Language selection

Search

Patent 1048606 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1048606
(21) Application Number: 242024
(54) English Title: APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATIC ADJUSTMENT OF FREQUENCY OF MECHANICAL RESONATORS
(54) French Title: APPAREIL DE REGLAGE AUTOMATIQUE DE LA FREQUENCE DE RESONATEURS MECANIQUES
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 324/36
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G01N 27/83 (2006.01)
  • B07C 5/344 (2006.01)
  • B23K 26/00 (2006.01)
  • G01H 13/00 (2006.01)
  • G04D 3/00 (2006.01)
  • G04D 7/12 (2006.01)
  • H03H 3/007 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • REUTER, HEINRICH (Not Available)
  • GANSER, ALFONS (Not Available)
  • HOFFMANN, GERHARD (Not Available)
(73) Owners :
  • SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (Germany)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent:
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1979-02-13
(22) Filed Date:
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract






ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Apparatus for the automatic adjustment of the resonant
frequency of magnetic mechanical resonators, in which conveyor means are
provided to feed a plurality of resonators step by step through a demagnet-
ization station and a magnetization station to a final measurement and
processing station in which the resonant frequency is monitored whilst
material is removed by bombardment with a laser beam, the final output of
the conveyor being to a selected ejection stage determined by the tuning
accuracy achieved in each case.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Apparatus for the automatic adjustment of the actual frequency of
mechanical resonators of magnetic material and provided with pin-like holding
elements, in which laser means are provided for the removal of resonator
material by controlled radiation to adjust the frequency to a given theore-
tical value in dependence upon a difference frequency obtained by comparison
of the theoretical frequency and a value representing the actual frequency
as determined by a measuring device, means being provided to convey the
resonators to a guide rail, along which are positioned a demagnetization sta-
tion a stop means pivotable into the guide rail at a magnetization station
an end stop being provided at the termination of the guide rail, where the
pinlike holding elements of each incoming resonator are gripped by an op-
positely located, closing holder which conveys that resonator to a laser ad-
justment device where the frequency is measured by said means and material
removed as necessary, the final measurement of the resonance frequency at the
termination of the laser adjustment process being stored and compared with a
given tolerance frequency range, and used to selectively control ejection of
that resonator from a selected one of a plurality of ejection station in
accordance with the measured resonance frequency for that resonator.


2. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 1 in which a rotary indexing turn-
table is arranged on said base plate to support and move said holders which
are arranged concentrically to the axis of rotation of said table and spaced
at equal intervals about its periphery, a feed device frequency processing
station and ejection stations being positioned about said table to lie opposite
respective holders when the turn-table is stationary at any indexed position,
said means for conveying resonators to said guide rail which is connected
to the output of a vibrator device comprises at least one light sensitive

13

monitoring position to detect the passage of resonators, and said guide rail
being sharply curved or vertical adjacent its end remote from the vibrator
device, where said end stop is provided, any resonator abutting against the
end stop having its pin-like holding elements between the open clamping jaws
of an oppositely located holder.


3. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 2, in which said magnetization sta-
tion incorporates a separating station with a rod-shaped upper lever and lower
lever aligned in parallel, both levers being rotatable about a common axis
of rotation running parallel to the central axis of the guide rail and
being rigidly connected to one another via a braced link so that end of the
lower lever which lies opposite the axis of rotation serves as stop means the
upper lever being provided with a leaf spring, both levers being commonly
rotated as a result of the deflection of a lifting magnet armature acting upon
the braced link against the force of a helical tension spring both levers
occupying a position during the rest position of the armature in which the
armature is located within the conveyor space of the guide rail bearing the
resonators, whereas said leaf spring lies outside of said space so that a
first resonator is held stationary against the stop means, and at the follow-
ing position of the levers the stop means and the leap spring assume a posi-
tion in which the stop means still lies within the conveyor space, and a
second resonator which follows the first resonator is clamped by the leaf
spring in the guide rail and that in the position of the levers which occurs
when the armature is in the operative position the second resonator remains
clamped whereas the stop means is pivoted out of the conveyor space.


4. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 3, in which said magnetization sta-
tion serves to magnetize a resonator abutting against said stop means using
a fixed first contact which is connected to earth, and an insulated second
contact which is movably operated by the armature of a second lifting magnet
14


and that the magnetization is effected by a controlled passage of current be-
tween the contact points to the resonator whilst clamped between said con-
tacts.


5. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 3, in which each said holder possesses
a rod-shaped first clamping jaw which is rigidly connected to said indexing
turn-table and radially aligned thereto, together with an oppositely located,
rod-shaped second clamping jaw rotatable about a vertical axis of rotation,
both clamping jaws being provided at their ends facing the processing stations
with vertical clamping surfaces which lie opposite one another, and at their
remote ends connected to one another via a helical pressure spring, the first
clamping jaw being provided with two horizontal fixing plates which are se-
cured to its ends and extend at least to the axis of rotation, which axis of
rotation is in the form of a pin conducted through the second clamping jaw
and mounted in the fixing plates, and a 90°elbow being connected by one
flank rigidly to that side of the second clamping jaw facing away from the
first clamping jaw, the clamping jaw being held opened by virtue of the de-
flection of the rectangularly upwards-extended free flank of the 90° elbow
to bring a prismatic locking component into a position which locks the open
clamping joint which at its one end is mounted to be rotatable between the
fixing plates and at its other end is provided with an arm branching off at
right angles in the upwards direction, the locking component being mechanical-
ly biased by a spiral spring towards that end of the second clamping jaw re-
mote from the processing stations, such that when the clamping jaws are held
open this end side is accommodated in a matching recess in the locking com-
ponent.


6. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 5, in which said first clamping jaw is
combined with fixing plates to form a unit of U-shaped cross-section, said
second clamping jaw being divided in a horizontal plane into two halves



rigidly connected together via said 90° elbow at a distance whereby in each
case one holding element is clamped by one half of the second clamping jaw.


7. Apparatus as claimed in any one of Claims 2, 5 and 6, in which at
least one of said ejection station possesses a lifting magnet whose armature
has its longitudinal axis aligned radially to said indexing turn-table, and
serves to open the associated one of said holders by deflection of the free
flank of the 90° elbow.


8. Apparatus as claimed in any one of the Claims 2, 5 or 6, in which
the last ejection station, considered in the direction of rotation of the
indexing turn-table, includes a roller which is rotatable about a vertical
axis, and which serves to open the associated holder by deflection of the free
flank of said 90° elbow.
16

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



10~ 6

The invention relates to apparatus for the automatic adjust- -
ment of the actual frequency of mechanical resonators of a magnetic material,
which aro provided with pin-like holding elements, the adjustment bringing
the resonator frequency to a given theoretical frequency by the removal of
resonator material using laser radiation controlled in dependence upon a
difference frequency obtained from a comparison of the theoretical and actual
frequencies.
On account of their high oscillatory quality and their small
space requirement, mechanical resonators enjoy wide-spread use, for example
as frequency standards or in mechanical filters. In virtually all cases of -
use it is of importance that the resonance frequency of such a mechanical
resonator should occur at a predetermined frequency that is set as accurately
as possible. As a result of the unavoidable requirement to allow production
tolerances in the production of the resonators, generally this requirement
is not sufficiently fulfilled, so that it is necessary to adjust the final
resonance frequency of such a resonator following its produc~ion. It is
known to carry out this process which is known as "adjustment" or "balancing"
by removing resonator material with the aid of a grinding process, or by
. sand blasting, or by the use of laser beams. In this connection a process --
for the frequency adjustment of mechanical resonators is described in the
German Patent Specification No. 1,929,994 of Siemens AG, issued October 21,
1971 in which the setting of the given resonance frequency takes place by
a controlled vaporization of resonator material with a laser beam. In the
process described in this patent, the resonators are excited to mechanical
oscillations which are converted into electric oscillations corresponding
to the actual frequency of the resonators, and then amplified. The amplified
electric oscillations are subjected to comparison with

