Language selection

Search

Patent 1068876 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1068876
(21) Application Number: 232587
(54) English Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BIMETALLIC CASTING WITHOUT METALLURGICAL BOND
(54) French Title: METHODE ET DISPOSITIF DE MOULAGE BIMETALLIQUE SANS L'APPORT D'UN LIANT METALLURGIQUE
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 22/176
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B22D 23/00 (2006.01)
  • B22D 19/00 (2006.01)
  • B22D 19/04 (2006.01)
  • B22D 27/04 (2006.01)
  • F01D 5/28 (2006.01)
  • F01D 5/30 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • VISHNEVSKY, CONSTANTINE (Not Available)
  • GRAHAM, LAWRENCE D. (Not Available)
(73) Owners :
  • TRW INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent:
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1980-01-01
(22) Filed Date:
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


ABSTRACT

Method and apparatus for bimetallic casting in which
a shape such as an airfoil which has anisotropic metallurgical
properties is bonded to a second shape by casting. A
disposable pattern with a configuration desired in the second
shape is attached to the first shape and an investment mold
is formed about the pattern in the usual investment mold
making procedure. A barrier layer is provided at least about
those portions of the first shape which are to be bonded to
the second shape to prevent interfacial melting or diffusion
bonding at the union between the first and second shapes.
The pattern material is then removed, leaving an investment
casting mold having a casting cavity conforming to the second
shape. Molten metal is then poured into the casting cavity
and solidifies to form the second shape without any significant
metallurgical bonding occurring between the two shapes.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The method of mechanically bonding a first metallic shape to a
second metallic shape which comprises providing a barrier layer at least
about the portions of said first shape which are to be mechanically bonded
to said second shape, attaching a disposable pattern in the configuration of
said second shape to said first shape, forming an investment mold over said
pattern, removing said pattern to leave a casting cavity of the configuration
desired in said second shape, pouring molten metal into said casting cavity,
and cooling the cast metal to provide a casting of said second shape
mechanically bonded to said first shape without significant metallurgical
bonding.


2. The method of claim 1 in which said first shape has anisotropic
metallurgical properties.


3. The method of claim 1 in which said first shape has an elongated
grain structure.


4. The method of claim 1 in which said first shape consists of
directionally solidified casting having a columnar grained structure.


5. The method of claim 1 in which said first shape is a directionally
solidified casting of substantially eutectic composition.


6. The method of claim 1 in which said first shape consists of a
composite having a fibre reinforced metal matrix.

18

7. The method of claim 1 in which said first shape
is substantially of an airfoil geometry.
8. The method of claim 1 in which said barrier
layer is provided by heating the mold with the first shape
positioned therein in air to a temperature sufficient to provide
an oxide layer over said first shape.
9. The method of claim 1 in which said first shape
is at a temperature substantially below the temperature of the
poured molten metal to thereby provide a chill for the molten
metal poured against said first shape.
10. The method of claim 1 in which said first shape
is composed of a nickel base superalloy.
11. The method of claim 1 in which said first shape
is composed of a cobalt base superalloy.
12. The method of claim 1 in which said first shape
is provided with apertures for mechanical interlocking with the
solidified metal of said second shape.
13. The method of claim 1 in which said barrier
layer is substantially of a ceramic composition.
14. The method of claim 1 in which said barrier layer
is a fused glass.
15. The method of claim 1 in which said barrier
layer is applied by molten metal spraying.
16. The method of claim 1 in which said barrier
layer is formed by oxidizing a metallic coating previously
applied to the first shape.

19

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


76

SPECIFICATION
This invention is in the field of bimetallic castings
wherein an investment casting mold is built around a preform
and the solidification of the metal in the mold serves to anchor
the two components together.
There are numerous disclosures in the prior art of
the advantages of anisotropic metallurgical properties in
components intended for high temperature use such as turbine
vanes and wheels. By "anisotropic metallurgical properties"
we mean that the part has enhanced strength properties parallel
to the major stress axis. In the case of an airfoil shape, this
type of structure has been produced by directional solidification
of a casting to provide columnar grains aligned parallel to the
airfoil major axis. This grain orientation greatly improves
` ~ resistance to intergranular ~acture at elevated temperatures,
lS and thus improves creep strength, ductility, and particularly
thermal-fatigue resistance.
Another material which evidences anisotropic
metallurgical properties is a fiber reinforced metal matrix
` composite. Fibers such as boron, silicon-carbide or graphite
are embedded in a metal matrix such as aluminum in the form
of thin plies and the plies are laid up into the desired airfoil -
shape and then diffusion bonded together with the fibers running
in the direction of the major stress axis. These composites
exhibit highly directional, i.e, anisotropic properties.
Still another example of structures evidencing -
anisotropic metallurgical properties is directionally solidificd
., - ' ' .
' ,
, -, 1 .
., ~


