Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 1 -
Process of preparing Glycolaldehyde
The present invention relates to a process of
preparing glycolaldehyde and a process of preparing
ethylene glycol from the glycolaldehyde thus prepared.
The reaction of an unsaturated substrate with carbon
monoxide and hydrogen is known as hydroformylation. It
has been disclosed in the past that glycolaldehyde, which
is a useful intermediate for the preparation of ethylene
glycol, may be prepared by a hydroformylation reaction of
formaldehyde employing a rhodium catalyst. However, the
preparation of glycolaldehyde in this way is hindered in
that the rhodium catalyst also promotes.hydrogenation of
formaldehyde to methanol, lowering glycolaldehyde yields.
Attempts have been made to suppress methanol
production and increase selectivity to the glycolaldehyde
product and in this regard it has been found that good
yields of glycolaldehyde can be achieved by use of
rhodium catalysts containing aryl-substituted phosphine
ligands such as triphenylphosphine, optionally in
combination with protonoic acids (e. g. see Pure&Appl.
Chem., Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 661-669, 1990). However, such
aryl-substituted ligands suffer from the disadvantage
that they are unstable in the reaction conditions,
lessening their effectiveness.
A further limitation on this method of preparing
glycolaldehyde, in particular when it is to be used as an
intermediate in the preparation of ethylene glycol, is
that good results~are only obtained when using para-
formaldehyde in non-aqueous conditions and that use of
the cheaper aqueous formaldehyde (formaline) gives lower
conversion and selectivity to glyCOlaldehyde. This is'
thought to be due to the instability of the catalyst in
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 2 -
aqueous conditions. Indeed, the difficulty in
hydrofo rmylating aqueous. formaldehyde represents a major
obstacl a to the commercialisation of this approach for
the pro duction of ethylene glycol.
European patent application EP-A-0331512 reviews the
use of a rhodium-phosphine ligand complex, wherein the
phoshin a ligand is a triorganophoshine, in the
hydrofo rmylation of aqueous formaldehyde to
glycola ldehyde, which can then be used to prepare
ethylene glycol.
A process has now been developed for hydroformylating
,formaldehyde that is based on the use of a rhodium
catalyst and a specific form of phosphine ligand. The
process has performance advantages when compared to known
IS rhodium catalysts having aryl-substituted phosphine.
ligands. Moreover, the catalysts of the present invention
are mor a stable in aqueous conditions than catalysts
contain ing aryl-substituted phosphine ligands, and may
readily be used to convert aqueous formaldehyde to
glycolaldehyde .
The present invention provides a process of preparing
glycola ldehyde which comprises reacting formaldehyde~with
hydroge n and carbon monoxide in the presence of a
catalys t composition which is based on
a) a source of rhodium, and
b) a ligand of general formula
R1P-R2 (I)
wherein R1 is a bivalent radical that together with the
phosphorous atom to which it is attached is an optionally
substituted 2-phospha-tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7}]-decyl group,
wherein from 1 to 5 of the carbon atoms has been replaced
by a he teroatom, and wherein R2 is a monovalent radical
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 3 -
which is an optionally substituted hydrocarbyl group
having from.l to 40 carbon atoms.
The catalyst composition of the present invention
requires a source of rhodium. Convenient sources of
rhodium include rhodium salts of mineral acids, such as
salts of sulphuric acid, nitric acid and phosphoric acid;
s alts of sulphonic acids, such as methane sulphonic acid
and para-toluenesulphonic acid; and salts of carboxylic
acids, in particular those having up to 6 carbon atoms,
such as acetic acid, propionic acid and trifluoracetic
acid. Alternatively, the source. of rhodium may contain
rhodium in a zero-valent form, complexed by ligands such
as carbon monoxide, acetylacetonates and phosphine
ligands. The source of rhodium metal may contain a
mixture of anioi2s and uncharged ligands, e.g. as in
Rh.Cl {CO) 2 or Rh (acac) (CO) 2.
In the ligand of general formula (I), R1 represents a
bivalent radical that together with the phosphorus atom
to which it is attached is an optionally substituted
2 -phospha-tricyclo[3.3.1.1(3,7}]decyl group, wherein from
1 to 5 of the carbon atoms has been replaced by a
heteroatom.
Tricyclo[3.3.1.1(3,7}]decane is the systematic name
for a compound more commonly known as adamantane.
Therefore, for ease of reference, in the present
description the optionally substituted 2-phospha-
tricyclo[3.3.1.1(3,7}decyl group, or a derivative
thereof, may be referred to as a "2-PA" group (as.in 2-
phosphadamantyl.group).
