Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
MARINE ANTI-BIOFOULING AND FOULING RELEASE COMPOSITION
Subject of the invention
[0001] The present invention relates to the use of a
composition for reducing the biological fouling of surfaces
in permanent or prolonged contact with the marine
environment.
Prior art
[0002] Biological contamination by the marine
environment, which is known as biofouling, whether it is
micro-organic or macro-organic, is a major problem, not
only for land-based installations that use a large amount
of seawater, but also for offshore installations and more
generally for any object in permanent or prolonged contact
with seawater, for instance boat hulls and aquaculture
ropes, cages and nets. The reason for this is that marine
organisms, such as algae, shellfish and other crustaceans,
attach themselves to and then grow on the exposed surfaces,
which has the consequence of impairing the correct
functioning and of deteriorating the installations or
objects to which they are attached. In particular, they
may, for example, block the inlets of seawater intake
valves and thus reduce the water uptake capacity of land-
based installations using seawater, or they may become
attached to ship hulls, reducing their speed and increasing
their fuel consumption.
[0003] Marine anti-biofouling and fouling release
compositions are usually applied to the surfaces in
permanent contact with the marine environment to control or
prevent the attachment or growth of such marine organisms,
or alternatively to facilitate their removal. Such a
composition generally contains one or more compounds that
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
2
are toxic to the marine organisms that attach to the
submerged surfaces that it is desired to protect. In order
to be durably effective, these toxic compounds have the
drawback of needing to be released into the marine
environment by the marine anti-biofouling coating or paint
over a more or less long period. As a result, such a
composition is always polluting, all the more so since it
generally comprises compounds such as mercury, lead or
arsenic.
[0004] Certain marine anti-biofouling coatings or
paints comprise copper-based compounds, which have been
known for a long time for their toxicity to phytoplankton
and other marine organisms. The copper may be, for example,
in the form of cuprous oxide, copper dioxide, copper
thiocyanate, copper acrylate, flaked copper powder or
copper hydroxide, and may be released into the marine
environment in the form of copper ions. Unfortunately, this
solution has the drawback of not being long-lasting.
Specifically, once the copper content of the coating has
been depleted, the coating is no longer effective. Usually,
the compositions are very highly dosed with copper in order
to give the coating a longer service life. However, the use
of high concentrations of copper may also give rise to
pollution of the marine environment.
[0005] Environmental regulations are heading towards
banning within a few years the use of marine anti-
biofouling coatings such as those mentioned previously, but
also those comprising tin (IV) derivatives such as tin
oxides or tributyltin, which are all environmentally toxic
and hazardous, in favour of alternative coatings that are
more environmentally friendly.
[0006] The document WO 87/03261 especially proposes an
alternative solution that consists in producing, across the
surface to be protected, an AC or DC current whose
intensity and frequency are sufficient to give the marine
organisms electric shocks and prevent their attachment.
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
3
However, this solution has the drawback of being relatively
impractical to implement.
Aims of the invention
5[0007] The present invention is directed towards
providing a marine anti-biofouling and/or fouling release
composition that does not have the drawbacks of the prior
art.
[0008] It is directed in particular towards providing
a composition that is more environmentally friendly and
easy to use.
[0009] It is also directed towards providing a
composition that gives the supports, onto which it is
applied, a resistance to soiling of marine origin.
[0010] It is moreover directed towards providing a
composition capable to reduce the frequency of cleaning of
the supports onto which it is applied, and to reduce the
intervention time.
Summary of the invention
[0011] The present invention describes the use of a
composition comprising a polysiloxane-based polymer and at
least one cylindrical nanofiller as a marine anti-
biofouling and/or fouling release coating.
