Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
05002993-2744CA
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING AND ACCOMMODATING A LOSS OF
TORQUE ON A GAS TURBINE ENGINE
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present disclosure relates generally to gas turbine engines, and more
particularly
to detecting and accommodating the loss of a torque signal on gas turbine
engines.
BACKGROUND OF THE ART
Turboshaft and turboprop engines for aircraft use a torque signal for
governing either
on torque or on power. In the unlikely event that the torque signal is lost,
it is desirable for
engine control systems to be designed so that engine control is maintained. As
such, there is
a need for improvement.
SUMMARY
In accordance with a broad aspect, there is provided a method for operating a
gas
turbine engine. The method comprises obtaining, at a control system associated
with the gas
turbine engine, a measured engine core speed and an actual power demand for
the gas
turbine engine during operation thereof, determining an expected engine core
speed based
on the actual power demand from a predicted relationship between engine core
speed and
engine output power, comparing the measured engine core speed to the expected
engine
core speed, detecting a torque-related fault when the measured engine core
speed differs
from the expected engine core speed by more than a threshold; and
accommodating the
torque-related fault when detected.
In accordance with another broad aspect, there is provided system for
operating a gas
turbine engine, the system comprising a processing unit and a non-transitory
computer-
readable medium having stored thereon program instructions. The program
instructions are
executable by the processing unit for obtaining, at a control system
associated with the gas
turbine engine, a measured engine core speed and an actual power demand for
the gas
turbine engine during operation thereof, determining an expected engine core
speed based
on the actual power demand from a predicted relationship between engine core
speed and
engine output power, comparing the measured engine core speed to the expected
engine
1
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-12-03
05002993-2744CA
core speed, detecting a torque-related fault when the measured engine core
speed differs
from the expected engine core speed by more than a threshold; and
accommodating the
torque-related fault when detected.
Features of the systems, devices, and methods described herein may be used in
various combinations, in accordance with the embodiments described herein.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Reference is now made to the accompanying figures in which:
Fig. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view of an example gas turbine engine;
Fig. 2 is a graph of an example predicted relationship between engine output
power
and engine core speed;
Fig. 3 is the graph of Fig. 2 with maximum and minimum limits for engine core
speed
overlaid thereon;
Fig. 4 is a graph showing example design requirements for the maximum and
minimum limits for engine core speed;
Fig. 5 is a flowchart of an example method for operating a gas turbine engine;
and
Fig. 6 is a block diagram of an example computing device.
It will be noted that throughout the appended drawings, like features are
identified by
like reference numerals.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
There are described herein methods and systems for detecting and accommodating
a
torque signal failure or drift on turbine engines. A torque signal is used by
a control system to
govern a gas turbine engine. In the unlikely event where the torque signal is
lost or
erroneous, the control system is configured to detect the fault and
accommodate the fault. In
some embodiments, accommodating the fault comprises changing the mechanism by
which
the engine is governed. In particular, the control system is configured to
switch from a power-
governing mode to a speed-governing mode, whereby instead of modulating fuel
flow to the
2
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-12-03
05002993-2744CA
gas turbine engine on the basis of a power demand and an actual power output
from the
engine (i.e. power-governing mode), the fuel flow is modulated on the basis of
an expected
engine core speed for the power demand (i.e. speed-governing mode).
Fig. 1 illustrates a powerplant 100 for an aircraft of a type provided for use
in subsonic
flight, generally comprising an engine 110 and a propeller 120. The powerplant
100 generally
comprises in serial flow communication the propeller 120 attached to a shaft
108 and through
which ambient air is propelled, a compressor section 114 for pressurizing the
air, a combustor
116 in which the compressed air is mixed with fuel and ignited for generating
an annular
stream of hot combustion gases, and a turbine section 106 for extracting
energy from the
.. combustion gases. The propeller 120 converts rotary motion from the shaft
108 of the engine
110 to provide propulsive force for the aircraft, also known as thrust. The
propeller 120
comprises two or more propeller blades 122. A blade angle of the propeller
blades 122 may
be adjusted. The blade angle may be referred to as a beta angle, an angle of
attack or a
blade pitch. The powerplant 100 may be implemented to comprise a single or
multi-spool gas
turbine engine, where the turbine section 106 is connected to the propeller
120 through a
reduction gearbox (RGB).
Although illustrated as a turboprop engine, the powerplant 100 may
alternatively be
another type of engine, for example a turboshaft engine, also generally
comprising in serial
flow communication a compressor section, a combustor, and a turbine section,
and a fan
through which ambient air is propelled. In addition, although the powerplant
100 is described
herein for flight applications, it should be understood that other uses, such
as industrial or the
like, may apply.
