Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
~ 2~30 RCA 71,752
The present invention relates to temperature-
sensitive control circuits which rely upon the change with
temperature in the operating characteristics of semiconductor
devices included in their construction, which convent.ionally
is in monollthic integrated circuit form.
Vittoæ in United States Patent No. 3,809,929
issued 7 ~ay 1974 and entitled "Temperature Sensing Device"
describes a temperature-sensitive control circuit in which
the emitter-to-base potential of a first transistor arranged
to operate at a predetermined collector current level is
divided and applied to a second transistor, their resultant
collector currents then being differentially compared using
a current mirror amplifier, to develop an output current
which changes polarity at a prescribed temperature. The
present inventor, Ahmed, ln United States Patent No~ 3,825,778
issued 23 July 1974 and entitled 'ITemperature-Sensitive
Control Circuit" describes a temperature--sensitive control
circuit in which the offset potential across a first series
connection, of a number n of forward-biased diodes, arranged
2~ to operate at predetermined current level, is applied -to
a second series connection, of a transistor base-emitter
junction and n further forward biased diodes, with the
collector current of the transistor being differentially
compared with a current equal to or proportional to the
Z5 current flowing through the first series connection. This
comparison is carried~out using a current mirror amplifier
for the purpose of developing an output current which changes
polarity at a prescribed temperature. Also of interest with
regard to the present invention is Crowle's United States
Patent No. 4,021,722 issued 3 ~ay 1977 and en-titled
-2-
~7
. . ~,
~2~ RCA 71,752
1 "Temperature Sensitive Current Divider" in which a fraction
of the emitter-to-base potential o~ a reference transistor
is applied between the base electrodes of two transistors
in long-tailed pair configuration, the collector currents
o~ the long-tailed pair transistors being differentially
compared using a current mirror amplifier, to develop an
output current which changes polarity at a prescribed
temperature.
The aforementioned prior art temperature-sensitive
control circuits each have the problem that a transis-tor
providing collector current as one of the collector currents
to ~e compared operates with a comparatively miniscule
; collector current, requiring the current mirror amplifier
-used in making comparison to have a current gain that is
a small fraction or a large multiple o~ minus unity. Such
a current mirror amplifier tends to take up excessive die
area in a monolithic integrated circuit construction. But
also the incremental change with temperature of the miniscule
collector current is smaller than one would like and
consequently, the control circuit has to operate into a
rather high impedance load to maintain high sensitivity to
temperature change.
In a temperature-sensitive control circuit embodying
the present invention, the foregoing problems are surmounted.
The emitter-to-base potential of a first transistor arranged
to operate at a predetermined collector current level is
scaled up and applied to a second transistor, having its
collector electrode connected to an output terminal for the
~- temperature-sensitive control circuit. The scaled up emitter-
to-base potential of the first transistor when applied as
-3-
.. c;
,~ .
RCA 71,752
3~
1 emitter-to-base potential to the second transistor conditions
the second transistor for substantial eollector current
which has desirably increased incremental ehange with
temperature.
In the drawing:
FIGURE 1 is a plot of transistor characteristies
versus temperature used for illustrating the differences
in operation of the present invention and of prior art
configurations of the sort described by Vittoz;
lQ FIGURES 2 and 3 are schematic diagrams of
temperature-sensitive control circuits embodying the present
invention and relying on current comparison of the colleetor
eurrent of the second transistor and a fixed souree of current
to provide eontrol current to a subsequent transistor;
1 FIGURES 4 and 5 are sehematie diagrams of temperature-
sensitive control eireuits embodying the present invention
: and relying on voltage eomparison to provide eontrol current
to subsequent cireuitry; and
: i
FIGURE 6 is a sehematie diagram of a temperature
sensitive eontrol circuit embodying the present invention
and providing for stabilization of eireuit temperature.
FIGURE 1 shows, on a linear voltage versus linear
temperature plot (not necessarily to scale) loci l, 2, 3, 4,
5 of the emitter-to-base voltages, or VBE's, of transistors
operated with respectively increasing values of IC/K. These
loci are defined by the following equation defining transistor
action~
- IC = KT exp E(-q/kt) (Vg(0) - VsE)] (l)
wherein IC is transistor collector current,
K is a temperature-independent constant depending
-4-
RCA 71.,752
3~
I on geometrical factors and fixed physical constants,
T is absolute -temperature,
r is determined by the temperature dependence of
the diffusion constant of minority carriers in the base
regi.on of the trans.istor (e~ualling 1.5 :Eor NPN silicon
transis-tor ancl 1.3 for PNP silicon transistors),
q is the charge on an electron,
; k is Boltxmann's cons-tant,
V~(o) is the extrapolated bandgap voltage at T = 0
(which equals 1.205 V for silicon), and
VBE is transistor emitter-to-base voltaye.