[0012] According to particular embodiments, the marine
anti-biofouling and/or fouling release composition may
comprise one or a combination of any of the following
characteristics:
- the cylindrical nanofiller represents in weight between
0.01% and 100 of the total weight of said composition;
- the cylindrical nanofiller represents in weight between
0.01% and 3.50 of the total weight of said composition;
- the cylindrical nanofiller comprises carbon nanotubes;
- the carbon nanotubes represent in weight between 0.01%
and 2.5% of the total weight of the composition;
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
4
- the carbon nanotubes represent in weight between 0.01a
and 1% of the total weight of the composition;
- the carbon nanotubes represent in weight between 0.05%
and 1% of the total weight of the composition;
- the carbon nanotubes represent in weight between 0.05%
and 0.50 of the total weight of said composition;
- the carbon nanotubes represent in weight 0.1% of the
total weight of said composition;
- the carbon nanotubes are chosen from the group of single-
walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), double-walled carbon
nanotubes (DWNTs) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes
(MWNTs);
- the cylindrical nanofiller comprises sepiolite;
- the sepiolite represents in weight between 0.1% and 10%
of the total weight of said composition;
- the sepiolite represents in weight between 0.1% and 3.5%
of the total weight of said composition;
- the sepiolite represents in weight between 0.1% and 1% of
the total weight of said composition;
- the composition comprises sepiolite and carbon nanotubes;
- in a composition comprising sepiolite and carbon
nanotubes, the carbon nanotubes represent in weight
between 0.05% and 0.1% of the total weight of the
composition and sepiolite represents in weight between 1%
and 3.5% of the total weight of the composition.
Brief description of the figures
[0013] Figure 1 represents the improvement of the
crustaceans release of PDMS-based coatings comprising
carbon nanotubes.
[0014] Figure 2 represents the improvement of the
crustaceans release of PDMS-based coatings comprising
sepiolite.
[0015] Figure 3 represents the improvement of the
crustaceans release of PDMS-based coatings comprising
carbon nanotubes and sepiolite.
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
[0016] Figure 4 represents the improvement of the
crustaceans release of PDMS-based coatings comprising
carbon nanotubes and sepiolite compared to PDMS-based
coatings comprising carbon nanotubes or sepiolite.
5[0017] Figure 5 represents the improvement of the
crustaceans release of PDMS-based coatings comprising
carbon nanotubes and sepiolite compared to PDMS-based
coatings comprising carbon nanotubes or sepiolite.
[0018] Figure 6 represents the settlement of
crustaceans on the surface of PDMS-based coatings free of
fillers (sample ic) or comprising carbon nanotubes, after
24h or 48h of immersion.
[0019] Figure 7 represents the settlement of
crustaceans on the surface of PDMS-based coatings free of
fillers (sample ic) or comprising sepiolite, or sepiolite
and carbon nanotubes, after 24h or 48h of immersion.
[0020] Figure 8 represents a comparison of improvement
of the crustaceans release of PDMS-based coatings
comprising carbon nanotubes according to two methods to
disperse carbon nanotubes in the PDMS-based matrix (Sample
008: obtained with the use of a premix, sample 010:
obtained without the use of a premix).
[0021] Figure 9 represents the amount of spores (or
biomass) of the marine alga Ulva that have colonized PDMS-
based coatings comprising carbon nanotubes and/or sepiolite
compared to the unfilled blank (sample lc). N = 1350,
errors bars: +2 x standard Error.
[0022] Figure 10 represents the removal of Ulva
sporeling biomass from PDMS-based coating comprising
different loadings of carbon nanotubes, compared to the
removal from the unfilled blank (sample ic) after applying
a flow force of 41.7 Pa of seawater to the surface. N
540, error bars = 2 x Standard Error.
[0023] Figure 11 represents the removal of Ulva
sporeling biomass from PDMS-based coatings comprising 0.1 %
carbon nanotubes (prepared using different processes and
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
6
with different batches of carbon nanotubes), compared to
removal from the unfilled blank (sample ic). N = 540, error
bars =+ 2 x Standard Error.
[0024] Figure 12 represents the removal of Ulva
sporeling biomass from PDMS-based coatings comprising
different loadings of sepiolite compared to removal from
the unfilled blank (sample lc). N = 540, error bars = 2 x
Standard Error.
