Language selection

Search

Patent 1066925 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1066925
(21) Application Number: 217649
(54) English Title: CAST MARAGING STEEL
(54) French Title: ACIER MARTENSITIQUE COULE
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 75/134
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C22C 38/52 (2006.01)
  • C21D 6/00 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/02 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/06 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/08 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/10 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/12 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/14 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • FLOREEN, STEPHEN (Not Available)
(73) Owners :
  • INCO LIMITED (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent:
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1979-11-27
(22) Filed Date:
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract




Abstract of the Disclosure
A cast maraging steel containing correlated percentages of
nickel, cobalt, molybdenum, silicon, aluminum, titanium, carbon and
titanium as well as iron. The alloy, by reason of its strength, tough-
ness and corrosion resistance, is deemed useful in aircraft and the
applications as well.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property
or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. A maraging steel in cast form consisting essentially of from
15% to 19% nickel, 8 to about 12.5% cobalt, about 1.5 to 2.5% molybdenum,
0.01 to about 0.2% each of aluminum and titanium, from 0.1 to about 0.6%
silicon, the silicon being about 0.3% or more when the cobalt is less
than about 11.5%, 0.001% to about 0.1% carbon, and the balance essentially
iron.


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


. ~)66925
The subject invention is addressed to cast maraging steels.
As those skilled in the art are aware, more than a decade has
passed since the advent of the maraging steels. During that period, these
steels, at least those in the wrought condition, achieved a position of
prominence in various areas of application. But, all their attributes not-
withstanding, the cast versions have apparently disappeared from the com-
mercial scene. Perhaps the reason forthis was largely occasioned by the
necessity to vacuum melt and vacuum pour in an effort to achieve a satis-
factory combination of properties. Of course, this would increase cost
markedly. It would appear, therefore, that cast maraging steels which
could be produced in accordance with air melting technology but capable
of delivering a satisfactory combination of metallurgical characteristics,
notably strength and toughness, would become a more formidable competitor
in the marketplace.
It has now been found that vacuum processing can be dispensed
with and that a high level of strength and toughness can be attained using
air melting processing provided the cast steels contain special amounts
of nickel, cobalt, molybdenum, silicon, aluminum, titanium and carbon.
Generally speaking, and in accordance with the present invention,
cast maraging steels are contemplated which contain from about 15 to 19%
nickel, from about 8 or 9% to about 12.5% cobalt, about 1.5 to 2.5%
molybdenum, 0.01 to 0.2% of each of aluminum and titanium, from 0.3 to
0.6% silicon, 0.001 to 0.1%, e.g., 0.005 to 0.05%, carbon, the balance
being essentially iron. Such steels consistenLly afford a minimum yield
strength of at least 175,000 or 180,000 psi together with the capability
of absorbing high levels of impact energy. (All percentages given herein
are in weight percent.)
With regard to the chemistry above given, it is noteworthy to men-
tion that the steels contain, comparatively speaking, a rather substantial
amount of silicon. Heretofore, it has been deemed that silicon was detrimental




. .

- ~0~69Z5
particularly in respect of toughness. Indeed, in speaking of maraging steels
in general, it has been said that the silicon content thereof should be held to
a maximum of 0.1%. However, as will be shown herein, provided that cast
maraging steels contain the proper constituents, the percentages of which are
particularly correlated, not only can high strength levels be achieved, but

-, .
more than satisfactory toughness as well. Of considerable importance, since

the instant steels accept high silicon levels, less pure materials can be used in
. : -:
production, thus offering a further economic advantage commercially. The
silicon can be extended down to 0.1% with a cobalt level from about 11.5 to 12.5%. ;~
The following illustrative data are given.
A series of steels were prepared in accordance with the invention
using conventional air melting techniques. In this regard, 30-lb. air induction
melts were made using electrolytic type charge materials. The melts were
cast into one-inch thick keel block sand molds. Tensile, Charpy V-notch
impact and, in some instances, fracture toughness tests were conducted, these
tests being performed at room temperature, The compositions of various steels
are given in Table I, Alloys 1-8 being within the invention whereas Alloys A-F
are beyond the scope thereof.
TABLE I
~ = ___ . .. _ .....
Ni Co Mo Si Al Ti C Fe
Alloy__ % % 96 % ~, % % %

18.012.2 1.7 .44 .04 .04 .022Bal.
2 17.512.4 1.9 .37 .04 .04 .010Bal.
3 17.812.6 2.0 .38 .03 .05 .011Bal.
4 18.110.2 2.0 .30 .04 .04 .019Bal.
17.910.5 1.6 .36 .03 .06 . 021 Bal .
6 18.08.1 2.1 .35 .02 .06 .031Bal.
7 17.98.4 1.7 .42 .02 .07 .047Bal.
8 17.712.5 1.9 .11 .09 .02 .006Bal.

