Language selection

Search

Patent 3040238 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 3040238
(54) English Title: SCREENING APPARATUS
(54) French Title: APPAREIL DE TAMISAGE
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B07B 13/16 (2006.01)
  • B01D 33/03 (2006.01)
  • B07B 1/46 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BAILEY, MARSHALL GRAHAM (United Arab Emirates)
(73) Owners :
  • NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO UK LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO UK LIMITED (United Kingdom)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2023-08-29
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2017-10-13
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2018-04-19
Examination requested: 2022-08-11
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/GB2017/053111
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2018069729
(85) National Entry: 2019-04-11

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
1617435.1 (United Kingdom) 2016-10-14

Abstracts

English Abstract

A shale shaker includes a basket (1) having a front, solids discharge end (2) and a rear, feed end (4) spaced apart by opposed first and second sides. The basket includes a lower, first, screen deck (8a) and an upper, second, screen deck (8b) directly above the first screen deck. The screening surfaces (13a, 13b) of the screen decks are spaced apart, by a vertical spacing of from 20mm to 250mm. There is a cavity (36) above the feed receiving end (10a) of the first screen deck (8a), in direct fluid communication with the space between the screening surfaces (13a, 13b) of the first and second screen decks (8a, 8b) that only receives feed that has passed through the upper, second, screen deck (8b). The cavity (36) extends to higher than the extreme end (37b) of the screening surface (13b) of the second screen deck (8b), at its feed receiving end (10b).


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un tamis vibrant comprenant un panier (1) ayant une extrémité avant d'évacuation de solides (2) et une extrémité d'alimentation arrière (4) espacées par des premier et second côtés opposés. Le panier comprend un premier tamis (8a) inférieur et un second tamis (8b) supérieur directement au-dessus du premier tamis. Les surfaces de tamisage (13a, 13b) des tamis sont espacées, d'un espacement vertical de 20 mm à 250 mm. Il y a une cavité (36) au-dessus de l'extrémité de réception d'alimentation (10a) du premier tamis (8a), en communication fluidique directe avec l'espace entre les surfaces de tamisage (13a, 13b) des premier et second tamis (8a, 8b) qui ne reçoit qu'une alimentation qui a traversé le second tamis (8b) supérieur. La cavité (36) s'étend plus haut que l'extrémité extrême (37b) de la surface de tamisage (13b) du second tamis (8b), au niveau de son extrémité de réception d'alimentation (10b).

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


18
CLAIMS:
1. A shale shaker comprising:
a basket having a solids discharge end and a feed end spaced apart by
opposed first and second sides, and a fluid retaining wall positioned at the
feed
end;
said basket including a stack of screen decks, each screen deck having
a screening surface, with respective screening surfaces of the screen decks
spaced apart and superposed one above another;
wherein the stack of screen decks comprises at least a first screen deck
and a second screen deck, wherein the second screen deck is directly above
the first screen deck;
wherein each of the first and second screen decks have a first end and
a second end, wherein the first end is proximal to the fluid retaining wall,
and
the second end is distal to and higher than the first end;
wherein the screening surfaces of the first and second screen decks are
spaced apart, by a vertical spacing of from 20mm to 250mm, at the first end of
the second screen desk;
wherein the first end of the second screen deck is further from the feed
end of the basket than the first end of the first screen deck;
wherein there is a cavity above the first end of the first screen deck, in
direct fluid communication with a space between the screening surfaces of the
first and second screen decks, and is configured to only receive feed that has
passed through the second screen deck;
wherein the cavity extends to higher than the screening surface of the
second screen deck, at the first end of the second screen deck; and
wherein the screening surfaces of the first and second screen decks and
the space between them provide sole outlets for solids and liquid from the
cavity, and
wherein the cavity is directly above the screening surface of the first
screen deck at the first end of the first screen deck and extends at least
across
a full width of the screening surface of the first screen deck at the first
end of
the first screen deck.
2. The shale shaker of claim 1 wherein the vertical spacing between screening
surfaces of the first and second screen decks is from 20mm to 120mm.

19
3. The shale shaker of claim 1 or 2 wherein the cavity is of a vertical height
of from
115% to 1000% of the vertical spacing between the screening surfaces of the
first and second screen deck, measured at the screening surface of the second
screen deck, at the first end.
4. The shale shaker of claim 3 wherein the vertical height is from 115% to
500% of
the vertical spacing between the screening surfaces of the first and second
screen deck, measured at the screening surface of the second screen deck, at
the first end.
5. The shale shaker of any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the cavity is defined
by
the first end of the first screen deck, the fluid retaining wall and a roof.
6. The shale shaker of any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the first end of the
second
screen deck is further from the feed end of the basket than the first end of
the
first screen deck by a horizontal displacement of from 25mm to 500mm.
7. The shale shaker of claim 6 wherein the first end of the second screen deck
is
horizontally displaced from 50mm to 150mm further from a back of the basket
than the first end of the first screen deck.
8. The shale shaker of any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the vertical spacing
between the screening surfaces of the first and second screen decks is
constant from the feed end of the basket towards the solids discharge end of
the basket.
9. The shale shaker of any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the vertical spacing
between the screening surfaces of the first and second screen decks
converges, from the feed end of the basket towards the solids discharge end of
the basket.
10. The shale shaker of any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the vertical spacing
between the screening surfaces of the first and second screen decks diverges,
from the feed end of the basket towards the solids discharge end of the
basket.