[0025] Figure 13 represents the removal of Ulva
sporeling biomass from PDMS-based coatings comprising two
loadings of sepiolite (1 0[sample-021, sample-023] or 3.5
%[sample-022, sample-024]) and carbon nanotubes (0.05 %
[sample-021, sample-022] or 0.1 0[sample-023, sample-0241)
compared to removal from the unfilled blank (sample lc). N
= 540, error bars = 2 x Standard Error.
[0026] Figure 14 represents a comparison of Ulva
sporeling removal from mixed carbon nanotubes/Sepiolite
PDMS-based coatings (as detailed in Figure 13) with removal
from coatings with the fillers present individually at the
same loadings. Sample 007 = 0.05 % CNT, , Sample 017 = 1 %
Sepiolite, Sample 018 = 3.5 % Sepiolite. N = 540, error
bars =+ 2 x Standard Error.
[0027] Figure 15 represents a comparison of Ulva
sporeling removal from mixed carbon nanotubes/Sepiolite
PDMS-based coatings (as detailed in Figure 13) with removal
from coatings with the fillers present individually at the
same loadings. Sample 008 = 0.1 o CNT, Sample 017 = 1%
Sepiolite, Sample 018 = 3.5 Sepiolite.
[00281 Figure 16 represents the variation in viscosity
of the polymer precursor as a function of the amount of
filler for composites comprising carbon nanotubes,
sepiolite or Cloisite 30B.
[0029] Figure 17 represents the variation in viscosity
of the polymer precursor as a function of the amount of
filler for compositions comprising carbon nanotubes of
different nature.
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
7
Detailed description of the invention
[0030] In order to address the problem of obtaining a
marine anti-biofouling and/or fouling release composition,
which is easy to use and non-toxic to marine life, and
which has the advantage of facilitating the detachment or
dislodging of organisms and algae that may have become
bound to the support or surface coated with the said
composition, the invention proposes the use of a
composition comprising a cylindrical nanofiller in a
polysiloxane-based polymer. By creating a surface that is
highly non-stick for marine organisms, these organisms are
incapable of durably gripping to the surface covered with
the coating according to the invention, and can be removed
more easily.
[0031] The term "support" means any material that can
be coated with a polymer, and the term "surface" means any
surface, whether interior or exterior, vertical or
horizontal, of any body or object. Without being limiting,
the supports concerned may be flexible supports or non-
flexible supports. They may be, for example, metal,
plastic, glass or ceramic components, or alternatively
polymeric or elastomeric supports.
[0032] The term "cylindrical nanofiller" means a
filler having the form of a cylinder, a needle or a fibre,
and of which two of the three dimensions of the filler are
less than 100 nm, or even of the order of from one to a few
tens of nanometres.
[0033] The composition according to the invention has
non-stick properties with respect to marine organisms
and/or marine algae, and has the advantage of being able to
obtain a strong and flexible coating, which does not crack
or become fissured. The composition may be applied with
good adhesion to the entire surface, whether the surface is
made, for example, of wood, metal, glass or plastic.
[0034] According to one preferred embodiment of the
invention, the polysiloxane-based polymer used is Sylgard
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
8
184 from Dow Corning, which is a resin that crosslinks by
hydrosilylation.
[0035] The term "resin that crosslinks by hydrosilyl-
ation" means a resin obtained from two precursors of
polysiloxane type, one comprising vinyl groups and the
other hydrosilane groups.
[0036] The crosslinking consists of an addition
reaction of the hydrosilane groups to the vinyl groups
(Scheme 1).
I I I I catalyst
- i i-O+Si-O+ i i- + ~H "' ` "" ~ "
C i i-O R - i i-O-Si-O i i-O i i-
H ~
m
HZri~
-SI-
~
Lt
R
Scheme 1
[0037] The composition of the resin Sylgard 184 from
Dow Corning is given in Table 1 and the chemical structure
of the components is given in Schemes 2 to 5.
