Language selection

Search

Patent 3015552 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 3015552
(54) English Title: HYDRAULIC MULTI-ROTOR AERIAL VEHICLE
(54) French Title: VEHICULE AERIEN MULTIROTOR HYDRAULIQUE
Status: Examination
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B64D 27/02 (2006.01)
  • B64C 27/12 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CALDWELL, NIALL JAMES (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • FLOWCOPTER LTD.
(71) Applicants :
  • FLOWCOPTER LTD. (United Kingdom)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2018-08-28
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2019-03-04
Examination requested: 2023-08-28
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
1714174.8 (United Kingdom) 2017-09-04

Abstracts

English Abstract


A multi-rotor aerial vehicle comprises least two rotors, a controller, a power
supply
having an output shaft, a shaft-driven hydraulic machine coupled to the output
shaft
and at least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines coupled to respective
rotors. At
least one of the hydraulic machines is an electronically commutated hydraulic
machine in which the displacement of hydraulic fluid through each working
chamber
is regulated by one or more electronically controllable valves, during each
cycle of
working chamber volume, in phased relationship to cycles of working chamber
volume. The controller controls the one or more electronically controllable
valves of
each of the electronically commutated hydraulic machines to independently
control
the rotation of the rotors. It may be that the shaft-driven hydraulic machine
is an
electronically commutated machine with a plurality of independent outputs,
which
independently drive the rotor-driving hydraulic machines. It may be that the
rotor-
driving hydraulic machines are electronically commutated machines the
displacement
of which is independently controlled to independently drive the rotors.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


52
Claims
1. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle comprising:
at least two rotors which generate aerodynamic thrust on the vehicle,
a controller, a power supply, an output shaft driven by the power supply, and
at least one shaft-driven hydraulic machine mechanically coupled to the
output shaft,
at least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines each of which drives a
respective
rotor,
wherein the at least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines are hydraulically
coupled to and thereby driven by the at least one shaft-driven hydraulic
machine,
at least one of said hydraulic machines being an electronically commutated
hydraulic machine,
the at least one electronically commutated machine comprising a plurality of
working chambers of cyclically changing volume and one or more fluid outlets
or inlets, each said fluid outlet or inlet being fluidically connected to a
respective group of said working chambers, wherein the displacement of
hydraulic fluid through each working chamber is regulated by one or more
electronically controllable valves, during each cycle of working chamber
volume, in phased relationship to cycles of working chamber volume, to
thereby regulate the net displacement of hydraulic fluid through the fluid
outlets or inlets,
wherein the controller controls the electronically controllable valves of the
at
least one electronically commutated hydraulic machine to thereby
independently control the flow of hydraulic fluid through the respective
hydraulic machines to thereby independently control the speed of rotation of
the at least two rotors.

53
2. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to claim 1, wherein the at least
one
shaft-driven hydraulic machine is a said electronically commutated hydraulic
machine, and the working chambers of the at least one shaft-driven hydraulic
machine comprise at least a first group of one or more working chambers
connected to a first fluid outlet which is hydraulically coupled to and
thereby
drives a first rotor-driving hydraulic machine which drives a first rotor, and
the
at least one shaft-driven hydraulic machine also comprises at least a second
group of one or more working chambers connected to a second fluid outlet
which is hydraulically coupled to and thereby drives a second rotor-driving
hydraulic machine which drives a second rotor, and
wherein the controller controls the electronically controlled valves of the
first
and second groups of working chambers to independently control the net
displacement of hydraulic fluid through the first and second fluid outlets,
thereby independently driving the first rotor-driving hydraulic machine and
second rotor-driving hydraulic machine and thereby independently controlling
the respective speed of rotation of the first and of the second rotors.
3. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to claim 2, wherein the rate of
displacement from individual groups of one or more working chambers is
controlled using open-loop feedback to produce a set flow-rate, to thereby
control the thrust generated by the respective rotors, the rotor-driving
hydraulic machines are fixed displacement, and these fixed displacement
machines turn at a speed which is proportional to the rate of fluid flow from
the
respective group of one or more working chambers to the respective rotor-
driving hydraulic machine, and the controller queries stored conversion data
which relates a target thrust or variable related to thrust to pump flow-rate,
and controls the flow rate of hydraulic fluid from the respective group of one
or
more working chambers through the fluid outlet to the respective rotor-driving
hydraulic machine accordingly.
4. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to claim 2 or claim 3, wherein
the rate of
displacement by each group of working chambers is controlled by flow-rate, or
by closed-loop rotor-driving hydraulic machine speed control, but with a set
pressure limit at the respective fluid outlet, using a pressure transducer
which
measures the pressure of the hydraulic fluid output through the fluid outlet.

54
5. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to claim 2 or claim 3, wherein to
control
the thrust of a respective rotor, the rate of displacement of hydraulic fluid
by
the respective group of one or more working chambers through a fluid inlet is
controlled using closed-loop feedback to maintain a target pressure using
feedback from a pressure transducer which measures the pressure of
hydraulic fluid output by the respective group of one or more working
chambers through the respective fluid inlet.
6. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one of claims 2 to 5,
wherein to
control the thrust of a respective rotor, the rate of displacement of
hydraulic
fluid by the respective group of one or more working chambers through a
respective fluid outlet is controlled using closed-loop feedback to obtain a
target rotor speed, using a rotor speed transducer.
7. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one of claims 2 to 6,
wherein the
rate of displacement by each shaft-driven hydraulic machine is controlled by
flow-rate, or by closed-loop rotor driving hydraulic machine speed control,
but
with a set pressure limit at the output of the respective shaft-driven
hydraulic
machine, implemented by closed-loop control of the rate of displacement of
the shaft-driven hydraulic machine, using a pressure transducer which
measures the pressure of the high pressure connection between the shaft-
driven hydraulic machine and respective rotor-driving hydraulic machine.
8. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to claim 1, wherein the at least
two
rotor-driving hydraulic machines are each said electronically commutated
hydraulic machines, and which have fluid inlets which are hydraulically
coupled to the same one or more fluid outlets of the at least one shaft-driven
hydraulic machine such that they receive hydraulic fluid from and are driven
by a common fluid supply, and
wherein the controller controls the electronically controlled valves of the at
least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines to independently control the net
displacement of working fluid by the rotor-driving hydraulic machines and
thereby independently control the speed of rotation of the respective rotors
driven by the at least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines.
9. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
wherein the
at least one shaft driven hydraulic machine comprises a plurality of working

5
chambers axially distributed along a single rotatable shaft coupled to the
output shaft of the power supply.
10. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
wherein said
one or of the electronically commutated hydraulic machines has a body, the
body encompassing the one or more working chambers and the electronically
controllable valves of the hydraulic working machine, the body having a pair
of
bearings mounted thereto, with all working chambers of the machine located
between the pair of bearings and without additional bearings between the
working chambers.
11. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
further
comprising one or more orientation sensors wherein the controller is
configured to process the output of the one or more orientation sensors and to
control the electronically controlled valves to control the displacement of
hydraulic fluid by the electronically commutated hydraulic machine(s) to
thereby regulate the stability, orientation and/or direction of movement of
the
multi-rotor aerial vehicle.
12. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
wherein the
electronically controlled valves of the said electronically commutated
hydraulic
machine(s) are controlled to control the displacement of hydraulic fluid by
the
electronically commutated hydraulic machines such as to balance the net
force exerted by the rotors.
13. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
having a
total of four rotors, wherein each rotor is driven by a respective rotor-
driving
hydraulic machine, and each rotor-driving hydraulic machine is driven by an
independent output of hydraulic fluid from the one or more shaft-driven
hydraulic machines which are mechanically coupled to the output shaft of the
power supply.
14. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
wherein the
rotational direction of each of the rotors is arranged such that it is
possible to
achieve a zero rotational movement of the multi-rotor aerial vehicle.

56
15. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
wherein the
at least one shaft-driven hydraulic machine(s) have a common drive shaft and
the axis of rotation of the drive shaft is substantially parallel to the mean
of the
direction of the axis of rotation of the at least two rotors.
16. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
wherein the
controller is configured to vary the speed of rotation of the output shaft
and/or
the power output of the power supply to provide just enough power for
hovering, typically plus a predetermined margin; and to then increase the
speed of rotation of the output shaft and/or the power output of the power
supply whenever higher power is required or is forecast to be required for
acceleration, climbing or manoeuvring.
17. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
wherein the
electronically commutated hydraulic machine(s) are controlled to
independently regulate the torque generated by each of the two or more rotor-
driving hydraulic machines.
18. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
comprising
an accumulator in fluid communication with the fluid connection between the
at least one shaft-driven hydraulic machine and one or more of the at least
two rotor-driving hydraulic machines.
19. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
wherein
some or all of the shaft-driven hydraulic machines are pump-motors, at least
one of those pump-motors is connected to an accumulator and the pump-
motor(s) connected to an accumulator can be operated in a pumping mode to
store pressurised fluid in the accumulator and then later motored, driven by
pressurised fluid from the accumulator, to provide transient additional power,
to supplement the power output by the power supply.
20. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
wherein
some or all of the rotor-driving hydraulic machines are partially encompassed
within the body of the multi-rotor aerial vehicle, and so are at least
partially
surrounded by material, and the multi-rotor aerial vehicle body comprises a
ring cam drive arrangement and the rotor has an annular ring at its periphery,
which comprises a part of the ring cam drive arrangement, and thus the rotor

57
ring is part of the respective hydraulic machine, directly driven by the
cylinders
of some or all of the rotor-driving hydraulic machines.
21. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
wherein the
controller is configured to implement an anti-stall procedure in which the
torque generated by the one or more shaft-driven hydraulic machines is
limited in response to determining that the speed of rotation of the output
shaft
of the power supply meets one or more stall risk criteria.
22. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
wherein the
controller is programmed to cause the one or more shaft-driven hydraulic
machines to make no net displacement of working fluid when the speed of
rotation of the output shaft is below a minimum speed.
23. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
wherein in
response to determining that one or more prime mover failure criteria are met
the controller operates some of the rotor-driving hydraulic machines as pumps
and the hydraulic fluid output by the respective rotor-driving hydraulic
machine(s), acting as pumps, is used to drive the working chambers of one or
more groups of working chambers of the one or more shaft-driven hydraulic
machines which are fluidly connected to those rotor-driving hydraulic
machine(s) acting as pump, and wherein when the common shaft is rotating,
other groups of working chambers, driven in effect by the rotors, use the
received energy to drive rotor-driving hydraulic machines and thereby rotors.
24. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one preceding claim,
wherein the
controller is configured such that in response to a rotor demand speed
increase from a first lower level to a second higher level, the flowrate
delivered by the common outlet of the one or more shaft-driven hydraulic
machines to which a rotor-driving hydraulic machine is connected, is
commanded by the controller to exceed the flowrate corresponding to the
steady-state flowrate of the second higher level of speed, for a period of
time.
25. A multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one of claims 1 to 23,
wherein the
controlled is configured such that in response to a rotor demand speed
decrease from a first higher level to a second lower level, the flowrate
delivered by the one or more groups of working chambers connected to the

58
common hydraulic fluid outlet to which the respective rotor-driving hydraulic
machine is connected, is commanded by the controller to decrease below the
flowrate corresponding to the steady-state flowrate of the second lower level
of speed, for a period of time.
26. A method of
operating a multi-rotor aerial vehicle, the multi-rotor aerial vehicle
comprising:
at least two rotors which generate aerodynamic thrust on the vehicle,
a controller, a power supply, an output shaft driven by the power supply, and
at least one shaft-driven hydraulic machine mechanically coupled to the
output shaft,
at least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines each of which drives a
respective
rotor,
wherein the at least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines are hydraulically
coupled to and thereby driven by the at least one shaft-driven hydraulic
machine,
at least one of said hydraulic machines being an electronically commutated
hydraulic machine,
the at least one electronically commutated machine comprising a plurality of
working chambers of cyclically changing volume and one or more fluid outlets
or inlets, each said fluid outlet or inlet being fluidically connected to a
respective group of said working chambers, wherein the displacement of
hydraulic fluid through each working chamber is regulated by one or more
electronically controllable valves, during each cycle of working chamber
volume, in phased relationship to cycles of working chamber volume, to
thereby regulate the net displacement of hydraulic fluid through the fluid
outlets or inlets,
the method comprising controlling the electronically controllable valves of
the
at least one electronically commutated hydraulic machine to thereby
independently control the flow of hydraulic fluid through the respective

9
hydraulic machines to thereby independently control the speed of rotation of
the at least two rotors.
27. A method according to claim 26, wherein the at least one shaft-driven
hydraulic machine is a said electronically commutated hydraulic machine, and
the working chambers of the at least one shaft-driven hydraulic machine
comprise at least a first group of one or more working chambers connected to
a first fluid outlet which is hydraulically coupled to and thereby drives a
first
rotor-driving hydraulic machine which drives a first rotor, and the at least
one
shaft-driven hydraulic machine also comprises at least a second group of one
or more working chambers connected to a second fluid outlet which is
hydraulically coupled to and thereby drives a second rotor-driving hydraulic
machine which drives a second rotor, and
wherein the method comprises controlling the electronically controlled valves
of the first and second groups of working chambers to independently control
the net displacement of hydraulic fluid through the first and second fluid
outlets, thereby independently driving the first rotor-driving hydraulic
machine
and second rotor-driving hydraulic machine and thereby independently
controlling the respective speed of rotation of the first and of the second
rotors.
28. A method according to claim 26, wherein the at least two rotor-driving
hydraulic machines are each said electronically commutated hydraulic
machines, and which have fluid inlets which are hydraulically coupled to the
same one or more fluid outlets of the at least one shaft-driven hydraulic
machine such that they receive hydraulic fluid from and are driven by a
common fluid supply, and
wherein the method comprises controlling the electronically controlled valves
of the at least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines to independently control
the net displacement of working fluid by the rotor-driving hydraulic machines
and thereby independently control the speed of rotation of the respective
rotors driven by the at least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines.
29. A method according to any one of claims 26 to 28, wherein the multi-
rotor
aerial vehicle is a multi-rotor aerial vehicle according to any one of claims
1 to
25.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


1
1 Hydraulic multi-rotor aerial vehicle
2
3 Field of the invention
4
A multi-rotor is a rotorcraft with more than two rotors. The invention relates
to multi-
6 rotor aerial vehicles (sometimes known as multi-copters) with hydraulic
drives for the
7 rotors.
8
9 Background to the invention
11 Hydraulic multicopters have been known for some years, for example from
US
12 3253806 (Karl Eickmann). Recent multicopter interest has been in the
field of drones
13 for delivery and recreational purposes, and in the field of personal
flight vehicles (the
14 latter may also be called personal air vehicle, PAVs or personal aerial
vehicles).
16 Conventional electrical multicopters have a lithium battery, and at
least 4 rotors
17 powered by electric motors, the speed of which is controlled by
switching converters
18 in order to vary the thrust. In order to stabilise the flight, it is
necessary to have very
19 fast response control of the motor speed.
21 Typical desired characteristics of multicopters include: stable position
and attitude
22 holding, rejection of wind gusts, rapid response to control inputs, long
range, long
23 loiter time, and large payload.
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

