Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
- - 21~7~1
PATENT
C-56.348
5 MEANS AND METHOD FOR PLACING CABLE WITHIN COILED
TUBING
This invention ,~lala-~ to the art of sul)ter~r,ean well operations, and
10 more particularly, to a means and ",~),od ~or installing a cable within coiled
tubing for the pu".oses of conducting well treatments in conjunction with
wireline-operated tools.
BACKGROUND OF THF lNV~TlON
Coiled tubing has long been used in well operations in order to place
desirable fluids such as acids, cer,-~nt and the like in a well utilizing a relatively
simple apparatus co"".risi.,y a long length of tubing, often as long as 25,000
feet, wound onto a large spool or reel. In coiled tubing operations, tubing fromthe reel is fed into the wellbore utili~illy an injector mechanism which is well20 known in the art. Fluids can be fed through a fitting on the tubing reel, through
the tubing to a tool disposed on the inserted end of the coiled tubing within the
well.
In recent years, it has become desirable to place electrically operated
25 tools in the wellbore either alone or in cG",bi.,ation with fluid treatment tools.
For instance, logging operations can be condlJcted on coiled tubing which may
also include means for injecting nit,uyen gas into the wellbore in order to gauge
flow. It is also advant~geous to use coiled tubing to convey a logging tool within
a highly deviated or horizontal wellbore where gravity wireline operations
30 cannot be used to convey the logging tool to the a~p,ûpriate wellbore IOCAtjOI).
21~ 7 5 9 1 C-56.348
More rece(,tly, coiled tubing has been used in conjunction with a fluid
operated downhole drilling motor to conduct slim hole drilling in vertical,
deviated and horizontal directiGns. With such coiled tubing drilling operations, it
5 is often desirable to have a device capable of sensil,~ the direction of drilling
and communicating this and other data to the oper~tor on the surface so that
alterations may be made to the direction of the drilling during the drilling
process. It can be cleariy seen that in order to employ logy;"~ tools as well asto operate steering sensors or tools in coiled tubing drilling operations, it is10 necessary to provide electrical communication between such tools and the
surface through a cable ~isposed within the coiled tubing.
In the past, in order to install electrically conductive cable within coiled
tubing, it has been necess~ry to deploy the coiled tubing in a relatively straight
15 line such as deploying it into a vertical well or laying the coiled tubing
horizontally such as on a straight road bed in order to feed the electrically
conductive cable into the tubing. It is obvious that this is a time consuming,
expensive and labor inle"sive solution to the proi l~." of installing cable within
tubing. In fact, the cost of instAI~ tion in this manner often exceeds the cost of
20 the cable itself by three to five times. Because of the high cost of cable
installation, it has become economically "ecessAry to maintain coiled tubing
reels with cable installed dedicated to that use for the life of the reel. This is
both expensive and wasteful of costiy assets requiring either a large inventory
of dedicated, cable-instAI'~ 1 reels to be kept at widely spAce~l locations or only
25 a few such de~icAte~ reels which must be transported over long distances for
use.
214~1 PATENT
- C-56.348
It is well known in the industry that it is theoretically possible to pump
cable through coiled tubing while it is on the reel. The fluid friction drag force of
the flowing fluid pulls the cable, overcoming friction forces between the cable
and the coiled tubing. However, attempts to pump cable into coiled tubing on
5 the reel have been thwarted by the cable tension induced by the cable seal
through which the cable must be passed into the tubing. This cable tension
generates a large frictional force as the cable is pulled tight within the tubing
around the reel creating a capstan effect which prevents the cable from passing
through the entire length of tubing on the reel.
A mechanical means to overcome the friction and pressure differential of
the cable seal was disclosed in European patent application publication
number 0565287A1. A mechanical pulling device is located within a sealed
chamber connected to the coiled tubing and with the cable passing into the
15 chamber through a seal. When used in conjunction with a fluid pump, cable
can be injected into coiled tubing on the reel because the pulling device
overcomes the friction of pulling the cable through the seal thereby avoiding the
capstan effect, albeit with considerable mechanical complexity.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a means and method for pumping cable
into coiled tubing which does not use a mechanical device to pull the cable
through a seal.
21~7~1 PATENT
C-56.348
In accordance with the invention, a ",etl,od for installing cable having a
first diameter into a first tube having a larger first intemal dian,ater comprises
providing a seal through which the cable p~sses attached to a second tube
5 having a seconJ intemal Ji~",eter which is at least larger than the diameter of
the cable. The secGnd tube is coupled to the open end of the first tubing and
fluid is pumped from pump means through a fluid connection in the second
tube, within an annular space between the cable and the secol,d tube and into
the first tube. The flow rate in the second tube is maintain6d at a rate sufficient
10 to over~o",e the frictional drag of the cable through the seal and the differential
pressure across the seal. The flow rate in the first tube is maintained at a rate to
cause the cable to be pumped into the first tube by fluid drag on the cable.
