Language selection

Search

Patent 2235140 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2235140
(54) English Title: MIXTURES FOR PIPELINE TRANSPORT OF GASES
(54) French Title: MELANGES POUR LE TRANSPORT DE GAZ PAR PIPELINES
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10L 3/06 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MORRIS, IAN (Canada)
  • PERRY, GLEN (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • JL ENERGY TRANSPORTATION INC. (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
  • 665976 ALBERTA LTD. (Canada)
(74) Agent: BLAKE, CASSELS & GRAYDON LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1996-11-18
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1997-05-29
Examination requested: 2001-11-16
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/CA1996/000749
(87) International Publication Number: WO1997/019151
(85) National Entry: 1998-04-16

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
08/560,402 United States of America 1995-11-17

Abstracts

English Abstract




At pressures over 1,000 psia, it is advantageous to add to natural gas an
additive which is a C2 or C3 hydrocarbon compound or a mixture of such
compounds. Above a lower limit (which varies with the additive being added and
the pressure), this results in a smaller z factor, representing increased
packing of molecules, and therefore leading to a decrease in the amount of
power needed to pump the mixture or to compress it.


French Abstract

A des pressions supérieures à 1000 psia, il est avantageux d'ajouter au gaz naturel un additif qui est un composé d'hydrocarbures C¿2? ou C¿3? ou un mélange de ce type de composés. Au-dessus d'une limite inférieure (qui varie en fonction de l'additif ajouté et de la pression), ceci permet d'obtenir un facteur z moindre, ce qui représente un compactage accru des molécules, et permet donc de réduire le niveau de puissance nécessaire pour pomper le mélange ou le comprimer.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 13 -
What is claimed is:


1. A method of transporting natural gas by pipeline, which comprises:

(a) adding to such natural gas sufficient of at least one C2 or C3 hydrocarbon
or a mixture of C2 and C3 hydrocarbons such so the hydrocarbon, together with
the C2 and C3 hydrocarbon (if any) originally in the natural gas, forms a resulting
mixture with a total C2 or C3 hydrocarbon content which is sufficient, at the
pressure and temperature to be used for transporting, to reduce the z factor to
a level lower than that of the untreated natural gas, and

(b) transporting such resulting mixture by pipeline at a temperature of
between -40° and +120° Fahrenheit and pressure greater than 1000 psia, said
pressure and temperature being chosen so the resulting mixture has no liquid
phase at the temperature and pressure of transmission.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 where the hydrocarbon is selected from

(a) between 26 and 40% of at least one C2 compound if the pressure is about
1000 psia, declining smoothly to about 6% to 15% of said C2 compound if the
pressure is about 2200 psia, or

(b) between 12% and 4% of a C3 compound, if the pressure is about 1000
psia, declining smoothly to the C3 amount which will not cause liquefaction at the
pressure used when the pressure is above 1000 psia.

3. A method as claimed in either claim 1 or claim 2, in which there is not more than
1% by volume of carbon dioxide in the resulting mixture.


- 14 -

4. A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, in which there is not more than 2%nitrogen in the resulting mixture.

5. A method as claimed in any of claims 1-4, in which the temperature at which the
resulting mixture is transmitted is between -20° F. and +70°F.

6. A method as claimed in any of claims 1-4, in which the pressure at which the
resulting mixture is transmitted is between 2160 psia and 1150 psia.

7. A method as claimed in any of claims 1-6 in which the C2 hydrocarbon added tothe natural gas is ethane.

8. A method as claimed in any of claims 1-7, in which the C3 hydrocarbon added
to the natural gas is propane.

9. A gas mixture, for use in a pipeline at a pressure greater than 1,000 psia and
a temperature of from -40 degrees F. to +100 degrees F., which comprises:

(a) from 65 to 92% by volume of methane

(b) from 6 to 35% by volume of ethane

(c) from 0 to 9% by volume of propane

(d) from 0% by volume of C4 hydrocarbons to a percentage of Cu
hydrocarbons which does not liquify at the pressure used

(e) not more than 1% each of carbon dioxide or nitrogen the total being
100%, and such mixture being completely gaseous with no liquid phase at the
temperature and pressure of intended operation.

