Language selection

Search

Patent 3017762 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 3017762
(54) English Title: A ROTOR FOR AN ELECTRICITY GENERATOR
(54) French Title: ROTOR POUR UN GENERATEUR D'ELECTRICITE
Status: Examination
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • F03B 3/04 (2006.01)
  • F03B 3/12 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MURDOCH, PETER JOHN (Australia)
(73) Owners :
  • FREEFLOW ENERGY PTY LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • FREEFLOW ENERGY PTY LIMITED (Australia)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2016-03-16
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2016-09-22
Examination requested: 2021-03-16
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/AU2016/000091
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2016145477
(85) National Entry: 2018-09-14

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
2015900950 (Australia) 2015-03-17

Abstracts

English Abstract

A rotor (10) for a hydro-powered electricity generator. The rotor (10) includes a hub (12) and a plurality of blades (16). The hub (12) has a circular cross sectional shape and a longitudinal rotational axis (14). The plurality of blades (16) each have a proximal root (16a) and a distal tip (16b). Each of the blade roots (16a) are mounted to the hub (12) at the widest part thereof (D1). The ratio between the diameter of the tips (16b) of the blades to the diameter of the widest part (D1) of the hub (12) is less than about 2:1.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un rotor (10) pour un générateur d'électricité entraîné hydrauliquement. Le rotor (10) comprend un moyeu (12) et une pluralité de pales (16). Le moyeu (12) a une forme de section transversale circulaire et un axe de rotation longitudinal (14). La pluralité de pales (16) ont chacune une racine proximale (16a) et une pointe distale (16b). Chacune des racines de pale (16a) est montée sur le moyeu (12) au niveau de la partie la plus large de ce dernier (D1). Le rapport entre le diamètre des pointes (16b) des pales au diamètre de la partie la plus large (D1) du moyeu (12) est inférieur à environ 2:1.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


7
CLAIMS:
1. A rotor for a hydro-powered electricity generator, the rotor including:
a hub with a circular cross sectional shape and a longitudinal rotational
axis,
a plurality of blades, each having a proximal root and a distal tip, each of
the blade roots
being mounted to the hub at the widest part thereof,
wherein the ratio between the diameter of the tips of the blades to the
diameter of the
widest part of the hub is less than about 2:1.
2. The rotor as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ratio between the diameter
of the tips of the
blades to the diameter of the widest part of the hub is between about 1.2:1
and 2:1.
3. The rotor as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ratio between the diameter
of the tips of the
blades to the diameter of the widest part of the hub is about 1.5:1 or about
1.6:1.
4. The rotor as claimed in claim 1, wherein the diameter of the tips of the
blades is between
3.6 and 4.8 metres and the diameter of the widest part of the hub is 2.4
metres.
5. The rotor as claimed in claim 1, wherein the diameter of the tips of the
blades is between
30 and 32 metres and the diameter of the widest part of the hub is 20 metres.
6. The rotor as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the profile
radius of the hub
surface, in the region where each of the blade roots are mounted to the hub,
is between 1/6th of
and equal to the radius of the widest part of the hub.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 03017762 2018-09-14
WO 2016/145477 PCT/AU2016/000091
1
A ROTOR FOR AN ELECTRICITY GENERATOR
Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates to a rotor for an electricity generator.
[0002] The invention has been primarily developed for use in a rotor for a
hydro-powered
electricity generator. Such generators are used to convert kinetic energy from
flowing fluids,
such as water and wind, to electrical power.
Background of the Invention
[0003] Kinetic energy in flowing fluids, such as water and wind, is a known
alternative to
energy sources such as bio-fuels and fossil fuels for generating power.
Unlike, for example,
bio- and fossil fuels which, when used in electrical power generation, go hand-
in-hand with
emission of harmful combustion gasses into the atmosphere, generation of power
by using
flowing fluids has no or very little adverse effects on the atmosphere.
[0004] Known installations for harvesting wind power generally have low
running costs,
however they tend to be expensive to install and have relatively low
generation capacity.
Known installations for harvesting hydropower, for example tidal power, on the
other hand,
have relatively higher generation capacity.
[0005] Known hydro-powered electricity generators typically have a rotor
comprising a central
hub to which is attached two or more outwardly extending blades. The rotor is
connected by a
drive shaft to a rotary work to electrical power converter (i.e. a generator).
Fluid flowing past
the rotor blades causes it to rotate which in turn causes the rotation in the
converter and the
generation of electrical power.
[0006] Known rotors have a relatively small diameter hub and relatively long
and slender
blades. The blades also have a relatively high aspect ratio (being the ratio
of the blade length to
the blade width). Such blades are prone to high operating loads and subject to
extreme bending
moments in turbulent fluid flow. This typically results in broken blades.

