Language selection

Search

Patent 1058217 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1058217
(21) Application Number: 205683
(54) English Title: SELECTIVE HERBICIDAL PHENYLUREAS
(54) French Title: PHENYLUREES, HERBICIDES
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 260/547
  • 71/9.8
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C07C 275/30 (2006.01)
  • A01N 25/00 (2006.01)
  • C07C 275/28 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • ROHR, OTTO (Not Available)
  • DURR, DIETER (Not Available)
(73) Owners :
  • CIBA-GEIGY AG (Switzerland)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: NA
(74) Associate agent: NA
(45) Issued: 1979-07-10
(22) Filed Date:
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract






Abstract of the Disclosure

Herbicidal phenylureas for selectively controlling
weeds in cultures of usefuls crop are disclosed. They
correspond to the formula


Image


wherein R1 is a hydrogen or chlorine atom and
R2 an ethyl, isopropyl or tert.butyl group.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OR
PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Compounds of the formula I

Image (I)

wherein
R1 represents hydrogen or chlorine, and
R2 represents ethyl, or tert.butyl.


2. The compounds according to formula I in Claim 1 wherein R1
represents hydrogen.


3. 1,1-Dimethyl-3-(3-ethyl-phenyl)-urea.


4. 1,1-Dimethyl-3-(3-tert.butyl-phenyl)-urea.


5. 1,1-Dimethyl-3-(3-ethyl-4-chlorophenyl)-urea.


6. Process for the preparation of ureas of formula I of Claim 1
comprising a) reacting an isocyanate of formula II


Image (II)

wherein R1 and R2 have the meanings given under formula I, with dimethyl-

amine, or b) if R1 is to be chlorine, reacting a compound of formula III


Image (I I I )

wherein R2 has the meaning given under formula I, with chlorine or with a
chlorine-releasing compound.


7. A method for the selective control of weeds in crops of useful
plants, which comprises applying to an area where weeds have to be controlled
an herbicidally effective, but for the crop not phytotoxic amount of a com-
pound of formula I as defined in claim 1, or of a composition (or an agent)
containing the same.

16

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



~5 ~ ~'7

The present invention relates to substituted phenyl-
ureas) to processes for their preparation~ also to
plant-regulating agents containing these new compounds
as active substances, as well as to methods for the
selective control of weeds in cultivated crops entailing
the use of the new active substances or of agents
containing them.
Herbicidally active phenylureas have become known
from the literature in exceedingly large numbers. From
the abundance of literature available to one skilled in the
art, reference is made here to the following patent
specifications as relevant prior art: German Patent
Specification No. 935,165; US Patent Specifications Nos.
2,705,195, 2,764,478 and 2,876,088; as well as the
published German Patent Application P 19 66 298.7-41.
In the US Patent Specification No. 2,876,088, reference
is made, for example, to various classes of soil-sterilising
substituted phenylureas known from US Patents 2,655,444 - 447
corresponding to the German Patent Specification No.
935,165. Phenylureas given as being particularly suitable
total herbicidal cornpounds for the subject of this US-
patent specification are those which can be alkyl- and also
halogen-substituted in the phenyl radical in any position,
and which carry, for example, methyl groups on the nitrogen
atom not linked with the phenyl nucleus. Herbicidal phenylureas

- 2


~ 7
of this type are described also in the US Patent
Specification No. 2,705,195. Furthermore, there are
known from the US Patent Specification No. 2,764,478
herbicidal phenylureas which are obligatorily substituted
in the 3~position of the phenyl radical by a methyl
group, and additionally, in any chosen remaining positions
of the phenyl radical, by halogen. A representative
of this group of compounds, l,l-dimethyl-3-(3-methyl~4-
chlorophenyl)-urea, is given in the mentioned US patent
specification as being, in the pre-emergence application
method, selective-herbicidally effective in cotton and in
maize crops. On the other hand, the unsuitability of
this compound for use as a selective weed-control agent
in cereal crops is taught, for example, by the known
German Patent Application No. P 19 66 298.7-41. Equally
unsuitable for selective-herbicidal application in grain
crops, as well as in a number of other useful plant crops,
such as, for example, maize and soya bean crops, are
the known halogenated phenylureas, l,l-dimethyl-3-(4-chloro-
phenyl)-urea and 1,1-dimethyl-3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl~-urea.
The use of these two compounds in cotton crops results in
the destruction or serious damaging of the crops.
On the basis of the teaching of the prior art, one skilled
in the art had to accept firstly that, for the attainment
of selective-herbicidal action, phenylureas methyl-substituted
in the 3-position of the phenyl radical were to be
- 3 -


