Language selection

Search

Patent 3211155 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 3211155
(54) English Title: SKYDIVING ROBOTS
(54) French Title: ROBOTS DE PARACHUTISME
Status: Application Compliant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B64D 23/00 (2006.01)
  • B64C 31/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HALEY, MARK (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • MARK HALEY
(71) Applicants :
  • MARK HALEY (United States of America)
(74) Agent:
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2023-09-05
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2024-05-06
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
18052927 (United States of America) 2022-11-06
2023-27260 (Japan) 2023-02-24

Abstracts

English Abstract


Device, system, and method for Skydiving Robots TM which can skydive using
customized
or off-the-shelf parachutes and deliver civilian or military payloads. The
Skydiving Robots can
freefall, open the parachute-s and steer toward the target, carry payloads,
operate in the daytime or
the pitch black at night using GPS guidance to land precisely. If they exited
the plane at up to or
over 30,000 feet above ground level (AGL) the final target could be miles
away. They are the
ideal reconnaissance scouts with a wide array of sensors such as cameras. They
can carry
payloads and precisely land within a few feet of a target.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS ¨ no Markups
What is claimed is:
1. A system for Skydiving Robots TM to skydive like humans using off-the-shelf
or customized
parachutes where the robots grasp the chute's toggles which open and then
control the chute and
then move their arms up and down like humans to turn, steer and land near the
target, where the
jump can begin at up to or over 30,000 feet above ground level (AGL) with a
system comprising:
human like hands for the robots to permit grasping the chute's toggles which
open the chute
and steer and operate the parachute and optionally to operate weapons for
military missions; and
a Global Positioning Sensor (GPS) and other sensors including the implied wind
speed, which
tracks the skydive and indicates the Skydiving Robot's position relative to
the target to permit the
robot to steer and land near the target using arm and hand movements to
control the chute's control
toggles similar to a real skydiver where the chute' s movement is controlled
by a jumper moving
their arms up and down which turns and controls and sets the speed of the
parachute; and
a computer vision camera system which permits the robot to find and pull the
toggle which
opens the parachute and control toggles for the parachute and then guide the
humanoid hand to
grasp the toggle and simply pull it down and up with the robot's arm movements
to steer, turn and
control the chute's speed and flare and land and during emergencies find
cutaway and pull the
reserve parachute; and
use a technique during freefall called tracking, where skydivers change their
body position to
turn, or move horizontally, which can be practiced using a simulator and/or
real jumps permitting
robots to precisely land and if the robot, like a human, is in an
aerodynamically stable position
there is no horizontal movement however if the skydiver puts their arms next
to their body and
their legs together straight out like a guided missile, they could move up to
or over 180 mph
horizontally and up to or over 300 mph vertically.
Page 1 of 4
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

2. The systeln of claim 1 further comprising: the robot's ability to skydive,
and carry civilian
or military payloads, using military and civilian parachutes and handle over a
dozen emergency
situations which can occur in skydives including failure of the parachute
where a cutaway is
needed and the backup chute must be deployed where this capability is provided
by the robots
ability to use its robotics hands to grasp the toggles, to cutaway the primary
chute and deploy the
backup chute and the ability to use the robot's cameras to track and avoid
collisions with other
skydivers where this ability is programmed after simulations with teams of
skydivers and the
ability to choose alternative landing sites using its cameras to detect clear
landing areas in case the
primary site is deem unreachable and/or unsafe.
3. The systeln of claim 1 further comprising: a low-cost, low-bandwidth, long-
rang digital radio
or a network for real-time communications with the ground, other skydivers or
with aircraft flying
which provides continuously updated data for real-time 3D maps (either
simulated or real) of
personnel both in the air or on the ground, which is crucial in missions where
their cell phone
communications failed whereas this system can provide real-time tracking of a
team to ensure the
success of the mission where this data can be integrated into broader secure
cell or other networks
plus the option in GPS denied environments to guide the robot using
alternatives such as Visual
Aided Navigation, which includes cameras and maps, Celestial Navigation which
tracks stars or
Micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) and Inertial Measurement Units (IMU).
4. The system of claim 1 wherein this data creates a virtual reality skydiving
shnulator with a
headset, or without a headset which uses a display, which is continuously
improved by a tracker
database plus feedback from expert skydivers so that after missions the
robot's movement and
accuracy can be tracked and reviewed to continuously irnprove the capabilities
of the skydiving
robots.
Page 1 of 4
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

