Language selection

Search

Patent 3021477 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 3021477
(54) English Title: A METHOD OF INSPECTING THE QUALITY OF BLANKS, IN PARTICULAR OF BLANKS TO BE PROCESSED INTO PACKAGING MATERIAL, AND QUALITY INSPECTION SYSTEM
(54) French Title: PROCEDE D'INSPECTION DE QUALITE DE FLANS, EN PARTICULIER DE FLANS DEVANT ETRE TRAITES EN MATERIAU D'EMBALLAGE, ET SYSTEME D'INSPECTION DE QUALITE
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G06T 7/00 (2017.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PORRET, OLIVIER (Switzerland)
  • BELLINO, MARIO (Switzerland)
  • ALONSO, JERONIMO (Switzerland)
  • TOMA, CLAUDE (Switzerland)
(73) Owners :
  • BOBST MEX SA
(71) Applicants :
  • BOBST MEX SA (Switzerland)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2022-11-08
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2017-05-11
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2017-11-16
Examination requested: 2018-10-18
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP2017/025119
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2017194201
(85) National Entry: 2018-10-18

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
16169645.5 (European Patent Office (EPO)) 2016-05-13

Abstracts

English Abstract

The invention provides a method of inspecting the quality of blanks (2n), in particular of blanks (2n) to be processed into packaging material, comprising the following steps: A carrier (1) with a plurality of blanks (2n) is supplied. Each blank (2n) is identified in accordance with its position (n) on the carrier (1), and a scanned image (Sn) of each blank (2) is obtained, and each scanned image (Sn) is compared with a reference image (Rn) associated with the specific position (n) of the blank (2n) from which the image was taken. Based on the result of the comparison, the respective blank (2n) is accepted or rejected. Furthermore, the invention provides a quality inspection system (10) comprising a digital imaging unit (12) for scanning images of blanks (2n) on a sheet (1), a unit (16) for generating individual reference images for each blank, a storage (18) for storing the individual reference images (Rn), and a comparator (20) for comparing scanned images (Sn) of a blank with the individual reference image (Rn) for this blank (2n).


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé permettant d'inspecter la qualité de flans (2n), en particulier de flans (2n) qui doivent être traités en matériau d'emballage. Ledit procédé comprend les étapes suivantes : un support (1) comprenant une pluralité de flans (2n) est fourni. Chaque flan (2n) est identifié en fonction de sa ou de ses positions sur le support (1) et une image balayée (S n) de chaque flan (2) est obtenue, puis chaque image balayée (Sn) est comparée à une image de référence (Rn) associée à la position ou aux positions spécifiques du flan (2n) à partir desquelles l'image a été prise. D'après le résultat de la comparaison, le flan respectif (2n) est accepté ou rejeté. De plus, l'invention concerne un système d'inspection de qualité (10) comprenant : une unité d'imagerie numérique (12) permettant de balayer des images de flans (2n) sur une feuille; une unité (16) permettant de générer des images de référence individuelles pour chaque flan; un dispositif de stockage (18) permettant de stocker les images de référence individuelles (Rn); et un comparateur (20) permettant de comparer les images balayées (Sn) d'un flan avec l'image de référence individuelle (Rn) pour ce flan (2n).

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


84784671
- 9 -
CLAIMS:
1. A method of inspecting the quality of blanks to be processed into packaging
material, the method comprising:
supplying a carrier with a plurality of blanks;
associating with each blank a respective mark of a plurality of marks, each
mark
associated with a respective position of the respective blank on the carrier;
obtaining a scanned image of each blank and identifying the scanned image of
each
blank in accordance with the respective mark;
comparing a first scanned image taken of a first blank at a first position on
the carrier
with a first reference image of a plurality of reference images, each
reference image
associated with a specific position on the carrier different from a position
on the
carrier of every other reference image;
comparing a second scanned image taken of a second blank at a second position
on the carrier with a second reference image of the plurality of reference
images;
and
based on a result of the comparison, accepting or rejecting the respective
blank.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising producing a preliminary reference
image based on printing data.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating the reference image in
a
learning phase by superimposing a plurality of the scanned images of produced
blanks which have a good quality.
4. The method of claim 3, further comprising using a pdf file as a master for
determining whether or not the blanks have the good quality for being used in
creating the reference image.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-09-16