Further in accordance with the invention, an apparatus for installing
15 cable into a first tube col"~lises a seconJ tube and a flow controlling connector
between the first and second tubes; a seal at an end of the second tube remote
from the connector and a fluid coupling on the secGr,d tube connected to a fluidpump for pumping fluid into the secGn d tube at a first pump rate and into the first
tube at a second pump rate differing from the first pump rate whereby frictional20 force on the extemal surface of the cable c~nses the cable to be transported
through the seal, the seco"d tube and the first tube.
Further in accordance with the invention, an apparatus for installing
cable having a first diameter into coiled tubing having a first intemal diametér25 comprises a reel of coiled tubing having coupled thereto a length of small
diameter tubing having seco"d intemal diameter larger than the diameter of the
cable to be installed and smaller than the first intemal diameter. A seal is
2 1 7 5 9 ~ PATENT
C-56.348
provided at the end of the small diameter tubing r~".ote from the coiled tubing
coupling and a pump coupling is provided on the small diameter tubing to
which a pump is col"~ected for pumping fluid into the small diameter tubing and
the coiled tubing whereby frictional force on the extemal surface of the cable
5 c~uses the cable to be transported through the seal, the small diameter tubing and the coiled tubing.
It is ll,er~for~ an object of this invention to provide a simple, transportable
means and ,netl,oJ whereby cable may be easily installed within tubing.
It is another object of this invention to provide a means and method
whereby cable may be easily and inexpensively installed and removed from a
reel of coiled tubing so that maximum use of both the cable and the coiled
tubing may be re~li7er
A BRIEF DFSCRIPTION OF THF DRAWINGS -
These and other ol,jects of the invention are accG."plished through themanner and form of the present invention to be described hereinafter in
conjunction with the accG",panying drawing illustrating a prefer,ed embodiment
20 of the invention and in which the sole J~av:;ng Figure is a schematic cross-
sectional view of a cable injector apparatus for installing cable within coiled
tubing in accordance with a prefer,ed embodiment of the present invention.
21 ~ 7 5 9 1 PATENT
C-56.348
._
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PRt~t~ED EMBODIMENTS AND THE
DRAWING
A drag force against the outside surface of a cable by ~lov~;"9 fluid can be
5 used to advantaga to first overcome a ~ tional force exerted on a cable by a
seal through which it ~JAsses and seco"d, to cause the cable to flow through a
long length of tubing.
The drag force per unit length of cable can be approximated by equation 1,
1 0 below:
Equation 1: Fo
L = ~D
where Fo is the drag force
L isex~.osed length in feet
D is the outside di...,-eter of the cable in feet, and
~ is the average wall shear stress cAlculAted by the forrnula of
equation 2, below:
Equation 2~ v2
where ~ is the fluid density
V is the fluid velocity in fVsec
g is the gravit~liGnal con~tant (32.2 fVsec2) and
l is a dimensionless friction coef~ nt derived from the Darch-
Weisbach equation and the empirical Colebrook equation developed for pipe
flow.
21~7S91 PATENT
C-56.348
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a cable is passed
through a seal into a tube having a coupling in fluid communication with a fluidpump. Fluid is then pumped into the tube at a rate sufficient to cause a drag
force on the cable sufficient to at least equal or overcome a frictional force
5 exerted on the cable by the seal and the differential pressure on the cable
which would tend to force it back through the seal. S~tfici.,nt drag force thus
c~uses the cable to move axially w~in the tube towar~ the end ,e,note from the
seal. In accordance with the above e~u~tions, several combinations of tube
length, diameter and fluid flow rate can be chosel) to provide sufficient drag
10 force on the cable.
In accordance with ~n~har aspect of the present invention, the tube,
above is coupled to another tube of longer length for inst~ tion of the cable
therewithin. The interconnection between the tube clescriL,ed above and the
longer tube must provide control for the fluid flow rate within the longer tube
15 which flow rate may be determined, as above. Thus, a coupling is provided
between the injection tube and the longer tube which effects the desired
change in flow rate between the two tubes. In its simplest and most preferred
forrn, the coupling may coi.",rise a dit~erential pipe clismeler coupling but the
coupling may cG"".rise a choke, pr~r.de for fluid bleed-off or any other means
20 whereby a flow fiate ~ r~ ;al may be effected between the injection tube and
the longer tube.
While instAll~tion of cable into coiled tubing is the primary desirable
feature of the pr~sent invention, flexibility in coiled tubing use is also desirable.