Precursor A Precursor B
Constituent 1 PDMS Si-H polymer
Nature and vinyl-terminated SFD 117 (0.76% H, MDD(H))
percentage 67% 60%
Constituent 2 VQM 1 SFD 117
Nature and (2% vinyl) 39%
percentage 31%
Constituent 3 Platinum catalyst Inhibitor
Nature and 0.14% methylcyclotetra-
percentage siloxane 1%
Other Cyclic compounds and
constituents volatile low-molecular-
weight silicone (1.5%)
and xylene (0.70)
Dynamic 4817 cP 89.1 cP
viscosity
Table 1: Composition of the resin
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
9
CH~CH-(CH2)~Si-O~434 -Si (CH2)zn CH=CH2
I I
Scheme 2: SFD 117, polysiloxane bearing vinyl groups
Me Me Me H
Scheme 3: Polymer of polysiloxane type bearing hydrosilane
groups
si-o\
O Si
~~ I I I
Si
o-si
Scheme 4: Crosslinking inhibitor
le
I-~-$I-~-$I-
~ o-Si-o- i-
Si
Scheme 5: VQM matrix comprising a polydimethylsiloxane
micro-network
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
[0038] The cylindrical nanofiller is any suitable
filler having the form of a cylinder, a needle or a fibre,
and of which two of the three dimensions of the filler are
less than 100 nm, or even of the order of from one to a few
5 tens of nanometres. Preferably, the filler is sepiolite or
carbon nanotubes, or a combination of sepiolite and carbon
nanotubes.
[0039] Sepiolite is a clay of fibrous structure, of
formula Mg4Si6O15 (OH) 2= 6H2O. It generally consists of fibres
10 from about 0.1 to 5lZm in length and from 5 to 40 nm in
diameter.
[0040] Carbon nanotubes are a particular crystalline
structure of carbon atoms, of tubular, hollow and close-
packed form, from about 0.1 to 50 lZm in length and from
about 2 to 50 nm in diameter. They may be single-walled
carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), double-walled carbon nanotubes
(DWNTs) or multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs). They are
preferably multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs).
Preferably, they are multi-walled carbon nanotubes from 1.3
to 1.7 lZm in length and 7 to 12 nm in diameter, which have
undergone no post-synthetic treatment, in particular no
purification.
[0041] Conventionally, polysiloxane-based compositions
are obtained from precursors A and B that are mixed
together with stirring, for example for 30 minutes, with a
ratio of 10 to 1 (10 parts of precursor A per one part of
precursor B). The fillers, for the compositions that
comprise them, are added to the precursor A with stirring,
for example at 1000 rpm for 30 minutes, before adding the
precursor B.
[0042] Preferably, carbon nanotubes are premixed in
the precursor A. The carbon nanotubes in the premix
represent 0.5 to 2.50 of total weight of the composition.
The premix is then mixed and/or diluted in precursor A
using an helix blade to get the desired composition. The
mixture thus obtained is applied to microscope slides,
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
11
which are maintained at 105 C for 4 hours. The coating
thicknesses thus obtained are of the order of from 0.2 to 4
mm.
[0043] Various compositions (table 2) were prepared
and their marine anti-biofouling and/or fouling release
properties were studied, first by measuring the force
required to remove crustaceans (barnacles) attached to a
surface covered with the compositions according to the
invention, and by measuring the cellular colonization by
spores of the marine alga Ulva.
