonds.
FIG. 2 shows an illustration of a cross section of an abrasive aggregate 200
comprising a vitreous binder composition 201 having abrasive particles 203,
modifier
particles 205, and pores 207 dispersed in the vitreous binder composition,
wherein the
abrasive particles are diamonds.
FIG. 3 shows an illustration of a cross section of an abrasive aggregate 300
comprising a vitreous binder composition 301 having abrasive particles 303
dispersed in the
vitreous binder composition, wherein the abrasive particles are diamonds. A
layer of carbide
particles 309, such as silicon carbide particles, is disposed on at least a
portion of the outer
surface of the aggregate. In certain embodiments, the entire outer surface of
the abrasive
aggregate is covered with carbide particles.
FIG. 4 shows a process flow diagram of an embodiment of a method 400 of making
an abrasive aggregate. Step 402 includes mixing together a plurality of
abrasive particles and
a vitreous binder composition to form a mixture, wherein the abrasive
particles are diamonds.
Step 406 includes shaping the mixture to form a plurality of abrasive
aggregate precursor
granules. Step 410 includes sintering the abrasive aggregate precursor
granules to form a
plurality of abrasive aggregates. Optionally, step 402 includes mixing one or
more modifier
particles together with the abrasive particles and the vitreous binder
composition to form the
mixture prior to shaping the mixture. Optionally, step 408 includes coating
the aggregate
precursor granules with carbide particles prior to sintering the aggregate
precursor granules.
Optionally, step 412 includes classifying the abrasive aggregates after
sintering.
Abrasive Aggregates
An abrasive aggregate comprises a vitreous binder composition and abrasive
particles
dispersed in the vitreous binder composition, wherein the abrasive particles
are diamonds. In
an embodiment, the abrasive aggregate can further comprise one or more
modifier particles
dispersed in the vitreous binder composition. In another embodiment, the
abrasive aggregate
can further comprise a layer of carbide particles disposed on at least a
portion of the outer
surface of the abrasive aggregate.
Abrasive Particles
- 4 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786 PCMJS2015/068258
The abrasive particles can be diamond particles (also referred to herein as
"diamonds"), cubic boron nitride particles, or combinations thereof. In an
embodiment, the
abrasive particles are diamonds. The diamonds can be monocrystalline,
polycrystalline, or a
combination thereof. The diamonds can be natural diamonds, synthetic diamonds,
metal
coated diamonds, resin coated diamonds, or combinations thereof. The diamonds
can be in a
particular size range, conform to a particular size distribution, or a
combination thereof. In an
embodiment, the diamonds are in a size range of not less than 1 micron and not
greater than
2000 microns. In a particular embodiment, the diamonds are in a size range
from 100 to 130
microns, such as from 105 to 125 microns.
Modifier Particles
If desired, the abrasive aggregate can comprise one or more modifier
particles. In a
particular embodiment, the abrasive aggregate does not include modifier
particles. In another
embodiment, the abrasive aggregate does include one or more modifier
particles. The
modifier particles can be the same or different. When included, the modifier
particles are
dispersed within the vitreous bond composition along with the abrasive
particles and can
affect certain physical and abrasive performance properties of the abrasive
aggregate. In an
embodiment, the modifier particles can be silicon carbide particles, cerium
particles, alumina
particles, or a combination thereof. The modifier particles can be in a
particular size range,
conform to a particular size distribution, or a combination thereof. In an
embodiment, the
size range of modifying particles can be in a range from 0.1 to 15% of the
abrasive particle
size. In an embodiment, the modifier particles arc in a size range of not less
than 0.5 microns
and not greater than 100 microns. In an embodiment, the modifier particles
include silicon
carbide particles in a size range of not less than 1 micron and not greater
than 100 microns.
In another embodiment, the modifier particles include cerium particles in a
size range of not
less than 1 micron and not greater than 100 microns. In another embodiment,
the modifier
particles include aluminum oxide particles in a size range of not less than 1
micron and not
greater than 100 microns.
Vitreous Binder Composition
The abrasive aggregate includes a vitreous binder composition (also referred
to herein
as a glass binder composition, glass bond composition, or glass bond). The
vitreous binder
composition is a glass composition that can comprise acidic oxides, amphoteric
oxides, alkali
oxides, neutral oxides, or a combination thereof. Acidic oxides are oxides
having the general
formula RO or R02, where R is a metal or transition metal moiety. Acidic
oxides can
include silicon dioxide (silica) (SiO2), manganese (IV) oxide (Mn02),
molybdenum trioxide
- 5 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786
PCMJS2015/068258
(molybdite) (Mo03), phosphorus pentoxide (P205), titanium dioxide (titania)
(Ti02),
vanadium (V) oxide (V205), and zirconium dioxide (Zr02), or combinations
thereof. Alkali
(also known as "basic oxides" or "flux") are oxides having the formula Rx0,
where R is a
metal or transition metal moiety. In an embodiment, alkali oxides can include
cobalt (II)
oxide (Co0), copper (II) oxide (cupric oxide)(Cu0), nickel (II) oxide (Ni0),
strontium oxide
(strontia) (Sr0), magnesium oxide (magnesia) (Mg0), calcium oxide (calcia)
(Ca0), lithium
oxide (lithia) (Li20), barium oxide (baria) (Ba0), zinc oxide (calamine)(Zn0),
sodium oxide
(Na20), potassium oxide (potash) (K20), and combinations thereof. Amphoteric
oxides are
oxides having the general formula R203, where R is a metal or transition metal
moiety. In
an embodiment, amphoteric species can include boron trioxide (boria) (B203),
chromium
(III) oxide (chromia) (Cr203), yttrium (III) oxide (yttria) (Y203), iron (III)
oxide (Fe203),
and aluminum oxide (alumina) (A1203), and combinations thereof. The amount of
acidic
oxides, basic oxides and amphoteric oxides in the vitreous binder composition
can vary. In
an embodiment, based on the weight of the vitreous binder composition, the
vitreous binder
composition comprises about 40 wt % to 65 wt% of total combined acid oxides.
In an
embodiment, based on the weight of the vitreous binder composition, the
vitreous binder
composition comprises about 15 wt% to 30 wt% of total combined amphoteric
oxides. In an
embodiment, based on the weight of the vitreous binder composition, the
vitreous binder
composition comprises about 15 wt% to 25 wt% total combined basic oxides.
