Language selection

Search

Patent 3009946 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 3009946
(54) English Title: BIOCHAR AS A MICROBIAL CARRIER
(54) French Title: BIOCHARBON EN TANT QUE VECTEUR MICROBIEN
Status: Examination
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C12N 11/14 (2006.01)
  • C12M 1/00 (2006.01)
  • C12P 5/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BELCHER, RICHARD WILSON (United States of America)
  • KIM, HAN SUK (United States of America)
  • BUEGE, BRIAN (United States of America)
  • JARAND, MARK L. (United States of America)
  • CHEIKY, MICHAEL C. (United States of America)
  • SILLS, RONALD A. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • CARBON TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC
(71) Applicants :
  • CARBON TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC (United States of America)
(74) Agent: PERRY + CURRIER
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2016-12-28
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2017-07-06
Examination requested: 2021-12-09
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2016/069050
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2017117314
(85) National Entry: 2018-06-26

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
15/156,256 (United States of America) 2016-05-16
15/350,920 (United States of America) 2016-11-14
62/271,486 (United States of America) 2015-12-28
62/290,285 (United States of America) 2016-02-02
62/344,865 (United States of America) 2016-06-02
62/432,253 (United States of America) 2016-12-09

Abstracts

English Abstract

The invention relates to a microbial delivery system where biochar acts as a carrier for microbes.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un système d'administration microbien, du biocharbon servant de vecteur pour des microbes.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


VI. CLAIMS
I claim:
1. A microbial delivery system comprising:
biochar having pores; and
microbes retained on the surface or in the pores of the biochar.
2. The delivery system of claim 1, where at least some of the microbes are
inoculated into
the pores of the biochar.
3. The delivery system of claim 2, where the microbes are inoculated into
the pores of the
biochar using mechanical, chemical, or biological assistance to move the
microbes either into
the pores of the biochar or onto the surfaces of the biochar.
4. The delivery system of claim 3 where the microbes are inoculated into
the pores of the
biochar using the application of positive or negative pressure.
5. The delivery system of claim 3 where the microbes are inoculated into
the pores of the
biochar using a surfactant.
6. The delivery system of claim 1 where the microbes are retained by the
biochar through
mixing the biochar and microbes together.
7. The delivery system of claim 6 where the microbes are retained on the
biochar by
suspending the microbes in liquid and depositing the microbes on the biochar.
8. The delivery system of claim 1 where the microbes retained by the
biochar are selected
from the group consisting of: Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium,
Burkholderia,
Achromobacter, Agrobacterium, Microccocus, Aereobacter, Flavobacterium,
Erwinia,
Klebsielia, and Enterobacter , including Bacillus mucilaginosus, Bacillus
edaphicus, Bacillus
circulans, Paenibacillus spp., Acidothiobacillus ferrooxidans, Pseudomonas
cepacia,
Burkholderia cepacia, Kiebsiella variicola, Pantoea agglomerans; fungi such as
Glomus
mosseae, Glomus intraradices, Aspergillus terreus and Aspergillus niger.
9. The delivery system of claim 1 where the biochar is treated biochar.
92

10. The delivery system of claim 9 where the biochar has been treated to
alter one or more
of the following properties of the biochar: pH; hydrophobicity;
hydrophilicity; ability of the
biochar to hold moisture; ability of the biochar to retain and exchange
certain types of
nutrients; ion exchange capacity; physical protection from environmental
hazards or protozoa;
presence or absence of nutrients, micronutrients, or sources of metabolic
carbon; or ability of
the biochar to host other symbiotic microbes or plant systems.
11. The delivery system of claim 1, where at least some of the microbes are
retained on the
biochar through integrated growth with the biochar.
12. A method for delivering microbes into an environment, the method
comprising
combining biochar and microbes in the environment, where the biochar has been
treated to have
suitable properties for the microbes in the environment in which the biochar
and microbes are
combined.
13. Biochar having pores where pores are filled with a media containing
microbes,
where the media is infused into the pores of the biochar.
14. The biochar of claim 13 where the microbes includes microorganisms
selected
from the group consisting of: Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium,
Burkholderia,
Achromobacter, Agrobacterium, Microccocus, Aereobacter, Flavobacterium,
Erwinia,
Klebsiella, and Enterobacter, , including Bacillus mucilaginosus, Bacillus
edaphicus, Bacillus
circulans, Paenibacillus spp., Acidothiobacillus ferrooxidans, Pseudomonas
cepacia,
Burkholderia cepacia, Klebsiella variicola, Pantoea agglomerans; fungi such as
Glomus
mosseae, Glomus intraradices, Aspergillus terreus and Aspergillus niger.
15. The biochar of claim 13 where the media is infused into the pores of
the biochar using
positive or negative pressure.
16. The biochar of claim 13 where the media is infused into the pores of
the biochar using a
surfactant.
17. The biochar of claim 16 where the surfactant treatment comprises adding
1% surfactant
to the media.
93

18. The biochar of claim 13 where the pores of the biochar are treated
prior to infusion with
the media.
19. The biochar of claim 13 where the moisture content of the pores of the
biochar
are adjusted prior to infusion with the media.
20. Biochar for use in agricultural, remediation, public health, or animal
application,
the biochar comprising a porous carbonaceous particle that has been treated
and/or mixed with
media containing microbes, whereby the porous carbonaceous particle after
treatment and/or
mixing has retained the media in at least some of the pores of the porous
carbonaceous particle.
21. The biochar of claim 20 where the microbes are microorganisms selected
from the group
consisting of: Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Burkholderia,
Achromobacter,
Agrobacterium, Microccocus, Aereobacter, Flavobacterium, Erwinia, Klebsiella,
and
Enterobacter , including Bacillus mucilaginosus, Bacillus edaphicus, Bacillus
circulans,
Paenibacillus spp., Acidothiobacillus ferrooxidans, Pseudomonas cepacia,
Burkholderia
cepacia, Klebsiella variicola, Pantoea agglomerans; fungi such as Glomus
mosseae, Glomus
intraradices, Aspergillus terreus and Aspergillus niger.
22. A method for creating enhanced biochar, the method comprising the steps
of infusing
media containing microbes into the pores of biochar.
23. The method of claim 22 where the media is infused into the pores of the
biochar using
positive or negative pressure.
24. The method of claim 22 where the media is infused into the pores of the
biochar using a
surfactant.
25. The method of claim 22 where the media includes microorganisms selected
from the
group consisting of: Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Burkholderia,
Achromobacter,
Agrobacterium, Microccocus, Aereobacter, Flavobacterium, Erwinia, Klebsiella,
and
Enterobacter , including Bacillus mucilaginosus, Bacillus edaphicus, Bacillus
circulans,
Paenibacillus spp., Acidothiobacillus ferrooxidans, Pseudomonas cepacia,
Burkholderia
cepacia, Kiebsiella variicola, Pantoea agglomerans; fungi such as Glomus
mosseae, Glomus
intraradices, Aspergillus terreus and Aspergillus niger.
94

26. A methods for integrating a microbial community with a biochar
particle, the method
selected from the group consisting of: while under vacuum, pulling the
microbial solution
through a treated biochar bed that is resting on a membrane filter; spraying a
microbial solution
on top of a treated biochar bed; lyophilizing a microbial solution and then
blending the freeze
dried solution with the treated biochar; again infusing, the treated biochar
with a microbial
solution; adding treated biochar to a growth medium, inoculating with the
microbe, and
incubating to allow the microbe to grow in said biochar containing medium;
infusing, as defined
previously, the biochar with a food source and then introducing the substrate
infused biochar to
a microbe and incubating to allow the microbes to grow; blending commercially
available
strains in dry form with treated biochar; adding the treated biochar to a
microbial solution and
then centrifuging at a high speed, potentially with a density gradient in
order to promote the
biochar to spin down with the microbes; densely packing a column with treated
biochar and then
gravity flowing a microbial solution through the column and possibly repeating
this multiple
times; or adding the microbe to a solution based binder that is well known to
enter the treated
biochar pores and then adding said solution to the treated biochar.
27. The method of claim 26 where biochar is sterilized before being infused
with the
microbial community.
28. The method of claim 26 where the microbial community includes a
microorganism
selected from the group consisting of: Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium,
Burkholderia,
Achromobacter, Agrobacterium, Microccocus, Aereobacter, Flavobacterium,
Erwinia,
Klebsiella, and Enterobacter , including Bacillus mucilaginosus, Bacillus
edaphicus, Bacillus
circulans, Paenibacillus spp., Acidothiobacillus ferrooxidans, Pseudomonas
cepacia,
Burkholderia cepacia, Kiebsteila variicola, Pantoea agglomerans; fungi such as
Glomus
mosseae, Glomus intraradices, Aspergillus terreus and Aspergillus niger.
29. The biochar of claim 20 where the biochar has been treated to alter one
or more of the
following properties of the biochar: pH; hydrophobicity; hydrophilicity;
ability of the blochar
to hold moisture; ability of the biochar to retain and exchange certain types
of nutrients; ion
exchange capacity; physical protection from environmental hazards or protozoa;
presence or

absence of nutrients, micronutrients. or sources of metabolic carbon; or
ability of the biochar
to host other symbiotic microbes or plant systems.
96

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
BIOCHAR AS A MICROBIAL CARRIER
RELATED APPLICATIONS
[001] This application claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent
Application Serial No.
62/271,486 filed on December 28, 2015 titled ADDITIVE INFUSED BIOCHARS, U.S.
Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 62/290,285 filed on February 2, 2016
titled
ADDITIVE INFUSED BIOCHARS, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No.
62/344,865 filed on June 2, 2016 titled MINERAL SOLUBILIZING MICROORGANISMS
INFUSED BIOCHARS and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 62/432,253
filed
on December 9, 2016 titled ADDITIVE INFUSED BIOCHARS; this application is a
continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 15/350,920 filed on
November 14,
2016 titled METHOD FOR ENHANCING SOIL GROWTH USING BIO-CHAR, which is a
continuation of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 14/385,986 filed on May 29,
2012, titled
METHOD FOR ENHANCING SOIL GROWTH USING BIO-CHAR (now U.S. Patent No.
9,493,380 that issued on November 15, 2016), which is a 371 national stage
filing of PCT
US12/39862 filed May 29, 2012 titled METHOD FOR ENHANCING SOIL GROWTH
USING BIO-CHAR, which is a continuation of U.S. Patent Application Serial No.
13/154,213
filed on June 6, 2011, titled METHOD FOR ENHANCING SOIL GROWTH USING BIO-
CHAR (now U.S. Patent No. 8,317,891 that issued on November 27, 2012); this
application is
also a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application No. 15/156,256, filed
on May 16, 2016,
titled ENHANCED BIOCHAR, which claims priority to United States Provisional
Patent
Application No. 62/162,219, filed on May 15, 2015, titled ENHANCED BIOCHAR;
this
1

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
application is also a continuation-in-part of United States Patent Application
No. 14/873,053
filed on October 1, 2015, titled BIOCHARS AND BIOCHAR TREATMENT PROCESSES,
which claims priority to United States Provisional Patent Application No.
62/058,445, filed on
October 1, 2014, titled METHODS, MATERIALS AND APPLICATIONS FOR
CONTROLLED POROSITY AND RELEASE STRUCTURES AND APPLICATIONS and
United States Provisional Patent Application No. 62/058,472, filed on October
1, 2014, titled
HIGH ADDITIVE RETENTION BIOCHARS, METHODS AND APPLICATIONS; and this
application is a continuation-in-part of United States Patent Application No.
14/036,480, filed
on September 25, 2013, titled METHOD FOR PRODUCING NEGATIVE CARBON FUEL,
which is a continuation of United States Patent Application No. 13/189,709,
filed on July 25,
2011 (now US Pat. No. 8,568,493), all of the above of which are incorporated
in their entirety
by reference in this application.
2

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
FIELD OF INVENTION
[002] The invention relates to porous carbonaceous structures having
increased
capabilities to retain additives for use in applications, including, but not
limited to, agricultural
applications. These additives include but are not limited to beneficial
nutrients, substances,
microbes, or enzymes. The additives can be incorporated with the biochar in
various ways,
including but not limited to infusing the biochar with the additives to
provide for the gradual
delivery of the additive to the surrounding environment, such as soil.
BACKGROUND
[003] During the last decades, soil degradation has increased due to
deforestation, agricultural
activities, industrial activities, vegetation overexploitation and excessive
grazing. To avoid and
potentially reverse soil degradation, many different types of soil enhancers
have been developed
and are already being used today. Among the most common soil enhancers are
fertilizers.
Fertilizers improve the supply of nutrients in the soil, directly affecting
plant growth. However,
despite the wide spread use of fertilizers, conventional fertilizers are
inefficient, particularly in
soils with low cation exchange capacities and humid climate conditions. The
demand for
frequent application, susceptibility to being washed out / leaching, and the
need for nutrients to
be constantly replenished are a few of the many problems associated with
conventional
fertilizers. Therefore, controlled released fertilizers (CRF) have become the
preferred type of
fertilizers to improve nutrient yield while minimizing losses. CRF's have the
ability to supply
nutrients gradually to soil and plants over a longer period of time. By
coinciding with the
nutrient requirements of the plant, CRF's ensure improved effectiveness
through minimizing
the losses between application and absorption, thus avoiding losses by
leaching, runoff, and
nutrient volatilization.
[004] A second known type of soil enhancer consists of microbes, such as
beneficial fungi
or plant growth promoting bacteria ("PGPB"). PGPB are rhizosphere-associated
organisms that
colonize the rhizo sphere and rhizoplane and improve plant growth when
artificially inoculated
into soil. PGPB can both promote plant growth and fight pathogenic fungi.
Current methods
for deploying microbes into the environment often lead to the microbes being
compromised and
even dying before they can be fully incorporated into the environment. Thus a
system or
3

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
method to deploy them which will better maintain their viability and
effectiveness is needed for
the industry to fully realize the benefits of microbial use.
[005] A third known type of soil enhancer is biochar. Biochar has been
known for many
years as a soil enhancer. It contains highly porous, high carbon content
material similar to the
type of very dark, fertile anthropogenic soil found in the Amazon Basin known
as Terra Preta,
which has very high carbon content and historically has been made from a
mixture of charcoal,
bone, and manure. Biochar is created by the pyrolysis of biomass, which
generally involves
heating and/or burning of organic matter, in a reduced oxygen environment, at
a predetermined
rate. Such heating and/or burning is stopped when the matter reaches a
charcoal like stage. The
highly porous material of biochar is suited to host beneficial microbes,
retain nutrients, hold
water, and act as a delivery system for a range of beneficial compounds and
additives suited to
specific applications.
[006] Raw biochar, while known for its soil enhancing characteristics, does
not always benefit
soil and, depending upon the biomass from which the biochar is produced and
the method of
production, can potentially be harmful to the soil, making it unsuitable for
various types of crops
or other productive uses. In particular, biochar can be detrimental, or even
toxic, to 1) soil
microbes involved in nutrient transport to the plant; 2) plants and 3) humans.
Biochars derived
from different biomass or produced with differing parameters, such as higher
or lower pyrolysis
temperature or variations in residence time, will have different physical and
chemical properties
and can behave quite differently when used in agriculture. For example,
biochar having pH
levels too high, containing too much ash, inorganics, or containing toxins or
heavy metal content
too high can be harmful and/or have minimal benefit to the soil and the plant
life it supports.
Biochar can also contain unacceptable levels of residual organic compounds
such as acids,
esters, ethers, ketones, alcohols, sugars, phenyls, alkanes, alkenes, phenols,
polychlorinated
biphenyls or poly or mono aromatic hydrocarbons which are either toxic or not
beneficial to
plant or animal life.
[007] Due to the unpredictable performance of biochar and its potential to be
detrimental to
plant life and growth, it has mostly been a scientific curiosity, not found
wide spread use, not
found large scale commercial application, and has been relegated to small
niche applications. It
is, however, known, as noted above, that biochar, having certain
characteristics can host
4

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
beneficial microbes, retain nutrients, hold water, and act as a delivery
system for a range of
beneficial compounds suited to specific applications. Thus, it has been a
continued desire to
capture the beneficial soil enhancing characteristics of biochar in a more
consistent, predictable
way. Biochar research has continued in an attempt to harness biochar having
predictable,
controllable, and beneficial results as a soil amendment for large scale
applications.
[008] Additionally, attempts have been made to narrowly combine the benefits
of fertilizer
with biochar by mixing it with, coating it with or submersing it in the
fertilizer. The results of
these attempts, however, have failed to adequately allow soil nutrient
exposure and plant
nutrient uptake to occur over a longer period of time throughout a growing
season from the same
application.
[009] There are currently around 7 billion people in the world and this is
expected to increase
to approximately 8 billion around the year 2020. In light of both the expected
worldwide
population increase and the increasing environmental damage caused by ever
greater levels of
industrialization, it will become more and more of a challenge to feed all of
the world's people,
a problem that will only increase with time. Thus, a need exists, in order to
feed this growing
population, for a method of combining the benefits of fertilizer, beneficial
fungi, PGPB or other
additives with biochar in a manner that reduces the cost and impact of the
frequent application
of nutrients to the soil and increases agricultural productivity in a
sustainable and
environmentally friendly manner.

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
SUMMARY
[010] The present invention relates to biochar having increased capabilities
to retain and then
deploy additives more effectively. The biochar may be infused with beneficial
additives to
allow for a more gradual, prolonged release of the compounds to the soil. This
time release
effect in agricultural applications can dramatically reduce the need for high
frequency
application in the period immediately following planting and can also increase
plant growth
and sustain plant life. The present invention can be used in connection with
any type of
beneficial additive ¨ including, but not limited to, plant nutrients,
beneficial fungi, PGPB,
hormones, enzymes, bio pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, nematicides,
bacteriacides,
fumigants among others additives, as will be described more fully below. In
addition, the
biochar can make a superior microbial carrier for various applications,
including but not
limited to agriculture, as the properties of the biochar can improve the
viability of the microbes
and their effectiveness after deployment with the biochar.
[011] The method includes producing an additive infused biochar that may
contain biochar,
plant nutrients, beneficial fungi, PGPB and/or other additives. The method
includes
impregnating at least some of the pores of the biochar with liquid additives
or additives in liquid
solution through an infusion process. The resulting infused biochar provides
for gradual and/or
steady delivery of the additives to the soil and plants. The utilization of
additive infused biochar
allows the delivery of more nutrients or additives per unit of biochar and
also provides for a
more gradual release of the additives to the surrounding soil. In turn, this
enables different
soils to provide an environment well suited to the long term success of the
desired plant. The
use of additive infused biochar results in visibly fuller plants, increases
plant yield with
improved vitality and longevity that can be maintained with less frequent
additive application
and reduced additive effectiveness from leaching or runoff.
[012] The present invention teaches treating the biochar in a manner that
forces, accelerates or
assists the infusion of additives into the pores of the biochar. Treatment in
this manner allows for
the impregnation or inoculation of the pores of the biochar with additives,
which can be beneficial
for the intended use of the biochar.
[013] In one example of an implementation of the present invention, the method
for treating the
biochar includes placing porous carbonaceous materials in a tank or chamber;
adding an additive
6

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
solution to the tank; and changing the pressure in the tank by, for example,
placing the contents
of the tank under a partial vacuum. In this example, the additive solution may
be added to the
tank either before the pressure change is applied or while the pressure change
is being applied.
In addition to subjecting the contents to a partial vacuum, the pores of the
biochar may be
impregnated with the additive solution using a surfactant solution (e.g., a
liquid solution
containing 0.1 - 20% surfactant) or ultrasonic treatment, as will be further
described below.
Through the above treatment methods, at least 10% or more of the pore volume
of the pores of
the biochar material may be filled with the additive solution within a time
period where it would
not otherwise be possible to achieve the same results by simply contact or
immersion of the
biochar with the additive solution alone.
[014] Other devices, apparatus, systems, methods, features and advantages of
the invention are
or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the
following figures
and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems,
methods, features and
advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the
invention, and be
protected by the accompanying claims.
7

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[015] The invention may be better understood by referring to the following
figures. The
components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being
placed upon
illustrating the principles of the invention.
[016] Figure 1 illustrates a cross-section of one example of a raw biochar
particle.
[017] Figure 2a is a SEM (10KV x 3.00K 10.0m) of pore morphology of treated
biochar
made from pine.
[018] Figure 2b is a SEM (10KV x 3.00K 10.0m) of pore morphology of treated
biochar
made from birch.
[019] Figure 2c is a SEM (10KV x 3.00K 10.0m) of pore morphology of treated
biochar
made from coconut shells.
[020] Figure 3 is a chart showing porosity distribution of various biochars.
[021] Figure 4 is a flow chart process diagram of one implementation of a
process for treating
the raw biochar in accordance with the invention.
[022] Figure 4a illustrates a schematic of one example of an implementation of
a biochar treat
processes that that includes washing, pH adjustment and moisture adjustment.
[023] Figure 4b illustrates yet another example of an implementation of a
biochar treatment
processing that includes inoculation.
[024] Figure 5 is a schematic flow diagram of one example of a treatment
system for use in
accordance with the present invention.
[025] Figure 6 is a chart showing the water holding capacities of treated
biochar as compared to
raw biochar and sandy clay loam soil and as compared to raw biochar and
sunshine potting soil.
[026] Figure 7 illustrates the different water retention capacities of raw
biochar versus treated
biochar measured gravimetrically.
[027] Figure 8 is a chart showing the retained water in vacuum impregnated
biochar over other
biochars after a seven week period.
[028] Figure 9 is a chart showing the weight loss of treated biochars versus
raw biochar samples
when heated at varying temperatures using a TGA testing method.
[029] Figure 10 illustrates the plant available water in raw biochar, versus
treated biochar and
treated dried biochar.
8

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[030] Figure 11 is a graph showing the pH of various starting biochars that
were made from
different starting materials and pyrolysis process temperatures.
[031] Figure 12 is a chart showing various pH ranges and germination for
treated biochars.
[032] Figure 13 is a Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) plot showing the
measurement of water
content, heavy organics and light organics in a sample.
[033] Figure 14 is a chart showing the impact of treatment on pores sizes of
biochar derived
from coconut.
[034] Figure 15 is a chart showing the impact of treatment on pores sizes of
biochar derived
from pine.
[035] Figure 16 is a chart showing the measured hydrophobicity index raw
biochar, vacuum
treated biochar and surfactant treated biochar.
[036] Figure 17 is a flow diagram showing one example of a method for infusing
biochar.
[037] Figure 18 illustrates the improved liquid content of biochar using
vacuum
impregnation as against soaking the biochar in liquid.
[038] Figure 19a is a chart comparing total retained water of treated biochar
after soaking
and after vacuum impregnation.
[039] Figure 19b is a chart comparing water on the surface, interstitially and
in the pores of
biochar after soaking and after vacuum impregnation.
[040] Figure 20 illustrates how the amount of water or other liquid in the
pores of vacuum
processed biochars can be increased varied based upon the applied pressure.
[041] Figure 21 illustrates the effects of NPK impregnation of biochar on
lettuce yield.
[042] Figure 22 is a chart showing nitrate release curves of treated biochars
infused with
nitrate fertilizer.
[043] Figures 23 and 24 are images that show how different sized bacteria will
fit in different
biochar pore size structures.
[044] Figure 25 illustrates release rate data verse total pore volume data for
both coconut shell
and pine based treated biochars inoculated with a releasable bacteria.
[045] Figure 26 is a chart comparing examples of biochars.
[046] Figures 27a, 27b, 27c are charts comparing different examples of
biochars.
9

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[047] Figure 28 is a chart comparing shoot biomass when the biochar added to a
soilless mix
containing soybean seeds is treated with microbial product containing
bradyrhizobium
japonicum. and when it is untreated.
[048] Figure 29 shows the comparison of root biomass in a treated verses an
untreated
environment.
[049] Figure 30 is a chart comparing the nitrogen levels when the biochar is
inoculated with
the rhizobial inoculant verses when it is not inoculated.
[050] Figure 31 illustrates the three day release rates of water infused
biochar compared to other
types of biochar.
[051] Figure 32a is a SEM (10KV x 3.00K 10.0m) of pore morphology of raw
biochar.
[052] Figure 32b is a SEM (10KV x 3.00K 10.0m) of pore morphology of raw
biochar of
Figure 32a after it has been infused with microbial species.
[053] Figure 32c is a SEM (10KV x 3.00K 10.0m) of a pore morphology of another
example
of raw biochar of Figure 17a after it has been infused with microbial species.
[054] Figure 33 contains charts illustrating improved results obtained through
the use of
biochars.
[055] Figure 34 is an example of carbon dioxide production captured as a
continuous gas bubble
in BGB (left two tubes) and LTB (right two tubes) growth medium.
[056] Figures 35 and 36 illustrate improved growth rates of colonies of
Streptomyces lydicus
using biochars.

