Language selection

Search

Patent 1089391 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1089391
(21) Application Number: 268549
(54) English Title: METHOD FOR PRESULFIDING HYDRODESULFURIZATION CATALYSTS
(54) French Title: PRESULFURATION DE CATALYSEURS D'HYDRODESULFURISATION
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 196/136
  • 252/70
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10G 45/04 (2006.01)
  • B01J 37/20 (2006.01)
  • C10G 45/08 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HILDEBRAND, RICHARD E. (United States of America)
  • MONTAGNA, ANGELO A. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • GULF RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (Not Available)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: MCCARTHY TETRAULT LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1980-11-11
(22) Filed Date: 1976-12-22
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
673,074 United States of America 1976-04-02

Abstracts

English Abstract



METHOD FOR PRESULFIDING HYDRODESULFURIZATION CATALYSTS

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE

An improved method for presulfiding a hydrodesulfur-
ization catalyst which comprises continuously contacting the
catalyst with a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon in an inert
hydrogen-free atmosphere at relatively low pressure.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A process which consists essentially of initially
contacting a catalyst comprising Group VI-B and Group VIII
hydrogenation components on a refractory oxide support with a
sulfur-containing liquid hydrocarbon in an inert substantially
oxygen-free and hydrogen-free atmosphere and at a pressure in the
range of atmospheric to 400 psig and at a temperature in the
range of 200 to 700°F, maintaining the contact between said
catalyst and said sulfur-containing liquid hydrocarbon until the
total amount of sulfur in said hydrocarbon brought into contact
with said catalyst is in the range of 200 to 1400 weight percent
of the amount of sulfur required to completely sulfide the metals
at the contact temperature and pressure, and thereafter
contacting said catalyst with a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon
feed under hydrodesulfurization conditions.
2. The process of Claim 1 wherein said sulfur-containing
hydrocarbon comprises a gas oil or furnace oil.
3. The process of Claim 1 wherein the initial contacting
is conducted in a nitrogen atmosphere.
4. The process of Claim 1 wherein said sulfur-containing
liquid hydrocarbon contains at least 1.0 weight percent sulfur.
5. The process of Claim 1 wherein said catalyst also
contains a Group IV hydrogenation component.
6. The process of Claim 1 wherein said catalyst comprises
nickel, cobalt and molybdenum on alumina.

11

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





BACKGROUND OE THE INVENTION
The hydrodesulfurization of hydrocarbon stocks with
catalysts comprising supported hydrogenating components selected
from the Group VI-B and Group VIII metals in a form capable of
promoting hydrogenation reactions is conventional in the art.
Especially effective catalysts for the purpose of such-~ydro-
desulfurization reactions are those comprising molybdenum and two
members of the iron group metals. Preferred catalysts of this
class are those containing nickel, cobalt and molybdenum but other
effective combinations of iron group metals and molybdenum comprise
iron-molybdenum-cobalt, nickel-molybdenum-iron, as well as combina-
tions of nickel and molybdenum, cobalt and molybdenum, nickel and
tungsten. The hydrogenating or desulfurizing components of such
catalysts are employed in the sulfided form.
Although the hydrogenating components indicated above
may be employed in any proportions with each other, especially
effective catalysts are those in which the hydrogenating components
consist of (a) a combination of 2 to 25~, preferably 4 to 16% by
weight molybdenum and at least two iron group metals where the iron
group metals are present in such proportions that the atomic ratio


'




,'
:

1(~893~1

of each iron group metal with respect to molybdenum is less than
about 0.6 and (b) a combination of about 5 to 40~, preferably lO
to 25~ of nickel and tungsten where the atomic ratio of tungsten
to nickel is about 1:0.1 to 5, preferably 1:0.3 to 4.
In the preparation of the hydrodesulfurization catalysts,
the hydrogenating components are composited with a porous refrac-
tory oxide support, preferably alumina. Molybdenum, for example,
can be deposited on the support from an aqueous solution of salts
such as ammonium molybdate, ammonium paramolybdate, molybdenum
pentachloride, or molybdenum oxalate. After drying the impregnated
support can be calcined to convert molybdenum into the oxide form.
The molybdenum containing carrier, which is normally shaped in the
form of extrudates, granules, pellets or balls, can then be treated
with an aqueous solution of the Group VIII metal salt followed by
oven drying and calcining. If a second Group VIII metal is employed,
it can be deposited in a like manner or simultaneously with the
first Group VIII metal. Nitrates or acetates of the Group VIII
; metals are normally utilized although any water soluble salt which
leaves no harmful residue can be employed. If desired, the Group
VIII metals and molybdenum can be deposited simultaneously, but are
preferably deposited in sequence with intervening oven drying which
is normally conducted at a temperature in the range of 220 to 350F.
(104 to 177C.) for a period of 1 to 24 hours.
In addition to the hydrogenating components of Group
VI-B and Group VIII, the desulfurization catalyst can also contain
a Group IV-B metal as a promoter. Under such circumstances, the
Group IV-B metal, preferably titanium or zirconium, is present in
the catalyst in an amount in the range of l.0 to lO.0 weight
.~




., .

.. . .. . - ., - ~ -

.: . . . , .. . . . .... . -
: . .

l(~B9391

percent based upon the total weight of the catalyst. The Group
IV-B metal can be added to the catalyst composite by the technique
of impregnating the calcined support with an aqueous solution of
-the ~letal salt, such as titanium tetrachloride. The Group IV-B
metal can be deposited on the support following impregnation of
the support with the Group VI and Group VIII metals or simultane-
ously with the deposition of the Group VI and/or Group VIII metals.
The carrier or support employed in the preparation of
the hydrodesulfurization catalyst can be any refractory oxide
having a surface area in excess of 3 square meters per gram such
as pure alumina, a silica stabilized alumina containing up to
about 5 percent by weight based upon the carrier of silica, silica
gels, acid leached boro-silicate glass and spinels, e.g. magnesium
aluminate. Preferably, however, the carrier is an alumina which
is silica-free.
Conventionally hydrodesulfurization catalysts as described
above can be presulfided after calcination, or after calcination and
reduction by contacting the catalyst with a hydrogen sulfide and
hydrogen gaseous mixture at a temperature in the range of 500 to
20 700F. (261 to 372C.) and at an elevated pressure. Gaseous mixtures
containing low or high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide have been
used, with gaseous mixtures containing low concentration of hydrogen
sulfide being preferably employed for economic reasons. Conven-
tional presulfiding methods employing hydrogen sulfide or other
sulfiding agents are directed to adding to the catalyst composite
at least the stoichiometric amount of sulfur required to completely
sulfide the hydrogenation metals of the catalyst composite.




.
- . ..

1(~89391
To insure completeness of the sulfiding reaction, the
presulfiding process is normally conducted until the concentration
of the sulfur contained in the total effluent withdrawn from the
presulfiding zone is substantially equivalent to the concentration
of the sulfur in the feed to the presulfiding zone. Normally,
the presulfiding step is conducted for a period of from 16 to 24
hours to insure complete conversion of the hydrogenation metals
to the most stable sulfide forms.
According to the present invention there is provided
a process which consists essentially of initially contacting a
catalyst comprising Group VI-B and Group VIII hydrogenation
components on a refractory oxide support with a sulfur-containing
liquid hydrocarbon in an inert substantially oxygen-free and
hydrogen-free atmosphere and at a pressure in the range of
atmospheric to 400 psig and at a temperature in the range of 200
to 700F, maintaining the contact between said catalyst and said
sulfur-containing liquid hydrocarbon until the total amount of
sulfur in said hydrocarbon brought into contact with said
catalyst is in the range of 200 to 1400 weight percent of the
amount of sulfur required to completely sulfide the metals at
the contact temperature and pressure, and thereafter contacting
said catalyst with a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon feed under
hydrodesulfurization conditions.
The drawing illustrates a specific embodiment of the
novel presulfiding procedure when compared with the conventional
method for presulfiding hydrodesulfurization catalyst.
The invention is directed to the presulfiding of the
previously described hydrodesulfurization catalysts. The
catalysts containing Group VI-B and Group VIII hydrogenating




.' . . ' - ~ ' .' :
,: . ~ .. : . .

1~89391
components are contacted with a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon at
a temperature in the range of 200 to 700F. (93 to 371C) and
at a nitrogen pressure in the range of atmospheric to 400 psig
~1.05 to 28 kg/cm ).