84784671
- 10 -
5. The method of claim 3, further comprising using a master which is a printed
blank,
for determining whether or not the blanks have the quality for being used in
creating
the reference image.
6. The method of claim 3, wherein the learning phase is repeated in intervals.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising using the result of the
comparison for
identifying problems in the production of the blanks.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the blank comprises a printed zone.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the blank comprises a hologram.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the blank comprises an embossing.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the blank comprises a folded edge.
12. A quality inspection system comprising:
the inspection system associating a respective mark with each blank of a
plurality
of blanks of a sheet received, each mark associated with a respective position
of
the respective blank on the sheet;
.. a digital imaging unit configured to obtain a scanned image of each blank
of the
plurality of blanks on the sheet in accordance with the respective mark;
a comparator configured to compare a first scanned image taken of a first
blank at
a first position on the sheet with a first reference image of a plurality of
reference
images, each reference image associated with a specific position on the sheet
.. different from a position on the sheet of every other reference image;
the comparator configured to compare a second scanned image taken of a second
blank at a second position on the sheet with a second reference image of the
plurality of reference images; and
the inspection system configured, based on a result of the comparison, to
accept or
to reject the respective blank.
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-09-16

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


84784671
-1-
A method of inspecting the quality of blanks, in particular of blanks to be
processed into packaging material, and quality inspection system
The invention relates to a method of inspecting the quality of blanks, in
particular blanks to be processed into packaging material such as boxes or
bags,
and to a quality inspection system.
Packaging material for packaging goods are made from blanks which are first
printed and then processed, for example into a box. In the following,
reference will
be made to boxes, but the invention relates to other forms of packaging
material
as well.
Typically, a plurality of blanks is being printed on a carrier (a sheet or web
of
material from which the boxes are being made, e.g. cardboard or paper). In the
following, the term "sheet" is being used for easier reference, but it is to
be kept in
mind that this term also encompasses a carrier in the form of a web.
After being printed, the blanks are being cut from the sheet and supplied to a
processing station where they are being folded, glued or otherwise processed
so
as to obtain the desired box.
The process of printing the blanks on the sheet can comprise conventional
printing, but also the application of a foil and/or a hologram, an embossing,
a
creasing, the production of fold edges and/or incisions. All these steps
randomly
introduce certain variations and tolerances which will impact the precision
with
which the different printed features are aligned with respect to each other
(e.g. the
precision with which the edges of a hologram register with fold edges or an
applied
foil registers with embossed portions). Depending on the size of the
particular
printed features and the proximity to adjacent features, an offset potentially
smaller
than 0.1 mm can already be clearly visible for a consumer. Furthermore, it is
to be
kept in mind that an offset might change during operation of a printing
machine. As
a result, the quality of the blanks provided by a perfectly adjusted printing
machine
might change over the time.
It is known to use an inspection system which uses a reference image
(sometimes called "golden template") with which the printed sheet is being
compared. If the difference between the golden template and the printed sheet
is
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-12-11