In the ligands employed in the present invention,
from 1 to 5 of the carbon atoms in the "2-PA" group have
been replaced by a heteroatom. Examples of heteroatoms
that may conveniently be used are oxygen and sulphur
atoms, oxygen atoms being preferred.. The from 1 to 5
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 4 -
carbon atoms replaced by heteroatoms are preferably those
located a t positions 4, 6, 8, 9, or 10 of the "2-PA"
group. Most preferably 3 carbon atoms of the "2-PA" group
have been replaced by heteroatoms, preferably at the 6, 9
and 10 positions .
Preferably, the "2-PA" group is substituted on one or
more of t he 1, 3, 5 or 7 positions with a monovalent
radical of up to 20 atoms, preferably a radical .
comprising 1' to 10 carbon atoms and more preferably 1 to
6 carbon atoms. Examples of suitable manovalent radicals
include methyl, ethyl; propyl, phenyl, and 4-
dodecylphenyl groups, methyl and ethyl groups being
preferred.~More preferably, the "2-PA" group is substi-
tuted on each of the l, 3, 5 and 7~positions. Most
preferabl y the substituents on each of the 1, 3, 5~and 7
positions are identical'.
Ligands that have given particularly good results in
the present invention are those wherein the bivalent
radical Ri to.gether with the phosphorous atom~to which it
is attach ed is a.2-phospha-1,3,5,7-tetralkyl-6,9,10-
trioxa-tr icyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7y]-decyl group, as depicted in
Figure I:=
R2
Me
Me P
~ Mel
0
~ _O
Me Figure, 1.
In th a ligand of general formula (I), R2 is a
monovalent radical which is an optionally substituted
hydrocarb y1 group having from 1 to 90 carbon atoms. The
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 5 -
hydrocarbyl groups may be substituted or unsubstituted,
straight or branched chain, saturated or unsaturated;
preferred such hydrocarbyl groups being alkyl,
cycloalkyl, aryl, alkaryl and aralkyl groups. Where the
hydrocarbyl group is substituted, substituents which the
hydrocarbyl group may conveniently carry may be
independently selected from one or more of halogen atoms
(e. g. fluorine or chlorine), alkoxy, alkenyloxy, aryloxy,
hydroxy, dialkylamido, diarylamido, alkylthio, arylthio,
alkyl suphonyl, alkylsulphinyl; alkoxycarbonyl,
dialkylamino and diarylamino groups. Herein as
substituents suitably an alkyl moiety has from 1 to 4
carbon atoms, an alkenyl moiety has from 2 to 4 carbon
atoms, and an aryl group has from 6 to 12 carbon atoms,
and i s especially phenyl. Preferred substituents are
dialkylamido and diarylamido groups.
In a first preferred embodiment, the process of the
present invention employs a ligand wherein the monovalent
radical R2 is an, alkyl group having in the range of from
4 to 34 carbon atoms. Preferably, the alkyl group R2 of
this embodiment comprises at least 6 carbon atoms, most
preferably at least 10, especially at least 12, carbon
atoms; and preferably up to 28 carbon atoms, more
preferably up to 22 carbon atoms. The alkyl group may be
, linea r or branched, however it will preferably be linear.
The ligands of this embodiment are preferred as they
displ ay a high conversion t.o glycol aldehyde and may
enhance stability of the catalyst. They perform
particularly well in the hydroformylation of formaldehyde
in no n-aqueous conditions.
L igands that may be conveniently used in the present
invention according to the first preferred embodiment
include 2-phospha-2-hexyl-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-6,9,10-
triox a-tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane, 2-phospha-2-octyl-
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 6 -
1,3,5,7 -tetramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-
decane, 2-phospha-2-dodecyl-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-6,9,10-
trioxa-tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane, and 2-phospha-2-
icosyl-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-
S tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane.
In a second preferred embodiment, the process of the
present invention employs a ligand wherein the monovalent
radical R2 'is of general formula
-R3_C(p)NR4R5 (II)
wherein R3 is an alkylene group and R4 and R5
independently represent an alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl or
alkaryl group, or R4 and R5 together represent a bivalent
bridging group. Conveniently, alkylene group R3 is a
methylene, ethylene, propylene or butylene group, most
conveniently an ethylene group. Preferably, R4 and R5
independently represent an aryl group, for example
phenyls or an alkyl group, preferably an alkyl group
having from 1 to 22 carbon atoms. Examples of alkyl
. groups that may conveniently be used include methyl,
ethyl, propyl, butyl, and pentyl groups. Zigands wherein
R2 is of general formula (II) are preferred as they
display an excellent conversion~to glycolaldehyde and are
particularly advantageous for hydroformylation reactions
performed with aqueous formaldehyde.