2
1 Such electric multicopter machines are successful at small scale, for
applications
2 such as aerial photography which require a payload of a few kilogrammes,
with
3 typical continuous power ratings of less than lkW. Flying time is
typically limited by
4 battery capacity to less than 30 minutes. If it is desired to scale up to
carry a
significant payload, or to have longer flight time, then problems emerge due
to the
6 low power and energy storage density of electrical technology.
7
8 Electrical machines are limited in power density by thermal dissipation.
The ratio of
9 surface area to volume dictates that small motors can dissipate heat more
easily than
large ones. Therefore large electric motors cannot reach high power density
without
11 complicated and heavy liquid cooling arrangements at larger scales. So,
more
12 powerful electric drives have lower specific power (typically delivering
0.5 to 1.0 kW
13 continuous per kg), which causes an increase in aircraft weight, and
therefore
14 increases power required from the batteries.
16 Compared to liquid fuel, electric batteries suffer from much lower
energy density, and
17 also suffer from overheating at higher power levels and so require heavy
active
18 cooling systems. This results in very limited flight time for electric
multirotors with
19 larger payload capacity.
21 Alternatively, it is possible to replace the electric system with a
hydraulic system. An
22 internal combustion engine, fed by a fuel tank, powers a variable
displacement
23 hydraulic pump; multiple valves deliver fluid to hydraulic motors
powering each rotor.
24 It is known that, for a given weight limit, the combination of a liquid
fuel tank and an
IC (Internal Combustion) engine can deliver much more energy than an electric
26 battery. It is also known that hydraulic motors offer higher power
density than
27 electrical motors, typically more than 6kW per kg. This allows higher
rotor power, and
28 therefore payload, without a weight penalty.
29
Despite these attractions, hydraulic systems suffer from important
disadvantages for
31 this application.
32
33 Hydraulic systems in known systems, with multiple independent loads
typically suffer
34 from poor efficiency, because the pressure from a single pump is
throttled by
proportional valves to control each individual hydraulic motor. Even if a
separate
36 pump is supplied for each hydraulic motor, the use of throttling valves
to control the
37 flow to the motor causes energy losses due to pressure drop of the
throttle. This poor
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

3
1 energy efficiency would result in high fuel consumption, reducing the
advantage of
2 the higher energy storage capacity of the liquid fuel.
3
4 Due to internal friction, hydraulic valves typically suffer from
hysteresis, stiction, non-
linearity and other sources of inaccuracy between the commanded flow and the
6 actual flow. Thus a conventional hydraulic transmission would give poor
quality
7 control of the motor speed. However, multicopters make extreme demands on
the
8 accuracy of the control of motor speed. Multicopters quickly integrate
any small error
9 of commanded thrust from each motor, resulting in undesired yaw, pitch or
roll, and
subsequent undesired translation.
11
12 Further, due to internal damping, hydraulic valves typically respond
slowly to
13 commands, which results in a phase lag in the control loop, which limits
the loop gain
14 which can be applied before oscillation occurs. Therefore a conventional
hydraulic
transmission would give slow control of the motor speed, resulting in poor
16 stabilisation, position holding and rejection of wind gusts. It is
difficult to control
17 conventional hydraulic systems more quickly without further reducing
energy
18 efficiency. Flapper-nozzle servo valves are capable of high control
bandwidth, but do
19 so by introducing even larger pressure drop, dropping system energy
efficiency well
below 50%.
21
22 When the multirotor is hovering, the speed commands to each of the
rotors will
23 typically be continuously modulated by small corrections (of the order
of 1% or less of
24 full range) which are needed to maintain constant attitude rate,
attitude, altitude rate,
altitude, velocity, and position. These small correction commands must be
faithfully
26 followed by the rotor to result in stable control. Surprisingly, the
inventors of the
27 current invention have found by simulation that the above non-ideal
characteristics of
28 proportional hydraulic valves cause instability and inaccurate control
of a multirotor.
29 The non-linearities of the proportional valve response cause
overwhelming distortion
of the small signals, which results in the buildup of errors in each of the
control loops
31 and the emergence of unstable limit cycling behaviour. The delays of the
proportional
32 valve response cause phase lag, which reduces the stability margin,
necessitating
33 much lower loop gains than would otherwise be chosen, ultimately
resulting in
34 inaccurate control of the aerial vehicle.
36 As an alternative to using proportional valves to control the individual
motor speeds, it
37 would be possible to provide separate variable-displacement pumps, each
dedicated
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

i .
4
1 to supply fluid to a single hydraulic motor. Such variable-displacement
pumps would
2 typically be of the axial piston swashplate type, whereby a hydraulic
actuator
3 positions the angle of the swashplate such that the stroke of the pistons
is varied to
4 deliver the flowrate required of the hydraulic motor. This configuration
has the merit of
reducing the system energy losses by eliminating the pressure drop in the
6 proportional valves.
7
8 However, the inventors have surprisingly found that the control quality
which would
9 result from such system would be even more inadequate than in the case of
using
proportional throttle valves. The hydraulic actuator of the pump swashplate is
typically
11 positioned by providing actuation fluid from a proportional valve. Such
valves suffer
12 from the same non-linearities and delays which have been mentioned
previously. In
13 addition, after the proportional valve delays and non-linearities, the
swashplate
14 mechanism itself introduces additional delays and non-linearities due to
friction, high
alternating moments from the piston pressures, and inertia of the mechanism.
The
16 result is that swashplate control systems are typically highly damped
and exhibit
17 hysteresis, deadband and an inability to reproduce small command signal
variations.
18 Although it is conceptually fully variable, a swashplate pump may
exhibit hysteresis,
19 deadband and other distortions amounting to 5% of its full range. This
would mean
for instance that if subject to a 2% change in command signal, the output flow
of such
21 a swashplate pump would be unchanged. In a multirotor, this would result
in the
22 buildup of error in the flight controller control loops, until the
commanded variation
23 exceeded 5% of the previous pump flow. Once the stiction of the
mechanism was
24 overcome, the swashplate would suddenly start moving, increasing the
flow to the
motor. This would result in the correction of the previously built up errors,
resulting in
26 the command signal returning to a neutral value indicating that no
further change was
27 required. However, now it had started to move, the swashplate actuator
would tend to
28 continue due to inertia, and would tend to keep moving even after the
commanded
29 variation reversed direction. The result would be a limit cycle, whereby
the non-
linearity and delay of the swashplate actuator causes the buildup of
increasing
31 alternating attitude errors.
32
33 The inventors have found that use of proportional valves to control the
speed of the
34 motors, either to throttle the flow from a pump or to control the
displacement of a
variable pump, would cause unacceptable control of the motor speed, causing
poor
36 response to operator inputs, poor tolerance to wind gusts, large
variation of altitude
37 and ground position when hovering. The multirotor would wobble in
attitude, attitude
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

I .
,
1 and ground position, resulting in hazard to the multirotor, its payload
and bystanders,
2 failure to be a stable platform for cameras and other sensors, and may
result in failure
3 to complete its mission.
4
5 The inventors have also found that the swashplate pumps can cause
instability of the
6 engine control and unwanted coupling of the engine control dynamics to
the aircraft
7 altitude control dynamics. When the engine speed increases, it is the
natural
8 response of the swashplate to stay at the same angle, resulting in the
same
9 displacement of fluid per revolution of the pump. This means that speed
changes of
the engine result in a proportional change of flow supplied by the pumps to
the
11 motors. Therefore whatever perturbations occur of the engine speed, will
cause a
12 similar perturbation to the rotor speeds. Such perturbations will cause
errors of
13 aircraft altitude, which in a hovering situation close to the ground may
be dangerous.
14 In principle, such unwanted coupling of the dynamics of the engine speed
and the
rotor speed may be counteracted by use of an electronic controller to correct
the
16 swashplate actuator command. However, the slow response of the
swashplate to
17 command signals and the relatively fast speed changes of the engine
means that the
18 inventors have found there is insufficient control bandwidth to
effectively counteract
19 the unwanted coupling.
21 Flight controllers are typically digital, and send their output command
signals in a
22 digital form. In order to interface with a variable displacement pump,
or a proportional
23 valve, it is necessary to convert the digital command signal to an
analog signal. This
24 signal must then be amplified such that enough current is generated to
drive the
solenoid of the proportional valve. The inventors have found that each analog
26 conversion and amplification step adds further delay, and introduces
possible error
27 such as offsets, deadband and uncertain gain factors. Therefore the use
of an analog
28 control method further degrades the control quality which can be
achieved.
29
In addition, the inventors have found that the use of multiple independent
variable
31 displacement pumps results in mechanically complex system due to the
requirement
32 for each pump to be driven from the engine. With a minimum of four
rotors required to
33 stabilise a multirotor, it is necessary to drive at least four pumps
from a single engine.
34 Typically an engine may only drive a load from one end of the
crankshaft, the other
being occupied with engine accessory drives. It may be thought to drive all
four
36 pumps end-to-end with through drive shafts. However, such a chain of
shafts in
37 sequence may cause torsional oscillations and excessive backlash, as
well as
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

6
1 overstressing the final pump shaft interface to the engine because it
must carry the
2 load of all four pumps. In alternative to this, it may be that the pumps
are driven by
3 pinions running on a common gear driven by the engine. However, this
increases
4 weight and also adds to backlash and torsional oscillation. Additionally,
there is
unwanted complexity from the provision of at least four independent variable
6 displacement swashplate pumps, each with its own shaft seals, bearings,
crankcase
7 temperature monitoring, swashplate actuator and associated proportional
valve and
8 solenoid amplifier. Failure of any one of the multiple pumps will likely
cause a
9 catastrophic crash of the aircraft. Therefore having multiple pumps
exponentially
increases the overall likelihood of an accident.
11
12 An IC engine delivers power as a function of its rotation speed. However
it reaches
13 highest efficiency when it turns at the lowest speed which can satisfy
the
14 instantaneous power required. It is possible to operate the engine
constantly at high
rotational speed regardless of the power demand, but this would result in
lower
16 overall fuel efficiency. Ideally the engine should operate at variable
speed. (When
17 referring to speed in respect of the IC engine or other prime mover, we
refer to
18 rotational speed). In low power demand situations, typically such as
descent, an IC
19 engine should turn at low speed for best efficiency; in high power
demand situations,
such as ascent, an IC engine should turn at high speed for highest power
output. In
21 order to accelerate the engine from low to high speed, it is necessary
for the engine
22 to produce more torque than the pump for a short period such that the
inertia of the
23 engine accelerates. The inventors have found that this control of engine
speed is
24 difficult and inaccurate due to the low response speed of the variable
displacement
hydraulic pump, which makes variable-speed operation more difficult. A faster
26 response of the pump would therefore enable more efficient fuel usage of
the engine.
27
28 Ideally, both pump and engine would respond instantly to an electronic
signal from a
29 controller tasked to control the engine speed. However, typical variable
displacement
hydraulic pumps typically respond slowly to such a demand due to the multiple
31 conversions and amplifications which such signals must pass through from
a purely
32 electronic demand, to an actual actuation force capable of moving the
swashplate of
33 a typical variable displacement pump. The result of slow response is
poor regulation
34 of the engine speed, which may result in poor speed control of the
engine, and in the
limit, stalling and overspeed which may be disastrous. As noted previously,
poor
36 engine speed control will cause poor rotor speed control, causing
instability of the
37 overall air vehicle control.
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

1 ,
7
1
2 IC engines also cannot change their output torque instantaneously due to
inherent
3 delays such as induction-to-power delay, inertia of the air induction
path,
4 turbocharger delay, and the finite response of the throttle butterfly. To
achieve good
5 control of the engine speed, it is desired that the pump be an active
control element in
6 the engine speed governor function. That is, that the pump both provides
sufficient
7 flow to the motor and responds to requests from the governor function to
modulate its
8 torque to help control engine speed.
9
10 An ideal hydraulic transmission for a multicopter would be light weight,
would not
11 have unnecessary mechanical complexity or failure modes, would combine
high
12 quality, accurate, and fast control of the rotor speed, with high energy
efficiency with
13 multiple independent loads, with fast accurate control of the pump
displacement and
14 the engine torque such as to control the overall load balance on the
engine such as to
15 stably regulate its speed, all under the direct control of a digital
electronic controller
16 with the minimum of digital/analog conversions
17
18 Without high frequency motor control, the craft will quickly destabilise
and suffer from
19 loss of flight control or undesirable flight characteristics (it may not
fly). It is important
20 to be able to set the rotor speed accurately, to meet a specific
demanded speed,
21 providing a particular thrust in the air, thus achieving a particular
rate of ascent /
22 descent / other craft motion.
23
24 Failure of control of a multi-rotor aerial vehicle drivetrain, to
respect one or both of 1)
25 the required bandwidth, and 2) the required rotor speed, will lead to
loss of flight
26 control or undesirable flight characteristics, which is unacceptable.
27
28 The invention seeks to provide a multicopter which has advantageous
control
29 accuracy, response time, mechanical complexity and reliability, and
reduced weight.
30 Some embodiments aim to improve energy efficiency and/or stored energy
density
31 and/or maximum power output.
32
33 Summary of the Invention
34
35 According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a
multi-rotor
36 aerial vehicle comprising:
37
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

$ ,
8
1 at least two rotors which generate aerodynamic thrust on the vehicle
(during
2 operation),
3
4 a controller, a power supply, an output shaft driven by the power
supply, and
at least one shaft-driven hydraulic machine mechanically coupled to the
6 output shaft,
7
8 at least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines each of which drives a
respective
9 rotor,
11 wherein the at least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines are
hydraulically
12 coupled to and thereby driven by the at least one shaft-driven
hydraulic
13 machine,
14
at least one of said hydraulic machines being an electronically commutated
16 hydraulic machine,
17
18 the at least one electronically commutated machine comprising a
plurality of
19 working chambers of cyclically changing volume and one or more fluid
outlets
or inlets, each said fluid outlet or inlet being fluidically connected to a
21 respective group of said working chambers, wherein the displacement of
22 hydraulic fluid through each working chamber is regulated by one or
more
23 electronically controllable valves, during each cycle of working
chamber
24 volume, in phased relationship to cycles of working chamber volume, to
thereby regulate the net displacement of hydraulic fluid through the fluid
26 outlets or inlets,
27
28 wherein the controller controls the electronically controllable valves
of the at
29 least one electronically commutated hydraulic machine to thereby
independently control the flow of hydraulic fluid through the respective
31 hydraulic machines to thereby independently control the speed of
rotation of
32 the at least two rotors.
33
34 In a second aspect, the present invention there extends to a method of
operating a
multi-rotor aerial vehicle, the multi-rotor aerial vehicle comprising: at
least two rotors
36 which generate aerodynamic thrust on the vehicle (during operation), a
controller, a
37 power supply, an output shaft driven by the power supply, and at least
one shaft-
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