5. The system of claim 1 further comprising: virtual reality headsets for
imrnersion into a 3D
world which is portable with just a PC, where some standalone headsets don't
require PCs, and
where the virtual 3D world could also be projected on screens, such as a TV or
projector, to permit
observers to see/evaluate the jumpers. and the where the headset or sensors
track arm rnovements
(which is how the jumper controls their turns and speed) and the user explores
by simply turning
your head for a unique trainer system which simulates round and ram-air chutes
anywhere in the
world and can inexpensively and compactly be used in planes while flying to
their missions for
teams of military or other skydivers, using deployment techniques such as High
Altitude High
Open (HAHO) jumps at altitudes of over 30,000 ft. and also night jumps.
6. The system of claim 1 further comprising: shared simulated flight data over
a network either
locally or remotely with the option to view night or day jurnps and see and
train over 12 jurnpers
with robots at the same time, which is a key requirement for elite units to
practice close formations
to avoid collisions and preform as a team which existing technology fails to
address; and this
technology cost-effectively permits tearns of 12 or more jumpers to practice
and irnmediately begin
rnissions to train with the Skydiving Robots.
7. The system of claim 1 further comprising a control system where the human
skydivers can
override the Skydiving Robot's movernents if plans change during a mission.
8. The system of claim 1 further comprising the option to use existing
robotics resupply systems
to deploy the Skydiving Robots if a simpler deployment option is recommended
based on the
capabilities of the skydiving robot vision and grasping limitations where the
Skydiving Robot
would have to simply extricate itself from the resupply robot once it landed
and the Skydiving
Robot could continue its mission to scout ahead of hurnan skydivers.
Page 1 of 4
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

9. The system of claim 1 further comprising a computer vison camera system
which perrnits the
robot to find, and with the humanoid hand grasp a weapon and then to identify
with vision and/or
a network capabilities to identify friend or foe, and if foe, the grasping
hand has aiming capability
to fire weapons at the foe with rnultiple backup checks to confirm the only
tirne the weapon is fired
is when a vision and/or networked capabilities or cornbination thereof
identifies friend or foe, robot
or humans and also the ability of the robot to walk, knell, lay down like
hurnans so it rnaintains
the optimal defensive position while it fires a weapon or to avoid being hit
by the enemy's
weapons.
10. The system of claim 1 further comprising the vision ability combined with
the arm
movement capability of the robot to steer away from other skydivers in the air
which come closer
than a set range and on landing to avoid objects such as trees.
11. A method for Skydiving Robots to skydive like humans using off-the-shelf
or customized
parachutes where the robots have carneras which permit them to find and grasp
the control toggles
for parachutes and then move their arrns and hurnans up and down like hurnans
to control the
toggles which operate the parachute allowing it to turn and glide and land
near the target, where
the jump can begin at up to or over 30,000 feet above ground level (AGL) and
where the robots
can land ahead of humans on skydives to scout ahead on the landing before the
human skydivers
land and the similar ability to find and grasp weapons and then aim and fire
these weapons at the
enemy.
12. The system of clairn 1 further comprising: the ability of the skydiving
robots to include a
payload of explosives, i.e. bombs, which could explode on impact after the
robot precisely landed
where the bornbs could weigh hundreds of pounds using parachutes and where
these explosives
could be placed in aerodynamically designed spaces in the robot's body and/or
legs to ensure it
Page 1 of 4
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

glides at the maximum speed, while human special ops skydivers (Special
Operators or Special
Forces) often carry hundreds of pounds of supplies beneath them which reduces
the parachute's
speed, while the aerodynarnically sleek robot could glide more rapidly over 30
rniles from the exit
point of the aircraft when deployed up to 25,000 feet or higher elevation,
i.e. above sea levelõ and
then precisely landing within feet of the target, ideally deployed under the
cover of darkness to
avoid enemy detection, and the additional option to land without detonation,
and to act as a scout
and them explode when the enemy comes to close, i.e. within 70 or more feet of
the robot.
13. The system of claim 1 further comprising: the option to fly an aircraft
deep behind enerny
lines when deploying the skydiving robot so the robot could land hundreds or
even thousands of
miles behind enemy lines, covering literally every part of any country in the
world and if the
aircraft deploying the robot was an autonomous unmanned vehicle, no hurnan
would need to risk
their lives in the mission of deploying the skydiving robot and if the
skydiving robot was deployed
in a HALO (high altitude ¨ low opening) jump, the robot could exit the
aircraft at up to or over
30,000 feet and then freefall at a terminal speed of up to or over 120 miles
per hour and land within
a few feet of the target in only 2 or 3 minutes, thereby becorning an
extremely difficult target to
shoot down.
14. The systern of claim 1 further comprising: the option with networked
Virtual Reality
headsets which display a virtual 3D world and which track the movements of a
jumper's arms and
legs permit practicing simulated free falls for teams of humans and/or
skydiving robots using either
a wind tunnel or without the wind tunnel since the headset tracks their
arm/leg movements whether
they are floating horizontally in the wind tunnel or standing up permitting
the jumpers to practice
missions worldwide including HALO or HAHO jurnps and continuing the simulation
after the
parachute opens tracking a complete mission from exiting the aircraft to
landing where the virtual
Page 1 of 4
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