CA 03021477 2018-10-18
WO 2017/194201
PCT/EP2017/025119
- 2 -
below a predefined threshold, the quality of the sheet is considered to be
good,
and the blanks of the respective sheet are being processed into boxes. If the
difference between the golden template and the printed sheet is above a
predefined threshold, the quality of the sheet is considered as being
insufficient,
and the sheet is discarded.
The golden template can be formed based on printing data, e.g. as a pdf image
which represents the theoretical image of the sheet with the blanks. As an
alternative, the golden template can be formed by superimposing a plurality of
sheets with printed blanks which have been judged by an operator as being of
good quality.
While the known inspection system is generally very helpful in identifying
sheets which carry blanks of insufficient quality, it has been found out that
there
are situations in which sheets are incorrectly accepted or rejected.
The object of the invention is to improve the accuracy with which a
determination between good and insufficient quality is being made.
In order to solve this object, the invention provides a method of inspecting
the
quality of blanks, in particular of blanks to be processed into packaging
material,
comprising the following steps: A carrier with a plurality of blanks is
supplied. Then,
each blank is identified in accordance with its position on the carrier, and a
scanned
image of each blank is obtained. Each image is compared with a reference image
associated with the specific position of the blank from which the image was
taken.
Based on the result of the comparison, the respective blank is accepted or
rejected.
Furthermore, the invention provides a quality inspection system which
comprises
a digital imaging unit for scanning images of blanks on a sheet, a unit for
generating
individual reference images for each blank, a storage for storing the
individual
reference images, and a comparator for comparing scanned images of a blank
with
the individual reference image for this blank.
The invention is based on the idea of comparing each individual blank on a
sheet with its own dedicated reference image. This idea is based on the
recognition
that the tolerances and process variations for the blanks are not identical
but are
different for the different positions of the blank on the sheet. Using
individual,
dedicated reference images ("golden templates") for each position of a blank
on a

84784671
- 3 -
sheet avoids a problem associated with the prior art inspection approach,
namely
a loss in sensitivity due to generating the golden template by scanning
complete
sheets. By doing so, the prior art golden template superimposes inter process
register variations and quality control degradation of the contours of printed
materials and/or foils with or without embossing for all blanks on one sheet
at the
same time.
By contrast, when the reference image is being created for each position of
the
blank on the sheet individually, only the variations occurring for the
respective
position of the blank affect the particular reference image, while the
variations
occurring for blanks at other positions on the sheet do not affect the
particular
reference image. This results in a plurality of advantages:
- Inter-
blanks register variations between informative and/or decorative
designs such as, but not limited to, variable printed zone, holograms,
embossing, creasing and printing, do not affect the reference image. This
allows a finer measurement of any deviations in print-to-process register.
- A better sharpness in the shape quality analysis of stamping foils,
embossing and creasing is being provided.
- Detection of small occlusions or missing character parts in negative text
printing from stamping is possible.
- A control and analysis of variable print is possible.
Depending on external requirements, the quality inspection can be made online
or offline.
It is possible to have the inspection system automatically identify the
different
blanks on a sheet simply based on their position on the sheet. Preferably
however,
a mark indicative of the position of the blank on the carrier is associated
with each
blank. In other words, a number or a letter is being printed adjacent each
blank.
This allows an operator to very easily identify the blank on a sheet for which
any
action is to be taken.
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-12-11

84784671
- 3a -
Some embodiments disclosed herein provide a method of inspecting the
quality of blanks to be processed into packaging material, the method
comprising:
supplying a carrier with a plurality of blanks; associating with each blank a
respective mark of a plurality of marks, each mark associated with a
respective
position of the respective blank on the carrier; obtaining a scanned image of
each
blank and identifying the scanned image of each blank in accordance with the
respective mark; comparing a first scanned image taken of a first blank at a
first
position on the carrier with a first reference image of a plurality of
reference images,
each reference image associated with a specific position on the carrier
different
from a position on the carrier of every other reference image; comparing a
second
scanned image taken of a second blank at a second position on the carrier with
a
second reference image of the plurality of reference images; and based on a
result
of the comparison, accepting or rejecting the respective blank.
Some embodiments disclosed herein provide a quality inspection system
comprising: the inspection system associating a respective mark with each
blank of
a plurality of blanks of a sheet received, each mark associated with a
respective
position of the respective blank on the sheet; a digital imaging unit
configured to
obtain a scanned image of each blank of the plurality of blanks on the sheet
in
accordance with the respective mark; a comparator configured to compare a
first
scanned image taken of a first blank at a first position on the sheet with a
first
reference image of a plurality of reference images, each reference image
associated with a specific position on the sheet different from a position on
the sheet
of every other reference image; the comparator configured to compare a second
scanned image taken of a second blank at a second position on the sheet with a
second reference image of the plurality of reference images; and the
inspection
system configured, based on a result of the comparison, to accept or to reject
the
respective blank.
Preferably, the reference image is generated in a learning phase by
superimposing a plurality of scanned images of produced blanks which have a
good
quality. Thus, it is ensured that the reference image generated for each
Date Recue/Date Received 2021-09-16