20
11. The shale shaker of any one of claims 1 to 10 wherein a length of each of
the
first and second screen decks, from the solids discharge end of the basket to
the feed end of the basket is the same.
12. The shale shaker of any one of claims 1 to 10 wherein a length of each of
the
first and second screen decks, from the solids discharge end of the basket to
the feed end of the basket is different.
13. The shale shaker of any one of claims 1 to 12 wherein the stack of screen
decks comprises a third screen deck that is directly above the second screen
deck;
wherein the third screen deck has a first end of the third screen deck
and a second end of the third screen deck, wherein the first end of the third
screen deck is proximal to the fluid retaining wall and the second end of the
third screen deck is distal to and higher than the first end of the third
screen
deck;
wherein a vertical spacing between the screening surfaces of the
second and third screen decks is from 20mm to 250mm, at the first end of the
third screen deck;
wherein the first end of the third screen deck is further from the feed end
of the basket than the first end of the second screen deck; and
wherein there is a second cavity, above the first end of the second
screen deck in direct fluid communication with a second space between the
screening surfaces of the second and third screen decks, and is configured to
only receive feed that has passed through the third screen deck; wherein the
second cavity extends higher than the screening surface of the third screen
deck at the first end of the third screen deck.
14. The shale shaker of claim 13 wherein the vertical spacing between the
screening surfaces of the first and second screen decks at the first end of
the
second screen deck and between the screening surfaces of the second and
third screen decks at the first end of the third screen deck is the same.
15. The shale shaker of claim 13 wherein the vertical spacing between the
screening surfaces of the first and second screen decks at the first end of
the

21
second screen deck and between the screening surfaces of the second and
third screen decks at the first end of the third screen deck is different.
16. The shale shaker of any one of claims 13 to 14 wherein the vertical
spacing
between the screening surfaces of the second and third screen decks is
constant from the feed end of the basket towards the solids discharge end of
the basket.
17. The shale shaker of any one of claims 13 to 14 wherein the vertical
spacing
between the screening surfaces of the second and third screen decks
converges, from the feed end of the basket towards the solids discharge end of
the basket.
18. The shale shaker of any one of claims 13 to 14 wherein the vertical
spacing
between the screening surfaces of the second and third screen decks diverges,
from the feed end of the basket towards the solids discharge end of the
basket.
19. The shale shaker of any one of claims 13 to 14 wherein a length of each of
the
second and third screen decks, from the feed end of the basket to the solids
discharge end of the basket is the same.
20. The shale shaker of any one of claims 13 to 18 wherein a length of each of
the
first and second screen decks, from the feed end of the basket to the solids
discharge end of the basket is different.
21. The shale shaker of any one of claims 13 to 18 wherein the second end of
each
of the first, second and third screen decks, are vertically aligned.
22. The shale shaker of any one of claims 13 to 21 wherein the second cavity
extends above the first end of the second screen deck to a same height that
the
cavity extends above the first end of the first screen deck.
23. The shale shaker of any one of claims 13 to 21 wherein the second cavity
extends above the first end of the second screen deck to a different height
than
the cavity extends above the first end of the first screen deck.

22
24. The shale shaker of any one of claims 13 to 23 wherein the second cavity
is of
a height of from 115% to 1000% of the vertical spacing between the screening
surfaces of the second and third screen decks measured at the first end of the
third screen deck.
25. The shale shaker of claim 24 wherein the height is from 115% to 500% of
the
vertical spacing between the screening surfaces of the second and third screen
decks measured at the first end of the third screen deck.
26. The shale shaker of any one of claims 13 to 25 wherein the second cavity
is
defined by the first end of the second screen deck, the fluid retaining wall
and a
roof.
27. The shale shaker of any one of claims 13 to 26 wherein the first end of
the third
screen deck is further from the feed end of the basket than the first end of
the
second screen deck by a horizontal displacement of from 25mm to 500mm.
28. The shale shaker of claim 27 wherein the horizontal displacement is from
50mm
to 150mm.
29. The shale shaker of any one of claims 13 to 28 wherein the first end of
the first
screen deck is connected to the fluid retaining wall and the first end of the
second screen deck is connected to a downwards directed flange of the fluid
retaining wall projecting towards the solids discharge end of the basket.
30. The shale shaker of claim 29 when dependent on any one of claims 15 to 28
wherein the first end of the third screen deck is connected to a second
downwards directed flange of the fluid retaining wall projecting towards the
solids discharge end of the basket.
31. The shale shaker of any one of claims 1 to 30 wherein the basket comprises
a
solids collecting and distribution chute, for separate collection of solids
discharged from at least the first and second screen decks.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


I
Screening apparatus
Field of the Invention
The invention relates to screening arrangements used in shale shakers as used
for
example for separating drill cuttings from used drilling mud when drilling
operations
such as drilling an oil well are being carried out.
Background to the Invention
Screening machines, especially vibratory screening machines such as the so
called
'shale shakers of the oil well drilling industry are used with success in
methods of
solids/liquids separation, especially classification.
An earlier patent application by the present applicant (W02015/166282)
describes a
shale shaker that includes a basket mounting at least two, typically three,
screen decks
that are closely spaced together one above the other. Each deck has a
screening
surface for screening a solids and liquid feed (normally used drilling mud and
drill
cuttings). The described machine is used for a screening method with the feed
receiving
end of each screening surface in the stack of two or three screen decks
submerged in
a common pond of applied solids and liquid feed.
The
shale shaker and method described in that application provide notable
improvements in
compactness of design and improved throughput for a feed that is to be
successively
screened through at least the two or three screen decks in the stack provided
in the
basket A number of optional features are described to facilitate screening
operations
and/or to allow operations under different conditions such as a change in feed
character
or the desire to collect solids from different screening surfaces separately
to allow
recycling of solids of preferred physical characteristics to a drilling mud.
Whilst shale shakers of different types are available there remains the desire
to
improve efficiency further.
Date Regue/Date Received 2022-12-01

