Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
1
GAIT EVALUATION APPARATUS, GAIT TRAINING SYSTEM, AND GAIT
EVALUATION METHOD
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
I. Field of the Invention
[0001] The
present invention relates to a gait evaluation apparatus, a gait training
system, and a gait evaluation method.
2. Description of Related Art
[0002] In
order to avoid falls or collisions by oneself or third parties, there is
known a technique of attaching an articulated structure for detecting a
movement state to a
target person to detect the start of falling (for example, refer to Japanese
Unexamined
Patent Application Publication No. 2010-022439 (JP 2010-022439 A)).
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0003] In a
case where a patient suffering from paralysis in the leg does gait
training as a rehabilitation, the patient will not be trained in a case where
a gait training
apparatus predicts a fall at the start of gait motion of the patient and
performs an avoidance
operation. For example, in a case where a paralyzed patient is made to do gait
training
while continuing the gait a plurality of cycles with the degree of freedom in
the gait motion
within a range in which the paralyzed patient does not completely fall down,
the
determination of an abnormal gait is very difficult unlike in the case of
predicting a fall.
For example, the gait of a paralyzed patient varies according to the disease.
In addition,
even in a case where the motion amount of a part involved in gait is similar
to that of a
healthy person, the gait of the paralyzed patient is often evaluated as an
abnormal gait as
observed as a whole.
[0004] The
invention provides a gait evaluation apparatus, a gait training system,
and a gait evaluation method for accurately evaluating an abnormal gait in
gait training of
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
2
a paralyzed patient suffering from paralysis in the leg.
[0005] A
first aspect of the invention relates to a gait evaluation apparatus. The
gait evaluation apparatus evaluates a training gait of a paralyzed patient
suffering from
paralysis in a leg. The gait evaluation apparatus includes an acquisition unit
and an
evaluation unit. The acquisition unit is configured to acquire a plurality of
motion
amounts of a paralyzed body portion, which includes an affected leg that is a
leg suffering
from paralysis, according to a gait motion. The evaluation unit is configured
to evaluate
that the gait motion is an abnormal gait in a case where at least one of the
motion amounts
acquired by the acquisition unit meets any one of a plurality of abnormal gait
criteria set in
advance. The abnormal gait criteria include at least two or more first
criteria, which are
criteria relevant to motion amounts of different parts of the paralyzed body
portion, or at
least two or more second criteria, which are criteria relevant to motion
amounts of the
same part of the paralyzed body portion in different directions. According to
the first
aspect of the invention, the motion amount is determined for a plurality of
different types
of abnormal gait criteria described above, and the gait motion is evaluated as
an abnormal
gait in a case where the motion amount meets any one of the abnormal gait
criteria.
Therefore, for various gaits of a paralyzed patient who does gait training
while continuing
the gait a plurality of cycles with the degree of freedom in the gait motion,
any abnormal
gait can be correctly evaluated.
[0006] In the gait
evaluation apparatus according to the first aspect of the
invention, the paralyzed patient may be a hemiplegic patient suffering from
paralysis in
one leg. The evaluation unit may evaluate the abnormal gait for at least one
of each step
of the affected leg or one cycle including one step of the affected leg and
one step of a
healthy leg not suffering from paralysis. According to the first aspect of the
invention,
the patient or the assistant can be notified of the situation in more real
time by performing
the evaluation in the cycle described above. In addition, the control of
auxiliary operation
or the like in the gait training apparatus can be successively changed as
needed.
[0007] In
the gait evaluation apparatus according to the first aspect of the
invention, the first criteria may be selected from a criterion relevant to a
motion amount of
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
3
a trunk, a criterion relevant to a motion amount of a knee joint, and a
criterion relevant to a
motion amount of a foot portion from an ankle. According to the first aspect
of the
invention, more appropriate gait evaluation can be performed by performing the
selection
as described above.
100081 In the gait
evaluation apparatus according to the first aspect of the
invention, the second criteria may include a criterion relevant to a motion
amount of the
trunk in a gait direction and a criterion relevant to a motion amount of the
trunk in an
orthogonal direction perpendicular to the gait direction. According to the
first aspect of
the invention, more appropriate gait evaluation can be performed by the
combination
described above.
[0009] In
the gait evaluation apparatus according to the first aspect of the
invention, the abnormal gait criteria may be set to different criteria in a
swing phase and a
stance phase of the affected leg. According to the first aspect of the
invention, the gait
evaluation can be performed more accurately by performing the setting as
described above.
[0010] A second aspect
of the invention relates to a gait training system including
the gait evaluation apparatus described above and a gait assistance device.
The gait
assistance device is attached to the affected leg. The gait assistance device
has a plurality
of sensors configured to acquire the motion amounts according to the gait
motion.
According to the second aspect of the invention, since the gait assistance
device attached to
the affected leg includes the sensors configured to acquire the motion
amounts, the motion
amount according to a gait motion can be acquired more directly.
[0011] The
gait training system according to the second aspect of the invention
may further include a treadmill and a falling prevention device. The treadmill
serves as a
gait surface on which the paralyzed patient walks. The falling prevention
device is
configured to prevent the paralyzed patient from falling on the treadmill. The
evaluation
unit may evaluate the abnormal gait for a trial in which the paralyzed patient
continuously
walks on the treadmill. According to the second aspect of the invention, the
gait
evaluation can be appropriately performed for the continuous gait training by
adopting the
configuration described above.
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
4
[0012] The
gait training system according to the second aspect of the invention
may further include a presentation unit configured to present information
regarding an
evaluation of the evaluation unit. According to the second aspect of the
invention, since
the patient can check the presentation of the information by the presentation
unit, the
patient can also try to change his or her gait during the course of a series
of trainings.
[0013] In
the gait training system according to the second aspect of the invention,
the presentation unit may perform a single abnormality presentation even in a
case where
each of the motion amounts meets any one of the abnormal gait criteria.
According to the
second aspect of the invention, during the training, it is possible to prevent
the patient from
being confused by performing a simpler presentation.