CA 03021477 2018-10-18
WO 2017/194201
PCT/EP2017/025119
- 4 -
specific blank on the sheet "comprises" the tolerances and variations which
are
inherently associated with this position only, thereby creating a reference
image
which is unique for each position of the blank on the sheet.
According to an embodiment of the invention, a preliminary reference image
("master") is based on printing data. In other words, the preliminary
reference
image corresponds to image data which is being used for the printing process.
Thus, the preliminary reference image is the image of a printed blank which
does
not have any of the tolerances or variations inevitably associated with the
printing
process. This type of reference image can in particular be used in an early
learning
step in which the inspection system collects image data for creating the
reference
images individualized for each position of the blank on the sheet.
As an alternative, an operator decides which blanks are being used for
creating
the individual reference images. This allows making a decision whether or not
the
color of the blanks corresponds to the intended color.
Preferably, the learning phase is being repeated in intervals. In view of the
fact
that the tolerances and variations which occur during the printing process
change
during production of the blanks, it is advantageous to "update" the reference
image
from time to time.
According to an embodiment of the invention, the result of the comparison is
being used for statistical evaluations and/or for identifying problems in the
production of the blanks. The inspection system can thereby monitor if there
is a
specific blank for which the printing quality is significantly below average
so that
an operator can appropriately intervene.
The blanks can comprise different printed features, for example a printed
zone,
a hologram, an embossing and/or a fold edge. The inspection system and the
inspection method allow precisely assessing whether or not these features are
correctly aligned with respect to each other.
The invention will now be described with reference to the enclosed drawings.
In the drawings,
- Figure 1 schematically shows a quality inspection system according to the
invention for performing the inspection method according to the invention;

CA 03021477 2018-10-18
WO 2017/194201
PCT/EP2017/025119
-5-
- Figure 2 schematically shows a top view of a sheet which comprises a
plurality of printed blanks;
- Figure 3
schematically shows in a superimposed manner scanned images
of a printed exemplary feature for a blank on a first position on the sheet;
- Figure 4
schematically shows the reference image for the blanks on the first
position on the sheet;
- Figure 5 schematically shows in a superimposed manner the scanned
images of a printed exemplary feature for a blank on a second position on
the sheet; and
- Figure 6 schematically shows the reference image for the blanks on the
second position on the sheet;
In Figure 1, a printed carrier or sheet 1 can be seen which is supplied to a
schematically shown quality inspection system 10.
The printed sheet 1 comprises a plurality of blanks 2 which later are to be
processed into packaging material. Here, it is boxes but it could be bags or
other
items as well. The sheet 1 is formed from the material of the boxes to be
produced
later, e.g. from cardboard, paper or a similar suitable material.
Even though the sheet is here shown as comprising a specific length, it can be
an "endless" web as well.
Each blank comprises a plurality of printed features. "Printed features" are
in a
first instance conventional printed portions, but can also be an applied foil
or an
applied hologram. Further, the printed feature can be varnish, an embossing, a
creasing, a fold edges and/or incisions.
By way of example, each of the printed blanks comprises a plurality of fold
edges 3, incisions 4, a rectangular print 5 and a triangular hologram 6
applied
within the rectangular print 5.
It is important to note that each of the blanks 1 is associated with an
identification which here is a number. In the embodiment shown, there are
twelve
blanks 2 on each sheet 1, which are numbered consecutively from 1 to 12. Thus,
the blanks can be designated as blanks 21, 22, ... 212.

