Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
111 230~38
''I . ,
lField of the Invention .
~1 _ ____ _
. This invention relate~ generally to fluid flowmeters
; : and more particularly to such flowmeter~ employing ultrasonic
¦mean~ to produce an output signal propor~ional to the ~eloclty
S of tbe flo~lrlg fluld.
I
8~9
¦ In the field of flu~d flow ~ea~urement, numerous tach-
nigue~ emplo~ing ultrasonic means have been dev~sed in the prior
I art... The number of patent dl~closure~ ln thi~ part~cular field
i8 great. Generally the e ultra~on~c flowmeters have been of the
son~c propagation type in whlch the speed o ound along a
diagonal line intersecting the longltud$nal axis of the flowing
,flu~d is measured both with and against th~ ~ ream o~ flowing
fluid. The.difference in these propagation times provides an
¦indication of ~he velocity of the flow fluid.
' I I
,, 1~
I -1-
.~ I
., ., ~....... . .
~1~3~8
'' I
,
Certain of these flowmeter3 are of the normal injection
j ¦¦type, i.e., the sound waves pass through ~he interface between thei flowing fluid and the ultra~onic transducer at right angles to
that interface. The di~advantage of such a meter configuration i~
S that in order to maintaln the required non-normal angle between the
longitudinal axis of the flowing fluid and the sonic velocity
ector, the ultrasonlc transducer must be moun~ed on the pipe in
such a manner as to produce either pockets or protrusions with
I respect to the inner wall~ of the pipe. Such designs thus disrupt
¦ 10 the local flow velocity prof~le in ~he regions where the measure-
I ments are to be made. Additionally they provide a collection point
: for solid5 and other waste matter mov$ng through the fluid.
i
Other ultrasonic f lowmeter5 have employed oblique or
edge injection technique~ for introducing the sonic pulse into
; the fluid to el$minate the need for pockets and/or protru~ions.
However, since in theRe ~ystem~ the sound wave is refracted at
the fluid interface in accordance with Snell'~ Law, varlations $n
the velocity of sound both in the liquid and the sonic transducer
~ill alter the angle of refraction and hence adver~ely effect the
2 ~accuracy of the output measurement unless accounted for. For
example, the ultrasonic flowmeter disclosed in U. S. Patent No.
¦3,575,050 measure~ the difference in the 50nic transit times
~etween upstream and downstream electroacoustical transducers
~hich are arranged ~o provide for oblique incidenc~ of sound waves
lat the pipe/fluid interface. However, th~ patent makes no
provision for variation~ in the acoustic path through ~he fluid
due to changes in sontc velocities ln the liquid and/or the trans-
. ~ I duc~
--2--
llZ3088
i
S~ill other prior art disclosures, of which U. S. Patent
Nos~ 3,731,532, 3,738,169, 3,727,454 and 3,727,458 are repre-
~entative, propose making a third measurement in addition to the
sonic upstream and down~traam propagation timeQ to determine the
S velocity of sound within the liquid and to usa that measurement
: to correct for any variation of the liquid sonic velocity. ~o
correction is made for possible change~ in acoustic path. In
addition, the.~e patents fail to consider the effects of errors
resulting from change~ in the son~c velocity within the tranQducer
which can produce changes in the acoustic path. Such error.~ can
be especially significant in procesR control applications because
the output accuracy of the flowmeter must be maintained over wide
temperature excurQions. Moreov~r the 6y~tems referred to ahove
involve an additional one or two ultra30nic transducer~ with
resultant expenditure in circuitry and manufacturing C08t which
add to the ovarall complexity of the flowmeter.
: Thus notwithstanding all the prior developments in this
field, it i~ apparent that the need ~111 exists for an improved
ultrasonic flowmeter having a high degree of accuracy a~d baing
particularly adapted for use in an industrial proc~s control
~environrenO.
I
I
~Z3C~88
.1
.
. ! .9
In a preferred e~bodiment of the present invention, an
~ mproved ultrasonic flowmeter i~ disclo~ed having a pair of
! ransducers mounted externally on the same side of a pipe which
arries a flowing fluid. The transducers are in turn coupled to
! sonic probe which transmit~ and rec~ives generated acou~tic: ulses between ~he transducers through the flowing fluid. The
ransducer~ and probe~ are arranged 3uch that acoustic pulses enter
he pipe at an oblique angle to the solid/fluid interface, at
hich point refraction occur~. The pulses then propagate through
¦ he fluid to the oppo~lte pipe wall where they are reflected to
he other transduc~r. The acou~tic path within the fluid is
niquely determined for a given set of conditions by the ratio of
. I . the velocity of ~ound in ~he probe and velocity of sound in the
;~ 1 15 luid in accordance with Snell' Law. The transducers are excited
~equentially to produce acoustic pulse~ which first ~.ravel from the
~p~tream to the downstream tran~ducer and vice-ver~a. A gated
ounter measures the respective son~c propagation time~ between
~he two transducPr3.