2
Description of the Invention
The present invention provides a shale shaker comprising: a basket having a
solids
discharge end and a feed end spaced apart by opposed first and second sides,
and a fluid
retaining wall positioned at the feed end; said basket including a stack of
screen decks,
.. each screen deck having a screening surface, with respective screening
surfaces of the
screen decks spaced apart and superposed one above another; wherein the stack
of
screen decks comprises at least a first screen deck and a second screen deck,
wherein
the second screen deck is directly above the first screen deck; wherein each
of the first
and second screen decks have a first end and a second end, wherein the first
end is
proximal to the fluid retaining wall, and the second end is distal to and
higher than the first
end; wherein the screening surfaces of the first and second screen decks are
spaced
apart, by a vertical spacing of from 20mm to 250mm, at the first end of the
second screen
desk; wherein the first end of the second screen deck is further from the feed
end of the
basket than the first end of the first screen deck; wherein there is a cavity
above the first
end of the first screen deck, in direct fluid communication with a space
between the
screening surfaces of the first and second screen decks, and is configured to
only receive
feed that has passed through the second screen deck; wherein the cavity
extends to higher
than the screening surface of the second screen deck, at the first end of the
second screen
deck; and wherein the screening surfaces of the first and second screen decks
and the
space between them provide sole outlets for solids and liquid from the cavity,
and wherein
the cavity is directly above the screening surface of the first screen deck at
the first end of
the first screen deck and extends at least across a full width of the
screening surface of
the first screen deck at the first end of the first screen deck.
The second screen deck is directly above the first screen deck i.e. there is
no intervening
screen deck.
The cavity may be directly above the screening surface at the feed receiving
end of the
first screen deck.
The vertical spacing between screening surfaces of the first and second screen
decks
is from 20mm to 250mm. It may be from 20mm to 150mm or even from 20mm to
120mm.
The cavity only receives feed that has passed through the upper, second,
screen deck.
An applied feed, typically a used drilling mud containing drill cuttings, is
fed into the
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-02-21

CA 03040238 2019-04-11
WO 2018/069729
PCT/GB2017/053111
3
shale shaker basket to be processed through the stack of screen decks, each
screen
deck processes feed reaching it by removing solids of a size not passing
through the
apertures of the respective screening surface. All the feed in the cavity has
passed
through the second screen deck.
The basket mounting the stack of screen decks as described above may be used
to
separating solids from a drill cuttings and drilling mud mixture feed, the
method
comprising:
a) providing the shale shaker of the invention;
b) providing a drill
cuttings and drilling mud mixture feed to the rear feed
end of the basket so as to form a pond of solids and liquid in a pond region
defined by
the fluid retaining wall and the feed receiving end of the screening surface
of the lower
first screen deck; the pond region immersing a portion of the screening
surface at the
feed receiving end of each of the at least two screen decks; and
c) operating the
shale shaker with a feed rate so as to maintain the pond
whilst screening the drill cuttings and drilling mud mixture feed on the
screening
surfaces.
Thus the shale shaker of the invention may be used to carry out the methods
described
in W02015/166282, but in a shale shaker featuring a cavity above the feed
receiving
end of the first screen deck of a height that is greater than the spacing
between the
screening surfaces of the first and second screen decks, at their feed
receiving ends.
This cavity extending to higher than the extreme end of the screening surface
of the
second screen deck, at the feed receiving end; has surprisingly been found
beneficial
in use. It might have been expected that the cavity would constitute a "dead
space"
above the respective screening surface, that would tend to accumulate solids
when fed
with a solids and liquids feed. In practice good screening efficiency can be
obtained,
with solids collected on the screening surface of the first screen deck moving
efficiently
towards the solids discharge end of the basket.
At the same time a significant reduction in wear rate of the screening surface
of the
lower, first, screen deck has been observed in comparison to an arrangement
where
the cavity does not extend to a height above the spacing between screening
surfaces
of adjacent (directly one above the other) screen decks.

CA 03040238 2019-04-11
WO 2018/069729
PCT/GB2017/053111
4
This reduction in wear is particularly important in a multi deck screening
machine
where the need to repair or replace the screening material of a screening
surface
requires halting of screening operations or diverting of the feed; whilst
screening
surfaces are removed, inspected, and repaired or replaced. Economic benefits
may be
obtained in terms of reduced down time and increased lifetime for screening
surfaces.
Screening surfaces are typically of a wire mesh and mounted on an apertured
plate,
which in turn is mounted and tensioned across a support frame in the usual way
to
form a screen deck. The screen decks utilised may be in the form of crown
decks as
often employed in shale shakers i.e. they are arcuate, rising up towards the
front to
back centre line screening surface. Support frames may be permanently fixed in
the
basket with screening surfaces slid onto them when being replaced.
Alternatively the
support frames may be demountable and removable from the basket when required.
The shale shaker may be further provided with a third screen deck, directly
above the
second screen deck that may have a similar relationship to the second screen
deck as
the second screen deck has to the first. This third screen deck may be an
uppermost
screen deck, but other screen decks may be provided above.
Additionally or alternatively other screen decks may be provided, above or
below the
first and second screen decks. Such other screen decks may or may not be
provided
in a relationship with a lower screen deck that provides a cavity as described
for the
first and second screen decks. Such other screen decks may or may not
participate in
a pond region, in use. For example, a coarse meshed scalping screen deck may
be
provided, that is above a pond region formed at the first and second screen
decks in
use of the shale shaker.
Thus the shale shaker may be further provided with a third screen deck,
directly above
the second screen deck;
wherein the screening surfaces of the second and third screen decks are
spaced apart, by a vertical spacing of from 20mm to 250mm, at the extreme end
of the
feed receiving end of the third screen deck;
wherein the feed receiving end of the third screen deck is further from the
back
of the basket than the feed receiving end of the second screen deck;