3D world could also be projected on screens, such as a TV or projector, to
permit observers to
see/evaluate the jumpers.
15. The system of claim 1 further comprising: the ability of skydiving robots
or unrnanned
aerial vehicles (UAVs) to be deployed by aircraft or more effectively by
weather type or others
balloons launched, ideally at night, which can evade air defense systems which
use missiles to
destroy aircraft, where these balloons can carry payloads up to or over 8,000
lb., to altitudes up to
or over 160,000 feet and use the jet streams, which have speeds of up to or
over 200 mph, which
usually flow from west to east, thereby permitting precise landings anywhere
along jet streams
worldwide where skydiving robots, which could be as small as or smaller than 5
x 2 x 1.5 ft., which
are srnaller than UAVs, powered or gliders, which are easier to shoot down and
the robots would
be aerodynamics designed to maxirnize speed like human skydiving speed record
holders and
freefall from up to or over 80,000 ft. reaching the target in rninutes and
during freefall use a
technique called tracking, where skydivers change their body position to turn,
or move
horizontally, which can be practiced using a simulator and/or real jumps and
if the robot, like a
human, is in an aerodynarnically stable position there is no horizontal
movement however if the
skydiver puts their arms next to their body and their legs together straight
out like a guided missile,
they could move up to or over 180 mph horizontally and up to or over 300 mph
vertically and, if
the mission was to crash an explosive into the target, a parachute would not
be needed
significantly reducing the cost and cornplexity of the robots, however a
backup parachute with a
standard Automatic Deployment Device (ADD) could be used in case of robotic
freefall
rnalfunctions and while wingsuits with horizontal speeds of up to or over 240
mph could be used,
only retractable wings would permit holding at 0 mph horizontally which can
help in pinpoint
landings.
Page 1 of 4
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

Page 1 of 4

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


This application is a continuation-in-part application of and claims priority
to U.S.
Patent Application No. 16852505 entitled "Automatic Ejection Safety Technology
with a Skydiving Simulator for Improving Pilot Safety", filed on April 19,
2020, the
disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
TECHNICAL FIELD ¨ No Markups
Device, system, and method for Skydiving Robots TM which can skydive using off-
the-shelf or
customized parachutes and deliver military or civilian payloads, such as
airdropping humanitarian
supplies after disasters, such as earthquakes, floods, or forest fires. The
Skydiving Robots can
freefall, open the parachute and steer toward the target, carry payloads,
operate in the daytime or
the pitch black at night using GPS guidance to land precisely. If they exited
the plane at up to or
above 30,000 feet above ground level (AGL) the final target could be miles
away. They are the
ideal reconnaissance scouts with an array of sensors such as cameras and they
can carry
payloads and precisely land within a few feet of the target.
BACKGROUND
Device, system, and method which permits Skydiving Robots to skydive, carry
explosive
or non-explosive payloads, and scout ahead of human skydivers, or to land
simultaneously, during
special ops or other military or nonmilitary missions.
Military free fall (MFF) offers the ideal method to insert personnel and
supplies from transport
planes. They fly at up to 35,000 feet or higher to avoid enemy surface to air
missiles (SAM). Then
the jumpers and supplies exit using either HALO (high altitude ¨ low opening)
or HAHO (high
altitude ¨ high opening). To permit the Skydiving Robots to scout ahead, the
robots could use
HALO, free falling at speeds up to or over 120 miles per hour and landing only
3 minutes after
Page 1 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

exiting the aircraft at up to or over 30,000 feet. On the other hand, the HAHO
opening or some
other variant such as opening at 15,000 feet (since the oxygen is limited),
thereby ensuring that the
Special Ops troops can hover longer while they wait for all clear from the
scouting robots. If the
landing site is clear, the skydivers would proceed to the target. If not, they
could land at a backup
site, miles from the original target.
HAHO jumps permit the skydivers to glide more than 40 miles from the drop
point. And if the
robots detect that the original targeted landing site has been compromised,
the troops can continue
to glide miles to a backup landing site.
The author of this patent, Mark Haley, was a Professor in Japan where he
developed land and
air robots including winning international competitions ranking in the top 6.
Mr. Haley also
authored a patent on the Skydiving Tracker which trains skydivers. The logic
in that technology is
a crucial part of the logic needed for the Skydiving Robots to precisely land
at the target. In his
original research Mr. Haley called Skydiving "A 6-minute dance with Death".
The combination
of the Skydiving Robots with real Special Ups Jumpers is even more challenging
and dangerous ¨
it's a complex team effort like a complex dance ensemble between the robots
and humans to
complete missions safely and efficiently.
A Resupply System - The Skydiving Robots land precisely and quickly and are
ideal to deliver
supplies and the ideal scouts. At speeds of over 150 mph, they can maneuver in
high winds and
avoid enemy fire.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 Skydiving Robots (Overview)
FIG. 2 Skydiving Robots ¨ Freefall, Open Chute, Steer Chute, Land
Page 2 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