Equation 1 is written in terms of VBE per equation 2 and then
dlfferentiated per equa-tion 3 to develop expressions
describing the slopes of the loci 1, 2~ 3, 4, 5.
VB~ = Vg(O) -~ (kT/q) ( ~ C (2)
- :
~ ~BE/~T = (]c/q) ( ~ IC ~ ~ ~ ~ r - r e~T) (3)
;In Vittoz's temperature-sensitive control circuit,
alluded to above, the VB~ of a first transistor conditioned
by direct~coupled collector-to-base feedback to operate
with a constant IC may be assumed to be defined by locus 4
and is proportionately divided to develop a potential defined
by locus 6, shown in dashed line, which divided potential
is then applied as the VBE of a second transistor. As the
:~ 25 temperature T of the first and second transistors increases
to Tl , TTHR and T~, successively, the IC of the second
transistor successively takes on the values associated with
; its crossings of loci 1, 2 and 3. The IC of the second
transistor is difEerentially compared against the level
- 30 of current that defines locus 2 to provide a control current
-5-
~.
~ RCA 71,752
,'
1 -that changes polarity at the threshold temperature TTHR.
The magnitude o~ the control current is delimited by the
relatively small IC/K value deEined by locus 2 and so tends
to be small itself. Furtherl the percentage change in the
amplitude of this control current as compared to the collector
current of the second transistor tends to be small since
the slopes of loci 2 and 6 are not very steep. In the
Vittoz circuit, then, the first transistor has to be designed
to operate with an IC that is fairly large, so that the
amplifier IC/K oE the second transistor falls into the range
where ade~uate values of control current can be obtained with
transistors that are sufficiently small in area to be
practically integrated.
The present inventor has overcome these problems
-~ 15 by operating his first transistor at a constant IC as
- defined by locus 2~ tending to be lower in the practical
range for integrated transistor operation, then proportionately
. .
scaling up the VBE of the first transistor and applying the
scaled up potential as the VBE of his second transistor. This
scaled up potential is shown as the alternately dashed-and-
' :
dotted locus 7. As the temperature T of the transistors
increases the IC of the second transistor of the present
inventor's circuit successively takes on the values associated
; with its crossings of loci 5, 4 and 3 at T2, TTHR and T3,
respectively. Differentially comparing the IC of this second
transistor with the level of current that defines locus 4
provides a control curren-t that changes polarity at the
- -threshold temperature TTHR.
The magnitude of this control current is delimited
by the comparatively large IC/I~ value de~ined by locus 4.
Further, the slopes o~ loci ~ and 7 are relatively steep
--6--
RCA 71, 752
~2~3~
1 compared to those of loci 2 and 6. So the percentage change
in the amplitude of ~his current as compared to the collector
current of the second transistor is comparatively large in
circuitry embodying the present invention.
In temperature-sensitive control circuitry
embodying the present invention, conduction in the second
transis-tor ls reduced with increasing temperature, in contrast
to the Vittoz circuit. This is of practical significance
; in schemes for controlling the temperature of the integrated
circuit on which the temperature-sensitive control circuitry
is located; slnce it avoids the possibility of regenerative
cycling due to the positive thermal feedback caused by
self-heating of the second transistor.
In FIGURE 2, first and second transistors Ql and
Q2, shown with grounded emitter electrodes, are thermally
coupled to each other and to receive heat from -their
environment, which thermal couplings are symbolized by the
double-headed wavy arrow. Transistors Ql and Q2 would
have respectlve collector currents related in n-to-one ratio
for like emitter-to-base voltages, as symbolized by the
encircled "n" and "l" near their respective emitter electrodes.
Ql is conditioned by direct-coupled collector-to-base feedback
to conduct substantially all of the current Il supplied to
its collector electrode by constant current generator
Sl. The feedback connection includes transistor Q3 in
emitter follower connection having the collector electrode
of Ql connected to its base electrode and having its
collector electrode connected to a supply of operating
potential, +Vcc, conditioning Q3 for normal transistor
operation. The feedback connection -further includes a
--7--
ll~Z43~ RC~ 71,752
1 resistive potential divi.der comprising resistors Rl and R2
having values also denominated R1 and R2, which divides the
emitter potential of Q3 to develop a base potential for Ql
which is m/(m+l) times as large. The direct-coupled
collector-to-base feedback connection of Ql adjusts its
- emitter-to-base potential VBEQl to the value associated
with a collec-tor current substantially equal to Il.