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[057] As illustrated in the attached figures, the present invention relates to
biochar having
increased capabilities to retain and then deploy additives more effectively.
In addition, it
includes additive infused biochars and methods for infusing biochars with
additives that allow
for the release of the additives into the environment gradually. When used in
agricultural
applications, the gradual release of the additive into the soil, can result in
an increase of plant
growth, vigor, or survivability, while minimizing the loss of beneficial
compounds in the root
zone. In particular, the biochar can make a superior microbial carrier for
various applications,
including but not limited to agriculture, as the properties of the biochar can
improve the viability
of the microbes and their effectiveness after deployment with the biochar.
This present
invention of the biochar as a microbial carrier can either be or not be in
conjunction with the
invention of the additive infusion, in which the additive infused is either
the microbe itself or
something else. As described below, through treatment, the properties of the
raw biochar can be
modified to significantly increase the biochar' s ability to retain water,
nutrients and additives
useful for an end application while also, in many cases, creating an
environment beneficial to
microorganisms. Generally, for agricultural applications, such enhanced
abilities could include
holding water, and nutrients, e.g. fertilizer, or removing compounds, such as
volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), that may react with or negatively impact either the additive
itself or
microbial or plant life in general.
[058] For example, through treatment, in addition to nutrients, other material
additives, e.g.,
beneficial fungi, PGPB, herbicides and pesticides, can be utilized and benefit
from the increased
holding and retention capacities of the treated biochar. For certain biochar,
the processing can
also ensure that properties of the biochar, including its pH, used in the
present application is
suitable for creating conditions beneficial for plant or microbial growth,
which has been a known
challenge for raw biochars.
[059] Generally, treated biochar of the present invention can be used
throughout the world,
in numerous soil types, agricultural applications, horticultural, large and
small scale farming,
organic farming, and in a variety of soil management applications and systems,
and
combinations and variations of these. Examples of these applications include
for example,
use in acidic and highly weathered tropical field soils, use in temperate
soils of higher fertility,
11

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
use in large commercial applications, use for the production of large scale
crops such as,
soybean, corn, sugarcane and rice, in forestry applications, for golf courses
(e.g., greens,
fairways), for general purpose turf grasses, wine grapes, table grapes, raisin
grapes, fruit and
nut trees, ground fruits (e.g., strawberries, blueberries, blackberries), row
crops (e.g., tomatoes,
celery, lettuce, leafy greens), root crops (e.g., tubers, potatoes, beets,
carrots), mushrooms,
and combinations and variations of these and other agricultural applications.
As discussed in
more detail below, biochar treated in this way may also be used in other
applications, such as
animal feed, composting, water treatment, and heavy metal remediation, to name
a few.
[060] For purposes of this application, the term "biochar" shall be given its
broadest possible
meaning and shall include any solid carbonaceous materials obtained from the
pyrolysis,
torrefaction, gasification or any other thermal and/or chemical conversion of
a biomass. For
purposes of this application, the solid carbonaceous material may include, but
not be limited to,
BMF char disclosed and taught by U.S. Patent 8,317,891, which is incorporated
into this
application by reference. Pyrolysis is generally defined as a thermochemical
decomposition
of organic material at elevated temperatures in the absence of, or with
reduced levels of oxygen.
When the biochar is referred to as "treated" or undergoes "treatment," it
shall mean raw,
pyrolyzed biochar that has undergone additional physical, biological, and/or
chemical
processing.
[061] As used herein, unless specified otherwise, the terms "carbonaceous",
"carbon based",
"carbon containing", and similar such terms are to be given their broadest
possible meaning,
and would include materials containing carbon in various states,
crystallinities, forms and
compounds.
[062] As used herein, unless stated otherwise, room temperature is 25 C. And,
standard
temperature and pressure is 25 C and 1 atmosphere. Unless stated otherwise,
generally, the
term "about" is meant to encompass a variance or range of 10%, the
experimental or
instrument error associated with obtaining the stated value, and preferably
the larger of these.
[063] A. Bioeliars
[064] Typically, biochars include porous carbonaceous materials, such as
charcoal, that are
used as soil amendments or other suitable applications. Biochar most commonly
is created by
pyrolysis of a biomass. In addition to the benefits to plant growth, yield and
quality, etc.;
12

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
biochar provides the benefit of reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) in the
atmosphere by serving as
a method of carbon sequestration. Thus, biochar has the potential to help
mitigate climate
change, via carbon sequestration. However, to accomplish this important, yet
ancillary benefit,
to any meaningful extent, the use of biochar in agricultural applications must
become widely
accepted, e.g., ubiquitous. Unfortunately, because of the prior failings in
the biochar arts, this
has not occurred. It is believed that with the solutions of the present
invention may this level
of use of biochar be achieved; and more importantly, yet heretofore
unobtainable, realize the
benefit of significant carbon dioxide sequestration.
[065] In general, one advantage of putting biochar in soil includes long term
carbon
sequestration. It is theorized that as worldwide carbon dioxide emissions
continue to mount,
benefits may be obtained by, controlling, mitigating and reducing the amount
of carbon dioxide
in the atmosphere and the oceans. It is further theorized that increased
carbon dioxide emissions
are associated with the increasing industrial development of developing
nations, and are also
associated with the increase in the world's population. In addition to
requiring more energy,
the increasing world population will require more food. Thus, rising carbon
dioxide emissions
can be viewed as linked to the increasing use of natural resources by an ever
increasing global
population. As some suggest, this larger population brings with it further
demands on food
production requirements. Biochar uniquely addresses both of these issues by
providing an
effective carbon sink, e.g., carbon sequestration agent, as well as, an agent
for improving and
increasing agricultural output. In particular, biochar is unique in its
ability to increase
agricultural production, without increasing carbon dioxide emission, and
preferably reducing
the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. However, as discussed above,
this unique
ability of biochar has not been realized, or seen, because of the inherent
problems and failings
of prior biochars including, for example, high pH, phytotoxicity due to high
metals content
and/or residual organics, and dramatic product inconsistencies.
[066] Biochar can be made from basically any source of carbon, for example,
from
hydrocarbons (e.g., petroleum based materials, coal, lignite, peat) and from a
biomass (e.g.,
woods, hardwoods, softwoods, waste paper, coconut shell, manure, chaff, food
waste, etc.).
Combinations and variations of these starting materials, and various and
different members of
13

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
each group of starting materials can be, and are, used. Thus, the large number
of vastly different
starting materials leads to biochars having different properties.
[067] Many different pyrolysis or carbonization processes can be, and are
used, to create
biochars. In general, these processes involve heating the starting material
under positive
pressure, reduced pressure, vacuum, inert atmosphere, or flowing inert
atmosphere, through one
or more heating cycles where the temperature of the material is generally
brought above about
400 C, and can range from about 300 C to about 900 C. The percentage of
residual carbon
formed and several other initial properties are strong functions of the
temperature and time
history of the heating cycles. In general, the faster the heating rate and the
higher the final
temperature the lower the char yield. Conversely, in general, the slower the
heating rate or the
lower the final temperature the greater the char yield. The higher final
temperatures also lead
to modifying the char properties by changing the inorganic mineral matter
compositions, which
in turn, modify the char properties. Ramp, or heating rates, hold times,
cooling profiles,
pressures, flow rates, and type of atmosphere can all be controlled, and
typically are different
from one biochar supplier to the next. These differences potentially lead to a
biochar having
different properties, further framing the substantial nature of one of the
problems that the
present inventions address and solve. Generally, in carbonization most of the
non-carbon
elements, hydrogen and oxygen are first removed in gaseous form by the
pyrolytic
decomposition of the starting materials, e.g., the biomass. The free carbon
atoms group or
arrange into crystallographic formations known as elementary graphite
crystallites. Typically,
at this point the mutual arrangement of the crystallite is irregular, so that
free interstices exist
between them. Thus, pyrolysis involves thermal decomposition of carbonaceous
material, e.g.,
the biomass, eliminating non-carbon species, and producing a fixed carbon
structure.
[068] As noted above, raw or untreated biochar is generally produced by
subjecting biomass
to either a uniform or varying pyrolysis temperature (e.g., 300 C to 550 C
to 750 C or more)
for a prescribed period of time in a reduced oxygen environment. This process
may either occur
quickly, with high reactor temperature and short residence times, slowly with
lower reactor
temperatures and longer residence times, or anywhere in between. To achieve
better results,
the biomass from which the char is obtained may be first stripped of debris,
such as bark, leaves
and small branches, although this is not necessary. The biomass may further
include feedstock
14

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
to help adjust the pH and particle size distribution in the resulting raw
biochar. In some
applications, it is desirous to have biomass that is fresh, less than six
months old, and with an
ash content of less than 3%. Further, by using biochar derived from different
biomass, e.g.,
pine, oak, hickory, birch and coconut shells from different regions, and
understanding the
starting properties of the raw biochar, the treatment methods can be tailored
to ultimately yield
a treated biochar with predetermined, predictable physical and chemical
properties.
[069] In general, biochar particles can have a very wide variety of particle
sizes and
distributions, usually reflecting the sizes occurring in the input biomass.
Additionally, biochar
can be ground or crushed after pyrolysis to further modify the particle sizes.
Typically, for
agricultural uses, biochars with consistent, predictable particle sizes are
more desirable. By
way of example, the biochar particles can have particle sizes as shown or
measured in Table
lbelow. When referring to a batch having 1/4 inch particles, the batch would
have particles that
will pass through a 3 mesh sieve, but will not pass through (i.e., are caught
by or sit atop) a 4
mesh sieve.
Table 1
U.S. Mesh Inches Microns Millimeters
(i.e., mesh) (1-11111) (mm)
3 0.2650 6730 6.370
4 0.1870 4760 4.760
0.1570 4000 4.000
6 0.1320 3360 3.360
7 0.1110 2830 2.830
8 0.0937 2380 2.380
0.0787 2000 2.000
12 0.0661 1680 1.680
14 0.0555 1410 1.410
16 0.0469 1190 1.190
18 0.0394 1000 1.000
0.0331 841 0.841
0.0280 707 0.707
0.0232 595 0.595
0.0197 500 0.500
0.0165 400 0.400
0.0138 354 0.354
0.0117 297 0.297
0.0098 250 0.250

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
70 0.0083 210 0.210
80 0.0070 177 0.177
100 0.0059 149 0.149
120 0.0049 125 0.125
140 0.0041 105 0.105
170 0.0035 88 0.088
200 0.0029 74 0.074
230 0.0024 63 0.063
270 0.0021 53 0.053
325 0.0017 44 0.044
400 0.0015 37 0.037
[070] For most applications, it is desirable to use biochar particles having
particle sizes from
about 3/4 mesh to about 60/70 mesh, about 4/5 mesh to about 20/25 mesh, or
about 4/5 mesh
to about 30/35 mesh. It being understood that the desired mesh size, and mesh
size
distribution can vary depending upon a particular application for which the
biochar is intended.
[071] Figure 1 illustrates a cross-section of one example of a raw biochar
particle. As
illustrated in Figure 1, a biochar particle 100 is a porous structure that has
an outer surface 100a
and a pore structure 101 formed within the biochar particle 100. As used
herein, unless
specified otherwise, the terms "porosity", "porous", "porous structure", and
"porous
morphology" and similar such terms are to be given their broadest possible
meaning, and would
include materials having open pores, closed pores, and combinations of open
and closed pores,
and would also include macropores, mesopores, and micropores and combinations,
variations
and continuums of these morphologies. Unless specified otherwise, the term
"pore volume" is
the total volume occupied by the pores in a particle or collection of
particles; the term "inter-
particle void volume" is the volume that exists between a collection of
particle; the term "solid
volume or volume of solid means" is the volume occupied by the solid material
and does not
include any free volume that may be associated with the pore or inter-particle
void volumes;
and the term "bulk volume" is the apparent volume of the material including
the particle
volume, the inter-particle void volume, and the internal pore volume.
[072] The pore structure 101 forms an opening 121 in the outer surface 100a of
the biochar
particle 100. The pore structure 101 has a macropore 102, which has a
macropore surface 102a,
and which surface 102a has an area, i.e., the macropore surface area. (In this
diagram only a
16

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
single micropore is shown. If multiple micropores are present than the sum of
their surface
areas would equal the total macropore surface area for the biochar particle.)
From the
macropore 102, several mesopores 105, 106, 107, 108 and 109 are present, each
having its
respective surfaces 105a, 106a, 107a, 108a and 109a. Thus, each mesopore has
its respective
surface area; and the sum of all mesopore surface areas would be the total
mesopore surface
area for the particle. From the mesopores, e.g., 107, there are several
micropores 110, 111, 112,
113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119 and 120, each having its respective surfaces
110a, 111a, 112a,
113a, 114a, 115a, 116a, 117a, 118a, 119a and 120a. Thus, each micropore has
its respective
surface area and the sum of all micropore surface areas would be the total
micropore surface
area for the particle. The sum of the macropore surface area, the mesopore
surface area and the
micropore surface area would be the total pore surface area for the particle.
[073] Macropores are typically defined as pores having a diameter greater than
300 nm,
mesopores are typically defined as diameter from about 1-300 nm, and
micropores are typically
defined as diameter of less than about 1 nm, and combinations, variations and
continuums of
these morphologies. The macropores each have a macropore volume, and the sum
of these
volumes would be the total macropore volume. The mesopores each have a
mesopore volume,
and the sum of these volumes would be the total mesopore volume. The
micropores each have
a micropore volume, and the sum of these volumes would be the total micropore
volume. The
sum of the macropore volume, the mesopore volume and the micropore volume
would be the
total pore volume for the particle.
[074] Additionally, the total pore surface area, volume, mesopore volume,
etc., for a batch of
biochar would be the actual, estimated, and preferably calculated sum of all
of the individual
properties for each biochar particle in the batch.
[075] It should be understood that the pore morphology in a biochar particle
may have several
of the pore structures shown, it may have mesopores opening to the particle
surface, it may
have micropores opening to particle surface, it may have micropores opening to
macropore
surfaces, or other combinations or variations of interrelationship and
structure between the pores.
It should further be understood that the pore morphology may be a continuum,
where moving
inwardly along the pore from the surface of the particle, the pore
transitions, e.g., its diameter
17

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
becomes smaller, from a macropore, to a mesopore, to a micropore, e.g.,
macropore 102 to
mesopore 109 to micropore 114.
[076] In general, the biochars have porosities that can range from 0.2 cm3/cm3
to about 0.8
cm3/cm3 and more preferably about 0.2 cm3/cm3 to about 0.5 cm3/cm3. (Unless
stated
otherwise, porosity is provided as the ratio of the total pore volumes (the
sum of the micro
+ meso + macro pore volumes) to the solid volume of the biochar. Porosity of
the biochar
particles can be determined, or measured, by measuring the micro-, meso-, and
macro pore
volumes, the bulk volume, and the inter particle volumes to determine the
solid volume by
difference. The porosity is then calculated from the total pore volume and the
solid volume.
[077] As noted above, the use of different biomass potentially leads to
biochars having
different properties, including, but not limited to different pore structures.
By way of example,
Figures 2A, 2B and 2C illustrate Scanning Electron Microscope ("SEM") images
of various
types of treated biochars showing the different nature of their pore
morphology. Figure 2A is
biochar derived from pine. Figure 2B is biochar derived from birch. Figure 2C
is biochar
derived from coconut shells.
[078] The surface area and pore volume for each type of pore, e.g., macro-,
meso- and micro-
can be determined by direct measurement using CO2 adsorption for micro-, N2
adsorption for
meso- and macro pores and standard analytical surface area analyzers and
methods, for
example, particle analyzers such as Micrometrics instruments for meso- and
micro pores and
impregnation capacity for macro pore volume. Mercury porosimetry, which
measures the
macroporosity by applying pressure to a sample immersed in mercury at a
pressure calibrated
for the minimum pore diameter to be measured, may also be used to measure pore
volume.
[079] The total micropore volume can be from about 2% to about 25% of the
total pore
volume. The total mesopore volume can be from about 4% to about 35% of the
total pore
volume. The total macropore volume can be from about 40% to about 95% of the
total pore
volume. By way of example, Figure 3 shows a bar chart setting out examples of
the pore
volumes for sample biochars made from peach pits 201, juniper wood 202, a
first hard wood
203, a second hard wood 204, fir and pine waste wood 205, a first pine 206, a
second pine
207, birch 208 and coconut shells 209.
18

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[080] As explained further below, treatment can increase usable pore volumes
and, among
other things, remove obstructions in the pores, which leads to increased
retention properties and
promotes further performance characteristics of the biochar. Knowing the
properties of the
starting raw biochar, one can treat the biochar to produce controlled,
predictable and optimal
resulting physical and chemical properties.
[081] B. Treatment
[082] The rationale for treating the biochar after pyrolysis is that given the
large pore volume
and large surface are of the biochars, it is most efficient to make
significant changes in the
physical and chemical properties of the biochar by treating both the internal
and external
surfaces and internal pore volume of the char. Testing has demonstrated that
if the biochar is
treated, at least partially, in a manner that causes the forced infusion
and/or diffusion of liquids
into and/or out of the biochar pores (through mechanical, physical, or
chemical means), certain
properties of the biochar can be altered or improved over and above simply
contacting these
liquids with the biochar. By knowing the properties of the raw biochar and the
optimal desired
properties of the treated biochar, the raw biochar can then be treated in a
manner that results in
the treated biochar having controlled optimized properties.
[083] For purposes of this application, treating and/or washing the biochar in
accordance with
the present invention involves more than a simple wash or soak, which
generally only impacts
the exterior surfaces and a small percentage of the interior surface area.
"Washing" or "treating"
in accordance with the present invention, and as used below, involves
treatment of the biochar
in a manner that causes the forced, accelerated or assisted infusion and/or
diffusion of liquids
and/or additivities into and/or out of the biochar pores (through mechanical,
physical, or
chemical means) such that certain properties of the biochar can be altered or
improved over and
above simply contacting these liquids with the biochar or so that treatment
becomes more
efficient or rapid from a time standpoint over simple contact or immersion.
[084] In particular, effective treatment processes can mitigate deleterious
pore surface
properties, remove undesirable substances from pore surfaces or volume, and
impact anywhere
from between 10% to 99% or more of pore surface area of a biochar particle. By
modifying the
usable pore surfaces through treatment and removing deleterious substances
from the pore
volume, the treated biochars can exhibit a greater capacity to retain water
and/or other nutrients
19

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
as well as being more suitable habitats for some forms of microbial life.
Through the use of
treated biochars, agricultural applications can realize increased moisture
control, increased
nutrient retention, reduced water usage, reduced water requirements, reduced
runoff or
leaching, increased nutrient efficiency, reduced nutrient usage, increased
yields, increased yields
with lower water requirements and/or nutrient requirements, increases in
beneficial microbial
life, improved performance and/or shelf life for inoculated bacteria, and any
combination and
variation of these and other benefits.
[085] Treatment further allows the biochar to be modified to possess certain
known properties
that enhance the benefits received from the use of biochar. While the
selection of feedstock,
raw biochar and/or pyrolysis conditions under which the biochar was
manufactured can make
treatment processes less cumbersome, more efficient and further controlled,
treatment processes
can be utilized that provide for the biochar to have desired and generally
sustainable resulting
properties regardless of the biochar source or pyrolysis conditions. As
explained further below,
treatment can (i) repurpose problematic biochars, (ii) handle changing biochar
material sources,
e.g., seasonal and regional changes in the source of biomass, (iii) provide
for custom features
and functions of biochar for particular soils, regions or agricultural
purposes; (iv) increase the
retention properties of biochar, (v) provide for large volumes of biochar
having desired and
predictable properties, (vi) provide for biochar having custom properties,
(vii) handle
differences in biochar caused by variations in pyrolysis conditions or
manufacturing of the
"raw" biochar; and (viii) address the majority, if not all, of the problems
that have, prior to the
present invention, stifled the large scale adoption and use of biochars.
[086] Treatment can wash both the interior and exterior pore surfaces, remove
harmful
chemicals, introduce beneficial substances, and alter certain properties of
the biochar and the
pore surfaces and volumes. This is in stark contrast to simple washing which
generally only
impacts the exterior surfaces and a small percentage of the interior surface
area. Treatment can
further be used to coat substantially all of the biochar pore surfaces with a
surface modifying
agent or impregnate the pore volume with additives or treatment to provide a
predetermined
feature to the biochar, e.g., surface charge and charge density, surface
species and distribution,
targeted nutrient addition, magnetic modifications, root growth facilitator,
and water
absorptivity and water retention properties. Just as importantly, treatment
can also be used to

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
remove undesirable substances from the biochar, such as dioxins or other
toxins either through
physical removal or through chemical reactions causing neutralization.
[087] Figure 4 is a schematic flow diagram of one example treatment process
400 for use in
accordance with the present invention. As illustrated, the treatment process
400 starts with raw
biochar 402 that may be subjected to one or more reactors or treatment
processes prior to
bagging 420 the treated biochar for resale. For example, 404 represents
reactor 1, which may
be used to treat the biochar. The treatment may be a simple water wash or may
be an acid wash
used for the purpose of altering the pH of the raw biochar particles 402. The
treatment may
also contain a surfactant or detergent to aid the penetration of the treatment
solution into the
pores of the biochar. The treatment may optionally be heated, cooled, or may
be used at ambient
temperature or any combination of the three. For some applications, depending
upon the
properties of the raw biochar, a water and/or acid/alkaline wash 404 (the
latter for pH
adjustment) may be the only necessary treatment prior to bagging the biochar
420. If, however,
the moisture content of the biochar needs to be adjusted, the treated biochar
may then be put
into a second reactor 406 for purposes of reducing the moisture content in the
washed biochar.
From there, the treated and moisture adjusted biochar may be bagged 420.
[088] Again, depending upon the starting characteristics of the raw biochar
and the intended
application for the resale product, further processing may still be needed or
desired. In this
case, the treated moisture adjusted biochar may then be passed to a third
reactor 408 for
inoculation, which may include the impregnation of biochar with beneficial
additives, such as
nutrients, bacteria, microbes, fertilizers or other additives. Thereafter, the
inoculated biochar
may be bagged 420, or may be yet further processed, for example, in a fourth
reactor 410 to
have further moisture removed from or added to the biochar. Further moisture
adjustment may
be accomplished by placing the inoculated biochar in a fourth moisture
adjustment reactor 410
or circulating the biochar back to a previous moisture adjustment reactor
(e.g. reactor 406).
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the ordering in which the raw
biochar is processed
and certain processes may be left out, depending on the properties of the
starting raw biochar
and the desired application for the biochar. For example, the treatment and
inoculation
processes may be performed without the moisture adjustment step, inoculation
processes may
21

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
also be performed with or without any treatment, pH adjustment or any moisture
adjustment.
All the processes may be completed alone or in the conjunction with one or
more of the others.
[089] For example, Figure 4a illustrates a schematic of one example of an
implementation of
biochar processing that includes washing the pores and both pH and moisture
adjustment.
Figure 4b illustrates yet another example of an implementation of biochar
processing that
includes inoculation.
[090] As illustrated in Figure 4a, raw biochar 402 is placed into a reactor or
tank 404. A
washing or treatment liquid 403 is then added to a tank and a partial vacuum,
using a vacuum
pump, 405 is pulled on the tank. The treating or washing liquid 403 may be
used to clean or
wash the pores of the biochar 402 or adjust the chemical or physical
properties of the surface
area or pore volume, such as pH level, usable pore volume, or VOC content,
among other things.
The vacuum can be applied after the treatment liquid 403 is added or while the
treatment liquid
403 is added. Thereafter, the washed/ adjusted biochar 410 may be moisture
adjusted by
vacuum exfiltration 406 to pull the extra liquid from the washed/moisture
adjusted biochar 410
or may be placed in a centrifuge 407, heated or subjected to pressure gradient
changes (e.g.,
blowing air) for moisture adjustment. The moisture adjusted biochar 412 may
then be bagged
or subject to further treatment. Any excess liquids 415 collected from the
moisture adjustment
step may be disposed of or recycled, as desired. Optionally, biochar fines may
be collected
from the excess liquids 415 for further processing, for example, to create a
slurry, cakes, or
biochar extrudates.
[091] Optionally, rather than using a vacuum pump 405, a positive pressure
pump may be
used to apply positive pressure to the tank 404. In some situations, applying
positive pressure
to the tank may also function to force or accelerate the washing or treating
liquid 403 into the
pores of the biochar 402. Any change in pressure in the tank 404 or across the
surface of the
biochar could facilitate the exchange of gas and/or moisture into and out of
the pores of the
biochar with the washing or treating liquid 403 in the tank. Accordingly,
changing the pressure
in the tank and across the surface of the biochar, whether positive or
negative, is within the
scope of this invention.
[092] As illustrated Figure 4b, the washed/ adjusted biochar 410 or the
washed/ adjusted and
moisture adjusted biochar 412 may be further treated by inoculating or
impregnating the pores
22

