Language selection

Search

Patent 3009380 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 3009380
(54) English Title: USE OF STARCH FOR IMPROVING THE PREPARATION OF A STRAINED FERMENTED DAIRY PRODUCT
(54) French Title: UTILISATION D'AMIDON POUR AMELIORER LA PREPARATION D'UN PRODUIT LAITIER FERMENTE FILTRE
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A23C 09/137 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BILBAO CALABUIG, MARIA ALMUDENA (Spain)
  • FLABBI, PAOLA (Spain)
(73) Owners :
  • DANONE S.A.
(71) Applicants :
  • DANONE S.A. (Spain)
(74) Agent: NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT CANADA LLP/S.E.N.C.R.L., S.R.L.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2022-11-29
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2015-12-24
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2017-06-29
Examination requested: 2020-12-23
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP2015/081235
(87) International Publication Number: EP2015081235
(85) National Entry: 2018-06-21

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for manufacturing a strained fermented dairy product comprising the following successive steps: (a) providing a dairy product containing starch, (b) fermenting the dairy product after adding lactic acid bacteria to obtain a fermented dairy product, and (c) separating a liquid whey from the fermented dairy product to obtain a strained fermented dairy product The present invention relates also to the use of starch for preventing the clogging of the separating device used in the preparation of a strained fermented dairy product.


French Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé pour la fabrication d'un produit laitier fermenté filtré, comprenant les étapes successives suivantes : (a) fourniture d'un produit laitier contenant de l'amidon, (b) fermentation du produit laitier après ajout de bactéries lactiques pour obtenir un produit laitier fermenté, et (c) séparation d'un lactosérum liquide présent dans le produit laitier fermenté afin d'obtenir un produit laitier fermenté filtré. La présente invention concerne également l'utilisation d'amidon pour éviter le bouchage du dispositif de séparation utilisé dans la préparation d'un produit laitier fermenté filtré.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


22
CLAIMS
_
1. A method for manufacturing a strained fermented dairy product comprising
the
following successive steps:
(a) providing a dairy product containing starch,
(b) fermenting the dairy product after adding lactic acid bacteria to obtain a
fermented dairy product, and
(c) separating a liquid whey from the fermented dairy product by
centrifugation to
obtain a strained fermented dairy product.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the dairy product provided in
step
(a) has a total protein content comprised between 2.8 and 4.6%.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the dairy product provided in
step
(a) has a total protein content comprised between 3.1 and 4.0%.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the dairy product provided in
step
(a) has a total protein content comprised between 3.2 and 3.6%.
5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the starch is
potato
starch, tapioca starch, wheat starch, maize starch, rice starch, oat starch,
barley
starch, rye starch, cassava starch, sorghum starch or a mixture thereof.
6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the starch is
a
granular or molecular starch.
7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the starch is
in a
native or modified form.
8. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the starch is
waxy
maize starch or tapioca starch.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the starch is waxy maize starch
or
tapioca starch, in a granular form.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-03-07

23
10. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the dairy
product
contains 0.05 to 1.0 wt% of starch based on the total amount of the dairy
product.
11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the dairy product contains
0.1 to
0.5 wt% of starch based on the total amount of the dairy product.
12. The method according to claim 11, wherein the dairy product contains
0.25 to
0.40 wt% of starch based on the total amount of the dairy product.
13. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the
fermentation
step (b) is performed at a temperature kept between 25"C and 44"C, for 3 to 25
hours.
14. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the
fermentation
step (b) is performed at a temperature kept between 30 and 40"C, for 5 to 15
hours.
15. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein the lactic
acid
bacteria used in step (c) are selected from Lactobacillus bulgaricus,
Lactobacillus
acidophilus, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus
pentosus,
Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus plantarum,
Lactobacillus
bifidus, Lactococcus lactis , Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium
infantis,
Bifidobacterium animalis, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum,
Streptococcus thermophilus, Streptococcus lactis, Streptococcus raffinolactis,
Streptococcus cremoris, and combinations thereof.
16. The method according to claim 15, wherein the Lactobacillus bulgaricus
is
Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus; the Lactococcus lactis is
Lactococcus lactis
subsp. lactis or Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris; and the Bifidobacterium
animalis
is Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis.
17. The method according to claim 15, wherein the lactic acid bacteria used
in step
(c) are selected from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus,
Streptococcus
thermophilus, Lactococcus lactis, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, and
combinations thereof.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-03-07

24
18. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 17, wherein a lactase is
added
to the dairy product along with or before the lactic acid bacteria.
19. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 18, comprising, after
step (c),
an additional step (e) of cooling the strained fermented dairy product to a
temperature
of between 1 and 10C.
20. The method according to claim 19, the temperature of cooling the
strained
fermented dairy product of step (e) is between 4 and 8'C.
21. Use of starch for preventing clogging of a separating device used in a
preparation of a strained fermented dairy product.
Date Recue/Date Received 2022-03-07

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
1
USE OF STARCH FOR IMPROVING THE PREPARATION
OF A STRAINED FERMENTED DAIRY PRODUCT
The present invention relates to an improved method for manufacturing a
strained fermented dairy product.
Fermented dairy products are recognized by consumers as healthy food having
nutritional benefits. Among these fermented dairy products, strained fermented
dairy products present the interest to contain higher levels of proteins than
in
conventional fermented dairy products, which represent an additional
nutritional
benefit.
Such strained fermented dairy products are generally prepared by the same
method as for conventional fermented dairy products; with an additional step
consisting in the separation of a liquid phase also called whey (containing
generally
water, lactose, minerals, etc.) from the conventional fermented dairy
products. The
remaining solid phase constitutes the desired strained fermented dairy
products
having increased protein content. Such processes are disclosed notably in
WO 2014/114970 or WO 2014/169171.
The separation step can be performed notably by centrifugation. However,
due to the formation of a thicker strained dairy product (solid phase) during
this
step, clogging issues of the separating device can occur.
There is thus a need for an improved method for manufacturing strained
fermented dairy products, preventing the clogging of the separating device.
The inventors of the present invention have surprisingly discovered that such
a clogging issue could be solved by adding starch in the dairy starting
material.
The present invention relates thus to a method for manufacturing a strained
fermented dairy product comprising the following successive steps:
(a) providing a dairy product containing starch,
(b) fermenting the dairy product after adding lactic acid bacteria to obtain a
fermented dairy product, and
(c) separating a liquid whey from the fermented dairy product to obtain a
strained
fermented dairy product.