CA 03021477 2018-10-18
WO 2017/194201
PCT/EP2017/025119
- 6 -
In order to obtain a box having the desired quality, it is important that the
various
printed features are correctly aligned with respect to each other. This is in
particular
of importance for printed features which are arranged very close to other
features.
As an example, should a print be misaligned with respect to a closely adjacent
edge of a box, even small misalignments potentially of 0.1 mm are visible for
a
consumer.
The quality inspection system 10 allows determining whether or not the printed
blanks 21, 22, ... 212 can be accepted or have to be discarded in case the
quality of
the print is not sufficient. To this end, the quality inspection system 10
comprises
a digital imaging unit 12 for scanning images Sn of the blanks 21, 22, ... 212
on sheet
1. The digital imaging unit 12 can be a camera, in particular a line camera or
a 2D
camera (area camera).
Further, the quality inspection system comprises a control 14 in which a unit
16
for generating individual reference images Rn for each blank 2, a storage 18
for
storing the individual reference images Rn and a comparator 20 for comparing
scanned images Sn of a blank 2n with the individual reference image Rn for
this
blank are implemented.
In a first step for setting up the quality inspection system 10, a preliminary
reference image ("master") for each of the blanks is being stored in the
storage 18.
This preliminary reference image can be obtained based on printing data. Thus,
it
can be a pdf file with the image of a complete, perfect blank 2
An alternative way of obtaining the master is to run the machine and have it
scan a printed blank 2 which was considered by the operator as being of good
quality. The advantage of using a master which was "approved" by an operator
is
that an operator is able to take into account, when making the assessment
whether
or not the printed blank should be used as the master, if the color is as it
should
be.
A key feature of the quality inspection system 10 is that, in a fully
operative
condition, storage 18 contains an individual reference image Rn for each of
the
blanks 2n which can be found on sheet 1. In the example shown in the drawings,
storage 18 thus contains twelve reference images R1, R2, R12 for the
blanks 21,
22, ... 212.

CA 03021477 2018-10-18
WO 2017/194201
PCT/EP2017/025119
- 7 -
These individual reference images R1, R2, ... R12 are being created by
scanning, in a learning phase of the system, a predefined number of sheets 1
with
printed blanks 2-, 22, ... 212 of good quality, and by superimposing the
scanned
images Si, S2, ... S12 of the individual blanks 21, 22, ... 212. As an
example, for
creating reference image Ri, for blank 2 carrying identification number 1,
twenty
scanned images Si of blank 21 are superimposed, and the resulting image is
stored
as individual reference image Ri for this blank 21 in storage 18. In the same
manner, the individual reference images R2 to R12 for the remaining blanks 22
to
212 are being created and stored.
Figure 3 schematically shows a portion of three scanned images of blank 21,
namely the portion with the triangular hologram 6 of Figure 2. A first image
shown
in a continuous line represents the hologram 6 in the "perfect" position, a
second
image shown in a dashed lined represents the hologram 6 displaced to the
right,
and a third image shown in a chain dotted line represents the hologram 6
rotated
in a counter-clockwise direction.
Figure 4 shows an exemplary reference image Ri created by superimposing
the scanned images of Figure 3 and stored in storage 18 for the blank 21. The
marked area between the outer lines of the triangle indicates the area within
which
the contour of a scanned hologram of a supplied printed blank 21 on sheet 1
should
be, during an online quality inspection operation of the system, in order to
make
the comparator 20 come to the conclusion that this particular blank is
accepted.
Should the contour of the hologram of an inspected blank 21 be outside the
marked area, the comparator 20 classifies this particular blank 21 as being of
insufficient quality, and it is being discarded.
Figure 5 shows a view similar to Figure 4, but for the blank 211. It can be
seen
that the variations of the position of the holograms 6 here are different than
the
variations which occur for blank 21. In particular, the holograms printed on
blank
211 are not rotated with respect to the theoretical "perfect" position but are
only
slightly displaced.
As a result, the reference image R11 created by superimposing the scanned
images 211 and shown in Figure 6, is slightly different from the reference
image Ri
shown in Figure 4. For the blank 2 with identification number 11, the area in
which