In an embodiment, based on the weight of the vitreous binder composition, the
amount of silicon dioxide can be not less than 40 wt%, such as not less than
about 45 wt%,
not less than about 50 wt%, or not less than about 55 wt%. In another
embodiment, based on
the weight of the vitreous binder composition, the amount of silicon dioxide
can be not
greater than 80 wt%, such as not greater than 75 wt%, not greater than 70 wt%,
or not greater
than 65 wt%. The amount of silicon dioxide can be within a range comprising
any pair of the
previous upper and lower limits. In a particular embodiment, based on the
weight of the
vitreous binder composition, the amount of silicon dioxide can be in a range
of not less than
45 wt% to not greater than 75 wt%, such as 50 wt% to 70 wt%. In a specific
embodiment,
based on the weight of the vitreous binder composition, the amount of silicon
dioxide can be
55 wt% to 60 wt% or 60 wt% to 65 wt%.
In an embodiment, based on the weight of the vitreous binder composition, the
amount of boron trioxide can be not less than 1 wt%, such as not less than
about 2 wt%, not
less than about 3 wt%, not less than about 4 wt%, or not less than about 5
wt%. In another
embodiment, based on the weight of the vitreous binder composition, the amount
of boron
- 6 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786 PCMJS2015/068258
trioxide can be not greater than 80 wt%, such as not greater than 75 wt%, not
greater than 70
wt%, or not greater than 65 wt%. The amount of boron trioxide can be within a
range
comprising any pair of the previous upper and lower limits. In a particular
embodiment,
based on the weight of the vitreous binder composition, the amount of boron
trioxide can be
in a range of not less than 45 wt% to not greater than 75 wt%, such as 50 wt%
to 70 wt%. In
a specific embodiment, based on the weight of the vitreous binder composition,
the amount of
boron trioxide can be 55 wt% to 60 wt% or 60 wt% to 65 wt%.
The vitreous binder composition can possess a particular amount of transition
metal,
which can vary. In an embodiment, based on the weight of the vitreous binder
composition.
the vitreous binder composition can comprises not less than 1 wt% and not
greater than 15
wt% of transition metal.
The vitreous binder composition can have a particular glass transition
temperature,
sintering temperature, or combination thereof. In an embodiment, the vitreous
binder
composition has a sintering temperature (Ts) in a range of 550 C to 800 C. In
an
embodiment, the vitreous binder composition has a glass transition temperature
(Tg) in a
range of 490 C to 700 C.
Abrasive Aggregate Composition
The composition of the abrasive aggregate's major components (i.e., vitreous
binder
composition, abrasive particles, and modifier particles) can vary within
certain ranges. The
amount of vitreous binder composition that comprises the abrasive aggregate
can be varied.
In an embodiment, the vitreous binder composition comprises not less than 1
wt% and not
greater than 90 wt% of the weight of the abrasive aggregate, such as not less
than 5 wt% and
not greater than 85 wt%, or not less than 6 wt% and not greater than 75 wt% of
the weight of
the abrasive aggregate. The amount of abrasive particle comprising the
abrasive aggregate
can vary. In an embodiment, the amount of abrasive particles can comprise not
less than 15
wt% and not greater than 99 wt% of the weight of the abrasive aggregate. The
amount of one
or more modifier particles in the abrasive aggregates can vary. The one or
more modifier
particles can comprise not less than 0.5 wt% and not greater than 15 wt% of
the weight of the
abrasive aggregate.
In an embodiment, the amount of abrasive particles comprising the abrasive
aggregate
can be not less than 10 wt%, such as not less than about 15 wt%, not less than
about 20 wt%,
not less than about 25 wt%, not less than about 30 wt%, not less than about 40
wt%, or not
less than about 45 wt%. In another embodiment, the amount of abrasive
particles comprising
the abrasive aggregate can be not greater than 99 wt%, such as not greater
than 95 wt%, not
- 7 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786 PCMJS2015/068258
greater than 90 wt%, not greater than 85 wt%, not greater than 80 wt%, not
greater than 75
wt%, not greater than 70 wt%, or not greater than 65 wt%. The amount of
abrasive particles
can be within a range comprising any pair of the previous upper and lower
limits. In a
particular embodiment, the amount of abrasive particles can be in a range of
not less than 10
.. wt% to not greater than 99 wt%, such as 15 wt% to 95 wt%, or 20 wt% to 90
wt%. In a
specific embodiment, the amount of abrasive particles can be 15 wt% to 30 wt%.
45 wt% to
55 wt%, 60 wt% to 70 wt%, or 85 wt% to 90 wt%.
In an embodiment, the amount of vitreous binder composition comprising the
abrasive
aggregate can be not less than 1 wt%, such as not less than about 3 wt%, not
less than about 5
wt%, not less than about 10 wt%, not less than about 15 wt%, not less than
about 20 wt%, or
not less than about 25 wt%. In another embodiment. the amount of vitreous
binder
composition comprising the abrasive aggregate can be not greater than 80 wt%,
such as not
greater than 75 wt%, not greater than 70 wt%, not greater than 65 wt%, not
greater than 60
wt%, not greater than 55 wt%, not greater than 50 wt%, or not greater than 45
wt%. The
amount of vitreous binder composition can be within a range comprising any
pair of the
previous upper and lower limits. In a particular embodiment, the amount of
vitreous binder
composition can be in a range of not less than 1 wt% to not greater than 75
wt%, such as 3
wt% to 70 wt%, or 5 wt% to 65 wt%. In a specific embodiment, the amount of
vitreous
binder composition can be 5 wt% to 15 wt%, 25 wt% to 35 wt%, 45 wt% to 55 wt%,
or 65
wt% to 75 wt%.
In an embodiment, the amount of modifier particles comprising the abrasive
aggregate
can be 0 wt% (i.e., the abrasive aggregate is comprises essentially only
abrasive particles and
vitreous binder composition). In another embodiment, the amount of modifier
particles
comprising the abrasive aggregate can be not less than 0.5 wt%, such as not
less than about 1
wt%, not less than about 1.5 wt%, not less than about 2 wt%, not less than
about 2.5 wt%, or
not less than about 3 wt%. In another embodiment, the amount of modifier
particles
comprising the abrasive aggregate can be not greater than 15 wt%, such as not
greater than 13
wt%, not greater than 10 wt%, not greater than 8 wt%, not greater than 7 wt%,
or not greater
than 5 wt%. The amount of modifier particles can be within a range comprising
any pair of
the previous upper and lower limits. In a particular embodiment, the amount of
modifier
particles can be in a range of not less than 1 wt% to not greater than 15 wt%,
such as 1 wt%
to 7 wt%, or 1 wt% to 5 wt%.