- 15 -
10. A gas mixture as claimed in claim 9, said gas mixture being at a pressure of
1000-2200 psia and a temperature of from -20 degrees F. to +70 degrees F.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 0223~140 1998-04-16

W O 97/19151 PCT/CA96/00749

MIXTURES FOR PIPELINE TRANSPORT OF GASES

Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the ll ~"srer by pipeline of mixtures which contain
~ methane or natural gas.

5 Backqround of the Invention
As is weil known, methane is the largest component of natural gas, and
usually accounts for at least g5U/o by volume of what is known as "transmission
specification" natural gas. Other usual components are ethane (usually about 2%),
propane (usually about 0.5%~, butanes, pentanes and possibly hexanes ~altogether10 amounting to less than about 0.3%), with the balance being nitrogen and carbon
dioxide. In this disclosure, transmission specification natural gas will be hereinafter
called "natural gas". For example, the natural gas as transmitted through the pipelines
of TransCanada Pipeline Limited from Alberta, Canada to Ontario, Canada has typically
the following percentage composition by volume:

Component Feed
Nitrogen 0.01 270
Carbon Dioxide 0.00550
Methane 0.95400
Ethane 0.01 970
Propane 0.00510
i-Butane 0.001 70
n-Butane 0.00080
i-Pentane 0.00020
n-Pentane 0.0001 0
n-Hexane 0.00020

The relation between pressure, volume and temperature of a gas can be
expressed by the Ideal Gas Law, which is stated as PV = nRT, where:
P = pressure of gas
V = volume of gas
n = number of moles of the gas

CA 0223~140 1998-04-16
W O 97/19151 PCT/CA96/00749
--2 --

R = the universal gas co"-~Lanl (which, as is known, varies somewhat depending
on volume and temperature)
T = temperature of the gas.
If the equation is expressed in English units, the pressure is in pounds per square inch
absoiute (psia), the volume is in cubic feet, and temperature is in degrees R (degrees
Fahrenheit plus 460).
The Ideal Gas Equation does not give exactly correct results in actual
practice, because gases are conlpressibie. Gas rnoiec~les, when cvmpressed, packmore tightly together than would be predicted by the Ideal Gas Equation, because of
intermolecular forces and molecular shape. To correct for this, an added term, the
compressibility factor z, can be added to the Ideal Gas Equation. This is a
dimensionless factor which reflects the compressibility of the particular gas being
measured, at the particular temperature and pressure conditions.
At aLmOSPher;C pressure or gage pressures of a few hundred pounds, the
compressibility factor is sufficiently close to 1.0 so that it can be ignored for most
gases, and so that the Ideal Gas Law can be used without the added term z. However,
where pressures of more than a few hundred pounds exist, the z term can be different
enough from 1.0 so that it must be included in order for the Ideal Gas Equation to give
correct results.
According to the van der Waals theorem, the deviation of a natural gas
from the Ideal Gas Law depends on how far the gas is from its critical temperature and
critical pressure. Thus, the terms TR and PR (known as reduced temperature and
reduced pressure respectively) have been defined, where
TR= T
TC
PR P
Pc
where,
T = the temperature of the gas in degrees R
Tc = the critical temperature of the gas in degrees R
P = the pressure of the gas in psia