. ,
9
1 driven
hydraulic machine mechanically coupled to the output shaft, at least two rotor-
2 driving
hydraulic machines each of which drives a respective rotor, wherein the at
3 least two
rotor-driving hydraulic machines are hydraulically coupled to and thereby
4 driven by the
at least one shaft-driven hydraulic machine, at least one of said
hydraulic machines being an electronically commutated hydraulic machine, the
at
6 least one
electronically commutated machine comprising a plurality of working
7 chambers of
cyclically changing volume and one or more fluid outlets or inlets, each
8 said fluid
outlet or inlet being fluidically connected to a respective group of said
9 working
chambers, wherein the displacement of hydraulic fluid through each working
chamber is regulated by one or more electronically controllable valves, during
each
11 cycle of
working chamber volume, in phased relationship to cycles of working
12 chamber
volume, to thereby regulate the net displacement of hydraulic fluid through
13 the fluid outlets or inlets,
14 the method
comprising the step (typically carried out by the controller) of
controlling the electronically controllable valves of the at least one
16 electronically
commutated hydraulic machine to thereby independently control
17 the flow of
hydraulic fluid through the respective hydraulic machines to
18 thereby independently control the speed of rotation of the at least
two rotors.
19
It may be that the at least one shaft-driven hydraulic machine is a said
electronically
21 commutated
hydraulic machine, and the working chambers of the at least one shaft-
22 driven
hydraulic machine comprise at least a first group of one or more working
23 chambers
connected to a first fluid outlet which is hydraulically coupled to (a fluid
inlet
24 of) and
thereby drives a first rotor-driving hydraulic machine which drives a first
rotor,
and the at least one shaft-driven hydraulic machine also comprises at least a
second
26 group of one
or more working chambers connected to a second fluid outlet which is
27 hydraulically
coupled to (a fluid inlet of) and thereby drives a second rotor-driving
28 hydraulic machine which drives a second rotor, and
29 wherein the
electronically controlled valves of the first and second groups of working
chambers are controlled (typically by the controller) to independently control
the net
31 displacement
of hydraulic fluid through the first and second fluid outlets, thereby
32 independently
driving the first rotor-driving hydraulic machine and second rotor-
33 driving
hydraulic machine and thereby independently controlling the respective speed
34 of rotation of the first and of the second rotors.
36 Thus, in this
case, there are independent supplies of hydraulic fluid from the one or
37 more shaft-
driven hydraulic machines to the two or more rotor-driving hydraulic
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

1,0
1 machines. The rotor-driving hydraulic machines might be passive hydraulic
machines
2 (e.g. hydraulic motors), which are not electronically commutated or
electronically
3 controlled. They may be fixed displacement (e.g. receive a volume of
hydraulic fluid
4 per rotation which is substantially constant). They may be controlled
only by the
supply of hydraulic fluid to an inlet. Nevertheless, they may in some
embodiments
6 also be said electronically commutated hydraulic machines.
7
8 It may be that the at least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines are each
said
9 electronically commutated hydraulic machines, and which have fluid inlets
which are
hydraulically coupled to the same one or more fluid outlets of the at least
one shaft-
11 driven hydraulic machine such that they receive hydraulic fluid from and
are driven by
12 a common fluid supply, and wherein the electronically controlled valves
of the at least
13 two rotor-driving hydraulic machines are controlled (typically by the
controller) to
14 independently control the net displacement of working fluid by the rotor-
driving
hydraulic machines and thereby independently control the speed of rotation of
the
16 respective rotors driven by the at least two rotor-driving hydraulic
machines.
17
18 The electronically controlled valves of the at least two rotor-driving
hydraulic
19 machines enable control of the fluid between the shaft-driven hydraulic
machine
outlet and the rotor-driving hydraulic machine inlet, and specifically enable
control of
21 flow and pressure of the fluid. Thus, in combination with control of the
shaft-driven
22 hydraulic machine, the flow and pressure in between can be controlled,
and with an
23 accumulator fluidly connected, therefore provides a means of energy
storage (for
24 later use, by any fluidly connected hydraulic machine) which in
combination with the
electronically controlled valves of at least one electronically commuted
machine
26 allows the hydraulic pressure to be varied independently of the rotor
speed (as
27 determined by the speed of the rotor driving hydraulic machines). The
size of the
28 accumulator volume (provided by accumulator or accumulators), directly
determines
29 its total energy capacity, and is selected in relation to the rest of
the hydraulic system
such that if the shaft driven hydraulic machine stops functioning and
supplying
31 pressurised hydraulic fluid, the rotor-driving hydraulic machines may be
supplied with
32 pressurised hydraulic fluid instead sourced from the pressurised
accumulator. The
33 specific size may be selected such that period of time that the rotors
can be driven by
34 the accumulator system is in the range 2 to 5 seconds, for example
approximately 3
seconds.
36
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

1.1
1 Thus, although the at least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines receive
a common
2 supply of hydraulic fluid from the at least one shaft-driven hydraulic
machine (driven
3 in turn by the power supply through the output shaft), the speed of
rotation of the
4 respective rotors can be independently controlled. The common supply may
be
formed by multiple groups of working chambers hydraulically coupled to
multiple fluid
6 outlets, which are connected in parallel to provide a combined flow
(output or input) of
7 hydraulic fluid.
8
9 In use, the shaft-driven hydraulic machine(s) (which could alternatively
be described
as first hydraulic machines) receive power from the power supply through the
output
11 shaft during normal operation and supply hydraulic fluid through the
outlet(s) to the at
12 least two rotor-driving hydraulic machines (although in some embodiments
the shaft
13 driven machine(s) may sometimes motor and thereby regenerate power, and
source
14 high pressure hydraulic fluid back through the outlets). The rotor-
driving hydraulic
machine(s) (which could alternatively be described as second hydraulic
machines)
16 drive the rotors, using hydraulic power supplied received through the
inlet(s) by the at
17 least one shaft driven hydraulic machine (again in some embodiments the
rotor-
18 driving hydraulic machine(s) may sometimes pump back through the
inlet(s),
19 regenerating energy from the rotors).
21 The at least two rotors are independently controlled. The at least two
rotors may be
22 fixed pitch rotors. It may be that one or more of the hydraulic motors
drives one or
23 more additional rotors as well as a respective one of the at least two
rotors.
24
The power supply comprises a power source. Typically the power supply
comprises a
26 prime mover such as an electric motor or internal combustion engine. The
power
27 supply applies torque to the output shaft in use to thereby drive the
driven hydraulic
28 machine.
29
Typically the said electronically commutated hydraulic machine(s) have a phase
31 sensor (e.g. a shaft position sensor) which measures the phase of cycles
of working
32 chamber volume.
33
34 It may be that the at least one shaft driven hydraulic machine comprises
a plurality of
working chambers axially distributed along a single rotatable shaft coupled to
(for
36 example integral to) the output shaft of the power supply.
37
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

12
1 The plurality of working chambers axially distributed along a single
rotatable shaft
2 may comprise a plurality of banks of working chambers which banks are
axially
3 spaced along the rotatable shaft. It may be that the working chambers in
each bank
4 are connected to the same fluid outlet, to thereby define a plurality of
independent
working fluid outlets from or inlets to the respective hydraulic machine.
6
7 It may be that the said one or (or all) of the electronically commutated
hydraulic
8 machines has a body, the body encompassing the one or more working
chambers
9 and the electronically controllable valves of the hydraulic working
machine, the body
having a pair of bearings mounted thereto, with all working chambers of the
machine
11 located between the pair of bearings and without additional bearings
between the
12 working chambers.
13
14 It may be that each working chamber of the one or more shaft-driven
hydraulic
machines which are mechanically coupled to the output shaft are located
between a
16 pair of bearings. It may be that there are no additional bearings
between the working
17 chambers.
18
19 Essentially there is no need for an additional bearing within the body,
between banks
for example, when the shaft is sufficiently supported and constrained by the
bearings
21 located outside the (banks of) the working chambers. There are at least
two groups of
22 cylinders (or working chambers), which are axially (along the shaft)
located between
23 the axial location of each of the pair of shaft bearings. There may be
more than two
24 bearings.
26 It may be that the multi-rotor aerial vehicle further comprises one or
more orientation
27 sensors wherein the controller is configured (e.g. programmed) to
process the output
28 of the one or more orientation sensors and to control the electronically
controlled
29 valves to control the displacement of hydraulic fluid by the
electronically commutated
hydraulic machine(s) to thereby regulate the stability, orientation and/or
direction of
31 movement of the multi-rotor aerial vehicle. The method may comprise
controlling the
32 electronically controlled valves responsive to the output of one or more
orientation
33 sensors to regulate the stability, orientation and/or direction of
movement of the multi-
34 rotor aerial vehicle.
36 The one or more orientation sensors may for example comprise one or more
37 gyroscopes, magnetometers, accelerometers and or global satellite
positioning
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

13
1 system receivers for satellite and or base station transmissions. The
output from a
2 multi-axis accelerometer may be processed to determine the direction of
gravity and
3 therefore the orientation of the vehicle.
4
It may be that the electronically controlled valves of the said electronically
6 commutated hydraulic machine(s) are controlled to control the
displacement of
7 hydraulic fluid by the electronically commutated hydraulic machines such
as to
8 balance the net force exerted by the rotors.
9
Balancing the net force on the rotors is a definition to encompass the idea
that an
11 aerial vehicle requires stabilisation of attitude and altitude change,
and changing the
12 net force on the rotors would be to change the altitude (or at least the
total upwards
13 force the rotors provide), and a change in the balance of the net force
on the rotors is
14 to change the attitude (for example by increasing the force on one side,
and
decreasing on the other which will lead to a rapid change in attitude).
16
17 It may be that the multi-rotor aerial vehicle has a total of four
rotors, wherein each
18 rotor is driven by a respective rotor-driving hydraulic machine, and
each rotor-driving
19 hydraulic machine is driven by an independent output of hydraulic fluid
from the one
or more shaft-driven hydraulic machines which are mechanically coupled to the
21 output shaft of the power supply.
22
23 It may be that the rotational direction of each of the rotors is
arranged such that it is
24 possible to achieve a zero rotational movement of the multi-rotor aerial
vehicle.
26 As is known in conventional multicopters, a pair of counter clockwise
rotating rotors is
27 typically combined on the same aerial vehicle with another pair of
clockwise rotating
28 rotors. The rotation of the rotor mass in air generates a torque effect
on the vehicle in
29 the opposite direction. This torque effect is the same as a yaw force on
the vehicle.
Balancing the torque effect, by having equal numbers of clockwise as of
counter
31 clockwise rotating rotors, provides a balance of the total yaw arising
from the rotors
32 acting on the aerial vehicle.
33
34 It may be that the at least one shaft-driven hydraulic machine(s) have a
common
drive shaft and the axis of rotation of the drive shaft is substantially
parallel to the
36 mean of the direction of the axis of rotation of the at least two
rotors.
37
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

14
1 It may be that the speed of rotation of the output shaft and/or the power
output of the
2 power supply is varied (typically by the controller, which is configured
for the purpose)
3 to provide just enough power for hovering, typically plus a predetermined
margin; and
4 to then increase the speed of rotation of the output shaft and/or the
power output of
the power supply whenever higher power is required or is forecast to be
required for
6 acceleration, climbing or manoeuvring.
7
8 It may be that the electronically commutated hydraulic machine(s) are
controlled to
9 independently regulate the torque generated by each of the two or more
rotor-driving
hydraulic machines.
11
12 The multi-rotor aerial vehicle may comprise an accumulator in fluid
communication
13 with the fluid connection between the (outlet(s) of) at least one shaft-
driven hydraulic
14 machine and (the inlet(s) of) one or more of the at least two rotor-
driving hydraulic
machines.
16
17 It may be that some or all of the shaft-driven hydraulic machines are
pump-motors, at
18 least one of those pump-motors is connected to an accumulator and the
pump-
19 motor(s) connected to an accumulator can be operated in a pumping mode
to store
pressurised fluid in the accumulator and then later motored, driven by
pressurised
21 fluid from the accumulator, to provide transient additional power, to
supplement the
22 power output by the power supply.
23
24 It may be that the rate of displacement from individual groups of one or
more working
chambers is controlled using open-loop feedback to produce a set flow-rate, to
26 thereby control the thrust generated by the respective rotors, the rotor-
driving
27 hydraulic machines are fixed displacement, and these fixed displacement
machines
28 turn at a speed which is proportional to the rate of fluid flow from the
respective group
29 of one or more working chambers to the respective rotor-driving
hydraulic machine,
and the controller queries stored conversion data which relates a target
thrust or
31 variable related to thrust to pump flow-rate, and controls the flow rate
of hydraulic
32 fluid from the respective group of one or more working chambers through
the fluid
33 outlet to the respective rotor-driving hydraulic machine accordingly.
34
It may be that some or all of the rotor-driving hydraulic machines are
partially
36 encompassed within the body of the multi-rotor aerial vehicle, and so
are at least
37 partially surrounded by material, and the multi-rotor aerial vehicle
body comprises a
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

1,5
1 ring cam drive arrangement and the rotor has an annular ring at its
periphery, which
2 comprises a part of the ring cam drive arrangement, and thus the rotor
ring is part of
3 the respective hydraulic machine, directly driven by the cylinders of
some or all of the
4 rotor-driving hydraulic machines.
6 It may be that the rate of displacement by each group of working chambers
is
7 controlled by flow-rate, or by closed-loop rotor-driving hydraulic
machine speed
8 control, but with a set pressure limit at the respective fluid outlet,
using a pressure
9 transducer which measures the pressure of the hydraulic fluid output
through the fluid
outlet.
11
12 It may be that, to control the thrust of a respective rotor, the rate of
displacement of
13 hydraulic fluid by the respective group of one or more working chambers
through a
14 fluid inlet is controlled using closed-loop feedback to maintain a
target pressure using
feedback from a pressure transducer which measures the pressure of hydraulic
fluid
16 output by the respective group of one or more working chambers through
the
17 respective fluid inlet.
18
19 It may be that, to control the thrust of a respective rotor, the rate of
displacement of
hydraulic fluid by the respective group of one or more working chambers
through a
21 respective fluid outlet is controlled using closed-loop feedback to
obtain a target rotor
22 speed, using a rotor speed transducer.
23
24 It may be that the rate of displacement by each shaft-driven hydraulic
machine is
controlled by flow-rate, or by closed-loop rotor driving hydraulic machine
speed
26 control, but with a set pressure limit at the output of the respective
shaft-driven
27 hydraulic machine, implemented by closed-loop control of the rate of
displacement of
28 the shaft-driven hydraulic machine, using a pressure transducer which
measures the
29 pressure of the high pressure connection between the shaft-driven
hydraulic machine
and respective rotor-driving hydraulic machine.
31
32 It may be that the controller is configured to implement (and the method
may
33 comprise implementing) an anti-stall procedure in which the torque
generated by the
34 one or more shaft-driven hydraulic machines is limited in response to
determining
that the speed of rotation of the output shaft meets one or more (prime mover)
stall
36 risk criteria.
37
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

, .
16
,
1 It may be that the controller is programmed to cause (and the method may
comprise
2 causing) the one or more shaft-driven hydraulic machines to make no net
3 displacement of working fluid when the speed of rotation of the output
shaft is below a
4 minimum speed.
6 It may be that, in some circumstances, for example in response to
determining that
7 one or more prime mover failure criteria are met, the controller operates
some of the
8 rotor-driving hydraulic machines as pumps and the hydraulic fluid output
by the
9 respective rotor-driving hydraulic machine(s), acting as pumps, is used
to drive the
working chambers of one or more groups of working chambers of the one or more
11 shaft-driven hydraulic machines which are fluidly connected to those
rotor-driving
12 hydraulic machine(s) acting as pump, and wherein when the common shaft
is
13 rotating, other groups of working chambers, driven in effect by the
rotors, use the
14 received energy to drive rotor-driving hydraulic machines and thereby
rotors.
16 It may be that (e.g. the controller may be configured such that) in
response to a rotor
17 demand speed increase from a first lower level to a second higher level,
the flowrate
18 delivered by the common outlet of the one or more shaft-driven hydraulic
machines to
19 which a rotor-driving hydraulic machine is connected, is commanded by
the controller
to exceed the flowrate corresponding to the steady-state flowrate of the
second
21 higher level of speed, fora period of time.
22
23 The commanded flowrate may be commanded to exceed the steady-state
flowrate of
24 the second higher level of speed, for a brief period only.
26 It may be that (e.g. the controller may be configured such that) in
response to a rotor
27 demand speed decrease from a first higher level to a second lower level,
the flowrate
28 delivered by the one or more groups of working chambers connected to the
common
29 hydraulic fluid outlet to which the respective rotor-driving hydraulic
machine is
connected, is commanded by the controller to decrease below the flowrate
31 corresponding to the steady-state flowrate of the second lower level of
speed, for a
32 period of time.
33
34 The commanded flowrate is commanded to decrease below the steady-state
flowrate
of the second lower level of speed, for a brief period only. The flowrate may
be
36 regulated to obtain a target pressure or shaft rotation speed (i.e. the
displacement is
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