Aggregate Size
- 8 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786
PCMJS2015/068258
The abrasive aggregate can be in a particular size range, conform to a
particular size
distribution, or a combination thereof. In an embodiment, the size range of
the abrasive
aggregate can be in a range not less than 2 microns, such as not less than 5
microns, not less
than 10 microns, not less than 20 microns, not less than 50 microns, not less
than 75 microns,
not less than 90 microns, not less than 100 microns, not less than 125
microns, not less than
140 microns, or not less than 150 microns. In an embodiment, the abrasive
aggregate can
have a size range of not greater than 10,000 microns, such as not greater than
7500 microns,
not greater than 5000 microns, not greater than 4000 microns, not greater than
2000 microns,
not greater than 1800 microns, not greater than 1500 microns, not greater than
1200 microns,
not greater than 1000 microns, not greater than 900 microns, not greater than
800 microns,
not greater than 700 microns, or not greater than 600 microns. The size of the
abrasive
aggregate can be within a range comprising any pair of the previous upper and
lower limits.
In a particular embodiment, the size of the abrasive aggregate can be in a
range of not less
than 2 microns to not greater than 4000 microns.
Aggregate Coating Layer
If desired, at least a portion of the outer surface of the abrasive aggregate
can be
covered with outer layer particles, such as carbide particles, alumina
particles, or a
combination thereof. In an embodiment, no portion of the abrasive aggregate is
covered with
a outer layer of carbide particles or alumina particles. In another
embodiment, at least a
portion of the outer surface of the abrasive aggregate can be covered with
carbide particles,
alumina particles, or a combination thereof. The amount of the surface of the
aggregate that
is covered with carbide particles, alumina particles, or a combination thereof
can vary. In an
embodiment, the portion of the outer surface of the abrasive aggregate that is
covered with
the particles is not less than 5% and not more than 100% of the outer surface
of the abrasive
aggregate.
The particles of the outer layer can vary in size. In an embodiment, the outer
layer
particles can be in a size range of not less than 1 micron and not greater
than 100 microns.
The size of the outer layer particles can have a certain relationship with
respect to the
size of the abrasive aggregate. In an embodiment, the size of the outer layer
particles are in a
particular ratio range with the size of the abrasive aggregate
(Sizeout,layer:Sizeaggregate). In a
particular embodiment, the ratio of the size of the outer layer particles to
the abrasive
aggregate (Sizeoute, layei :SizeAggregate) is in a range of 1:500 to 1:20.
The carbide particles can include boron carbide, silicon carbide, tungsten
carbide, and
combinations thereof. In an embodiment, the carbide particles are silicon
carbide particles.
- 9 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786 PCMJS2015/068258
Aggregate Properties
The abrasive aggregates can possess beneficial and characteristic properties.
The
abrasive aggregates can have a beneficial loose packed density in a particular
range. In an
embodiment, the abrasive aggregates have a loose packed density in a range of
not less than
0.5 g/cm3 to not greater than 3.5 g/cm3. In a specific embodiment, the
abrasive aggregates
have a loose packed density in a range of not less than 2.75 g/cm3 to not less
than 3.0 g/cm3.
The abrasive aggregate can have a beneficial porosity in a particular range.
In an
embodiment, the abrasive aggregates have a porosity in a range of 5% to 85% as
measured by
mercury porosimetry.
The abrasive aggregate can have a beneficial crush strength (represented by a
crush%)
in a particular range. In an embodiment, the abrasive aggregates have a crush%
value of not
greater than 90%, such as not greater than 85%, not greater than 80%, not
greater than 75%,
not greater than 70%, not greater than 65%, not greater than 60%, not greater
than 55%, not
greater than 50%, not greater than 45%, not greater than 40%, or not even
greater than 35%.
wherein the crush% is measured at a load of 5 MPa. The crush strength can be
measured at a
particular sieve mesh size, such as (-35 / +45), or -40/+60), or the like.
Method of Making an Abrasive Aggregate
In general, the aggregate can be made by providing an aggregate forming
mixture,
processing the aggregate forming mixture into an aggregate precursor, and
processing the
aggregate precursor into the aggregate.
Returning to FIG. 4, step 402 includes mixing together a plurality of abrasive
particles
and a vitreous binder composition to form a mixture, wherein the abrasive
particles are
diamonds. This activity can be accomplished by combining one or more glass
frit powders
that contain the desired combination of oxides with diamonds. The mixing can
be done wet
(aqueous) or dry. In an embodiment, the mixing is performed with the aid of an
aqueous
solution of polyethylene glycol, which acts as a temporary organic binder that
allows the
glass powder and diamond mixture to be shaped. Other organic temporary binders
are known
in the art. If desired, as indicated in step 404, modifier particles can be
added to the mixture
of vitreous binder composition and diamonds. Adequate mixing of the vitreous
binder
composition can be accomplished by any known suitable methods. In an
embodiment, the
ingredients are mixed together using a mortar and pestle until uniform. In
another
embodiment, the ingredients are mixed together using an automated tumbler
until uniform.
In another embodiment, the ingredients are combined in an automated grinder
mixer until
uniform.
- 10 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786
PCMJS2015/068258
Step 406 includes shaping the mixture to form a plurality of abrasive
aggregate
precursor granules. Shaping of the mixture to form a plurality of abrasive
aggregate
precursor granules may be accomplished by any means suitable for shaping a wet
mixture
into granules, including shaping by screening, pressing, sieving, extruding,
segmenting,
casting, stamping, cutting, or a combination thereof. In particular, the wet
mixture may be
shaped into the abrasive aggregate precursor granules by pushing, or otherwise
moving, the
wet mixture through a sieve or screen.
An additional optional activity (not shown), is drying the plurality of
aggregate
precursor granules. Drying can be performed at temperatures below the expected
curing
temperature, such as at ambient temperature, to remove water from the mixture
but leave the
aggregate precursor granules unsintered. Dried aggregate precursor granules
can be stored
for later usage. The dried aggregate precursor granules can then be sintered
prior to being
used or incorporated into a fixed abrasive article. In an embodiment, drying
the plurality of
shaped aggregate precursor granules is performed.
Step 410 includes sintering the abrasive aggregate precursor granules to form
a
plurality of abrasive aggregates. Sintering of the aggregate precursor
granules can be
accomplished by any known suitable methods. Sintering can be done under
pressure or at
ambient pressure. The sintering atmosphere can be a reducing atmosphere if
desired. In an
embodiment, the aggregate precursor granules are fired with graphite powder to
prevent
oxidation. The heat can be ramped up in intervals, followed by a heat soak at
a desired
temperature or temperatures for a desired period of time, followed by a cool
down period. In
an embodiment, the sintering is accomplished by ramping up the temperature
until a desired
sintering temperature in a range of 600 C to 800 C is reached, the granules
are soaked at that
temperature for about 1 to 5 hours and then allowed to cool down. In another
embodiment.
the precursor granules are disposed on a graphite sheet during the sintering
process.