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
2
In the absence of starch, a clogging in the disks of the separating device is
observed after only few hours of operation of the production line. The
production
line has thus to be stopped to clean the separating device. This leads to an
important
loss in productivity.
Surprisingly, the addition of starch to the starting dairy material allows
solving this clogging issue, whereas the use of other texturizing agent does
not
improve the separation step performance.
Dairy product:
In the context of the present invention, "dairy product" designates more
particularly a dairy product ready for human consumption made from milk of
animal
or vegetal origin.
The dairy product based on milk of animal origin can be made from milk and
milk components having a cow, goat, sheep, buffalo, donkey or camel origin,
preferably a cow origin.
The dairy product based on milk of vegetal origin can be made from grain milk
such as barley milk, oat milk, rice milk or spelt milk; legumes-based milk
such as
lupin milk, pea milk, peanut milk or soy milk; nut milk such as almond milk,
cashew
milk, hazelnut milk or walnut milk; or seed milk such as hemps milk, quinoa
milk,
sesame seed milk, sunflower seed milk or coconut milk. It contains thus
vegetal
proteins. Preferably, the dairy product based on milk of vegetal origin will
be made
from soy milk, oat milk, rice milk or almond milk.
According to a preferred embodiment, the dairy product is made from milk
and milk components of animal origin, and in particular of cow origin.
In addition to starch, other food additives can also be present in the dairy
product, notably chosen among:
¨ sugars and sweeteners:
sugars and sweeteners are food-acceptable carbohydrate sweetening agents that
may be natural or artificial, no or low calorie sweeteners,
preferred examples of appropriate sugars are sucrose, fructose, lactose,
glucose
and maltose, wherein such sugars can be incorporated in the form of beet
sugar,
cane sugar, maple sugar, molasses, corn syrup, malt syrup, maple syrup, agave
nectar or also honey,
preferred examples of appropriate no or low calorie sweeteners are aspartame,
sucralose, acesulfame potassium, saccharin, sodium cyclamate, thaumatin,

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
3
tagatose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, isomaltulose, rebaudioside A or also
a
stevia extract (containing rebaudioside A),
¨ vitamins (e.g. vitamin A, B1, B2, B6, B12, C, D, E or K, folic acid,
etc.),
¨ salts (e.g. sodium chloride),
¨ anti-oxidants,
¨ pH-modifying agents (e.g. buffering agents or acidifying agents such as
citric
acid and its salts, for ex. sodium, potassium or calcium citrate),
¨ lubricants (e.g. vegetable oils),
¨ preservatives (e.g. sorbic acid and its salts such as sodium, potassium
and
calcium salts, sulphur dioxide, benzoic acid and its salts such as sodium,
potassium and calcium salts, ethyl, methyl or propyl p-hydroxybenzoate, etc.),
¨ taste exhausters (e.g. glutamic acid and its salts such as sodium,
potassium,
calcium, magnesium or ammonium salts),
¨ other texturizing agents:
texturizing agents are used to modify the overall texture or mouthfeel of a
food
product and include gelling agents (for ex. gelatine, agar, carrageenan,
pectin,
natural gums), stabilisers (for ex. agar, pectin, Arabic gum, gelatin),
emulsifiers
(for ex. lecithin, mono- and di-glycerides of fatty acids (E471), esters of
mono-
and di-glycerides of fatty acid (E472a-f)), and thickeners (for ex.guar gum,
xanthan gum, pectin, agar, carrageenan, alginic acid),
¨ flavouring aromatic agents of synthetic or natural origin (e.g. fruit
flavours),
¨ colouring agents (pigments, dyes, etc.),
¨ enzymes such as lactases and proteases,
¨ vegetal ingredients (such as fruits and fruit pieces).
If need be, the skilled person will be able to choose appropriate food
additives among all the well-known food additives available on the market.
These
food additives can be added at different stages of the method of manufacturing
of
the strained fermented dairy product.
Strained fermented dairy product:
The dairy product produced by the method according to the present invention
is a strained fermented dairy product.
In the context of the present invention, "strained fermented dairy product"
designates more particularly a strained fermented dairy product ready for
human

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
4
consumption, such as a strained fermented milk such as "fresh cheese", skyr,
greek
or a strained yoghurt also called concentrated yoghurt, Greek-style yoghurt or
labneh.
The terms "fermented milk" and "yoghurt" are given their usual meanings in
the field of the dairy industry, that is, products intended for human
consumption and
originating from acidifying lactic fermentation of a milk substrate, having an
animal
or vegetal origin, preferably an animal origin.
The expression "fermented milk" is thus reserved in the present application
for a dairy product prepared with a milk substrate which has undergone
treatment at
least equivalent to pasteurisation, seeded with microorganisms belonging to
the
characteristic species or species of each product.
The term "yoghurt" is reserved for fermented milk obtained, according to
local and constant usage, by the development of specific thermophilic lactic
bacteria
known as Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus
thermophilus, which must be in the living state in the finished product, at a
minimum rate. In certain countries, regulations require the addition of other
lactic
bacteria to the production of yoghurt, and especially the additional use of
strains of
Bifidobacterium and/or Lactobacillus acidophilus and/or Lactobacillus casei.
These
additional lactic strains are intended to impart various properties to the
finished
product, such as that of favouring equilibrium of intestinal flora or
modulating the
immune system.
In practice, the expression "fermented milk" is therefore generally used to
designate fermented milks other than yoghurts, such as "Kefir", "Kumtss",
"Lassi",
"Dahi", "Leben", "Filmjolk", "Villi", "Acidophilus milk".
The term "strained" dairy product refers to a dairy product obtained by a
separation step in which a liquid whey is separated from a solid phase (the
strained
dairy product), such as step (c) of the method according to the invention.
The strained fermented dairy product obtained by the method according to
the invention can have a total protein content comprised between 6 and 16,
notably
between 7 and 12%, such as between 8 and 10%.
The "total protein content" of a dairy product corresponds to the weight of
the proteins present in the dairy product relatively to the total weight of
the dairy
product. The total protein content is expressed as a weight percentage.