[0014] A
third aspect of the invention relates to a gait evaluation method for
evaluating a training gait of a paralyzed patient suffering from paralysis in
a leg. The gait
evaluation method includes: acquiring a plurality of motion amounts of a
paralyzed body
portion, which includes an affected leg that is a leg suffering from
paralysis, according to a
gait motion; and evaluating that the gait motion is an abnormal gait in a case
where at least
one of the acquired motion amounts meets any one of a plurality of abnormal
gait criteria
set in advance. The abnormal gait criteria include at least two or more first
criteria, which
are criteria relevant to motion amounts of different parts of the paralyzed
body portion, or
at least two or more second criteria, which are criteria relevant to motion
amounts of the
same part of the paralyzed body portion in different directions. According to
the third
aspect of the invention, the motion amount is determined for a plurality of
different types
of abnormal gait criteria described above, and the gait motion is evaluated as
an abnormal
gait in a case where the motion amount meets any one of the abnormal gait
criteria.
Therefore, for various gaits of a paralyzed patient, any abnormal gait can be
correctly
evaluated.
[0015]
According to the aspects of the invention, it is possible to provide a gait
evaluation apparatus and the like for accurately evaluating an abnormal gait
in gait training
of a paralyzed patient suffering from paralysis in the leg.
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016] Features, advantages, and technical and industrial
significance of
exemplary embodiments of the invention will be described below with reference
to the
accompanying drawings, in which like numerals denote like elements, and
wherein:
5 FIG. 1 is a schematic perspective view of a gait training apparatus
according to the
present embodiment;
FIG. 2 is a schematic perspective view of a gait assistance device;
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the system configuration of the gait training
apparatus;
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating the first abnormal gait criterion;
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating the second abnormal gait criterion;
FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating the third abnormal gait criterion;
FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating the fourth abnormal gait criterion;
FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating the fifth abnormal gait criterion;
FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating the sixth abnormal gait criterion;
FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating the seventh abnormal gait criterion;
FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing the processing operation of the gait training
apparatus;
FIG. 12 is a display example showing a determination result; and
FIG. 13 is a schematic perspective view of a gait training apparatus according
to a
modification example.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
[0017] Hereinafter, the invention will be described through
embodiments of the
invention.
[0018] FIG. 1 is a schematic perspective view of a gait training apparatus
100
according to the present embodiment. The gait training apparatus 100 is an
apparatus for
gait training of a trainee 900 who is a hem iplegic patient suffering from
paralysis in one
leg. The gait training apparatus 100 mainly includes a control panel 133
attached to a
frame 130 forming the entire framework, a treadmill 131 on which the trainee
900 walks,
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN20 I 704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
6
and a gait assistance device 120 attached to an affected leg that is a leg
portion on the
paralyzed side of the trainee 900.
[0019] The
frame 130 stands on the treadmill 131 installed on the floor surface.
The treadmill 131 rotates a ring-shaped belt 132 with a motor (not shown). The
treadmill
131 is a device that prompts the trainee 900 to walk. The trainee 900 who is
to do gait
training rides on the belt 132, and tries a gait motion according to the
movement of the belt
132.
[0020] The
frame 130 supports the control panel 133 in which an overall
controller 210 for controlling a motor or a sensor is housed, a training
monitor 138 (for
example, a liquid crystal panel) for presenting the progress of training and
the like to the
trainee 900, and the like. The frame 130 supports a front side pulling unit
135 in the
vicinity of the front side of the upper portion of the head of the trainee
900, a harness
pulling unit 112 in the vicinity of the upper portion of the head of the
trainee 900, and a
rear side pulling unit 137 in the vicinity of the rear side of the upper
portion of the head of
the trainee 900. The frame 130 includes a handrail 130a for the trainee 900 to
grasp.
[0021] A
camera 140 functions as an imaging unit for observing the entire body
of the trainee 900. The camera 140 is installed in the vicinity of the
training monitor 138
so as to face the trainee 900. The camera 140 includes a set of a lens and an
imaging
element having an angle of view for imaging the entire body of the trainee
900. The
imaging element is, for example, a complementary metal oxide semiconductor
(CMOS)
image sensor, and converts an optical image formed on the imaging surface into
an image
signal.
[0022] A
first end of a front side wire 134 is connected to a winding mechanism
of the front side pulling unit 135, and a second end of the front side wire
134 is connected
to the gait assistance device 120. The winding mechanism of the front side
pulling unit
135 winds or unwinds the front side wire 134 according to the movement of the
affected
leg by turning on and off a motor (not shown). A first end of a rear side wire
136 is
connected to a winding mechanism of the rear side pulling unit 137, and a
second end of
the rear side wire 136 is connected to the gait assistance device 120. The
winding
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
7
mechanism of the rear side pulling unit 137 winds or unwinds the rear side
wire 136
according to the movement of the affected leg by turning on and off a motor
(not shown).
By the cooperative operation of the front side pulling unit 135 and the rear
side pulling unit
137 described above, the load of the gait assistance device 120 is canceled so
that the load
does not become a burden on the affected leg, and furthermore, the swinging
motion of the
affected leg is assisted depending on the degree of setting.
[0023] For
example, an operator who is a training assistant sets a high assistance
level for the trainee 900 who has severe paralysis. In a case where the high
assistance
level is set, the front side pulling unit 135 winds up the front side wire 134
with a relatively
large force in accordance with the swing timing of the affected leg. As the
training
progresses and no assistance is needed, the operator sets the assistance level
to the
minimum. In a case where the assistance level is set to the minimum, the front
side
pulling unit 135 winds up the front side wire 134 with a force that cancels
the own weight
of the gait assistance device 120 in accordance with the swing timing of the
affected leg.
[0024] The gait
training apparatus 100 includes a falling prevention harness
device as a safety device having a brace 110, the harness wire 111, and the
harness pulling
unit 112 as main components. The brace 110 is a belt wrapped around the
abdomen of
the trainee 900, and is fixed to the waist by a hook and loop fastener, for
example. The
brace 110 includes a connection hook 110a for connecting a first end of the
harness wire
111 as a suspender. The trainee 900 attaches the brace 110 thereto so that the
connection
hook 110a is located at the back portion.