2S Ligands that may be conveniently used in the present
inventi on according to the second preferred embodiment
include 2-phospha-2-(ethyl-N,N-diethylamido)-1,3,5,7-
tetramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane,
2-phospha-2-(ethyl-N,N-diphenylamido)-1,3,5,7-
tetramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane,
and 2-phospha-2-(ethyl-N,N-dimethylamido)-1,3,5,7-
tetramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane.
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
_ 7
The ligands of general formula (T) may be prepared by
coupling an optionally substituted 2-phospha-
tricyclo[3.3.1.1(3,7}]-decane, wherein from 1 to 5 of the
carbon atoms has been replaced by a heteroatom, with a
suitable RZ group precursor. The 2-phospha-
tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane may conveniently be
prepared by analogous chemistry to that described in
US-A-3,050,531, wherein for instance 2-phospha-1,3,.5,7-
tetramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-tricyclo[3.3.1.1[3,7}]-decane
is prepared b y reacting 2,4-pentanedione with phosphine
in the presence of hydrochloric acid. Similar chemistry
is also discussed in chapter 3 of "PRECIOUS METAL .
COMPLEXES OF SOME NOVEL FUNCTIONALISED SECONDARY AND
TERTIARY PHOS PHINES" by Ms. Joanne H Downing (thesis
submitted to the University of Bristol on November 1992).
Examples of R2 group precursors include compounds of
formula R2-X, wherein X is a halide, for example a
chloride or bromide, which may conveniently be used when
preparing lig ands of general formula (I) wherein R2 is an
alkyl group; for example by reaction of an R3-X compound
with 2-phosph a-1,3,5,~7-tetramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-
tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane or its borane adduct.
Alternatively, when R2 is of general .formula
-R3-C(0)NR4R5 (II), the R2 group precursor may
conveniently be an N,N-disubstituted alkenylamide. For
example, liga nds wherein R3 is an ethylene group and R4
and R5 are a1 kyl groups may be prepared by reaction of a
dialkyl-acryl amide with a "2-PA" group in the presence of
acid, e.g. acetic acid. Other ligands according to the
present invention may be prepared by analogous chemistry,
as will be understood by those skilled in the art.
The catalyst compositions employed in the present
invention may optionally comprise a source of anions c)
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
_ g _
as a further catalyst component. Preferred anions are
anions of protic acids having a pKa (measured at 18°C in
water) of less than 6, preferably less than 4. The anions
derived f ram these acids do not or only weakly co-
y ordinate with the rhodium, by which it is meant that
little or no covalent interaction occurs between the
anion and the rhodium. Catalysts.comprising such anions
exhibit good activity.
Examples of suitable anions include those derived
from Bronsted acids, such as phosphoric acid and
sulphuric acid; as well as anions derived from sulphonic
acids e.g. methanesulphonic acid, trifluoromethane
sulphonic acid, p-toluenesulphonic acid and 2,4,6-
trimethylbenzenesulphonic acid; and anions derived from
carboxylic acids, a . g. 2, 4, 6-trimethylbenzoic acid, 2, 4, 6
tri-isopropylbenzoic acid; 9-antracene carboxylic acid
and halogenated carboxylic acids. such as trifluoroacetic
acid ~,6-dichlorobenzoic acid, and 2,6
bis(trifluororriethyl)benzoic acid. Particularly good
results.have been obtained using alkyl-substituted
benzoic a rids, especially Cl to C4 alkyl-substituted
benzoic acids, as a source of anions.
Also suitable are complex anions, such as the anions
generated by the combination of a Lewis acid such as BF3,
B{C6F5)3, A1C13, SnF~, Sn(CF3S03)2, SnCl~ or-GeCl2, with
a erotic acid, preferably having a pKa of less than 5,
such as a sulphonic acid, e.g. CF3S03H or CH3S03H or a
hydrohalogenic acid such as HF or HC1., or a combination
of a Lewis acid with an alcohol. Examples of such comply
anions are BF4-, SnCl3-, [SnCI2.CF~S03]- and PF6-.
The molar ratio of carbon monoxide to hydrogen
supplied to the process of the present invention is not
critical and may vary over a wide range, for example of
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 9
from 5:95 to 95:5, preferably of from 30:70 to 80:20.