25 If it is desiled to remove the cable from the tubing, it is possible to remove the
cable by reversing the flow of fluid within the same system desc,iL,ed above. Inthis regard, it has been found that it is desirable to maintain some drag force on
214 7 5 91 PATENT
C-56.348
the cable as it exits the tubing while maintaining the cable in tension once it has
exited the longer tubing.
Referring now to the drawings wherein the sho~;. ,gs are for the purpose
5 of illustrating a preferred emboJi",e,lt of the invention only and not for thepurpose of li.rlitii)g same, the Figure illu~ tes an apparatus which uses fluid
flow to pump a cable into the coiled tubing, but avoids the use of a mechanical
device to pull the cable through the seal. Instead, a relatively short piece of
straight pipe or tubing 2, such as 20~00 feet of high pressure pipe having an
10 intemal diameter (I.D.) of 1/2~ to 3/4 ~ in the pr~fer,~J embodiment, is conne1ecl
at one end to and in fluid commu,licalion wKh a reel of coiled tubing 4 using,
again in the preferred emboJi",el)t, a ~tee~ flow rate co,lt-olling coupling 15. A
cable seal 6 is provided at the opposite end of the pipe 2. A cable 8 is coiled
on a reel 9 and passed through the cable seal 6 and through the entire length
of the pipe 2 into the coiled tubing 4. It will be understood by those skilled in
the art that the cable seal 6 cAuses some ~ tional drag on the cable 8 but that,in accordance with the pr~sent invention, frictional drag on the cable within the
seal is kept to a minimum. One preferred form of cable seal is a common
wireline lubricator known to those skilled in the art.
The pipe 2 also includes a fluid coupling 10 connected through a fluid
conduit 12 to a high pressure pump 14 which supplies fluid at high pressure to
the annular volume 16 L,et~Joon the inside of the pipe 2 and the cable 8 as wellas in the annular volume 18 bel~re0n the cable 8 and the inner wall of the
coiled tubing 4. The fluid friction drag in the pipe/cable annulus 16 provides
the necessary cable te"siol1 to overco",a the friction and pressure differential in
the cable seal 6. Therefore, the cable 8 has virtually no tension as it enters the
21~75~1 PATENT
C-56.348
reel of coiled tubing 4 and it is free to be pumped through the tubing coils using
the fluid flow drag on the cable 8 within the cable/coiled tubing annulus 18.
To install a cable 8, the equipment is set up as shown in Figure 1. The
5 pipe 2 must have an intemal diameter at least larger than the cable 8, car~
of withstanding the pumping pressure, and be reasonably straight to avoid
excessive wall friction. Theor~tically, almost any fluid could be used to injectthe cable into the coiled tubing, although water is the most practical choice.
The cable 8 is hand fed from the reel 9 through the seal 6 and the short,
straight pipe 2 so tl~at the cable 8 e3~t~nds a few feet in inside the coiled tubing
4. Fluid is then pumped through the pipe 2 and the coiled tubing 4. A small
back tension is preferably maintained on the cable 8, such as by dragging a
brake 22 on the reel 9 to control the insta"~tion rate. Sensors may be used to
15 measure the length of cable inserted, as well as the tension and speed.
However, it may only be necess~ry to detect the arrival of the cable at the hub
end of the coiled tubing, then measure (by hand) the length of slack to be
inserted. Fluid pressure(s) and flow rate(s) are monitored with sensors and/or
conlrolled by the pump 14.
In the preferred embodiment, the inj~ctiGn fluid flows through the short
pipe 2 and the coiled tubing 4 in series. In order to have to have two different25 flow rates in the short pipe 2 and the coiled tubing 4 a flow rate ~ontrolling
coupling must be provided. In the pr~e"ed emb~.li",e,.t, the different flow rates
are obtained by inserting a flow rate controlling coupling such as the "tee"
shaped connector 15 bel~een the pipe 2 and the tubing 4 as shown in the
drawing. As used in this specification the temm flow rate controlling coupling will
PATENT
7 ~ 9 1 C-56.348
be understood to mean any device which serves to divert or add fluid in
order to make up the di~erence bet~ ccn the flow rates in the first
pipe and the secGnd pipe. The tee connection 15 is preferred. The branch of
the tee may be connected to a flow re~t, ictor (orifice or choke) in the case of10 flow diversion (flow in pipe greater than in the tubing). If flow is to be added
(flow in the tubing greater than the flow in the pipe) the tee may connected to a
a second pump or to the first pump by means of a flow divider. Other flow
controlling couplings will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
2 1 ~ 7 5 9 ~ PATENT
EXAMPLES
An injection test was perfommed using 10,000 feet of 1-22 monocable
having a diameter of 1/4U, 71.5 feet of 1/2~ Schedule 80 steel pipe and about
5 99oo feet of coiled tubing. The cable tensiol) was measured after it was
installed in the 1/2' pipe but before it entered the coiled tubing. A flow- rate of
1.2 barrels per minute (bbl/min) generated a cable tension of 55 Ib. and a
pressure of 3300 psi (1600 psi across the 1/2~ pipe). At a pump rate of 1.4
bbVmin., the cable was pumped into the coiled tubing.