CA 03017762 2018-09-14
WO 2016/145477 PCT/AU2016/000091
2
Object of the Invention
[0007] It is an object of the present invention to substantially overcome, or
at least ameliorate,
the above disadvantage.
Summary of the Invention
[0008] In a first aspect, the present invention provides a rotor for a hydro-
powered electricity
generator, the rotor including:
a hub with a circular cross sectional shape and a longitudinal rotational
axis,
a plurality of blades, each having a proximal root and a distal tip, each of
the blade roots
being mounted to the hub at the widest part thereof,
wherein the ratio between the diameter of the tips of the blades to the
diameter of the
widest part of the hub is less than about 2:1.
[0009] Preferably, the ratio between the diameter of the tips of the blades to
the diameter of the
widest part of the hub is between about 1.2:1 and 2:1.
[0010] Preferably, the ratio between the diameter of the tips of the blades to
the diameter of the
widest part of the hub is about 1.5:1 or 1.6:1.
[0011] In one embodiment, the diameter of the tips of the blades is between
3.6 and 4.8 metres
and the diameter of the widest part of the hub is 2.4 metres.
[0012] In another embodiment, the diameter of the tips of the blades is
between 30 and 32
metres and the diameter of the widest part of the hub is 20 metres.
[0013] The profile radius of the hub surface, in the region where each of the
blade roots are
mounted to the hub, is preferably between 1/6th of and equal to the radius of
the widest part of
the hub.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0014] Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of
examples
only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

CA 03017762 2018-09-14
WO 2016/145477 PCT/AU2016/000091
3
[0015] Fig. 1 is a front view of a first embodiment of a rotor;
[0016] Fig. 2 is a perspective view of the rotor shown in Fig. 1 with stream
lines; and
[0017] Fig. 3 is cross sectional side view of a hydro-powered electricity
generator with a second
embodiment of a rotor.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
[0018] Figs. 1 and 2 show a rotor 10 for a hydro-powered electricity generator
suitable for
installation in a tidal flow environment. The rotor 10 includes a hub 12 with
a circular cross
sectional shape and a longitudinal rotational axis 14. The rotor 10 also
includes 7 equiangularly
spaced apart blades 16. The hub 10 is formed from glass reinfornced plastic
(GRP) or metal
skins and the blades 16 are formed from carbon fibre metal composites.
[0019] Each of the blades 16 has a proximal root 16a and distal tip 16b. Each
of the blades 16
are mounted to the hub 14, at their roots 16a, at the widest part of the hub
14. The diameter of
the widest part of the hub 14 is shown as diameter Dl. The diameter of the
tips 16b of the
blades 16 is shown as diameter D2. In the embodiment shown, the ratio between
diameters
D2:D1 is about 1.4:1.
[0020] Fig. 2 shows the rotor 10 relative to fluid flow stream lines 18 which
demonstrate that as
the fluid flows around the hub 12 its velocity increases. As the fluid
accelerates and the local
velocity increases, the local pressure decreases. This pressure reduction
causes the fluid to
remain concentrated around the hub 12. As a result, the energy in a free
stream of the fluid is
concentrated in the region of the blades 16.
[0021] Another way of describing the above D2:D1 ratio is that the diameter of
the hub 12 is
relatively large compared to the length of the blades 16. The relatively large
hub diameter D1
advantageously serves the dual function of: 1. concentrating the energy in the
passing water
stream; and 2 supporting a relatively greater number of smaller and stronger
blades 16, which
each have a lower aspect ratio.
[0022] In relation to the latter issue, the bending moment at the root is a
function of the aspect
ratio of the blade. For example, a blade with an aspect ratio of 8:1 will have
a stress value in the