- 4a -



-,

1(3~9391

The sulfur-containing hydrocarbon employed in the
presulfiding procedure is a liquid at the contacting conditions
and preferably comprises a gas oil or furnace oil boiling sub-
~tantially above 400F. (204C.). The liquid hydrocarbon can
comprise the feed to the hydrodesulfurization process or another
hydrocarbon boiling substantially above 400F. (204C.). Prefer-
ably, the liquid hydrocarbon employed in the presulfiding step
will contain at least 1.0 weight percent sulfur, thereby reducing
the length of time required for the presulfiding step.
The contacting between the presulfiding hydrocarbon and
the catalyst is conducted in a substantially oxygen-free, hydrogen-
free, inert atmosphere. If a gas is employed in the presulfiding
~tep, the gas must be inert under the presulfiding conditions and
can be suitably selected from the group consisting of argon, helium,
carbon dioxide, and nitrogen with nitrogen being a preferred gas.
Preferably, the inert gas-pressure employed in the presulfiding step
is in the range of 200 psig tl4 kg/cm2) to 400 psig t28 kg/cm2).
Presulfiding of the catalyst is conducted until the total
amount of the sulfur in the hydrocarbon brought into contact with
the catalyst is in the range from 200 to 1400 weight percent of the
amount of sulfur required to sulfide the metals on the catalyst to
their completely sulfided forms. Normally, when employing a pre-
sulfiding hydrocarbon as described above, contact between the
catalyst and the hydrocarbon can be conducted at a sulfur weight
hourly space velocity (weight of sulfur in the sulfiding agent per
weight of catalyst per hour) of less than 0.03 and under such
conditions that the time for conducting the presulfiding process
will be in the range of from 12 to 24 hours.




~ .
, ~ ,

9391

The presulfided catalyst can be employed in the hydro-
desu]furization of sulfur-containing hydrocarbon stocks. Generally,
the operating conditions employed in the hydrodesulfurization pro-
cess comprises a temperature in the range from about 500 to about
lOOO"F. (260 to about 538C.), preferably in the range from about
600 to about 800F. (316 to about 427C.) and more preferably in
the range from about 650 to about 780F. (343 to 416C.). The
space velocity can be in the range from about 0.10 to about 10.0
volumes of charge stock per volume of catalyst per hour. The
hydrogen feed rate employed normally ranges from about 500 to about
10,000 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed stock (8.9 to about
178 SCM/lOOL). The pressure employed in the process can be in the
range from about 100 to about 5,000 psig (7 to about 350 kg/cm2).
The feed stocks which can be hydrodesulfurized employing
the pre-sulfided catalysts of this invention include all naphtha
and heavier hydrocarbons. The feed stocks particularly suitable
are those containing a substantial quantity of components, i.e.
greater than 50 percent by volume, boiling above about 400F.
(204C.) and preferably above about 500F. (260C.). Such materials
can be synthetic crude oils such as those derived from shale oil,
tar sands and coal or full petroleum crudes or any individual frac-
tion thereof. Thus, for example, the feed stock to the hydrode-
sulfurization process can be an atmospheric topped crude or it can
be a vacuum residual fraction boiling substantially above 950F.
(510C.). Similarly, it can be a naphtha or any of the intermediate
distillate fractions, such as, a furnace oil boiling above about
450 to about 650F. (232 to about 343C.) or a gas oil boiling from
above about 650 to 950F. (343 to 510~C.).




. - , .

- 1~'89391
The following examples are presented to illustrate ~-
objects and advantages of the invention. It is not intended,
howeve!r, that the invention should be limited to the specific
embodiments presented therein.


BXAMPLE I

In this example a catalyst composition comprising 0.5
weight percent nickel, 1.0 weight percent cobalt, and 8.0 weight
percent molybdenum on alumina was presulfided employing sulfur-
containing hydrocarbons in the absence of hydrogen and oxygen in
four runs. The hydrocarbon employed in each of the pre-sulfiding
steps is identified and characterized in the following Table I.