Control of the operation of the engine 110 can be effected by one or more
control
systems, for example control system 150. The control system 150 may be an
engine
controller, such as a Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC), an Engine
Electronic
Control (EEC), an Engine Control Unit (ECU) or the like. In some embodiments,
the control
system 150 may be a combined engine and propeller controller, such as an
Engine &
Propeller Electronic Control (EPEC). The control system 150 can modulate a
fuel flow rate
provided to the engine 110, the position and/or orientation of variable
geometry mechanisms
.. within the engine 110, a bleed level of the engine 110, and the like.
3
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-12-03
05002993-2744CA
The control system 150 modulates fuel flow to the engine 110 in order to
obtain a
desired output power. In regular operation, fuel flow may be managed in a
closed-loop, such
that a given output parameter of the engine 110 is measured and fuel flow is
increased or
decreased as a function of the measured parameter in order to increase or
decrease,
respectively, the output power of the engine 110. For example, when governing
on torque or
power in a closed-loop, the torque or power of the engine 110 is determined
using one or
more sensor(s) 160. Power may be determined by multiplying torque by propeller
speed (Q x
Np). The sensor(s) 160 may comprise torque sensors to measure torque directly
from the
shaft 108 of the engine 110. The sensor(s) 160 may comprise speed sensors or
accelerometers to measure speed/acceleration from the shaft 108 and torque may
be
calculated from the measurements. Other embodiments for obtaining the torque
of the engine
110 may also be used.
In certain instances, the torque signal obtained from the sensor(s) 160 may be
lost or
erroneous. The control system 150 is configured to detect these circumstances
using one or
more predicted relationships between engine core speed and engine power. An
example is
illustrated in the graph 200 of Fig. 2. Curve 202 is the relationship between
engine core speed
and engine power. In other words, engine output power is expressed as a
function of the
engine core speed. Engine output power and/or engine core speed may be
normalized,
mechanical or percentage-based. The curve 202 may be built from numerical
simulation
results, experimental data, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments,
curve 202 is a
function of one or more operating conditions of the aircraft and/or engine,
such as altitude,
outside air temperature (OAT), airspeed, angle of entry of the airflow into
the engine intake,
and others. Installation effects of the engine may also be taken into account.
A plurality of
curves 202 may therefore be constructed, each one corresponding to a given set
of operating
conditions. In other embodiments, a single curve 202 is constructed to take
into account a
plurality of different operating conditions, and is applicable under more than
one set of
operating conditions.
The data points 204 are obtained across the envelope of a gas turbine engine
under
one or more sets of operating conditions and averaged to produce the curve
202. In some
embodiments, the data points 204 are obtained from a single gas turbine engine
under the
one or more operating conditions. In other embodiments, the data points are
obtained from a
4
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-12-03
05002993-2744CA
plurality of gas turbine engines under the one or more operating conditions,
and represent an
average of the multiple engines.
Referring to Fig. 3, graph 300 illustrates the predicted relationship curve
202, overlaid
with a maximum 302 and a minimum 304 threshold for engine core speed. For a
given engine
output power (Pott ), there is a corresponding expected engine core speed
(NGexpected). Using
upu
the maximum 302 and minimum 304 thresholds, the engine output power and
corresponding
expected engine core speed also have a maximum engine core speed (NG+) and a
minimum
engine core speed (NG-) associated thereto.
The control system 150 uses the maximum 302 and minimum 304 thresholds to
detect a torque-related fault. Using the actual power demand, an expected
engine core speed
is obtained from curve 202. The associated maximum and minimum engine core
speeds are
also obtained. A measured engine core speed is compared to the maximum and
minimum
engine core speeds. A torque-related fault is detected when the measured
engine core speed
is outside of the range defined by the maximum and minimum engine core speeds,
i.e.
greater than the maximum engine core speed or less than the minimum engine
core speed.
In some embodiments, the control system 150 is configured to limit the engine
core speed to
the maximum 302 and minimum 304 thresholds, as a safety measure. The engine
core speed
is prevented from going beyond the maximum threshold 302 and below the minimum
threshold 304. In such circumstances, a torque-related fault is detected when
the measured
engine core speed is on the threshold 302 or 304 for a given duration of time.