. "' '' ' ~

76

eutectic alloys. These eutectic alloys solidify into lamellar
or rod-like structures which resemble fiber reinforced
composites in that a relatively strong rod or plate-like material
reinforces the weaker matrix.
S There are yet other examples of metallurgical structures
which exhibit marked microstructural directionality and
anisotropy of mechanical properties. Highly elongated and
longitudinally aligned grains characteristic of high temperature
alloys produced from consolidated metal powder by the so-called
mechanical alloying process or by a process of directional
recrystallization of wrought material are further examples of
; anisotropic metallurgical structures in the sense used in this
invention.
There are inherent problems in producing articles having
such anisotropic structures which are generally associated
with changes in cross-section. For example, in cast high
temperature blades or vanes used in gas turbines considerable
; difficulties can occur in producing the necessary article by the
- ~ directional solidification process when large changes in geometry -~
o-cur. The most abrupt and troublesome changes occur at
the junctures of the airfoil portion and more massive attachment
` or root regions of blades, or so-called shrouds of vanes.
These areas often display a propensity for internal defects
~; referred to in the casting industry as shrinkage porosity and/or
composition changes arising from changes in solidification rates.
In addition, the ledges formed by the root areas or shrouds
can serve as traps for nonmetallic impurities such as inclusions

-2-

., .

, . . .

or dross.
In the case of blades and vanes the directionally
aligned, anisotropic, cast structure is desired generally in
the airfoil portion of the article which is the region exposed
to the most severe temperature and stress environment. The
nature of the casting process is such, however, that the
` entire article is cast by the directional solidification process
which for complex parts unduly adds to the difficulties of
` producing the article needed to meet the functional requirements
dictated by service conditions.
Still other configurations exist in which the geometrical
limitations are such that production of directionally solidified
airfoil portions is difficult. One example is found in unitary
. - - - .
cast turbine wheels consisting of a disc or hub portion
supporting a plurality of airfoils on the rim. Such wheels can
.; -
- be produced in cast form with an equiaxed cast grain structure -
using the investment casting process. The resulting product
will exhibit essentially the same type of cast grain micro~
structure in the airfoil and disc portion and the properties will
be more or less isotropic. Although the size of grains Illay -
`~ vary somewhat, no preferred alignment or anisotropy will
exist in the longitudinal direction of the airfoils. In commercial
~i practice the problem of achieving a wheel with directionally ;
solidified airfoils is approached by assembling the wheel from
" 25 separately cast blades mechanically attached to the rim of a ~ -separately produced disc having equiaxed grains, usually formed
by a forgin~ process. Slots machined in the rim of the disc

-3-


,, :,

.A~
76

serve to anchor the roots of the individual blades. This type of assembly
is extremely expensive in comparison with a unitary casting. However, its
commercial use serves to illustrate the desirability of selectively employing
anisotropic metallurgical structures and combining these with other metallur-
gical structures in an overall article such as a turbine wheel. The above
example also illustrates the practicality of a purely mechanical attachment
to transmit loads in a highly stressed component. In this case the mechani-
cal attachment serves to hold the blades in proper orientation to.and proxi-
mity with the disc.
According to the present invention there is provided the method of
mechanically bonding a first metallic shape to a second metallic shape which
comprises providing a barrier layer at least about the portions of said first
shape which are to be mechanically bonded to said second shape, attaching
a disposable pattern in the configuration of said second shape to said
first shape, forming an investment mold over said pattern, removing said
pattern to leave a casting cavity of the configuration desired in said second
shape, pouring molten metal into said casting cavity, and cooling the cast
` metal to provide a casting of said second shape mechanically bonded to said
first shape without significant metallurgical bonding.
According to a preferred feature of the process of the present
invention, which is a bimetallic casting process, shapes with anisotropic
. metallurgical properties can be readily combined with other metals to pre-
serve the unique properties of the anisotropic metallurgical structure at
one portion of the resultant bimetallic article and take advantage of the
unique properties constituent in another portion of said article.
Bimetallic casting processes, per se, have been described in prior
art literature and patents. By and large, however, these process are direct-
ed to the production of a metallurgical bond between the preform and the
metal which is cast about it. Reference lS invited to Schwartz et al. U.S.
Patents Nos. 3j279,006 and 3,342,564 as examples of such disclosures. These
patents describe the production of composite metallic objects by melting a
metallic material having a specific property desired in the poured portion
thereof under
'~ .


