Language selection

Search

Patent 1073674 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1073674
(21) Application Number: 245279
(54) English Title: RESIDUAL FUEL OILS
(54) French Title: FUEL-OIL RESIDUAIRE
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 196/69
  • 44/9
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10L 1/18 (2006.01)
  • C10L 1/04 (2006.01)
  • C10L 1/14 (2006.01)
  • C10L 1/22 (2006.01)
  • C10L 1/24 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • VAN ENGELEN, GERARDUS P. (Not Available)
(73) Owners :
  • SHELL CANADA LIMITED (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent:
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1980-03-18
(22) Filed Date:
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract



A B S T R A C T

The invention relates to a residual fuel oil having a potential dry
sludge content of not more than 0.1 %w in the case of a residual fuel oil
having a viscosity of below about 1,000 Redwood I seconds at 100°F or
having a potential dry sludge content of not more than 0.15 %w in the case
of a residual fuel oil having a viscosity of above about 1,000 Redwood I
seconds at 100°F, comprising a major proportion of a thermally cracked
residue and a diluent and a minor proportion of a dispersant additive,
such as a metal salt of an alkyl salicylic acid. Due to the presence of
the dispersant additive more severely cracked residues can be used.




Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. A residual fuel oil having a potential dry sludge content of
not more than 0.1%w in the case of a residual fuel oil having a viscosity of
below about 1,000 Redwood I seconds at 100°F or having a potential dry sludge
content of not more than 0.15%w in the case of a residual fuel oil having
a viscosity of above about 1,000 Redwood I seconds at 100°F, comprising
a thermally cracked residue 20-80 %w of a diluent and 0.025 - 10 %w of a
dispersant additive, which residual fuel oil, in the absence of the
additive, would have a potential dry sludge content of above 0.1 %w in the
case of a residual fuel oil having a viscosity of below about 1,000 Redwood I
seconds at 100°F or have a potential dry sludge content of above 0.15 %w
in the case of a residual fuel oil having a viscosity of above about
1,000 Redwood I seconds at 100°F.

2. A residual fuel oil as claimed in claim 1, wherein said additive
is an organic carboxylic acid or a derivative of an organic carboxylic acid.

3. A residual fuel oil as claimed in claim 2, wherein said
additive is a C8 to C22 alkyl salicylic acid.

4. A residual fuel oil as claimed in claim 2, wherein said additive
is an ester of a C8 to C22 alkyl salicylic acid.

5. A residual fuel oil as claimed in claim 2, wherein said ester
is derived from a naphthol.

6. A residual fuel oil as claimed in claim 2, wherein said additive
is a normal or basic salt of a C8 to C22 alkyl salicylic acid.

7. A residual fuel oil as claimed in claim 2, wherein said
additive is a normal or basic salt of a petroleum naphthenic acid.

8. A residual fuel oil as claimed in claim 6 or claim 7, wherein
said salt is a calcium or magnesium salt.

14

9. A residual fuel oil as claimed in claim 2, wherein said
additive is a polyisobutenyl succinate and/or a polyisobutenyl succinimide.