CA 03021477 2018-10-18
WO 2017/194201
PCT/EP2017/025119
- 8 -
the contour of the hologram of a printed blank 211 should be in order to be
accepted
is more narrow as this is the case for the blank 21.
It is to be understood that the quality inspection system 10, when making a
decision whether or not to accept a printed blank 2, takes into account more
details
of the printed blank than just the one feature (position of the hologram)
which was
explained with reference to Figures 3 to 6. The individual reference images
can
contain information on the color (intensity and tone) of prints applied to the
blank,
on the position of incisions, fold edges and/or creases, the absolute position
of
certain features and/or the relative position of one feature with respect to
one or
more second features. In any case, it is important that the reference image
which
is being used by the comparator 20 is an individual one for each of the blanks
which can be found on the sheet 1 being inspected.
The inspection system includes an operator interface where the operator can
input that certain specific errors should not result in a blank being
discarded. An
example of such acceptable error is an ink dot with a diameter of less than
0.2 mm.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Grant downloaded 2022-11-09
Inactive: Grant downloaded 2022-11-09
Letter Sent 2022-11-08
Grant by Issuance 2022-11-08
Inactive: Cover page published 2022-11-07
Pre-grant 2022-08-22
Inactive: Final fee received 2022-08-22
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2022-06-01
Letter Sent 2022-06-01
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2022-06-01
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2022-04-14
Inactive: QS passed 2022-04-14
Inactive: IPC expired 2022-01-01
Inactive: IPC expired 2022-01-01
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2021-09-16
Amendment Received - Response to Examiner's Requisition 2021-09-16
Examiner's Report 2021-06-10
Inactive: Report - No QC 2021-06-02
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2020-12-11
Common Representative Appointed 2020-11-07
Examiner's Report 2020-08-11
Inactive: Report - No QC 2020-08-07
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2020-02-24
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2019-08-22
Inactive: Report - No QC 2019-08-21
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry - RFE 2018-10-29
Inactive: Cover page published 2018-10-25
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2018-10-24
Letter Sent 2018-10-24
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-10-24
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-10-24
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-10-24
Application Received - PCT 2018-10-24
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2018-10-18
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2018-10-18
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2018-10-18
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2017-11-16

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2022-04-05

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Request for examination - standard 2018-10-18
Basic national fee - standard 2018-10-18
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2019-05-13 2019-03-08
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2020-05-11 2020-04-07
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2021-05-11 2021-04-08
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2022-05-11 2022-04-05
Final fee - standard 2022-10-03 2022-08-22
MF (patent, 6th anniv.) - standard 2023-05-11 2023-03-22
MF (patent, 7th anniv.) - standard 2024-05-13 2024-03-19
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
BOBST MEX SA
Past Owners on Record
CLAUDE TOMA
JERONIMO ALONSO
MARIO BELLINO
OLIVIER PORRET
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2018-10-18 8 347
Claims 2018-10-18 2 53
Abstract 2018-10-18 2 73
Representative drawing 2018-10-18 1 9
Drawings 2018-10-18 2 22
Cover Page 2018-10-25 1 45
Claims 2020-02-24 2 57
Description 2020-12-11 9 382
Claims 2020-12-11 2 58
Description 2021-09-16 9 399
Claims 2021-09-16 2 73
Representative drawing 2022-10-11 1 7
Cover Page 2022-10-11 1 47
Maintenance fee payment 2024-03-19 54 2,212
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2018-10-24 1 176
Notice of National Entry 2018-10-29 1 203
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2019-01-14 1 112
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2022-06-01 1 575
Declaration 2018-10-18 3 246
National entry request 2018-10-18 2 56
International search report 2018-10-18 3 76
Electronic Grant Certificate 2022-11-08 1 2,527
Examiner Requisition 2019-08-22 4 218
Amendment / response to report 2020-02-24 5 176
Examiner requisition 2020-08-11 4 167
Amendment / response to report 2020-12-11 11 400
Examiner requisition 2021-06-10 4 199
Amendment / response to report 2021-09-16 8 281
Final fee 2022-08-22 5 140