l~S~7

preferentially used, this application moreover being
limited to speciflc useful plant crops, and secondly
that phenylureas with higher alkyl substitution in
the 3-position of the phenyl radical were not suitable
as selective herbicides for practical purposes on
account of a phytotoxic action too intense and too
unspecific.
It has now been found that, surprisingly, the new
active substances according to the present invention,
which do not have the constitution alleged in the literature
to be essential for selective-herbicidal action,
have, contrary to the teaching of the US Patent Specification
No. 29876,088, excellent selective-herbicidal properties
in a number of useful-plant crops, and are also vastly
superior in effectiveness against weeds and in crop
compatibility to the constitutionally homologous phenyl~
ureas disclosed in the US Patent Specification No.
2,764,478.
The new phenylureas according to the invention
correspond to for~ula I
~ \\ CH3
R~ H C0 - N j (I3
/ : C~13
R2




wherein

~51~7
R1 represents hydrogen or chloxine, and
R2 represents ethyl, or tert.butyl.
A particularly pronounced selectivity between weeds
and useful-plant crops is exhibited, even with small applied
amounts, by the following compounds according to the invention
which correspond to formula I wherein
Rl represents hydrogen:
1,1-dimethyl-3-(3'-ethyl-phenyl)-urea,
1,1-dimethyl-3-(3'-tert.butyl-phenyl)-urea,
as well as the compound according to the invention l,l-dimethyl-
3-(3-ethyl-4-chlorophenyl)-urea.
The new phenylureas of formula I are prepared accord-
ing to known methods, with, in principle, all processes usually
employed for the preparation of urea derivatives, including
processes commonly used for manufacture on a commercial scale,
being applicable. A very advantageous process comprises,
reacting an isocyanate of formula II



f~
1 ~ ~ N = C = O
~ (II),
R2




wherein R1 and R2 have the meanings given under formula I,

with dimethylamine in a solvent or diluent inert to the




D
~ - 5




reactants, for example, benzene, toluene, dioxane and other
similar ones. The reaction is performed preferably in a
temperature range of between room temperature and about
80C. After completion of the reaction, the phenylureas
according to the invention precipitate, on cooling, from
the reaction mix~ure, or are caused to precipitate by the
addition of ice water to the reaction mixture. After
filtration of the precipitate thus obtained, the phenyl-
ureas are crystallised from suitable solvents or
solvent mixtures, such as, for example, benzene/hexane.
The isocyanates used in this reaction as starting
material, or the amines used for the preparation thereof,
are known compounds, or are prepared by methods analogous
to those known from prior art for the preparation of
such compounds.
Another process for preparation of the new phenylureas
of formula I consists in the reaction of compo-mds of
formula III

NH - C0 - N ~ 3

~2 ~ CH3 (III),
wherein
R2 has the meaning given under formula I, wi~h chlorine
or with a ~hlorine-releasing agent.
The urea derivatives serving as starting materials

~5~

are advantageously chlorinated or brominated in the
presence of a solvent or diluent in which they are
dissolved or suspended, as well as, optionally, in the
presence of an acid-binding agentj e.g. sodium acetate.
Suitable solvents or dispersing agents for the starting
materials of formula III to be chlorinated or brominated
are, for example, glacial acetic acid, halogenated
hydrocarbons such as carbon tetrachloride, chlorobenzene, etc..
Chlorine-releasing agents used for chlorination of the
compounds of formula III are, in particular, sulphuryl
chloride, or organic chlorine-releasing compounds.
Chlorination of the compounds of formula III is advantageously
performed in the presence of halogen-carriers, such as,
for example, iron, antimony or salts thereof, or sulphur.
As for the rest, the techniques applied are those commonly
used for the nucleus-halogenation of aromatic compounds.
The preferred temperature range suitable for the above-
described chlorination is one between 0 and 100C; the
reaction time is between half an hour and 100 hours. The
processing of the reaction mixture is performed analogously
to that for the previously described first preparation
process.
The starting materials of formula III correspond to the
final products of formula I for the case where Rl is
hydrogen, and are obtained by a process corresponding to the
above-described first preparation process for the phenylureas
of formula I. _ 7 _