,,.,1,,
1 In accordance with ~n important aspect of the invention,
the flowmeter output i8 essentially ~maffected by sonic velocity
' I variation~ which alter the acou tic path. The elimination of
onic velocity de~endence i achieved by lncluding within the
: onic prcbes means which define a fixed pa~h of known length along
~hi~h a portion of th~ generated acou~tic pulses propagates.
I 1,
. I -4-
. I .,
11;Z308~3
In this manner, a single transmlssion of an acoustic pulse produces
two electrical output signals, one representing the time of flight
betwcen the transducers through the flowing fluid and the other
llrepresenting the time of ~light within the sonic probe.
~ For ~ given geometry and tr~nsducer, the acoustlc field
iof the meter is completely described by the velocity of the flowing,
fluid and the sonic velocitie3 in the probe and ~he fluid. Conse- ¦
llquently, the two transducer system of the present invention produces
j!three independent sonic propagation time measurements which are sufr
Ijficient to fully characteri2e the output response. That is to say,¦
the three time of flight measurements may be combined in accordance
llith well known physical and mathematic~l principles to produce an I
; ¦lutput signal that is proportional to fluid velocity and independent
lff sound velocity changes both in the luid and the transmission
Iprobe and hen~e of changes in the path of propagation.
j ll
I In accordance wlth another a3pect of the invention, the
inside surface of the pipe along the region where acoustic pulses
~enter and exit the pipe is ~aintained as a smooth bore of uniform
llcross-section. In the preferred embodiment, ~he transducers and
llsonic probes are adapted to be inserted through an opening in the
ipe with th2 end of the probe ad~acent the flowing fluid being
for~.ed to match the i~ner contour of the pipe. Alternatively the
~ransducer~probe asse~ly may be clamped to the exterior of the
pipe without disrupting the i~ner pipe ~alls.
.1 1
, . .
_5_
,
/: ~
:~Z3~ 38
A further advantage of the present invention derived from the
placement of both transducers on the same side of the pipe and transmitting
acoustic pulses therebetween by "bouncing" the pulses off the opposite pipe
wall is the increase in the overall sensitivity of the meter. This results
in eEfectively doubling the difference between upstream and downstream sonic
propagation times within the fluid, while at the same time reducing the
effects of radial fluid velocity components.
In accordance with the invention there is provided an ultrasonic
flowmeter for measuring the velocity of a fluid flowing within a conduit
comprising:
first and second transducer means secured to said conduit at
longitudinally spaced positions for transmitting and receiving acoustic pulses;
said transducer means including respective sonic transmission means
arranged to direct acoustic pulses from one of said transducer means to the
other through said fluid along a sonic path which includes said transmission
means and said fluid;
signal generating means coupled to said transducer means for pro-
ducing a first transmission of acoustic pulses from said first to said second
transducer means and then a second transmission of acoustic pulses from said
second to said first transducer means along said sonic path;
means defining within said sonic transmission means at least one
acoustic path of known length along which a portion of said first transmission
propagates;
said transducer means producing output signals in response to
received acoustic pulses corresponding to sonic propagation times along said
sonic path between said first and second transducer means and vice-versa and
along said acoustic path within said sonic transmission means;
means operable with said signal generating means for measuring said
sonic propagation times;
said measured sonic propagation times adapted to be combined in
accordance with known physical principles to obtain a measure of flow velocity
-- 6 --
~ 3~
independent of changes in the sonic velocities in said fluid and in said
sonic transmission means.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention there is provid-
ed a method of measuring the velocity of a Eluid flowing within a conduit
which comprises:
generating acoustic pulses at respective f:irst and second trans-
ducer means for propagation back and forth therebetween through said fluid;
directing a first transmission of acoustic pulses by sonic trans-
mission means from said first to said second transducer means and a second
transmission from said second to said first transducer means, said trans-
missions being directed between said transducer means along a sonic path in-
cluding said sonic transmission means and said fluid;
guiding a portion of said first transmission along at least one
acoustic path of known length within said sonic transmission means;
producing by said first and second transducer means in response to
received acoustic pulses output signals corresponding to sonic propagation
times along said sonic path between said first and said second transducer
means and vice versa and along said acoustic path within said sonic trans-
mission means;
,:
combining said output signals corresponding to said sonic propaga-
- tion times in accordance with known physical principles to obtain a measure of
flow velocity independent of changes in the sonic velocities in said fluid
~; and in said sonic transmission means.
Other aspects, advantages, and features of the present invention
will become apparent from the description of the presently preferred embodiment
set forth below.