CA 03040238 2019-04-11
WO 2018/069729
PCT/GB2017/053111
wherein the screening surface of the third screen deck has a lower, feed
receiving, end that is proximal to the fluid retaining wall at the rear end of
the basket
and a distal, higher, solids discharge end at the front of the basket; and
wherein there is a second cavity, above the feed receiving end of the second
5 screen deck in direct fluid communication with the space between the
screening
surfaces of the second and third screen decks, and only receiving feed that
has passed
through the third screen deck; the second cavity extending to higher than the
extreme
end of the screening surface of the third screen deck, at the feed receiving
end.
The second cavity may be directly above the screening surface at the feed
receiving
end of the second screen deck.
The vertical spacing between screening surfaces of the second and third screen
decks
is from 20mm to 250mm. It may be from 20mm to 150mm or even from 20mm to
120mm.
The second cavity only receives feed that has passed through the third screen
deck.
An applied feed, typically a used drilling mud containing drill cuttings, is
fed into the
shale shaker basket to be processed through the stack of screen decks, each
screen
deck processes feed reaching it by removing solids of a size not passing
through the
apertures of the respective screening surface. All the feed in the second
cavity has
passed through the third screen deck.
Where a third screen deck as described above is provided then the shale shaker
may
be employed in a screening method using a common pond that includes a pond
region
immersing a portion of the screening surface at the feed receiving end of each
of the at
least three screen decks.
The vertical height of the cavity or the second cavity may be of from 115% to
1000%,
115% to 500% or even from 115% to 300% of the vertical spacing between the
respective screening surfaces. The vertical spacing between the respective
screening
surfaces is measured at the extreme end of the screening surface of the
uppermost of
the respective screen decks. The vertical height of the cavity or second
cavity is the
maximum vertical height: from the lowest point of the screening surface or
other upper
surface of the lower screen deck within the cavity, to the highest point in
the cavity.

CA 03040238 2019-04-11
WO 2018/069729
PCT/GB2017/053111
6
Where the cavity is provided with a roof, the highest point in the cavity is
the highest
point inside the roof. Where the cavity is not provided with a roof, the
highest point of
the cavity is the highest fluid retaining point of a fluid retaining wall that
retains fluid
within the cavity.
Where both the cavity and the second cavity are provided they may have the
same or
different dimensions. In particular the vertical height of the cavities may be
the same or
different.
The cavity may extend at least across the full width or substantially the full
width of the
screening surface of the first screen deck. The second cavity may extend at
least
across the full width or substantially the full width of the screening surface
of the
second screen deck.
The connection between the lower first screen deck and the fluid retaining
wall may be
to a flange of the wall or to the wall. For example a support frame or support
frames of
the first screen deck is fixed to the flange. The fixing may be releasable
(e.g. by
bolting) or permanent (e.g. by welding). The screening surface of the first
screen deck
may be in sealing, or in substantially sealing, contact with the flange or
directly onto the
wall.
The cavity is in direct fluid communication with the space between the
screening
surfaces of the first and second screen decks i.e. liquids and solids in the
space
between these screening surfaces may flow into the cavity. There may be no
outlet for
solids and liquid from the cavity other than to the screening surfaces of the
first and
second screen decks and the space between them.
Conveniently the cavity may be defined by the feed receiving end of the lower
first
screen deck, the fluid retaining wall, and a roof. The fluid retaining wall
and the roof
may prevent exit of liquid and solids from the cavity other than to the
screening
surfaces of the first and second screen decks and the space between them. The
cavity
may be further defined by the opposed first and second sides of the basket.

CA 03040238 2019-04-11
WO 2018/069729
PCT/GB2017/053111
7
The cavity may be defined by the feed receiving end of the lower first screen
deck, the
fluid retaining wall, and a roof. The roof of the cavity may be a downwards
directed
flange of the fluid retaining wall, projecting toward the front end of the
basket, that the
feed receiving end of the second screen deck connects to. For example a
support
frame or support frames of the second screen deck is fixed to the flange. The
fixing
may be releasable (e.g. by bolting) or permanent (e.g. by welding). The
screening
surface of the second screen deck may be in sealing, or in substantially
sealing,
contact with the flange.
Alternative arrangements can be made that include the cavity extending to
higher than
the extreme end of the screening surface of the second screen deck, at the
feed
receiving end. For example the lower first screen deck connects to the fluid
retaining
wall (optionally via a flange of the wall) and the upper second screen deck
connects to
a second fluid retaining wall (optionally via a flange of the second wall)
that is closer to
the front end of the basket (the solids discharge end). In such an arrangement
the
cavity may be defined by the feed receiving end of the lower first screen
deck, the fluid
retaining wall, and the second fluid retaining wall. Such a cavity may have a
roof. The
cavity may be further defined by the opposed first and second sides of the
basket.
The fluid retaining wall and the second fluid retaining wall may be formed and
arranged
so that, in use, there is no other outlet for solids and liquid from the
cavity other than to
the screening surfaces of the first and second screen decks and the space
between
them. There may be a roof that prevents exit of liquid and solids and/or fluid
retaining
walls may be of sufficient height to retain liquid and solids in the cavity
between the
fluid retaining walls (in normal use) until it is processed by the screening
surface of the
first screen deck.
Where a third screen deck is fitted then the second cavity may be defined by
the feed
receiving end of the second screen deck, the fluid retaining wall; and a
second
downwards directed flange of the fluid retaining wall projecting towards the
front end of
the basket that the feed receiving end of the third screen deck connects to.
Arrangements may be as discussed above with respect to the second deck. The
second cavity may be further defined by the opposed first and second sides of
the
basket.