CA 0223~140 1998-04-16

W O 97/19151 PCTtCA96/00749
--3 --

Pc = the critical pressure of the gas in psia
Criticai pressures and critical temperatures for pure gases have been
c~lc~ ed, and are available in most handbooks. Where a mixture of gases of knowncomposition is available, a pseudo critical temperature and pseudo critical pressure
5 which apply to the mixture can be obtained by using the averages of the critical
temperatures and critical pressures of the pure gases in the mixture, weighted
according the percentage of each pure gas present.
~ n~ a pseuclo reduoed temperature alld pseudo reduced pressure are
known, the compressibility factor z can be found by use of standard charts. One of
10 these is "Compressibility Factors for Natural Gases" by M.D. Standing and D.L. Katz,
published in the En~ineerin~ Data ~ook. Gas Processors Suppliers Association, 1 0th
edition (Tulsa, Oklahoma, U.S.A.) 19~7.
When the cor,lpressibility factor z of methane is read from the charts, it
is found that the factor z is always less than 1.0 in normal temperature ranges (i.e.
1~ between about 40~F and 120~F) and that it decreases as the pressure rises or the
temperature falls. Therefore, less energy need be used to pump a given volume ofmethane (measured at standard volume) at any given normal temperature than wouldbe expected at that temperature if the methane were an ideal gas. This effect is more
marked at higher pressures. Similarly, as the pressure is increased at a constant
20 temperature, more rnethane (measured at standard volume) can be stored in a given
volume than would be predicted from the Ideal Gas Equation. "Standard volume" isvolume measured at standard pressure and temperature (STP)).
Natural gas, like methane, shows z factor changes with pressure.
However, the z factor does not decrease as much with pressure for natural gas as it
2~ does for pure methane. Thus, natural gas containing 2% ethane and (~.5% propane
cannot be packed as tightly as methane alone at a given pressure, and needs moreenergy to compress or pump than methane alone. If the amount of ethane in the
natural gas is increased to 4%, the z factor drops still less with pressure, so that the
gas is still more difficult to compress or pump and cannot be packed as tightly at a
30 given pressure as could pure methane. (All percentages in this document are
percentages by volume).

CA 0223~140 1998-04-16
W O 97/19151 PCT/CA96/00749

- 4 --

It is usual in the gas transpo, laLion and storage industry to try to strip out
higher hydrocarbons such as ethane, propane, butane and unsaturated hydrocarbonsfrom natural gas if the gas is to be transmitted through pipelines in which the gas is
compressed to 1,000 or higher. This leaves mostly methane (with some traces of
nitrogen and carbon dioxide) to be transported by the gas pipeline. The materials
which are stripped out are then transported or stored separately, often as liquids.

Summarv of the Invention
It has now been found that, at pressures over 1,000 psia, it is
advantageous to add to natural gas an additive which is a C2 or C3 hydrocarbon
compound or a mixture of such additives. Above a lower limit (which varies with the
additive being added and the pressure~, this results in a smaller z factor than would
exist with methane alone, representing increased packing of molecules, and therefore
leading to a decrease in the amount of power needed to pump the mixture or to
compress it.

Detailed Description of the Invention
If ethane is the additive, enough ethane must be added to methane or
natural gas to give a gas composition having a minimum of about 26% ethane for
operation at 1,000 psia and normal temperatures (-40~F to +110~F). Ethane can beadded until just before the mixture se~ dles into separate gas and liquid (which occurs
at about 40% ethane for a pressure 1,000 psia and a temperature of about 35~F). To
reduce the danger of liquefaction if there is inadvertent pressure drop, and to reduce
temperature extremes, generally operation at 26-35% ethane and 35~F to +~0~F is
preferred.
When the pressure is raised to 2,200 psia, the addition of enough ethane
to natural gas to give a gas composition having more than 6% ethane gives some
beneficial results. Thus, as pressure increases, in the range from 1,000 psia to about
21200 psia the beneficial results occur with less and less ethane. For the most

