Language selection

Search

Patent 1045258 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1045258
(21) Application Number: 221300
(54) English Title: RECOVERY OF FLUORINE AND PHOSPHATE VALUES FROM WASTE WATER
(54) French Title: RECUPERATION DU FLUOR ET DES PHOSPHATES DANS LES EAUX USEES
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 362/58
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C02F 1/00 (2006.01)
  • A23K 1/175 (2006.01)
  • C01B 25/22 (2006.01)
  • C01B 25/222 (2006.01)
  • C01B 25/32 (2006.01)
  • C01F 11/22 (2006.01)
  • C02F 1/52 (2006.01)
  • C02F 1/58 (2006.01)
  • C02F 1/66 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HIRKO, RONALD J. (Not Available)
  • MILLS, HAROLD E. (Not Available)
(73) Owners :
  • OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION (Not Available)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent:
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1978-12-26
(22) Filed Date:
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract




ABSTRACT
Calcium fluoride is produced from pond waters resulting
from phosphoric acid processing by treating the pond waters
with calcium carbonate in two stages to precipitate out at
least 80% of the fluorine values from the waters as calcium
fluoride. After removal of the calcium fluoride the
filtrate is treated with calcium oxide to remove a substantial
portion of the remaining fluorine values as calcium fluoride.
After removal of these calcium fluoride solids, the filtrate
is treated with another charge of calcium oxide to produce
dicalcium phosphate (dical) which is separated from the
aqueous phase. The aqueous phase is treated with an
additional charge of calcium oxide to remove a substantial
portion of the solids from the aqueous phase leaving waters
that can be discharged as waste or recycled as process waters.


- ? 1


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The method of treating waste water containing fluorine and P2O5
values that comprises: in a first stage, adding with agitation to the waste
water a suitable basic inorganic calcium compound in an amount to provide
between 0.3 and 0.8 equivalents of calcium per equivalent of fluorine (F)
values in the water; thereafter, in a second stage, agitating the calcium
treated waste water effluent of said first stage with additional said calcium
compound, in an amount to form calcium fluoride solids and such that the total
calcium compound addition in the two stages provides not less than 0.8
equivalents of calcium per equivalent of F values in the waste water; and
separating the solids from the aqueous phase following said second stage.


2. The method of claim 1 wherein the calcium compound is calcium
carbonate.


3. The method of claim 2 which includes the step of prewetting the
calcium carbonate to form an aqueous slurry containing 5 to 50% calcium
carbonate prior to the addition of the calcium carbonate in the first and
second stage.


4. The method of claim 1, 2 or 3 including the step of purifying the
calcium fluoride in the solids separated from the aqueous phase following
the second stage.


5. The method of claim 3 including the additional step of treating
the waste water with ammonia to establish an ammonia concentration of from
about 10 to about 5000 ppm in said water.



6. The method of claim 5 in which the ammonia addition is such as to
establish an ammonia concentration within the range 600 to 800 ppm in the
water.


7. The method of claim 5 or 6 in which the ammonia is added to the
calcium carbonate-treated waste water effluent of said first stage.



22




8. The method of claim 3 in which the slurry addition in the second
stage is such as to provide from about 1 to about 2 equivalents of calcium
per equivalent of fluorine in the waste water.

9. The method of claim 3 in which the separated solids are washed
with an aqueous solution of a mineral acid to remove acid soluble values;
and thereafter washed with water to remove the mineral acid and aqueous
soluble values to leave solids enriched in calcium fluoride.

10. The method of claim 9 in which said separated solids are washed
with an amount of mineral acid about equivalent to the P2O5 and CO2 values
in said solids.

11. The method according to claim 10 wherein the effluent of said
second stage after separation from said solids is combined with both the
mineral acid washings and the water washings to form an aqueous mixture that
is agitated with calcium oxide in an amount to raise the pH of the aqueous
mixture to a value between about 3 and about 4 to convert a substantial por-
tion of the remaining fluorine values in the aqueous mixture to insoluble
calcium fluoride solids.

12. The method of claim 11 in which the aqueous mixture is treated
with ammonia to establish a concentration between about 10 and about 5000 ppm
of ammonia in the aqueous mixture prior to its said agitation with calcium
oxide.
13. The method of claim 12 in which the calcium fluoride solids are
separated from the treated aqueous mixture to yield a second crop of calcium
fluoride solids.

14. The method of claim 13 in which the second crop of calcium fluoride
solids are washed with an aqueous mineral acid to remove the acid soluble
values therefrom and then washed with water to remove acid and water soluble
values therefrom to give solids enriched in calcium fluoride.

23




15. The method of claim 13 in which the second crop of calcium fluoride
solids are combined with the solids separated from the second stage effluent.

16. The method of claim 13 in which the treated aqueous mixture, after
separation of calcium fluoride solids therefrom, is treated with additional
calcium oxide to raise the pH of the aqueous mixture to a value of from be-
tween about 5 and about 7 to form insoluble dicalcium phosphate solids.


17. The method of claim 16 in which said insoluble dicalcium phosphate
solids are separated from the treated aqueous mixture.


18. The method of claim 17 in which the treated aqueous mixture after
separation of said dicalcium phosphate solids, is treated with further calcium
oxide to raise the pH of the aqueous mixture to between about 8 and about 11
thereby to remove a substantial portion of the soluble mineral values from
the aqueous phase by the formation of insoluble mineral solids.


19. The method of claim 18 in which said insoluble mineral solids are
separated from the treated aqueous mixture, yielding an aqueous phase sub-
stantially free of fluorine, P2O5, calcium and silicon dioxide values.


20. The method of claim 19 in which the waste water is treated with
ammonia to maintain a concentration of between about 10 and about 5000 parts
per million of ammonia in the waste water during said first and second stages.