[0025] The
first end of the harness wire 111 is connected to the connection hook
110a of the brace 110, and the second end of the harness wire 111 is connected
to the
winding mechanism of the harness pulling unit 112. The winding mechanism of
the
harness pulling unit 112 winds or unwinds the harness wire 111 by turning on
and off a
motor (not shown). Through the configuration described above, in a case where
the
trainee 900 is about to fall down, the fall prevention harness device prevents
the falling of
the trainee 900 by winding up the harness wire 1 1 1 according to the
instruction of the
overall controller 210 that detects the movement of the trainee 900 and
supporting the
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
8
upper body of the trainee 900 with the brace 110.
[0026] The
brace 110 includes a posture sensor 217 for detecting the posture of
the trainee 900. The posture sensor 217 is, for example, a combination of a
gyro sensor
and an acceleration sensor, and outputs an inclination angle of the abdomen to
which the
brace 110 is attached with respect to the direction of gravity.
[0027] A
management monitor 139 is attached to the frame 130, and is a display
input device mainly for the monitoring and operation of the operator. The
management
monitor 139 is, for example, a liquid crystal panel, and a touch panel is
provided on the
surface of the liquid crystal panel. The management monitor 139 presents
various menu
items relevant to the training setting, various parameter values at the time
of training, a
training result, and the like.
[0028] The
gait assistance device 120 is attached to the affected leg of the trainee
900, and assists the gait of the trainee 900 by reducing the load of extension
and bending in
the knee joint of the affected leg. FIG. 2 is a schematic perspective view of
the gait
assistance device 120. The gait assistance device 120 mainly includes a
controller 121, a
plurality of frames for supporting respective parts of the affected leg, and a
load sensor 222
for detecting a load applied to the sole.
[0029] The
controller 121 includes an auxiliary controller 220 for controlling the
gait assistance device 120, and includes a motor (not shown) for generating a
driving force
for assisting extension and bending movements of the knee joint. The frames
for
supporting respective parts of the affected leg include an upper leg frame
122, a lower leg
frame 123 rotatably connected to the upper leg frame 122, a foot frame 124
rotatably
connected to the lower leg frame 123, a front side connection frame 127 for
connecting the
front side wire 134, and a rear side connection frame 128 for connecting the
rear side wire
136.
[0030] The
upper leg frame 122 and the lower leg frame 123 relatively rotate
around a hinge axis Ha shown in the diagram. The motor of the controller 121
rotates
according to the instruction of the auxiliary controller 220 to assist the
upper leg frame 122
and the lower leg frame 123 to be relatively opened or closed around the hinge
axis Ha.
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
9
An angle sensor 223 housed in the controller 121 is, for example, a rotary
encoder, and
detects an angle formed by the upper leg frame 122 and the lower leg frame 123
around the
hinge axis Ha. The lower leg frame 123 and the foot frame 124 relatively
rotate around
the hinge axis Hb shown in the diagram. The angle range of relative rotation
is adjusted
in advance by an adjustment mechanism 126.
[0031] The
front side connection frame 127 is provided so as to extend in the
right and left direction of the front side of the upper leg and be connected
to the upper leg
frame 122 at both ends. In the front side connection frame 127, a connection
hook 127a
for connecting the front side wire 134 is provided in the vicinity of the
center in the right
and left direction. The rear side connection frame 128 is provided so as to
extend in the
right and left direction of the rear side of the lower leg and be connected to
the lower leg
frame 123, which extends up and down, at both ends. In the rear side
connection frame
128, a connection hook 128a for connecting the rear side wire 136 is provided
in the
vicinity of the center in the right and left direction.
[0032] The upper leg
frame 122 includes an upper leg belt 129. The upper leg
belt 129 is a belt integrally provided in the upper leg frame, and is wrapped
around the
upper leg of the affected leg to fix the upper leg frame 122 to the upper leg.
The fixation
of the upper leg prevents the entire gait assistance device 120 from being
displaced with
respect to the leg portion of the trainee 900.
[0033] The load sensor
222 is a load sensor embedded in the foot frame 124.
The load sensor 222 detects the magnitude and distribution of the vertical
load applied to
the sole of the trainee 900. The load sensor 222 is, for example, a resistance
change
detection type load detection sheet in which electrodes are arranged in a
matrix.
[0034] The
system configuration of the gait training apparatus 100 will be
described. FIG. 3 is a system configuration diagram of the gait training
apparatus 100.
The overall controller 210 is, for example, a microprocessor unit (MPU), and
controls the
entire apparatus by executing a control program read from a system memory. A
treadmill
driving unit 211 includes a motor for rotating the belt 132 and a motor
driving circuit.
The overall controller 210 controls the rotation of the belt 132 by
transmitting a driving
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
signal to the treadmill driving unit 211. For example, the rotation speed of
the belt 132 is
adjusted according to the gait speed set by the operator.
[0035] An
operation receiver 212 receives an input operation from the trainee 900
or the operator, and transmits the operation signal to the overall controller
210. The
5 trainee
900 or the operator gives an instruction to turn on or off the power supply or
to start
training or inputs numerical values relevant to setting or selects a menu item
by operating
operation buttons provided in the device, a touch panel superimposed on the
management
monitor 139, an attached remote controller, and the like, all of which form
the operation
receiver 212.
10 [0036] A display
controller 213 receives the display signal from the overall
controller 210, generates a display screen, and displays the display screen on
the training
monitor 138 or the management monitor 139. According to the display signal,
the display
controller 213 generates a screen showing the progress of the training or a
real-time video
captured by the camera 140.
[0037] A tension
driving unit 214 includes a motor for pulling the front side wire
134 and a motor driving circuit, which form the front side pulling unit 135,
and a motor for
pulling the rear side wire 136 and a motor driving circuit, which form the
rear side pulling
unit 137. The overall controller 210 controls the winding of the front side
wire 134 and
the winding of the rear side wire 136 by transmitting a driving signal to the
tension driving
unit 214. Without being limited to the winding operation, the overall
controller 210
controls the tensile force of each wire by controlling the driving torque of
the motor. For
example, the overall controller 210 assists the swinging motion of the
affected leg by
identifying a timing, at which the affected leg switches from the stance state
to the swing
state, based on the detection result of the load sensor 222 and increasing or
decreasing the
tensile force of each wire in synchronization with the timing.