~ Preferred Embodiment
Drawings
Figure 1 is a cross sectional view of the primary element of an
ultrasonic flowmeter constructed in accordance with the present invention;
Figure 2 is an enlarged cross sectional view of the acoustical
- transducer and sonic probe assembly of the meter of Figure l;
- 6a -
,
~r-``` l ~
~LZ3~81!3
.
.
Fig. 3 i8 a ~chematic representation of the meter of
F~ g . 1 showing a typical variation in the path of an acoustic
ray between the two transducers cau~ed by change~ in sonic
velocities, and also defining the geometrical relationships ~or
1 the embodiment~
Fig. 4 i~ a schematic repre~entation o one of
tran~ducer/probe a~emblies o~ the meter of Fig. 1 ~howing
the path of an acoustlc ray ~ran~mitt~ orthogonally from th2
Ge~ter of the ~ran~ducer~
Fig. 5 $8 a block diagram ~howing ~he electronic cir-
cultry for producing ~n output flow ~ignal for the embodiment;
Fig. 6 is ~ timing diagram or the embodiment;
.
: Fig. 7 is a schematic representation o~ an alternate
embodiment ~howing the ~ath o~ a tran~ml~ted acou~tic ray 1~ which
tha t~an~ducers are located on oppo~lte side~ o~ th~ pipe,
.
~ Flg. 8 i8 a ~chematic represent~tion o~ another ~mbodi-
: ment having a different ~ransducer and probe a~sembly and ~howing the path of a tran6m~tted acoustic ray;
¦ Fig. 9 i~ a ~chematlc representation of still another
embodLment showing the path of a transmitted acoustic ray in wh~ch
both tran~ducers are hou~ed in ~ unitary structure.
~ I ~ ~.Z308~
Descr1ptio~
Turning now to F~gs. 1 and 2, ~he primary element of an
ultrasonic flowmeter 10 include~ a section of pipe 12 and a pair of
acoustic transducers ~hown generally by reference numerals 14, 24
S mounted within tubular hollsings 15, 25 welded to the sama side of
the pipe at respective upstream and downstream positions. The tran s-
ducers are arranged such that acoustic pulses genera~ed by each
¦transducer propagate through the fluid to the opposite pipe wall
where they are reflected and then received at the other transducer.
By this arrangement, ~the pulses travel diagonally across ~he fluid
along an acoustic path 13; and as is well known, a measure of the
difference in travel times of the acoustic pulses between the up-
stream and downstream transducers is indicative of tha fluid veloci ty.
Each of the transducers 14, 24 are of identical conQtruc-
tion and, accordingly, a de~cription of one will be sufficient for
oth, as is more clearly ~hown w$th reference to Fig. 2. The up-
stream acoustical transducer 14 include~ a cylindrical retalning
member 14A having a solid sonic probe 16 ~oined tD one end thereof.
The retaining member and ~onic probe form an integral unit which i~
29 adapted to be inserted in the housing 15 ana held therein against
a shoulder 32. The housing opens out laterally ~hrough the pipe
: walls such that the probe extends up to the interfa~e with the
flowing fluid. A gasket 34 which i~ fitted over ~he probe saals
the process fluid The end of the probe ad~acen~ the fluid ~nter-
face i8 shaped to precisely match the contour of the inner pipe wal 1,
thereby presenting a smooth bore of uniform cross-~ec~ion in the
: ¦Iregion where the acoustic pulseq enter and exit the pipe. A notch
1¦18 is machined in ~he probe so as to reflec~ a por~ion of the gener
: ated acoustic pulses back through the probe as will be more fully
.30 ¦ explained p~esen~ly~ The probe i~ formed of stainless steel but
ay be constructed from any solld materlal c~pable of transmitting
acoustic pul~e~.
_~_
--~ ~ ~lZ3C~88
., l ,
. ~
J I A piezoelectric crystal 20, adapted to generate acoustic
I I pulses when electrically excited, i8 positionad within the retainir g
member 14A and clamped to the end of the pro~e 16 remote from the
fluid. Thus the probe acts as an intermediate transmission medium
S for directing the generated pulses into the fluid at an appropriate
l, angle for reception at the downstream transducer 24. Of course,
I ~ hen acoustic pulses are received by 8uch piezoelectric crystals, I corre~ponding electrical output signals ~re produced~
In oxder to a sure maximum electro-acoustic conversion
o efficiency between the cxystal ~0, which i.~ polarized to produce
shear waves, and it~ associated probe 16, both contacting surface3
are lapped and then the crystal is clamped against the probe under
a pressure of approximately 1000 psi. This high pressure clamp is
. achieved by a piston 36 which i8 forcibly urged against the crystal1 15 ithin the retaining member 14A by the combination of a rigid
.~ , . lunger 38, a spxing 40, a~ anti-rotation wa~her 42, and a trans
.¦ ducer load n~lt 44. Additionally to maximize ener~y transfer fromthe probe to the flu~d, the polarization plane o the shear wave .