21. The method of claim 20 in which the ammonia treatment is such
as to maintain a concentration of between about 600 and 800 parts per million
of ammonia in the waste water during said first and second stages.
24

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



~0~5Z58
The present invention is concerned with recovering
fluorine and phosphate values from the waste waters ("pond waters")
resulting from the production of wet process phosphoric acid,
having as an objective the recovery of such values in the form
. of calcium fluoride and calcium orthophosphate while neutralizing
the waste waters so they can be discharged into rivers and streams
; without fear of pollution, or be recycled as process waters in the
production of phosphoric acidO
A wet process phosphoric acid plant using the dihydrate
technique uses large amounts of water, typically at a rate of
about 50 gallons per minute for each unit of plant output
" capacity as measured in product P205 tons per day: this is
equivalent to about 210 litres per minute per unit of plant
^. output capacity expressed in tonnes per day~ Much of this
water is repeatedly recycled but a substantial amount is
continually directed to a waste pond to restrict accumulation - ~ -
of contaminants in the water. The pond water contains from
about 0.1 to about 5% fluorine, from about 0.1 to about 5%
P205, from about Ool to about 2.5% SiO2, from about 0.1 to
`~ 20 about 0.5% dissolved calcium and from about 0.1 to about 0.5%
soluble sulphate saltsO The fluorine content of such pond
water is of major concern because it can present an ecological
hazard, while the P205 content both represents a loss of a
~ ~ valuable product and an ecological hazardO
i Traditionally pond waters have been passed through
settling basins prior to their discharge into rivers and streams.
At.times, pond waters are treated with limestone and lime to
precipitate out fluorine and other values before discharge to
< meet pollution control laws and regulationsO In the settling
basins, the amounts of the various chemical values, such as

i - 2 -
r~

t

1045'~58 ~
fluorine, P205, calcium, etc. in the water decrease so that
the pond water when discharged into the streams contains lesser,
but appreciable, amounts of these materials. Not only does this
discharge of pond waters add chemical values to streams, but it
also causes a decrease in the pH of the streams. Pond water
typically is acidic and has a pH from about 1 to about 3.
Workers in the art have recognized the economic loss and
ecological problem of pond waters and have developed methods of
treating pond watersO However, it appears that none of these
methods have been economically attractive or feasible since none
of the methods are in commercial use in the United StatesO For
example, DoRo Randolph developed a method which is disclosed in
U.S. Patent 3,625,6480 The Randolph method comprises treating
pond water with milk of lime to adjust the pH of the resulting
::
slurry to between about 3.2 and 3.5 whereby 99% of the available
fluorine is precipitated out as calcium fluorideO The calcium
fluoride is separated from the aqueous phase and treated with
sulphuric acid, or other strong acid, to liberate the hydrogen ;~
fluoride (HF) gas and yield a slurry of gypsum, sulphuric acid
~ 2a and phosphoric acid. The latter slurry can be recycled back
; into a conventional wet acid phosphoric acid process to recover -~
the P205 values. The HF gas can be upgraded by conventional -~
methods. The aqueous phase, after removal of the calcium ~ -
fluoride, is treated with an additional 10% milk of lime to
adjust the pH to between 4.7 and 5 to precipitate out dicalcium
phosphate. Dicalcium phosphate is separated from the aqueous
phase and is upgraded in a conventional dicalcium phosphate plant
~` or cycled to a conventional wet process phosphoric acid plant to ;
recover the phosphate values~ The aqueous slurry is then treated
` 30 with additional milk of lime to adjust the pH to between 6 and 7

;~

P: ,
.~, , .

10~5258
wherein further solids precipitate out, such as gypsum. The solids are sepa-
rated from the now almost neutral aqueous phase and passed to waste. The
aqueous phase is then recycled as process water to the phosphoric acid plant
or discharged into streams or rivers.
The object of the present invention is to provide an economic
method of treating phosphate waste waters so as to recover many of the valu-
able chemical values therein which are ecologically undesirable products in
streams and lakes. The present invention also aims to provide a method of
rendering the pond waters neutral so that they can be discharged into streams
or rivers or recycled as process water.
Accordingly the present invention provides for the method of
treating waste water containing fluorine and P205 values that comprises:
in a first stage, adding with agitation to the waste water a suitable basic
inorganic calcium compound in an amount to provide between 0.3 and 0.8
equivalents of calcium per equivalent of fluorine ~F) values in the water;
thereafter, in a second stage, agitating the calcium treated waste water
effluent of said first stage with additional said calcium compound, in an
amount to form calcium fluoride solids and such that the total calcium com-
pound addition in the two stages provides not less than 0.8 equivalents of
calcium per equivalent of F values in the waste water; and separating the
solids from the aqueous phase following said second stage.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention there
is provided a method of treating waste water containing fluorine and P205
values, comprising forming an aqueous calcium carbonate slurry containing
5% to 50~ calcium carbonate; then in a first stage, agitating said waste water
with an amount of said calcium carbonate slurry to provide between 0.3 and
0.8 equivalents of calcium per equivalent of fluorine (F) values in the
water; thereafter, in a second stage, agitating the calcium carbonate-treated
waste water with additional said calcium carbonate slurry in an amount to
form calcium fluoride solids and such that the total slurry addition in the
two stages provides not less than 0.8 equivalents of calcium per equivalent
of F values in the waste water; and separating the solids from the aqueous