It has been observed by Applicants that during sintering, the precursor
granules can
loose their shape and melt together, which requires additional crushing post
cooling, and
tends to reduce the yield of useable abrasive abrasives produced (yield of
about 30-40%).
Applicants have surprisingly discovered that coating at least a portion of the
precursor
granules with a layer of carbide particles substantially improves the yield of
the abrasive
aggregates (yield of about 50% to greater than 90%). Therefore, in an
embodiment, Step 408
is performed prior to sintering, and coating the precursor granules with a
layer of carbide
particles occurs. Applying the coating of carbide particles to the surface of
the abrasive
precursor granules can be accomplished placing the surface of the precursor
granules in
- 11 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786
PCMJS2015/068258
contact with the carbide particles. Suitable methods include, pouring the
carbide particles
onto the surface of the precursor granules, or placing the precursor granules
in a container
with a sufficient amount of carbide particles to cover a desired amount of
surface area of the
precursor granules. In an embodiment, the amount of carbide particles used to
coat a portion
of the precursor granules equal to 0.5 to 4 times the weight of the precursor
granules. Put
another way, the ratio of the weight of the carbide particles to precursor
granules is in a range
from 0.5:1 to 4:1. In an alternate embodiment, at least a portion of the
precursor granule can
be covered with a layer of oxide particles to improve the yield of the
abrasive aggregates.
Oxide particles can include alumina particles. In a specific embodiment, at
least a portion of
the precursor granule is covered with alumina particles. In another specific
embodiment, at
least a portion of the precursor granule is covered with particles comprising
carbide particles,
oxide particles, or a combination thereof. Optionally, in step 412, the
sintered, completed
abrasive aggregates can be classified according to size prior to being used as
a loose abrasive
or being incorporated into a fixed abrasive, such as a coated abrasive,
nonwoven abrasive, or
bonded abrasive.
Loose Abrasives and Abrasive Articles
Completed abrasive aggregates can be used as loose abrasives (e.g., in an
abrasive
slurry or as blast media) or incorporated into fixed abrasives. Fixed
abrasives include bonded
abrasives, coated abrasives, nonwoven abrasives, engineered abrasives (also
called structured
abrasives), and combinations thereof. In specific embodiments, completed
abrasive
aggregates can be incorporated into bonded abrasive wheels, nonwoven abrasive
wheels,
coated abrasive discs, coated abrasive belts, coated abrasive sheets, coated
abrasive films, or
a combination thereof.
In specific embodiments, fixed abrasive articles include lofty open nonwoven
abrasive articles (e.g., webs and sheets), unified (also called "unitized" in
the art) abrasive
wheels, and convolute abrasive wheels, that can be manufactured through
processes that
include common steps known in the art such as: coating a curable composition,
typically in
slurry form, on a nonwoven fiber web. The curable composition can comprise
polymeric
prepolymer; a curative; and optionally additives. In the formation of nonwoven
abrasive
wheels, the nonwoven fiber web is typically compressed (i.e., densified).
Nonwoven fiber webs suitable for use in the aforementioned abrasive articles
are well
known in the abrasives art. Typically, the nonwoven fiber web comprises an
entangled web
of fibers. The fibers may comprise continuous fiber, staple fiber, or a
combination thereof.
- 12-

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786
PCMJS2015/068258
The fiber web may be made air laid, carded, stitch bonded, spun bonded, wet
laid,
hydroentanglement, and/or melt blown procedures.
Nonwoven fiber webs are typically selected to be suitably compatible with
adhering
binders and abrasive particles while also being processable in combination
with other
components of the article, and typically can withstand processing conditions
(e.g.,
temperatures) such as those employed during application and curing of the
curable
composition. The fibers may be chosen to affect properties of the abrasive
article such as, for
example, flexibility, elasticity, durability or longevity, abrasiveness, and
finishing properties.
Examples of fibers that may be suitable include natural fibers, synthetic
fibers, and mixtures
.. of natural and/or synthetic fibers. The fiber may be homogenous or a
composite such as a
bicomponent fiber (e.g., a co-spun sheath-core fiber). The fibers may be
tensilized and
crimped, but may also be continuous filaments such as those formed by an
extrusion process.
Combinations and blends of fibers may also be used.
Prior to impregnation with the curable composition, the nonwoven fiber web
typically
.. has a specific weight per unit area (i.e., basis weight) and thickness.
Frequently, as known in
the art, it is useful to apply a pre-bond resin to the nonwoven fiber web
prior to coating with
the curable composition. The pre-bond resin serves, for example, to help
maintain the
nonwoven fiber web integrity during handling, and may also facilitate bonding
of the binder
composition to the nonwoven fiber web. Suitable prebond resins (blocked or
unblocked) can
include phenolic resins, urethane resins, hide glue, acrylic resins, urea-
formaldehyde resins,
melamine-formaldehyde resins, epoxy resins, and combinations thereof. The
amount of pre-
bond resin is typically adjusted toward the minimum amount consistent with
bonding the
fibers together at their points of crossing contact. In another embodiment,
the nonwoven
fiber web can include thermally bondable fibers, and thermal bonding of the
nonwoven fiber
web can be helpful to maintain web integrity during processing.
Optionally, the curable composition can be mixed with and/or include one or
more
additives. Additives can include fillers, plasticizers, surfactants,
lubricants, colorants (e.g.,
pigments), bactericides, fungicides, grinding aids, and antistatic agents.
In an embodiment, a nonwoven abrasive web is prepared by adhering inventive
abrasive aggregates as described herein to a nonwoven web with a curable
binder. The
coating weight for the abrasive aggregates (independent of other ingredients
in the curable
composition) can depend on the particular binder used, the process for
applying the abrasive
aggregates, and the size of the abrasive aggregates.
- 13 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786
PCMJS2015/068258
Binders useful for adhering the abrasive aggregates to the nonwoven fiber web
are
known in the art and can be selected according to the final product
requirements. Typical
binders can include those comprising polyurethane, phenolic, acrylate, and
combinations
thereof.
In a particular embodiment, the abrasive article is a nonwoven abrasive
article
comprising: a nonwoven web; a binder disposed on (and/or throughout) the
nonwoven web,
and abrasive aggregates as described herein disposed on the binder.
Many different aspects and embodiments are possible. Some of those aspects and
embodiments are described below. After reading this specification, skilled
artisans will
appreciate that those aspects and embodiments are only illustrative and do not
limit the scope
of the present invention. Embodiments may be in accordance with any one or
more of the
items as listed below.
Embodiment 1. An abrasive aggregate comprising: a vitreous binder composition
and
abrasive particles dispersed in the vitreous binder composition, wherein the
abrasive particles
are diamonds.
Embodiment 2. The abrasive aggregate of embodiment 1, further comprising one
or
more modifier particles dispersed in the vitreous binder composition.