S~ .t~
The following examples illustrate the processes
according to the invention, including the preparation
of starting materials. Further active substances of
formula I, which are prepared by one of the described
processes, are shown in the following table. The
temperatures are given in degrees Centigrade.
Example 1
a) 3-Isopropyl-phenylisocyanate
167 g of 3-isopropyl-aniline is reacted with phosgene
by the method described in HOUBEN-WEYL, Methoden der
organischen Chemie,Vol. VIII, page 122 (1952). There
is obtained in practically quantitative yield 3-
isopropyl phenylisocyanate, B.P. 90/11 mm Hg.
b) 1,1-dimethyl-3-(3-isopropyl-phenyl~-urea
; 64,5 g of 3-isopropyl~phenylisocyanate is added dropwise
- 15 to a solution of 55 ml of 40% aqueous dimethylamine
and 200 ml of dioxane. Ice water is addedg and the
precipitate is collected and dried to thus obtain
72 g of 1,1-dimethyl-3-(3-isopropyl-phenyl)-urea,
M.P. 102-103 (from benzene/hexane).




-- 8 --

~ 7

Example 2
1,1-Dimethyl-3-(3-ethyl-4-chlorophenyl)-urea
37 g of 1,1-dimethyl-3-(3-ethyl-phenyl)-urea is dissolved
in 250 ml of glacial acetic acid, and 18.5 ml of sulphuryl
chloride is added at 15 within one hour. Stirring is
maintained overnight at room temperature, and 1 litre of
ice water is then added to the reaction mixture. The
resulting precipitate is separated, and crystallised from
~enzene/hexane: yield 22 g of 1,1-dimethyl-3-(3-ethyl-4-
chlorophenyl)-urea; M.P. 138-140.




_ g _




., ,, . , . , . , . . ... . , . , . , .. , .. , , .. ,, . . . , . , .. , .... ,,,, .. , .,, . , . , ., .. , . ,
., , . ,, . , . , .. , ",,, ., ., ", , .. . . .. . ~ .. ,, ., .,, . ~ . , .




Teb 1 e

Constitution Melting poi-nt
:



C l~ Nil- CO~N ~ c~l 102 - 103
C31-17 (iso)

- Cl~ ,C1-13 163 - 16~

C41-lg(tert )
..
~ CoN~C}l3 123 - 124
C ~/ C113
2 5


~N ~ . 8l~
C~13
C4~!9 ~tel .. )



.

.

: ' .

- 10 -

~ '7

The compounds according to the invention possess
very good herbicidal properties against Gramineae such
as millet-like plants of the genera Setaria, Digitaria,
Echinochloa, etc., against grasses such as Lolium species,
Alopecurus, Avena fatua, etc., and also against many
dicotyledonous weeds such as Amaranthus, Sesbania,
Chrysanthemum, Sinapis, Ipomoea, Pastinaca, etc., without
the useful crops on which the active substance is applied
being damaged, even where large amounts are employed.
Useful crops that may be mentioned are, in particular,
cotton and also maize, soya bean, lucerne, sorghum,
and cereals such as wheat, barley and rye.
The active substances are applied either before or
after emergence of the cultivated plants and of the weeds
and wild grasses. The applied amounts per hectare are
between 0.2 and 16.0 kg of active substance, preferably
between 0.5 and 4.0 kg.

Example 3
Herbicidal action with application of the active substances
before emergence (pre-emergence) of the plantsO
__
Immediately after the sowing of the test plants, the
active substances are applied, as an aqueous suspension
obtained from 25% wettable powders, to the surface of the
soil. The seed trays are then kept in a greenhouse at
22-23C with 50-70% relative humidity.