- 4 _


,~'' : ,

~045Z~i8
phase following said second stage.
In typical practice of the method, pond water is treated with cal-
cium carbonate, such as ground limestone or an aqueous slurry of ground lime-
stone, in a first stage to form calcium salts containing phosphate and
fluorine values. Between about 30 and about 80% of the stoichiometric or
equivalent amount and preferably about 40% of such amount of calcium per
equivalent of fluorine in the pond water is added in the first reaction stage.
The reaction is normally carried out at ambient or equilibrium temperatures;
however, the reaction can be carried out at any temperature between the
freezing temperature of the pond water and its boiling point. The residence
time for this reaction stage is from about one-half minute to about 60
minutes, being preferably about 5 minutesO The pond water and the calcium
carbonate are agitated to ensure maximum reaction between the calcium carbon-
ate and the pond water valuesO
The treated pond water is then passed to a second stage wherein
additional calcium carbonate is added so that no less than about 80% equiva-
lent of calcium carbonate total per equivalent of fluorine is added in the
two steps to the pond water. The reaction in the second stage is also
normally carried out at atmospheric or ambient temperatures; however, the
reaction can be carried out at any temperature between the freezing point of ~
the treated pond water and its boiling point. The residence time in the ;
second stage is from about one-half minute to about 60 minutes, being prefer-
ably about 30 minutes.
In the second stage a slurry is formed containing solid calcium
fluoride and some solid calcium phosphate values. This slurry is passed to
a separation stage wherein the solids are separated from the aqueous phase.
The resulting solid cake is washed in an acid wash stage with a dilute
solution of a strong mineral acid, such as sulphuric acid, to remove phosphate
` and other values from the solid calcium fluoride phase to raise the F/P2O5
weight ratio thereof. The solid phase is subsequently washed with water in
a water wash stage to substantially remove most of soluble values, leaving a
solid product containing up to about 45% by weight fluorine as calcium

-- 5 --

,

,: :

~045258
fluoride.
The wash acid and the wash water are combined with the aqueous
phase in a mixer wherein they are mixed together to form a first stream which
is passed to a third stage wherein it is treated with calcium oxide, such as
ground lime OT aqueous lime slurry, to raise the pH of the first stream to
between about 3 and about 4 preferably between 3.6 and 3.8, the pH of the
first stream being initially between about 108 and about 206 because of the
addition of wash acidO In the third stage, additional calcium fluoride is
formed which is subsequently separated from the stream in a separator stage
and recycled to the acid wash stage where it is subsequently treated to the
acid washing and water washingO
The aqueous phase from the first separator stage is passed as a
second stream to a fourth reactor stage wherein it is mixed with a calcium
oxide slurry to adjust the pH of the resulting mixture to between about 5 and
about 8, preferably from about 6~5 to about 7020 In the fourth stage, calcium
orthophosphate ~"dical" or dicalcium phosphate) precipitates out and is
subsequently separated from the stream in a second separator stage to yield
dical solid. The aqueous phase from the second separator is passed as a
third stream to a fifth reactor stage wherein the third stream is combined
with slurried calcium oxide to adjust the pH to between about 8 and about llo
The calcium oxide is normally added to the third, fourth and fifth stages as
a 5 to 50% by weight aqueous slurry, preferably about 10 to about 25% slurry.
The calcium oxide slurry is prepared from fresh water, not pond waters or
process waters containing F and P205 valuesO The mixture from the fifth stage
is passed through a third separator stage wherein solids, mainly calcium
values and silicon dioxide, are separated from the aqueous phase and passed
`; to waste. The remaining aqueous phase is water which can be recycled back
into a wet acid phosphoric acid.
The accompanying drawing is a schematic illustration of the method
of the present inventionO
R~erring to the drawing, pond water is passed to the first
reactor stage 10. Simultaneously, a stream of slurried calcium carbonate 12

- 6 -


. .

. , .

~O~S'~S8
is also passed to the reactor 10~ l`he stream 12 originates in a mixer 14
wherein a source of ground calcium carbonate, such as limestone, is mixed with
fresh water, not pond water or process water containing F or P2O5 values, to
form the calcium carbonate slurry. The calcium carbonate source is ground to
at least a -10 mesh (U.S~ Standard), preferably to a 90% -200 mesh. The
calcium carbonate slurry is formulated with a solids content of between about
5 and about 50%, preferably about 10 to about 25%. The calcium carbonate
slurry and pond water are agitated in the reactor 10 for about 5 minutes,
although shorter or longer reaction times can be employed. The amount of
calcium carbonate added to reactor 10 is designated as Z1D Z1 represents the
equivalents of calcium added to the pond water per equivalent of fluorine in
the pond water. Zl typically has a value of from about 0.3 to about 008,
preferably having a value of about 0~4O The reaction that occurs in reactor ~ -
10 normally produces soluble calcium values such as CaSiF6, although in some
instances insoluble values will be formed. Preferably the reaction is so ~`
managed that no solids will be formed in reactor lOo
The reaction mixture from reactor 10 passed as a stream 16 to ~ ~ -
. a second reactor stage 18 wherein the stream 16 is mixed with additional
slurried calcium carbonate via stream 200 The stream 20 also originates from
the mixer 14
The reaction mixture in reactor 18 is agitated for a period of
about 30 minutes, although shorter or longer residence times as described
~ above can be employed. The amount of calcium carbonate added to reactor 18 is
i designated as Z2- Z2 is equal to at least ZR minus Zl' where ZR designates
the minimum amount, in stoichiometric equivalents, of calcium that can be
added to reactors 10 and 18 to remove from about 85 to I00% of the fluorine
values from the feed pond water. ZR' on a mineral acid-free basis, has a
value equal to 1 + 0.19 Rw, where Rw is the weight ratio of P2O5 to fluorine
in the pond waterO ZR usually has a value of from about l-to about 20 Z2
has a value ranging from about Ool to about 2, preferably being from about 0.4
to about 1.4; and an especially preferred range of Z2 values is from about
1 to about 1.4. In theory, the ZR valu; should provide sufficient calcium



:,,
.