CA 03017762 2018-09-14
WO 2016/145477 PCT/AU2016/000091
4
root that is 16 times higher than the same blade with an aspect ratio of 4:1.
In a known 3-blade
rotor with a relatively small diameter hub, the blades can only have a limited
chord length at the
root due to the diameter restriction of the hub. This restriction of chord
length means that the
blade root thickness must be increased, to provide sufficient strength, over
that otherwise
required for an ideal foil section.
[0023] A relatively longer blade mounted to a relatively smaller hub also
results in a lower
apparent velocity for a given RPM and a lower torque radius.
[0024] A thicker root, especially in the lower 1/3rd of the blade, combined
with the lower
apparent velocity and the lower torque radius, results in a lowered
contribution to the total
power of such a (known) 3-blade rotor. This is due to the fact that the outer
1/3rd of the blade in
the smaller hub/larger 3-blade configuration does 63% of the work. This is a
combination of the
swept area of the outer 30% of the blade, which constitutes 56% of the total
surface area, and
the inner 30% of the blade producing negligible power.
[0025] In contrast, the configuration of the rotor 10 (i.e. relatively larger
hub 14, relatively
shorter blades 16, relatively large number of blades 16) redirects and
concentrates the fluid flow
in the inner 2/3 region and accelerates it through the outer 1/3rd region
where 100% of the power
can be extracted. This advantageously means that the blades 16 are operating
at maximum
capacity, while also experiencing a lower stress loading.
[0026] Put another way, the D2:D1 ratio of the rotor 10 places the blades 16
in a zone of
acceleration around the hub 12 with an ideal blade length for the blades 16 to
operate in that
zone. If the blades are too long relative to the hub diameter then the blades
tips instead operate
in a region with no fluid acceleration and therefore do not contribute
positive torque.
[0027] Fig. 3 shows a hydro-powered electricity generator 30 with a second
embodiment of
rotor 32. The rotor 32 has a hub 34 and ten blades 36. Fig. 3 also shows blade
root mounting
beams 38, a blade mounting hub 40, a fixed main spindle 42, a drive shaft 44,
a gear box 46, a
support beam 48, a water seal 50, bearings 52 and a rotary electrical
generator 54. The beam 48
is used to connect the generator 30 to a floating deployment rig (not shown).
[0028] Also shown on Fig. 3 is radius R, being the profile radius hub 34 in
the region where the
hub 34 and the blades 36 are connected. In the preferred configuration shown,
the radius R is

CA 03017762 2018-09-14
WO 2016/145477 PCT/AU2016/000091
1/6 the radius of the hub 34. This particular ratio maximises flow
acceleration while avoiding
turbulence.
[0029] One preferred form of the generator 30 has the following
specifications:
Hub diameter Dl: 2.4 meters
Blade tip diameter D2: 4.8 to 3.6 meters
Power generation range: 50 to 300 kWs
Flow velocity range: 1.2 to 4.2 m/sec
Blade tip diameter to hub diameter ratio: 2:1 to 1.5:1
[0030] Another preferred form of the generator 30 has the following
specifications:
Hub diameter Dl: 20 meters
Blade tip diameter D2: 32 to 30 meters
Power generation range: 0.5 to 5 MWs
Flow velocity range: 1.2 to 4.0 m/sec
Blade tip diameter to hub diameter ratio: 1.6:1 to 1.5:1
[0031] There are several advantages for hydro-powered generators due to the
(relatively larger)
diameter hub to (relatively smaller) diameter blade ratios described above.
[0032] Firstly, the energy in the fluid stream is concentrated and accelerated
across a set of
small blades, which improves the efficiency of the rotor.
[0033] Secondly, the total volume of the multiple (e.g. 7) smaller blades is
less than the volume
of a small number of (e.g. 3) large blades, which lowers manufacturing cost.
[0034] Thirdly, the smaller blades have a lower aspect ratio, which equates to
a lower bending
moment in the blade root, and a lower probability of blade breakage.
[0035] Fourthly, the incident velocity and the incident angle of the flow onto
the smaller blades
is closer to a uniform value across the span of the blades. This equates to
near zero twist in the
blade across its span, and allows the blades to be articulated in pitch
control without any
performance losses induced by blade twist. Further, the ability to adjust the
pitch during
operation means the rotor can be run at a constant rpm independent of the flow
stream velocity.