10. A residual fuel oil as claimed in claim 9, wherein the succinate
is derived from pentaerythritol.

11. A residual fuel oil as claimed in claim 10, wherein the
succinimide is derived from a polyalkylene polyamine.


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~ `

~ 3~



The invention relates to stable residual fuel oils,
It is known to prepare stable residual fuels from residues
such as thermally cracked, i.e. visbroken, or catalytically processed
short or long residues, and diluents such as distillate ~uels or
oils, e.g. flashed distillates or gas oils. In general, these fuel
oils may be classified into t~o types, namely those having viscosities
of below about 15000 Redwood I seconds ~t 100F (type A) and those
having viscosities of above about 1,000 Redwood I seconds ~t 100~F
(typ~ B).
Known stable residual ~uel oils are usually characterized by
having a potential low dry sludge content. For example, it is usually
specified that fuel oils of type A should have a potential dry sludge
content of not more than 0.1 %w and that fuel oilæ of type B should
have a potential dry sludge content of not more than 0,15 %w. The
15 percentages are based on the weight of the residual fuel oil. Fuel
oils having potential dry sludge contents above these values may
be described as potentially unstable.
The term "potential dry sludge content" means, insofar as this
description is concerned, the potential flocculated asphaltene content
20 Or the fuel oil and does not mean ~ny extraneous matter which may
enter the fuel oil during the manu~acture, transport, storage or
use thereof. The potential dry sludee content i9 determined by the
Shell Hot Filtration Test, which i8 described in the Journal of
the Institute of Petroleum Vol. 37, No. 333, pages 596-604, September,
25 1951 after the residual fuel oil has been stored for 24 hours Qt
1 00 C .
In practice, the above specifications place little, if any
con~traint on the conditions by which catrlytically processed

short or long residues mdy be manufactured since they may be relatively
e~sily met when the ~esidues are diluted by the usual range of diluents.
However, these specifications do constrain the conditions by which


3~i7~
thermally cr~cked residues m~y i)e manufactured since severe cracking,
e.g. at higher temperature~ and/or for longer residence 1;imes than
is usual, may result in cracked residues which when diluted by the
usual range of diluents produce potentially unsta~le fuel oils.
This potential instability probsbly results from the higher amolmt
of insoluble asphaltenes in severely cracked residues than in other
types of residues.
This constraint on the severity of thermal cracking conditions
is unfortunate because more se~ere thermal cracking condition~ are
often desirable since they result in an increased production of
Yaluable distillate fractions, such as middle distillate fractions.
Whether or not the conditions of thermal cracking may be regarded
as severe depends upon the nature of the petroleum product being
cracked, usually a long or short residue 9 and the nature anld amount
of diluent with which it is blended. For example, a long residue
derived from B naphthenic crude may be cracked more severely than
a lon~ residue derived from a paraffinic crude since the components
of the ~ormer are more capable of preventing the flocculation of
asphaltenes. As another example, a long residue derived from say
a paraffinic crude may be cracked more severely if the cracked residue
is to be blended with a middle distillate having a high ~romatics
contents than if it is to be blended with a middle di~tillate having
a lcw aromatica content since the high aromatics content of the
former i8 again more capable of preventing the rlocculating o~ asphaltenes~
Hence, cracking conditions may only he described as severe if ~hen
a thermally cracked residue blended with a particular type and amount
of diluent produces a potentially unstable residual fuel oil.
In practice, the cracking temperature for normal~v cracked
residues i~ about 440C if the residence time is less than about
15 minutes; longer residence times would usu~lly be described as
severe cracking. On the other hand, higher cracking temperatures


-- 3 --

6``~


may be used for normally cracked residues provided the residence times
are shorter, for example a cracking temperature of about 4~0C and a
residence time of below 2 minutes would usually be described as normal
cracking whereas a residence time of above 2 minutes at this temperature
would usually be described as severe cracking.
The applicants have now disc~vered that by using dispersant
additives, residual fuel oils are obtained containing a potential dry
sludge content which is acceptable or on-specification but which, in
the absence of the dlspersant additives, would contain a potential dry
sludge content which is unacceptable or off-specification.
The present invention provides a residual fuel oil having a ;-
potential dry sludge content of not more than 0.1 %w in the case of a re-
sidual fuel oil having a viscosity of below about 1,000 Redwood I seconds
at 100F or having a potential dry sludge content of not more than 0.15 %w
in the case of a residual fuel oil having a viscosity of above about 1,000
Redwood I seconds at 100F, comprising a thermally cracked residue 20 - 80 %w
of a diluent and 0.025 - 10 %w of a dispersant additive, which resiclual
fuel oil, in the absence of the additive, would have a potential dry
sludge content of above 0.1 %w in the case of a residual fuel oil having
a viscosity of below about 1,000 Redwood I seconds at 100F or have a
potential dry sludge content of above 0.15 %w in the case of a residual
fuel oil having a viscosity of above about 1,000 Redwood I seconds at
100F.
I'he above residual fuel oils may be prepared by a process
which comprises adding the additive to the thermally cracked residue,
diluent or mixture thereof with the proviso that if the additive is added
to the mixture the dry sludge content, if any, of the mixture should be
below the specified amounts.
This dry sludge content or the dry sludge content at the
moment of addition of the additive is also determined by the aforesaid
test with the difference that it is determined just before the moment of
addition of the additive and not after storage thereof for 24 hours.
The additives are preferably added to the thermally cracked