10452S8
to remove substantially all the fluorine from the pond water. However, as
explained above, the pond water contains other values besides fluorine, such
as P2O5 and sulphate, which can complex with the calcium and limit the amount
of calcium available for reaction with the fluorine values. The ZR value
takes account of those other values. Preferably more calcium is added, such
as 5% excess, than calculated from the ZR value. However, excessive amounts
of calcium are not necessary and interfere with the acid wash stage described

belowO
The reaction mixture from reactor 18 is passed as a stream 24 to a
first separator stage 260 At least 85% of the fluorine values in stream 24
are solid calcium fluoride, preferably at least 95% of the fluorine values
being solid calcium fluoride. In addition, substantially all the iron and
aluminium values in the stream 24 are present as solids, and about 50% of the
sulphate valùes and about 25 to about 50% of the P2O5 values are present as
solids.
Ths separator 26 is a conventional liquid solid separator, such as
a filter, a centrifuge or a decanting tankO The calcium fluoride solids are
separated from the liquid phase of stream 24 in separator 26 and passed as a
stream 28 to an acid washer 30. The solids are washed with a stream 31 of a
dilute aqueous solution of a strong mineral acid in the washer 30, the solids
being washed with from about a 1% to about a 50% (w/w) mineral acid solution,
preferably from about a 5% to about a 25% (w/w) acid solution. The calcium
fluoride solids are preferably washed with an amount of mineral acid about
equivalent to the P2O5 and CO2 values contained in the solids, plus or minus
10%. The acid concentration and wash temperature are so controlled that
reaction between the fluoride values and the acid is minimized to prevent
formation of hydrogen fluoride. The maximum wash temperature is about 180Fo
(82C.). Although any strong mineral acid, such as hydrochloric, perchloric,
nitric, sulphuric, hydrofluoric or other strong mineral acid, can be used in
the wash step, sulphuric acid is preferred. In this acid wash step, a sub-
stantial portion of the P2O5 values are removed from the solid product. In
addition, other values, such as CaC03, MgO, Fe2O3, Al2O3 are also removed

-- 8 --


:
. , .

1045258
from the solid in varying amounts by the acicl wash.
The washed slurry stream 32 leaving the washer 30 is passed to
separator 34 wherein the solids are separated from the aqueous phase.
Separator 34 is a conventional liquid-solid separator. The solids from
separator 34 are passed as stream 36 to a water washer 38 wherein the solids
are washed with fresh water, not process waters or pond watersO The solids
are washed with at least an equal weight amount of water, preferably about
2 weights of water, although larger amounts of water can be used in the wash~
The water wash removes many of the soluble P205 values from the solidsO
The acid wash and water wash up-grade the calcium fluoride solids
with respect to the percentage of contained fluorine and the F/P205 weight
ratio.
The washed solids product of the washer 38, as a slurry, is passed
to a third separator stage 42 as a stream 44O Separator 42 is a conventional
liquid-solid separator such as the separator 26 described aboveO Solids are ~`
separated from stream 44 in separator 42 to yield a cake containing up to
about 45% fluorine as calcium fluoride. The cake can be processed by conven-
~ tional means Cnot shown) into hydrogen fluoride or it can be dried by conven-
i tional means (not shown) at a temperature between about 90 and 150C. and
stored or transported as a dry solid. The calcium fluoride cake is mostly
calcium fluoride; however, the cake could also contain a small amount of P205
values (usually less than about 5%), silicon dioxide values ~usually less than
about 3%) and sulphate valuesO
Thus the calcium fluoride solids of the cake are normally of suf-
ficient purity to prepare hydrogen fluoride directly therefrom by heating the
cake solids with sulphuric acid by conventional methods. If the P205 concen-
tration is greater than about 5 to 10% or if the silicon dioxide concentration
is greater than 5% in the cake solids, it is difficult to prepare good quality
hydrogen fluoride from the calcium fluorlde solids by treatment with sulphuric
acid, since at high temperature in an acid environment, phosphorus and
silicon will react with fluorine to produce gaseous fluorine values such as
PF30, and SiF4 which contaminate the hydrogen fluoride produced and are
_ g _

lO~SZ58
difficult to remove. Accordingly, it is one of the achievements of the present
invention that a calcium fluoride solid product can be obtained which can be
directly converted into hydrogen fluoride by conventional means.
The aqueous phases from the separator 26, 34 and 42 are passed to
a mixer 48 as streams 50, 52 and 54 respectivelyO In the mixer 48, the
various streams are thoroughly mixed together and passed to a third reactor
stage 56 as stream 580 In the mixer 48 some solids, mainly gypsum, may settle
out and are removed as stream 60 as waste solids.
In reactor 56, stream 58 is reacted with a slurry of calcium oxide
from stream 620 The origin of stream 62 is a mixer 64 wherein a ground calcium
oxide feed source, such as lime, and water are mixed to form a calcium oxide
slurry. The calcium oxide feed source is ground to at least -10 mesh (UOSO
Standard), preferably at least 90% -200 mesh. The calcium oxide slurry pre-
pared in the mixer 64 contains from about 5 to about 50% solids, preferably
from about 10 to about 25% solids. The calcium oxide slurry is prepared from
fresh water and not pond waters or process waters.
The stream 58 has a pH between about 1.8 and about 206. Sufficient
slurried calcium oxide is added to reactor 56 to raise the pH of the resulting
reaction mixture from about 3 to about 4, preferably from about 3.6 to about
2Q 3.8. The retention time of stream 58 in reactor 56 is from about 30 seconds
to about 60 minutes, preferably being about 15 minutes. The reaction
temperature within reactor 56 may have any value between the freezing and
boiling points of the reaction mixture but is preferably about ambient temper-
ature. The reaction mixture contains about 0.01 to about 0.2% fluorine, a
substantial portion of which is precipitated out as calcium fluoride upon the
addition of the calcium oxideO
The reaction mixture from the reactor 56 is passed to a fourth
separator stage 68 as stream 70O The separator stage 68 is a conventional
liquid-solid separator such as the separator 26 described above. The solids
separated out in the separator 68 consist of calcium fluoride and phosphate
values and are recycled as stream 72 to stream 28 wherein the solids undergo
the acid wash and the water wash as described ahove as part of stream 28.