Samples Description
lc Unfilled silicone (PDMS - Sylgard 184)
005 Filled Sylgard 184 (0.01 o CNTs)
007 Filled Sylgard 184 (0.05 % CNTs)
008 Filled Sylgard 184 (0.1 o CNTs)- obtained with the
use of a premix
009 Filled Sylgard 184 (0.1 % CNTs)- obtained without
the use of a premix
010 Filled Sylgard 184 (0.1 o CNTs)- obtained without
the use of a premix
Oil Filled Sylgard 184 (0.3 % CNTs)
012 Filled Sylgard 184 (0.5 o CNTs)
013 Filled Sylgard 184 (1 o CNTs)
014 Filled Sylgard 184 (2.5 % CNTs)
015 Filled Sylgard 184 (0.1 o Sepiolite)
016 Filled Sylgard 184 (0.5 o Sepiolite)
017 Filled Sylgard 184 (1 % Sepiolite)
018 Filled Sylgard 184 (3.5 % Sepiolite)
019 Filled Sylgard 184 (7 % Sepiolite)
020 Filled Sylgard 184 (10 Sepiolite)
021 Filled Sylgard 184 (0.05 % CNTs & 1 Sepiolite)
022 Filled Sylgard 184 (0.05 CNTs & 3.5 o Sepiolite)
023 Filled Sylgard 184 (0.1 CNTs & 1 % Sepiolite)
024 Filled Sylgard 184 (0.1 % CNTs & 3.5 % Sepiolite)
Table 2: Samples tested in the settlement and barnacles
release tests and in the growth and strength of
attachment of Ulva sporeling
[0044] Regarding the study of the adhesion of
crustaceans, the samples were pre-immersed for seven days
in a reservoir containing water purified by reverse osmosis
or in artificial seawater for one hour before the assay was
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
12
started. The settlement assay protocol is the one described
on pages 19 and 20 of the Biological Workshop Manual (BWM,
AMBIO Biological evaluation workshop, University of
Birmingham, UK, 21-22 April 2005) with slight modification.
About twenty three-day-old barnacle larvae (cyprids) are
placed on the coating samples in 1 mL of artificial
seawater, before being incubated for 24 or 48 hours at
28 C. After 24 hours, each coating samples was inspected to
obtain the percentage settlement. After a further period of
24 hours, the slides were again inspected and settlement
data were obtained for a period of 48 hours in total.
[0045] The force required to detach the barnacles from
the PDMS-based coatings is then measured using a device
intended for this purpose and the settlement on the
different PDMS-based coatings is normalised to the standard
sample ic (i.e. PDMS-based coating without any filler).
[0046] The evaluation of the adhesion of crustaceans
to a surface coated with the compositions according to the
invention mainly takes into account two parameters: one
concerns the force, per unit area, to be applied in order
to detach the crustacean from the surface and the second
concerns the state of the surface once the crustacean has
been removed; specifically, crustaceans attach themselves
to surfaces by means of a "glue" produced by the organism,
and, after its detachment, there may remain on the area of
contact of the crustacean an area that is "still
contaminated" with the residues of this glue or with part
of the crustacean itself.
[0047] Coatings that allow the crustacean to be
detached easily from its surface with a minimum of organic
residues after detachment of the organism are considered as
having good marine fouling release properties. From the
force which has to be applied to remove the crustacean from
the surface of the coatings, an "improvement" of the
barnacles release properties, normalised to unfilled PDMS
(sample ic), can be determined. For example, as the force
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
13
applied to remove barnacles from the control sample lc is
0.24 N.mm2, and as the force to be applied to sample007 is
0.201 N.mm2, thus the improvement observed for samp1e007 is
of 0.039 N.mm2, which represents 16,25 % of the force
corresponding to sample lc. Normalised to sample lc (sample
lc = 100%), the improvement observed for samp1e007 is
therefore 116.25%.
[0048] According to figures 1 to 5, the barnacles-
release performance of a PDMS-based polymer containing
carbon nanotubes and/or sepiolite is improved.
[0049] Preferably, as shown in Figure 1, the coating
may comprise in weight 0.01% to 1% of carbon nanotubes, and
more preferably between 0.05% and 1%. Indeed, the presence
of carbon nanotubes in a PDMS-based coating improves the
barnacles-release properties of the coating, (i.e. carbon
nanotubes in a PDMS-based coating reduce the force required
to detach barnacles), except for sample 005 (0.01% of
carbon nanotubes) for which the improvement is not
significant). Thus, for a PDMS-based coating comprising
0.05 to lo of carbon nanotubes, the improvement observed
goes from around 16% to around 38%.