Embodiment 3. The abrasive aggregate of embodiment 1, further comprising a
layer
of carbide particles disposed on at least a portion of the outer surface of
the abrasive
aggregate.
Embodiment 4. A method of forming an abrasive aggregate comprising: mixing
together a plurality of abrasive particles and a vitreous binder composition
to form a mixture;
shaping the mixture to form a plurality of abrasive aggregate precursor
granules; sintering the
abrasive aggregate precursor granules to form a plurality of abrasive
aggregates. wherein the
abrasive particles are diamonds.
Embodiment 5. The abrasive aggregate of embodiment 1, wherein the vitreous
binder
composition comprises not less than 1 wt% and not greater than 90 wt% of the
weight of the
abrasive aggregate.
Embodiment 6. The abrasive aggregate of embodiment 1, wherein the abrasive
particles comprise not less than 10 wt% and not greater than 99 wt% of the
weight of the
abrasive aggregate.
Embodiment 7. The aggregate of embodiment 2, wherein the one or more modifier
particles comprise not less than 0.5 wt% and not greater than 15 wt% of the
weight of the
abrasive aggregate.
- 14 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786
PCMJS2015/068258
Embodiment 8. The abrasive aggregate of embodiment 1, wherein the abrasive
aggregate has a loose packed density in a range of not less than 0.5 g/cm3 to
not greater than
3.5 g/cm3.
Embodiment 9. The abrasive aggregate of embodiment 1, wherein the abrasive
aggregate has a loose packed density in a range of not less than 2.75 g/cm3 to
not less than
3.0 g/cm3.
Embodiment 10. The abrasive aggregate of embodiment 1, wherein the abrasive
aggregate has a porosity in a range of 5% to 75% as measured by mercury
porosimetry.
Embodiment 11. The diamonds of embodiment 1. wherein the diamonds are in a
size
range of not less than 1 micron and not greater than 2000 microns.
Embodiment 12. The diamonds of embodiment 1, wherein the diamonds are
monocrystalline, polycrystalline, or a combination thereof.
Embodiment 13. The diamonds of embodiment 1, wherein the diamonds are natural
diamonds, synthetic diamonds, metal coated diamonds, resin coated diamonds, or
combinations thereof.
Embodiment 14. The modifier particles of embodiment 1, wherein the modifier
particles are silicon carbide particles, cerium particles, alumina particles,
or a combination
thereof.
Embodiment 15. The modifier particles of embodiment 1, wherein the modifier
particles are in a size range of not less than 0.5 microns and not greater
than 100 microns.
Embodiment 16. The modifier particles of embodiment 14, wherein the modifier
particles include silicon carbide particles in a size range of not less than 1
micron and not
greater than 100 microns.
Embodiment 17. The modifier particles of embodiment 14, wherein the modifier
particles include cerium particles in a size range of not less than 1 micron
and not greater
than 100 microns.
Embodiment 18. The modifier particles of embodiment 14, wherein the modifier
particles include aluminum oxide particles in a size range of not less than 1
micron and not
greater than 100 microns.
Embodiment 19. The vitreous binder composition of embodiment 1, wherein the
vitreous binder composition has a sintering temperature (Ts) in a range of 550
C to 800 C.
Embodiment 20. The vitreous binder composition of embodiment 1, wherein the
vitreous binder composition has a glass transition temperature (Tg) in a range
of 490 C to
700 C.
- 15 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786
PCMJS2015/068258
Embodiment 21. The vitreous binder composition of Embodiment 1, wherein the
vitreous binder composition comprises not less than 1 wt% and not greater than
15 wt%
transition metal.
Embodiment 22. The vitreous binder composition of embodiment 1, wherein the
vitreous binder composition comprises about 40 wt % to 65 wt% of total
combined acid
oxides, about 15 wt% to 30 wt% of total combined amphoteric oxides, and about
15 wt% to
25 wt% total combined base oxides and neutral oxides.
Embodiment 23. The abrasive aggregate of embodiment 3, wherein the portion of
the
outer surface of the abrasive aggregate that is covered by the carbide
particles is not less than
5% and not more than 100% of the outer surface of the abrasive aggregate.
Embodiment 24. The abrasive aggregate of embodiment 3, wherein the ratio of
the
size of the carbide particles and the size of the abrasive aggregate
(Sizecarbide:SizeAggõgate) is in
a range of 1:500 to 1:50.
Embodiment 25. The abrasive aggregate of embodiment 3, wherein the carbide
particles are silicon carbide particles.
Embodiment 26. The method of embodiment 4, further comprising mixing one or
more modifier particles together with the abrasive particles and a vitreous
binder composition
to form the mixture prior to shaping the mixture.
Embodiment 27. The method of embodiment 4, further comprising coating the
.. aggregate precursor granules with carbide particles prior to sintering the
aggregate precursor
granules.
Embodiment 28. The method of embodiment 4, further comprising coating the
aggregate precursor granules with carbide particles prior to sintering the
aggregate precursor
granules.
EXAMPLES
The properties and advantage of the present disclosure are illustrated in
further detail
in the following nonlimiting examples. Unless otherwise indicated,
temperatures are
expressed in degrees Celsius, pressure is ambient, and concentrations are
expressed in weight
percentages.
Components Listing
= DX200 brand glass frit (available from Saint-Gobain Abrasives at
Worcester, MA,
USA).
- 16 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786
PCMJS2015/068258
= Pemco B6 brand glass bond (available from Saint-Gobain Abrasives at
Worcester,
MA, USA).
= WA2500 brand 5.5 um aluminum oxide grain (available from Graystar, LLC
at
Bluffton, SC, USA).
= ABC Mesh brand 120/140 grit resin-bonded diamond mesh (available from
Saint-
Gobain Specialty Grains and Powders at Olyphant, PA, USA).
= 33% solution of 20M CARBOWAXTM brand Polyethylene Glycol binder
(available
from The Dow Chemical Company at Midland, MI, USA).
= Cerium (commonly commercially available).
= J3000 grit silicon carbide (available from Graystar, LLC at Bluffton, SC,
USA).
Example 1 - Preparation of Samples SI-S3
Samples abrasive aggregates (S1-S3) having different amount of glass bond were
prepared using the materials and amounts listed in Table 1.