FIG. 3 Sample Ground Scout
FIG. 4 Flowchart Skydive Training (Human and/or Robots)
FIG. 5 Moving Robotic and/or Human Arms to control jumps in Simulations
FIG. 6 Practicing Simulations with Teams of Human and/or Robot Skydivers
FIG. 7 Standard and Vertical Freefalls during Skydives and Freefalls with
Wingsuits
FIG. 8 Sample Jet stream from Los Angeles to Chicago
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
This device, system and method offers an integrated method using Skydiving
Robots to
act as scouts ahead of the deployment of teams of skydivers. These humanoid
robots would use
off-the-shelf parachutes and weapons and act as the scouts ahead of mission or
real skydivers ¨
military or civilian. To enhance the capabilities of these robots on the
ground, additional power
units and or solar powered units could provide electric recharging for the
robots thereby extending
their active time on missions. For illustration purposes a solar panel is
shown on the face of the
Skydiving Robots. This could provide crucial backup if the batteries ran out
before a crucial
mission was complete.
FIG. 1 shows the general capabilities of the Skydiving Robots, which permits
these humanoid
robots to use off-the-shelf military parachutes for jumps and standard weapons
on the ground.
Block 102 shows technical skills to operate off-the shelf parachutes:
freefall, open chute, steer
chute towards target, brake, and land. Block 103 shows the robots handling off-
the shelf weapons.
However, the design of the robots would depend on cost considerations. For
example, if it was
too difficult and expensive for the robots to operate standard military
weapons, a customized
Page 3 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

weapon might be needed. Also, while it's more cost effective to use standard
military parachutes,
a customized chute might also be needed. However, in general, robots can "see"
with cameras and
find and grasp control toggles and which then move its arms up and down ¨
these are all the skills
needed to operate chutes.
FIG 2 shows the basic capabilities needed by a Skydiving Robot TM. It must be
able to move its
arms, which are holding the chutes' toggles, up and down. When the arms are
fully raised, the
chute glides in a straight line at the maximum speed. If one arm moves down,
the chute turns in
that direction. If both arms are down to the waist, this is known as a half
brake where the chute
moves ahead but at a reduced speed. When both arms are fully down, this is
known as full braking,
or flaring, and the chute moves only slowly ahead. However, if the full brake
is held for more than
a few seconds, this creates a stall which can create a dangerous flight
condition. Therefore, the
robot's logic as with real skydivers has to include the ability to only gently
apply full brakes during
the final landing.
Blocks 201,202 and 203 provide more illustrations of the skills needed by the
Skydiving Robot.
An inexpensive GPS system and other sensors including the implied wind speed,
would provide
guidance towards the target (low-cost GPS systems are available for a few
hundred dollars). Then
the robot must hold the parachutes' toggles and move them up and down by
simply moving its
arms up and down. When both hands are fully up the parachute glides forward at
the maximum
speed. When both arms are down this is a hard brake, and the parachute rapidly
decreases in speed
ultimately coming into a dangerous stall. With only the left or right arm
down, the chute turns left
and right respectfully.
FIG. 3¨ Block 301. On the ground, a weapon, if needed, could be built into the
robot. Resupply
robots would be useful since they could deliver crucial extra supply supplies
needed by the robots
Page 4 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

such as power units to recharge the Skydiving Robots and extra weapons and
supplies for the
humans (troops) being deployed on the mission. Analytical Software Inc.
demonstrated a low-cost
version which delivers payloads of 200 pounds.
Technological Challenges to Make the Skydiving Robot Cost Effective ¨ A
challenge is to
have light-weight humanoid hands which can grasp a parachute control toggle
and grasp a gun
trigger. The second technological cost-effective challenge is to coordinate
the vision capability of
the robot with its hands providing the ability to find and hold the toggle and
find and hold the gun.
Finally, it needs the vision and grasping needs to identify friend or foe ¨
either with simple
networked links which identify the location of the human skydivers or a vision
system which uses
designed patches or a combination of both. Once those technological hurdles
are complete, the
Skydiving Robot could complete its scout mission, autonomously and cost-
efficiently. In short,
the Skydiving Robot needs the vision and grasping capabilities to grasp the
toggles to control the
parachute and move its arms up and down to steer the steer and land the chute
and then find and
grasp the weapons and identify friend or foe, then if foe, aim and fire
weapons.
Expediting Implementation of the Technology in this patent ¨ Mark Haley, the
author of this
patent, has an existing patent on training military and civilian jumpers to
become expert skydivers
on all types of military and civilian parachutes. The logic of this technology
could be embedded
into the Skydiving Robots thereby ensuring that these Skydiving Robots quickly
became expert
skydivers on all types of parachutes in all types of weather conditions around
the role. A key
feature is the ability to handle over a dozen emergency situations which often
occur in skydives
including failure of the parachute where a cutaway is needed, and the backup
chute must be
deployed. In short, the Skydiving Robot needs the same skydiving skills as a
skydiver and the
following provides more background on achieving this goal.
Page 5 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