'
,. ~


- 2 -


,

1~)486~6
a theoretical value, and the vaporization of resonator material by
means of a laser beam is controlled by the resultant difference fre-
quency. In order to achieve uniformly good results wi~h this process
however, it is necessary to use uniformly bias-magnetized resonators,
as these are excited via a drive magnet to oscillations whose freque-
ncy is to be measured. Therefore it is necessary~ for the resonators,
having been pre-adjusted by a grinding process, to be de-magnetized
prior to the actual magnetization.
Following the actual adjustment process, the resonators
must be checked to establish whether their resonance frequency lies
within the given tolerance - frequency range, and if this is not so,
, i.e, when a particular resonator is not capable of oscillation as re-
quired, that particular resonator must be selectively rejected.
~hus both prior to and following the actual adjustment pro-

cess, additional operating sequences are required, with special asso- ~ ~ -
ciated devices. This inevitably gives rise to long transport times
between the individual operating sequences and conveyance times for
the individual devices, and likewise increased outlay in personnel
for the operation, and in the conveyance and servicing of these de-
~i 20 vices. Because of the different natures of the individual operating
sequences, and the associated devices, it is difficult to fully a~o-
mate such an adj~stment process.
One object of the present invention is to provide an ap~
; paratus for the frequency adjustment of mechanical resonators, in
which all the above-described operating sequences may take place fully
automatically in one relatively economical device.
;;
The resonators which are to be adjusted are automatically

conveyed to the consecutive processing stations and can remain in the
,



: .............................. . .

- `

10~86(~6
guide rail or the holders of the rotary indexing table whilst thereon during
all the processing. This obviates the need for manpower for the conveyance
and transportation of the resonators between individual processing devices.
Another advantage consists in the fact that a separate
measurement of the resonance frequency, which is normally required for con-
ventional sorting of the resonators ~ollowing the adjustment process, is
rendered unnecessary as the respective measurement which concludes the sand
blasting adjustment for any resonator is stored and used to selectively
control the individual ejection stations for routing that resonator.
The combination of the various operating sequences required
for the adjustment of the resonators within one single device produces the
particularly advantageous possibility of a simple, central control of these
operating sequences.
Thus, in accordance with the present invention, there is
provided apparatus for the automatic adjustment of the actual frequency of
,~
,;` mechanical resonators of magnetic material and provided with pin-like holding
lements, in which laser means are provided for the removal of resonator
, material by controlled radiation to adjust the frequency to a given theoretical
value in dependence upon a difference frequency obtained by comparison of
, 20 the theoretical frequency and a value representing the actual frequency as
determined by a measuring device, means being provided to convey the resonators
to a guide rail, along which are positioned a demagnetization station a stop
means pivotable into the guide rail at a magnetization station an end stop
being provided at the termination of the guide rail, where the pin-like
` holding elements of each incoming resonator are gripped by an oppositely
located, closing holder which conveys that resonator to a laser adjustment
device where the frequency is measured by said means and material removed as
necessary, the final measurement of the resonance frequency at the termination
of the laser adjustment process being stored and compared with a given toler-
, 30 ance frequency range, and used to selectively control ejection of that reson-
;- ator from a selected one of a plurality of ejection station in accordance

- 4 -


.,

~486(~6
with the measured resonance frequency for that resonator.
The invention will now be described with reference to the
drawings, in which:-
Figure 1 is a schematic side view of one exemplary embodimentof apparatus constructed in accordance with the invention;
Figure 2 is a plan view of the apparatus shown in Figure l;
Figure 3 shows details of a separating station in the apparatus;
. Figure 3a is a perspective view of the separating station in
. detail;
Figure 4 is a section through a magnetization station in the
apparatus;
. Figure 5 is a plan view of a holder in the apparatus;
Figure 5a is a side view of the holder shown in Figure 5; -:




,',:,
. ~


- 4a -
'''

11~)486~6
Figure 5b is a section through the holder'shown in Figure 5; and
, Figure 6 schematically illustrates an ejection station operated
bv means of a lifting magnet in the apparatus.
, The adjusting device shown in Figure 1 consists of a plurality
'' 5 of assemblies which are mounted on a common base plate 1. Arranged
,, in the centre, for the transport of resonators to an actual adjustm-
ent station 3 is a pneumatic rotary indexing turn-table 2 of the type
' commercially available under the reference ST-270 from the Vesto co-
mpany, this being provided with twelve indexing positions. For the
support of the resonators, the rotary indexing table possesses a nu-

' mber of holders 4, which in number conform to the number of indexing
,' positions, and which are arranged concentrically to its axis of rot-
ation and at equal intervals. The resonators are conveyed to the ro-
~; tary indexing table by means of a feed device which is secured to the
base plate and which contains a vibrator device 5 and a guide rail 6
which is connected to the output of the vibrator device to receive
and feed the resonators along. In the represented exemplary embodi-

;~ ment, the vibrator device 5 is a conveying and sorting device comme-
rcially available under the name "Sortimat", which is set up for the
resonators which are to be adjusted, and comprises a vibrator base
with an electromagnetic vibrator, a sorting trough and a separatel~
'' arranged indexing device, via which the feed speed of the resonators
can be controlled.