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
The total protein content can be measured by Kjeldahl analysis
(NF EN ISO 8968-1) as the reference method for the determination of the total
protein content of dairy products based on measurement of total nitrogen
content.
The method is described in both AOAC Method 991.20 (1) and international Dairy
5 Federation Standard (IDF) 206:1993.
The strained fermented dairy product obtained by the method according to
the invention can have a fat content comprised between 0 and 6%, notably
between
1 and 5%, such as between 2 and 3%.
The "fat content" of the dairy product corresponds to the weight of the fat
components present in the dairy product relatively to the total weight of the
dairy
product. The fat content is expressed as a weight percentage.
The fat content can be measured by the Weibull-Berntrop gravimetric method
described in the standard NF ISO 8262-3.
The strained fermented dairy product used in the method according to the
present invention is a high textured dairy product, i.e. a thick dairy product
having a
viscosity comprised between 1500 and 5000 mPa.s, notably between 3000 and 4000
mPa.s, advantageously between 3300 and 3700 mPa.s.
The viscosity is measured at 24 h (i.e. 24h after the production of the
product) by a viscometer, more particularly of Rheomat type, equipped with a
measuring bob / measuring tube system of type 2 / 2 with a shear rate of 64 s-
1
during 90 s at 10 C. The viscometer can be for example a Rheomat RM200. The
measuring bob / measuring tube system of 2-2 type is a system in which the
measuring bob is of type 2 and has a diameter of 24 mm and the measuring tube
is of
type 2 and has a diameter of 26.03 mm.
The viscosity of the dairy product is the viscosity as measured after 24h cold
storage at 2 to 6 C, after the end of step (c). Indeed, this viscosity can
change during
the shelf life of the product. In particular, the viscosity of a fermented
dairy product
increases during its shelf life.
Advantageously, the final strained fermented dairy product according to the
invention is more texturized in comparison to a product with no starch
obtained
before the clogging issues appear but the strained fermented dairy product
according
to the invention is more stable in terms of texture evolution during shelf
life (see
example 2).

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
6
According to a particular embodiment, the strained fermented dairy product
contains also a lactase, notably in order to improve the organoleptic (texture
and
sweetness) and nutritional properties (low or free lactose content) of the
final
product.
Step (a) - Providing a dairy product
The dairy product used as a starting material to prepare the strained
fermented dairy product according to the invention is a non-fermented dairy
product, also called dairy mix or dairy starting material, containing milk and
milk
components of animal or vegetal origin, starch and optionally other food
additives
such as those indicated previously. The dairy product is thus obtained by the
mixing
of its various ingredients.
The milk and milk components of animal original can be whole milk and/or
wholly or partly skimmed milk, which can be used in a powder, concentrated or
retentate form which can be reconstituted by addition of water. Other milk
components can be added such as cream, casein, caseinate (for ex. calcium or
sodium caseinate), whey proteins notably in the form of a concentrate (WPC),
milk
proteins notably in the form of a concentrate (MPC), milk protein hydrolysates
and
mixtures thereof.
The milk and milk components of animal origin can have a cow, goat, sheep,
buffalo, donkey or camel origin, preferably a cow origin.
The milk and milk components of vegetal origin can be obtained from grain
milk such as barley milk, oat milk, rice milk or spelt milk; legumes-based
milk such
as lupin milk, pea milk, peanut milk or soy milk; nut milk such as almond
milk,
cashew milk, hazelnut milk or walnut milk; or seed milk such as hemps milk,
quinoa
milk, sesame seed milk, sunflower seed milk or coconut milk. It contains thus
vegetal
proteins. Preferably, the dairy product based on milk of vegetal origin will
be made
from soy milk, oat milk, rice milk or almond milk.
According to a preferred embodiment, the dairy product is made from milk
and milk components of animal origin, and in particular of cow origin.
The starch present in the dairy product can be of various origins. It can be
potato starch, tapioca starch, wheat starch, maize starch (also called corn
starch),
rice starch, oat starch, barley starch, rye starch, cassava starch, sorghum
starch or a

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
7
mixture thereof, notably maize starch, tapioca starch or a mixture thereof. It
can be
"waxy" (containing high amount of amylopectin) or not. It can be granular
(keeping
their natural molecular arrangement in semi-crystalline granules) or molecular
(starches' polymers, such as amylose or amylopectin) starch, notably granular.
It can
be in a native (or refined) or modified form.
Preferably, the starch used in the dairy product will be waxy maize starch or
tapioca starch, in particular in a granular form and notably refined
(unmodified
starch from a natural source) or modified (the properties of the starch, such
as its
resistance to heat treatment or shearing, are modified by physical
modifications
and/or by chemical modifications). The starch used in the dairy product
according to
the invention can be chosen among the following list or equivalent references
manufactured by other suppliers:
Commercial reference Supplier Origin Type
Novation EnduraTM 100 Ingredion Waxy maiz Refined
N-DulgeTM C1 I ngredion Tapioca Modified
N - Du lgeTM C2 I ngredion Waxy maiz Modified
Thermtex I ngredion Waxy maiz Modified
Advantageously, the dairy product will contain 0.05 to 1.00 wt%, notably 0.10
to 0.50 wt%, preferably 0.25 to 0.40 wt% of starch based on the total amount
of the
dairy product.
The dairy product provided in step (a) can have a total protein content
comprised between 2.8% and 4.6%, notably between 3.1 and 4.0%, such as between
3.2 and 3.6%.
The dairy product provided in step (a) can have a fat content comprised
between 0.0 and 2.0%, notably between 0.05 and 1.0%, such as between 0.1 and
0.3%.
According to an embodiment, the dairy product provided in step a) is a heat-
treated dairy product.
The heat-treatment of the dairy product is also called pasteurisation. It aims
to kill microorganisms, including pathogenic microorganisms, in the dairy
product in
order to preserve the quality and the organoleptic properties of the final
product and