[0038] A
harness driving unit 215 includes a motor for pulling the harness wire
111 and a motor driving circuit, which form the harness pulling unit 112. The
overall
controller 210 controls the winding of the harness wire 1 1 I and the tensile
force of the
harness wire 111 by transmitting a driving signal to the harness driving unit
215. For
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
11
example, in a case where the falling of the trainee 900 is predicted, the
overall controller
210 winds up the harness wire 111 by a certain amount to prevent the trainee
900 from
falling.
[0039]
According to the instruction from the overall controller 210, an image
processor 216 performs image processing on the image signal received from the
camera
140 to generate image data. According to the instruction from the overall
controller 210,
the image processor 216 can perform image processing on the image signal
received from
the camera 140 and execute specific image analysis. For example, the image
processor
216 detects the position (stance position) of the foot of the affected leg in
contact with the
treadmill 131 by image analysis. Specifically, the stance position is
calculated, for
example, by extracting an image region in the vicinity of the distal end of
the foot frame
124 and analyzing an identification marker drawn on the belt 132 overlapping
the distal
end.
[0040] The
posture sensor 217 detects the above-described inclination angle of
the abdomen of the trainee 900 with respect to the direction of gravity, and
transmits the
detection signal to the auxiliary controller 220. The overall controller 210
calculates the
posture of the trainee 900, specifically, the inclination angle of the trunk
by using the
detection signal from the posture sensor 217. The overall controller 210 and
the posture
sensor 217 may be connected by wires or may be connected by short-range
wireless
.. communication.
[0041] The
overall controller 210 also functions as a function execution unit that
executes various kinds of control or calculations relevant to control. A gait
evaluation
unit 210a evaluates whether or not the gait motion of the trainee 900 is an
abnormal gait
using the acquired various kinds of sensor information. A training
determination unit
210b determines a training result of a series of gait training based on the
accumulated
number of abnormal gaits evaluated by the gait evaluation unit 210a. Specific
processing
will be described later.
[0042] As
described above, the gait assistance device 120 is attached to the
affected leg of the trainee 900, and the gait training apparatus 100 includes
a
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
12
communication connection IF 219 connected to the overall controller 210 in
order to send
an instruction to the gait assistance device 120 or to receive sensor
information. A
communication connection IF 229 connected to the communication connection IF
219 by
wired or wireless connection is provided in the gait assistance device 120.
The
communication connection IF 229 is connected to the auxiliary controller 220
of the gait
assistance device 120. The communication connection IFs 219, 229 are
communication
interfaces conforming to the communication standard, for example, wireless
local area
networks (LANs).
[0043] The
auxiliary controller 220 is, for example, an MPU, and controls the gait
assistance device 120 by executing a control program given from the overall
controller 210.
The state of the gait assistance device 120 is transmitted to the overall
controller 210
through the communication connection IFs 219, 229. In response to the
instruction from
the overall controller 210, the gait assistance device 120 is started or
stopped.
[0044] A
joint driving unit 221 includes a motor of the controller 121 and a motor
driving circuit. The auxiliary controller 220 transmits a driving signal to
the joint driving
unit 221 to assist the upper leg frame 122 and the lower leg frame 123 to be
relatively
opened or closed around the hinge axis Ha. By the operation described above,
the
extension operation and the bending operation of the knee are assisted, or
knee folding is
prevented.
[0045] The load sensor
222 detects the above-described magnitude and
distribution of the vertical load applied to the sole of the trainee 900, and
transmits the
detection signal to the auxiliary controller 220. The auxiliary controller 220
receives and
analyzes the detection signal to determine a swing state or a stance state,
perform
switching estimation, and the like.
[0046] The angle
sensor 223 detects the above-described angle formed by the
upper leg frame 122 and the lower leg frame 123 around the hinge axis Ha, and
transmits
the detection signal to the auxiliary controller 220. The auxiliary controller
220 receives
the detection signal, and calculates the opening angle of the knee joint.
[0047] The
gait of a patient suffering from paralysis in the leg varies depending
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN I 70463-CA
13
on a part or the extent of the disease. Accordingly, it is difficult to
evaluate an abnormal
gait, which is determined to have a higher possibility of falling, with one
criterion.
Focusing on the motion of a part of the leg, even a gait that is evaluated as
an abnormal
gait in a case where the gait is observed as a whole may be almost the same as
the motion
of normal gait. Therefore, the normal gait evaluation apparatus evaluates an
abnormal
gait as a normal gait in some cases.
[0048] In
the embodiment of the present invention, there are at least seven
classified patterns in abnormal gaits seen in hemiplegic patients. In a case
where an
abnormal gait criterion is set for each pattern, it can be seen that the gait
motion of the
trainee 900 can be evaluated as an abnormal gait in a case where the gait of
the trainee 900
meets any abnormal gait criterion. In the gait training apparatus 100
according to the
present embodiment, the gait evaluation unit 210a evaluates whether or not the
gait motion
of the trainee 900 is an abnormal gait by comparing the motion amount of each
paralyzed
body portion with each abnormal gait criterion. Hereinafter, each abnormal
gait criterion
and an abnormal gait evaluation method will be described.
[0049] FIG.
4 is a diagram illustrating the first abnormal gait criterion. FIG. 4 is
a schematic diagram in a case where a paralyzed body portion, which is the
lower body of
the affected leg side, is observed from the side with respect to the gait
direction, and shows
a trunk TL, a hip joint Hi, a thigh HL, a knee joint NJ, a lower leg CL, a
foot joint FJ, a
foot FL from the top. In the present embodiment, "leg" and "leg portion" are
used as
terms indicating the entire lower part than the hip joint 111, and "foot" and
"foot portion"
are used as terms indicating parts from the ankle to the toe.
[0050] In
order to determine whether or not the gait of the trainee 900 meets the
first abnormal gait criterion, the overall controller 210 detects, as a first
motion amount
according to the gait motion, a distance Xi along the gait direction from the
hip joint Hi to
the foot joint FJ in a case where the affected leg has finished a swing phase
and landed.