~:

,

- 1~'7367~

residue before it is mixed ~ith the diluent or added to a stable mixture of
the cracked residue and diluent~s) (i.e. to a stable residual fuel oil)
before the mixture is blended with further amounts of the same or different
diluent(s) which~ in the absence of the additive, would produce a potentially -
unstable residual fuel oil. In addition, the additive may be added to the
diluent before it is blended with the ~hermally cracked residue. Moreover,
the additive may be added to a potentially unstable residual fuel oil pro-
vided that the dry sludge content, if any7 at the moment of addition does
not exceed the permissable maximum i.e. it has been found that the additives
are capable of arresting the further flocculation of asphaltenes even after
some flocculation has occurred~
Examples of suitable diluents include cracked cycle oils, kerosene,
gas-oils, flashed distillates and long and short residues. The amolmt of
diluent in the residual fuel oil may vary between wide limits but usual
amounts are from 20 to 80 %w.
Examples of suitable dispersant additives, which may be ash or -
ash-less dispersants, include the oil-soluble organic acids or derivatives,
such as salts thereof. In general such oil-soluble organic acids include
substituted and unsubstituted aliphatic, cycloaliphatic and aromatic acids
comprising the carboxylic acids, sulphur-containing acids for example
sulphonic acids~ phosphoric acids and the corresponding thio-acids. Phenols
and also partial esters of sulphur-containing and phosphorus-containing acids
can also be employed.
The sulphonic acids (or salts thereof) which can be employed include
the aliphatic-substituted cyclic sulphonic acids in which the aliphatic
substituent or substituents contain at least twelve carbon atoms, for example
alkylaryl sulphonic acids~ alkylcycloaliphatic sulphonic acids and alkyl-
heterocyclic sulphonic acids for example: petroleum sulphonic acids and

29 cycloaliphatic sulphonic acids such as petroleum nap~hane sulphonic acids.
--5--




, . . . . .

The phosphorus acids (or salts thereof) which can be employed in
the process of the present invention include tri- and pentavalent organic
phosphorus acids (and the corresponding thio-acids), such, for example, as
the aliphatic, cyclo-aliphatic and aromatic phosphoric and thiophosphoric
acids having at least ~welve carbon atoms per molecule.
The phenols (or salts thereof~ which may be used in carrying out
the present proc~ss include the octylphenols, dodecylphenols, octadecylphenols,
diisopropylphenols, dihexylphenols, and the condensation products of phenols
with aldehydes or ketones such as the condensation products of octyl phenol
and formaldehyde.
The preferred organic acids or derivatives thereof are the organic
carboxylic acids or derivatives of organic carboxylic acids.
Suitable organic carboxylic acids which may be used and/or organic
carboxylic acids whose derivatives may be used as additives in the residual
fuel oils~ include aliphatic, cycloaliphatic and aromatic carboxylic acids.
Preferred organic carboxylic acids are the alkyl aromatic acids such as the
alkyl hydroxy ben~oic acids, e.g. those havin~ at least 8 carbon atoms in
the alkyl group, petroleum naphthenic acids, and alkyl(ene) succinic acids
such as those haYing at least 25 carbon atoms in the alkyl(ene) group.
Preferred additives include the C8 to C22 allcyl aromatic acids e.g.
the C8 to C22 allcyl salicylic acids. More preferred are the C14 to C18
alkyl salicylic acids.
Other preferred additives include the esters of such alkyl aromatic
acids such as those derived from aliphatic and aromatic alcohols e.g. the
naphthols. An example of such an additive is alphanaphthol alkyl salicylate.
Other preferred additives include the salts of such alkyl aromatic
acids and of a naphthenic acid, in particular a petroleum naphthenic acid.
~uitable metal salts are salts of mono- or polyvalent metals but