¦ cry~tals must be perpendicular to the probe/fluid ~nterface. This
is assured by affixing the crystal to the piston w~th the polar
zation direction being aligned with a ke~way 4~ formed on the
~iston. The piston is then properly posi~ioned relative to the
l~robe by means of the ke~way.
The overall transducer assemhly 14, consiC~ing of probe,
~rystal~ clamping mechanism, and reta~ning member, is thu9 made
int~gral unit which is inserted into the housing 15 and clamped
~gainst the! shoulder 32 by a locknut 23. The unitary nature o the
ransducer a~sembly facilitates tes~ing and maintenance of the
: Elowmeter even under field condit~ns. Furthermore mounting ~he
_g_
. : ~
. : , . ,
- ~ 31~81~
transducer in this manner a~ opposed to integrally welding or
otherwise attaching the probe 16 dixectly to the p~pe improves the
ultrasonic signal to noise ratio o~ the flowmeter because the
relatively poor metal to metal contact between the probe and the
housing allows minimal transmi~sion of acoustic noise into the
pipe wall. Consequently, less acou~tic noise arrives at the other
transducer through this purely metallic path.
A smooth bore flowmeter having no pockets or protrusions
complicates the acoustic deqign. In order to achieve the required
diagonal transmi~sion between the transducers 14, 24,acoustic pulse 3
emanating from either the upstream piezoelectric crystal 20 travel-
ing through the sonic probe 16 or from the corresponding downstream
¦crystal 30 through the sonic probe 26 mu3t obliquely lmpinge on the
probe/fluid interface. Hence the effects of mode conversion and
refraction at this interface mu~t be taken into account.
In the embodiment being described, ~purious longitudinal
~aves can be generated within the probe (i.e., mode conversion) ln
~ddition to well defined reflected ~hear waves when the transmit~ed
3hear waves impinge on the probe/fluid interfase. Such longitudina L
1 aves could i~advertently trigger the output electronics of the flol 7-
eter resulting in significant ~onic propagation timing errors. To
reclude this prob~em all soni~ energy within the probe remains in
~e shear mode by choosing an angle of incidence fox the trans-
I itted wave such that the reflected longitudinal wave i5 not gener-
1 ted (i e considering the ratio between the longitudinal and
hear sonic velocities within the probe, an ~ncident angle at which
ccording to Snell's Law, the sine of the angle of the undesired
eflected wave i5 > 1).
~1 -10~
l . .
~1~23~1~8
' I
A more difficult problem to contend with involves
refraction of the acoustic pulses at the probe/fluid interface.
This results from the ~act that i~ ei~her the velocity of sound
in the metal probe (CM) or in the fluid tCL) changes, as may occur
S ~ with change8 in temperature, pres~ure, and/or composition, the angl
of refraction Will vary producing a concomltant change in the
¦ acoustic path length. Thi8 i~ best illustra~ed in Fig. 3 in which
the acoustic path 13 for the inltial design conditions has been
displaced (shown ~raphically a~ path 13A) due to a different
ratio of sonic velocity within ~he two med~a. The variation ln
acoustic path directly alters the prop~gat~on time of the acoustic
pulses between ~he two cry~tal~ 20~ 30, and hencQ 18 a source of
instrument error.
Since such change~ in acoustic pa~h occur in a known way,
¦they can be accounted for by resorting to establi~hed physical and
mathematical principle~O Accordingly, an important aspect of thi
invention i8 the pr~vision of a two tran8ducer ultra80nic flowmeter
capable of producing three independent 80nic propagation time
mea~urements which alone are sufficien~ to precisely characteri2
¦ ~he output response o~ the meter regardless of variations in the
l¦acou~tic path. The basis for such a three measurement sy~tem will
¦Ibe specifically demonstrated immediately below for the far field
approximation of the acou~tic field (l.e., where the receiving
l transducer ls far enough from the transmitting transducer ~o th~t
the transmitter may be consiaered as a point source). However, it
is to be emphasized tha~ the three mea~urement approach i~ perfectl Y
¦general an~ applle~ equelly as well for the ne~r field approximlti~.
~1 11- 1
L23~
. ~1
I
I
Con~idering in more detail the physical model repre-
sentea in Fig. 3, the acoustlc field resulting from the excitation
of the crystal 20 can be approximated by ~ plurallty of straight r lys
¦emanating from the center of the crystal. For s~mplicity only
ray~ in the plane of Fig. 3 will be con~idered. For a given
meter having ixed geometrical relationships as defined in Fig. 3,
the path of any acoustic ray originating from the ~enter of the
transmitting crystal i8 uniquely def ined by two parameter~, the
angle of incidence of ~he ray ln the sonlc probe (~M) and the
angle of refraction of the ray in the fluid (~L).