17
1 selected to meet a target pressure or shaft rotation speed rather than a
target flow
2 rate).
3
4 Optional features described above relate to both the first and second
aspects of the
invention. The controller may be configured (e.g. programmed) to implement the
6 method steps.
7
8 Description of the Drawings
9
An example embodiment of the present invention will now be illustrated with
11 reference to the following Figures in which:
12
13 Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of key components of a multi-rotor
aerial vehicle;
14
Figure 2A is a hydraulic circuit diagram of a first configuration, using fixed
16 displacement hydraulic motors and Figure 2B is a diagram of
corresponding
17 configuration using synthetically commutated hydraulic motors;
18
19 Figure 3A is a hydraulic circuit diagram of a second configuration,
using fixed
displacement hydraulic motors and Figure 3B is a diagram of a corresponding
21 configuration using synthetically commutated hydraulic motors;
22
23 Figure 3C is similar to 3B, but it comprises only a single output pump
service, and
24 common high pressure conduit commoning or combining high pressure
connections
22,24,26,28, which each synthetically commutated motor is connected to. An
26 accumulator 38 is connected to the hydraulic circuit, to a region
hydraulically
27 connected to the high pressure conduit, such that a compliant hydraulic
system is
28 created, in which the consumption of high pressure fluid from the high
pressure fluid
29 conduits, by one or more of the connected motors, will have relatively
little impact on
the pressure.
31
32 Figure 3D is similar to 3A with non-synthetically commutated motors
powering the
33 rotors, however for clarity it omits the circuit details on three pump
connections
34 showing instead truncated hydraulic lines with arrow terminations, and
only provides
details on the connection for pump 30a, however it is intended that all four
36 connections from the respective pumps adopt the configuration as
illustrated in this
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

. ,
1,8
1 Figure, thus each pump connection would include check valve 46, a heat
exchanger
2 49 and autorotation valve 47.
3
4 Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of an individual bank of working chambers
functioning as a pump; and
6
7 Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of control functions.
8
9 Figure 6 is a multi-rotor first hybrid configuration
11 Figure 7 is a multi-rotor second hybrid configuration
12
13 Figure 8 is a multi-rotor in the form of a Y6 coaxial tricopter
14
Figure 9 is a multi-rotor in the form of a tiltrotor in a forward flight
configuration
16
17 Figure 10 is a multi-rotor in the form of a tiltrotor as per Figure 9,
but in a vertical flight
18 configuration
19
Figure 11 is a multi-rotor in the form of a tiltwing in a vertical flight
configuration
21
22 Figure 12 is a multi-rotor in the form of a tail sitter in a vertical
flight configuration
23
24 Figure 13 is a multi-rotor in the form of a compound helicopter
26 Figure 14 is a multi-rotor in the form of a compound rotorcraft
27
28 Figure 15 is an image showing banks of a rotary machine with axial
galleries, and
29 pump services connected to one side.
31 Figure 16 is a graph showing pressure:speed relationship.
32
33 Figure 17a is a graph of speed against time.
34
Figure 17b is a magnified view of a portion of the graph shown in Figure 17a.
36
37 Figure 17c is a graph of motor pressure against time.
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

, .
19
.,
1
2 Figure 17d is a graph of pump controller displacement command against
time.
3
4 Figure 18a is a graph of flight system demanded speed against time.
6 Figure 18b is a graph of motor pressure against time.
7
8 Figure 18c is a graph of motor controller displacement command against
time.
9
Detailed Description of an Example Embodiment
11
12 With reference to Figure 1, a multi-rotor aerial vehicle (multicopter)
10 has a core 12,
13 containing a power supply 13 and controller 15. Rotors 14a, 14b, 14c,
14d are
14 spaced apart around the body and driven to rotate in use by respective
hydraulic
motors 40a, 40b, 40c, 40d (functioning as the rotor-driving hydraulic
machines) which
16 are held in place by arms 36 extending from the body, or by another
structural
17 support/chassis. Each of the motors 40a, 40b, 40c, 40d could be of bent-
axis type
18 (shown with individual rotors in Figure 1).
19
The power supply 13 might be one or more batteries driving an electrical motor
(in
21 which case the electrical motor functions as prime mover 20) and/or a
fuel tank and
22 internal combustion engine (in which case the internal combustion engine
functions
23 as prime mover 20). The internal combustion engine may be a
reciprocating engine
24 or gas turbine.
26 Hydraulic conduits 22, 24, 26, 28 extend from outlets of individual
pumps (30a, 30b,
27 30c, 30d) in the core of the multicopter to supply pressurised fluid to
respective
28 hydraulic motors to drive those motors, and low pressure conduits 18
extend back
29 from the output of the motors to the hydraulic pump apparatus, to return
hydraulic
fluid.
31
32 With reference to Figures 2A and 2B, an electric motor 20, under the
control of the
33 controller 15, drives a shaft 19 which drives four banks of cylinders,
each bank having
34 a separate hydraulic inlet and hydraulic outlet, connected to the
cylinders of the
respective bank, and so functioning as an individually controllable pumps 30a,
30b,
36 30c, 30d. The pumps 30a, 30b, 30c, 30d function as the shaft-driven
hydraulic
37 machines. In this example, the electric motor and pumps have a common
shaft
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

20
1 (functioning as the output shaft of the electric motor and input shaft of
the pumps),
2 although they may have separate shafts coupled by a gearing arrangement
(for
3 example). By common shaft, we mean either a single continuous component,
or a
4 plurality of components which are keyed to one another which are torque
connected
to transmit torque. Typically these components with be coaxial, however with
gearing
6 between components the coaxial alignment is not necessary. In this
example, the
7 respective pumps are formed by cylinders divided into separate banks,
with the
8 cylinders which form an individual bank having a common fluid input and
common
9 fluid output and so functioning as a discrete pump, however it would be
equally
possible for the inputs and output of groups of cylinders from different banks
(from
11 some, or all cylinders on those banks) to be connected together to form
pumps.
12 Furthermore, the grouping of cylinders to form pumps need not be fixed,
but may for
13 example be varied using control valves. It is advantageous from the view
of minimum
14 weight as well as elimination of multiple failure modes if each group of
cylinders is
arranged around a common crankshaft sharing common bearings, housing and shaft
16 seals.
17
18 In the embodiment of Figures 2A the hydraulic motors are driven simply
by the
19 pressure of the working fluid which they receive from the respective
pumps, and in
particular they are not electronically commutated machines. In the embodiment
of
21 Figure 2B the hydraulic motors are (like the pumps) electronically
commutated
22 machines which have a rate of displacement which is independently
controllable by
23 actively controlling electronically controlled valves. This provides an
additional level
24 of control (allowing the pressure in the hydraulic conduit between the
respective
pump and the respective hydraulic motor and the rate of displacement by the
26 hydraulic motor to be independently varied, e.g. controlling torque and
power output).
27
28 Figures 3A and 3B illustrate corresponding embodiments in which the
motors have
29 low pressure outputs which are commoned and connected to a tank 48.
Figures 3C
and 3D illustrate embodiments in which the motors have low pressure outputs
which
31 are commoned and connected to a tank 48.
32
33 Electronically Commutated Pump / Motor Structure
34
Figure 4 illustrates an electronically (or synthetically) commutated hydraulic
machine
36 useful for both the hydraulic pumps 30 and the hydraulic motors 40 of
the present
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

2,1
1 invention. Nevertheless, the hydraulic pumps or motors may be simpler in
some
2 embodiments, as described further below.
3
4 A electronically commutated hydraulic pump/motor comprises a plurality of
cylinders
100 which have working volumes 102 defined by the interior surfaces of the
cylinders
6 and pistons 106 which are driven from a rotatable shaft 108 (e.g. common
shaft 19 in
7 the case of the pumps) by an eccentric cam 110 and which reciprocate
within the
8 cylinders to cyclically vary the working volume of the cylinders. The
rotatable shaft is
9 firmly connected to and rotates with the generator drive shaft 19. A
shaft position and
speed sensor 112 determines the instantaneous angular position and speed of
11 rotation of the shaft, and through signal line 114 informs the machine
controller 116 of
12 the motor shaft position and/or speed, which enables the machine
controller to
13 determine the instantaneous phase of the cycles of each cylinder.
14
The cylinders are each associated with Low Pressure Valves (LPVs) in the form
of
16 electronically actuated face-sealing poppet valves 118, which face
inwards toward
17 their associated cylinder and are operable to selectively seal off a
channel extending
18 from the cylinder to a low pressure hydraulic fluid line 120, which may
connect one or
19 several cylinders, or indeed all as is shown here, to the low pressure
hydraulic fluid
line 120 of the electronically commutated hydraulic pump/motor. The LPVs are
21 normally open solenoid closed valves which open passively when the
pressure within
22 the cylinder is less than or equal to the pressure within the low
pressure hydraulic
23 fluid line, i.e. during an intake stroke, to bring the cylinder into
fluid communication
24 with the low pressure hydraulic fluid line, but are selectively closable
under the active
control of the controller via LPV control lines 124 to bring the cylinder out
of fluid
26 communication with the low pressure hydraulic fluid line. Alternative
electronically
27 controllable valves may be employed, such as normally closed solenoid
opened
28 valves.
29
The cylinders are each further associated with High Pressure Valves (HPVs) 126
in
31 the form of pressure actuated delivery valves. The HPVs open outwards
from the
32 cylinders and are operable to seal off a channel extending from the
cylinder to a high
33 pressure hydraulic fluid line 122, which may connect one or several
cylinders, or
34 indeed all as is shown here, to the transmission high pressure hydraulic
fluid line 122.
The HPVs function as normally-closed pressure-opening check valves which open
36 passively when the pressure within the cylinder exceeds the pressure
within the high
37 pressure hydraulic fluid line. The HPVs also function as normally-closed
solenoid
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

22
1 opened check valves which the controller may selectively hold open via
HPV control
2 lines 132 once that HPV is opened by pressure within the associated
cylinder.
3 Typically the HPV is not openable by the controller against pressure in
the high
4 pressure hydraulic fluid line. The HPV may additionally be openable under
the control
of the controller when there is pressure in the high pressure hydraulic fluid
line but
6 not in the cylinder, or may be partially openable, for example if the
valve is of the type
7 and is operated according to the method disclosed in WO 2008/029073 or WO
8 2010/029358.
9
In a normal mode of operation while pumping described in, for example, EP 0
361
11 927, EP 0 494 236, and EP 1 537 333, the contents of which are hereby
incorporated
12 herein by way of this reference, the controller selects the net rate of
displacement of
13 fluid to the high pressure hydraulic fluid line by an individual working
chamber by
14 either holding the LPV of the working chamber open throughout a cycle of
cylinder
working volume (in which case there is no net displacement of working fluid to
the
16 high pressure line, called an idle cycle) or by actively closing one or
more of the LPVs
17 typically near the point of maximum volume in the associated cylinder's
cycle, thereby
18 closing the path to the low pressure hydraulic fluid line and directing
fluid out through
19 the associated HPV on the subsequent contraction stroke (called a
pumping cycle).
The net displacement of the pump can be varied by mixing idle and pumping
cycles
21 on successive cycles of each of the working chambers in a sequence
determined the
22 controller synchronous with the shaft rotation and in response to an
electronic
23 demand signal.
24
Due to the digital nature of such control, and the lack of mechanical friction
inherent
26 in changing displacement (which a conventional variable stroke machine
would
27 have), this machine does not exhibit hysteresis, deadband, and non-
linearity in its
28 response to demand. The machine can change displacement (from max to
zero, or
29 vice versa) within half a shaft revolution due to the relatively rapid
rotation speed of
the machine shaft, the time for half a shaft revolution would typically be of
the order of
31 10 to 20ms, therefore the machine responds much faster to control inputs
than a
32 variable swashplate pump which would typically exhibit delays of more
than 100ms
33 from an electronic demand signal to pump displacement response.
34
When motoring, the controller selects the net rate of displacement of fluid
from the
36 high pressure hydraulic fluid line by a cylinder by either holding the
respective LPV
37 open during a cycle (in which case there is no net displacement of
working fluid from
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

= ,
23
,
1 the high pressure line to the low pressure line) or by actively closing
one or more of
2 the LPVs shortly before the point of minimum volume in the associated
cylinder's
3 cycle, closing the path to the low pressure hydraulic fluid line which
causes the fluid
4 in the cylinder to be compressed by the remainder of the contraction
stroke. The
associated HPV opens when the pressure across it equalises and a small amount
of
6 fluid is directed out through the associated HPV. The motor controller
then actively
7 holds open the associated HPV, typically until near the maximum volume in
the
8 associated cylinder's cycle, admitting fluid from the high pressure
hydraulic fluid line
9 and applying a torque to the rotatable shaft. This leads to a motoring
cycle. The
controller selects the number and sequence of LPV closures and HPV openings to
11 produce a flow or create a shaft torque or power to satisfy a selected
net rate of
12 displacement.
13
14 As well as determining whether or not to close or hold open the LPVs on
a cycle by
cycle basis, the controller is operable to vary the precise phasing of the
closure of the
16 either or both the HPVs and the LPVs with respect to the varying
cylinder volume and
17 thereby to select the net rate of displacement of fluid from the high
pressure to the
18 low pressure hydraulic fluid line or vice versa.
19
Arrows on the ports 122, 120 indicate fluid flow in the motoring mode; in the
pumping
21 mode the flow is reversed. A pressure relief valve 128 may protect the
hydraulic
22 motor from damage.
23
24 Although the machine shown in Figure 4 is usable as either a pump or a
motor, in
some embodiments, the pumps 30a, 30b, 30c, 30d which are driven by the prime
26 mover do not have electronically controlled high pressure valves.
Instead, the high
27 pressure valves are passive check valves, and thus the pumps 30a, 30b,
30c, 30d
28 cannot perform a motor function.
29
Similarly, in some embodiments, the hydraulic motors use entirely passive
valves, or
31 commutating port plates, in which case they are less controllable and
may be
32 regulated simply by the pressure of received hydraulic fluid.
33
34 Control of vehicle
36 It can be seen that the common shaft 19, extending out from the prime
mover 20
37 drives four pumps 30a, 30b, 30c, 30d. Each pump 30a, 30b, 30c, 30d
drives a
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