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
of the biochar with an additive 425. The biochar 410, 412 placed back in a
reactor 401, an
additive solution 425 is placed in the reactor 401 and a vacuum, using a
vacuum pump, 405 is
applied on the tank. Again, the vacuum can be applied after the additive
solution 425 is added
to the tank or while the additive solution 425 is being added to the tank.
Thereafter, the washed,
adjusted and inoculated biochar 428 can be bagged. Alternatively, if further
moisture
adjustment is required, the biochar can be further moisture adjusted by vacuum
filtration 406 to
pull the extra liquid from the washed/moisture adjusted biochar 410 or may be
placed in a
centrifuge 407 for moisture adjustment. The resulting biochar 430 can then be
bagged. Any
excess liquids 415 collected from the moisture adjustment step may be disposed
of or recycled,
as desired. Optionally, biochar particulates or "fines" which easily are
suspended in liquid may
be collected from the excess liquids 415 for further processing, for example,
to create a slurry,
biochar extrudates, or merely a biochar product of a consistently smaller
particle size. As
described above, both processes of the Figure 4a and 4b can be performed with
a surfactant
solution in place of, or in conjunction with, the vacuum 405.
[093] While known processes exist for the above described processes, research
associated with
the present invention has shown improvement and the ability to better control
the properties
and characteristics of the biochar if the processes are performed through the
infusion and
diffusion of liquids into and out of the biochar pores. One such treatment
process that can be
used is vacuum impregnation and vacuum and/or centrifuge extraction. Another
such treatment
process that can be used is the addition of a surfactant to infused liquid,
which infused liquid
may be optionally heated, cooled, or used at ambient temperature or any
combination of the
three.
[094] Since research associated with the present invention has identified what
physical and
chemical properties have the highest impact on plant growth and/or soil
health, the treatment
process can be geared to treat different forms of raw biochar to achieve
treated biochar
properties known to enhance these characteristics. For example, if the pH of
the biochar needs
to be adjusted to enhance the raw biochar performance properties, the
treatment may be the
infusion of an acid solution into the pores of the biochar using vacuum,
surfactant, or other
treatment means. This treatment of pore infusion through, for example, the
rapid, forced
infusion of liquid into and out the pores of the biochar, has further been
proven to sustain the
23

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
adjusted pH levels of the treated biochar for much longer periods than biochar
that is simply
immersed in an acid solution for the same period of time. By way of another
example, if the
moisture content needs to be adjusted, then excess liquid and other selected
substances (e.g.
chlorides, dioxins, and other chemicals, to include those previously deposited
by treatment to
catalyze or otherwise react with substances on the interior or exterior
surfaces of the biochar)
can be extracted from the pores using vacuum and/or centrifuge extraction or
by using various
heating techniques. The above describes a few examples of treatment that
result in treated
biochar having desired performance properties identified to enhance soil
health and plant life.
[095] Figure 5 illustrates one example of a system 500 that utilizes vacuum
impregnation to
treat raw biochar. Generally, raw biochar particles, and preferably a batch of
biochar particles,
are placed in a reactor, which is connected to a vacuum pump, and a source of
treating liquid
(i.e. water or acidic/basis solution). When the valve to the reactor is
closed, the pressure in the
reactor is reduced to values ranging from 750 Torr to 400 Torr to 10 Torr or
less. The biochar
is maintained under vacuum ("vacuum hold time") for anywhere from seconds to 1
minute to
minutes, to 100 minutes, or possibly longer. By way of example, for about a
500 pound
batch of untreated biochar, a vacuum hold time of from about 1 to about 5
minutes can be used
if the reactor is of sufficient size and sufficient infiltrate is available to
adjust the necessary
properties. While under the vacuum the treating liquid may then be introduced
into the vacuum
chamber containing the biochar. Alternatively, the treating liquid may be
introduced into the
vacuum chamber before the biochar is placed under a vacuum. Optionally,
treatment may also
include subjecting the biochar to elevated temperatures from ambient to about
250 C or reduced
temperatures to about -25 C or below, with the limiting factor being the
temperature and time
at which the infiltrate can remain flowable as a liquid or semi-liquid.
[096] The infiltrate or treating liquid is drawn into the biochar pore, and
preferably drawn into
the macropores and mesopores. Depending upon the specific doses applied and
pore structure
of the biochar, the infiltrate can coat anywhere from 10% to 50% to 100% of
the total macropore
and mesopore surface area and can fill or coat anywhere from a portion to
nearly all (10% -
100%) of the total macropore and mesopore volume.
[097] As described above, the treating liquid can be left in the biochar, with
the batch being a
treated biochar batch ready for packaging, shipment and use in an agricultural
or other
24

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
application. The treating liquid may also be removed through drying,
subsequent vacuum
processing, centrifugal force (e.g., cyclone drying machines or centrifuges),
with the batch
being a treated biochar batch ready for packaging, shipment and use in an
agricultural
application. A second, third or more infiltration, removal, infiltration and
removal, and
combinations and variations of these may also be performed on the biochar with
optional drying
steps between infiltrations to remove residual liquid from and reintroduce
gasses to the pore
structure if needed. In any of these stages the liquid may contain organic or
inorganic
surfactants to assist with the penetration of the treating liquid.
[098] As illustrated in Figure 5, a system 500 for providing a biochar,
preferably having
predetermined and uniform properties. The system 500 has a vacuum infiltration
tank 501. The
vacuum infiltration tank 501 has an inlet line 503 that has a valve 504 that
seals the inlet line
503. In operation, the starting biochar is added to vacuum infiltration tank
501 as shown by
arrow 540. Once the tank is filled with the starting biochar, a vacuum is
pulled on the tank, by
a vacuum pump connected to vacuum line 506, which also has valve 507. The
starting biochar
is held in the vacuum for a vacuum hold time. Infiltrate, as shown by arrow
548 is added to the
tank 501 by line 508 having valve 509. The infiltrate is mixed with the
biochar in the tank 501
by agitator 502. The mixing process is done under vacuum for a period of time
sufficient to
have the infiltrate fill the desired amount of pore volume, e.g., up to 100%
of the macropores
and mesopores.
[099] Alternatively, the infiltrate may be added to the vacuum infiltration
tank 501 before
vacuum is pulled on the tank. In this manner, infiltrate is added in the tank
in an amount that
can be impregnated into the biochar. As the vacuum is pulled, the biochar is
circulated in the
tank to cause the infiltrate to fill the pore volume. To one skilled in the
art, it should be clear
that the agitation of the biochar during this process can be performed through
various means,
such as a rotating tank, rotating agitator, pressure variation in the tank
itself, or other means.
Additionally, the biochar may be dried using conventional means before even
the first
treatment. This optional pre-drying can remove liquid from the pores and in
some situations
may increase the efficiency of impregnation due to pressure changes in the
tank.
[0100] Pressure is then restored in the tank 501 and the infiltrated biochar
is removed, as shown
by arrow 541, from the tank 501 to bin 512, by way of a sealing gate 511 and
removal line 510.

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
The infiltrated biochar is collected in bin 512, where it can be further
processed in several
different ways. The infiltrated biochar can be shipped for use as a treated
biochar as shown by
arrow 543. The infiltrated biochar can be returned to the tank 501 (or a
second infiltration tank).
If returned to the tank 501 the biochar can be processed with a second
infiltration step, a vacuum
drying step, a washing step, or combinations and variations of these. The
infiltrated biochar
can be moved by conveyor 514, as shown by arrow 542, to a drying apparatus
516, e.g., a
centrifugal dryer or heater, where water, infiltrate or other liquid is
removed by way of line 517,
and the dried biochar leaves the dryer through discharge line 518 as shown by
arrow 545, and
is collected in bin 519. The biochar is removed from the bin by discharge 520.
The biochar
may be shipped as a treated biochar for use in an agriculture application, as
shown by arrow
547. The biochar may also be further processed, as shown by 546. Thus, the
biochar could be
returned to tank 501 (or a second vacuum infiltration tank) for a further
infiltration step. The
drying step may be repeated either by returning the dry biochar to the drying
apparatus 516, or
by running the biochar through a series of drying apparatus, until the
predetermined dryness of
the biochar is obtained, e.g., between 50% to less than 1% moisture.
[0101] The system 500 is illustrative of the system, equipment and processes
that can be used
for, and to carry out the present inventions. Various other implementations
and types of
equipment can be used. The vacuum infiltration tank can be a sealable off-axis
rotating vessel,
chamber or tank. It can have an internal agitator that also when reversed can
move material
out, empty it, (e.g., a vessel along the lines of a large cement truck, or
ready mix truck, that can
mix and move material out of the tank, without requiring the tank's
orientation to be changed).
Washing equipment may be added or utilized at various points in the process,
or may be carried
out in the vacuum tank, or drier, (e.g., wash fluid added to biochar as it is
placed into the drier
for removal). Other steps, such as bagging, weighing, the mixing of the
biochar with other
materials, e.g., fertilized, peat, soil, etc. can be carried out. In all areas
of the system referring
to vacuum infiltration, optionally positive pressure can be applied, if
needed, to enhance the
penetration of the infiltrate or to assist with re-infusion of gaseous vapors
into the treated char.
Additionally, where feasible, especially in positive pressure environments,
the infiltrate may
have soluble gasses added which then can assist with removal of liquid from
the pores, or
gaseous treatment of the pores upon equalization of pressure.
26

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0102] As noted above, the biochar may also be treated using a surfactant. The
same or similar
equipment used in the vacuum infiltration process can be used in the
surfactant treatment
process. Although it is not necessary to apply a vacuum in the surfactant
treatment process, the
vacuum infiltration tank or any other rotating vessel, chamber or tank can be
used. In the
surfactant treatment process, a surfactant, such as yucca extract, is added to
the infiltrate, e.g.,
acid wash or water. The quantity of the surfactant added to the infiltrate may
vary depending
upon the surfactant used. For example, organic yucca extract can be added at a
rate of between
0.1 - 20%, but more preferably 1-5% by volume of the infiltrate. The
infiltrate with surfactant
is then mixed with the biochar in a tumbler for several minutes, e.g., 3-5
minutes, without
applied vacuum. Optionally, a vacuum or positive pressure may be applied with
the surfactant
to improve efficiency, but is not necessary. Additionally, infiltrate to which
the surfactant or
detergent is added may be heated or may be ambient temperature or less.
Similarly, the mixture
of the surfactant or detergent, as well as the char being treated may be
heated, or may be ambient
temperature, or less. After tumbling, excess free liquid can be removed in the
same manner as
described above in connection with the vacuum infiltration process. Drying,
also as described
above in connection with the vacuum infiltration process, is an optional
additional step. Besides
yucca extract, a number of other surfactants may be used for surfactant
treatment, which
include, but are not limited to, the following: nonionic types, such as,
ethoxylated alcohols,
phenols- lauryl alcohol ethoxylates, Fatty acid esters- sorbitan, tween 20,
amines, amides-
imidazoles; anionic types, such as sulfonates- arylalkyl sulfonates and
sulfate- sodium dodecyl
sulfate; cationic types, such as alkyl- amines or ammoniums- quaternary
ammoniums; and
amphoteric types, such as betaines- cocamidopropyl betaine.
[0103] Optionally, the biochar may also be treated by applying ultrasonics. In
this treatment
process, the biochar may be contacted with a treating liquid that is agitated
by ultrasonic waves.
By agitating the treating liquid, contaminants may be dislodged or removed
from the biochar
due to bulk motion of the fluid in and around the biocarbon, pressure changes,
including
cavitation in and around contaminants on the surface, as well as pressure
changes in or near
pore openings (cavitation bubbles) and internal pore cavitation.
[0104] In this manner, agitation will cause contaminants of many forms to be
released from the
internal and external structure of the biochar. The agitation also encourages
the exchange of
27

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
water, gas, and other liquids with the internal biochar structure.
Contaminants are transported
from the internal structure to the bulk liquid (treating fluid) resulting in
biochar with improved
physical and chemical properties. The effectiveness of ultrasonic cleaning is
tunable as bubble
size and number is a function of frequency and power delivered by the
transducer to the treating
fluid
[0105] In one example, applying ultrasonic treatment, raw wood based biochar
between 10
microns to 10 mm with moisture content from 0% to 90% may be mixed with a
dilute mixture
of acetic acid and water (together the treating liquid) in a processing vessel
that also translates
the slurry (the biochar/treating liquid mixture). During translation, the
slurry passes near an
ultrasonic transducer to enhance the interaction between the fluid and
biochar. The biochar
may experience one or multiple washes of dilute acetic acid, water, or other
treating fluids. The
biochar may also make multiple passes by ultrasonic transducers to enhance
physical and
chemical properties of the biochar. For example, once a large volume of slurry
is made, it can
continuously pass an ultrasonic device and be degassed and wetted to its
maximum, at a rapid
processing rate. The slurry can also undergo a separation process in which the
fluid and solid
biochar are separated at 60% effectiveness or greater.
[0106] Through ultrasonic treatment, the pH of the biochar, or other physical
and chemical
properties may be adjusted and the mesopore and macropore surfaces of the
biochar may be
cleaned and enhanced. Further, ultrasonic treatment can be used in combination
with bulk
mixing with water, solvents, additives (fertilizers, etc.), and other liquid
based chemicals to
enhance the properties of the biochar. After treatment, the biochar may be
subject to moisture
adjustment, further treatment and/or inoculation using any of the methods set
forth above.
[0107] C. Benefits of Treatment
[0108] As illustrated above, the treatment process, whether using vacuum,
surfactant or
ultrasonic treatment, or a combination thereof, may include two steps, which
in certain
applications, may be combined: (i) washing and (ii) inoculation of the pores
with an additive.
When the desired additive is the same and that being inoculated into the
pores, e.g., water, the
step of washing the pores and inoculating the pores with an additive may be
combined.
[0109] While not exclusive, washing is generally done for one of three
purposes: (i) to modify
the surface of the pore structure of the biochar (i.e., to allow for increased
retention of liquids);
28

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
(ii) to modify the pH of the biochar; and/or (iii) to remove undesired and
potentially harmful
compounds or gases.
[0110] 1. Increases Water Holding Capacity/Water Retention Capacity
[0111] As demonstrated below, the treatment processes of the invention modify
the surfaces of
the pore structure to provide enhanced functionality and to control the
properties of the biochar
to achieve consistent and predicable performance. Using the above treatment
processes,
anywhere from at least 10% of the total pore surface area up to 90% or more of
the total pore
surface area may be modified. In some implementations, it may be possible to
achieve
modification of up to 99% or more of the total pore surface area of the
biochar particle. Using
the processes set forth above, such modification may be substantially and
uniformly achieved for
an entire batch of treated biochar.
[0112] For example, it is believed that by treating the biochar as set forth
above, the
hydrophilicity of the surface of the pores of the biochar is modified,
allowing for a greater water
retention capacity. Further, by treating the biochars as set forth above,
gases and other substances
are also removed from the pores of the biochar particles, also contributing to
the biochar particles'
increased water holding capacity. Thus, the ability of the biochar to retain
liquids, whether water
or additives in solution, is increased, which also increases the ability to
load the biochar particles
with large volumes of inoculant, infiltrates and/or additives.
[0113] A batch of biochar has a bulk density, which is defined as weight in
grams (g) per cm3 of
loosely poured material that has or retains some free space between the
particles. The biochar
particles in this batch will also have a solid density, which is the weight in
grams (g) per cm3 of
just particles, i.e., with the free space between the particles removed. The
solid density includes
the air space or free space that is contained within the pores, but not the
free space between
particles. The actual density of the particles is the density of the material
in grams (g) per cm3 of
material, which makes up the biochar particles, i.e., the solid material with
pore volume removed.
[0114] In general, as bulk density increases the pore volume is expected to
decrease. When
the pore volume is macro or mesoporous, the ability of the material to hold
infiltrate, e.g.,
inoculant is directly proportional to the pore volume, thus it is also
expected to decrease as bulk
density increases. With the infiltration processes, the treated biochars can
have impregnation
capacities that are larger than could be obtained without infiltration, e.g.,
the treated biochars
29

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
can readily have 30%, 40%, 50%, or most preferably, 60%-100% of their total
pore volume
filled with an infiltrate, e.g., an inoculant. The impregnation capacity is
the amount of a liquid
that a biochar particle, or batch of particles, can absorb. The ability to
make the pores surface
hydrophilic, and to infuse liquid deep into the pore structure through the
application of positive
or negative pressure and/or a surfactant, alone or in combination, provides
the ability to obtain
these high impregnation capabilities. The treated biochars can have
impregnation capacities,
i.e., the amount of infiltrate that a particle can hold on a volume held/total
volume of a particle
basis, that is greater than 0.2 cm3/cm3 to 0.8 cm3/cm3. Resulting bulk
densities of treated biochar
can range from 0.1- 0.6 g/cm3 and sometimes preferably between 0.3 - 0.6 g/cm3
and can have
solid densities ranging from 0.2 ¨ 1.2 g/cm3.
[0115] Accordingly, by using the treatment above, the water retention capacity
of biochar can be
greatly increased over the water retention capacities of various soil types
and even raw biochar,
thereby holding water and/or nutrients in the plant's root zone longer and
ultimately reducing the
amount of applied water (through irrigation, rainfall, or other means) needed
by up to 50% or
more. Figure 6 is a chart showing the water retention capacities of soils
versus raw and treated
biochar. The soils sampled are loam and sandy clay soil and a common
commercial horticultural
mix. The charts show the retained water as a function of time.
[0116] In chart A, the bottom line represents the retained water in the sandy
claim loam soil over
time. The middle line represents the retained water in the sandy clay soil
with 20% by volume
percent of unprocessed raw biochar. The top line represents the retained water
in the sandy clay
loam soil with 20% by volume percent of treated biochar (adjusted and
inoculated biochar). Chart
B represents the same using a soilless potting mix rather than sandy clay loam
soil.
[0117] As illustrated in Figure 7, testing showed a treated biochar had an
increased water
retention capacity of approximately 1.5 times that of the raw biochar from the
same feedstock.
Similar results have been seen with biochars derived from various feedstocks.
With certain
biochar types, the water retention capacity of treated biochar could be as
great as three times that
of raw biochar.
[0118] "Water holding capacity," which may also be referred to as "Water
Retention Capacity,"
is the amount of water that can be held both internally within the porous
structure and in the
interparticle void spaces in a given batch of particles. While a summary of
the method of measure

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
is provided above, a more specific method of measuring water holding
capacity/water retention
capacity is measured by the following procedure: (i) drying a sample of
material under
temperatures of 105 C for a period of 24 hours or using another
scientifically acceptable
technique to reduce the moisture content of the material to less than 2%, less
than 1%; and
preferably less than .5% (ii) placing a measured amount of dry material in a
container; (iii) filling
the container having the measured amount of material with water such that the
material is
completely immersed in the water; (iv) letting the water remain in the
container having the
measured amount of material for at least ten minutes or treating the material
in accordance with
the invention by infusing with water when the material is a treated biochar;
(v) draining the water
from the container until the water ceases to drain; (vi) weighing the material
in the container (i.e.,
wet weight); (vii) again drying the material by heating it under temperatures
of 105 C for a period
of 24 hours or using another scientifically acceptable technique to reduce the
moisture content of
the material to less than 2% and preferably less than 1%; and (viii) weighing
the dry material
again (i.e., dry weight) and, for purposes of a volumetric measure,
determining the volume of the
material.
[0119] Measured gravimetrically, the water holding/water retention capacity is
determined by
measuring the difference in weight of the material from step (vi) to step
(viii) over the weight of
the material from step (viii) (i.e., wet weight-dry weight/dry weight). Figure
8 illustrates the
different water retention capacities of raw biochar versus treated biochar
measured
gravimetrically. As illustrated, water retention capacity of raw biochar can
be between 100-
200%, whereas treated biochar can have water retention capacities measured
gravimetrically
between 200-400%.
[0120] Water holding capacity can also be measured volumetrically and
represented as a percent
of the volume of water retained in the biochar after gravitationally draining
the excess
water/volume of biochar The volume of water retained in the biochar after
draining the water can
be determined from the difference between the water added to the container and
water drained
off the container or from the difference in the weight of the wet biochar from
the weight of the
dry biochar converted to a volumetric measurement. This percentage water
holding capacity for
treated biochar may be 50-55 percent and above by volume.
31

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0121] Given biochar's increased water retention capacity, the application of
the treated biochar
and even the raw biochar can greatly assist with the reduction of water and/or
nutrient application.
It has been discovered that these same benefits can be imparted to
agricultural growth.
[0122] Treated biochar of the present invention has also demonstrated the
ability to retain more
water than raw biochar after exposure to the environment for defined periods
of time. For
purposes of this application "remaining water content" can be defined as the
total amount of water
that remains held by the biochar after exposure to the environment for certain
amount of time.
Exposure to environment is exposure at ambient temperature and pressures.
Under this definition,
remaining water content can be measured by (i) creating a sample of biochar
that has reached its
maximum water holding capacity; (ii) determining the total water content by
thermogravimetric
analysis (H20 (TGA)), as described above on a sample removed from the output
of step (i) above,
(iii) exposing the biochar in the remaining sample to the environment for a
period of 2 weeks (15
days, 360 hrs.); (iv) determining the remaining water content by
thermogravimetric analysis (H20
(TGA)); and (v) normalizing the remaining (retained) water in mL to 1 kg or 1
L biochar. The
percentage of water remaining after exposure for this two-week period can be
calculated by the
remaining water content of the biochar after the predetermined period over the
water content of
the biochar at the commencement of the two-week period. Using this test,
treated biochar has
shown to retain water at rates over 4x that of raw biochar. Testing has
further demonstrated that
the following amount of water can remain in treated biochar after two weeks of
exposure to the
environment: 100-650 mL/kg; 45-150 mL/L; 12-30 gal/ton; 3-10 gal/yd3 after 360
hours (15 days)
of exposure to the environment. In this manner, and as illustrated in Figure
8, biochar treated with
a process consistent with those described in this disclosure can increase the
amount of retained
water in biochar about 3 times compared to other methods even after seven
weeks. In general,
the more porous and the higher the surface area of a given material, the
higher the water retention
capacity. Further, it is theorized that by modifying the
hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the pore
surfaces, greater water holding capacity and controlled release may be
obtained. Thus, viewed
as a weight percent, e.g., the weight of retained water to weight of biochar,
examples of the present
biochars can retain more than 5% of their weight, more than 10% of their
weight, and more than
15% of their weight, and even more than 50% of their weight compared to an
average soil which
may retain 2% or less, or between 100-600 ml/kg by weight of biochar.
32

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0123] Tests have also shown that treated biochars that show weight loss of >
1% in the interval
between 43-60 C when analyzed by the Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) (as
described
below) demonstrate greater water holding and content capacities over raw
biochars. Weight loss
of > 5%-15% in the interval between 38-68 C when analyzed by the Thermal
Gravimetric
Analysis (TGA) using sequences of time and temperature disclosed in the
following paragraphs
or others may also be realized. Weight percentage ranges may vary from between
> 1% - 15% in
temperature ranges between 38-68 C, or subsets thereof, to distinguish
between treated biochar
and raw biochar.
[0124] Figure 9 is a chart 900 showing the weight loss of treated biochars 902
versus raw biochar
samples 904 when heated at varying temperatures using the TGA testing
described below. As
illustrated, the treated biochars 902 continue to exhibit weight loss when
heated between 40-60
C when analyzed by the Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) (described below),
whereas the
weight loss in raw biochar 804 between the same temperature ranges levels off.
Thus, testing
demonstrates the presence of additional moisture content in treated biochars
902 versus raw
biochars 904.
[0125] In particular, the treated biochars 902 exhibit substantial water loss
when heated in inert
gas such as nitrogen following treatment. More particularly, when heated for
25 minutes at each
of the following temperatures 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 C the treated samples
lose about 5-% to 15%
in the interval 43 - 60 C and upward of 20-30% in the interval between 38- 68
C. The samples
to determine the water content of the raw biochar were obtained by mixing a
measured amount
of biochar and water, stirring the biochar and water for 2 minutes, draining
off the water,
measuring moisture content and then subjecting the sample to TGA. The samples
for the treated
biochar were obtained by using the same measured amount of biochar as used in
the raw biochar
sample and using treatment process consistent with those described in this
disclosure. .The
moisture content is then measured and the sample is subjected to TGA described
above.
[0126] The sequences of time and temperature conditions for evaluating the
effect of biochars
heating in inert atmosphere is defined in this application as the "Bontchev-
Cheyne Test" ("BCT").
The BCT is run using samples obtained, as described above, and applying
Thermal Gravimetric
Analysis (TGA) carried out using a Hitachi STA 7200 analyzer under nitrogen
flow at the rate of
110 mL/min. The biochar samples are heated for 25 minutes at each of the
following
33