For two media at rest relative to one another, i~ i5
po~slble to relate aL to ~ by Sn~ll'e La~,
~in ~M ~ in ~L
l ~M CL
¦ How~ver, if one media i6 moving relative to the other
¦¦ln a d~r~ction along their int~rface, a~ when fluid i~ ~lowing in
a conduit, ~nell'e Law must be modifled accordingly,
sin ~M ~ s~n ~L ~2)
__
CM CL (1+ ~ sin ~L)
:
where, V 3 flow veloc~ty, and
~he ~ and - ~ign represents ~onic propaga~ion
with and again~ th~ flow re~pect~vely.
I
~Z3~8
,
Therefore, for a fixed geometry, the path of any given
acoustic ray, i.e., any given ~M~ i8 uniquely defined a8 a function
of the sonic velocities both in the probe and the fluid, and the
fluid flow velocity, that is,
0L ~ f~ (CM~ CL~ V) (3)
Of course, the time for the ray to traverse thi8 path
i5 also a direct function of CM, CL, and V. Since the acoustic
ulse for the far field consists of an infinite number of rays all
aving the same functionality, the transit time (T) for ~he pulse
to traverse between the two transducers can be simllarly expressed
as,
T ~ fT (CM~ CL~ )
.
Because CM and CL are not known a priori, and because
in fact ~hey may vary over relatively wide ran~e~ thereby
. 15 resulting in ~ignificant output error ~f fixed value~ Are assumed,
it l~ apparent from the above expres3ion or ~ that three independ-
ent acoustic measurements are required to obtain an exact ~olution
for V in terms of only measured quantities. In the most general
case ~or a fixed ~eometry flowmeter having a given transducer, the
relationship between the various parameter~ may be mathematically
expressed as follows:
:
~l - fTl (C~, CL~ V)
T2 8 f~2 (CM' ~L' ~)
~3 ' fr3 (CMt ~L~ V) ~7)
,~.
~ -13- ~
Z3~8 !3
., ~
. I .
Using known mathematical technique~, equations (~), (6), and t7)
may be lnverted to obtain,
V ~ fV (T1J ~2~ 3) (8)
which demonstrates explicitly that three ~ndependent sonic
S Ipropagation time measurement~ are neces~ary and ~ufficlent to
: specify ~he ~low veloc~ty.
Returning now to the model shown in Fig. 30 the acoustic
behavior of the flowmetex can be assumed to follow that of a single
acou~tic ray which leaves the center of the upstream crystal 20
¦ and arrives at the center of the downstream crystal 30 and vice-
¦ ver~a. Although finite beam effects, which arise from other rays
impinging upon the receiving cry6tal, do exist, output errors
. I resulting from these effects are 8~ gnificantly smaller than those
: ari~ing from change3 in the acoustic path discuss~d above. For
most practical indu-~trial appl~cation~, the selection of the
~center-to-cent ~ acou3t1c r~y model is ~ valid premiue.
The path between the transducers 14, 24 through the
fluid produces two independent acoustic measurements~ i.e , ~he
l downstream and upstream sonic propagation times (Td and TU respec-
l tively). When the upstream c~ystal 20 is energized, the notch 18
reflects a portion of the transnutted ray back to that crystal
! oYer a known path length within the sonic probe 16 (see Fig~ 4),
: I thereby providing for a third independent acoustic measurement,
i.e.~ the 90nic propagation time wi~hin ~he metallic probe (~M)
!
` . `: ' .
~ ~L23~88
` l .
For the model chosen above, equations (5), ~6), and t7)
may be expressed as
Td 2H~ 9)
CM co~B~ CI, ~1 + V 8in ~L) co~ 9L
Tu --2H + __ D ( 10 )
CM Cos~M CL ( 1 - V sin ~,) cos 0~,
T~ ,12P ( l l)
CM :-:
where,
H ~ distance from inner pipe wall to the
centex of ~he piezoelectric crys~al
D - inner pipe diameter
P - ~ath leng~h in the sonic probe from the
crysta~ to the point of re~lection at
the notch.