In the normal gait of a healthy leg, the point of landing after the swing
phase should be
located ahead of the hip joint RI in the gait direction. In the gait of the
affected leg, the
affected leg cannot be sufficiently moved to the front since the affected leg
cannot be
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
14
sufficiently swung. For this reason, the point of landing may be slightly
ahead of the hip
joint HJ, or may be behind the hip joint HJ.
[0051] "Less
than a reference distance Xci" is set as the first abnormal gait
criterion. In a case where the distance Xi detected in the gait motion is less
than the
reference distance Xci, determination as an abnormal gait is made. The overall
controller
210 acquires the detection signal from the load sensor 222 and the image data
from the
camera 140, and detects the distance X1 at the end of the swing phase using
the acquired
information. For example, in a case where Xi = 20 cm (20 cm forward from the
hip joint
Hi) is set, the gait evaluation unit 210a evaluates the gait motion of the
trainee 900 as an
abnormal gait in a case where the detected distance X1 is 10 cm or ¨5 cm. The
reference
distance Xci may be changed according to the physique of the trainee 900, the
degree of
progress of rehabilitation, and the like.
[0052] FIG.
5 is a diagram illustrating the second abnormal gait criterion. FIG.
5 is a schematic diagram in a case where a paralyzed body portion, which is
the lower body
of the affected leg side, is observed from the side with respect to the gait
direction, and
shows each body portion in the same manner as in FIG. 4.
[0053] In
order to determine whether or not the gait of the trainee 900 meets the
second abnormal gait criterion, the overall controller 210 detects a sole load
X2 in the
swing phase of the affected leg as a second motion amount according to the
gait motion.
In the normal gait of a healthy leg, the sole does not touch the ground in the
swing phase.
In the gait of the affected leg, there is not enough power to lift the entire
leg. For this
reason, so-called dragging gait may occur, such as pushing the leg forward
with the sole in
contact with the ground.
[0054]
"Larger than a reference load Xc2" is set as the second abnormal gait
criterion. In a case where the load X2 detected in the gait motion is larger
than the
reference load X,2, determination as an abnormal gait is made. The overall
controller 210
acquires the detection signal from the load sensor 222 and the image data from
the camera
140, and detects the load X2 in the swing phase using the acquired
information. Normally,
Xc2 = 0 is set. In the swing phase, in a case where even a slight load from
the sole is
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
detected, the gait evaluation unit 210a evaluates the gait motion of the
trainee 900 as an
abnormal gait. The gait evaluation unit 210a may allow some ground contact
according
to the degree of progress of rehabilitation or the like. For example, Xc2 =
10N may be set.
The gait evaluation unit 210a may use the accumulated load in the swing phase
as a
5 reference value.
[0055] FIG.
6 is a diagram illustrating the third abnormal gait criterion. FIG. 6
is a schematic diagram in a case where a paralyzed body portion, which is the
lower body
of the affected leg side, is observed from the side with respect to the gait
direction, and
shows each body portion in the same manner as in FIG. 4.
10 [0056] In order
to determine whether or not the gait of the trainee 900 meets the
third abnormal gait criterion, the overall controller 210 detects a bending
angle X3 of the
knee joint NJ during the stance of the affected leg as a third motion amount
according to
the gait motion. In the normal gait of a healthy leg, the knee joint NJ during
the stance
does not bend so much. In the gait of the affected leg, the knee joint NJ may
bend greatly
15 during
the stance since the power of the knee joint NJ to support the upper body is
not
sufficient. In some cases, so-called knee folding occurs.
[0057] "Less
than a reference angle Xc3" is set as the third abnormal gait criterion.
In a case where the bending angle X3 detected in the gait motion is smaller
than the
reference angle Xc3, determination as an abnormal gait is made. The overall
controller
210 acquires the detection signal from the angle sensor 223 and the image data
from the
camera 140, and detects the bending angle X3 during the stance using the
acquired
information. For example, in a case where Xc3 = 165 is set, the gait
evaluation unit 210a
evaluates the gait motion of the trainee 900 as an abnormal gait in a case
where the
detected bending angle X3 is 140 . The gait evaluation unit 210a evaluates the
gait
motion of the trainee 900 as an abnormal gait in a case where the bending
angle X3
continuously detected during the stance is less than the reference angle Xc3
at least once.
The reference angle Xc3 may be changed according to the age of the trainee
900, the degree
of progress of rehabilitation, and the like.
[0058] FIG.
7 is a diagram illustrating the fourth abnormal gait criterion. FIG. 7
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
16
is a schematic diagram in a case where a paralyzed body portion, which is the
lower body
of the affected leg side, is observed from the side with respect to the gait
direction, and
shows each body portion in the same manner as in FIG. 4.
[0059] In
order to determine whether or not the gait of the trainee 900 meets the
fourth abnormal gait criterion, the overall controller 210 detects, as a
fourth motion amount
according to the gait motion, a distance X4 along the gait direction from the
hip joint HJ to
the foot joint FJ at the time of swinging at which the affected leg switches
from the stance
phase to the swing phase. In the gait of a healthy person, the foot joint FJ
at the time of
swinging is located behind the hip joint HJ to some extent. In the gait of a
paralyzed
patient, since the weight shift of the upper body cannot be freely performed,
swinging may
be started before the foot joint FJ is sufficiently separated from the hip
joint HJ.
[0060]
"Equal to or greater than a reference distance Xc4" is set as the fourth
abnormal gait criterion. In a case where the distance X4 detected in the gait
motion is less
than the reference distance Xca, determination as an abnormal gait is made.
The overall
controller 210 acquires the detection signal from the load sensor 222 and the
image data
from the camera 140, and detects the distance X4 at the time of swinging at
which the
affected leg switches from the stance phase to the swing phase using the
acquired
information. For example, in a case where Xca = ¨20 cm (20 cm backward from
the hip
joint HJ) is set, the gait evaluation unit 210a evaluates the gait motion of
the trainee 900 as
an abnormal gait in a case where the detected distance X4 is ¨10 Crn (10 cm
backward from
the hip joint 111) or 5 cm (5 cm forward from the hip joint HJ). The reference
distance
Xe4 may be changed according to the physique of the trainee 900, the degree of
progress of
rehabilitation, and the like.