CA 0223~140 1998-04-16
W O 97/19151 PCT/CA9C/0074g
-- 5 --

beneficial results, however, an addition of enough ethane to give at least 15% ethane
is preferred at pressures of 2,200 psia.
Thus, for ethane as an additive, an amount is added to give a gas which
has at least 26% ethane (but preferably 35% ethane) at 1,000 psia, and at least 6%
ethane (but preferably 15% ethane) at 2,200 psia, with the minimum percentage ofethane decreasi-,g smoothly with rise in pressure. Ethylene may be substituted for all
or part of the ethane on a 1:1 volume basis. Where pressure fll ~ctu~tes, as in a gas
pipeiine where the gas is compressed at compressor siatiorls and becomes less
compressed as it flows between compressor stations, the pressure indicated is the
maximum pressure to which the gas is cor~ ~pressed. In such a cor"pression-rarefaction
a, l ~nyer"ent, it is preferred that the ratio between the most compressed and the most
rarefied pressures of the gas not exceed 1.25:1.
C3 hydrocarbons alone can also be used as the additive. Minimum
useable percentage of the total gas mixture vary from a minimum of 5% at 1,000 psia
to about 3% at 2,200 psia. Maximum amounts are those which will not cause
separation of a liquid phase at the temperature used. The C3 hydrocarbons may be any
of propane, isopropane or propylene, separately or in admixture.
One or more C3 hydrocarbons may also be substituted, preferably on a
1:3.5 volume basis, for C2 hyd, uc~, bcins, but not to a point where they cause separation
of a liquid phase at the pressure and temperature of operation. (A 1:3.5 basis means
that each standard volume of C3 hydrocarbon replaces three and a half standard
volumes of C2 hydrocarbon.) Generally, the limitation that a liquid phase should not
be formed means that not more than about 12% of C3 hydrocarbons should be present
at 1000 psia and 60~F, and lesser amounts should be used as the pressure or
temperature increases.
Two or more of the C2 or C3 additives can also be used. The use of two
or more additives has a synergistic effect in many cases, so that less than the minimum
amount of each is needed than would be needed if only one were present, in order to
produce the z factor over that of an equivalent standard volume of natural gas at the
pressure and temperature involved.

CA 0223~140 1998-04-16
W O 97/19151 PCT/CA96/00749
--6 --

At pressures over 1000 psig, C4 hydrocarbons do not contribute much to
the improvement of the z factor, because an amount which would be large enough to
cause a reduction of the z factor is also large enough to liquify, which is undesirable.
Thus C4 hydrocarbons are not additives contemplated by this invention, however C4
5 hy~, .,ca, L~ons which are already present in the natural gas need not be removed if they
are present in insufficient quantity to liquify. The presence of more than 1% C4h)~dloca,bon in the mixture is not prer~"t:d, however, as C4 hydrocarbons tend to liquify
easily ai pressures beiween 1,C00 psia and 2,200 psia, ~nd more ~han 1~/'o C4
hydrocarbons give rise to increased danger that a liquid phase will separate out. C4
10 hydrocarbons also have an unfavourable effect on the mixture's z factor at pressures
just under 900 psia, so care should be taken that, during transport through a pipeline,
that mixtures according to the invention which contain C~ hydrocarbons are not allowed
to decompress to less than 900 psia, and preferably not to less than 1,000 psia.The addition of amounts of additive below the lower limit (unless two
15 additives with a sy, l13(yi51iC effect are used) actually increases the z factor over that of
methane or natural gas alone, and is thus del, i" ,ental. For example, when the pressure
is 1,000 psia and the temperature is 35~F, mixtures of methane and ethane having less
than about 26% ethane have a z factor greater than methane alone (all percentages
are based on volumes at standard pressures and temperatures). Adding ethane to
20 increase the percentage of ethane from 2% to, for example 12% at this pressure and
temperature is therefore counterproductive, as it increases the z factor and therefore
increases the energy required to pump or compress for storage a given standard
volume of gas. However, when more than 26% of ethane is present, the z factor
becomes lower than that of methane. The z factor continues to get smaller with
25 increased percentages of ethane, to the point where further increase of ethane causes
separation of a liquid phase (at about 40% ethane at 1,000 psia and 35~F). Thus,adding ethane to natural gas so that there is a mixture containing more than 26%ethane at 1,000 psia and 35~F leads to increased packing of molecules and hence
decreased pumping costs and more ability to store within a given volume. At 1,350
30 psia and 85~F, improved results over methane alone are obtained when only 17% of
ethane is present in the mixture. Where the pressure is increased to 1,675 psia at