, ~

76
vacuum, hea$ing a refractory mold having a cavity therein adaptecl
to receive melted metallic material and having a solid metallic
object or element positioned therein with at least a portion of
the surface thereof exposed within the cavity, under vacuum
and pouring the molten metallic material while maintaining
an inert a~nosphere. The bonding which èxists between the
solidified molten metal and the preform rèsults from the
interalloying of the preform with the poured metal to produce
a metallurgically bonded zone.
While metallurgical bonding is an effective means
for joining the two portions together into a bimetallic article,
such bonds are difficult to achieve on a reliable and reproducible
basis. In practice very high vacuum levels or other extremely
inert atmospheres must be used to prevent formation of
contaiminants at the interfacial region which can reduce the
- level of bonding. The temperatures of the pre-existing portionand the molten metal must be such that neither too rapid
- cooling of the cast-on metal occurs, which could reduce bond
strength by preventing sufficient interalloying, or excessively
slow cooling occurs, which could lead to gross melting oi the
initial solid portion. The physical contact occurring between
the two materials being joined is characterized by extreme
` proximity being aided not only by the capability of molten
metal to fill even microscopic recesses in the initial solid
portion but by the relatively greater contraction occurring in
the cast on material by virtue of its solidifying and subsequently
. .

~-
.. . .

76
cooling from a greater temperature than the initial solid material.
The resulting physical contact precludes, except in the case of
gross separation, the nondestructive inspection of the article
for bond quality.
It has been found that mold preheating and casting
conditions utilized to produce a bi-cast article can be such
that regions showing metallurgical bonding and areas free of
a metallurgical bond can both exist in the attachment region.
If the design of the article for satisfactory operation in service
relies exclusively on a metallurgical bond, undetectable areas
of inadequate bonding can lead to premature failure.
Reference is made to the prior technical information
published in the literature, (Article by U. Okapuu and G.S.
Calvert entitled "An Experimental Cooled Radial Turbine"
appearing in AGARD C~onference Proceedings No. 73 on High
Temperature Turbines, Agard-CP-73-71, Paper No. 10,
January, 1971) in which a gas turbine rotor was produced by
" bicasting a nickel-base superalloy hub around root areas of
` previously cast nickel-base superalloy blades. The design was
based on achieving a metallurgical bond although a few small
recesses were provided to yield some mechanical support. The
i root areas were tapered in a manner which, in the absence of
~ the recesses and any metallurgical bonding, would permit
g unrestricted removal of the blades from the hub portion. In
practice use of vacuum preheating and pouring conditions based
on prior con trolled tests using castings which modeled the


-6-



, ~ , ,

1068876

attachment resulted in the metallurgical bonding being limited to a single

region of the root area. The resultant performance of the bimetallic part
was not wholly adequate by virtue of failures from debonding at areas not
fully bonded metallurgically.
The degree of bonding necessary to achieve the necessary degree of
integrity in a metallurgical sense is such that a zone of alloying due to
local intermelting or diffusion occurs without a discrete interface contain-
ing weakening constituents. Even the presence of a thin film of a weakening
constituent having a thickness of only 0.00001 inch or even less can be
sufficient to prevent bonding. In some metals and alloys, severe reductions
in mechanical strength and ductility are known to occur from films only a
few atomic layers thick between grains. These can arise from compositional
impurities, improper metal working or casting procedures, heat treatments or
various combinations of these.
A preferred embodiment of the process of the present invention con-
sists in providing a preform having anisotropic metallurgical properties and
combining the preform with a disposable pattern in the shape of the piece
which is to be joined to it. An investment mold is built up around the
pattern in the usual way by the so-called dip and stucco process resulting in
the formation of an investment casting mold in which the preform is embedded.
To prevent metallurgical bonding, a barrier layer is provided on
the preform either before the mold is formed around it or, preferably,
afterwards by heating the mold in




'' ' :
.`' :