~s is readily apparent, equation6 (9), (10), and (11)
contain two additional variables, ~L~ and ~M~ from ~ho~e which
appear in the functional form of the~e e~uations~ iOe, (5), (6),
nd (7). However, these two variables ~r~ not independent; since,
ccording to the model, the transmitted ray i8 required to travel
rom center to center of each of the cry~tals 20~ 3a and must
imultaneously obey Snell'~ Law at the solid/fluid interface (i.e.,
equation t2)). The distancs (~) projected on the pipe axi ~e~wee
~the centers of the crystals i~ given by,
l I, ~ 2H tan ~p~ + D tan eL (12)
¦ Equations (2) an~ (9) through tl2) represen~ five indepe~ _
¦ent equations con~aining five unknown~ and hence can be solved by
¦well est2blished ~ethods to yield ~ny one of ~he unknowns in texms
l of the ~hree acoustic measurements deRcribed above and the g20~et-
rical constants. Because of the complexity of these equations, it
is impossible to obtain ~n expres~ion for flow veloci~y (V) in
-15-
; ~ :
--~ ~23~
clo~d analytic form~ It ha~ been found advantageou~ to use a
digital computer in ~olving these equatlons to establi~h the
relationship between V and the three sonic m~asurements ~Td,
Tu~ TM). Such computer techniques are well known to those skilled
S in the art and thus need not be explored in detail here.
This calculation may be performed ~on~line" if the flow-
meter incorporates a data processor of sufficient capability. How~
ever, from a commercial standpoint it is preferrable either to
construct ~off-line" a table of "V" values corre~ponding to measure d
sonic propagation time3 for on-line look-up, or to approximate off-
line a solution for V by some mathematical func~ion of Td, TU~ and
IM for on-line computation, or to provlde some combination of these
off-line techni~ue~. In ~hi9 embodiment the three measured varia-
~les are inputs to an approximated off-line ~olut~on for the flow
velocity involving a power ~eries expansion ~n TM/TL which ~8 given
by~
V ~ A u _ d [l~a (S-So) ~ ~S-So)2~.0~ (13)
'rM TL
where,
TL ' lU + Td - BTM
A and B - constants dependent on the geometry of ~he probe
S -- TM/TL
So ~ the value of ~M~IL experien¢ed with the design
fluid at ~he de~ign temperature
a and ~ ~ constants dependent on the pipe 8ize and/or
g~ometry
-16-
~ llZ3088
The number of terms kept in the above expansion i8
¦ de ermined by the re~uired accuracy of the 10wmeter. As 6een
¦ above, at de~ign reference condition~ V i~ g~ven by a simple
¦ function of the thre2 acoustlc measurements TU~ ~d~ and IM-
¦ Returning no~ to the operation of the flowmeter 10, Fig,
¦ 5 hows the detail~ of the electronic circuitry which drives the
I primary element and proce~se~ the measurement ~ignals rece~ved
¦ therefrom 60 a~ to produce an output flow signal. The block
diagram of Fig. 5 taken together with the wave form~ of Fig. 6,
whose amplitude and t~me base are shown out of scale for the
sake of presenting details of the wave forms, will serve to
provide bet~er under~tand~ng of the operation of the device. The
wave forms are identlfied at circult po~nts in Fig. 5 by corres-
ponding l~tter designators (i.e., A,B,C, et~.)0
In general, the circultry mu~t perform the ~unctlon~ of
(1) excitlng the transducexR; (2) mea~uring the ~onlc prop~gation
tim88; (33 reading ~he values of proce 8 and/or geometric paramete S5
(4) performi~g a v~riety of stand~rd nrlth~Qtic operation~; and (5
generating an ou~put control signal ~uitable for proces~ control
applications (e.g., 4-20ma). Although the art i~ replete with
analog techniques for performing the~e functlon~, as evidenced by
U.S. Patent Nos. 3,727,454, 3,731,532, and 3,738,169 referenced
: above, it ha~ been fou~d advantageous to use digital proce~sing
techni~ue~ for the required Rignal handling. Specifically for
thi~ embodiment a m~croproae~sor sy~tem o the type commercially
available from INTEL under Model No. 8085 i8 utilized. It is well
within he 5~ill 0 the ordinary man ln the art to program su~h
: microprocessox ~yst~ms to carry out the step~ outll~ed ~bove.
~ 1~3088
1 ~!
Moreovex, ~he use of ~ programmable digital processor has been
, described for use wlth an ultrasonic flowmeter of the general type,
disclosed herein in U. S. Patent No. 3,918,304 i~sued to Abruzzo
, et al, to which reference may bo made.
;
In operation, a digital proceRsor 50 delivers a 0.5 mill. _
1 second charging pulse 60 (waveform A) to a charge/fire circuit 51.
: ¦ The charge/fixe clrcuit ~lowly charge~ the upstream cry~tal 20
to approximately 40 volts. An SCR 52 is ~hen gated by the charge/
flre circuit cau~i~g the cryætal to be di~charged through th2
ISCR ~n 10 nanosecond~ or le88~ Thi~ rapid di~charge force~ the
¦crystal to generate an acou~tic pulse and al80 produces a negative
¦going spike 61 at the input of a comparator 53 ~waveform E3u
¦Thi~ in turn enable~ a timer control gate 54 so that a countex 56 ¦
~which i8 driven by a 100 M~z clock 55 gated from the timer control¦
Igate begin~ to count.