CA 0223~l40 l998-04-l6

W O 97/19151 PCT/CA96/00749
-- 7 --

35~F, mixtures with 13% or more ethane, and the balance methane give better packing
and a lower z factor than methane alone. At 2,140 psia and 35 ~ F, the improved effect
is shown in mixtures of 6% ethane and the balance methane.
By the avoidance of liquid phase in this disclosure is meant the avoidance
of enough liquid to provide a coherent liquid phase in the pipeline at the temperatures
and pressures used. Such a phase can create pipeline problems through pooling inlow portions of the pipeline or forming liquid slugs which affect pumping efficiency. A
few iiquid droplets in ~he line howevel, can be lviera~ed.
The use of a hydrocarbon as additive has the additional advantage that
it permits transport of a mixture of methane or natural gas and the hydrocarbon additive
in a single pipeline with less energy expenditure than if the two were transported
separately in separate pipelines.

Brief DescriPtion of the Drawin~s
The invention wiil be described further in association with the following
drawings in which:
Figures 1A to 1 E are plots of capacil~/ gain in percent against the content
of C2 hydrocarbons in a mixture of methane and ethane. Each of the plots shows the
results at a different pressure.
Figures 2A and 2B are plots of capacity gain versus temperature (in
degrees Fahrenheit) for pipelines at 800 psia and 1,675 psia respectively.
Figure 3 is a summary of pipeline horsepower requirements for various
gas mixes, using a 36" pipeline operating at a maximum operation pressure of 1,740
psia, an inlet temperature of 80~F and a ground temperature of 32~F.
Figure 4iS a plot of the horsepower requi,~r"er~ per thousand cubic feet
of gas showing different mixtures of ethane and methane, at different pressures.
Detailed DescriPtion of the Embodiments Shown in the Drawin~s
Dealing first with Figure 1, this shows, for various pressures and the same
temperature, the effect of the addition of ethane to methane. In each case, the z factor
has been calculated for each percentage of ethane from 0 to 40%. Then, the lowest

CA 0223~140 1998-04-16
W O 97/19151 PCT/CA96/00749
-- 8 --

calculated z factor, i.e. the most dense packing, has been arbitrarily defined as 0%
capacity gain. Each of the other results has been plotted as a percentage capacity
gain with reference to the 0% capacity gain in order to prepare a curve. Curves
developed in this way are given in Figures 1A to 1 E, for different pressures, with each
5 curve representing the situation for one pressure. The temperature represented by
each curve is 35~F.
Looking at Figure 1A, it is seen that, for an 800 psia pipeline, the best
packing occurs when lhe line is filleci wil~ pure methane. As etharle is adc:ied, the
packing steadily falls (and the capacity gain percent decreases) until there is about
10 25% ethane in the line. After this, the capacity gain begins to increase again, but it
does not reach the levels obtained for pure methane.
Figure 1 B shows the effect of addition to methane of ethane for a pipeline
at 1,150 psia. Here, the capacity gain steadily decreases from 0% ethane to about
12% ethane, and then increases again. After approximately 25% ethane, the capacity
15 gain is greater than occurred with no ethane at all.
Figure 1C shows that this effect is even more pronounced when the
pipeline pressure is increased to 1,350 psia. The lowest capacity now occurs at
approximately 7%, and mixtures with more than 17% ethane exhibit packing (and
hence, pipeline or storage capacity) gains unattainable with of natural gas or methane
20 alone.
Figure 1 D shows that at 1,760 psia, the lowest capacity occurs at about
5%, and anything over 12% ethane gives a better capacity gain than is attainable with
natural gas or methane alone. For best results, however, at least 15% ethane should
be present.
2~ At 2,140 psia (Figure 1E) the ad~ilion of about 4% ethane gives a benefit,
and the benefit steadily increases all the way up to the point at which the ethane begins
to separate out in a liquid phase. For best results, however, at least 12% ethane, and
preferably 15% ethane, should be present.
Thus, it will be seen that for pressures above about 1,000 psia better
30 packing, and hence lower cor,lpression cost and pumping cost for transportation occurs
when increased amounts of ethane are added over a minimum amount which
-