:. , : , ,

8~76

air to cause a surface film of metal oxide to form at least in
those areas at which the preform is to be attached to the
solidified metal. The molten metal then is poured into the
casting cavity produced by elimination of the pattern. The
molten metal is at a pouring temperature considerably higher
than the preheated mold so that a steep thérmal gradient exists
between the molten metal and the preform. ` This favors both
the avoidance of casting porosity in the solidifying metal in
the vicinity of the joint and the formation of fine columnar
"chill" grains in the solidified metal generally perpendicular
to the boundary of the two portions.
THE DRAWINGS
_ .
Other objects, features and advantages of the inventlon
will be readily apparent from the following description of certain
preferred embodiments thereof, taken in conjunction with the
accompanying drawings, although variations and modifications
may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of
the novel concepts of the disclosure, and in which:
Figures la and lb illustrate a properly bonded and
improperly metallurgically bondèd structure, respectively;
-~ Figure 2 is a fragmentary view of a turbine blade and
slot arrangement; -~
Figure 3 is a view in perspective of a preform in the
shape of an airfoil which is to be joined to two shrouds in the
process of the present invention; -
Figure 4 is a view in elevation showing how the platform
of Figure 3 is received in a wax pattern assembly for the

-8


..1
, , . : , . . ::
~. . ,', .

-


production of the investment casting mold; and
Figure 5 is a view of the assembly after the investment
casting mold has been formed around the pattern and the pattern
has been removed to produce a casting cavity for the reception
of molten metal.
It is apparent that the achievement of a metallurgically
bonded zone in bimetallic cast articles by means of techniques
taught in the prior art is not a wholly adequate process in terms
of reliability and amenability to inspection techniques. Further-
more the presence of a debonded region, regardless of the
proximity of the surfaces, can exert a weakening effect in
certain articles. One type of effect occurs if the part is
designed for a 100~ metallurgical bond; bonding over less than
; the complete interface surface will clearly represent an inferior
condition. Another type of effect arises by virtue of the juncture
` along the interface surface of the area containing a metallurgical
bond and a region evidencing debonding. The principle pertaining
. ..
to the latter effect is shown in Figure 1 using as an example
a tapered knob in the attachment region of the initial solid portion.
For purposes of illustration no specific article is implied by the
geometries shown. Reference numeral 10 identifies the initial
article which would pertain to the portion containing an anisotropic
metallurgical structure while 11 is the cast-on material. For ;
purposes of comparison in Figure la, the pouring parameters
were controlled in such a fashion that complete metallurgical
bonding was achleved and the resulting article Wa6 monolithic


9~ ~-~
., ,

.
,. ', . ' . . .~

1068876

in a load bearing, structural sense. The boundary between the
two portions is a region of interalloying possessing the ability
to transfer loads across the interface denoted by a dashed
line 12. A departure from this ideal condition is shown in
Figure lb wherein a small region of poor metallurgical bonding
appears, as denoted by 13.The material on either side of this
interface is free to separate under load and the junctures of
this separated area 13 and the fully bonded region 12 constitute
the tips of a notch 14. Thus, the debonded region is a so-called
stress raiser, commonly referred to as a crack. Under the
action of an applied load, such as a tension applied along the
longitudinal axis of 10, particularly if the load application is
of a repetitive nature typical of numerous service applications,
the notch is likely to result in the formation of cracks which
; ~ 15 can eventually grow to the stage of failure. The reduction in
strength arising from the notch effect of the poorly bonded
; region is in addition to the first effect cited, where in the
debonded zone simply reduced the area across which load is
transmitted.
We have previously discussed the common method of
constructing a turbine wheel in which individual blades are
mechanically held in place in slots machined into the rim of a
/ separately produced turbine disc. The type of attachment
s geometry employed is in some cases very similar to that
illustraled in Figure 1, being generally a so-called dovetail
design involving a single lobe as shown in Figure 1 or a
multiplicity of lobes, in the latter case referred to as a `~

,,

76

firtree dovetail. In such attachments the boundary between the
two materials, i.e, blades and disc in the specific case
discussed, is continuous. We illustrate this for a single lobe
dovetail, of the type described in reference to Figure 1, in
Figure 2 where 10 denotes the portion pertaining to the blade
inserted into a slot in a part of a disc 15. Because the
boundary between the blade 10 and the disc 15 denoted by 16
is purely mechanical and continuous, the deleterious type of
notch illustrated in Figure lb is absent.
The two extremes of bonding, 100~ metallurgical and
100% mechanical, are generally to be regarded as superior to a
mixture of the two, particulary when loading is severe such as
would exist in a turbine wheel. Now we have described how
a joint design based on a metallurgical bond using methods
detailed in prior art, i.e., based on interalloying through
melting or diffusion, tends to produce bonds that are difficult
to inspect and which could be unreliable and inferior. On the
other hand, a purely mechanical joint formed by using
machined geometrical locks or interfering surfaces is an
acceptable and proven design technique. The present inv~ntion ;
proceeds on the basis of securing adequate mechanical bonding - ~ ~;
rather than relying upon metallurgical bonding and, in fact, -
`, takes positive steps to avoid any metallurgical bonding
. .-
; occurring between the solidified molten metal and the preform.
In Figure 3, reference numeral 20 has been applied
generally to a preform having anisotropic metallurgical properties,
-


.. . .