CA 03017762 2018-09-14
WO 2016/145477 PCT/AU2016/000091
6
This allows the generator to be run at a constant rpm connected directly to
the electrical grid
thereby negating the cost of an electrical frequency inverter drive system.
[0036] Fifthly, rotors operating in fast flowing tidal flows are subject to
high levels of
turbulence in the stream. The action of the flow acceleration of the water
around the larger hub
reduces the level of turbulence into the blade region. This improves the
survivability of the
blades in highly turbulence environments.
[0037] Although the invention has been described with reference to preferred
embodiments, it
will be appreciated by person skilled in the art that the invention may be
embodied in other
forms.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Ack. of Reinst. (Due Care Not Required): Corr. Sent 2024-05-21
Amendment Received - Response to Examiner's Requisition 2024-05-14
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2024-05-14
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2024-05-14
Reinstatement Request Received 2024-05-14
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to an Examiner's Requisition 2023-05-16
Inactive: Report - No QC 2023-01-16
Examiner's Report 2023-01-16
Amendment Received - Response to Examiner's Requisition 2022-10-20
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2022-10-20
Examiner's Report 2022-06-21
Inactive: Report - No QC 2022-06-09
Inactive: Recording certificate (Transfer) 2021-10-25
Inactive: Recording certificate (Transfer) 2021-10-25
Inactive: Single transfer 2021-10-06
Letter Sent 2021-04-06
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2021-03-16
Request for Examination Received 2021-03-16
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2021-03-16
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2021-03-16
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2021-03-16
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2021-03-16
Common Representative Appointed 2020-11-07
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Letter Sent 2019-09-19
Letter Sent 2019-09-19
Letter Sent 2019-09-19
Letter Sent 2019-09-19
Inactive: Single transfer 2019-09-10
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2018-10-01
Inactive: Cover page published 2018-09-25
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2018-09-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-09-20
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-09-20
Application Received - PCT 2018-09-20
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2018-09-14
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2016-09-22

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2024-05-14
2023-05-16

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2024-03-04

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2018-09-14
Reinstatement (national entry) 2018-09-14
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2018-03-16 2018-09-14
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2019-03-18 2019-03-11
Registration of a document 2019-09-10
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2020-03-16 2020-03-09
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2021-03-16 2021-03-12
Request for examination - standard 2021-03-16 2021-03-16
Registration of a document 2021-10-06
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2022-03-16 2022-03-10
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2023-03-16 2023-03-03
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 2024-03-18 2024-03-04
Reinstatement 2024-05-16 2024-05-14
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
FREEFLOW ENERGY PTY LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
PETER JOHN MURDOCH
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2024-05-14 6 340
Claims 2024-05-14 2 118
Abstract 2018-09-14 1 58
Claims 2018-09-14 1 30
Description 2018-09-14 6 237
Drawings 2018-09-14 3 75
Representative drawing 2018-09-14 1 18
Cover Page 2018-09-25 2 40
Claims 2021-03-16 2 92
Claims 2022-10-20 2 100
Maintenance fee payment 2024-03-04 2 63
Reinstatement / Amendment / response to report 2024-05-14 18 958
Courtesy - Acknowledgment of Reinstatement (Request for Examination (Due Care not Required)) 2024-05-21 1 410
Notice of National Entry 2018-10-01 1 194
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2019-09-19 1 105
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2019-09-19 1 105
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2019-09-19 1 105
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2019-09-19 1 105
Courtesy - Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2021-04-06 1 425
Courtesy - Certificate of Recordal (Transfer) 2021-10-25 1 398
Courtesy - Certificate of Recordal (Transfer) 2021-10-25 1 398
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R86(2)) 2023-07-25 1 565
National entry request 2018-09-14 4 129
International search report 2018-09-14 11 345
Maintenance fee payment 2020-03-09 1 27
Maintenance fee payment 2021-03-12 1 27
Request for examination / Amendment / response to report 2021-03-16 7 278
Amendment / response to report 2021-03-16 5 169
Examiner requisition 2022-06-21 7 310
Amendment / response to report 2022-10-20 16 782
Examiner requisition 2023-01-16 9 488