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
8
to prevent the consumer to be infected by pathogenic microorganisms present in
the
dairy product and develop diseases.
The heat-treatment is commonly performed at a temperature (heat-
treatment temperature) comprised between 72 C and 140 C, preferably during 2
seconds to 30 minutes.
The heat-treatment can also be performed in several steps, notably two
steps, where the dairy product is heated at distinct temperatures in each
step. For
example, the heat-treatment can be performed according to the two following
successive steps:
(1) a first step of pre heat-treatment performed at a temperature comprised
between 55 and 95 C, notably until a temperature between 55 and 95 C is
reached,
(2) a second step of heat-treatment performed at a temperature comprised
between 90 and 95 C, notably for 2 to 7 min,
Advantageously, a homogenisation step is performed in between the 2 heating
steps, notably at a pressure comprised between 20 and 300 bars (20-300.105
Pa),
notably between 50 and 250 bars (50-250.105 Pa). This homogenisation step will
be
performed more particularly at a temperature of between 55 and 95 C.
Step (b) - Fermenting the dairy product
The dairy product containing starch is fermented after addition of lactic acid
bacteria.
To perform such a fermentation step, lactic acid bacteria are added and the
temperature (fermentation temperature) is kept in particular between 25 C and
44 C, notably between 30 and 40 C. The fermentation is performed in particular
for
3 to 25 hours, preferably for 5 to 15 hours.
In a preferred embodiment, lactic acid bacteria are added to the dairy
product which has been heat-treated. Consequently, it is necessary to cool the
heat-
treated dairy product obtained at the end of the heat-treatment step to the
fermentation temperature before inoculating the lactic acid bacteria and
performing
the fermentation step (b).
The fermentation step is commonly a lactic fermentation which involves
techniques well-known to the skilled person.
When reference is made to a "lactic fermentation", this means an acidifying
lactic fermentation which results in milk coagulation and acidification
following the

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
9
production of lactic acid which may be accompanied by the production of other
acids, carbon dioxide and various substances such as exopolysaccharides (EPS)
or
aromatic substances, for example diacetyl and acetaldehyde.
In the framework of the present invention, various lactic acid bacteria can be
used for performing the fermentation of the dairy product and in particular a
culture
of lactic acid bacteria such as:
¨ Lactobacillus sp. (for ex. Lactobacillus bulgaricus and especially
Lactobacillus
delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus
paracasei,
Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus pentosus, Lactobacillus helveticus,
Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus bifidus and
combinations thereof),
¨ Lactococcus sp. (for ex. Lactococcus lactis and especially Lactococcus
lactis
subsp. lactis, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris and combinations thereof),
¨ Bifidobacterium sp. (for ex. Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium
infantis,
Bifidobacterium animalis and especially Bifidobacterium animalis subsp.
lactis,
Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum and combinations thereof), and
¨ Streptococcus sp. (for ex. Streptococcus thermophilus, Streptococcus
lactis,
Streptococcus raffinolactis, Streptococcus cremoris and combinations thereof),
and combinations thereof.
Preferred lactic acid bacteria to be used in the present invention are
selected
from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus,
Lactococcus lactis such as Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Bifidobacterium
animalis
subsp. lactis, and combinations thereof.
More preferred lactic acid bacteria to be used in the present invention are
selected from:
- Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus deposited under the number
CNCM 1-1632 or Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus deposited under the
number CNCM 1-1519,
- Streptococcus thermophilus deposited under the number CNCM-1630,
- Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis deposited under the number CNCM-1631,
- Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis deposited under the number CNCM-
2494,
and combinations thereof. The above mentioned lactic acid bacteria have been
deposited under the Budapest treaty at the Collection Nationale de Cultures de

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
Micro-organismes (CNCM) located at Institut Pasteur's headquarters (25 rue du
Docteur Roux 75724 PARIS Cedex 15 FRANCE).
According to a first embodiment, the culture of lactic acid bacteria comprises
at least one strain of thermophilic lactic acid bacteria, i.e. lactic acid
bacteria that
5 grow best in relatively high temperature, typically above 35 C, notably
between 38
and 44 C. The thermophilic lactic acid bacteria can be selected in the group
consisting of Streptococcus sp., Lactobacillus sp. and Bifidobacterium sp.,
such as
defined previously, and notably Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus
delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, or a
10 combination thereof.
According to a second embodiment, the culture of lactic acid bacteria
comprises at least one strain of mesophilic lactic acid bacteria, i.e. lactic
acid
bacteria that grow best in moderate temperature, typically between 20 and 30
C.
The mesophilic lactic acid bacteria can be in particular Lactococcus sp. such
as
defined previously, and even more particularly Lactococcus lactis subsp.
lactis.
According to a third embodiment, the culture of lactic acid bacteria comprise
at least one strain of mesophilic lactic acid bacteria such as defined
previously and
at least one strain of thermophilic lactic acid bacteria such as defined
previously.
The mesophilic lactic acid bacteria can be in particular Lactococcus sp. such
as
defined previously, and notably Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis; and the
thermophilic
lactic acid bacteria can be selected in the group consisting of Streptococcus
sp.,
Lactobacillus sp. and Bifidobacterium sp., such as defined previously, and
notably
can be Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp.
bulgaricus,
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, or a combination thereof. In
particular, the
thermophilic lactic acid bacteria will comprise Bifidobacterium sp. such as
defined
previously, notably Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis.
According to a preferred embodiment, the culture of lactic acid bacteria
comprise, notably consist in, a combination of Lactobacillus delbrueckii
subsp.
bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus.
According to a more preferred embodiment, the culture of lactic acid bacteria
comprise, notably consist in, a combination of Lactobacillus delbrueckii
subsp.
bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis.
According to a more preferred embodiment, the culture of lactic acid bacteria
comprise, notably consist in, a combination of Lactobacillus delbrueckii
subsp.
bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp.
lactis.