~ 7

Each active substance is applied in amounts equivalent
to 4 kg, 2 kg, l kg and 0.5 kg of actlve substance
per hectare.
The test results are evaluated after 5, 15 and 25
S days; evaluation is on the basis of a scale of values
from l to ~:
l = plants dead,
2 - 4 = in~ermediate stages of destruction (over 50%
irreversible damage),
5 - 8 = intermediate stages of destruction (under 50%
reversible damage),
9 = plants undamaged (control).
In this test,
19 l-dimethyl-3-(3-ethyl-4-chlorophenyl)-urea,
l,l-dimethyl-3-(3-ethyl-phenyl)-urea and
l,l-dimethyl-3-(3-isopropyl-phenyl)-urea
prove to be very effective against grasses/millet and
dicotyledonous weeds, with very good compatibility in
cotton, maize, sorghum, soya bean, wheat and barley.

Example 4
Herbicidal action with application of the active substances
after emergence (post-emergence) of the plants.
, _ _
The test plants are treated in the 2-4-leaf stage
with aqueous suspensions of active substances obtained
from ~5% wettable powders. The amounts applied correspond

- 12 -




..... . . . . . .. ... .. . . . .. . .

~5~

to 4 kg, 2 kg, 1 kg and 0.5 kg of active substance
per hectare.
After the treatment, the plants are kept in a green-
house at 22-25C with 50-70% relative humidity.
S The test results are evaluated after 14 days and
21 days. Evaluation is on the basis of a scale of values
rom 1 to 9:
1 = plants dead,
2 - 4 = intermediate stages of destruction (over 50%
irreversible damage),
5 - 8 = intermediate stages of destruction (below 50%
reversible damage),
9 = plants undamaged (control).
The compounds according to the invention have a good
uniform action against undesirable grasses, and, furthermore,
are effective against broad-leaved weeds, and have very good
compatibility with useful crops. The compo~mds specially
mentioned in Example 3 prove also in this test to be
particularly effec~ive against weeds and compatible with
cultivated crops.
The compounds of formula I according to the invention
are used in varying ways for the selective control of weeds
in useful-plant crops. Thus, they may be formulated together
with suitable carriers and/or distributing agents to give
agents which can be applied as dusts, wettable powders,

- 13 -

~ 7

emulsions, granu]ates, etc., for the regulating of
plant growth. The processing of the active substances
to obtain the most favourable preparation for application
is covered by prior art, i.e. it is part of the
S general knowledge of the experts concerned. The preparation
of some such agents is further described below: the
given examples are intended to illustrate but in no
way to limit the invention. Parts are expressed as parts
by weight.

A) Dusts
Equal parts of active substance according to formula I
and precipitated silicic acid are finely ground. The mixture
is combined with kaolin and ~alcum to obtain dusts having
preferably an active-substance content of 1 to 6%.

B) Wettable ~owders
The following constituents, for example, are mixed
together and finely ground to obtain a wettable powder:
50 parts of active substance according to formula I,
~ 20 par~s of Hisil1(highly adsorptive silicic acid)~
-~ 20 25 parts of bolus alba (kaolin),
3.5 parts of reaction product from p-tert.-octyl-
phenol and ethylene oxide,
1.5 parts of sodium salt of 1-benzyl-2-stearyl-
benzimidazole-6,3'-disulphonic acid.

~ a~ n~rk

- 14


~s~
C) Emulsion concentrate
The active substance can also be formulated as an
emulsion concentrate in the following manner:
20 parts of active substance according to formula I,
70 parts of xylene, and
parts of a mixture of a reaction product of an
alkylphenol with ethylene oxide and
calcium-dodecylbenzenesulphonate
are mixed together. On dilution with water to the desired
concentration, there is obtained a sprayable emulsion.

Other biocidal active substances or agents can be
added to the described agents according to the invention.
Thus, the new agents may contain, in addition to the
mentioned compounds of formula I, e.g. insecticides,
fungicides, bactericides, fungistatics, bacteriostatics,
nematocides or further herbicides for the broadening of
the range of action, and also, if desired, fertilisers,
trace elements, etc..




- 15 -

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1058217 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1979-07-10
(45) Issued 1979-07-10
Expired 1996-07-10

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CIBA-GEIGY AG
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-04-25 1 13
Claims 1994-04-25 1 29
Abstract 1994-04-25 1 15
Cover Page 1994-04-25 1 21
Description 1994-04-25 14 402