CA 03040238 2019-04-11
WO 2018/069729
PCT/GB2017/053111
8
Alternatively the third screen deck may connect to a forwards projecting
downwards
directed flange of a second fluid retaining wall or even to a third fluid
retaining wall
(optionally via a flange of the third wall) that is closer to the front of the
basket than the
second fluid retaining wall.
In an arrangement where the third screen deck connect to a forwards projecting
downwards directed flange of a second fluid retaining wall the second cavity
may be
defined by the feed receiving end of the second screen deck, the second fluid
retaining
wall to which it connects, and a roof that is the downwards directed flange of
the
second fluid retaining wall. The second cavity may be further defined by the
opposed
first and second sides of the basket.
In an arrangement with a third fluid retaining wall, the second cavity may be
defined by
the feed receiving end of the second screen deck, the fluid retaining wall to
which it
connects, and the third fluid retaining wall. The second cavity may be further
defined by
the opposed first and second sides of the basket.
The second cavity may have no outlet for solids and liquid from the cavity
other than to
the screening surfaces of the second and third screen decks and the space
between
them. It will be understood that where the cavity does not have a roof the
fluid
retaining wall or walls is of sufficient height to retain liquid and solids
from exiting the
top of the first cavity in normal use.
Arrangements such as those discussed above for the cavity are also
contemplated for
the second cavity. The second cavity may include a roof. The roof and/or fluid
retaining wall or walls may prevent exit of solids and liquid from the cavity
other than to
the screening surfaces of the second and third screen decks and the space
between
them. The fluid retaining walls of the first cavity may be of sufficient
height to retain
liquid and solids in the first cavity between the fluid retaining walls until
it is processed
by the screening surface of the second screen deck.
The feed receiving end of the second screen deck is further from the back of
the basket
than the feed receiving end of the first screen deck. If provided, the feed
receiving end
of the third screen deck is further from the back of the basket than the feed
receiving
end of the second screen deck.

CA 03040238 2019-04-11
WO 2018/069729
PCT/GB2017/053111
9
This arrangement is advantageous where similar or the same screen deck lengths
are
used for the first, second and (if used) third screen decks. The horizontal
stagger in the
positioning of the screen decks at the feed end of the basket means that the
solids
discharge ends of the screen decks are also horizontally staggered with the
solids
discharge end of the third screen deck overhanging the solids discharge end of
the
second screen deck. The solids discharge end of the second screen deck
overhangs
the solids discharge end of first screen deck. Thus solids discharged in the
use of the
shale shaker can fall directly without interfering with each other. Simplified
solids
collection, without requiring chutes connected to ends of screen decks can be
employed. In particular, a solids collecting and distribution chute, that may
be mounted
on the basket can be used for separate collection of solids discharged from at
least the
first and second screen decks. When mounted on the basket, such a chute is
vibrated
by the vibratory action of the basket, helping to avoid blockages and can be
compact in
form. The chute may be adjustable to allow redirection of solids e.g. to send
all the
solids collected from the first second and (if provided) third screens in the
in the same
direction or to send them in different directions.
Although the use of similar or the same screen deck lengths as discussed above
may
be advantageous, alternative arrangements are contemplated. By using different
screen deck lengths, the horizontal stagger in the positioning of the screen
decks at the
feed end of the basket may not provide the same stagger at the solids
discharge end.
For example if desired different screen deck lengths may be provided that
allow the
solids discharge ends of the screen decks to be one substantially vertically
above the
other; or even one vertically above the other. This can be arranged with two
screen
decks, three screen decks or more. Such arrangements may be used where all the
solids collected on the screen decks are to be collected together. However, in
such an
arrangement, separate collection of solids discharged from a screen deck may
be
desired in some circumstances. If so, fitting a short extension to the solids
discharge
end of a screen deck can be used to provide a horizontal stagger, facilitating
separate
collection of the desired solids fraction.
Advantageously the feed receiving end of the second screen deck is further
from the
back of the basket than the feed receiving end of the first screen deck by a
horizontal
displacement of from 25mm to 500mnn or even of from 50mm to 150mnn. Similarly

CA 03040238 2019-04-11
WO 2018/069729
PCT/GB2017/053111
where a third screen deck is provided the feed receiving end of the third
screen deck is
further from the back of the basket than the feed receiving end of the second
screen
deck by a horizontal displacement of from 25mm to 500mm or even of from 50mm
to
150mm.
5
The vertical spacing between screening surfaces of screen decks is from 20mm
to
250mm or from 20mm to 150mm or even from 20mm to 120mm, at their feed
receiving
ends. The screen decks may be spaced apart and parallel and so have a
substantially
constant spacing along their length. Conveniently the spacing between the
screening
10 surfaces of the first and second screen decks and between the screening
surfaces of
the second and third screen decks is the same.
Alternatively the spacing between screening surfaces may diverge, or may
converge;
from the rear of the basket towards the front of the basket. A wider spacing
at the feed
receiving ends and a narrower spacing at the solids discharge ends (a
converging
arrangement) can allow a deeper space between screening surfaces in the pond
region. This may be advantageous if large volumes of fluid are to be
processed..
According to a further aspect the present invention provides a shale shaker
basket
having a front, solids discharge end and a rear, feed end spaced apart by
opposed first
and second sides; and comprising the stack of screen decks as described above
with
respect to the shale shaker of the invention.
According to another aspect the present invention provides a solids collecting
and
distribution chute for a shale shaker, the chute comprising:
first and second elongate troughs in a side by side relationship, the troughs
extending across the width of the basket of a shale shaker, in use and divided
by a
wall;
wherein at least one solids discharge port of the first elongate trough is
formed
to direct solids in a direction transverse to its length and at least one
solids discharge
port of the second elongate trough is formed to direct solids in a direction
transverse to
its length.
At least one of the troughs may be provided with at least one ramp for
directing solids
falling into the trough towards at least one solids discharge port. Both of
the troughs