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
11
According to a more preferred embodiment, the culture of lactic acid bacteria
comprise, notably consist in, a combination of Lactobacillus delbrueckii
subsp.
bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis.
The fermentation step will be stopped, notably by cooling, advantageously
when the breaking pH is reached, i.e. a pH comprised between 4.80 and 4.20,
notably between 4.65 and 4.35.
According to a particular embodiment, a lactase can also be added to the
dairy product, in particular to the dairy product which has been heat-treated.
This
lactase and the lactic acid bacteria can be added to the dairy product
simultaneously
or separately. Advantageously, the lactase is added before (notably 10 to 40
min, in
particular 20 to 30 min, before) or along with the lactic acid bacteria.
Indeed, the addition of a lactase allows improving the organoleptic properties
of the final product (less acidic, bitter and astringent, sweeter taste, with
more
creamy and butter notes)
The lactase used in the present invention can be any kind of lactase such as:
H-Lactase 5200 from Hansen or Maxitact Lgi 5000 from DSM.
The lactase can be added in an amount of 0.005 wt% to 0.20 wt%, in particular
0.01 wt% to 0.15 wt%, preferably 0.02 wt% to 0.06 wt%, based on the total
weight of
the dairy product.
Step (c) - Separating a liquid phase (called whey) from the fermented dairy
product
After fermentation, the fermented dairy product is subjected to a separating
step in order to form a strained dairy product having a higher total protein
amount
than the one of the starting fermented dairy product.
In this step, a liquid phase containing mainly water, lactose and minerals is
separated from the fermented dairy product so that the strained fermented
dairy
product remains.
This step is preferably performed by centrifugation, using thus a centrifugal
separator as separating device.
This step is advantageously performed at a temperature (separation
temperature) comprised between 30 and 58 C, notably between 35 and 43 C.
Consequently, it could be necessary to heat or cool (notably heat) the
fermented

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
12
dairy product obtained at the end of the fermentation step (b) to the
separation
temperature before performing the separation step (c).
Advantageously, most of the proteins contained in the fermented dairy
product remains in the final strained fermented dairy product. The protein
recovery
rate (PRR) is thus advantageously above 80 wt%, preferably above 95 wt%. This
PRR is
improved when the dairy product contains starch in comparison to a product
with no
starch obtained before the clogging issues appear (see example 2).
By "protein recovery rate" is meant, in the present invention, the percent
ratio between the total protein content (in wt) in the fermented dairy product
and
the total protein content (in wt) in the strained fermented dairy product
(i.e. the
ratio of the total protein content (in wt) in the dairy product before and
after the
separation step (c)).
The strained fermented dairy product obtained at the end of this step will
have thus advantageously a total protein content comprised between 6 and 16%,
notably between 7 and 12%, such as between 8 and 10%. Indeed, the aim of the
separation step (c) is to obtain a target total protein content.
The separation yield of this separation step (c) is advantageously below 3.6
kg
of fermented dairy product feeding the separator per kg of final strained
fermented
dairy product, preferably below 3.1 kg of fermented dairy product feeding the
separator per kg of final strained fermented dairy product. This separation
yield is
improved when the dairy product contains starch in comparison to a dairy
product
with no starch obtained before the clogging issues appear (see example 2).
By "separation yield" is meant, in the present invention, the quantity of
fermented dairy product needed to produce 1 kg of final strained fermented
dairy
product.
In the absence of starch, a clogging of the separating device is observed
after
only few hours of operation of the production line requiring to stop the
production
line and to clean the separating device. This clogging is particularly
important when
the lactic acid bacteria used in the fermented step comprise a thermophilic
lactic
acid bacteria and notably a combination of thermophilic lactic acid bacteria
and
mesophilic lactic acid bacteria.
Actually, the clogging issue referred here is not related to standard nozzles
clogging, commonly observed in standard centrifugal separation processes, when

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
13
small particles collapses one or two nozzles and the outlet flow rates of the
device
are affected as immediate consequences.
The clogging phenomenon described here is observed in between the
separation disks of the centrifugal device (see Figure 1) and also all along
the rising
channels of the device. An accumulation of proteins present at a very high
concentration (around 29% protein analysed) seems to be the most probable
source
of encountered problem. Therefore, the impact on flow rates modifications
observed
when standard clogging nozzles occurs are not observed in this type of
clogging. In
this case, the main impacts observed are (see Figure 2):
- sudden decrease of total protein content in the strained fermented dairy
product,
- sudden increase of total protein content in the separated whey, and
- no improvement whatever inlet flow increase is applied, sometimes
making
worse the situation.
It can be hypothesized that a small part of proteins not solubilized could
"initiate" the clogging by sticking into the walls due to a specific biofilm
produced by
the specificity of the strains used in the fermentation step. Then, the more
the
process is going ahead, the more the proteins accumulate on the disks.
When this clogging issue occurs, the total protein content in the liquid phase
or whey increases, whereas the NT content in the strained fermented dairy
product
decreases drastically (see for ex. Figure 2). In addition to the clogging
issue, it is
then difficult or impossible to reach the target NT content in the final
strained
fermented dairy product, no matter the inlet flow that we adjust.
Without wishing to be bound by any theory, the inventors are of the opinion
that this clogging issue could be due to the production of exopolysaccharides
(EPS) by
the lactic acid bacteria which could lead to the obtaining of a gel structure
having a
lower permeability, an increased water binding by EPS, and the formation of a
biofilm which can stick to the inner walls of the separating device.
The inventors have thus tried to overcome this problem by adding texturizing
or emulsifying agents which could compete with EPS in the water binding and
increase permeability of the gel structure, thus releasing more easily this
water
during the separation step. The inventors have thus surprisingly discovered
that
among the various texturizing or emulsifying agents tested, only starch allows
improving the separation step (increased amount of released whey) and thus
solved
the clogging issue of the separating device (see examples 1-3).