24
1 respective hydraulic motor 40a, 40b, 40c, 40d. Each hydraulic motor
drives a
2 respective rotor. Thus, the controller can independently control the
rotation of each
3 of the four rotors, by independently regulating the amount of working
fluid displaced
4 (per revolution of the common shaft) by the individual pumps, by
controlling the
electronically controlled valves of the respective pumps.
6
7 With reference to Figure 5, the controller 21 comprises a processor 150
in electronic
8 communication through a bus 152 with memory 154 storing an operating program
9 156. An electronic interface 158 receives inputs including:
11 - The speed of rotation 160 of each rotor, measured by 4 speed sensors
162
12 - Rotation speed measurements 164 from a 3-axis gyroscope 166
13 - Acceleration measurements 168 from a 3-axis accelerometer 170
14 - Magnetic field strength measurements 172 from a magnetometer 174
- The speed of rotation and/or position 176/178 of, the rotatable shaft 19
from
16 the speed and position sensor 112
17 - Longitude, latitude and altitude data 180 from a global navigation
satellite
18 system receiver 182 (e.g. GPS receiver)
19 - The current power output 184 of the prime mover
- The current spare battery capacity 186 of the batteries
21 - The level of fuel in the fuel tank
22 - The temperature of the hydraulic oil
23 - The level of the hydraulic oil in the oil tank
24 - The temperature and/or other status signals of the engine
- Control instructions 188 from a remote controller (e.g. a server) received
26 through a wireless communications interface 190 (e.g. WiFi or a
cellular
27 network data interface)
28 - Ranging data such as ultrasonic, radar or LIDAR (Light Detection and
Ranging)
29 to which provide height above ground or to scan for obstacles.
- Processed camera signals indicating ground speed such as from an optical
31 flow sensor
32
33 The electronic interface 158 transmits outputs including:
34
- Valve control signals 200 to control the electronic valves within the pumps
36 (and in some embodiments the motors)
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

25
1 - Prime mover control signals 202 (e.g. instructions to accelerate,
decelerate,
2 target torque, power output etc.)
3 - Reporting data 204 for a remote controller (e.g. current position,
orientation
4 etc.)
6 Instead of valve controls signals 200, the electronic interface may
output control
7 signals (e.g. target displacement or pressure signals) which are
processed by
8 separate circuitry to determine the timing of active control (e.g.
opening, closing,
9 holding open, holding closed) of electronically controlled valves. One
skilled in the
art will appreciate that whether the function of the controller is implemented
in a
11 single integrated circuit or distributed amongst a plurality of discrete
circuits is a
12 matter of design choice.
13
14 One skilled in the art will appreciate that the functionality of the
controller may be
distributed amongst a plurality of processors or circuits. Some of the
functionality of
16 the controller may be implemented in processors or circuits of the
electronically
17 commutated pumps (and electronically commutated motors, where present).
For
18 example, a central processor may output a target (e.g. as to rate of
displacement, or
19 torque, or output pressure) to a pump or motor controller, such as
machine controller
116, which generates the valve control signals required, taking into account
the
21 rotating shaft position/speed signals, so that the target is met.
22
23 The controller receives a desired location (e.g. longitude, latitude,
altitude) and
24 configuration (e.g. hovering, picking up or dropping off a parcel) or
flight path
(expressed as a series of intermediate coordinates or path segments) of the
26 multirotor and controls the speed of rotation of the rotors to move the
device to that
27 location or along that path as is generally known in the field of aerial
drones and
28 multicopters. The controller may also autonomously decide its desired
trajectory in
29 response to sensor inputs, for instance to seek a person who is lost at
sea using a
thermal camera input.
31
32 For example, in order to gain height, the speed of rotation of upward
facing rotors can
33 be increased until the lift generated exceeds gravity, or reduced in
order to lose
34 height. Feedback from the abovennentioned sensors, notably the rotor
speed
sensors, GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) position data,
accelerometer
36 data (which is processed to determine the direction of gravity and
therefore
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

. .
26
1 orientation in addition to measuring further components of acceleration),
2 magnetometer and gyroscope data, is monitored continuously in order to
assist
3 control. Rotors on one side of the device may be controlled to generate
different lift to
4 rotors on the other side to tilt the device. Rotors turning clockwise may
be sped up,
while rotors turning anti-clockwise are slowed down, or vice versa, in order
to
6 generate a yaw moment. Rotors facing with a horizontal component can be
driven to
7 generate horizontal movement. Suitable rotor control methods are known to
those
8 skilled in the art of multirotor control.
9
The control loop of the multirotor would comprise multiple nested control
loops, with
11 each loop providing commands the next inner loop. The innermost control
loop of the
12 multirotor would seek to attain a commanded attitude rate (i.e. rate of
change of pitch,
13 roll and yaw) with reference to gyroscope signals, by setting each rotor
commanded
14 thrust. The next outer loop would seek to attain a commanded attitude
(i.e. pitch, roll
and yaw), with reference to gyroscope, compass and accelerometer signals, by
16 providing attitude rate command signals to the innermost loop. The next
outer loop
17 would seek to attain a commanded translational velocity of the
multirotor with
18 reference to GPS (Global Positioning System) signals and/or integrated
19 accelerometer signals, by providing attitude command signals to the
attitude loop.
The next outer loop would seek to attain a commanded position with reference
to
21 GPS signals or distance sensors.
22
23 For control of multirotor altitude, a signal from a barometer, GPS or a
non-contact
24 height sensor (for instance ultrasonic, LIDAR or radar) would be
compared to a
commanded height to give an altitude error. This height error would be fed
through a
26 PID (proportional-integral-derivative) control loop to determine the
commanded
27 altitude rate such that the multirotor seeks to attain the commanded
altitude. The
28 commanded altitude rate would be compared with the observed altitude
rate from
29 differentiated barometer, GPS or non-contact height sensor, or integrated
acceleration sensors, to give an altitude rate error. This altitude rate error
would be
31 fed through a PID controller to give an altitude rate acceleration
command, which
32 would be compared with the observed altitude rate acceleration
(typically from
33 accelerometer signals) to give an altitude rate acceleration error. This
error would be
34 fed through a final PID controller to give an overall rotor thrust
command, which
would be mixed with the individual rotor thrust commands from the attitude
rate
36 controller to determine the final rotor speed commands.
37
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

27
1 It may be advantageous to fuse signals from multiple sensors to reduce
error and
2 provide best combination of high frequency information of one sensor
(e.g. from an
3 accelerometer), with low drift and absolute accuracy of another (e.g. non-
contact
4 altitude sensor). Such sensor fusion may be done by so-called
complementary filters,
or a Kalman filter.
6
7 According to the invention, the electronically commutated pumps allow the
rate of
8 displacement to individual motors (and therefore the speed of individual
rotors) to be
9 varied at high bandwidth, and with high efficiency. The controller
determines an
appropriate shaft speed for the prime mover taking into account the flow
limits of each
11 electronically commutated pump service, overall power demand and the
variation in
12 the power efficiency of the prime mover with shaft rotation speed. Each
pump may
13 have a single service or multiple services. Grouping of services, or
outputs from each
14 cylinder, is discussed below. The controller receives rotor speed
signals from each
rotor and so can control the respective pump valves to vary displacement using
open-
16 loop flow control, closed-loop speed control, or a combination thereof.
17
18 In embodiments using electronically commutated motors (Figures 2B, 3B,
3C) further
19 control is possible in that the volume of hydraulic fluid which is
displaced per rotation
of the rotatable shaft of the motor (and attached rotor) can be varied
continuously,
21 allowing the torque which is applied to the rotor (which is proportional
to the product
22 of the differential fluid pressure and the motor's displacement of
working fluid per
23 revolution) to be independently varied from the pressure by varying the
motor's
24 displacement of working fluid per revolution. This can further increase
the control
bandwidth, while also allowing a compliant element such as an accumulator to
be
26 connected to each of the high pressure lines, providing a short-term
storage of
27 energy to allow transient demands to be reacted to without requiring the
pump or
28 prime mover to react to quickly.
29
It may be required for a hydraulic motor to act as a pump in a transient
condition, so
31 as to quickly decelerate the rotor. For instance, in case of a sudden
pitch forward
32 command, the forward rotors may be commanded to decelerate by applying a
33 negative torque (requiring the respective motors to act as pumps), while
the rear
34 rotors may be commanded to accelerate, applying a positive torque
(requiring the
respective motors to act as motors). It is preferable that the fluid energy
generated by
36 the motors for the forward rotors (acting as pumps) is not wasted, but
is instead
37 recirculated to supply the additional energy required by the rear rotors
to accelerate.
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

28
1 To this end, high pressure lines may be commoned amongst (i.e. in fluidic
2 communication with) multiple electronically commutated motors. This has
the benefit
3 of allowing fluid energy to be recirculated from one motor (acting as a
pump) to
4 another motor.
6 Because the pumps route fluid directly to individual hydraulic motors,
and because
7 the pumps are electronically controlled, with displacement decisions
being made for
8 each cycle of working chamber volume, the torque applied to each rotor
can be
9 varied very quickly. For example, if the common shaft rotates at 1000 rpm
and each
pump comprises a bank of 6 cylinders (for example) distributed around the
shaft, it is
11 possible to make a decision whether a cylinder makes an active cycle
with a net
12 displacement of hydraulic fluid, or an inactive cycle every 10ms, and
therefore to
13 rapidly vary the net displacement to each rotor. Accordingly, a time
varying net
14 displacement target can be accurately met by making decisions as to
whether each
consecutive cylinder should carry out an active or inactive cycle (and in some
16 embodiments, for active cycles, what the net displacement of that cycle
should be)
17 depending whether the sum of displacements during preceding cycles is
slightly
18 below or above the integral of the net displacement target during a
corresponding
19 period of time.
21 Surprisingly, the inventors have found that open loop control by
enabling and
22 disabling individual pump working chambers on a stroke-by-stroke basis
by means of
23 solenoid valves using a sigma delta algorithm can be used to make this
very accurate
24 without hysteresis or non-linearity. Thus, accurate control of vehicle
speed, attitude
and position can all be achieved. In contrast to the prior art, in which the
flow is
26 controlled by a proportional valve, or by a variable displacement pump
with a stroke
27 varying mechanism actuated under control of a proportional valve, the
displacement
28 of the electronically commutated pump does not have a tendency to remain
at the
29 current valve due to friction, inertia, and damping effects. This means
for instance
that in response to a small variation in prime mover speed, the pumps of the
present
31 invention may be adjusted accurately and almost instantly to slightly
reduce their
32 displacement to counteract the speed variation, and hence to keep
constant the flow
33 provided to each motor regardless of prime mover speed variations. It
also means
34 that in response to small variations of the rotor speed command signal
from the flight
controller, the pumps of the present invention will accurately and almost
instantly
36 follow the command. This results in improved attitude, and hence
positional control,
37 compared to the prior art.
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

29
1
2 In the embodiments of Figures 2B, 3B and 3C, the motors are also
electronically
3 controlled hydraulic machines in which the displacement of each working
chamber is
4 controlled on each cycle of working chamber volume by the active control
of
electronic valves, allowing independent control of torque and speed of
rotation.
6 In such embodiments it may be desirable to have a compliant hydraulic
system
7 (through use of an accumulator, connected to the fluid ports/fluid
connections
8 between the shaft driven hydraulic machine, and the rotor driving
hydraulic machine),
9 such that the hydraulic volume between the pump and motors comprises an
accumulator (or merely the hoses etc, or some other compliance providing
11 component, can swell to have an accumulator like-effect) and this can be
used as a
12 significant energy store. If the flight controller demands an increase
in rotor speed,
13 this is met by commanding the respective motor to increase in speed, and
will
14 correspondingly increase the displacement command, whereby the pressure
in the
fluid conduits will drop. In a compliant system, removing volume has a
relatively small
16 effect on the pressure, and thus drawing fluid by the motor(s) in order
to increase
17 speed, will have a small effect on the pressure.
18
19 Depending on how long the elevated motor demand is sustained, it may be
necessary to increase the output from the pump. Alternatively, if the
increased motor
21 demand is very short term, no addition level of input to the system is
required by the
22 pump.
23
24 In the embodiments of Figures 2A and 3A, the motors are fixed
displacement
hydraulic machines. It may be desirable to use these rotor motors which
themselves
26 have a low bandwidth control characteristic, with a pump having a high
bandwidth
27 response characteristic, and for them to be connected by a hydraulically
stiff system.
28 This means the hydraulic volume between the pump and motors does not
comprise
29 an accumulator (or compliance providing component / structure) and thus
there is
relatively little energy stored within this volume. If the flight controller
demands an
31 increase in rotor speed, this is met by commanding the respective pump
to increase
32 pressure. As the pump has high bandwidth control, and is coupled to the
stiff system,
33 an increase in pressure output by the pump is very rapidly seen at the
inlet of the
34 motor, and thus the motor will increase in speed rapidly.
36 Furthermore, the use of a single shaft driving the various pumps,
enables the prime
37 mover to be operated efficiently. The high control frequency of each
pump allows the
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

. .
,
1 rate of displacement of hydraulic fluid to the motors driving each rotor
to be changed
2 rapidly (e.g. to begin an ascent or descent of the multirotor) despite
the inertia of the
3 prime mover and rotatable shaft (and connected rotating and reciprocating
masses).
4
5 The controller is programmed to determine the total torque of the pumps
and the
6 torque of the prime mover and to balance and manage these. The torque of an
7 individual pump is calculated as the product of the displacement of
working fluid per
8 revolution by the individual pump and the pressure of the output fluid.
Thus, the total
9 torque acting on or provided by the common shaft can be obtained by
summing the
10 torque for each pump. The prime mover receives this total torque, and so
by
11 regulating the rate of displacement of working fluid by each pump, and
the pressure
12 of the hydraulic fluid at the outputs of each pump, a maximum prime
mover torque, or
13 a target prime mover torque (e.g. selected for reasons of efficiency)
may be
14 implemented. In embodiments in which the hydraulic motors are
electronically
15 commutated machines, the pressure in the hydraulic connections between
the
16 respective pump and the respective motor, and therefore at the output of
each pump,
17 can also be controlled by regulating the rate of displacement of the
respective
18 hydraulic motor. A total pump torque limit may be implemented by the
controller.
19 The total torque of the pumps may be restricted at times in order to
enable the speed
20 of rotation of the prime mover to increase where required.
21
22 The controller may implement one or more priority rules when controlling
the rate of
23 displacement of hydraulic fluid by individual pumps. It may be that the
controller
24 comprises a flight control module which determines the intended path of
flight of the
25 vehicle. It may be that if a torque indicated by a motion request, e.g.
a torque required
26 for the vehicle to follow the intended path of flight, cannot be
implemented, because
27 the required rotor torque cannot be obtained from the torque available
from the prime
28 mover, the torque generated by each pump is scaled back proportionately
so that the
29 total torque by each pump meets a torque limit.
31 The demanded torque from a flight control system can be distributed to
each pump
32 service according to priority. For instance, in case the flight control
system demands
33 flows from the pump services which mean that the total engine torque
limit would be
34 exceeded, the torque imposed by the piston cylinders of each service may
be scaled
35 proportionally until the total torque, summed from the piston cylinders
of the
36 respective services, matches the available prime mover torque.
37
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