[0061] FIG.
8 is a diagram illustrating the fifth abnormal gait criterion. FIG. 8 is
a schematic diagram in a case where a paralyzed body portion, which is the
lower body of
the affected leg side, is observed from the side with respect to the gait
direction, and shows
each body portion in the same manner as in FIG. 4.
[0062] In
order to determine whether or not the gait of the trainee 900 meets the
fifth abnormal gait criterion, the overall controller 210 detects an
inclination angle X5 of
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN 170463-CA
17
the trunk TL in the forward direction during the stance of the affected leg as
a fifth motion
amount according to the gait motion. In the normal gait of a healthy person,
the trunk TL
during the stance is slightly inclined forward with respect to the vertical
line passing
through the hip joint HJ. In the gait of a paralyzed patient, in order to try
to protect the
lower body, the trunk TL may be greatly inclined forward with respect to the
vertical line
passing through the hip joint Hi.
[0063]
"Equal to or greater than a reference angle X,5" is set as the fifth abnormal
gait criterion. In a case where the inclination angle X5 in the forward
direction detected
in the gait motion is equal to or greater than the reference angle X65,
determination as an
abnormal gait is made. The overall controller 210 acquires the detection
signal from the
posture sensor 217 and the image data from the camera 140, and detects the
inclination
angle Xs during the stance using the acquired information. For example, in a
case where
X65 = 100 is set, the gait evaluation unit 210a evaluates the gait motion of
the trainee 900 as
an abnormal gait in a case where the detected inclination angle XS is 300. The
gait
evaluation unit 210a evaluates the gait motion of the trainee 900 as an
abnormal gait in a
case where the inclination angle X5 continuously detected during the stance is
equal to or
greater than the reference angle Xo at least once. The reference angle X65 may
be
changed according to the age of the trainee 900, the degree of progress of
rehabilitation,
and the like.
[0064] FIG. 9 is a
diagram illustrating the sixth abnormal gait criterion. FIG. 9
is a schematic diagram in a case where a paralyzed body portion, which is the
lower body
of the affected leg side, is observed from the front in the gait direction,
and shows each
body portion in the same manner as in FIG. 4.
[0065] In
order to determine whether or not the gait of the trainee 900 meets the
sixth abnormal gait criterion, the overall controller 210 detects an
inclination angle X6 of
the trunk TL toward the affected leg side during the stance of the affected
leg as a sixth
motion amount according to the gait motion. In the normal gait of a healthy
person, the
trunk TL during the stance is rarely shaken in the right and left direction
with respect to the
vertical line passing through the hip joint HJ. In the gait of a paralyzed
patient, the trunk
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
18
TL may be greatly inclined forward toward the affected leg side with respect
to the vertical
line passing through the hip joint Hi due to the fear of applying weight to
the affected leg
side and the like.
[0066]
"Equal to or greater than a reference angle Xc6" is set as the sixth abnormal
gait criterion. In a case where the inclination angle X6 toward the affected
leg side
detected in the gait motion is equal to or greater than the reference angle
Xc6,
determination as an abnormal gait is made. The overall controller 210 acquires
the
detection signal from the posture sensor 217 and the image data from the
camera 140, and
detects the inclination angle X6 during the stance using the acquired
information. For
example, in a case where Xc6 = 100 is set, the gait evaluation unit 210a
evaluates the gait
motion of the trainee 900 as an abnormal gait in a case where the detected
inclination angle
X6 is 20 . The gait evaluation unit 210a evaluates the gait motion of the
trainee 900 as an
abnormal gait in a case where the inclination angle X6 continuously detected
during the
stance is equal to or greater than the reference angle Xth at least once. The
reference
angle Xth may be changed according to the age of the trainee 900, the degree
of progress of
rehabilitation, and the like.
[0067] FIG.
10 is a diagram illustrating the seventh abnormal gait criterion. FIG.
10 is a schematic diagram in a case where a paralyzed body portion, which is
the lower
body of the affected leg side, is observed from the side with respect to the
gait direction,
and shows each body portion in the same manner as in FIG. 4.
[0068] In
order to determine whether or not the gait of the trainee 900 meets the
seventh abnormal gait criterion, the overall controller 210 detects an
inclination angle X7
of the trunk TL in the forward direction during the swing of the affected leg
as a seventh
motion amount according to the gait motion. In the normal gait of a healthy
person, the
trunk TL during the swing is inclined forward to some extent with respect to
the vertical
line passing through the hip joint HJ. In the gait of a paralyzed patient,
since the weight
shift of the upper body cannot be freely performed and accordingly the upper
body is bent
backward, the trunk TL may be inclined backward with respect to the vertical
line passing
through the hip joint Hi.
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
19
[0069] "Less
than a reference angle X,7" is set as the seventh abnormal gait
criterion. In a case where the inclination angle X7 in the forward direction
detected in the
gait motion is less than the reference angle Xc7, determination as an abnormal
gait is made.
The overall controller 210 acquires the detection signal from the posture
sensor 217 and
the image data from the camera 140, and detects the inclination angle X7
during the swing
using the acquired information. For example, in a case where Xe7 = ¨5 (= 5
backward)
is set, the gait evaluation unit 210a evaluates the gait motion of the trainee
900 as an
abnormal gait in a case where the detected inclination angle X7 is ¨20 . The
gait
evaluation unit 210a evaluates the gait motion of the trainee 900 as an
abnormal gait in a
case where the inclination angle X7 continuously detected during the swing is
less than the
reference angle Xc7 at least once. The reference angle Xc7 may be changed
according to
the age of the trainee 900, the degree of progress of rehabilitation, and the
like.