However, it is generally preferred to use a gas stream in
which the molar rati o of CO:H~ is at least 1:1, since
this minimises the formation of methanol. The process is
preferably conducted under pressure, conveniently in the
range of from 5 to 200 bar X0.5 to 20 MPa) and preferably
in the range of from 10 to 50 bar (1 to 5 MPa). Higher
pressures may be used, however they are generally
considered uneconomical. Inert gasses may also be present
in the gas stream but as this leads to an increase in
total pressure it is generally undesirable.
The hydroformyla t ion reaction of the present
invention may be conveniently carried out at moderate
temperatures, preferably in the range of from 22 to 180
°C, more preferably SO to 130 °C. The use of a
temperature as low a s possible commensurate with the
desired reaction rat a is preferred since at higher
temperatures the glycolaldehyde product is susceptible to
undergo side reactions, e.g. aldol condensation
reactions.
The reaction time for the process of the invention is
of course dependent on the temperature and pressure
conditions utilised. It has been generally found that
the reaction time ma y be in the range of from 1. to 10
hours, preferably 1 to 6 hours, especially 2 to.5 hours.
The quantity in which the catalyst system is used in
the present invention is not critical and may vary within
wide limits. However, the amount of mole atom of rhodium
metal per mole of formaldehyde will preferably be in the
range of from 1:1 to 1:10, more preferably from 1:10 to
1:105, and even more preferably from 1:100 to 1:104.
For the preparat.i on of catalyst systems employed in
the present invention, the amount of ligand of general
formula (I) is gener ally applied in an excess to the
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 10 -
amount of rhodium, expressed as moles of ligand per mole
atom of rhodium. Typically the amount of ligand is
selected such that per mole atom of rhodium 1 to 20 moles
.of ligand are present. However, for a preferred catalyst
system the molar amount of ligand per mole of rhodium is
preferably in the range of from 2 to 10, more preferably
in the range of from 2 to 5. When present the amount of
the anion source c), whilst not critical, may range from
1 to 500, preferably from 1 to 150, and more preferably
from 1 to 20 moles per mole atom of rhodium.
The process of the present..~nvention may be carried
out in the presence of~a solvent. Examples of solvents
that may conveniently be used include nitrites, pyridine,
substituted or unsubstituted ureas, for example
N,N,N',N'-tetrasubstituted ureas, and substituted or
unsubstituted amides, for example N,N-disubstituted
amides.
The formaldehyde may be introduced into the reaction
system in any suitable form, or it may be generated in
situ. A convenient source of formaldehyde is para-
formaldehyde. Further, it is an advantageous feature of
the present invention that good results are achieved when
aqueous formaldehyde is employed as the source of
formaldehyde. Accordingly, in a preferred process
according to the present invention the source of
formaldehyde is~aqueous formaldehyde.
Where the source of formaldehyde is aqueous
formaldehyde it is further preferred that the process is
.performed in a reaction medium comprising an aqueous
phase and an organic phase, wherein the organic phase and
aqueous phase are immiscible at 22 °C. For the avoidance
of doubt, by irnmiscible it ~is meant that on standing at
22 °C the organic phase and aqueous phase will separate
into two,distinct layers. A reaction medium comprising an
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 11
aqueous phase and an organic phase is preferred as on
completion of the reaction the catalyst will reside in
the organic~phase, whilst the glycolaldehyde product will
reside in the aqueous phase, and thus the product may
readily be separated from the catalyst by phase
separation. Such an approach is possible in the present
invention as the catalyst compositions are more stable in
aqueous conditions than known catalysts based on aryl-
substituted phosphine ligands.
. Where the process is performed in a reaction medium
comprising an aqueous phase arid an organic phase, the
solvent of the organi c phase may conveniently be a water-
immiscible amide solvent. Examples of water-immiscible
amide solvents that can be employed in the present
IS invention are those comprising long chain alkyl moieties
and includes N-alkyl- 2-pyrrolidones wherein the alkyl
group comprises at least 7 carbon atoms, preferably in
the range of from 8 t o 20 carbon atoms, N,N-dialkyl-
acetamides, in which each alkyl group has in the range of
from 1 to 10 carbon a toms, preferably from 1 to 6 Garbom
atoms, and N,N-diaryl -acetamides, preferably N,N-
diphenylacetamide. Examples of water-immiscible amide
solvents that have given particularly good results when
employed in the present invention include N-octyl-
pyrrolidone and N,N-dibutyl-acetamide.