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
14
Optional Step (d) - Smoothing
A smoothing step (e) can also be performed after the separation step (c).
This smoothing step can be carried out by means of a rotor stator mixer such
as defined in WO 2007/095969.
This step can be carried out at a temperature (smoothing temperature) of
between 30 and 45 C.
Optional Step (e) - Cooling
Advantageously, the strained fermented dairy product is a refrigerated
product, i.e. a product having a storage temperature of between 1 and 10 C,
notably
between 4 and 8 C.
The method according to the invention can thus comprise after step (c), and
notably after step (d) when a smoothing step is performed, an additional step
(e) of
cooling the strained fermented dairy product to its storage temperature.
Optional Step (f) - Adding food additives after the separation step
It could be envisaged to add to the strained fermented dairy product, after
the separation step (c), and notably after step (d) when a smoothing step is
performed, and notably after step (e) when a cooling step is performed,
additional
food additives, such as a cream material and/or a fruit preparation, if
necessary.
The cream material can be cream or a mixture of cream and milk. It can have
a fat content of from 20 to 50 wt%, in particular from 23 to 40 wt%.
The fruit preparation can be selected from fruits, fruit pieces, fruit puree,
fruit compote, fruit sauce, fruit coulis, fruit jam, fruit jelly, fruit juice
and mixtures
thereof, optionally in a concentrated or dried form, optionally present in a
matrix.
For example, the fruit(s) of the fruit-based preparation can be selected from
strawberry, raspberry, blackberry, blueberry, cherry, apricot, peach, pear,
apple,
plum, pineapple, mango, banana, papaya, passion fruit, pomelo, orange, lemon,
kiwi, coconut, vanilla and mixtures thereof.
The present invention relates also to the use of starch for preventing the
clogging of the separating device used in the preparation of a strained
fermented
dairy product.

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
The strained fermented dairy product can be as defined previously. In
particular, the strained fermented dairy product will have a total protein
content
comprised between 6 and 16%, notably between 7 and 12%, such as between 8 and
10%. The strained fermented dairy product can be more particularly a
refrigerated
5 product, i.e. a product having a storage temperature of between 1 and 10
C, notably
between 4 and 8 C.
This strained fermented dairy product is prepared from a fermented dairy
product by a separation step, using a separating device. The separating device
is
advantageously a centrifugal separator. The separation step can be performed
10 notably as defined above for step (c). The separation step can be
followed by a
cooling step of the strained fermented dairy product to its storage
temperature.
The fermented dairy product used to prepare the strained fermented dairy
product will have advantageously a total protein content comprised between
2.8%
and 4.6%, notably between 3.1 and 4.0%, such as between 3.2 and 3.6%. The
15 fermented dairy product contains the said starch, advantageously in an
amount of
0.05 to 1.0 wt%, notably 0.1 to 0.5 wt%, preferably 0.2 to 0.4 wt% based on
the total
amount of the fermented dairy product. The fermented dairy product can be
prepared from a dairy product containing the said starch, notably as defined
in step
(a) above. The preparation of the fermented dairy product from the dairy
product
comprises at least a fermentation step using notably the lactic acid bacteria
defined
previously. This fermentation step is advantageously preceded by a heat-
treatment
step. The fermentation step and the heat-treatment step can be performed
advantageously according to previously defined steps (b) and (c) respectively.
The starch present in the dairy product can be of various origins. It can be
potato starch, tapioca starch, wheat starch, maize starch (also called corn
starch),
rice starch, oat starch, barley starch, rye starch, cassava starch, sorghum
starch or a
mixture thereof, notably maize starch, tapioca starch or a mixture thereof. It
can be
"waxy" (containing high amount of amylopectin) or not. It can be granular or
molecular starch, notably granular. It can be in a native (or refined) or
modified
form.
Preferably, the starch used in the dairy product will be waxy maize starch or
tapioca starch, in particular in a granular form and notably refined or
modified. The
starch used in the dairy product according to the invention can be chosen
among the
following list or equivalent references manufactured by other suppliers:

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
16
Commercial reference Supplier Origin Type
Novation EnduraTM 100 Ingredion Waxy maiz Refined
N-DulgeTM C1 I ngredion Tapioca Modified
N - Du lgeTM C2 I ngredion Waxy maiz Modified
Thermtex I ngredion Waxy maiz Modified
Further details or advantages of the invention might appear in the following
non-limitative examples illustrated by the following figures.
FIGURES:
Figure 1 presents photographs of disks clogging occurred in a method of
manufacture of a strained fermented dairy product without starch.
Figure 2 represents the graphs of total protein content in the obtained
strained fermented dairy product (strained mass) and the separated whey in
function
of time, as well as the inlet flow in the separator device in function of
time, during 6
hours and 30 minutes production with a centrifugal separator device at
industrial
scale.
Figure 3 represents photographs of the two strained fermented dairy product,
with or without starch, obtained in example 2.
Figure 4 represents the evolution of the viscosity of the two strained
fermented dairy product, with or without starch, obtained in example 2, during
shelf
life.
Figure 5 represents the evolution of pH and Dornic acidity of the two strained
fermented dairy product, with or without starch, obtained in example 2, during
shelf
life.
Figure 6 represents the percent of whey release from the fermented dairy
products of example 3 (with various texturizing agents) in comparison to the
Reference product.
Figure 7 represents the percent of whey release from the fermented dairy
products of example 4 (with various starches) in comparison to the Reference
product.
Figure 8 represents the percent of whey release from the fermented dairy
products of example 5 (with various starch dosages) in comparison to the
Reference
product.