[0070]
Although the seven abnormal gait criteria have been described as
described above, other abnormal gait criteria may be added. In defining
abnormal gait
criteria, it is needed to define a plurality of abnormal gait criteria rather
than one abnormal
gait criterion. In this case, at least two or more abnormal gait criteria
relevant to the
motion amounts of different parts of the paralyzed body portion may be
included, or at
least two or more abnormal gait criteria relevant to the motion amount of the
same part of
the paralyzed body portion in different directions may be included.
[0071] Two or more
criteria relevant to the motion amounts of different parts may
be selected from criteria relevant to the motion amount of the trunk, criteria
relevant to the
motion amount of the knee joint, and criteria relevant to the motion amount of
the foot
portion from the ankle. In the embodiment described above, the criteria
relevant to the
motion amount of the trunk are the fifth, sixth, and seventh criteria, the
criteria relevant to
the motion amount of the knee joint are the third criterion, and the criteria
relevant to the
motion amount of the foot portion are the first, second, and fourth criteria.
In a case
where a motion amount of interest is selected as described above, it has
become obvious
through experiments that, in a case where the actual gait should be evaluated
as an
abnormal gait, the actual gait is not evaluated as an abnormal gait from one
motion amount
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN I 70463-CA
and is evaluated as an abnormal gait from another motion amount in many cases.
[0072] Two
or more criteria relevant to the motion amount of the same part of the
paralyzed body portion in different directions may include a criterion
relevant to the
motion amount of the trunk in the gait direction and a criterion relevant to
the motion
5 amount of
the trunk in an orthogonal direction perpendicular to the gait direction. In
the
embodiment described above, the relationship between any one of the fifth and
seventh
criteria and the sixth criterion corresponds thereto. Also in a case where
motion amounts
of interest are combined as described above, it has become obvious through
experiments
that, in a case where the actual gait should be evaluated as an abnormal gait,
the actual gait
10 is not
evaluated as an abnormal gait from one motion amount and is evaluated as an
abnormal gait from another motion amount in many cases.
[0073] It
can be seen that abnormal gait criteria may be set to different criteria in
the swing phase and the stance phase of the affected leg. The first criterion
and the fourth
criterion are criteria of the same part in the same direction. However, the
first criterion
15 and the
fourth criterion are focused on the time point of switching from the swing
phase to
the stance phase and the time point of switching from the stance phase to the
swing phase,
respectively. Similarly, the fifth criterion and the seventh criterion are
criteria of the same
part in the same direction. However, the fifth criterion and the seventh
criterion are
focused on the stance phase and the swing phase, respectively. Even the motion
amounts
20 of the
same part in the same direction can be evaluated as different feature amounts
of the
gait motion in a case where the observation time point can be distinguished.
[0074] The
processing operation of the gait training apparatus 100 will be
described. FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing the processing operation of the gait
training
apparatus. The flow starts at a point in time at which a series of training
programs are
activated in a case where a training menu is selected by the trainee 900 or
the operator.
[0075] In
step S101, the overall controller 210 resets a gait cycle counter n. The
overall controller 210 drives the treadmill driving unit 211 to start the
rotation of the belt
132, and drives the tension driving unit 214 and the joint driving unit 221
according to the
set adjustment value to assist the gait of the trainee 900. In a case where
the trainee 900
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
21
starts a gait motion, each motion amount according to the gait motion is
acquired in step
S102. Specifically, the image processor 216 analyzes the image signal acquired
from the
camera 140, or the detection signals from the posture sensor 217, the load
sensor 222, and
the angle sensor 223 are acquired and converted into the motion amount.
[0076] In step S103,
the overall controller 210 determines whether or not one gait
cycle has ended. Evaluation of an abnormal gait may be performed for each step
of the
affected leg. In the present embodiment, however, evaluation is performed in
one cycle
of one step of the affected leg and one step of the healthy leg subsequent to
the one step of
the affected leg. Accordingly, in a case where the overall controller 210
determines that
one gait cycle has ended, the overall controller 210 proceeds to step S104 to
execute
evaluation. In a case where the overall controller 210 determines that one
gait cycle has
not ended, the overall controller 210 returns to step S102 to continue the
acquisition of
each motion amount.
[0077] In
step S104, the gait evaluation unit 210a of the overall controller 210
evaluates an abnormal gait. Specifically, the gait evaluation unit 210a totals
the motion
amounts of respective parts in each direction and each period in the gait
motion to check
whether or not the totaled amount meets each of the abnormal gait criteria. In
a case
where the gait motion of the trainee 900 is evaluated as an abnormal gait, the
gait
evaluation unit 210a determines the gait motion of the trainee 900 as a failed
gait. In step
S105, the gait evaluation unit 210a determines whether or not the totaled
amount meets
one of the abnormal gait criteria described above. In a case where the gait
evaluation unit
210a determines that the totaled amount meets one of the abnormal gait
criteria described
above, the gait evaluation unit 210a proceeds to step S106 to substitute "0"
into an
evaluation variable En of the n-th step. The overall controller 210 displays
the fact that
the one step is a failed gait on the training monitor 138 and the management
monitor 139
through the display controller 213. In a case where the gait evaluation unit
210a
determines that the totaled amount does not meet any of the abnormal gait
criteria
described above in step S105, the gait evaluation unit 210a proceeds to step
S108 to
substitute "1" into the evaluation variable En of the n-th step. The overall
controller 210
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
22
displays the fact that the one step is successful gait on the training monitor
138 and the
management monitor 139 through the display controller 213.
[0078] In
the case of displaying the failed gait in real time during training, it is
desirable to perform simple and single display without indicating which of the
abnormal
gait criteria the gait motion of the trainee 900 meets although the invention
is not
particularly limited thereto. In the case of presenting the gait motion of the
trainee 900 as
a failed gait by simple and single display, the trainee 900 can recognize the
minimum
situation of the trainee 900 himself or herself without being confused during
the gait
training. Means for presenting whether or not the gait motion of the trainee
900 is a
failed gait is not limited to the management monitor 139, and a buzzer sound,
blinking
light, and the like can be used. Also in this case, although not particularly
limited, it is
desirable to show the sound or light to the trainee 900 in a simple and single
manner. The
management monitor 139 for presenting the fact that the gait motion of the
trainee 900 is a
failed gait as described above, a device for generating sound or light, and
the like function
as presentation units for presenting information regarding the evaluation of
the gait
evaluation unit 210a.