[0050] Preferably, as shown in Figure 2, the PDMS-
based coating may comprise in weight 0.1 to 1% of
sepiolite. Indeed, the presence of sepiolite in a PDMS-
based coating also improves the barnacles-release
properties of the coating. For a content of 0.1 to 1% of
sepiolite, the improvement observed is around 14% to around
32%. For the samples comprising 3.5% (samp1e018) and 7% of
sepiolite (sample0.19) there is no significant improvement
compared to unfilled PDMS-based coating. The result
observed for sample 20 (10% of sepiolite) may be due to an
artefact in manipulation.
[0051] Preferably, the coating may comprise carbon
nanotubes and sepiolite (Figure 3). Preferably, the coating
may comprise 0.05 to 0.1% in weight of carbon nanotubes and
1 to 3.5% in weight of sepiolite.
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
14
[0052] In figures 4 and 5, the barnacles-release
improvement of samples 021 (0.05 o CNT + 1 o Sepiolite),
022 (0.05 o CNT + 3.5 o Sepiolite), 023 (0.1o CNT + 1
Sepiolite) and 024 (0.1 o CNT + 3.5 % Sepiolite) is
compared to samples 007 (0.05 % CNT), 008 (0.1 o CNT), 017
(1 % Sepiolite), 018 (3.5 % Sepiolite). It appears that the
improvement with mixed fillers may not be clearly
attributed to carbon nanotubes or sepiolite.
[0053] Barnacles settlement studies (figures 6 and 7)
suggest that, compared to unfilled coating (sample ic), the
presence of carbon nanotubes (figures 6) do not prevent the
settlement on such coatings after 48h of immersion, and
only a slight prevention can be observed after 24h of
immersion. Regarding coatings comprising sepiolite (figure
7), it can be noticed that such coatings have better anti-
settlement activity compared to the unfilled PDMS-based
coating. However, compared to a polystyrene or glass
support (data not shown) PDMS-based coatings comprising
sepiolite and/or carbon nanotubes clearly prevent the
attachment of crustacean.
[0054] The coatings according the present invention
have the advantage of being not environmentally toxic or
hazardous. The percentage of cyprids mortality was
determined (Table 3).
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
Mean % 95% Mean % 950
Mortality Confidence Mortality confidence
after 24 Interval after 48 Interval
Sample Hrs after 24 Hrs Hrs after 48 Hrs
lc 2.98 2.60 2.98 2.60
005 0.42 0.82 0.83 1.10
007 0.46 0.91 0.46 0.91
008 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
009 0.44 0.86 0.44 0.86
010 0.42 0.82 0.86 1.13
011 3.65 4.06 3.65 4.06
012 0.86 1.13 0.86 1.13
013 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.82
014 1.71 1.91 2.09 1.94
015 1.69 1.86 1.69 1.86
016 0.86 1.13 1.27 1.30
017 2.55 3.32 2.52 3.31
018 3.75 2.62 4.19 2.55
019 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
020 1.39 1.40 0.56 1.03
021 8.16 5.34 8.16 5.34
022 5.83 4.32 3.75 4.02
023 6.71 6.07 6.71 6.07
024 6.27 5.92 6.27 5.92
Table 3: Mean % mortality after 24 and 48 hours
[0055] Low level mortality was noted (Table 3), which
is consistent with the background (i.e. that of the
5 internal lab controls) levels of mortality. There were also
some instances of a number of cyprids drying out on the
edge of the samples. This explains the higher levels of
mortality on sample 017, 018 and 021 to 024 (rather than
any toxic effect). However, no abnormal behaviour was
10 noted.
[0056] The anti-fouling and/or fouling release coating
may be processed by any suitable method. Preferably,
according to Figure 8, the anti-fouling and/or fouling
release coating comprising carbon nanotubes may be
15 processed by using a two step method which consists in
forming a premix comprising carbon nanotubes, and then mix
and/or dilute this premix with a helix blade to get the
desired composition.