CA 0223~140 1998-04-16
W O 97/19151 PCT/CA96/00749
_ g _

decreases with increasing pressure. At 1,150 psia (Figure 1 B) about 24% ethane must
be added to get the same packing effect as the approximately 2% ethane in normalnatural gas. If more than this amount is added, however, better packing occurs with
each addition. As the pressure increases, successively less ethane need be added to
give better packing (and hence lower transmission costs and compression costs) than
with natural gas. Indeed, at 2,410 psia, even about 4% ethane shows some advantage,
although the advantage is of course greater as more ethane is added.
Figure 2 si~ows how the e~Fect changes with temperature. Even at 800
psia (Figure 2A) there is a capacity increase (i.e. better packing) as temperature drops,
and the capacity gain is greater the more C2 that is present. However, the effect is not
nearly as significant as at higher pressures. With higher pressure ~Figure 2B) the
capacity gain is much greater with temperature, and the improvement in capacity gain
becomes still greater as increased amounts of ethane are added. Generally, there~ore,
it is prere"t:d to operate at a relatively low temperature, such as 70~ to -20~F. Higher
temperatures (e.g. up to about 120~F) can be tolerated, but detract from the benefits
of the invention.
Figure 3 shows ho,:,epo~ver required for different gas mixes of ethane and
methane, through a pipeline at a maximum pressure of 1,740 psia and a minimum
pressure of 1,350 psia. ~igures are for a pipeline of 36" in diameter and a length of
1,785 miles, with pumping stations located every 56 miles. At a throughput of 2.0
million, ~Lal ,dard cubic feet per day, a mixture of 98% methane and 2% ethane (which
corresponds to ol.linary natural gas) would require 812,579 horsepower. However, the
same standard volume of gas, but containing 35% C2, can be moved with only 661,860
horsepower, ~or a saving of over 150,000 horsepower. When the throughput is raised
to 2.5 million standard cubic feet, natural gas containing 2% ethane cannot practically
be transmitted, because the velocities and temperatures involved are too great.
However, gas with 6% ethane can be transmitted, and gas with 35% ethane shows a
saving of over 500,000 horsepower over that which is used to transmit the gas with 6%
ethane.

CA 0223~140 1998-04-16
W O 97/19151 PCT/CA961~0749
-10 -

Figure 4 shows the effect on horsepower requirements per million cubic
feet of gas being pumped through the same pipeline as used in Figure 3 when the
pipeline gas contains different concentrations of ethane at 35~F.
Figure 4 also shows the negative effect of adding ethane to a typical
5 pipeline running at about 800 psia pressure and 35~F. Required power for pumping
increases until the mix contains 26% ethane and then decreases for higher
concentrations approaching the liquid phase limits. However, the decrease is notsufFicient so that, by the concenll alion where iiquefac~ion occurs ~about ~%) there is
any saving of l ,o, ~e~ower over pumping ordinary natural gas. This energy hill however
10 peaks at decreasing concenl,alions of ethane as operational pressure increases, e.g.,
14% at 1,150 psia, 8% at 1,350 psia, 6% at 1,475 psia. This is due to the rate of
decrease in the value of the z factor overcoming the rate of increase in density.
As noted, at 800 psia, increasing the amount of ethane even up to 40%
of the mixture does not produce a saving of horsepower. At 1,150 psia, however, an
15 increase of ethane to over about 24% causes a horsepower saving when compared to
the values at 2% ethane (which is approximately the amount of ethane in most natural
gas). At 1,350 psia, a decrease in horsepower occurs with mixtures containing more
than about 14% ethane. As the pressure increases, the horsepower saving occurs
with still less added ethane. As can be seen from Figure 4, the peak horsepower
20 requirement shifts to the left of the graph and becomes smaller as pressure increases.
However, reading Figure 4 with Figure 2A and 2B shows that, as temperature
decreases, the curve tends to rotate to the right. Thus, as temperature decreases, less
addition of ethane is necessary to obtain the desired additional packing and hence
decreased compression and pumping energy requirements. The result is lower
25 compressive power requirements for equivalent volumes of higher B.T.U. gas mixes
than can be achieved with conventional pipeline specification natural gas. Higher
pipeline throughput are able to be economically achieved with these enhanced gasmixes with corresponding increases in horsepower.
Similar effects are seen when ethylene is used in substitution for all or
30 part of the ethane.