[0079] After
ending the failure display in step S107 or the success display in step
S109, the overall controller 210 proceeds to step S110 to increment the gait
cycle counter n.
In step S111, the overall controller 210 determines whether or not the gait
cycle counter n
has reached a gait cycle number no scheduled in a series of gait training
programs. In a
case where the overall controller 210 determines that the gait cycle counter n
has not
reached the gait cycle number no, the overall controller 210 returns to step
S102 to
continue the gait training control. In a case where the overall controller 210
determines
that the gait cycle counter n has reached the gait cycle number nO, the
overall controller
.. 210 proceeds to step S112.
[0080] In
step S112, the training determination unit 210b of the overall controller
210 totals the evaluation results in a series of gait training trials
performed continuously,
and performs determination to indicate the success degree of the gait training
trial.
Specifically, the training determination unit 210b derives a training
determination by
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
23
calculating the ratio of the number of failed gaits to the total number of
gaits of the affected
leg or by evaluating the number of fall avoiding operations by which the
harness driving
unit 215 has been operated. The overall controller 210 ends the series of
processes after
the training determination unit 210b displays the determination result on the
training
monitor 138 and the management monitor 139 through the display controller 213
in step
S113.
[0081] FIG.
12 is a display example showing a determination result on the
management monitor 139. The gait speed, the swing assist, and the knee
extension assist
are parameters that are set as levels according to the level of difficulty of
the training menu.
The gait speed is proportional to the speed at which the belt 132 of the
treadmill 131 is
rotated. In the initial stage of training, the gait speed is set to be low.
The swing assist
is proportional to the assisting force to assist the swing of the affected leg
by winding and
unwinding the front side wire 134 and the rear side wire 136. In the final
stage of training,
the front side wire 134 and the rear side wire 136 are pulled with a driving
force enough to
offset the weight of the gait assistance device 120. The knee extension assist
is
proportional to the driving torque of the joint driving unit. In a situation
in which knee
folding is likely to occur in the affected leg, assistance is steadily
performed.
[0082] Each
gait evaluation indicates the evaluation result of each gait cycle, for
example, 0 indicates success and X indicates failure. In the display example
shown in
FIG. 12, it can be seen that, in the gait cycle of seven steps in one
training, the second step
is a failure and the failure rate as a whole is 14%. The training
determination performed
by the training determination unit 210b is displayed as "A" determination, for
example.
[0083] Since
the gait training apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment
includes the harness wire 111 and the like as a falling prevention device that
prevents
falling on the treadmill 131, the trainee 900 can continue gait training even
in a case where
the trainee 900 is about to lose his or her posture. Therefore, it is possible
to
comprehensively determine the degree of normality for continuous gait needed
as a normal
gait motion.
[0084] In
particular, in a case where a patient suffering from paralysis in the leg
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN170463-CA
24
does gait training as a rehabilitation, doing the gait training with the level
of difficulty at
which gait is barely performed, that is, the level of difficulty at which the
trainee loses his
or her posture to some extent, increases the training effect (so-called
exercise learning
effect). In the related art, since a therapist checks the training situation
of a patient and
adjusts the setting of the level of difficulty of the next session, the
recovery effect of the
patient depends on the experience and intuition of the therapist. Since the
gait training
apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment can perform objective
training
determination, even a therapist with little experience can easily determine
the level of
difficulty of the next training session. Therefore, it can be expected that
the training
effect of the patient will be improved.
[0085] A
modification example of the gait training apparatus 100 will be
described. FIG. 13 is a schematic perspective view of a gait training
apparatus 100'
according to a modification example. The gait training apparatus 100' is
different from
the gait training apparatus 100 described above in that the treadmill 131 is
not provided
and the trainee 900 actually moves in the space surrounded by the frame 130.
In FIG. 13,
elements common to the gait training apparatus 100 are denoted by the same
reference
numerals, and the description thereof will be omitted.
[0086] The
gait training apparatus 100' includes a guide rail 150 for guiding the
harness pulling unit 112, the front side pulling unit 135, and the rear side
pulling unit 137.
The harness pulling unit 112, the front side pulling unit 135, and the rear
side pulling unit
137 move along the guide rail by a motor (not shown). The overall controller
210
determines the gait position of the trainee 900, and arranges the harness
pulling unit 112,
the front side pulling unit 135, and the rear side pulling unit 137 at the
optimal positions
according to the determined gait position. In the gait training apparatus 100'
configured
as described above, since the trainee 900 actually moves relative to the floor
surface, a
sense of accomplishment of rehabilitation training can be obtained more.
[0087] In
the embodiment described above, in a case where the trainee 900 does
training next time, the gait training apparatuses 100, 100' may set
parameters, such as a
swing assist level, according to the previous training determination. Since
the gait
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
TSN201704378CA00
TFN 170463-CA
training apparatus adjusts the training intensity automatically as described
above, the
burden on the operator is reduced. The gait training apparatuses 100 and 100'
may adjust
the gait speed and the like dynamically according to the evaluation of each
step during the
training. For example, in a case where the evaluation indicating an abnormal
gait
5
continues, the gait speed may be reduced. By the dynamic control described
above, the
safety of the trainee 900 can be secured, and the level of difficulty can be
adjusted
according to his or her ability.
[0088] In
the embodiment described above, an example has been described in
which the trainee 900 is a hemiplegic patient suffering from paralysis in one
of the legs.
10 However,
the gait training apparatuses 100, 100' may also be applied to a patient
suffering
from paralysis in both legs. In this case, training is performed by attaching
the gait
assistance device 120 to both legs. In this case, the evaluation of an
abnormal gait may
be performed for each of the affected legs. The degree of recovery of each
affected leg
can be individually determined by performing the evaluation of an abnormal
gait
15 independently for each affected leg.
[0089] The
embodiment described above is just an example for carrying out the
invention. Therefore, the invention is not limited thereto, and can be
appropriately
changed and executed within the scope of the invention described in the
claims.
CA 3019675 2018-10-03