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
temperatures: 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 C. The sample weights are measured at the
end of each dwell
step, at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. The analyzer also
continually measures
and records weight over time. Biochars treated with a process consistent with
those described in
this disclosure to enhance water holding or retention capacities typically
exhibit weight loss of >
5% in the interval between 38-68 C, > 1% in the interval between 43-60 C.
Biochars with
greater water holding or retention capacities can exhibit > 5% weight loss in
the interval between
43-60 C measured using the above described BCT.
[0127] Lastly, as illustrated in Figure 10, plant available water is greatly
increased in treated
biochar over that of raw biochar. Figure 10 illustrates the plant available
water in raw biochar,
versus treated biochar and treated dried biochar and illustrates that treated
biochar can have a
plant available water percent of greater than 35% by volume.
[0128] "Plant Available Water" is the amount of unbound water in a material
available for plants
to uptake. This is calculated by subtracting the volumetric water content at
the permanent wilting
point from the volumetric water content at field capacity, which is the point
when no water is
available for the plants. Field capacity is generally expressed as the bulk
water content retained
in at ¨33 J/kg (or ¨0.33 bar) of hydraulic head or suction pressure. Permanent
wilting point is
generally expressed as the bulk water content retained at -1500J/kg (or -15
bar) of hydraulic head
or suction pressure. Methods for measuring plant available water are well-
known in the industry
and use pressure plate extractors, which are commercially available or can be
built using well-
known principles of operation.
[0129] 2. Adjusts pH
[0130] With regard to treatment for pH adjustment, the above described vacuum
infiltration
processes and/or surfactant treatment processes have the ability to take raw
biochars having
detrimental or deleterious pHs and transform those biochars into a treated
biochar having pH that
is in an optimal range for most plant growth, and soil health. Turning to
Figure 11, a graph 1100
is provided that shows the pH of various starting raw biochars that were made
from different
starting materials and pyrolysis process temperatures, including coconut
shells 1104, pistachio
shells 1101, corn at 500 C 1105, corn at 900 C 1102, bamboo 1103, mesquite
1106, wood and
coffee 1108, wood (Australia) 1109, various soft woods 1110, 1111, 1112, 1113,
1114, 1115,
1116, 1117, red fir at 900 C 1107, various grasses at 500 C 1118, 1119, 1120,
grass 1121, and
34

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
grass at 900 C 1123. The treatment processes described in this disclosure, can
be used to alter
the pH from the various undesirable pH levels and bring the pH into the
preferred, optimal range
1124 for most plant growth, soil health and combinations of these. Figure 12
is a chart 1200
showing percentage of germination for lettuce plants for particular pHs, and a
desired germination
range 1201. A control 1204 is compared with an optimal pH range 1202, and a
distribution 1203
of growth rates across pHs is shown.
[0131] If treated for pH adjustment, the treated biochar takes a few days
after treatment for the
pH to normalize. Once normalized, tests have proven that pH altered biochar
remains at a stable
pH, typically the treatment is used to lower the stable pH to below that of
the raw biochar, for up
to 12 months or more after treatment. Although in certain situations, the pH
could be altered to
be higher than the raw biochar when needed.
[0132] For example, the treatment process of the present invention can remove
and/or neutralize
inorganic compounds, such as the calcium hydroxide ((CaOH)2), potassium oxide
(K20K20K20),
magnesium oxide (MgO), magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2), and many others that are
formed
during pyrolysis, and are fixed to the biochar pore surfaces. These
inorganics, in particular
calcium hydroxide, adversely affect the biochar's pH, making the pH in some
instances as high
as 8.5, 9.5, 10.5 and 11.2. These high pH ranges are deleterious, detrimental
to crops, and may
kill or adversely affect the plants, sometimes rendering an entire field a
loss.
[0133] The calcium hydroxide, and other inorganics, cannot readily and quickly
be removed by
simple washing of the biochar, even in an acid bath. It cannot be removed by
drying the biochar,
such as by heating or centrifugal force. It is theorized that these techniques
and methodologies
cannot reach or otherwise affect the various pore surfaces, e.g., macro-, meso-
and micro- in any
viable or efficacious manner; and thus cannot remove or otherwise neutralize
the calcium
hydroxide.
[0134] Upon modification of the pore surface area by removal and/or
neutralization of deleterious
substances, such as calcium hydroxide, the pH of the biochar can be reduced to
the range of about
pH 5 to about pH 8, and more preferably from about pH 6.4 to about 7.2, and
still more preferably
around 6.5 to 6.8, recognizing that other ranges and pHs are contemplated and
may prove useful,
under specific environmental or agricultural situations or for other
applications. Thus, the present
treated biochars, particles, batches and both, have most, essentially all, and
more preferably all,

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
of their pore surfaces modified by the removal, neutralization and both, of
the calcium hydroxide
that is present in the starting biochar material. These treated biochars have
pHs in the range of
about 5 to about 8, about 6.5 to about 7.5, about 6.4 to about 7, and about
6.8. Prior to and before
testing, biochar is passed through a 2mm sieve before pH is measured. All
measurements are
taken according to Rajkovich et. al, Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after
additions of
biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil, Biol. Fertil. Soils
(2011), from which the
International Biochar Initiative (IBI) method is based.
[0135] There are a wide variety of tests, apparatus and equipment for making
pH measurements.
For example, and preferably when addressing the pH of biochar, batches,
particles and pore
surfaces of those particles, two appropriates for measuring pH are the Test
Method for the US
Composting Council ("TMCC") 4.11-A and the pH Test Method promulgated by the
International
Biochar Initiative. The test method for the TMCC comprises mixing biochar with
distilled water
in 1: 5 [mass : volume] ratio, e.g., 50 grams of biochar is added to 250 ml of
pH 7.0 0.02 water
and is stirred for 10 minutes; the pH is then the measured pH of the slurry.
The pH Test Method
promulgated by the International Biochar Initiative comprises 5 grams of
biochar is added to 100
ml of water pH= 7.0 0.02 and the mixture is tumbled for 90 minutes; the pH
of the slurry is
measured at the end of the 90 minutes of tumbling.
[0136] 3. Removing/Neutralizing Deleterious Materials
[0137] Further, the treatment processes are capable of modifying the pore
surfaces to remove or
neutralize deleterious materials that are otherwise difficult, if not for all
practical purpose,
impossible to mitigate. For example, heavy metals, transition metals, sodium
and phytotoxic
organics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
and perhaps
other phytotoxins. Thus, by treating the biochar in accordance with the
treatment processes set
forth and described above, the resulting treated biochar has essentially all,
and more preferably
all, of their pore surfaces modified by the removal, neutralization and both,
of one or more
deleterious, harmful, o r potentially harmful material that is present in the
starting biochar
material.
[0138] For example, treatment can reduce the total percentage of residual
organic compounds
(ROC), including both the percentage of heavy ROCs and percentage of VOCs.
Through
treatment, the total ROC can be reduced to 0-25% wt.%, percentage heavy ROC
content can
36

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
be reduced to 0-20% wt.% and VOC content can be reduced to less than 5% wt.%.
For
purposes of this application, "Residual organic compounds" (ROCs) are defined
as compounds
that burn off during thermogravimetric analysis, as defined above, between 150
degrees C and
950 degrees C. Residual organic compounds include, but are not limited to,
phenols,
polyaromatic hydrocarbons, monoaromatic hydrocarbons, acids, alcohols, esters,
ethers, ketones,
sugars, alkanes and alkenes. Of the ROCs, those that burn off using
thermogravimetric analysis
between 150 degrees C and 550 degrees are considered light organic compounds
(volatiles or
VOCs), and those that burn off between 550 degrees C and 950 degrees C are
heavy residual
organic compounds. It should be noted that there may be some inorganic
compounds which also
are burned off during TGA analysis in these temperature ranges, but these are
generally a very
low percentage of the total emission and can be disregarded in the vast
majority of cases as slight
variations. In any of these measurements, a gas chromatograph / mass
spectrometer may be used
if needed for higher degrees of precision.
[0139] The percent water, total organic compounds, total light organic
compounds (volatiles or
VOC) and total heavy organic compounds, as referenced in this application as
contained in a
biochar particle or particles in a sample may all be measured by
thermogravimetric analysis.
Thermogravimetric analysis is performed by a Hitachi STA 7200 analyzer or
similar piece of
equipment under nitrogen flow at the rate of 110 mL/min. The biochar samples
are heated for
predetermined periods of time, e.g., 20 minutes, at a variety of temperatures
between 100 and 950
C. The sample weights are measured at the end of each dwell step and at the
beginning and at
the end of the experiment. Thermogravimetric analysis of a given sample
indicating percentage
water in a sample is determined by % mass loss measured between standard
temperature and 150
degrees C. Thermogravimetric analysis of a given sample indicating percentage
of residual
organic compounds is measured by percentage mass loss sustained between 150
degrees C and
950 degrees C. Thermogravimetric analysis of a given sample indicating
percentage of light
organic compounds (volatiles) is measured by percentage mass loss sustained
between 150
degrees C and 550 degrees C. Thermogravimetric analysis of a given sample
indicating
percentage of heavy organic compounds is measured by percentage mass loss
sustained between
550 degrees C and 950 degrees C. Figure 13 is an example of a
Thermogravimetric Analysis
37

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
(TGA) plot outlining the above explanation and the measure of water, light
organics and heavy
organics .
[0140] As noted above, treatment can remove or neutralize heavy metals,
transition
metals, sodium and phytotoxic organics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,
volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), other phytotoxins, and even dioxins. Thus, by treating the
biochar in
accordance with the treatment processes set forth and described above, the
resulting treated
biochar has essentially all, and more preferably all, of their pore surfaces
modified by the
removal, neutralization or both, of one or more deleterious, harmful, o r
potentially harmful
material that is present in the starting biochar material.
[0141] Dioxins may also be removed through the treatment processes of the
present
invention. Dioxins are released from combustion processes and thus are often
found in raw
biochar. Dioxins include polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) (i.e., 75
congeners (10
are specifically toxic)); polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) (i.e., 135
congeners (7 are
specifically toxic)) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) (Considered dioxin-
like compounds
(DLCs)).
[0142] Since some dioxins may be carcinogenic even at low levels of
exposure over
extended periods of time, the FDA views dioxins as a contaminant and has no
tolerances or
administrative levels in place for dioxins in animal feed. Dioxins in animal
feed can cause
health problems in the animals themselves. Additionally, the dioxins may
accumulate in the fat
of food-producing animals and thus consumption of animal derived foods (e.g.
meat, eggs, milk)
could be a major route of human exposure to dioxins. Thus, if biochar is used
in animal
applications, where the animals ingest the biochar, the ability to remove
dioxins from the raw
biochar prior to use is of particular significance.
[0143] Results have proven the removal of dioxins from raw biochar by
applying the
treatment process of the present invention. To demonstrate the removal of
dioxins, samples of
both raw biochar and biochar, treated within the parameters set forth above,
were sent out for
testing. The results revealed that the dioxins in the raw biochar were removed
through treatment
as the dioxins detected in the raw biochar sample were not detected in the
treated biochar
sample. Below is a chart comparing the test results of measured dioxins in the
raw verses the
treated biochar.
38

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
Dioxins Amount Detected in Raw Biochar Amount Detected in Treated
Biochar
Sample Sample
Tetradioxins 26.4 ng/Kg-dry Not detectable
Pentadioxins 5.86 ng/Kg-dry Not detectable
Hexadioxins 8.41 ng/Kg-dry Not detectable
[0144] A number of different dioxins exist, several of which are known to
be toxic or
undesirable for human consumption. Despite the test results above, it is
possible that any
number of dioxins could be present in raw biochar depending on the biomass or
where the
biomass is grown. It is shown, however, in the above testing, that the
treatment process of the
present invention can be used to eliminate dioxins present in raw biochar.
[0145] Seventeen tetra-octo dioxins and furan congeners are the basis for
regulatory
compliance. Other dioxins are much less toxic. Dioxins are generally regulated
on toxic
equivalents (TEQ) and are represented by the sum of values weighted by Toxic
Equivalency
TTEQ = 1[C] x EFi
Factor (TEF)
[0146] 2,3,7,8-TCDD has a TEF of 1 (most toxic). TEQ is measured as ng/kg
WHO-
PCDD/F-TEQ//kg NDs are also evaluated. Two testing methods are generally used
to determine
TEQ values: EPA Method 8290 (for research and understanding at low levels (ppt-
ppq); and
EPA Method 1613B (for regulatory compliance). Both are based on high
resolution gas
chromatography (HRGC)/high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS).
[0147] The required EU Feed Value is equal to or less than 0.75 ng/kg WHO-
PCDD/F-
TEQ//kg. Treated biochar, in accordance with the present invention, has shown
to have TEQ
dioxins less than 0.5 ng/kg WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ//kg, well below the requirement for
EU Feed
limits of 0.75 ng/kg WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ//kg. As further set forth above, treatment
can reduce
the amount of detectable dioxins from raw biochar such that the dioxins are
not detectible in
treated biochar. Two methods are used: EPA Method 8290 (for research and
understanding
at low levels (ppt-ppq); and EPA Method 1613B (for regulatory compliance).
Both are based
on high resolution gas chromatography (HRGC)/high resolution mass spectrometry
(HRMS).
39

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0148] 4. Pore Volume
[0149] Generally, a treated biochar sample has greater than 50% by volume
of its porosity
in macropores (pores greater than 300 nanometers). Further, results indicate
that greater than
75% of pores in treated biochar are below 50,000 nanometers. Also, results
indicate that greater
than 50% by volume of treated biochar porosity are pores in the range of 500
nanometers and
100,000 nanometers. Bacterial sizes are typically 500 nanometers to several
thousand
nanometers. Bacteria and other microbes have been observed to fit and colonize
in the pores of
treated biochar, thus supporting the pore size test results.
[0150] Macropore volume is determined by mercury porosimetry, which
measures the
meso and/or macro porosity by applying pressure to a sample immersed in
mercury at a pressure
calibrated for the minimum pore diameter to be measured (for macroporosity
this is 300
nanometers). This method can be used to measure pores in the range of 3 nm to
360,000 nm.
Total volume of pores per volumetric unit of substance is measured using gas
expansion method.
[0151] Depending upon the biomass from which the biochar is derived,
mercury
porosimetry testing has shown that washing under differential pressure, using
the processes
described above, can increase the number of both the smallest and larger pores
in certain biochar
(e.g., pine) and can increase the number of usable smaller pores. Treatment of
biochar using
either vacuum or surfactant does alter the percentage of total usable pores
between 500 to
100,000 nanometers and further has varying impact on pores less than 50,000
nanometers and
less than 10,000 nanometers.
[0152] Figure 14 is a chart 1400 showing the impact of treatment on pores
sizes of biochar
derived from coconut. The majority of the coconut based biochar pores are less
than 10 microns.
Many are less than 1 micron. Vacuum processing of the biochar results in small
reduction of
to 50 micron pores, with increase of smaller pores on vacuum processing. The
mercury
porosimetry results of the raw biochar are represented by 1402 (first column
in the group of
three). The vacuum treated biochar is represented by 1404 (second column in
the group of
three) and the surfactant treated biochar is 1406 (third column in the group
of three).
[0153] Figure 15 is a chart 1500 showing the impact of treatment on pores
sizes of biochar
derived from pine. The majority of the pine based biochar pores are 1 to 50
microns, which is
a good range for micro-biologicals. Vacuum processing results in significant
reduction of the

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
to 50 micron pores, with an increase of smallest and largest pores. The
mercury porosimetry
results of the raw biochar are represented by 1502 (first column in the group
of three). The
vacuum treated biochar is represented by 1504 (second column in the group of
three) and the
surfactant treated biochar is 3006 (third column in the group of three).
[0154] 5. Electrical Conductivity
[0155] The electrical conductivity (EC) of a solid material-water mixture
indicates the
amount of salts present in the solid material. Salts are essential for plant
growth. The EC
measurement detects the amount of cations or anions in solution; the greater
the amount of ions,
the greater the EC. The ions generally associated with salinity are Ca2 , Mg2
, K , Nat, fl+ ,
NO3-, 5042-, Cl-, HCO3, OH-. Electrical conductivity testing of biochar was
done following the
method outlined in the USDA' s Soil Quality Test Kit Guide and using a
conventional EC meter.
The biochar sample is mixed with DI water in a 1:1 biochar to water ratio on a
volume basis.
After thorough mixing, the EC (dS/m) is measured while the biochar particles
are still suspended
in solution. Treatment, as outlined in this disclosure can be used to adjust
the ions in the char.
Testing of treated biochar shows its EC is generally greater than 0.2 dS/m and
sometimes greater
than 0.5 dS/m.
[0156] 6. Cation Exchange Capacity
[0157] One method for cation exchange capacity ("CEC") determination is the
use of
ammonium acetate buffered at pH 7.0 (see Schollenberger, C.J. and Dreibelbis,
ER. 1930,
Analytical methods in base-exchange investigations on soils, Soil Science, 30,
161-173). The
material is saturated with 1M ammonium acetate, (NH40Ac), followed by the
release of the
NH4 + ions and its measurement in meq/100 g (milliequivalents of charge per
100 g of dry soil)
or cmolc/kg (centimoles of charge per kilogram of dry soil). Instead of
ammonium acetate
another method uses barium chloride according to Mehlich, 1938, Use of
triethanolamine
acetate-barium hydroxide buffer for the determination of some base exchange
properties and
lime requirement of soil, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29:374-378. 0.1 M BaC12 is
used to saturate
the exchange sites followed by replacement with either MgSO4 or MgCl2.
[0158] Indirect methods for CEC calculation involves the estimation of
extracted Ca2 ,
Mg2 , K , and Nat in a standard soil test using Mehlich 3 and accounting for
the exchangeable
acidity (sum of 1-1 , A13 , Mn2 , and Fe2 ) if the pH is below 6.0 (see
Mehlich, A. 1984, Mehlich-
41

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
3 soil test extractant: a modification of Mehlich-2 extractant, Commun. Soil
Sci. Plant Anal.
15(12): 1409-1416). When treated using the above methods, including but not
limited by
washing under a vacuum, treated biochars generally have a CEC greater than 5
millieq/l and
some even have a CEC greater than 25 (millieq/l). To some extent, treatment
can be used to
adjust the CEC of a char.
[0159] 7. Anion Exchange Capacity
[0160] Similar to CEC measurements, anion exchange capacity ("AEC") may be
calculated
directly or indirectly- saturated paste extraction of exchangeable anions, Cl-
, NO3-, 5042-, and
P043- to calculate anion sum or the use of potassium bromide to saturate
anions sites at different
pHs and repeated washings with calcium chloride and final measurement of
bromide (see
Rhoades, J.D. 1982, Soluble salts, p. 167-179. In: A. L. Page et al. (ed.)
Methods of soil
analysis: Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties; and Michael
Lawrinenkoa and David
A. Laird, 2015, Anion exchange capacity of biochar, Green Chem., 2015, 17,
4628-4636).
When treated using the above methods, including but not limited by washing
under a vacuum,
treated biochars generally have an AEC greater than 5 millieq/l and some even
have an AEC
greater than 20 (millieq/l). To some extent, treatment can be used to adjust
the CEC of a char.
[0161] 8. Hydrophilicity/Hydrophobicity
[0162] The ability to control the hydrophilicity of the pores provides the
ability to load the
biochar particles with larger volumes of inoculant. The more hydrophilic the
more the biochars
can accept inoculant or infiltrate. Tests show that biochar treated in
accordance with the above
processes, using either vacuum or surfactant treatment processes increase the
hydrophilicity of
raw biochar. Two tests may be used to test the hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity
of biochar: (i)
the Molarity of Ethanol Drop ("MED") Test; and (ii) the Infiltrometer Test.
[0163] The MED test was originally developed by Doerr in 1998 and later
modified by
other researchers for various materials. The MED test is a timed penetration
test that is noted
to work well with biochar soil mixtures. For 100% biochar, penetration time of
different
mixtures of ethanol/water are noted to work better. Ethanol/Water mixtures
verses surface
tension dynes were correlated to determine whether treated biochar has
increased hydrophilicity
over raw biochar. Seven mixtures of ethanol and deionized water were used with
a sorption
time of 3 seconds on the biochar.
42

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0164] Seven solutions of deionized ("DI") water with the following
respective
percentages of ethanol: 3, 5, 11, 13, 18, 24 and 36, were made for testing.
The test starts with a
mixture having no DI. If the solution is soaked into the biochar in 3 seconds
for the respective
solution, it receives the corresponding Hydrophobicity Index value below.
0 0 1 m
]
NimommomomiNimummommimimimimimmimi
13% ::g::::::::::::::::::::::::::::*::: ::::::::
g
18%
AtOt .0P9.8*419`Ø79.14.1.4.4.ik
[0165] To start the test the biochar ("material/substrate") is placed in
convenient open
container prepared for testing. Typically, materials to be tested are dried
110 C overnight and
cooled to room temperature. The test starts with a deionized water solution
having no ethanol.
Multiple drips of the solution are then laid onto the substrate surface from
low height. If drops
soak in less than 3 seconds, test records substrate as "0". If drops take
longer than 3 seconds or
don't soak in, go to test solution 1. Then, using test solution 1, multiple
drops from dropper are
laid onto the surface from low height. If drops soak into the substrate in
less than 3 seconds,
test records material as "1". If drops take longer than 3 seconds, or don't
soak in, go to test
solution 2. Then, using test solution 2, multiple drops from dropper laid onto
the surface from
low height. If drops soak into the substrate in less than 3 seconds, test
records material as "2".
If drops take longer than 3 seconds, or don't soak in, go to test solution 3.
Then, using test
solution 3, multiple drops from dropper laid onto the surface from low height.
If drops soak
into the substrate in less than 3 seconds, test records material as "3". If
drops take longer than
3 seconds, or don't soak in, go to solution 4.
[0166] The process above is repeated, testing progressively higher numbered
MED
solutions until the tester finds the solution that soaks into the substrate in
3 seconds or less. The
43

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
substrate is recorded as having that hydrophobicity index number that
correlates to the solution
number assigned to it (as set forth in the chart above).
[0167] Example test results using the MED test method is illustrated below.
MATERIAL HYDROPHOBICITY INDEX
Raw Biochars 3 to 5
Treated Biochars 1 to 3
[0168] Another way to measure and confirm that treatment decreases
hydrophobicity and
increases hydrophilicity is by using a mini disk infiltrometer. For this test
procedure, the bubble
chamber of the infiltrometer is filled three quarters full with tap water for
both water and ethanol
sorptivity tests. Deionized or distilled water is not used. Once the upper
chamber is full, the
infiltrometer is inverted and the water reservoir on the reserve is filled
with 80 mL. The
infiltrometer is carefully set on the position of the end of the mariotte tube
with respect to the
porous disk to ensure a zero suction offset while the tube bubbles. If this
dimension is changed
accidentally, the end of the mariotte tube should be reset to 6 mm from the
end of the plastic
water reservoir tube. The bottom elastomer is then replaced, making sure the
porous disk is
firmly in place. If the infiltrometer is held vertically using a stand and
clamp, no water should
leak out.
[0169] The suction rate of 1 cm is set for all samples. If the surface of
the sample is not
smooth, a thin layer of fine biochar can be applied to the area directly
underneath the
infiltrometer stainless steel disk. This ensures good contact between the
samples and the
infiltrometer. Readings are then taken at 1 min intervals for both water and
ethanol sorptivity
test. To be accurate, 20 mL water or 95% ethanol needs to be infiltrated into
the samples.
Record time and water/ethanol volumes at the times are recorded.
[0170] The data is then processed to determine the results. The data is
processed by the
input of the volume levels and time to the corresponding volume column. The
following
equation is used to calculate the hydrophobicity index of R
I = at + LIA5
a: Infiltration Rate, cm/s
44

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
b: Sorptivity, cm/s1/2
R = 1.95 * bethanolL _______________________
owater
[0171] Figure 16 illustrates one example of the results of a hydrophobicity
test performed
on raw biochar, vacuum treated biochar and surfactant treated biochar. As
illustrated, both the
vacuum treated and surfactant treated biochar are more hydrophilic than the
raw biochar based
upon the lower Index rating. In accordance with the test data in Figure 16,
the hydrophobicity
of raw biochar was reduced 23% by vacuum processing and 46% by surfactant
addition.
[0172] As an example, raw biochar and treated biochar were tested with
ethanol and water,
five times for each. The results below show that the hydrophobicity index of
the treated biochar
is lower than the raw biochar. Thus, tests demonstrate that treating the
biochar, using the
methods set forth above, make the biochar less hydrophobic and more
hydrophilic.
MATERIAL HYDROPHOBICITY INDEX
Dried Raw Biochar 12.9
Dried Vacuum Treated Biochar 10.4
Dried Surfactant Treated Biochar 7.0
As Is Raw Biochar 5.8
As Is Vacuum Treated Biochar 2.9
[0173] Further, through the treatment processes of the present invention,
the biochar can
also be infused with soil enhancing agents. By infusing liquid into the pore
structure through
the application of positive or negative pressure and/or a surfactant, alone or
in combination,
provides the ability to impregnate the macropores of the biochar with soil
enhancing solutions
and solids. The soil enhancing agent may include, but not be limited to, any
of the following:
water, water solutions of salts, inorganic and organic liquids of different
polarities, liquid
organic compounds or combinations of organic compounds and solvents, mineral
and organic
oils, slurries and suspensions, supercritical liquids, fertilizers, plant
growth promoting