Table 1 shows the predicted p6,1u".,al)ce of a system designed to install
1-23 monocable in a coiled tubing reel with 15000 feet of 1.5" x .109" coiled
tubing.
21 9 7 ~ ~ I C-56.348
TABLE I
In puts Small Pipe Coiled Tubing
Flow Rate (GPM) 50 50.00
Length of Coiled Tubing 1 5000
Tube ID 0.532 1.282
Cable OD 0.22 0.22
Pressure at CT Outlet - 0
Drag Force in cable seal 20
Cable Fluid Friction factor 0.01559743 0.01759474
Pipe Fluid friction factor 0.01529887 0.02409194
Cable roughness error (%) 0% 0%
Pipe roughness error(%) 0% 0%
Flow Area (in'`2) 0.18 1.25
Fluid Velocity (fttsec) 87.05 12.80
Fluid KineticViscosity (ftA2/sec) 1.00E-05 1.00E-05
Fluid Density (slugs/ft^3) 1.93 1.93
Hydraulic Radius (in) 0.078 0.2655
Reynold's Number 2.26E+95 1,13E+05
HFLOW (Ib/ft'`2) 7302 158
HFLOW (psi) 50.71 1.10
Cable roughness (ft) 1.00E-06 1.00E-06
Pipe roughness (ft) 1.OOE-07 1.50E-04
Cable roughness (4~hydrradius) 0.00004 0.00001
Pipe roughness (4~hydrradius) 0.00000038 - 0.00169
Fluid drag (Ib/ft) 1.6399 0.0400
Friction pressure drop (psUfoot) 30.01 0.29
Curved pipe press drop (psUrad) 0.0489
Avg coil diam (ft) 7.5
Curved pipe press drop (psUft) 0.0130
Expansion press drop coeff [Kl 0.83
Pressure drop: small pipe to CT 42.33
Pressure diff. pushing cable out psi 4540.59
Force pushing cable out (Ib) 172.60
Length of small pipe req'd (ft) 117.45 Assume: 120.00
Pressure Drop in CT reel (psi) 4498.25
Inlet pressure from pump (psi) 8065 8141
rdrag force in seal + back tension) (Ib) 24.18
Pressure drop in small pipe (psi) 3524 361
Tension due to small tube drag (Ib) 192.60 196.79
21475~:1 PATENT
C-56.348
Compared to the current inst~ tion methods (coiled tubing laid out flat
on the ground or hung in a vertical well), the fluid cable injection system of this
invention is much less ex,~,ensive and IG~ ;CAIIY s;m~ler. The simplicity of themethod allows it to be used at almost any field loc~tion, greatly enhancing the
5 flexibility of coiled tubing logging oper~liol)s and reducing the cost of the coiled
tubing logging service. New services, using downhole s~nsor~ and ActuAtors,
will become more eco"G."ically viable.
There are several advantages of the fluid cable injection system over a
10 mechanical injection system wherein cable tension through the seal is
overcome by a mechanicaJ pulling or pushing mechanism. With no moving
parts, it is much easier and less expensive to devGlop and manufacture. Also,
the instAl~tion process is safer and easier to control than with the mechanical
system. The forces applied to the cable are low, so the pote,ltial for damaging
15 the cable during the installation process is quite low compared with a
mechanical pulling device. There is no need for a source of power other than
the fluid pump.
The above examples have illu~t~dted the use of a fluid which comprises
20 water. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the term "fluid" as
used in this speci~icat`io,. may include either a liquid or a gas. Useful gAssesmay include, for example",it-ogen or air. Similarly, useful liquids may include
water, sea water, brine, polymer viscosi~ied water, any hydrocarbon liquid or anaqueous or hydrocarbon liquid to which a flow-improvement additive of types
25 well known in the art has been added.
2 1 4 7 ~ ~ I PATENT
C-56.348
.
While the invention has been desc,ibed in the more limited aspects of
preferred embodiments thereof, other embodiments have been suggested and
still others will occur to those skilled in the art upon a reading and
understanding of the foregoing specification. It is intended that all such
5 embodiments be incl~ ed within the scope of the present invention as limited
only by the apper,ded claims.