-- 10 -



,

1045Z58
The aqueous phase separated in separator 68 is passed to a fourth
reactor stage 74 as stream 760 In reactor 74, the aqueous phase is treated
with slurried calcium oxide from stream 75 which has its origin from mixer
640 The reaction temperature and reaction residence time in the reactor 74
are similar to those in reactor 56. The pH of the stream 76 is from about 3
to about 4. Sufficient calcium oxide is added to reactor 74 to raise the pH
of the reaction mixture to between about 5 and about 7 to cause the precipita-
tion of dical (calcium orthophosphate or dicalcium phosphate). The reaction
slurry from reactor 74 is passed to a fifth separator stage 78 as stream 800
The separator 78 is a conventional liquid-solid separator such as the separator
26 descrlbed above. The solids separated in separator 78 consist principally
of dical. The dical produced by this method is of sufficient purity to
employ in animal feed. That is, the P/F weight ratio in the dical is greater
than lOOo ' '
The aqueous phase from the separator 78 is passed to a fifth
reactor stage 82 as stream 84. Stream 84 is combined with a calcium oxide
slurry from stream 86 in the reactor 82. Stream 86 has its origin from mixer
64. Sufficient calclum oxide is added to the reaction mixture in the reactor
82 to raise the pH to a value of between about 8 and about 11 thereby to cause
` 20 precipitation of a substantial portion of the remaining soluble minerals as
` insoluble values, such as silicon dioxide solids and other solids from the
reaction mixture.
The reaction mixture in the reactor 82 is passed to a sixth
separator stage 88 as stream 900 The separator 88 is a conventional liquid-
solid separator such as the separator 26 as described aboveO Separated solids
from the separator 88, consisting chiefly of silicon dioxide solids, are sent
to waste as stream 920 The aqueous phase from separator 88 consists of a
nonacidic water which is substantially free of calcium, fluorine, P205 and
sulphate valuesO This water is discharged as stream 94 and can be used as a
fresh water for industry or it can be discharged into streams or lakesO
In another embodiment of the present invention, ammonia is added
to the reaction stream before the stream 80, preferably as the indicated stream
-- 11 --



.. :. - .
,., , :

1045Z58
8 to the reactor 18 or to the reactor 10. The ammonia is maintained at a
concentration between about 10 and about 5000 parts per million, preferably a
concentration of about 600 to around 800 parts per million active ammonia in
the reaction stream. The presence of ~mmonia in the reaction stream optimizes
the yield of calcium fluoride and the P/F ratio of the dical produced in
reactor 74. The reason for this is not thoroughly understood. However, it
is believed that the ammonia complexes with the fluorine values, furnishing
soluble fluorine values that can readily react with soluble calcium values
to form the insoluble calcium fluoride. Thus the presence of ammonia not
only enhances the quality of the produced dical but also increases the removal
of fluorine from the pond waters and the overall yield of calcium fluoride.
The following Examples are included to further illustrate the
present invention. In these examples, all percentages are weight percentages.
EXAMPLE 1
To 3834 grams of pond water at room temperature containing on a
weight basis 0.94% F (predominantly H2SiF6), 1.70% P2O5, 0.41% SO3, 0O59% Si02,
and other soluble metallic compounds, at 110F. (43C.), were added 34.4 grams
of ground commercial limestone (95% effective CaC03) as a 44D7% aqueous slurry
(Zl = 0 34) The mixture was agitated for five minutes while the pH in-
creased from 1039 to 1.850 No fluoride values precipitated. Ground commer-
~ cial limestone (10609 grams) wetted with water was added to the reaction
; mixture and agitated (Z2 = 1.07). ZR (theory) = 1 + 0.1927 x 1O70/0.94 =
1.35; ZR (used) = 1 + 141~3 x 0.95/94.93 = 1041 (4% excess Ca )O The pH of
' the reaction mixture after 37 minutes of agitation was 3Ø Calcium fluoride
precipitated from the mixture and was separated therefrom by decantation and
filtration, and dried at 105C. About 141 grams of calcium fluoride solids
were recovered having the following analysis: 25.0% F, 15.3% P2O5, 3.6% SO3,
49.8% CaO, 2.0% Si02, 2.0% CO2 plus other metallics and 12.8% hydration
waterO The filtrate contained 00017% F, 1018% P2O5 and 0.62% SiO2o The dried
calcium fluoride solids were washed with 10% H2SO4 and water to reduce the
; P2O5 content of the solids to about 3~5%O



- 12 -

.
: ,

1045258
EXAMPLE 2
To 2000 grams of pond water at room temperature containing 0084% F
and 1.52% P205 was added 15.7 grams of ground commercial limestone slurried
with water (Zl = 0 34) The resulting mixture was agitated for about 5
minutes. Additional ground commercial limestone ~17~9 grams) was added to
the reaction mixture and the resulting mixture was agitated for an additional
200 minutes to ensure equilibrium conditions ~Z2 = 0.38; ZR = 1.35). The
mixture was filtered. The filtrate contained 0.64% F and 1030% P2O5 represent-
ing a 24% fluoride precipitation as calcium fluoride~
; 10 EXAMPLE 3
In an experiment similar to that discussed in Example 1, the lime-
stone was totally added at the start of the reaction rather than in two
incrementsO The filtrate contained about 25% of the fluoride following fil-
i tration after 60 minutes of agitation.
EXAMPLE 4
Pond water similar to that used in the previous Examples was heated
to 200F. (93C.); and to this solution, 104 equivalents of limestone per
equivalent of contained fluoride were added in two stages with agitation to
precipitate over 85% of the fluorine values as calcium fluoride. No adverse
~ 2Q effects due to the temperature were observed.
,, EXAMPLE 5
` Pond water, at room temperature, was diluted ten-fold with water to
contain 00087% F and 0.153% P2O5. A quantity of pure limestone equivalent
to a 129% stoichiometric amount based on initial total fluoride was added
incrementally as in Example 1 ~Zl = 0-4; Z2 = 0.89; ZR = 1.34). Ninety-five
percent of the fluoride precipitated was calcium fluorideO
EXAMPLE 6
One thousand grams of pond water concentrated to contain 5.0% F
and 8.5% P2O5 was chilled to 40Fo ~4C~) and equilibrated with 52.7 grams of
a commercial limestone slurried with water ~Zl = 0~38). After 5 minutes of
agitation an additional 131.7 grams of limestone were added and agitation
continued for five more minutes ~Z2 = 0 95; ZR = 1033)o An 80% fluoride
- 13 -
:
., ~

.. . . . . .