FIG. 4 highlights how the system: (1) dramatically improves training teams of
skydivers
(humans or robots) and (2) helps prevent the leading causes of skydiving
deaths including mid-air
collisions and landing in dangerous areas such as lakes or power lines.
Collecting flight data of the
jumps continues to improve the system. The skydiving flight data tracks and
debriefs a planeload
of jumpers (humans and/or robots) and was successfully used on hundreds of
jumps and tracked
and debriefed accidents in minutes where previously it took months to analyze
accidents. It then
plots this data into interactive maps of any locations worldwide so it can be
used by skydivers.
FIG. 4 highlights one of the most important features is that it allows teams
of 12 or more
jumpers to train together. The GPS data from the 12 or more jumpers
continuously updates the
flight data database which is used for accident investigations and debriefings
enhances the Virtual
Reality simulator and even improves the error-checking of the data by cross-
checking flight data
between jumpers (you know the landing elevation and exit point so this helps
the GPS data from
12 jumpers to be cross-checked and corrected).
In block 1, low-cost trackers from any of a wide range of trackers (widely
used trackers for
cars, hiking and digital watches and which could be customized for any
proprietary systems) with
our proprietary error-checking creates clean flight data (Latitude, Longitude,
Altitude, etc.). There
are a number of error-checking techniques from basic to more advanced which we
use (the
customer sees none of these and each time they start the program they agree
not to reverse engineer
our technology as part of the user's agreement - if they disagree, they can't
start the program). GPS
data can be flawed for a number of reasons. Usually multiple satellites
provide this info, but as the
ground is more cluttered with forests, hills, or mountains, less data is
available and the latitude,
longitude and altitude readings fail. Moreover, when the jumpers are in the
plane sometimes where
they sit also provides poor data. Our technology rates trackers. Some of the
best-selling digital
Page 6 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

watches are not that good, and even the widely used trackers for cars or
hiking give readings which
show that the jumper was 300 ft. underground when they landed. Trackers
continue to evolve and
we rate and rank the best, least expensive options. For additional details on
these error-checking
techniques see the last pages before the claims.
The tracking data impacts four other features: In block 2 the flight data is
continuously used
to add to a Proprietary Skydiving database with detailed flight data on
hundreds of jumps. In block
3 the flight data continuously enhances the Virtual Reality (VR) 3D Flight
Simulator which permits
teams of 12 or more jumpers networked to train together. In block 4 the flight
data creates Stunning
3D Interactive Flight Paths of Jumpers/Aircraft for Debriefings/Accident
Investigations. In block
the flight data provides optional real-time commands to the jumper to guide
towards the target.
In block 6 feedback from expert jumpers is also used to continuously enhance
the VR simulator.
The net result of the continuously growing clean proprietary skydiving and
other databases is an
endlessly improving VR simulator and 3D mapping of flight data for debriefings
and accident
investigations: In block 7 a state-of-the-art training system for skydivers
offers simulations before
jumps, guidance during jumps and debriefings after jumps. Finally, in block 8
more jumps with
more tracking improves training of jumpers, pilots, and spotters, and enhances
the database and
VR simulator.
What makes this technology unique is: (1) low-cost trackers from $100 and also
it can be
customized for expensive trackers which provide clean flight data (using our
technology to clear
up GPS data which has many errors); (2) using this flight data for accident
investigations, jump
debriefings and for reliable data for the Virtual reality simulator (robots
and human would jump
together, practice together and debrief together); (3) the related maps to
continuously monitor
teams in the air and on the ground for the simulation or real missions; (4)
the simulator uses both
Page 7 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