Table 1: Abrasive Aggregates Sl-S3
S1 Si Si S2 S2 S2 S3 S3 S3
wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt%
Wet Dry Fired Wet Dry Fired Wet Dry Fired
Glass Bond A 59.6 65.7 69.2 42.3 45.7 47.6 28.5 30.9
32.3
Diamonds 21.3 23.5 24.7 42.3 45.7 47.6 56.9 61.8 64.5
Organic
14.0 5.1 0.0 11.2 4.0 0 11.8 4.3 0
Binder
Cerium 4.3 4.7 4.9 0 0 0 0 0 0
SiC 0.9 1.0 1.1 4.2 4.6 4.8 2.8 3.1
3.2
Samples 1-3 were prepared according to the following method:
All ingredients except for diamonds the organic binder were mixed in a beaker
with a
spoon and then screened with a mesh 140 sieve. The diamonds were added and
then the
organic binder was spoon-mixed in to achieve a uniform wet mixture. The wet
mixture was
then hand pushed through mesh 20 sieve to form wet aggregate precursor
granules. The wet
precursor granules were dried, then screened with a mesh 20 sieve, and then
fired in the
presence of graphite powder to prevent oxidation. The firing profile was ramp
300 C/hr.,
soak at 550 C for 1 hr., then 690 C for 4 hr., then cool.
The fired aggregates for each sample composition (S1-S3) melted together to
form
bars, as shown in FIG. 5 from left to right respectively. It is notable that
the fired bars shown
in Figure 5 had various shades of gray color due to the various concentrations
of diamond
- 17 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786 PCMJS2015/068258
grain. Because the diamonds have a black color, the color of the bars darkens
as the diamond
concentration increases. Therefore. S 1, with about 25 wt% diamond, had the
lightest gray
color. S2, with about 48 wt% diamond, had the middle gray color, and S3, with
about 64 wt%
diamond, had the darkest gray color.
The fired bars were then crushed and sieved to collect abrasive aggregates
having a
size between mesh 25 and 80. The fired S1-S3 aggregates contained about 1-5
wt% SiC as a
modifier, which functioned as pore inducer. Si also contained about 5 wt% of
5ium cerium
particles, which created extra porosity in the fired aggregates. Measured
properties of the
fired aggregates are provided below in Table 2. Note that loose pack density
increased with
increasing diamond concentration and the addition of cerium appears to
contribute to an
increase in porosity.
Crush Testing and Loose Pack Density
As described further below samples are subjected to crush% testing as follows.
Aggregate samples were screened at or between a particular mesh size (e.g.,
between mesh
35 and 45); and a fixed amount of each sample (e.g., 5 grams) was placed in a
one inch die.
The die was then subjected to a pressure of 5 MPa. The collected aggregate was
again
screened and the amount that passed through the mesh screens was collected and
recorded.
The higher the percentage of material that passed through the screen(s), the
greater the
amount of material that was crushed, thus indicating a weaker aggregate.
To determine loose pack density, the fired aggregate is poured through a
funnel in a
100 cc cup. Any excess material is removed with a blade and the cup is
weighed. The loose
pack density is equal to the weight divided by the cup volume.
The crush % and loose pack density for the samples are presented in the table
below.
Table 2: Properties of Si -S3 Fired Aggregates
Loose Pack
wt% Glass Density
Sample Bond Aggregate Size Cut (g/cm3) Crush %
Comments
Si 69.2 mesh 25/80 0.93 100 5% Ce, 1% SiC
S2 47.6 mesh 25/80 0.95 80 5% SiC
S3 32.3 mesh 25/80 1.25 100 3% SiC
SEM images of the fired aggregates and cross sections of the fired aggregates
are
provided: FIG. 6A and FIG. 6B for Si, FIG. 7A and FIG. 7B for S2, and FIG. 8A
and FIG.
8B for S3.
Example 2 ¨ S4 and S5
- 18 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786 PCMJS2015/068258
Samples 4 and 5 were prepared the same as S3, above in Example 1, except that
SiC
was not used in S4 and S5, and a different glass bond (glass bond B instead of
glass bond A)
was used for S5. Glass bond A and glass bond B compare as follows:
Glass bond B: contains 7% transition metal; Tg=509 C, Ts=580 C;
Glass bond A: contains 2% transition metal; Tg=512 C; Ts=580 C; and
Glass bond B has lower viscosity and flows better than Glass bond A.
S4 and S5 were prepared using the materials and amounts listed in Table 3.
Table 3: Abrasive Aggregates S4-S5
S4 S4 S4 S5 S5 S5
wt% wt% wt% wt% wt% wt%
Wet Dry Fired Wet Dry Fired
Glass Bond A 30.2 32.2 33.3
Glass Bond B 30.2 32.2 33.3
Diamonds 60.4 64.5 66.7 60.4 64.5 66.7
Organic Binder 9.3 3.3 0 9.3 3.3 0
Cerium
SiC
S4 and S5 were prepared according to the same method as S3 above in Example 1,
except that, for S4 and S5, a mesh 60 sieve was used to break up lumps in the
mixed dry
ingredients, and the firing profile was changed to: ramp 180 C/hr., soak at
750 C for lhr, then
cool.
FIG. 9 shows an SEM image of the fired aggregates of S4. FIG. 10 shows an SEM
image of the fired aggregates of S5. The S4 and S5 aggregates both appeared to
have the
same surface morphology; however, crush testing at 5 MPa of the fired
aggregates having a
size cut of mesh 35/45 showed that the S4 aggregate had a 76% crush strength
and the S5
aggregate was weaker with a 90% crush strength.
Table 4: Properties of S4-S5 Fired Aggregates
Loose Pack
wt% Glass Density
Sample Bond Aggregate Size Cut (g/cm3) Crush %
Comments
S4 33.3 mesh 35/45 76 glass bond A
S5 33.3 mesh 35/40 90 glass bond B
- 19 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786 PCMJS2015/068258
Example 3 ¨ S6
Sample 6 was prepared the same as S1 above in Example 1, except that S6
includes
significantly less glass bond than Si.
S6 was prepared using the materials and amounts listed in Table 5.
Table 5: Abrasive Aggregates S6
S6 S6 S6
wt% wt% wt%
Wet Dry Fired
Glass Bond A 33.8 36.8 38.5
Diamonds 54.1 58.8 61.5
Organic
12.2 4.4 0
Binder
Cerium
SiC
The method for making Sample 6 is as follows. First, the glass bond and the
diamond
grain were mixed in an automated mixer for 5 minutes. Under agitation, the
organic binder
was added to achieve a consistent wet mixture. Wet precursor granules were
formed with a
Quadro Comil using a mesh 7C032 screen (0.81mm, equivalent to mesh 20). The
remaining
wet mixture was hand pushed through a mesh 20 screen to produce additional wet
precursor
granules. The wet precursor granules were then dried, screened with mesh 20,
and fired with
a layer of graphite using the following firing profile: ramp 180 C/hr., soak
at 750 C for 1 hr.,
and cool down. The precursor granules melted together to forma fired block,
which was then
crushed and sieved to collect fired aggregates between size mesh 25 and mesh
80.