10~5Z58
recovery as calcium fluoride solids was realized.
; EXAMPLE 7
A pond water containing 1% F as a 1:1 mole ratio of HF and H2SiF6
and 1% P205 was treated with a ground limestone slurry (10.5 parts CaC03
per 1000 parts pond water by weight). The resulting solution was agitated
for 5 minutes (Zl = 0~38)~ About 20% of the fluoride precipitated at this
time. Twenty-one grams of additional slurried limestone were added to the
solution ~Z2 = 0.76; ZR = lol9); and after 40 minutes of equilibration, the
solids were flocculated, settled and separated. The calcium fluoride solids
! 10 were dried at 105C~ and contained about 30% F and about 12% P205O EXAMPLE 8
Pond water containing 0~45% F and 0.77% P205 was agitated and
equilibrated with commercial limestone, which amounted to 40% of the stoichio-
metric quantity required for total fluoride precipitation at room temperature ~ -
for 5 minutes (Zl = 0-40) An additional 70% limestone stoichiometry was
added; and at 20 minutes of total reaction time (Z2 = 0-7; ZR = 1~33)~ 0.12
equivalents of aqueous MH3 were added per equivalent of initial fluoride and
agitation continued for an additional 30 minutes. The resulting mixture was
separated into a solid cake and filtrateO The soluble fluoride concentration
in the filtrate was 0~56% F. This amounts to a 87% fluoride conversion to
calcium fluoride, more than would be anticipated from the amount of calcium
added ~Zl ~ Z2 = 82% ZR)~ The addition of ammonia apparently made some of
the in situ calcium available for reaction with the fluorineO
EXAMPLE 9
One thousand grams of Example 1 pond water, at room temperature,
was equilibrated with 1. 25 equivalents of commercial limestone in two steps
` per equivalent of fluoride (Zl =0 4; Z2 = 0085; ZR = 1~36)o After 19 minutes
of reaction, the aqueous phase contained 0016% F. At this time, 0~069 equiva~
lents of aqueous ammonia per equivalent of initial fluoride were introduced
into the reaction mixture. The aqueous phase contained 0014% F after ten
minutes of reaction timeO Subsequently, an additional 0~17 equivalents of ~:
ammonia per fluoride equivalent were added to the reaction mixture, and after
- 14 -


.~ .
~` ' ' . '

-
~045Z58
60 minutes of reaction time, the fluoride concentration in the filtrate was
0.0049% F. A 99.4% recovery of fluoride as calcium fluoride was realised
This shows that most of the fluorine in pond water containing a very low F
concentration can be recovered as calcium fluoride without excessive CaC03
usage.
EXAMPLE 10
One hundred grams of dry, raw calcium fluoride solids such as pro-
duced in the preceding examples containing 25.3% F, 1409% P205, 2.11% A1203,
52.6% CaO, 0.44% MgO, 1030% Fe203 and 3048% C02 was slurried with 100 grams
of water in a Teflon beaker. To this slurry were added 125 grams of 38.3% -
HN03 which corresponded to 0.955 equivalents of HN03 per contained equivalent
of P205 (equivalent weight taken as 23.66) plus loOO equivalent of HN03 per
equivalent of containing C02. The resulting slurry was agitated at room
temperature for about 15 minutes and filtered. The collected solids were
further washed with three 500 gram portions of water. The leached calcium
fluoride solids after drying at 105C. contained 36.8% F and 6004% P205. The
~ acid washing and subsequent water washes removed 7104 and 802% of the initial- -
c ly contained phosphorus and fluorine respectivelyO The quantity of phosphorus
~ not leached from the raw calcium fluoride was in correlation with the quanti- ;
t 2Q ties of metallics such as iron, aluminium and magnesium which were not removed
The acid washing can also be conducted with other mineral acids,
such as hydrochloric acid and sulphuric acid, with similar resultsO
EXAMPLE 11
The same calcium fluoride solids that were treated in Example 10
were leached at room temperature with 9.8% aqueous H2S04 using the same pro-
cedure as described in Example lOo However, 76.6 and 8.7 percent of the phos-
phorus and fluorine were leached from the raw calcium fluorideO The washed
calcium fluoride solids when dried at 105-110Co contained 2204% F, 3.3% P205
and 27.2% S03 resulting in the removal of 12% of the F and 78% of the P205.
EXAMPLE 12
The same dry, raw calcium fluoride solids as was used in Example
10 were slurried to 50% solids with waterO The calcium fluoride solids were


~,~, , . . :

,

1045258
leached with 60~ 4% aqueous H2S04 such that there existed 1.00 and lo 26
equivalents of sulphuric acid per contained equivalent of C02 and P205 res-
pectively. The temperature ranged from 150 to 200Fo (65 to 93C)o After
filtration and subsequent water washing, the dry washed calcium fluoride
contained 2006% F and 2~11% P205. About 87~6 and 12~4 percent of the phos-
phorus and fluorine were contained in the combined leach and wash solutions
respectively. At this temperature, approximately 602% of the initial fluorine
was volatilized from the systemO
EXAMPLE 13
No loss in phosphorus leach-efficiency is observed when 4% H2S04 is
used and the system is maintained at 40Fo (4C)~ However, final P205
concentration in combined wash liquors is not very suitable for economic
reasons for subsequent dical recovery because of the dilute state of combined
liquors.
EXAMPLE 14
A solution was prepared by combining the separated limestone
treated pond water, such as was produced in Example 1, and the acid leach
and water wash mixture, such as were produced in Example llo The solution
contained 0~22% F~ 1009% P20s~ 0~4% SiO2~ and other soluble impurities. To
300 grams of this solution were added a total of 2089 grams of pure calcium
oxide slurried with water. The resulting mixture was agitated for 35 minutes.
The pH increased from an initial 2~2 value to 9.7. The filtrate contained
6~4 ppm F, less than 3 ppm P205 and 252 ppm Si02 and was suitable for release
into public waters~
EXAMPLE 15
To 300 grams of the same initial solution as was used in Example
14 were added 1044 grams of pure calcium oxide slurried with waterO The
resulting mixture was agitated for about 20 minutes at room temperature to
yield calcium fluoride solids which were removed by filtration. The filtrate
had a pH of 3.4 and contained 220 ppm F and 9170 ppm P205O The weight ratio
of P/F in the aqueous phase was increased from 2016 to 1802 after the addi-
tion of the limeO