TABLE I

Run No. 1 Run No. 4
(Vacuum GasRuns 2 ~ 3(Atmospheric Tower
Oil)(Furnace Oil)Bottoms)

Gravity, API 20.3 37.8 16.8
Sulfur, wt. %1.99 1.11 3.79 -
Nitrogen, wt. % 0.13 .04 .21
Carbon, wt. %86.01 86.60 84.74
20 Hydrogen, wt. % 11.87 12.25 11.36
Asphaltenes~ wt. % -- -- 2.6

Distillation, F.
Over Point 750 409 600
End Point 1050 639 --
10~ 795 443 667
50% 886 518 929
90% 984 609 --

In each of the runs, the pre-sulfiding conditions included
a space velocity of 1.0 LHSV, a pressure of 200 psia (14 kg/cm ) and
a pre-sulfiding time of 24 hours. The temperature employed in each
of the pre-sulfiding runs was as shown below in Table II.




-- 7 --

1(~89;391

TABLE II

Temperature,
F.
Run No. 1 650(343C)

Run No. 2 500(260C)

Run No. 3 400(204C)

Run No. 4 650(343C)

The prepared pre-sulfided catalysts were thereafter

employed in the hydrodesulfurization of a hydrocarbon feed charac-

terized as shown below in Table III.

TABLE III
.
Gravity, API 22.5
Sulfur, wt. % 1.01
Nitrogen, wt. % .17
Carbon, wt. % 86.61
Hydrogen, wt. % 12.21

Distillation, F.
Over Point 500
End Point --
10% 596
50% 868
90% ~~

The hydrodesulfurization conditions employed in each of the runs
included a space velocity of 0.5 LHSV, a hydrogen partial pressure

of 1,980 psia (138.60 kg/cm ) and a hydrogen circulation rate of
4,235 standard cubic feet per barrel of charge (754 m2/m2). The
temperature was adjusted during each run to maintain a concentra-
tion of sulfur in the product of 0.32 weight percent. After 200
hours of operation, the average reactor temperature for each of
the runs was as shown below in Table IV.




- . ~ ~ . -
.
- . .
. . .

1089391


TABLE IV
Temperature,
F.
Run No. 1 697 (369C)
Run No. 2 702 (372C)
Run No. 3 691 (366C)
Run No. 4 699 (371C)

EXAMPLE II
In this example the performance of a catalyst prepared ~
10 by the novel pre-sulfiding procedure is compared with the perform- -.
ance of a catalyst which had been pre-sulfided by a conventional
process. The hydrodesulfurization catalyst of Example I was sub-
jected to a conventional pre-sulfiding procedure which comprised
contacting the catalyst for a period of 12 hours with the vacuum
gas oil of Table I in the presence of a hydrogen pressure of 2,000
psig (140 kg/cm2) with the hydrogen being circulated through the
catalyst at the rate of 5,000 standard cubic feet per barrel
(89.0 SCM/lOOL). The vacuum gas oil was passed through the catalyst
at the space velocity of 1.0 LHSV and at a temperature of 650F.
20 (343C.).
Thereafter, the conventionally pre-sulfided catalyst was
employed in a hydrodesulfurization run utilizing the feed and
hydrodesulfurization conditions of Example I. The drawing is
illustrative of the temperature required to maintain a desulfurized
; hydrocarbon product having 0.32 weight percent sulfur during the
` run (Run No. 5).



_ g _




- . . . .

9391


The results of the hydrodesulfurization of Run No. 3
of Exa!mple I are also plotted in the drawing. A comparison of
Runs 3 and 5 demonstrates that the novel pre-sulfiding process
results in an improvement in the hydrodesulfurization process.
At a catalyst age of 200 hours, for example, the catalyst pre-
pared by the novel pre-sulfiding technique shows a temperature
advantage of 8F. This temperature advantage, as indicated in
the drawing, increases as the catalyst age increases. At 280
hours the temperature differential is 14F.
Although the invention has been described with reference
to specific embodiments, references, and details, various modifica-
tions and changes will be apparent to one skilled in the art and
are contemplated to be embraced in this invention.




-- 10 --




.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1089391 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1980-11-11
(22) Filed 1976-12-22
(45) Issued 1980-11-11
Expired 1997-11-12

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1976-12-22
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
GULF RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1994-04-13 11 369
Drawings 1994-04-13 1 21
Claims 1994-04-13 1 38
Abstract 1994-04-13 1 14
Cover Page 1994-04-13 1 16