A particularly preferred embodiment of the present
invention is wherein the process i,s performed in a
reaction medium comprising an aqueous phase and an
organic phase comprising a water-immiscible amide
solvent, and wherein in the ligand of general 'formula
R1P-R2 (I), the monovalent radical R2 is of general
formula -R3-C(0)NR~R5 (II).
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 12
The rhodium-containing catalyst compositions
described herein above were specifically developed for
use in the process of the present invention.
Catalyst compositi ans of this type fall within the
wide-ranging definitio n of metal-ligand complexes
described in US-A-2003 /0092935 for the hydroformyl,ation
~of olefins such as ex-olefins, internal olefins, and
internal branched olef ins. The preferred catalyst
compositions for use i n the process of the present
invention are distant from the preferred metal-ligand
complexes. of US-A-2003/0092935 and display an excellent
activity in the hydrof ormylation of formaldehyde, a very
different substrate, in both non-aqueous and aqueous
conditions. Catalyst compositions in which the
monovalent.radical R2, of the ligand (I), is of general
formula -R3-C(O)NR4R5 (II) perform especially well in
aqueous conditions for example when formalin is used as
the substrate, or when water is present in the reaction
medium. Accordingly, the present invention further
provides a catalyst composition obtainable by combining
a) a source of rhodium, b) a ligand of general formula
~~-P-R2 ( I )
wherein R1 is a bivalent radical that together with the
phosphorous atom to which it is attached is an optionally
substituted 2-phospha -tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decyl group,
wherein from 1 to 5 of the carbon atoms has been replaced
by a heteroatom, and wherein R2 is a monovalent radical
which is an optionall y substituted alkyl group having
from 10 to 40 carbon atoms, or is, preferably, of the
general formula -R3-C(0)NR4R5, wherein R3 is an alkylene
group and R4 and R5 independently represent an alkyl,
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 13
cycloalkyl, aryl or alkaryl group or R4 and R5 together
represent a bivalent bridging group,
and optionally c) a source of anions. Within these
definitions of R2, preferred catalyst compositions as
described herein before with respect to the process of
the present invention are similarly preferred as the
catalyst composition of the invention.
An important use of glycolaldehyde is its conversion
to ethylene .glycol and the present invention still
further provides a process of preparing ethylene glycol
by hydrogenating glycolaldehyde prepared by the
hydroformylation process described herein above.
Hydrogenation catalysts of use in the conversion of
glycolaldehyde to ethylene glycol are well known in the
art, for example palladium, platinum or nickel catalysts,
often in heterogeneous form. Where glycolaldehyde is
prepared in non-aqueous conditions, the selected
hydrogenation catalyst may be added directly to the
reaction mixture resulting from the preparation of
glycolaldehyde with no work-up. procedure, and. gaseous
hydrogen introduced. Alternatively, the reaction mixture
may be worked-up before the glycolaldehyde is
hydrogenated, e.g. by extraction with a suitable solvent
such as water or ethylene glycol itself, and the
resulting solution then hydrogenated in conventional
manner. This approach is particularly convenient when the
glycolaldehyde is prepared from aqueous formaldehyde in a
reaction medium comprising an aqueous phase as has now
been made possible by means of the present invention.
The invention will be further understood from the
following illustrative examples.
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 14
Ligand Synthesis
The following examples, which were performed under an
atmosphere of purified argon using standard Schlenk
techniques, illustrate a typical preparation of a ligand
according to the present invention wherein (1) R2 is an
alkyl group (2-phospha-2-icosyl-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-
6,9,10-trioxa-trieyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane), and (ii) R2
is of general formula (II) {2-phospha-2-(ethyl-N,N-
dimethylamido)-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-6,9,10-.trioxa-
tricyclo [ 3 . 3 .1 .1 ( 3, 7 } ] -decane ) .
(1) Synthesis of 2-phospha - 2-icosyl-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-
6,9,10-trioxa-tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane.
A borane adduct of 2-phospha-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-
6,9,10-trioxa-tricyclo[3.3.1.1(3,7}]-decane was prepared
by adding BH3.THF (70 ml of 1M solution in THF) to a
solution of 2-phospha-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-.
tricyclo [ 3 . 3 .1.1 { 3, 7 } ] -decane ( ~0 mmol ) in THF at 0°C .
The reaction mixture was al 1 owed to warm to room
temperature and stir for two hours after which time the .
solvent was removed in vacu o to yield the borane adduct.