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
rhizobacteria, free-living and nodule-forming nitrogen fixing bacteria,
organic decomposers,
nitrifying bacteria, phosphate solubilizing bacteria, biocontrol agents,
bioremediation agents,
saprotrophic fungi, ectomycorrhizae and endomycorrhizae, among others.
[0174] 9. Impregnation and/or Inoculation with Infiltrates or Additives
[0175] In addition to mitigating or removing deleterious pore surface
properties, by treating
the pores of the biochar through a forced, assisted, accelerate or rapid
infiltration process, such as
those described above, the pore surface properties of the biochar can be
enhanced. Such
treatment processes may also permit subsequent processing, may modify the pore
surface to
provide predetermined properties to the biochar, and/or provide combinations
and variations
of these effects. For example, it may be desirable or otherwise advantageous
to coat
substantially all, or all of the biochar macropore and mesopore surfaces with
a surface
modifying agent or treatment to provide a predetermined feature to the
biochar, e.g., surface
charge and charge density, surface species and distribution, targeted nutrient
addition,
magnetic modifications, root growth facilitator, and water absorptivity and
water retention
properties.
[0176] By infusing liquids into the pores of biochar, it has been discovered
that additives infused
within the pores of the biochar provide a time release effect or steady flow
of some beneficial
substances to the environment, e.g. root zones of the plants, and also can
improve and provide a
more beneficial environment for microbes which may reside or take up residence
within the pores
of the biochar. In particular, additive infused biochars placed in the soil
prior to or after planting
can dramatically reduce the need for high frequency application of additives,
minimize losses
caused by leaching and runoff and/or reduce or eliminate the need for
controlled release
fertilizers. They can also be exceptionally beneficial in animal feed
applications by providing an
effective delivery mechanism for beneficial nutrients, pharmaceuticals,
enzymes, microbes, or
other substances.
[0177] For purposes of this application, "infusion" of a liquid or liquid
solution into the pores
of the biochar means the introduction of the liquid or liquid solution into
the pores of the biochar
by a means other than solely contacting the liquid or solution with the
biochar, e.g., submersion.
The infusion process, as described in this application in connection with the
present invention,
includes a mechanical, chemical or physical process that facilitates or assist
with the penetration
46

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
of liquid or solution into the pores of the biochar, which process may
include, but not be limited
to, positive and negative pressure changes, such as vacuum infusion,
surfactant infusion, or
infusion by movement of the liquid and/or biochar (e.g., centrifugal force
and/or ultrasonic
waves) or other method that facilitates, assists, forces or accelerates the
liquid or solution into
the pores of the biochar.
[0178] Prior to infusing the biochar, the biochar, as described in detail
above, may be washed
and/or moisture adjusted. Figure 17 is a flow diagram 1700 of one example of a
method for
infusing biochar with an additive. Optionally, the biochar may first be washed
or treated at step
1702, the wash may adjust the pH of the biochar, as described in more detail
above, or may be
used to remove elemental ash and other harmful organics that may be unsuitable
for the desired
infused additive. Optionally, the moisture content of the biochar may then be
adjusted by drying
the biochar at step 1704, also as described in further detail above, prior to
infusion of the additive
or inoculant at step 1706.
[0179] In summary, the infusion process may be performed with or without any
washing, prior
pH adjustment or moisture content adjustment. Optionally, the infusion process
may be
performed with the wash and/or the moisture adjustment step. All the processes
may be
completed alone or in the conjunction with one or more of the others.
[0180] Through the above process of infusing the additive into the pores of
the biochar, the
pores of the biochar may be filled by 25%, up to 100%, with an additive
solution, as compared
to 1-20% when the biochar is only submerged in the solution or washed with the
solution for a
period of less than twelve hours. Higher percentages may be achieved by
washing and/or drying
the pores of the biochar prior to infusion.
[0181] Data have been gathered from research conducted comparing the results
of soaking or
immersion of biochar in liquid versus vacuum impregnation of liquid into
biochar. These
data support the conclusion that vacuum impregnation provides greater benefits
than simple
soaking and results in a higher percentage volume of moisture on the surface,
interstitially and
in the pores of the biochar.
[0182] In one experiment, equal quantities of pine biochar were mixed with
equal quantities
of water, the first in a beaker, the second in a vacuum flask. The mixture in
the beaker was
continuously stirred for up to 24 hours, then samples of the suspended solid
were taken,
47

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
drained and analyzed for moisture content. The mixture in the vacuum flask was
connected
to a vacuum pump and negative pressure of 15" was applied. Samples of the
treated solid
were taken, drained and analyzed for moisture content. Figure 18 is a chart
illustrating the
results of the experiment. The lower graph 1802 of the chart, which shows the
results of
soaking over time, shows a Wt.% of water of approximately 52%. The upper graph
1804 of
the chart, which shows the results of vacuum impregnation over time, shows a
Wt.% of water
of approximately 72%.
[0183] Figures 19a and 19b show two charts that further illustrate that the
total water and/or
any other liquid content in processed biochar can be significantly increased
using vacuum
impregnation instead of soaking. Figure 19a compares the mL of total water or
other liquid
by retained by 1 mL of treated biochar. The graph 1902 shows that
approximately .17 mL of
water or other liquid are retained through soaking, while the graph 1904 shows
that
approximately .42 mL of water or other liquid are retained as a result of
vacuum impregnation.
Figure 19b shows that the retained water of a biochar subjected to soaking
consists entirely of
surface and interstitial water 1906, while the retained water of a biochar
subjected to vacuum
impregnation consists not only of surface and interstitial water 1908a, but
also water
impregnated in the pores of the biochar 1908b.
[0184] In addition, as illustrated by Figure 20, the amount of moisture
content impregnated
into the pores of vacuum processed biochars by varying the applied (negative)
pressure during
the treatment process. The graphs of four different biochars all show how the
liquid content
of the pours of each of them increase to 100% as the vacuum is increased.
[0185] The pores may be substantially filled or completely filled with
additives to provide
enhanced performance features to the biochar, such as increased plant growth,
nutrient
delivery, water retention, nutrient retention, disadvantageous species
control, e.g., weeds,
disease causing bacteria, insects, volunteer crops, etc. By infusing liquid
deep into the pore
structure through the application of positive or negative pressure, surfactant
and/or ultrasonic
waves, alone or in combination, provides the ability to impregnate the
mesopores and
macropores of the biochar with additives, that include, but are not limited
to, soil enhancing
solutions and solids. It should be noted that using these infusion techniques
allows for
impregnating the pores with additives that are more fragile. For example,
since heating is not a
48

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
requirement for these infusion techniques, microbes, chemicals, or compounds
can be infused
without risk of destroying the microbes or changing chemicals or compounds due
to high
temperatures. Also the process can be done at low temperatures to infuse
chemicals that have
low boiling points to keep them a liquid.
[0186] The additive may be a soil enhancing agent that includes, but is not be
limited to, any of
the following: water, water solutions of salts, inorganic and organic liquids
of different polarities,
liquid organic compounds or combinations of organic compounds and solvents,
mineral and
organic oils, slurries and suspensions, supercritical liquids, fertilizers,
PGPB (including plant
growth promoting rhizobacteria, free-living and nodule-forming nitrogen fixing
bacteria, organic
decomposers, nitrifying bacteria, and phosphate solubilizing bacteria),
enzymes, biocontrol
agents, bioremediation agents, saprotrophic fungi, ectomycorrhizae and
endomycorrhizae, among
others.
[0187] Fertilizers that may be infused into the biochar include, but are not
limited to, the
following sources of nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium: urea, ammonium
nitrate, calcium
nitrate, sulfur, ammonium sulfate, monoammonium phosphate, ammonium
polyphosphate,
potassium sulfate, or potassium chloride.
[0188] Similar beneficial results are expected from other additives, such as:
bio pesticides;
herbicides; insecticides; nematicides; plant hormones; plant pheromones;
organic or inorganic
fungicides; algicides; antifouling agents; antimicrobials; attractants;
biocides, disinfectants and
sanitizers; miticides; microbial pesticides; molluscicides; bacteriacides;
fumigants; ovicides;
repellents; rodenticides, defoliants, desiccants; insect growth regulators;
plant growth
regulators; beneficial microbes; and, microbial nutrients or secondary signal
activators, that may
also be added to the biochar in a similar manner as a fertilizer.
Additionally, beneficial macro-
and micro- nutrients such as, calcium, magnesium, sulfur, boron, zinc, iron,
manganese,
molybdenum, copper and chloride may also be infused into the biochar in the
form of a water
solution or other solvent solution.
[0189] Examples of compounds, in addition to fertilizer, that may be infused
into the pores of
the biochar include, but are not limited to: phytohormones, such as, abscisic
acid (ABA), auxins,
cytokinins, gibberellins, bras sinosteroies, salicylic acid, jasmonates,
planet peptide hormones,
polyamines, karrikins, strigolactones; 2,1,3-Benzothiadiazole (BTH), an
inducer of systemic
49

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
acquired resistance that confers broad spectrum disease resistance (including
soil borne
pathogens); signaling agents similar to BTH in mechanism or structure that
protects against a
broad range or specific plant pathogens; EPSPS inhibitors; synthetic auxins;
photosystem I
inhibitors photosystem II inhibitors; and HPPD inhibitors.
[0190] In one example, a 1000 ppm NO3- N fertilizer solution is infused into
the pores of the
biochar. As discussed above, the method to infuse biochar with the fertilizer
solution may be
accomplished generally by placing the biochar in a vacuum infiltration tank or
other sealable
mixing vessel, chamber or tank. When using vacuum infiltration, a vacuum may
be applied to
the biochar and then the solution may be introduced into the tank.
Alternatively, the solution
and biochar may both be introduced into the tank and, once introduced, a
vacuum is applied.
Based upon the determined total pore volume of the biochar or the incipient
wetness, the amount
of solution to introduce into the tank necessary to fill the pore of the
biochar can be determined.
When infused in this manner, significantly more nutrients can be held in a
given quantity of
biochar versus direct contact of the biochar with the nutrients alone.
[0191] When using a surfactant, the biochar and additive solution may be added
to a tank along
with 0.01 - 20% of surfactant, but more preferably 1-5% of surfactant by
volume of fertilizer
solution. The surfactant or detergent aids in the penetration of the wash
solution into the pores
of the biochar. The same or similar equipment used in the vacuum infiltration
process can be
used in the surfactant treatment process. Although it is not necessary to
apply a vacuum in the
surfactant treatment process, the vacuum infiltration tank or any other mixing
vessel, chamber
or tank can be used. Again, while it is not necessary to apply a vacuum, a
vacuum may be
applied or the pressure in the vessel may be changed. Further, the surfactant
can be added with
or without heat or cooling either of the infiltrate, the biochar, the vessel
itself, or any
combination of the three.
[0192] The utility of infusing the biochar with an additive is that the pores
in biochar create a
protective "medium" for carrying said additive to the environment. As an
example when the
additive is a fertilizer the nutrient infused biochar provides a more constant
supply of available
nutrients to the soil and plants and continues to act beneficially,
potentially sorbing more
nutrients or nutrients in solution even after introduction to the soil. By
infusing the nutrients
in the pores of the biochar, immediate oversaturation of the soil with the
nutrients is prevented

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
and a time released effect is provided. This effect is illustrated in
connection with Figures 18
and 19 below. As demonstrated in connection with Figures 18 & 19 below,
biochars having
pores infused with additives, using the infusion methods described above, have
been shown to
increase nutrient retention, increase crop yields and provide a steadier flow
of fertilizer to the
root zones of the plants.
[0193] Figure 21 is a chart showing improved mass yield in lettuce with
fertilizer infused
biochar using vacuum impregnation. Figure 21 compares the mass yield results
of lettuce grown
in different environments. One set of data measurements represents lettuce
grown in soil over
a certain set time period with certain, predetermined amounts of fertilizer
infused into the
biochar. A second set of data represents lettuce grown in soil over a certain
set period of time
with the same amount of unimpregnated biochar added at the beginning of the
trial and certain
predetermined amounts of NPK solution added to the soil over time. Growth
comparisons were
made between the same amount of fertilizer solution infused into the biochar
as added directly
to the soil, using the same watering schedule. As illustrated, the test
results demonstrated a 15%
yield increase in growth when infusing approximately 750 mg/pot of NPK into
the biochar than
when applying it directly to the soil. Similarly, the same mass yield of
lettuce is achieved at
400 mg NPK/pot with infused biochar than at 750 mg/pot when adding the
fertilizer solution
directly to the soil.
[0194] Figure 22 is a chart illustrating the concentration of nitrate (N)
found in distilled water
after washing differentially treated biochar. In the illustrated example, two
biochar samples
(500 ml each) mixed with 1000 ppm NO3- N fertilizer solution were washed with
distilled
water. The resulting wash was then tested for the presence of nitrate (N),
measured in ppm.
In one sample, the biochar was submerged in and mixed with the nutrient
solution. In the
other example, the biochar was mixed or washed with a nutrient solution
augmented with 1%
surfactant by volume (i.e., 1 ml of surfactant per 100 ml of fertilizer
solution) in a tumbler. In
both examples, the biochar was not dried completely before infusion with the
NO3- N fertilizer
solution, but used as received with a moisture content of approximately 10-
15%. In both
examples, the biochar was mixed with solution and/or surfactant (in the case
of a second
sample) with a bench scale tumbler, rotating the drum for four (4) minutes
without vacuum.
The results demonstrate that the biochar treated with the 1% surfactant
increases the efficiency
51

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
of infiltrating nitrate fertilizer into biochar and then demonstrates the
release of the nutrient
over time. To yield the above data, the test was repeated six times for each
treatment sample,
with 10 washes for each sample per repeat test.
[0195] The above are only a few examples of how additive infused biochar may
be produced
for different uses. Those skilled in the art will recognize that there may be
other mechanisms
for infusing fertilizer or other soil additives into the pores of the biochar
without departing
from the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art will further
recognize that the present
invention can be used on any type of soil application, including, but not
limited to, the
following: crops, turf grasses, potted plants, flowering plants, annuals,
perennials, evergreens
and seedlings, as will be further described below.
[0196] For example, in another implementation, additive infused biochar may be
produced for
use for consumption by animals and/or humans. Biochar may be infused in the
same manner
as described above with nutrients (such as carbohydrates, minerals, proteins,
lipids), vitamins,
drugs and/or other supplements (such as enzymes or hormones, to name a few),
or a
combination of any of the foregoing, for consumption by either humans and/or
animals.
Coloring, flavor agents and/or coating may also be infused into the pores of
the biochar or
applied to the surface. The foregoing may be included to enhance the
performance of the
substance in the digestive tract or to ease or facilitate the ingestion of the
biochar.
[0197] D. Biochar as a Habitat for Microorganisms
[0198] Biotechnology, specifically the use of biological organisms, usually
microorganisms, to
address chemical, industrial, medical, or agricultural problems is a growing
field with new
applications being discovered daily. To date, much research has focused on
identifying,
developing, producing and deploying microbes for various uses. However,
despite much work
on the microbes themselves, relatively little work has been performed on how
to carry, deliver,
and encourage the successful establishment of these microbes in their targeted
environment. Most
current technology for microbial carriers in agriculture is based on
technologies or products that
are highly variable and, in many cases, lead to highly unpredictable
performance of microbes in
the field. For example, many commercial microbes in agricultural settings are
delivered on peat,
clay, or other carriers derived from natural sources, accompanied by limited
engineering or
process control.
52

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0199] Biochar have a proclivity to interact positively with many microbes
relevant to plant
health, animal health, and human public health applications. In fact, there
has been a level of
initial research focused on inoculating biochar with microbes and/or using
biochar in conjunction
with microbes or materials with microbes, e.g. compost. See co-owned US Patent
8,317,891
Method for Enhancing Soil Growth Using Bio-char and Fischer et al., and
Synergisms between
compost and biochar for sustainable soil amelioration
2012
http ://www .intechopen.com/source/pdfs/27163/InTech-
Synergisms between compost and biochar for sustainable soil amelioration.pdf.
[0200] However, biochars, especially in raw form, often suffer from many
characteristics which
make their interaction with microbial organisms extremely unpredictable. Key
among these
undesirable characteristics is a high degree of variability. Because of this
and other factors,
biochar has been, to date, unused in large scale commercial biotechnology
applications. There
are several methods by which this variability can be ameliorated. At a high
level, the methods to
overcome these challenges fall into two categories: (i) making the biochar a
more favorable
habitat for the microbes ¨ either by modifying its properties, adding
materials beneficial to
microbes, or removing materials deleterious to microbes, or (ii) inoculating,
applying, or
immobilizing the microbes on the biochar in ways that mitigate the underlying
variability in the
material. Both of these high-level methods can be used independently or in
conjunction and have
been shown to have a significant impact on the suitability of biochar in many
biotechnology
applications.
[0201] Before delving into the varying treatment methods that will turn the
biochar into a
microbial carrier or co-deploying with microbes, it is important to be able to
view biochar as a
habitat for microbes. Biochar, especially treated biochar, has many physical
properties that
make it interesting as a microbial habitat. The most obvious of these is its
porosity (most
biochars have a surface area of over 100 m2/g and total porosity of 0.10
cm3/cm3 or above).
Furthermore, many biochars have significant water holding and nutrient
retention characteristics
which may be beneficial to microbes. Previous disclosure has outlined how
these characteristics
can be further improved with treatment, e.g., US Patent Application Serial No.
15/156,256, filed
on May 16, 2016, and titled Enhanced Biochar.
53

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0202] However, recent data indicates that the Earth may be home to more
than one trillion
independent species of microbes (See Kenneth J. Locey and Jay T. Lennon,
Scaling laws predict
global microbial diversity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science,
vol. 113 no. 21
(see full text at http://www.pna.s.orgicon tent/113/21/5970.full.). Clearly,
each of these
microbial species does not require an identical habitat. In fact, many have
evolved in different
conditions and thrive in different environments. Biochar, due to its organic
origins, porosity,
and a.menability to treatment seems to be an extremely desirable base product
to be used in the
construction of microbial carriers or co-deployment of microbes. If the
properties of the biochar
can be made to match the properties expected by particular microbes, or groups
of microbes,
empirical data has shown that a much greater impact can be delivered in many
applications ---
whether the targeted biochar is used as a carrier, substrate, co-deployed
product, or merely is
introduced into the same environment at a separate time. It stands to reason,
as many real-world
environments are composed of very complex microbial ecosystems, that giving
certain microbes
in these ecosystem.s a more favorable habitat, can ultimately help those
microbes to become
more successfully established, and potentially shift the entire ecosystem
based on their improved
ability to compete for resources. Clearly this i.s a very desirable
characteristic when the
successful deployment and establishment of a targeted microbe into a new
environment is a
desired outcome.
[0203] There are many properties of a habitat which may be important to
certain microbes, but
some of the most important are: pH, hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity, ability
to hold moisture,
ability to retain and exchange certain types of nutrients, ion exchange
capacity (cationic and
anionic), physical protection from predatory or competitive microbes or
protozoa (usable and
inhabitable porosity), presence or absence of nutrients, micronutrients, or
sources of metabolic
carbon, ability to host other symbiotic microbes or plant systems (such as
plant root tissue), or
others which may be important to various types or species of microbes. Ability
to either enhance
or suppress the availability of certain enzymes can also be an extremely
important factor in
building a viable habitat. This invention focuses on methods and systems that
can be used to
consistently produce biochar which has these targeted characteristics, methods
that can be used
to effectively create a particular formulation of biochar targeted to match a
particular microbe or
54

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
group of microbes, and techniques for deploying the desired microbes along
with this targeted
biochar, through inoculation., co-deployment, integrated growth /
fermentation, or other methods.
[0204] By using treatment properties disclosed previously, proper feedstock
selection, and
control of the pyrolysis process, the following are some, but not all, of the
properties that can be
consistently targeted and controlled at production scales to improve the
biochar for use with
microbes or as a microbial carrier. Examples of those properties include (1)
pH, (2)
hydrophobicity, (3) sodium levels, (4) usable pore size distribution and
usable pore volume, (5)
particle size and distribution, (6) exterior and interior surface geometry,
(7) nutrient exchange,
(8) useable carbon or energy source, (9) toxic materials or compounds, (10)
surface
structure/crystals/tortuosity, (11) compatibility with biofilm formations,
(12) surface charge, (13)
enzyme activity and (14) sterilization.
[0205] L
[0206] It is well known that various microbes prefer varying levels of acidity
or alkalinity. For
example, acidophiles have evolved to inhabit extremely acidic environments.
Likewise,
alkaliphiles prefer more basic (alkali) environments. It has been clearly
shown that the methods
outlined for treating biochars can product targeted p1-1 values that can be
sustained over long
periods of time.
[0207] 2. Hydrophobicity
[0208] There are several common sources of hydrophobicity in porous
carbonaceous materials.
One of them is the occurrence of hydrophobic organic compounds on the surface
of the char ¨
typically residual from the pyrolysis process. Targeted removal of these
compounds is a method
to improve the hydrophobicity of porous carbonaceous substances. These
compounds can be
removed in a non-selective way by increasing the pyrolysis temperature of the
biomass to a level
at which the compounds will disassociate with the material and become gaseous.
This method,
while useful, is very broad, and can also remove othc.T desirable compounds as
well as changing
the surface chemistry of the residual carbon, increasing ash percentages, or
reducing carbon yield
by reacting and removing more carbon than is necessary. These compounds can
also be
selectively removed by the application of a targeted solvent using the
mechanisms previously
disclosed to infiltrate liquids into the pore volume of the material. This
method is also effective,
and has shown to be much more predictable in the removal of certain compounds.
Since the vast

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
majority of microbes rely heavily on water for both transport and life, the
easy association of
water with a material has a large bearing on its ability to sustain microbial
life.
[0209] 3. Sodium Levels
[0210] Differing types of microbes have varying proclivities for the presence
of sodium. Some
microbes Halobacteriwn spp.õ5alinibacter ruber, Wallemia ichthyophaga prefer
high levels of
salinity, while others prefer moderate or limited levels of sodium. Sodium can
be removed from
biochar by either simple washing, or more preferably and effectively,
treatment methods which
infuse a solvent (most commonly water, although others may be used) into the
pores of the
material. Sodium can be added, by using the same methods except instead of
using a solvent, the
liquid being washed with or infused is a solution high in sodium content.
Additionally, since
sodium usually manifests itself as a cation in solution, temporary or
permanent adjustment of the
cationic exchange capacity (CEC) of the material through treatment which
impacts the ability of
the material to exchange cations. Lowering the CEC of the material will in
many cases reduce
its ability to exchange sodium cations, while raising the CEC will typically
enhance the ability of
the material to exchange sodium cations, with exceptions occurring if other
cations are present in
quantities that cause them to preferentially exchange instead of the sodium
cations present.
Finally, differing biomass feedstock contains differing levels of sodium
selecting an appropriate
feedstock prior to pyrolysis will result in a raw or untreated biochar with
reasonably controlled
levels of sodium. For example, pine wood, when pyrolyzed, results in a raw
char with lower
levels of sodium, while coconut shells result in char with higher levels of
sodium after pvinlysis.
AS El Composition Untreated Coconut Untreated Pine Untreated Pine
Shell Biochar Biochar #1 Biochar
Ultimate Analysis ---
Moisture free results
Ash 6.7% 9.2.% 3.6%
Ash Composition
Sodium Oxide, as 5.7 % 1.2% 0.8%
Na20
Regardless, it should be clear that there are various method.s available to
produce final product
with a targeted sodium level, making it suitable for various microbes
depending on their
preference for an environment with a certain sodium level.
[0211] 4. Usable Pore Size Distribution and Usable Pore Volume
36