- 16 -


,` ,. ' ~ ~ .

1045ZS8
EXAMPLE 16
To 300 grams of the same initial solutions as was used in Example
14 were added 0~72 gram of pure calcium oxide slurried with water and 1028
grams of a 240 2% NH3 solution at room temperatureO The resulting solution
was equilibrated for 20 minutes to a pH of 303 to yield calcium fluoride solids
which were removed by filtration. The filtrate contained about 32~2 ppm F
and 9200 ppm P205. In the presence of ammonia, less lime was required to
obtain a weight ratio of P/F of about 122 than was required in Example 15 to
obtain a P/F weight ratio of 18020

~- 10 EXAMPLE 17
Pond water was enriched with ammonia to contain about 0008% N and
treated with a slurry of commercial limestone in two steps as described in
Example lo After separation of the calcium fluoride solids, the defluorinated
waste water was combined with acid leach and wash solutions to render a
composite solution having a pH of 2~0 and containing 0~112% F, lolO % P205, -
0~28% SiO2 plus other valuesO To 900 grams of this final composite solution
~ at room temperature were added 2~94 grams of a commercial lime; assessed at
`, 85% active CaO, and the resulting mixture was agitated for 35 minutes to a
final pH of 3~5 to 3~60 The solid material formed was flocculated, settled
O and separated from the aqueous phase which contained 0~0027% F and 0~905% P205
and a weight ratio of P/F of 146~ The solid material precipitated after dry-
ing at 105-110C contained 19~5% F~ 2303% P205~ 44~0% CaO, 1~47% SiO2~ 0~21%
NH3 plus other minor values. This solid material is suitable for acid leaching
`~ and washing to obtain a further quantity of calcium fluoride.
EXAMPLE 18
To 200 grams of a composite solution similar to that used in
Example 17 but containing 4~ 69% P205 and 0. 87% F were added 5013 grams of
pure lime slurried with water and 6047 grams of a 29~0% NH3 solution. This
, mixture was agitated for about 15 minutes to a pH of 4~0 while the temperature
i 30 decreased from 180F~ to about 150F~ (82 to 65Co)~ The filtrate contained
3018% P205 and 0~0078% F yielding a P/F weight ratio of 178



- 17 ~


. .~ , . .

104SZS8

EXAMPLE 19
The procedure of Example 18 was conducted at 40F (4Co) with no
adverse effects on the resulting P/F ratio in the final filtrate,
EXAMPLE 20
646 ~ 4 grams of the final aqueous solution, having a P/F weight
ratio of 146~ produced in Example 17 were treated with 3~89 grams of a commer-
cial lime slurried with waterO The resulting mixture was agitated at room
temperature for 15 minutes. The pH increased from 306 to 607~ The solid
precipitate was recovered by decantation and filtration, dried at 105 to 110C.,and found to contain 0~08% F, 39~2% P205, 31~9% CaO, 204% SiO2~ 21~8% weight
loss at 800C~ plus other minor values. This solid having the stoichiometry ~:
of dicalcium phosphate, CaHPO4, contained a P/F weight ratio of 2140 This
same solid contained 44~7% P2O5 when dried at 164Co
EXAMPLE 21 ~ `
To a solution containing 29~5 ppm F and 1~23% P2O5 was added
slurried commercial lime to a final pH of about 805~ The mixture was agitated
at room temperature for 90 minutes and the solids were recovered by filtration
and were dried at 105 to 110C. The solid material analyzed 0~14% F~ 39~7%
P2O5, 37~4% CaO, 6-3% SiO2 (P/F = 124)-
EXAMPLE 22
An initial solution similar to that used in Example 21 was treated
with commercial lime to a pH of 6020 The solids dried at 105 to 110Co con-
tained 0~12% F~ 40~6% P2O5 and 30~7% CaO ~P/F = 148)o
EXAMPLE 23
A reaction similar to that of Example 22 was conducted at 180Fo
(82C~)o No adverse effects on the final product were observedO
EXAMPLE 24
A reaction similar to that of Example 22 but performed at 40F~
~4C~) showed no adverse effects on the solid materialO
EXAMPLE 25
A solution containing 000010% F~ 0~10 % P2O5 and 0~3% SiO2 at a
pH of 7.0 was treated with slurried lime to a pH of 9O0 and agitated to 30
~ 18 ~


~ ,. .. : .
. . . ~: ` - -

'
. . .