31
1 In the case of a quadcopter, if a first motor driving a first rotor was
torque limited, but
2 a cooperating second motor which operates in counter-rotation was not,
then an
3 undesired yaw could result due to a net yaw moment being generated. Hence
the
4 torque generated by motors which drive rotors which are opposition each
other may
be scaled in proportion to each other such that no yaw moment is generated
during
6 periods of torque limiting.
7
8 It is important that small signal corrections from the flight control
system for attitude
9 control are passed through the control system without distortion. Take
for example
the case where the vehicle is ascending and the prime mover torque limit is
reached,
11 while at the same time a small incremental signal is generated by the
flight control
12 system to increase the thrust of one rotor to correct the attitude
following a gust of
13 wind (gust caused by weather, or some other e.g. local disturbance). In
such
14 circumstances, in a stability priority mode, the increase in the thrust
of one rotor (e.g.
for correction purposes) will result in the reduction of thrust from the other
rotors (due
16 perhaps to reduction in displacement of those respective motors, or
reduction in
17 displacement of the respective connected pumps), such that the total
prime mover
18 maximum deliverable torque is respected. This will result in a momentary
reduction of
19 the rate of ascent during the period of correction following the gust
(or if it was
previously near/at maximum, then it might cause the air vehicle to slightly
descend).
21
22 As well as yaw moment, the inertia of fluid may generate further forces
which perturb
23 vehicle stability. Although the mass of the fluid within hydraulic
connections is
24 relatively low, the velocity may reach perhaps 14 or even 20 meters per
second. The
acceleration of masses of fluid in conduits may lead to forces on the vehicle.
26
27 Fluid conduit routing may need to take into account the potential to
generate forces
28 by accelerating fluid, and it may be preferable to direct conduits in a
radial nature
29 from a central pump or pumps, and to minimise conduits which encourage
flow in a
circular direction (which may produce rotational forces on the vehicle). It is
likely that
31 forces which act radially have a lower impact on the vehicle control
compared to
32 unwanted forces acting in a yaw type direction. In summary, radial
straight conduits
33 may be preferred over circular routed conduits, or conduits which
encourage flow in a
34 circular direction.
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

32
1 Such fluid inertial related forces may impact on control of the vehicle,
and it may be
2 necessary to anticipate and even compensate for such forces, for example
within the
3 control strategy of the vehicle.
4
To increase redundancy, the mechanical input to a rotor (e.g. rotor shaft, or
a gear)
6 may be directly or indirectly connected to the mechanical output of a
plurality of
7 hydraulic motors 40 (rather than just a single rotor), which are thereby
multiply
8 redundant. Some or all of the motors may be provided by redundant pumps
which
9 are instead run in a motor mode.
11 In some embodiments, to increase the speed of control response, the
rotors can be
12 actively decelerated by the hydraulic drive. One option is to use an
overcentre valve
13 45, shown in Figures 3A and 3B. When the pump flow reduces below the
flow taken
14 by the rotor drive motor, the hydraulic line pressure at the motor
reduces, causing the
overcentre valve to throttle the output flow from the motors, decelerating the
rotor
16 rapidly until it matches the flow produced by the electronically
commutated pumps.
17 Check valves 46 allow the motors to intake from the tank in this
situation thus
18 avoiding cavitation.
19
A number of features can be provided in order to minimise the weight of the
hydraulic
21 components. For example, lightweight materials can be used to form the
fluid
22 conduits (pipes, hoses, galleries etc.). Hydraulic hoses typically
comprise an inner
23 tube, a surrounding reinforced layer (polyester yarn / Kevlar layer /
wire reinforcement
24 / other strong fibre), and an outer casing for abrasion resistance and
flexibility.
Instead of being reinforced equally along the length of hoses, hoses may be
26 selectively reinforced along only parts of their length and/or around
parts of their
27 circumference, thereby reducing the total mass of reinforced material
present.
28 Furthermore, the outer casing could be selectively reduced or increased
along its
29 length and/or around its circumference, to reduce the total mass of
reinforced
material present. In effect, hose reinforcement and casing can be reduced
overall,
31 and present only on sections of hose where they are needed (where there
is
32 abrasion, stress, wear likely, protection essential etc.). The reduction
may extend to
33 the absence of reinforcing material, e.g. on zones of the hose which do
not need to
34 flex or which are unlikely to contact other parts, thus negating the
requirement for the
outer casing. The reinforced layer may comprise or consist of silk, carbon
nanotubes,
36 graphene, or a combination or composite including one or more of these.
37
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

33
1 The structure of the vehicle itself may be used to transfer hydraulic
fluid, and thus
2 fluid connections may be integral to the structure. In the example
illustrated in Figure
3 1, the pump is mounted in the central core 12, from which arms extend
radially to
4 support and mount the rotors and their respective motors. The arms
longitudinal
nature may include a drilling or void formed by some other means, along the
length of
6 the arms to thereby transfer fluid to the motor. Thus, the fluid
connections between
7 the pumps and the motor may extend through bores in the body (e.g.
chassis) of the
8 multi-rotor aerial vehicle.
9
Weight can also be reduced by minimising the volume of an internal crankcase /
tank
11 (where low pressure hydraulic fluid is retained prior to being pumps and
after driving
12 the motors), for example by filling unnecessary volume with filler
material and/or
13 hollow voids.
14
The hydraulic system may be adapted to be tolerant of high acceleration
forces, and
16 possible inversion (both during operational, and non-operational
period). For
17 example, in an open hydraulic system, breathing ports (to atmosphere)
must not be
18 susceptible to ejecting hydraulic fluid rather than air. For example,
there may be
19 breathing ports to the surrounding air (e.g. between the tank 48 and
air, or between
shared lower pressure line 32 and atmosphere) and controllable valves
(typically
21 electronically controlled valves, e.g. under the control of the
controller) which are
22 controllable to block the egress of hydraulic fluid out of specific
ports (for example
23 when the controller determines that the device is at a range of
orientations, e.g.
24 upside down). The controllable valve may be normally closed (e.g. biased
to the
closed position) so that they block the egress of hydraulic fluid when
unpowered. The
26 hydraulic tank may be pressurised by a diaphragm or bladder containing
compressed
27 air, such that positive pressure is maintained on the inlet of the pumps
regardless of
28 the aircraft attitude. The hydraulic tank may also contain baffles to
inhibit sloshing of
29 the oil during maneuverers.
31 The multi-rotor aerial vehicle may comprise additional and/or reinforced
structures
32 between high pressure fluid components (particularly high pressure fluid
connections
33 24) and a region where cargo is located (e.g. an internal compartment, a
cargo bay, a
34 seat). This is especially important where the cargo is biological, for
example a
human passenger. Structures may be provided between the passenger and
potential
36 high pressure leak zones or higher risk high pressure leak zones. The
high pressure
37 components, such as the high pressure fluid connections) may be
configured such
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

. .
34
1 that some existing part of the vehicle (e.g. generally radially extending
arms) is
2 between the potential leak point and the passenger or other payload. E.g.
a multi-
3 rotor aerial vehicle might be configured to carry a passenger on the top,
e.g. above
4 the multicopter structural arms, with the high pressure components (e.g.
high
5 pressure fluid connections) being located below or in the lower part of
these arms
6 (thus the arms obscure potential jets of fluid directly to the
passenger/operator). As
7 mentioned above, the fluid connections might be located within the
structure of the
8 vehicle, including within the generally radially extending arms, to
thereby contain
9 potential fluid leaks, and to aid reduction of the coefficient of drag.
11 It may be that some or all of the motors are partially compassed within
the body of the
12 multi-rotor aerial vehicle, being at least partially surrounded by
material (e.g.
13 shrouded). The multi-rotor aerial vehicle body may comprise a ring cam
drive
14 arrangement. The cam may be on the stator stationary side and
piston/cylinder
15 arrangements rotate relative to and act against the stationary cam. Or,
or the cam is
16 on the rotor rotating side, and the piston/cylinder elements do not
rotate relative to
17 the body of the vehicle. In this latter rotating cam embodiment, the
respective vehicle
18 rotor may have an annular ring at its periphery, which comprises one
part of the ring
19 cam drive arrangement, and thus the rotor ring is part of or is
rotatably connected to
20 the respective hydraulic motor (the cam), and thus is directly driven by
the pistons
21 and cylinders of the motor.
22
23 In the event that the surrounding structure radial extent was limited,
it might be
24 desirable to omit and/or non-symmetrically distribute some piston-
cylinder devices
25 with rollers driving the cam, and thus there may be an unequal
circumferential
26 distribution of the cylinders (and pistons) around the periphery of the
rotor. The
27 cylinders might be positioned in regions of greater space and omitted
from the other
28 regions where space is limited, or where it is desirable to locate the
mass of the
29 cylinder more to one side of the rotor than the other (e.g. clustering
towards the
30 centre of the vehicle). In the event of unacceptable bearing load
(having only a few
31 piston-cylinder units located purely on one side of the rotor, then the
cam could be
32 double sided, and opposing piston cylinder units run on each cam
surface, and the
33 pairs of opposing piston cylinder units operated such that the bearing
load of one of
34 the pair offsets the bearing load of the other of the pair, resulting in
near zero radial
35 load on the rotor.
36
37 Further example embodiments
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

. .
1
2 1. In some embodiments, to prevent fuel/oil/cooling water starvation
problems caused
3 by inversion, the prime mover and the pumps may be mounted on a gimballed
4 subframe such that the prime mover is always hanging downwards in spite
of tilting of
5 the multicopter.
6
7 2. The multicopter may transform from a multicopter in the hover format
(where thrust
8 from the rotors solely keeps the multicopter aloft) to an aeroplane
format, whereby
9 forward motion generates lift on an aerofoil either instead of, or
additional to, the
10 thrust from downwards-pointing rotors. This may be done by keeping the
constant X-
11 shape platform shown in Figure 1 and tilting forwards such that the
rotors provide
12 forwards thrust, while all the arms of the structure provide lift due to
their aerofoil
13 section, or by only two of the legs being horizontal and providing lift,
while the two
14 being vertical do not provide lift. The axis of some of the rotors may
tilt (like in the
15 MV-22 Osprey) to transition from hover to forward flight. The actuators
for such tilt
16 may derive flow from the pump.
17
18 The electronically commutated pump will provide high pressure fluid to
rotors which
19 are orientable between a first orientation which provides upward thrust
on the vehicle,
20 and a second orientation which provides forward thrust on the vehicle.
The pump may
21 also supply fluid to fixed orientation rotor or rotors which provide
forward thrust on the
22 vehicle. The reorientation action is also referred to as tilt, or
tilting.
23
24 The tilt action may require redirection of fluid via diverter valves,
for example where
25 fluid energy is primarily expended in the motor(s) of the vertical axis
rotor(s) and then
26 after the tilt the fluid energy is primarily expended in the motor(s) of
the horizontal
27 axis rotor(s).
28
29 The actuators required for the above discussed tiling actions, may be
hydraulically
30 actuated, and may be fed by and share the main hydraulic system. There
may be a
31 bleed-off from that system to supply the actuators, or there may be a
dedicated
32 service on the pump. Other actuated components which may utilise the
same
33 actuation feed or circuit, include landing gear actuators. Sharing the
main hydraulic
34 system means that some sharing and or reallocation of piston/cylinder
units may be
35 required depending on what the pressure and flow requirements are of
each
36 hydraulic component, and the nature of the service connections.
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

36
1 3. Hydraulic motors sometimes have a preferred direction of rotation. In
some
2 embodiments, some (typically half) of the rotors are driven to rotate in
the opposite
3 direction, so that their torques counteract when the multicopter is in a
'hover' state. To
4 reduce inventory and enhance re-use of spares, it is desirable to use
identical motors
on each rotor. Thus the motors may rotate in the same sense as each other but
the
6 rotors which they drive may rotate partially (e.g. half) in one sense and
the others
7 (e.g. half) in the other sense. This may be realised by pointing some of
the motor
8 shafts upwards (towards the sky) in use, and the others downwards
(towards the
9 ground) in use, or by using meshed gears on half of the rotors so that
half rotate in
the opposite direction to the motor shafts.
11
12 4. The controller may be configured (e.g. programmed) to vary the prime
mover
13 speed to provide just enough power for hovering, typically plus a
predetermined
14 margin; and to then increase (e.g. temporarily) whenever higher power is
required (or
is forecast to be required) for acceleration, climbing or manoeuvring. i.e.
there may
16 be a default prime mover speed or power output (e.g. in a hover mode),
from which
17 the prime mover speed or power output is temporarily varied before
returning to the
18 default prime mover speed.
19
5. The hydraulic motors which drive the rotors will typically contain bearings
to locate
21 the motor shaft. It may be preferable that the rotor is directly mounted
on the
22 hydraulic motor shaft, such that the thrust of the rotor is reacted
against the motor
23 bearings. In case of an axial piston motor, or bent-axis motor, the
thrust bearing on
24 the motor shaft may have a reduced rating when load is applied to pull
the shaft out
of the motor, compared to an increased rating when load is applied to push the
shaft
26 into the motors, the latter being preferred for best lifetime and
reduced risk of failure.
27 Therefore the motors may be mounted to the frame above the rotors.
28
29 Alternatively the rotor thrust may be reacted against the frame by
separate bearings
to those of the motor. The motor may then deliver a pure torque to the rotors
by
31 means of a spline or other coupling which is axially free but
torsionally stiff.
32
33 6. Conventional helicopters offer a safe mode of descent in the
emergency case that
34 the prime mover fails, in which the rotor is driven by the air flow,
acting to limit the
rate of descent (autorotation). Control of descent rate is exerted by the
pilot during
36 autorotation, by adjusting the pitch angle of the rotor blades.
37
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

. .
37
1 In the case of a multirotor using fixed displacement hydraulic motors to
drive the
2 rotors, there is no control of pitch angle because the rotor blades have
a fixed pitch.
3 Therefore, when motive power is lost and the rotors are driven by the air
in descent,
4 the motors will be turned by the rotors in the opposite direction to the
normal
5 direction, and hydraulic oil will be pumped by the motors from the low
pressure port to
6 the high pressure port. This oil will accumulate in the high pressure
line until the
7 pressure relief valve pressure is reached. This will retard the rotation
of the rotor such
8 that it stalls, and the rotor will fall through the air without rotation,
therefore failing to
9 significantly retard the descent of the aircraft, and an uncontrolled
crash will result. To
10 prevent this, and to provide a method of stabilisation of the aircraft
during such
11 emergencies, a proportional valve 47 shown in Figure 3D, may be fitted
to each
12 motor high pressure line, which allows oil to be throttled between the
high pressure
13 line of each motor and low pressure (e.g. back to the tank). By
adjusting the size of
14 the throttling orifice taking flow from each motor such that a steady
state is reached,
15 the multirotor may descend at a steady rate, the potential energy thus
absorbed as
16 heat in the oil. The flight controller may continue to stabilise the
attitude of the aircraft,
17 and may retain some control of its trajectory, by sending its commands
to each of
18 these proportional valves, instead of to the pumps. Similar differential
rotor control
19 methods to normal operation may be used to stabilise the attitude. For
instance, in
20 the case of an X-form quadcopter, to create a yaw moment, the two rotors
turning
21 clockwise may be throttled more than the two rotors turning
anticlockwise. To create
22 a pitch moment, the two forward rotors may be throttled more than the
two rear
23 motors. To create a roll moment, the two forward rotors may be throttled
more than
24 the two rear motors.
26 As has been noted, due to the shortcomings of proportional valves, the
control quality
27 will not be as good as in the normal driven mode, but may be sufficient
to make a
28 controlled landing rather than a catastrophic crash.
29
30 In the case of a multirotor using electronically commutated motors to
drive the rotors,
31 the proportional valve may be replaced with a digital (on/off) solenoid
autorotation
32 valve 47, as shown in Figure 3D (however, this image shows a fixed
displacement
33 hydraulic motor), containing a preset orifice which connects the high
pressure line
34 with low pressure when the autorotation is initiated. Variations of the
selected valve
35 may be possible, as is clear to one skilled in the art, however as
illustrated the valve
36 would in the event of power failure, fail to a position in which the
throttle connects the
37 high pressure line of each motor to the low pressure line. Control of
attitude and
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