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
16
[0057] The assay procedure regarding the studies of
cellular colonization is in accordance with section 4.2 of
the Biological Workshop Manual (BWM, AMBIO Biological
evaluation workshop, University of Birmingham UK 21-22
April 2005; Ulva Sporeling Growth). Spores are released
from plants collected from the seashore. The concentration
of spores is adjusted to a standard concentration, for
example 1 x 106 spores/ml. Each coating samples (table 2)
are immerse in 30 litres of distilled water for one week,
and then in artificial seawater for 1 hour, in darkness, in
the presence of the colonizing cells (spores of the marine
alga Ulva) before the growth medium added. The samples are
then incubated in an illuminated incubator for 6 days, the
medium being refreshed every 2 days. The biomass on each
slide is quantified by measurement of the amount of
chlorophyll present. This is quantified directly through in
situ fluorescence using for example a plate reader.
[0058] After 6 days growth, the amount of cells (or
biomass) that becomes attached to the surfaces is evaluated
by in situ fluorescence determination (section 4.2.1 of the
Biological Workshop Manual, AMBIO Biological evaluation
workshop, University of Birmingham, UK, 21-22 April 2005)
by virtue of the autofluorescence of the photosynthetic
pigment chlorophyll by mean of a fluorescent reader which
emits light of wavelength 430nm, exciting the chlorophyll
contained within the chloroplasts of the algal cells
growing on the sample surface and then measures the 630nm
light, which is emitted as the pigment returns to `resting
state'. This method of biomass quantification has the
advantage of being relatively quick and non-destructive.
[0059] The strength of sporeling attachment was
determined by exposure to a 41.7 Pa shear stress in a
water-channel apparatus (section 4.3.1 of the Biological
Workshop Manual; AMBIO Biological evaluation workshop,
University of Birmingham, UK, 21-22 April 2005). The water-
channel apparatus allows accurate wall shear stress
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
17
determination from measurements of flow rate. The flow
channel can hold for example 6 samples (microscope slides
with or without coatings). A variable height bedding system
allows each sample to be adjusted so that the surface is
flush with the surrounding channel wall. Turbulent flow is
created in a 60 cm long low aspect ratio section of channel
preceding the sample. For example, flows of sea water
-~
(Instant Ocean) up to 4.9 m.s generate wall shear stresses
up to 56 Pa. Exposure of samples to flow can be
standardized for example at 5 min. Wall shear stresses can
be determined for example from streamwise pressure drop
measurements using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes
equation.
[0060] As shown in Figure 9, there is no significant
difference between the amount of spores that have colonized
the different PDMS-based coatings. None of the coatings
tested appears to be less hospitable to the spores of the
marine alga Ulva. Regarding the sample 008 for which Ulva
biomass is notably higher then the control (lc), this
observation may reflect differences in the initial
settlement density of the Ulva spores.
[0061] In order to evaluate the adhesion of the spores
to the different surfaces, the PDMS-based coatings are
exposed to a flow of seawater, of a force of 41.7 Pa, in
order to remove a maximum of spores. The number of cells
remaining on the surface of the coatings is then counted
and the percentage of detached cells is determined (figures
10 to 15).
[0062] It appears that the presence of carbon
nanotubes (Figure 10) or sepiolite (Figure 11) enables the
PDMS-based coating to increase the percentage of cells
detached from the surface of the coating. In other words,
on a PDMS-based coating comprising cylindrical nanofillers,
the spores of the marine alga Ulva adhere less strongly
than on a filler-free PDMS coating. The foul-release
performance of the polymer is thus improved.
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
18
[0063] Preferably, as shown in Figure 10, the coating
may comprise in weight 0.01 to 2.50 of carbon nanotubes,
more preferably 0.05 to 0.50, and even more preferably 0.1
o in weight of carbon nanotubes.
5[0064] Preferably, as shown in Figure 11, the coating
is processed by using a premix which is then mixed and/or
diluted by using an helix blade.
[0065] Preferably, as shown in Figure 12, the PDMS-
based coating may comprise in weight 0.1o to 10% of
sepiolite.
[0066] Preferably, the coating may comprise carbon
nanotubes and sepiolite (Figure 13). Preferably, the
coating may comprise 0.05 to 0.1o in weight of carbon
nanotubes and 1 to 3.5% in weight of sepiolite.