To obtain the value o VBEQl associated with the
.collector current ICQl of Ql being substantia]ly equal to Il,
10 from the resistive potential divider comprisin~ Rl and R2,
the emitter potential of Q3 which is divided should have a
value (m+l)/m times VBEQl. This (m+l)VBEQl/ p
applied to Q2 as its emitter-to-base potential VBEQ2.
:. In FIGURE 2, a constant current generator S2
15 supplies a current I2 to a node Nl, which the collector
~ current of Q2 is withdrawn from and which connects to an
: -
~.~ outpu~ terminal labelled "OUTPUT". I2 is chosen so that at
.~ temperatures higher than a prescribed threshold temperature
TTHR it exceeds the collec-tor current of Q2, providing for
current flow from S2 via the OUTPUT termlnal to subsequent
. circuitry. (The value n, determined in most cases by the
:
ratio of the effective area of the base-emltter junction of
Ql -to that of the base-emitter junction of Q2 where vertical-
` structure NPN transistors are concerned, is preferably
: 2S chosen to be more than 1 to ~IINI~II ZE THE RATIO of the collector
currents of Q1 and Q2.) The circuitry subsequent to the
OUTPUT terminal may,~for example, as shown, be a transistor
Q4 of similar conductivity type to Ql and Q2. Q4 is arranged
in common-emitter amplifier configuration with its base
electrode connected from the OUTPUT terminal of the
-8-
` ` ~
RCA 71,752
3~
1 temperature-sensitive control clrcuit and is biased in~o
conduction by I2 supplied from constant current generator --
S2 exceeding the collector current demand of Q2. At
temperatures below TTE~R the col.lector current demand of Q2
will exceed I2, leav:ing no ba~e current for Q4 and so
biasing Q4 for non-conduction, and Q2 will become saturated
unless forestalled from dolng so.
SaturatiO1l of ~2 is an advantaye in certaln
applications, since its current demand need not be satisEied
by current drawn from the supply until the threshold
condition is reached. A-t such time, i-t will be brought out
- of saturation, thus render:ing the eEfects of shared emitter
: to base voltacJes of Ql and Q2 more predlc-table and amenable
to exact calculations Eor the area of operation which is
- 15 of primary interest. (Saturation of Q2, while not detrlmental
~ to the perFormance of the circuit of Fig. 2, may, as well
known, be forestalled by a clipper circuit, if desired.
.. A representative clipper circuit comprises a semiconduc-tor
.
` .~ junction having its cathode connected to Nl and its anode
;: 20 connected to a potential about 3V~C/2 more positive than
~ reference ground, where VAc is the cathode-to-anode
.. voltage of a forward-biased semiconductor junct.ion.)
FIGIJRE 3 shows a representative way in which one
may supply the currents Il and I2. Current mirror amplifier
`. 25 CMA includes transistors Q6 and Q7 and has a current gain
of -p as between its input terminal Tl and its output terminal
: T2. CMA is a current mirror amplifier of the type having
- an input circuit between its common terminal connected to
Vcc and its i.nput terminal Tl which input circuit maintains
a substantially constant offset potential across itself
_g _
RCA 71 752
2~3
`.:
1 over a range of input currents. In the particular type of
. . CMA shown -this offset potential is the emitter-to-base
offset potential VBEQ6 of the self-biased transistor Q6
connected across the emitter base junction of transistor Q7
having base emitter and collecto:r electrodes co~1nec-ted to
the inputl common and output -terminals r~spectively of
the C~.
The collector-to-base :Eeedback connection of Ql
keeps the emitter of Q3 at (m~1)VBEQl/m potential and the
feedback connection also keeps the base of Q3 more positive
than its emitter by the emitter--to-base offset VBEQ3 of Q3.
Resistor R3 has a voltage across it equal to
~ +Vcc - VBEQG - VBEQ3 [ (m~l) vBEQ~
and the current Il through resistor R3 can be straightforwardly
calculated by Ohm s .Law. I2 will be p times as large as I
~ owing to CMA having a current gain of -p. In the simple
: current mirror amplifier configuration CMA shown in
: FIGURE 2 this current gain comes about because of the
.~- collector current versus emitter-to-base characteristics of
Q7 and Q6 being in p-to-one ratio. This ratio is achieved
in monollthic construction using reverse-biased junctions
for isolatlon of elements by scaling the collector areas
. of Q7 and Q6 in p-to one ratio to affect their relative
.. collection efficiencies since Q7 and Q6 being of PNP
: 25 conductivity type are conventionally constructed using
lateral structures.