I
A~ shown in waveform C of Fig. 6, ~ typical acou~tic
: echo pul~e 62 i~ received back at the upstream crystal 20, thirty
microsecond~ after the discharge of the c~y~talO B~cau~e of the
I geometry of the 60nlC probe 16, thl8 event will always occur in
le~ than 50 m~cro~econd~ from the discharge of the cry6tal.
Thus the timer control gate 54 on co~mand rom the digit~l
proces~or 50 ignore~ any change in ~tate of the comparator 53
. I th,at occurs within the 50 micro~econd period after the upstrea~
: : ~ crystal discharge.
,
~ ~lZJ0~8
¦ The counter 56 continue~ to count until an acoustic
¦pulse is received at the down~tream crystal 30 as depicted by
numeral 63 on waveform D. As i~ also ~hown in waveforms E and F,
the comparator 53 will only be driven to its high state by pulse~
whose amplitude exceed a predetermined thre~hold level "Hn, there-
by preventing the comparator from belng se~ by spuriou~ pulses
resulting from reflection~ within the pipe 12 and the pro~e 16.
On the other hand, once the comparator is se~ a pulse must cros~
zero in order to clear the comparator. Timing to ~he zero crossing
i~ more accurate than timing to a level on a cycle of the pulse
because s~gnal amplitude fluctuations may occur.
Since the pulse 63 ~s received by the down.Qtream crystal
30 more than 50 micro~econds after the firing of the up-Rtream
crystal 20, both the comparator ~3 and the timer ~on~rol gate 54
are cleared, thereby disabling the counter 56. The number of
¦counts xecorded by ~he countar i~ ~hen fed to the digltal pro-
ce~sor 50 for storage. The number of count~ representR the time
¦of sonic propagation from the up~tr~am wav~ gener~tor to tha
down~ream generator (~d)~
I
,j
11;~3088
~fter thi~ cycl~ is completed, the digital proce~sor 50
initi.ate~ in a similar mannex a charge/firing proces~ for the
l downstream cryqtal 30, i.e., a O.S millisec pulse is fed to a
I down~tream charge/fire circuit 151 which charges and thsn suddenly
causes discharge o~ the crystal 30 through an as~ociated SCR 152,
I thereby forcing the cryqtal tG generate an acoustic pul~e. Once
aga~n, an echo pul~e 64 twaveform D) rece~ved back at the down-
~tream cry~tal i9 disregarded by the timer control gate 54 bPcause
lt occurs withln SO micro~econds after the discharge of the down- ¦
stream crystal. When an acoustic pulse 65 ~waveform C) i8 finally
received at the up~tream crystal 20, the content~ of th~ counter
1 56 are read by the digital processor to provide a measurement o~
the upstream sonic propagatlon t~me (Tu)
11
¦ As shown in Fig~ 5 and in F~g. 6 at waveform E, the
loutPuts of both crystAls are ~pplied to a summlng network 57 and
then fed to the ccmparator 53. Although the combinatio~ of the
waveform~ somewhat increa6e~ the complexity of di~cerning the
appropriate pulse~ for enabllng and disabling the t~mer control
gate 54, a Yingle comparator eliminates the need ~or preciss
matching of the electrical propagation path~ that would be
required if multiple comparators were u~ed. Different comparators
and theix a3~0ciated timer cvntrol clrcuitry have unequal total
delay time~ and the difference in total delay times can be in the
~enths of a nanosecond range~ Since the difference in sonic
propagation time~ (i.e., TU-Td) u~ed in the flow calculations
can be also in the nanosecond range, it can be seen that the
use of multiple comparator~ would introduce appreciable error
unle6s precii~e matching wexe employed.
11230N8
ll I .
A3 the difference in ~onic propagation tLmes (i.e~,
¦TU-Td) must be preciRely known, the upstre~m/downstream measure-
ment cycl~ i~ repeated and ~veraged over a fixed number of times
¦ (e.g., 400 pairs of measurements) prior to making a mea~urement
¦ of sonic propagation tlme in the metal probe ~M). After these
fixed pairs of measurement are made, the digital proces~or 50
: will enable the timer control gate 54 to re~pond to a ~ignal wh$ch
follow~ the discharge of the upstream crystal 20 by less than 50
micro~econds, while ~ulQe~ occuring more than 50 micro3econds
after di~charge (e.g., the pul~e recelved at the downstream
crystal 30) are ignored.
Becau~e digital mea~urement3 ~nvolve a resolut~on of
one clock cycle (i~e., 10 nanosecond~ in the described ~mbodiment)
and because as mentioned the diff~renee in ~onie propagatio~
times can also be in the nano~econd range, it ha~ been found
desireable to ut~lize tlme interval averagi~g to further enhance
¦the re~olution and accuracy of the flo~meter. Such technique~,
: which involve tatistical ~veraging ov0r many repetitive mea~ure-
ment cycle , are w~ll known in the art, Ref~rence iB made to
~ewlett/Packard Application Note~ 162-1 or furth~r di~cu 8ion
: ~ of tbi~ ~ubje t =atter.