...... ....
, ' ' ' , ~. ., . '

10~;8876

in this case, an airfoil having columnar grains generally
indicated at reference numeral 21, the grains 21 extending along
the major stress axis of the airfoil. At opposite ends of the
airfoil 10 are a pair of extensions 22 and 23 having spaced
apertures 24 and 25, respectively, therein. The extensions 22
and 23 are arranged to anchor the airfoil 20 in the subsequently
applied metal casting, with the apertures 24 and 25 facilitating
mechanical bonding between the solidified molten metal and the
airfoil preform. Other types of devices for facilitating
mechanical locking can, of course, be used such as slots,
grooves, tapers or threads. This mechanical bond is enhanced
`; by the compressive stresses exerted by the solidifying metal. -~
A disposable pattern assembly is then built up as
illustrated in Figure 4. The airfoil 20 is supported between
` 15 two replicas 26 and 27 of the shrouds between which the airfoil
20 is to be bonded. The pattern may be made of wax, polystyrene ;
; or mixtures of the two. The shroud patterns 26 and 27 are
connected to riser forming portions 28 and 29, respectively,
which are fed from a sprue forming portion 30 all composed of
tne disposable pattern material.
As previously noted, the airfoil portion 20 may be made
of any suitable material having anisotropic metallurgical properties.
Directionally solifified alloys of nickel and cobalt are particularly
useful for this purpose. The chemistry of these alloys has been ~-
well developed over the years and does not form a specific ~-
feature of the present invention. For a disclosure of such
chemistry and other properties of nickcl and cobalt base

-12-

.' ~

- 106~876

superalloys, reference is invited to Table 1 appearing in the
appendix of the work entitled "The Superalloys" edited by Sims
et al., and published by John Wiley ~ Sons. Table 1, appearing
at pages 596 to 597 lists many commercial nickel and cobalt
base superalloys~
The assembly shown in Figure 4 is then subjected to
the usual investment mold making process. While there are a
number of ways to produce shell molds of this type, we
particularly prefer to use the method described in Mellen et al.
United States PatentNo. 2,932,864 issued April 19, 1960. In the
method described in that patent, a destructible pattern of the
article to be reproduced is coated at room temperature by dip-
ping it in an aqueous slurry containing refractory particles and
a binder. This coating is then dried isothermally so that the .
temperature of the pattern remains constant. The drying is
achieved by passing air of controlled humidity past the coated
pattern, the air containing sufficient moisture to maintain a
substantially constant wet bulb temperature which is substantial- --
~, .
ly the same as the initial temperature of the pattern and having
a dry bulb temperature which is at least 10F higher than the
wet bulb temperature. The pattern is then dipped in additional
aqueous refractory slurries to form successive layers on the
pattern. Each successive layer is isothermally dried in the
same manner as described previously while maintaining the
temperature of the pattern substantially constant. Finally,
j the pattern is removed by melting it out either in a furnace
,~
or in an autoclave. ~
'. .

~ ~ . .

'

~ - 13 -
~ A
~,.
. .. .. ` ` ~ . .. . . . . ..
. . .. . . ,. . , . . ". . .

76

The mold which results is illustrated in Figure 5 of
the drawings. It contains a sprue portion 31 fceding a pair of
riser portions 32 and 33 which feed a pair of casting cavities
34 and 35 which are to form the shrouds of the airfoil assembly.
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention,
the mold is fired at a temperature of about 1600~ to oxidize
at least those portions, such as the extensions 22 and 23 which
are to form the mechanical bond with the subsequently cast
alloy. Alternatively, the airfoil portion may be precoated with
a nonmetallic barrier material by spray, dipping or painting
deposition using suitable binders. These can include various
ceramics such as SiO2 or ZrO2 held in place with refractory
cements, or fused glassy coatings . Still other techniqu es of
applying such barrier materials are the so-called flame spraying
or plasma arc spraying processes to form a ceramic surface
layer. The barrier layer can also be achieved by first -
depositing a layer of metallic material particularly suited for
subsequent conversion to a ceramic form by heating in an
oxidizing atmosphere.
The molten metal is then poured into the mold with a
superheat above the melting point at a level sufficient to fill
.
all recesses of the mold but not so great that melting of the
preform would occur. For nickel or cobalt base superalloys
~ .3
a superheat of 150 to 350~F above the liquidus, the temperature
:
of complete melting, is generally acceptable. Such temperatures
. . .
are in the range of 2600F for common alloys and result in a
- substantia1 tcmpcrature differential between the mold and the

-14-



. . .
.