The resonators, emerging in a row from the vibrator device 5,
Co~; ~ 25 are eeR~erte~ to the guide rail 6, which is initially horizontal and
then slants downwards, and on passing along said guide rail they fi-
rst pass through a demagnetization station 7, which is in the form of
a coil, and then pass through two light opto-electric detector moni-



, . . .

, --5--
i .
-

r
; .
,'' ` ~ ;
.. .~ ',.

10486(~6
: toring points 8 which serve to monitor the continuous transport of
the resonators and control the switching on and off of the vibrator
.~ device. The resonators subsequently enter a vertical part of the gu-
ide rail, to reach a separating station 9 in which they are held sta-
S tionary and magnetized by a magnetization means 10. The magnetized
resonators are then fed from the separating station 9 in accordance
` with a pulse train produced in a control device and pass individually
.. from the separating station to a lifting station 12 which is arranged
at the end of the guide rail and i5 provided with an end stop 11. An
incoming magnetized resonator 13 is shown in the station 12, with its
end against the end stop 11, to rest with its pin-like holding elem-

ents between the open clamping jaws of an oppositely located holder
- 4 on the pneumatic rotary indexing turn-table 2, and its pin-like ho-
lding elements are subsequently gripped by the holder 4. The rotary
15 indexing turn-table 2 then conveys the resonator, arranged in the ho-
lder, to a laser adjusting device which is combin~d with a measuring
device and a first ejection station. At this point, the resonance
frequency of the resonator 14 is alternately measured and then adju-
sted by working its end face by radiation from the laser to remove
~0 material until the actual resonant frequency is within two cycles
~jCQ/




: ~ per second of the theorcc-t~-ca~ frequency. In order that the resona-
; nce frequency can be measured, the resonator 14 is set in oscillation
by means of a coil 15, and its inherent frequency is determined via
. a microphone 16. The measurement result is compared with a given to-
lerance-frequency range by an electronic control device and if the
: resonator is not capable of oscillation it is deposited, via a chute,
into a container 17 forming part of the first ejection station, or
if the measured frequency is two high it is ejected following further


--6--
,

.' ' ' ~

.. ~

. .

1~4~06
steps of the rotary indexinq turn-table at an ejection station prov-
ided for resonators which have become resonant abPve the tolerance
:: range upper limit, whilst if it is within tolerance it is ejected at
; another ejection station, provided for correctly adjusted resonators.
For reasons of clarity, the horizontal and oblique parts of the
guide rail 6, which run tangentially to the rotary indexing table as
. shown in Figure 2, is shown in Figure 1 as extending in radial dire-
ction relative to indexing turn-table. As mentioned above, in the
present exemplary embodiment, the laser adjusting device and the fir-
rst ejection station for non-oscillatory resonators are combined to
; form one station, together with a measuring device.
Figure 2 is a plan view of the apparatus shown in Figure 1, in
which the tangential course of the guide rail 6, and the arrangement
of the holders 4 on the indexing turn-table 2-can be clearly seen,
15 together with details of a lifting magnet 18 which is secured to the
guide rail construction and serves to close the particular holder 4
arranged opposite the lifting station, a microphone 16 and coil 15
which serve to measure the resonance frequency of that resonator 14
20 arranged in the adjusting station, two ejection station containers
17 with ~ection means operated by associated lifting magnets
l9, and provided respectively for non-oscillatory and mal-adjusted
~ resonators, and also a further ejection station which is operated by
, a rotatable roller 20 and which serves to feed resonators that are
I,.. .
~5 adjusted within theresonance frequency range into an associated con-
tainer 17. The liftirgmagnets 21 and 22 which are secured to a sup-
por~ for the guide rail 6 are assigned to the magnetization station
. 10 and the separating station 9.
Figure 3 illustrates details of the end zone of the guide rail
,~ .
. .
" .
-7-

, ~ -

. ~ .