CA 03040238 2019-04-11
WO 2018/069729
PCT/GB2017/053111
11
may be provided with at least one ramp for directing solids falling into the
trough
towards at least one solids discharge port.
The solids discharge ports may include at least one solids discharge ramp for
directing
the solids being discharged.
The solids collecting and distribution chute may be mounted on a shale shaker
in use,
to obtain benefit of the vibratory action.
Advantageously the at least one solids discharge port of the second elongate
trough is
formed to direct solids in a direction transverse to its length that is in a
direction away
from the solids discharge direction of the first elongate trough.
Advantageously the solids discharge port or ports of the first elongate trough
directs
solids substantially at right angles to the length of the troughs and the
solids discharge
port or ports of the second elongate trough directs solids substantially at
right angles
to the length of the troughs in the opposite direction.
Advantageously the solids discharge port or ports of the first elongate trough
direct
solids transversely and beneath the second elongate trough. The port or ports
can
extend underneath at least the whole width of the second elongate trough i.e.
be a
conduit or pipe, that may include a downwards directed ramp, passing beneath
the
second elongate trough.
The chute affords a convenient means of recycling solids of a selected size
range to
the drilling mud. Solids collected from one of the elongate troughs may be
added to
drilling mud (either fresh or recycled) at any convenient point in the
drilling mud system,
for example directly to drilling mud that has been passed through the shale
shaker.
Alternatively, solids collected from one of the troughs may be added to
drilling mud at a
point in the drilling mud system after the mud that has passed through the
shale shaker
has been further processed.
The chute may be provided with a baffle piece to cover at least one of the
first and
second troughs to allow redirection of solids landing on the baffle piece. For
example

12
the baffle piece may cover one of the troughs and have a top surface that is
sloped to
direct solids in the same direction as solids exiting from the other trough.
Brief description of the Drawings
Figure la shows a schematic elevation of a shale shaker basket fitted with
three screen
decks;
Figure lb shows in magnified detail the rear end of the shale shaker basket of
figure
la;
Figure 2a shows a prior art shale shaker basket in schematic elevation;
Figure 2b shows a shale shaker basket of the invention in schematic elevation;
Figures 3a and 3b show in schematic perspective a solids collecting and
distribution
chute; and
Figures 4a, 4b, 4c and 4d show alternative shale shaker baskets of the
invention, in
schematic elevations.
Description of Some Embodiments by Way of Example
A schematic side elevation of a shale shaker basket 1 is depicted in figure
la. The
basket 1 has a front, solids discharge end 2 and a rear, feed end 4 separated
by the
basket sides of which one side 6 is visible in this view. The vibratory drive
that imparts
vibratory motion to basket 1 is not shown, for clarity.
The basket 1 mounts a stack of three screen decks 8a, 8b, 8c in this example,
one above
the other. Each screen deck has a lower feed receiving end 10a, 10b, 10c
(shown in
more detail in magnified detail figure lb) and a higher solids discharge end
12a, 12b,
and 12c. The screen decks have respective screening surfaces 13a, 13b,
13c mounted on support frames 14a, 14b, 14c. In this example the spacing of
the
screening surfaces 13a, 13b, 13c remains the same from front to back of the
basket i.e.
they are in a parallel relationship.
A used drilling mud 15 applied as feed to the feed receiving end 4 forms a
common
pond of feed 16 as the feed is processed by the three screen decks 8a, 8b, 8c.
The
screen decks 8a, 8b, 8c will be in sealing engagement or substantial sealing
engagement with the sides of the basket 1 in the usual way. As indicated by
arrows 18,
liquid and solids passing through the screening surfaces 13a, 13b, 13c flows
out of the
bottom of the basket 1 via a collection system or sump suggested by line 19.
Solids collected by the screening surfaces travel ("walk up") the screening
surfaces to
Date Regue/Date Received 2022-12-01

13
the solids discharge ends 12a, 12b, 12c by vibratory action applied to the
basket. The
solids fall off the staggered solids discharge ends 12a, 12b, 12c as indicated
by arrows
20a, 20b and 20c for disposal or reuse as discussed further below with respect
to figure
3; which shows more detail of the solids collecting and distribution chute 22.
The screening surfaces 13a, 13b, 13c are all of the same length, for example
by making
use of standard sized components for the screen decks. The stagger of the
solids
discharge ends 12a, 12b, 12c is obtained by the mounting arrangements at the
rear
end 4 of the basket as described below.
As can be seen more clearly in magnified detail figure lb, the feed end 4 of
the basket
1 includes a fluid retaining wall 24 that has downwards directed flanges 26,
28 and 30,
projecting towards the front end of the basket i.e. away from the rear end 4
of the
basket.
Flange 26 mounts the feed receiving end 10a of the lower, first screen deck
8a. Fixing
and sealing arrangements are suggested in this schematic by box 32. Fixing
may
include bolts passing through flange 26 securing the support frame 14a.
Screening
surface 13a is in sealing contact or substantially sealing contact at its
extreme end 37a
with flange 26. An altemative arrangement would be to mount the feed receiving
end
10a directly to the fluid retaining wall 24. Above, flange 28 mounts the feed
receiving
end 10b of the second screen deck 8b by a similar fixing and sealing
arrangement to
that of screen deck 8a, as suggested by box 34. Screening surface 13b is in
sealing
contact or substantially sealing contact with flange 28. Cavity
36 is defined by
screening surface 13a the fluid retaining wall (flange 26 of wall 24 in this
example) and
a roof formed by flange 28. Cavity 36 only receives feed that has passed
though deck
8b. Solids and liquid within cavity 36 may only escape to the screening
surfaces 13a,
13b and the space between them. Thus the first screening surface 13a will
process all
the feed 15 passing through the second screening surface 13b.
The vertical height H of cavity 36 exceeds the vertical spacing S between
screening
surfaces 13a and 13b at the feed receiving ends. The cavity 36 extends to
higher than
the extreme end 37b of the screening surface 13b of the second screen deck 8b,
at the
feed receiving end 10b. In this example, the cavity 36 is directly above the
screening
surface 13a at the feed receiving end 10a of the first screen deck 8a.
Date Regue/Date Received 2022-12-01