To a solution of this adduct (16 mmol in THF) a
solution of hexyl-lithium ~(6.4 ml, 2.5M in hexane) was
added at a temperature of - 70 °C and the reaction
mixture allowed to slowly w arm to - 20 °C over a period
of 1 hour. After retooling to - 70 °C, a solution of 1-
bromo-icosane (16 mmol in T HF) was added. The reaction
mixture was then allowed to warm to ambient temperature
and stirred for 2 hours bef ore diethylamine (3 ml) was
added arid the reaction mixture then refluxed for 12
hours. On completion of the reaction the solvent was
removed in vacuo. The product was then isolated by
solvent extraction in dichl oromethane-toluene and water,
the toluene fractions being evaporated to leave a solid
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 15
residue that was washed with methanol to yield 2-phospha-
2-icosyl-1,3,5,7-tet ramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-
tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane (96 0).
(ii) Synthesis of 2-phospha-2-(ethyl-N,N-dimethylamido)-
1,3,5,7-tetramethyl- 6,9,'10-trioxa-tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-
decane.
2-Phospha-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-
tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane (40 mmol) and
N, N dimethylacrylam.i.de (100 mmol) were introduced into a
Schlenk-tube contain ing a mixture of toluene and acetic
acid, and heated to a temperature of 115 °C. After 18
hours the reaction mixture was cooled to 80 °C and the
solvents evaporated in vacuo. The residue was then .
dissolved in triethylamine and the mixture heated to a
temperature of 100 °C for 2.5 hours after which the
resulting homogeneou s mixture was cooled to ambient
temperature. The product was then isolated by solvent
extraction with toluene and water, the toluene fractions
being evaporated to yield 2-phospha-2-(ethyl-N,N- .
, dimethylamido) -1, 3, 5, 7-te,tramethyl-6, 9, 10-trioxa-
tricyclo [ 3 . 3 . 1. 1 { 3, 7 } ] =decane ( 7 9 0 ) .
Hydroformylation of formaldehyde
The following examples were performed in a
magnetically stirred 250 ml autoclave. The autoclave was
charged with reactan is and solvent after which air was
removed and the auto clave pressurised with carbon
monoxide and hydroge n, each to a partial pressure of
30bar (3MPa). The oontents of the autoclave were then
heated to reaction temperature. Upon completion of the
reaction, the contents were cooled and the conversion of
formaldehyde, and yield of glycolaldehyde, was determined
by means of gas-liquid chromatography using di-ethylene
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 15
glycol dimethylether as an internal standard. All ligands
were prepared using analogous chemistry to that described
for ligands (i) and (ii) abov e.
Example 1
("2-PA"-C20 ligand in non-aqueous conditions)
The autoclave was charged with 0.17 mol of
formaldehyde, in the form of para-formaldehyde, 62 ml
(0.58 mol) of N-methyl-pyrrol idone, 0.25 mmo1 of
rhodiumdicarbonylacetonylacet one (Rh(acac)(CO)2), 0.50
mmol of 2-phospha-2-icosyl-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-6,9,10-
trioxa-tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane, and 9.1 mmol of
trimethylbenzoic acid. The contents of the autoclave were
then heated to a temperature of 110 °C and maintained at
that temperature for 2 hours.
Conversion of formaldehyde was 1000 and the yield of
glycolaldehyde, calculated on formaldehyde intake, was
76~. The initial reaction rat a was calculated by
measurement of the pressure drop to be 595 mol CO/mol
Rh.h.
Example 2
("2-PA"-CZO ligand in aqueous conditions)
The autoclave was charged with 0.17 mol of
formaldehyde, in the form of para-formaldehyde, 35 ml
(0.22 mol) of dibutyl-acetami de, 25 ml of demineralised
2S water, 0.25 mmol of Rh (acac) (CO) 2, 0 .53 mmol of 2-
phospha-2-icosyl-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-
tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane, and 9.1 mmo1 of
trimethylbenzoic acid. The contents of the autoclave were
heated to a temperature of 110 °C and maintained at that
temperature for 5 hours.
Conversion of formaldehyde was 64 o and the yield of
glycolaldehyde in the two-phase reaction product,
calculated on formaldehyde i make, was 45 0. The initial
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 17
reaction rate was calculated by measurement of the
pressure drop to be 115 mot CO/mol Rh.h
Example 3
("2-PA"-CHzCH2C {0) NMez ligand in non-aqueous conditions)
The autoclave was charged with 0.18 mol of
formaldehyde, in the form of pares-formaldehyde, 23 ml
(0.15 mol) of di-sec-butyl-acetamide, 0.25 mm~l of
Rh{a.cac)(CO)2, 0.49 mmol of 2-phospha-2-(ethyl-N,N-
dimethylamido)-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-
tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane, and 9.1 mmol of
trimethylbenzoic acid. The contents of the autoclave were
then heated to a temperature of 100 °C and maintained at
that temperature for 3 hours.