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0212] One very important quality of a microbial habitat is the availability
of shelter from
environmental or biological hazards. A few examples of environmental hazards
are high
temperature. UV radiation, or low moisture, while an example of a biological
hazard is the
existing of predatory multicellular microbes such as protozoa, including both
flagellates and
ciliates. In order for a particle or material to provide shelter for microbes,
at least two conditions
must be present: (i) The material must consist of pores or openings of a size
which can be
inhabited by the microbe in question (ii) but prevent the hazard from entering
(e.g. pore size
smaller than the size of predators, such as protozoa, or deep enough to be
shaded from UV rays)
and, (iii) the pores mentioned previously must be usable ¨ namely, they should
not be occupied
by solid matter (clogged) and/or they should not contain substances that are
toxic or undesirable
for the microbe in question. In some cases, the pore size distribution of a
biochar can be adjusted
by the selection of the biomass feedstock to be pyrolyzed and the conditions
of the pyrolysis
process itself. For example, pine wood has a relatively narrow pore size
distribution, with most
pores falling in the range from 10-70 pm. Coconut shells, on the other hand,
have a much wider
size distribution, with many pores below lam, and also a high percentage of
porosity above
I 00p m. It is theorized that materials with pores of a single size or where
most pores are of similar
size can potentially be good carriers or habitats for certain, targeted
microbes, while materials
consisting of broader ranges of pore sizes may be better habitats for
communities, consortia or
groups of microbes, where each microbe may prefer a slightly different pore
size. Furthermore,
the pore size of a material may also be controlled during the pyrolysis
process by increasing
temperature or performing "activation" or other steps common in activated
carbon production to
react or remove carbon, leaving larger pores, or exposing availability of
pores that were once
inaccessible from the exterior surface of the material. Adjusting the particle
size of the material
may also change the pore size distribution in at least two ways: (i) exposing
pores that were not
available or accessible previously, or (ii) d.estroying larger pores by
fracturing, splitting, or
dividing them. In many cases, raw biochar may contain a proper pore size
distribution, but for
on.e reason or another, the pores are not usable by the microbes in.
question.. In other cases, the
pore size distribution provided by the natural feedstock may be undesirable.
Both properties may
also be impacted through treatment of the raw biochar itself. Larger pores can
be created using
strong acids or other caustic substances either by simple washing or through
forced or rapid
57

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
infusion into the pores. Conversely, a material with fewer usable pores may be
created by
intentionally "clogging" or filling the larger pores with either solids, gums,
or liquids designed to
stay resident in the pores themselves. This treatment may be done in a
controlled way to only
partially fill the pores. For example, one could infuse a limited amount of
heated liquid, such as
a resin, that will become solid at normal atmospheric temperatures. If the
volume of liquid used
is less than the available pore volume of the material being infused, some of
the porosity of the
material will be left untreated and available for use. Most importantly, and
most commonly,
usable pore volume may be increased through the act of simply removing
contaminants (physical
or chemical) from the pores. Rapid infusion and. extraction of liquids may be
used to accomplish
this. As discussed previously, appropriate solvents may be infused or
extracted to remove
chemical contaminants. Additionally, gasses or liquids may be driven into or
out of the pores to
force the removal of many solid obstructions, such as smaller particles of ash
or simply smaller
particles of raw biochar which may have become lodged in the pore in question.
Regardless of
the mechanism used, it has been shown that the available, uncontaminated,
usable pore volume
and pore size has a major role in determining the efficacy of biochars in
microbial roles.
[0213] Figures 23 and 24 are images that show how different sized bacteria
will fit in different
biochar pore size structures. Figure 23 is rod-shaped gram-positive
bacteria, Bacillus
thuringiensis israelensis, in a treated pine biochar, with pore openings of -
10-20 pm and bacteria
of -2-5 pm. Figure 24 is rod-shaped gram-negative bacteriaõ5erratia
liquefaciens, in a treated
coconut shell biochar, with pore openings of -2-10 pm and bacteria. of - 1-2
um.
[0214] In addition, total pore volume in the size of 5-50 um has been shown to
correlate with
microbial release rate after inoculation on treated biochar. Figure 25
illustrates release rate data
verse total pore volume data for both coconut shell and pine based treated
biochars inoculated
with a releasable bacteria. As illustrated in Figure 25, the data was plotted
in a graph, and clearly
shows that as pore volume increases so does the release rate.
[0215] 5. Exterior and Interior Surface Geometry
[0216] Two important properties of microbial carriers are: (i) their ability
to release microbes
from their surfaces and (ii) their ability to immobilize or stabilize microbes
on their surfaces.
Depending on the final application or use of the carrier, one or both of these
properties may be
desired. For example, for carriers designed to quickly release a microbe into
a targeted domain
58

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
such as a lake, river, or other waterway, the release characteristics of the
material are paramount.
For other applications, such as applications of certain symbiotic microbes in
agriculture, rapid
release may be undesirable, rather it may be important to sustain the microbes
within the
porosity of the material until plant tissue, such as root biomass, is nearby
to provide nutrition
for the microbes in question. The surface and pore geometry of the material
used as a carrier
can be critical to determine this behavior. For example, material with
generally smooth, uniform
surfaces will typically release many microbes much more effectively, while
material with more
rugged, varied, tortuous pore surfaces and geometry will typically retain and
immobilize
microbes more effectively. The biomass used in the production of the final
material is one of
the most important factors in surface geometry. However, even this quality can
be altered
through treatment. Specifically, smooth surfaces may be etched by implementing
the treatment
and infusion processes previously disclosed with strong acids, rendering them
rougher.
Conversely, rough surfaces may be treated with either organic or inorganic
compounds to coat
and remove contour. Mechanical means may also be used to affect changes in
particle geometry.
Many forms of charred material have relatively low crush strength and are
relatively brittle. The
method used to grind, or size particles can have a large impact on the
geometry of the final
particles. For example, particles milled using a ball mill or other type of
grinding technology
will typically have a smoother exterior geometry after the milling is complete
and may lose a
good amount of their porosity through the simple mechanical crushing of pores.
However,
particles sized using ultrasonic vibrations or even simple physical vibrations
to shatter, rather
than crush larger particles into smaller ones, will typically retain their
geometry, or sometimes
result in smaller particles with more rugged geometries than the particles at
the beginning. It
should be apparent to one skilled in the art that there are various mechanical
mechanisms
available to effect these changes, but the resulting particles can be tailored
to meet a particular
microbial release or immobilization outcome.
[0217] 6. Particle Size and Distribution
[0218] It is well known that the particle size and particle size distribution
of a material has a
key impact on its formulation as a microbial carrier. In many cases, these
factors are very
different for porous carbonaceous materials than they are for other common
microbial carriers.
In standard carriers, typically the reduction of particle size is a method
used to increase surface
59

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
area, and thus the area available to support, immobilize, and carry microbes.
However, in porous
materials, specifically materials with a large volume of usable interior
porosity, sometimes a
reduction in particle size does not cause a large increase in the usable
surface area --specifieaUy
-
because the interior surfaces of the material were already exposed, and
reducing the size of the
particle does not change that fact. This leads to a somewhat counterintuitive
behavior in some
cases in which the reduction of the particle size of a porous material
actually degrades its
performance as a microbial carrier, due to the phenomena that surfaces that
were once sheltered
inside the material are exposed as exterior surfaces when the material is
split or crushed, making
the material less desirable as a habitat for microbes that require shelter
from the surrounding
environment. Additionall:,,,,, at times the actual distribution of particle
sizes can be a key factor
in performance. As a simple example, imagine an aggregated material which
consists of only
two particle sizes: imm and lum. Furthermore, imagine that 50% of the mass of
the aggregate
resided in the lmm particles with the remainder in the lum particles. Lastly,
imagine that the
Imm particles were porous carbonaceous particles with an average pore si.ze of
approximately
50pm. It should he clear that if this aggregate was placed in a container and
agitated, that a.
good portion of the 1pm particles would end up inhabiting the pore volume of
the I min particles,
impacting their usability. In fact, this is the behavior that we see in
practice. Therefore, for
certain microbial applications, it is desirable to remove extremely small
particles, often. referred
to as fines, from the aggregate. This has the additional benefit of reducing
dust during
application, which is particularly important in aerial applications, and
reducing the level of
surface runoff for applications in water, which also is important in certain
microbial
applications. The small particles may be removed through several methods such
as sieving,
blowing or aerodynamic removal, separation with either stationary or moving
liquids
(hydrostatic or hydrodynamic separation) of various viscosities, temperatures,
flow rates, etc.
However, at times, havin.g a mixture of smaller and larger particles can be
desirable. The most
common cases are when communities of microbes are to be deployed, or the
aggregate is to
remain generally intact for a period of time (fermentation applications, long
term storage
applications, or preparation for other formulation uses such as
palletization), in which case, the
interparticle void space is also an important factor and can be optimized for
a particular microbe
or set of microbes by providing a range of particle sizes and geometries.

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0219] 7. Nutrient Exchange
[0220] The ability of a material to hold or exchange nutrients is an
incredibly important
characteristic, not only for microbial, but also for general agricultural
applications. There are
two primary mechanism.s that porous carbonaceous materials can exchange
nutrients: (i)
sorption or retention of the nutrients on the interior and exterior surfaces
of the material, and (ii)
retention of the nutrients either in suspension or solution in liquid or
gasses residing in the pore
volume of the material. Both mechanisms are very useful, but also very
different in function.
Surface sorption or retention is driven by two main properties, among others:
(i) ion exchange
capacity of the material and. (ii) reactivity or electrical charge of
compounds present on or
coating the surfaces of the material. Retention of nutrients in solution or
suspension are
impacted by other, different characteristics of the material, such as
hydrophilicity, oil sorption
capacity, usable pore volume and pore size distribution, and interior pore
geometry and
tortuosity. The surface retention of nutrients can be targeted by selecting
the feedstock biomass
(some materials render a char after pyrolysis with vastly differing ionic
exchange capacities
(CEC and AEC) than others). It can also be impacted by adjusting pyrolysis
conditions. Higher
pyrolysis temperatures tend to reduce CEC and nutrient adsorption capability.
See Gai, Xiapu
et al. "Effects of Feedstock and Pyrolysis Temperature on Biochar Adsorption
of Ammonium
and Nitrate." Ed. Jonathan A.. Coles, PLoS ONE 9.12 (2014): e113888. PAIC Web.
19 Nov.
2016. In addition, the surface retention of nutrients can be impacted by
treating the surfaces of
the material with substances targeted towards adjusting the ionic exchange
characteristics. For
example, using the previously disclosed treatment methods to infuse 11202 into
the pores of the
carbonaceous material and then evaporating the liquid can increase the
cationic exchange
properties of the material.
[0221] Furthermore, another way to exchange nutrients more efficiently is to
use the pore
volume rather than, or in addition to, the pore surfaces ¨ namely keeping the
nutrients in solution
or liquid or gaseous form and placing them in the volume of the pores rather
than attempting to
sorb them on the surfaces of the material. This can be an incredibly useful
technique not only
for plant life and soil health, but also for microbes. The food sources can
vary from simple to
complex such as glucose, molasses, yeast extract, kelp meal, or bacteria media
(e.g.
MacConkey, Tryptic Soy, Luria-Bertani). When using the pore volume to exchange
nutrients
61

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
in this way, it should be clear that a wide variety of nutrients may be used,
and targeted
combinations of pore volume, size, and r3utrition can be produced to assist in
the delivery,
establishment, or successful colonization of targeted microorganisms or groups
of
microorganisms. It should be clear by this point that merely immersing the
biochar or pomus
carbonaceous material in a liquid nutrient broth may be partially effective in
filling the pore
volume or coating the pore surfaces with these nutrients and should be
considered within the
scope of this invention, however using the treatment techniques outlined in
this and related
disclosures is much more effective at both coating the surfaces and infusing
nutrition into the
pore volume of the material itself. Since many microbes rely on liquid for
mobility, placing
liquid into the pore volume of the material is in many cases a prerequisite
for successfully
infusing, carrying, or delivering microbes.
[0222] 8. Usable Carbon or Energy Sources
[0223] Related to the ability to improve nutrient exchange is the ability to
treat the pore volume,
pore surfaces, exterior surfaces, or any combination of these with not only
custom broths or
growth media, but also other forms of carbon known to be beneficial to
microbes and plant life.
Some examples of this are carbohydrates (simple and complex), humic
substances, plant macro
and micronutrients such as nitrogen (in many forms, such as ammonium and
nitrates),
phosphorous, potassium, iron, magnesium, calcium, and sulfur and trace
elements such a.s
manganese, cobalt, zinc, copper, molybdenum. These nutrients may either be
infused in liquid
or gaseous form, or even as a suspended solid in liquid. The liquid may be
left in the pores, or
may be removed. If removed through evaporation, nutrients in solution or
suspended solids
may be left behind, while if removed by mechanical or physical means, a
portion of the liquid
may be left behind as .well as some solids. It should be noted that the
various forms of removal
have differing advantages and disadvantages and that many energy sources may
be added either
at the same time or in sequence, with one, or many, removal steps in between
treatment or
infusion steps.
[0224] 9. Toxic Materials or Compounds
[0225] The selective addition or removal of materials or substances known to
be toxic to a
certain microbe or lifeforin is a key step in preparation of biochar for use
as a microbial habitat
or carrier. It has been shown, that through treatment., potentially toxic
compounds can be
62

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
removed with much greater effectiveness than through simple pyrolysis alone.
Some examples
of the potentially deleterious compounds that. may be removed are: volatile
organic compounds
(VOCs), monoaromatics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PARs), heavy metals,
and
chlorinated compounds (e.g. dioxins and furans). A
proven, approach to remove these
substances is to wash the exterior surfaces with and/or rapidly infuse a
solvent into the pore
volume of the material targeted to remove these substances. Following the
infusion with either
mechanical extraction, drying, or other methods to remove the solvent, la.den
with the substances
in question, from the pores and interparticle spaces is a desirable, but not
strictly necessary step
to further reduce the levels of toxicity. For example, the followin.g data
shows removal of
dioxins using the treatment process of the present invention.
Raw coconut Treated coconut Raw pine Treated pine
shell biochar shell biochar biochar biochar
TEQ ngfkig 0.7 0.4 9.6 0.4
(method
8290A)
[0226] Another approach for some toxic compounds (benzene as one example) is,
rather than
removing the compounds in question, to react them in place with other
compounds to neutralize
the toxicant. This approach can be used either with washing, or forced /
assisted infusion, and
in these cases a removal step is less necessary ¨ although it still can be
used to prepare the
material for another, subsequent phase of treatment.
[0227] Much attention is given to the removal of toxic compounds, but it
should be also be
noted that at times, it can be extremely beneficial to actually add or treat
the material with toxic
compounds. A primary example of this is sterilization, or preparation for
selective infusion.
Even after pyrolysis, residual -biological life has been found to potentially
establish itself in
biochars given the right conditions. Treating, washing, or infusing the
material with antiseptics
such as methanol, ethanol, or other antibacterial or antiviral substances can
be a key step in
removing contamination and preparing the material for use in microbial
applications. A
variation on this approach is to infuse, treat, or wash the material with a
selectively toxic
compound, such as a targeted antibiotic or pharmaceutical targeted towards
interrupting the
lifecycle of a specific set of microorganisms or organisms, thereby giving
other microbes, either
through infusion or merely contact in situ the opportunity to establish. Some
examples of this
63

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
treatment would be the use of antifungais such as cycloheximide to suppress
fungal growth and
provide an environment more well suited toward the establishment of bacteria.
A.s has been
stated previously, the methods may be used alone, or in combination with one
another.
Specifically, a toxic compound such a.s ethanol, may be infused, removed, and
then steps may
be taken to remove other toxic compounds, followed by steps to add carbon
sources or growth
media.
[0228] 10. Surface Structures I Crystals / Tortuosity
[0229] The physical surface and pore structure of the material is critically
important to its
suitability as a microbial habitat. There are many factors that contribute to
the surface structure
of the material. The most notable of these factors is the biomass used to
produce the
carbonaceous material ¨ the cellular structure of the biomass dictates the
basic shape of many
of the pores. For example, pyrolyzed coconut shells typically have less
surface area, and a more
diverse distribution of pore sizes than pyrolyzed pine wood, which, when
pyrolyzed at the same
temperature, has greater surface area, but a more uniform (less diverse) pore
size distribution.
Tortuosity, or the amount of curvature in a given path through a selected pore
volume is also an
extremely important characteristic of engineered porous carbonaceous
materials.
[0230] Figure 26 shows the total fungi/bacteria ratio for two biochars derived
from different
biochar starting materials, e.g., feedstocks. Each biochar was loaded with
different levels of
moisture, and the total fungi/bacteria ratio was monitored during the first
week. Biochar A
2301 showed a constant total fungi/bacteria ratio of 0.08 across moisture
levels rang5000ng
from 15% to 40%, while Biochar B 2302 showed a constant total fungi/bacteria
ratio of 0.50
for moisture levels ranging from 30% to 40%. It is theorized that, a
fungi/bacteria ratio
between 0.05 and 0.60 is an effective prescription for a stable biochar
composition. This
composition allows a commercially viable product, which has sufficient shelf
life that it can
be delivered to storage houses waiting for the proper planting window.
[0231] It is theorized that the difference in the observed total fungi/total
bacteria ratios of
may also be explainable by the structures of the biochars. Biochar's having an
open pore
structure, e.g., more interconnected pores, promotes more bacteria formation;
while closed
pores, e.g., relatively non-connected nature of the pores, tends to promote
fungi formation.
Biochars with differing microbial communities may be beneficial for specific
applications in
64

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
commercial agriculture. Thus, custom or tailored loading of the microbial
population may
be a desired implementation of the present invention.
[0232] For example, as shown in Figures 27a, 27b and 27c, Biochar A 2701
shows that it
has a greater population of, i.e., is inhabited by, more gram negative, gram
positive and
actinomycetes than Biochar B 2702. Thus, for example, Biochar A would be more
applicable
for use with certain agricultural crops in which Plant Growth Promoting
Bacteria (PGPB) species
in the actinomycetes, gram (-) pseudomonas, and bacillus groups are used for
nutrient
utilization and uptake.
[0233] It should be noted that both pyrolysis and post-treatment can be
used to further modify
the shape of these pores and structures. p-yrolyzing at higher temperatures,
injecting select gasses
or liquids during pyrolysis, or both typically will increase the pore volume
and surface area of the
material in question. Steam is the most readily available gas to cause this
effect, but hydrogen
sulfide, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, as well as other reactive gasses can
be used. Prior art
has clearly shown that the surface area of a biochar changes based on
feedstock and pyrolysis
temperature. Post treatment focused on a forced infusion of a strong acid, or
other reactive
substance into the pore space of the carbonaceous material can also be used to
modify the pore
size and pore volume of material by removing or breaking down the carbon
matrix which forms
the structure of the bi.ochar, or other porous carbonaceous material. Acid
etching or infusion can
also be used to make smoother surfaces rougher. Rough surfaces can be very
useful in the
attachment and immobilization of microbes. Smooth surfaces can be useful for
the easy release
of carried microbes. Coating the surface area with materials such as starches
is a technique to
make rough surfaces smoother. Ultrasound, with or without a transmission media
(gel, liquid,
oil, or other) can also be used to rupture interpore divisions and create more
pore space. Hash
gasification, either at atmospheric pressure, or under negative or positive
pressure, of liquid
infused into the pores by the methods previously disclosed can also be used to
crack, disrupt, or
fracture solid material separating adjacent pores.
[0234] While much. attention is given to modifying the pore structure by
removing
carbonaceous material, it should be noted that the pore structure can also be
modified by the
coating, forced infusion, and/or addition of materials which will bond to the
carbon and consume
pore volume, smooth surfaces, add tortuosity, change the exterior surfaces, or
all of these. In the

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
most simple form, it should be clear that materials may be added to coat
surfaces or fill pore
volume either through forced infusion, simple contact, or other means.
However, if the material
is infused or even simply contacted with a super saturated solution of a
substance that will
crystalize, such as sucrose, sodium chloride, or other common or uncommon
substances known
to form crystals. It should be noted that the crystals or substances used to
create them do not need
to be water soluble, and in fact in many cases it is desirable if they are
not. The crystals may also
be composed of nutrients or substances which may be beneficial to microbial or
plant life.
Examples of this are sucrose and monoatimionium phosphate, both known for
their ability to
easily crystalize and be beneficial for microbial and plant life respectively.
By adding material
or even growing crystals on the carbon, a hybrid material is formed which can
have many
properties that are exceptionally useful for the delivery and establishment of
microbial systems.
Crystallization is also way to add tortuosity to a carbonaceous material and
typically is much
more effective in this aspect than coating with solids alone.
[0235] 11. Compatibility with Biofilm Formation
[0236] Biofilms can be an important factor in the survival of a microbe in
extreme or challenging
conditions. Bacterial communities can shift their morphology to increase
nutritional access and
decrease predation. One such modification is that the bacteria may attach to
surfaces, such as
those found in biochar, in a densely compacted community. In this compacted
form, they may
form an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix called a biofilm. These
communities
can contain hundreds o f different species which find shelter under the
protective EPS coating
from predatory protozoa, pathogens, contaminants, and other environmental
stressors. In some
cases, usually related to public health or healthcare, biofilms are
undesirable as they typically
allow pathogenic microbes to survive exposure to antiseptics, antibiotics,
predatory microbes
such as protozoa, or other agents which may eliminate them or negatively
impact their prospects
for survival. But in. agricultural settings, encouraging target biofihn
establishment could lead to
improved microbe survival and thus improved agricultural or crop benefits.
[0237] As outlined in the article titled The Effect of Environmental
Conditions on Biofilm
Formation of Burkholderia psudomallei Clinical isolates, it can be seen that
certain bacteria
require certain environmental factors, among them surface pH, for the creation
of biofilms. See
Ramli, et al., The Effect of Environmental Conditions on Biofilm Formation of
Burkholderia
66

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
.psudomallei Clinical Isolates (September 6,
2012)
(http://dx.doi.org/10.1.371/jourr3al.pone.0044.104). It is believed that other
surface characteristics
(rugged vs. smooth surfaces, surface charge, and more), along with moisture
levels and relative
humidity also play a large role in biofilin formation,
[0238]
But for certain microbes requiring deployment into environments known to
present
survival challenges, optimizing a delivery material to encourage the formation
of these protective
biofilms can provide the targeted microbes with a significant advantage. Also,
many vegetable
and short cycle row crops such as tomatoes, lettuce, and celery form
mutualistic relationships
with bacteria that lead to the formation of biofilms on root hairs that
function not only in
nutrient uptake but also in plant pathogen resistance.
[0239]
A.s outlined in previous disclosure, treatment of raw biochar can be used to
adjust the
surface pH to a level suitable for biofilm formation. Similarly, adjusting the
humidity by
selectively leaving a measured or controlled amount of water resident in the
pore volume of the
material can also provide benefit. Lastly, the techniques outlines for
modifying the physical
surface properties of the material either by smoothing or roughening, can be
key factors also.
[0240]
It should be clear that these factors can also be reversed to create an
environment that
is unsuitable for biofilm formation in applications where the formation of
biofilms on the carrier
is not desirable ¨ e.g. delivery or applications where quick. release of
microbes from the carrier is
important.
[0241] 12, Surface Charge
[0242] The surface charge of a porous carbonaceous material can be crucially
important in the
association and establishment of targeted microbes with or on the material.
For example, most
bacteria have a net negative surface charge and in certain conditions a
specific bacterium may
favor attachment to positively charged surfaces. In some biological
applications, this attachment
may be preferred, in others, attachment may not be preferred. However,
modifying the surface
charge of the material is clearly a way to impact the suitability for
attachment of certain microbes.
There are many ways in which the surface charge of a carbonaceous material may
be changed or
modified. One way to accomplish this is by treating the surface area of the
material with a solution
containing a metal, such as Mn, Zn, Fe, or Ca. This can be performed either by
doping the
material with these metals prior to or during pyrolysis, or more preferably,
by using a forced
67

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
infusion or treatment technique after pyrolysis to deposit these substances on
the interior and/or
exterior surfaces of the carbonaceous material. By controlling the amount. and
or types of
substances infused, the surface charge of the material can be modified by
encouraging loading of
02- or other anions, or conversely, N. N1H2+, or other cations. This
modification of surface charge
can have a profound impact on the ability of certain microorganism to be
immobilized on the
interior and exterior surfaces of the material.
[0243] Another application of surface charge can be found by temporarily
charging the
carbonaceous material during inoculation with microbes. Carbon is used as a
cathode or anode
in many industrial applications. Because of its unique electrical properties,
carbon, or more
specifically porous carbonaceous materials, may be given a temporary surface
charge by the
application of a difference in electrical potential. One application of this
mechanism is to create
a temporarily positively charged surface to encourage microbial attachment.
Then, while the
charge is maintained, allowing the microbes to attach themselves to and
colonize the carrier.
Once the colonization is complete, the charge can be released and the carrier,
laden with microbes
can either be deployed as is, or can undergo further treatment to stabilize
the microbes such as
lyophilization, or freeze drying.
[0244] 13. Enzyme Activity
[0245] For some types of microbes, enzyme activity, or the presence of certain
enzymes is every
bit as important as the availability of energy or nutrition. Enzymes can be
critical in the ability
of microbes to -metabolize nutritior3, which in turn, can be a key element of
reproduction., survival,
and effective deployment. There are six main types of enzymes: hydrolases,
isom.erases, ligases,
lyases, oxidoreductases, and transferases. These enzymes can be important in
microbial
applications. Through treatment or even simple contact, enzymes, like
nutrients and energy
sources, can be deposited on the surfaces or within the pore volume of porous
carbonaceous
materials, either a.s solids, or in solution/suspension, ensuring the enzymes
are not. degraded
through the process. However, forced infusion of enzymes through the treatment
processes
previously outlined allows for much greater storage capacity and much greater
levels of contact.
with the interior surfaces of the biochar, and as such, is preferable to
simple contact. In some
cases, the carbonaceous material can be used to deliver enzymes alone into an
environment where
68