this data plus feedback from expert jumpers on many types of parachutes, such
as round chutes,
an older technology and precise faster RAM chutes, now widely used; and (5)
using a state-of-the-
art system which trains teams of skydivers with networked realistic
interactive jumps using
commercially available 3D low-cost maps available on PCs or cell phones..
One of the most important features of our system is that we network teams of
jumpers where
they just put their headsets on, each with a $500 device, so teams of 12
jumpers, robots and/or
human, can train together (FIG. 6) where the virtual 3D world could also be
projected on screens,
such as a TV or projector, to permit observers to see/evaluate the jumpers.
Key components and contributions of the system include methods for efficient
data
consolidation from multiple sensors and immediate intuitive feedback. These
provide rapid
training, real-time tracking and status notification, and post-jump accident
investigation and flight
debriefing for skydivers. The system also incorporates a simulator which can
be used prior to
jumps. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation was performed on real jumps
(over four hundred
total jumps), the results of which are encouraging towards the use of this
system for all skydivers
from training to post-jump feedback. For real-time data acquisition, an all-
inclusive approach to
jump analysis is utilized, whereby data from GPS, a priori topological terrain
data, flight path, and
pilot and spotter information are all consolidated to rapidly inform
qualitative feedback to the
jumper. This low-cost approach is robust compared to poor global positioning
system
(GPS) readings by leveraging multiple types of inexpensive, lightweight
sensors and a rule-based
classifier to isolate and extrapolate only reliable sensor information from
hundreds of thousands
of relevant data points. The method is furthermore extendable to and improved
with multiple
simultaneous jumpers¨ more jumpers provide additional data for cross-checking
and consistency.
Page 8 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

In addition to novel data acquisition and processing, the system extracts
relevant data and
transforms the data into intuitive, 3D visual feedback during or almost
immediately following the
jump. 3D aircraft flight path, jump path and landing accuracy are just a few
of the analytical
capabilities which are generated immediately.
Technical improvements to the jumpers are also calculated and displayed. Such
information is
useful, for example, to debrief both spotters and jumpers to prepare for
safely and accurately
landing on target. The tracking system is also amenable to various types of
tracker sensors and
hardware and can thus provide a basis for quantitative comparison between
hardware as it relates
to skydive tracking. In contrast to the proposed system, other currently
implemented methods rely
on single-modality sensing and expensive, non-robots tracking equipment and
procedures, and can
require months of analysis and data refinement before accident investigations
can be reliably
conducted. The method is furthermore extendable to and improved with multiple
simultaneous
jumpers¨ more jumpers provide additional data for cross-checking and
consistency. A 2016 injury
was analyzed within fifteen minutes after receiving flight data, and detailed
3D flight path, data
and graphics were generated. It isolated the cause of the accident, showed the
best camera angles
for the jump, and simultaneously displayed the flight data while also
evaluating jumpers, spotters,
and pilots. Also, data was collected from twelve jumpers during their rookie
training and
from veteran jumpers. This consisted of seventy-five individual jumps over two
weeks, and the
tracked data provided quantitative evidence of diver skill improvement using
the intelligent
tracking system. With the tracking and feedback system, rookie jumpers overall
doubled their
landing accuracy between the first and second week of jumps.
The inventor developed the "Skydiver Tracker", which is skydiving
training/safety technology.
It has been purchased and successfully field-tested in hundreds of jumps by
the U.S. government
Page 9 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

and as noted by a skydiver training manager, it allows them "to help teach
parachute manipulation
to new jumpers and refine techniques for experienced jumpers... Your concept
of a GPS-guided
cargo delivery system is of interest to us" since "being able to stay at a
higher altitude to deliver
cargo packages would lower our mission risk."
These interrelated technologies transform skydiving training/safety with: (1)
a Virtual Reality
(VR) simulator which permits practicing simulated jumps anywhere in the world
prior to a real
skydive and (2) two ounce $100 trackers which create actual flight data/3D
graphics for post-jump
debriefings/accident investigations far beyond existing capabilities as shown
in the jump into the
Grand Canyon. It should be used on every jump for humans and/or robots,
especially during
teamwork training. This black box (low-cost trackers with additional options)
provides flight data
and interactive 3D maps and videos which can be: (1) used for debriefings for
the spotter, pilot,
and jumpers after skydives; and (2) it provides crucial flight data for
accident investigations. The
headset and sensors permit the user to move their arms as in real skydives and
practice jumps
anywhere in the world. FIG. 5 shows a smokejumper (in gear) 501 training on
our non-Virtual
Reality (VR) version, but a more powerful option shows a VR Headset 504 where
no display 502
is needed. The sensor 503 tracks the users' arm movements like a real skydive.
The jumper pulls
imaginary (or real) toggles which control the chute. If their arms are
straight up, they fly at the
maximum speed straight ahead but if one arm, i.e., the left, is down they turn
left.
Team Training - The training is also for a team of 12 or more jumpers which
includes any
combination of humans and/or skydiving robots. FIG. 6 shows how low-cost Jump
VR Simulators
(601, 609) can be set up in minutes to train a team. The skydiving instructor
sees all the jumpers
in a top-down daytime view with their flight data and all topography on a 3D
color map on the
Page 10 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