Conversion of formaldehyde was 72 o and the yie"ld of
glycolaldehyde in the single-phase reaction product,
calculated on formaldehyde intake, was 69 0. The initial
reaction rate was calculated by measurement of the
pressure drop to be 275 mot CO/mol Rh.h.
Example 4
( "2-PA"-CH~CH2C (0) NMe2 ligand in non-aqueous conditions )
The autoclave was charged with 0.25 mol of
formaldehyde, in the form of pares-formaldehyde, 35 ml
(0.26 mol) of N,N'-dimethylpropylenurea, 0.10 mmol of
Rh(acac)(CO)2, 0.20 mmol of 2-phospha-2-(ethyl-N,N-
dimethylamido)-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-6,9,10-trioxa-
tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane, and 3.1 mmol of
trimethylbenzoic acid. The contents of the autoclave were
then heated to a temperature of 90 °C and maintained at
that temperature~for 5 hours.
Conversion of formaldehyde was 73 o and the yield of
glycolaldehyde in the singl e-phase reaction product,
calculated on .formaldehyde intake, was 71 %. The initial
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
_ 18 _
reaction rate was calculated by measurement of the
pressure drop to be 595 mol CO/mol Rh.h.
Example 5
("2-PA"-CH2CH2C1g ligand in non-aqueous conditions)
The autoclave was charged with 0.25 mol of
formaldehyde, in the form of para-formaldehyde, 35 ml
(0.26 mol) of N,N'-dimethylpropylenurea, 0.10 mmol of
Rh(acac)(CO)2, 0.20 mmol of 2-phospha-2-octyl-1,3,5,7-
tetramethyl -6,9,10-trioxa-tricyclo[.3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane,
and 3.1 mmol of trimethylbenzoic acid. The contents of
the autoclave were then heated to a temperature of 90 °C
and maintained at that temperature for 5 hours.
Conversion of formaldehyde was 69 o and the yield of
glycolaldehyde in the single-phase reaction product,
calculated on formaldehyde intake, was 66 0.~ The initial
reaction rate was calculated by measurement of the
pressure drop to be 518 mol CO/mol Rh.h.
Example 6
("2-PA"-CH2CH2C(0)NMe2 ligand in aqueous conditions)
The autoclave was charged with 0.15 mol of
formaldehyde, in the form of a formaline solution (37 0
formaldehyde in water), 37 ml (0.22 mol) of dibutyl-
acetamide, 7.5 ml of demineralised water, 0.49 mmol of
Rh(acac)(CO)2, 0.96 mmol of 2-phospha-2-(ethyl-N,N-
dimethylamido) -1, 3,,5, 7-tetramethyl-6, 9, 10-trioxa-
tricyclo[3.3.1.1{3,7}]-decane~, and 9.1 mmol of
trimethylbenzoic acid. The contents of the autoclave were
heated to a temperature of 90 °C and maintained at that
temperature for 5 hours.
Conversion of formaldehyde was 90 o and the yield of
glycolaldehyde in the two-phase reaction product,
calculated on formaldehyde intake, was 90 0. The initial
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 19
reaction rate was calculated by measurement of the
pressure drop to be 170 mol CO/mo1 Rh.h.
Example 7
("2-PA"- CH~CH~C(0)NPh~ ligand in aqueous conditions)
The autoclave was charged with 0.15. mol of
formaldehyde, in the form of a formaline solution (37
formaldehyde), 37 ml (0.~2 mol) of dibutyl-acetamide, 7.5
ml of demineralised water, 0.44 mrnol of Rh(acac)(CO)2,
0.89 mmol of 2-phospha-2-(ethyl-N,N-diphenylamido)-
1, 3, 5, 7-tetramethyl-6, 9, 10-trioxa-tricyclo [3 . 3 . 1 . 1 ( 3, 7 } ) -
decane, and 9.1 mmol of trimethyl~enzoic acid. The
contents of the autoclave were heated to a temperature of
110 °C and maintained at that temp erature for 3 hours.
Conversion of formaldehyde was 100 o and the yield of
glycolaldehyde in the two-phase re action product,
calculated on formaldehyde intake, was 52 0. The initial
reaction rate was calculated by measurement of the
pressure drop to be 180 mol CO/mo~ Rh.h.