'

'~ ' . ' ' ' . ,,: ' .: -
., , ~ . . :

-
10486~6
6 with its separating station 9, magnetization station 10, lifting
station 12 and end stop means 11. The separating station 9 consists
of a rod-shaped upper lever 23 and a rod-shaped lower lever 24 arran-
ged in parallel to the former, both of which are mounted to be pivot-

able about a common axis of rotation 25, running parallel to the cen-
tral axis of the guide rail 6, in a fixing rail 26, the two levers
being rigidly connected together via braced link 27. That end of the
lower lever 24 which lies remote from the axis of ro~ation 25 is ta-
pered and provided as stop means 24' to engage any resonators such as
the resonator 30 which is shown in the position required for it to be
magnetized. The upper lever 23 has its end remote from the axis of
rotation 25 connected to an extension in the form of a leaf spring
~; 23'. The guide tail 6 possesses a slot-like recess in each case at
. . .
the level of that end of the lower lever 24 which forms the stop me-
ans 24', and at the level of the leaf spring 23' thus facilitating
, the engagement of the stop means 24' and of the leaf spring 23' into
the conveyor area of the guide rail. By virtue of the deflection of
an armature 28 belonging to a lifting magnet 22 (Figure 5) and acting
' on the centre of the braced link 27, both levers can be commonly mo-
ved against the force of a helical tension spring 29 acting on the
braced link 27.
When the armature 28 is in the rest position, the stop means 24'
i is pivoted inside the conveyor space of the guide rail, which bears
~:,
' the resonators, and the leaf spring is at the same time located out-
side the conveyor space. In this position the resonator 30, abutting
against the stop means 24' can be magnetized by the magnetization st-
ation 10. Then, with a continuous movement of the armature 28 again-

, st the tension of the helical spring 29, a position is passed through
-~ .

~ 8- -
.;, .

;; ~ .: -


.. . . .

~6)486~6
in which the stop means 24' is still pivoted inside the conveyor spa-
ce, but the resonator which follows the magnetized resonator 30 is g-
ripped by the leaf spring 23' on its rear, which lies opposite its h-

; olding elements, and is thus pressed against the guide rail. When
the armature 28 then moves on into its operative position, the stopmeans 24' is pivoted out of the conveyor space, whilst the clamped r-
esonator is still held by the leaf spring 23'. The magnetized reson-
ator 30 then falls against the end stop 11 of the lifting station 12.
With the following, reverse movement of the armature 28 back to its
rest position, the stop means 24' is pivoted into the conveyor space
of the guide rail and the clamping of the next resonator is terminat-


ed, so that said resonator can move to the stop means 24' and a furt-
- her resonator come to the level of the leaf spring.
Figure 3a gives a perspective view of the mobile elements of the

separating station, in which, for reasons of clarity, both the guide
rail 6 and the securing rail-26 have been omitted, but the resonators
contained within the guide rail have been represented.
Figure 4 is a section through the magnetization station 10, whi-

i ch possesses a fixed contact 31 connected to an earth point, and a
mobile contact 33, which is insulated by means of insultators 32 andis operated via the armature of a lif~ing magnet 21. The resonator
30, here shown is that one resting against the stop means 24' (Figure
3) in the separating station 9, and is magnetized by means of a surge

of current flowing between the fixed contact 31 and the mobile cont-
i~. .
act 33 from a source (not shown). Following the magnetization, the
mobile contact 33 is removed from the resonator via the armature of
the lifting magnet 21. The magnetized resonator is now able to move
when the pulse train from the control device provides a control pulse