screen 616. Due to space limitations, FIG. 6 only shows 12 skydivers on the
map (Jumpers J1 -
J12) and the headsets of 9 members of the team who are practicing together.
The team could train
in the same room or worldwide on a network. During this mission they are
circling an island. For
night jumps, each jumper's headset only shows a pitch-black sky with small
indicator lights to
avoid each other.
Skydiving Robot which carries Explosive Payloads - A crucial final feature of
the skydiving
robot is to include the option to have it carry explosives, i.e., bombs, or
nonexplosive payloads,
which the robot could precisely deliver into enemy territory. The robot could
use its skydiving
capability to skydive over 30 miles after exiting the aircraft where the exit
elevation is up to 25,000
feet or more, i.e., the exit point above sea level. The robot could carry
bombs weighing hundreds
of pounds which is possible using off-the-shelf military parachutes since
special ops human
skydivers often carry hundreds of pounds of payloads of supplies during their
jumps. However,
when human skydivers carry extra supplies, they drag them beneath them which
slows up the speed
of the parachute. Fortunately, the skydiving robot could be designed to be
relatively light, i.e., less
than 100 pounds, and the explosives could be placed in aerodynamically
designed spaces within
the robot's body and/or legs to easily carry over 150 lbs. of explosives. Then
the robot could weigh
250 pounds or more, similar to the weight of a human and the robot would be
aerodynamically
built to minimize drag and thereby maximize its speed as it glided up to or
over 30 miles within
enemy territory. Using a robot's precise skydiving capability, it could land
within a few feet of the
target thereby permitting robots either acting alone or with teams of robots
to precisely bomb
enemy targets up to 30 miles or more behind enemy lines, ideally at night to
avoid enemy detection.
Another option for the skydiving robot would be to land without detonation and
then serve as a
scout before humans skydive or before attacks on the enemy to ensure precise
deployment of
Page 11 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

troops and/or bombing. Whenever the enemy approached too closely to the scout
robot on the
ground ¨ it would then detonate its bomb to both attack the enemy and to avoid
giving the enemy
any valuable technical information about the robot.
Deploying the Skydiving Robot ¨ While for safety the aircraft deploying the
robot could stay
away from enemy lines, if the aircraft flew into enemy territory to deploy the
robot, then the robot
could land hundreds or even thousands of miles behind enemy lines, covering
literally every part
of any country in the world. And if the aircraft deploying the robot was an
autonomous unmanned
vehicle, no human would need to risk their lives in the mission of deploying
the skydiving robot.
Finally, and if the skydiving robot was deployed in a HALO (high altitude ¨
low opening) mission,
the robot could exit the aircraft at up to or over 30,000 feet and then
freefall at a terminal speed of
roughly 120 miles per hour and land within a few feet of the target in only 2
or 3 minutes, thereby
becoming an extremely difficult target to shoot down.
GPS denied environment¨ While GPS inexpensively guides the robot to the
target, backup
options in GPS denied environments include Visual Aided Navigation, which
includes cameras
and maps, Celestial Navigation which tracks stars or Micro-electromechanical
systems (MEMS)
and Inertial Measurement Units (IMU).
Simulated Free Falls ¨ Skydives include the free fall before the parachute
opens followed by
steering the chute to landing (Fig. 2). Wind tunnels permit free falls
training for as little as $100
per jump, however they lack the headset related to the Skydiving Tracker shown
in Fig. 5.
Networked Virtual Reality headsets which display a virtual 3D world and which
track the
movements of a jumper's arms and legs permit practicing simulated free falls
for teams of humans
and/or skydiving robots using either a wind tunnel or without the wind tunnel
since the headset
tracks their arm/leg movements whether they are floating horizontally in the
wind tunnel or
Page 12 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