38
1 descent rate in this case may be done by modulating the displacement of
the motors
2 under command of the flight controller such that the motors act as pumps,
pumping
3 oil across the solenoid valve orifice, producing the torque, and
therefore retarding
4 force, demanded by the flight controller. Differential torque applied to
each rotor will
produce attitude corrections as noted above.
6
7 In case of a descent by autorotation as above, heat is quickly generated
in the
8 hydraulic circuit and therefore it is advantageous if the return flow
from the throttle
9 valve is directed into the main tank such that thermal mixing may occur.
A heat
exchanger 49, as shown in Figure 3D, may be required to remove heat from the
oil in
11 this mode.
12
13 As a final safety measure, in case that a failure mode occurs which
prevents a safe
14 descent by means of autorotation (for instance, complete loss of
hydraulic fluid or a
failure of the flight controller), then a parachute may be deployed, for
instance by
16 rocket, such that the aircraft can descend at a controlled rate without
any control
17 inputs. This final parachute deployment may be trigged by an independent
controller
18 to the primary flight controller, over which it acts as a watch-dog.
Such independent
19 controller may also take other action to ensure safety, such as to
jettison the load or
fuel, to disable the pump(s), disable the engine, close fuel cutoff valves and
otherwise
21 make the aircraft descent as safe as possible.
22
23 In some embodiments, some or all of the pumps are pump-motors, i.e. they
have
24 electronically controlled high pressure valves and are controllable to
pump or motor in
alternative operating modes as described above with reference to Figure 4. At
least
26 one of these pump-motors may be connected to an accumulator. Thus, the
pump-
27 motor(s) connected to an accumulator can by operated in a pumping mode
to store
28 pressurised fluid in the accumulator and then later motored, driven by
pressurised
29 fluid from the accumulator, to provide transient additional power, to
supplement the
power output by the prime mover. This transient additional power may be useful
for
31 dealing with transient wind effects (e.g. sudden gusts of wind), or
bursts of higher
32 acceleration, more quickly than can be provided by changing the prime
mover speed.
33 In some embodiments, the transient power supplied by motoring driven by
the
34 accumulator(s) is used to temporarily provide increased power while the
prime mover
speed is increased. This is especially helpful when lifting heavy payloads,
i.e. those
36 close to the maximum weight which is carriable by the multi-rotor aerial
vehicle.
37
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

39
1 In some embodiments the controller may selectively carry out a procedure
in which
2 the rate of displacement of working fluid of one or more of the pumps is
temporarily
3 restricted, typically such that the rate of displacement of working fluid
to the
4 respective motor(s) drops below the amount required for the multi-rotor
aerial vehicle
to continue to hover, typically causing the multi-rotor aerial vehicle to lose
altitude,
6 while the prime mover speed (and therefore the speed of rotation of the
rotatable
7 shaft of the pump(s)) increases. The rate of displacement of working
fluid is then
8 increased again once the prime mover speed has reached a target speed
(which is
9 higher than the original prime mover speed). Effectively, the load on the
prime mover
is temporarily reduced by restricting the rate of displacement of working
fluid by one
11 or more of the pumps driven by the prime mover while the speed of
rotation of the
12 output shaft of the prime mover increases, and then the torque is
increased again, by
13 increasing the rate of displacement at a higher speed of rotation,
thereby providing a
14 higher power than before. This then allows the vehicle to hover again,
or climb, now
that more power is available.
16
17 In embodiments where the motors are electronically commutated motors,
changes in
18 motor torque may be implemented more quickly because the torque of the
motors
19 may be varied without waiting for the pressure in the hydraulic
connection from the
respective pump to increase.
21
22 It may be that at least two, or all of the motors, are fluidically
connected to the output
23 of an individual pump, or the combined outputs of more than one pump,
but the
24 electronically controlled valves of the said motors, are controlled to
independently
vary the displacement of the at least two, or all of the motors. Thus, a part
of the
26 hydraulic circuit connecting the output of the one or more pumps to the
input of the at
27 least two, or all of the motors may have a common pressure, with the
torque
28 generated by each of the motors independently controlled by the
controller. There
29 may be an accumulator in communication with the said part of the
hydraulic circuit (to
stabilise the pressure in the said part of the hydraulic circuit).
31
32 6. The rate of displacement from individual pumps may be controlled to
produce a set
33 flow-rate (compensating for the actual prime mover speed of rotation),
to thereby
34 control the thrust generated by the respective rotors. It may be that
the individual
motors are fixed displacement (per rotation of the rotatable shaft of the
motor), and
36 these fixed displacement motors will turn at a speed which is
proportional to the rate
37 of fluid flow to the respective motor, from the respective pump; both
the motor torque
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

. .
1 and rotor thrust will be proportional to the square of that motor speed
(the torque and
2 thrust of a rotor being proportional to the square of the speed). The
controller may
3 query stored conversion data (e.g. a look-up table) which relates a
target thrust (or a
4 variable related to thrust) to pump flow-rate, and controls the flow rate
of the
5 respective pump accordingly. In case of a sudden step demand of torque,
the rate of
6 displacement by the respective pump will suddenly increase while the
rotor inertia
7 means that the rate of displacement by the respective motor will increase
more slowly
8 - this difference accumulates in the hydraulic connector between the
respective pump
9 and motor which will cause the pressure to spike; this pressure spike
then causes the
10 rotor to quickly accelerate to the new speed.
11
12 7. Alternatively, to control the thrust of a respective rotor, the rate
of displacement of
13 hydraulic fluid by the respective rotor may be controlled using closed-
loop feedback
14 to maintain a target pressure. This target pressure will be proportional
to the target
15 rotor torque and hence the thrust. The pressure may be controlled using
feedback
16 from a pressure transducer which measures the pressure of hydraulic
fluid output by
17 the respective pump (either at the pump or in the hydraulic connector
extending to the
18 respective hydraulic motor), and a pressure-control feedback algorithm
implemented
19 by the controller. This method of control results in a slower but more
stable response
20 to changes in target thrust, because only the steady-state pressure is
made by the
21 pump; only the difference between the current pressure and the newly-
desired
22 pressure is available to accelerate the inertia of the rotor; and there
is no sudden
23 pressure spike.
24
25 8. Alternatively, to control the thrust of a respective rotor, the rate
of displacement of
26 hydraulic fluid by the respective pump may be controlled using closed-
loop feedback
27 to obtain a target rotor speed, using a rotor speed transducer. In case
of a transient
28 demand increase, the rate of displacement per rotation of the rotatable
shaft of the
29 respective pump may make a step change to a high (e.g. maximum) rate,
such that
30 the system pressure rapidly increases (e.g. to a predetermined maximum,
for
31 example until pressure limiting control acts to prevent over-pressure);
then the rate of
32 displacement by the pump returns to the desired steady-state value once
the desired
33 rotor speed is reached. Thus the acceleration to the new thrust
condition happens as
34 quickly as possible.
36 9. It may be that the rate of displacement by each pump is controlled by
flow-rate, or
37 by closed-loop motor speed control, but with a set pressure limit at the
output of the
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

41
1 respective pump, implemented either by a pressure relief valve or by
closed-loop
2 control of the rate of displacement of the pump, using a pressure
transducer which
3 measures the pressure of the hydraulic fluid output by the pump. Such a
pressure
4 limit may be reached in a transient due to the torque required to
accelerate the inertia
of the rotor rather than the steady-state torque due to the rotor
aerodynamics. It is
6 desirable not to waste energy over the relief valve, which should be kept
for safety
7 purposes in event of failure e.g. rotor entanglement or ground strike.
Therefore the
8 threshold pressure level, for the pressure relief valve or closed-loop
control, should
9 be set accordingly. This set limit may be dynamically controlled such
that when it is
known that a high pressure will be required to accelerate the inertia of the
rotor, the
11 level may accordingly, for a limited time, be set to a higher level.
12
13 10. The controller may be configured (programmed) to implement an anti-
stall
14 procedure (to avoid stalling of the prime mover) in which the torque
generated by the
pumps is limited (e.g. restricting the rate of displacement of hydraulic fluid
by the
16 pumps) in response to determining that the speed of rotation of the
prime mover
17 output shaft meets one or more stall risk criteria (e.g. that the speed
of rotation has
18 dropped below a threshold). The controller may be programmed to cause
the pumps
19 to make no net displacement of working fluid when the speed of rotation
of the output
shaft of the prime mover is below a minimum speed (e.g. by implementing only
21 inactive cycles). This avoids stalling at start-up or during a warm-up
phase (e.g.
22 when the vehicle resting on a support (e.g. on the ground)).
23
24 11. For a quadcopter, it is necessary to have independent control of the
speed of
each rotor to control all 6 axes of motion of the multicopter (pitch, roll and
yaw
26 rotation and up/down, forwards/backwards and left/right translation).
For a multicopter
27 with more rotors, e.g. an octocopter, it may be that two or more motors
are coupled to
28 the output of a single pump such that they are not independently
controllable but
29 operate together, either in fluid parallel or series configuration.
Thus, for example, 8
rotors may be controlled by 4 pump outputs, each controlling 2 motors to have
the
31 same speed or torque.
32
33 12. In some embodiments of the present invention, in response to
determining that
34 one or more prime mover failure criteria are met (e.g. if the prime
mover breaks, or
loses power) the controller operates some of the motors as pumps (driven by
the
36 rotation of the respective rotor as the vehicle descends), thereby
retarding the fall of
37 the multicopter, storing kinetic energy in the rotation of the rotors.
The hydraulic fluid
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

42
1 output by the respective motors, acting as pumps, may be used to drive
the
2 respective pumps, and there may be a sprag clutch between the output
shaft of the
3 prime mover and the common shaft to allow the common shaft to continue to
rotate
4 even after the prime mover has stopped. Once the common shaft is
rotating, other
pumps, driven in effect by the rotors, may use the received energy to drive
respective
6 motors and thereby rotors, in order to control the motion of the
multicopter. It may for
7 example, be possible to maintain control during a descent with only three
motors
8 functioning (as motors) by allowing the multicopter to yaw continuously
like a
9 sycamore tree seeds, while still providing enough thrust with the
remaining three
rotors to control the descent, although the landing maybe dangerous to the
11 multicopter itself due to its high yaw rate.
12
13 13. In some embodiments, the motors are arranged in a coaxial
arrangement, for
14 instance two motors may be arranged coaxially, e.g. on each of three or
four arms of
the vehicle.
16
17 14. Although the rotors may each be of the same dimension and/or pitch,
in some
18 embodiments, the rotors are of different (e.g. a mixture of) dimensions
and/or pitch.
19 Two rotors, aligned on the forward/backward axis, may have smaller pitch
and larger
diameter than two rotors on the left/right axis. Those aligned on the
21 forward/backward axis may be prioritised to provide the majority (or at
least 75% or at
22 least 90%) of the thrust during hover; the two rotors on the left/right
axis may be used
23 predominantly for roll stabilisation. Two rotors may have larger pitch
and smaller
24 diameter than any other rotor, and controlled to provide the majority
(or at least 75%
or at least 90%) of the thrust in forward flight. Alternatively, there could
be one central
26 rotor which provides the majority (or at least 75% or at least 90%) of
the thrust, and
27 three or more auxiliary rotors which are oriented at tilted angles to
provide counter-
28 torque.
29
Each of the dashed lines connected to controller 21 in Figures 6 & 7
represents a
31 control line, along which a signal is typically sent from the
controller, and/or signals
32 may be provided from the respective component back to the controller.
The inverter
33 50 for example may provide the controller an indication of speed, or
current along the
34 respective signal path. The dashed line around the pumps 30 represents a
single
region of control for governing all of the pumps, and the unified region or
element
36 may be a further controller, which is primarily dedicated to control of
the pumps
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

43
1 individually. The main controller 21 and the pump controller must
coordinate their
2 systems in order to properly control the overall system.
3
4 Figure 6 shows a hybrid configuration in which the prime mover 20 can be
clutched
out and idled, and even stopped, when not needed or desired (e.g. glide
descent, or
6 low noise operation). An electric machine 22 can assist the prime mover
during high
7 power demand (e.g. during vertical take-off or landing) or can provide
pump power
8 alone.
9 The electric machine can work as generator to charge a battery 58 and/or
power low
voltage 60 and high voltage 62 electric consumers when the prime mover is
providing
11 power. The clutch 54 could be a sprag (one-way, freewheel) clutch. This
allows the
12 prime mover to stop while the pump continues to rotate under power from
the electric
13 machine. Or it can be a two-way clutch which is actuated by command from
the
14 controller 21.
16 Generator 56 and primer move 20 are torque connected such that rotation
of the
17 prime mover causes rotation of the generator and production of
electricity to supply to
18 low voltage electric consumers.
19
The electric machine could rotate and start the prime mover (e.g. by slipping
the
21 clutch, which may be a fixed partially engaged / disengaged point, or by
repeatedly
22 cycling the clutch between at least partially engaged and at least
partially
23 disengaged), although the available pump power may be reduced
momentarily due to
24 the high load of both starting the prime mover and continuing to power
the pump. A
dedicated starter motor for the prime mover may be preferred to prevent such
26 interruption.
27
28 In a further hybrid configuration, as shown in Figure 7, the prime mover
is always
29 coupled to the pump, through the electric machine. A Generator powered
by the
prime mover can supply the low voltage electrical consumers.
31 The electric machine can assist the prime mover during high power demand
(vertical
32 take-off). Electric machine can work as generator to charge battery
and/or power high
33 voltage electric consumers. The electric machine could rotate and start
the prime
34 mover at the start of the flight.
36 Figure 8 simply shows the form of a standard Y-shape multi-rotor. The
six in 'Y6' is a
37 reference to the number of rotors. Each arm has a pair of rotors which
counter-rotate,
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

44
1 each rotor, or each pair of rotors, in driven by an individual hydraulic
motor. One
2 skilled in the art is familiar with the advantages yielded by such shape
and
3 arrangement of rotors.
4
Figure 9 is a vehicle arranged as a tiltrotor in a forward flight
configuration.
6
7 Figure 10 is a tiltrotor, the same as illustrated in Figure 9, but in a
vertical flight
8 configuration. As per the name, the rotors (and their immediately
adjacent structure)
9 tilt, but the wing remains in a fixed position.
11 Figure 11 is a tiltwing, shown in a vertical flight configuration. When
in a horizontal
12 flight configuration, it adopts the same appearance as the vehicle
illustrated in Figure
13 9. As per the name, the wing rotates (along with the connected rotors
and
14 immediately adjacent structure).
16 Figure 12 is a tail sitter (a type of vertical landing and/or take off
air vehicle), shown in
17 a vertical flight configuration. When in a horizontal flight
configuration, it adopts the
18 same appearance as illustrated in Figure 9. The rotors (and their
immediately
19 adjacent structure) tilt, but the wing remains in a fixed position.
21 Figure 13 is a compound helicopter, having a main rotor providing
vertical thrust, and
22 additional horizontally mounted rotors to provide forward thrust on the
vehicle. The
23 rotors, their immediately adjacent structure, and the wing remain in a
fixed position
24 for all flight configurations.
26 Figure 14 is a compound rotorcraft, shown with four vertical axis rotors
providing
27 vertical thrust, and an additional horizontal mounted rotor to provide
forward thrust on
28 the vehicle. The rotors, their immediately adjacent structure, and the
wing remain in a
29 fixed position for all flight configurations.
31 Figure 15 is an image showing banks of a rotary machine, each bank
aligned with a
32 separate eccentric portion of the crankshaft, each bank having connected
axial
33 galleries, and services connected to one side. In the illustrated
embodiment, 3 axial
34 galleries extend from the left hand bank and meet at the left hand pump
service ring /
connection, and 3 axial galleries extend from the right hand bank and meet the
right
36 hand pump service ring / connection. Each bank is galleried separately.
37
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