A 17.615.3 2.6 .45 .03 .02 .015Bal .
B 17.915.4 2.5 .33 .04 .04 .039Bal.
C 12.012.4 2.1 . 03 .01 .04 .009Bal .
D 18.24.2 2.55 .23 .02 .04 .011Bal.
E 17.96.3 1.52 .36 .02 .05 .010Bal .
F 18.16.2 2. 30 .36 .02 .07 .009Bal .
.


'

` - 10669ZS
The alloys were subjected to a heat treatment consisting of
(i) solution annealing at 2100F. for 1 hour, air cooling, (ii) heating at
1100F. for 1 hour, air cooling, (iii) followed by heating at 1500F. for 1
hour and air cooling, the alloys thereafter being (iv) aged at 900F. for
3 hours. The results of these tests are reported in Table II below.
TABLE II

Yield Strength UTSElong. R.A.CVN
Alloy0.2% offset, ksi ksi % %ft.-lbs.

196 20610 4327.0
2 203 20810 5225.0
3 211 21511 5024.7
4 197 20410 4725.7
190 19414 5727.5
6 193 19811 3824.2 -
7 190 19412 5222.2
8 198 20211 5124.0

A 241 251 8 335.2
B* 260 271 2 44.0
C 141 15410 3214.7
D 169 17614 4920.5
E 149 15818 6447.0
F 163 17715 5534.5
*Aged at 800F. for 24 hours
The data reported in Tables I and II reflect the disadvantages in
appreciably departing from the cast steel compositions in accordance herewith.
For example, Alloys A and B had high cobalt levels (the molybdenum also
being at the high end of its alloying range). And while strength was high,
tensile ductility and toughness were relatively low. On the other hand,
whereas ductility and toughness were acceptable in respect of, say, Alloys E
30 and F, strength was unsatisfactory. Alloy 8 has been included in Tables I
and II to illustrate that lower percentages of silicon can be used when high
levels of cobalt are present. Such an alloy, while within the invention,
is more costly and does not provide any real benefit. Alloy 8 can be compared
with Alloy 3 in terms of silicon effect. These steels were rather similar in
composition, the latter containing 0.38% silicon versus 0.11% for the ~ormer .
3-

-
- 10669~5
Notwithstanding the higher silicon level, Alloy 3 exhibited comparable
toughness, its yield strength being 13,000 psi higher . With cobalt per-
centages below about 9.5 or 10%, the molybdenum should be upwards of 1.7%.
The foregoing data indicate that provided a properly correlated
chemical balance is employed, "cast maraging" steels can be produced with
a quite acceptable combination of strength and toughness, this obtaining with
air melting processing.
It might also be added that it is of significance that steels in accordance
herewith combine the capability of offering high strength, e.g., 180,000 psi
and above in thick sections. As indicated in a recent National Advisory Board
Report, such a cast steel would be desirable. It was indicated that, subject to
further development work, even HY-180 probably would have to be vacuum
melted. In this regard, a 300 lb. air induction melt of the following composition
was sand cast into not only one and three inch castings, but also a six inch
thick casting with good results (193 KSI Y.S. plus 34 CVN at room temperature):
17.7% nickel, 10.1% cobalt, 1.61% molybdenum, 0.28% silicon, 0.01% aluminum,
0.04% titanium, 0. 009% carbon, balance iron and impurities .
A particularly satisfactory cast alloy contains 16. 5 to 18% nickel,
9.75 to 11% cobalt, 1 . 6 or 1. 7 to 2 . 1% molybdenum, 0 . 01 to 0 . 1% each of
aluminum and titanium, about 0.01 to 0.0596 carbon and the balance essentially
iron.
Although the invention has been described in connection with ;
preferred embodiments, modifications may be resorted to without departing
from the spirit and scope of the invention, as those skilled in the art will
readily understand. Such are considered within the purview and scope of
the invention and appended claims.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1066925 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1979-11-27
(45) Issued 1979-11-27
Expired 1996-11-27

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
INCO LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-05-02 1 7
Claims 1994-05-02 1 13
Abstract 1994-05-02 1 9
Cover Page 1994-05-02 1 17
Description 1994-05-02 4 165