CA 03040238 2019-04-11
WO 2018/069729
PCT/GB2017/053111
14
A second cavity 38 is defined by screening surface 13b, flange 28 of fluid
retaining wall
24 and a roof formed by flange 30. Flange 30 mounts the feed receiving end 10c
of the
third screen deck 8c. A similar fixing and sealing arrangement to that of
screen deck
8a, is employed, as suggested by box 35. The vertical height H2 of cavity 38
exceeds
the vertical spacing S2 between screening surfaces 13b and 13c at the feed
receiving
ends. The cavity 38 extends to higher than the extreme end 37c of the
screening
surface 13c of the third screen deck 8c, at the feed receiving end 10c. In
this example,
the cavity 38 is directly above the screening surface 13b at the feed
receiving end 10b
of the second screen deck 8b. Cavity 38 only receives feed that has passed
though
deck 8c. Solids and liquid within cavity 38 may only escape to the screening
surfaces
13b, 13c and the space between them. Thus the screening surface 13b will
process all
the feed 15 passing through the third screening surface 13c.
In use the arrangement depicted has been found to reduce wear on screening
surfaces
13a and 13b in comparison to a similar arrangement where the screening
surfaces are
staggered but there is no provision of a cavity of a height that extends to
higher than
the extreme end of the screening surface of the directly above screen deck.
Initial comparative tests were carried out in a shale shaker basket mounting
only a
lower first screen deck 8a and an upper second screen deck 8b. The prior art
(control)
arrangement is shown in schematic elevation figure 2a where the feed receiving
end
10b of deck 8b, in this case extreme end 37b of upper, second, screening
surface 13b;
is staggered by a horizontal displacement X from the extreme end 37a of the
feed
receiving end of lower, first, screening surface 13a. Other parts of the
screen decks 8a,
8b not shown in this figure, for clarity. Feed 15 all passes screening surface
1 3b of
screen deck 8b, before contacting surface 13a. No cavity extending to higher
than the
extreme end 37b of the screening surface of the second screen deck 13b was
provided.
The screening surfaces 13a, 13b comprised multiple screen panels laid abutting
in the
usual way. The screen panels were manufactured to commercial specifications
for
shale shaker use (steel mesh screening material on apertured support plates).

15
The shale shaker basket 1 was used to process a simulated drilling mud (feed
15). The
simulated mud is a solution of water including a polymer, to increase
viscosity, together
with solids. The solids content is barite as weighting agent (to increase
density of the
simulated mud); and sand, to provide a relatively harsh, abrasive regime
on the screening surfaces.
The prior art arrangement of figure 2a was used to process the simulated
drilling mud
until damage became evident. On inspection, 30% of the mesh panels comprising
the
rear (feed end) two rows of panels making up the lower screening surface 13a
had
failed (were holed). A further 58% of the screen panels of the screening
surface 13a
showed wear on visual inspection.
The configuration of the basket was then changed to that shown in figure 2b
where the
horizontal stagger remained the same (X) but a cavity 36 was provided (as
depicted in
more detail in figures la, 1b). The screening surfaces 13a, 13b were made of
the same
specification multiple screen panels as for figure 2a.
Using this arrangement according to the invention, the basket 1 was used to
process
the simulated drilling mud for the same period of time and at similar flow
rates as the
test for the control arrangement of figure 2a. On inspection 0% of the mesh
panels
comprising the rear (feed end) two rows or the screening surface 13a had
failed, and
only a further 25% were showing wear.
Figure 3a shows in schematic perspective the solids collecting and
distribution chute
22 of figure la. The chute 22 has two troughs 42, 44 extending across the
basket of a
shale shaker in use and divided by wall 46. In the arrangement of figure la,
trough 42
will be below solids discharge end 12a and trough 44 below solids discharge
end 12b.
In use solids falling from end of a screening surface 12a and landing into
trough 42 are
directed via ramps 48, 50 and discharge ports 52, 54 and 56 that include ramps
in this
example, away from the basket where they will join solids falling from solids
discharge
end 12c (see arrows 20a and 20c, also in figure la).
Solids falling from end of a screening surface 12b land in trough 44 and are
directed by
ramps 58, 59 and discharge ports 60, 62 (with ramps) toward the underneath of
the
Date Regue/Date Received 2022-12-01

16
basket see arrows 20b, also in figure la. There these solids can join the
fluid and solids
mixture passing through all three screens as suggested by arrows 18 in figure
1a. By
this means solids collected on the middle screening surface 13b are returned
to the fluid
stream i.e. to the screened drilling mud. Alternatively where it is desired to
return
the solids from the middle screening surface 13b to drilling mud further
downstream in
the mud processing system, then ports 60,62 may direct solids via a conveying
system,
such as a conveyor belt (not shown) to a downstream location.
Thus the chute 22 affords a convenient means of recycling solids of a selected
size
range to the drilling mud. If solids recycling is not required then a baffle
piece 64
(figure 3b) can be fitted over trough 44 so that all solids collected by the
screening
surfaces are discharged in the same direction, away from the sump 19 of the
shale
shaker.
Figure 4a shows in schematic elevation an arrangement according to the
invention
where two fluid retaining walls are employed. In this example the feed
receiving end 10b
of deck 8b, in this case extreme end 37b of upper, second, screening surface
13b; is
staggered by a horizontal displacement from the extreme end 37a of the feed
receiving
end of lower, first, screening surface 13a. Other parts of the screen decks
8a,
8b not shown in this figure, for clarity.
The horizontal stagger is provided by the extreme end 37a of the feed
receiving end of
lower, first, screening surface 13a connecting to fluid retaining wall 24
whilst the
extreme end 37b of upper, second, screening surface 13b connects to a second
spaced apart fluid retaining wall 66. Cavity 36 is between the fluid retaining
wall 24
and the second fluid retaining wall 66. Optional roof 68 is provided in this
example.
A common pond 16 forms as shown by the application of feed 15 to the feed
receiving
end 10b of second screening surface 13b. Cavity 36 only receives feed that has
passed though deck 8b. Solids and liquid within cavity 36 may only escape to
the
screening surfaces 13a, 13b and the space between them. Thus the first
screening
surface 13a will process all the feed 15 passing through the second screening
surface
13b.
Date Regue/Date Received 2022-12-01