45
1 High payload aerial craft typically rely on large diameter rotors, where
such rotor
2 growth also increases the rotational resistance to motion. This is due to
both
3 increased rotating mass, but also increased blade area which displaces
air. This
4 increase in inertia must be taken into account in the control system,
especially in
meeting the requirement of a minimum control bandwidth to maintain overall
6 controllability of the aerial craft.
7
8 In respect of the increase in inertia, from large diameter rotors, one
option for the
9 hydraulic machine sizing is to increase the size of the hydraulic motor
and/or pump,
such that a fixed % small increase in displacement, in a larger motor, has the
effect of
11 increasing the pressure more quickly. For a larger machine, an increase
in
12 displacement demand from 20-30% will result in a greater pressure change
than for a
13 small machine.
14
A further option in relation to the increase in inertia, from large diameter
rotors, is to
16 change the pressure map (or table) in the controller, such that (in the
instance of
17 increasing the rotor speed) the controller causes the system pressure to
rise to an
18 elevated level which exceeds the steady state required pressure level of
the newly
19 demanded rotor speed. Once the new speed is achieved, the pressure may be
allowed to drop to a new level, but the elevated 'excess' pressure level is
maintained
21 as long as the blade speed is below demanded.
22
23 In contrast where a rotor speed must decrease quickly, instead of
dropping motor
24 displacement in reference to a steady-state pressure which corresponds
to the new
speed, the rotor speed may be obtained more quickly by dropping the
displacement
26 % to zero for a short period of time. Reducing motor displacement to
zero may cause
27 the pressure to increase in the delivery channels. The speed of response
of the
28 hydraulic motor may outstrip the speed with which the pump output can
decrease.
29 The rotor speed drop will occur due to friction in the drivetrain, and
wind resistance
against the rotor blades.
31
32 Figure 16 is a graph showing pressure:speed relationship, and a two-
point transition,
33 with an arrow for increase in speed transition, and a further arrow for
decrease in
34 speed transition.
36 Figure 17a is a graph of speed showing transition from point (1) to
point (2) on the
37 previous pressure/speed graph (Figure 17).
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

46
1
2 Figure 17b is a magnified view of a portion of the graph shown in Figure
18a, showing
3 detail of the demanded speed, the actual speed with the invention, and
the actual
4 speed without the invention.
6 Figure 17c is a graph of system pressure showing transition from point
(1) to point (2)
7 on the previous pressure/speed graph (Figure 17).
8
9 Figure 17d is a graph of pump controller displacement command showing
transition
from point (1) to point (2) on the previous pressure/speed graph (Figure 17).
11
12 Looking at Figures 17a/17b/17c/17d together, following the increase in
demanded
13 speed, the pump controller increases displacement to maximum (100%
saturation)
14 for a brief period, between time 1 and 1'. During this period, the
system pressure
ramps quickly to maximum set pressure, although there is a slight delay as
speed
16 change lags the change in the motor controller. Acceleration will be
near maximum.
17 Once the maximum set pressure is reached, the pump controller reduces
its
18 displacement command, to around the original level, and then gradually
increases to
19 hold pressure at maximum set pressure, causing acceleration to be at
maximum.
Once the desired speed is achieved, the pump displacement is reduced to zero
for a
21 brief period, between time 2 and 2', in order to bring the system
pressure down
22 quickly, thus avoiding speed overshoot. By setting the motor to zero
displacement, it
23 may be set to idle mode (i.e. low pressure breathing mode). The
displacement
24 demand is held at zero until a pressure is achieved (set pressure
'Ps2'), which will
hold the speed at the new higher speed. At this point, displacement command is
26 increased such as to hold the pressure at level Ps2. These transitions
and choices of
27 displacement fraction at various times are made according to respective
tables /
28 lookup maps.
29
In detail, looking at the speed response which occurs without the invention
(dotted
31 line), it reacts more slowly than with the invention taking until around
time 1' before
32 speed change starts to occur. In contrast the invention causes the speed
increase to
33 occur around 1, and between 1 and 2 to it accelerate at a higher rate,
thus reaching
34 the demanded speed sooner (time x, instead of around 5). The original
method is
subject to speed overshoot (peaking at point 3), and speed undershoot
(reaching a
36 minimum undershoot at point 4), and then later (at point 5) the actual
speed matches
37 the demanded speed. In contrast, using the invention, once the actual
speed meets
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

47
1 the demanded speed, it soon then matches the demanded speed (at time x).
2 Although one skilled in the art will recognise that this is a somewhat
idealised
3 representation, the essential advantages are clear compared to operation,
and
4 reaction to speed changes, without the invention.
6 The demanded speed levels are demanded by the flight system (for example
to climb
7 as demanded by the pilot, or for example to increase one rotor speed to
maintain
8 horizontal flight compensating for perturbation like a gust of wind). It
is the aim of the
9 motor controller, on receiving a speed demand, to meet this speed
rapidly, and
accurately.
11
12 Figure 18a is a graph of flight system demanded speed showing a drop
from point 1
13 to point 2, which corresponds on the previous pressure/speed graph
(Figure 17) of a
14 drop from point 2 to point 1.
16 Figure 18b is a graph of system pressure which corresponds on the
previous
17 pressure/speed graph (Figure 17) of a drop from point 2 to point 1.
There are two
18 motor pressures shown: PA and Pg. When PB > PA = Retarding. When PA > PB
19 Driving.
21 Figure 18c is a graph of pump controller displacement command which
corresponds
22 on the previous pressure/speed graph (Figure 17) of a drop from point 2
to point 1.
23 After time 2', the new displacement is lower than previously, because
new speed
24 requirement demand is lower.
26 In a further embodiment, negative torque could be applied to the rotor,
in order to
27 drop the rotation speed even more quickly. Looking at Figures
18a/18b/18c together,
28 following the decrease in demanded speed (starting at time 1), the pump
controller
29 sharply ramps the commanded displacement to zero. The motor pressure may
be the
pressure of a first main connected port or a second main connected port.
Pressure PA
31 sharply falls. As the pressure PA falls below the "cracking" pressure of
the over centre
32 valve ('OCV') Pilot A, the OCV closes and acts to throttle the flow.
This raises
33 pressure PB causing the motor to retard the motor. The maximum retarding
torque is
34 reacted when pressure PB reaches the maximum, as determined by the
cracking
pressure of the OCV pilot port B. Once the motor has decelerated to the new
36 demanded speed at 2', the pump flow rises to match the consumption of
the motor,
37 and the pressure PA becomes higher causing the OCV to cease throttling
the flow.
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

1
2 As a supplement in a combined simultaneous electric and hydraulic mode,
or instead
3 of the ability of the hydraulic motors to enter a pumping mode, there may
be electrical
4 motor driven rotor or rotors, which can reverse torque. These electric
motors may
drive the same, or separate rotors from those driven by the hydraulic motors.
The
6 electric motors may be used to decelerate the rotors driven by the
hydraulic motors,
7 then be used to accelerate the rotors in a reverse direction. During this
deceleration
8 acceleration phase, the hydraulic motors may be idled or enter a low
power mode. It
9 may be that the electric motors are better suited to torque reversal and
to
regeneration and thus rotor torque reversal required for aerial vehicle
manoeuvres
11 may be reserved wholly or in part for the electric motors. The electric
motors may be
12 used to drive the corresponding rotor or rotors during normal operation,
or may be
13 used during periods of high manoeuvrability requirements, potentially to
boost total
14 power, possibly in the event of failure of a rotor drive component, and
or to
temporarily or ordinarily raise the bandwidth of control of the aerial
vehicle.
16
17 In some embodiments, there is redundancy of some or all of the motors,
rotors,
18 pumps, hoses and prime mover.
19
For example, there may be multiple groups, each comprising a plurality of
pumps
21 which direct fluid to a common hydraulic connection which is connected
in turn to
22 one, or a plurality of hydraulic motors. Thus, there is redundancy of
pumps (and
23 optionally motors) enabling one to take over if another fails. There
could be check
24 valves between the hydraulic connections so there is no leakage between
them.
26 It may be that for some or all of the rotors, there is a second backup
drive
27 mechanism, for use in the event of a failure of the motor which is
coupled to the rotor
28 to drive the rotor during normal use (the first rotor). For example, a
gear train could
29 be provided which through which a motor (the second motor) which
primarily drives a
second rotor might selectively supplement or take over driving of a first
rotor, e.g. in
31 the event of failure of its respective motor (the first motor).
32
33 The plurality of pumps may comprise a further pump which, in a normal
operating
34 mode, does not drive a first motor but which, in the event of a failure
of the pump
which drives the first motor during normal operation, is controlled to supply
hydraulic
36 fluid to the first motor. The further pump may be unused during normal
operation or
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

49
1 may be used to drive a different motor during normal operation (but
typically
2 prioritising the first motor in the event of failure of the shaft driven
pump).
3
4 In some embodiments, there is both a prime mover and a secondary mover,
which
typically has a lower maximum power output, both of which are coupled to the
pumps.
6 It may be that both the prime mover and the secondary mover operate
concurrently to
7 drive the pumps during normal operation. In the event of failure of the
prime mover,
8 the secondary mover may continue to function. Typically, the secondary
mover can,
9 for a period of time, provide sufficient power to the hydraulic system to
maintain
speed/attitude/position of the copter. Being larger capacity, the prime mover
is
11 typically capable of solely fulfilling power requirements of the
vehicle, in the event of
12 failure of the secondary mover.
13
14 Where there is a both a prime mover and secondary mover, it may be that
they are
coupled to opposite ends of a common shaft, which drives one or more or all of
the
16 pumps, therebetween. This arrangement is suitable if the prime mover and
secondary
17 mover have corresponding size and/or maximum power output and/or are not
18 designed for one to continue operate in the event of the failure of the
other.
19 Alternatively, the secondary mover may have a rotatable shaft which is
coupled to the
output shaft of the prime mover in series to one side of the plurality of
pumps.
21
22 In respect of sizing the secondary mover, possibly an internal
combustion engine, it
23 could be specified (max power, etc) such as to maintain a controlled
descent in the
24 event of failure of the primary engine with a given payload, or could
perhaps operate
in a time-limited boost regime. Such boost regime may well provide
unsustainable
26 stress to the secondary engine and is not designed for prolonged use.
This boost-
27 regime period provides sufficient time to land, or to reach a service
centre, or some
28 specified, possibly pre-set, landing location.
29
Reference numerals:
31
32 10 - Multicopter (quadcopter embodiment as illustrated in Figure 1)
33 12 - Core (containing power supply and electronically (synthetically)
commutated
34 pumps 30)
13 - Power supply (prime mover, e.g. electric generator, plus power source,
e.g.
36 battery)
37 14a,14b,14c,14d - Rotor (first, second, third, fourth)
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

. .
,
1 16a,16b,16c,16d - Electronically (synthetically) commutated motor/
housing
2 18- Low pressure connection between pumps and respective hydraulic motor
output
3 19 - Common shaft
4 20 - Prime mover
5 21 -Controller
6 22 - High pressure connection between pump 30a and hydraulic motor 40d
7 24 - High pressure connection between pump 30b and hydraulic motor 40c
8 26 - High pressure connection between pump 30c and hydraulic motor 40b
9 28 - High pressure connection between pump 30d and hydraulic motor 40a
10 30a, 30b, 30c, 30d - Electronically (synthetically) commutated pumps
(first, second,
11 third and fourth shaft-driven hydraulic machines)
12 32 - Common low pressure manifold
13 33 - Input torque demanded of the prime mover
14 34 - Output target torque or speed demand (1 per pump)
15 36 - Multicopter structural support, arm
16 38 - Accumulator
17 40a, 40b, 40c, 40d - Electronically (synthetically) commutated motors
(first, second,
18 third and fourth rotor-driving hydraulic machines)
19 45a, 45b, 45c, 45d - Overcentre Valves (OCVs) functioning as control
valves
20 46 - Check valves
21 47 - Autorotation solenoid valve
22 48 - Tank
23 49 - Heat exchanger
24 50 - Inverter
25 52 - Electric machine
26 54 - Clutch
27 56 - Generator
28 58 - Battery
29 60 - To low voltage electric consumers
30 62 - To high voltage electric consumers100 - Cylinders
31 102- Cylinder working volumes
32 106 - Pistons
33 108- Rotatable shaft
34 110 - Eccentric cam
35 112- Shaft position and speed sensor
36 114 - Signal line
37 116 - Machine controller
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

. .
51 1 118- Low pressure valves
2 120- Low pressure hydraulic fluid line
3 122- High pressure hydraulic fluid line
4 124- Low pressure valve control line
126- High pressure valves
6 128- Pressure relief valve
7 132- HPV control line
8 150 - Processor
9 152 - Bus
154 - Memory
11 156 - Operating program
12 158- Electronic interface
13 160 - Rotor speed signal
14 162 - Rotor speed sensors
164- Rotation speed signal (from gyroscope)
16 166 - 3-axis gyroscope
17 168 - Acceleration signals
18 170 - 3-axis accelerometer
19 172- Magnetic field strength measurements
174- Magnetometer
21 176/178- Speed of rotation and/or position signals
22 180- Longitude, latitude and altitude data
23 182- Global navigation satellite system receiver
24 184- Current power output signal
186- Battery reserve signal
26 188- Control instructions
27 190 - Wireless communications interface
28 200 - Valve control signals
29 202 - Prime mover control signals
204 - Reporting data
31
CA 3015552 2018-08-28

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Maintenance Request Received 2024-08-27
Maintenance Fee Payment Determined Compliant 2024-08-27
Letter Sent 2023-09-01
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2023-08-28
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2023-08-28
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2023-08-28
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2023-08-28
Request for Examination Received 2023-08-28
Inactive: IPC expired 2023-01-01
Common Representative Appointed 2020-11-07
Inactive: Recording certificate (Transfer) 2020-02-18
Common Representative Appointed 2020-02-18
Inactive: Single transfer 2020-02-11
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2019-03-04
Inactive: Cover page published 2019-03-03
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-10-11
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2018-10-11
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-10-11
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-10-11
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-10-11
Inactive: IPC removed 2018-10-11
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (bilingual) 2018-09-06
Application Received - Regular National 2018-08-30

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2024-08-27

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - standard 2018-08-28
Registration of a document 2020-02-11
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2020-08-28 2020-08-17
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2021-08-30 2021-08-19
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2022-08-29 2022-08-16
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2023-08-28 2023-08-10
Request for examination - standard 2023-08-28 2023-08-28
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2024-08-28 2024-08-27
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
FLOWCOPTER LTD.
Past Owners on Record
NIALL JAMES CALDWELL
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2023-08-27 51 3,276
Claims 2023-08-27 6 413
Description 2018-08-27 51 2,311
Abstract 2018-08-27 1 24
Claims 2018-08-27 8 329
Drawings 2018-08-27 11 181
Representative drawing 2019-01-28 1 9
Confirmation of electronic submission 2024-08-26 1 62
Filing Certificate 2018-09-05 1 204
Courtesy - Certificate of Recordal (Transfer) 2020-02-17 1 374
Courtesy - Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2023-08-31 1 422
Request for examination / Amendment / response to report 2023-08-27 23 999
Maintenance fee payment 2022-08-15 1 26