1 kg of diamond aggregates having a size in a range of 0.18 mm to 0.75 mm (US
standard mesh 25/80) were produced. FIG 11 is an SEM image of the produced
fired
aggregates for S6.
Table 6: Properties of S6 Fired Aggregates
Loose Pack Crush %
wt% Glass Density (35/45) @
Sample Bond Aggregate Size Cut (g/cm3) 5 MPa
Comments
S6 38.5 Mesh 25/80 1.18 68 Glass Bond A
The loose pack density (LPD) of Sample 6 was 1.18 glee, and the crush strength
of
35/45 cut at 5 MPa was 68%.
- 20 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786 PCMJS2015/068258
Table 7: Abrasive Testing of Nonwoven Abrasive Wheels
Grind- Comparison to
Avg Cut Avg Shed, ratio Comparison to Control Grind
Sample (g) (g) (cut/shed) Avg. Control Cut
Ratio
Control 2.42 0.80 3.02 1.00 1.00
S6 3.05 0.62 4.88 1.26 1.62
In addition, S6 was tested for grinding properties using a BearTex Unified
wheel.
The initial grinding test results on a tungsten carbide work piece showed that
S6 had a 26%
higher material removal than that conventional loose diamond grit. See FIG. 12
Example 4 ¨ S7
Sample 7 was made using the materials and amounts listed in Table 8.
Table 8: Abrasive Aggregates S7
S7 S7 S7
wt% wt% wt%
Wet Dry Fired
Glass Bond A 56.82 63.92 68.18
Diamonds 20.83 23.44 25
OrganicBbinder 16.67 6.25 0
Alumina 5.68 6.39 6.82
SiC
Sample 7 was prepared according to the following method:
All the ingredients except for the glass bond and organic binder were weighed
into a
jar and mixed with an automated tumbler for 30 minutes. The glass bond and
organic binder
were then mixed with the other ingredients to form a uniform wet mixture. The
wet mixture
was screened with mesh 30 and the formed precursor granules were dried in an
oven at 350 F
for 1 hour and then air dried for 8-12 hours.
The dried precursor granules were re-screened with mesh 30 and then placed in
a
shallow sagger over bed of aluminum oxide grain (38A F320, 29 gm). The loaded
saggers
were placed in a kiln and fired with the firing profile: ramp at 180.C/hr.,
soak at 750 C for
lhr. After the firing cycle, the dried precursor granules had turned into a
thin solid plate.
The thin plate was hammer crushed into pieces having a 5-10 mm size, which
then further
crushed using a two-roll crusher. The crushed fired aggregates were screened
and collected
between mesh 30 and 80(0.18 to 0.6 mm). FIG. 13A and FIG. 13 B are SEM images
of the
fired aggregates of S7.
- 21 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786 PCMJS2015/068258
The abrasive performance, loose pack density, porosity, and crush strength are
to be
evaluated.
Table 9: Properties of S7 fired aggregates
Loose Pack Crush %
wt% Glass Density (35/45) @
Sample Bond Aggregate Size Cut (g/cm3) 5 MPa
Comments
glass bond A and
S7 68.2 mesh 30/80 0.97 45 6.8 wt% Alumina
The completed abrasive aggregates were used to make inventive abrasive discs.
The
inventive abrasive discs were compared to conventional (control) diamond cloth
abrasive
discs. The inventive discs had a useful life than was approximately twice as
long as the
control discs. The inventive discs had a higher cumulative cut rate that
varied from about
15% to 30% higher than the cut rate for the control discs.
Example 5 ¨ S8-S11
Samples 8 was prepared according to the following method using the dry and
fired
aggregate having the composition described below in Table 10.
Table 10: Abrasive Aggregates S8
S8 S8
wt% wt%
Dry Fired
Glass Bond A 33.1 33.1
Diamonds 63.6 63.6
SiC 3.3 3.3
S9-S11 were prepared using the dry S8 precursor granules according to the
following
method:
For each sample S9-S11, 100 grams of the dry S8 precursor granules were mixed
with
a specific amount of SiC powder (size J2500, 5 micron) to form a mixture of
dry granules and
SiC powder. For Sample S9, the 100 grams dry green aggregates were mixed with
50 grams
of SiC J2500. For Sample S10, the 100 grams of dry precursor granules were
mixed with 66
grams of SiC powder (J2500, 5 micron). For Sample 11, the 100 grams of dry
precursor
granules were mixed with 100 grams of SiC powder (J2500, 5 micron). The
mixtures of SiC
coated precursor granules were each loaded into a sagger (bed depth less than
3/8 inches) and
fired at 750 C for about 1 hour. The fired abrasive aggregate was collected
between mesh 30
and 80 (0.18 to 0.6 mm).
- 22 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786
PCMJS2015/068258
The loose pack density, surface area, porosity, and yield of Samples 9-11 were
measured. The results of the testing are provided below in Table 11. It
appears that
increasing the amount of SiC particles to cover the dry precursor granules
only slightly
changes the loose packed density, porosity, and surface area, but
significantly increases the
yield of usable abrasive aggregates from 53% up to 70% and up to 93%. Figure
14A and
14B are SEM images showing that the fired abrasive aggregates were covered
with a layer of
fine silicon carbide particles.
Table 11: Abrasive Aggregates S9, S10, Sll
g SiC BET Hg
Sample Precursor %SiC LPD Yield
%
Powder m2/g Poros.
Granules
S9 (2:1) 100 50 33.3 2.8125 0.1427 56.28 53
S10 (1.5:1) 100 66 39.8 2.9088 0.1228 63.72 70
S 1 1 (1:1) 100 100 50.0 2.8837 0.1368 61.21
93.3
Example 6¨ S12
Sample 12 was prepared using the materials and amounts listed in Table 12.
Table 12: Abrasive Aggregates S12
S12 S12 S12
wt% wt% wt%
Wet Dry Fired
Glass Bond
9.22 9.72 10
A
Diamonds 82.95 87.52 90
Organic
7.83 2.75 0
Binder
Alumina
SiC
S12 was prepared according to the following method:
All of the materials listed in Table 12 were added to a beaker, except for the
organic
binder, and were hand mixed with a spatula until a substantially uniform
consistency was
reached. The organic binder was then added to form a wet mixture and the wet
mixture was
added to an automated grinder (Strand Grinder) as shown in FIGs. 15. The wet
mixture was
mixed for 5 seconds, stopped to scrape the walls, and repeated 4 times. The
wet mixture was
then screened with mesh 20 screen to form precursor granules as shown in FIG.
16.