[0067] In figure 14, the Ulva sporeling removal of
samples 007 (0.05 % CNT), 017 (1 % Sepiolite) and 018 (3.5
% Sepiolite) is compared to samples 021 (0.05 % CNT + 1 %
Sepiolite) and 022 (0.05 % CNT + 3.5 o Sepiolite). It
appears that, the Ulva sporeling removal from coatings
comprising mixed fillers (at 0.05 0 of carbon nanotubes)
may largely be attributable to carbon nanotubes. However,
the comparison (Figure 15) of the Ulva sporeling removal of
samples 008 (0.1 o CNT), 017 (1 % Sepiolite), 018 (3.5 o
Sepiolite) with samples 023 (0.1% CNT + 1 % Sepiolite) and
024 (0.1 o CNT + 3.5 o Sepiolite) show that, at 0.1% of
carbon nanotubes, the mixed fillers present an increased
Ulva sporeling removal, suggesting a synergic effect
between carbon nanotubes and sepiolite.
[0068] The effect of carbon nanotubes on the viscosity
of a PDMS-based composition, in particular the
viscosimetric properties of the precursor A, makes it
possible to envisage application of this precursor by brush
or a paint roller for particular embodiments of the
invention in which the cylindrical nanofiller of the
composition comprises at least carbon nanotubes, i.e. a
composition in which the cylindrical nanofiller comprises
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
19
carbon nanotubes and one or more other cylindrical
nanofillers that are not carbon nanotubes, or a composition
in which the cylindrical nanofiller consists of carbon
nanotubes.
5[0069] The effect of the carbon nanotubes on the
viscosity of the constituents of the polymer into which
they are incorporated, especially of the precursor A, is
illustrated in Figure 16. The viscosity of the precursor A
containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes is markedly
increased compared with more standard compositions
containing clay-based fillers.
[0070] As shown in Figure 17, the viscosity of the
precursor A varies as a function of different parameters
such as the size, the diameter and the purity of the carbon
nanotubes.
[0071] It appears that a filler content of less than
1% by weight of carbon nanotubes allows a significant
increase in viscosity and more particularly with carbon
nanotubes that have undergone no post-synthetic treatment.
These nanotubes lead to a significant increase in the
viscosity of the polymer with very low filler contents of
between 0.2% and 0.3% by weight. This surprising increase
in viscosity is explained by the very high affinity of the
raw carbon nanotubes for the polysiloxane polymer, as shown
by the measurements taken by means of a "bound rubber" test
(Table 4). The experimental procedure of this test consists
in extracting 3.5 g of precursor A/carbon nanotubes mixture
with 30 mL of solvent (heptane) for 4 hours, at 25 C. After
centrifuging and evaporating off the solvent, the dry
residue is weighed in order to determine the amount of PDMS
polymer bound to the carbon nanotubes. Table 3 shows that
the cylindrical nanofillers, carbone nanotubes or
sepiolite, have higher affinity for the precursor A
compared to a platelet-type filler such as Cloisite 30B.
CA 02664902 2009-03-30
WO 2008/046166 PCT/BE2007/000114
Amount (in grams)
Composition of PDMS bound per Comments
gram of fillers
0.5% by weight of carbon 60
nanotubes (MWNTs) Excellent
0.1o by weight of carbon 107 affinity
nanotubes (MWNTs)
5% by weight of sepiolite 1.2 Good
0.5% by weight of sepiolite 2.5 affinity
0.5% by weight of cloisite 30B - 0.1 No affinity
Table 4: Affinity of carbon nanotubes for the polymer
matrix of the composition
[0072] Thus, the viscosimetric properties of the
5 precursor A containing a small amount of carbon nanotubes
allow it to be applied by brush, a paint roller, spraying,
or a manual plate coater, in order to coat the surface of a
material. However, the application of the composition
according to the invention to a support or a surface may be
10 performed via any suitable means. For example, the
application may be performed by injection moulding or by
casting.