CA 03040238 2019-04-11
WO 2018/069729
PCT/GB2017/053111
17
Figure 4b shows a similar arrangement to that of figure 4a except that three
screen
desks 8a, 8b and 8c are provided the feed receiving ends 10a, 10b, 10c of
screen
decks 8a, 8b, 8c each connect to a different fluid retaining wall i.e. 24, 66
and 70
respectively. Feed 15 is applied to the feed receiving end 10c of third screen
deck 8c.
In this example cavity 36 and second cavity 38 are not provided with roofs.
The height
of walls 24, 66 and 70 is sufficient to retain pond 16 as it is processed
through the
screen decks. The vertical heights of the first and second cavities 36, 38 are
indicated
as H and H2, extending from the respective screening surface to the highest
fluid
retaining point of a fluid retaining wall 24, 66, 70, that retains fluid
within the cavity.
In figure 4c a similar arrangement to that of figure 4a is depicted except
that the
extreme end 37b of the second, screening surface 13b connects to an upwards
directed flange of the second fluid retaining wall 66. Furthermore a roof is
not provided
on cavity 36. Also shown in this figure are converging screen decks 8a and 8b
that
become more closely spaced as they move away from the rear end 4 of basket 1
towards the front end (not shown).
In figure 4d and arrangement similar to that of figure 4a is depicted, except
that roof 68
in cavity 36 is lower. In use, the roof 68 restricts the possible height of
the pond region
16 within cavity 36; in comparison to the possible height above second screen
8b.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Maintenance Request Received 2024-09-05
Maintenance Fee Payment Determined Compliant 2024-09-05
Inactive: Grant downloaded 2023-08-29
Grant by Issuance 2023-08-29
Inactive: Grant downloaded 2023-08-29
Letter Sent 2023-08-29
Inactive: Cover page published 2023-08-28
Pre-grant 2023-06-27
Inactive: Final fee received 2023-06-27
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2023-03-24
Letter Sent 2023-03-24
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2023-03-22
Inactive: Q2 passed 2023-03-22
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2023-02-21
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2023-02-21
Examiner's Interview 2023-02-09
Amendment Received - Response to Examiner's Requisition 2022-12-01
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2022-12-01
Inactive: Report - No QC 2022-09-14
Examiner's Report 2022-09-14
Letter Sent 2022-09-01
Advanced Examination Determined Compliant - PPH 2022-08-11
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2022-08-11
Request for Examination Received 2022-08-11
Advanced Examination Requested - PPH 2022-08-11
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2022-08-11
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2022-08-11
Inactive: Recording certificate (Transfer) 2021-08-05
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2021-07-20
Common Representative Appointed 2020-11-07
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2019-07-24
Inactive: Reply to s.37 Rules - PCT 2019-07-15
Inactive: Cover page published 2019-05-01
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2019-04-25
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2019-04-23
Inactive: Request under s.37 Rules - PCT 2019-04-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2019-04-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2019-04-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2019-04-23
Application Received - PCT 2019-04-23
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2019-04-12
Inactive: IPRP received 2019-04-12
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2019-04-11
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2018-05-01
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2018-05-01
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2018-04-19

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2022-10-12

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2019-04-11
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2019-10-15 2019-04-11
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2020-10-13 2020-09-29
Registration of a document 2021-07-20 2021-07-20
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2021-10-13 2021-10-12
Request for examination - standard 2022-10-13 2022-08-11
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2022-10-13 2022-10-12
Final fee - standard 2023-06-27
MF (patent, 6th anniv.) - standard 2023-10-13 2023-09-29
MF (patent, 7th anniv.) - standard 2024-10-15 2024-09-05
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO UK LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
MARSHALL GRAHAM BAILEY
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2023-08-14 1 18
Description 2019-04-10 17 751
Claims 2019-04-10 6 217
Abstract 2019-04-10 2 73
Drawings 2019-04-10 7 129
Representative drawing 2019-04-10 1 19
Description 2022-08-10 17 1,099
Claims 2022-08-10 5 284
Claims 2019-04-11 6 345
Description 2022-11-30 17 1,237
Claims 2022-11-30 5 283
Drawings 2022-11-30 7 176
Description 2023-02-20 17 1,207
Claims 2023-02-20 5 280
Confirmation of electronic submission 2024-09-04 3 78
Notice of National Entry 2019-04-24 1 193
Courtesy - Certificate of Recordal (Transfer) 2021-08-04 1 402
Courtesy - Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2022-08-31 1 422
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2023-03-23 1 580
Final fee 2023-06-26 4 121
Electronic Grant Certificate 2023-08-28 1 2,527
International Preliminary Report on Patentability 2019-04-10 18 725
International search report 2019-04-10 5 119
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) 2019-04-10 1 39
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) 2019-04-10 2 67
National entry request 2019-04-10 4 110
Request under Section 37 2019-04-22 1 55
Response to section 37 2019-07-14 3 65
Request for examination / PPH request / Amendment 2022-08-10 22 1,070
Examiner requisition 2022-09-13 5 233
International preliminary examination report 2019-04-11 17 954
Amendment 2022-11-30 26 1,070
Interview Record 2023-02-08 1 22
Amendment 2023-02-20 16 606