~ - ,
` 1068876

superheated metal. Consequently, those portions of the molten
metal which embrace the extensions 22 and 23 will chill rapidly
and almost immediately with the production of very fine columnar
grains perpendicular to the interface. This fine grained
structure is highly desirable, being relatively superior in
mechanical properties to coarser grained cast structures. In
addition, the steep temperature differential, as evidenced by the
chill grains, is indicative of solidification occurring in such a
fashion that the rapidly cooled metal in the vicinity of interface
will generally be much less prone to shrinkage porosity which,
to those familiar with castings, is clèarly a superior condition
in terms of metallurgical quality and m~ochanical properties.
The particular molten metal which is to form the shroud
portions is essentially a matter of choice. For example, the -
-` 15 metal may be a nickel or cobalt base superalloy, or it may be
a high temperature iron alloy. Surprisingly, we can actually
" use higher melting alloys for the shroud portion than for the
~ - .
~ airfoil because of the substantial heat transfer which exists. ~ -
:, :
The barrier layer at the interface between the preform
and the solidifying metal should have a lower thermal coriductivity
than either of the two metals being joinèd. Such a barrier
~ layer prevents intermixing or interalloying of the two metals.
-~ The thickness of the barrier layer may be quite small, on the
order of one-thousandth inch or less.
J 25 While the prior art teaches the use of high vacuum
preheating conditions in making bimetallic castings, such high
vacuum conditions are not necessary in accordance with the

-15- - .

1061~876
present invention. As noted, the preheating of the mold may
take place in an oxidizing atmosphere, and the pouring may
take place at moderate vacuum conditions. The actual vacuum
level is not dictated by the bimetal~c casting process in the
S present invention because the bond desired is mechanical
and not metallurgical. Hence, the vacuum environment used
in melting need be adequate for the specific material being cast.
Special precautions to assure very clean interface surfaces are
not required under this invention. In the case of alloys which
are usually melted in air, such as many cobalt base superalloys,
the melting and casting could be performed without the use of
any vacuum in marked departure from the techniques required
by the prior art to achieve a metallurgical bond.
The process of the present invention can be used to
produce a wide variety of complex shapes, taking advantage of
unique physical properties in each portion of the shape being
produced. The process may be used, for example, in the casting
of entire turbine wheels about airfoil portions having different
` physical and chemical composition. The process may be used
in casting of shrouds onto airfoils singly or as multiple assemblies
to produce vanes or vane segments combining alloys with
properties tailored to match the different operating conditions
experienced in the airfoil and shroud portions. Articles which
as unitary castings tend to exhibit shrinkage porosity at those
regions where airfoils meet more massive attachment regions ~ - -
would exhibit less sllrinkage porosity. Because such bimeta~lic
castings would be based on mechanical rathcr than me~allurgical

- 16 -
.
., ~

876

bonding, the element of uncertainty and performance risk
arising from inspectability problems and dangers of loacl bcaring
degradation in the presence of even small areas of poor ;;
metallurgical bonding is avoided. The procedures needed to
S obtain a mechanical bond require far less rigorous control and
result in a more readily achievable bond. Thermal conditions
are such that very high preheat and pouring temperatures
are not needed and the possibility of erosion or melting of
; the preform avoided. ~onsequently, the results of the process
. lO are highly predictable.
Although the specific process is described herein for
alloy combinations involving anisotropic metallurgical structures
in the preform, these are not a prerequisite for the successful ~
utilization of the proceQs to achieve a mechanical joint by ` `
deliberately avoiding metallurgical bonding.
.,
. . .

. ,... ~

` , .


., '.
~, : .

... .

.~, .
. - . .; .

,",,.' .':

:'

",`~

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1068876 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1980-01-01
(45) Issued 1980-01-01
Expired 1997-01-01

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
TRW INC.
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-05-10 2 47
Claims 1994-05-10 2 70
Abstract 1994-05-10 1 26
Cover Page 1994-05-10 1 20
Description 1994-05-10 17 728