lO~S258
minutes. The water decanted from the settled solution contained minute
amounts of F, P205 and SiO2.
EXAMPLE 26
A pond water containing 0~85% F, 1049% P205, plus other impurities
was heated to 203F~ ~95C~) and was then equilibrated with a total of 1~35
equivalents of commercial limestone per contained equivalent of fluoride in
two stages as described in Example lo In the first stage Zl calcium equival-
ents added equalled 0~4 and the Z2 calcium equi~alents equalled 0~95 in the
second stage (ZR = 1~34)~ After 20 minutes of reaction time and subsequent
separation of the solid material, the recovered solids at 105C. drying,
contained 25~6% F~ 14~2% P205 ~ 50~3% CaO, 1~8% SiO2~ plus other impurities
and hydrated water. This material was of the same nature as found in Example
1 and shows that the precipitation of fluoride is not extremely dependent on
temperature. The filtrate obtained was heated to 203F~ (95C~) and was com-
bined with slurried commercial lime to an equilibrated pH of 306 where calcium
fluoride solids formedO The solids were separated from the liquid by
decantation and filtration and analyzed 9.0% F, 31~7% P20s~ 48~6% CaO, 104%
SiO2, plus other impurities when dried at 105C~ The aqueous phase, which
had a P205/F weight ratio of 333~ from this reaction was heated to 194F~
~90C~) and equilibrated to pH 702 with slurried commercial lime to form dical
solids. After about 15 minutes of reaction, the dical solids were separated
by decantation and filtration and were dried at 105C~ This material contain-
ed 0~21% F~ 21~5% P20s~ 4604% CaO, 901% SiO2~ plus other impurities and is
suitable for granulation with phosphoric acidO
EXAMPLE 27
Pond water containing 1~01% Fo and 1~84% P205 was first treated
with 560 ppm of NH3 and then reacted with commercial limestone, the solid
material isolated and the filtrate combined with sulphuric acid wash solutions
such as prepared in Example 12~ In the first stage, Zl = 0038 calcium
equivalents were added and in the second stage, Z2 = 0.81 calcium equivalents
were added (ZR = 1035)o This final mixture containing 0~27% F and 1070% P205
was equilibrated at pH 3O5 to 306 for 20 minutes to render a P/F weight ratio

- 19 --


... . . .
:

104525~
of 153 in the aqueous phase after recovery of the solidsO This liquid phase
was further equilibrated with commercial lime to a pH of 10.0 for about 15
minutesO The recovered solids contained dicalcium phosphate and nearly all
of the silica which would otherwise remain in solution at pH values of about
7.0 to 705 or less.
EXAMPLE 28
A pond water containing 0.3% F and 0.05% P205 was treated with
one equivalent of calcium as limestone per equivalent of contained fluoride
with the mixture agitated for fifteen minutes (Zl = 1.00). An additional OoOl
equivalents of calcium per equivalent of contained fluoride were further added -~
~Z2 = 0.01; ZR = 1.03) and equilibrated by agitation for forty-five additional
minutes. The calcium fluoride precipitate contained 40% F and 1% P2050
EXAMPLE 29
~` A pond water containing 003% F and 200% P205 was treated with
limestone such that 1.1 equivalents of calcium were added per equivalent of
. :.
contained fluoride ~Zl = lol)~ The mixture was equilibrated by agitation for
five minutes after which time 1.19 equivalents of calcium per equivalent of
contained fluoride were added (Z2 = lol9; ZR = 2029)~ and the solution
equilibrated for an additional thirty minutes. The precipitated calcium
~ 20 fluoride contained 14% F and 28% P205.
; EXAMPLE 30
One thousand gra~.s of pond water containing 0.7% F and 103% P205
along with varied levels of other substances normally found in pond water was
treated at 95F. ~35C.) with 7076 grams of 95% effective limestone slurried
as a 40% mixture with water and agitated for five minutes (Zl = 004)o To
this mixture was added an additional 18063 grams of limestone as in the
^l previous manner and the agitation was continued for an additional thirty
- minutes (Z2 = 0.96; ZR = 1036). A raw calcium fluoride slurry containing 40%
solids was collected by filtration of the reaction mixture and contained
23080 grams of solids that, dried at 105C. were found to contain 25.0% F,
1500% P205 and 2.0% C02. The filtrate or treated pond water contained 1059

'!, grams of fluorine and analysed 0012% F and 1011% P205. A sulphuric acid wash
- 20 -

:~'

- . .
*

1~)45Z58
was applied to the raw calcium fluoride slurry whereby it was combined with
7049 grams of sulphuric acid as ten percent aqueous solution and agitated
for fifteen minutes at 95F. (35C.). Subsequent to filtration of the solids
the filter cake was washed with two 119 gram portions of waterO The 23080
grams of dry calcium fluoride contained 22.7% F and 3.74% P205 with the
diluent being primarily calcium sulphateO The combined acid and water wash
filtrates were combined with the treated pond water to give 951013 grams of a
: solution containing 0.17% F and 1.82% P205. This solution was made to contain
500 ppm NH3 by the addition of a 25% NH3 aqueous solution. Further treatment
at 95F. (35C.) with 4.10 grams of 95% effective lime as a 20% water solution
to a pH of from 3.7 to 3.8 and with 15 minutes of agitation resulted in the
precipitation of a second calcium fluoride solid having a dry-base analysis
. of 2000% F and 2000% P205 and amounting to 7077 gramsO This material in
slurry form was taken back to the sulphuric acid leach stage and recycled
through the systemO The resulting filtrate contained 0.0031% F, 1011% P205
and amounted to 954.12 gramsO A further lime treatment comprised the addition
of 7.48 grams of lime as in the previous manner in order that a pH of 609 to
;'! 701 was maintained at 95F. ~35C.) with fifteen minutes of agitationO The
resulting 25043 grams of dry calcium phosphate contained 0012% F and 39.5%
P205, a P/F weight ratio of 144, and was suitable for granulation to produce
a feed grade material. The filtrate contained 000011% F, 00056% P205 and all
of the soluble silica initially present in ~he pond waterO By this scheme
of pond water treatment, 99.6% of the fluorine was converted into a synthetic
calcium fluoride and 77~1% of the phosphate was transformed into a material
which confor s to the P/F of 1~ ratio necessary for a feed grade phosphate.




.

- 21 -

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1045258 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1978-12-26
(45) Issued 1978-12-26
Expired 1995-12-26

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-05-28 1 24
Claims 1994-05-28 3 121
Abstract 1994-05-28 1 30
Cover Page 1994-05-28 1 18
Description 1994-05-28 20 975