CA 02235140 1998-04-16

W O 97/19lSl PCT/CA96/00749


When propane, isopropane or propylene, or mixtures of any of these
gases, are substituted for ali or part of the ethane, the effects are even more
pronounced than with ethane, and occur with a smaller addition of each of the
compounds mentioned than was necessary with ethane as noted previously in this
5 disclosure.

The preferred composition of the resulting gas is as follows:

COMPONENT MAXIMUM VALUE MINIMUM VALUE
METHANE AND/OR 92% VOLUME 68%VOLUME
1 0 ETHYLENE
ETHANE AND/OR 35% VOLUME 6% VOLUME
OTHER C3
PROPANE 9% VOLUME 0%VOLUME
BUTANES AND OTHER Not required, but 0% VOLUME
COMPONENTS OF THE amount present in
NATURAL GAS original natural gas can
be tolerated if it does not
cause separation of a
liquid phase at the
pressure and
temperature used
NITROGEN Not required, but amount 0% VOLUME
present in the original
natural gas can be
tolerated if below 2% by
volume
CARBON DIOXIDE Not required, but amount 0% VOLUME
present in the original
natural gas can be
tolerated if below 1% by
volume.
COMPONENTS TOTAL
1 00%
TEMPERATURE 70~ F -20~ F
PRESSURE 2160 PSIA 1150 PSIA

CA 0223~140 1998-04-16
W O 97/191~,1 PCT/CA96/00749
-12 -


Compositionswith hyd,~JcG,L,on additives outside these ranges generally
are of little economic benefit, or approach the limits at which two-phase or liquid
behaviour can be seen. Therefore, if mixtures outside these parameters are used,care should be taken to avoid conditions which might cause liquid to fall out of the
5 mixture. Liquid is generally to be avoided, as it may pool in low areas of a pipeline and
be difficult to remove. The preferential liquefaction of some components will also cause
the ~rnp~sition of the gase~us phase of the mixture to ch~n~e, thereby changing tne
z factor and hence the compressibility of the gaseous phase.

The foregoing has illustrated certain specific embodiments of the
invention, but other embodiments will of course be evident to those skilled in the art.
Therefore it is intended that the scope of the invention not be limited by the
embodiments described, but rather by the scope of the appended claims.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(86) PCT Filing Date 1996-11-18
(87) PCT Publication Date 1997-05-29
(85) National Entry 1998-04-16
Examination Requested 2001-11-16
Dead Application 2004-11-18

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2003-11-18 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE
2004-03-29 R30(2) - Failure to Respond
2004-03-29 R29 - Failure to Respond

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 1998-04-16
Application Fee $300.00 1998-04-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1998-11-18 $100.00 1998-04-16
Registration of a document - section 124 $50.00 1998-07-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1999-11-18 $100.00 1999-11-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2000-11-20 $100.00 2000-11-09
Request for Examination $400.00 2001-11-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2001-11-19 $150.00 2001-11-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2002-11-18 $150.00 2002-11-14
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
JL ENERGY TRANSPORTATION INC.
Past Owners on Record
665976 ALBERTA LTD.
MORRIS, IAN
PERRY, GLEN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 1998-07-30 1 14
Abstract 1998-04-16 1 48
Description 1998-04-16 12 607
Claims 1998-04-16 3 74
Drawings 1998-04-16 6 107
Cover Page 1998-07-30 1 44
Fees 1999-11-10 1 33
Fees 2002-11-14 1 31
Correspondence 1998-11-06 3 64
Assignment 1998-07-28 6 123
Assignment 1998-04-16 5 197
PCT 1998-04-16 8 255
Prosecution-Amendment 2001-11-16 1 29
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-09-29 2 76
Fees 2000-11-09 1 33
Fees 2001-11-16 1 32
Sequence Listings Requested 1999-03-24 1 11
Sequence Listings Requested 1999-03-24 1 12