Comparative Example A
(PPh3 ligand in non-aqueous condit ions)
The autoclave was charged with 0.17 mol of
formaldehyde, in the form of para- formaldehyde, 37 ml
(0.24 mol) of dibutyl-acetamide, 0.25 mmol of
Rh(acac)(CO)2, 0.52 mmol of triphe nylphosphine, and 9.3
mmol of trimethylbenzoic acid. The contents of the
autoclave were then heated to a temperature of 90 °C and
maintained at that temperature fo r 10 hours.
Conversion of formaldehyde was 61 '% and the yield of
glycolaldehyde in the single-phase reaction product,
calculated on formaldehyde intake, was 40 0. The initial
reaction rate was calculated by measurement of the
pressure drop to be 75 mol CO/mol Rh.h
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
2p _
Comparative Example B
(PPh3 ligand in aqueous conditions)
The autoclave was char ged with 0.17 mol of
formaldehyde, in the form of para-formaldehyde, 37 ml
(0.22 mol)~of ~dibutyl-acet amide, 12.5 ml of demineralised
water, 0.25 mmol of Rh.(acac) (CO) 2,. 0. 52 mmol of
triphenylphosphine, and 9.1 mmol of trimethylbenzoic
acid. The contents of the autoclave were heated to a
temperature of 90 °C and maintained at that temperature
for 10 hours.
Conversion of formaldehyde was 54 % and the yield of
glycolaldehyde in the two-phase reaction product,
calculated on formaldehyde intake, was 25 %. The reaction
rate was calculated by measurement of the pressure drop
to be 51 mol CO/mol Rh.h.
Comparative Example C
(9-icosyl-9-phosphabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane ligand in aqueous
conditions)
The autoclave was charged with 0.17 mol of
formaldehyde, in the form of para-formaldehyde, 37 ml
(0.19 mol) of N-octyl-pyrrolidone, 25 ml of demineralised
water, 0.25 mmol of Rh (acac) (CO) 2, 0. 52 mmol of 9-icosyl-
9-phosphabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane, and 9.1 mmol of
. trimethylbenzoic acid. The contents of the autoclave were
heated to a temperature of 110 °C and maintained at that
temperature for 5 hours.
Conversion of formaldehyde was 17 % and the yield of
glycolaldehyde in the two-phase reaction product,
calculated on formaldehyde intake, Was 6 %.
Comparative Example D
(9-CH2CH2C(0)NMe2-9-phosphabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane liga.nd in
aqueous conditions)
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 21
The autoclave was charged with 0.17.mo1 of
formaldehyde, in the form of para-formaldehyde, 37 ml
(0.22 mol) of dibutyl-acetamide, 25 m1 of demineralised
water, 0.25 mmol of Rh (acac) (CO) 2, 0. 50 mmol of 9-
phospha-9-(ethyl-N,N-dimethylamido-bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane,
and 9.1 mmol of trimethylbenzoic acid. The contents of
the autoclave were then heated to a temperature of 110 °C
and maintained at that temperature for 5~ hours.
Conversion of formaldehyde was 3 o and the yield of
glycolaldehyde in the two-phase react ion product,
calculated on formaldehyde intake, wa s 0 0.
The above examples demonstrate th a t catalyst
compositions according to the present invention display a
superior performance to comparative compositions
containing a triphenylphosphine ligan d under both~aqueous
and non-aqueous conditions (e.g. comp are Examples 1 and 3
with Comparative Example A, and Examples 2 and 4 with
Comparative Example B), and to catalysts based on other
forms of bicyclic phosphine-containin g ligand (see
Comparative Examples C and D). Moreover, from Examples 4
and 5 it.can also be seen that catal~rst compositions of
general formula (I) wherein R2 is of general formula
-R3-C (0) NR4R5 continue to display a good level of
performance even under aqueous~condit ions.
Hvdroaenation to Ethvlene alvcol
To demonstrate the ease with which glycolaldehyde
prepared according to the present invention may be
converted to ethylene glycol, an aqueous phase separated
from a hydroformylation reaction pexf ormed under
conditions analogous to those of Example 2 ( "2-PA"-CZo
ligand in aqueous conditions) was treated with Raney
Nickel slurry. The aqueous phase (25 ml, 9.5owt
glycolaldehyde) was mixed with Raney Nickel slurry (2m1)
CA 02549456 2006-06-09
WO 2005/058788 PCT/EP2004/053492
- 22
and stirred for 15 hours at a temperature 40°C, then.
treated with hydrogen at a pressu re of 50 bar (5Mpa). The
conversion from glycolaldehyde to ethylene glycol was
90 0 .