29 preferably the metal is in the divalent state. Preferred metal salts are
--6--

3~i74

the salts of beryllium, magnesium7 calcium, sb~ntium or barium with metal
salts of calcium or magnesium being particularly preferred. Specific examples
of such salts include calcium or magnesium alkyl salicylates and calcium
petroleum naphthenates. However metal salts of sodium,lithium, copper, zinc,
aluminium, tin, chromium, cobalt, manganese, lead or nickel may also be used.
Mixtures of salts may also be used.
The salts may be neutral or basic. By the term "basic" is meant
that the ~number of gram equivalents of metal in the salt ls greater than the
number of gram equivalents of the acid. The basicity of such salts of poly-

valent metals may be expressed in the formula (M-l)x100%, where M s~ands for
the number of equivalents of metal and Z for the number of equi~alents of the
carboxylic acid, for example per 100 grams of the basic metal salt. The
basicity of the salt may be as high as 2,000%, whereas basicities of from
150 to 250% are preferred for basic salts of aromatic carboxylic acids and
from 500 to 1,500% for basic salts of cycloaliphatic carboxylic acids.
Other preferred additives include the esters, amides or imides of
the aforesaid alkyl(ene) succinic acids, e.g. polyisobutenyl succinic acids,
uhich may be derived from such acids or the anhydri~;es thereof, by reac~ion
thereof with alcohols, such as pentaerythritol, amines, hydroxyamines, imines
etci. Examples of suitable alcohols include the polyols such as trimethylol
propane, pentaerythritol etc. and examples of suitable amines include poly-
amines such as polyalkylene polyamines e.g. tetrameth~lene pentamine~ Suit~
able esters i.e. alkyl(ene) succinates have a number average molecular weight
of from 550 to 750 and suitable amides or imides i.e. alkyl(ene~ succinamides
or polyalkyl(ene) succinimides have a number average molecular weight of from
2,000 to 4,000.
Mixtures of the additives may also be used. A particularly suitable
mixture is a mixture of alkyl salicylates, e.g. calcium alkyl salicylate, and
9 a polyisobutenyl succinate. Another suitable mixture is a mix~ure of a
--7--


~ 3 ~ ~ ~



polyisobutenyl succinate and a polyisobutylene succinimide.
The additives may be added in amounts of up to 10 %w based on weight
of res.idual fuel oil but amounts of from 0.01 to 5 %w, particularly from 0.025
to 2.0 ~w, are suitable.
The invention is now illustrated by reference to the following
Examples.
In the Examples the residual fuel oils used were: -

1) Residual Fuel Oil A comprising :
(I) 62~4 %w of a Kuwait thermally cracked residue prepared from a
naphthenic short residue, having a viscosity of 25p00 Redwood I
seconds at 100 F, a density (15/4 C) of 1.0061 and a sulphur
content of 4.94 %w, and
(II) 37.6 %w of a diluent, comprising 5 pbw of n-hexadecene and
1 pbw of alpha-methylnaphthalene, having a density (15/4 C) of
0.8134 and a viscosity of 32 Redwood I seconds at 100 F.
The residual fuel oil A had a viscosity of 240 Redwood I seconds
at 100 F.
2) Residual Fuel Oil B comprising
(I) 50 %w of a Cura,cao fuel oil consisting of
(a) 60 %w of a Cura~ao thermally cracked residue, prepared
from a naphthenic short residue,
(b) 18 ~Ow of a light cracked cycle oil,
(c) 7 %w of a Bachaquero straight-run residue, and
(d) 15 %w of a Sarir heavy gas oil; and
(II) 50 %w of a Sarir fuel oil, of paraffinic origin consisting of
(a) 50 %w of Sarir long residue,
(b) 15 %w of Gamba long residue, and
(c) 35 ~w of Sarir heavy gas oil.