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
17
Figure 9 represents the total protein content in the strained fermented dairy
products obtained in example 5 (with various starch dosages).
EXAMPLES:
1. Evolution of total protein content at the outlet of the separator
device during
separation before and after disk clogging appears
A strained fermented dairy product was prepared by fermenting a heat-treated
skimmed dairy mix (prepared from skimmed milk and skimmed milk powder in
proportions so as to obtain a total protein content of about 3.5%) with a
culture of
lactic acid bacteria consisting of a mix of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp.
bulgaricus,
Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and
Bifidobacterium
animalis subsp. lactis.
The heat-treatment was performed according to the following steps:
¨ a first pre heat-treatment step to reach a temperature of about 65 C,
followed
by
¨ an homogenisation step at a pressure of about 50 bars (2 stages),
followed by
¨ a second heat-treatment step at a temperature of about 92 C for about 5
min.
The heat-treated dairy mix was fermented at 37 C and went into lactic
acidification
until reaching a targeted pH of 4.60.
The fermented dairy product was then re-heated to an appropriate separation
temperature, around 41 C, and then separated by a 12 nozzles centrifugal
separation
device to produce around 1/3 of a strained fermented dairy product reaching a
total
protein content of about 10% and 2 /3 of whey.
After some hours of production, the total protein content in the strained
fermented
product at the outlet of the device suddenly decreases (below 9.3% total
protein
content) whereas the total protein content recovered in the whey increases the
other way around (above 0.50%), without observing any fluctuation on the flows
neither of the whey nor on the strained fermented mass outlet (see Figure 2),
due to
a disk clogging of the centrifugal separation device (see Figure 1).
When this effect appears, we observe a degradation of the main separation
performance parameters: protein recovery rate decreases significantly (2%
versus the

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
18
starting phase of the production and getting worse when going ahead with the
production) and the yield was increasing in the same way.
2. Impact of starch addition vs. the reference
Two strained fermented dairy products were prepared as in example 1 using a 6
nozzles centrifugal separation device (KDB 16 - GEA Westfalia Nozzle
separator). The
first strained fermented dairy product corresponds to the one of example 1
before
the clogging issue appears. The second fermented dairy product corresponds to
the
one of example 1, except that starch (Novation EnduraTM 0100 from Ingredion at
0.5
wt% dosage) was added to the skimmed dairy mix before fermentation.
The analytical and process results observed for the two dairy products (with
or
without starch) after a separation step are reported in the table below:
Improvement
Without With
Parameter Unit (with -
starch starch
without)
(%) of protein
PRR recovered in the final 95.7 97 1.3
product
Separator feed
kg/h 3882 3690 -192
flow
kg of dairy mix/kg of
Flow yield 3.128 2.942 -0.186
final product
kg of proteins in the
Protein lost in
whey/kg of final 0.33 0.3 -0.03
whey
product
The following responses during processing were thus observed:
a) The total protein content measured in the whey from the fermented mix
containing starch was lower than the one measured in the fermented mix
without starch. It means that the losses of protein in the whey were lower.
b) The inlet flow to feed the separator device was lower when separating the
mix
with starch than the feed flow needed with the mix without starch, for the
same
total protein targeted at the outlet of the centrifugal separator.

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
19
c) The maximum proteins recovery rate (PRR) measured was higher in the
fermented strained dairy product with starch.
d) The milk consumption per kg of finished product was lower when separating
the
fermented dairy product with starch for the same total protein targeted at the
outlet of the centrifugal separator.
The following sensory, physical and chemical analyses on the strained
fermented
dairy products were observed:
a) No significant visual differences between the two products were observed
(see
Figure 3).
b) The viscosity of the two products has been measured with a Rheomat RM 200
at
a shear rate of 64 s-1 and at 10 Cat 24h after production (D+1) until D+50
(see
Figure 4). The product containing starch is significantly thicker than the
product
without starch; advantageously the texture of the product containing starch
evolves much less than the the product without starch (product causing the
clogging problem), making it more stable during shelf life.
c) The pH of the two products has been measured at 10 C with classical
laboratory
equipment and the Dornic acidity has been measured at 10 C by addition of
NaOH 0.1N until pH 8.35 (see Figure 5). No significant impact of the addition
of
starch on pH or Dornic acidity was observed.
3. % of whey released by the coagulum when introducing different
texturizing
agents in the formula
Five different fermented dairy products were prepared as detailed in example 1
from
the following dairy mixes:
a) the skimmed dairy mix of example 1 (Reference product);
b) the skimmed dairy mix of example 1 with an emulsifier (Grindsted Lactem
PQ22
from Danisco) at a dosage of 0.68 wt% ;
c) the skimmed dairy mix of example 1 with a pectin (Grindsted Pectin
SY640 from
Danisco) at a dosage of 0.09 wt% ;
d) the skimmed dairy mix of example 1 with a starch (Novation EnduraTM 0100
from
Ingredion) at a dosage of 0.5 wt%;
e) the skimmed dairy mix of example 1 with a gum (FibergumTM B from CNI) at a
dosage of 0.3 wt%.