When a torque-related fault is detected, the control system 150 is configured
to
accommodate the fault. In some embodiments, accommodating the fault means
logging the
fault for maintenance purposes. In some embodiments, accommodating the fault
means
communicating the fault to the pilot. For example, the fault may be
annunciated in the cockpit
using one or more discrete switches, ARINC, a message on a cockpit display,
and other
suitable alerting mechanisms visible to the pilot or an aircraft operator. If
an engine core
speed limiting function was previously enabled, accommodating may comprise
disabling the
limiting function to allow extra power for emergencies. Disabling the limiting
function may be
triggered automatically upon detecting the torque-related fault, or it may be
triggered
manually by the pilot once the torque-related fault has been annunciated in
the cockpit. The
control system 150 may be configured to offer disabling of the limiting
function to the pilot
upon detection of the torque-related fault. In some embodiments, disabling
occurs upon a
5
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-12-03
05002993-2744CA
slam/reslam of a power lever angle (i.e. a fast movement towards either max
power or idle
gate). Other embodiments may also apply.
In some embodiments, accommodating the fault means governing the gas turbine
engine using the expected engine core speed. This is referred to herein as
operating in a
speed-governing mode, as opposed to governing in a power-governing mode. When
in
power-governing mode, the control system 150 compares an actual power output
to an actual
power demand and increases or decreases fuel flow accordingly. When in speed-
governing
mode, the control system 150 sets fuel flow to obtain a desired or target
engine core speed.
The desired or target engine core speed used is the expected engine core speed
that
corresponds to the actual power demand. For example, when in speed-governing
mode, a
position of a power lever may be used to determine the actual power demand.
Curve 202
may be used to obtain the expected engine core speed that corresponds to the
actual power
demand, and fuel flow may be set as a function of the expected engine core
speed. Switching
from the power-governing mode to the speed-governing mode may be triggered
automatically
.. upon detection of the torque-related fault, or it may be triggered manually
by the pilot once
the torque-related fault has been annunciated in the cockpit. The control
system 150 may be
configured to offer speed-governing mode to the pilot upon detection of the
torque-related
fault.
The maximum 302 and minimum 304 thresholds may be determined using the same
set of conditions as the predicted relationship curve 202. For example, if the
predicted
relationship curve 202 corresponds to a given set of operating conditions, the
maximum 302
and minimum 304 thresholds may also correspond to the same set of operating
conditions.
As such, the maximum 302 and minimum 304 thresholds may take into account one
or more
set of operating conditions, and may represent one or more gas turbine engine,
characterized
across an operating envelope of the engine(s).
The maximum 302 and minimum 304 thresholds may be designed to ensure
maximum rated power throughout the operating envelope of the engine by taking
into account
certain uncertainties with the predicted relationship curve 202. An example is
shown in the
graph 400 of Fig. 4. The anticipation curve 202 is separated from the
thresholds 302, 304 by
one or more region 402, 404, 406 that each account for a given type of
uncertainty associated
with the predicted relationship curve 202. For example, region 402 may account
for a
modeling inaccuracy, related to the model used to generate the predicted
relationship curve
6
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-12-03
05002993-2744CA
202. Region 404 may account for engine deterioration, which can vary from one
engine to
another and which may have an impact on the engine core speed. Region 406 may
account
for transitory operation of the engine, i.e. when the engine is in a transient
state instead of a
steady state, to allow for engine core speed transient overshoot following
slam accelerations
and/or engine core speed transient undershoot following slam decelerations,
for example.
Also provided on the graph 400 are curves that define a torque transitory
limit 408, a
thermal limit 410, and a loss of power or thrust control limit 412. These
limits 408, 410, 412
may be taken into account when setting the maximum 302 and minimum 304
thresholds, so
as to provide some design margin 414 when all uncertainties are taken into
account. The
maximum 302 threshold is thus set low enough to mitigate engine mechanical or
thermal
exceedances. The minimum 304 threshold is set sufficiently high to not
interfere with the
integrity or safety of the flight. The maximum 302 and minimum 304 thresholds
may be built
from numerical simulation results, experimental data, or a combination
thereof.
Referring to Fig. 5, there is illustrate a method 500 for operating a gas
turbine engine.
At step 502, engine parameters such as the measured engine core speed and the
actual
power demand of the engine are received. At step 504, the expected engine core
speed is
determined from a predicted relationship between engine output power and
engine core
speed. The actual power demand is used as an input to the predicted
relationship and the
expected engine core speed is output therefrom.
At step 506, the measured engine core speed is compared to the expected engine
core speed. If the measured engine core speed differs from the expected engine
core speed
by more than a threshold, a torque-related fault is detected. The threshold is
defined by a
range set out by maximum and minimum limits for the engine core speed. At step
508, the
torque-related fault is accommodated when detected.