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
both a habitat and enzymes are needed to promote or encourage the growth of
certain indigenous
microbes.
[0246] Another important aspect of enzyme activity is that some bacteria
make extra-cellular
enzymes which. could be bound by the bioc.har or either reduce or even stop
biochemical reactions.
Thus, in certain situations when application is appropriate the carbonaceous
material can be used
to inhibit or make certain enryines ineffective. For example, if the biochar
is being used as a
carrier for food or certain chemicals that are vulnerable to breakdown by
enzymatic degradation
and these specific enzymes would be bound by the biochar, then using the
carbonaceous material
as the carrier would provide for greater shelf-life and viability of the
product versus traditional
carriers.
[0247] 14., Sterilization
[0248] in many cases, it is desirable to remove potential unwanted microbes
from the surfaces
and pore volume of the material through sterilization. At outlined above,
infusion with antiseptics
or antibiotics are a way to accomplish this. Boiling, or more preferably,
forced infusion of steam
is also a technique that can be used to remove resident microbial life.
Heating to a temperature
above 1(X) degrees C, and preferably between 100 and 150 degrees C is also
effective for
removing some microbial life. Heating may be required for ideally 30 minutes
or more,
depending on volume, method, and extent (temperature, radiation). Autoclaving
can also be used
30 minutes, 121 degrees C, 20 psig. For applications requiring a high level of
sterility, gamma
irradiation can be used, with dosages adjusted for the level of sterility
needed in ranges of 5 to 10
kGy or even 50 to 100 kGy or even higher dosage levels. For all sterilization
methods, the extent
of treatment required will depend on the volume of material and the required
level of sterilization.
In general, sterilization, using heat, should be done for at least 30 minutes,
but should be adjusted
as needed.
[0249] At this point, it should be clear that all of these properties can
be controlled and
modified to create a treated, controlled biochar that is suitable for use as a
microbial carrier,
delivery system, habitat, fermentation substrate, or environmental (soil,
water or other)
enhancement. By controlling these properties and producing a material matched
to the application
and the microbe(s) in question, effectiveness can be dramatically improved
over both traditional
biological carriers, and many forms of raw, untreated, uncontrolled biochar.
Furthermore,
69

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
varying materials, with varying properties, may be aggregated to provide
delivery systems or
habitats targeted towards consortia, communities, or groups of microbes.
[0250] E. Inoculating, Applying, or Immobilizing the Microbes on the
Biochar
[0251] Typically, the prior art teaches either placing biochar on soils alone
or combining the
biochar with compost and using this mixture as a soil amendment. The nature of
the microbial
population in this compost mixture is poorly disclosed by the prior art. Thus
using more targeted
methods to get the desired microbes into the suitable habitat created by the
raw biochar, or more
preferably treated or controlled biochar is desired. The following are some
but not all, methods
and systems that can be used to inoculate, deploy, or otherwise associate
microbial life with a
treated or untreated biochar:
[0252] 1. Co-deployment
[0253] This method focuses on deploying the microbes at the same time as the
biochar. This
can be done either by deploying the biochar into the environment first,
followed by microbes or
by reversing the order, or even deploying the two components simultaneously.
An example of
this would be the deployment of a commercial brady rhizobium inoculant
simultaneously with
the introduction of a treated biochar into the soil media. The system here is
the combination use
of a biochar and microbes in the environment, and more preferably a char
treated to have suitable
properties for a target microbe or group of microbes which it is used with in
a targeted
application for a specified purpose, for example a symbiotic crop of said
microbe(s).
[0254] In one experiment, various biochar feedstocks with various post-
treatments were added
to a soilless mix containing soybean seeds that had been treated with a
commercial microbial
product containing bradyrhizobium japonicum. and compared to both a control
with microbe
inoculant and one without. Some of the treated biochars co-deployed with the
inoculant
increased seed germination rates, one by 29%. Others increased nodulation
measured at 10
weeks, one more than doubled the number of nodules. The use of the microbial
inoculant
increased shoot biomass in all treatments. Figure 28 is a chart comparing
shoot biomass when
the biochar added to a soilless mix containing soybean seeds is treated with
microbial product
containing bradyrhizobium japonicum. and when it is untreated. As illustrated
in Figure 28,
shoot biomass increased with the biochar was treated.

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0255] Figure 29 shows the comparison of root biomass in a microbial
inoculated environment
versus one without inoculation. As illustrated in Figure 29, when inoculated,
root biomass
decreased with the inoculant alone yet increased with the use of all the
treated biochars with or
without inoculant.
[0256] In addition leaf tissue analysis was done which showed some of the
treated biochars co-
deployed with the rhizobial inoculant showed a significant increase in
nitrogen uptake. Figure
30 is a chart comparing the nitrogen levels when the biochar is inoculated
with the rhizobial
inoculant verses when it is not inoculated. Statistical significance in the
chart in Figure 30 is
marked with a star. In all cases, nitrogen levels increase with inoculation.
[0257] As outlined in these results, the addition of a treated biochar
suitable for co-
deployment with this particular microbe increased nodulation, increased
nitrogen
fixation/availability, and resulted in substantially increased root mass. It
should be noted that
to demonstrate the differing performance of varying formulations, two
formulations were tested,
each showing different interactions with the microbe in question, along with
significant
variations in performance. This is just one example to demonstrate the
invention of how the
specific combination of biochar feedstock, biochar treatment, co-deployed
microbe, and
application (this case plant species) can lead to improved microbial
effectiveness and thus
improved results (this case plant vigor), versus no treatment, applying the
microbe alone, or
applying the biochar alone. Another example of co-deployment benefit could be
using a biochar
that has strong absorption properties in combination with fertilizer (or
infused with fertilizer)
and microbes in an agricultural setting. The biochar properties that help
retain and then slowly
release nutrients and ions will also help the targeted microbe population to
establish and grow
without being impacted by the high levels of fertilizer salts or nutrients
which can often impede
and sometimes kill the microbes being deployed.
[0258] 2. Basic Inoculation
[0259] A more advanced method of inoculation centers on mixing the microbe or
microbes in
question with the treated or untreated biochar before deployment. In some
cases, the biochar in
question can be treated, produced, or controlled to assist with this
deployment, making this case
slightly different than merely inoculating a microbe on untreated biochar. In
one form, microbes
suspended in liquid (either water, growth media, or other liquids) are
deposited on the biochar
71

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
and mixed together until both materials are well integrated and then the
material is deployed as
a granular solid. It has been shown that materials that have been treated to
be more hydrophilic
typically accept this inoculation more readily than hydrophobic materials ¨
demonstrating yet
another way in which the treatment of biochar can enhance performance. In
another form of
basic inoculation, the biochar is delivered in suspension in the liquid also
carrying the microbes.
This biochar/liquid/microbe slurry is then deployed as a liquid. In this form,
sizing the biochar
particles in such a way that their surface properties and porosity is
maintained is a key element
of effectiveness. Additionally, ensuring that the pores are treated to allow
easy association of
both liquid and microbes with the surfaces of the biochar is important. An
example of a basic
inoculation method of biochar for a bacteria in lab scale is as follows:
1) Isolate Pseudomonas protegens on a plate with 1.5% w/v Tryptic Soy Broth
solidified
with 1.5% w/v agar and incubate at 30 C for 12h
2) Take an isolated colony of Pseudomonas protegens and grow up in a 1.5% w/v
TSB
solution (90 ml) along with 10 g sterile biochar (sterilized at 110C in small
batches for
15-20 min) and combine both in a sterile 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask
3) Shake contents of flask at 150 rpm at 30 C for 12h, or greater
4) Transfer contents of flask into a sterilized ultracentrifuge tube (250 ml)
and spin at
10,000 x g for 10 min
5) Carefully remove supernatant liquid fraction by filtering through a Whatman
No 4 filter
with a vacuum filtration system to separate out the bulk liquid from biochar.
After basic inoculation, the material and the microbes may be deployed
immediately, stored for
future use, or stabilized using technology such as lyophilization.
[0260] 3. Assisted Inoculation
[0261] Another form of inoculation, which appears to have greater efficacy
with some microbial
systems, is assisted inoculation. Assisted inoculation involves providing
mechanical, chemical,
or biological assistance to move the targeted microbe either into the pore
volume of the carrier
or onto interior surfaces of the material that normally may not be accessible.
Realizing that
many microbes require liquid, and preferably water, for mobility, the most
straightforward
method of assisted inoculation requires infiltrating the pore volume of the
material with water
prior to contact with the targeted microbes. This water infusion can be done
using the treatment
72

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
methods described previously in this disclosure. It has been shown that, with
certain microbes,
making this change alone will have a positive impact on the ability of
microbes to associate with
and infiltrate the material. In one experiment, it was shown that water
infusion improved release
rate on both a treated pine biochar with granular particles and with a coconut
biochar powder.
Figure 31 illustrates the three-day release rates of water infused biochar
compared to other types
of biochar. As illustrated, results vary depending upon the biomass.
[0262] Changes can also be made in the media to reduce surface tension and
increase flowability
through the addition of a surfactant to the water, either into the liquid used
to carry the microbes,
or into the pores of the material itself, through simple contact, or
preferably forced infusion.
[0263] Additionally, the microbes themselves may be assisted into the pores
using the treatment
techniques previously outlined. Care needs to be taken to match the microbe to
the technique
used, but many microbes are capable of surviving vacuum infiltration if
performed at relatively
gentle, lower pressure differentials (+/- 10% of standard temperature and
pressure). Some
microbes, and many spores however are capable of surviving vacuum infiltration
even at
relatively large pressure differentials (+/- 50, 75, or even 90 or 95% or more
variation from
standard temperature and pressure). When this technique is used, a liquid
mixture is constructed
containing both liquid to be infused and the microbe or microbes in question.
The liquid is then
used as the "infiltrant" outlined in previous disclosure related to placing
liquid into the pore
volume of the material. The final material, infiltrated with microbes, may
then be heated to
incubate the microbes, cooled to slow development of the microbes or stabilize
the microbes, or
have other techniques applied such as lyophilization. The material may then be
delivered in
solid granular form, powdered, further sized downward by grinding or milling,
upward by
agglomerating, aggregating, or bonding, or suspended in a liquid carrier. A
clear advantage to
this assisted infusion approach is that the material can be processed or
handled after inoculation
with more microbial stability because the targeted microbes are inhabiting the
interior pore
volume of the material and are less prone to degradation due to contact with
exterior surfaces,
or other direct physical or environmental contact. This method may be applied
repeatedly, with
one or more microbes, and one to many moisture removal steps. It may also be
combined with
the other inoculation methods disclosed here either in whole or in part.
73

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0264] Figures 32a, 32b and 32c show scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images
of raw
biochar compared to ones that have been processed by being infused under
vacuum with bio-
extract containing different microbial species.
[0265] Figure 32a is a SEM (10KV x 3.00K 10.0m) of pore morphology of raw
biochar.
Figure 32b is a SEM (10KV x 3.00K 10.0m) of pore morphology of raw biochar of
Figure 32a
after it has been infused with microbial species. Figure 32c is a SEM (10KV x
3.00K 10.0m)
of a pore morphology of another example of raw biochar of Figure 32a after it
has been infused
with microbial species. The images confirm the ability to incorporate
different microbes into
the pores of biochar by treatment. In turn, these beneficial microbes can
interact with and
enhance the performance of the environment they are deployed into, for example
the plants'
root systems when the inoculated biochar is mixed with the soil in the root
zone.
[0266] Compared to a biochar that has immersed in a compost tea, which may
have a
relatively short, e.g., a few days for the life of the microbes, the
impregnated populations of
examples of the present treated biochars, are stable over substantially longer
periods of time,
e.g., at least an 8 week period and in some cases 1 year or more as measured
by
PLFA(Phospholipid-derived fatty acids) analysis. PLFA analysis extracts the
fatty acid side
chains of phospholipid bilayers and measures the quantity of these biomarkers
using GC-
MS. An estimate of the microbial community population can thus be determined
through
PLFA analysis. The microbial activity may also be inferred through PLFA
analysis by
monitoring the transformation of specific fatty acids. Thus, the impregnation
of the biochar
with a microbial population provides for extended life of the microbes by at
least 5x, 10x,
or more over simple contact or immersion. In fact, some microbes may be better
suited to
surfactant infiltration versus vacuum infiltration and vice versa and this may
impact the shelf
life, penetration, viability, or other characteristics of the microbes.
[0267] As used herein, unless stated otherwise, the stable shelf life of an
example of a biochar
product having a microbial population is the period of time over which the
product can be
stored in a warehouse, e.g., dry environment, temperature between 40 F- 90 F,
with a less
than 50% decrease in microbial population.
[0268] 4. Integrated Growth / Deployable Substrate
74

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0269] With many microbes, especially fungi, it can be helpful to develop or
"grow" the microbes
on the material itself. With porous materials, rather than mechanically or
chemically assisting
the infiltration of the microbes, it can be beneficial to allow the microbes
themselves to inhabit
the pore volume of the material prior to deployment. In fact, with materials
constructed to
effectively immobilize microbes, this can be the most efficient technique to
stabilize, store, and
ultimately deploy the microbes in question.
[0270] An example of this method involves preparing the biochar material for
the microbes,
sometimes through thorough cleansing, other times through addition of either
enzymes or energy
sources needed by the microbe in question, preferably using the treatment
techniques described
previously in this disclosure. Once the material is prepared, the microbes are
placed onto the
material, or infused into the material and then incubated for a period of
time. In the case of many
microbial systems, the microbes themselves will inhabit the material and form
close affiliations
with available surfaces and pore volume. At this point, the material can be
deployed with the
microbes actively attached and affiliated. With many microbes, especially
fungi, this is a
preferred method of deployment and shows many advantages over co-deployment,
or basic
inoculation because of the tight integration of biological life with the
material itself.
[0271] An example of an integrated growth inoculation method of biochar for a
fungus in lab
scale is as follows :
1) Make petri dishes containing corn meal agar (17 g/L), glucose (10 g/L), and
yeast extract
(1 g/L)
2) Inoculate plates with Sordaria fimicola and incubate between 22-30C for at
least 1 day
to produce hyphae
3) Sterilize an inoculating loop and slice "plugs" of the hyphae and agar
generating cubes
that are agar and hyphal mass
4) Inoculate a sterile plate with a "plug" in the center of the plate, around
perimeter have
sterile biochar
5) Incubate plate for at least a day and remove biochar (that are now covered
with grown
over hyphae)]
[0272] It should be noted that because of this effect, biochars, and
specifically treated biochars
can also be extremely effective substrates for solid state fermentation ¨
particularly when growth

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
media or energy sources are added to the pore volume of the material. So, once
incubation is
ongoing, the material can either be removed, with the integrated microbes, and
deployed, or it can
be stabilized for long term storage, or it can be left in situ and used as a
fermentation or growth
substrate to develop or grow more microbes ¨ especially those that require a
solid to propagate
and develop.
[0273] 5. Media and/or Enzyme Infiltration
[0274] As mentioned previously, growth media, energy sources, enzymes, or
other beneficial /
necessary components for microbial growth may be infused into the pore volume
or coated onto
the surfaces of the material in question. This method can be combined with any
of the other
inoculation techniques disclosed here. It has been shown that with certain
microbes and certain
types of material, inoculation with growth media or enzymes can significant
impact the
effectiveness of the biochar material as a carrier.
[0275] 6. Habitat Pre-Establishment (Enhanced Rhizosphere)
[0276] There are certain microbes which, because of symbiotic associations
with host organisms,
such as plants, prefer to develop in the vicinity of the organism, such as the
active root or other
plant tissue. An effective method for deploying these organisms can be to
develop and deploy
the plant/microbe/habitat (biochar) system together as a unit.
[0277] An example of this is germinating seed or transplanting a seedling or
developing juvenile
plant in the presence of treated or untreated biochar, and the targeted
microbes. Biochar that has
been treated to encourage hydrophilicity and neutral pH typically allows for
easier affiliation of
plant root tissue with the material. As this affiliation occurs, a habitat for
symbiotic organisms is
developed within the material itself due to the proximity of active plant
tissue to microbes reliant
on the tissue for energy. As this symbiosis continues, the number, activity,
and colony size of the
targeted microbes will continue to grow. At this point, the plant and biochar
can be deployed
together into the target environment, acting as a pre-established habitat and
carrying the microbes
along with them.
[0278] Another option is to develop and then remove the biochar from the
"incubation" system
either by stripping the biochar material from the symbiotic organism, such as
the root mass, or by
sieving or sifting the media used to grow the plant. At this point, the
microbes can either be
deployed directly or stabilized for storage.
76

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0279] Thus, through more controlled inoculation of the biochar particles, one
can achieve a
predetermined and controllable amount of a microbial community, e.g.,
population, into the
soil. This integration of a microbial community with a biochar particle, and
biochar batches
provides the ability to have controlled addition, use and release of the
microbes in the
community. In agricultural applications, this integration c an further
enhance, promote and
facilitate the growth of roots, e.g., micro- roots, in the biochar pores,
e.g., pore morphology,
pore volume.
[0280] Other methods than those listed above exist for integrating a microbial
community with
an untreated or previously infused biochar particle. Different manners and
methods would be
preferred depending on needs to minimize contamination, encourage biochar pore
colonization/infiltration, minimize labor and cost and producing a uniform, or
mostly uniform,
product.
[0281] Other methods for integrating a microbial community with a biochar
particle may
include, but are not be limited to the following : while under vacuum, pulling
the microbial
solution through a treated biochar bed that is resting on a membrane filter;
spraying a microbial
solution on top of a treated biochar bed; lyophilizing a microbial solution
and then blending said
freeze dried solution with the treated biochar; again infusing, as defined
previously, the treated
biochar with a microbial solution; adding treated biochar to a growth medium,
inoculating with
the microbe, and incubating to allow the microbe to grow in said biochar
containing medium;
infusing, as defined previously, the biochar with a food source and then
introducing the substrate
infused biochar to a microbe and incubating to allow the microbes to grow;
blending
commercially available strains in dry form with treated biochar; adding the
treated biochar to a
microbial solution and then centrifuging at a high speed, potentially with a
density gradient in
order to promote the biochar to spin down with the microbes; densely packing a
column with
treated biochar and then gravity flowing a microbial solution through the
column and possibly
repeating this multiple times; or adding the microbe to a solution based
binder that is well known
to enter the treated biochar pores and then adding said solution to the
treated biochar. In order
to insure the proper microbial community the treated biochar may need to be
sterilized prior to
these methods for integrating a microbial community. All or parts of the above
manners and
methods may be combined to create greater efficacy. In addition, those skilled
in the art will
77

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
recognize that there may be additional manners or methods of infusing biochars
with
microbials, including those created by the combination of one or more of the
manners and
methods listed above, without departing from the scope of the present
invention.
[0282] F. Using Microbial Inoculated Biochars
[0283] Thus, treated biochar can have a microbial community in its pores
(macro-, meso-, and
combinations and variations of these), on its pore surfaces, embedded in it,
located on its
surface, and combinations and variations of these. The microbial community can
have several
different types, e.g., species, of biologics, such as different types of
bacteria or fungi, or it
may have only a single type. For example, a preferred functional biochar, can
have a preferred
range for bacterial population of from about 50-5000000 micrograms/g biochar;
and for fungi,
from about 5 to 500000 micrograms/g biochar. A primary purpose in agricultural
settings,
among many purposes, in selecting the microbial population is looking toward a
population
that will initiate a healthy soil, e.g., one that is beneficial for, enhances
or otherwise advance
the desired growth of plants under particular environmental conditions. Two
types of
microbial infused biochars will be discussed further for agricultural
settings: bacteria and
fungi. However, the microbes may also be used in other applications, including
but not limited
to animal health, either directly or through interactions with other microbes
in the animals'
digestive tract and public health applications, such as microbial larvicides
(e.g. Bacillus
thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti)) and Bacillus sphaericus used to fight
Malaria).
[0284] G. Bacteria Inoculated Biochars
[0285] PGPB include, for example, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, free-
living and
nodule-forming nitrogen fixing bacteria, organic decomposers, nitrifying
bacteria, phosphate
solubilizing bacteria, biocontrol agents, bioremediation agents, archea,
actinomycetes,
thermophilic bacteria, purple sulfur bacteria, cyanobacteria, and combinations
and variations
of these.
[0286] PGPB may promote plant growth either by direct stimulation such as iron
chelation,
phosphate solubilization, nitrogen fixation and phytohormone production or by
indirect
stimulation, such as suppression of plant pathogens and induction of
resistance in host plants
against pathogens. In addition, some beneficial bacteria produce enzymes
(including chitinases,
cellulases, -1,3 glucanases, proteases, and lipases) that can lyse a portion
of the cell walls of
78

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
many pathogenic fungi. PGPB that synthesize one or more of these enzymes have
been found
to have biocontrol activity against a range of pathogenic fungi including
Botrytis cinerea,
Sclerotium rolfsii, Fusarium oxysporum, Phytophthora spp., Rhizoctonia solani,
Pythium
ultimum.
[0287] Currently the most economic conventional solid carrier used to deliver
microbes is peat.
A solid carrier allows for a relatively long shelf life and a more direct
application to a plant's
root system compared to a microbial liquid solution, which would be sprayed
directly.
[0288] Research has shown a substantial increase in PGPB growth and
distribution resulting
from being infused in biochar. For example, data resulting from research
conducted to compare
the effects upon CO2 production (an indicator of bacterial growth) using peat
and biochars show
the beneficial effects of using various biochars in promoting PGPB growth. As
illustrated in
the left-hand chart in Figure 33, peat results in CO2 production of between
approximately 10%
and 30% (depending upon the grown medium), whereas biochars result in CO2
production of
approximately 48% and 80%. Replicated experimental results using different
biochars confirm
CO2 production of approximately 30% to 70% (depending on the grown medium), as
compared
to approximately 10% to 20% for the peat control.
[0289] The method developed for determining this CO2 production as an
indicator of bacterial
growth consists of the following. The substrate, here biochar or peat, is
sterilized by heating at
110C for 15 hours. A bacterial stock solution is then created, here Tryptic
Soy Broth was
solidified with agar at 1.5% w/v in petri plates to isolate the gram negative
non-pathogenic
organism Escherichia coli ATCC 51813 (15h growth at 37 C). Then an isolated
colony is
captured with an inoculating loop and suspend in 10 ml sterile buffer
(phosphate buffer saline
or equivalent) to create the bacterial stock solution. Lactose containing
assays are then used,
here, test tubes that contain 13 ml of either Lauryl Tryptose Broth (LTB) or
Brilliant Green
Broth (BGB) that also contain a Durham tube. A negative control is generated
by adding 10 i.t.L
of sterile buffer to triplicate sets of LTB and BGB tubes. A positive control
is generated by
adding 10 i.t.L of bacterial stock solution to triplicate sets of LTB and BGB
tubes. A negative
substrate is generated by adding 1.25 ml (-1% v/v) of sterile substrate to
triplicate sets of LTB
and BGB tubes. A positive substrate is generated by adding 1.25 ml (-1% v/v)
of sterile
substrate and 10 i.t.L of bacterial stock solution to triplicate sets of LTB
and BGB tubes. The
79

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
tubes of the four treatments are then incubated statically in a test tube rack
at 37 C for at least
15h. The tubes are then carefully observed and any gas bubbles captured by the
Durham tube
within respective LTB or BGB tubes are closely measured with a ruler. Small
bubbles <0.2 mm
should not be considered. A continuous bubble as shown in individual tubes in
Figure 34 are
what are observed and quantified. Figure 34 is an example of carbon dioxide
production
captured as a continuous gas bubble in BGB (left two tubes) and LTB (right two
tubes) growth
medium. The percent carbon dioxide production is then calculated by dividing
the recorded
bubble length by the total Durham tube length and multiplying by 100.
[0290] Further tests were conducted using the Streptomyces lidicus WYEC 108
bacterium found
in one of the commercially available products sold under the Actinovate brand.
Actinovate
products are biofungicides that protect against many common foliar and soil-
borne diseases
found in outdoor crops, greenhouses and nurseries. The formulations are water-
soluble.
[0291] Figure 35 illustrates the effects upon the growth of Streptomyces
lidicus using
conventional peat versus biochars. In the test illustrated by the photograph
on the left of Figure
35, an Actinovate powder was blended with peat, placed in an inoculated media
and incubated
at 25 C. The photograph shows the distribution and density of white colonies
after 3 days. In
the test illustrated by the photograph on the right of Figure 35, an
Actinovate powder was
blended with the treated biochar, placed in an inoculated media and incubated
at 25 C. The
photograph also shows the distribution and density of white colonies after 3
days, the
distribution and density of which are significantly greater than those
achieved with peat.
[0292] Figure 36 further illustrates the improved growth of the Actinovate
bacterium using
biochar versus peat. The left photograph shows only limited and restricted
growth away from
the peat carrier. The right photograph shows abundant growth of the bacterium
spread much
farther out from the biochar carrier.
[0293] Another application of using biochar inoculated with bacteria would be
in the biofuel
industry, where methanotroph inoculated biochar could be used to create
methanol.
Methanotrophic bacteria are proteobacteria with diverse respiration
capabilities, enzyme types,
and carbon assimilation pathways. However, Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b is
one of the
few methanotrophs that can be manipulated by environmental conditioning to
exclusively
produce methanol from methane. M. trichosporium OB3b is one of the most well
studied aerobic