FIGURE 3 also shows the reversal in current fram
the OUTPUT terminal being sensed by a PNP transistor Q5
rather than an NPN transi.stor Q4. This is advantageous to
do ln certain applications since the base-emitter junction
10-
.~
~.
RCA 71,752
3~
1 of Q5 when forward-biased clamps the OUTPUT terminal to
within a junction offset voltage of +Vcc forestalling
saturation of Q2 so the effects of shared emitter-to-base
potential of Ql and Q2 can be more confidently predicted.
The saturation of Q7 when the collector current oE Q2 is
less than p times the collector current of Ql presents no
significant operating problem. This arrangement is convenient
also when the ensuing stage (including Q5) must handle
appreciable currents and so contributes substantially to
self heating of the integrated circuit, since the thermal
coupling is of a sense that avoids thermal cycling problems.
Q5 may be in many practical circuits be replaced by a
Darlington cascade connection of transistors.
FIGURE 4 shows how the FIGURE 2 configuration
"~ 15 may be modified to use voltage~sensing techniques for
determining when the collector current of Q2 is larger than
that of Ql by a given factor. R~ is connected between
+Vcc and the base electrode of Q3, which electxode is at
~VB~Q3 -~ [(m+l)VBEQl/m~ potential. The current Il through R4
can be calculated by ohm's Law dividing the
; { CC VBEQ3 ~(m+l~VBEQl/m~ potential across R4 by the
resistance of R4. A resistor R5 having a resistance smaller
than that of R4 by a factor p connects the collector
electrode of Q2 to +Vcc; and, when the collector current of
Q2 is more than p times larger than the collector current
- f Ql~ the potential drop across R5 will exceed that across
R4 - .
The potential appearing at the OUTPUT terminal is
applied to the base electrode oE an emitter-follower
transistor Q8' being decremented by a junction offset
--11--
~ .
~.
~ 4 3~ RCA 71,752
1 potential VBEQ8 that compensates for the VBEQ3 decrement
in potential between the base and emitter electrodes of
Q3. The decremented OUTPUT potential is then divided by
m in a resistive potential divider comprising R6 and R7 ~o
supply emitter-to-base potential VBEQg to Q9. At temperatures
higher than TTHR, when the potential drop across R5 is less -
than that across R4, Qg is biased into conduction to demand
collector current. ~t temperatures lower than TTHR, Qg
is not conductive and does not demand collector current.
10Alternatively, as shown in FIGURE 5, the relative
magnitudes of the potential drop across R4 and R5 may be
compared using a differential-input amplifier DIA. DIA
- is shown as comprising PNP transistors Qlo and Qll connected
in long-tailed pair configuration with constant current
generator S3 ~upplying current to the interconnection of
their emitter electrodes.
` In FIGURE 6 the elements are presumed all to be
- disposed with the same monolithic integrated circuit
structure and to respond to the temperature of other elements
which are disposed within the monolithic inte~rated circuit
structure for supplying an adjustable amount of heat to lessen
variations in the temperature of those other elements. The
emitter-to-collector path of Q2 is connected across the
+Vcc supply for providing the principal means for supplying
heat to the other elements. This is symbolized in FIGURE 6
by the wavy arrows demonstrating the thermal coupling of
Q2 to these other elements.
In FIGURE 6 an emitter-follower transistor
Q12 buffers -the emitter electrode of Q3 from the rather
large base current demands that may be expected of Q2.
12-
~, . ..
~. ~.., s
RCA 71,752
~2~3~D
1 The emitter-to-base offset potential VBEQ12 of Q12 is
compensated for by a self-biased transistor Q13 raising the
potential against which the emitter potentials of Ql and
Q3 are referred. Q13 is the master transistor in a current
S mirror amplifie~ configuration with a slave transistor Q14
having, like Q12' collector current versus emitter-to-base
voltage characteristics in s/r ratio with those of Q13
The ratio s/r is chosen large enough that the collector
current demand of Q14 is severa] times larger than the base
current demand of Q2. The collector current demand of Q14
is supplied by connection of the collector electrode of
Q14 to the emitter electrode of Q12' forward biasing the
;- base-emitter junction f Q12 to a value VBEQ13 substantially
equal to the emitter-to-base potential VBEQ of Q13'
15One skilled in the art of electronic circuit
design will be enabled by the foregoing disclosure to
design many variations of the circuits (e.g., replacing
' simple transistors by compound device structures), and
the scope of the ensuing claims should be construed accordingly.
:
.
., ,