standing up permitting the jumpers to practice missions worldwide including
HALO or HAHO
jumps and continuing the simulation after the parachute opens tracking a
complete mission from
exiting the aircraft to landing where the virtual 3D world could also be
projected on screens, such
as a TV or projector, to permit observers to see/evaluate the jumpers.
Weather type or others balloons to deploy robots ¨ Hundreds of skydiving
robots,
costing as little as $10,000 ($2023) or less each, could be deployed by a
large military transport
aircraft. However, air defense systems use missiles which cost up to or over
$200,000 each, to
destroy aircraft which cost up to or over $100 million, effectively creating
no fly zones. An
alternative deployment, ideally at night, would be balloons, which carry
payloads up to or over
8,000 lb., carrying unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), skydiving robots, etc.,
to altitudes up to
160,000 feet. Jet streams, which have speeds of up to or over 250 mph, which
exist between
roughly 30,000 feet and 50,000 feet, and usually flow from west to east and
can be predicted by
meteorologists, provide cost effective penetration of air defense systems
precisely landing
anywhere along jet streams worldwide. The jet streams vary from location to
location and change
from day to day. Figure 8 shows that a balloon launched into a jet stream of
100 mph in LA could
theoretically reach Chicago within about 18 hours. Pilots fly with jet streams
to fly faster or above
them to avoid headwinds. Skydiving robots, which could be as small as or
smaller than 5 x 2 x 1.5
ft., which are smaller than UAVs, powered or gliders, which are easier to
shoot down. The robots
would be aerodynamics designed to maximize speed like human skydiving speed
record holders
and freefall from up to or over 80,000 ft. reaching the target in minutes and
use a technique called
tracking, where skydivers change their body position to turn, or move
horizontally, which can be
practiced using a simulator such as the Skydiving tracker and/or real jumps
permitting robots to
precisely land without opening the parachute. Wind tunnels aren't ideal for
horizontal training.
Page 13 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

Fig. 7 (top left) shows a skydiver in an aerodynamically stable position where
there is no horizontal
movement. If the skydiver puts their arms next to their body and their legs
together straight out
like a guided missile, they could move up to or over 180 mph horizontally and
up to or over 300
mph vertically (Fig. 7, right, poor form). If the mission was to crash an
explosive into the target, a
parachute would not be needed, significantly reducing the cost and complexity
of the robots.
However, a backup parachute with a standard Automatic Deployment Device (ADD)
could be
used to handle robotic freefall malfunctions. This amazing technology provides
precision
landings within 50 ft. of targets, worldwide, thousands of miles away using a
robot which
costs as little as $5,000 or less. While wingsuits Fig. 7 (bottom left -top-
down view) with
horizontal speeds of up to or over 240 mph could be used, only retractable
wings would permit
holding at 0 mph horizontally which can help in pinpoint landings.
SIGNED
/Mark Haley/ 07/02/2023
Page 14 of 14
Date Recue/Date Received 2023-09-05

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Submission of Prior Art 2024-05-31
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2024-05-28
Inactive: Ack. of Reinst. (Due Care Not Required): Corr. Sent 2024-05-28
Inactive: Office letter 2024-05-28
Letter Sent 2024-05-27
Inactive: Compliance - Formalities: Resp. Rec'd 2024-05-23
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2024-05-23
Maintenance Request Received 2024-05-23
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2024-05-23
Priority Document Response/Outstanding Document Received 2024-05-21
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2024-05-06
Inactive: Cover page published 2024-05-05
Letter Sent 2024-04-19
Inactive: Office letter 2024-04-19
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Notice of Non Compliance 2023-12-13
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2023-11-05
Inactive: IPC assigned 2023-11-05
Inactive: IPC assigned 2023-11-05
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 2023-09-26
Letter sent 2023-09-26
Priority Claim Requirements Determined Compliant 2023-09-13
Letter Sent 2023-09-13
Priority Claim Requirements Determined Compliant 2023-09-13
Request for Priority Received 2023-09-13
Request for Priority Received 2023-09-13
Application Received - Regular National 2023-09-05
Inactive: Pre-classification 2023-09-05
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2023-09-05
Inactive: QC images - Scanning 2023-09-05

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2023-12-13

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2024-05-23

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 2023-09-05 2023-09-05
Reinstatement 2024-12-13 2024-05-23
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 2026-09-08 2024-05-23
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2025-09-05 2024-05-23
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MARK HALEY
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2024-04-11 1 10
Cover Page 2024-04-11 1 39
Claims 2023-09-05 7 255
Description 2023-09-05 14 570
Abstract 2023-09-05 1 15
Drawings 2023-09-05 8 160
Courtesy - Office Letter 2024-04-19 2 211
Priority document 2024-05-21 3 61
Courtesy - Acknowledgment of Restoration of the Right of Priority 2024-05-27 2 210
Reinstatement 2024-05-23 3 62
Maintenance fee payment 2024-05-23 3 62
Courtesy - Office Letter 2024-05-28 1 171
Amendment / response to report 2024-05-28 3 73
Courtesy - Acknowledgment of Reinstatement (Request for Examination (Due Care not Required)) 2024-05-28 1 417
Priority documents requested 2024-04-19 1 538
Courtesy - Filing certificate 2023-09-26 1 567
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R65) 2024-02-07 1 539
New application 2023-09-05 7 152
Commissioner’s Notice - Non-Compliant Application 2023-09-13 2 203