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
The fermented dairy products were heated to the appropriate separation
temperature, around 41 C, and then separated with a laboratory spin
centrifuge: 4
samples of 40 g of each fermented dairy product, at 4000 rpm during 4 min.
Then,
the whey separated was weighted with a precision weighting device. The results
5 obtained are presented on Figure 6 as a percent of whey release in
comparison to the
Reference product.
Only the coagulum d) containing starch in the formula is able to release more
whey
than the reference meaning that the separation step is improved. No
significant
10 impact is observed for the use of gum, whereas the use of emulsifier or
pectin has a
negative impact on the capacity of releasing water from the coagulum.
4. % of whey released by the coagulum when introducing different types
of
starches in the formula
15 Five different fermented dairy products were prepared as detailed in
example 1 from
the following dairy mixes:
a) the skimmed dairy mix of example 1 (Reference product);
b) the skimmed dairy mix of example 1 with a modified tapioca starch (N-Dulge
C1
from Ingredion) at a dosage of 0.8 wt%;
20 c) the skimmed dairy with a modified waxy maize starch (N-Dulge C2 from
Ingredion)at a dosage of 0.8 wt%;
d) the skimmed dairy mix of example 1 with a dextrin from tapioca starch
(Crystal
TEX TM 626 from Ingredion) at a dosage of 1.25%; and
e) the skimmed dairy mix of example 1 with a refined waxy maize starch (Endura
0100 from Ingredion) at a dosage of 0.5%.
The fermented dairy products were heated to the appropriate separation
temperature, around 41 C, and then separated with a laboratory spin
centrifuge: 4
samples of 40 g of each coagulum, at 4000 rpm during 4 min. Then, the whey
separated was weighted with a precision weighting device. The results obtained
are
presented on Figure 7 as a percent of whey release in comparison to the
Reference
product.
The addition of the various starches to the dairy product improved the
quantity of
whey released after the centrifugal separation, but it is not the case for the
addition

CA 03009380 2018-06-21
WO 2017/108140 PCT/EP2015/081235
21
of the dextrin. Special increase of whey released was observed with the recipe
e),
using the non-modified waxy maize type starch.
5. % of whey released by the coagulum when introducing different doses
of starch
in the formula
Five different fermented dairy products were prepared as detailed in example 1
from
five different dairy mixes containing 5 different dosages (Owt%, 0.13wt%,
0.25wt%,
0.38wt%, or 0.50wt%) of refined waxy maize starch (Novation EnduraTM 0100 from
I ngredion).
The fermented dairy products were heated to the appropriate separation
temperature, around 41 C, and then separated with a laboratory spin
centrifuge: 4
samples of 40 g of each coagulum, at 4000 rpm during 4 min. Then, the whey
separated was weighted with a precision weighting device. The results obtained
are
presented on Figure 8 as a percent of whey release in comparison to the
Reference
product (comprising 0 wt% starch). The total protein content of the strained
fermented dairy product obtained is also presented on Figure 9.
These results show that the separation step is improved in the presence of
starch,
whatever the starch dosage used. However the impact of starch dosage on the
whey
release capacity is not linear; to reach a maximum amount of water releasing
capacity, there is an optimum dosage of starch. Below or above this dosage,
the
amount of released whey is lower. In the same way, the total protein content
reached in the separated mass increased up to this optimum starch dosage;
above it,
the total protein concentration decreases.
Without wishing to be bound by any theory, the inventors are of the opinion
that
when adding too high amount of starch, the coagulum viscosity increases,
making the
whey separation by centrifugal force more difficult than with an optimised
dosage.
Advantageously, an optimised starch dose will produce an improvement of the
separation capacity of the dairy fermented curd, without impacting too much
the
viscosity and the corresponding sensory profile, thus, getting closer to the
reference
(without any starch).

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 3009380 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Letter Sent 2022-11-29
Inactive: Grant downloaded 2022-11-29
Inactive: Grant downloaded 2022-11-29
Grant by Issuance 2022-11-29
Inactive: Cover page published 2022-11-28
Pre-grant 2022-09-02
Inactive: Final fee received 2022-09-02
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2022-06-22
Letter Sent 2022-06-22
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2022-06-22
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2022-04-29
Inactive: Q2 passed 2022-04-29
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2022-03-07
Amendment Received - Response to Examiner's Requisition 2022-03-07
Examiner's Report 2021-11-16
Inactive: Report - QC passed 2021-11-12
Letter Sent 2021-01-06
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2020-12-23
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2020-12-23
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2020-12-23
Request for Examination Received 2020-12-23
Common Representative Appointed 2020-11-07
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Inactive: Cover page published 2018-07-12
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2018-07-03
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2018-06-27
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-06-27
Application Received - PCT 2018-06-27
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2018-06-21
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2017-06-29

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2022-11-10

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2018-06-21
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2017-12-27 2018-06-21
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2018-12-24 2018-11-12
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2019-12-24 2019-11-15
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2020-12-24 2020-11-16
Request for examination - standard 2020-12-24 2020-12-23
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2021-12-24 2021-11-10
Final fee - standard 2022-10-24 2022-09-02
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2022-12-28 2022-11-10
MF (patent, 8th anniv.) - standard 2023-12-27 2023-11-21
MF (patent, 9th anniv.) - standard 2024-12-24 2023-12-22
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
DANONE S.A.
Past Owners on Record
MARIA ALMUDENA BILBAO CALABUIG
PAOLA FLABBI
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 2018-06-20 5 1,464
Description 2018-06-20 21 935
Abstract 2018-06-20 1 52
Claims 2018-06-20 2 73
Claims 2022-03-06 3 83
Notice of National Entry 2018-07-02 1 206
Courtesy - Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2021-01-05 1 433
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2022-06-21 1 576
Electronic Grant Certificate 2022-11-28 1 2,527
International search report 2018-06-20 2 57
National entry request 2018-06-20 4 181
Declaration 2018-06-20 1 57
Request for examination / Amendment / response to report 2020-12-22 6 205
International preliminary examination report 2021-11-08 6 215
Examiner requisition 2021-11-15 4 194
Amendment / response to report 2022-03-06 12 557
Final fee 2022-09-01 4 162