-23 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786 PCMJS2015/068258
The screened precursor granules were loaded into a ceramic sagger lined with
graphite sheet having a bed depth of less than 5 mm and fired at 750 C for
lhour. The fired
aggregates were collected between mesh 30 and 100. The loose pack density and
crush
strength of the Sample 12 aggregates was measured as described herein above
and the results
of the testing are provided below in Table 13.
Table 13: Properties of S12 Fired Aggregates
Crush %
wt% Glass Loose Pack (40/60) @ 5
Sample Bond Aggregate Size Cut Density (g/cm3) MPa
S12 10 mesh 30/100 1.18 69
FIG. 17 shows an SEM image of the fired aggregates of S12.
Control abrasive nonwoven and inventive nonwoven abrasive wheels were prepared
and were used to conduct abrasive testing ("90 Degree Angle Testing")
according to the
conditions listed below.
= Contact Angle: 90 Degrees
= Test Speed: 9000 RPM
= Dead Weight: 3 lb.
= Test Piece: Tungsten Carbide
= Cycles (1 min.): 5 cycles
The control wheels included conventional loose diamond grit size 120/140. The
inventive nonwoven wheels included the S12 aggregates. An inventive S12 wheel
and the 90
Degree Angle Testing set-up are shown in FIG. 20. The 90 Degree Angle Testing
results are
listed in Table 14.
- 24 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786 PCT/1JS2015/068258
Table 14: Flat Surface Testing Results
ID Grain Shed Cut Grind ratio Comparison
to Comparison to
Avg. Control Avg. Control
Cut Grind Ratio
D52 Control. 1 0.93 2.82 3.03 0.97 1.03
D52 Control. 2 0.99 2.96 2.99 1.02 1.02
D52 Control 3 0.97 2.87 2.96 0.99 1.01
D52 Control 4 1.07 2.96 2.77 1.02 0.94
Avg. 0.99 2.90 2.94 1.00 1.00
Control
DA1 Inv. 1 2.17 4.81 2.22 1.66 0.75
DA1 Inv. 2 2.01 4.52 2.25 1.56 0.77
DA1 Inv. 3 2.97 4.78 1.61 1.65 0.55
DA1 Inv. 4 2.23 4.73 2.12 1.63 0.72
Avg. Inv. 2.35 4.71 2.05 1.62 0.70
As is shown, all the inventive wheels produced a higher cumulative cut than
the
control wheels. The inventive wheels did have a higher shed rate than the
control wheels;
however, the average grind ratio (mass removed from workpiece/mass shed from
wheel) of
the inventive wheels was surprisingly only about 30% lower than the average
for the control
wheels but was surprisingly able to achieve an average cumulative cut that was
62% higher
than the average for the control wheels. Such an increased cumulative cut is
particularly
beneficial and significant for particular hard workpiece surfaces, such as
tungsten carbide, as
was used in the testing.
Note that not all of the activities described above in the general description
or the
examples are required, that a portion of a specific activity may not be
required, and that one
or more further activities may be performed in addition to those described.
Still further, the
order in which activities are listed is not necessarily the order in which
they are performed.
Benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described
above with
regard to specific embodiments. However, the benefits, advantages, solutions
to problems,
and any feature(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur
or become
more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential
feature of any or
all the claims.
- 25 -

CA 02972440 2017-06-27
WO 2016/109786
PCT/1JS2015/068258
The specification and illustrations of the embodiments described herein are
intended
to provide a general understanding of the structure of the various
embodiments. The
specification and illustrations are not intended to serve as an exhaustive and
comprehensive
description of all of the elements and features of apparatus and systems that
use the structures
or methods described herein. Separate embodiments may also be provided in
combination in
a single embodiment, and conversely, various features that are, for brevity,
described in the
context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any
subcombination.
Further, reference to values stated in ranges includes each and every value
within that range.
Many other embodiments may be apparent to skilled artisans only after reading
this
.. specification. Other embodiments may be used and derived from the
disclosure, such that a
structural substitution, logical substitution, or another change may be made
without departing
from the scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, the disclosure is to be
regarded as illustrative
rather than restrictive.
- 26 -

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Common Representative Appointed 2021-11-13
Grant by Issuance 2020-04-28
Inactive: Cover page published 2020-04-27
Inactive: Final fee received 2020-03-05
Pre-grant 2020-03-05
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2020-01-10
Letter Sent 2020-01-10
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2020-01-10
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2019-11-26
Inactive: Q2 passed 2019-11-26
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2019-09-05
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2019-03-18
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2019-03-11
Inactive: Q2 failed 2019-03-04
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2018-12-19
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2018-07-03
Inactive: Report - No QC 2018-06-29
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2018-01-10
Inactive: Cover page published 2017-08-21
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2017-08-18
Inactive: IPC removed 2017-08-18
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry - RFE 2017-07-12
Letter Sent 2017-07-11
Inactive: IPC assigned 2017-07-10
Inactive: IPC assigned 2017-07-10
Application Received - PCT 2017-07-10
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2017-06-27
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2017-06-27
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2017-06-27
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2016-07-07

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2019-11-26

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2017-06-27
Request for examination - standard 2017-06-27
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2018-01-02 2017-11-22
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2018-12-31 2018-11-21
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2019-12-31 2019-11-26
Final fee - standard 2020-05-11 2020-03-05
MF (patent, 5th anniv.) - standard 2020-12-31 2020-11-20
MF (patent, 6th anniv.) - standard 2021-12-31 2021-11-17
MF (patent, 7th anniv.) - standard 2023-01-03 2022-11-22
MF (patent, 8th anniv.) - standard 2024-01-02 2023-11-22
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SAINT-GOBAIN ABRASIVES, INC.
SAINT-GOBAIN ABRASIFS
Past Owners on Record
JIANNA WANG
TIMOTHY E. SCOVILLE
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2017-06-27 26 1,353
Drawings 2017-06-27 15 993
Claims 2017-06-27 2 64
Abstract 2017-06-27 2 65
Representative drawing 2017-06-27 1 7
Cover Page 2017-08-21 2 40
Description 2018-12-19 27 1,457
Claims 2018-12-19 3 88
Claims 2019-09-05 3 91
Representative drawing 2020-04-07 1 5
Cover Page 2020-04-07 1 32
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2017-07-11 1 174
Notice of National Entry 2017-07-12 1 201
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2017-09-05 1 113
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2020-01-10 1 511
International search report 2017-06-27 3 119
National entry request 2017-06-27 13 242
Examiner Requisition 2018-07-03 4 225
Amendment / response to report 2018-12-19 8 330
Examiner Requisition 2019-03-11 3 168
Amendment / response to report 2019-03-18 1 41
Amendment / response to report 2019-09-05 5 148
Final fee 2020-03-05 1 35