~9_

':. - ' .
- . ~ -

.: . . - . ~ :
:: . ~. . , , - :
. .: : : . : . . : ~.
. ~ : :, ,

`


104~6

and is conveyed through the separating station to the lifting station
12.
Figures 5 and 5a illustrate one of the holders 4 mounted on the
periphery of the rotary indexing table 2, in a plan view and a side
view respectively. As in each of these illustratio~sonly a part of
the holders are visible, Figures 5 and 5a will be commonly described
in the following.
The holder 4 contains a rod-shaped first clamping jaw 34 which
is rigidly connected to the indexing turn-table and is combined with
two fixing plates secured to its lateral faces to form a unit 34' of
U-shaped cross-section, and also possesses a second rod-shaped clam-
ping jaw 35 whi~h lies in parallel opposite the first clamping jaw,
and which is mounted in the fixing plates to be pivotable about a
perpendicular axis of rotation 36. Both of the clamping jaws 34 and
35 are a~igned radially to the indexing turn-table, and are provided
at their ends facing the processing stations wi~h-opposed vertical
clamping faces 37 whilst their other ends are connected to one ano-
ther via a helical pressure spring 46 (Figure 5b).
In the present exemplary embodiment, the second clamping jaw
35 is divided by a horizontal sectional plane into two halves 35',
'~ which on their sides facing away from the first clamping jaws are
rigidly connected to one another via a 90 elbow 38, at a distance
which ensures that in each case one of the pin-like holding elements
of the resonator 39 is clamped by in each case one half of the sec-
ond clamping jaw. Each holding element is thus individually clamp-

i




ed by a respective one half, and thus the clamping reliability is

considerably improved. The 90 elbow 38, whose free flank extends
' upwards is used to cause the closed clamping jaw to be opened, in

--10--




- ~
- -
'' ' ~ ' . ~ :

1~;J48~;~6
that its free flank is deflected in the direction of the arrow 40. me holder
also contains a prismatic elbow 41 which at its one end is-mounted to be
pivotable between the fixing plates, and which is mechanically biased by a
spiral spring 42 towards those ends of the halves of the second clamping jaw
351 which face away from the processing stations, and serves to lock the open
clamping jaws in position. This locking is ensured in that the ends of the
halves of the second clamping jaw 35' are accommodated in a matching recess
47 (Figure 5b) in the locking component 41, when the holder is open. At its
end which lies opposite the axis of rotation, the prismatic locking component
10 41 is extended vertically upwards by an arm 43 which branches off at right
; angles. A deflection of this arm 43 in the direction of arrow 44 causes the
locking of the clamping jaws in the open position to be discontinued~ and
the clamping jaws then close as a result of the pressure of the hellcal
spring 46 located between the clamping jaws. me deflection is carried out
in the lifting station 12 by means of the armature of the lifting magnet 18
(Figure 2) which latter is secured to the guide rail support.
Figure 5b shows a sub-longitudinal section, in the horizontal
direction, through an open holder, revealing the helical spring 46, inserted
in a bore 45 in the first clamping jaw 34 and pressed against the second
20 clamping jaw. mose ends of the open, second clamping jaw halves 35' which
are remote from the clamping surfaces 37, are here accommodated in the form
fitting recess 47 in the locking component 41, which is biased by the spiral
spring 42 towards these ends.
Figure 6 schematically illustrates details of that ejection
station provided for resonators which have been adjusted to a frequency out- ~
; side the given tolerance frequency range and are therefore to be rejected. ;
It contains a lifting magnet 19 (see also Figure 2), which is secured to the
base plate, and has an armature 19' that is aligned such that its longitudinal
axis extends radially relative to the indexing turn-table 2. The lifting
; -11- -


.

1~;1486Q6
magnet 19 is secured at a sufficient height above the indexing turn-table
to ensure that when the table rotates, ~he holders move passed underneath
its armature 19'. m e holder is opened by deflecting the rectangularly
upwards-extended part of the free flank of the 90 elbow 38 in the direction
of arrow 40 with the aid of the armature 19' of the lifting magnet.
In the last ejection station, which is provided to receive correct- -
ly adjusted resonators, the free flank of the 90 elbow 38 is deflected by
a roller 20 (Figure 2) which is rotatable about a vertical axis and the
holder is thus opened. On the further rotation of the rotary indexing table,
the holder remains open until it is again turned to the station lying opposite
the lifting station 12.


. , .

,'
., . ~

i~ .
,. .

,,
, :;, .

".
~,


;;''

., .


-

~ '

' `
~,~ . --1 ''--
.~.`.; .
'" '
: ,.
.'

;'~ ' ' " ' ' ', .
' ' ' ' . . '

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1048606 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1979-02-13
(45) Issued 1979-02-13
Expired 1996-02-13

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-04-30 5 112
Claims 1994-04-30 4 169
Abstract 1994-04-30 1 16
Cover Page 1994-04-30 1 23
Description 1994-04-30 12 533