29 The residual fuel oil B had a viscosity of 155 Redwood I seconds
--8--

:~n~3~q~

at lOO F.
3) Residual Fuel Oil C comprising
~I) 47.6 %w of the Kuwait ther~ally cracked residue described
above under residual fuel oil A, and
(II) 52.4 ~Ow of an Oman heavy gas oil having a viscositv of 50
Uedwood I seconds at 100 F, a density ~15/4C) of 0.869 and a
sulphur content of 1.04 ~w. Its initial boiling point was
233 C, its 50 ~Ov boiling point was 347 C and the recovery was
83 % at 370 C.
The residual fuel oil C ha~ a viscosity of 310 Redwood I seconds
at 100 F.
4) Residual Fuel Oil D comprising
(I) 70.5 %w of the ~uwait thermally cracked residue described
above under residual fuel oil A, and ~'
(II) 29.5 ~w of a Sarir flashed distillate having a viscosity of
75 Redwood I seconds at 100 F, a specific gravity (70/4 C) of
0.8235 and a sulphur content of 0.17 ~w.
The residual fuel oil D had a viscosity of 2,300 Redwood I seconds
at 100 F.
EXAMPLES I TO XIV
.
Doped residual fuel oils were prepared by adding one or more of the
following additives in xylene to components (I) of the residual Euel oils
before dilution thereof with component (II). The amounts of additives used
are given in Table I. (The amounts are the amounts of 44 ~w of additive in
xylene).
The additives used were as follows: -
Additive A. An alkyl salicylic acid wherein the alkyl chain contains from
14 to 18 carbon atoms.
29 Additive B, The neutral calcium salt of the Additive A.
_g_


' - ' ' ' ' '

~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~



Additive C. The basic calcium salt of Additive A having a basicity of about
200 %.
AdditiVe D. The basic magnesium salt of Additive A having a basicity of
about 200 %.
Additive E. The alpha-naphthyl ester of Additive Ao
Additive F. 1 pbv of Additive A and 1 pbv of an ester of polyisobutenyl
succinic anhydride and pentaerythritol wherein the ester has a Mn of about 6~0.
me potential dry sludge content of the undoped residual fuel oils
and doped residual fuel oils I to XIV were determined by the Shell Hot Filtra-

tion Test as described in the Journal of the Institute of Petroleum Vol. 37,
No. 333 pages 596-604, September,1951. The doped or undoped residual fuel
oi]s are first heated for 24 hours at 100 C. Care is taken that no extraneous
matter had entered the oil. According to the method, Whatma~ No. 50 filter
paper (diameter S5 mm) is first dried for 1 hour in a drying oven at about
105 C and stored in a glass container having a ground-in stopper. For analy-
sis, one dried filter is weighed on a damped balance. The dried filter paper
is placed on a felt disc resting on a perforated plate with a flat, raised
edge. This assembly is then mounted over a vacuum flask and a heating jacket
placed around the assemblyO Live steam is passed through the heating jacket.
10 g of doped or undoped residual fuel oil are then placed on the
filter paper, the flask vacuated and air or nitrogen pressure applied to the
filter paper~ as a result of which the fuel oil is filtered. Filtration is
continued until air or nitrogen flows through the filter. After filtration
is substantially complete water is passed through the heating jacket until
the filter is cooled after which it is washed with firstly 5 ml n-heptane
and secondly with a large amount of n-heptane whilst the flask is vacuated.
me filter paper is then removed, dried and weighed. The amount of dried
sludge is then determined and expressed as ~w, based on weight of residual


29 fuel oil. m e results are expressed in Table I.
~-Trade Mark ~ -10-


. .

:1~?~3t;'74
Doped residual fuel oils I, IV, V, VI, IX, XI, XIII and XIV were also
examined microscopically (x80 to xlOO) after storage at 100 C for 24 hours
and with the exception of doped fuel oil V, in which a small amount of
flocculated asphaltenes was observed, no




-lOa-


.