~3~)813
After the variou-~f measurement~ cycle~, the digital
processor 50 ha~ thus ftored therein a measurement of the sonic
upstream time of flight, the sonic downftream time of flight
and the sonic time of flight within the probe. Additionally
various process parameters, ~uch as ~ero and span together with
¦ the geometric parameters for the meter (i.e., height and position
of the transducer~, pipe diameter, etc.) are ~upplied a~ inputs
to the processor. Thereafter, by simple straight forward arlfth-
metic operations, the various parameters and measured values are
adapted to be combined (as exemplified by equation (13)~ by the
processor to produce a digital flow signal proportional to the
velocity. This digital value is converted If nto a corresponding
analog signal by a digital to analog converter 58 to produce an
output signal compatable with industrial control requirements,
i.e., 4 to 20 ma. The output signFfl is then fed to a ground
isolator 59 which may taXe the form of a pulse tran~former to
assure that the ground of ~he associated process controller i8
not tied to the ground of the flowmeter.
The placement of ~he two transducer~ on ~he same s~de of
the pipe has the desired effect of f~ubstantially eliminating the
sensitivity of the meter to radial fluid velocity components in
the plane of Fig. 3, while at the same time doubling 'Iff ts sensitivit~
to axial flow. Output errors resulting from radial flow can ~e
significant, p~rticularly when the transfducers are positionea
2S near elbfows or other similar areas of ~lfJw distrubfance.
-22-
.
l~Z3088
When a ~ingle me~surement cycle i~ defined by tran~mitting acou~ti~
pulses from one transducer across to the opposite pipe wall and
back across ~he fluid to the other transducer as in the present
Iflowmeter, it is evident that ~or a constant radial flow pattern
S along the axial dire~tion summin~ these two travel paths cancels
the vector components of the radial flow. ~his "bounce" technique
has the added advantage of doubling the propagation times of th~
pulses within the fluid and more importantly of doubling the
l difference in sonic propagation times. Since the difference in
sonic propagation time i~ directly proportional to the pipe dia-
meter, a rbounce~ flowmeter of given diameter has ~wice the
sensitivity to axial flow a~ a comparabl~ size meter in which the
transducers are placed on opposite sides of the pipe.
I ~ r~e~ ~b~ t~
¦ Although the invention has been de~cribed in detail with
respect to a ~pec~fic illustrative example involving a refractive
metering system wherein the output i~ unaffected by ~ariations in
¦acoustic path, the inventive feature~ diAclo~ed above apply equall~
las well to normal injection (i.e., non-refractive) meters to obtai
la measure of flow velocity independent of changes in the sonic
¦velocities in the fluid and the sonic probe. Add$tional modificat ons
may be po~sible as exemplified by Fig. 7 wherein the tran~ducers
: are shown in schematic form mounted on diagonally opposite pipe
walls. This configuration may be preferrable in certain fluid
applica~ion~ where the flow is undis~urbed for several pipe dia-
meters. Nvnethele~, the ultrasonic mea~urement and signal pro-
¦~wes~ing discuss~d ~bove apply to ~liS tr~sducer arrang me~
-23-
.
llZ3088
Fig~. 8 and 9 show other poo~ible modific4tions which
relate to the structure housing the transducers and the techniques
for deriving a measurement of the sonic propagation time within
that ~tructure. In Fig. 8, the piezoelectric crystal is schema
tically depicted as being bonded to the exterior of a truncated
pyramidal atructure, the acou~tic path with~n th~ structure of
known length being defined without the use o~ reflection notches
or the like. Fig. 9 ~hows a unltary hou~ng for both tran~ducers
in which the acouctic path for measuring ~onic propagation time~
in the housing i8 e3tablished between the two tran6ducers as
opposed to being derived from a reflection ~ack to the tran~mittin' r
¦transducer as in previous example~.
Additionally all o~ the preceding example8 have Rhown
transducer housings that are welded or otherwise ~ntegrally joined
to the pipe. ~owever, the proce~sing/mea~urement techniques of
the pre ent invention can be implemented equally a~ well by tran~-
ducer housi~g/sonic probe assemblies that ~re clamped in po~ition
to the exterior of a pipe; kh~reby aimplifying ~astallation and
maintenance within a proces~ fiel~.
Various other modifled ~rrangements will become apparent
to tho~e of ~kill in the art from the above detailed description.
¦ Accordingly~ the true scope of ~he invention i~ not to be l~mited
: by the~e rpeci 1c i1luctrotive eYa~pler.
~ -24- ~
Il l