The range set out by the maximum and minimum limits for the engine core speed
allows the use of rated power throughout the life of the engine without having
to monitor and
store any steady state deterioration value, since deterioration is already
taken into account in
the determination of the threshold. The limits also protect from high and low
torque signal
drifts and allows the identification of torque system issues, such as
permanent torque drift in
both directions, temporary loss of torque during a time when the aircraft or
engine conditions
7
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-12-03
05002993-2744CA
are changing, and engine malfunctions or failures resulting in a diverging gas
generator
speed at a given power reference.
The method 500 may also be applicable to an engine architecture having more
than
two rotors. For example, a three spools engine configuration, the two rotors
not mechanically
connected to the propeller could have their own predicted relationship and
their own
maximum and minimum engine core speed limits. For a two spool engine, the
engine core
speed refers to the speed of the gas generator. For a three spool engine,
there may be an
engine core speed for a high pressure spool and another engine core speed for
a low
pressure spool.
In some embodiments, the predicted relationship and the maximum and minimum
limits to engine core speed may be combined in a unique authorized NGN speed
range that
varies with the power demand, the operating condition (airspeed, OAT,
altitude) and the
modeling inaccuracy, transient operation, engine deterioration, installation
losses.
With reference to Fig. 6, the method 500 may be implemented by a computing
device
600, comprising a processing unit 602 and a memory 604 which has stored
therein computer-
executable instructions 606. The processing unit 602 may comprise any suitable
devices
configured to implement the system such that instructions 606, when executed
by the
computing device 600 or other programmable apparatus, may cause the
functions/acts/steps
of the method 500 as described herein to be executed. The processing unit 602
may
comprise, for example, any type of general-purpose microprocessor or
microcontroller, a
digital signal processing (DSP) processor, a central processing unit (CPU), an
integrated
circuit, a field programmable gate array (FPGA), a reconfigurable processor,
other suitably
programmed or programmable logic circuits, or any combination thereof.
The memory 604 may comprise any suitable known or other machine-readable
storage medium. The memory 604 may comprise non-transitory computer readable
storage
medium, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical,
electromagnetic,
infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable
combination of the
foregoing. The memory 604 may include a suitable combination of any type of
computer
memory that is located either internally or externally to a device, for
example random-access
memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), compact disc read-only memory (CDROM),
electro-optical memory, magneto-optical memory, erasable programmable read-
only memory
8
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-12-03
05002993-2744CA
(EPROM), and electrically-erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM),
Ferroelectric RAM (FRAM) or the like. Memory 604 may comprise any storage
means (e.g.,
devices) suitable for retrievably storing machine-readable instructions 606
executable by
processing unit 602.
The methods and systems for detection and accommodation described herein may
be
implemented in a high level procedural or object oriented programming or
scripting language,
or a combination thereof, to communicate with or assist in the operation of a
computer
system, for example the computing device 600. Alternatively, the methods and
systems for
detection and accommodation may be implemented in assembly or machine
language. The
language may be a compiled or interpreted language. Program code for
implementing the
methods and systems for detection and accommodation may be stored on a storage
media or
a device, for example a ROM, a magnetic disk, an optical disc, a flash drive,
or any other
suitable storage media or device. The program code may be readable by a
general or
special-purpose programmable computer for configuring and operating the
computer when
the storage media or device is read by the computer to perform the procedures
described
herein. Embodiments of the methods and systems for detection and accommodation
may
also be considered to be implemented by way of a non-transitory computer-
readable storage
medium having a computer program stored thereon. The computer program may
comprise
computer-readable instructions which cause a computer, or in some embodiments
the
processing unit 602 of the computing device 600, to operate in a specific and
predefined
manner to perform the functions described herein.
Computer-executable instructions may be in many forms, including program
modules,
executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules
include
routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., that perform
particular tasks
or implement particular abstract data types. Typically the functionality of
the program modules
may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments.
The embodiments described in this document provide non-limiting examples of
possible implementations of the present technology. Upon review of the present
disclosure, a
person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that changes may be made to
the
embodiments described herein without departing from the scope of the present
technology.
For example, various combinations of the software and/or hardware components
described
herein may be used. Yet further modifications could be implemented by a person
of ordinary
9
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-12-03
05002993-2744CA
skill in the art in view of the present disclosure, which modifications would
be within the scope
of the present technology.
Date Recue/Date Received 2020-12-03