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
Ci degraders and can be grown in either batch or continuous systems. As
mentioned earlier, the
large pore volume and surface area of biochar is suitable for bacterial
colonization and should
subsequently increase substrate access to enzyme activation sites. To improve
the conversion
rate, copper, nitrate, and phosphate should be included in the system. The use
of biochar as a
support material for the aerobic bioconversion of methane to methanol provides
a pore
distribution suitable for both adsorptions of methane and impregnation with
bacteria. By
providing biological and adsorptive functionality the biochar can intensify
the bacteria in the
biochar and increases the conversion rate.
[0294] In general, bacteria communicate via the distribution of signaling
molecules which
trigger a variety of behaviors like swarming (rapid surface colonization),
nodulation
(nitrogen fixation), and virulence. Biochars can bind signaling molecules and
in particular it
is believed can bind a major signaling molecule to their surface. This binding
ability can be
dependent upon many factors including on the pyrolysis temperature. This
dependency on
pyrolysis temperature and other factors can be overcome, mitigated, by the use
of examples
of the present vacuum infiltration techniques. For example, a signaling
molecule that is
involved in quorum sensing- multicellular-like cross-talk found in prokaryotes
can be bound
to the surface of biochars. Concentration of biochars required to bind the
signaling molecule
decreased as the surface area of biochars increased. These signaling molecules
may be added
to the surface of a biochar and may be used to manipulate the behavior of the
bacteria. An
example of such a use would be to bind the molecules which inhibit cell-to-
cell
communication and could be useful in hindering plant pathogens; using
techniques in the
present invention signaling molecules may be added to the surface of a biochar
to engineer
specific responses from various naturally occurring bacteria.
[0295] H. Fungi Inoculated Biochars
[0296] Beneficial fungi include, for example, saprotrophic fungi, biocontrol
fungi,
ectomycorrhizae, endomycorrhizae, ericoid mycorrhizae, and combinations and
variations of
these. It is further theorized that, in general, biochars with greater fungal
development may
be better suited for perennial crops such as grapes, almonds, blueberries, and
strawberries
in which symbiotic relationships with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are
favored over
PGPBs. The presence of high concentrations of AMF spores in biochars can
therefore rapidly
81

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
promote fungal colonization of plant root hairs leading to extensive mycelial
development.
Increased plant root associations with mycelial filaments would consequently
increase
nutrient and water uptake.
[0297] Mycorrhizal fungi, including but not limited to Endomycorrhizae and
Ectomycorrhizae,
are known to be an important component of soil life. The mutualistic
association between the
fungi and the plant can be particularly helpful in improving plant
survivability in nutrient-poor
soils, plant resistance to diseases, e.g. microbial soil-borne pathogens, and
plant resistance to
contaminated soils, e.g. soils with high metal concentrations. Since
mycorrhizal root systems
significantly increase the absorbing area of plant roots, introducing
mycorrhizal fungi may also
reduce water and fertilizer requirements for plants.
[0298] Typically mycorrhizae are introduced into soil as a liquid formulation
or as a solid in
powder or granular form and contain dormant mycorrhizal spores and/or
colonized root
fragments. Often the most economic and efficient method is to treat the seeds
themselves, but
dealing with traditional liquid and powder inoculums to coat the seed can be
difficult. In
accordance with the present invention, inoculated biochar may be used to coat
the seeds by, for
example, using a starch binder on the seeds and then subjecting the seeds to
inoculated biochar
fines or powder. Another method is by placing the mycorrhizae inoculum in the
soil near the
seeding or established plant but is more costly and has delayed response as
the plants initial
roots form without a mycorrhizal system. This is because the dormant
mycorrhizae are only
activated when they come close enough to living roots which exude a signaling
chemical. In
addition if the phosphorus levels are high in the soil, e.g. greater than 70
ppm, the dormant
mycorrhizae will not be activated until the phosphorus levels are reduced.
Thus applying
inoculant with or near fertilizers with readily available phosphorus levels
can impede the desired
mycorrhizal fungi growth. A third option is to dip plant roots into an
inoculant solution prior to
replanting, but this is costly as it is both labor and time intensive and only
applicable to
transplanting.
[0299] If the colonization of mycorrhizae can be quickened and the density of
the
mycorrhizae's hyphal network can be increased then the beneficial results of
mycorrhizal root
systems, e.g. increased growth, increased survivability, reduced water, and
reduced fertilizer
needs, can be realized sooner. Prior art shows that compost, compost teas,
humates, and fish
82

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
fertilizers can improve microbial activities and in more recent studies have
shown physically
combining arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculant with raw biochar has
resulted in
additional plant yield compared to each alone. See Hammer, et. al. Biochar
Increases
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Plant Growth Enhancement and Ameliorates Salinity
Stress, Applied
Soil Ecology Vol 96, Nov 2015 (pg. 114-121).
[0300] An ideal carrier for the mycorrhizae would have moisture, air, a
neutral pH, a surface
for fungi to attach, and a space for the roots and fungi to meet. Thus a
previously infused
biochar created by the method disclosed above would be a better carrier than
raw biochar
alone. The infused biochar could be physically mixed with a solid mycorrhizal
fungi inoculant
or sprayed with a liquid mycorrhizal inoculant prior to or during application
at seeding or to
established plants. Additionally, the infused biochar and mycorrhizal fungi
inoculant could
be combined to form starter cubes, similar to Organo-Cubes, rockwool, oasis
cubes, and peat
pots.
[0301] The infused biochar could be further improved upon by initially
infusing or further
infusing the biochar with micronutrients for mycorrhizal fungi, for example
but not limited to
humic acid, molasses, or sugar. The growth nutrient infused biochar would
further expedite
the colonization of the mycorrhizal fungi when physically combined with the
inoculant and
applied to seeds or plants.
[0302] Another improvement to the infused biochar would be to initially infuse
or further
infuse the biochar with the signaling molecules of mycorrhizal fungi. The
signaling molecule
infused biochar would further expedite the colonization of the mycorrhizal
fungi when
physically combined with the inoculant and applied to seeds or plants, as it
would bring the
mycorrhizae out of dormancy quicker and thus establish the mycorrhizal root
system quicker.
[0303] Another method for establishing and improving mycorrhizal fungi
colonies would be
by growing mycorrhizae into the infused biochar and then applying the
mycorrhizal fungi
inoculated biochar to seeds or plants. Similar to a sand culture (Ojala and
Jarrell 1980
http://jhbiotech.com/docs/Mycorrhizae-Article.pdf), a bed of infused biochar
is treated with a
recycled inoculated nutrient solution by passing it through the bed multiple
times.
[0304] I. Batch Treatment/Bulk Production
83

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0305] As demonstrated above, the treatment processes described above are
particularly well
suited for large scale production of biochar. The processes and biochars of
the present
invention provides a unique capability to select starting materials and
pyrolysis techniques
solely on the basis of obtaining a particular structure, e.g., pore size,
density, pore volume,
amount of open pores, interconnectivity, tortuosity, etc. Thus, these starting
materials and
processes can be selected without regard to adverse, harmful, phytotoxic side
effects that
may come from the materials and processes. This is possible, because the
infiltration steps
have the capability of mitigating, removing or otherwise address those adverse
side effects.
In this manner, a truly custom biochar can be made, with any adverse side
effects of the
material selection and pyrolysis process being mitigated in later processing
steps.
[0306] Further, the processes are capable of treating a large, potentially
variable, batch of
biochar to provide the same, generally uniform, predetermined customized
characteristics for
which treatment was designed to achieve, e.g., pH adjustment. Treatment can
result in treated
biochar batches in which 50% to 70% to 80% to 99% of the biochar particles in
the batch
have same modified or customized characteristic, e.g., deleterious pore
surface materials
mitigated, pore surface modified to provide beneficial surface, pore volume
containing
beneficial additives.
[0307] Accordingly, the ability to produce large quantities of biochar having
a high level of
consistency, predictability and uniformity, provides numerous advantages in
both large and
small agricultural applications, among other things. For example, the ability
to provide large
quantities of biochar having predetermined and generally uniform properties
will find
applications in large scale agriculture applications. Thus, treated biochar
batches from about
1001bs up to 50,000+lbs and between may have treated biochar particles with
predetermined,
uniform properties.
[0308] As the treated biochar batches are made up of individual biochar
particles, when
referring to uniformity of such batches it is understood that these batches
are made up of tens
and hundreds of thousands of particles. Uniformity is thus based upon a
sampling and testing
method that statistically establishes a level of certainty that the particles
in the batch have
the desired uniformity.
84

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0309] Thus, when referring to a treated batch of biochar as being "completely
uniform" or
having "complete uniformity" it means that at least about 99% of all particles
in the batch
have at least one or more property or feature that is the same. Same being
within appropriately
set tolerances for said property. When a treated batch of biochar is referred
to as "substantially
uniform" or having "substantial uniformity" it means that at least about 95%
of all particles
in the batch have at least one or more property or feature that is the same.
When a treated
batch of biochar is referred to as "essentially uniform" or having "essential
uniformity" it
means that at least about 80% of all particles in the batch have at least one
or more property
or feature that is the same. The batches can have less than 25%, 20% to 80%,
and 80% or
more particles in the batch that have at least one or more property or feature
that is the same.
Further, the batches can have less than 25%, 20% to 80%, and 80% or more
particles in the
batch that have at one, two, three, four, or all properties or features that
are the same.
[0310] J. Applications
[0311] Generally, treated biochar of the present inventions can be used
throughout the world,
in numerous soil types, agricultural applications, horticultural, large and
small scale farming,
organic farming, and in a variety of soil management applications and systems,
and
combinations and variations of these. In fact, this particular solution
provides the capability to
custom-manufacture biochar for a particular climate, environment, geographical
area, soil type,
plant type, microbe type, or application by more precisely controlling key
characteristics.
[0312] Examples of these applications include for example, use in acidic and
highly weathered
tropical field soils, use in temperate soils of higher fertility, use in large
commercial
applications, use for the production of large scale crops such as, soybean,
corn, sugarcane and
rice, in forestry applications, for golf courses (e.g., greens, fairways), for
general purpose turf
grasses, wine grapes, table grapes, raisin grapes, fruit and nut trees, ground
fruits (e.g.,
strawberries, blueberries, blackberries), row crops (e.g., tomatoes, celery,
lettuce, leafy greens),
root crops (e.g., tubers, potatoes, beets, carrots), mushrooms, and
combinations and variations
of these.
[0313] Treated biochars and agriculture practices and methods, provide for
improved soil
structure, increased water retention capability, increased water holding
ability of the soil over
time, reduced runoff or leaching, increased holding ability for nutrients,
increase holding of

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
nutrients over time, and combinations and variations of these, and other
features that relate to
the increased holding and retention features and soil aggregation of the
present biochars and
processes. It further being understood that in addition to nutrients, other
material additives,
(e.g., herbicide, pesticide), can be utilized and benefit from the increased
holding and retention
capacities of the present biochars, systems, and methods.
[0314] Treated biochar may also be used in other applications, for example,
such mixing with
manure in holding ponds to potentially reduce gaseous nitrogen losses, soil
remedial (for
example absorption and capture of pesticide, contaminates, heavy metals, or
other undesirable,
disadvantageous soil components), ground water remediation, other
bioremediations, storm
water runoff remediation, mine remediation, mercury remediation and as a
cattle or poultry feed
additive.
[0315] Further, the present invention could be used to clean and/or infiltrate
the pores of
biochar with a variety of substances, for a number of purposes, including but
not limited to,
infiltrating the pores of biochar with nutrients, vitamins, microbes, drugs
and/or other
supplements, or a combination of any of the foregoing, for consumption by
either humans
and/or animals. The treated biochar may also be applied to animal pens,
bedding, and/or other
areas where animal waste is present to reduce odor and emission of unpleasant
or undesirable
vapors. Furthermore it may be applied to compost piles to reduce odor,
emissions, and
temperature to enable the use of the food waste and animal feed in composting.
Biochar can
also be applied to areas where fertilizer or pesticide runoff is occurring to
slow or inhibit
leaching and runoff. Additionally, it can be used in the public health sector
to help control
disease, for example carrying or deploying larvicides to reduce numbers of
certain disease
carrying or transmitting insects. The biochar may also be treated with
additives which make it
easier to dispense or apply, such as non-toxic oils, anti-clumping/binding
additives, surface
drying agents, or other materials.
[0316] In general, in the agricultural application of biochar to soil, the
biochar should be
located near the soil's surface in the root zone, or in or adjacent to the
rhizosphere, where the
bulk of nutrient cycling and uptake by plants takes place. Although benefits
may be obtained
from the application of biochar in layers above, below, in and combinations
and variation of
these, the root zone, for example during landscaping for carbon sequestration,
or if using
86

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
biochar for moisture management. Layering of biochar at various depths above,
below, in
and combinations and variation of these, the root zone, the surface, and
combinations and
variations of these, may also be employed. The biochar layers may have
different
predetermined properties for each layer, based upon, for example, the depth of
the layer,
soil type, geography, crop, climate and other factors.
[0317] The above are only a few examples of how additive infused or microbial
carrying
biochar may be produced for different uses. Those skilled in the art will
recognize that there
may be other mechanisms for infusing additives into the pores of the biochar
without departing
from the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art will further
recognize that the present
invention can be used on any type of soil application, including, but not
limited to, the
following: crops, turf grasses, potted plants, flowering plants, annuals,
perennials, evergreens
and seedlings. By way of example, treated biochar may be incorporated into or
around the root
zone of a plant. As most trees, rows, and specialty crops extract large
percentage of their water
from the first twenty-four inches below the soil surface, the above
applications will generally
be effective incorporating the biochar around the root zone from the top
surface of the soil and
up to a depth of 24" below the top surface of the soil, depending on the plant
type and species,
or alternatively, within a 24" radius surrounding the roots regardless of root
depth or proximity
from the top surface of the soil. When the plant roots are closer to the
surface, the incorporation
of the biochar within the top 2-6" inches of the soil surface may also be
effective. Greater depths
are more beneficial for plants having larger root zones, such as trees.
[0318] In certain examples of biochar applications, the treated biochar can be
applied in
amounts (e.g., rates of addition as measured by weight of treated biochar per
area of field)
of from about 0.001 ton of treated biochar per acre to about 150 tons of
treated biochar per
acre, from about 2.5 tons of treated biochar per acre to about 100 tons of
treated biochar per
acre, and from about 5 tons of treated biochar per acre to about 70 tons of
treated biochar
per acre, although larger and smaller amounts may be used. A dditional rates
of from about
1/2 tons of treated biochar to about 10 tons of treated biochar may be used.
For example,
application rates of 1 ton of treated biochar was added per acre to a soil for
a lettuce crop
where the soil had a pH of about 7. In another example, about 3 tons per acre
of treated
87

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
biochar was added to soil for a strawberry crop. In these examples, the plants
showed
enhanced growth rates and yields.
[0319] Generally, for conventional field cropping systems, biochar can be
preferably added
using existing farm equipment and incorporated into existing farming
operations. For
example, treated biochar can be applied and incorporated together with lime,
since lime is
often applied as a fine solid, which must be well incorporated into soil.
However, it is also
contemplated that the examples of the present inventions may give rise to new
equipment
and utilizations based upon the features, performance and capabilities of the
present
inventions. Generally, treated biochar may be applied to fields, by way of
example through
the use of manure or compost spreaders, lime spreaders, plowing method (e.g.,
from hand
hoes, animal draft plows, disc harrows, chisels, rotary hoes, etc.), large
scale tillage
equipment, including rotary tillers, mulch finishers, draw offset discs, and
disc harrows (such
as for example JOHN DEERE DH51, DH52F, PC10, RT22, and RC22). Treated biochar
may also be applied by modified large scale nutrient applicators (such as, for
example, JOHN
DEERE 2410C, 2510H, 25105 Strip-Till Medium Residue Applicator), large scale
draw dry
spreaders (such as JOHN DEERE DN345), large scale no-till planters, large
scale dry
fertilizer sub- surface applicators, and liquid slurry surface or subsurface
applicators.
Similar, and various other types of large farming, and earth moving and
manipulation
equipment may be used to apply the treated biochar to the field, such as for
example, drop
spreaders or drills.
[0320] For example, treated biochar may be applied using banding techniques,
which is an
operation involving applying the biochar in a narrow band, using equipment
that cuts the
soil open, without disturbing the entire soil surface. Using this technique
the biochar can be
placed inside the soil while minimizing soil disturbance, making it possible
to apply biochar
after crop establishment, among other applications.
[0321] In other examples, treated biochar may be mixed with other soil
amendments, or other
materials, such as for example manure, sand, topsoil, compost, turf grass
substrate, peat,
peat moss, or lime before soil application, which are already scheduled or
part of the existing
operations, and in this manner by combining these steps (e.g., biochar
application with
existing application step) can improve efficiency by reducing the number of
field operations
88

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
required. In other examples, treated biochar can also be mixed with liquid,
(e.g., liquid
manures) and applied as a slurry. Finer biochar particles may be preferably
used with this
type of slurry application using existing application equipment, and dust
problems associated
with these finer particles may be mitigated, managed or eliminated.
[0322] In further examples, treated biochar can be top dressed on perennial
pastures or other
perennial vegetation, such as spaces between fruit trees in orchards. Treated
biochar may
also be applied with individual plants while transplanting or mixed with
topsoil and other
amendments while preparing raised beds. In forestry or similar operations
where replanting
of seedlings takes place, treated biochar can be applied by broadcasting
(e.g., surface
application) or incorporation over the entire planting area, it can be added
in the planting
holes, and combinations and variations of these. Before or after tree
establishment, biochar
could also be applied by traditional and subsurface banding or top-dressed
over perennial
vegetation in orchards, but care should be taken to minimize root damage and
soil
compaction.
[0323] In other examples of applications, treated biochar can be applied in
trenches radiating
out from the base of established trees ("radial trenching") or in holes dug at
some distance
from the base of the tree ("vertical mulching"); biochar could also
potentially be applied to
soil using "air excavation tools". These tools use pressurized air to deliver
material, e.g.,
compost, under the soil surface and reduce compaction. Alternatively, the soil
around tree
roots can be excavated and treated biochar applied before covering with soil.
[0324] While, in some examples, particle size distribution of treated biochar
materials may
vary widely depending on the feedstock and the pyrolysis technique used to
produce the
biochar, uniformity if required or preferred, can be achieved by various
milling and grinding
techniques that may be employed during processing or during the distribution
and application
to soil. When smaller particles are utilized, and in particular for surface
applications, care
should be taken to apply the treated biochar in ways that minimize loss due to
wind or water
erosion.
[0325] As set forth above, the treated biochar of the present invention may be
used in various
agriculture activities, and the fields of edaphology and pedology, as well as
other activities
and in other fields. Additionally, the treated biochar may be used, for
example, with: farming
89

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
systems and technologies, operations or activities that may be developed in
the future; and
with such existing systems, operations or activities which may be modified, in-
part, based
on the teachings of this specification. Further, the various treated biochar
and treatment
processes set forth in this specification may be used with each other in
different and various
combinations. Thus, for example, the processes and resulting biochar
compositions provided
in the various examples provided in this specification may be used with each
other; and the
scope of protection afforded the present inventions should not be limited to
any particular
example, process, configuration, application or arrangement that is set forth
in a particular
example or figure.
[0326] Although this specification focuses on agriculture, soil modification
and plant growth,
it should be understood that the materials, compositions, structures,
apparatus, methods, and
systems, taught and disclosed herein, may have applications and uses for many
other
activities in addition to agriculture for example, as filters, additives, and
in remediation
activities, among other things.
[0327] It being understood that one or more of these may be preferred for one
application,
and another of these may be preferred for a different application. Thus, these
are only a
general list of preferred features and are not required, necessary and may not
be preferred in
all applications and uses.
[0328] It is noted that there is no requirement to provide or address the
theory underlying
the novel and groundbreaking functionality, performance or other beneficial
features and
properties that are the subject of, or associated with, embodiments of the
present inventions.
Nevertheless, to the extent that various theories are provided in this
specification to further
advance the art in this important area. These theories put forth in this
specification, and
unless expressly stated otherwise, in no way limit, restrict or narrow the
scope of protection
to be afforded the claimed inventions. These theories many not be required or
practiced to
utilize the present inventions. It is further understood that the present
inventions may lead
to new, and heretofore unknown theories to explain the functionality,
performance or other
beneficial features and properties that are the subject of, or associated
with, embodiments of
the methods, articles, materials, and devices of the present inventions; and
such later
developed theories shall not limit the scope of protection afforded the
present inventions.

CA 03009946 2018-06-26
WO 2017/117314 PCT/US2016/069050
[0329] Those skilled in the art will recognize that there are other methods
that may be used to
treat biochar in a manner that forces the infusion of liquids into the pores
of the biochar
without departing from the scope of the invention. The foregoing description
of
implementations has been presented for purposes of illustration and
description. It is not
exhaustive and does not limit the claimed inventions to the precise form
disclosed.
Modifications and variations are possible in light of the above description or
may be acquired
from practicing the invention. The claims and their equivalents define the
scope of the
invention.
91

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Examiner's Report 2024-04-22
Inactive: Report - No QC 2024-04-19
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2023-06-16
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2023-06-16
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2023-05-26
Amendment Received - Response to Examiner's Requisition 2023-05-26
Examiner's Report 2023-01-30
Inactive: Report - No QC 2023-01-26
Letter Sent 2022-01-06
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2021-12-09
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2021-12-09
Request for Examination Received 2021-12-09
Common Representative Appointed 2020-06-12
Inactive: Recording certificate (Transfer) 2020-06-12
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2020-06-01
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Inactive: Cover page published 2018-07-16
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2018-07-06
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2018-07-04
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-07-04
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-07-04
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-07-04
Application Received - PCT 2018-07-04
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2018-06-26
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2018-06-26
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2017-07-06

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2023-10-31

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - small 2018-06-26
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2018-12-28 2018-12-28
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 2019-12-30 2019-12-19
Registration of a document 2020-06-01 2020-06-01
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - small 04 2020-12-29 2020-11-23
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - small 05 2021-12-29 2021-11-22
Request for examination - small 2021-12-29 2021-12-09
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - small 06 2022-12-28 2022-11-22
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2023-12-28 2023-10-31
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CARBON TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC
Past Owners on Record
BRIAN BUEGE
HAN SUK KIM
MARK L. JARAND
MICHAEL C. CHEIKY
RICHARD WILSON BELCHER
RONALD A. SILLS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2023-05-25 91 7,459
Claims 2023-05-25 2 97
Description 2023-06-15 91 8,184
Drawings 2023-06-15 37 3,223
Description 2018-06-25 91 5,351
Drawings 2018-06-25 37 2,910
Claims 2018-06-25 5 208
Abstract 2018-06-25 2 64
Representative drawing 2018-06-25 1 18
PCT Correspondence 2024-01-13 3 146
PCT Correspondence 2024-02-12 3 146
PCT Correspondence 2024-03-11 3 146
Examiner requisition 2024-04-21 5 269
PCT Correspondence 2024-04-10 3 124
Notice of National Entry 2018-07-05 1 206
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2018-08-28 1 111
Courtesy - Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2022-01-05 1 423
Amendment / response to report 2023-05-25 10 350
Amendment / response to report / Request for examination 2023-06-15 43 1,980
PCT Correspondence 2023-12-14 3 146
National entry request 2018-06-25 6 210
International search report 2018-06-25 1 54
Maintenance fee payment 2018-12-27 1 25
Request for examination 2021-12-08 3 115
PCT Correspondence 2022-07-31 3 150
PCT Correspondence 2022-09-07 3 153
PCT Correspondence 2022-10-06 3 148
PCT Correspondence 2022-11-05 3 147
PCT Correspondence 2022-12-04 3 118
PCT Correspondence 2023-01-03 3 146
Examiner requisition 2023-01-27 4 251