~ ~'73 ~




flocculated asphaltenes were detected. Microscopic ex~mination of
the undoped residual ~uel oils, also after storage at 100C for 24
hours, revealed large amounts of flocculated asphaltenes.
The dry sludge con~ent of residual fuel oil A was also determaned
by storing the oil at lOO~C and determining the dry sludge content,
as described above, but after increasing ti~e intervals. Just a M er
the determination, 1 %w of additive ~ was added to a separated
amount of the fuel oil ~nd the potential dry sludge content of
the thus doped fuel oil determined ~fter additional storage at
100C for 24 hours. It was found that the additive substantially
prevents fu~ther flocculation o~ asphaltenes if the dry slud~e
content thereof was below 0.1 %w i.e. in these cases the maximum
potential dry sludge content of the doped fuel oil was substantiQlly
the same as the dry sludge content of the undoped fuel oil.

7 ~

~able I

~xp. Residual Fuel Additive Amount of Dry sludge
i~o. Oil type additive') content(%w)
(%w of residual -
fuel oil)
_____ ____ ________ __________ ____________________ _______
- C - - 0.20
I C A 1.0 0.03
II C C 0.4 0.07
III C C o.6 0.04
IV C C 1.0 0.03
V C F 1.0 0.10
VI C F 1.0 0.02
- A - - 0.47
VII A C 0.4 o.o6
VIII A C o.6 0.05
_ B - ~ ~49
IX B C 1.0 o~o8
- D - - 0.17
X D C 0.1 0.07
XI D C 0.2 o.o6
XII D C 1.0 0.05
XIII A ~ 1.0 0.05
XIV A D 1.0 0.05
========_=================_=====================_==_=========
') Amount of 44 %w additive in xylene.

EXAMPLE XV
A doped residual fuel oil composition was prepared by addin~
basic calcium petroleum naphthenate having a basieity of 1000%
(additive G) to component(I) of re~idual f'uel oi} C before it was
diluted with component(II)- The amount used was 1.0 %w o~ 411 ~w
additive in xylene based on residual fuel oil. The Shell Hot Filtration
Test, as described above, was carried out on the undoped and do~ed
residual fuel oils and the results were 0.2 %w and o.o6 %w 0~ dry
s.ludge respectively. Microscopic observation of undoped residual
fuel oil C and the doped residual ~uel oil after storage at 100C
~10 at 24 hours, revealed a lar~e amount and a small amount of flocculated
asphaltenes respectively.
- 12 -

~ 3
EXAMPLES XYI to XVIII
Doped residual fuel oils were prepared by adding one or more of the
followin~ additives to components (I) of the residual fuel o.ils before dilu-
tion thereof with components(II). The amounts of additives used were 1 %w
of 44 % additive in xylene, based on residual fuel oil.
The additives used were as follows.
Additive H. The reaction product of a polyisobutenylsuccinic anhydride and
pentaerythritol having a Mn of about 670.
Addditive I. The reaction product of a polyisobuten~lsuccinic anhydride and
pentaerythritol having a M of abaut 730.
Additive J~ A mixture of a reaction product of polyisobutenylsuccinic anhy-
dride with pentaerythritol and a polyalkylene polyamine, having a molecular
weight of about 3000.
The Shell Hot filtration Test, as descr:ibed above, was carried out
on the doped and undoped residual fuel oils. The results are give:n in Table
II~
Table II

Exp. No. Residual Fuel Additive Dry sludge conten~
Oil Type (a~w)
_________ _____________ ________ __________________
-- A -- 0.47

XVI A H 0.06

XVII A I 0.07

__ C - 0.20

XVIII C J 0.08
- ' '




-13- :


. . . , , ,. , . . , . ~ .

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1073674 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1980-03-18
(45) Issued 1980-03-18
Expired 1997-03-18

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SHELL CANADA LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1994-03-28 13 515
Drawings 1994-03-28 1 12
Claims 1994-03-28 2 56
Abstract 1994-03-28 1 22
Cover Page 1994-03-28 1 24